Next Article in Journal
An Evaluation of Urban Renewal Based on Inclusive Development Theory: The Case of Wuhan, China
Previous Article in Journal
Construction of a COVID-19 Pandemic Situation Knowledge Graph Considering Spatial Relationships: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJGI
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/ijgi11110558
ijgi-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Acceptance of Online Mapping Technology among Older Adults: Technology Acceptance Model with Facilitating Condition, Compatibility, and Self-Satisfaction

by
Siu Shing Man
1,
Yingqian Guo
1,
Alan Hoi Shou Chan
2,3 and
Huiping Zhuang
4,*
1
School of Design, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
2
Department of Advanced Design and Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
3
Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518060, China
4
Shien-Ming Wu School of Intelligent Engineering, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 511436, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11(11), 558; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110558
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 22 October 2022 / Accepted: 5 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The benefits of traveling for older adults are extensively supported in the literature. Online mapping technology (OMT) is one of the most widely used applications by people during traveling. This study aimed to obtain insight into the acceptance of OMT among older adults. Additionally, an OMT acceptance model for older adults was developed in this study by integrating facilitating condition (FC), compatibility (COM), and self-satisfaction (SS) into the technology acceptance model (TAM). In this study, structural equation modeling was applied to the test of the OMT acceptance model. This study adopted a cross-sectional structured questionnaire survey for collecting quantitative data from older adults in China. Four hundred and sixteen Chinese older adults were involved in this survey. This study found that TAM was useful to explain the OMT acceptance among older adults. Additionally, FC was confirmed to be a positive factor in determining the perceived ease of use, while COM and SS were found to positively influence perceived usefulness. The results of this study are helpful for OMT developers to design OMT and adopt measures to enhance the use of OMT among older adults, thereby increasing their travel frequency.

1. Introduction

Population aging is becoming a challenging issue for most developed countries in which the older adult proportion has been gradually increasing over the past decade. According to the 7th National Census of China [1], the number of older adults (who were aged greater than or equal to 60 years) was 2.64 billion in 2020, representing 18.7% of the population. Compared with the statistics in 2010, the percentage of the total population accounting for older adults in 2020 increased by 5.44. It is expected that the number of older adults will be more than 3 billion in 2025, which will exceed 20.0% of the total population. Compared with young adults, older adults are wealthier and have more discretionary time to travel [2]. The aging population results in an increasing share of vacations and travel expenditures [3]. As a result, older adults become a major consumer force in tourism [4]. The tourism segment of older adults has obtained growing attention from scholars in the past decade [5].
There is substantial literature demonstrating how traveling benefits older adults. Zhang and Zhang [6] suggested that tourism is closely related to the quality of older adults’ lives. Totsune et al. [7] investigated how tourism benefits the subjective well-being of older adults and the relations among subjective well-being, travel frequency and curiosity with a mediator of the family budget situation. They found that tourism has a large potential to enhance older adults’ subjective well-being. Ferrer et al. [8] used a structural equation model to provide a tentative conclusion that tourism has positive influences on older adults’ mental and physical health. Pan et al. [9] advocated that tourism positively influences the life satisfaction of older adults.
Information and communications technology (ICT) is useful for the development of tourism [10]. For instance, ICT has great impacts on destination competitiveness [11], vocational education and training [12] and tourism product competitiveness [13]. Moreover, ICT has modified people’s ways of planning and experiencing their trips and has enhanced tourism companies’ efficiency [14]. The use of ICT made the tourism industry smart by collecting and exchanging useful information [15]. With the application of ICT, the tourism industry can connect with travel activities in real time to enhance the travel experience of people [16]. According to Houssien et al. [17], the development of the tourism industry relied on ICT and various mobile applications. ICT can assist in the integration of the various operations of the tourism industry and supply chain management into a single line to facilitate the business activities of the tourism industry [17].
ICT has completely changed tourism, as people share their experiences through social media [18,19]. Previous studies examined how hotels use social media such as Facebook as a marketing tool to promote their services [20,21,22] and increase tourists’ satisfaction [23]. ICT and social media can also facilitate online interactions between tourists [24]. Hysa et al. [25] found that social media helps promote the responsible behavior of the public for sustainable tourism.
Among the different types of ICT, online mapping technology (OMT), such as Baidu Maps, Amap, Apple Maps, and Google Maps, is one of the most widely used applications by people during traveling. OMT enables people to identify available directions through driving, walking, public transportation, or biking with a route planner during traveling. OMT may be helpful for older adults to overcome unfamiliarity with new places during traveling [26]. The study of Pai et al. [27] demonstrated that smart tourism technology experience is a critical factor in affecting travel experience and retravel intention. Given an increasingly large number of older adults who may benefit from the use of OMT, issues related to aging and OMT are critically important in increasing the travel frequency of older adults.
Some excellent studies were recently conducted for understanding the ICT acceptance among the public in the tourism context. For instance, Mohamad et al. [28] explored how the use of mobile technology affects people’s intention to reserve hotel rooms via smartphone. El-Said and Aziz [29] determined the factors influencing whether people adopted virtual tours during the COVID-19 pandemic. Shen et al. [30] used perceived price value and hedonic motivation to explain why students adopt virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality applications in tourism education. Law et al. [31] conducted a review to provide a research agenda that understanding how people accept the emerging ICT applicable to tourism should receive more research efforts. However, there is no research concerning the OMT acceptance of older adults in the literature. Research efforts to identify the factors affecting older adults’ intentions to use OMT are lacking in the literature.
For addressing the above-mentioned research limitations, this study aimed to obtain insightful knowledge about the acceptance of OMT among older adults by answering the research question: “What are the critical factors that affect the OMT acceptance of older adults?” Additionally, an OMT acceptance model for older adults was developed in this study by integrating the technology acceptance model (TAM), facilitating condition (FC), compatibility (COM), and self-satisfaction (SS).

2. Literature Review and Model Development

2.1. Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

TAM (shown in Figure 1), firstly introduced by Davis et al. [32], was a widely used theory to explain how people adopt technology [33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. TAM suggested that perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), and attitude toward using a technology (ATUT) are important factors in shaping people’s technology acceptance. PEOU and PU positively determine ATUT. ATUT and PU have a positive effect on intention to use the technology (ITU). Consequently, ITU leads to people’s actual use of the technology. Moreover, external factors may affect PU and PEOU, such as risk perception, perceived cost, and facilitating condition. According to the study context and TAM [32], PU means the degree to which older adults consider that using OMT improves their performance during traveling. PEOU means the extent to which older adults suppose that using OMT is easy and needs little effort. ATUT is older adults’ evaluation toward using OMT. ITU means the extent to which older adults are likely to use OMT.
Many tourism-related studies have applied TAM to interpret people’s acceptance of various technologies, for example, hotel mobile applications [40], VR applications [30], and robots [41]. Therefore, this study applied TAM to explain the OMT acceptance of older adults. Based on TAM, this study proposed five hypotheses:
H1: 
PU has a positive effect on ATUT.
H2: 
PEOU has a positive effect on ATUT.
H3: 
PEOU has a positive effect on PU.
H4: 
PU has a positive effect on ITU.
H5: 
ATUT has a positive effect on ITU.

2.2. Facilitating Condition (FC)

FC means the degree to which people think that infrastructure and devices are available for them to use a technology [42]. Due to the unfamiliarity with a new technology, older adults may require more support than the populations of other age segments [43]. Guner and Acarturk [44] examined the influence of FC on PEOU and PU among older adults for their ICT acceptance and indicated that FC positively influences PEOU but not PU. Similarly, the study of Li et al. [45] on smart wearables acceptance among older adults found that FC positively influences PEOU. FC may help older adults to manage resources and obtain knowledge for facilitating their use of OMT. In the context of OMT, no study examined the influence of FC on PEOU among older adults. Thus, this study hypothesized that:
H6: 
FC positively affects PEOU.

2.3. Compatibility (COM)

COM is the degree to which technology meets users’ needs and complies with their experience and lifestyles [46]. COM was commonly added to TAM for enhancing TAM’s explanatory power for the acceptance of various technologies among older adults, including wearable health monitoring technologies [45], self-driving vehicles [47], and self-service technologies [48]. Previous research showed that COM positively influenced PU and PEOU [45] among older adults. COM may be an important factor in explaining why older adults adopt OMT when traveling. However, no studies examined the extent to which COM influences older adults’ OMT acceptance. As a result, this study hypothesized that:
H7: 
COM positively affects PU.
H8: 
COM positively affects PEOU.

2.4. Self-Satisfaction (SS)

SS means the extent to which a technology provides older adults satisfaction with their achievements [49]. Previous studies used SS to illustrate the acceptance of various technologies among older adults, such as VR exergames [50], smartphone technology [51], and Telecare [52]. Generally, SS was found to positively influence PU and PEOU among older adults. When older adults use OMT, their SS can be obtained from the desired values, such as positive feelings and a sense of achievement during traveling. Hence, this study hypothesized that:
H9: 
SS positively affects PU.
H10: 
SS positively affects PEOU.

2.5. Model Development

For obtaining an in-depth insight into the OMT acceptance among older adults, this study developed an OMT acceptance model according to the ten proposed hypotheses related to TAM, FC, COM, and SS. Figure 2 depicts the OMT acceptance.

3. Methodology

3.1. Study Design

This study used a cross-sectional structured questionnaire survey for collecting quantitative data from older adults in China. The OMT acceptance model for older adults was tested and validated with the data using SEM to identify critical factors influencing the OMT acceptance among older adults. SEM can effectively investigate people’s technology acceptance in different research areas, for example, automated vehicles [53,54], personal protective equipment [36,55], and enterprise resource planning systems [39]. Therefore, this study used SEM to investigate the OMT acceptance among older adults.

3.2. Measurement

The questionnaire provided a brief definition of OMT and examples such as Baidu Maps, Amap, Apple Maps, and Google Maps. In addition, two sections of the questionnaire were used to collect data about (1) participants’ demographic information (i.e., age, gender, education level, and travel frequency in the last 12 months) and (2) the constructs including PU, PEOU, ATUT, ITU, FC, COM, and SS in the developed research model. For the travel frequency, it was defined as the frequency of traveling to a tourist attraction. The items for measuring the constructs were designed based on previous technology acceptance studies to suit the study context with a five-point Likert-type scale (i.e., 1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree). The item details are given in Table 1 with corresponding references.

3.3. Participants

A convenience sampling method with a face-to-face questionnaire survey was adopted for collecting quantitative data from Chinese older adults (aged ≥ 60) from dwelling communities and parks in Guangzhou, China. Four hundred and sixteen older adults participated in this study. Table 2 shows the demographic information of the participants. The mean age of the participants was 66.6 (SD = 4.3). About half (54.1%) of the participants were female, and approximately half of the participants (49.3%) had a junior high school education level or higher. Most of the participants (93.2%) traveled once or more in the past 12 months.

3.4. Data Analysis

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), a technique to examine the measurement model, was adopted with the model fitness indices (Table 3) [45]. When the model fitness indices met the criteria shown in Table 3 [56], the construct validity of the measurement was regarded as acceptable. Additionally, the convergent validity (i.e., the extent to which the items for measuring the same construct are consistent) and discriminant validity (i.e., the assessment of the difference among constructs) of the measurement were examined [47]. When the average variance extracted (AVE) of each construct exceeds 0.5 and the composite reliability of each construct and the factor loading for each item exceed 0.7, the appropriate convergent validity of the measurement is supported [57]. The values of the square root of AVE (SAVE) of the constructs should be larger than the correlations among the constructs. As a result, the discriminant validity of the measurement is acceptable [57]. Cronbach’s alpha was utilized to test the internal consistency of each construct measurement. A Cronbach’s alpha value of 0.7 or above indicates the acceptable internal consistency of the measurement [58].
When the reliability and validity of the measurement were proven to be acceptable, the test of all the hypotheses of the structural model (i.e., the OMT acceptance model for older adults) was conducted using SEM. The goodness-of-fit criteria for assessing the model fit of the OMT model were the same as those for measurement model assessment. AMOS 22 software was utilized to conduct CFA and SEM in this study.

4. Results

4.1. Measurement Model Assessment

The results of the measurement model assessment showed that χ2/df, CFI, SRMR, and RMSEA satisfied the recommended criteria (Table 3), reflecting that the measurement model was sufficiently fitted to the data. The factor loading of each item and the composite reliability of each construct were larger than 0.7 (Table 4). Additionally, the AVE of each construct was greater than 0.5. As a result, the convergent validity of the measurement was acceptable. Table 5 shows that all SAVEs were greater than bivariate correlations among the constructs, which suggested that the discriminant validity was acceptable. In addition, the Cronbach’s alpha value of each construct was over 0.7, indicating that the measurement had good internal consistency reliability.

4.2. Structural Model Assessment

Table 3 showed that the model fit indices for the structural model assessment met the criteria, which demonstrated that the OMT acceptance model for older adults can sufficiently represent the hypothesized relationships among the constructs. The results also showed that the OMT acceptance model could explain 48.2%, 60.9%, 64.8%, and 45.7% of the variance in PEOU, PU, ATUT, and ITU, respectively.
Table 6 summarizes the standardized path coefficients. All five hypotheses of TAM (H1–H5) were supported. Specifically, PU (β = 0.446, p < 0.001, H1) and PEOU (β = 0.430, p < 0.001, H2) positively influenced ATUT. PEOU had a positive effect on PU (β = 0.450, p < 0.001, H3). In addition, PU (β = 0.336, p < 0.001, H4) and ATUT (β = 0.388, p < 0.001, H5) had a positive effect on ITU. Three out of the five hypotheses related to FC, COM, and SS were supported. Specifically, FC (β = 0.617, p < 0.001, H6) had a positive effect on PEOU. COM (β = 0.275, p < 0.001, H7) had a positive effect on PU but had no positive effect on PEOU (β = 0.108, p = 0.064, H8). Similarly, SS had a positive effect on PU (β = 0.222, p < 0.001, H9) but had no positive effect on PEOU (β = 0.006, p = 0.924, H10). Therefore, H6, H7, and H9 were supported, while H8 and H10 were rejected.

5. Discussion

The advancement of OMT allows older adults to overcome unfamiliarity with new places during traveling [26], thereby motivating them to travel. This study investigated important factors that affect the OMT acceptance among older adults by developing and testing the OMT acceptance model. The OMT acceptance model was developed with the theoretical framework of TAM and involved FC, COM, and SS as the external factors. The results confirmed that the OMT acceptance model sufficiently represented the hypothesized relationships. The results are explicitly discussed below from the theoretical and practical aspects, followed by the research limitations of this study.

5.1. Theoretical Contributions

This study successfully developed and tested the OMT acceptance model by integrating TAM, FC, COM, and SS to explain how older adults adopt OMT. The study results fully supported that TAM is applicable in the understanding of older adults’ OMT acceptance. PU and PEOU positively affected ATUT, which, in turn, positively influenced ITU. When older adults think using OMT is easy and OMT is useful for finding available directions through public transportation, driving, walking, or biking, they tend to have a positive attitude toward using OMT. This positive attitude determines their intention to use OMT. These results are consistent with TAM of Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw [32] and previous studies on people’s acceptance of smartwatches [59], automated vehicles [53], and personal protective equipment [36,55]. This study is pioneering to provide empirical evidence to validate TAM in the current research context (i.e., the OMT acceptance of older adults).
This study considered FC, COM, and SS as external factors for shaping PU and PEO. These factors have not been considered to explain the OMT acceptance of older adults in the literature. The results supported that PEOU was positively affected by FC. This was in line with the study of Li, Ma, Chan, and Man [45], who found that FC positively influenced PEOU in the context of smart wearables acceptance among older adults. Facilitating conditions include assistance from someone and training practice for older adults to learn skills at using OMT. Given adequate facilitating conditions, older adults consider using OMT easy. This study also found that COM and SS failed to positively influence PEOU. The compatibility of OMT and self-satisfaction were not the antecedents for PEOU in the current research context. However, COM and SS positively affected PU. When older adults feel self-satisfied with the use of OMT and perceive that OMT can satisfy their needs and comply with their experience and lifestyles, they tend to think that OMT is useful to them during traveling. These results were consistent with those of Guner and Acarturk [44], who found that SS positively affected PU but failed to affect PEOU in the context of ICT acceptance among older adults. Additionally, Man, Xiong, Chang, and Chan [53] found that COM positively affected PU. This study confirmed the important role of FC, COM, and SS in understanding older adults’ acceptance of OMT.

5.2. Practical Implications

The results of the current study are expected to be helpful for OMT developers to design OMT and adopt measures to enhance the use of OMT among older adults. First, this study found that PU positively influenced ATUT so that OMT developers should put advertisements on social media to promote the merits of using OMT, such as route planner, traffic condition information provision, and street viewer. This way can increase the PU of OMT among older adults. Second, FC and COM were found to positively affect PEOU and PU, respectively. Therefore, OMT developers should provide training videos for older adults to learn skills at using OMT [60]. Additionally, OMT developers should ensure that the user-friendly interface design of OMT facilitates its compliance with the experience and lifestyles of older adults [61] so that older adults think OMT is useful to them. Last, as self-satisfaction positively affected PU, OMT developers should pay great attention to how to enhance the self-satisfaction of older adults when using OMT.

5.3. Research Limitations

The limitations in this study provide future research opportunities. First, this study recruited participants in China. The interpretations of the study results should be cautious, because the results may not be applicable to populations in other countries. Thus, more research efforts should be made to reconduct this study with participants from other countries to generalize the results of this study. Second, this study adopted a questionnaire survey for quantitative data collection to understand the OMT acceptance among older adults. Qualitative approaches such as interviews should be applied to obtain qualitative data about the opinions of older adults about the factors affecting the acceptance of OMT in future research.

6. Conclusions

This study proposed an OMT acceptance model by integrating TAM, FC, COM, and SS for explaining the OMT acceptance among older adults. This research model was tested using SEM. The results showed that TAM was useful to explain the OMT acceptance among older adults. FC was confirmed to be a positive factor in determining PEOU, while COM and SS were found to positively influence PU. This study stressed the importance of understanding the OMT acceptance of older adults and enriched the relevant literature. The findings of this study were consistent with those of previous studies on the technology acceptance of older people in the context of smart wearables [45], smartphone [51], smart home technology [62], and online shopping [63]. The study results are helpful for OMT developers to design OMT and adopt measures to enhance the use of OMT among older adults, thereby increasing their travel frequency.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Siu Shing Man, Yingqian Guo and Huiping Zhuang; methodology, Siu Shing Man, Yingqian Guo and Alan Hoi Shou Chan; validation, Siu Shing Man and Yingqian Guo; formal analysis, Siu Shing Man and Yingqian Guo; investigation, Siu Shing Man and Yingqian Guo; resources, Huiping Zhuang and Alan Hoi Shou Chan; data curation, Siu Shing Man and Yingqian Guo; writing—original draft preparation, Siu Shing Man, Huiping Zhuang, Yingqian Guo and Alan Hoi Shou Chan; writing—review and editing, Siu Shing Man, Huiping Zhuang and Alan Hoi Shou Chan; visualization, Siu Shing Man; supervision, Huiping Zhuang and Alan Hoi Shou Chan; and project administration, Huiping Zhuang and Alan Hoi Shou Chan. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 72071170).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the South China University of Technology and the City University of Hong Kong.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics of China. 7th National Census of China. Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/zxfb/202105/t20210510_1817176.html (accessed on 12 July 2022).
  2. Kazeminia, A.; Del Chiappa, G.; Jafari, J. Seniors’ travel constraints and their coping strategies. J. Travel Res. 2015, 54, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patterson, I.; Balderas-Cejudo, A.; Pegg, S. Tourism preferences of seniors and their impact on healthy ageing. Anatolia 2021, 32, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Otoo, F.E.; Hwang, Y.; Kim, S.; Morrison, A.M. Understanding the Dimensionality and Underlying Nature of Senior Overseas Travel Motivations. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2021, 45, 1513–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, N.; Menegaki, A.N.; Al-Muharrami, S. Systematic literature review of tourism growth nexus: An overview of the literature and a content analysis of 100 most influential papers. J. Econ. Surv. 2020, 34, 1068–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, L.; Zhang, J. Impacts of leisure and tourism on the elderly’s quality of life in intimacy: A comparative study in Japan. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Totsune, T.; Matsudaira, I.; Taki, Y. Curiosity-tourism interaction promotes subjective wellbeing among older adults in Japan. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2021, 8, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ferrer, J.G.; Sanz, M.F.; Ferrandis, E.D.; McCabe, S.; García, J.S. Social tourism and healthy ageing. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2016, 18, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Pan, Y.; Fu, X.; Wang, Y. How does travel link to life satisfaction for senior tourists? J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2020, 45, 234–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ukpabi, D.C.; Karjaluoto, H. Consumers’ acceptance of information and communications technology in tourism: A review. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 618–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Petrović, J.; Milićević, S.; Djeri, L. The information and communications technology as a factor of destination competitiveness in transition countries in European Union. Tour. Econ. 2017, 23, 1353–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Deaconu, A.; Dedu, E.M.; Igreț, R.Ș.; Radu, C. The use of information and communications technology in vocational education and training—Premise of sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Tfaily, R.A. E-Tourism and the competitiveness of tourism products in the context of the global tourism and travel industry Market. Rev. De Manag. Comp. Int. 2018, 19, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liang, S.; Schuckert, M.; Law, R.; Guo, X. A retrospective analysis and future trends of E-tourism research in China. J. China Tour. Res. 2017, 13, 231–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, S.; Tian, D.; Law, R.; Zhang, M. Bibliometric and visualized review of smart tourism research. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2022, 24, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corrêa, S.C.H.; Gosling, M.d.S. Travelers’ perception of smart tourism experiences in smart tourism destinations. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2021, 18, 415–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Houssien, A.-H.M.A.; Shajrawi, A.A.; Ali, H. Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Tourism Marketing in Jordan. J. Manag. Inf. Decis. Sci. 2021, 24, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sotiriadis, M.D. Sharing tourism experiences in social media: A literature review and a set of suggested business strategies. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 29, 179–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cervi, L. Travellers’ virtual communities: A success story. Univ. -XXI Rev. Cienc. Soc. Hum. 2019, 30, 97–125. [Google Scholar]
  20. Molina, A.; Gómez, M.; Lyon, A.; Aranda, E.; Loibl, W. What content to post? Evaluating the effectiveness of Facebook communications in destinations. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2020, 18, 100498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gruss, R.; Kim, E.; Abrahams, A. Engaging restaurant customers on Facebook: The power of belongingness appeals on social media. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2020, 44, 201–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Del Mar Galvez-Rodriguez, M.; Alonso-Cañadas, J.; Haro-de-Rosario, A.; Caba-Pérez, C. Exploring best practices for online engagement via Facebook with local destination management organisations (DMOs) in Europe: A longitudinal analysis. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 34, 100636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arasli, H.; Abdullahi, M.; Gunay, T. Social media as a destination marketing tool for a sustainable heritage festival in Nigeria: A moderated mediation study. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Molina-Collado, A.; Gómez-Rico, M.; Sigala, M.; Molina, M.V.; Aranda, E.; Salinero, Y. Mapping tourism and hospitality research on information and communication technology: A bibliometric and scientific approach. Inf. Technol. Tour. 2022, 24, 299–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hysa, B.; Zdonek, I.; Karasek, A. Social media in sustainable tourism recovery. Sustainability 2022, 14, 760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Phillips, J.; Walford, N.; Hockey, A.; Foreman, N.; Lewis, M. Older people and outdoor environments: Pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces. Geoforum 2013, 47, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pai, C.; Kang, S.; Liu, Y.; Zheng, Y. An examination of revisit intention based on perceived smart tourism technology experience. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mohamad, M.A.; Hanafiah, M.H.; Radzi, S.M. Understanding tourist mobile hotel booking behaviour: Incorporating perceived enjoyment and perceived price value in the modified Technology Acceptance Model. Tour. Manag. Stud. 2021, 17, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. El-Said, O.; Aziz, H. Virtual tours a means to an end: An analysis of virtual tours’ role in tourism recovery post COVID-19. J. Travel Res. 2022, 61, 528–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shen, S.; Xu, K.; Sotiriadis, M.; Wang, Y. Exploring the factors influencing the adoption and usage of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality applications in tourism education within the context of COVID-19 pandemic. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2022, 30, 100373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Law, R.; Leung, D.; Chan, I.C.C. Progression and development of information and communication technology research in hospitality and tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 32, 511–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Davis, F.D.; Bagozzi, R.P.; Warshaw, P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 1989, 35, 982–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sternad Zabukovšek, S.; Tominc, P.; Bobek, S.; Štrukelj, T. Spatial Exploration of Economic Data—Insight into Attitudes of Students towards Interdisciplinary Knowledge. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020, 9, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Man, S.S.; Lee, W.K.H.; Wong, K.P.; Chan, A.H.S. Policy Implications for Promoting the Adoption of Cogeneration Systems in the Hotel Industry: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Mode. Buildings 2022, 12, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, W.K.H.; Man, S.S.; Chan, A.H.S. Cogeneration System Acceptance in the Hotel Industry: A Qualitative Study. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2022, 51, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Man, S.S.; Alabdulkarim, S.; Chan, A.H.S.; Zhang, T. The acceptance of personal protective equipment among Hong Kong construction workers: An integration of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior with risk perception and safety climate. J. Saf. Res. 2021, 79, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Flacke, J.; De Boer, C. An interactive planning support tool for addressing social acceptance of renewable energy projects in the Netherlands. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017, 6, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kim, J.; Kwan, M.-P. An examination of people’s privacy concerns, perceptions of social benefits, and acceptance of COVID-19 mitigation measures that harness location information: A comparative study of the US and South Korea. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sternad Zabukovšek, S.; Tominc, P.; Deželak, Z.; Nalbandyan, G.; Bobek, S. Acceptance of GIS within ERP System: Research Study in Higher Education. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, Y.-C.; Chang, L.L.; Yu, C.-P.; Chen, J. Examining an extended technology acceptance model with experience construct on hotel consumers’ adoption of mobile applications. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2019, 28, 957–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Martins, M.; Costa, C. Are the Portuguese ready for the future of tourism? A Technology Acceptance Model application for the use of robots in tourism. Rev. Tur. Desenvolv. 2021, 36, 39–54. [Google Scholar]
  42. Venkatesh, V.; Morris, M.G.; Davis, G.B.; Davis, F.D. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003, 27, 425–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chen, K.; Chan, A.H.S. Use or non-use of gerontechnology—A qualitative study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 4645–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guner, H.; Acarturk, C. The use and acceptance of ICT by senior citizens: A comparison of technology acceptance model (TAM) for elderly and young adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2020, 19, 311–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, J.; Ma, Q.; Chan, A.H.S.; Man, S.S. Health monitoring through wearable technologies for older adults: Smart wearables acceptance model. Appl. Ergon. 2019, 75, 162–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Corrocher, N. The adoption of Web 2.0 services: An empirical investigation. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2011, 78, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rahman, M.M.; Deb, S.; Strawderman, L.; Burch, R.; Smith, B. How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2019, 65, 242–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, H.-J.; Lyu, J. Exploring factors which motivate older consumers’ self-service technologies (SSTs) adoption. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consum. Res. 2019, 29, 218–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Park, J.; Han, S.H.; Kim, H.K.; Cho, Y.; Park, W. Developing elements of user experience for mobile phones and services: Survey, interview, and observation approaches. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2013, 23, 279–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, W.; Liang, H.-N.; Yu, K.; Wen, S.; Baghaei, N.; Tu, H. Acceptance of Virtual Reality Exergames Among Chinese Older Adults. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2022, 39, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Ma, Q.; Chan, A.H.S.; Chen, K. Personal and other factors affecting acceptance of smartphone technology by older Chinese adults. Appl. Ergon. 2016, 54, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Peng, L.; Man, S.S.; Chan, A.H.; Ng, J.Y. Personal, Social and Regulatory Factors Associated With Telecare Acceptance by Hong Kong Older Adults: An Indication of Governmental Role in Facilitating Telecare Adoption. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2022, 39, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Man, S.S.; Xiong, W.; Chang, F.; Chan, A.H.S. Critical Factors Influencing Acceptance of Automated Vehicles by Hong Kong Drivers. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 109845–109856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, T.; Tao, D.; Qu, X.; Zhang, X.; Lin, R.; Zhang, W. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2019, 98, 207–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wong, T.K.M.; Man, S.S.; Chan, A.H.S. Exploring the acceptance of PPE by construction workers: An extension of the technology acceptance model with safety management practices and safety consciousness. Saf. Sci. 2021, 139, 105239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hoe, S.L. Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. J. Appl. Quant. Methods 2008, 3, 76–83. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Dutot, V.; Bhatiasevi, V.; Bellallahom, N. Applying the technology acceptance model in a three-countries study of smartwatch adoption. J. High Technol. Manag. Res. 2019, 30, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fields, J.; Cemballi, A.G.; Michalec, C.; Uchida, D.; Griffiths, K.; Cardes, H.; Cuellar, J.; Chodos, A.H.; Lyles, C.R. In-home technology training among socially isolated older adults: Findings from the Tech Allies Program. J. Appl. Gerontol. 2021, 40, 489–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Sanchiz, M.; Amadieu, F.; Paubel, P.-V.; Chevalier, A. User-friendly search interface for older adults: Supporting search goal refreshing in working memory to improve information search strategies. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2020, 39, 1094–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ghorayeb, A.; Comber, R.; Gooberman-Hill, R. Older adults’ perspectives of smart home technology: Are we developing the technology that older people want? Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Stud. 2021, 147, 102571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Wu, J.; Song, S. Older adults’ online shopping continuance intentions: Applying the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Int. J. Hum.–Comput. Interact. 2021, 37, 938–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijgi 11 00558 g001 550
Figure 1. TAM by Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw [32].
Figure 1. TAM by Davis, Bagozzi, and Warshaw [32].
Ijgi 11 00558 g001
Ijgi 11 00558 g002 550
Figure 2. OMT acceptance model for older adults.
Figure 2. OMT acceptance model for older adults.
Ijgi 11 00558 g002
Table
Table 1. Measurement items of this study.
Table 1. Measurement items of this study.
ConstructItemContentReference
Perceived usefulness (PU)PU1Using OMT can be helpful in satisfying my traveling needs.Davis, Bagozzi and Warshaw [32]
PU2Using OMT can improve my effectiveness while traveling.
PU3I can find OMT helpful during my traveling.
Perceived ease of use (PEOU)PEOU1Learning to use OMT is easy to me.Davis, Bagozzi and Warshaw [32]
PEOU2It is easy for me to use OMT masterly.
PEOU3I find OMT easy to use.
Attitude toward using a technology (ATUT)ATUT1Using OMT is a good idea.Davis, Bagozzi and Warshaw [32]
ATUT2Using OMT is a wise idea.
ATUT3Using OMT is a pleasant experience.
Facilitating Conditions (FC)FC1It is important to obtain assistance from someone when I use OMT.Venkatesh, Morris, Davis and Davis [42]
FC2I have the required knowledge to use OMT.
FC3Training practice is helpful and critical for the use of OMT.
Compatibility (COM)COM1I consider that using OMT fits my traveling habits.Corrocher [46]
COM2I consider that using OMT is compatible with my lifestyle.
COM3I consider using OMT is perfect for the way I like to travel.
Self-Satisfaction (SS)SS1Using OMT makes you feel younger.Park, Han, Kim, Cho and Park [49]
SS2Using OMT enhances your sense of achievement.
SS3Using OMT helps you to keep pace with the times.
Intention to use (ITU)ITU1I will intend to use OMT during traveling.Davis, Bagozzi and Warshaw [32]
ITU2I hope I will use OMT during traveling.
ITU3I plan to use OMT during traveling.
Table
Table 2. Summary of the demographic characteristics (n = 416).
Table 2. Summary of the demographic characteristics (n = 416).
FrequencyPercentage
Age
60–6415036.0%
65–6916840.4%
>709823.6%
Gender
Male19145.9%
Female22554.1%
Education
Informal or Elementary21150.7%
Junior high school9222.1%
High school8119.5%
Post-high school327.7%
Travel frequency in the last 12 months
0 time286.8%
1 time19847.6%
2 times12530.0%
>3 times6515.6%
Table
Table 3. Model fit indices for the measurement model and structural model.
Table 3. Model fit indices for the measurement model and structural model.
Model Fit IndexRecommended ValueMeasurement ModelStructural Model
χ2/df<52.213.05
CFI>0.90.970.95
SRMR≤0.080.040.07
RMSEA≤0.080.050.08
Table
Table 4. Results for the convergent validity and reliability assessment of the measurements.
Table 4. Results for the convergent validity and reliability assessment of the measurements.
ConstructItemMeanStandard DeviationFactor LoadingAVECRCronbach’s Alpha
Perceived usefulness (PU)PU13.680.970.830.710.880.88
PU23.730.960.85
PU33.900.910.84
Perceived ease of use (PEOU)PEOU13.860.930.870.730.890.89
PEOU23.820.900.90
PEOU33.770.930.79
Attitude toward using a technology (ATUT)ATUT13.760.850.900.700.870.86
ATUT23.680.810.85
ATUT33.720.900.75
Facilitating Conditions (FC)FC13.560.910.890.820.930.93
FC23.560.920.93
FC33.510.920.89
Compatibility (COM)COM13.681.070.880.810.930.93
COM23.731.100.91
COM33.681.110.92
Self-Satisfaction (SS)SS13.730.900.760.670.860.85
SS23.760.920.87
SS33.630.890.82
Intention to use (ITU)ITU13.900.920.880.760.910.91
ITU23.710.930.87
ITU33.561.020.88
Table
Table 5. Results for the discriminant validity assessment.
Table 5. Results for the discriminant validity assessment.
PUPEOUATUTFCCOMSSITU
PU0.84
PEOU0.660.85
ATUT0.720.700.84
FC0.690.650.810.91
COM0.580.480.610.620.90
SS0.540.430.560.610.560.82
ITU0.590.570.640.660.600.480.87
Note: All the diagonal values are square roots of the average variance extracted values for the corresponding constructs, and all off-diagonal numbers are correlations among the constructs.
Table
Table 6. Hypotheses testing results.
Table 6. Hypotheses testing results.
HypothesisStandardized Path Coefficientp-ValueResult
H1: PU has a positive effect on ATUT.0.446<0.001Supported
H2: PEOU has a positive effect on ATUT.0.430<0.001Supported
H3: PEOU has a positive effect on PU.0.450<0.001Supported
H4: PU has a positive effect on ITU.0.336<0.001Supported
H5: ATUT has a positive effect on ITU.0.388<0.001Supported
H6: FC positively affects PEOU.0.617<0.001Supported
H7: COM positively affects PU.0.275<0.001Supported
H8: COM positively affects PEOU.0.1080.064Not supported
H9: SS positively affects PU.0.222<0.001Supported
H10: SS positively affects PEOU.0.0060.924Not supported
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Man, S.S.; Guo, Y.; Chan, A.H.S.; Zhuang, H. Acceptance of Online Mapping Technology among Older Adults: Technology Acceptance Model with Facilitating Condition, Compatibility, and Self-Satisfaction. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110558

AMA Style

Man SS, Guo Y, Chan AHS, Zhuang H. Acceptance of Online Mapping Technology among Older Adults: Technology Acceptance Model with Facilitating Condition, Compatibility, and Self-Satisfaction. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information. 2022; 11(11):558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110558

Chicago/Turabian Style

Man, Siu Shing, Yingqian Guo, Alan Hoi Shou Chan, and Huiping Zhuang. 2022. "Acceptance of Online Mapping Technology among Older Adults: Technology Acceptance Model with Facilitating Condition, Compatibility, and Self-Satisfaction" ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 11, no. 11: 558. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11110558

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop