Next Article in Journal
Component Design of Environmentally Friendly High-Temperature Resistance Coating for Oriented Silicon Steel and Effects on Anti-Corrosion Property
Next Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress in Surface and Interface Properties of Nanostructures
Previous Article in Journal
Antibacterial Properties of PMMA Functionalized with CuFe2O4/Cu2O/CuO Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Special Issue
MicroRaman Study of Nanostructured Ultra-Thin AlGaN/GaN Thin Films Grown on Hybrid Compliant SiC/Por-Si Substrates
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Silicon on the Surface Modification of Al-Cr Powder Cathodes Subjected to Vacuum Arc Treatment

Institute of Strength Physics and Materials Science SB RAS, 634055 Tomsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Coatings 2022, 12(7), 958; https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070958
Submission received: 7 June 2022 / Revised: 1 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 6 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Progress in Surface and Interface Properties of Nanostructures)

Abstract

:
Al-Cr and Al-Cr-Si composite cathodes were obtained by the hot compaction of aluminum, chromium, and silicon powder mixtures. The phase transformations in the surface layer of the Al-Cr-Si composite cathodes subjected to the arc heating were considered. The elemental and phase compositions of the modified cathodes’ surfaces were studied using X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The effect of the silicon addition on the structural evolution in the cathode surface during arc evaporation is shown. It was found that an arc impact on the cathode surface resulted in the melting and consequent crystallization of the multiphase mixture of intermetallic compounds and eutectic in the cathode surface layer. Cathode surface layers were found to be depleted of aluminum and silicon due to the ejection of these elements in drop form from the Al-Si liquid layer on the cathode surface. This can result in the change in the elements ratio in the deposited coating as compared with that in the cathode and thus influence the coated tools’ durability.

1. Introduction

Wear-resistant coatings for metalworking tools increase a tool life due to their high hardness, resistance to air oxidation, and a reduced coefficient of friction on the material being worked. Coatings are applied to the tool surface by vacuum arc evaporation or magnetron sputtering of cathodes in reactive gases, mainly in nitrogen and oxygen [1,2]. When a titanium cathode is exposed to vacuum arc evaporation in nitrogen gas, a thin film of titanium nitride is deposited on the tool surface. The elemental composition of the titanium cathodes has been doped by other nitride-forming elements (aluminum, chromium, molybdenum, and silicon). The greatest increase in tool life was obtained on tools with TiAlN, CrAlN, and CrAlSiN nitride coatings [3,4,5]. AlCrN and AlCrSiN coatings on metalworking tools have excellent thermal stability, air-oxidation resistance, and a reduced coefficient of dry friction against steels [6,7,8,9]. During vacuum arc evaporation, the cathode material is ejected from vacuum arc craters on the cathode surface in ion form with different charges, neutral atoms, and melted drops [10,11]. In the investigations devoted to cathodic arc-coating technologies, attention is paid to the deposition process features and to the coatings’ structure and properties [12,13]. The effect of the cathode’s elemental composition and the cathode’s evaporation modes on the coated tool durability are also examined [14,15]. Lttle attention is paid to the cathode surface, which is a source of plasma flow generated by the arc.
It is known that the surfaces of cathodes, used for coating deposition by vacuum arc evaporation, are heated to high temperatures exceeding the melting point of the cathode material. Surface melting results in an increased number of drops in the products of the arc erosion. The greater the drop quantity, the lower the melting temperature of the cathode [16]. Heating of the surface layer of multicomponent cathodes, which are in a nonequilibrium state, for example, consisting of a mechanical mixture of elementary powders, is accompanied by structural and phase transformations, which can change the ejection properties of the surface layer of cathodes. In particular, on the surface of cathodes composed of a compacted powder mixture of aluminum (50 at.%) and titanium subjected to vacuum arc heating, the formation of titanium aluminides occurred [17]. Titanium aluminides in a surface layer of the vacuum-arc-powder cathodes were also detected in [18]. The origin of the aluminides was not discussed. The coatings deposited by the cathodic arc evaporation had high roughness because of the solidified drops of the plasma jets [19,20,21]. The Al-Cr and Al-Cr-Si cathodes, hot compacted from powder mixtures, contain a low-melting aluminum. Therefore, the drop content in the plasma increases, resulting in surface quality deterioration as a result of the drops’ crystallization on the coating surface. There are studies [19] where analysis results of the arc impact on the elemental and phase state of Al-Cr cathodes under various gas media are presented, but a detailed assessment of the element balance during the arc evaporation has not been provided. According to [19,20,21,22], an Al-Cr intermetallic formation occurred on the cathodes’ surface consisting of the compacted powder mixture of aluminum and chromium, as a result of the arc impact. Here too, the origin of the Al-Cr aluminides was not discussed. There was also no information about the silicon effect on erosive processes in these cathodes during the plasma generation. Thus, it is of great interest to investigate the microstructure, the phase, and the elemental composition of the surface layer of multicomponent cathodes modified by the arc impact. The investigation results can clarify the influence of the cathode surface layer on the coatings’ elemental composition and properties, as well as the effect on tool durability in machining operations.
The mechanical properties of the hot compacted Al-Cr and Al-Cr-Si powder materials were investigated previously [23]. According to our results, the residual porosity, strength, and ductility of the hot compacted cathode was appropriate for the use condition of the vacuum arc and magnetron cathodes.

2. Materials and Methods

The targets for the cathodic arc deposition were obtained by hot (550 °C) compaction (0.5 GPa) of the preforms produced by cold consolidation of the powder mixtures of aluminum (⩽80 μm), chromium (⩽50 μm), and silicon (⩽80 μm). The powder shape is presented in Figure 1.
The cathodes of Al0.7Cr0.3, Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1, and Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2 (at.%) compositions were investigated. The coatings were deposited in N2 gas under 0.065 Pa pressure and a 90 A arc current for 60 min.
The phase composition was determined by X-ray diffraction using Co K α radiation. The X-ray data of the ASTM data file and the PDWin (4.0, NPP Bourevestnik, Saint-Petersburg, Russia) software were used for phase identification and characterization. Structure studies of the cathodes were carried out by optical (AXIOVERT-200MAT) and scanning electron (LEO EVO 50, Zeiss, Germany) microscopy. The elemental composition of the modified layer was determined by X-ray spectroscopy (EDS).

3. Results and Discussion

The microstructure of the hot-compacted powder cathodes represented an aluminum matrix with inclusions of chromium (Figure 2a) or of chromium and silicon particles (Figure 2b). The porosity of the hot compacted cathode material was near to zero.
Figure 3 shows top views of the cathode surfaces after the arc treatment. The smooth view of the surfaces was evidence of the surface fusion of the cathode material. A crack formation due to the crystallization of the melt film can be seen on the surface. A network of cracks on the surfaces was an indication of the low plasticity of the solidified liquid surface layer.
Figure 4 shows cross sections of the modified layers. The thickness of the modified layer depended on the silicon content in the cathodes and increased from 5–30 μm on the Al0.7Cr0.3 to 80 μm on the Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1 cathode. One reason for the wide range in the layer thicknesses was the inhomogeneous distribution of the Cr and Si particles in the Al matrix resulting in a wide variation in the depth of the melted layer. The transition zone between the modified layer and the cathode body was not observed. That is, no reactive solid-state diffusion occurred. So, the crystallization origin of the modified layer was proved.
The thickness of the modified surface layer on the Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2 cathode increased to 120 μm (Figure 4c). In this case, the multiphase composition of the modified layer presented along with the typical transverse cracks. At the boundary between the modified layer and the cathode bulk, cavities appeared due to the crystallization shrinkage. A significant part of this layer was occupied by a crystallized Al-Si eutectic. The large volume of low-melting eutectic is explained by the double silicon content in the mechanical mixture of powders as compared to the Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1 composition. Therefore, the number of contacts of adjacent particles of aluminum and silicon, on which a eutectic liquid appeared, increased. The process of contact melting was accelerated, and the volume of the resulting eutectic liquid increased. The surface layer was separated from the initial material of the cathode by a sharp boundary, on which there were defects in the form of cavities formed during the crystallization of the melt.
The change in the phase composition on the cathode working surface was confirmed by the results of the X-ray diffraction analysis (Figure 5, Table 1). The top of the cathode surface was X-ray exposed. The multiphase composition of the modified layers was the result of the nonequilibrium conditions of the melting and crystallization. The XRD data showed that in the Al-Cr cathode surface layer, the main phase was Al8Cr5. Silicon addition up to 20 at.% led to the Al74Cr20Si6 ternary phase formation along with Al8Cr5. The aluminum content in the Al8Cr5 was more than that in the cathode body. Free aluminum and silicon belonged to the eutectic in the modified layer of the Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2 cathode (Table 1).
The existence of a continuous melt film on the surface of the Al-Cr and Al-Cr-Si powder cathodes under the conditions of stationary vacuum arc evaporation resulted in enhanced droplet generation. The formation of the Al8Cr5 intermetallic in the modified surface layer of the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode was an effect of the crystallization of the aluminum-depleted melt but not a consequence of the aluminum and chromium reaction interdiffusion. The melting of the cathode surface was promoted by a high content of low-melting aluminum (76.4 vol.%) in the mechanical mixture with chromium. The addition of silicon increased the thickness of the melted layer on the cathode surface due to the formation of low-melting Al-Si eutectic.
An additional factor contributing to the formation of the intermetallic compounds by reaction diffusion in elemental powder mixtures was a large interfacial reaction surface, that is, the use of the finest powders. However, more research is required with a variety of powder mixture compositions, powder dispersion, and arc evaporation modes, primarily arc current, to elucidate the possibility and conditions for the formation of high-melting intermetallic layers on the working surface of powder cathodes under arc treatment.
The elemental composition of the modified layer was determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS); the distribution of aluminum and chromium in the volume of the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode and in the modified layer is clearly visible in the map images (Figure 6).
The elemental composition of the cathode modified layer was investigated both on the top surface and on cross sections (Figure 7). The averaged results of the EDS analysis in the counted areas on Figure 7 are presented in Table 2. The Al/Cr ratio (1.55) in the top part of the modified layer on the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode was much lower than that (2.1) in the bottom part adjacent to the cathode body (Table 2 and Table 3). Both values were different from the initial cathode Al/Cr ratio (2.33). That means there was a depletion of the modified layer with aluminum as a result of its predominant ejection in drop form under the arc impact. In this case, the Al/Cr ratio (1.55) approximately corresponded to the Al8Cr5 phase (Al/Cr = 1.6) that was the dominant phase in the thin surface layer of the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode according to the XRD results.
A similar effect of aluminum depletion was also observed for the Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1 cathodes. The Al/Cr ratio (2.10) for the top surface was less than that for the cathode bulk (2.60). According to the EDS analysis, the Al/Cr ratio became equal to that for the cathode bulk when moving away from the top surface to the bottom of the modified layer. The Al depletion effect in the modified Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1 cathode surface occurred only in a thin layer (≈5 μm).
Along with Al depletion, Si depletion occurred in the top thin layer of the cathode. Apparently, this depletion of silicon was also related to the silicon ejection in the drops of low-melting Al-Si eutectic. The difference between the Al/Si ratios for the top and bottom of the modified layer was minor in both the Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1 and Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2 cathodes. The reason is the intensive convective mixing in the molten surface film that was thicker on the surface of the Si-containing cathodes than that on the Al-Cr cathode surface.

4. Conclusions

The surface layers of the powder Al-Cr-Si hot-compacted cathodes subjected to arc heating were melted up to 120 μm in depth, depending on the elemental composition of the cathode. After cooling, the melted layer solidified, forming a multiphase mixture of intermetallic compounds and eutectic. The silicon addition to the Al-Cr powder mixtures resulted in a thickness increase of the melted layer on the cathode surface. A novelty of the work lies in the fact that in the stationary mode of the arc evaporation, the aluminum and silicon depletion of the surface layer occurred due to their ejection in drop form from the Al-Si liquid film on the cathode surface. The depletion can change the elements ratio in the coating deposited.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and experimental design, G.P. and V.K.; methodology, and analysis and discussion of the results, E.K.; EDS analysis and the manuscript writing, M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was performed according to the Government research assignment for ISPMS SB RAS, project FWRW-2021-0005.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martin, P.; Bendavid, A. Review of the filtered vacuum arc process and materials deposition. Thin Solid Film. 2001, 394, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boxman, R.L.; Sanders, D.; Martin, P.J. Handbook of Vacuum Arc Science & Technology: Fundamentals and Applications; William Andrew: Norwich, CT, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yamamoto, K.; Sato, T.; Takahara, K.; Hanaguri, K. Properties of (Ti, Cr, Al) N coatings with high Al content deposited by new plasma enhanced arc-cathode. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2003, 174, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sousa, V.F.; Silva, F.; Alexandre, R.; Fecheira, J.; Silva, F. Study of the wear behaviour of TiAlSiN and TiAlN PVD coated tools on milling operations of pre-hardened tool steel. Wear 2021, 476, 203695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yang, Y.; Shang, H.; Shao, T. Influence of nitrogen implantation on adhesion strength of TiAlN film on γ-TiAl alloy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 508, 145141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Qi, Z.; Yue, G.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Peng, D. Investigation on the structure and properties of AlxCr1-xN coatings deposited by reactive magnetron co-sputtering. J. Alloys Compd. 2010, 502, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tritremmel, C.; Daniel, R.; Mitterer, C.; Mayrhofer, P.H.; Lechthaler, M.; Polcik, P. Oxidation behavior of arc evaporated Al-Cr-Si-N thin films. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2012, 30, 061501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Xian, G.; Xiong, J.; Zhao, H.; Fan, H.; Li, Z.; Du, H. Evaluation of the structure and properties of the hard TiAlN-(TiAlN/CrAlSiN)-TiAlN multiple coatings deposited on different substrate materials. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2019, 85, 105056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, M.; Cheng, Y.; Xin, L.; Su, J.; Li, Y.; Zhu, S.; Wang, F. Cyclic oxidation behaviour of Ti/TiAlN composite multilayer coatings deposited on titanium alloy. Corros. Sci. 2020, 166, 108476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Anders, A. Cathodic Arcs: From Fractal Spots to Energetic Condensation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 50. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimblin, C. Erosion and ionization in the cathode spot regions of vacuum arcs. J. Appl. Phys. 1973, 44, 3074–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, M.; Li, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xin, L.; Niu, Y.; Su, J.; Zhu, S.; Wang, F. Studies on different oxidation behaviors of TiAlN on titanium alloy and stainless steel under thermal cycling. Corros. Sci. 2021, 192, 109865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chang, K.; Dong, Y.; Zheng, G.; Jiang, X.; Yang, X.; Cheng, X.; Liu, H.; Zhao, G. Friction and wear properties of TiAlN coated tools with different levels of surface integrity. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 4433–4443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moreno, M.; Andersson, J.M.; Boyd, R.; Johansson-Jöesaar, M.P.; Johnson, L.J.; Odén, M.; Rogström, L. Crater wear mechanism of TiAlN coatings during high-speed metal turning. Wear 2021, 484, 204016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhao, J.; Liu, Z.; Wang, B.; Song, Q.; Ren, X.; Wan, Y. Effects of Al content in TiAlN coatings on tool wear and cutting temperature during dry machining IN718. Tribol. Int. 2022, 171, 107540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nürnberg, A.; Fang, D.; Bauder, U.; Behrisch, R.; Brossa, F. Temperature dependence of the erosion of A1 and TiC by vacuum arcs in a magnetic field. J. Nucl. Mater. 1981, 103, 305–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pribytkov, G.A.; Andreeva, I.A. Structure transformations on the surface of Al-Ti cathodes under the action of vacuum arc. Phys. Chem. Mater. Process. 2011, 1, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rafaja, D.; Polzer, C.; Schreiber, G.; Polcik, P.; Kathrein, M. Surface modification of Ti-Al targets during cathodic arc evaporation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 205, 5116–5123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Franz, R.; Mendez Martin, F.; Hawranek, G.; Polcik, P. Erosion behavior of composite Al-Cr cathodes in cathodic arc plasmas in inert and reactive atmospheres. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A Vac. Surf. Film. 2016, 34, 021304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pohler, M.; Franz, R.; Ramm, J.; Polcik, P.; Mitterer, C. Cathodic arc deposition of (Al, Cr)2O3: Macroparticles and cathode surface modifications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2011, 206, 1454–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ramm, J.; Neels, A.; Widrig, B.; Döbeli, M.; de Abreu Vieira, L.; Dommann, A.; Rudigier, H. Correlation between target surface and layer nucleation in the synthesis of Al–Cr–O coatings deposited by reactive cathodic arc evaporation. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 1356–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhirkov, I.; Landälv, L.; Göthelid, E.; Ahlgren, M.; Eklund, P.; Rosén, J. Effect of Si on DC arc plasma generation from Al-Cr and Al-Cr-Si cathodes used in oxygen. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 121, 083303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Korosteleva, E.N.; Pribytkov, G.A.; Korzhova, V.V. Effect of the Hot Deformation Conditions on Structure and Mechanical Properties of AlCr/AlCrSi Powder Composites. Metals 2021, 11, 1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of the powders used for the cathode compactions: (a) Al; (b) Cr; (c) Si.
Figure 1. SEM images of the powders used for the cathode compactions: (a) Al; (b) Cr; (c) Si.
Coatings 12 00958 g001
Figure 2. Optical microscopy images of the cathode structure: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1.
Figure 2. Optical microscopy images of the cathode structure: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1.
Coatings 12 00958 g002
Figure 3. SEM images (top view) of the arc-treated cathodes: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Figure 3. SEM images (top view) of the arc-treated cathodes: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Coatings 12 00958 g003
Figure 4. SEM image of the cross section of the cathodes’ modified layer: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Figure 4. SEM image of the cross section of the cathodes’ modified layer: (a) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Coatings 12 00958 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns from the top of the modified layer of the cathodes: (1) Al0.7Cr0.3; (2) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (3) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Figure 5. XRD patterns from the top of the modified layer of the cathodes: (1) Al0.7Cr0.3; (2) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (3) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2.
Coatings 12 00958 g005
Figure 6. EDS element (Al (b) and Cr (c) elements) mapping in the near-surface region (a) of the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode according to the results of the EDS analysis.
Figure 6. EDS element (Al (b) and Cr (c) elements) mapping in the near-surface region (a) of the Al0.7Cr0.3 cathode according to the results of the EDS analysis.
Coatings 12 00958 g006
Figure 7. Elemental analysis of the modified layer of the cathodes: (a,d) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b,e) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c,f) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2. (ac)—top view; (df)—cross section. Investigated areas are marked with numbers.
Figure 7. Elemental analysis of the modified layer of the cathodes: (a,d) Al0.7Cr0.3; (b,e) Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1; (c,f) Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2. (ac)—top view; (df)—cross section. Investigated areas are marked with numbers.
Coatings 12 00958 g007
Table 1. Phase composition of the modified layer (vol.%).
Table 1. Phase composition of the modified layer (vol.%).
CathodeAlCrSiAl4CrAl74Cr20Si6Al8Cr5
Al0.7Cr0.316.79.8-12.4-61.1
Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.110.28.95.217.421.636.7
Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.225.25.413.616.513.525.8
Table 2. The distribution of the elements in the modified layer (top and cross section).
Table 2. The distribution of the elements in the modified layer (top and cross section).
Cathode CNOAlCrSi
Al0.7Cr0.3Top12.8 ± 6.64.8 ± 1.41.7 ± 0.649.5 ± 5.431.2 ± 4.0-
Cross section25.2 ± 11.11.3 ± 1.41.1 ± 0.849.1 ± 6.623.3 ± 5.8-
Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1Top (int)17.42.52.447.922.87.0
Cross section17.9 ± 13.41.7 ± 1.01.0 ± 1.251.9 ± 10.520.0 ± 4.37.5 ± 1.2
Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2Top34.1 ± 18.44.9 ± 2.810.7 ± 10.025.8 ± 16.79.2 ± 6.615.3 ± 11.6
Cross section34.0 ± 22.70.7 ± 0.80.8 ± 1.339.7 ± 15.112.9 ± 4.611.9 ± 3.8
Table 3. Elements ratio in the top and cross section parts of the modified layer.
Table 3. Elements ratio in the top and cross section parts of the modified layer.
AreaElements Ratio Cathode
Al0.7Cr0.3Al0.65Cr0.25Si0.1Al0.6Cr0.2Si0.2
Top ofAl/Cr1.552.102.81
modified layerAl/Si-6.843.33
Cr/Si-3.261.18
Cross-section ofAl/Cr2.102.603.05
modified layerAl/Si-6.833.41
Cr/Si-2.631.12
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pribytkov, G.; Korzhova, V.; Korosteleva, E.; Krinitcyn, M. Effect of Silicon on the Surface Modification of Al-Cr Powder Cathodes Subjected to Vacuum Arc Treatment. Coatings 2022, 12, 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070958

AMA Style

Pribytkov G, Korzhova V, Korosteleva E, Krinitcyn M. Effect of Silicon on the Surface Modification of Al-Cr Powder Cathodes Subjected to Vacuum Arc Treatment. Coatings. 2022; 12(7):958. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070958

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pribytkov, Gennady, Victoria Korzhova, Elena Korosteleva, and Maksim Krinitcyn. 2022. "Effect of Silicon on the Surface Modification of Al-Cr Powder Cathodes Subjected to Vacuum Arc Treatment" Coatings 12, no. 7: 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12070958

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop