Next Article in Journal
Characterization of Arabidopsis thaliana Coq9 in the CoQ Biosynthetic Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Rosacea Meibomian Gland Dysfunction Posterior Blepharitis May Be a Marker for Earlier Associated Dyslipidaemia and Inflammation Detection and Treatment with Statins
Previous Article in Special Issue
Long-Term Impacts of Diurnal Temperature Range on Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 13
Issue 7
10.3390/metabo13070812
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

The Association between Maternal Urinary Phthalate Concentrations and Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Mengyue Zhang
1,2,†,
Jianchao Qiao
1,†,
Pinpeng Xie
1,
Zhuoyan Li
1,
Chengyang Hu
3,4,* and
Fei Li
2,*
1
Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
2
Department of Prevention and Health Care, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, China
3
Department of Humanistic Medicine, School of Humanistic Medicine, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
4
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, 81 Meishan Road, Hefei 230032, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Metabolites 2023, 13(7), 812; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13070812
Submission received: 29 May 2023 / Revised: 15 June 2023 / Accepted: 24 June 2023 / Published: 30 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Exposures and Cardiovascular Disease)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Phthalates are commonly found in a wide range of environments and have been linked to several negative health outcomes. While earlier research indicated a potential connection between phthalate exposure and blood pressure (BP) during pregnancy, the results of these studies remain inconclusive. The objective of this meta-analysis was to elucidate the relationship between phthalate exposure and BP in pregnancy. A comprehensive literature search was carried out with PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, and pertinent studies published up until 5 March 2023 were reviewed. Random-effects models were utilized to consolidate the findings of continuous outcomes, such as diastolic and systolic BP, as well as the binary outcomes of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP). The present study included a total of 10 studies. First-trimester MBP exposure exhibited a positive association with mean systolic and diastolic BP during both the second and third trimesters (β = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.83, I2 = 93%; β = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.74, I2 = 71%, respectively). Second-trimester monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) exposure was positively associated with systolic and diastolic BP in the third trimester (β = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.13, I2 = 0; β = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.13, I2 = 0, respectively). Conversely, first-trimester mono-2-ethylhexyl phthalate (MEHP) exposure demonstrated a negative association with mean systolic and diastolic BP during the second and third trimesters (β = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.60, −0.05, I2 = 0; β = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.60, −0.05, I2 = 0, respectively). Additionally, monoethyl phthalate (MEP) exposure was found to be associated with an increased risk of HDP (OR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.23, I2 = 26%). Our study found that several phthalate metabolites were associated with increased systolic and diastolic BP, as well as the risk of HDP across pregnancies. Nevertheless, given the limited number of studies analyzed, additional research is essential to corroborate these findings and elucidate the molecular mechanisms linking phthalates to BP changes during pregnancy.

1. Introduction

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) rank among the top contributors to maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity [1,2]. Hypertension can either be chronic or develop during pregnancy and may be accompanied by other comorbidities, potentially resulting in pre-eclampsia (PE) and preterm birth (PTB) [3]. Factors known to heighten the risk of elevated blood pressure (BP) during pregnancy include being overweight or obese, first-time pregnancies, advanced maternal age, alcohol consumption and smoking, low physical activity, or a genetic predisposition [4,5,6].
Recent evidence suggests that environmental factors, such as exposure to ambient air pollution and environmental chemicals, may also contribute to hypertensive disorders. Among these chemicals, phthalates—a group of non-persistent chemicals commonly used in consumer and personal care products—were linked to widespread exposure in pregnant women [7,8]. Phthalates, ubiquitously utilized in daily life to augment the durability of plastics, are found in an array of products: vinyl flooring, lubricating oils, plastic packaging, building materials, medical devices, and personal care items such as soaps, cosmetics, shampoos, and hair products. Notwithstanding their practical benefits, phthalates are acknowledged to be endocrine-disrupting compounds, and their exposure has been linked to elevated blood pressure and an amplified risk of cardiovascular diseases [9,10]. Exposure to phthalates can occur through multiple pathways: inhalation (including air, dust, and fragrance), ingestion (encompassing dietary ingestion and incidental ingestion), and dermal absorption (incorporating air-to-skin transport, use of personal care products, and contact with contaminated surfaces) [7,11,12]. Given their potential adverse effects on human health, certain phthalates are prohibited in some jurisdictions.
Previous studies examining the association between phthalate metabolites and gestational BP and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) have yielded mixed results. In an Ohio-based birth cohort study, prenatal urinary monobenzyl phthalate (MBzP) was associated with increased diastolic BP and the risk of PIH diseases [13]. However, two European studies did not replicate these findings [14,15]. Warembourg et al. (2019) observed negative correlations between monoethyl phthalate (MEP) and mono-iso-butyl phthalate (MiBP) concentrations and systolic BP [15]. In contrast, Philips et al. (2019) did not identify any consistent associations between early-pregnancy phthalate metabolite levels and BP or gestational hypertensive disorders [14]. Additionally, two Chinese studies with distinct background exposure levels also reported inconsistent results. Gao et al. (2021) found that exposure to specific phthalate metabolites or diesters during the first trimester raised BP in the third trimester [16], whereas Han et al. (2019) observed no significant associations between phthalate exposure and BP during pregnancy for the general population [17]. However, they noted that among pregnant women carrying male fetuses, first-trimester MiBP exposure was linked to increased second-trimester diastolic BP.
While some epidemiological studies have reported associations between gestational urinary phthalate concentrations and elevated BP or increased HDP risk, others have not. To better understand the reasons behind these divergent findings, further investigation is necessary to determine the potential adverse effects of phthalates on pregnancy outcomes. As such, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of human epidemiological studies to evaluate the relationship between gestational urinary phthalate levels, BP during pregnancy, and the risk of HDP.

2. Materials and Methods

The present study adhered to PRISMA guidelines (http://www.prisma-statement.org/ (accessed on 5 March 2023)) (Supplementary Material, Table S1), and was not registered with PROSPERO in advance.

2.1. Search Strategy

We conducted a search for studies published up to 5 March 2023 using three databases: Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. Relevant keywords were determined based on the PECO framework [18]. To generate search terms, we combined keywords that represented exposure and outcome components within the PECO framework. The following search terms were employed: (gestational phthalate exposure OR phthalates OR urinary phthalate metabolites OR maternal urinary phthalate concentrations) AND (blood pressure OR cardiometabolic indices OR hypertensive diseases of pregnancy OR pregnancy-induced hypertension OR maternal hemodynamics OR gestational hypertensive disorders OR gestational hypertension OR preeclampsia). These terms were used to identify English-language original articles reporting the effects of phthalate exposure on BP during pregnancy or risk of HDP. A comprehensive list of search terms utilized across various databases can be found in Supplementary Materials, Table S2.
No restrictions were placed on study designs during the search process. Relevant studies were also identified by screening reviews and reference lists of search results. After removing duplicates, titles and abstracts underwent an initial screening, followed by a full-text review. Two authors (MYZ and JCQ) independently assessed all articles, with their findings reaching a consensus. In cases of disagreement, a third reviewer (CYH) examined the article and made the final decision.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criterion

In alignment with the PECO elements, we applied the following inclusion criteria: (1) the population (P) consisted of pregnant women; (2) exposure (E) was determined by phthalate exposure measured from biological samples; (3) the comparator (C) involved a group with lower exposure levels; (4) the outcomes (O) included BP during pregnancy and risk of HDP, which were verified by physicians, medical records, or according to the International Classification of Diseases codes; and (5) the study was accessible as a full text and in English. The exclusion criteria included: (1) studies focusing on the general population; (2) studies concentrating on occupational exposure; and (3) studies without a reference group.

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Two authors (MYZ and JCQ) independently carried out the data extraction and quality assessment. From each eligible study, we collected the source (author name and publication year), location, study period, study design, phthalates examined, exposure assessment, exposure period, outcomes, covariates adjusted for, and main findings. Additionally, we contacted several corresponding study authors to request supplementary results not included in their published articles but relevant to our research. Additionally, if necessary, we contacted several corresponding study authors to request supplementary results not included in their published articles but relevant to our research.
In our systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the quality of the incorporated studies by employing the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) specifically designed for observational research [19]. The NOS contains eight elements, organized into three distinct categories: (I) selection of study groups; (II) group comparability; and (III) interest-specific exposure or outcomes. Individual categories receive a score, with the highest possible being four, two, and three stars, adding up to a maximum of nine stars. Utilizing this scale, we categorized studies as high-quality (≥7 stars), moderate (4–6 stars), or low-quality (≤3 stars) [20]. Any differences in determining the quality of the studies were settled through achieving a consensus.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

We carried out a meta-analysis employing a random-effects model to accommodate variations both within and across studies. By utilizing the reported odds ratios (ORs) and their associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs), we calculated the combined ORs for the binary outcome of HDP. Additionally, coefficients from linear regressions were combined in a meta-analysis to estimate the effects of phthalate exposure on continuous outcomes, including diastolic and systolic BP. We performed separate meta-analyses for each trimester-specific exposure (phthalate metabolite exposure during the first, second, and second trimesters, or the full pregnancy mean) and outcomes (diastolic BP and systolic BP) when at least three studies were available. Given the limited number of studies addressing various HDP types, we included all research on HDP (e.g., GH and PE as distinct outcomes or a mix of these conditions), regardless of the employed definition, in order to provide an adequate basis for random-effects meta-analyses.
For the purpose of facilitating effect estimate comparisons across studies, we transformed the documented ORs and 95% CIs to align with a standardized exposure increment (per natural log-unit increase). We assessed statistical heterogeneity among the selected studies using the Q-test and the I2 statistic (range: 0–100%). I2 values were classified as low, medium, or high based on values of 25, 50, or 75%, respectively [21]. We employed funnel plot asymmetry and Egger’s test to evaluate publication bias. If fewer than five studies were included, publication bias was not assessed. We adopted a p-value of <0.05 for Egger’s test. If the p-value was less than 0.05, publication bias was present, and vice versa [22]. For analyses with >3 studies, sensitivity analyses were conducted by systematically excluding one study at a time and recalculating summary effect sizes. All analyses were performed using Stata software version 16.1 (StataCorp, Texas, USA). All p-values were two-sided with a significance level set at 0.05.

3. Results

The PRISMA flowchart, illustrating our literature search process, can be found in Figure 1. Our study encompassed a total of 379 studies, incorporating the outcomes of keyword searches. Following an in-depth examination of the full texts, 43 articles were deemed potentially suitable for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Finally, the present study included a total of 10 studies for the meta-analysis. Of the 10 included studies, 6 were performed in North America [9,13,14,23,24,25], 2 were from Europe [15,26], and the remaining 2 were from Asia [16,17]. The studies incorporated in our analysis were published between 2015 and 2021, with participant numbers ranging from 152 to 3273. Among these, nine were cohort studies, while one was a cross-sectional study. Each study assessed phthalate exposure using maternal urinary samples as the measurement method.

3.1. Study Characteristics

The majority (N = 7) of the included studies documented preeclampsia [9,13,14,16,23,24,26]. Additionally, four studies [13,23,24,26] reported on PIH, five studies [13,14,23,24,26] reported on GH, three studies [15,17,25] reported on blood pressure during pregnancy, five studies [13,16,23,24,26] reported on eclampsia, while only one study presented results for HELLP syndrome [13]. Three studies gathered multiple (three) urine samples during the gestational period [9,16,17]. Two studies gathered two urine samples during the second and second trimesters [15,25] and the first and second trimesters [23], respectively. Four studies gathered single urine sample during the first trimester [14] and second trimester [13,24,26], respectively. Table 1 provides the primary information for the eligible studies.
The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS), ranging from 0 to 9 stars, was utilized to evaluate the quality of the studies, with a higher number of stars indicating superior quality. As shown in Table 2, all studies were assessed as high-quality (>7) using the NOS tool.

3.2. Main Meta-Analysis Findings

The meta-analysis synthesized outcomes regarding the associations between multiple different phthalates, BP during pregnancy, and HDP risk, which are presented in Table 3 below.

3.2.1. Phthalates Exposure during Pregnancy and BP

The aggregated findings on the impact of trimester-specific phthalates exposure throughout pregnancy on BP displayed varying outcomes. Some demonstrated a negative association with both diastolic and systolic BP. The first trimester MBP exposure was positively associated with the mean systolic BP and diastolic BP of the second and the second trimester (β = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.83, I2 = 93%; β = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.05, 0.74, I2 = 71%), respectively. The second trimester MBzP exposure was positively associated with the systolic BP and diastolic BP of the second trimester (β = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.13, I2 = 0; β = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.27, 1.13, I2 = 0), respectively. In contrast, the first trimester MEHP exposure was negatively associated with the mean systolic BP and diastolic BP of the second and the second trimester (β = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.60, −0.05, I2 = 0; β = −0.32, 95% CI: −0.60, −0.05, I2 = 0), respectively.

3.2.2. Phthalates Exposure during Pregnancy and Risk of HDP

The collective findings indicate that trimester-specific phthalate exposure during pregnancy was not associated with HDP, with the exception of monoethyl phthalate (MEP) exposure. The combined effect estimates ranged from 1.01 to 1.18, with a low 95% confidence interval (CI) spanning from 0.86 to 1.02 and a high 95% CI extending from 1.09 to 1.41. However, almost all these combined effect estimates were not statistically significant. The only exception was MEP exposure, which was found to be associated with an increased risk of HDP (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.23, I2 = 26%).

3.3. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

The sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that the combined effect estimates remained generally stable when individual studies were excluded. Due to the limited number of studies included for each exposure and outcome combination, funnel plots were not conducted. Nonetheless, for all exposures, the p-values from Egger’s tests were not statistically significant (p > 0.05), suggesting no evidence of publication bias. However, given the relatively small number of studies in our meta-analysis, these test results should be interpreted cautiously, as they may lack the power to detect publication bias in meta-analyses with a limited number of studies [27].

4. Discussion

In this meta-analysis, we synthesized data from 10 human epidemiological studies to investigate the connection between phthalate exposure, BP, and HDP risk. Our findings suggest that, aside from MBP, MBzP, and MEHP, the majority of phthalate metabolites show no association with BP. Notably, only MEP exposure was associated with a heightened risk of HDP.
The impact of phthalate exposure on BP during pregnancy and HDP risk has attracted considerable interest in recent years. Soomro et al. found that prenatal exposure to phthalates, particularly MBP and MEP, could play a vital role in PIH [26]. Werner et al. proposed that early mid-pregnancy exposure to MBzP correlated with increased diastolic BP and HDP [13]. Warembourg et al. (2019) reported an association between phthalate metabolite exposure and decreased systolic and diastolic BP during pregnancy, particularly in the second trimester [15]. This observation is consistent with results showing an association between MEHP exposure and reduced systolic and diastolic BP. Although evidence on gestational BP changes related to phthalate exposure is somewhat conflicting, there is consistent support from prior studies involving children and nonpregnant adults that DEHP [28,29], MBP (a metabolite of DBP) [23,28], and MBzP [30,31] correlate with BP changes.
Numerous factors could account for the discrepancies observed in the results of prior studies. Inconsistencies between studies investigating the same phthalate might arise from inadequate statistical power, variation in outcome assessment, divergent analysis methods, or differing study populations. While the majority of studies assessed phthalate levels during one trimester, the timing of exposure evaluation was not consistent across studies. It is well-established that phthalate plasma/serum concentrations decrease as pregnancy progresses due to the expansion of plasma volume and the distribution of phthalates into the fetal compartment [13].
In terms of outcomes, three studies exclusively examined BP during pregnancy, one study focused on PE, and others investigated GH or other HDPs. Only a single study explored the association with repeated BP measurements throughout pregnancy [17]. Recently, women participating in the Programming Research in Obesity, Growth, Environment, and Social Stressors (PROGRESS) study were followed for up to 72 months postpartum to assess the associations between gestational phthalate exposure and postpartum outcomes. Wu et al. (2021) found that combined phthalate mixture levels were positively associated with elevated postpartum BP up to 72 months postpartum. This finding highlights the significance of examining women’s health beyond pregnancy when evaluating the potential effects of phthalate exposure [25].
The precise mechanisms underlying phthalate-induced elevated BP remain uncertain; however, current research provides some understanding. Phthalate metabolites function as agonists for PPARγ (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma), known to inhibit the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, an essential BP regulator [32,33]. Phthalate exposure has been associated with heightened oxidative stress in pregnant women [34], potentially affecting the release of circulating angiogenic factors. These factors not only serve as predictors for PE [35,36] but are also linked to PIH [37]. Furthermore, phthalates may impact BP by modifying thyroid hormone levels during pregnancy. A previous study found a connection between urinary phthalates and decreased serum thyroxine in pregnant women [38], which has been demonstrated to raise the risk of PE [39]. Additionally, phthalate-triggered inflammatory responses might play a significant role in GH. An earlier study among pregnant women uncovered a relationship between specific urinary phthalate metabolites and increased levels of inflammatory cytokines [40]. This heightened production of inflammatory cytokines could have a crucial role in GH or PE [41].

4.1. Strengths and Limitations

Meta-analyses can offer more accurate conclusions than individual studies by increasing statistical power, which is particularly crucial for rare outcomes. In our meta-analysis, we identified several significant relationships between phthalates and BP during pregnancy and risk of HDP, even though many individual studies failed to do so. The robustness of our findings was evident as the exclusion of individual studies typically had minimal impact on the results. Additionally, our meta-analysis showed no significant signs of small-study bias.
However, our study has several limitations that should be considered when interpreting the results. First, while we included all available studies in three databases examining the effect of phthalates on BP during pregnancy and the risk of HDP up to 2023, insufficient data on this research topic prevented us from conducting subgroup analyses based on study design, location, and offspring gender. Second, the studies were conducted in various geographic regions and populations, leading to differences in phthalate exposure. This factor may further affect the measured concentrations of these phthalates at different times. Furthermore, the range of exposure varied among the included studies, which could influence the meta-analysis results. Third, we exclusively included studies that assessed phthalate levels in urine samples to maintain consistency and comparability in our analysis. Although phthalate metabolites in urine are considered suitable biomarkers for short-term exposure to parent compounds due to their rapid excretion and short half-life in humans [42], urinary measurements may not accurately reflect long-term exposure. Lastly, some studies combined GH and PE, preventing us from including these studies in separate meta-analyses for HDP as a distinct outcome.

4.2. Recommendations for Future Study

While some epidemiological evidence and potential mechanisms suggest that phthalates may be risk factors for elevated BP during pregnancy and HDP, additional research is necessary to verify this relationship and guide medical recommendations and environmental policies. Such research faces challenges, including logistical issues related to sample collection, timing, and the selection of specific phthalate metabolites for investigation. Acquiring well-timed samples from pregnant women and confirming their HDP diagnosis is both difficult and costly. Prior studies have indicated variations or interactions influenced by factors such as parity and fetal sex [13,43]. To develop a comprehensive understanding of HDP risk, these factors, among others, should be considered. Future research should, at a minimum, assess the modifying effects of fetal sex, parity, and race/ethnicity, and include the timing of phthalate measurements during pregnancy as a covariate in analyses. Accounting for essential confounders, such as maternal age, smoking status, and pre-pregnancy BMI, is crucial, as is exploring the modifying influence of diet and physical activity [44,45]. Investigating the relationship between phthalates and HDP in diverse racial and ethnic populations is essential to evaluate risk and develop targeted prevention strategies.
To fully understand the effects of phthalates on health outcomes, future research must take into account their cumulative burden. Methods for exposure assessment and strategies for categorizing phthalates during risk assessment are being developed [46,47]. As epidemiological studies increasingly measure multiple phthalate metabolites, developing methods for modeling exposure mixtures will become increasingly important. Available statistical methods include, but are not limited to, BKMR [48], environmental risk score [49], supervised principal component analysis followed by classification and regression tree [50], toxicant score [51], joint WQS regression [52,53], and machine learning methods such as lasso or adaptive elastic net [50]. When selecting the appropriate method, the correlation structure between phthalates is crucial. For instance, joint WQS displays strong sensitivity and specificity for identifying predictors within a correlated mixture, while other methods might be more suitable for non-correlated or weakly correlated exposures [54,55].

5. Conclusions

Our meta-analysis determined that there was a strong association between several phthalate metabolites (MBP, MBzP, and MEHP) and BP during pregnancy, while MEP was found to be associated with an increased risk of HDP. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to the relatively small number of included studies. Given the considerable maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality associated with HDP, this study has significant public health implications. Nonetheless, additional research is required to clarify the underlying mechanisms.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/metabo13070812/s1, Table S1. Literature search strategy (dated to 5 March 2023); Table S2. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 Checklist.

Author Contributions

M.Z.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft. J.Q.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. P.X.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. Z.L.: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—original draft. C.H.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. F.L.: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing—review & editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program for College Students (grant number 202210366019) and the Key Projects of Natural Science Research of Anhui Provincial Department of Education (grant number 2020KJA0163).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Roberts, C.L.; Ford, J.B.; Algert, C.S.; Antonsen, S.; Chalmers, J.; Cnattingius, S.; Gokhale, M.; Kotelchuck, M.; Melve, K.K.; Langridge, A.; et al. Population-based trends in pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia: An international comparative study. BMJ Open 2011, 1, e000101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Say, L.; Chou, D.; Gemmill, A.; Tuncalp, O.; Moller, A.B.; Daniels, J.; Gulmezoglu, A.M.; Temmerman, M.; Alkema, L. Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2014, 2, e323–e333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Bramham, K.; Parnell, B.; Nelson-Piercy, C.; Seed, P.T.; Poston, L.; Chappell, L.C. Chronic hypertension and pregnancy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2014, 348, g2301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Umesawa, M.; Kobashi, G. Epidemiology of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: Prevalence, risk factors, predictors and prognosis. Hypertens. Res. 2017, 40, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wei, J.; Liu, C.X.; Gong, T.T.; Wu, Q.J.; Wu, L. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 43667–43678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ye, C.; Ruan, Y.; Zou, L.; Li, G.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Jia, C.; Megson, I.L.; Wei, J.; Zhang, W. The 2011 survey on hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) in China: Prevalence, risk factors, complications, pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Giovanoulis, G.; Bui, T.; Xu, F.; Papadopoulou, E.; Padilla-Sanchez, J.A.; Covaci, A.; Haug, L.S.; Cousins, A.P.; Magner, J.; Cousins, I.T.; et al. Multi-pathway human exposure assessment of phthalate esters and DINCH. Environ. Int. 2018, 112, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zota, A.R.; Calafat, A.M.; Woodruff, T.J. Temporal trends in phthalate exposures: Findings from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001–2010. Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Cantonwine, D.E.; Meeker, J.D.; Ferguson, K.K.; Mukherjee, B.; Hauser, R.; McElrath, T.F. Urinary Concentrations of Bisphenol A and Phthalate Metabolites Measured during Pregnancy and Risk of Preeclampsia. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 1651–1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Trasande, L.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Spanier, A.J.; Trachtman, H.; Attina, T.M.; Urbina, E.M. Urinary phthalates are associated with higher blood pressure in childhood. J. Pediatr. 2013, 163, 747–753.e741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Varshavsky, J.R.; Morello-Frosch, R.; Woodruff, T.J.; Zota, A.R. Dietary sources of cumulative phthalates exposure among the U.S. general population in NHANES 2005–2014. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 417–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Huang, P.C.; Liao, K.W.; Chang, J.W.; Chan, S.H.; Lee, C.C. Characterization of phthalates exposure and risk for cosmetics and perfume sales clerks. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 233, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Werner, E.F.; Braun, J.M.; Yolton, K.; Khoury, J.C.; Lanphear, B.P. The association between maternal urinary phthalate concentrations and blood pressure in pregnancy: The HOME Study. Environ. Health 2015, 14, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Philips, E.M.; Trasande, L.; Kahn, L.G.; Gaillard, R.; Steegers, E.A.P.; Jaddoe, V.W.V. Early pregnancy bisphenol and phthalate metabolite levels, maternal hemodynamics and gestational hypertensive disorders. Hum. Reprod. 2019, 34, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Warembourg, C.; Basagana, X.; Seminati, C.; de Bont, J.; Granum, B.; Lyon-Caen, S.; Manzano-Salgado, C.B.; Pin, I.; Sakhi, A.K.; Siroux, V.; et al. Exposure to phthalate metabolites, phenols and organophosphate pesticide metabolites and blood pressure during pregnancy. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2019, 222, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, H.; Zhu, B.B.; Huang, K.; Zhu, Y.D.; Yan, S.Q.; Wu, X.Y.; Han, Y.; Sheng, J.; Cao, H.; Zhu, P.; et al. Effects of single and combined gestational phthalate exposure on blood pressure, blood glucose and gestational weight gain: A longitudinal analysis. Environ. Int. 2021, 155, 106677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Han, X.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, S.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhao, H.; Fang, J.; Cai, Z.; et al. Association between phthalate exposure and blood pressure during pregnancy. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 189, 109944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Morgan, R.L.; Whaley, P.; Thayer, K.A.; Schunemann, H.J. Identifying the PECO: A framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ. Int. 2018, 121, 1027–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wells, S.M.; Buford, M.C.; Migliaccio, C.T.; Holian, A. Elevated asymmetric dimethylarginine alters lung function and induces collagen deposition in mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2009, 40, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Xing, Y.; Ma, Q.; Ma, X.; Wang, C.; Zhang, D.; Sun, Y. CHADS2 score has a better predictive value than CHA2DS2-VASc score in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Clin. Interv. Aging 2016, 11, 941–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Harbord, R.M.; Egger, M.; Sterne, J.A. A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat. Med. 2006, 25, 3443–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bedell, S.M.; Lyden, G.R.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Barrett, E.S.; Ferguson, K.K.; Santilli, A.; Bush, N.R.; Swan, S.H.; McElrath, T.F.; Nguyen, R.H.N. First- and Third-Trimester Urinary Phthalate Metabolites in the Development of Hypertensive Diseases of Pregnancy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vuong, A.M.; Braun, J.M.; Sjodin, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Yolton, K.; Lanphear, B.P.; Chen, A. Exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and cardiometabolic indices during pregnancy: The HOME Study. Environ. Int. 2021, 156, 106747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, H.; Kupsco, A.; Just, A.; Calafat, A.M.; Oken, E.; Braun, J.M.; Sanders, A.P.; Mercado-Garcia, A.; Cantoral, A.; Pantic, I.; et al. Maternal Phthalates Exposure and Blood Pressure during and after Pregnancy in the PROGRESS Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 127007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Soomro, M.H.; Maesano, C.N.; Heude, B.; Bornehag, C.G.; Annesi-Maesano, I. The association between maternal urinary phthalate metabolites concentrations and pregnancy induced hypertension: Results from the EDEN Mother-Child Cohort. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2021, 50, 102216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Terrin, N.; Schmid, C.H.; Lau, J.; Olkin, I. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat. Med. 2003, 22, 2113–2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Amin, M.M.; Ebrahimpour, K.; Parastar, S.; Shoshtari-Yeganeh, B.; Hashemi, M.; Mansourian, M.; Poursafa, P.; Fallah, Z.; Rafiei, N.; Kelishadi, R. Association of urinary concentrations of phthalate metabolites with cardiometabolic risk factors and obesity in children and adolescents. Chemosphere 2018, 211, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sol, C.M.; Santos, S.; Asimakopoulos, A.G.; Martinez-Moral, M.P.; Duijts, L.; Kannan, K.; Trasande, L.; Jaddoe, V.W.V. Associations of maternal phthalate and bisphenol urine concentrations during pregnancy with childhood blood pressure in a population-based prospective cohort study. Environ. Int. 2020, 138, 105677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vafeiadi, M.; Myridakis, A.; Roumeliotaki, T.; Margetaki, K.; Chalkiadaki, G.; Dermitzaki, E.; Venihaki, M.; Sarri, K.; Vassilaki, M.; Leventakou, V.; et al. Association of Early Life Exposure to Phthalates With Obesity and Cardiometabolic Traits in Childhood: Sex Specific Associations. Front. Public Health 2018, 6, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Warembourg, C.; Maitre, L.; Tamayo-Uria, I.; Fossati, S.; Roumeliotaki, T.; Aasvang, G.M.; Andrusaityte, S.; Casas, M.; Cequier, E.; Chatzi, L.; et al. Early-Life Environmental Exposures and Blood Pressure in Children. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2019, 74, 1317–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Corrales, P.; Izquierdo-Lahuerta, A.; Medina-Gomez, G. Maintenance of Kidney Metabolic Homeostasis by PPAR Gamma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Sugawara, A.; Uruno, A.; Matsuda, K.; Saito-Ito, T.; Funato, T.; Saito-Hakoda, A.; Kudo, M.; Ito, S. Effects of PPARgamma agonists against vascular and renal dysfunction. Curr. Mol. Pharmacol. 2012, 5, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ferguson, K.K.; McElrath, T.F.; Cantonwine, D.E.; Mukherjee, B.; Meeker, J.D. Phthalate metabolites and bisphenol-A in association with circulating angiogenic biomarkers across pregnancy. Placenta 2015, 36, 699–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Burton, G.J.; Yung, H.W.; Cindrova-Davies, T.; Charnock-Jones, D.S. Placental endoplasmic reticulum stress and oxidative stress in the pathophysiology of unexplained intrauterine growth restriction and early onset preeclampsia. Placenta 2009, 30 (Suppl. SA), S43–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Levine, R.J.; Maynard, S.E.; Qian, C.; Lim, K.H.; England, L.J.; Yu, K.F.; Schisterman, E.F.; Thadhani, R.; Sachs, B.P.; Epstein, F.H.; et al. Circulating angiogenic factors and the risk of preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Draganovic, D.; Lucic, N.; Jojic, D. Oxidative Stress Marker and Pregnancy Induced Hypertension. Med. Arch. 2016, 70, 437–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Yao, H.Y.; Han, Y.; Gao, H.; Huang, K.; Ge, X.; Xu, Y.Y.; Xu, Y.Q.; Jin, Z.X.; Sheng, J.; Yan, S.Q.; et al. Maternal phthalate exposure during the first trimester and serum thyroid hormones in pregnant women and their newborns. Chemosphere 2016, 157, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Y.; Dai, X.; Yang, S.; Zhang, C.; Han, M.; Huang, H.F.; Fan, J. Maternal low thyroxin levels are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes in a Chinese population. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. van’ t Erve, T.J.; Rosen, E.M.; Barrett, E.S.; Nguyen, R.H.N.; Sathyanarayana, S.; Milne, G.L.; Calafat, A.M.; Swan, S.H.; Ferguson, K.K. Phthalates and Phthalate Alternatives Have Diverse Associations with Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Pregnant Women. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 53, 3258–3267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harmon, A.C.; Cornelius, D.C.; Amaral, L.M.; Faulkner, J.L.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Wallace, K.; LaMarca, B. The role of inflammation in the pathology of preeclampsia. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Benjamin, S.; Masai, E.; Kamimura, N.; Takahashi, K.; Anderson, R.C.; Faisal, P.A. Phthalates impact human health: Epidemiological evidences and plausible mechanism of action. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 340, 360–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Barrett, E.S.; Corsetti, M.; Day, D.; Thurston, S.W.; Loftus, C.T.; Karr, C.J.; Kannan, K.; LeWinn, K.Z.; Smith, A.K.; Smith, R.; et al. Prenatal phthalate exposure in relation to placental corticotropin releasing hormone (pCRH) in the CANDLE cohort. Environ. Int. 2022, 160, 107078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Schoenaker, D.A.; Soedamah-Muthu, S.S.; Mishra, G.D. The association between dietary factors and gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Med. 2014, 12, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Zhu, Z.; Xie, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, R.; Yu, J.; Yan, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z.; Yan, W. Effects of physical exercise on blood pressure during pregnancy. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cousins, I.T.; DeWitt, J.C.; Gluge, J.; Goldenman, G.; Herzke, D.; Lohmann, R.; Ng, C.A.; Scheringer, M.; Wang, Z. The high persistence of PFAS is sufficient for their management as a chemical class. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts 2020, 22, 2307–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kwiatkowski, C.F.; Andrews, D.Q.; Birnbaum, L.S.; Bruton, T.A.; DeWitt, J.C.; Knappe, D.R.U.; Maffini, M.V.; Miller, M.F.; Pelch, K.E.; Reade, A.; et al. Scientific Basis for Managing PFAS as a Chemical Class. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2020, 7, 532–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bobb, J.F.; Valeri, L.; Claus Henn, B.; Christiani, D.C.; Wright, R.O.; Mazumdar, M.; Godleski, J.J.; Coull, B.A. Bayesian kernel machine regression for estimating the health effects of multi-pollutant mixtures. Biostatistics 2015, 16, 493–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Park, S.K.; Tao, Y.; Meeker, J.D.; Harlow, S.D.; Mukherjee, B. Environmental risk score as a new tool to examine multi-pollutants in epidemiologic research: An example from the NHANES study using serum lipid levels. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e98632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Sun, Z.; Tao, Y.; Li, S.; Ferguson, K.K.; Meeker, J.D.; Park, S.K.; Batterman, S.A.; Mukherjee, B. Statistical strategies for constructing health risk models with multiple pollutants and their interactions: Possible choices and comparisons. Environ. Health 2013, 12, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Billionnet, C.; Gay, E.; Kirchner, S.; Leynaert, B.; Annesi-Maesano, I. Quantitative assessments of indoor air pollution and respiratory health in a population-based sample of French dwellings. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Czarnota, J.; Gennings, C.; Wheeler, D.C. Assessment of weighted quantile sum regression for modeling chemical mixtures and cancer risk. Cancer Inform. 2015, 14, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Levin-Schwartz, Y.; Gennings, C.; Schnaas, L.; Del Carmen Hernandez Chavez, M.; Bellinger, D.C.; Tellez-Rojo, M.M.; Baccarelli, A.A.; Wright, R.O. Time-varying associations between prenatal metal mixtures and rapid visual processing in children. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Bartell, S.M.; Calafat, A.M.; Lyu, C.; Kato, K.; Ryan, P.B.; Steenland, K. Rate of decline in serum PFOA concentrations after granular activated carbon filtration at two public water systems in Ohio and West Virginia. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 222–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Olsen, G.W.; Burris, J.M.; Ehresman, D.J.; Froehlich, J.W.; Seacat, A.M.; Butenhoff, J.L.; Zobel, L.R. Half-life of serum elimination of perfluorooctanesulfonate, perfluorohexanesulfonate, and perfluorooctanoate in retired fluorochemical production workers. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 1298–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Metabolites 13 00812 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow diagram of systematic literature search through 31 March 2023.
Figure 1. Flow diagram of systematic literature search through 31 March 2023.
Metabolites 13 00812 g001
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies on the associations of phthalate exposure with blood pressure and risk of hypertension during pregnancy.
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies on the associations of phthalate exposure with blood pressure and risk of hypertension during pregnancy.
SourceLocationStudy
Period		Study
Design		Sample SizePhthalates
Examined		Exposure AssessmentExposure
Period		Outcome(s)Covariates Adjusted forMain Findings
[9]U.S.2011Cohort 50MEHP; MEHHP; MEOHP; MECPP; MBzP; MBP; MiBP; MEP; MCPP;
ΣDEHP		Maternal urine sample1st, 2nd and 3rd trimestersPEAge, race/ethnicity, prepregnancy BMI, health insurance category, education, smoking status during pregnancy, parity, gestational diabetes, prior history of PESeveral phthalate metabolites were significantly associated with increased risk of PE
[13]U.S.2003–2006Cohort 369MBzP; MMP; MEP; MiBP; MnBP; MEHP; MEOHP; MEHHP; MECPP; MBP; MCPP;
ΣDEHP		Maternal urine sample2nd trimesterPIH (GH; PE; eclampsia; HELLP syndrome)Race, age, house hold income, education, marital status, serum cotinine concentrations, parity, BMI at 16 weeks gestation, self-reported use of medications for high BPMaternal urinary MBzP concentrations may be associated with increased diastolic BP and risk of pregnancy-induced hypertensive diseases
[14]U.S.2004–2005Cohort 1396Phthalic acid/LMW/HMW/DEHP/DNOP metaboliteMaternal urine sample1st trimesterGestational
hypertensive disorders (GH; PE)		Maternal age, maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, ethnicity, education, maternal smoking, maternal alcohol, folic acid supplementation, gestational age at time of measurement and creatininePhthalate metabolite concentrations were not associated with gestational hypertensive disorders
[15]Spain2014–2015Cross-sectional152MEP; MiBP; MnBP; MBzP; MEHP; MEHHP; MEOHP; MECPP;
ΣDEHP; OH-MiNP; OXO-MiNP		Maternal urine sample2nd and 3rd trimestersBP during pregnancyStudy center, age, ethnicity, marital status, pre-pregnancy BMI, BMI at examination, maternal height, education, working status, parity, physical activity, fruits and vegetables consumption, ultra-processed food consumption, gestational age, smoking status at examination
[16]China-Cohort 3273DMP; DEP; DBP; MEHP; MEOHP; MBP; MMP; MEP; MBzP; MEHHP; BBzP; ∑DEHP Maternal urine sample 1st, 2nd and 3rd trimestersHDOP (GH; PE; severe PE; eclampsia)Age, pre-pregnancy BMI, education, residence, race, occupation type, monthly household income, drinking during pregnancy, smoking during pregnancy, primiparousExposure to a single phthalate metabolite or a specific diester during the first trimester of pregnancy elevated BP in the third trimester. However, inverse relationships were revealed for some phthalate metabolites, which were inconsistent with the results of their diesters
[17]China2013–2015Cohort 636MiBP; ΣDEHP; MMP; MEP; MnBP; MBzP; MEHP; MEOHP; MEHHP; MECPP; ΣLMWMaternal urine sample1st, 2nd and 3rd trimestersBP during pregnancyPre-pregnancy BMI, household income, GDM, fetus gender, age, parityExposure to phthalates was positively related to BP in pregnant women
[23]U.S.2010–2012 Cohort 668MEP; MCPP; MiBP MBP; ∑DEHP; MBzP; MEHP; ∑DEHTPMaternal urine sample 1st and 3rd
trimesters		PIH, GH; PE; eclampsiaStudy center, race, age at delivery, household income, highest level of education, marital status, cigarette smoking in the first trimester, pre-pregnancy BMI, and paritySeveral phthalate metabolite concentrations were significantly associated with PIH and greater increases in systolic BP across pregnancy
[24]U.S.2003–2006Cohort 388MEP; MBP; MiBP; MBzP; MCPP; ∑DEHPMaternal urine sample 2nd trimesterPIH, GH; PE; eclampsia Age, race/ethnicity, annual household income, smoking status, marijuana use, pre-pregnancy BMI, parity, gestational weekNo relationship was noted between any EDC compound and PIH disorders
[25]Mexico2007–2011Cohort 892∑DEHP; MECPP; MBzP; ∑DBP; MCPP; MEP; MCNP; ∑DiNP; ∑DiBPMaternal urine sample 2nd and 3rd trimestersBP during pregnancyAge, SES, education, parity, second trimester BMI, second trimester height, second trimester BP, seasonality, and gestation ageExposure to phthalates and phthalate biomarkers was associated with higher BP during late pregnancy
[26]France2003–2006Cohort 604MEP; MBP; MiBP; MECPP; MEHHP; MEOHP; MEHP; MBzP; MCOP; MCPP; MCNP;
ΣDEHP		Maternal urine sample 2nd trimesterPIH, GH; PE; eclampsia Smoking, age, BMI, education level, gestational age, number of siblingsPrenatal exposure to some phthalates, including MEP and MBP, might play a role in pregnancy induced hypertension
Abbreviations: U.S., United States of America; MEP, Monoethyl phthalate; MBP, Mono-n butyl phthalate; MiBP, Mono-isobutyl phthalate; MECPP, Mono (2-ethyl-5-carboxypentyl) phthalate; MEHHP, Mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEOHP, Mono (2-ethyl-5-oxohexyl) phthalate; MEHP, Mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; MBzP, Monobenzyl phthalate; MCOP, Monocarboxy-isooctyl phthalate; MCPP, Mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MCNP, Monocarboxy-isononyl phthalate; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (∑DEHP = MECPP, MEHP, MEHHP, and MEOHP); DEHTP, di-(2-ethylhexyl) terephthalate; DMP, dimethyl phthalate; DEP, diethyl phthalate; DBP, dibutyl phthalate; BBzP, butyl benzyl phthalate; MMP, monomethyl phthalate; DiNP, diisononyl phthalate (ΣDiNP = MONP + MCOP); DiBP, diisobutyl phthalate (ΣDiBP = MHiBP + MiBP); DBP, dibutyl phthalate; ΣLMW: the molar sum of MEP; MnBP, mono-n-butyl phthalate; DNOP, di-n-octylphthalate; HMW, high molecular weight; HMW, high molecular weight; OH-MiNP, Mono-4-methyl-7-hydroxyoctyl phthalate; OXO-MiNP, Mono-4-methyl-7-oxooctyl phthalate; PIH, pregnancy induced hypertension syndrome; GH, gestational hypertension; PE, pre-eclampsia; BMI, body mass index; EDC, endocrine disrupting chemical; BP, blood pressure.
Table
Table 2. Quality assessment of included studies by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.
Table 2. Quality assessment of included studies by the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.
Study DesignReference SelectionComparabilityOutcome/ExposureQuality Score
Item 1Item 2Item 3Item 4Item 5Item 6Item 7Item 8
Case-control [9]★★ ★★★★★★8/9
Cohort [13]★★★★★★★ 7/9
[14]★★★★★★★★ 8/9
[15]★★★★★★★★★9/9
[16]★★★★★★★★8/9
[17]★★★★★★★ 7/9
[23]★★★★★★★★ 8/9
[24]★★★★★★★★ 8/9
[25]★★★★★★★★ 8/9
[26]★★★★★★★★ 8/9
Notes: The NOS has eight items grouped in three domains: (I) selection of study groups; (II) comparability of the groups; and (III) exposure or outcomes of interest. Each domain is scored with a maximum of four, two, and three stars, respectively; thus, the total score for the scale sums up to nine stars. Based on this scale, the studies were classified as high quality (≥7 stars), moderate (4–6 stars), and low quality (≤3 stars).
Table
Table 3. Meta-analytical summary estimates of associations between phthalate exposure (each 1 ln unit increase) and blood pressure and risk of hypertension during pregnancy. (NOTE: the results were grouped by time of exposure and outcome measurement and outcome of interest).
Table 3. Meta-analytical summary estimates of associations between phthalate exposure (each 1 ln unit increase) and blood pressure and risk of hypertension during pregnancy. (NOTE: the results were grouped by time of exposure and outcome measurement and outcome of interest).
Time of Outcome MeasurementTime of Exposure MeasurementSystolic Blood PressureDiastolic Blood PressureHypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy
NPooled Estimates
(β)		I2 (%)Tau2NPooled Estimates
(β)		I2 (%)Tau2NPooled Estimates(OR)I2 (%)Tau2
MBP
T1T1<3NA<3NA41.07 (0.95, 1.20)00.0005
T2 + T331.05 (0.27, 1.83) *930.378030.40 (0.05, 0.74) *710.0514<3NA
T2T2<3NA<3NA<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA51.04 (0.92, 1.17)00.0018
MBzP
T1T1<3NA<3NA41.01 (0.94, 1.09)00.0009
T2 + T330.10 (−0.40, 0.59)320.137530.06 (−0.28, 0.40)410.0625<3NA
T2T2<3NA<3NA<3NA
T340.57 (0.01, 1.13) *00.010740.70 (0.27, 1.13) *00.0012<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA61.09 (0.99, 1.20)80.0109
MCPP
T1T1<3NA<3NA31.18 (0.99, 1.41)180.0117
T2T330.63 (–1.14, 2.40)721.770030.18 (−0.51, 0.86)00.0042<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA51.02 (0.86, 1.22)00.0066
MEHP
T1T2 + T33−0.32 (−0.60, −0.05) * 00.01633−0.38 (−0.61, −0.15) 320.0139<3NA
MEHHP
T1T1<3NA<3NA31.02 (0.89, 1.17)00.0002
Average <3NA<3NA31.10 (0.96, 1.26)0<0.0001
MEP
T1T1<3NA<3NA41.12 (1.02, 1.23) 260.0104
T2 + T330.14 (−0.14, 0.41)340.020030.06 (−0.20, 0.32)480.0292<3NA
T2T23−0.12 (−0.95, 0.72)440.33783−0.16 (−0.78, 0.45)360.1702<3NA
T350.21 (−0.61, 1.04)500.641850.22 (−0.27, 0.71)350.1897<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA61.06 (0.97, 1.15)00.0055
MIBP
T1T1<3NA<3NA31.14 (0.94, 1.39)320.0292
T2T330.04 (−0.91, 0.98)260.269130.17 (−0.38, 0.71)00.0652<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA41.11 (0.93, 1.33)480.0606
MMP
T1T1<3NA<3NA31.05 (0.93, 1.19)00.0004
Average <3NA<3NA31.02 (0.92, 1.14)00.0009
ΣDEHP
T1T2 + T330.27 (−0.11, 0.66)00.02293−0.01 (−0.30, 0.28)00.0088<3NA
T2T23−0.02 (−0.58, 0.53)00.00413−0.22 (−0.63, 0.19)00.0007<3NA
T350.25 (−0.39, 0.90)150.18025−0.13 (−0.73, 0.47)220.2403<3NA
Average <3NA<3NA41.11 (0.96,1.28)00.0122
* Indicates statistically significant association. Abbreviations: MBP, Mono-n butyl phthalate; MBzP, Monobenzyl phthalate; MCPP, Mono (3-carboxypropyl) phthalate; MEHP, Mono (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate; MEHHP, Mono (2-ethyl-5-hydroxyhexyl) phthalate; MEP, Monoethyl phthalate; MiBP, Mono-isobutyl phthalate; MMP, monomethyl phthalate; DEHP, di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (∑DEHP = MECPP, MEHP, MEHHP, and MEOHP); T1, first trimester; T2, second trimester; T3, third trimester.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, M.; Qiao, J.; Xie, P.; Li, Z.; Hu, C.; Li, F. The Association between Maternal Urinary Phthalate Concentrations and Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Metabolites 2023, 13, 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13070812

AMA Style

Zhang M, Qiao J, Xie P, Li Z, Hu C, Li F. The Association between Maternal Urinary Phthalate Concentrations and Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Metabolites. 2023; 13(7):812. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13070812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Mengyue, Jianchao Qiao, Pinpeng Xie, Zhuoyan Li, Chengyang Hu, and Fei Li. 2023. "The Association between Maternal Urinary Phthalate Concentrations and Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Metabolites 13, no. 7: 812. https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo13070812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop