Next Article in Journal
Whey Protein Isolate and Garlic Essential Oil as an Antimicrobial Coating to Preserve the Internal Quality of Quail Eggs
Next Article in Special Issue
Study of the Design and Mechanical Properties of the Mix Proportion for Desulfurization Gypsum–Fly Ash Flowable Lightweight Soil
Previous Article in Journal
In Situ Decorated Palladium Nanoparticles on Chitosan Beads as a Catalyst for Coupling Reactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on the Oil Well Cement-Based Composites to Prevent Corrosion by Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen Sulfide at High Temperature
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Advantages on Using GGBS and ACBFS Aggregate to Obtain an Ecological Road Concrete

1
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 15, C. Daicoviciu Street, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
2
Faculty of Construction, Cadaster and Architecture, University of Oradea, 4, B.S. Delavrancea Street, 410058 Oradea, Romania
3
INCDO-INOE 2000, Research Institute for Analytical Instrumentation, 67 Donath Street, 400293 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Department of Physics and Chemistry, Technical University of Cluj-Napoca, 400114 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(8), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13081368
Submission received: 29 June 2023 / Revised: 27 July 2023 / Accepted: 31 July 2023 / Published: 3 August 2023

Abstract

:
This work aims to show the advantages of using GGBS (Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag) and ACBFS aggregate (Air-Cooled Blast Furnace Slag) on the tensile strength and durability properties of infrastructure concrete at the reference age of 28 days. Three concrete mixes were prepared: the first one was a control sample; the second one had 15% GGBS (instead of Portland cement) and 25% ACBFS (instead of natural sand); and the third had 15% GGBS (instead of Portland cement) and 50% ACBFS (instead of natural sand). The studies on mortars focused on the ratio of compressive strength (CS) in correlation with the specific surface area (obtained by the Blain method). The microstructure of the prepared mortars was examined at the age of 28 days by X-ray diffraction, SEM electron microscopy with an energy-dispersive EDX spectrometer, and NMR nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry. The results of the tests carried out afterwards on the concretes containing slag (15% GGBS and 25% or 50% ACBFS) showed values that met high-quality criteria for exfoliation (S56 < 0.1 kg/m2), carbonation, and gelling G100 (with a loss of resistance to compression η < 25%). The slag concretes showed a degree of gelation of G100 (with a loss of compressive strength below 25%), low volume losses below 18,000 mm3/5000 mm2 (corresponding to wear class 4, grade I), and moderate penetration of chlorine ions (according to the RCPT test). All of these allow the concrete with slag (GGBS/ACBFS) to be recommended as an ecological road concrete. Our study proved that a high-class road concrete of BcR 5.0 can be obtained, with tensile strengths of a minimum 5 MPa at 28 days (the higher road concrete class in Romania, according to national standards).

1. Introduction

In less than one century, concrete has become the most widely used construction material in the world [1], which is why large amounts of natural resources are consumed in its production. As a measure to ensure the ecological balance, it is necessary to implement the use of various unconventional and renewable resources [2,3]. An important characteristic of cementitious materials is their ability to accommodate large amounts of waste by replacing some or all of the cement and/or natural aggregate. Extensive research work has been carried out to evaluate the suitability of various industrial by-products as supplementary cementitious materials (SCM) and their influence on the rheology and physical and mechanical properties of mortars and concretes [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. In the steel industry, millions of tons of slag are a by-product that has to be neutralized for environmental reasons. The slag obtained is classified according to the origin of the minerals and the solidification process. Slag that cools slowly to atmospheric temperature is called air-cooled blast furnace slag (ACBFS), and slag that is instantaneously cooled under pressurized water jets is called granulated slag; the latter is ground into a powder that turns into ground granulated blast furnace slag. A crystalline character is observed in ACBFS slag by slow cooling in the air [11], while little or no crystallization occurs in slag rapidly cooled in water, where the glass content predominates [12,13].
The durability and mechanical properties of cement composites with GGBS largely depend on the hydraulic activity of the slag. The properties of the slag powder and the hydraulic activity are mainly affected by the glass content, chemical composition, and fineness of the slag powder. The vitreous content and chemical composition are passively determined by the ironmaking process, but the activation performance of GGBS can be changed by the fineness of the slag powder. The fineness of GGBS is usually expressed in terms of specific surface area and particle size distribution. Different levels of fineness can be achieved by grinding cementitious materials using different methods and grinding times [14,15,16]. By increasing the fineness of GGBS, the cementitious properties of cement containing steel slag are significantly improved [17]. The use of GGBS obtained by wet milling results in improved mechanical strength, reduced porosity, and low Ca(OH)2 content in concrete composites [18]. One of the important uses for GGBS is in concrete structures in marine environments as it has been shown to reduce the penetration of chlorides into concrete. Other positive effects of GGBS in concrete are protection against sulfate attacks and the alkali–silica reaction.
More stringent requirements apply to pavement concretes used on roads, platforms, and/or airfields than those used in hydraulic or civil engineering [19,20,21]. Atmospheric factors caused by temperature fluctuations and the influence of traffic caused by dynamic loads, as well as the presence of chemical deicing agents, contribute to the demanding operating conditions of pavement concrete [21,22]. The pollutant transport processes through concrete are different and can occur through absorption, when the movement of liquids is due to the capillary forces generated in the capillary pores. Transport occurs by permeability when the fluid movement is due to the action of pressure and by diffusion when the fluid movement is due to a concentration gradient [23]. Finally, the penetration of aggressive substances from the operating environment into the component impairs the durability of road concrete [24]. Due to the limitations related to the percentage of cement substitution, for example, the Swedish standard SS 13 70 03 [25] allows the addition of GGBS up to 25% of the CEM I cement for exposure class XF4, a class which is specific to road concrete. According to the Indian standard IS: 383, the replacement of natural sand with blast furnace slag is allowed up to a limit of 50% for unreinforced concrete [11], and the ACI 213R guidance [26] recommends the range of 20%–60% for the replacement of natural sand with ACBFS. The substitution percentage limitation is based on previous research, which indicated that ACBFS aggregate could be a potential internal source of sulfates released into the pore solution. These sulfates contribute to the filling of air voids in the concrete with ettringite. The filling process reduces the space for water to expand as it freezes, making the concrete microstructure more susceptible to freeze–thaw damage [27]. On the other hand, the study in [28] highlighted that the porous and rough ACBFS aggregate increased the contact area with the concrete matrix; thus, the concave holes and micropores on the surface of the slag aggregate could be filled with mortar and hydrated cement paste. This process can increase the interlocking and mechanical bond between the aggregate and the concrete matrix. ACBFS slag is used as a fine and a coarse aggregate in concrete [11,29,30]. The study in [31] reported that replacing coarse aggregate with up to 40% ACBFS and cement with 10% fly ash increased the concrete’s compressive and flexural strength. The study in [32] showed that road concrete with coarse aggregate replacement by ACBFS and fly ash cement developed a 6% higher compressive strength, while the flexural strength decreased by 15% compared to the reference.
Coarse aggregate road concrete ACBFS showed a decrease in wear resistance in a study [33]. Due to the low resistance to the crushing and fragmentation of coarse aggregate in the slag, it is recommended to use them only in the road infrastructure base layer [12]. Regarding the use of ACBFS as a fine aggregate, the study in [34] highlighted better properties in geopolymer mortars than in Portland cement mortar. The influence of the replacement degree of up to 100% natural sand by ACBFS in the concrete composition showed no detrimental effects on the properties studied, such as workability and mechanical strength, or on durability, which recorded a reduction in porosity, water absorption, chloride permeability, etc., at the age of 90 days [11].
Most of the research has examined the individual effects of GGBS replacing cement and ACBFS aggregate replacing sand in concrete. The research results [35,36,37,38] show that GGBS does not significantly improve compressive strength up to 28 days but that it does significantly improve it after 56 and 90 days as the pozzolanic reaction of GGBS gradually continues. Moreover, the studies in [38,39] show that by using GGBS with a low reactivity index in mortar mixtures at older ages (90 and 360 days) lower porosity and lower water absorption were achieved. The 0–10 micron particles of the GGBS particle distribution were strongly correlated with the hydration activity index at different curing ages [40].The study in [41] highlights a reduction in the shrinkage of concrete at the age of 150 days when granulated slag was used with a reduced hydration activity index.
This study focuses on the durability of rigid pavements and the environmental benefits of using possible industrial waste as raw material in the mass of road concrete, while ensuring the transition to a circular economy. At least two benefits emerge from this research; the first is the reduction in the energy consumption needed for the additional grinding of slag powder, and the second is the conservation of natural resources. First, the effect of GGBS fineness on compressive strengths was investigated on two mortars with 50% GGBS with specific Blaine surface areas of 360 m2/kg and 330 m2/kg. The ratio of compressive strengths between slag mortars and standard mortar was recorded at 7 and 28 days. A detailed study of the microstructure of the mortars was carried out using X-ray diffraction, SEM electron microscopy with an EDX energy dispersive spectrometer, and NMR nuclear magnetic resonance relaxometry.
To further explore the blast furnace slag benefits, two pavement concrete compositions were studied; in these, the cement was replaced with 15% GGBS with a low Blaine specific surface area (330 m2/kg) equivalent to that of Portland cement, and the natural sand was replaced with 25% and 50% ACBFS. The tensile strength and durability properties were tested, including freeze–thaw resistance with and without deicing agent, abrasion resistance, resistance to carbonation, and chlorine ion permeability by the RCPT rapid test. The analysis of the results sought to establish the optimal percentages of using blast furnace slag in the composition of road concrete with performances equivalent to those of the reference concrete at the age of 28 days.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Portland cement-CEM I 42.5R, supplied by Romcim, CRH Romania Company, Romania, presents technical properties with values falling within the limits recommended by SR EN 197-1 [42]. The granulated blast furnace slag purchased from Steelworks Galati has a glass content of 95% and an oxide composition as given in Table 1, and the physico-mechanical properties have been declared according to SR EN 15167-1 [43]. The superunitary ratio (1.07) of calcium oxide to silicon indicates efficient hydraulic activity, and the 70% concentration of oxides of silicon, calcium, aluminum, magnesium, and iron accumulated in GGBS indicates good pozzolanic activity according to standard D 6868 [38,44,45].
Air-cooled blast furnace slag aggregate ACBFS, crushed to 0/4 mm size, was purchased from Galati Steelworks. The quality assurance of the slag aggregate (0/4) mm; natural sand NA quality (0/4) mm; and gravel (4/8) mm was controlled according to SR EN 12620 [46]. The geometric and physical–mechanical properties of the crushed quarry chippings of grade (16/25) mm correspond to the requirements of SR 667 [47] and SR EN 13043 [48] for grade (8/16) mm. Figure 1a–e present the granulometric composition of the used aggregate, determined in accordance with SR EN 933-1 [49]. For the ACBFS, the slag aggregates are given in Figure 1f, photographic images before and after crushing.
The additives used were purchased from Master Builders Solutions Romania group, Romania, MasterGlenium SKY 527 superplasticizer additive, and Master Air 9060 air entrainer additive, with characteristics following SR EN 934-2 [50]. The water was taken from the Cluj-Napoca supply system, and the properties corresponded to SR EN 1008 [51].

2.1.1. Preliminary Mortar Mixtures

To assess the compressive strength, preliminary tests were carried out on the mortars with different specific GGBS surfaces. Then, the ratio of the compressive strength (CS) between the mortars with GGBS and the standard mortar was determined to show the influence of the specific surface area on the mortars; these experiments were similar to those of the study in [52]. The recipe for standard mortar M I with 100% Portland cement and two mortar recipes with 50% GGBS M II/360 and M III/330 and different specific surface areas of 360 m2/kg and 330 m2/kg were created in the experiment. The prepared mortars were stored in a polyethylene bag at a relative humidity of (90 ± 5)% for 7 days and then in a humidified air box at a temperature of (20 ± 2) °C and a relative humidity of (65 ± 5)%. As curing conditions, water according to SR EN 196-1 [53] or a wet environment according to SR EN 1015-11 [54] can be optionally applied [55]. For this experiment, we chose the method of curing the samples in a wet environment, which is less favorable for compressive strength development and closer to the in situ conditions. The water to binder ratio was 0.5, and the quantities of materials used to make the mortars are listed in Table 2. The prismatic specimens of 40 × 40 × 160 mm were tested according to SR EN 1015-11 [54].

2.1.2. Concrete Mixtures

In the run-up to this work, the optimal proportions of the blast furnace slag material substitution were analyzed, and the material proportions were selected based on the various preliminary recipes in the study in [56]. We then proceeded with three paving mixes, one reference and two that were constantly incorporated with 15% GGBS blast furnace slag and 25% or 50% ACBFS slag aggregate crushed to a (0/4) mm size.
When preparing the concrete, the aggregate was saturated with the SSD dry surface. The initial moisture state of aggregate in concrete containing recycled materials has a major impact on the fresh and hardened state of the concrete. To avoid changes in the effective water–cement ratio and prevent the transfer of water from the mix to the porous aggregate, water balancing is generally suggested [57]. The quantities of material (kg/m3) for the concrete production are given in Table 3.
The road concrete design parameters were established for resistance class BcR 5.0, which corresponds to very heavy traffic, with casting in the sliding formwork system, according to the requirements of NE 014 [58] and SR EN 206 [59]. The test results for the concrete mix are shown in Table 4. It can be seen that the results were within the limits established by the applicable standards and that the compressive strengths in the preliminary recipes reached the minimum value of 50 MPa from the seventh day which are found in the previous work, [56].

2.2. Method

2.2.1. Influence of GGBS on the Ratio of Compressive Strength of Mortars at 7 and 28 Days

The CS ratio of mortars was calculated with Equation (1):
CS ratio =(fc GGBS/fc C) × 100, (%),
In the above relationship, (fc GGBS) is the mean compressive strength (MPa) of the mortar made from 50:50 slag and cement, and (fc C) is the mean compressive strength (MPa) of the mortar made from cement, (Figure 2a,b). Table 5 shows the minimum hydration activity index values determined according to the specifications SR EN 15167:1 [43] and ASTM C989 [60], correlated with the resistance classes for GGBS.

2.2.2. Characterization of the Microstructure of Standard Mortars and Mortars with GGBS

Phase composition analysis by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and microstructure analysis by electron microscopy coupled with energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM–EDX) were performed on the fragments resulting from the compression test on the standard mortar (M I) and the mortar with 50% GGBS (M II/360, M III/330) at the ages of 7 and 28 days.

X-ray Diffraction on Mortars at 7 and 28 Days

XRD patterns were recorded on the powder samples using a D8 Advance diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with CuK α1 radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å), operating at 40 kV and 35 mA, at room temperature. The semi-quantitative evaluation was performed following the reference intensity ratio (RIR) method [61].

SEM Measurements on Mortars at 7 and 28 Days

SEM–EDX analysis was performed at room temperature using a scanning electron microscope (VEGAS 3 SBU, Tescan, Brno-Kohoutovice, Czech Republic) with a Quantax EDX XFlash (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) detector. The ~4 mm2 samples were mounted with carbon tape on an SEM stub.

2.2.3. NMR Relaxometry Measurements Made on Mortars, at 28 Days

From the intact prismatic samples prepared with standard mortar and mortar with 50% GGBS, a cylindrical sample with a length of 20 mm and a diameter of 9.5 mm was taken at the age of 28 days. The sample was used to extract the relative distribution of the pore sizes by the NMR relaxometry technique (Figure 2c). After oven drying, the samples were placed and sealed in 10 mm diameter glass tubes, and NMR measurements were performed to reveal the intra-C-S-H pores. To better highlight the inter-C-S-H and capillary pores, a second set of NMR measurements was performed on cyclohexane-saturated samples [62]. The NMR measurements were performed with a MinispecMQ20 low-field device (Bruker, Germany) using the CPMG technique (see Ref. [57] for a description). Before each measurement, the samples were brought to the thermal equilibrium at a temperature of 35 °C. A total of 2000 spin echoes were recorded in each experiment, and the time between two echoes was kept at 0.1 ms to mitigate the effects of internal gradients on the relaxation measurements. The relaxation time distributions were extracted from the CPMG series using a numerical Laplace inversion of the recorded data [63,64].

2.2.4. Road Concrete Mixes with Embedded Slag (GGBS and ACBFS), Tested at 28 Days

In this study, hardened concrete, mechanical strengths (flexural and compression), wear resistance, freeze–thaw resistance, permeable void content, corrosion resistance by chlorine ion penetration, and carbonation were evaluated. For each mixture, three 150 × 150 × 600 mm prismatic samples were cast and kept in air for 24 h and then kept in water at (20 ± 2) °C until the reference age of 28 days. Subsequently, flexural tests were carried out according to SR EN 12390-5 [65], (Figure 3a,b). To determine the corrosion resistance by carbonation according to SR CR 12793, a 1% phenolphthalein solution was sprayed onto the freshly cleaved fragments [66] (Figure 3c). From the remaining prisms, 18 cubes with a side length of 150 mm were cut; with these, the compressive strengths were evaluated according to SR EN 12390-3 [67], and the loss of compressive strength between the water-preserved control samples and the samples tested in 100 freeze–thaw cycles was evaluated according to SR 3518 [68] (Figure 3d). For each mixture, 9 slabs with a cross-section of 150 × 150 mm and a thickness of 50 mm were cut from the remaining fragments to estimate the mass loss by exfoliation in the presence of thawing agents (3% NaCl) after 56 freeze–thaw cycles according to SR assessment CEN/TS 12390-9 [69] (Figure 3e), and 9 cubes with a side length of 71 mm were used to assess the volume loss through wear according to SR EN 1338 [70] (Figure 3f,g). The permeable void content was evaluated in 71 mm cubes according to ASTM C 642 [71] (Figure 3h).
The concrete quality in terms of frost–thaw resistance was assessed against the criteria presented in Table 6, and the conditions for wear resistance are given in Table 7.
To assess chlorine ion penetration, cylindrical specimens 100 mm in diameter and approximately 200 mm long were cast, from which 50 mm thick strips were cut for the RPCT test according to ASTM C 1202 [75]. The samples, protected on the side surface with epoxy material and covered with boiled and chilled water, were kept in the vacuum saturation apparatus with a vacuum pump and manometer for 20 h until fully saturated (Figure 4a). Immediately after completion of the RCPT test (Figure 4b), the chlorine ion migration coefficient was then determined on the same samples using the NT BUILD 492 colorimetric method [76]. A silver nitrate solution (AgNO3) was sprayed at 0.1 mol/dm3 (0.1 M) onto axially split samples. After 15 min, a light gray precipitate of silver chloride formed on the surface of the sample on the part of the face where chlorine ions were present. The chlorine penetration depth (Xd) for each sample was obtained from the average of seven measurements taken at different positions across the sample width. Then, the migration coefficients of the chlorine ions (D) were calculated using the Nernst–Planck Equation (2) [76,77]:
D = 0.0239 273 + T L V 2 t ( x d 0.0238 273 + T L x d V 2 )  
under:
  • D—Migration coefficient in non-equilibrium state (×10−12 m2/s);
  • V—Applied voltage (V);
  • T—Mean value between initial and final temperature in the anolytic solution, NaCl (°C);
  • L—Sample thickness (mm);
  • Xd—Average chlorine penetration depth (mm).
The correlation between the past electric charge Q and chlorine ion penetrability is shown in Table 8:

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Mortar Mixes with GGBS

3.1.1. Influence of GGBS on the Ratio of Compressive Strength of Mortars at 7 and 28 Days

The mean values of the three specimens of the standard mortar M I and the slag mortars M II/360 and M III/330 that were tested for compressive strength and the CS ratios for the mortars are shown in Table 9.
The compressive strengths of the standard mortar and the test mortars are shown in Figure 5a. It can be seen that the compressive strength of the mortar samples increased with age; this was due to the continued duration of the hydration process and the reactions of the cement with the water in the pores and capillaries of the system [78]. The hydration reactions led to the formation of new hydration products, of which C-S-H occupied 50% ÷ 60% of the volume of cement paste after 28 days and was the main product contributing to the development of mechanical strength [79]. The CS ratio of the standard and GGBS mortars with the two specific surface areas at 7 and 28 days are shown in Figure 5b. The results recorded for the CS ratio in the two test mortars with GGB, as associated with the requirements specified in SR EN 15167:1 [43], classified the GGBS slag powder as being in resistance class 80 according to ASTM C989 [60]. With the specific GGBS area increase from 330 to 360 m2/kg, the CS ratio increased by 8.47% after 7 days and by 13.58% after 28 days. The larger the specific surface area, the stronger the reaction capacity and the faster the increase in the hydration rate [14,40,80], which increased the strength of M II/360 slag mortar more compared to M III/330. The linear equations in Figure 4b show that the CS ratio could reach 100 for the specific area of 382 m2/kg at the age of 28 days and the specific area of 576 m2/kg at the age of 7 days under the conditions of the linear increase in the specific surface area, according to the results of the study in [40].

3.1.2. XRD Measurements with X-ray Diffractometer Made on Mortars at 7 and 28 Days

The XRD patterns of the mortar samples at the ages of 7 and 28 days are presented in Figure 6.
The semi-quantitative analysis of the crystalline phases identified in the investigated samples is presented in Table 10. At the age of 7 days, quartz SiO2 was the main phase observed; this was followed by albite NaAlSi3O8, portlandite Ca(OH)2, ettringite Ca6Al2(SO4)3(OH)12·26H2O, calcium silicate hydrate CaH2O4Si, and orthoclase K(AlSi3O3) (Figure 5). At the age of 28 days, the diffraction peaks of portlandite and ettringite, which are characteristic of early cement hydration [81], were no longer observed.
The crystallinity degree of the investigated samples at the ages of 7 and 28 days is presented in Figure 7. At the age of 7 days, the highest value was obtained for MI. Replacing the cement with 50% GGBS led to more disorder in the early-stage structure of the mortars. At the age of 28 days, the degree of crystallinity of MI decreased, probably due to the change in structure leading to the disappearance of the portlandite and ettringite crystals. For the mortars with the addition of GGBS, the degree of crystallinity increased. A possible explanation for this behavior could be the higher proportion of calcium silicate hydrates found in the concrete with GGBS [82] than in the concrete made with Portland cement only. Moreover, the higher degree of crystallinity in slag mortar M II/360 could be attributed to the increased pozzolanic activity of the GGBS particles with higher SS [83,84,85].

3.1.3. SEM Measurements with Scanning Electron Microscopy and EDX with Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy Performed on Mortars Aged 7 and 28 Days

The pore size and morphology of the mortar samples M I, M II/360, and M III/330 at 7 and 28 days were studied by SEM and are shown in Figure 8. As can be seen, their surfaces were irregular and inhomogeneous, with pore sizes larger than capillary pores, which was characteristics of air holes (>a few μm) [86,87].
Table 11 shows the sizes of the pores measured as well as the pore spacing on the samples studied at 7 and 28 days.
Larger air holes at smaller intervals indicate a more porous surface, and conversely, small pore sizes spaced at larger intervals indicate a more compact surface [69,70].
At 7 days, the standard mortar sample M I (Figure 8a) had the most compact surface, with air holes (from 2.26 to 5.90 µm) at intervals (from 14.73 to 34.92 µm). In comparison, the slag sample M II/360 (Figure 8b) had larger air holes (from 2.09 to 7.02 µm) which were identified at smaller intervals (from 11.26 to 32.60 µm). Sample M III/330 (Figure 8c) was characterized by the largest pore ranges (from 10.70 to 187.62 µm) and sizes (r ranges from 5.57 to 15.24 µm). The different morphology of the slag mortar surfaces at the early age of 7 days is explained by the slower hydration reaction and lower heat release rate in GGBS than in Portland cement [13]. The SEM results were in correlation with the compressive strengths; an increase in porosity in the M II/360 and M III/330 samples caused a decrease in the compressive strengths [88].
At 28 days, the M III/330 slag mortar sample (Figure 8f) showed the most compact surface with smaller air holes (from 2.05 to 4.30 µm) at larger spacings (from 19.84 to 103.50 µm). In comparison, for the sample standard mortar sample M I (Figure 8d), the air holes were larger (r ranges from 3.20 to 11.52 µm), and the distances at the intervals were smaller (from 37.57 to 45.33 µm). For the slag sample M II/360, (Figure 8e) we observed air holes at larger spacings (from 35.51 to 124.04 µm) and pore sizes (from 8.65 to 13.24 µm) close to the standard sample M I. The surface morphology of the M II/360 sample was consistent with the slightly lower compressive strength compared to the M I, which was justified by the fineness of the GGBS. But the denser surface in sample M III/330 contrasted with the compressive strength, which decreased the most compared to the standard mortar. This behavior may be due to the filling of the free pores and the ability of GGBS to reduce the pore volume of the matrix [89] or to the inhomogeneity of the mortar.
The EDX images are presented in Figure 9 and Figure 10, and the results for the concentration of the identified elements are given in Table 12.
In the three samples analyzed, the predominant element, along with oxygen, was calcium, followed by silicon. The calcium-rich gel formation mechanisms imparted strength to the cementitious materials [90]. Hydrated calcium silicate C-S-H contributed significantly to the macro-properties of the concrete, such as strength and durability [91].
In the slag mortars, these high calcium concentrations can be attributed to the formation of C-S-H calcium silicate hydrate gel in addition to the hydraulic and pozzolanic reactivity of GGBS [89]. In addition, Al and Mg compounds were observed in samples M II/360 and M III/330 since the GGBS contained higher amounts of aluminum and magnesium than the Portland cement [92,93].
Different variations in the Ca/Si ratio characterized the composition of the gels C-S-H [94]:
-
For standard mortar M I with 100% cement, the value of 5.63 at 7 days old indicated the presence of most of the calcium-based structure, and the value of 2.29 at 28 days old indicated the presence of different forms of C-S-H there. As C-S-H gels are amorphous [94], the EDX result was in accordance with the XRD data obtained for the crystallinity degree.
-
For M II/360 and M III/330 with 50% GGBS, the values obtained in the range (1.85–2.23) at 7 and 28 days indicated the presence of different forms of C-S-H in the slag mortar samples [91,92].
The EDX measurements correlated with the 28-day SEM measurements, showing a more compact surface in the MIII/330 sample with 50% GGBS with smaller air holes and larger spacings compared to the standard mortar.

3.1.4. NMR Relaxometry Data at 28 Days

The evolution of the CPMG echo series in the empty mortar samples and cyclohexane-saturated samples at 28 days is shown in Figure 10 and Figure 11.
A clearer interpretation of these results comes from using the inverse Laplace transform to reveal the distribution of the relaxation times extracted from the CPMG series [63,64], as shown in Figure 11. The distribution of the relaxation times in the bare mortar samples after oven drying and in the cyclohexane-saturated samples obtained by the inverse Laplace numerical analysis is shown in Figure 12.
The values for the transverse relaxation time T2 plotted on the horizontal axis are proportional to the relative pore size, and the values plotted on the vertical axis represent the probability density that such relaxation times exist in the sample (here, a.u. stands for arbitrary units). The probable density indicates the probability of a certain relaxation time in the measured sample. In Figure 12, three peaks can be distinguished, the position of which can be assigned to the three types of pores: intra-gel pores C-S-H (Peack 1) with dimensions up to 2 nm; inter-gel pores C-S-H (Peack 2) with dimensions up to 10 nm; and capillary pores (Peack 3) with dimensions between 50 nm and 1 μm [62].
The peak area is proportional to the amount of water or cyclohexane that is absorbed into the pores. The highest amount of water in the gel pores penetrating C-S-H (Peack 1, Figure 12a) was recorded in the slag mortar samples M II/360 and M III/330. But the gel pores in the cementitious materials had a protective effect due to their small size; the water in the pores of the gel did not freeze during the operation and was characterized by minimal permeability to liquids and gases. The C-S-H inter-gel pores, (Peack 2, Figure 12b) showed a similar relaxation time distribution in the three measured samples. The macro-capillaries with a radius in the range of 0.1 ÷ 10 μm were filled with water only in direct contact with water but had the ability of capillary condensation of moisture, making the cementitious materials hygroscopic. The main pores that caused damage to the structure of the cement stone were capillary pores [21,90].
The surface area of the Peack 3 in Figure 12b, corresponding to the capillary pores saturated with cyclohexane, shows that the test samples M II/360 and M III/330 with 50% GGBS absorbed the least amount of cyclohexane, and the sample of standard MI absorbed the greatest amount. These results indicated a lower capillary porosity compared to the standard mortar MI. The region of the transverse relaxation time distribution T2 (on the Ox axis) moved slightly to the right at higher values (100 ms) for samples M II/360 and M III/330 compared to sample M I, which had a larger radius pore but a greater decreasing probability density below 0.01. In addition, it was observed that the maximum intensity (Peack 3) in sample M III/330 was slightly shifted to the left at the lower values compared to sample M II/360 which had smaller radius pores; the NMR results were consistent with those obtained by SEM–EDX.

3.2. Road Concrete Mixes with Embedded Slag (GGBS and ACBFS), Tested at 28 Days

3.2.1. Mechanical, Mechanical Wear, Freeze–Thaw Resistance, and Permeable Pore Content

The flexural tensile strength evolution at 28 days, the compressive strengths of the blanks and samples maintained in the thermostatic chamber, and the loss of compressive strength after 100 freeze–thaw cycles are shown in Figure 13. It was observed in all mixtures that the value of the tensile strength by bending in (Figure 13a) was above the limit of 5.5 MPa, which allowed the classification of the road concrete as class BcR 5.0, corresponding to very heavy traffic according to NE 014 [58]. However, the tensile strengths decreased slightly with the increasing dosage of ACBFS aggregate, by up to 4.1% for composite S15/25 and 10% for S 15/50 compared to the reference mixture S 0/0. Regarding compressive strength, the S15/50 composite performed better than the S15/25 composite although it was up to 7.58% lower than the S0/0 reference mixture, (Figure 13b). It was also observed that the two slag mixtures had lower compressive strength losses at 100 freeze–thaw cycles than the reference composite S0/0 (Figure 13c), with values below the limit of 25% set in SR 3518 [68].
The total exfoliated mass S at 56 freeze–thaw cycles, the volume loss from attrition, and the permeable void content gave the results shown in Figure 14a. It shows an 8.9% increase in exfoliated cumulative mass in the S15/50; Figure 14b shows a wear volume loss of 5.5% in the S15/50 composite compared to the reference S0/0 composite. For the slag mixtures, however, the total value of the exfoliated mass S56 was <0.1 kg/m2, which corresponds to a very good exfoliation resistance according to SS 13 72 44 [72,73] and falls into the same wear resistance class as the reference concrete (class 4, marking I, with values ≤18,000 mm3/5000 mm2) [70]. In Figure 14c, the permeable pore content of slag compositions shows values above the reference composite S0/0.
Figure 14 shows the relationship between the permeable void content and compressive strength, the total mass exfoliated after 56 freeze–thaw cycles, and the volume loss through abrasion and tensile strength. It was found that a second-order polynomial relationship developed between these features with a very good correlation coefficient (R-value), with decreasing permeable void content, flexural strengths, and freeze–thaw resistance and a wear resistance increase (Figure 15a–c). The porosity increase justified the reduction in performance parameters since more porous concrete usually results in a lower degree of hydration and lower compressive and tensile strengths [24].

3.2.2. Corrosion Resistance from Chlorides and Carbonation

The passing electric charges recorded values between 2273 and 3650 Coulombs for all the mixtures made (Figure 16a), which placed them in the moderate class of chlorine ion permeation, in accordance with ASTM C 1202 [75]. A discrepancy in RCPT values was observed with the S15/50 blend, which increased by 61%, while the S15/25 blend increased by only 16%. This observation needs to be investigated in a future study.
It can be seen that as the degree of substitution by ACBFS aggregate increases, the penetration depth of the chlorine ions and the migration coefficient calculated with the Nernst–Planck equation increased (Figure 16b). Due to the higher water absorption of the ACBFS aggregate, the water requirement to maintain specific workability increases at higher levels of sand substitution [11]. A higher amount of water led to an increase in the porosity of the S15/50 composite and the highest migration coefficient of chlorine ions compared to the reference mixture. The two features developed a directly proportional relationship, as shown in Figure 16c and Figure 17, with images of the chlorine ion migration front.

3.2.3. Corrosion Resistance from Carbonation

Both the reference samples (Figure 18a) and the slag samples (Figure 18b,c) were unaffected by corrosion by carbonation at the age of 28 days. The color of the indicator solution (red-purple) on the contour areas of the surfaces was kept identical to the interior of the test specimens. The diffusion of carbon dioxide from the cement matrix was impeded by the increased compactness of the concrete cement stone [95,96].
The reported results represented the average of the three samples tested for each mixture with the CoV coefficient of variation (%), as shown in Table 13.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the influence of blast furnace slag (GGBS and ACBFS) on the physico-mechanical properties at 28 days was studied in three road concrete mixes, as follows: S0/0, a blank sample (exclusively Portland cement), and two other mixes S15/25 and S15/50, in which the Portland cement was replaced by 15% GGBS and the natural sand by 25% ACBFS and 50% ACBFS.
First of all, before making concrete, studies were made on mortars. This method was very useful in finding the best direction for the study of concrete with different percentages of slag (GGBS/ACBFS).
The main results of the physico-mechanical and durability properties of the road concretes and mortars showed the following:
The report on the compressive strengths classified the GGBS powder as resistance class 80, relative to the criteria established by ASTM C989.
At 7 days, the XRD measurements showed the highest level of crystallinity in the standard mortar M I.
After 28 days, mortar M II/360 showed a level of crystallinity above the level of the standard mortar.
At 7 days, the SEM measurements indicated the most compact surface for the standard MI mortar.
At 28 days, the slag mortar M III/330 showed a compact surface. The surface morphology of the M II/360 was similar to that of the standard sample; results were also confirmed by the compressive strength and degree of crystallinity determined by XRD.
The EDX results complemented the SEM assessment and showed the presence of C-S-H in all the samples analyzed.
At 28 days, in M III/330, the Ca/Si ratio value was the closest to the standard M I.
The NMR results showed that the slag mortars M II/360 and M III/330 had the largest proportion of C-S-H intra-pores, which had a protective effect against the freeze–thaw strength due to their small size.
Due to the evolution of the CS ratio and a similar microstructure in both the M II/360 and M III/330 mortars, it was decided to use GGBS slag with a low specific surface, to create an ecological pavement concrete.
The physical and mechanical properties and the durability values of slag concrete S15/25 and S15/50 were:
Above the limit of 5.5 MPa, which allowed the classification of the road concrete as class BcR 5.0, corresponding to very heavy traffic according to NE 014 [58].
The tensile strengths decreased slightly with the increasing dosage of ACBFS aggregate, by up to 4.1% for composite S15/25 and 10% for S 15/50 compared to the reference mixture S0/0.
In terms of compressive strength, the S15/50 composite performed better than the S15/25 composite, although it was up to 7.58% lower than the S0/0 reference mixture.
In general, the results were 10% lower, and they were up to 16% in the RCPT test. However, they were at the same level as the quality criteria of the reference concrete. The low reactivity of GGBS and the increased porosity of ACBFS explain the reduction in resistances: mechanical, freeze–thaw resistance, exfoliation, wear, and chlorine ion penetration.
The pavement mixes with 15% GGBS and 25% or 50% ACBFS met the criteria for the assessment of the concrete quality as being very good in terms of exfoliation (S56 is <0.1 kg/m2) and carbonation, which corresponds to a G100 degree of gelation (with losses η < 25%), full placement into wear resistance class 4, brand I (volume loss values ≤ 18,000 mm3/5000 mm2), and a moderate level of chlorine ion penetration.
This research shows that blast furnace slag containing 15% GGBS and 25% or 50% ACBFS is an effective substitute for cement and natural sand in road concrete for all traffic classes.
Furthermore, from an environmental and carbon footprint perspective, the sustainability of GGBS with a low specific surface area and an ACBFS fine aggregate is evident.
Although the current focus is on mechanical strengths at 28 days, as a reference for determining the strength class of concrete further investigations aim to investigate the influence of blast furnace slag on road concrete composition at the age of 90 days since the pozzolanic activity of GGBS slag lasts longer than that of Portland cement.
The authors are currently working on publishing results on the quality and sustainability of ecological BcR in terms of strength and exposure class.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.M.N., D.L.M., D.S., O.C., I.A. and M.L.D.; methodologies, L.M.N., D.S., O.C. and I.A.; investigations, L.M.N., D.S., O.C. and M.L.D.; writing—preparation of the original draft, L.M.N.; writing—review and editing, L.M.N., D.L.M., D.S., O.C., I.A. and M.L.D.; supervision, D.L.M., D.S., I.A. and M.L.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Project “Network of excellence in applied research and innovation for doctoral and postdoctoral programs/InoHubDoc”, a project co-funded by the European Social Fund financing agreement No. POCU/993/6/13/153437.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the required data that support the finding are presented in the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This paper was financially supported by the Project “Network of excellence in applied research and innovation for doctoral and postdoctoral programs/InoHubDoc”, a project co-funded by the European Social Fund financing agreement No. POCU/993/6/13/153437. D.S. and O.C. acknowledge the financial support by the Ministry of Research, Innovation, and Digitization through Program 1—Development of the national research & development system, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional performance—Projects that finance the RDI excellence, Contract no. 18PFE/30.12.2021.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Aitcin, P.-C. Cements of yesterday and today: Concrete of tomorrow. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 1349–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Prakash, R.; Thenmozhi, R.; Raman, S.N. Mechanical characterisation and flexural performance of eco-friendly concrete produced with fly ash as cement replacement and coconut shell coarse aggregate. Int. J. Environ. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 18, 131–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burlacu, A.; Racanel, C. Reducing Cost of Infrastructure Works Using New Technologies. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/development/road-and-rail-infrastructure-in-asia_9789264302563-en (accessed on 27 February 2023).
  4. Corbu, O.; Toma, I.O. Progress in Sustainability and Durability of Concrete and Mortar Composites. Coatings 2022, 12, 1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ahmad, J.; Martínez-García, R.; Szelag, M.; De-Prado-gil, J.; Marzouki, R.; Alqurashi, M.; Hussein, E.E. Effects of steel fibers (Sf) and ground granulated blast furnace slag (ggbs) on recycled aggregate concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 7497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dimulescu, C.; Burlacu, A. Industrial Waste Materials as Alternative Fillers in Asphalt Mixtures. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Popescu, D.; Burlacu, A. Considerations on the Benefits of Using Recyclable Materials for Road Construction. Rom. J. Transp. Infrastruct. 2017, 6, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Forton, A.; Mangiafico, S.; Sauzéat, C.; Di Benedetto, H.; Marc, P. Behaviour of binder blends: Experimental results and modelling from LVE properties of pure binder, RAP binder and rejuvenator. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2021, 22, S197–S213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cadar, R.D.; Boitor, R.M.; Dragomir, M.L. An Analysis of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement from a Single Source—Case Study: A Secondary Road in Romania. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Forton, A.; Mangiafico, S.; Sauzéat, C.; Di Benedetto, H.; Marc, P. Properties of blends of fresh and RAP binders with rejuvenator: Experimental and estimated results. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 236, 117555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jain, S.; Santhanam, M.; Rakesh, S.; Kumar, A.; Gupta, A.K.; Kumar, R.; Sen, S.; Ramna, R.V. Utilization of Air-Cooled Blast Furnace Slag As a 100 % Replacement of River Sand in Mortar and Concrete. Indian Concr. J. 2022, 96, 6–21. [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith, K.D.; Morian, D.A.; Van Dam, T.J. Use of Air-Cooled Blast Furnace Slag as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete Pavements—A Guide to Best Practice; Report No. FHWA-HIF-12-009; Federal Highway Administration: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. ACI-233R-03; Slag Cement in Concrete and Mortar. American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2003.
  14. Khan, K.; Amin, M.N. Influence of fineness of volcanic ash and its blends with quarry dust and slag on compressive strength of mortar under different curing temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 154, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, S.; Li, Q.; Xie, G.; Li, L.; Xiao, H. Effect of grinding time on the particle characteristics of glass powder. Powder Technol. 2016, 295, 133–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, S.; Li, Q.; Song, J. Study on the grinding kinetics of copper tailing powder. Powder Technol. 2018, 330, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yen, T.; Hsu, T.H.; Liu, W.Y.; Chen, S. Influence of class F fly ash on the abrasion–erosion resistance of high-strength concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Y.; He, X.; Su, Y.; Yang, J.; Strnadel, B.; Wang, X. Efficiency of wet-grinding on the mechano-chemical activation of granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS). Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 199, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Petrova, T.; Chistyakov, E.; Makarov, Y. Methods of road surface durability improvement. Transp. Res. Procedia 2018, 36, 586–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garipov, A.; Makarov, D.; Khozin, V.; Stepanov, S.; Ayupov, D. Cement concrete modified by fine-dispersed anionactive bitumen emulsion for road construction. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 890, 12107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Smirnov, D.; Stepanov, S.Y.; Garipov, R.; Garayev, T.; Sungatullin, T. Influence of the porosity structure of road concrete on its durability. In Proceedings of the E3S Web of Conferences, Virtual Event, 6–7 September 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Tolmachov, S. Research of the reasons of frost destruction of road concrete. Key Eng. Mater. 2020, 864, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bjegović, D.; Serdar, M.; Oslaković, I.S.; Jacobs, F.; Beushausen, H.; Andrade, C.; Monteiro, A.V.; Paulini, P.; Nanukuttan, S. Test methods for concrete durability indicators. RILEM State-Art Rep. 2016, 18, 51–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Correia, V.; Ferreira, J.G.; Tang, L.; Lindvall, A. Effect of the addition of GGBS on the frost scaling and chloride migration resistance of concrete. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. SS 13 70 03; Concrete-Usage of EN 206-1 in Sweden. Swedish Standard Institute: Stockholm, Sweden, 2008.
  26. ACI 213R-03; Guide for Structural Lightweight Aggregate Concrete. American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2003.
  27. Panchmatia, P.; Olek, J.; Kim, T. The influence of air cooled blast furnace slag (ACBFS) aggregate on the concentration of sulfates in concrete’s pore solution. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 168, 394–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, A.; Deng, M.; Sun, D.; Li, B.; Tang, M. Effect of crushed air-cooled blast furnace slag on mechanical properties of concrete. J. Wuhan Univ. Technol. Sci. Ed. 2012, 27, 758–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Patra, R.K.; Mukharjee, B.B. Influence of incorporation of granulated blast furnace slag as replacement of fine aggregate on properties of concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 165, 468–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Singh, G.; Das, S.; Ahmed, A.A.; Saha, S.; Karmakar, S. Study of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag as Fine Aggregates in Concrete for Sustainable Infrastructure. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 195, 2272–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sandhu, R.S.; Singh, J.; Dhanoa, G.S. Use of Air Cooled Blast Furnace Slag (ACBFS) as Coarse Aggregates—A Case Study. Int. J. Innov. Eng. Res. Technol. 2015, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  32. Verian, K.P.; Panchmatia, P.; Olek, J.; Nantung, T. Pavement concrete with air-cooled blast furnace slag and dolomite as coarse aggregates: Effects of deicers and freeze-thaw cycles. Transp. Res. Rec. 2015, 2508, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kılıç, A.; Atiş, C.D.; Teymen, A.; Karahan, O.; Özcan, F.; Bilim, C.; Özdemir, M. The influence of aggregate type on the strength and abrasion resistance of high strength concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Luna-Galiano, Y.; Leiva Fernández, C.; Villegas Sánchez, R.; Fernández-Pereira, C. Development of Geopolymer Mortars Using Air-Cooled Blast Furnace Slag and Biomass Bottom Ashes as Fine Aggregates. Processes 2023, 11, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmad, J.; Martínez-García, R.; De-Prado-gil, J.; Irshad, K.; El-Shorbagy, M.A.; Fediuk, R.; Vatin, N.I. Concrete with Partial Substitution of Waste Glass and Recycled Concrete Aggregate. Materials 2022, 15, 430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ahmad, J.; Aslam, F.; Martinez-Garcia, R.; de-Prado-Gil, J.; Qaidi, S.M.A.; Brahmia, A. Effects of waste glass and waste marble on mechanical and durability performance of concrete. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 21525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ahmad, J.; Tufail, R.F.; Aslam, F.; Mosavi, A.; Alyousef, R.; Javed, M.F.; Zaid, O.; Khan Niazi, M.S. A step towards sustainable self-compacting concrete by using partial substitution of wheat straw ash and bentonite clay instead of cement. Sustainability 2021, 13, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ahmad, J.; Kontoleon, K.J.; Majdi, A.; Naqash, M.T.; Deifalla, A.F.; Ben Kahla, N.; Isleem, H.F.; Qaidi, S.M.A. A Comprehensive Review on the Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) in Concrete Production. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hadj-sadok, A.; Kenai, S.; Courard, L.; Darimont, A. Microstructure and durability of mortars modified with medium active blast furnace slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 1018–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dai, J.; Wang, Q.; Xie, C.; Xue, Y.; Duan, Y.; Cui, X. The Effect of Fineness on the Hydration Activity Index of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Materials 2019, 12, 2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Nicula, L.M.; Manea, D.L.; Simedru, D.; Cadar, O.; Becze, A.; Dragomir, M.L. The Influence of Blast Furnace Slag on Cement Concrete Road by Microstructure Characterization and Assessment of Physical-Mechanical Resistances at 150/480 Days. Materials 2023, 16, 3332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. SR EN 197; Standard Cement—Part 1: Composition, Specification, and Conformity Criteria Common Cements. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2011.
  43. SR EN 15167; Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag for Use in Concrete, Mortar and Grout Part 1: Definitions, Specifications and Conformity Criteria. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2007.
  44. D6868 Standard; Specification for Biodegradable Plastics Used as Coatings on Paper and Other Compostable Substrates. ASTM Internation: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017.
  45. Lothenbach, B.; Scrivener, K.; Hooton, R.D. Supplementary cementitious materials. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 1244–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. SR EN 12620+A1; Aggregates for Concrete. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2008.
  47. SR 667; Natural Aggregates and Processed Stone for Roads. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2001.
  48. SR EN 13043; Aggregates for Bituminous Mixtures. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2004.
  49. SR EN 933-1; Tests to Determine the Geometric Characteristics of the Aggregates. Part 1: Determination of Granularity. Granulometric Analysis by Sieving. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2012.
  50. SR EN 934-2+A1; Concrete Additives. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2002.
  51. SR EN 1008; Mixing Water for Concrete. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2003.
  52. Corbu, O.; Ioani, A.M.; Bakri, A.; Meiţă, V.; Szilaghyi, H.; Sandu, A.V. The Pozzoolanic Activity Level of Powder Waste Glass in Comparisons with other Powders. Key Eng. Mater. 2015, 660, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. SR EN 196-1; Methods of Testing Cement Part 1: Determination of Strength. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2016.
  54. SR EN 1015-11; Methods of Testing Masonry Mortars. Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2020.
  55. Sajedi, F.; Razak, H.A. Comparison of different methods for activation of ordinary Portland cement-slag mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Nicula, L.M.; Manea, D.L.; Simedru, D.; Dragomir, M.L. Investigations Related to the Opportunity of Using Furnace Slag in the Composition of Road Cement Concrete. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovative Research, Iasi, Romania, 11–12 May 2023; p. 85. [Google Scholar]
  57. Sosa, M.E.; Villagrán Zaccardi, Y.A.; Zega, C.J. A critical review of the resulting effective water-to-cement ratio of fine recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 313, 125536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. NE 014; The Norm for the Execution of Cement Concrete Road Pavements in a Fixed and Sliding Formwork System. Matrix ROM: Bucharest, Romania, 2007; ISBN 978-973-755-185-6.
  59. SR EN 206; Standard for Concrete-Part 1: Specification, Performance, Production and Conformity. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2021.
  60. ASTM C989:C989/C989M Standard Specification for Slag Cement for Use in Concrete and Mortars. Available online: https://img.antpedia.com/standard/files/pdfs_ora/20210202/ASTM%20C989-18a.pdf (accessed on 28 June 2023).
  61. Jenkins, R.; Snyder, R.L. Introduction to X-ray Powder Diffractometry; Wiley Online Library: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1996; Volume 138. [Google Scholar]
  62. Bede, A.; Scurtu, A.; Ardelean, I. NMR relaxation of molecules confined inside the cement paste pores under partially saturated conditions. Cem. Concr. Res. 2016, 89, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Venkataramanan, L.; Song, Y.-Q.; Hurlimann, M.D. Solving Fredholm integrals of the first kind with tensor product structure in 2 and 2.5 dimensions. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2002, 50, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Provencher, S.W. CONTIN: A general purpose constrained regularization program for inverting noisy linear algebraic and integral equations. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1982, 27, 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. SR EN 12390; Test on Hardened Concrete. Part 5: Bending Tensile Strength of Specimens. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2019.
  66. SR CR 12793; Determination of the Depth of the Carbonation Layer of Hardened Concrete. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2002.
  67. SR EN 12390; Standard for Test-Hardened Concrete—Part 3: Compressive Strength of Test Specimens. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2019.
  68. SR 3518; Tests on Concrete: Determination of the Freeze-Tawing Resistance by Measuring the Variations of the Resistance Strength and/or of the Dynamic Relative Elastics Modulus. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2009.
  69. SR CEN/TS 12390; Test on Hardened Concrete. Part 9: Resistance to Freeze-Thaw Using De-icing Salts Exfoliating. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2017.
  70. SR EN 1338:2006; Concrete Pavers. Test Conditions and Methods. ASRO: Bucharest, Romania, 2006.
  71. ASTM C 642; Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption and Voids in Hardened Concrete. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2006.
  72. SS 13 72 44; Concrete Testing—Hardened Concrete—Scaling at Freezing. Swedish National Testing and Reasearch Institute: Borras, Sweden, 2005.
  73. Nicula, L.M.; Corbu, O.; Iliescu, M. Methods for assessing the frost-thaw resistance of road concrete used in our country and at European level. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 877, 012025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ne 012 Normative for the Production of Concrete and the Execution of Works in Concrete, Reinforced Concrete and Prestressed Concrete Part 1: Production of Concrete; Ministry of Development, Public Works and Administration, Technical University of Construction: Bucharest, Romania, 2022.
  75. ASTM C 1202; Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration. American Society for Testing and Materials, Annual Book of ASTM Standards: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2000.
  76. NT BUILD 492: 1999 Chloride Migration Coefficient from Nonsteady-State Migration Experiments. Nord. Finl. Available online: https//www.betonconsultingeng.com/services/concrete-testing/nt-build-492/ (accessed on 28 June 2023).
  77. Bassuoni, M.T.; Nehdi, M.L.; Greenough, T.R. Enhancing the Reliability of Evaluating Chloride Ingress in Concrete Using the ASTM C 1202 Rapid Chloride Penetrability Test. J. ASTM Int. 2006, 3, 3. [Google Scholar]
  78. Jercan, S. Concrete Roads; Corvin Publishing House: Deva, Romania, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  79. Raki, L.; Beaudoin, J.; Alizadeh, R.; Makar, T.S. Cement and concrete nanoscience and nanotechnology. Materials 2010, 3, 918–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Liu, S.; Li, L. Influence of fineness on the cementitious properties of steel slag. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2014, 117, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jakob, C.; Jansen, D.; Ukrainczyk, N.; Koenders, E.; Pott, U.; Stephan, D.; Neubauer, J. Relating Ettringite Formation and Rheological Changes during the Initial Cement Hydration. Materials 2019, 12, 2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. What Are the Advantages and Applications of GGBS? Available online: https://constrofacilitator.com/what-are-the-advantages-and-applications-of-ggbs/ (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  83. Hosseini, P.; Abolhasani, M.; Mirzaei, F.; Kouhi Anbaran, M.R.; Khaksari, Y.; Famili, H. Influence of two types of nanosilica hydrosols on short-term properties of sustainable white portland cement mortar. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 4017289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Khaloo, A.; Mobini, M.H.; Hosseini, P. Influence of different types of nano-SiO2 particles on properties of high-performance concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 113, 188–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Madani, H.; Bagheri, A.; Parhizkar, T. The pozzolanic reactivity of monodispersed nanosilica hydrosols and their influence on the hydration characteristics of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1563–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Song, Y.; Zhou, J.; Bian, Z.; Dai, G. Pore Structure Characterization of Hardened Cement Paste by Multiple Methods. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 2019, 3726953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Scurtu, D.A.; Kovacs, E.; Senila, L.; Levei, E.A.; Simedru, D.; Filip, X.; Dan, M.; Roman, C.; Cadar, O.; David, L. Use of Vine Shoot Waste for Manufacturing Innovative Reinforced Cement Composites. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Nicula, L.M.; Corbu, O.; Ardelean, I.; Sandu, A.V.; Iliescu, M.; Simedru, D. Freeze–Thaw Effect on Road Concrete Containing Blast Furnace Slag: NMR Relaxometry Investigations. Materials 2021, 14, 3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Ganesh, P.; Murthy, A.R. Tensile behaviour and durability aspects of sustainable ultra-high performance concrete incorporated with GGBS as cementitious material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 197, 667–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Yang, K.; White, C.E. Modeling of aqueous species interaction energies prior to nucleation in cement-based gel systems. Cem. Concr. Res. 2021, 139, 106266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Chu, D.C.; Kleib, J.; Amar, M.; Benzerzour, M.; Abriak, N.-E. Determination of the degree of hydration of Portland cement using three different approaches: Scanning electron microscopy (SEM-BSE) and Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2021, 15, e00754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Richardson, I.G. The nature of C-S-H in hardened cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1131–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lee, J.; Choi, S. Case Studies in Construction Materials Effect of replacement ratio of ferronickel slag aggregate on characteristics of cementitious mortars at different curing temperatures. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e01882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Thermodynamic Description of the Solubility of C-S-H Gels in Hydrated Portland Cement. Available online: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/43/063/43063335.pdf (accessed on 26 June 2023).
  95. Pimienta, P.; Albert, B.; Huetb, B.; Dierkens, M.; Francisco, P.; Rougeaud, P. Durability performance assessment of non-standard cementitious materials for buildings: A general method applied to the French context, Fact sheet 1—Risk of steel corrosion induced by carbonation. RILEM Tech. Lett. 2016, 1, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Medeiros, R.A.; Lima, M.G.; Yazigi, R.; Medeiros, M.H.F. Carbonation depth in 57 years old concrete structure. Steel Compos. Struct. 2015, 19, 953–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Badr, A.; Ashour, A.F.; Platten, A.K. Statistical variations in impact resistance of polypropylene fibre-reinforced concrete. Int. J. Impact Eng. 2006, 32, 1907–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Granulometric composition for aggregate: (a) natural sand 0/4 mm; (b) gravel 4/8 mm; (c) crushed stone 8/16 mm; (d) crushed stone 16/25 mm; (e) ACBFS 0/4 mm; (f) ACBFS slag during the air-cooling process and after crushing (Source: Galati Steel Works and the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Laboratory).
Figure 1. Granulometric composition for aggregate: (a) natural sand 0/4 mm; (b) gravel 4/8 mm; (c) crushed stone 8/16 mm; (d) crushed stone 16/25 mm; (e) ACBFS 0/4 mm; (f) ACBFS slag during the air-cooling process and after crushing (Source: Galati Steel Works and the Technical University of Cluj-Napoca Laboratory).
Coatings 13 01368 g001
Figure 2. (a) Preservation of mortar specimens; (b) compressive strength test on mortars; (c) mortar samples prepared for the NMR relaxometry measurements.
Figure 2. (a) Preservation of mortar specimens; (b) compressive strength test on mortars; (c) mortar samples prepared for the NMR relaxometry measurements.
Coatings 13 01368 g002
Figure 3. (a) Prisms 150 × 150 × 600 mm; (b) bending tensile strength test; (c) prism fragments sprayed with phenolphthalein solution; (d) cubes of 150 mm sides maintained in the thermostatic chamber for 100 freeze–thaw cycles; (e) samples prepared to assess loss of mass through exfoliation; (f) abrasive material; (g) Böhme abrasive disc wear test; (h) weighing of samples with hydrostatic balance.
Figure 3. (a) Prisms 150 × 150 × 600 mm; (b) bending tensile strength test; (c) prism fragments sprayed with phenolphthalein solution; (d) cubes of 150 mm sides maintained in the thermostatic chamber for 100 freeze–thaw cycles; (e) samples prepared to assess loss of mass through exfoliation; (f) abrasive material; (g) Böhme abrasive disc wear test; (h) weighing of samples with hydrostatic balance.
Coatings 13 01368 g003
Figure 4. (a) Vacuum apparatus and pressure gauge; (b) RCPT rapid test.
Figure 4. (a) Vacuum apparatus and pressure gauge; (b) RCPT rapid test.
Coatings 13 01368 g004
Figure 5. (a) Compressive strengths of mortars; (b) evolution of CS ratio by specific surface area of (GGBS) at the ages of 7 and 28 days.
Figure 5. (a) Compressive strengths of mortars; (b) evolution of CS ratio by specific surface area of (GGBS) at the ages of 7 and 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g005
Figure 6. (A) Diffraction patterns of M I; (B) Diffraction patterns of M II; Diffraction patterns of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Figure 6. (A) Diffraction patterns of M I; (B) Diffraction patterns of M II; Diffraction patterns of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g006
Figure 7. Degree of crystallinity of mortar samples at the ages of 7 days and 28 days.
Figure 7. Degree of crystallinity of mortar samples at the ages of 7 days and 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g007
Figure 8. Pore structure of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Figure 8. Pore structure of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g008aCoatings 13 01368 g008b
Figure 9. Surface mapping of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Figure 9. Surface mapping of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g009
Figure 10. Surface mapping of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days; (g) M I, (h) M II/360, (i) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Figure 10. Surface mapping of (a) M I, (b) M II/360, (c) M III/330 mortar samples at 7 days, and (d) M I, (e) M II/360, (f) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days; (g) M I, (h) M II/360, (i) M III/330 mortar samples at 28 days.
Coatings 13 01368 g010aCoatings 13 01368 g010bCoatings 13 01368 g010c
Figure 11. CPMG echo series for cyclohexane-saturated bare mortar samples M I, M II/360, M III/330 at 28 days (note: S1 = M I; S2 = M II/360; S3 = M II/330).
Figure 11. CPMG echo series for cyclohexane-saturated bare mortar samples M I, M II/360, M III/330 at 28 days (note: S1 = M I; S2 = M II/360; S3 = M II/330).
Coatings 13 01368 g011
Figure 12. (a) Distribution of relaxation times in empty samples; (b) distribution of relaxation times in cyclohexane-saturated samples at 28 days (note: S1 = M I; S2 = M II/360; S3 = M II/330).
Figure 12. (a) Distribution of relaxation times in empty samples; (b) distribution of relaxation times in cyclohexane-saturated samples at 28 days (note: S1 = M I; S2 = M II/360; S3 = M II/330).
Coatings 13 01368 g012
Figure 13. (a) The tensile strengths at 28 days; (b) the compressive strength of the reference samples and the compressive strength at 100 freeze–thaw cycles, (c) loss of compressive strength.
Figure 13. (a) The tensile strengths at 28 days; (b) the compressive strength of the reference samples and the compressive strength at 100 freeze–thaw cycles, (c) loss of compressive strength.
Coatings 13 01368 g013
Figure 14. (a) Total mass exfoliated after 56 freeze–thaw cycles; (b) volume loss after mechanical wear test; (c) permeable pore content.
Figure 14. (a) Total mass exfoliated after 56 freeze–thaw cycles; (b) volume loss after mechanical wear test; (c) permeable pore content.
Coatings 13 01368 g014
Figure 15. Relationship between pore permeable content and (a) flexural tensile strengths; (b) the total mass exfoliated after 56 freeze–thaw cycles; (c) loss of volume from wear.
Figure 15. Relationship between pore permeable content and (a) flexural tensile strengths; (b) the total mass exfoliated after 56 freeze–thaw cycles; (c) loss of volume from wear.
Coatings 13 01368 g015
Figure 16. (a) Electric charge Q recorded at 6 h; (b) penetration depth Xd and migration coefficient Dx (10−12 m2/s) of chlorine ions; (c) the bonding relationship between the migration coefficient of chlorine ions and the content of permeable pores.
Figure 16. (a) Electric charge Q recorded at 6 h; (b) penetration depth Xd and migration coefficient Dx (10−12 m2/s) of chlorine ions; (c) the bonding relationship between the migration coefficient of chlorine ions and the content of permeable pores.
Coatings 13 01368 g016
Figure 17. (a) Chlorine ion migration front for sample S 0/0; (b) for sample S 15/25; (c) for sample S 15/50.
Figure 17. (a) Chlorine ion migration front for sample S 0/0; (b) for sample S 15/25; (c) for sample S 15/50.
Coatings 13 01368 g017
Figure 18. Carbonation progress one hour after spraying phenolphthalein solution: (a) sample S0/0; (b) sample S15/25; (c) per sample S15/50.
Figure 18. Carbonation progress one hour after spraying phenolphthalein solution: (a) sample S0/0; (b) sample S15/25; (c) per sample S15/50.
Coatings 13 01368 g018
Table 1. Oxide analysis of granulated and ground GGBS slag.
Table 1. Oxide analysis of granulated and ground GGBS slag.
(GGBS)SiO2Al2O3MnOMgOCaOFe2O3Na2OK2OOther
(%)38.109.500.238.1040.800.560.300.681.73
Table 2. The composition of mortars.
Table 2. The composition of mortars.
MaterialsM IM II/360M III/330
Specific binder surface (SS)331 m2/kg360 m2/kg330 m2/kg
Portland cement, (g)450 ± 2225 ± 1225 ± 1
(GGBS < 63 µm), (g)-225 ± 1225 ± 1
(NA_0/4 mm), (g)1350 ± 51350 ± 51350 ± 5
Water, (ml)225225225
Table 3. Concrete composition kg/m3.
Table 3. Concrete composition kg/m3.
Materials (Kg/m3)S 0/0
Reference Concrete
S 15/25
(15% GGBS_25% ACBFS)
S 15/50
(15% GGBS_50% ACBFS)
Cement ©370314.50314.50
(GGBS < 63 µm)-55.5055.50
Binder (b)370370370
Water (w)151.68154.51155.92
w/b0.410.4180.421
(ACBFS_0/4 mm)-163.44326.90
Natural sand (AN_0/4 mm)654.70490.33326.90
Coarse aggregate (AC_4/25 mm)1215.881214.161214.18
Total aggregate1870.581867.941867.97
Admixtures (SP-SKY 527)5.556.186.29
Admixtures (MA 9060)0.740.740.81
Table 4. Design parameters of road concrete composites in accordance with NE 014 [58] and SR EN 206 [59].
Table 4. Design parameters of road concrete composites in accordance with NE 014 [58] and SR EN 206 [59].
Parameter
Design
Min. Dosage
Cement
(w/l)Compaction (%)Density
(kg/m2)
Occluded Air (%)fcm
28 days MPa
fcfm
28 days MPa
NE 014 and
SR EN 206
360 kg/m3max. 0.451.15 ÷ 1.352390 ± 305.0 ÷ 6.5min. 50min. 5.5
Results370 kg/m30.41 ÷ 0.4211.26 ÷ 1.332392 ÷ 23945.1 ÷ 6.4--
Table 5. The minimum value of the hydration activity index at 7 and 28 days of slag GGBS.
Table 5. The minimum value of the hydration activity index at 7 and 28 days of slag GGBS.
SR EN 15167:1ASTM C989
(Class 80)
ASTM C989
(Class 100)
ASTM C989
(Class 120)
7 days28 days7 days28 days7 days28 days7 days28 days
4570-75759595115
Table 6. Acceptance criteria for the frost resistance of concrete SS 13 72 44 [72,73], NE012-1 [74], and SR 3518 [68].
Table 6. Acceptance criteria for the frost resistance of concrete SS 13 72 44 [72,73], NE012-1 [74], and SR 3518 [68].
Frost–Thaw ResistanceCriteria SS 13 72 44Criteria NE 012-1Criteria SR 3518
Very goodm56 < 0.10 kg/m2
Goodm56 < 0.20 kg/m2m56 < 0.50 kg/m2-
(High)or m56 < 0.50 kg/m2 and m56/m28 < 2
or m112 < 0.50 kg/m2
Acceptable
(Moderate)
m56 < 1.00 kg/m2 and m56/m28 < 2
or m112 < 1.00 kg/m2
m56 < 1.0 kg/m2-
Unacceptable
(Low)
m56 ≥ 1.00 kg/m2 and m56/m28 ≥ 2
or m112 ≥ 1.00 kg/m2
m56 < 2.0 kg/m2-
Degree of gelation G100--Loss of compressive strength (η) ˂ 25%
Table 7. Wear resistance classes SR EN 1338 [70].
Table 7. Wear resistance classes SR EN 1338 [70].
Class134
MarkFHI
CriteriaNo measured performance≤20,000 mm3/5000 mm2≤18,000 mm3/5000 mm2
Table 8. Interpretation of results according to ASTM C 1202 [75].
Table 8. Interpretation of results according to ASTM C 1202 [75].
Past electrical Charge (Coulomb)HighModerateLowVery Low
Penetrability of chlorine ions>40002000–40001000–2000100–1000
Table 9. Compressive strength fc determined for mortars (MPa) and CS ratio (%).
Table 9. Compressive strength fc determined for mortars (MPa) and CS ratio (%).
Agefc_MIfc_M II/360fc_M III/330CS Ratio-MII/360CS Ratio-MIII/330
7 days34.4022.1620.346459
28 days43.6240.2635.149281
Table 10. Phase fraction (%) identified by RIR method of mortar samples investigated at the ages of 7 and 28 days.
Table 10. Phase fraction (%) identified by RIR method of mortar samples investigated at the ages of 7 and 28 days.
Mortar MixtureM IM II/360M III/360
7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days
Quartz++++++++++++++++++
Albite (Ab)++++++++++++
Orthoclase++++++
Calcium-silicate (C-S-H)++++++
Portlandite (CH)+ + +
Ettringite (C-A-S-H)+ + +
+++ major phases (>20%), ++ minor phases (5%–10%), + phases in traces (<5%).
Table 11. Pore measurements of mortar samples M I, M II/360, and M III/330.
Table 11. Pore measurements of mortar samples M I, M II/360, and M III/330.
SamplePore Identification CodePore Radius (μm)Distance
Code Qi(Ci − Ci + n)
Distance (μm)Pore Identification CodePore Radius (μm)Distance
Code Qi(Ci − Ci + n)
Distance (μm)
7 Days28 Days
M IC15.90Q1(C1 − C2)24.01C111.52Q1(C1 − C2)37.57
C24.53 C26.28
C32.52 C310.96
C42.65Q2(C3 − C4)14.73C48.61
C54.97 C58.51
C65.13Q4(C5 − C6)34.92C65.49
C73.03 C73.42
C82.26Q3(C7 − C8)21.28C83.20Q2(C5 − C8)45.33
M II/360C17.02 C113.24
C23.83Q1(C1 − C2)21.81C28.65Q1(C2 − C3)35.51
C33.61Q2(C3 − C4)32.60C311.39Q2(C1 − C3)124.04
C44.19
C56.57
C62.41Q4(C6 − C7)15.24
C74.07
C82.09Q3(C8 − C9)11.26
C92.35
M III/330C18.75Q110.70C14.30Q1(C1 − C4)19.84
C215.24Q4(C2 − C5)187.62C23.02
C36.48Q3(C3 − C4)28.96C32.57Q2(C3 − C4)103.50
C45.57 C42.05
C56.06Q2(C1 − C5)187.62C52.41
Table 12. Element concentrations (%) in M I, M II/360, M III/330 obtained by mapping the mortar sample surface.
Table 12. Element concentrations (%) in M I, M II/360, M III/330 obtained by mapping the mortar sample surface.
MixOCaSiAlMgCa/Si
7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days7 Days28 Days
M I51.6949.5138.8733.476.9014.601.152.421.39-5.632.29
M II/36053.4441.4928.0027.0414.6315.392.73.871.231.151.921.85
M III/33053.6346.9628.4432.6314.6914.663.243.25-1.471.942.23
Table 13. Coefficient of CoV variation (%) of physic mechanical characteristics.
Table 13. Coefficient of CoV variation (%) of physic mechanical characteristics.
MixS0/0S15/25S15/50
Coefficient of VariationCoV (%)CoV (%)CoV (%)
The tensile strength—fcf (MPa)12.47.31.7
Reference compressive strength—fc (MPa)5.09.01.0
Compressive strength at 100 freeze–thaw—fc (MPa)118.05.0
The exfoliated mass at 56 freeze–thaw cycles (kg/m2)87.812.2
Loss of volume from wear (mm3)5.53.67.7
Permeable pore content (%)11.33.311.2
Passing charge at 6 h (Q)1.11.50.8
Penetration depth Xd (mm)1.98.60.9
Migration coefficient of chlorine ions (D× (10−12 m2/s))2.19.31.0
Note that the ratio of the standard deviation to the mean value obtained was below the accepted limit of 15% [97], with a reasonable quality in the range of 0.8% to 12%.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nicula, L.M.; Manea, D.L.; Simedru, D.; Cadar, O.; Ardelean, I.; Dragomir, M.L. The Advantages on Using GGBS and ACBFS Aggregate to Obtain an Ecological Road Concrete. Coatings 2023, 13, 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13081368

AMA Style

Nicula LM, Manea DL, Simedru D, Cadar O, Ardelean I, Dragomir ML. The Advantages on Using GGBS and ACBFS Aggregate to Obtain an Ecological Road Concrete. Coatings. 2023; 13(8):1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13081368

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nicula, Liliana Maria, Daniela Lucia Manea, Dorina Simedru, Oana Cadar, Ioan Ardelean, and Mihai Liviu Dragomir. 2023. "The Advantages on Using GGBS and ACBFS Aggregate to Obtain an Ecological Road Concrete" Coatings 13, no. 8: 1368. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13081368

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop