Next Article in Journal
NSAIDs as a Drug Repurposing Strategy for Biofilm Control
Next Article in Special Issue
Acquisition Risk Factors of the SCCmec IX-Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Swine Production Personnel in Chiang Mai and Lamphun Provinces, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Is Only Clarithromycin Susceptibility Important for the Successful Eradication of Helicobacter pylori?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antimicrobial Resistance and Virulence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Human, Chicken and Environmental Samples within Live Bird Markets in Three Nigerian Cities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

Methicillin-Resistant Macrococcus bohemicus Encoding a Divergent SCCmecB Element

by
Geoffrey Foster
1 and
Gavin K. Paterson
2,*
1
SRUC Veterinary Services, Inverness IV2 5NA, UK
2
Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies and The Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH25 9RG, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(9), 590; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090590
Submission received: 21 August 2020 / Revised: 2 September 2020 / Accepted: 7 September 2020 / Published: 10 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococci)

Abstract

:
A methicillin-resistant Macrococcus isolate from canine otitis, H889678/16/1, was whole-genome sequenced using HiSeq technology to identify the species, antimicrobial resistance determinates and their genomic context. H889678/16/1 belonged to the newly described species Macrococcus bohemicus. It encoded mecB within a novel SCCmec element most similar to that of Macrococcus canis KM45013T. This SCCmecH889678/16/1 element also encoded blaZm and fusC, but no other resistance determinates were found in the H889678/16/1 genome. The ccrA and ccrB recombinase genes within SCCmecH889678/16/1 were distinct from those previously described in staphylococci and macrococci and therefore designated here as ccrAm3 and ccrBm3. Our study represents, to the best of our knowledge, the first description of mecB being encoded by M. bohemicus and of methicillin resistance in this species. Furthermore, the SCCmec described here is highly dissimilar to other such elements and encodes novel ccr genes. Our report demonstrates a wider distribution of mecB among Macrococcus species and expands the genomic context in which mecB may be found. The potential for dissemination of mec genes from Macrococcus to related but more pathogenic Staphylococcus species highlights the need to understand the epidemiology of these genes in macrococci.

1. Introduction

The genus Macrococcus is closely related to Staphylococcus and consists of eleven species typically found as commensals in a range of animal hosts [1]. However, there is a growing appreciation that some macrococci may also act as opportunistic pathogens in different animals. For instance, M. caseolyticus has been isolated from mastitis in dairy cattle [2,3], canine dermatitis [4], canine otitis [2], an outbreak high-mortality systemic infection in broiler chickens [5], ovine abscesses [6] and cases of embryo mortality in greater white-fronted geese (Anser albifrons) [7]. Macrococcus canis has also been isolated from a range of canine infections [4] and a small number of isolates of different Macrococcus species have come from human clinical samples, suggesting a potential role, albeit infrequently, in human infections as well [8].
As with staphylococcal species, macrococci can acquire methicillin resistance through mec genes which encode an alternative penicillin-binding protein, PBP2a [9]. While PBP2a is encoded by mecA in Staphylococcus, and to a lesser extent by mecC [10], methicillin resistance in Macrococcus is encoded by the mec gene alleles mecB and mecD. mecB has been reported from M. caseolyticus [5,11,12,13], M. canis [4,14] and Macrococcus goetzii [8,15]. To date, mecD has only been reported from M. caseolyticus [2,3,4,12].
mecB has been found to be encoded by various genetic elements in Macrococcus; different SCCmec elements [11,13], different plasmids [11,14,16] and different ΨSCC elements [8,14]. Importantly, there has been a single report of a human isolate of Staphylococcus aureus encoding mecB [17] on a plasmid almost identical to a M. canis plasmid also encoding mecB [14]. This raises the strong possibility of the exchange of methicillin resistance determinates between these two genera and highlights the need to better understand the epidemiology and genomics of mec genes among Macrococcus.
Macrococcus bohemicus was first described in 2018 on the basis of a single isolate cultured from a human traumatic knee wound sample collected in 2003 in the Czech Republic [8]. Subsequently, a second M. bohemicus isolate coming from bovine milk in the Republic of Ireland and collected in 2017 has been described [18]. Both isolates have been genome sequenced.
To the best of our knowledge, no mec gene or methicillin resistance has been described in M. bohemicus, and herein we describe the first example of such, a canine otitis isolate H889678/16/1 encoding mecB within a distant SCCmec element and carrying novel ccrA and ccrB alleles, designated here as ccrAm3 and ccrBm3.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Isolation and Whole-Genome Sequencing of Methicillin-Resistant M. bohemicus H889678/16/1

H889678/16/1 was isolated from mixed growth cultured from a canine otitis sample collected from a cocker spaniel in Scotland in 2016. Also isolated were an Enterobacter sp., yeast (likely Malassezia pachydermatis) and Aerococcus viridans. H889678/16/1 was identified phenotypically as a presumed Macrococcus sp. and considered to be methicillin resistant on the basis of resistance to oxacillin when tested by Vitek2. H889678/16/1 was also resistant to benzylpenicillin and fusidic acid but susceptible to all the other antimicrobials tested. H889678/16/1 was whole-genome sequenced using HiSeq technology to resolve its identity to the species level and to determine the genetic basis for methicillin resistance. The resultant assembled draft genome consisted of 49 contigs totalling 2,497,285 bp in length, with a GC% content of 33.89%. The average genome coverage was 42.9-fold. H889678/16/1 was identified as belonging to M. bohemicus using the Type Strain Genome Server [19] and showed a dDDH value of 83.3 against M. bohemicus type strain CCM 7100.

2.2. M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 Encodes mecB within a Novel SCCmec Element

ResFinder analysis of the H889678/16/1 genome showed that it encoded mecB and fusC. Further analysis showed that mecB was within a mec gene complex with blaZm, but no other antimicrobial resistance determinates were apparent in the genome. All three genes, mecB, blaZm and fusc, were located on a single contig 265 kbp in size (JACEGF000000003) and encoded within a SCCmec element in the orfX/rlmH region. The insertion of the element into the orfX/rlmH region has to date been a reliable indication of a chromosomal location for SCCmec elements. Additional evidence for this being the case in H889678/16/1 are the large size of the SCCmec-containing contig, the absence of any plasmid features in this contig as detected by PlasmidFinder and the presence of numerous housekeeping genes on this contig, including those likely to be essential for viability, such as gyrA and gyrB. This SCCmec element, designated as SCCmecH889678/16/1, was most similar to, but distinct from, the mecB-encoding SCCmec of M. canis KM45013T (Figure 1) [13]. SCCmecH889678/16/1 is also distinct from the ΨSCC element found in the M. bohemicus type strain CCM7100 that lacks a mec gene complex and ccr genes (Figure 1) [8]. The only other described M. bohemicus isolate, DPC 7215 [18], also lacks any mec gene and possesses an orfX/rlmH region distinct from that of H889678/16/1 (data not shown). SCCmecH889678/16/1 is 57,612 bp in size, as defined by the length from the two outermost direct repeats inclusive (Figure 1). The mec gene complex of mecI, mecR1, mecB and blaZm in SCCmecH889678/16/1 was highly conserved with those of SCCmecKM45013, with each gene pair sharing 98–99% nucleotide identity. The other large region conserved between these two elements is a series of eight genes located near the ccr genes which encode the DNA repair protein RadC, a helix-turn-helix domain protein and six hypothetical proteins. This region of similarity extends into portions of the two flanking genes and, in the apparent absence of adjacent mobile genetic elements, may indicate their acquisition by homologous recombination. SCCmecH889678/16/1 also contained blocks of similarity with the ΨSCC element found in the M. bohemicus CCM7100T, indicating a mosaic structure likely arising through multiple horizontal genetic transfer events.

2.3. SCCmecH889678/16/1 Encodes Novel Recombinase Genes ccrA3m and ccrB3m

A notable feature of the SCCmecH889678/16/1 is the relative lack of similarity shown by the ccr genes with those of SCCmecKM45013 (Figure 1), with the ccr genes being responsible for the excision and integration of SCCmec elements in and out of the genome. Indeed, SCCmecH889678/16/1 ccr genes share limited nucleotide identity with known Macrococcus and Staphylococcus ccr genes, 43.5–63.0% in the case of ccrB and 41.5–54.4% in the case of ccrA. Following precedent [11,13], we propose the designation of the SCCmecH889678/16/1 ccr genes as ccrAm3 and ccrBm3. A phylogenetic analysis of ccr genes highlights the distinctness of ccrAm3 and ccrBm3 (Figure 2). Whilst ccrAm3 and ccrBm3 belong to their respective Macrococcus ccr gene branches, they are distant to these counterparts, with ccrAm3 and ccrBm3 closest to the ancestral forms of the macrococcal ccr genes.
In conclusion, we report the first example, to the best of our knowledge, of methicillin resistance and mecB in the newly described species M. bohemicus. This is only the third description of a M. bohemicus isolate and appears to be the first isolation from a dog. The mecB gene in this isolate is encoded within a distinct SCCmec element containing novel ccr alleles. This expands our knowledge on the distribution and genomic context of methicillin resistance determinates among Macrococcus which themselves are opportunistic pathogens, but which may also act as a genetic reservoir for the more pathogenic and related Staphylococcus.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Antimicrobial Sensitivity Testing

Antimicrobial sensitivity testing was performed using Vitek2 (bioMérieux, Basingstoke, UK) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Using the Vitek2 AST-P634 card, the antimicrobials tested were as follows: cefoxitin (screen), benzylpenicillin, oxacillin, gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, inducible clindamycin resistance, erythromycin, clindamycin, linezolid, teicoplanin, vancomycin, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin, fusidic acid, mupirocin, chloramphenicol, rifampicin and trimethoprim with interpretation performed using The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criterion (2015) for coagulase-negative staphylococci.

3.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing

Whole-genome sequencing was performed by Microbes NG (University of Birmingham, Birmingham UK) using Illumina technology with 2 × 250 bp paired-end reads. Genomic DNA was purified with solid-phase reversible immobilization beads, and libraries were prepared using Nextera XT Library Prep Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications: two nanograms of DNA instead of one were used as input, and PCR elongation time was increased to 1 min from 30 seconds. Reads were trimmed using Trimmomatic version 0.30 [20], using a sliding window quality cut-off of 15. Genome assembly was done de novo using SPAdes, version 3.7, with default parameters for 250 bp Illumina reads [21] and annotated by the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline [22].

3.3. Genome Analysis

Genome-based identification was done using the Type Strain Genome Server [17] (https://tygs.dsmz.de/). Acquired resistance genes were identified using ResFinder-3.1 [23] employing the thresholds of 60% for percentage identity and minimum length of 60%. Visual inspection and formatting of the genome for Figure 1 was performed using Artemis 17.0.1 [24]. Schematic comparison of mecB regions was performed using EasyFig 2.2.5 [25]. Plasmid features were searched for using PlasmidFinder 2.0 [26] with the thresholds of 60% for percentage identity and minimum length of 60%. The phylogenetic relationship of ccr genes was assessed in MEGA X [27] using a single representative of each type (nucleotide accession numbers provided in Figure 2), aligning the nucleotide sequences with MUSCLE and producing a maximum-likelihood tree using a general time-reversible (GTR) model. The final tree was produced using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) [28].

4. Nucleotide Accession Numbers

The whole-genome sequencing reads and annotated assembly of M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 are available under the GenBank accession numbers SRR12266687 and JACEGF000000000, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: G.K.P. and G.F.; Data curation: G.K.P. and G.F.; Formal analysis: G.K.P. and G.F.; Investigation: G.K.P. and G.F.; Methodology: G.K.P. and G.F.; Project administration: G.K.P. and G.F.; Writing—original draft: G.K.P.; Writing—review and editing: G.K.P. and G.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The excellent technical assistance of Jennifer Harris and Sarah Goodbrand at Royal Dick School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, is gratefully acknowledged. Genome sequencing was provided by MicrobesNG.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mazhar, S.; Hill, C.; McAuliffe, O. The genus Macrococcus: An insight into its biology, evolution, and relationship with Staphylococcus. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 105, 1–50. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Schwendener, S.; Cotting, K.; Perreten, V. Novel methicillin resistance gene mecD in clinical Macrococcus caseolyticus strains from bovine and canine sources. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Schwendener, S.; Nigg, A.; Collaud, A.; Overesch, G.; Kittl, S.; Phumthanakorn, N.; Perreten, V. Typing of mecD Islands in genetically diverse methicillin-resistant Macrococcus caseolyticus strains from cattle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01496-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Cotting, K.; Strauss, C.; Rodriguez-Campos, S.; Rostaher, A.; Fischer, N.M.; Roosje, P.J.; Favrot, C.; Perreten, V. Macrococcus canis and M. caseolyticus in dogs: Occurrence, genetic diversity and antibiotic resistance. Vet. Dermatol. 2017, 28, 559-e133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Li, G.; Du, X.; Zhou, D.; Li, C.; Huang, L.; Zheng, Q.; Cheng, Z. Emergence of pathogenic and multiple-antibiotic-resistant Macrococcus caseolyticus in commercial broiler chickens. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2018, 65, 1605–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. De la Fuente, R.; Suarez, G.; Ruiz Santa Quiteria, J.A.; Meugnier, H.; Bes, M.; Freney, J.; Fleurette, J. Identification of coagulase negative staphylococci isolated from lambs as Staphylococcus caseolyticus. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1992, 15, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hansen, C.M.; Meixell, B.W.; Van Hemert, C.; Hare, R.F.; Hueffer, K. Microbial infections are associated with embryo mortality in Arctic-nesting geese. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 5583–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Mašlaňová, I.; Wertheimer, Z.; Sedláček, I.; Švec, P.; Indráková, A.; Kovařovic, V.; Schumann, P.; Spröer, C.; Králová, S.; Šedo, O.; et al. Description and comparative genomics of Macrococcus caseolyticus subsp. hominis subsp. nov.; Macrococcus goetzii sp. nov.; Macrococcus epidermidis sp. nov.; and Macrococcus bohemicus sp. nov.; novel macrococci from human clinical material with virulence potential and suspected uptake of foreign DNA by natural transformation. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1178. [Google Scholar]
  9. Peacock, S.J.; Paterson, G.K. Mechanisms of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2015, 84, 577–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paterson, G.K.; Harrison, E.M.; Holmes, M.A. The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2014, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tsubakishita, S.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Baba, T.; Hiramatsu, K. Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec-like element in Macrococcus caseolyticus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. MacFadyen, A.C.; Fisher, E.A.; Costa, B.; Cullen, C.; Paterson, G.K. Genome analysis of methicillin resistance in Macrococcus caseolyticus from dairy cattle in England and Wales. Microb. Genom. 2018, 4, e000191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gómez-Sanz, E.; Schwendener, S.; Thomann, A.; Gobeli Brawand, S.; Perreten, V. First Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec containing a mecB-carrying gene complex independent of transposon Tn6045 in a Macrococcus caseolyticus isolate from a canine infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 4577–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Chanchaithong, P.; Perreten, V.; Schwendener, S. Macrococcus canis contains recombinogenic methicillin resistance elements and the mecB plasmid found in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2019, 74, 2531–2536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schlattmann, A.; von Lützau, K.; Kaspar, U.; Becker, K. The porcine nasal microbiota with particular attention to livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Germany-a culturomic approach. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Baba, T.; Kuwahara-Arai, K.; Uchiyama, I.; Takeuchi, F.; Ito, T.; Hiramatsu, K. Complete genome sequence of Macrococcus caseolyticus strain JSCS5402, reflecting the ancestral genome of the human-pathogenic staphylococci. J. Bacteriol. 2009, 191, 1180–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Becker, K.; van Alen, S.; Idelevich, E.A.; Schleimer, N.; Seggewiß, J.; Mellmann, A.; Kaspar, U.; Peters, G. Plasmid-encoded transferable mecB-mediated methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2018, 24, 242–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Mazhar, S.; Altermann, E.; Hill, C.; McAuliffe, O. Draft genome sequences of Macrococcus caseolyticus, Macrococcus canis, Macrococcus bohemicus, and Macrococcus goetzii. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2019, 8, e00344-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bolger, A.M.; Lohse, M.; Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2114–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bankevich, A.; Nurk, S.; Antipov, D.; Gurevich, A.A.; Dvorkin, M.; Kulikov, A.S.; Lesin, V.M.; Nikolenko, S.I.; Pham, S.; Prjibelski, A.D.; et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 2012, 19, 455–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zankari, E.; Hasman, H.; Cosentino, S.; Vestergaard, M.; Rasmussen, S.; Lund, O.; Aarestrup, F.M.; Larsen, M.V. Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2640–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rutherford, K.; Parkhill, J.; Crook, J.; Horsnell, T.; Rice, P.; Rajandream, M.-A.; Barrell, B. Artemis: Sequence visualization and annotation. Bioinformatics 2000, 16, 944–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sullivan, M.J.; Petty, N.K.; Beatson, S.A. Easyfig: A genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 1009–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carattoli, A.; Zankari, E.; García-Fernández, A.; Voldby Larsen, M.; Lund, O.; Villa, L.; Møller Aarestrup, F.; Hasman, H. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 3895–3903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: Recent updates and new developments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W256–W259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic comparison of SCCmec and ΨSCC elements in M. canis KM45013T (top), M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 (centre) and M. bohemicus CCM7100T (below). The sequences used are as follows: M. canis KM45013T CP021059.1 region: 31942 … 105740; M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 JACEGF000000003.1 region: 81206 … 141735; M. bohemicus CCM7100T PZJG01000007.1 region: 14792 … 52744. Regions of homology are represented by bands connecting the genomes sequences, with the percentage identity key shown on the key. Red denotes normal sequence alignment (N); blue denotes inverted sequence alignment (I). Selected features are coloured and labelled. Direct repeats are indicated by blue triangles. Colouring of genes denotes the following: orfX/rmlH, black; mec gene complex, blue; ccr genes, yellow; mobile elements, gold; genes putatively involved in heavy metal resistance, brown.
Figure 1. Schematic comparison of SCCmec and ΨSCC elements in M. canis KM45013T (top), M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 (centre) and M. bohemicus CCM7100T (below). The sequences used are as follows: M. canis KM45013T CP021059.1 region: 31942 … 105740; M. bohemicus H889678/16/1 JACEGF000000003.1 region: 81206 … 141735; M. bohemicus CCM7100T PZJG01000007.1 region: 14792 … 52744. Regions of homology are represented by bands connecting the genomes sequences, with the percentage identity key shown on the key. Red denotes normal sequence alignment (N); blue denotes inverted sequence alignment (I). Selected features are coloured and labelled. Direct repeats are indicated by blue triangles. Colouring of genes denotes the following: orfX/rmlH, black; mec gene complex, blue; ccr genes, yellow; mobile elements, gold; genes putatively involved in heavy metal resistance, brown.
Antibiotics 09 00590 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among ccr genes in Macrococcus and Staphylococcus. ccrAm3 and ccrBm3 from this study are highlighted in bold. Nucleotide accessions used are as follows: ccrAm1 and ccrBm1 M. caseolyticus JCSC7096, GenBank accession no. AB498756; ccrAm2 and ccrBm2 M. caseolyticus KM45013, GenBank accession no. HG970732; ccrA1 and ccrB1 S. aureus NCTC10442, GenBank accession no. AB033763; ccrA2 and ccrB2 S. aureus N315, GenBank accession no. BA000018; ccrA3 and ccrB3 S. aureus 85/2082, GenBank accession no. AB037671; ccrA4 and ccrB4 S. aureus HDE288, GenBank accession no. AF411935; ccrA5 and ccrB5 S. pseudintermedius KM241, GenBank accession no. AM904731; ccrB6 S. aureus JCSC6945, GenBank accession no. AB505630; ccrC1 S. aureus JCSC6082, GenBank accession no. AB373032; ccrC2 S. aureus strain BA01611 GenBank accession no. KR187111. There were a total of 1804 positions in the final dataset. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among ccr genes in Macrococcus and Staphylococcus. ccrAm3 and ccrBm3 from this study are highlighted in bold. Nucleotide accessions used are as follows: ccrAm1 and ccrBm1 M. caseolyticus JCSC7096, GenBank accession no. AB498756; ccrAm2 and ccrBm2 M. caseolyticus KM45013, GenBank accession no. HG970732; ccrA1 and ccrB1 S. aureus NCTC10442, GenBank accession no. AB033763; ccrA2 and ccrB2 S. aureus N315, GenBank accession no. BA000018; ccrA3 and ccrB3 S. aureus 85/2082, GenBank accession no. AB037671; ccrA4 and ccrB4 S. aureus HDE288, GenBank accession no. AF411935; ccrA5 and ccrB5 S. pseudintermedius KM241, GenBank accession no. AM904731; ccrB6 S. aureus JCSC6945, GenBank accession no. AB505630; ccrC1 S. aureus JCSC6082, GenBank accession no. AB373032; ccrC2 S. aureus strain BA01611 GenBank accession no. KR187111. There were a total of 1804 positions in the final dataset. Scale bar indicates number of substitutions per site.
Antibiotics 09 00590 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Foster, G.; Paterson, G.K. Methicillin-Resistant Macrococcus bohemicus Encoding a Divergent SCCmecB Element. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090590

AMA Style

Foster G, Paterson GK. Methicillin-Resistant Macrococcus bohemicus Encoding a Divergent SCCmecB Element. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(9):590. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Foster, Geoffrey, and Gavin K. Paterson. 2020. "Methicillin-Resistant Macrococcus bohemicus Encoding a Divergent SCCmecB Element" Antibiotics 9, no. 9: 590. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9090590

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop