Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Herbicide Metabolism and Target-Site Mutations Confer Multiple Resistance to Fomesafen and Nicosulfuron in Amaranthus retroflexus L.
Previous Article in Journal
Defining Patterns and Rates of Natural vs. Drought Driven Aquatic Community Variability Indicates the Ongoing Need for Long Term Ecological Research
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/biology12040591
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
Correction published on 26 June 2023, see Biology 2023, 12(7), 915.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Critical Genes for Ovine Horn Development Based on Transcriptome during the Embryonic Period

by
Yuanyuan Luan
1,2,
Shangjie Wu
1,2,
Mingkun Wang
1,2,
Yabin Pu
1,2,
Qianjun Zhao
1,2,
Yuehui Ma
1,2,
Lin Jiang
1,2 and
Xiaohong He
1,2,*
1
Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China
2
Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Resources Evaluation and Utilization, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100193, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(4), 591; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040591
Submission received: 6 March 2023 / Revised: 9 April 2023 / Accepted: 11 April 2023 / Published: 13 April 2023 / Corrected: 26 June 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

A unique structure of ruminants, the horn trait is not only closely related to natural and sexual selection but is also an important trait for polled sheep breeding. RXFP2 may be a crucial gene in regulating sheep horn. However, the underlying genetic mechanisms of sheep horn development remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the gene expression profile of the horn buds in sheep fetuses using RNA-seq technology. We identified 68 differentially expressed genes in the horn buds of 105-day-old Altay sheep fetuses, including RXFP2, FOXL2, and TNN. Further, we found that the Wnt signaling pathway may be responsible for horn development. Our study provides new possible marker genes for horn development, which may promote our understanding of the genetic mechanisms of sheep horn formation.

Abstract

Horns, also known as headgear, are a unique structure of ruminants. As ruminants are globally distributed, the study of horn formation is critical not only for increasing our understanding of natural and sexual selection but also for the breeding of polled sheep breeds to facilitate modern sheep farming. Despite this, a significant number of the underlying genetic pathways in sheep horn remain unclear. In this study, to clarify the gene expression profile of horn buds and investigate the key genes in horn bud formation, RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) technology was utilized to investigate differential gene expression in the horn buds and adjacent forehead skin of Altay sheep fetuses. There were only 68 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) identified, consisting of 58 up-regulated genes and 10 down-regulated genes. RXFP2 was differentially up-regulated in the horn buds and had the highest significance (p-value = 7.42 × 10−14). In addition, 32 DEGs were horn-related genes identified in previous studies, such as RXFP2, FOXL2, SFRP4, SFRP2, KRT1, KRT10, WNT7B, and WNT3. Further, Gene Ontology (GO) analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched with regard to growth, development, and cell differentiation. Pathway analysis revealed that the Wnt signaling pathway may be responsible for horn development. Further, through combining the protein–protein interaction networks of the DEGs, it was found that the top five hub genes, namely, ACAN, SFRP2, SFRP4, WNT3, and WNT7B, were also associated with horn development. Our results suggest that only a few key genes, including RXFP2, are involved in bud formation. This study not only validates the expression of candidate genes identified at the transcriptome level in previous studies but also provides new possible marker genes for horn development, which may promote our understanding of the genetic mechanisms of horn formation.

1. Introduction

Horns, also termed headgear, are a unique structure developed by ruminants. Sheep (Ovis aries) is an important domesticated ruminant that is widely distributed around the world and that has provided milk, skin, meat, and wool for humans [1]. Sheep horns are hollow paired structures with a skeletal core that is covered by the integument; located on frontal bones, they may develop from neural crest stem cells [2,3]. Able to be used as a weapon, horns play a significant role in defending against predators and in sexual selection through their use in intra-male competition [4,5,6,7,8,9]. The study of horn formation and the presence or absence of horns is critical not only for the study of natural and sexual selection but also for the breeding of polled sheep breeds to facilitate modern sheep farming.
The genetic mapping of the polled phenotype in sheep has been investigated in previous studies. The sheep polled locus has been found to be located on chromosome 10 in a hybrid population of Merino and Romney sheep [10] and Soay sheep [11]. Genome-wide signal selection analysis found a significant SNP locus (OAR10_29546872) on chromosome 10 in the polled phenotype, which is adjacent to the relaxin family peptide receptor 2 (RXFP2) gene [12]. Further, a study of Soay sheep found that an SNP in the 3′-UTR region of the RXFP2 gene was highly correlated with the polled trait [8]. Meanwhile, Wiedemar et al. [13] found that a 1.8 kb insertion in the 3′-UTR region of the RXFP2 gene was associated with the polled phenotype in five European sheep breeds. Conversely, an analysis of 34 European sheep breeds and three Chinese sheep breeds reported that an insertion in the 3′-UTR region of the RXFP2 gene was not associated with the polled phenotype in some breeds [14,15], a finding that suggests that the sheep horn is more genetically complex than initially thought. In addition, previous studies have found that a series of genes and proteins, such as RXFP2 and tenascin N (TNN), are related to horn length, growth direction, and deformity [7,16,17]. Lately, comparative transcriptome analysis has demonstrated that bovine horns and cervid antlers most likely share the same cellular origin, namely from neural crest stem cells [18]. Despite this, a significant number of the underlying genetic pathways in sheep horn remain unclear.
The Altay sheep is an ancient indigenous breed that is distributed in Xinjiang Province of China. All Altay rams have two horns, while some ewes have two horns and others are hornless; this breed, therefore, provides an ideal model for the study of the genetic basis of sheep horns. Previous studies have demonstrated that sheep horn formation is initiated during the embryonic period [3,19]. However, our understanding of horn bud formation in sheep is very limited. It is not known whether the genes identified in previous studies are critical to horn development or which key genes and pathways are involved in the formation of horns. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is a high-throughput technology that provides a comprehensive view of the entire transcriptome, which contributes to a better understanding of embryonic development and the role of genes [20,21].
In this study, transcriptome analysis was performed on the horn buds and adjacent forehead skin of sheep fetuses to clarify the gene expression profile of horn buds and investigate whether the horn candidate genes identified in previous studies affect horn bud formation. RXFP2, the most important candidate gene screened at the genome level, was found to be differentially up-regulated in the horn bud tissues and recorded the highest significance (p-value = 7.42 × 10−14). In addition, a series of key genes for horn development were identified and the Wnt pathway was found to potentially be responsible for horn development. The results of this study may promote our understanding of the genetic mechanisms of horn formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

According to our previous histological results (unpublished), horn buds initially grow from the epithelium and undergo rapid development during the embryonic period of ~100 days in Altay sheep. Therefore, to exclude the influence of gender on the horn phenotype [7,8], three 105-day-old male sheep fetuses were used in this study. During tissue collection, it was observed that the hairs on the head of sheep fetuses were spirally shaped in horn bud regions. When the hair was removed, an indentation in the skin was found that was not present in the adjacent parts of the skin. The shape of sheep horn buds is similar to that of cattle horn buds [22]. Horn buds (H) and forehead skin tissues (S) adjacent to the horn buds from the same individual were collected. The samples were placed in RNAlater and stored at −80 °C in a refrigerator for further analysis.

2.2. Preparation of Histological Samples

The horn buds and skin tissues were fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution, dehydrated in a graded ethanol series, cleared with xylene, and embedded in paraffin. Hematoxylin–eosin (HE) was used to stain the microtome slices. A slice digital scanner (Pannoramic 250FLASH, Budapest, Hungary) was utilized to scan and image the entirety of the slices. Images of HE slices at 10× magnification were captured using the software SlideViewer, and epithelial thickness was calculated using Image J. At least 10 parts were selected from each slice randomly to detect the epithelial thickness. All data are presented as the means ± standard deviation (SD).

2.3. RNA Extraction, cDNA Library Preparation, and Sequencing

We used Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to extract total RNA and used an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to measure RNA concentration and integrity. For the sequencing analysis, samples with RNA concentration >100 ng/μL, total RNA > 2 μg, and RIN > 7.0 were chosen. Six libraries were constructed, with 2 μg of RNA per sample. A VAHTS mRNA-seq v2 Library Prep Kit for Illumina was used to cluster the index-coded samples. According to manufacturer instructions, the libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq6000 RNA-Seq platform to produce 150 bp paired-end reads.

2.4. Quality Control and Mapping of Reads

Primary quality control of raw data (raw reads) was carried out in fastq format. Raw data (raw reads) with adaptor reads and low-quality reads were removed using quality control standards developed by Berry Genomics Beijing Co., Ltd., Beijing, China. These standards were as follows: clean data (clean reads) were obtained by removing read pairs that contain N more than 3 or theproportion of base with a quality value below 5 is more than 20%, in any end, or adapter sequence was founded. HISAT2 (v2.1.0) software was used to align clean reads with the sheep reference genome (Oar rambouillet v1.0).

2.5. Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes

The featureCounts program in Subread (v2.0.3) was used to calculate the gene expression of horn buds and skin tissues [23]. Moreover, the expression of a gene was expressed by FPKM value. FPKM, which stands for fragments per kilobase of exon per million mapped fragments, was transferred from read counts. The package DESeq2 v1.36.0 of R software [24] was used to examine DEGs in horn buds and skin tissues. The DEGs were selected using the thresholds of p-value < 0.05 and |log2FoldChange| > 1. The heatmaps included in the R v4.2.2 software package were subsequently utilized to perform a clustering analysis of the detected DEGs.

2.6. Enrichment Analysis

To further understand the functions of DEGs in horn buds and forehead skin tissues in sheep, Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were used for enrichment analysis. This was carried out on the g: Profiler (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler/gost (accessed on 15 September 2022)) and KEGG Mapper [25,26] (https://www.genome.jp/kegg/mapper/color.html (accessed on 15 September 2022)) tools. All analyses were deemed substantially enriched if the p-value was less than 0.05. All p values were adjusted using Benjamini and Hochberg’s FDR correction method.

2.7. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Construction

We used the STRING database (https://string-db.org (accessed on 22 September 2022) version 11.5) to assess the interactions of all DEGs in horn buds and forehead skin tissues. We used the Ovis aries genome as a reference, and the confidence value was set at 0.4. PPI networks are represented as graphs in Cytoscape, with nodes representing proteins and edges representing related interactions. The hub genes were identified with the plug-in cytoHubba of Cytoscape.

2.8. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) for Verification of DEGs

Six genes were chosen at random for qRT-PCR to assess transcriptome sequencing accuracy. Using Primer-BLAST (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/tools/primer-blast/ (accessed on 5 October 2022)) to create primers (see Supplementary Table S1). RNA was generated into single-stranded cDNA using a HiScript III All-in-one RT SuperMix Ideal (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) for qPCR. The synthesized cDNA was used as the template for qRT-PCR using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) by the ABI 7900 real-time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems). The six genes were tested in triplicate using the six samples. The DEGs’ expression was compared to PGK1, an internal control [27], utilizing Livak and Schmittgen’s 2−∆∆CT technique to derive quantification cycle values [28].

3. Results

3.1. Histological Appearance

To analyze the morphological features of horn bud development, the histological changes in the embryonic horn buds were evaluated using hematoxylin–eosin (HE). The horn buds of the 105-day-old male sheep fetuses showed an obvious difference in the epithelial portion compared with the forehead skin. The histological results showed that the horn bud epithelium was thicker than the skin epithelium in fetal sheep (Figure 1A–C). Further, the number of epithelial cell layers in the horn bud region was significantly higher than that in the forehead skin tissue (Figure 1A,B,D).

3.2. Overview of Transcriptomics Data

In order to determine the differences in gene expression between the horn buds and skin tissues of the sheep fetuses, RNA-seq was used to analyze the transcript expression profiles (Figure 2). A total of 247.46 million raw reads were obtained by RNA-seq for six samples from the S and H groups. An average of 39.69 million clean reads were generated after quality control was carried out. About 94.97% of the clean reads on average were successfully mapped to the Ovis aries reference genome (95.37% for the S group; 94.57% for the H group) (Table 1). The FPKM distribution box plot showed that the S and H groups had similar gene expression distributions (Figure 3A). Of these, 71 genes were specifically expressed in the horn buds and 119 genes were specifically expressed in the skin tissues, and 21,425 genes were expressed in both tissues (Figure 3B). PCA analysis showed that the samples were not separated by different groups (H and S groups) (Figure 3C). These results indicated that the gene expression profiles of the horn bud region and its adjacent forehead skin were similar in the global transcriptome, suggesting that horn development may be regulated by a few key genes during embryonic development.

3.3. Differentially Expressed Genes Analysis

Based on RNA-seq data, 68 DEGs were identified (|log2FoldChange| > 1, p-value < 0.05), consisting of 58 up-regulated genes and 10 down-regulated genes (Figure 4A,B). Supplementary Table S2 provides information on the DEGs. The DEGs were further distinguished by supervised hierarchical clustering (Figure 4A). Interestingly, we found that RXFP2, an important candidate gene for the sheep horn trait, was highly expressed in the horn buds, recording the highest significance (p-value = 7.42 × 10−14). Meanwhile, we integrated the gene sets (Table S3) and compared them with the DEGs identified in this study; these sets included the horn-related genes and proteins of sheep, goats, and cattle horns identified in previous studies [1,3,10,12,13,14,15,17,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. We found that 32 of the DEGs were horn-related genes and proteins identified in these previous studies, accounting for 47% of all the DEGs (Figure 5B,C); these DEGs included RXFP2, forkhead box L2 (FOXL2), secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (SFRP4), secreted frizzled-related protein 2 (SFRP2), keratin 1 (KRT1), keratin 10 (KRT10), Wnt family member 7B (WNT7B), and Wnt family member 3 (WNT3) (Figure 5B,C). Further, among the DEGs, tenascin N (TNN) and fibromodulin (FMOD) were identified as horn-related genes in previous studies on three levels, namely the genome, transcriptome, and proteome levels.

3.4. Analysis of Gene Function Enrichment

To further investigate the function of the DEGs in the skin and horn buds, GO analysis of the DEGs was carried out using the g: Profiler. A total of 56 DEGs were enriched to GO terms (p < 0.05), and 134 biological process terms, 41 cellular component terms, and 15 molecular function terms were significantly enriched. The results are shown in Supplementary Table S4. The top 30 GO terms were identified including growth and development terms, such as the cellular developmental process, system development, tissue development, and animal organ development terms (Figure 6). Interestingly, some DEGs were found to be mainly involved in osteoblast differentiation, ossification, and cell differentiation.
The KEGG enrichment analysis showed that the DEGs were mainly enriched in the Wnt signaling pathway (Figure S1) which included the SFRP4, SFRP2, WNT7B, and WNT3 genes. We performed the KEGG analysis by merging the genes from two different gene sets and the DEGs from this study and the horn-related gene sets from previous studies. Interestingly, the KEGG enrichment analysis showed that these DEGs were also mainly enriched in the Wnt signaling pathway (Figure 7), which suggests that the Wnt signaling pathway may play a significant role in horn development.

3.5. Protein–Protein Interaction Networks of the DEGs

We used the STRING database to investigate the relationships between the DEGs in order to identify the hub genes involved in the process of horn development. The protein–protein interaction networks (PPI) of the DEGs were found to have 18 nodes and 19 edges. (Figure 8). The top five hub genes, which were identified using the plugin cytoHubba of Cytoscape, were found to be aggrecan (ACAN), SFRP2, SFRP4, WNT3, and WNT7B (Table S5).

3.6. Validation of RNA-Seq Data

Further, we selected PGK1 as an internal control. The CT value of PGK1 showed no difference between the horn bud and skin tissue groups (Figure 9A), indicating that this gene was stably expressed in the two groups. RXFP2, SFRP2, SFRP4, KRT1, KRT10, and WNT3 were selected as the six DEGs to be analyzed by qRT-PCR in order to determine their expression levels, which were to be used to validate the RNA-seq data. The results showed that the expression of these genes was significantly different between the two groups (Figure 9C). The gene expression patterns were consistent with the RNA-seq data (Figure 9B), suggesting that the transcriptome sequencing results are trustworthy.

4. Discussion

The embryonic period is crucial for the differentiation and formation of sheep horn [19]. However, little is known about horn development in sheep during this period. In this study, the histological results showed that the horn buds were significantly different from the forehead skin, having a thicker epidermis and more layers of epithelial cells, both of which findings have been previously reported [19,22]. However, the vacuolated keratinocytes previously found reported in the horn buds of cow fetuses were not observed in the present study [22]. Meanwhile, in a previous study of Merino sheep, the vacuolated keratinocytes were not found in the development of horn buds from 75 days of gestation to adulthood [19]. Therefore, it is necessary to collect earlier horn bud tissues for further analysis and verification.
Further, RNA-seq was performed in this study to investigate the gene expression profile of sheep horn buds during the embryonic stage. We found only 68 differentially expressed genes in the horn buds and forehead skin tissues, suggesting that horn development may be regulated by a few key genes during embryonic development. Further, our study identified four important candidate genes for ruminant horn formation in sheep fetal horn buds, namely RXFP2, FOXL2, TNN, and ACAN. The RXFP2 gene was the most significant DEG identified (p-value = 7.42 × 10−14), and is a crucial candidate gene for the polled trait in sheep [8,12,13,29]. It is also related to horn size, length, and shape in sheep [5,7,8,9,16], indicating that it plays a vital role in horn development during the embryonic period. The FOXL2 gene is involved in horn bud differentiation [36], and is associated with horn growth in goats [34]. Previous proteomic analysis has suggested that TNN is associated with the formation of horn deformity in sheep [17]. In addition, TNN is mainly associated with chondrogenesis during antler regeneration and acts as an important marker gene in antler blastema progenitor cells [37]. ACAN is a chondrogenic gene involved in cartilage development in antlers [37]. In this study, we also identified the ACAN gene, suggesting that this gene may also be involved in cartilage development in sheep horns. These results suggest that various previously identified horn-related genes, including RXFP2, FOXL2, TNN, and ACAN, play an important role in sheep horn development at the transcriptome level.
Additionally, our study provides some possible candidate genes for horn development, including the KRT10, KRT1, FMOD, free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFAR4), serine protease 22 (PRSS22), signal peptide, CUB domain, and EGF-like domain containing 2 (SCUBE2), extracellular matrix protein 1 (ECM1), and keratin 24 (KRT24) genes. The genes KRT10 and KRT1 are expressed in keratinocytes during early differentiation [38], and their mutations cause epidermolytic hyperkeratosis [39,40,41,42]. In this study, KRT1 (FPKM = 3399) and KRT10 (FPKM = 2037) were found to be highly expressed in the horn buds, implying that KRT1 and KRT10 may regulate the keratinization of horn buds. The FMOD gene not only promotes angiogenesis [43,44,45,46] but also regulates skin wound repair by transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) [46,47,48]. This gene may regulate the development of blood vessels in horn buds and provide adequate nutrients for horn bud development. The genes FFAR4, PRSS22, and SCUBE2 are associated with the epithelial–mesenchymal transition [49,50,51,52]. ECM1 controls the differentiation of keratinocytes within the epidermis [53]. The KRT24 gene has been suggested as an epidermal keratinocyte differentiation marker. [54]. These candidate genes may each play a role in horn development, including in epidermal keratinocyte differentiation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition; therefore, their functions need to be further validated.
According to our KEGG results, the DEGs identified were mainly enriched in the Wnt signaling pathway, which has been shown to play vital roles in epidermal development, stem cell self-renewal, and wound healing [55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. The horns of ruminants have a common cellular origin from neural crest cells [3] and the Wnt signaling pathway is essential for regulating the fate, migration, and proliferation of cranial neural crest cells [62,63,64,65]. In addition, antler regeneration may be influenced by the Wnt signaling pathway [37]. This suggests that the Wnt signaling pathway is important in the development and formation of horns. Interestingly, in this study, the hub genes SFRP2, SFRP4, WNT3, and WNT7B were found in the Wnt signaling pathway. SFRP2 affects hair follicle and skin development through the Wnt signaling pathway, as well as in the catagen of hair follicles, where SFRP2 inhibits keratinocyte proliferation [66,67]. Further, SFRP2 is important for stem cell maintenance during antler regeneration [37]. SFRP4 promotes epidermal differentiation and affects the function of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, promoting bone development and remodeling [68,69,70,71]. WNT7B is related to the epithelial–mesenchymal transition [72], and WNT3 is associated with hair regeneration [73] and hair follicle development [74]. These results illustrate the potential role of these genes in the development of horn buds in sheep fetuses.

5. Conclusions

In our study, 68 DEGs were identified in the horn buds of sheep fetuses, including 32 horn-related genes identified in previous studies, such as RXFP2, FOXL2, SFRP4, SFRP2, KRT1, KRT10, WNT7B, and WNT3. RXFP2 was found to be differentially up-regulated in the horn buds and recorded the highest significance. Furthermore, the DEGs were mainly enriched with regard to the growth, development, and cell differentiation terms. Additionally, KEGG enrichment analysis revealed that the DEGs were mainly involved in the Wnt signaling pathway. Therefore, the results indicated that the Wnt signaling pathway may be involved in horn development. This study provides new possible marker genes for horn development and promotes our understanding of horn formation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/4/591/s1, Figure S1: KEGG pathway map for Wnt signaling pathway of DEGs; Table S1: Primer pairs of DEGs used for qRT-PCR validation; Table S2: The DEGs in horn bud and forehead skin tissues of fetal sheep; Table S3: Gene sets of horn-related genes and proteins from previous studies; Table S4: GO enrichment analysis of DEGs; Table S5: Top 5 hub genes of the protein–protein interaction network.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.H.; methodology, X.H., Y.L. and L.J.; project administration, L.J., Y.M. and X.H.; software, Y.L. and S.W.; validation, Y.L., S.W. and M.W.; formal analysis, Y.L.; investigation, Y.P. and Q.Z.; resources, Y.P.; visualization, S.W. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, X.H., Y.L., S.W. and M.W.; writing—review and editing, X.H., L.J. and Y.M.; supervision, X.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFD1300201), the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of China (Grant No. ASTIP-IAS01), the National Infrastructure of Domestic Animal Resources, and the Earmarked Fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-40-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval on animal survival was given by the animal ethics committee of the Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China (No. IAS2021-34).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All clean data generated in this study were submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Archive (NCBI SRA) database. The BioProject number is PRJNA947734.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Yang, J.; Shen, M.; Xie, X.-L.; Liu, G.-J.; Xu, Y.-X.; Lv, F.-H.; Yang, H.; Yang, Y.-L.; Liu, C.-B. Whole-genome resequencing of wild and domestic sheep identifies genes associated with morphological and agronomic traits. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davis, E.B.; Brakora, K.A.; Lee, A.H. Evolution of ruminant headgear: A review. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011, 278, 2857–2865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.; Li, Z.; Heller, R.; Liu, R.; Zhao, Y.; Han, J.; Pan, X.; Zheng, Z. Genetic basis of ruminant headgear and rapid antler regeneration. Science 2019, 364, eaav6335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Poissant, J.; Davis, C.; Malenfant, R.; Hogg, J.; Coltman, D. QTL mapping for sexually dimorphic fitness-related traits in wild bighorn sheep. Heredity 2012, 108, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kardos, M.; Luikart, G.; Bunch, R.; Dewey, S.; Edwards, W.; McWilliam, S.; Stephenson, J.; Allendorf, F.W.; Hogg, J.T.; Kijas, J. Whole-genome resequencing uncovers molecular signatures of natural and sexual selection in wild bighorn sheep. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 5616–5632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Martin, A.; Festa-Bianchet, M.; Coltman, D.; Pelletier, F. Demographic drivers of age-dependent sexual selection. J. Evol. Biol. 2016, 29, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Johnston, S.; Beraldi, D.; McRae, A.; Pemberton, J.; Slate, J. Horn type and horn length genes map to the same chromosomal region in Soay sheep. Heredity 2010, 104, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Johnston, S.E.; McEwan, J.C.; Pickering, N.K.; Kijas, J.W.; Beraldi, D.; Pilkington, J.G.; Pemberton, J.M.; Slate, J. Genome-wide association mapping identifies the genetic basis of discrete and quantitative variation in sexual weaponry in a wild sheep population. Mol. Ecol. 2011, 20, 2555–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Johnston, S.E.; Gratten, J.; Berenos, C.; Pilkington, J.G.; Clutton-Brock, T.H.; Pemberton, J.M.; Slate, J. Life history trade-offs at a single locus maintain sexually selected genetic variation. Nature 2013, 502, 93–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montgomery, G.; Henry, H.; Dodds, K.; Beattie, A.; Wuliji, T.; Crawford, A. Mapping the Horns (Ho) locus in sheep: A further locus controlling horn development in domestic animals. J. Hered. 1996, 87, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Beraldi, D.; McRae, A.F.; Gratten, J.; Slate, J.; Visscher, P.M.; Pemberton, J.M. Development of a linkage map and mapping of phenotypic polymorphisms in a free-living population of Soay sheep (Ovis aries). Genetics 2006, 173, 1521–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kijas, J.W.; Lenstra, J.A.; Hayes, B.; Boitard, S.; Porto Neto, L.R.; San Cristobal, M.; Servin, B.; McCulloch, R.; Whan, V.; Gietzen, K. Genome-wide analysis of the world’s sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10, e1001258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wiedemar, N.; Drögemüller, C. A 1.8-kb insertion in the 3′-UTR of RXFP2 is associated with polledness in sheep. Anim. Genet. 2015, 46, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lühken, G.; Krebs, S.; Rothammer, S.; Küpper, J.; Mioč, B.; Russ, I.; Medugorac, I. The 1.78-kb insertion in the 3′-untranslated region of RXFP2 does not segregate with horn status in sheep breeds with variable horn status. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2016, 48, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, X.; Zhou, Z.; Pu, Y.; Chen, X.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, L. Mapping the four-horned locus and testing the polled locus in three Chinese sheep breeds. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Pan, Z.; Li, S.; Liu, Q.; Wang, Z.; Zhou, Z.; Di, R.; Miao, B.; Hu, W.; Wang, X.; Hu, X. Whole-genome sequences of 89 Chinese sheep suggest role of RXFP2 in the development of unique horn phenotype as response to semi-feralization. GigaScience 2018, 7, giy019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. HE, X.-h.; CHEN, X.-f.; PU, Y.-b.; GUAN, W.-j.; Shen, S.; ZHAO, Q.-j.; LI, X.-c.; Jiang, L. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis reveals key pathways responsible for scurs in sheep (Ovis aries). J. Integr. Agric. 2018, 17, 1843–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Simon, R.; Drögemüller, C.; Lühken, G. The complex and diverse genetic architecture of the absence of horns (polledness) in domestic ruminants, including goats and sheep. Genes 2022, 13, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lyne, A.; Hollis, D. Development of horns in merino sheep. Aust. J. Zool. 1973, 21, 153–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, X.; Zhang, C.; Gong, T.; Ni, X.; Li, J.e.; Zhan, D.; Liu, M.; Song, L.; Ding, C.; Xu, J. A time-resolved multi-omic atlas of the developing mouse stomach. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 4910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Andersson, R.; Gebhard, C.; Miguel-Escalada, I.; Hoof, I.; Bornholdt, J.; Boyd, M.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, X.; Schmidl, C.; Suzuki, T. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 2014, 507, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wiener, D.J.; Wiedemar, N.; Welle, M.M.; Drögemüller, C. Novel features of the prenatal horn bud development in cattle (Bos taurus). PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liao, Y.; Smyth, G.K.; Shi, W. featureCounts: An efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Love, M.I.; Huber, W.; Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kanehisa, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M. KEGG mapping tools for uncovering hidden features in biological data. Protein Sci. 2022, 31, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kanehisa, M.; Furumichi, M.; Sato, Y.; Kawashima, M.; Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023, 51, D587–D592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zang, R.; Bai, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, L.; Yang, J.; Yang, L.; Lu, J.; Wu, J. Selection of suitable reference genes for real-time quantitative PCR studies in Lanzhou fat-tailed sheep (Ovis aries). Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 6, 789–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, X.; Zhou, G.; Li, Q.; Zhao, D.; Chen, Y. Discovery of SNPs in RXFP2 related to horn types in sheep. Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 116, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ren, X.; Yang, G.-L.; Peng, W.-F.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Zhang, M.; Chen, Z.-H.; Wu, F.-A.; Kantanen, J.; Shen, M.; Li, M.-H. A genome-wide association study identifies a genomic region for the polycerate phenotype in sheep (Ovis aries). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 21111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kijas, J.W.; Hadfield, T.; Naval Sanchez, M.; Cockett, N. Genome-wide association reveals the locus responsible for four-horned ruminant. Anim. Genet. 2016, 47, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pailhoux, E.; Vigier, B.; Chaffaux, S.; Servel, N.; Taourit, S.; Furet, J.-P.; Fellous, M.; Grosclaude, F.; Cribiu, E.P.; Cotinot, C. A 11.7-kb deletion triggers intersexuality and polledness in goats. Nat. Genet. 2001, 29, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pannetier, M.; Renault, L.; Jolivet, G.; Cotinot, C.; Pailhoux, E. Ovarian-specific expression of a new gene regulated by the goat PIS region and transcribed by a FOXL2 bidirectional promoter. Genomics 2005, 85, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Boulanger, L.; Pannetier, M.; Gall, L.; Allais-Bonnet, A.; Elzaiat, M.; Le Bourhis, D.; Daniel, N.; Richard, C.; Cotinot, C.; Ghyselinck, N.B. FOXL2 is a female sex-determining gene in the goat. Curr. Biol. 2014, 24, 404–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Medugorac, I.; Seichter, D.; Graf, A.; Russ, I.; Blum, H.; Göpel, K.H.; Rothammer, S.; Förster, M.; Krebs, S. Bovine polledness–an autosomal dominant trait with allelic heterogeneity. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e39477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Allais-Bonnet, A.; Grohs, C.; Medugorac, I.; Krebs, S.; Djari, A.; Graf, A.; Fritz, S.; Seichter, D.; Baur, A.; Russ, I. Novel insights into the bovine polled phenotype and horn ontogenesis in Bovidae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e63512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qin, T.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, Y.; Li, S.; Yuan, Y.; Li, Q.; Hu, M.; Si, H.; Wei, G.; Gao, X. A population of stem cells with strong regenerative potential discovered in deer antlers. Science 2023, 379, 840–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, X.; Yin, M.; Zhang, L.-j. Keratin 6, 16 and 17—Critical barrier alarmin molecules in skin wounds and psoriasis. Cells 2019, 8, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Osipowicz, K.; Wertheim-Tysarowska, K.; Kwiek, B.; Jankowska, E.; Gos, M.; Charzewska, A.; Woźniak, K.; Kowalewski, C. Bullous diseases caused by KRT1 gene mutations: From epidermolytic hyperkeratosis to a novel variant of epidermolysis bullosa simplex. Adv. Dermatol. Allergol. Postępy Dermatol. Alergol. 2021, 38, 1032–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Ji, Y.; Bai, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, F. A KRT1 gene mutation related to epidermolytic ichthyosis in a Chinese family. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2015, 40, 879–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Calì, F.; Failla, P.; Vinci, M.; Siragusa, M.; Schepis, C. A de novo mutation of KRT1 in a baby girl causing epidermolytic ichthyosis with impressive epidermolytic palmoplantar keratoderma. Dermatol. Online J. 2020, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hotz, A.; Oji, V.; Bourrat, E.; Jonca, N.; Mazereeuw-Hautier, J.; Betz, R.C.; Blume-Peytavi, U.; Stieler, K.; Morice-Picard, F.; Schönbuchner, I. Expanding the clinical and genetic spectrum of KRT1, KRT2 and KRT10 mutations in keratinopathic ichthyosis. Acta Derm. Venereol. 2016, 96, 473–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zheng, Z.; Jian, J.; Velasco, O.; Hsu, C.-y.; Zhang, K.; Levin, A.; Murphy, M.; Zhang, X.; Ting, K.; Soo, C. Fibromodulin enhances angiogenesis during cutaneous wound healing. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2014, 2, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Adini, I.; Ghosh, K.; Adini, A.; Chi, Z.-L.; Yoshimura, T.; Benny, O.; Connor, K.M.; Rogers, M.S.; Bazinet, L.; Birsner, A.E. Melanocyte-secreted fibromodulin promotes an angiogenic microenvironment. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 425–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kontos, C.D. More than skin deep: Connecting melanocyte pigmentation and angiogenic diseases. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 76–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Pourhanifeh, M.H.; Mohammadi, R.; Noruzi, S.; Hosseini, S.A.; Fanoudi, S.; Mohamadi, Y.; Hashemzehi, M.; Asemi, Z.; Mirzaei, H.R.; Salarinia, R. The role of fibromodulin in cancer pathogenesis: Implications for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer Cell Int. 2019, 19, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Zheng, Z.; Nguyen, C.; Zhang, X.; Khorasani, H.; Wang, J.Z.; Zara, J.N.; Chu, F.; Yin, W.; Pang, S.; Le, A. Delayed wound closure in fibromodulin-deficient mice is associated with increased TGF-β3 signaling. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2011, 131, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zheng, Z.; Lee, K.S.; Zhang, X.; Nguyen, C.; Hsu, C.; Wang, J.Z.; Rackohn, T.M.; Enjamuri, D.R.; Murphy, M.; Ting, K. Fibromodulin-deficiency alters temporospatial expression patterns of transforming growth factor-β ligands and receptors during adult mouse skin wound healing. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e90817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Meng, F.-T.; Huang, M.; Shao, F.; Huang, Q. Upregulated FFAR4 correlates with the epithelial-mesenchymal transition and an unfavorable prognosis in human cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2018, 23, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yasuda, S.; Morokawa, N.; Wong, G.W.; Rossi, A.; Madhusudhan, M.S.; Săli, A.; Askew, Y.S.; Adachi, R.; Silverman, G.A.; Krilis, S.A. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator is a preferred substrate of the human epithelium serine protease tryptase ϵ/PRSS22. Blood 2005, 105, 3893–3901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wong, G.W.; Yasuda, S.; Madhusudhan, M.S.; Li, L.; Yang, Y.; Krilis, S.A.; Săli, A.; Stevens, R.L. Human tryptase ε (PRSS22), a new member of the chromosome 16p13. 3 family of human serine proteases expressed in airway epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 49169–49182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lin, Y.-C.; Lee, Y.-C.; Li, L.-H.; Cheng, C.-J.; Yang, R.-B. Tumor suppressor SCUBE2 inhibits breast-cancer cell migration and invasion through the reversal of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. J. Cell Sci. 2014, 127, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Chan, I. The role of extracellular matrix protein 1 in human skin. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2004, 29, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Ehrlich, F.; Laggner, M.; Langbein, L.; Burger, P.; Pollreisz, A.; Tschachler, E.; Eckhart, L. Comparative genomics suggests loss of keratin K24 in three evolutionary lineages of mammals. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 10924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Fuchs, E. Scratching the surface of skin development. Nature 2007, 445, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Logan, C.Y.; Nusse, R. The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2004, 20, 781–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Clevers, H.; Nusse, R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell 2012, 149, 1192–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lim, X.; Nusse, R. Wnt signaling in skin development, homeostasis, and disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 5, a008029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Veltri, A.; Lang, C.; Lien, W.-H. Concise review: Wnt signaling pathways in skin development and epidermal stem cells. Stem Cells 2018, 36, 22–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhou, Y.; Xu, J.; Luo, H.; Meng, X.; Chen, M.; Zhu, D. Wnt signaling pathway in cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Lett. 2022, 525, 84–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yan, H.-C.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, M.-Y.; Zhang, S.-E.; Sun, J.-D.; Dyce, P.W.; Klinger, F.G.; De Felici, M.; Shen, W.; Cheng, S.-F. YAP regulates porcine skin-derived stem cells self-renewal partly by repressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2022, 157, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dorsky, R.I.; Moon, R.T.; Raible, D.W. Control of neural crest cell fate by the Wnt signalling pathway. Nature 1998, 396, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, H.-Y.; Kléber, M.; Hari, L.; Brault, V.; Suter, U.; Taketo, M.M.; Kemler, R.; Sommer, L. Instructive role of Wnt/ß-catenin in sensory fate specification in neural crest stem cells. Science 2004, 303, 1020–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hayat, R.; Manzoor, M.; Hussain, A. Wnt signaling pathway: A comprehensive review. Cell Biol. Int. 2022, 46, 863–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ahmad, M.H.; Ghosh, B.; Rizvi, M.A.; Ali, M.; Kaur, L.; Mondal, A.C. Neural crest cells development and neuroblastoma progression: Role of Wnt signaling. J. Cell. Physiol. 2022, 238, 306–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhao, B.; Chen, Y.; Yang, N.; Chen, Q.; Bao, Z.; Liu, M.; Hu, S.; Li, J.; Wu, X. miR-218-5p regulates skin and hair follicle development through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting SFRP2. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 20329–20341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kim, B.-K.; Yoon, S.K. Expression of sfrp2 is increased in catagen of hair follicles and inhibits keratinocyte proliferation. Ann. Dermatol. 2014, 26, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Pawar, N.M.; Rao, P. Secreted frizzled related protein 4 (sFRP4) update: A brief review. Cell. Signal. 2018, 45, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Haraguchi, R.; Kitazawa, R.; Mori, K.; Tachibana, R.; Kiyonari, H.; Imai, Y.; Abe, T.; Kitazawa, S. sFRP4-dependent Wnt signal modulation is critical for bone remodeling during postnatal development and age-related bone loss. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Maganga, R.; Giles, N.; Adcroft, K.; Unni, A.; Keeney, D.; Wood, F.; Fear, M.; Dharmarajan, A. Secreted Frizzled related protein-4 (sFRP4) promotes epidermal differentiation and apoptosis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 377, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chen, R.; Baron, R.; Gori, F. Sfrp4 and the Biology of Cortical Bone. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2022, 20, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jiang, S.; Li, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Y.; Shi, X.; Li, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y. Activation of WNT7b autocrine eases metastasis of colorectal cancer via epithelial to mesenchymal transition and predicts poor prognosis. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hawkshaw, N.; Hardman, J.; Alam, M.; Jimenez, F.; Paus, R. Deciphering the molecular morphology of the human hair cycle: Wnt signalling during the telogen–anagen transformation. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 182, 1184–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Andl, T.; Reddy, S.T.; Gaddapara, T.; Millar, S.E. WNT signals are required for the initiation of hair follicle development. Dev. Cell 2002, 2, 643–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Biology 12 00591 g001 550
Figure 1. Histological appearance of samples. (A) Forehead skin with one or two epithelial layers. (B) Horn buds with multiple epithelial layers. The red line marks the epidermis and the black arrow marks the epidermis of the horn buds. The insets show changes in the number of epithelial cell layers in the horn buds and skin tissues. (C) Epidermis thickness of horn buds and skin tissues. (D) The number of epithelial cell layers in the horn bud region. **** p < 0.0001. ep, epidermis; de, dermis.
Figure 1. Histological appearance of samples. (A) Forehead skin with one or two epithelial layers. (B) Horn buds with multiple epithelial layers. The red line marks the epidermis and the black arrow marks the epidermis of the horn buds. The insets show changes in the number of epithelial cell layers in the horn buds and skin tissues. (C) Epidermis thickness of horn buds and skin tissues. (D) The number of epithelial cell layers in the horn bud region. **** p < 0.0001. ep, epidermis; de, dermis.
Biology 12 00591 g001
Biology 12 00591 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of technical route.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of technical route.
Biology 12 00591 g002
Biology 12 00591 g003 550
Figure 3. Characteristics of RNA-seq data. (A) Distribution of FPKM in a box plot across six samples. (B) Venn diagram of genes expressed in horn buds and skin tissues. (C) The PCA analysis. S, forehead skin; H, horn bud.
Figure 3. Characteristics of RNA-seq data. (A) Distribution of FPKM in a box plot across six samples. (B) Venn diagram of genes expressed in horn buds and skin tissues. (C) The PCA analysis. S, forehead skin; H, horn bud.
Biology 12 00591 g003
Biology 12 00591 g004 550
Figure 4. Identification of DEGs. (A) The statistical analysis of DEGs in H (horn bud) and S (forehead skin) groups. (B) Volcano plot showing DEGs (p value < 0.05) in H (horn bud) and S (forehead skin) groups.
Figure 4. Identification of DEGs. (A) The statistical analysis of DEGs in H (horn bud) and S (forehead skin) groups. (B) Volcano plot showing DEGs (p value < 0.05) in H (horn bud) and S (forehead skin) groups.
Biology 12 00591 g004
Biology 12 00591 g005 550
Figure 5. Analysis of DEGs. (A) The clustering analysis of the DEGs is shown on a heatmap. Different genes are represented by rows and samples are represented by columns. (B) Overlapping DEGs from this study and horn-related genes from previous studies. Red represents the overlapping genes. (C) Venn diagram of DEGs and horn-related genes. A: DEGs; B: Horn-associated genes in transcriptome studies by Wang, Y. et al. [3], Pannetier, M. et al. [33], and Boulanger, L. et al. [34]; C: Horn-associated genes in proteome studies by He, X. et al. [17]; D: Horn-associated genes in genome studies by Li, X. et al. [1], Montgomery, G.W. et al. [10], Kijas, J.W. et al. [12,31], Wiedemar, N. et al. [13], Lühken, G. et al. [14], He, X. et al. [15], Wang, X. et al. [29], Ren, X. et al. [30], Pailhoux, E. et al. [32], and Medugorac, I. et al. [35].
Figure 5. Analysis of DEGs. (A) The clustering analysis of the DEGs is shown on a heatmap. Different genes are represented by rows and samples are represented by columns. (B) Overlapping DEGs from this study and horn-related genes from previous studies. Red represents the overlapping genes. (C) Venn diagram of DEGs and horn-related genes. A: DEGs; B: Horn-associated genes in transcriptome studies by Wang, Y. et al. [3], Pannetier, M. et al. [33], and Boulanger, L. et al. [34]; C: Horn-associated genes in proteome studies by He, X. et al. [17]; D: Horn-associated genes in genome studies by Li, X. et al. [1], Montgomery, G.W. et al. [10], Kijas, J.W. et al. [12,31], Wiedemar, N. et al. [13], Lühken, G. et al. [14], He, X. et al. [15], Wang, X. et al. [29], Ren, X. et al. [30], Pailhoux, E. et al. [32], and Medugorac, I. et al. [35].
Biology 12 00591 g005
Biology 12 00591 g006 550
Figure 6. Top 30 enriched GO terms of DEGs in horn buds and forehead skin tissues. The x-axis displays the GO terms, while the y-axis displays the number of DEGs.
Figure 6. Top 30 enriched GO terms of DEGs in horn buds and forehead skin tissues. The x-axis displays the GO terms, while the y-axis displays the number of DEGs.
Biology 12 00591 g006
Biology 12 00591 g007 550
Figure 7. KEGG pathway map for Wnt signaling pathway. The genes form our study are shown in red and those from previous studies are shown in yellow.
Figure 7. KEGG pathway map for Wnt signaling pathway. The genes form our study are shown in red and those from previous studies are shown in yellow.
Biology 12 00591 g007
Biology 12 00591 g008 550
Figure 8. Protein–protein interaction networks of the DEGs. The circle size represents the degree and the circle color represents the log2FoldChange value. The size of the circles ranges from 1 to 6, and the number of colors ranges from 1.4 to 5.0.
Figure 8. Protein–protein interaction networks of the DEGs. The circle size represents the degree and the circle color represents the log2FoldChange value. The size of the circles ranges from 1 to 6, and the number of colors ranges from 1.4 to 5.0.
Biology 12 00591 g008
Biology 12 00591 g009 550
Figure 9. The verification of DEGs profile. (A) CT values of PGK1 in horn buds and skin tissues. (B) Comparison of the fold changes between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR. (C) Gene expression of horn buds and skin tissues by qRT-PCR. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Figure 9. The verification of DEGs profile. (A) CT values of PGK1 in horn buds and skin tissues. (B) Comparison of the fold changes between RNA-seq and qRT-PCR. (C) Gene expression of horn buds and skin tissues by qRT-PCR. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Biology 12 00591 g009
Table
Table 1. Transcriptome data statistics.
Table 1. Transcriptome data statistics.
SamplesRaw ReadsClean ReadsQ30(%)Mapping Rate
S142,148,76240,337,97091.73; 90.5395.17%
S236,713,68835,483,44691.87; 90.8295.53%
S342,799,61241,443,88392.17; 91.0795.41%
H148,177,09746,171,91392.09; 90.9093.49%
H238,016,08736,458,80591.17; 87.1594.13%
H339,607,97538,257,62293.77;92.8996.10%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luan, Y.; Wu, S.; Wang, M.; Pu, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Ma, Y.; Jiang, L.; He, X. Identification of Critical Genes for Ovine Horn Development Based on Transcriptome during the Embryonic Period. Biology 2023, 12, 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040591

AMA Style

Luan Y, Wu S, Wang M, Pu Y, Zhao Q, Ma Y, Jiang L, He X. Identification of Critical Genes for Ovine Horn Development Based on Transcriptome during the Embryonic Period. Biology. 2023; 12(4):591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luan, Yuanyuan, Shangjie Wu, Mingkun Wang, Yabin Pu, Qianjun Zhao, Yuehui Ma, Lin Jiang, and Xiaohong He. 2023. "Identification of Critical Genes for Ovine Horn Development Based on Transcriptome during the Embryonic Period" Biology 12, no. 4: 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop