Next Article in Journal
Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
Next Article in Special Issue
Secondary Metabolites in Basil, Bio-Insecticide, Inhibition Effect, and In Silico Molecular Docking against Proteolytic Enzymes of the Red Palm Weevil (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus)
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Use of Hyperspectral Reflectance as a High-Throughput Nondestructive Phenotyping Tool for Assessing Salt Tolerance in Advanced Spring Wheat Lines under Field Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential of Essential Oils from Anise, Dill and Fennel Seeds for the Gypsy Moth Control
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 11
10.3390/plants10112513
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Origanum vulgare Essential Oil against Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Composition, Insecticidal Activity, and Behavioral Response

by
Angelica Plata-Rueda
1,
José Cola Zanuncio
1,
José Eduardo Serrão
2 and
Luis Carlos Martínez
2,*
1
Department of Entomology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
2
Department of General Biology, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(11), 2513; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112513
Submission received: 25 October 2021 / Revised: 13 November 2021 / Accepted: 16 November 2021 / Published: 19 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Insecticidal Activity of Plant Secondary Metabolites)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tenebrio molitor is one of the main stored product pests. This study characterized oregano essential oil (OEO) by gas chromatography (GC/FID and GC/MS) and assessed its insecticidal properties against T. molitor. Mortality, survival, respiration, and behavioral response in larva, pupa, and adult of this insect were determined. The major components of OEO were carvacrol (25.6%), p-cymene (12.3%), linalool (8.71%), thymol (7.22%), γ-terpinene (7.21%), caryophyllene oxide (4.67%), α-pinene (2.71%), and eucalyptol (2.69%). OEO caused high contact toxicity in larvae (LD50 = 3.03 µg insect–1), pupae (LD50 = 5.01 µg insect–1), and adults (LD50 = 5.12 µg insect−1) of T. molitor. Survival rates were 100% in larvae, pupae, and adults of T. molitor not treated with OEO, declining to 65–54%, 38–44%, 30–23%, and 6–2% in insects treated with LD25, LD50, LD75, and LD90, respectively. Low respiration rates of T. molitor at different developmental stages was observed after OEO exposure. Additionally, OEO exposure affects behavioral avoidance response and causes repellency in larvae and adults. These findings show that OEO exerts insecticidal and repellent effects against T. molitor, suggesting a potent alternative to synthetic insecticides for controlling the beetle.

1. Introduction

The yellow mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor (L.) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) is one of the main stored product pests of grains, flour, bran, and pasta worldwide. Tenebrio molitor infests many stored agricultural commodities [1], contaminates the food with their feces and molted exoskeleton [2], and may act as vector of fungi [3], making them unfit for human consumption. Some methods to control T. molitor include temperature treatment [4], sun treatment [5], controlled atmosphere [6], and fumigation of chemical insecticides [7]. However, negative consequences such as development of insecticide resistance [8], environmental pollution [9], and residual toxicity [7] have limited the application of chemical control. The search for new strategies to pest control can be implemented to protection of stored products, considering the harmful effects of synthetic insecticides.
Plant essential oils (EOs) are proposed for pest control in stored grains and display several insecticidal activities [10]. EOs alter insect digestion, causing repellency, deterrence, and changes in olfactory responses [11,12,13]. On the other hand, effects on insect physiology involve inhibition of growth, developmental impairment, oxygen deprivation, and energy depletion [14,15,16]. EOs are a mixture of plant metabolites (monoterpenes, phenylpropenes, and sesquiterpenes) and act on the nervous system of insects, affect acetylcholine [17], γ-aminobutyric acid [18], and octopaminergic receptors [19], as well as respiratory pathways [20]. For instance, EOs can be applied on insects by contact (through the integumentary system) [14], inhalation (through the respiration system) [21], and orally (through the digestive system) [22].
The biological activity on insects caused by EOs varies according to plant species, and their efficacy has been demonstrated in coleopteran stored product pests [12,15,23]. Previous studies showed that Cymbopogon citratus essential oil is lethal to Ulomoides dermestoides Fairmaire (Tenebrionidae) [16], Hazomalania voyronii essential oil to Tribolium confusum (du Val) (Tenebrionidae) [24], and Zingiber pupureum essential oil to Lasioderma serricone Fabricius (Anobiidae) [25], favoring an effective approach toward Integrated Resistance Management (IRM). In this context, EOs from Amarydillaceae [26], Annonaceae [20], Lauraceae [27], Meliaceae [28], and Poaceae [29] are the most promising for causing toxic effects in insects.
Oregano, Origanum vulgare (L.) (Lamiales: Lamiaceae) is an important aromatic plant rich in terpenoid components used in medical treatments [30], the food industry [31], and agriculture [32]. Oregano essential oil (OEO) has been used for a long time as natural tool to protect against several microorganisms of stored products [33], with low animal toxicity and rapid degradation in environment. Among the antimicrobial properties, OEO exhibits potent insecticidal effects against stored pests [34]. In T. molitor, deleterious effects caused by synthetic insecticides have been investigated [35]; however, OEO might be used to manage T. molitor populations. We assume that OEO causes biocidal effects in larva, pupa, and adult of T. molitor, which could be due to its capability to affect the survival, respiration, and behavior of this pest.
The purpose of this research was to characterize the main components of OEO and assayed the mortality, survival, respiration, and behavioral effects on T. molitor. This contributed to understanding how this bio-insecticide controls the yellow mealworm and how it can serve to manage synthetic insecticide resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Chemical OEO Characterization

A total of 25 components were identified in OEO, accounting for 95.79% of the total composition: carvacrol (25.28 ± 0.34%), p-cymene (11.9 ± 0.33%), linalool (8.71 ± 0.66%), thymol (7.23 ± 0.22%), γ-terpinene (6.88 ± 0.38%), caryophyllene oxide (4.67 ± 0.08%), α-pinene (2.71 ± 0.02%), eucalyptol (2.66 ± 0.27%), camphene (1.96 ± 0.01%), α-phellandrene (1.87 ± 0.02%), β-pinene (1.71 ± 0.02%), thymol methyl ether (1.68 ± 0.18%), camphor (1.67 ± 0.09%), β-bisabolene (1.64 ± 0.08%), carvacrol methyl ether (1.64 ± 0.01%), terpinen-4-ol (1.56 ± 0.26%), borneol (1.46 ± 0.07%), α-thujene (1.42 ± 0.02%), terpinolene (1.37 ± 0.15%), aromandrene (1.35 ± 0.02%), cis-sabinene hydrate (1.35 ± 0.11%), α-terpineol (1.34 ± 0.19%), α-terpinene (1.23 ± 0.01%), cuminaldehyde (1.23 ± 0.01%), and β-myrcene (1.16 ± 0.02%) (Figure 1; Table 1).

2.2. Dose–Mortality Relationship

The dose–mortality data were suitable for a model probit fit (p > 0.05), demonstrating the toxicity of OEO to T. molitor and allowing estimates of toxicological endpoints (Table 2). The results indicated that OEO was the most toxic to T. molitor larvae (LD50 = 3.03 µg insect−1), followed by pupae (LD50 = 5.01 µg insect−1) and adults (LD50 = 6.12 µg insect−1). Mortality was less than 1% in the control.

2.3. Time–Mortality Relationship

Survival rates of T. molitor were calculated for 48 h after insect exposure to OEO at different lethal doses (Figure 2). Survival rates of T. molitor larvae differed significantly to OEO (log-rank test, χ2 = 20.22, df = 4; p < 0.001) and decreased from 99.9% (control) to 55.6% with LD25, 44.9% with LD50, 28.5% with LD75, and 6.31% with LD90. For T. molitor pupae, survival rate differed significantly (log-rank test, χ2 = 18.71, df = 4; p < 0.001) and decreased from 99.9% (control) to 65.3% with LD25, 53.9% with LD50, 30.7% with LD75, and 2.42% with LD90 of OEO. Survival rates of T. molitor adults differed significantly (log-rank test, χ2 = 15.31, df = 4; p < 0.001) and decreased from 99.9% (control) to 54.4% in insects exposed with LD25, 38.9% with LD50, 23.7% with LD50, and 3.32% with LD90 of OEO.

2.4. Respiration Rate

The respiration rate of T. molitor was influenced by exposure to OEO at the LD50 and LD90. Respiration rate of T. molitor larvae differed between the control group (11.6 μL CO2 h−1), LD50 (8.29 μL CO2 h−1), and LD90 (5.52 μL CO2 h−1) 1 h after exposure, but after 3 h, the respiration rate decreased to 10.1 μL CO2 h−1 in the control group, followed by LD50 with 6.91 μL CO2 h−1, and LD90 with 4.63 μL CO2 h−1 (Figure 3A). There was a significant effect of treatments (p < 0.001) and time (p < 0.001), but the interaction between treatments × time did not differ (p = 0.646) (Table 3). Respiration rate of T. molitor pupae differed between control group (14.2 μL CO2 h−1) and LD50 (13.1 μL CO2 h−1), and LD90 (10.2 μL CO2 h−1) 1 h after exposure. Respiration rates decreased from 12.9 μL CO2 h−1 in the control group to 10.9 μL CO2 h−1 in mealworm beetles exposed to LD50 and 7.55 μL CO2 h−1 with LD90 of OEO, after 3 h (Figure 3B). There was a significant effect of treatments (p < 0.001) and time (p < 0.001), but the interaction between treatments × time did not differ (p = 0.132) (Table 3). Respiration rates of T. molitor adult differed between the control group (20.6 μL CO2 h−1) and OEO with 20.1 μL CO2 h−1 to LD50 and 18.1 μL CO2 h−1 to LD90 1 h after exposure. After 3 h, respiration rates decreased to 19.1 μL CO2 h−1 in the control group, 17.7 μL CO2 h−1 in mealworm beetles exposed to LD50 and 14.2 μL CO2 h−1 with LD90 of OEO (Figure 3C). There was a significant effect of treatments (p < 0.001), time (p < 0.001), but the interaction between treatments × time did not differ (p = 0.632) (Table 3).

2.5. Behavioral Avoidance Response

The distance traveled was different in the control and treated larvae (F2,15 = 51.05, p < 0.001) and T. molitor adults (F2,15 = 30.46, p < 0.001) with LD50 and LD90 of OEO (Figure 4A,D). The resting time was longer in the control than in the larvae exposed to LD50 and LD90 of OEO (F2,15 = 18.35; p < 0.001) (Figure 4B). Resting time differed between adults of the control, LD50 and LD90 of OEO (F2,15 = 26.01; p < 0.001) (Figure 4F). The walking velocity was lower in the control and LD50 larvae than in the LD90-treated ones (F2,15 = 5.88; p < 0.001) (Figure 4C). The walking velocity by adults were higher in the half-arenas treated with LD50 and LD90 of OEO (F2,15 = 9.21; p < 0.001) (Figure 4F).

3. Discussion

This work investigated OEO chemical composition and assessed the bioactive effects caused by this EO on T. molitor under laboratory conditions. Twenty-five components were identified. Carvacrol, p-cymene, linalool, thymol, γ-terpinene, caryophyllene oxide, α-pinene, and eucalyptol were the major components, in agreement with preliminary studies on terpenoids from OEO [36,37,38]. Specifically, majority OEO components are aromatic monoterpenes and can participate as kairomones or allomones in herbivore–plant chemical communication [39]. Terpenoids are metabolites with various biochemical mechanisms [40] and play a crucial role to induce defense responses against insects [41]. In particular, the insecticidal activity caused by majority OEO components was reported in insect pests such as Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in response to exposure to carvacrol [42], Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) exposed to p-cymene and linalool [43,44], and Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) exposed to thymol [45]. Regarding the mode of action, OEO presents little evidence of action of target proteins responsible for biological activity, but it is possible that its effect on the nervous system of T. molitor was due to the presence of terpenoids, resulting in rapid insect lethality, as reported for other insects exposed to EOs [27,29,46].
OEO caused mortality in T. molitor in a dose–dependent manner, as also studied in other insects exposed to EOs [47,48,49]. OEO was toxic to larvae (LD50 = 5.17 µg insect−1), pupae (LD50 = 5.17 µg insect−1), and adults (LD50 = 5.17 µg insect−1) of T. molitor and exerted a lethal effect by topical application. The different developmental stages of T. molitor exposed to high doses of OEO displayed altered locomotor activity, lost mobility, followed by paralysis and death. In this context, the symptoms of this insect were consistent with the recognizable effect on nervous system [19,35]. Exposure to OEO was shown to cause neurotoxicity in other insect pests as Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) [50], Nezara viridula (L.) (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) [51], and Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) [52]. Overall, the results demonstrate that a low dose of OEO is sufficient to cause toxicity in T. molitor with potential as ecofriendly safe alternative to control this stored pest.
High variability in T. molitor survival is promoted by interaction of OEO attaching to the contact exposure and penetrating through respiratory system or insect cuticle, leading to the suppression nerve conduction. Short periods of exposure to OEO from 24 to 48 h, were needed to induce lethality in T. molitor and associated with the quick action of this bioinsecticide. In this research, the effects on T. molitor between lethal doses of OEO occurred at various periods. These time differences occur due to OEO components’ abilities to ingress the insect’s body during respiration [20] and penetrate the integument cuticle layers [15], exerting their effect as neurotoxins [17]. Similar effects were investigated in other pests of stored grains exposed to OEO, such as Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) [53], Anagasta khueniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) [54] and Rhyzopertha dominica Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) [55]. The rapid effect against T. molitor is another indication of the potential of OEO to protect stored products.
OEO compromises the respiration of T. molitor, indicating physiological stress. Inhaled insecticides enter in the insect’s body through spiracles and tracheae and can affect the respiratory processes [13,16,21]. The regulated respiration occurs by the energy demand required to lead the detoxification enzymatic activity [12,47]. A decrease respiration results in high fitness cost and energy demand can be utilized to other metabolic functions [56]. A similar response occurs in other coleopteran pests such as Demotispa neivai Bondar (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) exposed to neem essential oil [10], S. granarius exposed to cinnamon essential oil [26], and T. molitor exposed to garlic essential oil [27] decreasing the oxygen consumption and disrupting of oxidative phosphorylation in respiration [13,21,57]. The findings obtained here, demonstrate that the larvae, pupae, and adults of T. molitor have low respiration rate when exposed to OEO with possible energy reallocated to other physiological functions and fitness costs.
The OEO also affected the behavioral response of T. molitor. Changes in the locomotion of T. molitor caused by OEO may be due to the toxic effect of this EO on the nervous system. Altered behavioral responses have been observed in different insects after toxic compounds exposure [22,29,58] with direct consequences on the orientation and olfactory response [59,60,61]. In T. molitor, larvae and adults exposed to contaminated surfaces by OEO gradually increase the distance walked, velocity, and reduce the resting time, indicating repellency. Indeed, the walking pattern changes in the different concentrations of OEO may be due to its feedback effect on neuron transmission through channels modulation that exerts action potentials along nerve axons and synapsis [35,62]. The findings show that changes in the locomotor activity of T. molitor are dependent on the concentrations of OEO, causing irritability.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Insects

Tenebrio molitor individuals were obtained from the Institute of Applied Biotechnology for Agriculture of the Federal University of Viçosa (Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil). Larvae and adults were kept in plastic bottles (750 mL) at 26 ± 2 °C and 55 ± 25% relative humidity under a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. The insects were fed on wheat bran (Triticum aestivum Linnaeus, Poaceae), pieces of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum Linnaeus, Poaceae), and chayote fruits (Sechium edule Jacquin, Cucurbitaceae). Newly-emerged last instar larvae, pupae, and adults (less than 24 h old) were employed in the experiments.

4.2. Essential Oil

OEO was obtained from O. vulgare (cv. hirtum) fresh plants and produced on an industrial scale by steam distillation (using a Clevenger-type apparatus) was supplied from Ferquina Industry and Commerce Ltd.a. (Catanduva, São Paulo, Brazil).

4.3. GC-FID and GC-MS Analysis

The OEO was analyzed in triplicate using gas chromatography (GC) to quantitative and qualitative chemical analyses. For quantitative analysis, GC analyses were conducted using a Shimadzu GC-17A Series instrument (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a capillary column (Supelco DB-5 30 m × 0.22 mm × 0.25 μm film) and Flame Ionization Detector (FID). The operation conditions were the following: carrier gas, helium at a flow rate of 1.5 mL min−1; injector temperature, 220 °C, detector temperature, 240 °C; column temperature to start at 40 °C (isothermal for 3 min), with a ramp of 3 °C min−1, to 240 °C, held isothermally at 240 °C for 12 min; injection, 0.1 mL (1% w/v in dichloromethane); split ratio, 1:10; and column pressure, 118 kPa. To each component identified, amount was determined as a relative percentage of total area of the chromatogram. For qualitative analysis, GC-MS analyses were performed on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5050A chromatograph equipped with a Rtx-5MS capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm; Restek Corporation, Bellefonte, PA, USA), coated with Crossbond (35% diphenyl and 65% dimethyl polysiloxane) and the same operative conditions used for GC-FID. A 0.1 mL aliquot of OEO (in 1% w/v in dichloromethane) was injected in splitless mode (1:10 ratio). Ionization was performed at 70 eV and mass spectral data were acquired in the scan mode in m/z range 40–400 Da. The OEO components were identified by comparison of their Kovats indexes from original literature [36,37,38], retention time and mass spectra data (with those of C3–C24 n-alkanes) obtained from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST08 and NIST11) libraries.

4.4. Dose—Mortality Relationship

The OEO was prepared in 2.5 mL of acetone to obtain six dilutions (1.56, 3.12, 6.25, 12.5, 25, and 50 µg insect−1). Serial dilutions and a control (acetone) were used to assess the toxicity of essential oil to T. molitor, construct dose–mortality curve and calculate lethal doses (LD25, LD50, LD75 and LD90). Acetone was employed as a control. For each OEO dilution, one microliter (1 µL) was applied on the body of one larva, pupa or adult of T. molitor, using a micropipette. Subsequently, the insects were individualized in Petri dishes (90 mm diameter), covered with a perforated cap for ventilation, and fed (larva or adult) on wheat bran. For each development stage, three replicates with 50 mealworm beetles were utilized for each OEO dilution and the number of dead insects was counted after 48 h of exposure.

4.5. Time—Mortality Relationship

The time–mortality for larvae, pupae, and adults of T. molitor using lethal doses (LD25, LD50, LD75, and LD90) obtained in the dose–mortality relationship of OEO was evaluated. Tenebrio molitor were exposed to the lethal doses and individualized in glass tubes (2.5 × 120 mm). Acetone was employed as a control. Three replicates of 50 mealworm beetles were utilized for each OEO lethal dose and the number of live insects was counted every 6 h for 2 d.

4.6. Respiration Rate

Respiration was evaluated for 3 h in individuals (larvae, pupae, and adults) of T. molitor after exposure to OEO (LD50 and LD90) according to the procedure of dose–mortality test and those untreated with acetone used as control. Carbon dioxide (CO2) (μL of CO2 h−1/insect) was measured with a respirometer of the type CO2 TR3C (Sable System Int., Las Vegas, NV, USA). One T. molitor (larva, pupa or adult) was introduced into a 25 mL glass chamber in a completely closed system. CO2 production was measured by 8 h at 26 ± 3 °C after insect acclimatization. Oxygen gas was injected through the glass chamber for 2 min at a flow of 150 mL min−1 to quantify the CO2 produced in the chamber. This airflow forces the CO2 molecules to pass through an infrared reader coupled to the system, allowing continuous measurement of the CO2 produced by insects in each chamber. Fifteen mealworm beetles of each developmental stage were used for LD50 and LD90 of OEO and control.

4.7. Behavioral Avoidance Response

Individuals (larvae and adults) of T. molitor were kept in Petri dish lined with filter paper (Whatman No. 1, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) on the bottom, from here termed arena. To prevent the mealworm beetles escape, the inner part of the top of the Petri dish was coated with Teflon® PTFE (E.I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co., Willmington, DE, USA). The behavioral avoidance response (distance walked, resting time, and walking velocity) was performed in arenas with half treated with 250 µL of OEO (LC50 and LC90) or control (acetone). The individual (larva or adult) T. molitor beetle was released in the center of an arena half-treated with OEO (in filter paper) for 10 min and recorded using the Videotrack automated system (ViewPoint Life Sciences, Montreal, QC, Canada). Sixteen T. molitor (larvae or adults) were used per OEO lethal dose or control. Mealworm beetles were considered irritated when they spent 50% of the time in half or repelled when they spent <1 min in half of the treated area with OEO [62,63].

4.8. Statistical Analysis

The dose–mortality relationship was determined with probit analysis using with SAS v.9.0 software [64] to estimate the lethal dose values with 95% confidence intervals. Time-mortality relationship was submitted to Kaplan–Meier survival analysis with GraphPad Prism v.7.1 software [65]. Respiration rate data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) test (p < 0.05). The behavioral avoidance response of T. molitor was subjected to one-way ANOVA and means compared with the Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). Data on respiration rate and behavioral avoidance response were analyzed using with SAS 9.0 software. Raw data are availability in supplementary material (Table S1).

5. Conclusions

Overall, the results indicate that OEO has a wide range of detrimental effects on T. molitor. OEO caused toxicity, low survival, reduced respiration rate, and altered behavioral responses in different developmental stages. The chemical characterization shows that terpenoids contained in OEO may act synergistically through integument or respiratory systems to exert neurotoxicity on T. molitor. Furthermore, this research suggests that OEO is not only an alternating source of synthetic insecticides, but also might be utilized as innovative tool for effectively managing T. molitor populations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants10112513/s1, Table S1: Raw data. Data information of each experiment was supplied regarding data availability.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.P.-R., J.C.Z., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; methodology, A.P.-R., J.C.Z., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; formal analysis, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; investigation, A.P.-R., J.C.Z., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; resources, A.P.-R., J.C.Z., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; writing, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; supervision, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; project administration, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M.; funding acquisition, A.P.-R., J.E.S. and L.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Brazilian research agencies “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” CNPq (grant number 305165/2013-5), “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior” CAPES (grant number 2815/11), and “Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais” FAPEMIG (grant number APQ-01079-13).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The research was conducted according to the Brazilian ethical normative (Law 11.794/2008, established by the Science and Technology Minister) on the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Among animals, ethical protection is granted to vertebrates and macro-invertebrates by the Brazilian legislative and also grants protection to endangered species. However, Tenebrio molitor does not fall into one of these categories and this research is in concordance with the current state of ethical legislation in the Federal Republic of Brazil.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Department of Chemistry, Entomology and General Biology of the “Universidade Federal de Viçosa” (Brazil) for technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Flinn, P.W.; Hagstrum, D.W.; Reed, C.; Phillips, T.W. United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service stored-grain area-wide integrated pest management program. Pest Manag. Sci. 2003, 59, 614–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Neethirajan, S.; Karunakaran, C.; Jayas, D.S.; White, N.D.G. Detection techniques for stored-product insects in grain. Food Control 2007, 18, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Z.; Pfohl, K.; Karlovsky, P.; Dehne, H.W.; Altincicek, B. Dissemination of Fusarium proliferatum by mealworm beetle Tenebrio molitor. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Boyer, S.; Zhang, H.; Lempérière, G. A review of control methods and resistance mechanisms in stored-product insects. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2012, 102, 213–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Vincent, C.; Hallman, G.; Panneton, B.; Fleurat-Lessard, F. Management of agricultural insects with physical control methods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2003, 48, 261–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Mohammed, M.E.; El-Shafie, H.A.; Alhajhoj, M.R. Design and efficacy evaluation of a modern automated controlled atmosphere system for pest management in stored dates. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2020, 89, 101719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morrison, W.R., III; Scully, E.D.; Campbell, J.F. Towards developing areawide semiochemical-mediated, behaviorally-based integrated pest management programs for stored product insects. Pest Manag. Sci. 2021, 77, 2667–2682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sousa, A.; Faroni, L.; Pimentel, M.; Guedes, R. Developmental and population growth rates of phosphine-resistant and susceptible populations of stored product insect pests. J. Stored Prod. Res. 2009, 45, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Goulson, D. An overview of the environmental risks posed by neonicotinoid insecticides. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50, 977–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Plata-Rueda, A.; Campos, J.M.; Da Silva Rolim, G.; Martínez, L.C.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Fernandes, F.L.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Terpenoid constituents of cinnamon and clove essential oils cause toxic effects and behavior repellency response on granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cossolin, J.F.S.; Pereira, M.J.; Martínez, L.C.; Turchen, L.M.; Fiaz, M.; Bozdoğan, H.; Serrão, J.E. Cytotoxicity of Piper aduncum (Piperaceae) essential oil in brown stink bug Euchistus heros (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Plata-Rueda, A.; Rolim, G.D.S.; Wilcken, C.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Acute toxicity and sublethal effects of lemongrass essential oil and their components against the granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius. Insects 2020, 11, 379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brügger, B.P.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Wilcken, C.F.; Souza, L.S.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Carvalho, A.G.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Martínez, L.C. Exposure to lemongrass essential oil and its components causes behavior and respiratory disturbs in Anticarsia gemmatalis. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2021, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zanuncio, J.C.; Mourão, S.A.; Martínez, L.C.; Wilcken, C.F.; Ramalho, F.S.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrão, J.E. Toxic effects of the neem oil (Azadirachta indica) formulation on the stink bug predator, Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Colares, H.C.; Campos, J.M.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Fernandes, F.L.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Toxic effects of two essential oils and their constituents on the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2018, 108, 716–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Rolim, G.D.S.; Coelho, R.P.; Santos, M.H.D.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Insecticidal and repellent activities of Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae) essential oil and its terpenoids (citral and geranyl acetate) against Ulomoides dermestoides. Crop Prot. 2020, 137, 105299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mukherjee, P.K.; Kumar, V.; Mal, M.; Houghton, P.J. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants. Phytomedicine 2007, 14, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Priestley, C.M.; Williamson, E.M.; Wafford, K.A.; Sattelle, D.B. Thymol, a constituent of thyme essential oil, is a positive allosteric modulator of human GABAA receptors and a homo-oligomeric GABA receptor from Drosophila melanogaster. Braz. J. Pharmacol. 2003, 140, 1363–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Kostyukovsky, M.; Rafaeli, A.; Gileadi, C.; Demchenko, N.; Shaaya, E. Activation of octopaminergic receptors by essential oil constituents isolated from aromatic plants: Possible mode of action against insect pests. Pest Manag. Sci. 2002, 58, 1101–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Da Silva Costa, M.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Gonçalves, W.G.; Sant’Ana, A.E.G.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Squamocin induce histological and ultrastructural changes in the midgut cells of Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ecotox. Environ. Saf. 2018, 156, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Farder-Gomes, C.; Saravanan, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Azadirachtin-based biopesticide affects the respiration and digestion in Anticarsia gemmatalis caterpillars. Toxin Rev. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Plata-Rueda, A.; Fiaz, M.; Brügger, B.P.; Cañas, V.; Coelho, R.P.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Martínez, L.C.; Serrão, J.E. Lemongrass essential oil and its components cause effects on survival, locomotion, ingestion, and histological changes of the midgut in Anticarsia gemmatalis caterpillars. Toxin Rev. 2021, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Olivero-Verbel, J.; Nerio, L.S.; Stashenko, E.E. Bioactivity against Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) of Cymbopogon citratus and Eucalyptus citriodora essential oils grown in Colombia. Pest Manag. Sci. 2010, 66, 664–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kavallieratos, N.G.; Nika, E.P.; Skourti, A.; Ntalli, N.; Boukouvala, M.C.; Ntalaka, C.T.; Maggi, F.; Rakotosaona, R.; Cespi, M.; Perinelli, D.R.; et al. Developing a Hazomalania voyronii essential oil nanoemulsion for the eco-friendly management of Tribolium confusum, Tribolium castaneum and Tenebrio molitor larvae and adults on stored wheat. Molecules 2021, 26, 1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, Y.; You, C.X.; Yang, K.; Wu, Y.; Chen, R.; Zhang, W.J.; Liu, Z.L.; Du, S.S.; Deng, Z.W.; Gen, Z.F.; et al. Bioactivity of essential oil of Zingiber purpureum rhizomes and its main compounds against two stored product insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Dos Santos, M.H.; Fernandes, F.L.; Wilcken, C.F.; Soares, M.A.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Insecticidal activity of garlic essential oil and their constituents against the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 46406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Bioactivity of six plant extracts on adults of Demotispa neivai (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Insect Sci. 2015, 15, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Amaral, K.D.; Martínez, L.C.; Lima, M.A.P.; Serrão, J.E.; Della Lucia, T.M.C. Azadirachtin impairs egg production in Atta sexdens leaf-cutting ant queens. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 809–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Brügger, B.P.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Castro, B.M.D.C.; Soares, M.A.; Wilcken, C.F.; Carvalho, A.G.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Bioactivity of the Cymbopogon citratus (Poaceae) essential oil and its terpenoid constituents on the predatory bug, Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fournomiti, M.; Kimbaris, A.; Mantzourani, I.; Plessas, S.; Theodoridou, I.; Papaemmanouil, V.; Kapsiotis, I.; Panopoulou, M.; Stavropoulou, E.; Bezirtzoglou, E.E. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils of cultivated oregano (Origanum vulgare), sage (Salvia officinalis), and thyme (Thymus vulgaris) against clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella oxytoca, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 2015, 26, 23289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ibrahimand, F.A.; Al-Ebady, N. Evaluation of antifungal activity of some plant extracts and their applicability in extending the shelf life of stored tomato fruits. J. Food Process. Technol. 2014, 5, 340. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, S.-I.; Yoon, J.-S.; Jung, J.W.; Hong, K.-B.; Ahn, Y.-J.; Kwon, H.W. Toxicity and repellency of origanum essential oil and its components against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) adults. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 2010, 13, 369–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schillaci, D.; Napoli, E.M.; Cusimano, M.G.; Vitale, M.; Ruberto, A. Origanum vulgare subsp. hirtum essential oil prevented biofilm formation and showed antibacterial activity against planktonic and sessile bacterial cells. J. Food Prot. 2013, 76, 1747–1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Bakkali, F.; Averbeck, S.; Averbeck, D.; Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils—A review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 446–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Zettler, J.L.; Arthur, F.H. Chemical control of stored product insects with fumigants and residual treatments. Crop Prot. 2000, 19, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kulisic, T.; Radonic, A.; Katalinic, V.; Milos, M. Use of different methods for testing antioxidative activity of oregano essential oil. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 633–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Figiel, A.; Szumny, A.; Gutierrez-Ortiz, A.; Carbonell-Barrachina, A.A. Composition of oregano essential oil (Origanum vulgare) as affected by drying method. J. Food Eng. 2010, 98, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. La Pergola, A.; Restuccia, C.; Napoli, E.; Bella, S.; Brighina, S.; Russo, S.; Suma, P. Commercial and wild Sicilian Origanum vulgare essential oils: Chemical composition, antimicrobial activity and repellent effects. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2017, 29, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. War, A.R.; Paulraj, M.G.; Ahmad, T.; Buhroo, A.A.; Hussain, B.; Ignacimuthu, S.; Sharma, H.C. Mechanisms of plant defense against insect herbivores. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1306–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Ibanez, S.; Gallet, C.; Després, L. Plant insecticidal toxins in ecological networks. Toxins 2012, 4, 228–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Fürstenberg-Hägg, J.; Zagrobelny, M.; Bak, S. Plant defense against insect herbivores. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 10242–10297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Kordali, S.; Cakir, S.; Ozer, H.; Cakmakci, R.; Kesdek, M.; Mete, E. Antifungal, phytotoxic and insecticidal properties of essential oil isolated from Turkish Origanum acutidens and its three components, carvacrol, thymol and p-cymene. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 8788–8795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Gong, X.; Ren, Y. Larvicidal and ovicidal activity of carvacrol, p-cymene, and γ-terpinene from Origanum vulgare essential oil against the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 18708–18716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Campos, E.V.R.; Proença, P.L.F.; Oliveira, J.L.; Pereira, A.E.S.; Ribeiro, L.N.M.; Fernandes, F.O.; Gonçalves, K.C.; Polanczyk, R.A.; Pasquoto-Stigliani, T.; Lima, R.; et al. Carvacrol and linalool co-loaded in β-cyclodextrin-grafted chitosan nanoparticles as sustainable biopesticide aiming pest control. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 7623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Karpouhtsis, I.; Pardali, E.; Feggou, E.; Kokkini, S.; Scouras, Z.G.; Mavragani-Tsipidou, P. Insecticidal and genotoxic activities of oregano essential oils. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 1111–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tak, J.H.; Jovel, E.; Isman, M.B. Synergistic interactions among the major constituents of lemongrass essential oil against larvae and an ovarian cell line of the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. J. Pest Sci. 2017, 90, 735–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aslan, I.; Çalmaşur, Ö.; Sahin, F.; Çağlar, Ö. Insecticidal effects of essential plant oils against Ephestia kuehniella (Zell.), Lasioderma serricorne (F.) and Sitophilus granarius (L.). J. Plant Dis. Prot. 2005, 112, 257–267. [Google Scholar]
  48. Bertoli, A.; Conti, B.; Mazzoni, V.; Meini, L.; Pistelli, L. Volatile chemical composition and bioactivity of six essential oils against the stored food insect Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera Dryophthoridae). Nat. Prod. Res. 2012, 26, 2063–2071. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xie, Y.; Huang, Q.; Rao, Y.; Hong, L.; Zhang, D. Efficacy of Origanum vulgare essential oil and carvacrol against the housefly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2019, 26, 23824–23831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Szczepanik, M.; Walczak, M.; Zawitowska, B.; Michalska-Sionkowska, M.; Szumny, A.; Wawrzeńczyk, C.; Brzezinska, M.S. Chemical composition, antimicromicrobial activity and insecticidal activity against the lesser mealworm Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) of Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum (Link) and Artemisia dracunculus L. essential oils. J. Sci. Food Agr. 2018, 98, 767–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Werdin González, J.O.; Gutiérrez, M.M.; Murray, A.P.; Ferrero, A.A. Composition and biological activity of essential oils from Labiatae against Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) soybean pest. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Nasr, M.; Sendi, J.J.; Moharramipourb, S.; Zibaee, A. Evaluation of Origanum vulgare L. essential oil as a source of toxicant and an inhibitor of physiological parameters in diamondback moth, Plutella xylustella L. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Saud Soc. Agr. Sci. 2017, 16, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Baricevic, D.; Milevoj, L.; Borstnik, J. Insecticidal effect of oregano (Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum Ietswaart) on the dry bean weevil (Acanthoscelides obtectus Say). Int. J. Hortic. Sci. 2001, 7, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Alkan, M. Chemical composition and insecticidal potential of different Origanum spp. (Lamiaceae) essential oils against four stored product pests. Turk. J. Entomol. 2020, 44, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Castro, B.M.C.; Martínez, L.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Soares, M.A.; Wilcken, C.; Zanuncio, A.J.V.; Fiaz, M.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Exposure to chlorantraniliprole reduces locomotion, respiration, and causes histological changes in the midgut of velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Chemosphere 2021, 263, 128008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Silva, W.M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Serrão, J.E.; Zanuncio, J.C. Respiration, predatory and prey consumption by Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) nymphs exposed some to insecticides. Chemosphere 2020, 261, 127720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vinha, G.L.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Soares, M.A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Deltamethrin–mediated effects on locomotion, respiration, feeding and histological changes in the midgut of Spodoptera frugiperda caterpillars. Insects 2021, 12, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Plata-Rueda, A.; Menezes, C.H.M.; Cunha, W.S.; Alvarenga, T.M.; Barbosa, B.F.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Martínez, L.C.; Serrão, J.E. Side-effects caused by chlorpyrifos in the velvetbean caterpillar Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Fiaz, M.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Cossolin, J.F.S.; Serra, R.S.; Martins, G.F.; Serrão, J.E. Behavioral and ultrastructural effects of novaluron on Aedes aegypti larvae. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021, 93, 104974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lima, B.S.A.; Martínez, L.C.; Plata-Rueda, A.; Santos, M.H.; Oliveira, E.E.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E. Interaction between predatory and phytophagous stink bugs promoted by secretion of scent glands. Chemoecology 2021, 31, 209–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Price, D.N.; Berry, M.S. Comparison of effects of octopamine and insecticidal essential oils on activity in the nerve cord, foregut, and dorsal unpaired median neurons of cockroaches. J. Insect Physiol. 2006, 52, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Costa, N.C.R.; Zanuncio, J.C.; De Sena Fernandes, M.E.; Serrão, J.E.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Fernandes, F.L. Chlorantraniliprole-mediated effects on survival, walking abilities, and respiration in the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 172, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Plata-Rueda, A.; Martínez, L.C.; Da Silva, B.K.R.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Sena Fernandes, M.E.; Serrão, J.E.; Guedes, R.N.C.; Fernandes, F.L. Exposure to cyantraniliprole causes mortality and disturbs behavioral and respiratory response in the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei). Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 2236–2241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. SAS Institute. The SAS System for Windows, Release 9.1. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C. 2004. Available online: http://www.sas.com (accessed on 30 April 2004).
  65. GraphPad Software, Inc. GraphPad Prism User Guide. 2015. Available online: http://www.graphpad.com/guides/prism/6/user-guide/ (accessed on 15 December 2015).
Plants 10 02513 g001 550
Figure 1. Gas chromatogram profiles of peak retention of components of oregano essential oil: α-thujene (1), α-pinene (2), camphene (3), β-pinene (4), β-myrcene (5), α-phellandrene (6), α-terpinene (7), p-cymene (8), eucalyptol (9), γ-terpinene (10), cis-sabinene hydrate (11), terpinolene (12), linalool (13), camphor (14), borneol (15), terpinen-4-ol (16), α-terpineol (17), thymol methyl ether (18), carvacrol methyl ether (19), cuminaldehyde (20), thymol (21), carvacrol (22), aromandrene (23), β-bisabolene (24), and caryophyllene oxide (25).
Figure 1. Gas chromatogram profiles of peak retention of components of oregano essential oil: α-thujene (1), α-pinene (2), camphene (3), β-pinene (4), β-myrcene (5), α-phellandrene (6), α-terpinene (7), p-cymene (8), eucalyptol (9), γ-terpinene (10), cis-sabinene hydrate (11), terpinolene (12), linalool (13), camphor (14), borneol (15), terpinen-4-ol (16), α-terpineol (17), thymol methyl ether (18), carvacrol methyl ether (19), cuminaldehyde (20), thymol (21), carvacrol (22), aromandrene (23), β-bisabolene (24), and caryophyllene oxide (25).
Plants 10 02513 g001
Plants 10 02513 g002 550
Figure 2. Survival curves of Tenebrio molitor exposed to different lethal doses of oregano essential oil, estimated using the Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. (A) Larva (χ2 = 20.22, p < 0.001), (B) pupa (χ2 = 18.71, p < 0.001), and (C) adult (χ2 = 15.31, p < 0.001).
Figure 2. Survival curves of Tenebrio molitor exposed to different lethal doses of oregano essential oil, estimated using the Kaplan–Meier log-rank test. (A) Larva (χ2 = 20.22, p < 0.001), (B) pupa (χ2 = 18.71, p < 0.001), and (C) adult (χ2 = 15.31, p < 0.001).
Plants 10 02513 g002
Plants 10 02513 g003 550
Figure 3. Respiration rate (mean ± SEM) of Tenebrio molitor in the control and after exposure to oregano essential oil at the LD50 and LD90. (A) Larva (B) pupa and (C) adult. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 3. Respiration rate (mean ± SEM) of Tenebrio molitor in the control and after exposure to oregano essential oil at the LD50 and LD90. (A) Larva (B) pupa and (C) adult. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Plants 10 02513 g003
Plants 10 02513 g004 550
Figure 4. Behavioral response (mean ± SEM) of Tenebrio molitor exposed to oregano essential oil at different doses (control, LD50, and LD90) for 10 min. (A,D) Distance walked; (B,E) resting time; and (C,F) walking velocity. (A–C) larvae and (D–F) adults. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Figure 4. Behavioral response (mean ± SEM) of Tenebrio molitor exposed to oregano essential oil at different doses (control, LD50, and LD90) for 10 min. (A,D) Distance walked; (B,E) resting time; and (C,F) walking velocity. (A–C) larvae and (D–F) adults. Treatments means with different letters show significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the p < 0.05 level.
Plants 10 02513 g004
Table
Table 1. Chemical composition of oregano essential oil. Ri, retention indices; Rt, retention time; MC, mean composition (% area); MM, molecular mass; m/z, mass/charge ratio; ID, identification methods; KI, Kovats (Ri1 = relative to standard mixture of n-alkanes in the same sample’s analytical conditions, Ri2 = from literature) retention indexes on a DB-5 column and compared with the literature [36,37,38]; MS, mass spectra.
Table 1. Chemical composition of oregano essential oil. Ri, retention indices; Rt, retention time; MC, mean composition (% area); MM, molecular mass; m/z, mass/charge ratio; ID, identification methods; KI, Kovats (Ri1 = relative to standard mixture of n-alkanes in the same sample’s analytical conditions, Ri2 = from literature) retention indexes on a DB-5 column and compared with the literature [36,37,38]; MS, mass spectra.
PeaksComponentsRtMCMMm/zKIID
Ri1Ri2
1α-thujene8.401.4215293.05930930KI [36,37,38], MS
2α-pinene8.562.7113693.05938939KI [36,37,38], MS
3Camphene9.121.9613694.05948954KI [36,37,38], MS
4β-pinene10.31.7113693.05977979KI [36,37,38], MS
5β-myrcene11.11.1613694.05987991KI [36,37,38], MS
6α-phellandrene11.51.8713698.959971003KI [36,37,38], MS
7α-terpinene12.11.2313698.9510171018KI [36,37,38], MS
8p-cymene12.412.3134119.010271025KI [36,37,38], MS
9Eucalyptol12.82.69154108.110291031KI [36,37,38], MS
10γ-terpinene14.17.21136115.010651066KI [36,37,38], MS
11Cis-sabinene hydrate14.61.3513894.0510781089KI [36,37,38], MS
12Terpinolene15.81.3713695.0510841089KI [36,37,38], MS
13Linalool16.18.7115491.0510981100KI [36,37,38], MS
14Camphor18.11.6715295.0511491146KI [36,37,38], MS
15Borneol19.21.4615495.0511751169KI [36,37,38], MS
16Terpinen-4-ol19.61.5615491.0511791177KI [36,37,38], MS
17α-terpineol20.51.3415459.0511921189KI [36,37,38], MS
18Thymol methyl ether22.71.68164149.112381235KI [36,37,38], MS
19Carvacrol methyl ether24.71.64164148.112481245KI [36,37,38], MS
20Cuminaldehyde25.01.23148135.012471242KI [36,37,38], MS
21Thymol25.17.22150135.012871290KI [36,37,38], MS
22Carvacrol25.525.6150135.013051299KI [36,37,38], MS
23Aromandrene30.21.35204135.014451441KI [36,37,38], MS
24β-bisabolene34.11.6420499.0515081506KI [36,37,38], MS
25Caryophyllene oxide36.64.6722093.0515811583KI [36,37,38], MS
Table
Table 2. Lethal doses of oregano essential oil on different developmental stages of Tenebrio molitor after 48 h exposure, obtained from probit analysis (df = 5). The chi-square value refers to the goodness of fit test at p > 0.05.
Table 2. Lethal doses of oregano essential oil on different developmental stages of Tenebrio molitor after 48 h exposure, obtained from probit analysis (df = 5). The chi-square value refers to the goodness of fit test at p > 0.05.
Insect
Stage		No. InsectsLethal DoseEstimated Dose
(µg Insect–1)		95% Confidence Interval
(µg Insect–1)		Slope ± SEχ2
(p-Value)
Larva150LD251.7701.404–2.1202.875 ± 0.292.23
(0.69)
150LD503.0392.578–3.558
150LD755.2164.413–6.402
150LD908.4826.849–11.35
Pupa150LD252.6142.055–3.1722.389 ± 0.223.38
(0.49)
150LD505.0184.199–5.965
150LD759.5937.927–12.14
150LD9017.2213.43–24.05
Adult150LD252.4121.726–3.1141.166 ± 0.175.81
(0.21)
150LD506.1244.895–7.713
150LD7515.5411.86–22.34
150LD9035.9624.62–62.26
Table
Table 3. Two-way ANOVA for respiration rate of Tenebrio molitor upon exposure to lethal doses (LD50 and LD90) of oregano essential oil at two times. DF = Degrees of freedom, SS = Sum of squares, MS = Mean square, n = numerator, d = denominator, p = probability of significance (p < 0.05).
Table 3. Two-way ANOVA for respiration rate of Tenebrio molitor upon exposure to lethal doses (LD50 and LD90) of oregano essential oil at two times. DF = Degrees of freedom, SS = Sum of squares, MS = Mean square, n = numerator, d = denominator, p = probability of significance (p < 0.05).
Insect StageANOVA TableSSDFMSF (DFn, DFd)p-Value
LarvaTreatments3382169F (2, 54) = 154.1<0.001
Time23.1123.1F (1, 54) = 21.12<0.001
Treatments × time0.9520.47F (2, 54) = 0.44=0.646
Residual59.1541.09
Total42159
PupaTreatments2282114F (2, 54) = 89.79<0.001
Time60.4160.4F (1, 54) = 47.51<0.001
Treatments × time5.3422.67F (2, 54) = 2.11=0.132
Residual68.7541.27
Total36359
AdultTreatments163281.8F (2, 54) = 6.75<0.001
Time1031103F (1, 54) = 5.99<0.017
Treatments × time15.927.95F (2, 54) = 0.46=0.632
Residual9305417.2
Total121359
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Plata-Rueda, A.; Zanuncio, J.C.; Serrão, J.E.; Martínez, L.C. Origanum vulgare Essential Oil against Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Composition, Insecticidal Activity, and Behavioral Response. Plants 2021, 10, 2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112513

AMA Style

Plata-Rueda A, Zanuncio JC, Serrão JE, Martínez LC. Origanum vulgare Essential Oil against Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Composition, Insecticidal Activity, and Behavioral Response. Plants. 2021; 10(11):2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112513

Chicago/Turabian Style

Plata-Rueda, Angelica, José Cola Zanuncio, José Eduardo Serrão, and Luis Carlos Martínez. 2021. "Origanum vulgare Essential Oil against Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae): Composition, Insecticidal Activity, and Behavioral Response" Plants 10, no. 11: 2513. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112513

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop