Next Article in Journal
Chlorhexidine-Containing Electrospun Polymeric Nanofibers for Dental Applications: An In Vitro Study
Previous Article in Journal
Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Output on Antimicrobial Resistance among Pneumonia Pathogens (2013–2023)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/antibiotics12091413
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antifungal Use and Resistance in a Lower–Middle-Income Country: The Case of Lebanon

by
Nesrine Hassoun
1,
Issmat I. Kassem
2,
Monzer Hamze
3,
Jad El Tom
4,
Nicolas Papon
5 and
Marwan Osman
6,7,*
1
Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Tripoli 1300, Lebanon
2
Center for Food Safety, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Georgia, 1109 Experiment Street, Griffin, GA 30223, USA
3
Laboratoire Microbiologie Santé et Environnement (LMSE), Doctoral School of Sciences and Technology, Faculty of Public Health, Lebanese University, Tripoli 1300, Lebanon
4
School of Pharmacy, Lebanese American University, Byblos 1401, Lebanon
5
University of Angers, University of Brest, IRF, SFR ICAT, F-49000 Angers, France
6
Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
7
Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(9), 1413; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091413
Submission received: 19 August 2023 / Revised: 31 August 2023 / Accepted: 4 September 2023 / Published: 6 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Emergence of Multidrug Resistance: Genetic Mechanisms, Fitness Cost, and Dissemination in the Human-Environment Continuum)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Antifungal resistance is often underestimated in both healthcare and non-clinical settings. In LMICs, it is believed that the inappropriate use of antifungals, limited surveillance systems, and low diagnostic capacities are significant drivers of resistance. Like other LMICs, Lebanon lacks antifungal use and resistance surveillance programs, and the impact of antifungal resistance in the country remains unclear, especially during the unfolding economic crisis that has severely affected medical care and access to safe food and water. Interestingly, the widespread use of antifungals in medicine and agriculture has raised concerns about the development of antifungal resistance in Lebanon. In this light, we aimed to survey available antifungal drugs in the country and evaluate susceptibility patterns of prevalent fungal species to guide empiric treatments and develop antifungal stewardship programs in Lebanon. We noted that the economic crisis resulted in significant increases in antifungal drug prices. Additionally, a comprehensive literature search across PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases identified 15 studies on fungal infections and antifungal resistance conducted from 1998 to 2023 in Lebanon. While data on antifungal resistance are limited, 87% of available studies in Lebanon focused on candidiasis, while the remaining 13% were on aspergillosis. Overall, we observed a marked antimicrobial resistance among Candida and Aspergillus species. Additionally, incidences of Candida auris infections have increased in Lebanese hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a uniform resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin-B. Taken together, a One Health approach, reliable diagnostics, and prudent antifungal use are required to control the spread of resistant fungal pathogens in healthcare and agricultural settings.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance has become a significant global public health threat, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) that are challenged with different medical, environmental, and socioeconomic problems [1,2,3]. Although bacterial resistance to antibiotics has received great attention in recent years, antifungal resistance is relatively underappreciated, and its real burden is still underestimated in both healthcare and non-clinical settings.
Fungal diseases represent a growing concern in human and veterinary medicine, with a significant impact on morbidity and mortality, particularly among predisposed patients, and substantial healthcare costs [4,5,6,7]. As observed in bacteria, fungi display primary (intrinsic) and/or secondary (acquired) drug resistance [8,9]. Concerning intrinsic resistance, a series of prominent pathogenic fungal species are well known for being less susceptible to one or several antifungal compounds, such as the yeast Pichia kudriavzevii (formerly known as Candida krusei) towards fluconazole [10] and the filamentous fungi Aspergillus terreus towards amphotericin-B [11]. In addition, the capacity of fungi to acquire antifungal resistance mainly relies on their genome plasticity, which allows these microorganisms to evolve and adapt dynamically to environmental cues. Upon antifungal exposure, some mutations, underlying changes in gene expression, and/ or modification of protein properties can indeed drive the emergence of secondary resistance [12]. For example, resistance to azoles is associated with three major mechanisms: (i) increased expression of the azole target gene, (ii) changes in the amino-acid sequence of the azole target at the level of the azole binding site, and (iii) increased production of multidrug efflux transporters [13,14].
It is known that the inappropriate use of antifungals poses a selective pressure that is a key driver for the emergence and dissemination of antifungal resistance in the human–animal–environment continuum [6,15,16,17,18]. This is not surprising, because antifungals are used in clinical settings, as well as in agriculture for controlling animal and plant diseases and increasing crop yields [19,20]. Notably, approximately half of veterinary and agriculture antifungal drugs are also approved for use in human medicine [21]. For example, triazole, a common class of antifungal agents commonly used to treat invasive fungal infections in humans, is also among the most used in agriculture [20]. Consequently, the efficacy of antifungal drugs to treat human infections is being affected by the emergence of antifungal-resistant determinants in agriculture, including pathogens/microorganisms associated with many animals and plants and their environment [22]. Hence, it is critical to tackle antifungal resistance using a One Health approach, which acknowledges the interconnectedness of the health of humans, animals, plants, and environment
In 2017, Lebanon joined the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Global Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System (GLASS) [23,24]. However, the scope of this collaborative platform does not currently encompass antifungal resistance. Additionally, there is currently no nationwide system in place that implements a comprehensive antifungal use and resistance surveillance program in the country. Altogether, the full extent of the impact of antifungal use and resistance remains largely unknown. This is highly relevant, because Lebanon has been encountering an array of serious challenges that are posing significant threats to its social and economic stability. These include the massive influx of refugees (~1.5 million) since 2011, as well as an unprecedented economic collapse since October 2019, which has resulted in hyperinflation, high unemployment rates, major strikes in the public sector, and a steep decline in the value of the Lebanese currency. These conditions resulted, in turn, in a severe shortage in importation (Lebanon relies heavily on imports to meet its nutritional and medical needs), reducing the availability and increasing the prices of essential items that impact public health and agriculture. Moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic has magnified these issues, increasing the surge in poverty rates and overwhelming the country’s healthcare system further. Taken together, these conditions are very suitable for the emergence and re-emergence of disease, especially in the most vulnerable populations. Despite these challenges and the increase in antimicrobial drug prices, anecdotal evidence suggests that the inappropriate use of antimicrobials, including antifungals, is still notable in human medicine and the agriculture sector in Lebanon. The relatively low cost of antimicrobial drugs compared to healthcare or agriculture services and other treatment modalities associated with poor knowledge often prompts individuals to resort to self-prescribing practices to reduce costs, including the use of expired antimicrobials or swapping of broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs, which pose a significant threat to public health [16,17,23,25]. This is especially evident when antimicrobials are accessible in drug stores and black markets without the need for prescriptions [16,17,23,25].
The pervasive use of antifungal agents in healthcare and agriculture has raised concerns regarding the emergence of antifungal resistance in Lebanon. To address this issue, we conducted a survey to identify the antifungal drugs available in both pharmaceutical and agricultural markets. Additionally, we evaluated the current trends of antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp. prevalent in Lebanon in order to facilitate effective treatment of fungal infections and reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. The results of this study provide valuable bases for developing antifungal stewardship programs and mitigating the emergence of antifungal resistance in the region and beyond.

2. Results

2.1. Antifungal Use in Human Medicine

We identified a total of 18 antifungal drugs belonging to four different classes. The drugs were classified as follows: (1) azoles (clotrimazole, miconazole, sertaconazole, fluconazole, econazole, omoconazole, fenticonazole, ketoconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, isoconazole, and voriconazole), (2) allylamines (terbinafine), and (3) echinocandins (caspofungin, anidulafungin, and micafungin), and (4) polyenes (amphotericin-B liposome and nystatin) (Table 1). These drugs are primarily used to treat various fungal infections, including candidiasis (cutaneous, vulvovaginal, or oropharyngeal), dermatophyte infections, and other fungal diseases like non-invasive aspergillosis (treated with azoles), invasive aspergillosis (treated with echinocandins), onychomycosis (treated with allylamines), and pityriasis (treated with sertaconazole). The recommended dosage for these drugs typically ranges from once to twice daily, depending on many factors such as age, weight, infection site, and the size of infected area.
In human medicine, antifungal drugs are either locally manufactured in Lebanon or imported from various European countries and Japan, and they can be administered topically, orally, or intravenously. Most of the drugs are available in both topical and oral forms and can be easily obtained from pharmacies without prescriptions. However, drugs administered intravenously, such as caspofungin, anidulafungin, micafungin, and amphotericin-B liposome, are strictly reserved for hospital use and are not available in pharmacies.
In response to the economic crisis in Lebanon, the Ministry of Public Health initially subsidized a range of essential medications, including antifungal drugs, to ensure patients had access to affordable drugs. However, as the crisis persisted, the government was forced to remove or drastically reduce these subsidies, resulting in a significant increase in drug prices across the country. To assess the impact of these changes on the availability and affordability of antifungal drugs in Lebanon, we evaluated the market prices of antifungal medications that are important in human medicine. We observed that the prices of the most used antifungal drugs significantly increased, by 3 to 12 times in comparison to the pre-crisis cost in some instances, from October 2019 to February 2023 (Figure 1).

2.2. Antifungal Use in Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine

We found that six fungicides are currently available in agricultural drug stores and used in Lebanon. Specifically, the highest number of antifungals present in the Lebanese agricultural drug stores belonged to triazoles (difenoconazole, penconazole), followed by pyrimidine derivatives (azoxystrobin, pyrimethanil), thioureas (thiophanate methyl), and copper (copper oxychloride). In addition, three drugs that are widely used in animals without the requirement of a veterinarians’ prescription were found. These drugs belong to different classes of antifungals, including pyrimidine derivatives (diazinon), polyenes (nystatin), inorganic sulfurs (calcium polysulfide), and carboxylic acid amides. (Table 2). The drugs are imported from the United States, Europe, Egypt, Malaysia, India, and China.
Most of the antifungals used to prevent fungal infections in plants and animals are systemic fungicides. Our data revealed six systemic fungicides. For example, difenoconazole, penconazole, pyrimethanil, nystatin, and calcium polysulfide are among the systemic fungicides detected (Table 2). Preventive fungicides are also used in Lebanon, where we found one drug available in agricultural pharmacies (copper oxychloride). Our findings also indicate that there is one preventive and curative fungicide in veterinary clinics and agriculture drug stores (thiophanate methyl). Moreover, a systemic, preventive, and curative fungicide (azoxystrobin + difenoconazole) is available in agriculture drug stores (Table 2).

2.3. Antifungal Resistance in Human Medicine and Environment

We screened all available studies (n = 15): 13 (87%) focused on Candida, and the remaining two (13%) were on Aspergillus. These investigations primarily adopted a cross-sectional approach, complemented by two case reports, one prospective and two retrospective studies. Overall, our analysis revealed a limited number of well-designed national studies (i.e., only one of the 15 studies was nationwide), the non-use of reference susceptibility testing methods in most clinical laboratories, and the absence of epidemiological tracking and national reports.
Assessing the available data, our findings highlighted that Candida and Aspergillus isolates exhibited a notable resistance to almost all antifungal agents (Table 3). We found that Candida albicans isolates were resistant to fluconazole (2% to 33% of isolates tested), ketoconazole (6% to 19%), itraconazole (12.1% to 44%), posaconazole (20.7%), voriconazole (2.5% to 13.8%), micafungin (13.8%), anidulafungin (41.4%), amphotericin-B (0% to 13.8%), and flucytosine (6%). We also found moderately significant resistance rates to antifungal drugs in Candida glabrata and Candida tropicalis. Specifically, fluconazole resistance ranged from 22.2% to 100% in C. glabrata and 16.4% to 95.7% in C. tropicalis, while ketoconazole resistance affected 0% of C. glabrata isolates and 67% of C. tropicalis isolates. Itraconazole resistance was identified in 16.7% to 70.5% of C. glabrata isolates and 40% to 67% of C. tropicalis isolates, while 11% of C. glabrata and 50% to 96.1% of C. tropicalis were posaconazole-resistant. Voriconazole resistance was found in 25% to 33% of C. glabrata and 0% to 10.5% of C. tropicalis isolates. Additionally, C. glabrata showed resistance to micafungin (1.5% to 16.7%) and anidulafungin (0% to 61.1%), while 0% to 10% of C. tropicalis were resistant to amphotericin-B. Flucytosine resistance was not noted in C. glabrata or C. tropicalis isolates. Moreover, an important antifungal drug resistance was identified in Candida parapsilosis and P. kudriavzevii, where 0% to 93.2% and 68% to 100% were resistant to fluconazole, 0% to 75% and 0% to 20% were resistant to itraconazole, 8.3% to 100% and 0% were resistant to posaconazole, 0% to 41.7% and 20% were resistant to micafungin, 0% to 33.3% and 20% were resistant to anidulafungin, and 0% to 8.3% and 0% to 60% were resistant to amphotericin-B, respectively. It is worth mentioning that all tested isolates were susceptible to voriconazole.
Regarding Kluyveromyces marxianus (formerly known as Candida kefyr), 41.6% of the isolates were resistant to fluconazole, 33.3% were resistant to itraconazole, 50% were resistant to miconazole, and 33.3% were resistant to micafungin; all isolates were susceptible to voriconazole, posaconazole, anidulafungin, and amphotericin-B. The emergent Candida auris was frequently reported in different hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. C. auris circulating in Lebanon consistently demonstrated resistance to fluconazole (100%) and amphotericin-B (100%) and susceptibility to echinocandins (0%). Resistance to voriconazole was observed in 3% of the C. auris isolates.
Our analysis showed also a concerning increase in multidrug-resistant Aspergillus isolates in Lebanon. Specifically, 32.5% of Aspergillus niger isolates were resistant to itraconazole, followed by 25% to posaconazole, 12.5% to voriconazole, and 20% to amphotericin-B. Furthermore, 20% of Aspergillus flavus isolates were resistant to itraconazole, along with 30% to posaconazole, 40% to voriconazole, and 70% to amphotericin-B. However, lower resistance rates were observed in Aspergillus fumigatus isolated from both clinical [24] and environmental [26] settings.
Table 3. Distribution and prevalence of antifungal resistance among common Candida and Aspergillus species in clinical and non-clinical settings in Lebanon.
Table 3. Distribution and prevalence of antifungal resistance among common Candida and Aspergillus species in clinical and non-clinical settings in Lebanon.
Study PeriodStudy DesignSample Type (n)Species (n)Susceptibility Testing MethodPrevalence of Antifungal Resistance (%) Ref.
FLZKTZITZPCZVRZMIZCPFMCFADFAMBFLU
2020–1Retrospective case controlUrine (n = 20); deep tracheal aspirates (DTA) (n = 26); blood (n = 8); wounds (n = 4)Candida auris (n = 58)E-test; Vitek-2100 3 00 100 [27]
2021Case reportBlood (n = 2); urine (n = 2); DTA (n = 2)Candida duobushaemulonii (n = 1)Vitek-2 R RS[28]
2021Cross-sectionalPeripheral blood (n = 4); central line catheter (n = 1); DTA (n = 12); Urine (n = 8); skin (n = 2); bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (n = 1)C. auris (n = 28)Vitek-2100 25 3 00 100 [29]
2020Case reportBlood (n = 2); urine (n = 3); DTA (n = 10); skin (n = 1)C. auris (n = 14)E-test100 00 100 [30]
2014–9Cross-sectionalUrine (n = 22); skin (n = 26); vaginal swab (n = 18); ear, nose, and throat (ENT) (n = 3); stool (n = 5); lower respiratory tract (n = 11); pus (n = 3); catheter (n = 2); blood (n = 1); gastric fluid (n = 1); cerebrospinal fluid (n = 1)Candida albicans (n = 29)Micro-broth dilution24.1 24.120.713.8 13.841.413.8 [31]
Candida glabrata (n = 18)22.2 16.71133 16.761.111.1
Candida parapsilosis (n = 12)8.3 758.30 41.733.38.3
Candida tropicalis (n = 10)20 40500 206010
Kluyveromyces marxianus (n = 6)0 000 33.300
Pichia kudriavzevii (n = 5) 100 2000 202060
2016–8Cross-sectionalUrine (n = 393), vaginal swabs (n = 147), [sputum, blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), miscellaneous] (n = 460)C. glabrata (n = 408)Micro-broth dilution100 NANA 1.500 [32]
C. tropicalis (n = 231)95.7 96.10 NA00.4
C. parapsilosis (n = 103)93.2 1000 000
P. kudriavzevii (n = 35)NA NANA NANANA
K. marxianus (n = 72)NA NANA NANANA
2019Cohort prospectiveWater samples collected across Lebanon (n = 84)K. marxianus (n = 12)Disc diffusion41.6 33.3 50 [33]
2015–6Cross-sectionalVaginal discharge
(n = 258)		C. albicans (n = 40)E-test10 12.5 2.5 2.5 [34]
2014Cross-sectionalStool (n = 41)C. glabrata (n = 6)Fungitest™ (BioRad®)000 0 00[35]
C. albicans (n = 2)000 0 00
C. parapsilosis (n = 1)SSS S SS
C. tropicalis (n = 1)SSS S SS
2005–14Cohort retrospectiveUrine (28%); blood (25%); respiratory tract (19%); fluids (15%); wounds/abscesses (11%); catheters (2%)C. albicans (n = 68)E-test2 44 4.5 0 [36]
C. tropicalis (n = 72)16.4 55.5 10.5 0
C. glabrata (n = 46)28.7 70.5 25 0
C. parapsilosis (n = 10)4.7 25 0 0
P. kudriavzevii (n = 8)68 0 0 0
2010–1Cross-sectionalUrine (n = 31); sputum (n = 23); tracheal aspirates (n = 12); BAL (n = 11); body fluids (n = 3); abscesses (n = 2); pus swabs (n = 2); abdominal swab (n = 1)Candida spp. (n = 83)
C. albicans (n = 69)		E-test69.5 63.5 11.737.6 [37]
C. glabrata (n = 8), and
C. tropicalis (n = 6)]
2009Cross-sectionalSputum (n = 35); stool (n = 24); urine (n = 17); DTA (n = 9); vagina (n = 8); bronchial alveolar wash (n = 8); wound (n = 5); abdominal fluid (n = 2); tooth abscess (n = 1); pus (n = 1); penile swab (n = 1); peritoneal fluid (n = 1); nail (n = 1); blood (n = 1); Jackson–Pratt drainage (n = 1); cerebrospinal fluid (n = 1) C. albicans (n = 116)E-test; micro-broth dilution5.2612.1 7.8 0 1.7 [38]
1995–6Cross-sectionalRespiratory (n = 35); urine (n = 16); blood (n = 4); wound (n = 8); ear (n = 3), catheter (n = 2); abdominal fluid (n = 2)C. albicans (n = 48)E-test331921 06[39]
C. tropicalis (n = 12)336767 00
C. parapsilosis (n = 6)000 00
C. glabrata (n = 2)000 00
P. kudriavzevii (n = 2) 10000 0100
2022Cross-sectionalPlant beds (n = 67); hospital flowers (n = 5); construction sites (n = 25); flowers beds (n = 50); parks (n = 32); green houses (n = 28); hospital plant beds (n = 6); agriculture fields (n = 49)Aspergillus fumigatus (n = 26)Micro-broth dilution 000 [26]
Aspergillus neoellipticus (n = 1) SSS
Aspergillus fischeri (n = 1) SRS
2011–9Cross-sectionalEars (n = 60); respiratory (n = 8); nails (n = 5)Aspergillus niger (n = 40)Micro-broth dilution 32.52512.5 20 [24]
Aspergillus flavus (n = 20) 203040 70
Aspergillus tubingensis (n = 4) 505025 25
A. fumigatus (n = 3) 33.333.30 0
Aspergillus terreus (n = 3) 33.333.333.3 100
Other Aspergillus (n = 3) 66.766.766.7 66.7
FLZ, fluconazole; KTZ, ketoconazole; ITZ, itraconazole; PCZ, posaconazole; VRZ, voriconazole; MIZ, miconazole; CPF, caspofungin; MCF, micafungin; ADF, anidulafungin; AMB, amphotericin-B; FLU, flucytosine; NA, Information not available. The prevalence of antifungal resistance is shown as R/S when there was only one isolate. We only included the most identified Candida and Aspergillus species, including Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida duobushaemulonii, Candida glabrata, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Pichia kudriavzevii, Kluyveromyces marxianus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus neoellipticus, Aspergillus fischeri, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus tubingensis, and Aspergillus terreus.

3. Discussion

The inappropriate and unsupervised use of antifungals in Lebanon appears to be a growing public health concern with significant implications associated with the emergence of multidrug-resistant fungal pathogens, patient outcomes, and healthcare and agricultural systems. Our findings showed an increasing trend in antifungal resistance, emphasizing an urgent need to address this critical issue promptly and effectively at the human–animal–environment continuum. Addressing this burden requires a comprehensive approach that combines various aspects of the One Health ethos, from surveillance to outreach, targeting the proper use of antifungals, appropriate diagnostics, infection control, and patient management.
Antifungal use in the community in Lebanon increased by 88% from 2004 to 2018, as measured by the number of defined daily doses, with the highest consumption level noted in 2017 [40]. Triazoles (73.6%) were the most consumed antifungals, including fluconazole (21%), itraconazole (12.5%), voriconazole (0.15%), and posaconazole (0.02%). Echinocandins and amphotericin-B were the least used, with a combined consumption of less than 0.03% [40]. Alarmingly, no data are available on the use of antifungals in animals and in the agriculture sector. Despite this, the increasing trends in resistance have been commonly associated with the use of antifungal agents without a prescription in humans, animals, and agriculture [24,31]. To date, the over-the-counter use of antifungal drugs remains a regular habit among resident communities in Lebanon, including farmers and the general population [25].
Intravenous antifungals are often appropriately used because they are typically reserved for in-hospital use. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought about a concerning surge in fungal infections within intensive care units of healthcare facilities, resulting in an increased reliance on broad-spectrum antifungals [41]. This was precipitated further by the ongoing Lebanese economic crisis [17]. Indeed, due to the shortage of suitable diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance, healthcare providers have been forced to make critical treatment decisions without access to essential information, further complicating patient care and potentially promoting the selection of resistant fungi [23,42]. Prolonged or inappropriate use of these medications selectively favors the emergence of non-albicans species that inherently possess higher resistance to these treatments [43]. Notably, since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the incidence of C. auris infections in critically ill patients in healthcare settings has been steadily increasing across hospitals in Lebanon [27,29,30]. The first reported outbreak of C. auris occurred during the pandemic (October–December 2020) at the American University of Beirut Medical Center [30], posing serious public health concerns due to its multidrug-resistant properties and elevated transmission ability. Albeit underestimated due to the lack of reliable identification tools in most Lebanese clinical laboratories and the absence of a national reference center for mycoses and antifungals, the characterization of the current circulating isolates indicated a uniform resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin-B [29]. Furthermore, as witnessed worldwide, we observed an evident shift of C. albicans toward less susceptible non-albicans Candida (i.e., mainly C. glabrata and C. tropicalis) over the last two decades [31,44], which also raises concerns about the potential impact on patient outcomes and treatment effectiveness. This highlights the importance of reliable diagnostics and prudent antifungal drug administration to mitigate the development and spread of resistant fungal pathogens.
Little information is available in the literature about antifungal susceptibility in the Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) countries, but a few previous studies reported varied rates of resistance to antifungals. Overall, the data from Lebanon showed that Candida and Aspergillus isolates exhibited a notable level of resistance to almost all antifungal drugs compared to neighboring countries. In Lebanon, fluconazole resistance ranged from 2% to 33% in C. albicans, 22.2% to 100% in C. glabrata, and 16.4% to 95.7% in C. tropicalis. In Tunisia, resistance to fluconazole was observed in 63 % and 16% of C. albicans and C. glabrata isolates from vaginal swab samples of pregnant women, respectively [45]. Moreover, numerous sporadic cases and outbreaks caused by C. auris have been recently reported in the MENA region, including Lebanon [27,29,30,46,47,48]. Other reports on Aspergillus showed differing frequency of azole resistance as follows: 31.5% were resistant in Lebanon [24], 30.6% were resistant in Iran [49], 3.3–25% were resistant in Turkey [50,51,52], 4.1% were resistant in Tunisia [53], 2.9% were resistant in Qatar [54], and 0% were resistant in Kuwait [55].
The majority of antifungals used in agriculture are classified as preventive fungicides (i.e., prevent crop loss and increase agricultural yield) [56]. This has significant implications, because these treatments tend to accumulate within plant tissues and can affect the environment, potentially promoting the development of resistant fungal pathogens of clinical and veterinary interests. The transmission of resistant fungi can occur through spore inhalation, direct contact with treated plants, or the handling of other contaminated agricultural items such as soils and tools. Importantly, it should not be neglected that the rise in antifungal resistance threatens global food security, because uncontrollable fungal infections can devastate crops, increasing poverty, malnutrition, and disease, especially in disenfranchised communities. Taken together, our observations highlight the importance of exploring robust stewardship programs and alternative approaches to manage fungi in medical and agricultural practices. This could precipitate in minimizing the risk of resistance development and subsequent implications for public health and food security.
The study presented here had a few limitations. Our approach did not encompass the consideration of non-official antifungals that might have been illicitly introduced into Lebanon or brought in by the diaspora to support local communities. Additionally, the available data obtained previously in Lebanon addressed only the epidemiology of clinical strains of Candida and Aspergillus; thus, the epidemiological significance of the existing findings remains to be confirmed. Furthermore, the lack of reliable identification tools in most of the available studies hindered attempts to explore genetic profiles of isolates and identify underlying resistance mechanisms. To better understand the dissemination of these fungi and the risk factors associated with the spread of antifungal resistance, it is necessary to conduct further prospective multicentric studies involving a substantial number of clinical and non-clinical isolates.

4. Materials and Methods

This study was conducted between January and February 2023 to identify antifungal drugs that are used in human and animal medicine in Lebanon. The Lebanese Ministry of Public Health, as well as major pharmacies, veterinary clinics, and agriculture markets located in Tripoli and Beirut, provided the primary data sources. The study collected comprehensive data on the available antifungals, including their antifungal class, brand name, active molecules, administration routes, availability in pharmacies, veterinary and agricultural stores, and healthcare settings. The study also recorded the usual recommended treatment regimens, treatment indications, and manufacturing country of origin. In addition, the current price of the antifungal drugs of clinical interest was compared to the price before the economic collapse (October 2019) in Lebanon.
Moreover, we searched PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases for studies on fungal and antifungal resistance between 1998 and 2023. We selected a word combination that included “yeast”, “fungal”, “fungal infection”, “fungi”, “antifungal”, “antimicrobial resistance”, “Candida”, “aspergillosis”, “azole”, and “One Health”. We reviewed all relevant publications. Original publications in English or French that were indexable and of any epidemiologic methodology, sampling technique, or type (case report, longitudinal, case–control, or cross-sectional) were included. All research that published original data on antifungal resistance in Lebanon was considered for inclusion in the study.

5. Conclusions

As Candida and Aspergillus species continue to challenge healthcare settings, implementing robust One Health programs that rely on reliable diagnostic tools is essential to monitor the prevalence of these species and assess their susceptibility patterns. Indeed, using the micro-broth dilution technique following the international guidelines has become crucial in patient management and resistance surveillance. Additionally, enhancing awareness and strengthening infection control measures, such as strict adherence to hand hygiene protocols and proper disinfection practices, are required to limit the spread of these resilient pathogens. Lastly, we recommend the establishment of national reference centers for invasive mycoses and antifungal resistance and new regulations to prevent the inappropriate use of antifungal drugs in humans and agriculture.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O.; validation, I.I.K., M.H., N.P. and M.O.; formal analysis, N.H. and J.E.T.; investigation, N.H.; resources, I.I.K., M.H., J.E.T., N.P. and M.O.; data curation, N.H.; writing—original draft preparation, N.H. and M.O.; writing—review and editing, I.I.K. and N.P.; supervision, M.O.; project administration, M.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

None to declare.

Acknowledgments

M.O. is supported by the Atkinson Postdoctoral Fellowship (Cornell University).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Murray, C.J.L.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: A systematic analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abbara, A.; Rawson, T.M.; Karah, N.; El-Amin, W.; Hatcher, J.; Tajaldin, B.; Dar, O.; Dewachi, O.; Abu Sitta, G.; Uhlin, B.E.; et al. Antimicrobial resistance in the context of the Syrian conflict: Drivers before and after the onset of conflict and key recommendations. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 73, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abbara, A.; Rawson, T.M.; Karah, N.; El-Amin, W.; Hatcher, J.; Tajaldin, B.; Dar, O.; Dewachi, O.; Abu Sitta, G.; Uhlin, B.E.; et al. A summary and appraisal of existing evidence of antimicrobial resistance in the Syrian conflict. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 75, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bongomin, F.; Gago, S.; Oladele, R.O.; Denning, D.W. Global and multi-national prevalence of fungal diseases-estimate precision. J. Fungi 2017, 3, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brown, G.D.; Denning, D.W.; Gow, N.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Netea, M.G.; White, T.C. Hidden killers: Human fungal infections. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 165rv113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fisher, M.C.; Gurr, S.J.; Cuomo, C.A.; Blehert, D.S.; Jin, H.; Stukenbrock, E.H.; Stajich, J.E.; Kahmann, R.; Boone, C.; Denning, D.W.; et al. Threats posed by the fungal kingdom to humans, wildlife, and agriculture. mBio 2020, 11, e00449-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rudramurthy, S.M.; Paul, R.A.; Chakrabarti, A.; Mouton, J.W.; Meis, J.F. Invasive aspergillosis by Aspergillus flavus: Epidemiology, diagnosis, antifungal Resistance, and management. J. Fungi 2019, 5, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lee, Y.; Puumala, E.; Robbins, N.; Cowen, L.E. Antifungal Drug Resistance: Molecular mechanisms in Candida albicans and beyond. Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 3390–3411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gow, N.A.R.; Johnson, C.; Berman, J.; Coste, A.T.; Cuomo, C.A.; Perlin, D.S.; Bicanic, T.; Harrison, T.S.; Wiederhold, N.; Bromley, M.; et al. The importance of antimicrobial resistance in medical mycology. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rogers, T.R.; Verweij, P.E.; Castanheira, M.; Dannaoui, E.; White, P.L.; Arendrup, M.C. Molecular mechanisms of acquired antifungal drug resistance in principal fungal pathogens and EUCAST guidance for their laboratory detection and clinical implications. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 2053–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jukic, E.; Blatzer, M.; Posch, W.; Steger, M.; Binder, U.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Wilflingseder, D. Oxidative stress response tips the balance in Aspergillus terreus amphotericin B resistance. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00670-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sun, S.; Hoy, M.J.; Heitman, J. Fungal pathogens. Curr. Biol. 2020, 30, R1163–R1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zakaria, A.; Osman, M.; Dabboussi, F.; Rafei, R.; Mallat, H.; Papon, N.; Bouchara, J.P.; Hamze, M. Recent trends in the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and mechanisms of resistance in clinical Aspergillus species: A general review with a special focus on the Middle Eastern and North African region. J. Infect. Public. Health 2020, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Canuto, M.M.; Rodero, F.G. Antifungal drug resistance to azoles and polyenes. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2002, 2, 550–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kassem, I.I.; Osman, M.; Jaafar, H.; El Omari, K. Refugee settlements, sewage pollution, COVID-19 and the unfolding cholera outbreak in Lebanon. J. Travel. Med. 2022, 29, taac142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kassem, I.I.; Osman, M. A brewing storm: The impact of economic collapse on the access to antimicrobials in Lebanon. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2022, 29, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Osman, M.; Cummings, K.J.; El Omari, K.; Kassem, I.I. Catch-22: War, refugees, COVID-19, and the scourge of antimicrobial resistance. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 921921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bastos, R.W.; Rossato, L.; Goldman, G.H.; Santos, D.A. Fungicide effects on human fungal pathogens: Cross-resistance to medical drugs and beyond. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1010073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brauer, V.S.; Rezende, C.P.; Pessoni, A.M.; De Paula, R.G.; Rangappa, K.S.; Nayaka, S.C.; Gupta, V.K.; Almeida, F. Antifungal agents in agriculture: Friends and foes of public health. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jørgensen, L.N.; Heick, T.M. Azole Use in agriculture, horticulture, and wood preservation—Is it indispensable? Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 730297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fisher, M.C.; Alastruey-Izquierdo, A.; Berman, J.; Bicanic, T.; Bignell, E.M.; Bowyer, P.; Bromley, M.; Brüggemann, R.; Garber, G.; Cornely, O.A.; et al. Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 557–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Arastehfar, A.; Gabaldón, T.; Garcia-Rubio, R.; Jenks, J.D.; Hoenigl, M.; Salzer, H.J.F.; Ilkit, M.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Perlin, D.S. Drug-Resistant Fungi: An emerging challenge threatening our limited antifungal armamentarium. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Osman, M.; Kasir, D.; Kassem, I.I.; Hamze, M. Shortage of appropriate diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance in Lebanese clinical settings: A crisis amplified by COVID-19 and economic collapse. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2021, 27, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Osman, M.; Bidon, B.; Abboud, C.; Zakaria, A.; Hamze, B.; Achcar, M.E.; Mallat, H.; Dannaoui, E.; Dabboussi, F.; Papon, N.; et al. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility of Aspergillus clinical isolates in Lebanon. Future Microbiol. 2021, 16, 13–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Al Omari, S.; Al Mir, H.; Wrayde, S.; Merhabi, S.; Dhaybi, I.; Jamal, S.; Chahine, M.; Bayaa, R.; Tourba, F.; Tantawi, H.; et al. First Lebanese antibiotic awareness week campaign: Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards antibiotics. J. Hosp. Infect. 2019, 101, 475–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Khalife, S.; Resendiz-Sharpe, A.; Lagrou, K.; Frealle, E. Molecular identification and azole susceptibility testing of Aspergillus section Fumigati isolated from soil samples in Lebanon. J. Mycol. Med. 2022, 32, 101242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Allaw, F.; Haddad, S.F.; Habib, N.; Moukarzel, P.; Naji, N.S.; Kanafani, Z.A.; Ibrahim, A.; Zahreddine, N.K.; Spernovasilis, N.; Poulakou, G.; et al. COVID-19 and C. auris: A case-control study from a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Awada, B.; Alam, W.; Chalfoun, M.; Araj, G.; Bizri, A.R. COVID-19 and Candida duobushaemulonii superinfection: A case report. J. Mycol. Med. 2021, 31, 101168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Reslan, L.; Araj, G.F.; Finianos, M.; El Asmar, R.; Hrabak, J.; Dbaibo, G.; Bitar, I. Molecular characterization of Candida auris isolates at a major tertiary care center in Lebanon. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 770635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Allaw, F.; Kara Zahreddine, N.; Ibrahim, A.; Tannous, J.; Taleb, H.; Bizri, A.R.; Dbaibo, G.; Kanj, S.S. First Candida auris outbreak during a COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-care center in Lebanon. Pathogens 2021, 10, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Osman, M.; Al Bikai, A.; Rafei, R.; Mallat, H.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility patterns of clinical Candida isolates in North Lebanon: A pilot cross-sectional multicentric study. J. Mycol. Med. 2020, 30, 100986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Husni, R.; Bou Zerdan, M.; Samaha, N.; Helou, M.; Mahfouz, Y.; Saniour, R.; Hourani, S.; Kolanjian, H.; Afif, C.; Azar, E.; et al. Characterization and susceptibility of non-albicans Candida isolated from various clinical specimens in Lebanese hospitals. Front. Public. Health 2023, 11, 1115055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Halawi, M.H.; Nasser, R.; Yassine, W.; Yusef, H.; Borjac, J.; Zeaiter, Z. First case of identification of Candida kefyr and Pichia kluyveri in Lebanese water. Water Air Soil. Pollut. 2020, 231, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ghaddar, N.; Anastasiadis, E.; Halimeh, R.; Ghaddar, A.; Dhar, R.; AlFouzan, W.; Yusef, H.; El Chaar, M. Prevalence and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans causing vaginal discharge among pregnant women in Lebanon. BMC Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Christophy, R.; Osman, M.; Mallat, H.; Achkar, M.; Ziedeh, A.; Moukaddem, W.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility and characterization of antibiotic resistant genes among carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and yeast in intestinal flora of cancer patients in North Lebanon. J. Infect. Public. Health 2017, 10, 716–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Araj, G.F.; Asmar, R.G.; Avedissian, A.Z. Candida profiles and antifungal resistance evolution over a decade in Lebanon. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2015, 9, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Bitar, I.; Khalaf, R.A.; Harastani, H.; Tokajian, S. Identification, typing, antifungal resistance profile, and biofilm formation of Candida albicans isolates from Lebanese hospital patients. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 931372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Basma, R.; Barada, G.; Ojaimi, N.; Khalaf, R.A. Susceptibility of Candida albicans to common and novel antifungal drugs, and relationship between the mating type locus and resistance, in Lebanese hospital isolates. Mycoses 2009, 52, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Araj, G.F.; Daher, N.K.; Tabbarah, Z.A. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida isolates at the American University of Beirut Medical Center. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 1998, 10, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rahme, D.; Ayoub, M.; Shaito, K.; Saleh, N.; Assaf, S.; Lahoud, N. First trend analysis of antifungals consumption in Lebanon using the World Health Organization collaborating center for drug statistics methodology. BMC Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hoenigl, M.; Seidel, D.; Sprute, R.; Cunha, C.; Oliverio, M.; Goldman, G.H.; Ibrahim, A.S.; Carvalho, A. COVID-19-associated fungal infections. Nat. Microbiol. 2022, 7, 1127–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Osman, M.; Al Bikai, A.; Rafei, R.; Mallat, H.; Dabboussi, F.; Hamze, M. Update on invasive fungal infections in the Middle Eastern and North African region. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 1771–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kołaczkowska, A.; Kołaczkowski, M. Drug resistance mechanisms and their regulation in non-albicans Candida species. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 71, 1438–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Papon, N.; Courdavault, V.; Clastre, M.; Bennett, R.J. Emerging and emerged pathogenic Candida species: Beyond the Candida albicans paradigm. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bouglita, W.; Rabhi, S.; Raich, N.; Bouabid, C.; Belghith, C.; Slimani, O.; Hkimi, C.; Ghedira, K.; Karess, R.E.; Guizani-Tabbane, L.; et al. Microbiological and molecular screening of Candida spp. isolated from genital tract of asymptomatic pregnant women. J. Mycol. Med. 2022, 71, 1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Salah, H.; Sundararaju, S.; Dalil, L.; Salameh, S.; Al-Wali, W.; Tang, P.; Ben Abid, F.; Tsui, C.K.M. Genomic epidemiology of Candida auris in Qatar reveals hospital transmission dynamics and a South Asian origin. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kaki, R. Risk factors and mortality of the newly emerging Candida auris in a university hospital in Saudi Arabia. Mycology 2023, 14, 256–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Koleri, J.; Petkar, H.M.; Rahman, S.; Al Soub, H.A.; Rahman, S.; AlMaslamani, M.A. Candida auris blood stream infection–A descriptive study from Qatar. BMC Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Badiee, P.; Alborzi, A.; Moeini, M.; Haddadi, P.; Farshad, S.; Japoni, A.; Ziyaeyan, M. Antifungal susceptibility of the Aspergillus species by Etest and CLSI reference methods. Arch. Iran. Med. 2012, 15, 429–432. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ener, B.; Ergin, Ç.; Gülmez, D.; Ağca, H.; Tikveşli, M.; Aksoy, S.A.; Otkun, M.; Siğ, A.K.; Öğünç, D.; Özhak, B.; et al. Frequency of azole resistance in clinical and environmental strains of Aspergillus fumigatus in Turkey: A multicentre study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2022, 77, 1894–1898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Erdem, E.; Yagmur, M.; Boral, H.; Ilkit, M.; Ersoz, R.; Seyedmousavi, S. Aspergillus flavus keratitis: Experience of a tertiary eye clinic in Turkey. Mycopathologia 2017, 182, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ozmerdiven, G.E.; Ak, S.; Ener, B.; Agca, H.; Cilo, B.D.; Tunca, B.; Akalin, H. First determination of azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus strains carrying the TR34/L98H mutations in Turkey. J. Infect. Chemother. 2015, 21, 581–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gheith, S.; Saghrouni, F.; Bannour, W.; Ben Youssef, Y.; Khelif, A.; Normand, A.C.; Piarroux, R.; Ben Said, M.; Njah, M.; Ranque, S. In vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole and caspofungin of Aspergillus spp. isolated from patients with haematological malignancies in Tunisia. Springerplus 2014, 3, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Salah, H.; Lackner, M.; Houbraken, J.; Theelen, B.; Lass-Florl, C.; Boekhout, T.; Almaslamani, M.; Taj-Aldeen, S.J. The emergence of rare clinical Aspergillus species in Qatar: Molecular characterization and antifungal susceptibility profiles. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Al-Wathiqi, F.; Ahmad, S.; Khan, Z. Molecular identification and antifungal susceptibility profile of Aspergillus flavus isolates recovered from clinical specimens in Kuwait. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Toda, M.; Beer, K.D.; Kuivila, K.M.; Chiller, T.M.; Jackson, B.R. Trends in agricultural triazole fungicide use in the United States, 1992–2016 and possible implications for antifungal-resistant fungi in human disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2021, 129, 055001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 12 01413 g001
Figure 1. Increase in the prices of available antifungal drugs between October 2019 and February 2023. Before the economic crisis, 1000 Lebanese pounds (LBP) was equivalent to 0.67 USD. Currently, 1000 LBP is equivalent to ∼0.01 USD. All included antifungals are PO (by mouth) or IV (intravenous).
Figure 1. Increase in the prices of available antifungal drugs between October 2019 and February 2023. Before the economic crisis, 1000 Lebanese pounds (LBP) was equivalent to 0.67 USD. Currently, 1000 LBP is equivalent to ∼0.01 USD. All included antifungals are PO (by mouth) or IV (intravenous).
Antibiotics 12 01413 g001
Table 1. Summary of available antifungal drugs used in human medicine in Lebanon.
Table 1. Summary of available antifungal drugs used in human medicine in Lebanon.
Antifungal ClassBrand NameActive DrugRouteAvailable in PharmaciesManufacturer OriginRecommended DoseIndication
AzolesCanestenClotrimazoleTopicalYesGermany5 g dailyCutaneous candidiasis, dermatophyte infections
DaktarinMiconazoleTopicalYesBelgium5 g dailyCutaneous or oropharyngeal candidiasis
DermofixSetraconazoleTopicalYesSpainVariable ^, daily or BIDCutaneous candidiasis, dermatophyte infections, pytiriasis
DiflucanFluconazolePO *, IVYesFrance200 mg daily +Candidiasis, cryptococcal meningitis, coccidiomycosis
EconazEconazoleTopicalYesLebanonVariable ^, daily or BIDCutaneous candidiasis, dermatophyte infections
FongamilOmoconazoleTopicalYesFranceVariable ^, daily or BIDCutaneous candidiasis, dermatophyte infections
LomexinFenticonazoleTopicalYesLebanon5 g BIDVulvovaginal candidiasis
NizoralKetoconazoleTopicalYesBelgiumVariable ^, twice weeklyTinea capitis
NoxafilPosaconazolePOYesNetherlands300 mg daily, 300 mg BIDAspergillosis, candidiasis
SporanoxItraconazolePOYesLebanon200 mg BIDAspergillosis, candidiasis
TravogenIsoconazoleTopicalYesItalyVariable ^, dailyCutaneous candidiasis, dermatophyte infections
V-fendVoriconazolePO, IVYesPO: Germany, IV: France200 mg BIDCandidiasis, candidemia, aspergillosis, Scedosporium infection, Fusarium infection
AllylaminesLamisilTerbinafinePO, TopicalYesPO:Germany, Topical: SwitzerlandPO: 250 mg daily. Topical: variable ^. daily or BIDOnychomycosis
EchinocandinsCancidasCaspofunginIVNo §France70 mg once then 50 mg dailyInvasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, neutropenic fever
EcaltaAnidulafunginIVNo §Belgium200 mg once then 100 mg dailyInvasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, neutropenic fever
MycamineMicafunginIVNo §Japan100 mg dailyInvasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, neutropenic fever
PolyenesAmbisomeAmphotericin-B liposomeIVNo §Ireland3–10 mg/kgInvasive candidiasis, invasive aspergillosis, neutropenic fever, cryptococcal meningitis,
MedistanNystatinTopicalYesLebanon40,000 to 60,000 U QIDoropharyngeal candidiasis
PO *, per os (by mouth); IV, intravenous; BID, twice daily; QID, four times daily. ^ Dose varies according to the size of infected area. + This dosage regimen is used for oropharyngeal candidiasis. +A higher dosing regimen might be needed in certain infections, e.g., cryptococcal meningitis. § Only available in hospitals.
Table 2. Available antifungal drugs used in agriculture and veterinary applications in Lebanon.
Table 2. Available antifungal drugs used in agriculture and veterinary applications in Lebanon.
Antifungal ClassUseBrand NameActive Molecule (Formulation)Treated Animals/PlantsTreatment IndicationsWithdrawal TimeManufacturer Origin
TriazolesSystemic fungicideSakay (liquid formulation)Difenoconazole (250 g in 1 L)Winter wheat, oilseed rape, brussels sprouts, cabbage, broccoli/calabrese, cauliflowerBroad spectrum7 daysMalaysia
CopperPreventive fungicideFungatox (powder)Copper oxychloride (2.50 g in 1 L)Onion, garlic, apple, pear, tonsils, grapes, cowpeas, peas, olives, citrus, chickpeas, spinachAlternaria spp., Phytophthora spp.3–15 daysIndia
TriazolesSystemic fungicideTopas 100 EC (liquid formulation)Penconazole (100 g in 1 L)Apple tree, pear tree, quince, strawberry, cucumber, melon, zucchini, eggplant, peppers, tomatoBroad spectrum3–35 daysSwitzerland
AryloxypyrimidinePreventive, systemic and curative fungicideAmistar top (liquid formulation)Azoxystrobin (200 g in 1 L) + difenoconazole (125 g in 1 L)Barley, grapes, maize, onions, peas, potatoes, ryegrass seed crops, sweetcorn, field tomatoes, wheatBroad spectrum3–7 daysUnited Kingdom
ThioureasPreventive and curative fungicideGypson (powder)Thiophanate methyl (70% WP)Apples, pears, small grains, cucurbits, peanuts, garlic, onions, almonds, potatoes, tobacco, vegetables, bananas, figs, brassicas, citrus, and strawberries.Broad spectrum3–7 daysChina
AnilinopyrimidineSystemic fungicideKuile (liquid formulation)Pyrimethanil (40% SC)Grapes, tomatoes, strawberriesBotrytis cinerea3–7 daysChina
PolyeneSystemic fungicideNystatin (tablet or oral liquid)NystatinCats, dogs, reptiles, birdsCandida, fungal infections in the mouth or gastrointestinal tract1 to 2 days
Inorganic sulfurSystemic fungicideLime sulfur (cream)Calcium polysulfide (calcium hydroxide and sulfur) (0.16 g in 100 g)All animalsDermatophyte infections1 time daily for 1 week, then 2 times per week for 2 more weeksUnited States
Carboxylic acid amidesSystemic fungicideAnti-mycotoxins (powder)1,3-Beta glucan (125 mg in 1 kg) + mannan oligosaccharide (90 mg in 1 kg) + formic acid (100 mg in 1 kg) + acetic acid (100 mg in 1 kg) + propionic acid (100 mg in 1 kg)BirdsAspergillus flavus, Aspergillus parasiticus, Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., Fusarium spp., Byssochlamys spp.NoneEgypt
EC, emulsifiable concentrate; WP, wettable powder; SC, suspension concentrate.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hassoun, N.; Kassem, I.I.; Hamze, M.; El Tom, J.; Papon, N.; Osman, M. Antifungal Use and Resistance in a Lower–Middle-Income Country: The Case of Lebanon. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091413

AMA Style

Hassoun N, Kassem II, Hamze M, El Tom J, Papon N, Osman M. Antifungal Use and Resistance in a Lower–Middle-Income Country: The Case of Lebanon. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(9):1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091413

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hassoun, Nesrine, Issmat I. Kassem, Monzer Hamze, Jad El Tom, Nicolas Papon, and Marwan Osman. 2023. "Antifungal Use and Resistance in a Lower–Middle-Income Country: The Case of Lebanon" Antibiotics 12, no. 9: 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12091413

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop