Next Article in Journal
Identification and Verification of Biomarkers and Immune Infiltration in Obesity-Related Atrial Fibrillation
Next Article in Special Issue
The Level of Selected Blood Parameters in Young Soccer Players in Relation to the Concentration of 25(OH)D at the Beginning and End of Autumn
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Climate Change on Chlorophyll a in the Barents Sea: A Long-Term Assessment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects on Respiratory Pressures, Spirometry Biomarkers, and Sports Performance after Inspiratory Muscle Training in a Physically Active Population by Powerbreath®: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biology
Volume 12
Issue 1
10.3390/biology12010120
biology-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Biological Age on Athletic Adaptations to Combined Plyometric and Sprint with Change of Direction with Ball Training in Youth Soccer Players

by
Hamza Marzouki
1,
Samar Sbai
1,
Ibrahim Ouergui
1,
Okba Selmi
1,
Marilia S. Andrade
2,
Ezdine Bouhlel
3,
Mabliny Thuany
4,
Katja Weiss
5,
Pantelis T. Nikolaidis
6 and
Beat Knechtle
5,7,*
1
High Institute of Sports and Physical Education of Kef, University of Jendouba, Kef 7100, Tunisia
2
Departamento de Fisiologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo 04021-001, SP, Brazil
3
Laboratory of Cardio-Circulatory, Respiratory, Metabolic and Hormonal Adaptations to Muscular Exercise, Faculty of Medicine Ibn El Jazzar, University of Sousse, Sousse 4000, Tunisia
4
CIFI2D, Faculty of Sports, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
5
Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
6
School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, 12243 Athens, Greece
7
Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(1), 120; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010120
Submission received: 16 December 2022 / Revised: 9 January 2023 / Accepted: 10 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Frontiers of Sport, Exercise and Physical Activity for Health and Human Performance)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The combination of plyometric and sprint with change of direction (COD) training was shown to be more attractive and effective in eliciting greater developments in youth soccer fitness than a single training regime (e.g., plyometric protocol). However, the evidence is not well-known regarding the in-season effects of biological age (peak height velocity—PHV) on motor adaptive processes following combined plyometric and COD with ball training (P-CODBT) in youth soccer players. Thus, this study aimed to examine the effects of a short combined plyometric and CODB training protocol (8 weeks and twice a week) on some measures of athletic performances of male youth soccer players, circa- and post-PHV, within the competitive season. The data showed that the experimental condition induced significant additional gains only on explosive measures compared to the control condition. The data showed that a short-term P-CODB (two sessions per week) can be a safe strategy and induce meaningful benefits in the explosive performances (i.e., speed with and without a ball, jump, and COD with and without a ball) of youth soccer players during the season period. Therefore, coaches and practitioners can integrate the protocols proposed in this study into their training weekly routines as part of well-structured warm-up before specific soccer training. Since training programs should incorporate drills that closely resemble competition motions, the use of P-CODBT may be a suitable and alternative strategy to improve both the athletic and technical abilities of youth soccer players. However, the improvements generated by P-CODBT were not affected by biological age.

Abstract

There is evidence for the effectiveness of youth combined plyometric and sprint with change of direction (COD) training. However, the evidence is not well-known regarding the in-season effects of biological age (peak height velocity—PHV) on the motor adaptive processes following combined plyometric and COD with ball training (P-CODBT) in youth soccer players. This study aimed to examine the in-season effects of P-CODBT (8 weeks and twice a week) on the athletic performances of male youth soccer players, circa- and post-PHV. In a randomized controlled training study with pre-to-post measurements, forty-eight male players were assigned into two experimental (performing P-CODBT; n = 12 × circa-PHV and n = 12 × post-PHV) and two control groups (CONG; n = 12 × circa-PHV and n = 12 × post-PHV). The pre- and post-training participants were assessed for their anthropometric, linear sprinting with and without a ball, COD speed with and without a ball, vertical jump, dynamic balance, and endurance-intensive performances. After the intervention, the experimental condition induced significant (all p < 0.0001) and small to large effect size (ES = 0.263–3.471) additional gains only on explosive measures compared to CONG. Both the experimental (all p < 0.0001; ES = 0.338–1.908) and control (p = 0.011–0.0001; ES = 0.2–1.8) groups improved their athletic performances over the training period. The improvements generated by p-CODBT were not affected by biological age. In-season short-term P-CODBT (twice a week) could be safe way to generate benefits in explosive performances in youth soccer players, which are relevant components of match-winning actions in soccer.

1. Introduction

Soccer is an intermittent-intensity sport that involves both the aerobic and anaerobic metabolism. Mental, physical, technical, and tactical skills are required for a player to succeed in a competition [1,2]. During competitive matches, time and motion analyses have shown that players complete 1300 changes of activity [3], including 220 high-intensity movements over short distances (i.e., acceleration/decelerations, sprints, jumps, and changes of direction (COD)) [4], which are associated with specific actions (i.e., tackling, defending, heading, and creating space during possession), in sprints, with or without a ball, being the most common action before crucial moments (e.g., scoring or conceding a goal or winning the ball) [5,6,7,8].
Although sprinting with the ball represents only 1.2–4.6% of the total distance covered by players [9], the physiological stress could be higher when running with the ball compared to normal running [10], and physical actions with the ball could be affected by match-induced fatigue [11]. For a given locomotion’s speed, Reiley [12] has mentioned that the training stimulus was higher when players were running with the ball compared to normal running, therefore suggesting the positive effects of using soccer-specific routines wherever possible. As a result, various training modalities based on dribbling actions were designed to develop the physical performances (e.g., running speed, COD ability, jumping, agility, and intermittent endurance (maximal oxygen consumption—VO2max)) in soccer players at different competitive levels and ages, such as circuits with the ball and small-sided games [10,13,14,15]. Recently, it has been shown that COD with ball training (CODBT) is effective in conditioning soccer-related fitness among youth players [13]. Given the frequent in-game situations that allow for a sudden COD action [16], it would be plausible to plan CODBT in conjunction with other training modalities (e.g., plyometrics) in order to optimize physical fitness as well as some technical (e.g., dribbling ability) and tactical (e.g., counterattacking) skills in youth players [13].
As previously documented, soccer players have to perform a wide range of motions (e.g., accelerations, turns, and headings) that require a high-power development output by the lower limb muscles, and play a crucial role in the match outcome [17,18]. Plyometric training (PT) is an effective way to promote components of muscle power (e.g., acceleration, explosive strength, speed, and jumping ability) in youth soccer players [17,19]. Such a training strategy extensively stresses the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) muscle action during jumping exercises [19]. The SSC is of great importance in PT based on its participation in enhancing the muscle–tendon unit’s ability and producing the maximal force in the shortest time [20]. The combination of this kind of training with CODBT may be more attractive and effective in eliciting greater developments in youth soccer fitness compared to a single training regime (e.g., plyometric protocol).
Despite today’s compelling evidence for the effectiveness of youth combined plyometric and sprint with change of direction training [1,17], the evidence is not well-known regarding the in-season effects of different moderator variables, such as biological age (i.e., peak height velocity—PHV), on motor adaptive processes following combined plyometric and CODB training programs (P-CODBT) for young soccer players. From puberty, it is expected that a marked gain of muscle mass and strength, especially among the male athletes, is a consequence of the maturity of the neuroendocrine system [21]. This could be of interest, given the debate on the timing of youth training and the potential existence of “golden periods” of adaptation [22]. In fact, a prior meta-analysis [23,24,25] and some randomized controlled interventions [26,27] regarding maturation-related athletic adaptations to various modes of training (e.g., PT and combined resistance training) in male youth athletes indicated conflicting results between more- and less-mature athletes. However, to the best of our knowledge, only one interventional study has examined the influence of biological age (circa- vs. post-PHV) on PT-related effects on the athletic performances of male youth soccer players [26]. In the aforementioned study, no significant differences in motor performance gains were found across the circa- and post-PHV groups. Addressing this shortfall in knowledge may be highly important within the context of P-CODBT training prescription for male youth soccer players of different biological ages. Thus, this study aimed to examine the effects of a short combined plyometric and CODB training protocol (8 weeks and twice a week) on some measures of athletic performances (i.e., short linear sprinting with and without a ball, COD speed with and without a ball, jumping, dynamic balance, and endurance-intensive performances) in male youth soccer players, circa- and post-PHV, within the competitive season. We hypothesized that the experimental condition induced significant additional gains on athletic measures compared to the control condition, with no biological age-related differences.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

A statistical software (G*Power software, version 3.1.9.4, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany) was used to calculate the sample size. Given the study design (4 groups × 2 times), the effect sizes considered to generate the sample size estimation were attained based on tabled data from previous research [19,27,28]. The analysis resulted in a minimum of 8 participants required in each group (effect size f = 0.25, α = 0.05, and 1 − ß = 0.80; actual power = 82.80%). Thus, forty-eight healthy male youth players from the same regional level soccer team (under 15 and under 17) and with similar training habits volunteered to participate in this study. Participants were categorized into 2 maturity groups following a previously described equation by Mirwald et al. [29]. The Mirwald method is a simple, noninvasive, and inexpensive method of predicting years from PHV as a measure of maturity offset using anthropometric measurements. Briefly, maturity offset = −9.236 + (0.0002708 × leg length × sitting height) + (−0.001663 × age × leg length) + (0.007216 × age × sitting height) + (0.02292 × body mass/body height ratio) [29]. Based on PHV offset, subjects can be classified into 3 categories: pre-PHV (−3 to >−1 years), circa-PHV (−1 to +1 year), and post-PHV (>1 to +3 years) [29]. Random allocation was maintained using the method of randomly permuted blocks stratified by biological age, which resulted in the following assignments: 2 experimental (n = 12 × circa-PHV and n = 12 × post-PHV) and 2 control (CONG; n = 12 × circa-PHV and n = 12 × post-PHV) groups. To participate in the study, the inclusion criteria were as follows: (a) to be safe from musculoskeletal injuries for one year before the study, (b) to have at least 2 years of soccer experience and participate regularly in the club training routines, (c) to have accomplish ≥95% of training sessions, and (d) to not have any background in formalized strength and power training and have no prior experience with P-CODBT programs. Participants competed regularly at regional championship. Prior to the study, parental informed consent was obtained as participants were younger than 18 years. Participant characteristics per biological age and condition are illustrated in Table 1. The local research ethics committee approved the protocol (approval number: 011/2021; date of approval: 19 September 2021), in the spirit of the Helsinki Declaration [30].

2.2. Experimental Design

The current study adopted a randomized controlled trial with pre-to-post measurement design to examine the effects of 8 weeks of P-CODBT on athletic performances of male youth soccer players, circa- and post-PHV. Participants were assigned according to their biological age into 2 experimental groups (performing P-CODBT twice per week) and 2 control groups. The experimental groups replaced a part of their standard technical–tactical drills with P-CODB training (Tuesday and Thursday), while the CONG completed skill-development activities according to their standard training routines, during the interventions across all the training study to satisfy the randomized controlled design assumed. The usual micro-cycle training for all cohorts consists of 5 sessions a week (~70 to 90 min each session), with a weekly match scheduled on Sunday (Table 2). Briefly, during the first three days of the micro-cycle training, ~60% of the time was devoted to technical–tactical tasks and ~40% to physical training, while the last two days devoted ~75% of the total time to technical–tactical tasks and remaining time to physical training (Table 2).
The experimentation was carried out within the competitive season (from January to March), lasted 10 weeks, and consisted of 2 testing weeks (pre and post-test) and 8 weeks of specific training. One week before the beginning of the experimentation, all participants participated in two separate familiarization sessions (~48 h) to ensure their technical proficiency of performing testing and training procedures. At pre- and post-testing, all participants were assessed for anthropometric, linear sprinting with and without ball, COD speed with and without ball, vertical jump, dynamic balance, and endurance-intensive performances by the same evaluators who were not blinded to groups. The reliability (i.e., intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)) was calculated using the results of the second familiarization session and pre-test.
All tests were carried out ≥48 h after the most recent weekly match or training session to reduce the fatigue influence, and under similar standardized conditions (e.g., on a synthetic grass soccer field) and verbal encouragement over 2 non-consecutive days 48 h apart (Tuesday and Thursday evening from 18:00 to 20:30 h). The first testing day was devoted to assessing anthropometric parameters (body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg using a digital scale (OHAUS, Florhman Park, NJ, USA), body height, leg length, and sitting height were measured to the nearest 0.01, and body mass index (BMI) was determined (kg·m−2)), linear sprinting with and without ball, and COD speed with and without ball performances. The second day was devoted to assessing vertical jump, dynamic balance, and endurance-intensive performances. Each testing session was preceded by a general 15 min warm-up consisting of jogging, active stretching, and sets of intense exercises (e.g., short sprints and skipping). With the exception of the endurance-intensive test, which was performed only once, the other tests involved two valid maximal repetitions separated by two minutes of passive recovery, and the best performance was retained for analysis. We allowed 5 min of passive recovery between tests.

2.3. Procedures

2.3.1. Assessment of Linear Sprinting with and without Ball

To assess linear sprinting, the participants covered a 20 m distance with and without the ball as fast as possible, with times over 10 and 20 m (S10, S20, Ball-S10, and Ball-S20) recorded using a series of paired photocells (Globus, Microgate, Bolsano, Italy). Participants started from a standing position with the front foot placed 0.2 m behind the first photocell beam. The ICCs were 0.875 for S10, 0.965 for S20, 0.963 for Ball-S10, and 0.959 for Ball-S20, respectively.

2.3.2. Assessment of Change of Direction Speed with and without Ball

Participants’ COD abilities were evaluated with the 15 m agility run with and without the ball (COD-15 m and Ball-15 m, respectively) as described by Mujika et al. [31]. In the 15 m agility run without the ball, participants were instructed: (a) to start sprinting 3 m behind the first photocell beam (start line); (b) to follow up with a 3 m sprint, then enter a 3 m slalom section marked by three sticks 1.6 m high and placed 1.5 m apart; (c) to clear a 0.5 m hurdle placed 2 m beyond the third stick; and to sprint 7 m to the second photocell beam (finish line).
The 15 m agility run with the ball was similar to the one without the ball, but participants were instructed to kick the ball under the hurdle while they cleared it. The participants then kicked the ball towards either of two small goals placed diagonally 7 m on the left and the right sides of the hurdle and then sprinted to the finish line. The ICC for COD-15 m and Ball-15 m were 0.812 and 0.895, respectively.

2.3.3. Assessment of Vertical Jump

We adopted the counter movement jump test (CMJ) without arm swing to assess the jumping height (cm), according to Bosco et al. [32], using an infrared jump system (Optojump; Microgate, Bolzano, Italy). Participants had to start in a standing position, squat with their legs bent at 90 degrees, and immediately jump vertically as high as possible. Participants were required to place their hands on their hips to avoid the swinging effect of the arms on the test. Knees and ankles should be extended on takeoff, as well as on tiptoe landing. The ICC for CMJ was 0.986.

2.3.4. Assessment of Dynamic Balance

We adopted the Y-balance test to evaluate the dynamic balance according to Chaouachi et al. [33]. The composite score was calculated and retained for analysis. The ICC for Y-balance test was 0.985.

2.3.5. Assessment of Endurance-Intensive Performance

To assess the maximal aerobic velocity (MAV, km·h−1) and estimate the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) we used the multistage 20 m run test [34]. Between 2 parallel lines spaced 20 m apart, the participants were instructed to perform the greatest number of shuttles while respecting a running rhythm (dictated by a pre-recorded soundtrack). The initial speed of the test was 8 km·h−1 and it increased by 0.5 km·h−1 every minute. The test was stopped when the participants were no longer able to follow the imposed rhythm and could not reach the line in time when the beep sounded or stopped voluntarily. The ICC for MAV was 0.898. The VO2max was estimated using the following equation [34]:
VO2max (mL·kg−1·min−1) = 31.025 + (3.238 × MAV) − (3.248 × A) + (0.1536 × MAV × A);
where A = age (years).

2.4. Plyometric Training

The training program was adapted from previous research [13,35,36] and consisted of four workshops, as visualized and quantified in Figure 1. In each workshop, participants began with plyometric drills (bouncy strides, hurdle jumps, single leg alternating hop jumps, and lateral hurdle jumps) and finished with a preplanned COD with ball. The training load progressively increased during the 8-week period (i.e., by increasing the set number) to minimize the risk of the occurrence of possible injuries. The characteristics of plyometric (i.e., volume and intensity) and COD (i.e., angles) exercises were based on prior recommendations [1,37]. A total of 90 s of passive recovery was allowed between repetitions and workshops. Participants were required to execute all drills at maximal intensity to ensure optimal training effects. No participants were excluded from the study due to injury.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive data were presented as means ± standard deviation (SD). ICC was used to assess the relative reliability of each outcome measure. Shapiro–Wilk and Levene’s tests were used to test the distribution’s normality and homogeneity of variance for all variables before inferential statistics. Paired t-test examined the effectiveness of the training program within all groups. Percentage changes (Δ) were calculated for all athletic measures. Independent sample t-test was performed to examine differences between groups at pre-test. Regarding baseline differences in maturational groups, ANCOVAs (biological age (circa-PHV and post-PHV) × condition (experimental and CONG)) with pre-test as covariate were performed to test biological age and condition effects on the dependent variable values. Bonferroni post-hoc analyses were performed to locate the pairwise when significant main effects or interactions were found. The partial eta squared was converted to Cohen’s d [38] to determine the effect size (ES). The magnitude of effect size was classified as trivial (<0.20), small (0.20–0.49), medium (0.50–0.79), and large (0.80 and greater) [38]. The ES is reported in conjunction with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for all analyzed measures. SPSS version 26 for Windows (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for analyses and the significance level (p) was set at 0.05.

3. Results

Normality of the data and the homogeneity of variance were confirmed. The control groups did not show any significant differences in anthropometric or athletic measures relative to the experimental groups at baseline in either circa- or post-PHV (all p > 0.05) (Table 1 and Table 3). There were no significant anthropometric changes in all groups after the training period (Table 1). Both the experimental (all p < 0.0001; ES = 0.338–1.908) and control (p = 0.011–0.0001; ES = 0.2–1.8) groups improved their athletic performances over the 8-week intervention (Table 3).
For sprint times, there was a main effect for condition (Table 3), with the experimental groups eliciting higher improvements than CONG over all distances (S10: ES = 0.829, 95% CI = −0.055 to −0.029; S20: ES = 0.77, 95% CI = −0.090 to −0.062; Ball-S10: ES = 0.423, 95% CI = −0.099 to −0.065; and Ball-S20: ES = 3.471, 95% CI = −0.162 to −0.120; all p < 0.0001) in either circa- (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: S10: p = 0.003, 95% CI = −0.73 to −3.23, ES = 1.327; S20: p < 0.0001, 95% CI = −1.53 to −2.68, ES = 2.737; Ball-S10: p < 0.0001; 95% CI = −2.35 to −4.46; ES = 2.732; and Ball-S20: p < 0.0001; 95% CI = −2.74 to −4.14; ES = 4.566) or post-PHV (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: S10: ES = 1.582, 95% CI = −1.19 to −3.69; S20: ES = 4.024, 95% CI = −1.92 to −3.07; Ball-S10: ES = 2.588, 95% CI = −1.77 to −3.54; and Ball-S20: ES = 3.374, 95% CI = −2.45 to −3.85; all p < 0.0001) (Table 3).
There was also a condition effect (Table 3), with significant improvements in COD-15 m and Ball-15 m times for the experimental groups relative to CONG (all p < 0.0001; ES = 0.604 and 0.404, 95% CI = −0.193 to −0.135, and −0.295 to −0.164, respectively) in either circa- (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: COD-15 m: ES = 2.766, 95% CI = −2.64 to −4.98; Ball-15 m: ES = 1.659, 95% CI = −3.61 to −6.74; all p < 0.0001) or post-PHV (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: COD-15 m: ES = 3.381, 95% CI = −2.79 to −4.96; Ball-15 m: ES = 2.709, 95% CI = −2.68 to −5.80; all p < 0.0001) (Table 3).
For CMJ, the training period led to a greater improvement in the experimental groups than CONG (p < 0.0001; 95% CI = 1.290 to 2.406; ES = 0.263) in either circa- (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: p < 0.0001, ES = 1.43, 95% CI = 3.20 to 9.99) or post-PHV (Δ experimental vs. Δ CONG: p < 0.0001, ES = 2.16, 95% CI = 3.99 to 10.78) (Table 3). In contrast, no main effect for the condition was identified in the dynamic balance, MAV and VO2max scores (Table 3). Moreover, no statistical interactions or main effects for biological age were observed in all the assessed variables (Table 3).

4. Discussion

The aim of this study was to examine the in-season effects of short combined plyometric and CODB training programs (twice a week) on some measures of the athletic performances of male youth soccer players, circa- and post-PHV. After 8 weeks of intervention, the experimental condition induced significant additional gains only on explosive measures compared to the control condition, which confirms our first hypothesis in part. Our findings also showed that both the experimental and control groups improved their athletic performances over the training period. As hypothesized, circa-PHV groups did not show any significant differences in pre-to-post changes relative to the post-PHV groups.
As mentioned above, all experimental groups achieved greater improvements in their sprint, jump, and COD performances than CONG. Previous studies on youth team-sport athletes of different maturational status have highlighted improvements in power performances (i.e., S10, S20, CMJ, and COD-15 m) after different training modalities, including combined plyometric and COD drills training, PT, COD training with or without the ball, and specific circuits with the ball [1,13,14,17,35,36,39,40]. These additional meaningful adaptations in the power abilities of P-CODBT programs might be associated with neuromuscular adaptations, such as enhanced excitability of the stretch reflex system, fast nerve conduction, increased maximal voluntary contraction, and changes in the mechanical and structural characteristics of the lower limb’s muscles (e.g., muscle architecture, intramuscular coordination, and motor unit recruitment) [1,19,36,41]. Moreover, it has been reported that athletes who perform jumping and COD drills could reduce the ground contact time (especially during acceleration) and become more economical during soccer-specific motions, such as sprints, jumps, and COD activities [1,19,41]. Since horizontal-oriented force production is highly involved in the sprint performance in team sports [14], maximizing horizontal acceleration (e.g., hopping with horizontal displacement and COD exercises) seems to be an optimal conditioning stimulus for achieving power and strength improvements [14,20]. Furthermore, the additional gains in power performances could be attributed to the progressively increased training load (volume and intensity) during the experimentation. It is worth noting that prior to the intervention, our experimental groups performed only one session to train power, strength, and their derivatives (acceleration and sprinting). Interestingly, the use of selected P-CODB training exercises was effective in providing greater enhancements in the time of tests with the ball (i.e., S10-Ball, S20-Ball, and 15 m-Ball) compared with CONG. Likewise, incorporating actions that are biomechanically and metabolically specific to the performance tasks is attractive for further improving fitness performance [24], and could thus be a suitable stimulus to stress the athletic abilities of interest, as well as some technical skills (e.g., dribbling ability), in youth soccer players [13]. Indeed, the present training program extensively included COD with ball and jumping drills performed at a maximal effort (~20 min/session), which offer better results in power and strength performances than regular soccer training.
In the present study, no main effect for condition was found in the dynamic balance scores. This result contrasts previous reports that recorded additional gains in young soccer players (i.e., pre-, circa- and post-PHV) following 8 weeks of combined plyometric and COD exercise protocols [35,39,40]. The lack of difference in the dynamic balance between conditions was surprising, since prior studies have reported a good connection between dynamic balance performance and COD exercises [40,42]. In fact, rapid COD activities impose frequent perturbations upon postural control and thus, may stress the dynamic balance [42]. The reasons that can explain why the dynamic balance was not affected by additional training might be related in part to the strategy used to process postural-related information [43,44] by our regional level players. In fact, it has been demonstrated that high-level players use more short-long information (i.e., vestibular), while low-level players use more short-loop information (i.e., proprioceptive myotatic and plantar cutaneous) [44], which may consequently influence the players’ responses to learning and training stimuli. Therefore, the evidence suggests that the movement skill level should be associated with balance skill level in youth soccer players.
Although the scores for the 20 m shuttle run test increased for all groups after the intervention period, no main effect for condition was detected. The lack of significant difference between the experimental groups and CONG was not expected, since the COD exercises intensively used in the experimental condition largely mimic the motions performed during the intensive-endurance test (i.e., 20 m shuttle run test). In fact, it has been reported that the greatest transfer effects on the athletic ability of interest (i.e., VO2max performance) may occur when the training exercise modes (i.e., COD exercises) most closely resemble the testing procedures [45,46]. In contrast, the improved VO2max performance in the experimental condition, which was ~2.5% as high as that recorded for CONG, is encouraging to examine the effect of a longer duration or more frequent (>2 sessions/week) training program for youth soccer players.
A novel aspect of this study was to examine the interaction effects of the P-CODBT program and biological age on youth soccer players’ fitness. Our findings have shown no significant differences in the training-related motor adaptations between circa- and post-PHV cohorts. A meta-analysis that examined the influence of biological age on PT-related effects on COD performance in youth team-sport athletes, reported no significant differences between circa- and post-PHV groups in COD performance gains (ES for change = 0.95 vs. 0.99) [23]. In fact, it has been mentioned that the marked differences in COD performance gains between the pre- and circa-PHV stages (ES for change = 0.68 vs. 0.95) may possibly attenuate with the increased anabolic hormone concentrations and the development of the central nervous system that occur with increased age [22,23,47,48]. Furthermore, Asadi et al. [26] have shown that 6 weeks of PT (performed twice a week) induced no significant differences between circa- and post-PHV groups in motor performance gains (sprint, ES = 0.58 vs. 0.66; sprint with the ball, ES = 0.80 vs. 0.55; CMJ, ES = 0.57 vs. 0.73, respectively) in youth soccer players. In accordance with age-related athletic development, previous studies [26,49,50] reported that older youths showed a meaningful tendency toward greater explosive changes in responses to PT compared to younger youths (i.e., pre-PHV). This is partly due to various neuromuscular adaptations, such as enhanced structural and mechanical muscle properties, improved motor neuron excitability, and better quality of movement and coordination [26,51]. Regarding balance and endurance abilities, it is difficult to compare the current findings with the prior research since the influence of maturation on these abilities’ responses has not been studied after plyometric and/or COD with or without the ball protocols in both maturity statutes. Thus, further studies are warranted to elucidate the influence of maturation on balance and endurance adaptations after different training modes (e.g., PT, combined plyometric and COD with or without the ball training) in youth soccer players. This can help coaches plan proper strength and conditioning protocols to improve motor and technical skills and prevent injury. From a training prescription, the similarity in athletic responses between circa- and post-PHV may be due to the adequate stimulus of the combined plyometric and CODB program for both biological ages. In fact, both groups within this investigation had no prior experience of P-CODB training, therefore, using an equal training volume with low to moderate-high intensities may have induced comparable levels of adaptations for circa- and post-PHV cohorts.
Some limitations of this study should be stated. First, it was not possible to recruit the pre-PHV group due to logistical constraints (i.e., players’ availability at this age range), considering athletic adaptations to training stimuli can differ between these biological ages [26]. The second limitation is associated with sex and competitive level. Therefore, extending our findings to other populations (e.g., sub-elite or elite male young players, amateur or professional senior players, and female players) could be speculative. Future interventions are warranted to further understand how other populations might adapt to the P-CODBT program. Third, due to the lack of electrophysiological and biomechanical measures and muscle damage assessments, it was not possible to clarify the potential mechanisms (e.g., muscle architecture and muscle action) behind the changes observed in the power variables within age groups. Finally, there was an absence of a group performing only PT and another group performing only CODB exercises. Such a study setting would have helped to highlight which strategy is more effective.

5. Conclusions

The current data show that a short-term combined training protocol of plyometric and sprint with CODB exercises (2 sessions per week) can be a safe strategy that induces meaningful benefits in the explosive performances (i.e., speed with and without a ball, jump, and COD with and without a ball) of youth soccer players during the season period. Therefore, coaches and practitioners can integrate the protocols proposed in this study with their training weekly routines as part of a well-structured warm-up before specific soccer training. Since training programs should incorporate drills that closely resemble competition motions, the use of P-CODBT may be a suitable and alternative strategy to improve both the athletic and technical abilities of youth soccer players. Considering the limited available time for physical training during the season, the P-CODBT program may allow coaches to save more time for technical and tactical purposes. However, the improvements generated by P-CODBT were not affected by biological age. Further study elucidating maturational responses following P-CODBT with more maturity stages is therefore warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, H.M.; data curation, H.M. and S.S.; formal analysis, H.M., S.S. and I.O.; investigation, H.M. and S.S.; project administration, H.M.; resources, I.O.; supervision, B.K.; validation, H.M.; visualization, B.K.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.; writing—review and editing, I.O., O.S., M.S.A., E.B., M.T., K.W., P.T.N. and B.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was approved by the local research ethics committee (approval number: 011/2021; date of approval: 19 September 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from each parents/legal guardians after being thoroughly informed about the purpose and potential risks of participating in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy reasons.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the trainers, administrators, and workers for their enthusiasm and cooperation. The authors also thank all the parents and players that took part in this study. All individuals have consented to the acknowledgments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Beato, M.; Bianchi, M.; Coratella, G.; Merlini, M.; Drust, B. Effects of plyometric and directional training on speed and jump performance in elite youth soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018, 32, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Stolen, T.; Chamari, K.; Castagna, C.; Wisloff, U. Physiology of soccer. An update. Sports Med. 2005, 35, 501–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yanci, J.; Los Arcos, A.; Camara, J.; Castillo, D.; Garcia, A.; Castagna, C. Effects of horizontal plyometric training volume on soccer players’ performance. Res. Sports Med. 2016, 24, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Di Salvo, V.; Baron, R.; Tschan, H.; Calderon Montero, F.; Bachl, N.; Pigozzi, F. Performance characteristics according to playing position in elite soccer. Int. J. Sports Med. 2007, 28, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cochrane, D.J.; Monaghan, D. Using sprint velocity decrement to enhance acute sprint performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021, 35, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mara, J.; Thompson, K.G.; Pumpa, K.L.; Morgan, S. The acceleration and deceleration profiles of elite female soccer players during competitive matches. J. Sci. Med. Sports 2017, 20, 867–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Buchheit, M.; Al Haddad, H.; Simpson, B.M.; Palazzi, D.; Bourdon, P.C.; Di Salvo, V.; Mendez-Villanueva, A. Monitoring accelerations with GPS in football: Time to slow down? Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 442–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reilly, T.; Bangsbo, J.; Franks, A. Anthropometric and physiological predispositions for elite soccer. J. Sports Sci. 2000, 18, 669–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carling, C. Analysis of physical activity profiles when running with the ball in a professional soccer team. J. Sports Sci. 2010, 28, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoff, J.; Wisloff, U.; Engen, L.C.; Kemi, J.O.; Helgerud, J. Soccer specific aerobic endurance training. Br. J. Sports Med. 2002, 36, 218–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rampinini, E.; Impellizzeri, F.M.; Castagna, C.; Coutts, A.J.; Wisløff, U. Technical performance during soccer matches of the Italian Serie Aleague: Effect of fatigue and competitive level. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2009, 12, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Reilly, T. An ergonomics model of the soccer training process. J. Sports Sci. 2005, 23, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Marzouki, H.; Ouergui, I.; Cherni, B.; Ben Ayed, K.; Bouhlel, E. Effects of different sprint training programs with ball on explosive, high-intensity and endurance-intensive performances in male young soccer players. Int. J. Sports Sci. Coach. 2023, 18, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. DelloIacono, A.; Beato, M.; Unnithan, V. Comparativeeffects of game profile-based training and small-sidedgames on physical performance of elite soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021, 35, 2810–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hill-Haas, S.V.; Dawson, B.; Impellizzeri, F.M.; Coutts, A.J. Physiologyof small-sided games training in football: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2011, 41, 199–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Söhnlein, Q.; Müller, E.; Stöggl, T.L. The effect of 16-week plyometric training on explosive actions in early to mid-puberty elitesoccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2014, 28, 2105–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Michailidis, Y.; Tabouris, A.; Metaxas, T. Effects of plyometric and directional training on physical fitness parameters in youth soccer players. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2019, 14, 392–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mohr, M.; Draganidis, D.; Chatzinikolaou, A.; Barbero-Álvarez, J.C.; Castagna, C.; Douroudos, I.; Avloniti, A.; Margeli, A.; Papassotiriou, I.; Flouris, A.D.; et al. Muscle damage, inflammatory, immune and performance responses to three soccer games in 1 week in competitive male players. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2016, 116, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Markovic, G.; Mikulic, P. Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med. 2010, 40, 859–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sáez de Villarreal, E.; Requena, B.; Cronin, J.B. The Effects of plyometric training on sprint performance: A meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2012, 26, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Round, J.M.; Jones, D.A.; Honour, J.W.; Nevill, A.M. Hormonal factors in the development of differences in strength between boys and girls during adolescence: A longitudinal study. Ann. Hum. Biol. 1999, 26, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. McNarry, M.A.; Lloyd, R.S.; Buchheit, M.; Williams, C.A.; Oliver, J.L. The bases expert statement on trainability duringchildhood and adolescence. Sport Exerc. Sci. 2014, 41, 22–23. [Google Scholar]
  23. Asadi, A.; Arazi, H.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Moran, J.; Izquierdo, M. Influence of maturation stage on agility performance gains after plyometric training: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 2609–2617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Behm, D.G.; Young, J.D.; Whitten, J.H.; Reid, J.C.; Quigley, P.J.; Low, J.; Li, Y.; de Lima, C.; Hodgson, D.D.; Chaouachi, A.; et al. Effectiveness of traditional strength versus power training on muscle strength, power and speed with youth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Moran, J.; Sandercock, G.R.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Meylan, C.; Collison, J.; Parry, D.A. A meta-analysis of maturation-related variation in adolescent boy athletes’ adaptations to short-term resistance training. J. Sports Sci. 2017, 35, 1041–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Asadi, A.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Arazi, H.; Saez de Villarreal, E. The effects of maturation on jumping ability and sprint adaptations to plyometric training in youth soccer players. J. Sports Sci. 2018, 36, 2405–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vera-Assaoka, T.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Alvarez, C.; Garcia-Pinillos, F.; Moran, J.; Gentil, P.; Behm, D. Effects of maturation on physical fitness adaptations to plyometric drop jump training in male youth soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2020, 34, 2760–2768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Drury, B.; Green, T.; Ramirez-Campillo, R.; Moran, J. Influence of maturation status on eccentric hamstring strength improvements in youth male soccer players after the Nordic Hamstring Exercise. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2020, 18, 990–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mirwald, R.L.; Baxter-Jones, A.D.; Bailey, D.A.; Beunen, G.P. An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 689–694. [Google Scholar]
  30. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013, 310, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mujika, I.; Santisteban, J.; Impellizzeri, F.M.; Castagna, C. Fitness determinants of success in men’s and women’s football. J. Sports Sci. 2009, 27, 107–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bosco, C.; Luhtanen, P.; Komi, P.V. A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1983, 50, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Chaouachi, M.; Granacher, U.; Makhlouf, I.; Hammami, R.; Behm, G.D.; Chaouachi, A. Within session sequence of balance and plyometric exercises does not affect training adaptations with youth soccer athletes. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2017, 16, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Léger, L.A.; Mercier, D.; Gadoury, C.; Lambert, J. The multistage 20-metre shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J. Sports Sci. 1988, 6, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aloui, G.; Hermassi, S.; Khemiri, A.; Bartels, T.; Hayes, L.D.; Bouhafs, E.G.; Souhaiel Chelly, M.; Schwesig, R. An 8-week program of plyometrics and sprints with changes of direction improved anaerobic Fitness in young male soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hammami, M.; Negra, Y.; Shephard, R.J.; Chelly, M.S. The effect of standard strength vs. contrast strength training on the development of sprint, agility, repeated change of direction, and jump in junior male soccer players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2017, 31, 901–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bedoya, A.A.; Miltenberger, M.R.; Lopez, R. Plyometric training effects on athletic performance in youth soccer athletes: A systematic review. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 2351–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; Routledge: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  39. Aloui, G.; Hermassi, S.; Hayes, L.D.; Sanal Hayes, N.E.M.; Bouhafs, E.G.; Chelly, M.S.; Schwesig, R. Effects of Plyometric and Short Sprint with Change-of-Direction Training in Male U17 Soccer Players. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Makhlouf, I.; Chaouachi, A.; Chaouachi, M.; Ben Othman, A.; Granacher, U.; Behm, D.G. Combination of agility and plyometric training provides similar training benefits as combined balance and plyometric training in young soccer players. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Young, W.B.; Behm, D.G. Effects of running, static stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 2003, 43, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kibele, A.; Granacher, U.; Muehlbauer, T.; Behm, D.G. Stable, unstable and metastable states of equilibrium: Definitions and applications to human movement. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2015, 14, 885–887. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Ricotti, L.; Rigosa, J.; Niosi, A.; Menciassi, A. Analysis of balance, rapidity, force and reaction times of soccer players at different levels of competition. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e77264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Paillard, T.; Noé, F.; Rivière, T.; Marion, V.; Montoya, R.; Dupui, P. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. J. Athl. Train. 2006, 41, 172–176. [Google Scholar]
  45. Marzouki, H.; Ouergui, I.; Doua, N.; Gmada, N.; Bouassida, A.; Bouhlel, E. Effects of 1 vs. 2 sessions per week of equal-volume sprint training on explosive, highintensity and endurance-intensive performances in young soccer players. Biol. Sport 2021, 38, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baquet, G.; Van Praagh, E.; Berthoin, S. Endurance training and aerobic fitness in young people. Sports Med. 2003, 33, 1127–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Malina, R.M.; Bouchard, C.; Bar-Or, O. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity, 2nd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. Rogol, A.D.; Roemmich, J.N.; Clark, P.A. Growth at puberty. J. Adolesc. Health 2002, 31, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Moran, J.; Sandercock, G.R.H.; Rumpf, D.; Parry, D.A. Variation in responses to sprint training in male youth athletes: A meta-analysis. Int. J. Sports Med. 2016, 38, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Meyers, R.W.; Oliver, J.L.; Hughes, M.G.; Cronin, J.B.; Lloyd, R.S. Maximal sprint speed in boys of increasing maturity. Pediatr. Exerc. Sci. 2015, 27, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Radnor, J.M.; Oliver, J.L.; Waugh, C.M.; Myer, G.D.; Moore, I.S.; Lloyd, R.S. The influence of growth and maturation on stretch-shortening cycle function in youth. Sports Med. 2018, 48, 57–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biology 12 00120 g001 550
Figure 1. Description of the combined plyometric and sprint with change of direction with ball training program.
Figure 1. Description of the combined plyometric and sprint with change of direction with ball training program.
Biology 12 00120 g001
Table
Table 1. Participants’ physical characteristics (mean ± SD) (n = 48).
Table 1. Participants’ physical characteristics (mean ± SD) (n = 48).
Circa-PHVPost-PHV
Experimental (n =12)Control (n = 12)Experimental (n =12)Control (n = 12)
Pre-TestPost-TestPre-TestPost-TestPre-TestPost-TestPre-TestPost-Test
Age (years)14.2 ± 0.314.3 ± 0.214.1 ± 0.214.3 ± 0.316.3 ± 0.216.4 ± 0.216.2 ± 0.316.3 ± 0.2
Height (cm)164.4 ± 4.9165.6 ± 4.9163.6 ± 6.8164.9 ± 6.5176.2 ± 5.7177.1 ± 5.5174.4 ± 3.6175.6 ± 3.7
LL (cm)85.1 ± 2.485.5 ± 2.384.0 ± 3.484.7 ± 3.490.0 ± 2.890.6 ± 2.789.3 ± 2.489.8 ± 2.2
SH (cm)79.1 ± 2.680.2 ± 2.979.6 ± 3.780.3 ± 3.386.2 ± 3.286.5 ± 2.985.2 ± 1.685.8 ± 1.7
Weight (kg)48.3 ± 4.549.1 ± 4.550.1 ± 8.349.9 ± 7.665.0 ± 6.465.5 ± 5.364.6 ± 4.965.3 ± 5.5
BMI (kg·m−2)17.6 ± 1.317.9 ± 1.319.3 ± 2.418.3 ± 2.421.0 ± 2.621.0 ± 2.221.3 ± 1.821.2 ± 2.2
APHV (years)14.8 ± 0.4-14.7 ± 0.4-14.9 ± 0.5-15.0 ± 0.3-
Predicted years from APHV −0.6 ± 0.3-−0.6 ± 0.5-1.4 ± 0.4-1.2 ± 0.2-
SD: standard deviation; LL: leg length; SH: sitting height; BMI: body mass index; APHV: age of peak height velocity.
Table
Table 2. Weekly training routine of youth soccer players during intervention.
Table 2. Weekly training routine of youth soccer players during intervention.
Week DaysObjectivesTimeDuration (min)
MondayDay off: physical and mental recovery--
TuesdayAerobic training and technical–tactical drills18:00–20:0085–90
WednesdaySmall-sided games and technical–tactical drills18:00–20:0085–90
ThursdayPower anaerobic training and technical–tactical drills 18:00–20:0085–90
FridaySpeed training, technical drills, and simulated competitive games18:00–20:0085–90
SaturdayReaction speed and technical–tactical drills 14:00–15:3060–70
SundayOfficial match--
Table
Table 3. Athletic measures at baseline and after the intervention period for all groups (mean ± SD) (n = 48).
Table 3. Athletic measures at baseline and after the intervention period for all groups (mean ± SD) (n = 48).
Experimental Control ANCOVA
Pre-TestPost-TestES (p Value), 95 %CIΔPre-TestPost-TestES (p Value), 95 %CIΔ
S10 (s)Circa-PHV1.73 ± 0.101.64 ± 0.09 †0.946 (<0.0001), 0.07–0.10−4.94 ± 1.42 ‡1.77 ± 0.091.71 ± 0.09 †0.667 (<0.0001), 0.03–0.07−2.96 ± 1.56Condition: F = 40.407; p < 0.0001; ES = 0.935
Maturation: F = 0.567; p = 0.455; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.085; p = 0.722; ES = 0
Post-PHV1.70 ± 0.071.62 ± 0.06 †1.227 (<0.0001), 0.06–0.09−4.58 ± 1.45 ‡1.72 ± 0.091.68 ± 0.08 †0.532 (=0.0005), 0.02–0.05−2.14 ± 1.63
S20 (s)Circa-PHV3.32 ± 0.183.18 ± 0.17 †0.8 (<0.0001), 0.12–0.16−4.31 ± 0.91 ‡3.39 ± 0.173.32 ± 0.16 †0.424 (<0.0001), 0.06–0.09−2.20 ± 0.73Condition: F = 121.457; p < 0.0001; ES = 1.636
Maturation: F = 0.645; p = 0.426; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.672; p = 0.417; ES = 0
Post-PHV3.26 ± 0.143.10 ± 0.14 †1.143 (<0.0001), 0.14–0.16−4.69 ± 0.58 ‡3.29 ± 0.173.22 ± 0.17 †0.412 (<0.0001), 0.06–0.08−2.19 ± 0.66
Ball-S10 (s)Circa-PHV2.36 ± 0.322.22 ± 0.29 †0.458 (<0.0001), 0.11–0.17−5.84 ± 1.37 ‡2.50 ± 0.272.44 ± 0.25 †0.231(<0.0001), 0.04–0.07−2.24 ± 0.82Condition: F = 95.003; p < 0.0001; ES = 1.445
Maturation: F = 0.392; p = 0.534; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.778; p = 0.384; ES = 0
Post-PHV2.24 ± 0.342.10 ± 0.33 †0.418 (<0.0001), 0.10–0.15−5.89 ± 1.53 ‡2.19 ± 0.252.14 ± 0.25 †0.2 (<0.0001), 0.04–0.07−2.48 ± 0.88
Ball-S20 (s)Circa-PHV4.46 ± 0.624.21 ± 0.59 †0.413 (<0.0001), 0.22–0.28−5.64 ± 0.91 ‡4.59 ± 0.354.49 ± 0.35 †0.286 (<0.0001), 0.08–0.012−2.19 ±0.56Condition: F = 180.211; p < 0.0001; ES = 1.995
Maturation: F = 1.820; p = 0.184; ES = 0.134
Interaction: F = 1.579; p = 0.216; ES = 0.113
Post-PHV4.10 ± 0.543.89 ± 0.53 †0.393 (<0.0001), 0.18–0.24−5.19 ± 1.10 ‡4.14 ± 0.434.05 ± 0.42 †0.212 (<0.0001), 0.06–0.10−2.04 ± 0.73
COD−15 m (s)Circa-PHV4.34 ± 0.474.09 ± 0.43 †0.555 (<0.0001), 0.20–0.29−5.68 ± 1.14 ‡4.50 ± 0.434.41 ± 0.39 †0.219 (=0.004), 0.03–0.14−1.87 ±1.58Condition: F = 127.510; p < 0.0001; ES = 1.676
Maturation: F = 3.757; p = 0.059; ES = 0.247
Interaction: F = 1.048; p = 0.312; ES = 0.032
Post-PHV3.83 ± 0.263.60 ± 0.25 †0.902 (<0.0001), 0.19–0.27−6.02 ± 1.50 ‡3.89 ± 0.273.81 ± 0.27 †0.296 (<0.0001), 0.07–0.10−2.14 ± 0.62
Ball−15 m (s)Circa-PHV5.60 ± 0.625.21 ± 0.56 †0.66 (<0.0001), 0.28–0.49−6.86 ± 2.57 ‡5.76 ± 0.855.60 ± 0.75 †0.2 (=0.0112), 0.04–0.26−2.48 ±2.71Condition: F = 50.174; p < 0.0001; ES = 1.045
Maturation: F = 2.877; p = 0.097; ES = 0.204
Interaction: F = 0.557; p = 0.459; ES = 0.013
Post-PHV5.18 ± 0.424.81 ± 0.38 †0.924 (<0.0001), 0.31–0.43−7.11 ± 1.69 ‡5.08 ± 0.634.93 ± 0.55 †0.254 (=0.0003), 0.09–0.21−2.87 ± 1.43
CMJ (cm)Circa-PHV24.6 ± 2.927.7 ± 3.0 †1.051 (<0.0001), 2.30–3.9412.9 ± 5.9 ‡26.5 ± 3.428.2 ± 3.7 †0.478 (<0.0001), 1.17–2.196.3 ±2.8Condition: F = 44.619; p < 0.0001; ES = 0.984
Maturation: F = 2.555; p = 0.117; ES = 0.185
Interaction: F = 3.011; p = 0.090; ES = 0.211
Post-PHV31.9 ± 4.035.8 ± 3.5 †1.038 (<0.0001), 2.45–4.4012.7 ± 4.0 ‡31.1 ± 3.632.8 ± 3.7 †0.466 (<0.0001), 1.06–2.175.3 ± 3.1
Balance scores (%)Circa-PHV101.2 ± 5.4104.4 ± 5.2 †0.604 (<0.0001), 2.40–3.933.2 ± 1.299.8 ± 9.2102.1 ± 9.1 †0.251 (<0.0001), 1.83–2.842.4 ±0.9Condition: F = 3.833; p = 0.057; ES = 0.250
Maturation: F = 0.204; p = 0.654; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.025; p = 0.875; ES = 0
Post-PHV90.6 ± 5.393.7 ± 5.0 †0.602 (<0.0001), 2.30–3.913.5 ± 1.591.7 ± 4.394.1 ± 4.9 †0.521 (=0.0004), 1.39–3.512.7 ± 1.8
MAV (km·h−1)Circa-PHV10.9 ± 0.812.0 ± 0.8 †1.375 (<0.0001), 0.93–1.3210.4 ± 2.910.6 ± 0.511.5 ± 0.5 †1.8 (<0.0001), 0.73–1.108.7 ± 2.8Condition: F = 3.648; p = 0.063; ES = 0.242
Maturation: F = 0.646; p = 0.426; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.226; p = 0.637; ES = 0
Post-PHV12.2 ± 0.613.4 ± 0.7 †1.841 (<0.0001), 1.08–1.4110.3 ± 2.112.0 ± 1.013.0 ± 0.9 †1.0 (<0.0001), 0.67–1.248.5 ± 4.2
VO2max (mL·min−1·kg−1)Circa-PHV43.8 ± 4.349.8 ± 4.4 †1.379 (<0.0001), 4.86–7.0113.7 ± 4.142.4 ± 3.147.1 ± 3.0 †1.541 (<0.0001), 3.60–5.8311.3 ± 4.3Condition: F = 3.940; p = 0.054; ES = 0.255
Maturation: F = 0.085; p = 0.773; ES = 0
Interaction: F = 0.239; p = 0.627; ES = 0
Post-PHV47.9 ± 3.355.0 ± 4.1 †1.908 (<0.0001), 6.12–8.0314.8 ± 3.047.1 ± 5.952.7 ± 5.4 †0.914 (<0.0001), 3.61–7.0512.3 ± 6.9
SD: standard deviation; S10: 10 m sprint; S20: 20 m sprint; Ball-S10: 10 m sprint with ball; Ball-S20: 20 m sprint with ball; COD−15 m: 15 m agility run without ball; Ball−15 m: 15 m agility run with ball; CMJ: countermovement jump; MAV: maximal aerobic velocity; VO2max: maximal oxygen consumption. ES: effect size; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval. †: A significant difference when comparing T1 and T2; ‡: Significantly different from Δ control.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marzouki, H.; Sbai, S.; Ouergui, I.; Selmi, O.; Andrade, M.S.; Bouhlel, E.; Thuany, M.; Weiss, K.; Nikolaidis, P.T.; Knechtle, B. Effects of Biological Age on Athletic Adaptations to Combined Plyometric and Sprint with Change of Direction with Ball Training in Youth Soccer Players. Biology 2023, 12, 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010120

AMA Style

Marzouki H, Sbai S, Ouergui I, Selmi O, Andrade MS, Bouhlel E, Thuany M, Weiss K, Nikolaidis PT, Knechtle B. Effects of Biological Age on Athletic Adaptations to Combined Plyometric and Sprint with Change of Direction with Ball Training in Youth Soccer Players. Biology. 2023; 12(1):120. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010120

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marzouki, Hamza, Samar Sbai, Ibrahim Ouergui, Okba Selmi, Marilia S. Andrade, Ezdine Bouhlel, Mabliny Thuany, Katja Weiss, Pantelis T. Nikolaidis, and Beat Knechtle. 2023. "Effects of Biological Age on Athletic Adaptations to Combined Plyometric and Sprint with Change of Direction with Ball Training in Youth Soccer Players" Biology 12, no. 1: 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010120

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop