Next Article in Journal
Expression Analysis of Phenylpropanoid Pathway Genes and Metabolomic Analysis of Phenylpropanoid Compounds in Adventitious, Hairy, and Seedling Roots of Tartary Buckwheat
Previous Article in Journal
Modelling the Plant Uptake of Metals from Release Rates Obtained by the EUF Method
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/plants11010088
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Taxonomic Significance of Seed Morphology in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) Species from Central Europe

by
Małgorzata Mazur
1,*,
Katarzyna Marcysiak
1,*,
Agnieszka Dunajska
1,
Magdalena Gawlak
2 and
Tomasz Kałuski
2
1
Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kazimierz Wielki University, Ossolińskich 12, 85-093 Bydgoszcz, Poland
2
Institute of Plant Protection—National Research Institute, Władysława Węgorka 20, 60-318 Poznan, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010088
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 23 December 2021 / Accepted: 25 December 2021 / Published: 28 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Systematics, Taxonomy, Nomenclature and Classification)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, 1159 seeds of 29 Central European species of the genus Veronica were analyzed based on scanning electron microscopy images. The species belonged to nine subgenera: Beccabunga, Chamaedrys, Cochlidiosperma, Pellidosperma, Pentasepalae, Pocilla, Pseudolysimachium, Stenocarpon and Veronica, following the newest phylogenetic classification of the genus. Nine measured characteristics of seeds and nine ratios were analyzed statistically using ANOVA followed by post hoc testing, cluster analysis and discriminant analysis. In most cases, the results were not congruent with the contemporary classification of the genus. Examinations of qualitative seed features by scanning electron microscopy included the cochlidiospermous or discoid seed type, the seed shape, the general sculpture of the seed coat surface, the sculpture of anticlinal and periclinal walls and some species-specific traits such as the presence of the epidermal appendix. All these features, apart from seed shape, were useful to distinguish all subgenera and some species within subgenera: Beccabunga, Chamaedrys, Pellidosperma, Pocilla (only V. filiformis) and Veronica. The identification key based on the seed micromorphological features was prepared.

1. Introduction

The genus Veronica L. comprises about 450 species of about 500 belonging to the tribe Veroniceae [1,2] of the family Plantaginaceae sensu Angiosperm Phylogeny Group [3], about 39 of which occur in the central part of Europe [4]. Five sections were usually distinguished within the genus [5]: Veronicastrum W.D.J. Koch., Veronica, Beccabunga (Hill) Dumort., Pocilla Dumort. and Pseudolysimachium W.D.J.Koch. Phylogenetic research, based on DNA analyses of ribosomal ITS-regions and plastid trnL-F region [6,7,8,9] and cpDNA [10], chromosome numbers [11,12], morphological features of plant parts [13,14,15,16], pollen grains morphology [17,18,19,20], chemotaxonomic studies by flavonoid and iridoid glycosides [21,22,23,24] introduced changes in the systematics of the genus Veronica. In order to make the genus Veronica a monophyletic taxon, the genera Synthyris Benth. and Pseudolysimachion Opiz were included [1,12]. Albach et al. [1] excluded the genus Veronicastrum Heist. ex Fabr. and divided the genus Veronica into 13 subgenera: Veronica, Beccabunga (Hill) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Pseudolysimachium (W.D.J. Koch) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Synthyris (Benth.) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Cochlidiosperma (Rchb.) M.M. Mart. Ort. & Albach, Pellidosperma (E.B.J. Lehm.) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Stenocarpon (Boriss.) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Triangulicapsula M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Pocilla (Dumort.) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Pentasepalae M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Chamaedrys (W.D.J. Koch) M.M. Mart. Ort., Albach & M.A. Fisch., Hebe Comm. ex Juss. and Derwentia Raf. Southern hemisphere genera such as Chionohebe B.G. Briggs & Ehrend., Derwentia, Detzneria Diels, Hebe, Hebejeebie Heads, Heliohebe Garn.-Jones, Leonohebe Heads and Parahebe W.R.B. Oliv. were subsequently recognized as a subgenus Pseudoveronica J.B. Armstr. [2]. As a result, there are currently 12 subgenera, including nine of them widespread in temperate climates and sometimes in the mountains on the three continents of the northern hemisphere, one widespread in the western part of North America (Synthyris), one containing two single-legged species from Turkey and Spain (Triangulicapsula) and the last one containing the previously mentioned species of the southern hemisphere (Pseudoveronica).
Because of the parallel evolution of morphology and growth habits of Veronica species [16], it is difficult to find uniform morphological characteristics of the subgenera. Muñoz-Centeno et al. [25] demonstrated that some morphological traits, especially the ultrastructure of the seed coat sculpture, supported classifications based on molecular data. The various characteristics of seeds of Veronica species have been used in their descriptions and taxonomy for a long time [26,27,28]. Kulpa [29] prepared the first thorough analysis of the seed morphology of 67 Veronica species, including their shapes and traits of the testa sculpture. Based purely on light microscopic observations, the author noticed details of the seed surface such as a chalazal plate and a chalazal podium (plateau), as well as an epidermal appendix. This allowed him to delimit eight infrageneric groups based on seed morphology. Further studies were based on SEM images analyses, taking into account the features of the micro-morphological structure of the seed coat sculpture. These works mostly comprised only several species, sampled from a limited area, e.g., from the Mediterranean [19,30], Spain [31], Iran [32], Turkey [33,34] and Poland [35]. For example, Hassan and Khalik [36] investigated seeds of 29 species mainly from Egypt and Europe. Some studies found a relationship between seed morphology and chromosome number in the genus Veronica [22,30]. The most comprehensive study was performed by Muňoz-Centeno et al. [25], including 132 species of all subgenera of the genus Veronica and using material from the most extensive herbaria in western Europe (France, Germany, the United Kingdom, Spain), Turkey and Japan. Most authors of the above-mentioned studies tended to create groups of taxa based on their testa sculpture or other traits related to the phylogeny of the genus.
The present study covers 29 Veronica species common in Central Europe and one of our purposes was to compare seed measurements from different geographical localities. The main purpose of the study was to check whether the relations of species and subgenera, inferred from the qualitative seed features and from the statistical analyses based on quantitative traits, were congruent with the phylogenetic classification by Albach et al. [1] and Albach and Meudt [10], that is, if the analyzed traits had taxonomic importance. To achieve this goal, we took the following steps: (1) We measured the seeds and statistically analyzed the results and (2) assessed the qualitative features of the seeds, with emphasis on the testa surface. Another goal was to assess whether Kulpa’s [29] observations could be confirmed by SEM.

2. Results

2.1. Seed Feature Assessment

2.1.1. Seed Type

The seed types of all 29 species of 9 subgenera of Veronica were assessed (Table 1). Seeds of the subgenera Pocilla, Pellidosperma and Cochlidiosperma were cochlidiospermous (that is ventrally concave) (Figure 1), whereas those of the subgenera Pseudolysimachium, Beccabunga, Veronica, Chamaedrys, Pentasepalae and Stenocarpon were discoid (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4). In the subgenera Veronica and Stenocarpon, all seeds were of the discoid-thin type (Table 2; Figure 2A). Most of the seeds of Chamaedrys, Pentasepalae and Pseudolysimachium were also discoid-thin, whereas in Beccabunga, all seeds were discoid-thick (Table 2, Figure 2B). Seeds of V. peregrina (Beccabunga) had a characteristic keel (Figure 2C).

2.1.2. Seed Shape

We recorded all seed shapes, that is, obovoid (Figure 1C), broadly obovoid (Figure 3B), elliptical (Figure 2D), broadly elliptical (Figure 3C) and suborbicular (Figure 3E), in the subgenera Pseudolysimachium, Beccabunga, Veronica, Chamaedrys, Pocilla and Pellidosperma (Table 2). In Pentasepalae and Cochlidiosperma, obovoid, broadly obovoid, broadly elliptical and suborbicular shapes were observed. In Stenocarpon, seeds of only three outline types were present, namely broadly elliptical, broadly obovoid and suborbicular. The broadly elliptical seeds dominated or co-dominated in most species.

2.1.3. Sculpture of Seed Coat Surface

Seven general types of testa surface sculpture were recognized, namely reticulate (Figure 2I), reticulate-striate (Figure 2E), reticulate-verrucate (Figure 2G), reticulate with supracellular rings (Figure 4D), reticulate-corrugate (Figure 1I), reticulate-verrucate-colliculate (only in V. chamaedrys, Figure 3I) and verrucate (only in V. fruticans, Figure 3H). The reticulate-verrucate sculpture was observed in most of the seeds of the species studied (Table 2). The periclinal walls of the testa surface sculpture were most often concave (Figure 2E,I) or flat (e.g., Figure 4C) and rugose (e.g., Figure 1I and Figure 2G), less frequently smooth (Figure 4H), sometimes also colliculate (Figure 4H) or corrugate (Figure 4A,B) and sometimes also granulate (Figure 2F,H and Figure 4C). Convex walls were rare. Anticlinal walls were rugose (e.g., Figure 2F,G,I) and most often convex (e.g., Figure 2E–I), but sometimes flat or concave.

2.2. Statistical Differences among Subgenera and Species

The values of characteristics of individual species and subgenera were mostly unimodally distributed. Characters values distributions in the set of all data deviated from normal, both for raw and standardized data. In the set of means of all individuals, only seed width at ½, ¼ and ¾ to seed length (W½/L, W¼/L, W¾/L), and seed width at ¼ to width at ¾ (W¼/W¾) were normally distributed. In the set of means of species, most traits were normally distributed, with the exceptions of W½, W¼ and seed thickness at ½ (T½). Morphological features were mutually strongly correlated, and relations between ratios were fewer and weaker.
Subgenera Beccabunga and Pseudolysimachium had the smallest seeds, whereas the seeds of Cochlidiosperma were the largest. The remaining subgenera had medium-sized seeds, and the variation of feature values of species within each subgenus was noticeable (Table 3, Figure S1). Seed length (L) and width (W½, W¼, W¾) highly correlated with the perimeter (P), and therefore differentiated the subgenera in the same way, as well as, in most cases, the length of the chalaza (LCh) and the length and width of the chalazal plate (LPl, WPl). Seed thickness (T½) was important for differentiation of subgenera into groups. The largest group, with very thin seeds, comprised Beccabunga, Chamaedrys, Pseudolysimachium, Stenocarpon, Veronica and Pentasepalae. Cochlidiosperma seeds were very thick, whereas seeds of Pocilla and Pellidosperma were intermediate (Table 3, Figure S1). The values of ratios complemented the characteristics of the subgenera, e.g., Beccabunga, with the smallest LCh and LPl values, had the greatest value of the LCh/LPl ratio (Table 3, Figure S1). The values of some traits differed among species within the same subgenus, e.g., L/T½ in Beccabunga and Veronica and LCh/LPl in Veronica (Figure S1).
All examined features differentiated nine subgenera with statistical significance (p ≤ 0.01) according to ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests, but the post-hoc tests pointed out that some subgenera differed from others only in terms of a few features (Table S1). The differences among species revealed by Dunn’s test did not fully confirm the above results for subgenera. The differentiation among species of the individual subgenera was more complex. In general, these data were difficult to interpret because of the complex schemes of numerous statistically significant differences (Table S2).
Cluster analysis among subgenera separated the cluster comprising Pocilla, Pellidosperma and Cochlidiosperma from others. Chamaedrys was close to Pentasepalae and Pseudolysimachium was close to Beccabunga (Figure 5A). The species dendrogram showed differences within the subgenera. The species of Beccabunga and Pseudolysimachium formed the most compact cluster. The Cochlidiosperma species were grouped together and separated from others, but one species of Pocilla (V. agrestis) clustered with them. The other species of Pocilla were mixed in a cluster with Pellidosperma. Two species of the subgenus Veronica, namely V. montana and V. scutellata, were highly separated from all others, including other species of this subgenus (Figure 5C). The results of the discrimination analysis support the clustering results. The scatter plot shows the separation of the subgenus Cochlidiosperma and similarity of Beccabunga to Pseudolysimachium and Pocilla to Pellidosperma. The subgenera Veronica, Chamaedrys and Pentasepalae were also similar (Figure S2A). Species of particular subgenera showed a similar distribution, as in the case of the dendrogram discussed above (Figure S2B). The features, which most significantly discriminated subgenera, were P, LCh/LPl and L/T½, related to the first discrimination variable, and L/T½, LCh/LPl and W¼/W¾, related to the second discrimination variable.

3. Discussion

3.1. Subgenera and Species—Identification and Relations

3.1.1. Subgenus Cochlidiosperma (COCH)—V. hederifolia, V. sublobata, V. triloba

Seeds of this subgenus were highly specific and easy to recognize: They were the biggest and deeply cochlidiospermous with strongly folded edges, which was in agreement with the findings of Kulpa [29]. The general seed coat structure was reticulate-corrugate, as previously demonstrated by Muñoz-Centeno et al. [25]. In our analyses, species of this subgenus formed a separate group but were closest to Pocilla. Kulpa [29] also placed them into a separate group. In the previous classification [5], the species of this subgenus belonged to the section Pocilla, which indicated the similarity of the present subgenera Cochlidiosperma and Pocilla. The cpDNA and ITS analyses showed the subgenus Cochlidiosperma to be the least supported in Veronica and not related to Pocilla (Figure 5B) [10]. It was impossible to distinguish the three species examined in our study based on the seed features, and their morphology is generally very similar. In some classifications, V. sublobata and V. triloba are treated as subspecies of V. hederifolia (e.g., [5]).

3.1.2. Subgenus Pellidosperma (PEL)—V. praecox, V. triphyllos

These seeds were also cochlidiospermous, but shallower with smooth or only very slightly wrinkled surface, as previously indicated by Kulpa [29]. This author observed the seed edge in subgenus Pellidosperma was not or slightly folded. In our study this was true only for V. triphyllos, whereas V. praecox seed edges were strongly folded, which at the same time helped to distinguish between species. The trace of the micropyle and the incision at the base of a seed were other features observed by Kulpa [29] to discuss. The author defined the trace of the micropyle in the seeds of this subgenus (separate group in his work) as the dark spot at the base on the down edge of the seed, and this observation was not confirmed in the present study. On the other hand, he pointed out the incision at the seed base, which was shallow (V. triphyllos) or deep (V. praecox), as the important feature to distinguish between species, and this was confirmed in the present study. In our opinion, the incision could be the trace of the micropyle. The reticulate-verrucate seed coat structure we found was consistent with Muñoz-Centeno et al. [25]. Based on the results of the statistical analyses, this subgenus was closest to Pocilla, but this finding had not been supported by any previous molecular nor genetic studies [10,22].

3.1.3. Subgenus Pocilla (POC)—V. agrestis, V. filiformis, V. opaca, V. polita, V. persica

Seeds of this subgenus could be easily recognized, however, the identification of the species based on the seed features was difficult. The seeds were medium-sized, cochlidiospermous, with a deeply transversely wrinkled dorsal seed surface and a generally radially wrinkled ventral side. These features were observed, e.g., by Kulpa [29] and Ghimire et al. [37], and confirmed in the present study. The seed coat was reticulate-verrucate [25]. Only V. filiformis was easy to recognize among the species of the subgenus, namely by the chalaza raised on the podium (plateau), and this feature has earlier been described by Kulpa [29]. The other four species could not be distinguished, and the features found by Kulpa [29], such as the type of wrinkles, more or less regular or dentate, were not suitable.
In our analyses, seeds of species of this subgenus were most similar to those of Pellidosperma, and V. agrestis was close to the species of the subgenus Cochlidiosperma. In general, our results showed that species with cochlidiospermous seeds, that is, species of the subgenera Pocilla, Cochlidiosperma and Pellidosperma, were close. These results were not consistent with previous genetic and biochemical findings [6,7,9,10,16,22,23]. While some earlier findings indicate the close similarity of Cochlidiosperma to Pellidosperma, this could have been influenced by the increase in the substitution index used because of their annual growth habit [16]. Phylogenetic studies have shown that the subgenus Pocilla is attached to Pentasepalae and Chamaedrys [9,10,16,23].

3.1.4. Subgenus Pentasepalae (PEN)—V. austriaca, V. teucrium

The two species of the subgenus had large seeds with large chalaza, a well-developed chalazal podium (plateau) and the epidermal appendix situated in the upper part of the chalazal plate. These features were found by Kulpa [29] and confirmed in the present work. Kulpa [29] only analyzed V. teucrium but included V. chamaedrys (from the subgenus Chamaedrys) into the group comprising V. teucrium, and the presence of the epidermal appendix was the important common feature. We confirmed that the seed coat was reticulate-verrucate, as observed in the previous works [25]. According to the cluster analysis, the Pentasepalae species were close to the Chamaedrys and the taxonomic distance between them was the shortest. Phylogenies based on cpDNA and ITS by Albach and Meudt [10] placed this subgenus as a sister clade to Pocilla, but not far from Chamaedrys. Features distinguishing the species were not found.

3.1.5. Subgenus Chamaedrys (CHAM)—V. arvensis, V. chamaedrys, V. dillenii, V. verna

The seeds of this subgenus were small, flat, with a large chalazal plate. The presence of the easily visible chalazal plateau was the common feature of the subgenera Chamaedrys and Pentasepalae, consistent with the study by Kulpa [29]. The seed coat structure was reticulate-verrucate, but in V. chamaedrys also colliculate, which was consistent with the findings by Muñoz-Centeno et al. [25]. Veronica chamaedrys differed from other species of the subgenus by its smooth seed surface, in contrast to the wrinkled surface of the seeds of other species. The presence of the epidermal appendix situated in the upper part of the seed, outside the chalazal plate, was another important feature of this species. This was in agreement with the findings of Kulpa [29]. In the previous classification, V. chamaedrys belonged to the section Veronicastrum, whereas the remaining species of the subgenus were included in section Pocilla [5].
In our cluster analyses, the subgenus Chamaedrys was closest to Pentasepalae, as stated above, but species of Chamaedrys were mixed with species of Pentasepalae, Veronica and Stenocarpon. These relationships were not in line with any previous findings [1,10,19,30].

3.1.6. Subgenus Beccabunga (BEC)—V. anagalis-aquatica, V. beccabunga, V. catenata, V. peregrina, V. serpyllifolia

The small size of the discoid-type seeds, combined with the reticulate or reticulate-verrucate testa surface sculpture, may be the basis for distinguishing them from other seeds. These seeds were most similar to Pseudolysimachium. In former classifications, V. peregrina and V. serpyllifolia were included into the sections Pocilla and Veronicastrum (e.g., [5]), respectively. Kulpa [29] integrated these two species into the group comprising some species of the present subgenera Veronica and Stenocarpon. This author grouped the other species of the present subgenus Beccabunga (that is V. anagallis-aquatica, V. peregrina, V. catenata) together with species of Pseudolysimachium. In our analyses, V. peregrina and V. serpyllifolia differed from the remaining species of the subgenus by the reticulate-verrucate type of the testa surface, but this type was characteristic of many subgenera and former sections, including Pocilla and Veronicastrum [30]. The specific feature of V. peregrina was the keel on the dorsal side of the seed, observed also by other authors [25,29,31,37]. The strongly flattened seeds were one of the important characteristics of the group delimited by Kulpa [29], and comprising V. peregrina and V. serpyllifolia. In our study, the relative thickness of the seeds (in relation to the seed length) was different for these species, compared to the remaining species of this subgenus but similar to that of the species of Chamaedrys, Pentasepalae, Veronica and Stenocarpon. Kulpa [29] did not find any features differentiating between V. anagallis-aquatica and V. catenata, but in our study, the former species differed from all others by lumps present on the anticlinal walls of the testa sculpture. Cluster analysis showed a similarity between Beccabunga and Pseudolysimachium, which was consistent with the results of previous genetic analyses [10].

3.1.7. Subgenus Pseudolysimachium (PSEUD)—V. longifolia, V. spicata

The seeds of these two species were similar and easy to distinguish from others. They were the smallest and very flat, similar to those of the species of Beccabunga., as stated above. Most of the previous researchers obtained similar results, e.g., [29,30,38,39]. The closeness of species of these two subgenera has also been confirmed by applying other methods by Albach and Meudt [10], Müller and Albach [9] and Wang et al. [16]. The seeds of the subgenus Pseudolysimachium could be identified on the basis of their reticulate-striate testa surface. According to Hassan and Khalik [36], the strong periclinal walls represented the most significant characteristic of this subgenus, but in our opinion, their striate character was more important. Kulpa [29] pointed out that the chalazal plate was slightly greater for Pseudolysimachium species, but according to our research, both the length of the chalazal plate and the ratio of the length of the chalaza to the chalazal plate (LCh/LPl) indicated its small size (Table 3). The distinguishing between species was impossible. The features pointed by Kulpa [29] were either too general or these observations were not confirmed by SEM images.

3.1.8. Subgenus Veronica (VER)—V. aphylla, V. montana, V. officinalis, V. scutellata, V. urticifolia

Medium-sized, flat seeds with a small chalaza situated in the center of the seed were characteristic for the species of this subgenus, as observed by Kulpa [29] and confirmed in the present study. Features of the testa sculpture helped in distinguishing species. The traits indicated by Kulpa (i.e., the size of the seeds or the relative size of the chalazal plate), were difficult to apply. The supracellular rings of the seed coat sculpture were the most prominent features of species of the subgenus, which is in agreement with the results of Muňoz-Centeno et al. [25]. Based on our statistical analyses, the species V. montana and V. scutellata were separated from the remaining species of this subgenus, but this fact was not supported by genetic analyses [10].

3.1.9. Subgenus Stenocarpon (STEN)—V. fruticans

Veronica fruticans was previously included in the section Veronicastrum, together with e.g., V. serpyllifolia (now in Beccabunga) and the present subgenus Veronica [5]. Based on our analysis, the species was indeed most similar to the subgenus Veronica, but in general, species of Veronica, Chamaedrys, Pentasepalae formed one group with V. fruticans. Thus, our results partially support the findings of the genetic analyses by Albach et al. [7] and Müller and Albach [9], who indicated the closeness of Stenocarpon to Chamaedrys, and Taskova et al. [22], who found it close to Pocilla and Pentasepalae.

3.2. Compliance of Statistical Results with the Veronica Taxonomic Classification

In our study, the species analyzed were a priori grouped into the subgenera according to the new phylogenetic classification by Albach et al. [7] and Albach and Meudt [10]. Numerical analyses enabled the determination of statistically significant differences among them, but in terms of their many characteristics, the species formed groups of several subgenera. The most visible differences were related to seed thickness, which corresponded well with the division of the species into those with cochlidiospermous or discoid seeds, as discussed above. The size of the seeds, i.e., their length and width, was another feature that differentiated species and subgenera into those with large seeds (Cochlidiosperma), with very small seeds (Pseudolysimachium and Beccabunga) and with seeds of intermediate size (all others), but these are also features that are evident without measurements or calculations. Despite statistically significant differences among the subgenera and species, it was not possible to establish a set of taxon characteristics that would allow for their differentiation and identification. The subgenus Cochlidiosperma was the only exception.
The groupings of subgenera obtained as a result of multivariate analyzes were not consistent with the recent phylogenetic classification of the genus [10]. We only obtained compliance on the similarity between Beccabunga and Pseudolysimachium (Figure 5A,B).

3.3. Comparison of Seed Sizes from Different Sources

Comparison of the different sizes of Veronica seeds from different sources, although generally confirming the similar variations in their length and width, showed also some differences.
Most studies have only published data on seed length and width, and only Kulpa [29] measured seed thickness. The results were published either as the descriptive statistics (mean, minimum, maximum, coefficient of variation and confidence interval at p = 0.05) based on examining 30–60 seeds of each taxon [29] or as the mean values with the range minimum–maximum [30,36], based on measuring several seeds. Based on these and previous findings, seed size was generally similar, albeit with some exceptions. The average values of length and width of seeds published by Kulpa [29] were in several cases greater compared to our data (e.g., for V. hederifolia, V. austriaca, V. triphyllos, V. filiformis or V. spicata), but there were no substantial differences among the seed thickness values (Table S2). Some seeds investigated by Hassan and Khalik [36] were smaller, such as those from V. hederifolia or V. urticifolia. According to Martínez-Ortega and Rico [30], two species of Pentasepalae had different seed sizes compared to previously published data, and V. austriaca seeds were considerably smaller, whereas seeds of V. teucrium were substantially larger (Table S3).
The differences found were most likely due to different sampling locations or collection years. Kulpa [29] obtained a significant part of the research material from herbaria in eastern Germany (former GDR). Martínez-Ortega and Rico [30] mostly analyzed seeds from Spain, whereas seeds of V. austriaca and V. teucrium were obtained from the old 19th-century collections from Germany and Switzerland, respectively.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Materials

We analyzed material collected from 166 herbarium specimens from herbaria KRA, TRN and BYDG in Poland (Table S1) from 29 species of nine subgenera of the genus Veronica, following the newest phylogenetic classification by Albach et al. [1] and Albach & Meudt [10]. Only undamaged, fully developed seeds from matured capsules and from well-preserved herbarium specimens were selected for the examinations. In total, 1159 seeds were investigated, including for comparison seeds of the former section Pocilla, used in a previous study (Table 1) [35]. Dry seeds were attached to table mounts using double sided adhesive carbon discs and then were sputter coated with gold. Seed observations were performed using an S-3000N Hitachi Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The images were obtained in the Institute of Plant Protection in Poznań, according to the procedure described in Mazur et al. [35]. Seeds of each species were photographed from ventral, dorsal and lateral sides, with magnification from ×35 to ×300 depending on the seed size. We examined 462 images of the dorsal side, 453 of the ventral side and 244 of the lateral side. In this number, we included 125 images of the dorsal side, 184 of the ventral side and 113 of the lateral side from a previous study [35], the measurements of which were made anew. Subsequently, images of the testa sculpture of the 1159 seeds were observed at magnification ×1000, including 422 images prepared in a previous study [35]. In total, 2318 images were examined.

4.2. Methods

4.2.1. Qualitative Seed Feature Assessment

The examination was focused on the assessment of features of the testa surface; in addition, several other traits indicated as significant by Kulpa [29] were investigated. For each seed, we determined whether it was cochlidiospermous (that is, ventrally concave) or discoid [25,28,29,31,32,38] but with adaptations [35] to increase objectivity. The discoid (D) type of seeds: A thick discoid (D-tk) when the value of L/T½ was less than 3.0 and a thin discoid (D-tn) with L/T½ exceeding or equaling 3.0. The cochlidiospermous (C) type of seeds: Deep-cochlidiospermous (C-d) when the value of L/T½ was less than 2.0 and shallow-cochlidiospermous (C-s) with this value exceeding or equaling 2.0.
We also used the improved procedure of the evaluation of the seed shape in outline to increase objectivity [35]. We followed the nomenclature used previously [29,31,38,40], where the orbicular, obovoid and elliptical outlines of seeds were named. Additionally, we defined the shapes as follows: Suborbicular (S), when the values of W¼/L, W½/L and W¾/L exceeded 0.80, obovoid (O), when the value of W¼/W¾ ranged from 0.9 to of 1.1 and elliptical (E), when this value was less than 0.9 or more than 1.1. Additionally, we adopted two intermediate shapes: Broadly obovoid (BO) and broadly elliptical (BE), when obovoid or elliptical seeds had W½/L and W¼/L values or W½/L and W¾/L values exceeding or equaling 0.67.
Different seed coat surface types were recognized, and the sculpture of anticlinal and periclinal walls of the testa surface was described, using the terminology applied previously (e.g., [19,25,26,30,41]). The applicability and usefulness of the features used by Kulpa [29] were verified. The key to recognizing the examined subgenera of Veronica, and species within the subgenera, was prepared, based on the features indicated by Kulpa [29] and, where possible, on the testa surface features.

4.2.2. Seed Measurements

We measured nine seed characteristics, namely seed perimeter (P), maximum length (L), width measured at 25% (W¼), at 50% (W½) and at 75% (W¾) of the length, thickness measured at 50% of the length (T½) and three characteristics of the chalazal part of seeds, namely the length of the chalazal part (LCh) and the length (LPl) and the width (WPl) of the chalazal plate. Seeds on the images were measured automatically with the use of the digiShape software [42]. Another nine features were obtained as a result of calculations (Table 3). The characteristics analyzed have been developed for the testing of Veronica seeds in our earlier work [35].

4.2.3. Statistical Analyses of Quantitative Traits

The normality of the distribution of feature values was tested using Shapiro-Wilks’ test, performed for each species, subgenus and all data, as well as for sets of individual means and species means [43]. The descriptive statistics of 18 morphological seed characteristics were prepared for species and subgenera. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to check relations among feature values, as many traits were non-parametric [44]. Prior to analysis, data were standardized using the standardization procedure available in STATISTICA [45]. The homogeneity of variance was determined using Levene’s test. Differences between subgenera and species were determined with ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test; Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance by ranks [46] with the post-hoc Dunn’s test [47] was used in the case of non-parametric traits. The results are illustrated via box-and-whiskers plots. Multivariate comparisons were performed via cluster analysis [43,48] and discriminant function analysis [49]. These analyses were based on the set of species means. Not strongly mutually correlated features with normal distribution were used, that is P, W½/L, W¼/W¾, L/T½, LCh/L, LCh/LPl and LPl/WPl. For all analyses, the software package STATISTICA 13 [45] was applied.

5. Conclusions

Referring to the selected examined species we can conclude that numerical taxonomy of analyzed traits of Veronica seeds was not helpful in distinguishing subgenera and species. Seed shape did not differentiate subgenera and species. However, the set of qualitative features comprising the seed type and structures of the seed coat surface was useful, especially in distinguishing subgenera and, in many cases, species within subgenera, delimited according to Albach et al. [7] and Albach and Meudt [10], making this set taxonomically important. The features observed by Kulpa [29] were mostly confirmed via SEM images, although their taxonomic importance was sometimes limited.

The Key to Recognizing the Examined Veronica Species Based on Seed Micromorphological Features

1.
Key to subgenera
1ACochlidiospermous seeds (Figure 1)2
1BDiscoid seeds (Figure 2)4
2AVery deeply cochlidiospermous, large seeds—more than 1.8 mm long (Figure 1A)Cochlidiosperma
2BLength of seeds up to 1.8 mm (Figure 1B,C)3
3ASeed surface deeply wrinkled (Figure 1B,C)Pocilla
3BSeed surface smooth (Figure 1D,E), a trace of micropyle in the form of a pore (Figure 1F,G)Pellidosperma
4ASmall seeds—length of seeds up to 1.0 mm (Figure 2A,D)5
4BLarger seeds—length of seeds more than 1.0 mm (Figure 3A–H and Figure 4E,F)6
5AReticulate-striate seed coat sculpture, with striate anticlinal and periclinal walls (Figure 2D,E)Pseudolysimachium
5BReticulate or reticulate-verrucate seed coat sculpture, walls not striate (Figure 2F–I)Beccabunga
6AIrregular, thick but shallow wrinkles on the seed surface (Figure 3A); large chalazal plate, with a length more than 30% of the seed length (Figure 3B)7
6BSmooth or slightly wrinkled seed surface (Figure 4E,F); small chalazal plate with length up to 25% of the seed length (Figure 3C)8
6CSmooth or slightly wrinkled seed surface, large chalazal plate with length more than 30% of the seed length, epidermal appendix in the upper part of the seed, outside chalazal plate (Figure 3D)V. chamaedrys
7AEpidermal appendix in the upper part of chalazal plate (Figure 3B,E)Pentasepalae
7BEpidermal appendix absent (Figure 3C,F)Chamaedrys
8AChalazal plate at approximately half of the length of the seed (Figure 3G), supracellular rings often occur, at least in the area of the chalazal plate (Figure 4D,E,I)Veronica
8BChalazal plate in the upper part of the seed (Figure 3H)Stenocarpon—V. fruticans
2.
Keys to species within subgenera
Cochlidiosperma
It is not possible to distinguish species of the subgenus Cochlidiosperma based on seed characteristicsV. hederifolia, V. sublobata, V. triloba
Pocilla
1ALarge chalazal plate, chalaza raised on the podium (plateau), with large polygonal structures and a reticulate sculpture, the sculpture of the remaining part of the seed reticulate-verrucate, polygons smaller (Figure 1H)V. filiformis
1BSeeds with other characteristics; it is not possible to further distinguish species of the genus Pocilla based on seed characteristicsV. agrestis, V. opaca, V. persica, V. polita
Pellidosperma
1ASlightly irregularly wrinkled seed surface, with a longitudinal rib on the dorsal side, seed edge not folded; a trace of micropyle (a pore) shallow (Figure 1F)V. triphyllos
1BSlightly irregularly wrinkled seeds with the edge strongly folded; a trace of micropyle (a pore) deep (Figure 1G)V. praecox
Pseudolysimachium
It is not possible to distinguish species of the subgenus Pseudolysimachium based on seed characteristicsV. longifolia, V. spicata
Beccabunga
1AA distinct keel on the dorsal side of the seed (Figure 2C)V. peregrina
1BSeeds without a keel (Figure 2B)2
2AAnticlinal walls with lumps (Figure 2F)V. anagallis-aquatica
2BSeeds with other characteristics3
3AReticulate-verrucate seed coat sculpture; large papillae occupy the entire surface of the periclinal wall, connected with anticlinal walls, their surface and surface of anticlinal walls strongly rugose (Figure 2G)V. serpyllifolia
3BReticulate seed coat structure (Figure 2H,I)V. beccabunga, V. catenata
Pentasepalae
It is not possible to distinguish species of the subgenus Pentasepalae based on seed characteristicsV. austriaca, V. teucrium
Chamaedrys
1AReticulate-verrucate seed coat sculpture, papillae usually not clearly visible (Figure 4A)V. arvensis
1BReticulate-verrucate seed coat sculpture, papillae small, usually clearly visible (Figure 4B,C)V. dillenii, V. verna
Veronica
1ANo supracellular rings or rings occurring only singly at the area of chalazal plate, polygonal structures of the testa surface small, their anticlinal walls simple (Figure 4G)V. officinalis
1BReticulate seed coat sculpture with supracellular rings or polygons, at least at the area of the chalazal plate (Figure 4D,E,H,I)2
2ASupracellular rings or polygons always only on the ventral side, at least near chalaza (Figure 4I)V. urticifolia
2BRings or polygons cover the whole seed surface (Figure 4E)3
3ARings in the form of regular network of polygons over the colliculate structure of seeds; polygonal structures large, each anticlinal wall consists of the walls of adjacent polygons; the boundary between them is visible (Figure 4H)V. scutellata
3BRings with other characteristics, usually round, more or less regular4
4ADorsal surface of seeds smooth, without wrinkles (Figure 4E)V. montana
4BDorsal surface of seeds with wrinkles (Figure 4F)V. aphylla

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11010088/s1, Figure S1: Box-and-whiskers plots of traits important for differentiating the 29 species of the genus Veronica; Point—median; Box—quartiles 25–75%; Whiskers—minimum-maximum; P—seed perimeter; W½—seed width measured at half of seed length; T½—seed thickness measured at half of seed length; LPl—length of chalazal plate; L/T½—ratio of seed length to seed thickness; LCh/LPl—ratio of chalaza length to length of chalazal plate. Subgenera and species abbreviations as in Table 1, Figure S2: Results of the discriminant analyses on the scatter-plots between the first two variables U1 and U2; (A) for nine subgenera of the genus Veronica; (B) for 29 species of the genus Veronica. Species abbreviations as in Table 1, Table S1: Characteristics differing among the nine subgenera of Veronica; results of the post-hoc Dunn’s test with p ≤ 0.01. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1. Character abbreviations as in Table 3, Table S2: The number of characters differing pairs of twenty-nine species of genus Veronica of nine subgenera; the result of the post-hoc Dunn’s test. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1, Table S3: Comparisons of seed size of Veronica species analyzed in the present study and by Kulpa [29], Martinez-Ortega & Rico [30], and Hassan & Khalik [36]; bold—greatest values for the given species; italics—smallest values for the given species, Table S4: List of herbarium specimens of the 29 Veronica species used in the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, K.M. and M.M.; plant material acquisition and data curation, M.M.; software, M.M.; data analyses and interpretation, M.M., K.M., A.D., M.G. and T.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M. and K.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M., K.M., A.D., M.G. and T.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The proofreading was financed by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education, under the program “Regional Initiative of Excellence” in 2019–2022; Grant No. 008/RID/2018/19.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from corresponding authors upon request.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the curators and personnel in the herbaria for providing materials and for their help: Marcin Nobis and Wacław Bartoszek (KRA), Radosław Puchałka (TRN), Barbara Kwiatkowska-Wilczyńska (BYDG).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Albach, D.C.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M.; Fischer, M.A.; Chase, M.W. A new classification of the tribe Veroniceae—Problems and a possible solution. Taxon 2004, 53, 429–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Garnock-Jones, P.J.; Albach, D.C.; Briggs, B.G. Botanical names in the Southern Hemisphere. Veronica (Plantaginaceae): Sect. Detzneria, sect. Hebe, and sect. Labiatoides. Taxon 2007, 56, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group; Chase, M.W.; Christenhusz, M.J.M.; Fay, M.F.; Byng, J.W.; Judd, W.S.; Soltis, D.E.; Mabberley, D.J.; Sennikov, A.N.; Soltis, P.S.; et al. An Update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Classification for the Orders and Families of Flowering Plants: APG IV. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 181, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Plants of the World Online. Available online: https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon (accessed on 14 December 2021).
  5. Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Veronica L. In Flora Europaea; Tutin, T.G., Heywod, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1972; Volume 3, pp. 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Albach, D.C.; Greilhuber, J. Genome size variation and evolution in Veronica. Ann. Bot. 2004, 94, 897–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Albach, D.C.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M.; Chase, M.W. Veronica: Parallel morphological evolution and phylogeography in the Mediterranean. Plant Syst. Evol. 2004, 246, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Albach, D.C.; Grayer, R.J.; Kite, G.C.; Jensen, S.R. Veronica: Acylated flavone glycosides as chemosystematic markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 1167–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Müller, K.; Albach, D.C. Evolutionary Rates in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae): Disentangling the Influence of Life History and Breeding System. J. Mol. Evol. 2010, 70, 44–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Albach, D.C.; Meudt, H.M. Phylogeny of Veronica in the Southern and Northern Hemispheres based on plastid, nuclear ribosomal and nuclear low-copy DNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010, 54, 457–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Saeidi-Mehrvarz, S.; Kharabian, A. Chromosome Counts of Some Veronica L. (Scrophulariaceae) Species from Iran. Turk. J. Bot. 2005, 29, 263–267. [Google Scholar]
  12. Albach, D.C.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M.; Delgado, L.; Weiss-Schneeweiss, H.; Ozgokce, F.; Fischer, M.A. Chromosome Numbers in Veroniceae (Plantaginaceae): Review and Several New Counts. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 2008, 95, 543–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Juan, R.; Fernández, I.; Pastor, J. Morphological and anatomical studies on fruits of Veronica from South-west Spain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 123, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Saeidi-Mehrvarz, S.; Ghahreman, A.; Assadi, M. Fruit structure of some species of Veronica (Scrophulariaceae: Tribe Veroniceae) from Iran. Iran. J. Bot. 2001, 9, 111–121. [Google Scholar]
  15. Andrés-Sánchez, S.; Rico, E.; Herrero, A.; Santos-Vincente, M.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M. Combining traditional morphometrics and molecular markers in cryptic taxa: Towards an updated integrative taxonomic treatment for Veronica subgenus Pentasepalae (Plantaginaceae sensu APG II) in the western Mediterranean. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 159, 68–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Wang, J.-C.; Pan, B.-R.; Albach, D.C. Evolution of morphological and climatic adaptations in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae). PeerJ 2016, 4, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Martínez-Ortega, M.M.; Sanchez, J.S.; Rico, E. Palynological study of Veronica Sect. Veronica and Sect. Veronicastrum (Scrophulariaceae) and its taxonomic significance. Grana 2000, 39, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Saeidi-Mehrvarz, S.; Zarrei, M. Pollen morphology of some species of the genus Veronica (Scrophulariaceae) in Iran. Wulfenia 2006, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  19. Muñoz-Centeno, L.M.; Delgado-Sánchez, L.; Santos-Vicente, M.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M. Taxonomy of Veronica L. subsect. Veronica (Plantaginaceae) in the western Mediterranean. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 155, 65–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Sánchez Agudo, J.Á.; Rico, E.; Sánchez, J.S.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M. Pollen morphology in the genus Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) and its systematic significance. Grana 2009, 48, 239–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Albach, D.C.; Grayer, R.J.; Jensenc, S.R.; Özgöcke, F.; Veitch, N.C. Acylated flavone glycosides from Veronica. Phytochemistry 2003, 64, 1295–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Taskova, R.M.; Albach, D.C.; Grayer, R.J. Phylogeny of Veronica—A combination of molecular and chemical evidence. Plant Biol. 2004, 6, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Albach, D.C.; Jensen, S.R.; Özgöcke, F.; Grayer, R.J. Veronica: Chemical characters for the support of phylogenetic relationship based on nuclear ribosomal and plastid DNA sequence data. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 1087–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jensen, S.R.; Albach, D.C.; Ohno, T.; Grayer, R.J. Veronica: Iridoids and cornoside as chemosystematic markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2005, 33, 1031–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Muñoz-Centeno, L.M.; Albach, D.C.; Sánchez-Agudo, J.A.; Martínez-Ortega, M.M. Systematic Significance of Seed Morphology in Veronica (Plantaginaceae): A Phylogenic Perspective. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 335–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Riek-Häußermann, C. Vergleichend-anatomische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen űber Samen in der Gattung Veronica. Beihefte zum Botanischen Centralblatt 1943, 62, 1–60. [Google Scholar]
  27. Thieret, J.W. The seeds of Veronica and allied genera. Lloydia 1955, 18, 37–45. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yamazaki, T. Taxonomical and phylogenic studies of Scrophulariacea—Veronicae with special reference to Veronica and Veronicastrum in Eastern Asia. J. Fac. Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokyo Sect. 3 1957, 7, 91–162. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kulpa, W. Comparative seed morphology of European species of Veronica L. Pol. Agric. Annu. 1968, 126, 1–108. [Google Scholar]
  30. Martínez-Ortega, M.M.; Rico, E. Seed morphology and its systematic significance in some Veronica species (Scrophulariaceae) mainly from the Western Mediterranean. Plant Syst. Evol. 2001, 228, 15–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Juan, R.; Pastor, J.; Fernández, I. Seed morphology in Veronica L. (Scrophulariaceae) from south-west Spain. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1994, 115, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saeidi-Mehrvarz, S.; Ghahreman, A.; Assadi, M. Notes on the genus Veronica (Scrophulariaceae: Tribe Veroniceae) in Iran: Seed characters and a new record. Pak. J. Bot. 2001, 33, 143–152. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kaplan, A.; Hasanoğlu, A.; İnce, İ.A. Morphological, Anatomical and Palynological Properties of Some Turkish Veronica L. Species (Scrophulariaceae). Int. J. Bot. 2007, 3, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Yilmaz, G. Seed morphology studies on some Veronica L. species (Plantaginaceae) with scanning electron microscopy. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2013, 18, 8180–8189. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mazur, M.; Gawlak, M.; Sandurska, E.; Kałuski, T.; Marcysiak, K. Taxonomic importance of seed morphology of Veronica L. subsect. Agrestes Benth. (Plantaginaceae). Biodivers. Res. Conserv. 2018, 50, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hassan, N.M.; Khalik, K.N.A. Systematic significance of seed morphology in the genus Veronica (Plantaginaceae), with special reference to the Egyptian taxa. J. Syst. Evol. 2014, 52, 215–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ghimire, B.; Choi, G.E.; Lee, H.; Heo, K.; Jeong, M.J. Morphological studies on seeds of Scrophulariaceae s.l. and their systematic significance. In Seed Biology; Jiménez-López, J.C., Ed.; CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 2017; pp. 200–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Fischer, M.A. Veronica L. In Flora Iranica; Rechinger, K.H., Ed.; Akademische Druck-u. Verlagsanstalt: Graz, Austria, 1981; p. 165. ISBN 3-201-00728-5. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tacik, T.; Trzcińska-Tacik, H. Veronica L., Przetacznik. In Flora Polska. Rośliny Naczyniowe Polski i Ziem Ościennych; Pawłowski, B., Ed.; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa, Poland, 1963; Volume 10, pp. 280–338. [Google Scholar]
  40. Stearn, W.T. Botanical Latin, 4th ed.; Timber Press: Portland, OR, USA, 2013; p. 560. ISBN 978-0-88192-321-6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Barthlott, W. Epidermal and seed surface characters of plants: Systematic applicability and some evolutionary aspects. Nord. J. Bot. 1981, 1, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moraczewski, I.R. digiShape. A Software for Automated Morphometry; Cortex Nova: Bydgoszcz, Poland, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  43. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, T.J. Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research, 8th ed.; W.H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 2003; p. 887. ISBN 978-0716724117. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zar, J.H. Biostatistical Analysis, 4th ed.; Prentice-Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999; ISBN 978-0130815422. [Google Scholar]
  45. TIBCO. Statistica; (Data Analysis Software System), Version 13; TIBCO Software Inc.: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  46. Kruskal, W.H.; Wallis, A.W. Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1952, 47, 583–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dunn, O.J. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 1964, 6, 241–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cattell, R.B. The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 1943, 38, 476–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. McLachlan, G.J. Discriminant Analysis and Statistical Pattern Recognition; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2004; p. 526. ISBN 978-0-471-69115-0. [Google Scholar]
Plants 11 00088 g001 550
Figure 1. Cochlidiospermous (ventrally concave) seeds of Veronica species. (A) V. hederifolia—deep cochlidiospermous, large seed; (B) V. polita—shallow cochlidiospermous, small seed, with deeply wrinkled surface; (C) V. persica—small, obovoid seed with deeply wrinkled surface; (D) V. praecox—deep cochlidiospermous seed with smooth surface; (E) V. triphyllos—shallow cochlidiospermous seed with smooth surface; (F) V. triphyllos—broadly obovoid shape in outline with a trace of micropyle in the form of a shallow pore (arrow); (G) V. praecox—broadly obovoid seed with a trace of micropyle in the form of a deep pore (arrow); (H) V. filiformis—broadly obovoid seed with the large chalazal plate raised on the plateau, with large polygonal structures on the chalaza (without papillae), the sculpture of the remaining seed surface is reticulate-verrucate, polygons small; (I) V. sublobata—reticulate-corrugate sculpture with convex, corrugate anticlinal walls and flat, rugose periclinal walls.
Figure 1. Cochlidiospermous (ventrally concave) seeds of Veronica species. (A) V. hederifolia—deep cochlidiospermous, large seed; (B) V. polita—shallow cochlidiospermous, small seed, with deeply wrinkled surface; (C) V. persica—small, obovoid seed with deeply wrinkled surface; (D) V. praecox—deep cochlidiospermous seed with smooth surface; (E) V. triphyllos—shallow cochlidiospermous seed with smooth surface; (F) V. triphyllos—broadly obovoid shape in outline with a trace of micropyle in the form of a shallow pore (arrow); (G) V. praecox—broadly obovoid seed with a trace of micropyle in the form of a deep pore (arrow); (H) V. filiformis—broadly obovoid seed with the large chalazal plate raised on the plateau, with large polygonal structures on the chalaza (without papillae), the sculpture of the remaining seed surface is reticulate-verrucate, polygons small; (I) V. sublobata—reticulate-corrugate sculpture with convex, corrugate anticlinal walls and flat, rugose periclinal walls.
Plants 11 00088 g001
Plants 11 00088 g002 550
Figure 2. Discoid, small seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. longifolia—discoid-thin seed; (B) V. anagalis-aquatica—discoid-thick seed; (C) V. peregrina—discoid-thick seed with a keel; (D) V. longifolia—elliptical seed with the reticulate-striate sculpture; (E) V. longifolia—reticulate-striate sculpture with convex, striate anticlinal walls and concave, striate periclinal walls; (F) V. anagalis-aquatica—reticulate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls with lumps and slightly colliculate, granulate periclinal walls; (G) V. serpyllifolia—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex and rugose anticlinal walls and rugose periclinal walls, with large papillae; (H) V. beccabunga—reticulate sculpture with convex anticlinal walls and slightly colliculate, granulate periclinal walls; (I) V. catenata—reticulate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and concave, corrugate periclinal walls.
Figure 2. Discoid, small seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. longifolia—discoid-thin seed; (B) V. anagalis-aquatica—discoid-thick seed; (C) V. peregrina—discoid-thick seed with a keel; (D) V. longifolia—elliptical seed with the reticulate-striate sculpture; (E) V. longifolia—reticulate-striate sculpture with convex, striate anticlinal walls and concave, striate periclinal walls; (F) V. anagalis-aquatica—reticulate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls with lumps and slightly colliculate, granulate periclinal walls; (G) V. serpyllifolia—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex and rugose anticlinal walls and rugose periclinal walls, with large papillae; (H) V. beccabunga—reticulate sculpture with convex anticlinal walls and slightly colliculate, granulate periclinal walls; (I) V. catenata—reticulate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and concave, corrugate periclinal walls.
Plants 11 00088 g002
Plants 11 00088 g003 550
Figure 3. Discoid, large seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. austriaca—broadly elliptical seed with thick but shallow wrinkles on the surface; (B) V. teucrium—broadly obovoid seed with large chalazal plate and epidermal appendix in the upper part of the chalazal plate (arrow); (C) V. aphylla—broadly elliptical shape in outline with small chalazal plate; (D) V. chamaedrys—broadly elliptical seed with large chalazal plate and epidermal appendix in the upper part of the seed, outside chalazal plate (arrow); (E) V. austriaca—suborbicular shape seed with epidermal appendix in the upper part of the chalazal plate (arrow); (F) V. verna—broadly elliptical seed with large chalazal plate and no epidermal appendix; (G) V. scutellata—broadly elliptical shape in outline with chalazal plate at approximately half of the length of the seed; (H) V. fruticans—broadly elliptical seed with chalazal plate in the upper part of the seed, verrucate seed coat; (I) V. chamaedrys—reticulate-verrucate-colliculate sculpture with convex, corrugate periclinal walls and flat, rugose anticlinal walls.
Figure 3. Discoid, large seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. austriaca—broadly elliptical seed with thick but shallow wrinkles on the surface; (B) V. teucrium—broadly obovoid seed with large chalazal plate and epidermal appendix in the upper part of the chalazal plate (arrow); (C) V. aphylla—broadly elliptical shape in outline with small chalazal plate; (D) V. chamaedrys—broadly elliptical seed with large chalazal plate and epidermal appendix in the upper part of the seed, outside chalazal plate (arrow); (E) V. austriaca—suborbicular shape seed with epidermal appendix in the upper part of the chalazal plate (arrow); (F) V. verna—broadly elliptical seed with large chalazal plate and no epidermal appendix; (G) V. scutellata—broadly elliptical shape in outline with chalazal plate at approximately half of the length of the seed; (H) V. fruticans—broadly elliptical seed with chalazal plate in the upper part of the seed, verrucate seed coat; (I) V. chamaedrys—reticulate-verrucate-colliculate sculpture with convex, corrugate periclinal walls and flat, rugose anticlinal walls.
Plants 11 00088 g003
Plants 11 00088 g004 550
Figure 4. Discoid, large seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. arvensis—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with rugose, corrugate periclinal walls, with papillae not clearly visible; (B) V. dillenii—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with flat, rugose, corrugate periclinal walls and with papillae clearly visible; (C) V. verna—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with flat, rugose and granulate periclinal walls, with papillae clearly visible; (D) V. montana—reticulate sculpture with supracellular rings, with convex anticlinal walls and colliculate periclinal walls; (E) V. montana—broadly elliptical shape in outline, supracellular rings, seed surface smooth; (F) V. aphylla—broadly elliptical shape in outline, seed surface wrinkled; (G) V. officinalis—reticulate sculpture with convex, smooth anticlinal walls and colliculate, granulate periclinal walls, polygonal structures small; (H) V. scutellata—reticulate sculpture with convex, smooth anticlinal walls and colliculate, smooth periclinal walls, polygons large; (I) V. urticifolia—broadly elliptical shape in outline with large polygons around the chalaza.
Figure 4. Discoid, large seeds of Veronica species; (A) V. arvensis—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with rugose, corrugate periclinal walls, with papillae not clearly visible; (B) V. dillenii—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with flat, rugose, corrugate periclinal walls and with papillae clearly visible; (C) V. verna—reticulate-verrucate sculpture with convex, rugose anticlinal walls and with flat, rugose and granulate periclinal walls, with papillae clearly visible; (D) V. montana—reticulate sculpture with supracellular rings, with convex anticlinal walls and colliculate periclinal walls; (E) V. montana—broadly elliptical shape in outline, supracellular rings, seed surface smooth; (F) V. aphylla—broadly elliptical shape in outline, seed surface wrinkled; (G) V. officinalis—reticulate sculpture with convex, smooth anticlinal walls and colliculate, granulate periclinal walls, polygonal structures small; (H) V. scutellata—reticulate sculpture with convex, smooth anticlinal walls and colliculate, smooth periclinal walls, polygons large; (I) V. urticifolia—broadly elliptical shape in outline with large polygons around the chalaza.
Plants 11 00088 g004
Plants 11 00088 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) UPGMA dendrogram constructed on the shortest Euclidean distances for nine subgenera of the genus Veronica, based on quantitative traits; (B) simplified tree showing the relationships between the analyzed subgenera of Veronica, based on the fragment of combined cpDNA and ITS phylogeny by Albach and Meudt [10]; only the binding order is shown; (C) UPGMA dendrogram constructed on the shortest Euclidean distances for 29 species of the genus Veronica, based on quantitative traits. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1.
Figure 5. (A) UPGMA dendrogram constructed on the shortest Euclidean distances for nine subgenera of the genus Veronica, based on quantitative traits; (B) simplified tree showing the relationships between the analyzed subgenera of Veronica, based on the fragment of combined cpDNA and ITS phylogeny by Albach and Meudt [10]; only the binding order is shown; (C) UPGMA dendrogram constructed on the shortest Euclidean distances for 29 species of the genus Veronica, based on quantitative traits. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1.
Plants 11 00088 g005
Table
Table 1. The number of individuals and seeds analysed of nine subgenera and twenty-nine species of genus Veronica.
Table 1. The number of individuals and seeds analysed of nine subgenera and twenty-nine species of genus Veronica.
SubgenusSubgenus AbbreviationSpeciesSpecies AbbreviationNumber of IndividualsNumber of Seeds
PseudolysimachiumPSEUDV. longifolialong540
V. spicataspic426
BeccabungaBECV. anagalis-aquaticaan-a747
V. beccabungabecc743
V. catenatacat211
V. peregrinaper427
V. serpyllifoliaserp322
VeronicaVERV. aphyllaaph321
V. montanamont421
V. officinalisoff735
V. scutellatascut733
V. urticifoliaurti317
ChamaedrysCHAMV. arvensisarv747
V. chamaedryscham740
V. dilleniidill856
V. vernavern535
PentasepalaePENV. austriacaaust320
V. teucriumteuc211
StenocarponSTENV. fruticansfrut638
PocillaPOCV. agrestisagr1182
V. filiformisfili213
V. opacaopac1188
V. persicapers14118
V. politapol1085
PellidospermaPELV. praecoxprae651
V. triphyllostriph531
CochlidiospermaCOCHV. hederifoliahed747
V. sublobatasubl545
V. trilobatril19
Total 1661159
Table
Table 2. Seed type and shape, general seed coat sculpture and type of anticlinal and periclinal walls of the testa surface of twenty-nine species of nine subgenera of genus Veronica. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1. D-tn—discoid-thin. D-tk—discoid-thick. C-s—shallow cochlidiospermous. C-d—deeply cochlidiospermous. E—elliptical. BE—broadly elliptical. O—obovoid. BO—broadly obovoid. S—suborbicular.
Table 2. Seed type and shape, general seed coat sculpture and type of anticlinal and periclinal walls of the testa surface of twenty-nine species of nine subgenera of genus Veronica. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1. D-tn—discoid-thin. D-tk—discoid-thick. C-s—shallow cochlidiospermous. C-d—deeply cochlidiospermous. E—elliptical. BE—broadly elliptical. O—obovoid. BO—broadly obovoid. S—suborbicular.
SpeciesSeed TypeSeed ShapeGeneral SculpturePericlinal Cell WallsAnticlinal Cell Walls
SculptureBulging StateSculptureBulging State
PSEUDV. longifoliaD-tn, D-tkE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulate-striatestriateconcave/flatstriateconvex
V. spicataD-tkE, BE, O, BO
BECV. anagalis-aquaticaD-tkE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulaterugose/
corrugate/
granulate		flat/concave/
slightly colliculate		rugose/
rugose with lumps		convex
V. beccabungaD-tkE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulaterugoseconvex
V. catenataD-tkE, BE, BO, Sreticulaterugoseconvex
V. peregrinaD-tkE, BE, O, BOreticulate-verrucaterugoseconvex/flat/
concave
V. serpyllifoliaD-tkE, BE, Oreticulate-verrucaterugoseconvex
VERV. aphyllaD-tnBE, Sreticulate with supracellular ringssmooth/rugosecolliculaterugose/
rugose with lumps		convex
V. montanaD-tnE, BE, BO, Sreticulate with supracellular ringsrugose/corrugate/granulatesmooth/rugose/granulate
V. officinalisD-tnE, BE, BO, Sreticulatesmooth/rugose/granulatesmooth/rugose/
with lumps
V. scutellataD-tnE, BE, BO, Sreticulatesmooth/rugose/granulatesmooth/rugose
V. urticifoliaD-tnBE, O, BO, Sreticulate with supracellular ringssmooth/rugose/granulatesmooth/rugose/granulate; always with lumps
CHAMV. arvensisD-tn, D-tkE, BE, Oreticulate-verrucaterugose/corrugateflat/concaverugoseconvex
V. chamaedrysD-tnE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulate-verrucate-colliculaterugose/corrugate/granulateflat/convexconvex/flat/
concave
V. dilleniiD-tnBE, BO, Sreticulate-verrucaterugose/corrugate/granulateflat/colliculateconvex
V. vernaD-tnE, BE, O, BOreticulate-verrucaterugose/granulateflat/colliculateconvex
PENV. austriacaD-tn, D-tkBE, BO, Sreticulate-verrucaterugoseflat/colliculaterugoseconvex/
concave
V. teucriumD-tnBE, O, BO, S
STENV. fruticansD-tnBE, BO, Sverrucaterugoseconvexrugoseconcave/
flat
POCV. agrestisC-s, C-dE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulate-verrucaterugoseflat/concaverugoseconvex
V. filiformisC-s, C-dE, BE, BO, S
V. opacaC-s, C-dE, BE, O, BO, S
V. persicaC-s, C-dE, BE, O, BO, S
V. politaC-s, C-dE, BE, O, BO, S
PELV. praecoxC-s, C-dE, BE, O, BO, Sreticulate-verrucaterugoseflat/concaverugoseconvex
V. triphyllosC-s, C-dO, BO, S
COCHV. hederifoliaC-s, C-dBE, O, BO, Sreticulate-corrugaterugoseflat/concavecorrugateconvex
V. sublobataC-s, C-dBE, S
V. trilobaC-dBE, S
Table
Table 3. Means and standard deviations of eighteen characters of seeds of nine subgenera of the genus Veronica. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1.
Table 3. Means and standard deviations of eighteen characters of seeds of nine subgenera of the genus Veronica. Subgenera abbreviations as in Table 1.
Characters of SeedsCharacter
Abbreviation		PSEUDBECVERCHAMPENSTENPOCPELCOCH
Perimeter [mm]P2.16 ± 0.351.84 ± 0.404.32 ± 1.303.57 ± 0.734.54 ± 1.124.30 ± 0.365.27 ± 1.073.61 ± 0.887.82 ± 1.33
Length [mm]L0.69 ± 0.120.63 ± 0.151.35 ± 0.371.15 ± 0.181.40 ± 0.251.32 ± 0.131.54 ± 0.271.18 ± 0.242.28 ± 0.31
Width at ½ [mm]W½ 0.48 ± 0.090.44 ± 0.091.08 ± 0.300.86 ± 0.181.13 ± 0.231.09 ± 0.111.09 ± 0.220.91 ± 0.221.96 ± 0.33
Thickness at ½ [mm]T½ 0.22 ± 0.040.22 ± 0.030.25 ± 0.070.28 ± 0.050.38 ± 0.080.30 ± 0.050.72 ± 0.180.60 ± 0.081.37 ± 0.28
Width at ¼ [mm]W¼ 0.39 ± 0.090.38 ± 0.090.95 ± 0.240.73 ± 0.171.06 ± 0.180.95 ± 0.100.87 ± 0.200.76 ± 0.241.71 ± 0.31
Width at ¾ [mm]W¾ 0.41 ± 0.100.37 ± 0.090.90 ± 0.260.72 ± 0.161.00 ± 0.190.92 ± 0.141.00 ± 0.200.80 ± 0.221.71 ± 0.32
Length of chalaza [mm]LCh0.53 ± 0.090.45 ± 0.080.81 ± 0.180.73 ± 0.131.00 ± 0.150.88 ± 0.101.00 ± 0.220.74 ± 0.191.36 ± 0.23
Length of chalazal plate [mm]LPl0.15 ± 0.030.14 ± 0.030.28 ± 0.090.41 ± 0.100.55 ± 0.130.24 ± 0.040.49 ± 0.090.30 ± 0.070.68 ± 0.14
Width of chalazal plate [mm]WPl0.14 ± 0.030.12 ± 0.030.22 ± 0.070.26 ± 0.090.39 ± 0.080.21 ± 0.040.33 ± 0.060.28 ± 0.080.51 ± 0.11
P/L3.13 ± 0.383.01 ± 0.413.16 ± 0.393.14 ± 0.523.31 ± 0.623.26 ± 0.263.45 ± 0.423.07 ± 0.353.50 ± 0.73
Calculated characters–ratiosW½/L0.69 ± 0.110.71 ± 0.080.79 ± 0.060.74 ± 0.080.81 ± 0.110.82 ± 0.070.71 ± 0.090.77 ± 0.080.85 ± 0.08
W¼/L0.55 ± 0.100.62 ± 0.090.70 ± 0.070.62 ± 0.090.72 ± 0.080.71 ± 0.050.57 ± 0.100.63 ± 0.110.73 ± 0.07
W¾/L0.58 ± 0.120.59 ± 0.090.66 ± 0.060.61 ± 0.070.69 ± 0.130.69 ± 0.050.65 ± 0.080.66 ± 0.100.73 ± 0.07
W¼/W¾ 0.98 ± 0.141.05 ± 0.141.06 ± 0.101.03 ± 0.181.08 ± 0.211.04 ± 0.120.88 ± 0.120.96 ± 0.231.01 ± 0.09
L/T½ 3.04 ± 0.332.82 ± 0.804.84 ± 1.113.91 ± 0.623.78 ± 1.124.16 ± 0.462.19 ± 0.521.94 ± 0.241.65 ± 0.18
LCh/L0.75 ± 0.070.73 ± 0.080.60 ± 0.050.63 ± 0.060.69 ± 0.100.67 ± 0.060.64 ± 0.080.62 ± 0.080.58 ± 0.06
LCh/LPl3.62 ± 0.643.22 ± 0.513.02 ± 0.551.80 ± 0.311.86 ± 0.333.63 ± 0.442.19 ± 0.322.48 ± 0.422.06 ± 0.40
LPl/WPl1.13 ± 0.191.20 ± 0.201.28 ± 0.161.63 ± 0.321.40 ± 0.151.17 ± 0.161.50 ± 0.231.09 ± 0.231.37 ± 0.30
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mazur, M.; Marcysiak, K.; Dunajska, A.; Gawlak, M.; Kałuski, T. Taxonomic Significance of Seed Morphology in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) Species from Central Europe. Plants 2022, 11, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010088

AMA Style

Mazur M, Marcysiak K, Dunajska A, Gawlak M, Kałuski T. Taxonomic Significance of Seed Morphology in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) Species from Central Europe. Plants. 2022; 11(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mazur, Małgorzata, Katarzyna Marcysiak, Agnieszka Dunajska, Magdalena Gawlak, and Tomasz Kałuski. 2022. "Taxonomic Significance of Seed Morphology in Veronica L. (Plantaginaceae) Species from Central Europe" Plants 11, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11010088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop