Next Article in Journal
A Potential Negative Regulatory Function of Myostatin in the Growth of the Pacific Abalone, Haliotis discus hannai
Previous Article in Journal
Genome-Wide Identification and Expression Pattern of the GRAS Gene Family in Pitaya (Selenicereus undatus L.)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic Diversity Evaluation and Conservation of Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus) Germplasm in Five River Basins in China

1
National Demonstration Center for Experimental Fisheries Science Education, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, China
2
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fisheries and Germplasm Resources Utilization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Freshwater Fisheries Research Center, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuxi 214081, China
3
Wuxi Fisheries College, Nanjing Agricultural University, Wuxi 214081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biology 2023, 12(1), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010012
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 9 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 21 December 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

To better protect and manage the germplasm resources of the topmouth culter (Culter alburnus), it is important to explore the current status of its genetic diversity. In this study, the mitochondrial DNA COI gene was used to analyze the genetic diversity, genetic differentiation, and historical dynamics of C. alburnus from five river basins in north and south China. The results showed that the genetic diversity is polarized in different populations but without new species differentiation and has significant geographical features, which are important for developing conservation strategies.

Abstract

To study the genetic diversity of Culter alburnus (C. alburnus) populations, we analyzed the genetic diversity of five C. alburnus populations from Songhua Lake (SH), Huaihe River (HH), Changjiang River (CJ), Taihu Lake (TH), and Gehu Lake (GH) based on mitochondrial COI gene sequences. The results showed that the average contents of bases T, C, A, and G in the 526 bp COI gene sequence were 25.3%, 18.1%, 28.1%, and 28.6%, respectively, which showed AT bias. A total of 115 polymorphic sites were detected in the five populations, and 11 haplotypes (Hap) were defined. The nucleotide diversity (Pi) of the five populations ranged from 0.00053 to 0.01834, and the haplotype diversity (Hd) ranged from 0.280 to 0.746, with the highest genetic diversity in the TH population, followed by the SH population, with lower genetic diversity in the HH, CJ and GH populations. The analysis of the fixation index (Fst) and the genetic distance between populations showed that there was significant genetic differentiation between the SH population and the other populations, and the genetic distances between all of them were far; the genetic diversity within populations was higher than that between populations. Neutral tests, mismatch distributions, and Bayesian skyline plot (BSP) analyses showed that the C. alburnus populations have not experienced population expansion and are relatively stable in historical dynamics.

1. Introduction

Culter alburnus belongs to the genus Culter within the family Cyprinidae of the order Cypriniformes, which is a large fish in the Culterinae subfamily that is widely distributed in major freshwater lakes and reservoirs. It has a high economic value and ecological significance; it maintains the stability of the water ecosystem and is an important freshwater economic fish in China [1]. However, with continuing human fishing and habitat destruction, C. alburnus is facing decreases in natural resources and population genetic diversity, reducing germplasm resources [2].
In recent years, studies on C. alburnus were focused on its nutritional composition and feeding habits, anatomical and biological characteristics, anthropogenic reproduction and embryonic development, and genetic diversity [3,4]. With the development of DNA sequencing technology, mitochondrial molecular markers have been widely used for population genetic structure and phylogenetic development analyses [5,6]. Mitochondrial DNA is maternally inherited and is not easy to recombine. It evolves relatively quickly, so it is the preferred molecular genetic marker for population differentiation [7]. COI (cytochrome subunit I) is mainly used in species identification and population genetic analyses with close genetic relationships, where it is a commonly used genetic marker method in populations [8]. In previous studies, the genetic diversity of wild C. alburnus populations in the Yangtze River was found to be low, closely related, and highly differentiated, which is probably due to a combination of environmental and human effects [9]. There are great genetic differences between Danjiang River and Xingkai Lake. The genetic diversity of Xingkai Lake is low, which may be related to the geographical isolation and habitat differences [10]. The overall genetic diversity of C. alburnus in the Pearl River basin is high, but there are still many sampling sites where genetic diversity is at a low level [11]. Therefore, the study of C. alburnus genetic diversity and the management of C. alburnus germplasm conservation has become a high-priority research area. However, most of the studies on wild C. alburnus have focused on only local water bodies, and the sample sizes and geographic diversity of populations have been limited. Few studies have been reported on large geographic scales.
In this study, the genetic diversity and genetic characteristics of five different populations of C. alburnus in the Yangtze River, Taihu lake, Gehu lake, Huaihe lake, and Songhua lakes were investigated based on the mitochondrial DNA COI gene sequences. The genetic differences among the populations were revealed to provide basic data for the conservation and management of C. alburnus germplasm resources.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Materials

Five C. alburnus populations were collected in 2021 and 2022 using gill nets:32 from the Changjiang River (CJ), 31 from the Taihu Lake (TH), 31 from Gehu Lake (GH), 30 from the Huaihe River (HH), and 44 from the Songhua Lake (SH) (Figure 1 and Table 1). All individual fish fins were stored in 95% ethanol until DNA extraction. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the regulations for the administration of laboratory animal affairs. Fish sampling was approved and cleared by the China Fishery Resources Commission.

2.2. DNA Extraction, PCR Amplification, and Sequencing

About 30 mg tissue samples of C. alburnus fins were cut in centrifuge tubes, and DNA was extracted using a kit method (Marine Animal Tissue Genomic DNA Extraction Kit, Tiangen Biochemical Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The concentration and purity of the DNA were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis at a concentration of 1%, and DNA samples that met the requirements for subsequent amplification were stored at −20 °C for backup [12].
The primer sequences used for the mitochondrial COI gene amplification in C. alburnus [13] were L5956-COI: 5′-CACAAAGACATTGGCACCCT-3′ and H6558-COI: 5′-CCTCCTGCAGGGTCAAAGAA-3′as primers in a 50 μL reaction volume mixture containing 25 μL of Premix Taq (1.25 U of rTaq polymerase, a dNTP mixture (each at 0.4 mM), and 4 mM Mg2+; TaKaRa, Dalian, China), 1.0 μL of each of 10 μM primer, 3.0 μL of total genomic DNA (approximately 100 ng as a template), and 18–22 μL of sterile distilled water. PCR was performed according to the reaction method as follows: pre-deformation at 94 °C for 5 min; denaturation at 94 °C for 35 s, annealing at 50 °C for 35 s, and extension at 72 °C for 50 s for 35 cycles; extension at 72 °C for 10 min; end at 4 °C. Purified PCR products were directly sequenced using primers from both ends in a semi-automated DNA analyzer (3700; Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Genetic Diversity Analysis

After sequencing was completed, the COI gene sequences were compared and corrected using Clustal W software, and the base content composition of the sequences was analyzed using MEGA11 software to calculate the genetic distances within and between populations [14]. DnaSP v5.1 software was used to analyze the genetic diversity index [15]. The Fst (fixation index) was calculated using Arlequin 3.5 software. [16,17]. MEGA11 software was used to construct an ML(maximum-likelihood) tree based on the haplotypes and an NJ (neighbor-joining) tree based on genetic distance. The Kimura two-parameter method was used as the model, and the bootstrap analysis was tested 1000 times. Culter dabryi was selected as the out group, which was conducive to the comparative analysis of the relationships between populations [18]. Phylograms between haplotypes were constructed using Network software based on the median joining equation method [19]. DnaSP v5.1 software for the neutral detection and mismatch distribution analysis of historical population dynamics used the formula t = Tτ/2u (T, generation time; τ, expansion time parameter; u, mutation rate of the sequence) [20]. Beast1.7.3 used Bayesian skyline plots (BSP) to detect population history and effective population size changes. The GTR model was chosen, and sequences were run at a 1% mutation rate per million years, operated for 2 × 108 generations, and merged with Log Combiner. Tracer 1.5 software was used to detect the results of an effective sample size greater than 200 (ESS > 200), which were output as Bayesian skyline plots [21].

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity

After the COI gene sequences were proofread and edited by Clustal W, 168 gene sequences with 526 bp lengths were obtained, with 399 invariant sites, 46 parsimony-informative sites, and 115 variant sites. The average contents of bases T, C, A, and G in the COI sequences were 25.3%, 18.1%, 28.1%, and 28.6%, and the content of A+T (53.4%) was higher than that of C+G (46.7%), showing an AT bias (Table 2).

3.2. Haplotype Distribution and Phylogeny

Basing on the COI sequence, the genetic diversity statistics showed that 11 haplotypes were detected in the 168 sampled C. alburnus individuals (Table 3 and Appendix Table A1). In detail, the TH population had the highest number of haplotypes, with 7; followed by the SH population, with 5; and the CJ and GH populations had the lowest number of haplotypes, with 2. Hap1 and Hap2 were the shared haplotypes in the five populations, and Hap2 appeared most frequently, distributed among 77 samples, accounting for 45.8% of the total fish individuals, and may be the original haplotype of C. alburnus. Among the unique haplotypes, there were three haplotypes in the SH population (Hap4, Hap5, and Hap6), one haplotype in the HH population (Hap3), and five haplotypes in the TH population (Hap7, Hap8, Hap9, Hap10, and Hap11). Based on Kimura’s two-parameter model, the ML phylogenetic tree of the 11 haplotypes was constructed with C. dabryi (GenBank accession number: EF467625.1) as the out group. From the evolutionary tree, the haplotypes were mainly divided into three branches. Hap6 and Hap11 as well as Hap4 and Hap9 each clustered into one branch, mainly from the SH and TH populations, and the remaining seven haplotypes clustered into one branch, including five populations (Figure 2).
Network 5.0 software was used to analyze the evolutionary relationships among the C. alburnus haplotypes (Figure 3). The haplotype network distribution of the five populations showed a radial structure centered on the shared haplotype, Hap2, of the five populations, with the largest proportion of Hap2 in the GH population (33.8%). The haplotypes of the other populations were linked by single mutations or multi-step mutations and showed a star-like distribution around the original haplotype, which was consistent with the results of the ML tree.

3.3. Genetic Diversity and Genetic Structure of the Population

The results of the genetic diversity parameters of the five populations of C. alburnus showed that the population haplotype diversity ranged from 0.280 to 0.746, and the nucleotide diversity index was 0.00053 to 0.01834 (Table 3). The TH population had the highest haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity, while the GH population had the lowest haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity. The results showed that the TH population had the highest genetic diversity, followed by the SH and CJ populations, and the HH and GH populations had the lowest genetic diversity.
The genetic distance analysis of the five populations showed that the genetic distance within the populations ranged from 0.00054 to 0.01992. The largest genetic distance within the populations was in the TH population, and the smallest genetic distance was in the GH population (Table 4). Based on the genetic distance between the five populations, an NJ tree was constructed, and the genetic distances between two populations ranged from 0.00073 to 0.01588, with the greatest genetic distance between the SH population and the TH population (Figure 4). The results of the inter-population Fst analysis showed that the Fst values ranged from 0.00035 to 0.51712, and the genetic variation between the SH population and other populations was greater, with the greatest genetic variation and significant differences (p < 0.05) with the CJ population and the smallest variation in the HH and GH populations (Table 4).

3.4. Analysis of Population History Dynamics of the Population

This study used a combination of neutral tests, a mismatch distribution, and a BSP analysis to analyze the historical population dynamics of C. alburnus from five different populations. Fu’s Fs detection value was 1.890; the mismatch distribution indicated that the C. alburnus population showed a multi-peaked pattern. It is speculated that the C. alburnus population showed a relatively stable state and that no population expansion occurred (Figure 5). To further estimate the historical population dynamics of C. alburnus, the overall BSP analysis was performed using BEAST software based on the average mutation rate of the animal’s mitochondrial COI gene, at about 1% per million years [22], and the results showed that the C. alburnus population showed a tendency to remain stable (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

4.1. Genetic Diversity of the Population

Genetic diversity is a prerequisite for species to adapt to environmental changes, and its level determines the long-term viability and evolutionary potential of species. The conservation of genetic diversity is of vital importance for the long-term survival of species. The genetic diversity of species is an important part of biodiversity research and reflects the ability of species to adapt and evolve in response to environmental changes. The higher the genetic diversity, the stronger the environmental adaptive ability [23]. Among the parameters that measure the genetic diversity of a species, nucleotide diversity is somewhat better than haplotype diversity [24]. According to the criterion proposed by Grant et al., the threshold value for haplotype diversity is 0.5 and the threshold value for nucleotide diversity is 0.005; the higher the value of both, the higher the degree of genetic diversity in the population [25]. In this study, the genetic diversity of 168 DNA sequences of five geographic populations of C. alburnus was analyzed, resulting in a total of 11 haplotypes, and the nucleotide diversity of the five populations ranged from 0.00053 to 0.01834, with the highest genetic diversity in the TH population, followed by the SH population, with lower genetic diversity in the HH, CJ, and GH populations. Compared to previous studies, the genetic diversity of the TH population was higher than that in the Pearl River (Pi = 0.007) [10], the Three Gorges Reservoir (Pi = 0.0141) [26], Xingkai Lake (Pi = 0.0041), and Danjiangkou (Pi = 0.0017) [27]. Genetic diversity is influenced by a variety of factors. Population evolution and historical factors are the main reasons for reduced levels of genetic diversity, and geographic isolation and inbreeding can lead to differentiation in gene exchange between populations, reduced gene richness, and severe homogenization. Overall, the C. alburnus population showed high haplotype diversity and high nucleotide diversity, and it is speculated that this situation may be due to the secondary contact of independent populations [28]. TH is the largest lake, with a high degree of protection and a prominent ecological status. C. alburnus has different ecological protections in the different lakes. The SH population is possibly affected by the active release of cultured fish, avoiding inbreeding and bottleneck effects and leading to population mixing and the random exchange of genes, resulting in increased genetic diversity. However, the CJ and HH populations have been overfished for many years, and the fishery resources have seriously declined. The habitats have changed, and the germplasm resources have declined. Under the influence of net-enclosure aquaculture facilities, GH has not yet fully restored its fishery resources, resulting in the low genetic diversity of C. alburnus.

4.2. Genetic Structure of the Population

Fst is an important indicator of the degree of genetic differentiation among populations [29]. In this study, the Fst values of five different C. alburnus populations were calculated to evaluate the genetic differentiation among populations, and the results showed that the Fst of the SH population was larger (Fst > 0.25) than those of the other four populations, with the highest degree of differentiation with the Changjiang River population (Fst = 0.51712). The genetic variation was mainly from within the population, and the intra-population variation was much greater than the inter-population genetic variation, which was consistent with the genetic differentiation coefficient (Fst) of the C. alburnus population, which showed negative values when the intra-population variation was greater than the inter-population variation [30].
Different geographic populations tend to have significant genetic differences due to isolation, and geographic isolation limits gene flow and leads to a high degree of genetic differentiation among populations [31]. From the NJ phylogenetic tree constructed using genetic distance, the five populations showed a significant geographical pattern. The NJ tree divided the five populations into three branches, with the HH, CJ, and GH populations in central China clustered into one and the SH population in the north and the TH population in the south distributed independently, with the SH and TH populations having the greatest genetic distance and maintaining consistency in geographic distribution. The large genetic difference between the SH population and the other four wild populations may be attributed to geographical distance. SH lake is very far from the other four regions. SH and TH are two different lakes that are independent of north and south China. Fish gene flow is mostly concentrated within their respective lakes or adjacent tributaries. Most fish are in relatively closed water bodies for a long time, and genetic exchange between the two populations is limited. Genetic differentiation occurred to form a distance isolation pattern, which is related to the lack of long-distance geographical distribution. The gene flow between populations, geographical isolation, and habitat heterogeneity are important factors in the formation of spatial genetic patterns in the population of C. alburnus [32].

4.3. Historical Dynamics of the Population

Historical population dynamics can reflect the influence of historical events such as past geological climate change and human activities on the current species distribution [33,34]. Generally, there is a belief that the negative and significant values of Tajima’s and Fu’s Fs in the neutral test indicate that the population expanded in history. The other result indicated that, based on the clear unimodal shape of the individual inter-basal mismatch distribution curve, population expansion can be considered [35]. The BSP analysis of the historical effective population size and the skyline plot of historical time for C. alburnus both indicated that the C. alburnus population was relatively stable and that the historical population dynamics did not significantly deviate from equilibrium. The neutral test showed that the overall Tajima’s D was negative and Fu’sFs test results were positive values. The mismatch analysis plot was a multi-peaked curve, which also indicated that the population was stable. The BSP further verified that the effective population of C. alburnus did not experience significant population expansion. In terms of historical evolution, the population experienced the last major ice age during the late Quaternary ice age 0.29 million years ago. Although alternating climate changes had a significant impact on the population, the Bayesian skyline diagram reflects a small effect on the effective population size of C. alburnus with the end of the last ice age and sea level rise due to climate warming. Populations of C. alburnus continued to spread outward, and in subsequent evolution and habitat changes different haplotypes were gradually generated, which formed a rich pattern of genetic structures.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a genetic diversity analysis of five different populations of C. alburnus was analyzed, and it indicated that populations with higher genetic diversitycan be managed by establishing conservation units. For the low genetic diversity of C. alburnus, populations should be enhanced through the breeding of C. alburnus germplasm resources and the protection of the survival environment. However, using individual mitochondrial sequence markers for population genetic analyses still has limitations, and subsequent studies should be conducted in combination with other methods such as the RAD (restriction-site-associated DNA) and GBS (genotyping by sequence) research methods to ensure more accurate results and an all-round assessment of the germplasm resource to provide data to support the sustainable and healthy development of C. alburnus.

Author Contributions

D.-A.F., M.H., and Y.-j.C. conceived and designed the experiments. M.H. and D.-A.F. were responsible for data scoring, the analyses, and writing the manuscript. H.-b.S. and H.L. helped selecting the samples. Y.-f.R. and T.-y.L. helped with data analysis during manuscript preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Special Investigation on Fishery Resources and Environment of Key Waters in Northeast China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of China (2130135DS02), the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFD0900604),the National Infrastructure of Fishery Germplasm Resources (2022DKA3047003), and the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund, CAFS (No. 2020TD61).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Variable sites of mitochondrial DNA COI gene haplotypes in C. alburnus.
Table A1. Variable sites of mitochondrial DNA COI gene haplotypes in C. alburnus.
Variable SitesHaplotype
Hap 1Hap 2Hap 3Hap 4Hap 5Hap 6Hap 7Hap 8Hap 9Hap 10Hap 11
3G..A......A
5A..G....G.G
8A....G..G.G
24C....T....T
25G....A..A..
26T.......C.C
27T....C..C.C
46C..T.T..T.T
62G....A..A.A
37T....C....C
38G..A.A..A.T
43G....A..A.A
44A....G....G
45A....G....G
46T....A....A
47A..G.G.....
50G....A....A
54A....G....G
57T..C.A..C.A
58T....C....C
59A..T.G....T
60C....T..T.G
61G....A....A
63G....A....A
70G...A.A...A
74C....G..T.G
75G.......A.A
76T..G.G.....
77C....T..T..
80A....G..G.G
83G..A.A....A
87G..A....A.A
89A..G.T..G..
93A..G.G..G.G
94A....G....G
99T....G...CG
101T..C......C
102T....G....G
106C....T....T
107G....A....A
109C....T....T
111CT.TTTTTTT.

References

  1. Chen, Y.Y. Fauna Sinica Osteichthyes: Cypriniformes II; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998; pp. 112–207. [Google Scholar]
  2. Álvarez-Noriega, M.; Burgess, S.C.; Byers, J.E.; Pringle, J.M.; Wares, J.P.; Marshall, D.J. Global biogeography of marine dispersal potential. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 4, 1196–1203. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Lu, S.; Walayat, N.; Hu, C.; Xiong, H. Effects of oxidative modification on the functional, conformational and gelling properties of myofibrillar proteins from Culter alburnus. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 162, 1442–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Qi, P.Z.; Qin, J.H.; Xie, C.X. Determination of genetic diversity of wild and cultured topmouth culter (Culter alburnus) inhabiting China using mitochondrial DNA and microsatellites. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2015, 61, 232–239. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chen, S.H.; Qu, Y.J.; Li, J.E. Mitochondrial DNA and Its Progresses in Fish. Biotechnol. Bull. 2011, 3, 13–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Boore, J.L. Animal mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999, 27, 1767–1780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Folmer, O.; Black, M.; Hoeh, W.; Lutz, R.; Vrijenhoek, R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome coxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1994, 3, 294–299. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J.; Gao, T.; Yokogawa, K.; Zhang, Y. Differential population structuring and demographic history of two closely related fish species, Japanese sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) and spotted sea bass (Lateolabrax maculatus) in Northwestern Pacific. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006, 39, 799–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, G.N.; Fang, D.A. Genetic diversity analysis of C. alburnus Basilewsky in typical waters of the lower Changjiang River based on COI gene. Freshw. Fish. 2021, 51, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, H.Q.; Yang, Z.T.; Li, G.F.; Xiao, S.B.; Sun, J.J.; Yang, H.R.; Zhao, H.H.; Xie, T.H.; Han, X.P.; Liu, L. Genetic Diversity of Mitochondrial Cyt b Sequences in Pelteobagrus fulvidraco from the Pearl River. Acta Sci. Nat. Univ. Sunyatseni. 2015, 54, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, X.J.; Cao, W.M.; Song, F. Anatomical and Histological Characteristics of the Intestine of the Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus). Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2011, 40, 292–298. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oosting, T.; Hilario, E.; Wellenreuther, M.; Ritchie, P.A. DNA degradation in fish: Practical solutions and guidelines to improve DNA preservation for genomic research. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 8643–8651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wang, Q.; Jin, Y. Study on DNA Barcoding of Four Common Cyprinidae Species. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 3. [Google Scholar]
  14. Thompson, J.D. The Clustal_X Windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tool. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25, 4876–4882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Librado, P.; Rozas, J. DnaSP v5: A Software for Comprehensive Analysis of DNA Polymorphism Data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25, 1451–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Excoffier, L.; Lischer, H. An Integrated Software Package for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Mol. Bio. Evol. 2005, 1, 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  17. Rogers, A.R.; Harpending, H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1992, 1, 552–569. [Google Scholar]
  18. Allio, R.; Donega, S.; Galtier, N.; Nabholz, B. Large Variation in the Ratio of Mitochondrial to Nuclear Mutation Rate across Animals: Implications for Genetic Diversity and the Use of Mitochondrial DNA as a Molecular Marker. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2017, 34, 2762–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Bandelt, H.J.; Forster, P.; Rohl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999, 16, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jolle, B.S.; Veronika, B.; Du, P.L.; Denise, K.; Carsten, M.; Venelin, M.; Müller, N.F.; Jūlija, P.; Rasmussen, D.A.; Chi, Z. Taming the BEAST—A Community Teaching Material Resource for BEAST 2. Syst. Biol. 2018, 67, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
  22. Hebert, P.D.N.; Ratnasingham, S.; De Waard, J.R. Barcoding animal life: Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc. Biol. 2003, 270, S96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Qi, X.Z.; Lin, Z.S.; Wen, T. Resistance of available resource fluctuation to alien species invasion. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2007, 27, 9. [Google Scholar]
  24. Houki, S.; Yamada, M.; Honda, T.; Komaru, A. Origin and possible role of males in hermaphroditic androgenetic Corbicula clams. Zool. Sci. 2011, 28, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Was, G.; Bowen, B.W. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: Insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J. Hered. 1998, 89, 415–426. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang, D.; Cheng, Q.W.; Yang, Z.Y.; Lian, Y.X.; Ye, S.W.; Liu, J.S.; Li, Z.X.; Luo, X.Z.; Zou, G.W. Preliminary Analysis on the Mtdna COI Genetic Diversity of Culter spp. (Cyprinidae) in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2015, 39, 1054–1058. [Google Scholar]
  27. Qi, P.; Guo, B.; Xie, C.; Wu, C.; Lu, S.; Duan, Y.; Zhou, X. Assessing the genetic diversity and population structure of C. alburnus in China based on mitochondrial 16S rRNA and COI gene sequences. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 2013, 50, 390–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, J.Z.C.; Luo, J.H.; Lu, L.R.; Sun, Z.; Cao, Z.G.; Zeng, Q.F.; Mao, Z.G. Changes in aquatic vegetation communities based on satellite images before and after pen aquaculture removal in East Lake Taihu. J. Lake Sci. 2021, 33, 11. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wright, S. Evolution and the Genetics of Populations Vol-1; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1978; pp. 120–150. [Google Scholar]
  30. Kitada, S.; Nakamichi, R.; Kishino, H. Understanding population structure in an evolutionary context: Population-specific FST and pairwise FST. G3 2021, 11, b316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Berger, E.M. Population Genetics of Marine Gastropods and Bivalves, in Ecology; Academic Press: Hanover, Germany, 1983; pp. 563–569. [Google Scholar]
  32. Séré, M.; Thévenon, S.; Belem, A.M.G.; De Meeûs, T. Comparison of different genetic distances to test isolation by distance between populations. Heredity 2017, 119, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Elmer, K.R.; Reggio, C.; Wirth, T.; Verheyen, E.; Salzburger, W.; Meyer, A. Pleistocene desiccation in East Africa bottlenecked but did not extirpate the adaptive radiation of Lake Victoria haplochromine cichlid fishes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 13404–13409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fontaine, M.C.; Snirc, A.; Frantzis, A.; Koutrakis, E.; Öztürk, B.; Öztürk, A.A.; Austerlitz, F. History of expansion and anthropogenic collapse in a top marine predator of the Black Sea estimated from genetic data. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, E2569–E2576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Fu, Y.X. Statistical Tests of Neutrality of Mutations Against Population Growth, Hitchhiking and Background Selection. Genetics 1997, 147, 915–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sampling locations of C. alburnus in 5 different river basins.
Figure 1. Sampling locations of C. alburnus in 5 different river basins.
Biology 12 00012 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of 11 haplotypes in 5 populations and the ML tree. Note: the same symbol before haplotypes indicates clustering as a group.
Figure 2. Distribution of 11 haplotypes in 5 populations and the ML tree. Note: the same symbol before haplotypes indicates clustering as a group.
Biology 12 00012 g002
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of haplotypes (A) and haplotype network tree (B).
Figure 3. Geographical distribution of haplotypes (A) and haplotype network tree (B).
Biology 12 00012 g003
Figure 4. NJ trees of 5 populations based on genetic distance.
Figure 4. NJ trees of 5 populations based on genetic distance.
Biology 12 00012 g004
Figure 5. Mismatch distribution of C. alburnus based on COI gene sequences.
Figure 5. Mismatch distribution of C. alburnus based on COI gene sequences.
Biology 12 00012 g005
Figure 6. Bayesian skyline plot of C. alburnus.
Figure 6. Bayesian skyline plot of C. alburnus.
Biology 12 00012 g006
Table 1. Sampling information of C. alburnus in five different river basins.
Table 1. Sampling information of C. alburnus in five different river basins.
PopulationAbbreviationSample SizeLongitudeLatitude
Songhua LakeSH44E 126°79′34.26′′N 43°71′37.53′′
Huaihe RiverHH30E 117°22′22.54′′N 32°96′06.18′′
Changjiang RiverCJ32E 116°27′72.95′′N 29°79′57.50′′
Taihu LakeTH31E 120°19′27.02′′N 31°23′17.43′′
Gehu LakeGH31E 119°82′67.59′′N 31°66′33.95′′
Table 2. Average base content of COI gene sequences of five populations of C. alburnus.
Table 2. Average base content of COI gene sequences of five populations of C. alburnus.
PopulationPercentage of Nucleotide (%)
T(U)CAGT+AC+G
SH25.418.027.828.753.246.7
HH25.218.128.128.553.346.6
CJ25.118.228.128.553.246.7
TH25.218.228.128.553.346.7
GH25.318.128.128.553.446.6
Average25.318.128.128.653.446.7
Table 3. Genetic diversity of five populations of C. alburnus based on COI sequences.
Table 3. Genetic diversity of five populations of C. alburnus based on COI sequences.
PopulationHaplotypesPolymorphic SitesHaplotype Diversity (Hd)Nucleotide Diversity (Pi)Neutrality Tests
Tajima’s DFu’s Fs
SH5640.4760.00865−2.520296.200
HH320.4210.00091−0.21831−0.143
CJ210.4170.000791.03928 *1.328
TH7980.746 *0.01834 *−2.422477.380
GH210.2800.000530.180250.637
Total111150.6770.00673−2.694131.890
* indicates significant difference (p < 0.05).
Table 4. Genetic distance and Fst of five different populations.
Table 4. Genetic distance and Fst of five different populations.
PopulationSHHH CJ TH GH
SH0.008490.47062 *0.51712 *0.29755 *0.49043 *
HH 0.00669 0.000920.222710.025280.00035
CJ 0.00740 0.001240.000810.053080.46155 *
TH 0.01588 *0.01068 *0.01087 *0.019920.03503
GH 0.00644 0.000730.001260.01056 *0.00054
The value in bold in a diagonal line indicates the genetic distance within a population. The genetic distance between populations is below the diagonal line, and the Fst between populations is above the diagonal line. The “*” indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, M.; Fang, D.-A.; Chen, Y.-j.; Sun, H.-b.; Luo, H.; Ren, Y.-f.; Li, T.-y. Genetic Diversity Evaluation and Conservation of Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus) Germplasm in Five River Basins in China. Biology 2023, 12, 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010012

AMA Style

He M, Fang D-A, Chen Y-j, Sun H-b, Luo H, Ren Y-f, Li T-y. Genetic Diversity Evaluation and Conservation of Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus) Germplasm in Five River Basins in China. Biology. 2023; 12(1):12. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010012

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Miao, Di-An Fang, Yong-jin Chen, Hai-bo Sun, Hui Luo, Ya-fei Ren, and Tian-you Li. 2023. "Genetic Diversity Evaluation and Conservation of Topmouth Culter (Culter alburnus) Germplasm in Five River Basins in China" Biology 12, no. 1: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12010012

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop