Next Article in Journal
A Poplar Rust Effector Protein Associates with Protein Disulfide Isomerase and Enhances Plant Susceptibility
Previous Article in Journal
Cytotoxicity and Pro-Apoptotic, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Geopropolis Produced by the Stingless Bee Melipona fasciculata Smith
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 9
Issue 9
10.3390/biology9090293
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Maternal Obesity Does Not Exacerbate the Effects of LPS Injection on Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice

by
Natasha Virginkar
1 and
Julian K. Christians
1,2,3,4,*
1
Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
2
Centre for Cell Biology, Development and Disease, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
3
British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
4
Women’s Health Research Institute, 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2020, 9(9), 293; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090293
Submission received: 19 August 2020 / Revised: 10 September 2020 / Accepted: 11 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Physiology)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Obesity increases the risk of problems during pregnancy, potentially due to inappropriate activation of the immune system. We predicted that, because of this immune activation, obesity in mice would exacerbate the effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a substance that mimics infection, impairs fetal growth and leads to pregnancy loss in animal models. Mice were fed a high- or low-fat diet for thirteen weeks prior to mating, and then received an LPS or control injection during pregnancy. Treatment with LPS induced pregnancy loss in some mice, as expected. However, LPS did not have more severe effects in females fed the high-fat diet, who were heavier. Our results therefore do not support the hypothesis that an otherwise healthy obese pregnancy can be driven to an adverse outcome by a low-level infection. Our study improves the understanding of why obese women are at greater risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In doing so, it will contribute to future studies that seek to determine how obese pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes can be distinguished from healthy obese pregnancies.

Abstract

Obesity increases the risk of a number of pregnancy complications, potentially due to chronic inflammation. We predicted that an obesogenic high-fat diet (HFD) in mice would create an inflammatory environment that would exacerbate the effects of lipopolysaccharide (LPS), an inflammatory insult, administered during pregnancy. Females were placed on a HFD or a low-fat diet (LFD) prior to mating, injected with 2 µg LPS or control on gestational day 7 and collected on day 14. Treatment with LPS increased the odds that a female thought to be pregnant at injection had no conceptuses at day 14 (p = 0.024), suggesting that injection with LPS was more likely to induce complete abortion. However, there was no effect of diet on the odds of having no conceptuses at day 14 and no interaction between diet and LPS injection. Diet and LPS injection had no effect on the number of viable fetuses in females still pregnant at day 14. For fetal weight, there was a significant interaction between diet and treatment (p = 0.017), whereby LPS reduced fetal weight in HFD females but not in LFD females. However, LPS treatment of HFD females reduced fetal weight to that observed in control-injected LFD females. Although LPS increased the odds of abortion, there was little evidence that a HFD exacerbated the effects of LPS.

1. Introduction

Obesity doubles to triples the risk of pregnancy complications such as miscarriage, stillbirth and preeclampsia [1,2,3,4]. However, the mechanisms underlying associations between obesity and pregnancy complications remain unknown [5], and most obese women have healthy pregnancies. It has been suggested that inflammation, rather than obesity per se, affects the risk of adverse outcome [5,6]. Specifically, it is hypothesized that increased adipose tissue results in elevated levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the blood [7,8,9], which influence the function of immune cells within the uterus [5], thereby impairing normal placental development and increasing the risk of adverse outcomes [10,11]. While maternal obesity alone does not necessarily lead to complications, the associated chronic, low-grade inflammation might increase susceptibility to adverse outcomes when combined with an additional inflammatory challenge.
We sought to test this hypothesis in an animal model. We recently reported that an obesogenic high-fat diet (HFD) fed to mice altered populations and activity of uterine natural killer cells, maternal immune cells that play a crucial role in placental development [12]. However, this diet did not affect fetal weight and was not otherwise associated with adverse outcomes [12,13], suggesting that it models healthy obese pregnancy. We hypothesized that the immunological changes caused by this HFD could exacerbate the inflammatory effects of infection. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, is frequently used to induce inflammation in mice, and injection around gestational day (GD) 7-9 of pregnancy (where the day after mating is day 0) increases the rate of fetal resorption [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and reduces fetal weight [14,19]. Few studies have combined HFD and LPS during pregnancy [21,22], but these examined adult offspring phenotypes rather than pregnancy outcomes and did not begin the HFD prior to pregnancy to induce maternal obesity. We predicted that maternal obesity induced by a HFD would exacerbate the response to a low dose of LPS, leading to synergistic effects on fetal growth and survival.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Mice

All work was carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care and approved by the SFU University Animal Care Committee (protocol 1188). C57BL/6J mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (stock # 664) and were group-housed in individually ventilated cages (50 air changes/hour; max. 5 mice per cage) on a 12:12 h light:dark cycle at constant temperature (21 ± 1 °C), 50% humidity, with water and food available ad libitum. These mice were bred to produce the animals used in this study.

2.2. Diet Manipulation

At wean at three weeks of age, female offspring were randomly assigned to either a high-fat, high-sucrose diet (HFD; 45% kcal fat, 35% carbohydrate (including 17% kcal sucrose), 20% kcal protein, 4.73 kcal/g, D12451, Research Diets, New Brunswick, NJ, USA) or a nutrient-matched low-fat, no-sucrose control diet (LFD; 10% kcal fat, 70% kcal carbohydrate (corn starch and maltodextrin), 20% kcal protein, 3.85 kcal/g, D12450K, Research Diets). A nutrient-matched control diet was used instead of chow since the latter may differ from a defined HFD with regard to protein source and fiber content [23,24]. Females were maintained on the experimental diets for 13 weeks prior to breeding and food consumption was measured weekly (females were group-housed and so consumption could be calculated for cages but not individual mice). This HFD and duration of feeding had previously been found to increase maternal weight and adiposity with no effect on fetal growth [12,13]. More females were assigned to the HFD (N = 49) than to the LFD (N = 28) to enable separate analysis of HFD mice that were resistant to diet-induced obesity (DIO-R) or susceptible to diet-induced obesity (DIO-S). As described by others [25,26,27], we distinguished between the latter two groups based on whether the weight at first mating was lower (DIO-R) or higher (DIO-S) than 3 standard deviations above the mean weight at first mating of LFD mice that became pregnant.

2.3. Lipopolysaccharide Injection

Females were housed with a male overnight and separated from the male the following morning (gestational day (GD) 0). Males were fed normal chow (LabDiet Rodent 5001; 13.5% of calories from fat, 58% from carbohydrates and 28.5% from protein) and females were exposed to the male’s diet, not their experimental diet, for the overnight mating. We assessed pregnancy using weight gain rather than the presence of a vaginal plug as we have found the latter less reliable. On GD6, females were weighed, and those with substantial weight gain (2 g for HFD and 1 g for LFD mice) were considered pregnant. Different weight-gain thresholds for HFD and LFD mice were based on our previous experience with timed matings of mice on these diets [12,13]. On GD7, pregnant females were weighed again to confirm pregnancy and, if sufficient weight had been gained, were administered a subcutaneous injection of either 2 μg LPS (Salmonella enterica; L6511, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 0.85% saline or the same volume of saline.
We used a constant dose of LPS per mouse, rather than a dose per unit of body weight, because the HFD mice were, on average, heavier. If we used dosed by weight, more severe effects in HFD/LPS treated mice might be due to a higher dose of LPS rather than exacerbation of the effects of LPS by a HFD. Dosing by weight would also result in HFD mice receiving a higher dose per lean mass. Furthermore, females were pregnant when LPS was administered, and, as a result, females carrying more fetuses would be treated with a higher dose. We aimed to use an LPS dose that, in lean mice, would have only moderate effects on fetal growth and resorption, so that it would be possible to discern if these were exacerbated by the HFD. We therefore used slightly lower doses than previous studies (e.g., 2.5 µg/mouse intraperitoneal at GD7 [15]; 0.5 µg/g subcutaneous at GD7 [14]; 0.3 µg/g subcutaneous at GD8 [17]). We used subcutaneous injection rather than intraperitoneal in an attempt to induce a chronic rather than acute response [28].
Females assessed to be not pregnant based on weight gain at GD6 were re-mated repeatedly until pregnant while maintained on their experimental diet. On GD14, females were sacrificed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation under isoflurane anesthesia. Uteri were examined for signs of fetal resorptions and other abnormalities, and the number of fetuses in each litter was recorded. Litter size was defined as the number of viable-appearing fetuses, not including the number of resorbed fetuses. Fetal resorptions were identified as dark masses that were substantially smaller than fetuses from the same litter. Entire uteri were immediately placed in a 4% PFA (paraformaldehyde) solution, stored at 4 °C for three days and then dissected in 1% phosphate-buffered saline to individually weigh fetuses and placentas. At the time of sacrifice, blood was collected by cardiac puncture and serum concentrations of TNF-α were later measured using a commercially available ELISA (DY410-05 R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with a 1:2 dilution factor according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

All analyses were performed in SAS (Version 9.4; data provided in Table S1; SAS code provided in File S1). Differences between means were tested using general linear models (proc GLM), and the numbers of viable-appearing fetuses and resorptions were also analyzed using nonparametric approaches (proc NPAR1WAY). Where a significant interaction between diet and LPS treatment was observed, the effect of LPS was tested separately within each diet (ESTIMATE statement). Since the dam was the unit of replication, we analyzed average fetal and placental weight per dam. The presence or absence of pregnancy at GD14 was analyzed using logistic regression (proc LOGISTIC). Age at pregnancy showed a skewed distribution and so was log-transformed prior to analysis. Means are presented ± standard error, except where noted.

3. Results

Of the mice mated (HFD N = 49; LFD N = 28), seven became pregnant but were mistakenly not injected (HFD N = 3; LFD N = 4), four were not observed to become pregnant after repeated matings and were culled (HFD N = 2; LFD N = 2), and one HFD female (that had not been injected) was found dead. Over the first 13 weeks of the experimental diets, HFD females consumed more calories, more protein, more fat and less carbohydrate than LFD females (Table 1). At the time of the first mating, HFD females were heavier than LFD females (HFD: 25.5 ± 0.4 g; LFD: 22.8 ± 0.5 g; p < 0.0001).
A substantial number of females injected on GD7 were subsequently found to be not pregnant when dissected following sacrifice at GD14 (Table 2). Using logistic regression, we tested whether the odds that a female thought to be pregnant and injected at GD7 had no conceptuses at GD14 were influenced by treatment (LPS vs. saline), diet or the interaction between treatment and diet, controlling for weight gain between mating and GD6 (we recorded weights at GD6 and only confirmed weight gain at GD7 prior to injection). The odds of not being pregnant were significantly higher for females injected with LPS (adjusted OR = 3.3, 95% confidence interval: 1.1–10.1; p = 0.024; adjusted OR from model without diet by treatment interaction), suggesting that LPS was more likely to induce complete pregnancy loss. This analysis controlled for weight gain, where greater weight gain was associated with reduced odds of not being pregnant (p = 0.014). However, there was no effect of diet (p = 0.77) or interaction between diet and treatment (p = 0.28), i.e., no evidence that diet exacerbated the effects of LPS. In no case was a female with an apparent pregnancy loss mated again, i.e., all data are from first apparent pregnancies.
Among females with confirmed pregnancy at sacrifice at GD14, there was no effect of diet on the age at which they became pregnant, although there was a marginally significant decrease in the number of pairings that HFD females required to become pregnant (Table 3). In this group of animals, HFD females were heavier than LFD females at the time of mating resulting in pregnancy, but HFD females lost weight between their first mating and the mating when they became pregnant, whereas LFD females did not (Table 3).
Average fetal weight and placental weight were not affected by diet or treatment, controlling for female age (Table 4). However, the interaction between diet and treatment had a significant effect on fetal weight (p = 0.017), whereby LPS reduced fetal weight in HFD females (difference between LPS and saline: 56 ± 2 mg; p = 0.03) but not in LFD females (difference between LPS and saline: −51 ± 3 mg; p = 0.14; Table 4). There was no diet by treatment interaction for placental weight. Fetal weight decreased with increasing female age. There was no effect of diet, treatment or diet by treatment interaction on the number of viable-appearing fetuses or the number of resorptions (Table 4). The number of viable-appearing fetuses decreased, and the number of resorptions increased, with increasing female age. Serum TNF-α was not detectable in 11 out of 27 samples analyzed and showed no effect of diet or treatment (Table S1).
Of the 20 HFD females where pregnancy was confirmed, 11 weighed less at first mating than the mean of LFD mice plus 3 SD (22.3 g + 3 × 1.3 g) and so were deemed to be resistant to diet-induced obesity. When separating the HFD group into females that were susceptible or resistant to diet-induced obesity, we obtained similar results (Table 5) as when all HFD females were grouped together (Table 4).

4. Discussion

It has been hypothesized that the increased risk of pregnancy complications in obesity is due to inflammation [5,6]. Obese pregnancies are associated with increased systemic and placental inflammation [29,30] and alterations in immune cell populations that affect placental development [31,32]. Potentially as a result, obesity is associated with abnormal uterine artery remodeling [33]. In addition to effects within the placenta, obesity may also increase the responsiveness of adipose tissue to endotoxins including LPS [29]. In mice, diet-induced obesity also affects immune cell populations [12,34], as well as placental development [35,36]. Outside of pregnancy, mice fed a HFD show an increased response to LPS [37].
These observations led us to predict that diet-induced obesity would exacerbate the effects of LPS administered during pregnancy. Treatment with LPS increased the odds that a female thought to be pregnant at injection had no conceptuses at day 14, suggesting that LPS injection was more likely to induce complete abortion than the control injection. However, this effect was not exacerbated by a HFD. LPS had an all-or-nothing effect on abortion, with no effect on the number of viable-appearing fetuses or fetal resorptions among females who remained pregnant. There was a significant interaction between diet and treatment, whereby LPS reduced fetal weight in HFD females but not in LFD females. While this might suggest synergy between LPS and HFD, LPS treatment of HFD females reduced fetal weight to that observed in control-injected LFD females, i.e., the combination of HFD and LPS did not result in growth restricted fetuses. These effects on fetal weight were similar regardless of whether females were resistant or susceptible to diet-induced obesity, indicating that they were the result of diet or other metabolic alterations rather than weight per se.
We did not observe effects of the HFD on serum TNF-α, but our prediction does not rest on an assumption of systemic inflammation. Rather, we have previously observed that this HFD alters the activity of uterine natural killer cells [12], and we predicted that this would render the pregnancy more susceptible to the inflammatory insult of LPS. Our previous studies have found that this HFD elevates circulating TNF-α and leptin levels [12,13], but it is possible that a HFD may not lead to systemic inflammation in a consistent manner.

5. Conclusions

We administered LPS at a dose sufficient to cause pregnancy loss in some mice but did not find that the effects of LPS were exacerbated by a HFD. Our results therefore do not support the hypothesis that an otherwise healthy obese pregnancy can be driven to an adverse outcome by an inflammatory insult. To our knowledge, this is the first experimental test of this hypothesis. However, since LPS from a single bacterial species models just one aspect of an inflammatory or infectious challenge, further studies combining diet-induced obesity with additional challenges are necessary.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/9/9/293/s1, Table S1: Raw data used in analyses; File S1: SAS code used for analyses.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.C.; methodology, N.V. and J.K.C.; investigation, N.V.; formal analysis, N.V. and J.K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.C.; writing—review and editing, N.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by an NSERC (Canada) Discovery Grant to J.K.C. (RGPIN-2016-04047).

Acknowledgments

We thank Raajan Garcha, Maria Huicochea Munoz, Lena Premack, Amy Ly and Kate Fitzsimmons for assistance in the lab; the Animal Care staff at Simon Fraser University, notably Kim Buettner, Pilar Cepeda, Marina MacLean and Audrey Wang, for maintaining the animals and performing injections, and Alex Beristain for discussion leading to the conception of this work and feedback regarding experimental design. We thank two anonymous reviewers and an academic editor for thoughtful and constructive comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Fuchs, F.; Senat, M.V.; Rey, E.; Balayla, J.; Chaillet, N.; Bouyer, J.; Audibert, F. Impact of maternal obesity on the incidence of pregnancy complications in France and Canada. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Spradley, F.T.; Palei, A.C.; Granger, J.P. Increased risk for the development of preeclampsia in obese pregnancies: Weighing in on the mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015, 309, R1326–R1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Cavalcante, M.B.; Sarno, M.; Peixoto, A.B.; Araujo Junior, E.; Barini, R. Obesity and recurrent miscarriage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2018, 45, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Marchi, J.; Berg, M.; Dencker, A.; Olander, E.K.; Begley, C. Risks associated with obesity in pregnancy, for the mother and baby: A systematic review of reviews. Obes. Rev. 2015, 16, 621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Denison, F.C.; Roberts, K.A.; Barr, S.M.; Norman, J.E. Obesity, pregnancy, inflammation, and vascular function. Reproduction 2010, 140, 373–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Conrad, K.P.; Rabaglino, M.B.; Post Uiterweer, E.D. Emerging role for dysregulated decidualization in the genesis of preeclampsia. Placenta 2017, 60, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wensveen, F.M.; Valentić, S.; Šestan, M.; Turk Wensveen, T.; Polić, B. The “Big Bang” in obese fat: Events initiating obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 2446–2456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gregor, M.F.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Inflammatory Mechanisms in Obesity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 29, 415–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Segovia, S.A.; Vickers, M.H.; Reynolds, C.M. The impact of maternal obesity on inflammatory processes and consequences for later offspring health outcomes. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2017, 8, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Challis, J.R.; Lockwood, C.J.; Myatt, L.; Norman, J.E.; Strauss, J.F.; Petraglia, F. Inflammation and pregnancy. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 16, 206–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. St-Germain, L.E.; Castellana, B.; Baltayeva, J.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal Obesity and the Uterine Immune Cell Landscape: The Shaping Role of Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Baltayeva, J.; Konwar, C.; Castellana, B.; Mara, D.L.; Christians, J.K.; Beristain, A.G. Obesogenic diet exposure alters uterine natural killer cell biology and impairs vasculature remodeling in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2020, 102, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chin, E.H.; Schmidt, K.L.; Martel, K.M.; Wong, C.K.; Hamden, J.E.; Gibson, W.T.; Soma, K.K.; Christians, J.K. A maternal high-fat, high-sucrose diet has sex-specific effects on fetal glucocorticoids with little consequence for offspring metabolism and voluntary locomotor activity in mice. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chua, J.S.C.; Rofe, A.M.; Coyle, P. Dietary zinc supplementation ameliorates LPS-induced teratogenicity in mice. Pediatr. Res. 2006, 59, 355–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lee, A.J.; Kandiah, N.; Karimi, K.; Clark, D.A.; Ashkar, A.A. Interleukin-15 is required for maximal lipopolysaccharide-induced abortion. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2013, 93, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gendron, R.L.; Nestel, F.P.; Lapp, W.S.; Baines, M.G. Lipopolysaccharide-induced fetal resorption in mice is associated with the intrauterine production of tumour necrosis factor-alpha. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1990, 90, 395–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Coyle, P.; Tran, N.; Fung, J.N.T.; Summers, B.L.; Rofe, A.M. Maternal dietary zinc supplementation prevents aberrant behaviour in an object recognition task in mice offspring exposed to LPS in early pregnancy. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 197, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Robertson, S.A.; Care, A.S.; Skinner, R.J. Interleukin 10 regulates inflammatory cytokine synthesis to protect against lipopolysaccharide-induced abortion and fetal growth restriction in mice. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 76, 738–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Baek, H.; Yang, H.J.; Lee, J.H.; Kang, N.H.; Lee, J.; Bae, H.; Hwang, D.S. Prophylactic effects of bee venom phospholipase A2 in lipopolysaccharide-induced pregnancy loss. Toxins (Basel) 2019, 11, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Leazer, T.M.; Daston, G.P.; Keen, C.L.; Rogers, J.M. The embryolethality of lipopolysaccharide in CD-1 and metallothionein I-II null mice: Lack of a role for induced zinc deficiency or metallothionein induction. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 73, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Huang, C.F.; Du, J.X.; Deng, W.; Cheng, X.C.; Zhang, S.Y.; Zhao, S.J.; Tao, M.J.; Chen, G.Z.; Hao, X.Q. Effect of prenatal exposure to LPS combined with pre- and post-natal high-fat diet on hippocampus in rat offspring. Neuroscience 2015, 286, 364–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hao, X.-Q.; Du, J.-X.; Li, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, S.-Y. Prenatal Exposure to Lipopolysaccharide Combined with Pre- and Postnatal High-Fat Diet Result in Lowered Blood Pressure and Insulin Resistance in Offspring Rats. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e88127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lai, M.; Chandrasekera, P.C.; Barnard, N.D. You are what you eat, or are you? the challenges of translating high-fat-fed rodents to human obesity and diabetes. Nutr. Diabetes 2014, 4, e135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Pellizzon, M.A.; Ricci, M.R. The common use of improper control diets in diet-induced metabolic disease research confounds data interpretation: The fiber factor. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 15, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boi, S.K.; Buchta, C.M.; Pearson, N.A.; Francis, M.B.; Meyerholz, D.K.; Grobe, J.L.; Norian, L.A. Obesity alters immune and metabolic profiles: New insight from obese-resistant mice on high-fat diet. Obesity 2016, 24, 2140–2149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Enriori, P.J.; Evans, A.E.; Sinnayah, P.; Jobst, E.E.; Tonelli-Lemos, L.; Billes, S.K.; Glavas, M.M.; Grayson, B.E.; Perello, M.; Nillni, E.A.; et al. Diet-Induced Obesity Causes Severe but Reversible Leptin Resistance in Arcuate Melanocortin Neurons. Cell Metab. 2007, 5, 181–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. James, B.R.; Tomanek-Chalkley, A.; Askeland, E.J.; Kucaba, T.; Griffith, T.S.; Norian, L.A. Diet-Induced Obesity Alters Dendritic Cell Function in the Presence and Absence of Tumor Growth. J. Immunol. 2012, 189, 1311–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yokochi, T.; Inoue, Y.; Yokoo, J.; Kimura, Y.; Kato, N. Retention of bacterial lipopolysaccharide at the site of subcutaneous injection. Infect. Immun. 1989, 57, 1786–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Basu, S.; Haghiac, M.; Surace, P.; Challier, J.C.; Guerre-Millo, M.; Singh, K.; Waters, T.; Minium, J.; Presley, L.; Catalano, P.M.; et al. Pregravid obesity associates with increased maternal endotoxemia and metabolic inflammation. Obesity 2011, 19, 476–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Challier, J.C.; Basu, S.; Bintein, T.; Minium, J.; Hotmire, K.; Catalano, P.M.; Hauguel-de Mouzon, S. Obesity in Pregnancy Stimulates Macrophage Accumulation and Inflammation in the Placenta. Placenta 2008, 29, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Castellana, B.; Perdu, S.; Kim, Y.; Chan, K.; Atif, J.; Marziali, M.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal obesity alters uterine NK activity through a functional KIR2DL1/S1 imbalance. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2018, 96, 805–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Perdu, S.; Castellana, B.; Kim, Y.; Chan, K.; DeLuca, L.; Beristain, A.G. Maternal obesity drives functional alterations in uterine NK cells. JCI Insight 2016, 1, e85560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Avagliano, L.; Marconi, A.M.; Romagnoli, S.; Bulfamante, G. Pietro Abnormal spiral arteries modification in stillbirths: The role of maternal prepregnancy body mass index. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2012, 25, 2789–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Parker, V.J.; Solano, M.E.; Arck, P.C.; Douglas, A.J. Diet-induced obesity may affect the uterine immune environment in early-mid pregnancy, reducing NK-cell activity and potentially compromising uterine vascularization. Int. J. Obes. 2014, 38, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Stuart, T.J.; O’Neill, K.; Condon, D.; Sasson, I.; Sen, P.; Xia, Y.; Simmons, R.A. Diet-induced obesity alters the maternal metabolome and early placenta transcriptome and decreases placenta vascularity in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 2018, 98, 795–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, D.W.; Young, S.L.; Grattan, D.R.; Jasoni, C.L. Obesity during Pregnancy Disrupts Placental Morphology, Cell Proliferation, and Inflammation in a Sex-Specific Manner Across Gestation in the Mouse. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, H.; Liu, T.; Rose, J.L.; Stevens, R.L.; Hoyt, D.G. Sensitivity of mice to lipopolysaccharide is increased by a high saturated fat and cholesterol diet. J. Inflamm. 2007, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table
Table 1. Food consumption of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating. Females were group-housed and so consumption was calculated for cages, not individual mice.
Table 1. Food consumption of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating. Females were group-housed and so consumption was calculated for cages, not individual mice.
LFD
(N = 6)		HFD
(N = 10)		p-Value
Calories (kcal/mouse/day)10.2 ± 0.411.6 ± 0.30.01
Protein (g/mouse/day)0.51 ± 0.020.59 ± 0.020.005
Fat (g/mouse/day)0.11 ± 0.020.59 ± 0.010.0001
Carbohydrate (g/mouse/day)1.77 ± 0.041.01 ± 0.030.0001
Table
Table 2. Numbers of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant or not pregnant on gestational day 14.
Table 2. Numbers of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant or not pregnant on gestational day 14.
InjectionDietPregnant at GD14Appeared Pregnant at GD7 But No Evidence of Pregnancy on GD14
LPSHFD9141322
LFD59
SalineHFD11171012
LFD62
Table
Table 3. Characteristics of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating and confirmed to be pregnant at GD14.
Table 3. Characteristics of females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating and confirmed to be pregnant at GD14.
LFD
(N = 11)		HFD
(N = 20)		p-Value
Age at which females became pregnant (days) 1184 ± 1167 ± 10.13
Number of times paired with male to achieve pregnancy 25.5 ± 0.63.4 ± 0.50.05
Weight at first mating (g)22.3 ± 0.726.3 ± 0.50.0001
Weight at mating that resulted in pregnancy (g)22.5 ± 0.524.7 ± 0.40.001
Weight change 3 (g)−0.2 ± 0.61.5 ± 0.40.02
1 Age at which females became pregnant was log-transformed for analysis and back-transformed for presentation, which is why the standard error appears very small. 2 Number of times paired with male to achieve pregnancy was analyzed with nonparametric Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. 3 Weight change = weight at first mating–weight at mating that resulted in pregnancy.
Table
Table 4. Reproductive traits in females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with LPS or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant at gestational day 14.
Table 4. Reproductive traits in females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with LPS or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant at gestational day 14.
LFDHFDp-Value
LPS
(N = 5)		Saline
(N = 6)		LPS
(N = 9)		Saline
(N = 11)		DietTreatmentDiet *
Treatment 1		Female Age
Fetal weight (mg)252 ± 26201 ± 22203 ± 18259 ± 160.830.900.0170.016 2
Placental weight (mg)144 ± 8143 ± 7149 ± 6147 ± 50.500.860.950.40
Viable-appearing fetuses6.1 ± 0.96.2 ± 0.85.7 ± 0.66.2 ± 0.60.77 30.67 30.760.011 2
Resorptions1.2 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.62.1 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.40.39 30.51 30.460.008 2
* the standard notation for a statistical interaction. 1 The statistical interaction between diet and treatment (LPS vs. saline). 2 For fetal weight and number of viable-appearing fetuses, the relationship with female age was negative, while for number of resorptions, it was positive. 3 Effects were not significant when testing diet or treatment separately with nonparametric Wilcoxon or Kruskal–Wallis tests.
Table
Table 5. Reproductive traits in females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with LPS or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant at gestational day 14. Females that weighed more or less at first mating than the mean of LFD mice plus 3 SD were considered susceptible or resistant to diet-induced obesity (DIO-S or DIO-R), respectively.
Table 5. Reproductive traits in females fed a high-fat diet (HFD) or low-fat diet (LFD) for 13 weeks prior to mating, injected with LPS or saline on gestational day 7 and found to be pregnant at gestational day 14. Females that weighed more or less at first mating than the mean of LFD mice plus 3 SD were considered susceptible or resistant to diet-induced obesity (DIO-S or DIO-R), respectively.
LFDDIO-RDIO-Sp-Value
LPS
(N = 5)		Saline
(N = 6)		LPS
(N = 4)		Saline
(N = 7)		LPS
(N = 5)		Saline
(N = 4)		DietTreatmentDiet *
Treatment 1		Female Age
Fetal weight (mg)253 ± 26201 ± 23190 ± 29259 ± 21212 ± 25257 ± 280.930.320.060.018 2
Placental weight (mg)145 ± 8143 ± 7139 ± 9150 ± 6157 ± 7142 ± 80.730.820.270.28
Viable-appearing fetuses6.1 ± 0.96.2 ± 0.85.8 ± 1.06.2 ± 0.85.6 ± 0.96.3 ± 1.00.97 30.600.950.018 2
Resorptions1.2 ± 0.71.3 ± 0.62.6 ± 0.71.6 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.61.0 ± 0.70.41 30.290.670.007 2
* the standard notation for a statistical interaction. 1 The statistical interaction between diet and treatment (LPS vs. saline). 2 For fetal weight and number of viable-appearing fetuses, the relationship with female age was negative, while for number of resorptions, it was positive. 3 Effects were not significant when testing diet separately with nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Virginkar, N.; Christians, J.K. Maternal Obesity Does Not Exacerbate the Effects of LPS Injection on Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice. Biology 2020, 9, 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090293

AMA Style

Virginkar N, Christians JK. Maternal Obesity Does Not Exacerbate the Effects of LPS Injection on Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice. Biology. 2020; 9(9):293. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090293

Chicago/Turabian Style

Virginkar, Natasha, and Julian K. Christians. 2020. "Maternal Obesity Does Not Exacerbate the Effects of LPS Injection on Pregnancy Outcomes in Mice" Biology 9, no. 9: 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology9090293

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop