Next Article in Journal
Effect of Escin Alone or in Combination with Antifungal Agents on Resistant Candida glabrata Biofilms: Mechanisms of Action
Next Article in Special Issue
Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in COVID-19 Era—Challenges and Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Compliance with a Procalcitonin-Based Protocol in Patients with Ventilation-Associated Pneumonia: An Observational, Retrospective Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Moving toward Extensively Drug-Resistant: Four-Year Antimicrobial Resistance Trends of Acinetobacter baumannii from the Largest Department of Internal Medicine in Slovakia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

High Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Sequence Type 131 Subclade C2 among Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia

1
Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, University Hospital Bratislava, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, 84215 Bratislava, Slovakia
3
Institute of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, 81108 Bratislava, Slovakia
4
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Ss. Cyril and Methodius in Trnava, 91701 Trnava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2023, 12(7), 1209; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12071209
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 17 July 2023 / Accepted: 18 July 2023 / Published: 20 July 2023

Abstract

:
The expansion of sequence type 131 (ST131) extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli (E. coli) represents major worldwide challenges. E. coli strains originating from healthcare facilities (labeled No. 1 and No. 2) of the University Hospital Bratislava (UHB) were analyzed for ST131 emergence, including its (sub)lineages and clonal relatedness. Antimicrobial resistance was determined in most strains. Of a total of 354 E. coli strains, 263 (74.3%) belonged to ST131; of these, 177 (67.3%) were from No. 1. Generally, among 260 ST131 E. coli, clades A/B were confirmed in 20 (7.7%), while clade C was noted in 240 (92.3%) strains; within them, subclades were detected as follows: C0 (17; 7.1%), C1 (3; 1.2%), and C2 (220; 91.7%). Among fifteen randomly selected E. coli strains that were investigated for ST and clonal relatedness, seven STs were identified: eight (53.3%) ST131, two (13.3%) ST73, and one each (6.7%) of ST10, ST12, ST14, ST1193, and ST1196. From No. 1, two ST131 in the first internal clinic and one ST131 from No. 2 in the aftercare department were highly clonally related, suggesting possible epidemiological association. Antimicrobial resistance was as follows: ciprofloxacin 93.8%, ceftazidime 78.4%, meropenem 0%, fosfomycin 2.9% and nitrofurantoin 1.4%. Prevention of ESBL-producing E. coli dissemination, especially for ST131 clade C2, is inevitably necessary for reducing drug resistance and decreasing healthcare-associated infections.

1. Introduction

The global emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) to extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains represents an ongoing rising threat of healthcare-associated infections contributing to the antimicrobial resistance crisis. The potential driver of this might be ineffective early empirical therapy resulting in the overuse of reserve drugs required for difficult-to-treat pathogens [1,2]. In addition, the elevation in MDR strains is correspondingly related to the overall increase in the administration of antimicrobial agents, which affects the composition of the microbiota in humans [3]. Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains have been recognized as some of the most prevalent ESBL-producing Gram-negative pathogens [4,5,6] from the Enterobacterales order. The prevalence of ESBL-producing E. coli strains has increased in clinical samples to more than 10% in 22 European countries in previous years. Increased colonization in the gastrointestinal tract may have contributed to this rise even in countries that until now had a low proportion of ESBL strains, such as Sweden and the Netherlands [7]. Recent molecular epidemiologic studies have confirmed the increasing tendency for both hospital-acquired and community-acquired extraintestinal infections, especially urinary tract and bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producing E. coli with sequence type (ST) 131, which was more frequent in human samples than other STs [6,8]. In particular, urinary tract infections caused by ST131 were more often persistent, had an unfavorable treatment outcome, and were related to urinary catheterization, diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency, and higher age [1]. On the other hand, E. coli strains were the leading cause of bloodstream infections, and ESBL production was recorded up to 17%, while ST131 was reported to be one of the most frequent clones implicated in colonization, hospital transmission, morbidity, and mortality [9]. Accordingly, we can emphasize that these mostly extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC, from extraintestinal sites) strains are concerning for public health due to being important etiological agents, and they are most often associated with the pandemic clonal group denoted as ST131 that has resistance to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins [10,11]. Nowadays, ST131 is associated with many MDR infections in developed and developing countries [1]. The occurrence of ESBL-producing E. coli strains was recorded in one-third (34.2%) of clinical samples in recent years in Slovakia [12], but research regarding the emergence of high-risk clones such as, e.g., ST131 or others, has not yet been published from our country, as they were confirmed in the former common state of the Czech Republic [13].
Expansion of the ST131 clone is commonly related to plasmid-disseminated blaCTX-M genes, including genetic determinants of fluoroquinolone resistance. The H30 subclone of ST131 is defined according to its allele 30 of fimH (fimbrial adhesin-encoding gene type 1), and this genetic form has become the most prevalent [14,15,16]. Other fimH allele variants of the ST131 clone correspond to distinct major lineages or clades: A/H41, B/H22, and C/H30. The main generator of antimicrobial resistance is E. coli from the predominant clade C, mostly comprising subclades C1 and C2 (formerly H30R and H30Rx) [10,17,18]. The latter, subclade C2, is mainly associated with blaCTX-M-15 and sublineage C1, which can be related to blaCTX-M-27 (cluster C1-M27) or not (cluster non-C1-M27). The variant C0 is regarded as the progenitor of subclades C1 and C2 [10,19].
The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of ST131 among ESBL-producing Escherichia coli strains in two healthcare facilities within the University Hospital Bratislava (UHB). Further, the representation of ST131 lineages or clades A, B, or C was determined, and within the last (clade C), subclades C0, C1, and C2 were detected using the multiplex PCR method. Selected ESBL- and/or AmpC β-lactamase-producing E. coli strains, including nonproducers from both healthcare facilities, were also explored for genetic relatedness by the next-generation sequencing method. In addition, susceptibility to antimicrobial agents was ascertained in the examined strains. The resistance profile was evaluated and used to statistically compare the resistance rate associated with ST131 and non-ST131 in mostly ESBL-positive E. coli strains. Finally, binary logistic regression was used to examine patient- and E. coli-related characteristics associated with increased antimicrobial resistance.

2. Results

2.1. Patients’ Characteristics and Isolation of ESBL-Producing E. coli Strains

In total, 354 ESBL- and/or AmpC β-lactamase-producing E. coli strains were isolated from patients residing in two healthcare facilities within the UHB. The studied patient cohort comprised 235 (66.4%) females, and their mean age was 80.4 ± 11.9 (range from 9 to 98) years. According to the Mann–Whitney U test, the difference when comparing both genders, including age, was statistically significant (p ˂ 0.001). Overall, out of all patients, an age of 65 or over was predominant in 310 (87.6%) individuals, as shown in Table 1. Healthcare facility No. 1 had a larger number of ESBL-producing E. coli strains, with 243 (68.6%) originating here; most of them, that is, 190 (53.7%), were from the first internal clinic. In healthcare setting No. 2, 111 (31.4%) examined strains were isolated; a majority of these, 76 (21.5%), were mainly from the geriatric clinic. Regarding the type of specimen, the urine sample represented the largest number at 227 (64.1%). Specimens collected from the skin and soft tissue were less frequent, with 50 (14.1%) being found, and they were associated with a wound, ulcus cruris, abscess, fistula, skin lesion or defect, or pattern (lungs and spleen swab) obtained via the postmortem of dead patients from the Institute of Pathological Anatomy. There were 29 (8.2%) hemocultures obtained. From the genital tract, two (0.6) samples, one a vaginal swab and one ejaculate, were collected. In the cases of catheter-related infections, the four (1.1%) tips of the catheters mainly originated from the surgical site of infection. Six (1.7%) sputum samples were collected. Finally, 22 (6.2%) throat or nasal swabs and 14 (4%) stools or rectal swabs were sampled. According to defined criteria conditions, including a significant microbiological finding, our set of evaluated clinical strains was associated with 287 (81.1%) cases of infection and 67 (18.9%) cases of colonization.

2.2. Occurrence of ST131 and non-ST131 ESBL-Producing E. coli Strains

A total of 354 multidrug-resistant and mostly ESBL-producing E. coli strains were investigated for the presence of ST131. Suspected pathogens were subjected to ST131 clade multiplex PCR with fimH detection [10]. Overall, 263 (74.3%) ST131 and 91 (25.7%) non-ST131 mostly ESBL-producing E. coli strains were obtained. ST representation in males was as follows: 86 (32.7%) ST131 strains and 33 (36.3%) non-ST131 strains. Conversely, females had a higher number of ST131 strains at 177 (67.3%) than non-ST131 strains at 58 (63.7), without statistical significance, as shown in Table 1. In addition, an increased prevalence of 236 (89.7%) ST131 strains in comparison with 74 (81.3%) non-ST131 strains was confirmed in patients aged 65 years and older with statistical significance (p = 0.036). Considering healthcare facility No. 1, the proportion of STs was as follows: 177 (67.3%) ST131 strains and 66 (72.5%) non-ST131 strains, but within some clinics, e.g., the first internal clinic and neurological clinic, a slightly higher rate of ST131 versus (vs.) non-ST131 was recorded, as shown in Table 1. On the other hand, in healthcare facility No. 2, a higher number of ST131 strains compared to non-ST131 were detected, being 86 (32.7%) vs. 25 (27.5%), respectively, and also within individual workplaces, such as the geriatric clinic, long-term care department, and aftercare department, a raised rate of ST131 compared to non-ST131 was found, as presented in Table 1. However, it was not statistically significant. Regarding the specimens, ST131 was more common than non-ST131, e.g., in urine samples (172; 65.4% vs. 55; 60.4%), blood cultures (25; 9.5% vs. 4; 4.4%), and throat or nasal swabs (17; 6.5% vs. 5; 5.5%).

2.3. Distribution of Clades and Subclades of ST131 ESBL-Producing E. coli Strains

Out of 263 ST131 ESBL-positive E. coli strains, 260 were used to determine lineages or clades A and B (A/B) and C, including subclades (C0, C1, and C2). Three ST131 strains remained undetermined. Clades A/B were recorded 20 times (7.7%), while clade C was determined for 240 (92.3%) ST131 E. coli strains. Within clade C, 17 (7.1%) cases of subclade C0 were identified, and there were 3 (1.2%) strains of C1 and 220 (91.7%) pathogens belonging to subclade C2. Regarding both genders, clades A/B had the same distribution (10; 50%), but the following subclades had a higher representation in females: subclade C0 (13; 76.5%) and subclade C2 (152; 69.1%), while a higher rate of subclade C1 was noted in males (2; 66.7%), as indicated in Table 2. The prevalence of identified clades and subclades in patients aged 65 and over was higher—A/B (16; 80%), C0 (16; 94.1%), C1 (3; 100%), and C2 (200; 90.9%)—than in younger patients. From the viewpoint of healthcare facility No. 1, and mainly from the first internal clinic, there were 12 (60%) detected strains of clades A/B and the same number, 12 (70.6%), of subclade C0. However, most of the 116 (52.7%) ST131 ESBL-producing E. coli strains were from subclade C2 at the first internal clinic. In healthcare facility No. 2, particularly at the geriatric clinic, four (20%) cases of clades A/B, three (17.6%) cases of subclade C0, and two (66.7%) C1 occurrences were determined. However, the highest number of E. coli strains, 49 (22.3%), were identified to be subclade C2 within the same geriatric clinic; further data are presented in Table 2. Based on the urine samples, 15 (75%) ST131 ESBL-positive E. coli strains were determined as clades A/B, and 11 (64.7%) agents were identified as subclade C0; however, most cases, 142 (64.5%), were found to be subclade C2.

2.4. Genetic Relatedness of ESBL-Producing Sequenced E. coli Strains

Fifteen E. coli genomes were sequenced using next-generation sequencing (NGS) Illumina technology. High-quality contigs were obtained for all of the sequenced strains, with an average of 116 contigs and an average coverage of 77 times per sequenced genome. The length of genomes ranged from 3.7 Mbp to 5.3 Mbp.
The clonality of the strains was confirmed using MLST, which was used to determine the occurrence of seven sequence types (STs). Most samples (53.3%) belonged to ST131, followed by ST73 (13.3%). The remaining samples were assigned to ST10, ST12, ST14, ST1193, and ST1196 (each 6.7%).
The mutual relatedness of strains assigned to the same ST was later evaluated using core genome MLST (cgMLST). Strains belonging to ST131 showed high variability, with up to 659 different alleles between them (Figure 1). According to this analysis, the ST131 strains created seven unique profiles. Four strains (KMB-999, KMB-981, KMB-979, and KMB-984) differed only in 0–13 alleles and were clustered in one group. The rest of the ST131 strains were clonally unrelated and quite distinct, except for two ST131 strains (KMB-1000 and KMB-1002) from the urological outpatient clinic with high clonal relatedness. Seven remaining STs formed distant and unrelated forms, including the two ST73 strains, which mutually differed in 227 alleles (Figure 1).

2.5. Occurrence of STs in Healthcare Facilities

Fifteen randomly selected E. coli strains originating from two healthcare facilities following sequencing were assigned to STs. A total of 12 strains belonged to healthcare facility No. 1, of which the most ST131 strains (4) were from the first internal clinic, including 1 ST10 and 1 ST73 strain. From healthcare facility No. 2, three E. coli strains belonged to different STs (ST73, ST131, and ST1193). They originated from various hospital departments, including a clinic, as illustrated in Figure 1.

2.6. Antibiotic Resistance of MDR and ESBL-Producing E. coli Strains

Out of a total set of 354 E. coli strains, the presence of blaCTX-M genes was investigated; 350 (98.9%) were found to be positive for the production of CTX-M extended-spectrum β-lactamase, without specifying the variant in more detail. Using the sequencing method, the production of AmpC β-lactamase was encountered in 11 (3.1%) E. coli strains and 7 (2%) possible causative agents were found to concurrently produce ESBL, including AmpC β-lactamase. Four (1.1%) blaCTX-M-negative strains only carried out AmpC production. One E. coli strain produced KPC (Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase) from serine group A. The blaKPC gene encoding this carbapenemase was confirmed using the PCR method at the National Reference Centre (NRC) for monitoring antimicrobial resistance in the Slovak Republic.
The susceptibility of MDR E. coli with ESBL production was evaluated, and the resistance rate to antimicrobial agents was compared between ST131 and non-ST131 E. coli strains. Resistance to ST131 vs. non-ST131 was determined to be statistically significant as follows: 79.1% vs. 67.5% to ampicillin/sulbactam (p = 0.037), 20.3% vs. 14.5% to piperacillin/tazobactam (p = 0.002), 99.2% vs. 96.1% to cefotaxime (p = 0.043), and 81.6% vs. 68.4% to ceftazidime (p = 0.042). Overall, resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem was not confirmed, while resistance to ertapenem was recorded at 0.5% in ST131 vs. 3% in non-ST131 E. coli strains, and further resistance to gentamicin was found at 22.3% vs. 31.2%, respectively; however, these values were not statistically significant. Resistance to amikacin was detected in ST131 at 4.1% vs. non-ST131 E. coli strains at 5.3% (p = 0.038), and ciprofloxacin resistance was recorded at 96.7% vs. 84.4% (p < 0.001), respectively, with statistical significance; these data are listed in Table 3, including data on resistance to other antimicrobial agents.
In addition, the ability to predict patients’ characteristics was evaluated, and E. coli clades and subclades were analyzed based on the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. It was found that the male gender was associated with gentamicin resistance (p = 0.049), with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.029 (95% CI [confidence interval], 1.003–4.104) with statistical significance. Similarly, statistically significant relations were represented by a specimen collected from the upper respiratory tract (p < 0.001; OR 0.032; 95% CI, 0.06–0.159); collection from the medical setting of the urological outpatient clinic (p = 0.048; OR 0.09; 95% CI, 0.008–0.977); and the presence of ST131 subclade C2 associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin (p = 0.038; OR 6.238; 95% CI, 1.106–35.176). Resistance to ceftazidime was also predicted by a specimen collected from the upper respiratory tract (p = 0.001; OR 0.102; 95% CI, 0.026–0.394); by the type of specimen being sputum (p = 0.012; OR 0.047; 95% CI, 0.004–0.515); and also by ST131 subclade C2 (p = 0.001; OR 8.41; 95% CI, 2.534–27.918) with statistical significance.

3. Discussion

Carbapenemase-producing E. coli ST131 strains have been spreading and causing diseases in recent years [20], and the treatment options are limited for these extensively drug-resistant (XDR, i.e., susceptible to one or two antimicrobial classes) pathogens. On the other hand, the dissemination of a pandemic high-risk clone designated as multidrug-resistant E. coli ST131 is worrying, as it could lead to an emergency in the public healthcare system due to the production of ESBL with resistance to third-generation cephalosporins and other classes of antibiotics [1,10]. The drugs of choice for these ESBL-producing E. coli pathogens causing severe and life-threatening infections are carbapenems, but the increasing administration of these drugs, which are considered last-resort antimicrobial agents, can result in the emergence of carbapenem resistance [4].
In studies conducted in Denmark [21] and Sweden [18], in which ESBL-producing E. coli was isolated from various biological samples or urine, respectively, the findings were comparable to our research results. Even though the proportion of females in these surveys was almost the same (65—66%) as in our records, the median age was 14 years lower (69 years), and the proportion of ST131 strains (38%) was lower [21] compared to our data (Table 1). Lindblom et al. (2022) [18] reported a much lower median age of 65 for inpatient females in a previous examination compared to that in our survey (Table 1), in which the overall proportion of patients in the age category of 65 years and older was seven times higher than the number of younger individuals. Our results confirm the occurrence of ST131 in older patients, while the prevalence of this clone may differ according to regions and countries.
In recent decades, many studies have emphasized the importance of the worldwide ST131 clone responsible for the spreading of antimicrobial-resistant infections with ESBL (mainly CTX-M β-lactamase) and coresistant profiles becoming dominant, including with regard to its acquisition in hospital [9] and community [22,23] settings. Subsequently, in the Lindblom et al. (2022) study, there was also a 2-fold higher ratio of patients from the community compared to inpatients [18]. In our group, there were a small number of patients from the urology outpatient clinic and other outpatient clinics (healthcare facilities No. 1 and No. 2, respectively). Regarding community carriage, which may contribute to infections, van den Bunt et al.’s (2020) study investigated the occurrence of ST131 in the gastrointestinal tract. They found that the most common risk factors were travelling related to prolonged carriage and antimicrobial administration [24]. In comparison, colonization was not detected in our outpatients.
A survey from the United States underlines that the ST131-H30 subclone (or clade C) is more common in hospitalized patients, in more at-risk elderly male patients in long-term care facilities (LTCF) [1]. On the contrary, compared to our results, ST131 clade C (together, C0, C1, and C2) was more represented in the female gender. In association with healthcare facility No. 2, it was more prevalent in the geriatric clinic than in the long-term care department (Table 2). In addition, in a study by Martischang et al. (2021), ST131 H30 or clade C was confirmed in a lower (68.6%) number of samples that originated from LTCF patients than in our survey. The reason for the lower occurrence of clade C could be that the prevalence of this subclone has had a downward tendency since 2015 [17]. Moreover, Flament-Simon et al. (2020) demonstrated the following data of ST131 clades and subclades of E. coli with ESBL production: clade A, 5.1%; subclade C1, 27.9%, and subclade C2, 65.8% [25]. According to our outcomes, clades A/B were detected with similarly low incidence, and the C1 subclade was detected in very few values. At the same time, subclade C2 showed in our survey an 18.8% higher prevalence (Table 2) than was found in the above-mentioned joint research from Spain and France. A variety of STs have been reported from hospital environments in this region [25], including ST10 and the newly emerging global ST1193, which were also confirmed in the first internal clinic (No. 1) and the geriatric clinic (No. 2), respectively, but so far without epidemiological, i.e., clonal, relatedness (Figure 1). Recently, this rapid and ongoing expansion of ST1193 was described in U.S. cities related to young patients less than 40 years old [26].
Two ST131 E. coli strains isolated from the first internal clinic and from the urological outpatient clinic (No. 1), together with one isolate from the aftercare department (No. 2), were highly clonally related, with only zero to three different alleles between each them (Figure 1); these findings suggest a possible epidemiological transmission within the healthcare facilities of No. 1, and between No. 1 and No. 2. The other randomly selected STs occurred sporadically, and they showed a marked difference both in STs and in allele diversity and did not appear to be epidemiologically significant or genetically related. From the largest surveillance research on multidrug-resistant pathogens, including E. coli, Roberts et al. (2022) published data on epidemiologic confirmations that support clustering, which is defined as the overlap of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) with another in the same cluster. The number of confirmed overlaps for E. coli strains (11; 50%) was lower than other nosocomial strains. However, this high value represents half of the assessed E. coli strains [27]. From the given data, it can be pointed out that MDR E. coli strains are of great importance in the dissemination between patients. In small numbers, this was ascertained by our investigation.
In an observational cohort survey from Vietnam, the genomic characteristics of MDR E. coli were evaluated [27]. The resistance genes blaCTX-M (85%) were found to have the highest prevalence, while blaKPC (13%) and blaNDM (24%) occurred in lower but important numbers. Compared to our data, the same number of ST131 and ST1193 strains were also confirmed in our study, but blaCTX-M genes were detected in the whole set (except for four strains) with a much higher prevalence. A more precise detection of blaCTX-M genes was not performed. Based on subclades C1 and C2 (Table 2), the possible presence of blaCTX-M-27 or not, and blaCTX-M-15 [10,19,25], respectively, can be assumed. On the other hand, carbapenemase production was confirmed in only one strain by evidence of blaKPC genes, which is a remarkable difference compared to the study by Roberts et al. (2022), in which almost a quarter of E. coli were confirmed to produce metallo-carbapenemase NDM (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase) [27]. In line with our knowledge from this investigation, it could be highlighted that the emergence of carbapenemase-producing E. coli at our monitored medical facilities so far has been sporadic, but not insignificant. Correspondingly, it is necessary to consider warnings about the possible rise in carbapenem resistance even in E. coli strains [20]. In addition, ST361 E. coli that produces two carbapenemases encoded blaKPC-3 and blaNDM-5 was detected in a patient hospitalized in Switzerland, and this strain was resistant even to the most recent generations of antimicrobial agents (cefiderocol and aztreonam/avibactam). At the same time, it was sensitive to older agents (tigecycline, fosfomycin, and colistin) [28]. The situation is similar with colistin resistance. In our outcomes, only one ST131 E. coli strain was resistant to this last-line resort antibiotic (Table 3). In the findings of Roberts et al. (2022), resistance to colistin (4%) mediated by mcr genes (mediated by the colistin resistance gene) is reported with a slightly higher incidence [27]. It is crucial to be aware that although colistin-resistant strains are rare in our healthcare-associated facilities, if such a threat emerges worldwide, it may unexpectedly extend to our medical settings.
MacFadden et al. (2019) published results related to E. coli bloodstream infections, and they reported that inappropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy increases mortality [29]. In our data, the occurrence of E. coli blood infections with ESBL production was noted, of which, out of 29 patients, 25 cases were caused by ST131, and 21 of those cases were caused by subclade C2, which is mostly blaCTX-M-15 positive. Concerning our hemoculture outcomes, empiric treatment for susceptible E. coli may have been inappropriate. In the mentioned study [29], the proportion of ST131 (21%) resistance to ciprofloxacin (54%) was almost 50% lower, and to gentamicin (52%) it was two times higher compared to our results (Table 3). Accordingly, our data suggest that the administration of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin could be estimated as being higher and lower, respectively, in our medical facilities relating to E. coli ESBL-producing strains compared with the previous study.
Mahaya et al. (2022) determined resistance in E. coli ESBL-producing strains, while resistance to carbapenems, including colistin and fosfomycin, was not detected [19]; overall, a minimal reduction in susceptibility to these agents was observed in our results (Table 3). On the other hand, strains were 100% resistant to cefotaxime and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, as well as to other resistance values [19]. In comparison, in our findings, resistance was much lower, especially against amikacin and nitrofurantoin; ciprofloxacin was the only exception, against which resistance in our evaluation had a higher value (Table 3). These differences in the resistance rate may be closely related to the consumption of particular antimicrobial agents, which may be diverse between various regions and healthcare facilities, but they may also be due to the spreading of distinct multidrug-resistant bacterial clones [30].
When comparing the antimicrobial resistance of ST131 vs. non-ST131 E. coli ESBL-producing strains, statistically significant differences were found for ciprofloxacin (93% and 63%, respectively) in Olesen et al.’s (2013) study [21], which was consistent with our results. However, the resistance rate was slightly higher in our evaluations. Likewise, the gentamicin resistance of ST131 (16%) vs. non-ST131 (35%) [21] was also at a similar ratio in our results (Table 3). If we compare the resistance rate of ST131 strains to trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole with non-ST131 resistance, as was performed by Olesen et al. (2013), then the resistance was higher in ST131 strains. According to this comparison, it might be inferred that ST131 could have a similar proportion of resistance to the same antimicrobial agents as other STs.
The impact of predicted risk factors related to patient characteristics and pathogen properties on antimicrobial resistance was analyzed using binary logistic regression. The male gender had the highest positive predictive value for gentamicin resistance, including ST131 subclade C2, which is associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime. According to MacFadden et al.’s (2019) research comparing patient risk factors, STs, and resistance genes as predictors for antibiotic resistance in E. coli bloodstream infections, it was found by using a logistic regression model that ST shows strong predictive discrimination that patient epidemiologic predictors may enhance; however, the highest degree of antibiotic administration exclusion allows for the identification and presence of known resistance genes [29].
The significance of this study compared to that of others is the highlighting of the elevated emergence of ST131 in diverse samples relating to infection or colonization, as well as the predominant representation of subclade C2 instead of other sublineages, which predicted resistance to the two above-mentioned antimicrobials. Moreover, we tried to find out the possible clonal transmission of ST131 in the survey, in which we were slightly successful.
The lacking in the study is that, within performed biochemical identification of E. coli strains, the PCR proof of these pathogens was not carried out.
Nonetheless, further examinations are required to determine the best way to make therapy more effective in monitoring and to combat antimicrobial resistance with the knowledge about the circulation of particular STs and close genetic relatedness, including the presence of their resistance determinants [31]; moreover, more studies are needed to identify when it is possible to implement tailored preventive measures to control these expanding risk clones.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Healthcare Facilities, Patients, and Specimens

Extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains originated from patients hospitalized at the University Hospital Bratislava (UHB) during the period from January 2017 to May 2019. The UHB is one of the largest Slovak hospitals, comprising five healthcare workplaces. The patients resided in healthcare facility No. 1, Hospital Old Town, and No. 2, Specialized Geriatric Hospital. According to our standard rules, from the patients hospitalized at the UHB, signed informed consent of the patient was obtained that his or her biological materials and samples can be provided for scientific purposes including to present the data relating to research, and such consent is in each patient’s medical record if he or she was treated in our medical facility. Specimens were collected from various body sites concerning infection or colonization. Infection was specified by employing the treating physician’s diagnosis, which was consistent with the clinical manifestation of disease associated with ESBL-producing E. coli in the particular biological sample and with the significant laboratory findings. The colonization of the patients was defined as positive cultivation when there was no evidence of infection signs at the time of the microorganisms’ isolation.

4.2. Isolation, Proof of Bacterial Strains, and Susceptibility Testing

Following the primary cultivation of the samples on standard media, Escherichia coli strains were detected using the biochemical set ENTEROtest 24 (Erba Lachema s.r.o., Brno, Czech Republic) in our microbiology laboratory. Only one unique strain per patient was included in the study. In parallel with regular cultivation, specimens were also inoculated on COLOREXTM ESBL screening chromogenic media (MkB Test a.s., Rosina, Slovak Republic). If the suspected ESBL E. coli strains also grew on the corresponding screening plates, they were submitted to further testing by the combination disk diffusion test with cefotaxime (30 µg) ± clavulanic acid (10 µg) and ceftazidime (30 µg) ± clavulanic acid (10 µg) for proof of ESBL production, according to the EUCAST criteria [32]. However, the Carba NP test was used to confirm carbapenemase production when testing strains showed higher breakpoint values than the 0.125 µg/mL screening cut-off for meropenem and ertapenem [32,33].
Susceptibility testing of most antimicrobial agents was performed using the colorimetric micromethod that is commercially available as a MIDITECH panel [34], and has been currently modified to test strains against the 18 antimicrobials listed in Table 3 (classes: penicillins and cephalosporins (0.25–32 µg/mL; protected by β-lactamase inhibitor, 4 µg/mL), carbapenems (ertapenem, 0.03–4 µg/mL; meropenem, 0.125–16 µg/mL), aminoglycosides (gentamicin and tobramycin, 0.125–16 µg/mL; amikacin, 0.5–64 µg/mL), tetracyclines (tetracycline, 0.125–16 µg/mL), glycylcyclines (tigecycline, 0.03–4 µg/mL), fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, 0.03–4 µg/mL), polymyxins (colistin, 0.25–8 µg/mL), and antimetabolites (trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 0.125/2–4/76 µg/mL)). Meanwhile, sensitivity determination against nitrofurantoin (100 µg) and fosfomycin (200 µg) was carried out with a disk diffusion assay.

4.3. DNA Isolation and NGS Library Preparation

From 15 randomly selected E. coli strains, nucleic acid isolation was performed using the Higher PurityTM Bacterial Genomic DNA Isolation Kit (CanvaxBiotech; Valladolid, Spain). DNA concentration was measured with the Qubit ds-DNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen; Waltham, MA, USA). Genomic libraries for sequencing were prepared using the Nextera XT DNA Prep Kit (Illumina; San Diego, CA, USA) and purified on AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter Life Sciences; Brea, CA, USA). The quality of the libraries was checked by electrophoresis with the Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Paired-end sequencing with 2 × 150 bp reads was carried out on a NextSeq system (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA).

4.4. ST-131 Clade Multiplex PCR with fimH-30 Detection

Detection was carried out according to the work of Matsumura et al. (2017). Amplification was performed with 1× DreamTaq Green Buffer (ThermoFisher; Waltham, MA, USA); 0.2 mM dNTP (Promega; Madison, WI, USA); the primers listed in Table 4, each 0.5 pmol; 1U Taq DNA polymerase (ThermoFisher; Waltham, MA, USA); and 2 μL of template DNA, with a total volume of 25 μL. DNA was amplified using the Biometra TAdvanced (Analytik Jena; Jena, Germany) with a thermal protocol consisting of predenaturation at 98 °C for 2 min, which was followed by 30 cycles of 98 °C for 10 s, 57 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 40 s, and final polymerization at 72 °C for 3 min. PCR products were loaded on 2% agarose gel stained with GoodView Nucleic Acid Stain (SBS Genetech; Beijing, China) and visualized under UV light [10].

4.5. Bioinformatic Processing and Genome Analysis

Raw reads obtained from the sequencer were assembled de novo via the SPAdes assembler using standard settings (Center for Algorithmic Biotechnology; St. Petersburg State University, Saint Petersburg, Russia) [35]. Annotation of the obtained contigs was performed with the online program BV-BRC (Bacterial and Viral Bioinformatics Resource Center) and RAST (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology) software. BV-BRC was also used to detect antibiotic resistance genes by implementing the NDARO (National Database of Antibiotic Resistant Organisms) database. The criterion of 100% identity and 100% coverage with the reference gene was used as the threshold for gene presence. The genomes were further analyzed using the CGE database (Center for Genomic Epidemiology; Kongens, Lyngby, Denmark) and the EnteroBase database (Warwick University). GrapeTree was used to visualize strain clusters based on the Escherichia coli cgMLST analysis [36].

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Considering the data related to the study’s results, Pearson’s chi-square (χ2) and Fisher’s exact test were used alongside the statistical software IBM SPSS for Windows, version 29 (IBM SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA). For the assessment of both tests, a p-value < 0.05 was statistically significant. The relevant patient- and E. coli strain-related factors associated with increased antimicrobial resistance were analyzed using binary logistic regression. The odds ratio and 95% confidence interval were used to quantify the estimated risk of these characteristics.

5. Conclusions

Through investigation of selected ESBL-producing E. coli strains from two healthcare facilities of the UHB, a three-fold higher prevalence of ST131 with a statistically significant difference was found, mainly in patients aged 65 and over, and particularly in females and from urine samples. Concerning the predominant ST131 clone, almost all types of investigated lineages and sublineages occurred the most in the first internal clinic of healthcare facility No. 1. By detecting genetic relatedness even with a small sample size of randomly selected E. coli strains, a possible horizontal transmission within healthcare facility No. 1 and a sporadic case between healthcare facilities No. 1 and No. 2 were identified in connection with ST131. Altogether, subclade C2 had the highest overall representation and was a significant predictor of ciprofloxacin and ceftazidime resistance; additionally, the male gender proved to be a positive predictive value for gentamicin resistance. Antimicrobial resistance was considerably higher in ST131 E. coli strains compared with non-ST131, with the only exception being some aminoglycosides, and indeed, these strains had a similar resistance profile to the same antimicrobial agents. Consequently, exploring these MDR worrisome and high-risk pathogenic clones is important, as well as their genetic relatedness, including recognizing genes that encode reduced susceptibility, which is crucial in the case of antimicrobial-resistant severe infections to help provide successful early therapy.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K., M.A. and H.D.; data curation, J.K., M.A., H.D., M.W. and A.L.; formal analysis, J.K., M.A., E.O. and H.D.; methodology, J.K., M.A., E.O. and H.D.; investigation, J.K., M.A., E.O. and M.W.; software, M.A. and M.W.; supervision, M.A., H.D. and A.L.; visualization, M.A. and E.O.; writing—original draft, J.K., M.A. and H.D.; writing—review and editing, M.A., H.D. and A.L.; funding acquisition, J.K., A.L. and T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was created thanks to the support of the Operational Program Integrated Infrastructure for the project, “Research and development in medical sciences—the way to personalize the treatment of serious neurological, cardiovascular, and cancer diseases” (code: ITMS: 313011T431), and was cofinanced by the resources of the European Regional Development Fund.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tchesnokova, V.; Riddell, K.; Scholes, D.; Johnson, J.R.; Sokurenko, E.V. The Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Subclone Sequence Type 131-H30 Is Responsible for Most Antibiotic Prescription Errors at an Urgent Care Clinic. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 781–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, B.; Rodríguez-Baño, J. Current options for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different groups of patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019, 8, 932–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Geisinger, E.; Isberg, R.R. Interplay Between Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence During Disease Promoted by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, S9–S17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Tamma, P.D.; Rodriguez-Baňo, J. The Use of Noncarbapenem β-Lactams for the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Infections. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 64, 972–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Pérez-Etayo, L.; González, D.; Vitas, A.I. Clonal Complexes 23, 10, 131 and 38 as Genetic Markers of the Environmental Spread of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing E. coli. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Soncini, J.G.M.; Cerdeira, L.; Sano, E.; Koga, V.L.; Tizura, A.T.; Tano, Z.N.; Nakazato, G.; Kobayashi, R.K.T.; Aires, C.A.M.; Lincopan, N.; et al. Genomic insights of high-risk clones of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolated from community infections and commercial meat in southern Brazil. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 9354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Isendahl, J.; Giske, C.G.; Hammar, U.; Sparen, P.; Tegmark Wisell, K.; Ternhag, A.; Nauclér, P. Temporal Dynamics and Risk Factors for Bloodstream Infection With Extended-spectrum β-Lactamase-producing Bacteria in Previously-colonized Individuals: National Population-based Cohort Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 641–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ahmed, S.; Besser, T.E.; Call, D.R.; Weissman, S.J.; Jones, L.P.; Davis, M.A. Evaluation of two multi-locus sequence typing schemes for commensal Escherichia coli from dairy cattle in Washington State. J. Microbiol. Methods 2016, 124, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ludden, C.; Coll, F.; Gouliouris, T.; Restif, O.; Blane, B.; Blackwell, G.A.; Kumar, N.; Naydenova, P.; Crawley, C.; Brown, N.M.; et al. Defining nosocomial transmission of Escherichia coli and antimicrobial resistance genes: A genomic surveillance study. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2, e472–e480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Matsumura, Y.; Pitout, J.D.D.; Peirano, G.; DeVinney, R.; Noguchi, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Gomi, R.; Matsuda, T.; Nakano, S.; Nagao, M.; et al. Rapid Identification of Different Escherichia coli Sequence Type 131 Clades. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00179-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Mills, J.P.; Kaye, K.S.; Evans, R.; Salzman, E.; Pogue, J.; Hayakawa, K.; Marchaim, D.; Awasthy, P.; Salim, M.; Martin, E.T. Clinical and Molecular Epidemiology of Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia Coli Infections in Metro Detroit: Early Dominance of the ST-131 Clone. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2020, 9, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lovayová, V.; Čurová, K.; Hrabovský, V.; Nagyová, M.; Siegfried, L.; Toporová, A.; Rimárová, K.; Andraščíková, Š. Antibiotic resistance in the invasive bacteria Escherichia coli. Cent. Eur. J. Public Health 2022, 30, S75–S80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hrabák, J.; Empel, J.; Bergerová, T.; Fajfrlík, K.; Urbásková, P.; Kern-Zdanowicz, I.; Hryniewicz, W.; Gniadkowski, M. International clones of Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in a Czech hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47, 3353–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Lafolie, J.; Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Grenouillet, F.; Hocquet, D.; Bertrand, X. Prevalence of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 and its H30 subclone among E. coli isolates in a French hospital. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2014, 44, 466–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Roer, L.; Johannesen, T.B.; Hansen, F.; Stegger, M.; Tchesnokova, V.; Sokurenko, E.; Garibay, N.; Allesøe, R.; Thomsen, M.C.F.; Lund, O.; et al. CHTyper, a Web Tool for Subtyping of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia coli Based on the fumC and fimH Alleles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00063-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Boll, E.J.; Overballe-Petersen, S.; Hasman, H.; Roer, L.; Ng, K.; Scheutz, F.; Hammerum, A.M.; Dungu, A.; Hansen, F.; Johannesen, T.B.; et al. Emergence of Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli within the ST131 Lineage as a Cause of Extraintestinal Infections. mBio 2020, 11, e00353-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martischang, R.; François, P.; Cherkaoui, A.; Gaïa, N.; Renzi, G.; Agostinho, A.; Perez, M.; Graf, C.E.; Harbarth, S. Epidemiology of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli from repeated prevalence studies over 11 years in a long-term-care facility. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2021, 10, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lindblom, A.; Kiszakiewicz, C.; Kristiansson, E.; Yazdanshenas, S.; Kamenska, N.; Karami, N.; Åhrén, C. The impact of the ST131 clone on recurrent ESBL-producing E. coli urinary tract infection: A prospective comparative study. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mhaya, A.; Trabelsi, R.; Aillerie, S.; M’Zali, F.; Bégu, D.; Tounsi, S.; Gdoura, R.; Arpin, C. Detection of Clones B2-ST131-C2 and A-ST617 in Escherichia coli Producing Both CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-27 from Tunisian Community Patients. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ellaby, N.; Doumith, M.; Hopkins, K.L.; Woodford, N.; Ellington, M.J. Emergence of diversity in carbapenemase-producing Escherichia coli ST131, England, January 2014 to June 2016. Eurosurveillance 2019, 24, 1800627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Olesen, B.; Hansen, D.S.; Nilsson, F.; Frimodt-Møller, J.; Leihof, R.F.; Struve, C.; Scheutz, F.; Johnston, B.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Johnson, J.R. Prevalence and characteristics of the epidemic multiresistant Escherichia coli ST131 clonal group among extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing E. coli isolates in Copenhagen, Denmark. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Weterings, V.; van den Bijllaardt, W.; Bootsma, M.; Hendriks, Y.; Kilsdonk, L.; Mulders, A.; Kluytmans, J. Duration of rectal colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli: Results of an open, dynamic cohort study in Dutch nursing home residents (2013–2019). Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Feng, Y.C.; Liou, C.H.; Ng, W.V.; Chen, F.J.; Hung, C.H.; Liu, P.Y.; Liao, Y.C.; Wu, H.C.; Cheng, M.F. Distribution and Genomic Characterization of Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Escherichia coli Isolated from a Single Family and Home Environment: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. van den Bunt, G.; Fluit, A.C.; Bootsma, M.C.J.; van Duijkeren, E.; Scharringa, J.; van Pelt, W.; Bonten, M.J.M. Dynamics of Intestinal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Dutch General Population, 2014–2016. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 1847–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Flament-Simon, S.C.; García, V.; Duprilot, M.; Mayer, N.; Alonso, M.P.; García-Meniño, I.; Blanco, J.E.; Blanco, M.; Nicolas-Chanoine, M.H.; Blanco, J. High Prevalence of ST131 Subclades C2-H30Rx and C1-M27 among Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Causing Human Extraintestinal Infections in Patients from Two Hospitals of Spain and France during 2015. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tchesnokova, V.L.; Rechkina, E.; Larson, L.; Ferrier, K.; Weaver, J.L.; Schroeder, D.W.; She, R.; Butler-Wu, S.M.; Aguero-Rosenfeld, M.E.; Zerr, D.; et al. Rapid and Extensive Expansion in the United States of a New Multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli Clonal Group, Sequence Type 1193. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 68, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Roberts, L.W.; Hoi, L.T.; Khokhar, F.A.; Hoa, N.T.; Giang, T.V.; Bui, C.; Ninh, T.H.; Co, D.X.; Binh, N.G.; Long, H.B.; et al. Genomic characterisation of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Acinetobacter baumannii in two intensive care units in Hanoi, Viet Nam: A prospective observational cohort study. Lancet Microbe 2022, 3, e857–e866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sadek, M.; Saad, A.M.; Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L. Genomic Characterization of an Extensively Drug-Resistant Extra-Intestinal Pathogenic (ExPEC) Escherichia coli Clinical Isolate Co-Producing Two Carbapenemases and a 16S rRNA Methylase. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. MacFadden, D.R.; Melano, R.G.; Coburn, B.; Tijet, N.; Hanage, W.P.; Daneman, N. Comparing Patient Risk Factor-, Sequence Type-, and Resistance Locus Identification-Based Approaches for Predicting Antibiotic Resistance in Escherichia coli Bloodstream Infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2019, 57, e01780–e18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Cummins, E.A.; Snaith, A.E.; McNally, A.; Hall, R.J. The role of potentiating mutations in the evolution of pandemic Escherichia coli clones. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. van Hout, D.; Verschuuren, T.D.; Bruijning-Verhagen, P.C.J.; Bosch, T.; Schürch, A.C.; Willems, R.J.L.; Bonten, M.J.M.; Kluytmans, J.A.J.W. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing and non-ESBL-producing Escherichia coli isolates causing bacteremia in the Netherlands (2014–2016) differ in clonal distribution, antimicrobial resistance gene and virulence gene content. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. EUCAST. Breakpoint Tables for Interpretation of MICs and Zone Diameters. Version 13.0. 2023. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_13.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf (accessed on 2 January 2023).
  33. Nordmann, P.; Poirel, L.; Dortet, L. Rapid Detection of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 1503–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gattringer, R.; Nikš, M.; Ostertág, R.; Schwarz, K.; Medvedovic, H.; Graninger, W.; Georgopoulos, A. Evaluation of MIDITECH automated colorimeter MIC reading for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Prjibelski, A.D.; Antipov, D.; Meleshko, D.; Lapidus, A.L.; Korobeynikov, A.I. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2020, 70, e102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhou, Z.; Alikhan, N.F.; Mohamed, K.; Fan, Y.; Agama Study Group; Achtman, M. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 2020, 30, 138–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. GrapeTree of 15 assayed E. coli strains based on cgMLST. Circle sizes are consistent with the count of strains with the same sequence types (STs) noted inside the circle. Numbers on lines between circles indicate the values of distinct alleles between groups. The colors represent the origin of the strains—clinics or departments, as well as healthcare facilities designated by healthcare setting number (No. 1 or No. 2)—including clonal relatedness.
Figure 1. GrapeTree of 15 assayed E. coli strains based on cgMLST. Circle sizes are consistent with the count of strains with the same sequence types (STs) noted inside the circle. Numbers on lines between circles indicate the values of distinct alleles between groups. The colors represent the origin of the strains—clinics or departments, as well as healthcare facilities designated by healthcare setting number (No. 1 or No. 2)—including clonal relatedness.
Antibiotics 12 01209 g001
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics including the occurrence of ST131 and non-ST131 Escherichia coli extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains in patients and healthcare settings.
Table 1. Patients’ characteristics including the occurrence of ST131 and non-ST131 Escherichia coli extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains in patients and healthcare settings.
Total of (354)ST131 (263)Non-ST131 (91)
Gender and Agen%n%n%
Male11933.68632.73336.3
Mean years (range) 75.0 ± 14.4 (25–96)
Median years 79
Female23566.417767.35863.7
Mean years (range) 80.4 ± 11.9 (9–98) *
Median years 83
≥65 years31087.623689.7 **7481.3
˂65 years4412.42710.31718.7
Setting
No. 1First internal clinic19053.714254.04852.7
Surgical clinic205.6134.977.7
Neurological clinic72.062.311.1
Psychiatric clinic51.451.900
Dermatovenerological clinic82.362.322.2
Urological outpatient clinic102.851.955.5
Institute of Pathological Anatomy30.80033.3
No. 2Geriatric clinic7621.55822.11819.8
Long-term care department185.1145.344.4
Aftercare department123.4114.211.1
Other outpatient offices51.431.122.2
n—number of patients, cases, or specimens; %—percentage; No. 1 and No. 2—designations of selected healthcare facilities that belong to the University hospital Bratislava (UHB); *—p < 0.001; and **—p = 0.036.
Table 2. Distribution of clades and subclades of ST131 Escherichia coli extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains relating to patients and healthcare settings.
Table 2. Distribution of clades and subclades of ST131 Escherichia coli extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing strains relating to patients and healthcare settings.
Total of (260)A/B (20)C0 (17)C1 (3)C2 (220)
Gendern%n%n%n%n%
Male8432.31050423.5266.76830.9
Female17667.710501376.5133.315269.1
Age
≥65 years23590.416801694.1310020090.9
˂65 years259.642015.9 209.1
Setting
No. 1First internal clinic14053.812601270.6 11652.7
Surgical clinic13515 125.4
Neurological clinic62.3 62.7
Psychiatric clinic51.9 52.3
Dermatovenerological clinic62.3 62.7
Urological outpatient clinic51.9210 31.4
Institute of Pathological Anatomy
No. 2Geriatric clinic5822.3420317.6266.74922.3
Long-term care department145.4 211.8 125.5
Aftercare department103.815 133.383.6
Other outpatient offices31.2 31.4
A/B—clades A and B; C0, C1, and C2— subclades; n—number of patients, cases, or specimens; %—percentage; and No. 1 and No. 2—designations of selected healthcare facilities that belong to the University Hospital Bratislava (UHB).
Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance of total, ST131, and non-ST131 Escherichia coli ESBL-producing strains.
Table 3. Antimicrobial resistance of total, ST131, and non-ST131 Escherichia coli ESBL-producing strains.
AntibioticsTotalST131 StrainsNon-ST131 Strainsp *
nR(%)nR(%)nR(%)
Ampicillin/sulbactam32124576.324419379.1775267.50.037
Piperacillin/tazobactam3176018.92414920.3761114.50.002
Cefuroxime32031799.124324299.6777597.4
Cefotaxime31931498.424324199.2767396.10.043
Ceftazidime32025178.424419981.6765268.40.042
Ceftazidime/avibactam34700262008500
Cefoperazone/sulbactam280186.42141576634.5
Cefepime28123483.321418285675277.6
Ertapenem28031.121410.56623
Meropenem 31900243007600
Gentamicin3197824.52425422.3772431.2
Tobramycin2801545521412156.5663350
Amikacin320144.4244104.17645.30.038
Tetracycline29919063.522614564.2734561.6
Tigecycline28031.121431.46600
Ciprofloxacin32130193.824423696.7776584.4<0.001
Colistin27610.421110.56500
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole31924175.524218676.9775571.4
Nitrofurantoin7211.451122100
Fosfomycin6922.949122015
n—number of strains; Rn of resistant strains; %—percentage; and *p < 0.05 values were statistically significant in comparisons between ST131 and non-ST131 resistance rate (%), which is indicated by boldface text.
Table 4. Primers for ST131 clade multiplex PCR with fimH-30 following Matsumura et al. (2017) [10].
Table 4. Primers for ST131 clade multiplex PCR with fimH-30 following Matsumura et al. (2017) [10].
PrimerSequenceLength of Product
ST-131_FAGCAACGATATTTGCCCATT580 bp
ST-131_RGGCGATAACAGTACGCCATT
Clade C1_FTGAATCAAAGGTCCGAGCTG232 bp
Clade C1_RTATGGCTGGCAGATGCTTTA
Clade C2_FACGGATTCAGGTAGACGATT164 bp
Clade C2_RCCTCACCAAAGTTGCGATTAC
FimH-30_FCCGCCAATGGTACCGCTATT354 bp
FimH-30_RCAGCTTTAATCGCCACCCCA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koreň, J.; Andrezál, M.; Ozaee, E.; Drahovská, H.; Wawruch, M.; Liptáková, A.; Maliar, T. High Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Sequence Type 131 Subclade C2 among Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12071209

AMA Style

Koreň J, Andrezál M, Ozaee E, Drahovská H, Wawruch M, Liptáková A, Maliar T. High Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Sequence Type 131 Subclade C2 among Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia. Antibiotics. 2023; 12(7):1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12071209

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koreň, Ján, Michal Andrezál, Elham Ozaee, Hana Drahovská, Martin Wawruch, Adriána Liptáková, and Tibor Maliar. 2023. "High Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Sequence Type 131 Subclade C2 among Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Escherichia coli Isolated from the University Hospital Bratislava, Slovakia" Antibiotics 12, no. 7: 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12071209

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop