Next Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Application in Antibacterial and Antifungal Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Discovery of Highly Trimethoprim-Resistant DfrB Dihydrofolate Reductases in Diverse Environmental Settings Suggests an Evolutionary Advantage Unrelated to Antibiotic Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Halogenated Pyrrolopyrimidines with Low MIC on Staphylococcus aureus and Synergistic Effects with an Antimicrobial Peptide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resistance Genes, Plasmids, Multilocus Sequence Typing (MLST), and Phenotypic Resistance of Non-Typhoidal Salmonella (NTS) Isolated from Slaughtered Chickens in Burkina Faso
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 8
10.3390/antibiotics11080985
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex and Its Intrinsic, Adaptive, and Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in Pristine and Human-Impacted Sites

by
Myllena Pereira Silverio
1,2,
Gabriela Bergiante Kraychete
2,
Alexandre Soares Rosado
1,3 and
Raquel Regina Bonelli
2,*
1
Laboratório de Ecologia Molecular Microbiana, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
2
Laboratório de Investigação em Microbiologia Médica, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Góes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro 21941-902, Brazil
3
Biological and Environmental Sciences and Engineering Division (BESE), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955-6900, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(8), 985; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11080985
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 18 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 22 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue When Communities Matter: Interplay between Mobile Genetic Elements and Antibiotic Resistance)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Pseudomonas spp. are ubiquitous microorganisms that exhibit intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antimicrobial agents. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most studied species of this genus due to its clinical importance. In contrast, the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex consists of environmental and, in some cases, pathogenic opportunistic microorganisms. The records of antimicrobial-resistant P. fluorescens are quite scattered, which hinders the recognition of patterns. This review compiles published data on antimicrobial resistance in species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex, which were identified through phylogenomic analyses. Additionally, we explored the occurrence of clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes in the genomes of the respective species available in the NCBI database. Isolates were organized into two categories: strains isolated from pristine sites and strains isolated from human-impacted or metal-polluted sites. Our review revealed that many reported resistant phenotypes in this complex might be related to intrinsic features, whereas some of them might be ascribed to adaptive mechanisms such as colistin resistance. Moreover, a few studies reported antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs), mainly β-lactamases. In-silico analysis corroborated the low occurrence of transferable resistance mechanisms in this Pseudomonas complex. Both phenotypic and genotypic assays are necessary to gain insights into the evolutionary aspects of antimicrobial resistance in the P. fluorescens complex and the possible role of these ubiquitous species as reservoirs of clinically important and transmissible ARGs.

1. Introduction

The genus Pseudomonas comprises a wide range of ubiquitous metabolically versatile microorganisms found in diverse ecosystems, including water, soil, and the rhizosphere [1,2]. From a clinical perspective, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most important and extensively characterized species belonging to this genus [3,4]. Nevertheless, other members of the genus Pseudomonas might act as opportunistic pathogens, causing infections mainly in immunocompromised patients or individuals subjected to invasive medical procedures. For instance, Pseudomonas fluorescens and related species have been reported to cause bloodstream, urinary, pulmonary, cerebrospinal, joint-fluid, skin, and soft-tissue infections [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Furthermore, epidemiological studies of nosocomial infections have revealed that resistant P. fluorescens strains can be transported into hospitals by water or other materials used in medical procedures, as well as by insects such as moth flies [15,16,17,18,19].
The description of new species and the reclassification of those previously defined as Pseudomonas, such as Burkholderia, Ralstonia, Comamonas, Acidovorax, and Hydrogenophaga, is a continuous process [20,21]. Based on 16S rDNA analysis and multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA), the genus comprises three main lineages recognized as P. aeruginosa, P. fluorescens, and P. pertucinogena, which have been divided into fourteen groups [22]. The P. fluorescens complex comprises eight groups occupying various ecological niches, namely P. fluorescens, P. gessardii, P. fragi, P. mandelii, P. koreensis, P. jessenii, P. corrugata, and P. chlororaphis [22,23].
Over the last 30 years, antimicrobial resistance has been described in isolates of the P. fluorescens complex obtained from non-medical sources. However, the phenomenon of intrinsic resistance in Pseudomonas poses a challenge when studying the role of these species as environmental reservoirs of transferable resistance genes. This review compiles literature reports on antimicrobial resistance detected in strains belonging to the P. fluorescens complex occupying different environmental niches, thus establishing a theoretical basis for the evaluation of the possible role of these bacteria as environmental reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis

A phylogenomic approach based on genomes from type strains of all species already described for the genus Pseudomonas was used to identify species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex. Pseudomonas spp. with valid publications and correct names (excluding synonyms) according to the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/genus/pseudomonas, accessed on 26 October 2021) were included in this analysis.
Out of the 269 retrieved species, 243 were selected for further analysis based on the availability of a published type strain genome. After generating a phylogenomic tree using the Type Strain Genome Server (https://tygs.dsmz.de/ accessed on 26 October 2021), 98 species associated with the P. fluorescens complex (Figure S1) were identified. To understand the composition of the groups, digital DDH estimation (dDDH) was calculated with the GGDC 3.0 web service (http://ggdc.dsmz.de accessed on 26 October 2021) using the BLAST+ alignment tool and formula 2 (identities/HSP length). The dDDH data were plotted on a heatmap (Supplementary Figure S1) and detailed in Table S1. Species with more than 31.8% dDDH were considered to belong to the same group [23].
Data obtained from whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex were further analyzed. WGS data from these species were obtained from the PATRIC database (https://www.patricbrc.org accessed on 28 November 2021), after which the available data were filtered according to genome status (WGS; Complete), assembly accession (empty spaces were removed), and isolation source (empty spaces were also removed), resulting in 619 genomes. The genomes were downloaded using the NCBI assembly accession with the ncbi-genome-download software (version 0.3.1; https://github.com/kblin/ncbi-genome-download accessed on 28 November 2021). Next, acquired antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) were identified using ABRicate version 1.0.0 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate accessed on 28 November 2021) and the ResFinder database (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ResFinder/ accessed on 28 November 2021) (Table 1).

2.2. PubMed and Google Scholar Research Approach

A comprehensive review was conducted using the names of species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex as keywords. These included the species identified via the phylogenomic analysis presented in this study (Figure S1), as well as a recent phylogenetic MLSA based on four genes [22,23,24], alongside the words “antibiotics”, “antimicrobial”, “susceptibility”, or “resistance” in the PubMed platform. Google Scholar was used when a given study was unavailable in the PubMed database. No time frame was defined. Overall, the selected studies were categorized based on the origin of the isolates and were critically evaluated in light of current knowledge on intrinsic, adaptive, and acquired resistance. The recovered data was organized in two tables. Table 1 summarizes the available literature describing antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of isolates collected in pristine environments. In contrast, Table 2 focuses on isolates from urban, human-impacted, or metal-polluted sites. Both tables indicate the resistance phenotypes typically recognized as intrinsic in non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria or P. aeruginosa. Genotypic characteristics were also included when available.

3. Antimicrobial Resistance in the P. fluorescens Complex

3.1. Intrinsic Resistance

The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guideline “Expected Resistant Phenotypes” (http://www.eucast.org accessed on 12 May 2022) reports that non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria are intrinsically resistant to benzylpenicillin, first- and second-generation cephalosporins, glycopeptides, lipoglycopeptides, fusidic acid, macrolides, lincosamides, streptogramins, rifampicin, and oxazolidinones. Concerning other antimicrobials not cited above, the same document stated that P. aeruginosa is expected to be resistant to ampicillin and amoxicillin, as well as their combinations with β-lactamase inhibitors, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ertapenem, chloramphenicol, selected aminoglycosides such as kanamycin and neomycin, trimethoprim, tetracycline, and tigecycline [25]. Knowledge of the intrinsic resistance of P. fluorescens is still limited; however, the trends appear to be similar to those of P. aeruginosa.
Regarding β-lactams, Rocha et al. evaluated 39 endophytic strains of Pseudomonas sp. isolated from a metal-accumulating plant, after which they correlated the resistance phenotypes with the distribution of strains in a dendrogram [26]. The authors recognized three clusters. The first cluster, composed of a few isolates from five different species, was associated with resistance to ampicillin and amoxicillin, and was susceptible to most of the β-lactams tested. The second cluster, formed mainly by P. koreensis (P. koreensis group, n = 10) and Pseudomonas simiae (P. fluorescens group, n = 4), showed resistance to ampicillin, amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, and cefotaxime. Many isolates were also resistant to aztreonam, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, and chloramphenicol. In contrast, the third cluster formed mainly by Pseudomonas sabulinigri (n = 11) included isolates that were resistant to the same β-lactams as in the second cluster, in addition to piperacillin and piperacillin–tazobactam. Some isolates belonging to the third cluster also displayed resistance to cefepime and ceftazidime but were susceptible to other classes of antimicrobial agents. Acquired resistance genes for β-lactams (blaSHV, blaTEM, blaCTX-M, blaGES, blaKPC, blaVIM, blaIMP, blaOXA-2-like, blaOXA-10-like, blaOXA-30-like), sulfonamides (sul1), and chloramphenicol (cat), as well as the integrase genes intI1 and intI2, were not detected in these strains, supporting the hypothesis that the phenotypes were associated with intrinsic features [26].
The production of an inducible chromosomal β-lactamase called AmpC contributes to Pseudomonas resistance to most penicillins and to first- and second-generation cephalosporins (such as cefoxitin and cefuroxime). In P. aeruginosa, de-repression of this gene can result in resistance to antipseudomonal penicillins, oxyiminocephalosporins, and cefepime [27,28]. Accordingly, among several β-lactamase genes searched, only the chromosomal class C β-lactamase gene blaAmpC was detected in two P. koreensis isolates from urban wastewater treatment plants in Italy, showing low susceptibility to several β-lactams [29].
Recently, acquired β-lactamase genes have not been identified among isolates belonging to the P. fluorescens complex resistant to aztreonam and carbapenems isolated from chicken meat in Norway. Besides genes encoding efflux pumps, the isolates carried blaAmpC and the penicillin-binding protein gene mrcA; however, mutations in these genes or their promoters have not been addressed. In some isolates, the authors also reported the detection of the pbpC gene, which encodes a PBP3 homolog [30]. PBP3, a penicillin-binding protein encoded by ftsI, is the target of aztreonam, and mutations in this gene may affect the activity of the drug [31]. Further studies are necessary to investigate the relevance of this gene in aztreonam resistance.
The intrinsic resistance of P. aeruginosa to chloramphenicol, trimethoprim, and tetracyclines can be ascribed to the presence of chromosomally expressed resistance-nodulation-division (RND)-type multidrug efflux systems on the cell surface. Notably, multidrug-resistance (MDR) efflux pumps are conserved in different microorganisms, which are likely involved in the extrusion of many toxic compounds [32]. For example, environmental P. aeruginosa strains isolated prior to the discovery of quinolones can extrude this class of antimicrobial agents, suggesting that antimicrobial extrusion is not the primary function of some efflux pumps [33,34]. Likewise, the RND-type efflux pump MexAB–OprM has been detected in a β-lactam resistant Pseudomonas strain submitted to WGS [30].
In this context, genes encoding an RND efflux pump for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) termed EmhABC have been described in the P. fluorescens strain cLP6a [35]. Disruption of the emhB gene increased the activity of chloramphenicol and nalidixic acid, but not tetracycline, erythromycin, trimethoprim, or streptomycin, suggesting a more limited spectrum of substrates compared to other RND pumps [35,36]. Later, it was suggested that an alternative EmhABC efflux pump conferred resistance to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, ethidium bromide, and crystal violet in the P. fluorescens strain 2P24, which was isolated from wheat roots [37]. Complementary studies showed that incubation temperature and other physicochemical factors may affect EmhABC activity in P. fluorescens cLP6a [38,39].
Likewise, the knockout of some putative transporters increased the susceptibility of Pseudomonas protegens (P. protegens group) to rifampicin, among other toxic compounds [40]. Also, genes encoding many efflux-pump proteins, β-lactamases, and a macrolide glycosyltransferase have been described in the genome of the plant growth-promoting bacterium Pseudomonas sp. UW4 (P. jessenii, according to the authors; P. jessenii group). This strain was resistant to ampicillin, erythromycin, and novobiocin [41].
Aminoglycosides are cationic drugs, and the incubation temperature might affect their activity. Papapetropoulou et al. reported that temperatures higher than 37 °C lowered the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of P. fluorescens to gentamicin and amikacin, suggesting that higher temperatures promote changes in cell-wall lipids, which increases the permeability to these aminoglycosides [42]. P. aeruginosa harbors the chromosomally encoded aminoglycoside phosphotransferase APH(3′)-IIb, having kanamycin and neomycin as substrates [25,42,43]. However, in a search for “APH(3′)” in the NCBI database, only a few results report this gene associated with other Pseudomonas species, including P. fluorescens.
Colistin is a cationic drug that is used to treat P. aeruginosa infections [25,44]. Still, all five P. koreensis isolates obtained from urban wastewater-treatment plants in Italy were resistant to this polymyxin [29]. Moreover, many Pseudomonas species with plant-beneficial properties, such as P. protegens and P. chlororaphis, have been reported as intrinsically resistant to cationic compounds [45]. According to the authors, the phenotype is dependent on the presence of O-specific side chains on the cell surface [45]. Among clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, adaptive resistance to polymyxins can occur due to the addition of 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (Ara4N) to the lipid A moiety of lipopolysaccharide through induction of the arn operon under the control of two-component regulatory systems [46]. Recently, six genes related to colistin resistance (emrA, lpxA, lpxD, pgsA, phoP, phoQ), but not the plasmid-mediated mcr, have been detected in the genome of colistin-resistant Pseudomonas spp. obtained in the Norwegian food chain [30].

3.2. Antimicrobial Resistance in Pristine Sites

Atypical antimicrobial resistance profiles in Pseudomonas sp. obtained from pristine sites have been reported in many studies. Shivaji et al. (1989) obtained 10 isolates of Pseudomonas spp. (including P. fluorescens) from Antarctic soil samples, which were susceptible to kanamycin, gentamicin, tobramycin, polymyxin B, tetracycline, rifamycin, colistin, streptomycin, and nalidixic acid [47]. At that time, considering that these strains grow at low temperatures (4 °C), authors suggested that such a distinct phenotype compared to mesophilic Pseudomonas strains may have resulted from adapting to harsh conditions [47]. Later, the psychrophilic species P. antarctica, P. meridiana, and P. proteolytica (P. gessardii group) obtained from cyanobacterial mats in Antarctica were characterized [48]. Curiously, P. antarctica was also susceptible to antimicrobial agents considered ineffective against P. aeruginosa due to intrinsic resistance, such as penicillin, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim, erythromycin, kanamycin, and tetracycline. In contrast, P. meridiana and P. proteolytica were resistant to all the antimicrobials mentioned above, except for kanamycin and tetracycline. Similar to P. aeruginosa, the three Pseudomonas strains tested were resistant to trimethoprim [25,48]. More recently, Orellana-Saez et al. isolated the Pseudomonas sp. strain MPC6 (closely related to P. fluorescens, according to the authors) of a soil sample from Deception Island (Antarctica) [49]. This isolate was susceptible to antimicrobials that are ineffective against most of the Pseudomonas analyzed and had a similar resistance profile to the environmental isolates P. putida KT2440 and P. antarctica (P. fluorescens subgroup). Genes encoding antibiotic-inactivation enzymes found in the genome of reference strains P. aeruginosa PA7 and P. aeruginosa PAO1 such as aminoglycoside phosphotransferases (APHs), chloramphenicol acetyltransferases (CATs), bleomycin-binding proteins, and β-lactamases, were absent in the genome of Pseudomonas sp. MPC6. The genome of Pseudomonas sp. MPC6 also lacked genes encoding modifications in cell-wall charges that are reported as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. However, the genome was well equipped with efflux pumps [49]. An uncommon susceptible phenotype to penicillin, kanamycin, neomycin, and tetracycline was also detected in Pseudomonas sp. strain AHD-1 (closely related to P. azotoformans, P. gessardii, and P. libanensis, according to the authors), which was isolated from wastewater in Tunisia [50].
Furthermore, recent studies have reported P. fluorescens members that are resistant to clinically relevant antibiotics such as piperacillin, aztreonam, ceftazidime, carbapenems, and colistin. These strains were isolated from diverse environments such as Antarctica soil samples, rhizosphere of desert plants in Atacama, and calcite moonmilk deposits from caves in the Czech Republic [51,52,53]. Known acquired resistance mechanisms associated with these unexpected phenotypes have not been detected, although genomic islands and other likely acquired mobile genetic elements have been reported in P. fildesensis (P. fluorescens group) [51]. Therefore, further studies are needed to characterize the pathogenic potential and the presence of transmissible ARGs in such Pseudomonas sp. strains.
Although Antarctica is the most remote continent in the world, antimicrobial resistance may be transferred to this region due to the migration of animals and humans. Recently, Na et al. evaluated isolates from animal feces, soil, and sediments with varying human and animal impacts in the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica [54]. Pseudomonas was the dominant genus that showed resistance to sulfamethazine, and a strong correlation between mobile genetic elements and antimicrobial resistance genes was recognized, considering isolates of different genera included in the study [54]. In contrast, in a study that included isolates either from human-impacted or pristine sites in Antarctica, most of the strains displaying multi-resistance were collected from areas without human intervention, suggesting that antimicrobial resistance is likely a natural and ancestral process [55]. Yet, in the characterization of two multidrug-resistant isolates belonging to the P. fluorescens, Marcoleta et al. (2022) reported that although these strains lack genes found in the reference P. aeruginosa PA7 strain, they showed a higher number of genes associated with ATP-binding cassete (ABC) and small multidrug resistance (SMR) efflux pumps [55]. Genes for putative β-lactamases have also been detected, including a homolog of LRA-3 β-lactamase, which was previously described in soil metagenomic DNA from Alaskan soil [55,56].

3.3. Antimicrobial Resistance in Human-Impacted Sites

In human-impacted sites, the selective pressure caused by antimicrobial pollution may promote the dissemination and persistence of acquired resistance mechanisms. Chow et al. exposed one strain of P. aeruginosa and one of P. protegens to kanamycin, tetracycline, or ciprofloxacin at 1/10 of the MIC in a serial streaking over 40 passages, thus mimicking environmental pollution with antimicrobial agents. Higher MICs and increased genome changes were detected in P. protegens, suggesting that this type of antimicrobial pollution might generate new resistant strains [57].
Compared to contemporary samples, ancient and well-conserved samples are powerful tools to measure the degree to which the rates of antimicrobial resistance have changed over the years. Addressing this issue, Lugli et al. characterized a P. veronii (P. fluorescens group) strain isolated from a frozen and mummified human body found in an Italian Alpine glacier [58]. Screening for ARGs revealed an abundance of putative β-lactamases, glycopeptide-resistance proteins, ABC transporters, and major facilitator superfamily (MFS) efflux pump. Notwithstanding, modern strains of P. veronii harbor 24% more ARGs than the ancient strain P. veronii, which might be due to horizontal gene transfer (HGT), accounting for the rapid spread and persistence of antimicrobial resistance determinants in the environment [58].
As an example of exceptional resistance phenotypes identified in highly human-impacted sites, P. fluorescens strains resistant to clinically available antimicrobial agents, such as piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin, were isolated from the multinational Danube River [59,60].

3.3.1. Metal-Polluted Sites

Metal resistance can be accompanied by antimicrobial resistance, as suggested by several references listed in Table 3 [26,61,62,63,64,65,66]. Metals are not easily degraded and occur in various environments, especially those receiving hospital and industrial effluents, as well as mining areas [67]. Furthermore, metal pollution causes a persistent selective pressure that favors the development and transmission of antimicrobial resistance traits [68]. There are two known mechanisms through which metal and antimicrobial resistance are co-selected. So-called “co-resistance” refers to the presence of metal- and antimicrobial-resistance determinants encoded in the same mobile genetic element, whereas “cross-resistance” refers to the same mechanism conferring resistance to both metals and antimicrobial agents (e.g., efflux pumps) [68,69]. In addition to the data on P. fluorescens found in this review, previous studies have evaluated metal and antimicrobial resistance in hospital and environmental isolates of members of the genus Pseudomonas [67,70,71,72,73].
Ramos et al. detected P. saponiphila (n = 13; P. chlororaphis group), P. humanensis (n = 5) and P. asiatica (n = 2) (P. putida group), and P. aeruginosa (n = 3) in water samples obtained from the state of São Paulo and Brasília (Brazil) [73]. Most of these isolates were resistant to heavy metals and clinically relevant antimicrobial agents, such as the β-lactams piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, and aztreonam, as well as the quinolones ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, and norfloxacin, and the aminoglycosides gentamicin and tobramycin. The ARGs blaGES (β-lactam resistance), tetB (tetracycline resistance), qnrS and qepA (quinolone resistance), and aac(3′)-IIa and ant(2″)-Ia (aminoglycoside resistance) were identified for the first time in P. saponiphila. Even so, plasmids were not detected, suggesting that the identified genes could be located in the chromosome. These findings suggested that the resistant phenotype for most of the antimicrobial agents and heavy metals analyzed might be attributed to alternative mechanisms that were not evaluated, such as efflux pumps of the RND superfamily [73].

3.3.2. Other Reservoirs of Human Importance

Resistant P. fluorescens strains have been found in food products such as chicken and camel meat, salad vegetables, fish and mushroom farms, as well as in cheese [30,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]. Notably, Pseudomonas spp. is one of the main microorganisms causing food spoilage [30,82,83,84,85]. Likewise, Poirel et al. isolated P. synxantha (P. fluorescens group) from chicken meat, which harbored a likely-acquired chromosomal metallo-β-lactamase PFM-1 [80]. PFM-1 showed high amino-acid identity with Sfh-1 and CphA-1 carbapenemases, which were initially reported in species of Serratia and Aeromonas, respectively. Variants of PFM-1 were also detected in P. libanensis (PFM-2) and P. fluorescens (PFM-3), suggesting that the P. fluorescens group may behave as reservoir of PFM-like encoding genes [80]. Recently, one isolate of P. fluorescens harboring the β-lactamase blaSHV was identified in Benin. The isolate was resistant to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ertapenem, imipenem, aztreonam, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin [86].
Members of the P. fluorescens complex have also been recognized as veterinary pathogens, causing infections in bovines, canines, dolphins, fish, wild animals, and even frog oocytes. Common resistance phenotypes observed in these strains include tetracycline, chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim, amoxicillin, amoxicillin–clavulanic acid, cefoxitin, cefotaxime, and ticarcillin resistance. Moreover, most of these animals were living in environments under the human influence [87,88,89,90,91,92,93].
Due to the clinical importance of P. aeruginosa, breakpoints for effective antimicrobial agents against this pathogen are available in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and EUCAST guidelines. The β-lactams ticarcillin, piperacillin, ceftazidime, cefepime, cefiderecol, ceftolozane, aztreonam, imipenem, doripenem, and meropenem, some of which are associated with β-lactamase inhibitors, as well as the quinolones ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin, the aminoglycosides gentamicin, amikacin, tobramycin, and polymyxins colistin or polymyxin B, should be effective against this microorganism [94,95]. Table 1 and Table 2 list the P. fluorescens isolates with resistant phenotypes to one or more of the drugs listed above. However, few reports have described their genetic features, and further studies identifying ARGs in P. fluorescens are needed to infer whether the resistance profile was acquired or adaptive. Still, β-lactamases are the most reported among the ARGs listed in Table 2 and Table 3.

3.4. Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) of Antimicrobial Resistance

Possible HGT from hospitals and health facilities to the environment is a serious public health concern. Forsberg et al. analyzed the transfer of resistance determinants between soil and clinical bacteria. Resistance genes present in the environmental bacterium Pseudomonas sp. K94.23 (according to the authors, a member of the P. fluorescens complex) shared a complete nucleotide identity with clinical pathogens [96]. Likewise, Herrick et al. suggested that transmissible plasmids from environmental Pseudomonas that confer resistance to tetracycline (commonly used in agriculture) would cause the persistence of co-carried genes that confer resistance to clinically available antimicrobial agents such as gentamicin, ticarcillin, and ciprofloxacin [97]. In the 1990s, Chandrasekaran et al. suggested that even viable but non-culturable P. fluorescens can transfer plasmids to other bacteria in marine environments [98]. The same group also reported the transference of an MDR plasmid (pSCL) from rifampicin-resistant P. fluorescens isolated from polluted soil to E. coli and P. putida. It appears that pSCL conferred rifampicin resistance to the transformants, presumably through an efflux pump [99].
Efficient transference of plasmids carrying resistance genes to chloramphenicol (cat) [100] and colistin (mcr-variants) have been reported for P. putida and/or P. aeruginosa [101,102,103]. Regarding P. fluorescens, the gene mcr-1 was detected in one isolate from a community/household environment in the Republic of Congo [104]. A gene encoding BIC-1, a class A carbapenemase capable of hydrolyzing penicillins, cephalosporins (except ceftazidime), and carbapenems, was detected in the chromosome of a P. fluorescens isolate from the Seine River (France). Three months later, the β-lactamase gene was also found in the chromosomes of two other P. fluorescens isolates from the same site [105]. Furthermore, the class B metallo-β-lactamase IMP-22, encoded by the blaIMP-22 gene, located in a class 1 integron and capable of hydrolyzing narrow and extended-spectrum β-lactams, was detected in two strains of P. fluorescens from urban wastewater, as well as in a clinical isolate of P. aeruginosa in Italy [64].
The risk of human infection by exposure to contaminated rivers was illustrated by a case of a patient admitted to an intensive care unit for near-drowning in a river in France, who was colonized and infected by carbapenem-resistant bacteria of probable environmental origin. Among the isolates characterized, six strains belonging to the P. fluorescens complex collected from the river had the same carbapenem-resistant phenotype as a P. fluorescens strain colonizing the patient’s respiratory tract [106]. In another country, an isolate of P. cedrina (P. fluorescens group) was identified in water bodies in Los Angeles, which was resistant to cefotaxime, meropenem, and imipenem [107]. However, none of these studies reported carbapenemase production, suggesting that other genotype features, transmissible or not, might be responsible for the observed phenotype.
In 2012, Maravić et al. published the first report of a TEM-type ESBL in P. fluorescens [108]. The blaTEM-116 gene was present in the chromosome of isolates from a Croatian bay highly impacted by agricultural, industrial, and municipal effluents. In the same study, out of 185 P. fluorescens isolates investigated, 70 presented a multidrug resistant phenotype, with the highest resistance rates for cefotaxime, ceftazidime, meropenem, aztreonam, and tetracycline [108]. Later studies have reported the presence of blaTEM in isolates belonging to the P. fluorescens group in South Africa and India [109,110].
Some results from studies whose focus was not on the genus Pseudomonas are worth mentioning. Pseudomonas was one of the most abundant genera recovered under selective pressure with cefotaxime or imipenem from Lake Bolonha in the Brazilian Amazon. Among 37 Pseudomonas strains displaying the above-mentioned resistance phenotypes (species were not determined), 25 carried the likely acquired β-lactamase genes blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX, blaIMP, and blaVIM either alone or in combination. Many of these isolates were also resistant to non-β-lactams such as gentamicin [111]. Similarly, Chakraborty et al. reported that Pseudomonas was the most abundant genus contributing to the occurrence of ARGs, including multidrug-efflux pumps, glycopeptide, bacitracin, tetracycline, and aminoglycoside-resistance genes, in the Lonar soda lake (India) [112].

3.5. Research of Resistance Genes in Genome Public Databases

Congruent with the data collected in the scientific literature, the analysis conducted herein identified a small number of genomes of species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex (n = 17, 2.7%) carrying one or more transferable ARG. Genes associated with resistance to β-lactams, aminoglycosides, phenicol, fosfomycin, sulfamethoxazole, or tetracycline classes have been found in isolates of different species, which were recovered from variable sources and countries (Table 3).
Table
Table 1. Isolates of the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex obtained from pristine environments and their resistance phenotypes/genotypes.
Table 1. Isolates of the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex obtained from pristine environments and their resistance phenotypes/genotypes.
Isolation SiteIsolates Identified and Characterized as Belonging to the
Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex (Group)		Phenotype/Genotype (Number of Isolates)Ref.
Soil/Schirmacher Oasis,
Antarctica		P. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to P, AM, CB, E, VAN, TMP, and BAC, and to the antifungal NY. Susceptibility to C varied (undefined number of isolates) A [47]
Cyanobacterial mat/McMurdo region, AntarcticaDescription of P. antarctica strain CMS35T (P. fluorescens), P. meridiana strain CMS38T (P. gessardii), and P. proteolytica CMS64T (P. gessardii) Resistance to TMP and FUZ in P. antarctica (1); resistance to P, AM, AMX, CB, E, LIN, C, TMP, SXT, GM, CL, PB, BAC, FM, FUZ, and NY in P. meridiana (1) and resistance to P, AM, AMX, CB, E, LIN, C, TMP, SXT, FUZ, NY, BAC, FM, and NFZ in P. proteolytica (1) A[48]
Rhizosphere of Amaranth/Northwestern Indian
Himalayas		Pseudomonas sp. NARs9 (closely related to P. lurida, according to the authors)Resistance to AM, P, PB, and C (1) B[113]
Drinking water from karstic ecosystems/Le Havre, FranceP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens) and P. brenneri (P. gessardii)P. fluorescens (6) and P. brenneri (1) were resistant to CF, AMX, AMC, CTX, CFS, TIC, TIM, C, and SXT. Resistance to ATM, FOS, and NA was frequent among the isolates A[114]
Soil/Isla de los Estados, Ushuaia, ArgentinaDescription of P. yamanorum strain 8H1T (P. gessardii) Resistance to P, OX, CF, CXM, SAM, CTX, CAZ, E, CM, TEC, VA, C, SXT, and CL (1) A[115]
Brook sediment/Whalers Bay, Deception Island,
Antarctica
Ornithogenic soil/Galindez Island, Antarctica		Metal-resistant P. migulae (P. mandelii), P. gessardii (P. gessardii), and P. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)P. migulae was intermediate to CIP and TM, resistant to GM, NB, LIN, AM, TE, C, VA, E, CZ (1) A
P. gessardii was intermediate to GM and resistant to NB, LIN, TE, AM, C, VA, E, and CZ (1) A
P. fluorescens was intermediate to CZ and E, resistant to NB, LIN, AM, and VA (1) A		[116]
Soil from the northern
deglaciated part of Ulu
Peninsula/James Ross
Island, Antarctica		Description of P. gregormendelii strain CCM 8506T (closely related to P. migulae, according to the authors)Resistance to β-lactams TIC, TIM, CAZ, and ATM (2) A[117]
Rhizospheres of wild cranberry plants/Cape Cod
National Seashore,
Massachusetts, USA		Draft genome of Pseudomonas sp. strain MWU12-2534b (closely related to P. protegens, according to the authors) Detection of efflux-pump genes, β-lactamases, aminoglycoside N(6′)-acetyltransferase, and fluoroquinolone resistance (1)[118]
Soil sample/King George
Island, Antarctica		Description of fildesensis KG01T (P. fluorescens)Resistance to CAZ and IPM C[51]
Rhizosphere of desert bloom plant/Atacama, ChileDescription of P. atacamensis M7D1T (P. koreensis)Intermediate to MEM; resistance to CTX, CAZ, AM, and SAM A[52]
Calcite moonmilk deposits from caves/Moravian Karst, Czech RepublicDescription of P. karstica HJ/4T and P. spelaei SJ/9/1T (P. gessardii)Strain HJ/4T: resistance to ATM, PIP, and TZP. Strain SJ/9/1T: resistance to ATM and CL D[53]
Antartic Peninsula SoilPseudomonas ArH3a and Pseudomonas YeP6b (P. fluorescens)Strains resistant against 9 to10 antimicrobial agents A with arbitrary breakpoints. Detection of genes encoding ABC and SMR efflux pumps[55]
Antimicrobials to which P. aeruginosa is considered intrinsic resistant are indicated in bold. Antimicrobials in both bold type and underlined are generally recognized as ineffective against non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria. T: type strain; A: disc-diffusion method; B: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by agar dilution; C: MIC by Etest; D: Mikrolatest MIC based on the Neferm kit (Erba Lachema, Czech Republic). AM: ampicillin; AMC: amoxicillin–clavulanic acid; AMX: amoxicillin; ATM: aztreonam; BAC: bacitracin; C: chloramphenicol; CAZ: ceftazidime; CB: carbenicillin; CF: cephalothin; CFS: cefsulodin; CZ: cefazolin; IPM: imipenem; MEM: meropenem; CIP: ciprofloxacin; CL: colistin; CM: clindamycin; CTX: cefotaxime; CXM: cefuroxime; E: erythromycin; FM: nitrofurantoin; FOS: fosfomycin; FUZ: furazolidone; GM: gentamicin; LIN: lincomycin; NA: nalidixic acid; NB: novobiocin; NFZ: nitrofurazone; NY: nystatin; OX: oxacillin; P: penicillin; PB: polymyxin B; SAM: ampicillin–sulbactam; SXT: sulfamethoxazol–-trimethoprim (or cotrimoxazole); TE: tetracycline; TEC: teicoplanin; TIC: ticarcillin; TIM: ticarcillin–clavulanic acid; PIP: piperacillin; TZP: piperacillin–tazobactam; TMP: trimethoprim; TM: tobramycin; VA: vancomycin.
Table
Table 2. Isolates of the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex obtained from human-impacted or metal-polluted environments and their resistance phenotypes/genotypes.
Table 2. Isolates of the Pseudomonas fluorescens complex obtained from human-impacted or metal-polluted environments and their resistance phenotypes/genotypes.
Isolation SiteIsolates Identified and Characterized as Belonging to the Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex (Group)Phenotype/Genotype (Number of Isolates)Ref.
Sewage from sixteen sites/Casablanca, MoroccoHeavy metal-resistant P. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Notable resistance to all antibiotics tested, including AM, AMX, CRO, RIF, C, TE, CIP, and SPIR. (Undefined number of isolates) A[61]
Subtropical and temperate soils from maize fields/Sikkim Himalaya, IndiaP. corrugata (P. corrugata)Resistance to P, AM, and CB at high concentrations (2) B[119]
Sea waterArsenic-resistant P. fluorescens strain MSP3 (P. fluorescens)Resistance to AM, RIF, NB, and BAC (1) C[120]
Kiwi-fruit plants/Korea and JapanP. marginalis (P. fluorescens) Streptomycin-resistance genes (strA and strB) (1)[121]
Soil artificially polluted with 1000 mg chromate (Cr(VI)) kg−1P. corrugata (P. corrugata)Resistance to AM, CF, CRO, C, BLE, and FOS (2) D[63]
Hydrotherapy swimming pool/Northwestern GreeceP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to TIC, TIM, AZT, SUT, FM, and TM; intermediate resistance to TZP and IPM (2) E[122]
Rape roots of Brassica napus in heavy metal-contaminated soils/Nanjing, ChinaP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to AM, K, STS, and SPT (1) B[62]
Urban wastewater/L’Aquila, ItalyP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Presence of the gene blaIMP-22, which encodes the metallo-β-lactamase IMP-22, capable of hydrolyzing narrow- and extended-spectrum β-lactams (2)[64]
Blowhole, gastric fluid, and feces of Tursiops truncatus dolphins from estuarine waters/Charleston and Indian River Lagoon, USAP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Frequent resistance to AM, AMC, CF, TE, E, C, SUT, and FM. Less-frequent resistance to PIP and EN (82) C[123]
Soil contaminated with wastewater/Sfax, TunisiaDescription of Pseudomonas sp. strain AHD-1 (closely related to P. azotoformans, P. gessardii, and P. libanensis, according to the authors) Resistance to E and C (1) C[50]
Water from the Seine River/Paris, FranceP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Production of BIC-1, an Ambler class A carbapenemase capable of hydrolyzing penicillins, carbapenems, and cephalosporins (except CAZ). Resistance to TIC, TIM, PIP, and ATM, among others (1) E[105]
Seawater/Algiers, AlgeriaP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)All 7 isolates tested were resistant to AMX, AMC, and FOX; 6 to CTX, TIC, TIM, and NA; 5 to CFS; 4 to TMP; 2 to IPM, TE, and SUT; 1 to RIF and CIP (7) C[124]
Freshwater and wastewater/Eastern Cape Province, South AfricaP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to P, OX, CM, VAN, TMP, and RIF; varied resistance rates to CF, CTX, SAM, and FM C.
Detection of blaTEM in 57.14% of isolated P. fluorescens (14.28% and 31.25% of isolates in freshwater and wastewater, respectively)		[109]
Liver of wedge sole fish Dicologlossa cuneate/Coast of SpainP. baetica a390T (P. koreensis)Resistance to AM C
Tolerant to OT B
Detection of orthologs of MexAB–OprM and MexEF–OprN RND efflux pumps		[125,126]
Coastal waters/Kaštela Bay, CroatiaP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)First report of a chromosomally located blaTEM-116 in P. fluorescens. 70 (of 185) isolates were MDR, with the highest rates for CTX, CAZ, MEM, ATM, and TE E[108]
Soils under distinct management (with or without manure/antibiotic history)/Masuria, Warka, and Lesznowola, PolandP. jessenii (P. jessenii), P. mandelii, and P. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Tetracycline (tet-like), erythromycin (erm-like) and streptomycin (aac) resistance genes
Detection of integrase, recombinase, and resolvase
High MICs for TE, STS, and E B		[127]
Treated wastewater/Puck Bay, PolandP. protegens (P. protegens)Resistance to TIM, CAZ, FEP, and ATM (1) F[128]
Small colony variant isolated from biofilm cultures of rhizosphere colonizing P. chlororaphis strain 30-84P. chlororaphis strain 30-84Resistance to K and PIP (one small colony variant) A[129]
Danube River water/MultinationalP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)All eight isolates tested were resistant to CAZ, six to MEM, four to CIP, three to IPM, two to TZP and/or FEP, and one to GM or LVX (eight) C
Modified Hodge test was positive for carbapenemase presence in isolates resistant to MEM and IPM		[60]
Halimione portulacoides tissue samples from a metal-contaminated estuary/Ria de Aveiro, northwest coast of PortugalP. koreensis (P. koreensis); P. simiae (P. fluorescens); P. migulae (P. mandelii), and P. fragi (P. fragi) The most common resistance phenotypes included AM, AMX, AMC, and CTX. P. koreensis (10), P. simiae (5), P. migulae (1), and P. fragi (1) C[26]
Treated wastewater/GermanyP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to β-lactams (P, O CLO, CF, CZ, AMX, CRO, and CB); aminoglycosides (K, NEO, CAP, AN, GM, SIS, NB, and SPT); E, RIF, LIN, VAN, C, BLE, varied sulfonamides and tetracyclines; NA, OFL, LOM, and PB (1) D[130]
Peaty soil from biological pesticide sewage treatment plant/Jaworzno City, Silesia district, Southwestern PolandDescription of P. silesiensis strain A3T (P. mandelii)Resistance to ATM, RIF, VAN G
Resistance to AM B		[131]
Water from Del Rey Lagoon (DRL). Lower Ballona Creek watershed/Los Angeles County, California, USAP. fluorescens and P. rhodesiae (P. fluorescens) Resistance phenotypes included AM, CTX, TE, E, S, STS, NA, and CIP for P. fluorescens (4) and CTX, E, TE, S, STS, NA, and CIP for P. rhodesiae (1) C[132]
Leaves of the Ni hyperaccumulator Alyssum serpyllifolium (subsp. malacitanum) grown in serpentine soils (high concentrations of heavy metals)/Bragança, PortugalDrought-resistant P. azotoformans strain ASS1 (P. fluorescens)Resistance to P, AM, C, and STS (1) C[65]
Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) feces/Northern PortugalP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to AMX, AMC, CF, FOX, CTX, TIC, TIM, IPM, ATM, E, TE, C, SUT, and FOS C
Resistance to IPM and CIP on biofilm removal.
Detection of blaOXA-aer (1)		[92]
Fruits and leaves of sick Citrus sinensis cv. ‘Valencia Late’ and Citrus limon cv. ‘Eureka’/TunisiaP. kairouanensis strains KC12T, KC17, KC20, KC22, KC24A, KC25, and KC26;
P. nabeulensis strains E10BT, E10AB, E10CB1, and Iy3BA (P. fluorescens)		All strains displayed resistance to OX, CF, CZ, CXM, AMX, and TM C
MDR phenotype among the strains		[133]
Stream waters and effluents from urban wastewater treatment plants/Central ItalyP. koreensis (P. koreensis)Resistance to AM and CTX B
High MIC values for AMP, CZ, and ETP A
Resistance to CL (5) A
Detection of blaAmpC in two (of five) isolates 		[29]
Roots of Odontarrhena obovata on copper-influenced soil/Chelyabinsk region, RussiaCopper tolerant P. lurida strain EOO26 (P. fluorescens)Resistance to AM, TE, C and P C[84]
Wastewater/Kwara, NigeriaP. fluorescens (P. fluorescens)Resistance to CAZ, CXM, CFM, OFL, CIP, FM C
The same isolate, when plasmid-cured, was not resistant to CFM, OFL, CIP, and FM		[134]
River, stream, lake, and sewage water samples/São Paulo state and Brasília, BrazilHeavy-metal resistant P. saponiphila (P. chlororaphis)Resistance to TZP, CRO, CTX, CAZ, IPM, MEM, FEP, ATM (10, 11, 11, 8, 2, 2, 5 and 7 of 13, respectively). Resistance to TE (11); C (10); CIP (2); LVX (4) and NOR (5); GM (1) and TM (1). A
First report of blaGES, qnrS, aac(3′)-IIa, and tetB in P. saponiphila. 		[73]
Marine polypropylene/Øygarden, NorwayDraft genome sequence of P. protegens 11HC2Resistance to CTX, AM, C and TMP E
The strain carries a class C β-lactamase, type-B chloramphenicol O-acetyltransferase (catB), three distinct copies of dihydrofolate reductase, and a bifunctional aminoglycoside phosphotransferase		[135]
Antimicrobial agents to which P. aeruginosa is considered intrinsically resistant are indicated in bold. Antimicrobials in both bold type and underlined are generally recognized as ineffective against non-fermentative gram-negative bacteria. T: Type strain; A: minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) by broth microdilution; B: MIC by agar dilution; C: disc-diffusion method; D: phenotype microarray; E: MIC by Etest; F: Phoenix Automated Microbiology System (BD Diagnostic Systems, USA); G: Biolog GENIII Microplates. AM: ampicillin; AMC: amoxicillin–clavulanic acid; AMX: amoxicillin; AN: amikacin; ATM: aztreonam; BAC: bacitracin; BLE: bleomycin; C: chloramphenicol; CAP: capreomycin; CB: carbenicillin; CAZ: ceftazidime; CF: cephalothin; CFS: cefsulodin; CIP: ciprofloxacin; CL: colistin; CLO: cloxacillin; CM: clindamycin; CRO: ceftriaxone; CTX: cefotaxime; CXM: cefuroxime; CFM: cefixime; CZ: cefazolin; E: erythromycin; EN: enrofloxacin; ETP: ertapenem; FEP: cefepime; FM: nitrofurantoin; FOS: fosfomycin; FOX: cefoxitin; GM: gentamicin; IPM: imipenem; K: kanamycin; LIN: lincomycin; LOM: lomefloxacin; LVX: levofloxacin; MEM: meropenem; NA: nalidixic acid; NB: novobiocin; NEO: neomycin; OFL: ofloxacin; OX: oxacillin; P: penicillin; PB: polymyxin B; PIP: piperacillin; RIF: rifampicin; S: sulfamethoxazole; SAM: ampicillin–sulbactam; SIS: sisomycin; SPIR: spiramycin; SPT: spectinomycin; STS: streptomycin; SUT: sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim (or cotrimoxazole); TE: tetracycline; OT: oxytetracycline; TIC: ticarcillin; TIM: ticarcilli–clavulanic acid; TM: tobramycin; TMP: trimethoprim; TZP: piperacillin–tazobactam; VA: vancomycin;. MDR: multidrug resistant.
Table
Table 3. P. fluorescens genomes harboring transferable antimicrobial resistance determinants.
Table 3. P. fluorescens genomes harboring transferable antimicrobial resistance determinants.
Antimicrobial Resistance Genes
Accession NumberTaxon IDIsolation SourceIsolation CountryAminoglycosidesβ-LactamsPhenicolFosfomycinSulfamethoxazoleTetracyclineOther
GCA_000801855.1P. fluorescenssputum of an individual with cystic fibrosisUSA tet(G)
GCA_001021695.1P. fluorescenssputum of an individual with cystic fibrosisUSAaac(3)-IIIb tet(B)
GCA_001542715.1P. fluorescensmozzarella cheeseItalyaph(3″)-Ib; aph(6)-Id
GCA_004614275.1P. fluorescensrootPoland tet(A)
GCA_900636635.1P. fluorescensrespiratory tract-aph(3′)-IibblaOXA-50; blaPAOcatB7fosA crpP
GCA_004102685.1P. azotoformanschickpea rhizosphere grown in saline soilIndiaant(3″)-Ia sul1 qacE
GCA_003851525.1P. synxanthawheat rhizosphereUSA tet(A)
GCA_003852025.1P. synxanthawheat rhizosphereUSA tet(A)
GCA_008632315.1P. veroniisoilSvalbardaph(3″)-Ib; aph(6)-Id
GCA_014076455.1P. migulaebiofilm reactorChinaaadA15; aph(3″)-Ib; aph(6)-Id cmlA1; floR sul1tet(G)qacE
GCA_002177125.1P. koreensislake soilIndiaant(3″)-Ia sul1 qacE
GCA_003666515.1P. protegenssoilNetherlandsaph(3′)-Ia catA1
GCA_004212425.1P. mooreiactivated sludgePoland tet(A)
GCA_000282975.1P. psychrophilaactivated sludge sampleChinaant(2″)-Ia; aph(3″)-Ib; aph(3′)-XV; aph(6)-Id catB3; floR tet(G)qacE
GCA_001043065.1P. helleriraw milkGermanyaph(3″)-Ib; aph(6)-Id tet(A)
GCA_001050345.1P. fildesensisAntarctic soilAntarcticaaph(3′)-Ia tet(C)
GCA_001594225.2P. glycinaecotton fieldUSAaph(3′)-Ia
Among 619 genomes of isolates belonging to the P. fluorescens complex available on the NCBI Public Database in November 2021 with source metadata,17 carried acquired resistance mechanisms.

4. Final Considerations

The trends recognized in this review support the idea that antimicrobial resistance is a natural phenomenon. Nevertheless, human-impacted sites allow environmental isolates to acquire clinically relevant ARGs. Despite differences in the number of samples and the antimicrobial agents analyzed, the data in Table 1 and Table 2 suggest that MDR phenotypes are abundant in both natural and human-impacted environments. In general, few studies have reported genotype data. However, this situation will likely be improved in the following years as sequencing and whole-genome approaches become more widespread. The characterization of antimicrobial susceptibility phenotypes alongside modern molecular biology techniques will provide key insights into the resistance profiles of P. fluorescens.
This review sought to compile the scattered literature on the many different but closely related species of the P. fluorescens complex. The data summarized herein contribute to recognizing resistance profiles that are probably associated with intrinsic properties, indicating the features that might be predicted as new or acquired. Considering the “one health” perspective on antimicrobial resistance, the information summarized in this review enables the characterization of the roles of different Pseudomonas species as actors in the environmental chain of transfer and maintenance of resistance determinants. Our analysis of the assembled literature also highlighted the importance of developing efficient sewage and wastewater management approaches, as well as the bioremediation of human-impacted sites, as necessary strategies to delay the evolution of antimicrobial resistance in environmental bacteria.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antibiotics11080985/s1, Figure S1: Phylogenomic tree of the 98 species belonging to the P. fluorescens complex and heatmap representing the digital DDH estimation (dDDH) between genomes. Black squares delimit the species belonging to the same group. The groups already described in the literature are indicated next to the heatmap; Table S1: Digital DDH estimation (dDDH) values between bacterial species belonging to Pseudomonas fluorescens complex. These dDDH values were used to plot the heatmap used on Supplementary Figure S1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P.S., G.B.K., A.S.R., R.R.B.; Data acquisition and writing the draft manuscript, M.P.S.; In silico analysis, G.B.K.; Data curation, R.R.B.; Writing—review and edition A.S.R., R.R.B.; Founding acquisition: A.S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–Brasil (CAPES)–Finance Code 001; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Programa Antártico Brasileiro (PROANTAR). This study was also financed in part by INPRA (CNPq 465718/2014-0; FAPERGS17/2551-0000514-7) and CAPES Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) grant # E-26/211.554/2019. The APC was funded by KAUST Baseline Grant (BAS/1/1096-01-01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is provided in this article or Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Silby, M.W.; Winstanley, C.; Godfrey, S.A.C.; Levy, S.B.; Jackson, R.W. Pseudomonas Genomes: Diverse and Adaptable. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 652–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Jun, S.-R.; Wassenaar, T.M.; Nookaew, I.; Hauser, L.; Wanchai, V.; Land, M.; Timm, C.M.; Lu, T.-Y.S.; Schadt, C.W.; Doktycz, M.J.; et al. Diversity of Pseudomonas Genomes, Including Populus-Associated Isolates, as Revealed by Comparative Genome Analysis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 82, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Moradali, M.F.; Ghods, S.; Rehm, B.H.A. Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Horcajada, J.P.; Montero, M.; Oliver, A.; Sorlí, L.; Luque, S.; Gómez-Zorrilla, S.; Benito, N.; Grau, S. Epidemiology and Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00031-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Hsueh, P.-R.; Teng, L.-J.; Pan, H.-J.; Chen, Y.-C.; Sun, C.-C.; Ho, S.-W.; Luh, K.-T. Outbreak of Pseudomonas fluorescens Bacteremia among Oncology Patients. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 2914–2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Koh, T.H.; Wang, G.C.Y.; Sng, L.-H. IMP-1 and a Novel Metallo-β-Lactamase, VIM-6, in Fluorescent Pseudomonads Isolated in Singapore. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2004, 48, 2334–2336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rolston, K.V.I.; Kontoyiannis, D.P.; Yadegarynia, D.; Raad, I.I. Nonfermentative Gram-Negative Bacilli in Cancer Patients: Increasing Frequency of Infection and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Clinical Isolates to Fluoroquinolones. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2005, 51, 215–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sader, H.S.; Jones, R.N. Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Uncommonly Isolated Non-Enteric Gram-Negative Bacilli. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 25, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lindholm, D.A.; Murray, C.K.; Akers, K.S.; O’Brien, S.D.; Alderete, J.F.; Vento, T.J. Novel Pseudomonas Fluorescens Septic Sacroiliitis in a Healthy Soldier. Mil. Med. 2013, 178, e963–e966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Faccone, D.; Pasteran, F.; Albornoz, E.; Gonzalez, L.; Veliz, O.; Prieto, M.; Bucciarelli, R.; Callejo, R.; Corso, A. Human Infections Due to Pseudomonas chlororaphis and Pseudomonas oleovorans Harboring New BlaVIM-2-Borne Integrons. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2014, 28, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arega, B.; Wolde-Amanuel, Y.; Adane, K.; Belay, E.; Abubeker, A.; Asrat, D. Rare Bacterial Isolates Causing Bloodstream Infections in Ethiopian Patients with Cancer. Infect Agents Cancer 2017, 12, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Oba, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Ogida, C.; Kawanami, M.; Fujiwara, M.; Matsumura, I. Longitudinal Nosocomial Outbreak of Pseudomonas fluorescens Bloodstream Infection of 2 Years’ Duration in a Coronary Care Unit. Am. J. Infec. Control 2017, 45, e75–e79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Huang, C.-R.; Lien, C.-Y.; Tsai, W.-C.; Lai, W.-A.; Hsu, C.-W.; Tsai, N.-W.; Chang, C.-C.; Lu, C.-H.; Chien, C.-C.; Chang, W.-N. The Clinical Characteristics of Adult Bacterial Meningitis Caused by Non- Pseudomonas (Ps.) aeruginosa Pseudomonas Species: A Clinical Comparison with Ps. aeruginosa Meningitis. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2018, 34, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montaña, S.; Lazzaro, T.; Uong, S.; Place, K.; Iriarte, A.; Ocampo, C.V.; Vay, C.; Ramírez, M.S. Genomics Helps to Decipher the Resistance Mechanisms Present in a Pseudomonas chlororaphis Strain Recovered in an HIV Patient. New Microbes New Infect. 2018, 25, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wilkinson, F.H.; Kerr, K.G. Bottled Water as a Source of Multi-Resistant Stenotrophomonas and Pseudomonas Species for Neutropenic Patients. Eur. J. Cancer Care 1998, 7, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wong, V.; Levi, K.; Baddal, B.; Turton, J.; Boswell, T.C. Spread of Pseudomonas fluorescens Due to Contaminated Drinking Water in a Bone Marrow Transplant Unit: Table 1. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 2093–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Faulde, M.; Spiesberger, M. Role of the Moth Fly Clogmia Albipunctata (Diptera: Psychodinae) as a Mechanical Vector of Bacterial Pathogens in German Hospitals. J. Hosp. Infect. 2013, 83, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vincenti, S.; Quaranta, G.; De Meo, C.; Bruno, S.; Ficarra, M.G.; Carovillano, S.; Ricciardi, W.; Laurenti, P. Non-Fermentative Gram-Negative Bacteria in Hospital Tap Water and Water Used for Haemodialysis and Bronchoscope Flushing: Prevalence and Distribution of Antibiotic Resistant Strains. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 499, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Iseppi, R.; Sabia, C.; Bondi, M.; Mariani, M.; Messi, P. Virulence Factors, Drug Resistance and Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Healthcare Water Systems. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 1737–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bennasar, A.; Mulet, M.; Lalucat, J.; García-Valdés, E. PseudoMLSA: A Database for Multigenic Sequence Analysis of Pseudomonas Species. BMC Microbiol. 2010, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. van den Beld, M.J.C.; Reinders, E.; Notermans, D.W.; Reubsaet, F.A.G. Possible Misidentification of Species in the Pseudomonas fluorescens Lineage as Burkholderia pseudomallei and Francisella tularensis, and Emended Descriptions of Pseudomonas brenneri, Pseudomonas gessardii and Pseudomonas proteolytica. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol 2016, 66, 3420–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lalucat, J.; Mulet, M.; Gomila, M.; García-Valdés, E. Genomics in Bacterial Taxonomy: Impact on the Genus Pseudomonas. Genes 2020, 11, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Garrido-Sanz, D.; Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Göker, M.; Martín, M.; Rivilla, R.; Redondo-Nieto, M. Genomic and Genetic Diversity within the Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Peix, A.; Ramírez-Bahena, M.-H.; Velázquez, E. The Current Status on the Taxonomy of Pseudomonas Revisited: An Update. Infect Genet.Evol. 2018, 57, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. EUCAST. Expected Resistant Phenotypes Version 1.1. 2022. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/expert_rules_and_expected_phenotypes/expected_phenotypes/ (accessed on 21 June 2022).
  26. Rocha, J.; Tacão, M.; Fidalgo, C.; Alves, A.; Henriques, I. Diversity of Endophytic Pseudomonas in Halimione Portulacoides from Metal(Loid)-Polluted Salt Marshes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 13255–13267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Jacoby, G.A. AmpC β-Lactamases. Clin. Microbiol. Ver. 2009, 22, 161–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lima, A.B.M.; de Oliveira Leão-Vasconcelos, L.S.N.; de Melo Costa, D.; Vilefort, L.O.R.; André, M.C.D.P.B.; Barbosa, M.A.; Prado-Palos, M.A. Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from the Oral Cavity of Healthcare Workers from an Ocology Hospital in Midwestern Brazil. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. S. Paulo 2015, 57, 513–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Piccirilli, A.; Pompilio, A.; Rossi, L.; Segatore, B.; Amicosante, G.; Rosatelli, G.; Perilli, M.; Di Bonaventura, G. Identification of CTX-M-15 and CTX-M-27 in Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Three Rivers Running in Central Italy. Microb. Drug Resist. 2019, 25, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Heir, E.; Moen, B.; Åsli, A.W.; Sunde, M.; Langsrud, S. Antibiotic Resistance and Phylogeny of Pseudomonas Spp. Isolated over Three Decades from Chicken Meat in the Norwegian Food Chain. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jorth, P.; McLean, K.; Ratjen, A.; Secor, P.R.; Bautista, G.E.; Ravishankar, S.; Rezayat, A.; Garudathri, J.; Harrison, J.J.; Harwood, R.A.; et al. Evolved Aztreonam Resistance Is Multifactorial and Can Produce Hypervirulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 2017, 8, e00517-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Olivares Pacheco, J.; Alvarez-Ortega, C.; Alcalde Rico, M.; Martínez, J.L. Metabolic Compensation of Fitness Costs Is a General Outcome for Antibiotic-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mutants Overexpressing Efflux Pumps. mBio 2017, 8, e00500-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Alonso, A.; Rojo, F.; Martinez, J.L. Environmental and Clinical Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Show Pathogenic and Biodegradative Properties Irrespective of Their Origin. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 1, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Martinez, J.L.; Sánchez, M.B.; Martínez-Solano, L.; Hernandez, A.; Garmendia, L.; Fajardo, A.; Alvarez-Ortega, C. Functional Role of Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps in Microbial Natural Ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 33, 430–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hearn, E.M.; Dennis, J.J.; Gray, M.R.; Foght, J.M. Identification and Characterization of the EmhABC Efflux System for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Pseudomonas fluorescens CLP6a. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 6233–6240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Hearn, E.M.; Gray, M.R.; Foght, J.M. Mutations in the Central Cavity and Periplasmic Domain Affect Efflux Activity of the Resistance-Nodulation-Division Pump EmhB from Pseudomonas fluorescens CLP6a. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Tian, T.; Wu, X.-G.; Duan, H.-M.; Zhang, L.-Q. The Resistance-Nodulation-Division Efflux Pump EmhABC Influences the Production of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol in Pseudomonas fluorescens 2P24. Microbiology 2010, 156, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Adebusuyi, A.A.; Foght, J.M. An Alternative Physiological Role for the EmhABC Efflux Pump in Pseudomonas fluorescens CLP6a. BMC Microbiol. 2011, 11, 252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Adebusuyi, A.; Foght, J. Physico-Chemical Factors Affect Chloramphenicol Efflux and EmhABC Efflux Pump Expression in Pseudomonas fluorescens CLP6a. Res. Microbiol. 2013, 164, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lim, C.K.; Penesyan, A.; Hassan, K.A.; Loper, J.E.; Paulsen, I.T. Disruption of Transporters Affiliated with Enantio-Pyochelin Biosynthesis Gene Cluster of Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 Has Pleiotropic Effects. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0159884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Duan, J.; Jiang, W.; Cheng, Z.; Heikkila, J.J.; Glick, B.R. The Complete Genome Sequence of the Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Pseudomonas sp. UW4. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Papapetropoulou, M.; Rodopoulou, G.; Giannoulaki, E.; Stergiopoulos, P. Effect of Temperature on Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Drinking Water. J. Chemother. 1994, 6, 404–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zeng, L.; Jin, S. Aph(3J)-IIb, a Gene Encoding an Aminoglycoside-Modifying Enzyme, Is under the Positive Control of Surrogate Regulator HpaA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2003, 47, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Snesrud, E.; Maybank, R.; Kwak, Y.I.; Jones, A.R.; Hinkle, M.K.; McGann, P. Chromosomally Encoded Mcr-5 in Colistin-Nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e00679-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Kupferschmied, P.; Chai, T.; Flury, P.; Blom, J.; Smits, T.H.M.; Maurhofer, M.; Keel, C. Specific Surface Glycan Decorations Enable Antimicrobial Peptide Resistance in Plant-Beneficial Pseudomonads with Insect-Pathogenic Properties: O-Antigen Function in Biocontrol Pseudomonads. Environ. Microbiol. 2016, 18, 4265–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Fernández, L.; Gooderham, W.J.; Bains, M.; McPhee, J.B.; Wiegand, I.; Hancock, R.E.W. Adaptive Resistance to the “Last Hope” Antibiotics Polymyxin B and Colistin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Is Mediated by the Novel Two-Component Regulatory System ParR-ParS. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 3372–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Shivaji, S.; Rao, N.S.; Saisree, L.; Sheth, V.; Reddy, G.S.; Bhargava, P.M. Isolation and Identification of Pseudomonas Spp. from Schirmacher Oasis, Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55, 767–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Reddy, G.S.N.; Matsumoto, G.I.; Schumann, P.; Stackebrandt, E.; Shivaji, S. Psychrophilic Pseudomonads from Antarctica: Pseudomonas antarctica sp. nov., Pseudomonas meridiana sp. nov. and Pseudomonas proteolytica sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2004, 54, 713–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Orellana-Saez, M.; Pacheco, N.; Costa, J.I.; Mendez, K.N.; Miossec, M.J.; Meneses, C.; Castro-Nallar, E.; Marcoleta, A.E.; Poblete-Castro, I. In-Depth Genomic and Phenotypic Characterization of the Antarctic Psychrotolerant Strain Pseudomonas sp. MPC6 Reveals Unique Metabolic Features, Plasticity, and Biotechnological Potential. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fendri, I.; Chaari, A.; Dhouib, A.; Jlassi, B.; Abousalham, A.; Carrière, F.; Sayadi, S.; Abdelkafi, S. Isolation, Identification and Characterization of a New Lipolytic Pseudomonas Sp., Strain AHD-1, from Tunisian Soil. Environ. Technol. 2010, 31, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pavlov, M.S.; Lira, F.; Martinez, J.L.; Olivares-Pacheco, J.; Marshall, S.H. Pseudomonas fildesensis sp. nov., a Psychrotolerant Bacterium Isolated from Antarctic Soil of King George Island, South Shetland Islands. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 3255–3263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Poblete-Morales, M.; Carvajal, D.; Almasia, R.; Michea, S.; Cantillana, C.; Levican, A.; Silva-Moreno, E. Pseudomonas atacamensis sp. nov., Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Desert Bloom Plant in the Region of Atacama, Chile. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2020, 113, 1201–1211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Švec, P.; Kosina, M.; Zeman, M.; Holochová, P.; Králová, S.; Němcová, E.; Micenková, L.; Urvashi; Gupta, V.; Sood, U.; et al. Pseudomonas karstica sp. nov. and Pseudomonas spelaei sp. nov., Isolated from Calcite Moonmilk Deposits from Caves. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5131–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Na, G.; Zhang, W.; Gao, H.; Wang, C.; Li, R.; Zhao, F.; Zhang, K.; Hou, C. Occurrence and Antibacterial Resistance of Culturable Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria in the Fildes Peninsula, Antarctica. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2021, 162, 111829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Marcoleta, A.E.; Arros, P.; Varas, M.A.; Costa, J.; Rojas-Salgado, J.; Berríos-Pastén, C.; Tapia-Fuentes, S.; Silva, D.; Fierro, J.; Canales, N.; et al. The Highly Diverse Antarctic Peninsula Soil Microbiota as a Source of Novel Resistance Genes. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 810, 152003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Allen, H.K.; Moe, L.A.; Rodbumrer, J.; Gaarder, A.; Handelsman, J. Functional Metagenomics Reveals Diverse β-Lactamases in a Remote Alaskan Soil. ISME J. 2009, 3, 243–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chow, L.; Waldron, L.; Gillings, M.R. Potential Impacts of Aquatic Pollutants: Sub-Clinical Antibiotic Concentrations Induce Genome Changes and Promote Antibiotic Resistance. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lugli, G.A.; Milani, C.; Mancabelli, L.; Turroni, F.; Ferrario, C.; Duranti, S.; van Sinderen, D.; Ventura, M. Ancient Bacteria of the Ötzi’s Microbiome: A Genomic Tale from the Copper Age. Microbiome 2017, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Mulet, M.; Montaner, M.; Román, D.; Gomila, M.; Kittinger, C.; Zarfel, G.; Lalucat, J.; García-Valdés, E. Pseudomonas Species Diversity Along the Danube River Assessed by RpoD Gene Sequence and MALDI-TOF MS Analyses of Cultivated Strains. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kittinger, C.; Lipp, M.; Baumert, R.; Folli, B.; Koraimann, G.; Toplitsch, D.; Liebmann, A.; Grisold, A.J.; Farnleitner, A.H.; Kirschner, A.; et al. Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from the River Danube. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Filali, B.K.; Taoufik, J.; Zeroual, Y.; Dzairi, F.Z.; Talbi, M.; Blaghen, M. Waste Water Bacterial Isolates Resistant to Heavy Metals and Antibiotics. Curr. Microbiol. 2000, 41, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sheng, X.-F.; Xia, J.-J.; Jiang, C.-Y.; He, L.-Y.; Qian, M. Characterization of Heavy Metal-Resistant Endophytic Bacteria from Rape (Brassica Napus) Roots and Their Potential in Promoting the Growth and Lead Accumulation of Rape. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156, 1164–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Viti, C.; Decorosi, F.; Tatti, E.; Giovannetti, L. Characterization of Chromate-Resistant and -Reducing Bacteria by Traditional Means and by a High-Throughput Phenomic Technique for Bioremediation Purposes. Biotechnol. Progress 2008, 23, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Pellegrini, C.; Mercuri, P.S.; Celenza, G.; Galleni, M.; Segatore, B.; Sacchetti, E.; Volpe, R.; Amicosante, G.; Perilli, M. Identification of BlaIMP-22 in Pseudomonas spp. in Urban Wastewater and Nosocomial Environments: Biochemical Characterization of a New IMP Metallo-Enzyme Variant and Its Genetic Location. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2009, 63, 901–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Ma, Y.; Rajkumar, M.; Moreno, A.; Zhang, C.; Freitas, H. Serpentine Endophytic Bacterium Pseudomonas azotoformans ASS1 Accelerates Phytoremediation of Soil Metals under Drought Stress. Chemosphere 2017, 185, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Zhang, L.; Chen, W.; Jiang, Q.; Fei, Z.; Xiao, M. Genome Analysis of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacterium Pseudomonas chlororaphis Subsp. aurantiaca JD37 and Insights from Comparasion of Genomics with Three Pseudomonas Strains. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 237, 126483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Malik, A.; Aleem, A. Incidence of Metal and Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas Spp. from the River Water, Agricultural Soil Irrigated with Wastewater and Groundwater. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2011, 178, 293–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Henriques, I.; Tacão, M.; Leite, L.; Fidalgo, C.; Araújo, S.; Oliveira, C.; Alves, A. Co-Selection of Antibiotic and Metal(Loid) Resistance in Gram-Negative Epiphytic Bacteria from Contaminated Salt Marshes. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 109, 427–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seiler, C.; Berendonk, T.U. Heavy Metal Driven Co-Selection of Antibiotic Resistance in Soil and Water Bodies Impacted by Agriculture and Aquaculture. Front. Microbio. 2012, 3, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Matyar, F.; Akkan, T.; Uçak, Y.; Eraslan, B. Aeromonas and Pseudomonas: Antibiotic and Heavy Metal Resistance Species from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey (Northeast Mediterranean Sea). Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 167, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deredjian, A.; Colinon, C.; Brothier, E.; Favre-Bonté, S.; Cournoyer, B.; Nazaret, S. Antibiotic and Metal Resistance among Hospital and Outdoor Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Pitondo-Silva, A.; Gonçalves, G.B.; Stehling, E.G. Heavy Metal Resistance and Virulence Profile in Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Brazilian Soils. APMIS 2016, 124, 681–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ramos, M.S.; Furlan, J.P.R.; Gallo, I.F.L.; dos Santos, L.D.R.; de Campos, T.A.; Savazzi, E.A.; Stehling, E.G. High Level of Resistance to Antimicrobials and Heavy Metals in Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas sp. Isolated from Water Sources. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2694–2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hamilton-Miller, J.M.T.; Shah, S. Identity and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Enterobacterial Flora of Salad Vegetables. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2001, 18, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Miranda, C.D.; Zemelman, R. Antimicrobial Multiresistance in Bacteria Isolated from Freshwater Chilean Salmon Farms. Sci. Total Environ. 2002, 293, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Munsch, P. Pseudomonas costantinii sp. nov., Another Causal Agent of Brown Blotch Disease, Isolated from Cultivated Mushroom Sporophores in Finland. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1973–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Igbeneghu, O.A.; Abdu, A.B. Multiple Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria on Fluted Pumpkin Leaves, a Herb of Therapeutic Value. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2014, 32, 7. [Google Scholar]
  78. Iliev, I.; Marhova, M.; Gochev, V.; Tsankova, M.; Trifonova, S. Antibiotic Resistance of Gram-Negative Benthic Bacteria Isolated from the Sediments of Kardzhali Dam (Bulgaria). Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Osman, K.; Orabi, A.; Elbehiry, A.; Hanafy, M.H.; Ali, A.M. Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Camel Meat: Quorum Sensing-Dependent Virulence, Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance. Future Microbiol. 2019, 14, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Poirel, L.; Palmieri, M.; Brilhante, M.; Masseron, A.; Perreten, V.; Nordmann, P. PFM-Like Enzymes Are a Novel Family of Subclass B2 Metallo- β-Lactamases from Pseudomonas synxantha Belonging to the Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2020, 64, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Quintieri, L.; Caputo, L.; De Angelis, M.; Fanelli, F. Genomic Analysis of Three Cheese-Borne Pseudomonas lactis with Biofilm and Spoilage-Associated Behavior. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lavilla Lerma, L.; Benomar, N.; del Carmen Casado Muñoz, M.; Gálvez, A.; Abriouel, H. Antibiotic Multiresistance Analysis of Mesophilic and Psychrotrophic Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Goat and Lamb Slaughterhouse Surfaces throughout the Meat Production Process. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014, 80, 6792–6806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Estepa, V.; Rojo-Bezares, B.; Torres, C.; Sáenz, Y. Genetic Lineages and Antimicrobial Resistance in Pseudomonas spp. Isolates Recovered from Food Samples. Foodborne Path. Dis. 2015, 12, 486–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Kumar, H.; Franzetti, L.; Kaushal, A.; Kumar, D. Pseudomonas fluorescens: A Potential Food Spoiler and Challenges and Advances in Its Detection. Ann. Microbiol 2019, 69, 873–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Quintieri, L.; Fanelli, F.; Caputo, L. Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas spp. Spoilers in Fresh Dairy Products: An Underestimated Risk and the Control Strategies. Foods 2019, 8, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Dougnon, V.; Houssou, V.M.C.; Anago, E.; Nanoukon, C.; Mohammed, J.; Agbankpe, J.; Koudokpon, H.; Bouraima, B.; Deguenon, E.; Fabiyi, K.; et al. Assessment of the Presence of Resistance Genes Detected from the Environment and Selected Food Products in Benin. J. Environ. Public Health 2021, 2021, 8420590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Meyer, F.P.; Collar, J.D. Description and Treatment of a Pseudomonas Infection in White Catfish. Appl. Microbiol. 1964, 12, 201–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Martin Barrasa, J.L.; Lupiola Gomez, P.; Gonzalez Lama, Z.; Tejedor Junco, M.T. Antibacterial Susceptibility Patterns of Pseudomonas Strains Isolated from Chronic Canine Otitis Externa. J. Vet. Med. Series B 2000, 47, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Nam, H.M.; Lim, S.K.; Kang, H.M.; Kim, J.M.; Moon, J.S.; Jang, K.C.; Kim, J.M.; Joo, Y.S.; Jung, S.C. Prevalence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria Isolated from Bovine Mastitis between 2003 and 2008 in Korea. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 2020–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. O’Connell, D.; Mruk, K.; Rocheleau, J.M.; Kobertz, W.R. Xenopus Laevis Oocytes Infected with Multi-Drug–Resistant Bacteria: Implications for Electrical Recordings. J. Gen. Physiol. 2011, 138, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Stewart, J.; Townsend, F.; Lane, S.; Dyar, E.; Hohn, A.; Rowles, T.; Staggs, L.; Wells, R.; Balmer, B.; Schwacke, L. Survey of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Isolated from Bottlenose Dolphins Tursiops Truncatus in the Southeastern USA. Dis. Aquat. Org. 2014, 108, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dias, C.; Borges, A.; Oliveira, D.; Martinez-Murcia, A.; Saavedra, M.J.; Simões, M. Biofilms and Antibiotic Susceptibility of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria from Wild Animals. PeerJ 2018, 6, e4974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Umasuthan, N.; Valderrama, K.; Vasquez, I.; Segovia, C.; Hossain, A.; Cao, T.; Gnanagobal, H.; Monk, J.; Boyce, D.; Santander, J. A Novel Marine Pathogen Isolated from Wild Cunners (Tautogolabrus adspersus): Comparative Genomics and Transcriptome Profiling of Pseudomonas sp. Strain J380. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. CLSI. M100—Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 32nd ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, PA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  95. EUCAST: Clinical Breakpoints and Dosing of Antibiotics. Available online: https://eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (accessed on 19 May 2021).
  96. Forsberg, K.J.; Reyes, A.; Wang, B.; Selleck, E.M.; Sommer, M.O.A.; Dantas, G. The Shared Antibiotic Resistome of Soil Bacteria and Human Pathogens. Science 2012, 337, 1107–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Herrick, J.B.; Haynes, R.; Heringa, S.; Brooks, J.M.; Sobota, L.T. Coselection for Resistance to Multiple Late-Generation Human Therapeutic Antibiotics Encoded on Tetracycline Resistance Plasmids Captured from Uncultivated Stream and Soil Bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Chandrasekaran, S.; Venkatesh, B.; Lalithakumari, D. Transfer and Expression of a Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Plasmid in Marine Bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 1998, 37, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chandrasekaran, S.; Lalithakumari, D. Plasmid-Mediated Rifampicin Resistance in Pseudomonas Fluorescens. J. Med. Microbiol. 1998, 47, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Schwarz, S.; Kehrenberg, C.; Doublet, B.; Cloeckaert, A. Molecular Basis of Bacterial Resistance to Chloramphenicol and Florfenicol. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 28, 519–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Ahmed, Z.S.; Elshafiee, E.A.; Khalefa, H.S.; Kadry, M.; Hamza, D.A. Evidence of Colistin Resistance Genes (Mcr-1 and Mcr-2) in Wild Birds and Its Public Health Implication in Egypt. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2019, 8, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Hameed, F.; Khan, M.A.; Muhammad, H.; Sarwar, T.; Bilal, H.; Rehman, T.U. Plasmid-Mediated Mcr-1 Gene in Acinetobacter Baumannii and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa: First Report from Pakistan. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20190237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Abd El-Baky, R.M.; Masoud, S.M.; Mohamed, D.S.; Waly, N.G.; Shafik, E.A.; Mohareb, D.A.; Elkady, A.; Elbadr, M.M.; Hetta, H.F. Prevalence and Some Possible Mechanisms of Colistin Resistance Among Multidrug-Resistant and Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa. IDR 2020, 13, 323–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Ahombo, G.; Baloki Ngoulou, T.; Moyen, R.; Kayath, A.C.; Ontsira Ngoyi, N.E. Study of Colistin Resistance Encoded by the Mcr-1 Gene in Community and Clinical Pseudomonas in Brazzaville, Republic of Congo. J. Microb. Biochem. Technol. 2019, 11, 7. [Google Scholar]
  105. Girlich, D.; Poirel, L.; Nordmann, P. Novel Ambler Class A Carbapenem-Hydrolyzing β-Lactamase from a Pseudomonas Fluorescens Isolate from the Seine River, Paris, France. AAC 2010, 54, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Laurens, C.; Jean-Pierre, H.; Licznar-Fajardo, P.; Hantova, S.; Godreuil, S.; Martinez, O.; Jumas-Bilak, E. Transmission of IMI-2 Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae from River Water to Human. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018, 15, 88–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Harmon, D.E.; Miranda, O.A.; McCarley, A.; Eshaghian, M.; Carlson, N.; Ruiz, C. Prevalence and Characterization of Carbapenem-resistant Bacteria in Water Bodies in the Los Angeles–Southern California Area. Microbiol. Open 2019, 8, e00692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  108. Maravić, A.; Skočibušić, M.; Šamanić, I.; Puizina, J. Antibiotic Susceptibility Profiles and First Report of TEM Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase in Pseudomonas Fluorescens from Coastal Waters of the Kaštela Bay, Croatia. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 2039–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Igbinosa, I.H.; Nwodo, U.U.; Sosa, A.; Tom, M.; Okoh, A.I. Commensal Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Wastewater and Freshwater Milieus in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa, as Reservoir of Antibiotic Resistant Determinants. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2537–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Skariyachan, S.; Mahajanakatti, A.B.; Grandhi, N.J.; Prasanna, A.; Sen, B.; Sharma, N.; Vasist, K.S.; Narayanappa, R. Environmental Monitoring of Bacterial Contamination and Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of the Fecal Coliforms Isolated from Cauvery River, a Major Drinking Water Source in Karnataka, India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Alves, J.; Dias, L.; Mateus, J.; Marques, J.; Graças, D.; Ramos, R.; Seldin, L.; Henriques, I.; Silva, A.; Folador, A. Resistome in Lake Bolonha, Brazilian Amazon: Identification of Genes Related to Resistance to Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Chakraborty, J.; Sapkale, V.; Rajput, V.; Shah, M.; Kamble, S.; Dharne, M. Shotgun Metagenome Guided Exploration of Anthropogenically Driven Resistomic Hotspots within Lonar Soda Lake of India. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Bisht, S.C.; Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Bisht, J.K.; Gupta, H.S. Isolation, Molecular Characterization and Growth-Promotion Activities of a Cold Tolerant Bacterium Pseudomonas Sp. NARs9 (MTCC9002) from the Indian Himalayas. Biol. Res. 2009, 42, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Flores Ribeiro, A.; Bodilis, J.; Alonso, L.; Buquet, S.; Feuilloley, M.; Dupont, J.-P.; Pawlak, B. Occurrence of Multi-Antibiotic Resistant Pseudomonas Spp. in Drinking Water Produced from Karstic Hydrosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 490, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Arnau, V.G.; Sánchez, L.A.; Delgado, O.D. Pseudomonas Yamanorum Sp. Nov., a Psychrotolerant Bacterium Isolated from a Subantarctic Environment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tomova, I.; Stoilova-Disheva, M.; Lazarkevich, I.; Vasileva-Tonkova, E. Antimicrobial Activity and Resistance to Heavy Metals and Antibiotics of Heterotrophic Bacteria Isolated from Sediment and Soil Samples Collected from Two Antarctic Islands. Front. Life Sci. 2015, 8, 348–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kosina, M.; Švec, P.; Černohlávková, J.; Barták, M.; Snopková, K.; De Vos, P.; Sedláček, I. Description of Pseudomonas Gregormendelii Sp. Nov., a Novel Psychrotrophic Bacterium from James Ross Island, Antarctica. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 73, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Ebadzadsahrai, G.; Thomson, J.; Soby, S. Draft Genome Sequence of Pseudomonas sp. Strain MWU12-2534b, Isolated from a Wild Cranberry Bog in Truro, Massachusetts. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2018, 7, e01005-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Pandey, A.; Palni, L.M.S.; Hebbar, K.P. Suppression of Damping-off in Maize Seedlings by Pseudomonas corrugata. Microbiol. Res. 2001, 156, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Prithivirajsingh, S.; Mishra, S.K.; Mahadevan, A. Detection and Analysis of Chromosomal Arsenic Resistance in Pseudomonas fluorescens Strain MSP3. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2001, 280, 1393–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Han, H.S.; Koh, Y.J.; Hur, J.-S.; Jung, J.S. Occurrence of the StrA-StrB Streptomycin Resistance Genes in Pseudomonas Species Isolated from Kiwifruit Plants. J. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 365–368. [Google Scholar]
  122. Papadopoulou, C.; Economou, V.; Sakkas, H.; Gousia, P.; Giannakopoulos, X.; Dontorou, C.; Filioussis, G.; Gessouli, H.; Karanis, P.; Leveidiotou, S. Microbiological Quality of Indoor and Outdoor Swimming Pools in Greece: Investigation of the Antibiotic Resistance of the Bacterial Isolates. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2008, 211, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Schaefer, A.M.; Goldstein, J.D.; Reif, J.S.; Fair, P.A.; Bossart, G.D. Antibiotic-Resistant Organisms Cultured from Atlantic Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus) Inhabiting Estuarine Waters of Charleston, SC and Indian River Lagoon, FL. Ecohealth 2009, 6, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Alouache, S.; Kada, M.; Messai, Y.; Estepa, V.; Torres, C.; Bakour, R. Antibiotic Resistance and Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases in Isolated Bacteria from Seawater of Algiers Beaches (Algeria). Microb. Environ. 2012, 27, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. López, J.R.; Diéguez, A.L.; Doce, A.; De la Roca, E.; De la Herran, R.; Navas, J.I.; Toranzo, A.E.; Romalde, J.L. Pseudomonas baetica sp. nov., a Fish Pathogen Isolated from Wedge Sole, Dicologlossa Cuneata (Moreau). Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 874–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Beaton, A.; Lood, C.; Cunningham-Oakes, E.; MacFadyen, A.; Mullins, A.J.; Bestawy, W.E.; Botelho, J.; Chevalier, S.; Coleman, S.; Dalzell, C.; et al. Community-Led Comparative Genomic and Phenotypic Analysis of the Aquaculture Pathogen Pseudomonas baetica A390T Sequenced by Ion Semiconductor and Nanopore Technologies. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fny069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  127. Popowska, M.; Rzeczycka, M.; Miernik, A.; Krawczyk-Balska, A.; Walsh, F.; Duffy, B. Influence of Soil Use on Prevalence of Tetracycline, Streptomycin, and Erythromycin Resistance and Associated Resistance Genes. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1434–1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  128. Luczkiewicz, A.; Kotlarska, E.; Artichowicz, W.; Tarasewicz, K.; Fudala-Ksiazek, S. Antimicrobial Resistance of Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Wastewater and Wastewater-Impacted Marine Coastal Zone. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 19823–19834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Wang, D.; Dorosky, R.J.; Han, C.S.; Lo, C.; Dichosa, A.E.K.; Chain, P.S.; Yu, J.M.; Pierson, L.S.; Pierson, E.A. Adaptation Genomics of a Small-Colony Variant in a Pseudomonas chlororaphis 30-84 Biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 890–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Jałowiecki, Ł.; Chojniak, J.; Dorgeloh, E.; Hegedusova, B.; Ejhed, H.; Magnér, J.; Płaza, G. Using Phenotype Microarrays in the Assessment of the Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Bacteria Isolated from Wastewater in On-Site Treatment Facilities. Folia Microbiol. 2017, 62, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Kaminski, M.A.; Furmanczyk, E.M.; Sobczak, A.; Dziembowski, A.; Lipinski, L. Pseudomonas silesiensis sp. nov. Strain A3 T Isolated from a Biological Pesticide Sewage Treatment Plant and Analysis of the Complete Genome Sequence. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 41, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kawecki, S.; Kuleck, G.; Dorsey, J.H.; Leary, C.; Lum, M. The Prevalence of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria (ARB) in Waters of the Lower Ballona Creek Watershed, Los Angeles County, California. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2017, 189, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Oueslati, M.; Mulet, M.; Gomila, M.; Berge, O.; Hajlaoui, M.R.; Lalucat, J.; Sadfi-Zouaoui, N.; García-Valdés, E. New Species of Pathogenic Pseudomonas Isolated from Citrus in Tunisia: Proposal of Pseudomonas kairouanensis sp. nov. and Pseudomonas nabeulensis sp. nov. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 42, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Olawale, S.I.; Mutiat Busayo, O.-O.; Iyiola Olatunji, O.; Mariam, M.; Sariyat Olayinka, O. Plasmid Profiles and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns of Bacteria Isolated from Abattoirs Wastewater within Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria. Iran J. Microbiol. 2020, 12, 547–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Radisic, V.; Lunestad, B.T.; Sanden, M.; Bank, M.S.; Marathe, N.P. Draft Genome Sequence of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas protegens Strain 11HC2, Isolated from Marine Plastic Collected from the West Coast of Norway. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2021, 10, e01285-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Silverio, M.P.; Kraychete, G.B.; Rosado, A.S.; Bonelli, R.R. Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex and Its Intrinsic, Adaptive, and Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in Pristine and Human-Impacted Sites. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11080985

AMA Style

Silverio MP, Kraychete GB, Rosado AS, Bonelli RR. Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex and Its Intrinsic, Adaptive, and Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in Pristine and Human-Impacted Sites. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(8):985. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11080985

Chicago/Turabian Style

Silverio, Myllena Pereira, Gabriela Bergiante Kraychete, Alexandre Soares Rosado, and Raquel Regina Bonelli. 2022. "Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex and Its Intrinsic, Adaptive, and Acquired Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms in Pristine and Human-Impacted Sites" Antibiotics 11, no. 8: 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11080985

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop