Next Article in Journal
Microstructure and Properties of Al-Based Ceramic Coating Deposited on Magnesium Alloy Surface by Cold Spraying
Next Article in Special Issue
Bimetallic 3D Nickel-Manganese/Titanium Bifunctional Electrocatalysts for Efficient Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution Reaction in Alkaline and Acidic Media
Previous Article in Journal
Biodegradability of Starch Nanocomposite Films Containing Different Concentrations of Chitosan Nanoparticles in Compost and Planting Soils
Previous Article in Special Issue
Shear and Tensile Behaviors of Fiber-Reinforced Resin Matrix Composites Printed by the FDM Technology
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bacterial Detection and Differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Utilizing Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Nanoporous Coated Structures

1
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
2
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA
3
Department of Materials Research, Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Cutting Tools Co., Ltd., Diamond Industrial Park, No. 28 South Huanghe Road, Tianyuan District, Zhuzhou 412007, China
4
National Innovation Center for Advanced Rail Transit Equipment, Zhuzhou 412001, China
5
Hunan Engineering Technology Research Center of Intelligent Sensing and Maintenance for Railway Transportation Equipment, Zhuzhou 412001, China
6
School of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2023, 13(4), 778; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040778
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 5 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2023 / Published: 17 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advance in Nanoparticles, Fiber, and Coatings)

Abstract

:
A biosensor utilizing long-period fiber gratings (LPFG) functionalized with nanoporous coated structures was developed for the rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) bacteria. The nanoporous structure coatings on the LPFG surface facilitated specific adhesion and interaction with S. aureus, resulting in an instantaneous shift in the resonance wavelength (RW) in the transmission spectrum of the LPFG. The LPFG with nanoporous polyelectrolyte coatings exhibited an approximately seven-fold RW shift compared to the bare LPFG under the optimal experiment conditions. By tracking the RW shifts, we were able to monitor the real-time S. aureus adhesion to study the interaction process in detail. The bacterial differentiation and S. aureus specificity of the method was confirmed through a series of studies using Escherichia coli (E. coli). This nanoporous structure-enabled LPFG-based biosensor scheme holds significant promise for rapid, reliable, and low-cost detection of S. aureus for biomedical applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Microorganisms are everywhere. Even though most bacteria are harmless, a few of them can cause serious illness and even death. Countless people are hospitalized each year as a result of bacteria-related infections [1,2,3,4]. In hospital settings, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the primary sources of nosocomial infections [5]. Traditional, culture-based tests are time-consuming and can work poorly with slow-growing or viable but non-culturable organisms. They do not provide real-time results or timely information that is needed in applications such as industrial manufacturing. Rapid detection and differentiation of bacteria is crucial to identify and distinguish pathological differences, especially at the early stage of diagnosis [6], and to efficiently reduce their impact on human and animal health [7].
There are a variety of methods for bacteria detection based on bio-recognition strategies [8] such as nucleic acids (DNA/RNA) [9,10], bacteriophages [3,11] and antibodies [12,13]. Although nucleic acids and bacteriophages offer high specificity [8], these techniques are not only laborious and time-consuming, but also require highly trained personnel and dedicated facilities [14]. Even though antibody-based recognition methods are sensitive [10], they are costly and may result in false positives due to cross-binding to other bacteria [11]. The fluorescent label method involves labeling with specific dyes, making the procedure complex and time-consuming [15]. Label-free biosensors are of significant appeal for rapid, reliable and in situ measurements [16]. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)-based sensing is one of the most widely investigated label-free detection methods [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26], but the sensor area and mass transport of this method are limited [27]. Recently, LPFG-based label-free biosensors have also been studied for bio-analyte detections [8,28]. As a low cost, simple detection technique, it offers the opportunity for rapid and reliable detections, even in harsh environments [29]. In the past few decades, numerous studies have focused on the development of biofunctional layer-by-layer (LbL) polyelectrolyte films [30,31,32]. The freedom in designing LbL films with multifunctionality shows particular potential in biomedical developments ranging from design of medical devices and drugs [33] to the study of bacterial behaviors [31]. The LbL multilayer coatings with three-dimensional structures can incorporate probes and molecular recognition elements to generate an amplified response and improve the sensitivity and selectivity of detection, opening up new opportunities for biosensors [34,35]. LPFG-based biosensors offer the capability to not only quantitatively measure changes in refractive index (RI) of the analyte under investigation, but also enable real-time analysis of dynamic interactions [36].
In this study, a cutting-edge optofluidic biosensor utilizing LPFG was developed for the swift detection of low-concentration S. aureus bacteria. First, functional polyelectrolyte coatings were deposited on the surface of LPFG via LbL assembly. Nano-structured pores were then introduced in these coatings through post-assembly treatment to facilitate S. aureus adhesion and hence its ready detection. We found that the LPFG with functional coatings containing nanopores exhibited around a seven-fold increase in RW shift as compared to the bare LPFG upon exposure to S. aureus for only 60 min. No apparent resonance wavelength (RW) shift change was observed when the same nanoporous coated LPFG was exposed to E. coli. The different adhesion behavior of bacteria on the porous structures coated for specific bacteria allows us to selectively detect and differentiate bacteria using nanoporous coated LPFG.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH Coatings

The LbL films were assembled from poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH) and poly(acrylic acid) (PAA). We prepared 10 bilayers of [PAH/PAA] and applied another PAH layer as the top layer of [PAH/PAA]10 coating. The nanoporous structure was introduced to the coatings of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH via acid corrosion. This process of transformation is substantial and irreversible, and results in the modification of the topography of PAH/PAA coatings to generate nanoporous structures [37]. The mechanism for this process involves a reduction in the ionic cross-link in the films followed by spinodal decomposition to generate thin films with a nanoporous morphology [37,38].
As shown in Figure 1, the COO groups of PAA readily bind to the NH3+ groups of PAH, forming –NHCO– ionic intermolecular cross-links (step 1). In the low-pH environment, the hydrogen cations protonate some of the COO groups, leading to breakage of interchain ion pairs of LbL (step 2) and thus increased mobility of polymer chains (step 3). It allows more energetically favorable reorganizations of the chains on the surface. This reorganization results in an insoluble swelling polyelectrolyte complex (step 4), which is followed by phase separation in the neutral solution via a spinodal decomposition process [29,37], thus forming nanopores (step 5).
Figure 2a depicts the SEM image of the nanoporous coating. Figure 2b shows the size distribution of the nanopores, with the majority falling into the size range from 200 to 400 nm. The average diameter of these nanopores is measured to be 300 ± 86.39 nm, which is slightly smaller than the physical dimensions of S. aureus and E. coli. The nanopores were investigated for their potential to provide protection to microorganisms against chemical exposure and hydrodynamic shear forces, [39,40], and thus provide bacterial retention on the surface of the designed functional polyelectrolyte coatings.

2.2. Rapid Detection of Bacteria Using LPFGs with Functional Coatings

Prior to bacterial detection measurements, the RWs of the LPFGs with [PAH/PAA]10-PAH and nanoporous functional coatings were measured at a flow rate of 30 μL/min in PBS buffer solution (37 °C) for 260 min. This assessment was made to determine the stability of the coatings in a microfluidic environment. The RWs of the LPFGs coated with [PAH/PAA]10-PAH and nanoporous coatings exhibited consistent stability throughout the measurement period, with a maximum fluctuation of 0.05 nm, which is comparable to the resolution of the optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) at 0.05 nm. The stability of the coating of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH and the nanoporous coatings can be ascribed to the chemical cross-linking mechanism achieved through a heat-induced amidation reaction, wherein the coatings were subjected to a temperature of 200 °C to facilitate the formation of amide cross-links (–NHCO–) between NH3+ groups of PAH and COO groups of PAA [15].
During the bacterial detection measurement, a syringe pump was utilized to continuously inject a fresh bacterial solution into the LOFOP. Assuming that the coverage density of the bacteria on the LPFG remains constant, the RI of the surrounding coating on the LPFG is not expected to undergo any changes [41]. When the coverage density of the bacteria changes, the surrounding RI of LPFG changes accordingly, leading to an RW shift in the transmission spectrum of the LPFG. The capacity to accurately track the RW shift, and thereby determine the coverage density of bacteria, enables us to investigate the dynamics of bacterial adhesion on functional coatings applied to the LPFG in situ.
For rapid bacterial detection, RW shifts of the coated LPFGs were captured at 10 min intervals over a period of 60 min. This was accomplished by exposing the LPFGs to bacterial solutions with a concentration of 104 CFU/mL in PBS, while maintaining a flow rate of 30 μL/min and a temperature of 37 °C. The reason we used 104 CFU/mL bacterial concentration is because it represents an infection of the urinary tract, and thus simplifies the experimental process [42]. Bacterial monitoring of LPFGs with various substrates was carried out three times for each substrate. Figure 3a shows the RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs for monitoring S. aureus (a spherical Gram positive (G+) microbe). As shown in Figure 3a, the fitted slopes of RW shifts for the bare LPFGs, the coatings and the nanoporous coatings were 0.45, 4.09 and 7.96 pm/min, respectively. The RW shift of the bare LPFGs was close to zero, due to the limited adhesion of bacteria on the bare LPFGs surface. As the bacteria were retained on the surface of the polyelectrolyte coatings, the effective external RI was changed and thus a corresponding red shift occurred in the RW of the LPFGs. Figure 3b–d are the overall SEM images of S. aureus on bare LPFGs, [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated and nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs at 60 min, respectively. The densities of bacteria attached to different platforms are shown in Figure S2. Figure 3b shows that there were few bacteria attached to the bare LPFGs after 60 min, which is consistent with its limited RW shift as shown in Figure 3a (blue square). For the S. aureus monitoring using coated LPFGs, as shown in Figure 3a (red circle), there was a striking 10-fold increase in the slope of the RW shift compared to that of the bare LPFGs. The SEM image (Figure 3c) clearly shows that there is an increase in the density of S. aureus on the coated LPFGs. The increased surface wettability of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs [43] and the improved hydrophilicity [44] of the PAH-terminated substrate with amino groups may favor the adhesion of S. aureus, leading to an increased density of S. aureus and thus the enhanced sensitivity in terms of RW shifts. It was observed that the S. aureus were aggregated and attached to the coating surface as bacterial clusters. The clusters were due to microbial self-binding termed “autoaggregation”, a widespread phenomenon mediated by the surface proteins of bacteria [45]. The RW shift of nanoporous coated LPFGs shows the highest fitted slope when monitoring S. aureus (Figure 3a, orange triangle), with a 20-fold increase compared to that of the bare LPFGs. The transmission spectra of nanoporous coatings for S. aureus detection for the first 60 min are shown in Figure S3a. The SEM image of S. aureus attached to the nanoporous coatings (Figure 3d) clearly displays that the density of S. aureus on the nanoporous coating was higher than that on bare LPFGs (Figure 3b) and the coated LPFGs (Figure 3c). The nanoporous structure of the coatings results in an enlarged surface area, which subsequently diminishes the shear stress encountered by the adhered bacteria in fluidic conditions [46,47], facilitating the adhesion of S. aureus and thus enhancing the RW shifts. As previously mentioned, the presence of the nanoporous structure in the coatings has been reported to offer protection to bacteria against chemical exposure and hydrodynamic shear forces within a fluidic system. This protective effect further facilitates bacterial adhesion onto the nanoporous coatings, ultimately enhancing the sensitivity of LPFGs for bacterial detection.
Because S. aureus were detected using the LPFGs with various functional coatings, we explored the specificity of this technology using other bacteria. E. coli were selected due to their distinctive shape (rod-like), biology (G−) and size. Interestingly, the results were quite different from those of S. aureus. Figure 4a shows the RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs when monitoring E. coli. The fitted slopes were 1.82, 0.29 and 3.76 pm/min, respectively. As expected, there was an increase in the RW shift of the nanoporous coated LPFGs on E. coli detection, perhaps due to the increased surface area by the nanoporous structure and thus the reduced shear stress, leading to bacterial retention on the surface of coatings. The transmission spectra of nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs for E. coli detection for the first 60 min were shown in Figure S3b. Figure 4b–d are the overall SEM images of E. coli on bare LPFGs, [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs at 60 min, respectively. The densities of E. coli on various platforms are shown in Figure S2. It shows clearly that the density of E. coli attached to the nanoporous coatings (Figure 4d) was higher than that on the bare LPFGs (Figure 4b) and the coated LPFGs (Figure 4c). It was still lower when compared to that of S. aureus attached to the nanoporous coatings (Figure 3d). What is surprising is that there was almost no RW shift for the coated LPFGs during E. coli detection, which is in contrast to the S. aureus detection, indicating the limited adhesion of E. coli on the coated LPFG surface. Figure 4c further demonstrates that there were few E. coli attached to the coated LPFG after 60 min, which is consistent with the limited RW shift as shown in Figure 4a (green circle).
The results of the RW shifts of LPFGs with different coatings for 60 min in S. aureus bacterial solution are summarized in Table 1. As recorded in Table 1, the ratio of the RW shifts for S. aureus detection between the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs was 1:4.08:7.09.
However, the ratio of the RW shifts for E. coli detection for 60 min between the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs was 1:0.31:1.13, as shown in Table S1. Unlike S. aureus with its striking increase in RW shifts (4.08:1), there is an obvious decrease in the RW shifts for E. coli detection (0.31:1) using coated LPFGs compared to using bare LPFGs. This is highly likely due to the inherent hydrophobic property of E. coli [48]. The surface of E. coli is composed of lipopolysaccharides with a rigid framework and an inevitable steric hindrance. Moreover, the pili of E. coli collide with the substrate during detection, and so the mechanical resistance of the substrate material to pili retraction would increase with increasing substrate stiffness; this means the adhesion of E. coli on a stiffer substrate (such as bare LPFGs) could increase the lifetime of pili–substrate interactions [49]. This is in contrast to S. aureus, which does not possess pili. Furthermore, the outer layer of the LbL coatings comprises PAH with a pH of 7.5, which is less than the pKa of PAH (pKa is 8.5). This indicates that the PAH layers have protonated amino groups. Compared with S. aureus, these uncharged amines are more lethal to the more negatively charged E. coli [50] and thus, the adhesion of E. coli on LbL coatings would decrease. As a result, the RW shift of E. coli on LbL coatings is almost zero, which is even smaller than that of the bare LPFGs. There is an appreciable increase in the RW shift when using nanoporous coated LPFGs compared to bare LPFGs for S. aureus detections (1:7.09), however, the effect of the nanoporous coatings on the RW shift for E. coli detections was not obvious (1:1.13). This drastic difference inspired us to explore the potential of various coating strategies to differentiate the two bacteria.

2.3. Bacterial Differentiation Using Functional Coatings on LPFGs

To demonstrate the potential of the LbL coatings with or without nanostructured pores for the differentiation of S. aureus and E. coli, the transmission spectra were recorded up to 260 min. Figure 5a shows the RW shifts of the bare LPFGs in S. aureus and E. coli PBS solutions over this duration. The fitted slopes of the two curves corresponding to S. aureus and E. coli adhesions were similar, at 0.92 and 1.04 pm/min, respectively. Figure 5b shows that there was a drastic difference in the RW shifts of the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs in response to the presence of S. aureus and E. coli. The fitted slopes of the RW shifts for S. aureus and E. coli were 5.31 and 0.58 pm/min, respectively. As explained in the previous section, this is possibly because S. aureus is more hydrophilic [45] than E. coli and so is more able to attach to the LbL coatings. The RW shifts of the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs for S. aureus and E. coli adhesion for 260 min are shown in Figure 5c. When the nanoporous structures were introduced in the coatings, the fitted slope for S. aureus increased to 9.96 pm/min. However, for E. coli detection, although the slope of the RW shift increased in the first 60 min because of the reduction in shear stress caused by the nanoporous structure, and therefore protection and retention of bacteria occurred, it plateaued over a longer period, with a slope as low as 2.63 pm/min. As discussed in Section 2.2, this is conceivably due to the hydrophobicity of the E. coli surface and the antibacterial properties selected for the PAH-layer coatings, which lead to a decrease in E. coli adhesion on the functional coatings.
Figure 6 and Table 2 compare the RW shifts during the monitoring of S. aureus and E. coli adhesion using LPFGs with various coatings. Figure 6a shows the RW shifts at 60 min. It can be noticed that the RW shift of the bare LPFGs for E. coli detection is slightly larger than that for S. aureus detection, which can be explained by the attachment point theory [47]. The dissimilarities in the adhesion patterns between sphere-shaped S. aureus and rod-shaped E. coli can be attributed to the discrepancy in the number of available access points for bacteria on polyelectrolyte functional coatings. Figure 6b shows the RW shifts at 260 min. The specific RW shifts are listed in Table 2. At 260 min, the RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs for S. aureus detection are 0.31 ± 0.16, 1.44 ± 0.33 and 2.64 ± 0.17 nm, respectively. For E. coli detection at 260 min, the RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs are 0.37 ± 0.20, 0.21 ± 0.11 and 0.74 ± 0.12 nm, respectively. Figure 6a,b shows that for S. aureus detection, the RW shifts of the coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs at 260 min were significantly increased compared to that at 60 min. However, for E. coli detection at 260 min, the enhancement in RW shifts of the coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs were much lower than that for S. aureus detection. For E. coli detection, there is an obvious difference in the RW shifts between coated LPFGs and other coating strategies; it was even lower than that of the bare LPFGs.
In order to illustrate the optimal conditions for differentiation between S. aureus and E. coli, the ratios of the RW shifts for S. aureus and E. coli detection using the three coating strategies after 60 and 260 min adhesion are provided in the last two columns of Table 2; all variations of the ratio with time were recorded in Table S2. As recorded in Table 2, at 60 min, the ratios between the RW shifts for the detections of S. aureus and E. coli were 0.31:1, 4.00:1 and 1.92:1 for the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs, respectively. These ratios increased to 0.83:1, 6.89:1 and 3.60:1 at an extended time of 260 min, respectively. A higher ratio indicates better differentiation between the two types of bacteria.
Among the three coating strategies, the coated LPFGs exhibited overall higher ratio and thus a better differentiation. The best differentiation was achieved for coated LPFGs at 260 min, with the highest ratio of 6.89:1. In order to maximize the ability to differentiate, it is necessary to extend the adhesion and detection time.

3. Conclusions

In this study, a novel approach has been described for expeditious bacterial detection of S. aureus utilizing LPFGs that are integrated with functional polyelectrolyte coatings featuring meticulously designed nanoporous structures. The LbL assembly allows the deposition of polyelectrolyte coatings with high-quality thickness on the LPFG surface. The functional polyelectrolyte coatings, characterized by their nanoporous structure, were grown and integrated with the LPFG platform to facilitate the rapid detection of bacteria by increasing its adhesion on the surface of the functional coatings. Since this is effected by the size of the nanoporous structure, future work should design different sizes and shapes of nanopores to further investigate and explore bacterial detection and differentiation. The RW shift of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated and nanoporous coated LPFGs was increased by ~4- and 7-fold, respectively, compared to that of bare LPFGs for S. aureus detection at 60 min. The nanoporous coated LPFG is thus suitable for swift detection of S. aureus. The capability of LPFGs with various functional coatings for E. coli detection was also explored with the coated LPFGs showing the lowest RW shift, which is in contrast to that of the S. aureus, perhaps due to the different adhesion behaviors of the two bacteria on the polyelectrolyte coatings. Based on the drastically different LPFG response to S. aureus and E. coli, we further explored and demonstrated the potential in bacterial differentiation using LPFGs with various functional coatings. The flexibility in fabricating and controlling the nanostructure of functional polyelectrolyte coatings on the LPFG makes our biosensor platform robust for rapid bacterial detection as well as differentiation. This study set up a good foundation for us to further explore multi-culture detection in the future.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. Chemical Reagents and Materials

Sodium hydroxide standard solution (0.1 M, NaOH), sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl), sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH2PO4), disodium phosphate (Na2HPO4), poly(allylamine hydrochloride) (PAH, Mw ~17.5 kDa), poly(acrylic acid) (PAA, Mw ~450 kDa), tryptic soy broth (TSB), glucose, agar, nitric acid and glutaraldehyde were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Hydrochloric acid (1N standard solution, HCl) was obtained from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 29213™, Gram-positive) and Escherichia coli (ATCC® 25404™, Gram-negative) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). All chemicals were used without further purification steps. All solutions were prepared using Milli-Q ultrapure water (no less than 18.2 MΩ).

4.2. LPFG Fabrication

The LPFGs were fabricated using point-by-point irradiation of a focused CO2 laser beam. The CO2 laser with a closed-loop kit has excellent power stability to ensure the reproducibility of LPFG. The LPFG coupled with LP0,10 cladding mode was inscribed in the SMF-28 optical fiber (from Corning Optical Communications Inc., Charlotte, NC, USA) using the CO2 laser with a 120° Au-coated Si mirror pair via a motorized movement stage with ~0.2 μm incremental range [51]. The entire fabrication of the LPFG was controlled by a desktop computer interface to ensure synchronized operations of laser irradiation and movement of the stage. The SMF–LPFG was fabricated with a period of 247 μm and a total length of 50 mm. A broadband light source was connected to one end of the LPFG and an optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) was connected to the other for the measurement of the transmission spectra of the LPFG in real time during the fabrication process [52].

4.3. Preparation of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH Coatings

As illustrated in Figure S1, the LPFG was positioned in a straight orientation between two stable holders on a motorized arm, then immersed into 0.1 M NaOH standard solution for 20 min in order to clean the surface. Then, it was dipped into containers filled with alternative polymer solutions and subsequently into rinsing phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution during the LbL self-assembly cycles at room temperature. During the entire deposition process, the PAH solution was pH-adjusted to pH 7.5, and the PAA solution was pH-adjusted to pH 3.5. The rinsing PBS buffer solution was kept at pH 7.4. Specifically, the LPFG was immersed into the PAH solution with a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL for 10 min, followed by a rinsing step in 0.1 M PBS buffer solution for 5 min, and subsequently immersed into the 0.2 mg/mL PAA solution for 10 min, followed by the same rinsing step. The above deposition process was repeated 10 times to prepare 10 bilayers of [PAH/PAA], and the last step involved depositing a PAH layer to form the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH polyelectrolyte coating on the surface of the LPFG. Upon completion of the coating process, the coated LPFG was dried in an oven at 200 °C for a duration of 30 min. Subsequently, the LPFGs with [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings were stored under ambient conditions prior to measurement.

4.4. Preparation of Nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH Coatings

The LPFG with [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings prepared in Section 4.3 was dipped into 0.01 M NaH2PO4 solution for 5 s (pH adjusted to 5.0), followed by three consecutive dipping steps in NaH2PO4 buffer solution at pH 4.0 for 5 s, NaH2PO4 buffer solution at pH 3.3 for 1 min and NaH2PO4 buffer solution at pH 2.5 for 5 min. Then, it was rinsed with PBS buffer solution at pH 7.4 for 10 min and blown dry. LPFGs with Nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings were stored under ambient conditions before measurement.

4.5. Culture and Preparation of S. aureus and E. coli

A single isolated colony of bacteria (S. aureus or E. coli) was picked from an agar plate, and then transferred into a 50 mL conical tube containing ~10 mL trypsin soy broth with 0.2% glucose (TSBG) medium. The sample was incubated with orbital agitation (175 rpm) at 37 °C for 18 h. A small amount of incubated bacteria was diluted with fresh TSBG medium and grown for additional 2–3 h to reach the mid-exponential growth phase. The bacteria culture was centrifuged for 10 min at 1500 rpm in a 15 mL centrifuge tube and resuspended with saline to the initial optical cell density of 0.29 ± 0.02 at 570 nm (OD 570) measured by a Unico® (Bohemia, NY, USA) 1100 spectrophotometer (the bacterial concentration was 108 to 2 × 108 cells/mL). The broth was then serial diluted 104 times with PBS to a final concentration of 104 to 2 × 104 cells/mL.

4.6. Characterization and Analysis

The size of the nanoporous structure and the bacteria attached to the surface of the LPFG with various functional coatings were characterized using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) at 3 kV accelerating voltage, with a working distance of 7.5 mm, utilizing an Auriga Modular Cross Beam workstation from Carl Zeiss, Inc. (Thornwood, NY, USA). The SEM images were analyzed using ImageJ 1.52 software from the National Institutes of Health.

4.7. Optofluidic Platform

An all-optical lab-on-fiber optofluidic platform (LOFOP) was designed and developed for in situ measurements in the biological micro-environment [29]. It was composed of two vital and multifunctional components. One part comprised the LPFG as a sensing element, and the other was a glass capillary to allow bacterial adhesion on the LPFG under continuous flow conditions. The LPFG and the glass capillary, with a length of 50 mm and an inner diameter of 1.56 mm, were assembled to create a liquid-tight LOFOP with an inlet and an outlet for flow regulation using a syringe pump (New Era Pump Systems, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA). Two ends of the LPFG were fixed as it was mounted in LOFOP. The entire LOFOP setup was placed in an incubator set at a temperature of 37 °C [29]. Each measurement was repeated 3 times.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/coatings13040778/s1. Figure S1: Schematic of the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings self-assembly process; Figure S2: The densities of different bacteria attached on various functional coatings on LPFG in 104 CFU/mL bacteria PBS solution at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C at 60 min. Figure S3: The transmission spectra of porous coatings for (a) S. aureus and (b) E. coli detection at different time spots. Table S1: The ratio of the RW shifts between different LPFG-based platforms in E. coli PBS solutions with concentration of 104 CFU/mL at 60 min. Table S2: The ratios between the RW shifts for S. aureus and E. coli detections at different time points. References [52,53,54,55,56] are cited in the supplementary materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.H. and F.Y.; methodology, S.H., J.W., F.Y. and T.-L.C.; software, S.H., Z.T., K.L. and S.L.; validation, S.H. and K.L.; formal analysis, S.H. and K.L.; investigation, S.H. and J.W.; resources, J.-F.L., H.D. and Y.L.; data curation, S.H., Z.T. and S.L.; writing—original draft, S.H.; writing—review and editing, S.H., F.Y., F.T., J.-F.L., H.D. and Y.L.; visualization, S.H.; supervision, S.H., J.-F.L., H.D. and Y.L.; project administration, H.D.; funding acquisition, F.T., H.D. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the US National Science Foundation [grant number ECCS-1611155] and Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Achievement and Industry Program [grant number 2021GK4014].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Smietana, M.; Bock, W.J.; Mikulic, P.; Ng, A.; Chinnappan, R.; Zourob, M. Detection of bacteria using bacteriophages as recognition elements immobilized on long-period fiber gratings. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 7971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zourob, M.; Mohr, S.; Brown, B.J.T.; Fielden, P.R.; McDonnell, M.B.; Goddard, N.J. Bacteria detection using disposable optical leaky waveguide sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shabani, A.; Zourob, M.; Allain, B.; Marquette, C.A.; Lawrence, M.F.; Mandeville, R. Bacteriophage-modified microarrays for the direct impedimetric detection of bacteria. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 9475–9482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Taylor, A.D.; Yu, Q.; Chen, S.; Homola, J.; Jiang, S. Comparison of E. coli O157:H7 preparation methods used for detection with surface plasmon resonance sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Templier, V.; Roux, A.; Roupioz, Y.; Livache, T. Ligands for label-free detection of whole bacteria on biosensors: A review. TrAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 79, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, T.; Liu, J.; Gu, X.; Li, D.; Wang, J.; Wang, E. Label-free electrochemical aptasensor constructed by layer-by-layer technology for sensitive and selective detection of cancer cells. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 882, 32–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cho, I.; Blaser, M.J. The human microbiome: At the interface of health and disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 260–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bock, W.J.; Tripathi, S.M.; Smietana, M. Sensitive and Selective Lab-on-a-Fiber Sensor for Bacteria Detection in Water. Springer Ser. Surf. Sci. 2015, 56, 315–334. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baeumner, A.J.; Cohen, R.N.; Miksic, V.; Min, J. RNA biosensor for the rapid detection of viable Escherichia coli in drinking water. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Van Dorst, B.; Mehta, J.; Bekaert, K.; Rouah-Martin, E.; De Coen, W.; Dubruel, P.; Blust, R.; Robbens, J. Recent advances in recognition elements of food and environmental biosensors: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 26, 1178–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Balasubramanian, S.; Sorokulova, I.B.; Vodyanoy, V.J.; Simonian, A.L. Lytic phage as a specific and selective probe for detection of Staphylococcus aureus—A surface plasmon resonance spectroscopic study. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 948–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Arora, P.; Sindhu, A.; Dilbaghi, N.; Chaudhury, A. Biosensors as innovative tools for the detection of food borne pathogens. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011, 28, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rijal, K.; Leung, A.; Shankar, P.M.; Mutharasan, R. Detection of pathogen Escherichia coli O157:H7 at 70 cells/mL using antibody-immobilized biconical tapered fiber sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2005, 21, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, X.; Samuelson, D.R.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, S.; Rasco, B.A.; Xu, J.; Konkel, M.E. Detecting and tracking nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using a microfluidic SERS biosensor. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2320–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, F.; Chang, T.-L.; Liu, T.; Wu, D.; Du, H.; Liang, J.; Tian, F. Label-free detection of Staphylococcus aureus bacteria using long-period fiber gratings with functional polyelectrolyte coatings. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 133, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goodridge, L.; Chen, J.; Griffiths, M. Development and characterization of a fluorescent-bacteriophage assay for detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, K.; Chen, T.; He, S.; Robbins, J.P.; Podkolzin, S.G.; Tian, F. Observation and Identification of an Atomic Oxygen Structure on Catalytic Gold Nanoparticles. Angew. Chem.-Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 12952–12957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Liu, K.; He, S.; Li, L.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Liu, T.; Wu, H.; Jiang, X.; Liu, K.; Tian, F. Spectroscopically clean Au nanoparticles for catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 9709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, S.; Wu, D.; Chen, S.; Liu, K.; Yang, E.-H.; Tian, F.; Du, H. Au-on-Ag nanostructure for in-situ SERS monitoring of catalytic reactions. Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 155701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tang, Z.; Chen, T.; Liu, K.; Du, H.; Podkolzin, S.G. Atomic, Molecular and Hybrid Oxygen Structures on Silver. Langmuir 2021, 37, 11603–11610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Scoullos, E.V.; Hofman, M.S.; Zheng, Y.; Potapenko, D.V.; Tang, Z.; Podkolzin, S.G.; Koel, B.E. Guaiacol Adsorption and Decomposition on Platinum. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 29180–29189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zheng, Y.; Tang, Z.; Podkolzin, S.G. Catalytic Platinum Nanoparticles Decorated with Subnanometer Molybdenum Clusters for Biomass Processing. Chem.-A Eur. J. 2020, 26, 5174–5179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Robbins, J.P.; Ezeonu, L.; Tang, Z.; Yang, X.; Koel, B.E.; Podkolzin, S.G. Propane Dehydrogenation to Propylene and Propylene Adsorption on Ni and Ni-Sn Catalysts. ChemCatChem 2022, 14, e202101546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, Y.; Qi, Y.; Tang, Z.; Hanke, F.; Podkolzin, S.G. Kinetics and Reaction Mechanisms of Acetic Acid Hydrodeoxygenation over Pt and Pt-Mo Catalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 5212–5224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, Y.; Qi, Y.; Tang, Z.; Tan, J.; Koel, B.E.; Podkolzin, S.G. Spectroscopic observation and structure-insensitivity of hydroxyls on gold. Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 4036–4039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ezeonu, L.; Tang, Z.; Qi, Y.; Huo, F.; Zheng, Y.; Koel, B.E.; Podkolzin, S.G. Adsorption, surface reactions and hydrodeoxygenation of acetic acid on platinum and nickel catalysts. J. Catal. 2023, 418, 190–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-optic chemical sensors and biosensors. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 3859–3873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Helmerhorst, E.; Chandler, D.J.; Nussio, M.; Mamotte, C.D. Real-time and label-free bio-sensing of molecular interactions by surface plasmon resonance: A laboratory medicine perspective. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 2012, 33, 161–173. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bandara, A.B.; Zuo, Z.; Ramachandran, S.; Ritter, A.; Heflin, J.R.; Inzana, T.J. Detection of methicillin-resistant staphylococci by biosensor assay consisting of nanoscale films on optical fiber long-period gratings. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 70, 433–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Boudou, T.; Crouzier, T.; Ren, K.; Blin, G.; Picart, C. Multiple functionalities of polyelectrolyte multilayer films: New biomedical applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 441–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saha, N.; Monge, C.; Dulong, V.; Picart, C.; Glinel, K. Influence of polyelectrolyte film stiffness on bacterial growth. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, F.; Kanka, J.; Tian, F. Silica nanoparticle coated long-period grating for in situ monitoring of drug delivery thin films. Opt. Fibers Sens. Med. Diagn. Treat. Appl. XVII 2017, 10058, 1005809. [Google Scholar]
  33. Hammond, P.T. Building biomedical materials layer-by-layer. Mater. Today 2012, 15, 196–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Du, Y.; Chen, C.; Li, B.; Zhou, M.; Wang, E.; Dong, S. Layer-by-layer electrochemical biosensor with aptamer-appended active polyelectrolyte multilayer for sensitive protein determination. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2010, 25, 1902–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Podsiadlo, P.; Kotov, N.A. Biomedical applications of layer-by-layer assembly: From biomimetics to tissue engineering. Adv. Mater. 2006, 18, 3203–3224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chiavaioli, F.; Biswas, P.; Trono, C.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Giannetti, A.; Tombelli, S.; Basumallick, N.; Dasgupta, K.; Baldini, F. Towards sensitive label-free immunosensing by means of turn-around point long period fiber gratings. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2014, 60, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mendelsohn, J.D.; Barrett, C.J.; Chan, V.V.; Pal, A.J.; Mayes, A.M.; Rubner, M.F. Fabrication of microporous thin films from polyelectrolyte multilayers. Langmuir 2000, 16, 5017–5023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sun, B.; Flessner, R.M.; Saurer, E.M.; Jewell, C.M.; Fredin, N.J.; Lynn, D.M. Characterization of pH-induced changes in the morphology of polyelectrolyte multilayers assembled from poly(allylamine) and low molecular weight poly(acrylic acid). J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2011, 355, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Perera-Costa, D.; Bruque, J.M.; González-Martín, M.L.; Gómez-García, A.C.; Vadillo-Rodríguez, V. Studying the influence of surface topography on bacterial adhesion using spatially organized microtopographic surface patterns. Langmuir 2014, 30, 4633–4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Whitehead, K.A.; Colligon, J.; Verran, J. Retention of microbial cells in substratum surface features of micrometer and sub-micrometer dimensions. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2005, 41, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Harris, J.J.; DeRose, P.M.; Bruening, M.L. Synthesis of passivating, nylon-like coatings through cross-linking of ultrathin polyelectrolyte films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1978–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chang, T.L.; Zhou, X.; Liang, J. Synthesis and characterization of Ag-Cu alloy nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications: A polydopamine chemistry application. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 98, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vaamonde, G.; Chirife, J. Effect of phosphate buffer on Staphylococcus aureas growth at a reduced water activity. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1986, 3, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Guo, S.; Zhu, X.; Loh, X.J. Controlling cell adhesion using layer-by-layer approaches for biomedical applications. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 70, 1163–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lerebour, G.; Cupferman, S.; Bellon-Fontaine, M.N. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis to the Episkin® reconstructed epidermis model and to an inert 304 stainless steel substrate. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 97, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Trunk, T.; Khalil, H.S.; Leo, J.C. Bacterial autoaggregation. AIMS Microbiol. 2018, 4, 140–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Berne, C.; Ellison, C.K.; Ducret, A.; Brun, Y.V. Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2018, 16, 616–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jacobson, S.H.; Tullus, K.; Brauner, A. Hydrophobic properties of Escherichia coli causing acute pyelonephritis. J. Infect. 1989, 19, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lichter, J.A.; Thompson, M.T.; Delgadillo, M.; Nishikawa, T.; Rubner, M.F.; Van Vliet, K.J. Substrata Mechanical Stiffness Can Regulate Adhesion of Viable Bacteria. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 1571–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lichter, J.A.; Rubner, M.F. Polyelectrolyte multilayers with intrinsic antimicrobial functionality: The importance of mobile polycations. Langmuir 2009, 25, 7686–7694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Ivanov, O.V.; Yang, F.; Tian, F.; Du, H. Thin-core fiber structures with overlays for sensing applications. Opt. Express 2017, 25, 31197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, F.; Sukhishvili, S.; Du, H.; Tian, F. Marine salinity sensing using long-period fiber gratings enabled by stimuli-responsive polyelectrolyte multilayers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 745–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tian, F.; Kanka, J.; Zou, B.; Chiang, K.S.; Du, H. Long-period gratings inscribed in photonic crystal fiber by symmetric CO2 laser irradiation. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 13208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vengsarkar, A.M.; Lemaire, P.J.; Judkins, J.B.; Bhatia, V.; Erdogan, T.; Sipe, J.E. Long-period fiber gratings as band-rejection filters. J. Light. Technol. 1996, 14, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yang, F.; Hlushko, R.; Wu, D.; Sukhishvili, S.A.; Du, H.; Tian, F. Ocean Salinity Sensing Using Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Layer-by-Layer Hydrogels. ACS Omega 2019, 4, 2134–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Tian, F.; Kaňka, J.; Yang, F.; Min, J.; Hammond, P.T. Role of silica nanoparticles in monitoring and prolonging release of drug-eluting polyelectrolyte coatings using long-period fiber grating platform. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 252, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The mechanism of pH-induced nanoporous structure in the coating of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH. Step 1 is the side view of the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings; in the dashed frame shown on the right is the pseudo-3D view. Step 2 and step 3 are side views showing the breakage of the interchain ionic bonds between amino groups and carboxylate groups due to protonation in acidic solution. Step 4 is the top view showing the formation of a swelling complex after ionic bonds break in acidic solution; the pseudo-3D view is shown in the dashed frame above. Step 5 is the top view showing the spinodal decomposition and nanopores formation in the neutral buffer solution; the pseudo-3D view is shown in the dash frame above.
Figure 1. The mechanism of pH-induced nanoporous structure in the coating of [PAH/PAA]10-PAH. Step 1 is the side view of the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH coatings; in the dashed frame shown on the right is the pseudo-3D view. Step 2 and step 3 are side views showing the breakage of the interchain ionic bonds between amino groups and carboxylate groups due to protonation in acidic solution. Step 4 is the top view showing the formation of a swelling complex after ionic bonds break in acidic solution; the pseudo-3D view is shown in the dashed frame above. Step 5 is the top view showing the spinodal decomposition and nanopores formation in the neutral buffer solution; the pseudo-3D view is shown in the dash frame above.
Coatings 13 00778 g001
Figure 2. (a) The SEM image displays the pH-induced nanoporous structure of the coatings on the LPFG. (b) A statistical histogram illustrates the diameter distribution of the nanopores on the nanoporous coating.
Figure 2. (a) The SEM image displays the pH-induced nanoporous structure of the coatings on the LPFG. (b) A statistical histogram illustrates the diameter distribution of the nanopores on the nanoporous coating.
Coatings 13 00778 g002
Figure 3. (a) The time-resolved RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs for S. aureus detections at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 60 min. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. The error bar represents the standard deviation. SEM images of S. aureus on the (b) bare LPFGs, (c) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (d) nanoporous coated LPFGs at 60 min. The inset of (d) is a zoomed-in SEM image of S. aureus attached to the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFG at 60 min.
Figure 3. (a) The time-resolved RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs for S. aureus detections at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 60 min. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. The error bar represents the standard deviation. SEM images of S. aureus on the (b) bare LPFGs, (c) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (d) nanoporous coated LPFGs at 60 min. The inset of (d) is a zoomed-in SEM image of S. aureus attached to the nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFG at 60 min.
Coatings 13 00778 g003
Figure 4. (a) The time-resolved RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs for E. coli detections at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 60 min. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. The error bar represents standard deviation. SEM images of E. coli on the (b) bare LPFGs, (c) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (d) nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs at 60 min. The inset of (d) is a zoomed-in SEM image of E. coli attached to the nanoporous coated LPFG at 60 min.
Figure 4. (a) The time-resolved RW shifts of the bare LPFGs, the [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and the nanoporous coated LPFGs for E. coli detections at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 60 min. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. The error bar represents standard deviation. SEM images of E. coli on the (b) bare LPFGs, (c) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (d) nanoporous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs at 60 min. The inset of (d) is a zoomed-in SEM image of E. coli attached to the nanoporous coated LPFG at 60 min.
Coatings 13 00778 g004
Figure 5. The time-resolved RW shifts of the (a) bare LPFGs, (b) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (c) porous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs in 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli PBS solutions at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 260 min.
Figure 5. The time-resolved RW shifts of the (a) bare LPFGs, (b) [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs and (c) porous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH-coated LPFGs in 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli PBS solutions at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C for 260 min.
Coatings 13 00778 g005
Figure 6. The RW shifts of LPFGs coated with functional coatings on 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli PBS solutions at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C at (a) 60 min and (b) 260 min.
Figure 6. The RW shifts of LPFGs coated with functional coatings on 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli PBS solutions at a flow rate of 30 μL/min and temperature of 37 °C at (a) 60 min and (b) 260 min.
Coatings 13 00778 g006
Table 1. The ratio of the RW shifts between different LPFG-based platforms in S. aureus PBS solutions with concentration of 104 CFU/mL at 60 min.
Table 1. The ratio of the RW shifts between different LPFG-based platforms in S. aureus PBS solutions with concentration of 104 CFU/mL at 60 min.
SubstrateS. aureus Detection at 60 min
RW Shift (nm)Ratio of RW Shift between Various Platforms
Bare LPFG0.07 ± 0.051
[PAH-PAA]10-PAH LbL-coated LPFG0.31 ± 0.144.08
Porous [PAH-PAA]10-PAH LbL-coated LPFG0.53 ± 0.217.09
Table 2. The RW shifts of the functional coatings on LPFGs in 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli solutions at 260 min and the ratios between the RW shifts for S. aureus and E. coli detections at 260 and 60 min.
Table 2. The RW shifts of the functional coatings on LPFGs in 104 CFU/mL S. aureus and E. coli solutions at 260 min and the ratios between the RW shifts for S. aureus and E. coli detections at 260 and 60 min.
SubstrateRW Shift at 260 min (nm)Ratio of RW Shift:
S. aureus:E. coli
S. aureusE. coli260 min60 min
Bare LPFG0.31 ± 0.160.37 ± 0.200.83:10.31:1
[PAH/PAA]10-PAH LbL-coated LPFG1.44 ± 0.330.21 ± 0.116.89:14.00:1
Porous [PAH/PAA]10-PAH LbL-coated LPFG2.64 ± 0.170.74 ± 0.123.60:11.92:1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, S.; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Chang, T.-L.; Tang, Z.; Liu, K.; Liu, S.; Tian, F.; Liang, J.-F.; Du, H.; et al. Bacterial Detection and Differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Utilizing Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Nanoporous Coated Structures. Coatings 2023, 13, 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040778

AMA Style

He S, Wang J, Yang F, Chang T-L, Tang Z, Liu K, Liu S, Tian F, Liang J-F, Du H, et al. Bacterial Detection and Differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Utilizing Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Nanoporous Coated Structures. Coatings. 2023; 13(4):778. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040778

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Shuyue, Jue Wang, Fan Yang, Tzu-Lan Chang, Ziyu Tang, Kai Liu, Shuli Liu, Fei Tian, Jun-Feng Liang, Henry Du, and et al. 2023. "Bacterial Detection and Differentiation of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli Utilizing Long-Period Fiber Gratings Functionalized with Nanoporous Coated Structures" Coatings 13, no. 4: 778. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13040778

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop