Next Article in Journal
Comparative Genomic Analysis Discloses Differential Distribution of Antibiotic Resistance Determinants between Worldwide Strains of the Emergent ST213 Genotype of Salmonella Typhimurium
Previous Article in Journal
The Production of Antibiotics Must Be Reoriented: Repositioning Old Narrow-Spectrum Antibiotics, Developing New Microbiome-Sparing Antibiotics
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/antibiotics11070926
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical Impact of COVID-19 on Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections in an Intensive Care Unit Setting: Two Pandemics Compared

by
Francesco Cogliati Dezza
1,
Gabriele Arcari
2,
Federica Alessi
1,
Serena Valeri
1,
Ambrogio Curtolo
1,
Federica Sacco
2,
Giancarlo Ceccarelli
1,
Giammarco Raponi
2,
Francesco Alessandri
3,
Claudio Maria Mastroianni
1,
Mario Venditti
1 and
Alessandra Oliva
1,*
1
Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
2
Microbiology and Virology Laboratory, Department of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(7), 926; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070926
Submission received: 31 May 2022 / Revised: 5 July 2022 / Accepted: 7 July 2022 / Published: 9 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Therapy for Critically Ill Patients in the Age of COVID-19)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Two mutually related pandemics are ongoing worldwide: the COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance pandemics. This study aims to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GN) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in a single intensive care unit (ICU). We conducted a retrospective study including patients admitted to the ICU, reorganized for COVID-19 patients’ healthcare, with at least one confirmed MDR-GN BSI during 2019–2020. We compared clinical and microbiological features, incidence density, antibiotic therapy and mortality rate in pre- and during-COVID-19 pandemic periods. We estimated the impact of COVID-19 on mortality by means of univariate Cox regression analyses. A total of 46 patients were included in the study (28 non-COVID-19/18 COVID-19). Overall, 63 BSI episodes occurred (44/19), and non-COVID-19 patients had a higher incidence of MDR-GN BSIs and were more likely to present K. pneumoniae BSIs, while the COVID-19 group showed more A. baumannii BSIs with higher per pathogen incidence. COVID-19 patients presented more critical conditions at the BSI onset, a shorter hospitalization time from BSI to death and higher 30-day mortality rate from BSI onset. COVID-19 and septic shock were associated with 30-day mortality from MDR-GN BSIs, while early active therapy was a protective factor. In conclusion, COVID-19 showed a negative impact on patients with MDR-GN BSIs admitted to the ICU.

1. Introduction

Since 2020, two mutually related pandemics are ongoing worldwide: COVID-19 and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) pandemics. The former is a big global threat that has resulted, at the time of writing, in over 6 million deaths [1] and disrupted healthcare systems at all levels, leading to a reorganization of health facilities and changes in social behavior all over the world. The second, much less visible and known, is also called a «hidden pandemic», and it has been recognized as one of the most urgent threats facing global health, economic and social development, causing over 1 million estimated deaths attributable to AMR bacteria in 2019 [2,3,4].
From the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, experts have warned about the relation between COVID-19 and AMR and suggested increasing Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures and antimicrobial stewardship programs to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use to reduce the potential long-term impact on AMR [5,6]. Nevertheless, the gap between the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing (~75%) and the estimated bacterial co-infection (8.6%) upon admission of COVID-19 patients requiring hospitalization was largely reported, thus leading to a high level of inappropriate antimicrobial exposure [7].
Studies reported conflicting evidence on the impact of COVID-19 on multi-drug-resistant organism (MDRO) infections. Several reports—particularly from Italy, Brazil, and Germany—described outbreaks or significant increases in MDRO infections during the COVID-19 period [8,9,10]. However, other studies from Spain and France did not describe an increase in MDR infections [11,12], and, interestingly, an Irish study showed a decrease in hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infections compared to the pre-COVID-19 pandemic period [13].
As for critically ill patients admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) during the COVID-19 pandemic, few papers have investigated the burden of MDRO, especially for Gram-negative bacteria invasive infections such as bloodstream infections (BSIs) [9,14,15,16]. In a review in 2020, Fattorini et al. found that only 1.3% of 522 COVID-19 patients in the ICUs developed an infection from MDR bacteria [17], while another review showed a prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae that ranged from 0.35% to 53% [18]. As a matter of fact, many hospitals have reported MDRO outbreaks in the ICU during the COVID-19 pandemic, mostly caused by Gram-negative bacteria or Candida auris [19]. Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) seems to be the main pathogen involved with a higher incidence compared to the pre-COVID-19 period and a higher risk of death than other MDROs [20,21,22].
In order to add new findings regarding the burden of MDRO infection in SARS-CoV-2-infected, critically ill patients, this study aimed to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on MDR Gram-negative bacteria BSIs (MDR-GN BSIs) in a single ICU reorganized for exclusive COVID-19 patients’ healthcare.

2. Results

During the study period, 63 (44 pre-pandemic (no-CoV) and 19 pandemic (CoV)) BSI episodes were observed in 46 patients (28 no-CoV and 18 CoV). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population with the microbiological data and clinical characteristics of the BSI episodes are summarized in Table 1. No differences between no-CoV and CoV patients were observed regarding age, gender, previous hospitalization, previous antibiotic therapy, and the burden of comorbidities, calculated through CCI.
Instead, the no-CoV population was more likely to present a higher APACHE II score at ICU admission than the CoV population (median 22 (IQR 16–23) vs. 11 (3.2–21.5), respectively, p: 0.003), to get admitted to the ICU for polytrauma (9 (32.1%) vs. 0 (0), p: 0.007), and to show more than one BSI episode from different MDR species (13 (28.3%) vs. 1 (2.2%), p: 0.003).

2.1. Microbiological Data

The overall MDR-GN BSI incidence density for the pre-COVID19 period was 16.5 per 100 patients and 11.2 per 100 patients for the COVID-19 period (p: 0.12). In the pre-COVID-19 period, the K. pneumoniae BSI incidence density was 8.2 per 100 patients, and the A. baumannii BSI incidence density was 6.4 per 100 patients. Instead, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the K. pneumoniae BSI incidence density was significantly lower (2.4 per 100 patients, p: 0.012), and the A. baumannii BSI incident density was higher (9.0 per 100 patients, p: 0.34).
As for the BSI episodes, no differences were observed regarding the BSI focus, source control, early active therapy, and the time to definite therapy. However, CoV patients presented significantly more critical conditions at the BSI onset with higher PITT scores (8 (2–8) vs. 3 (1–5), p: 0.002) and more frequently had septic shock (13 (68.4%) vs. 12 (27.3%), p: 0.003) than no-CoV patients. In contrast, the no-CoV group was more likely to show an infection before BSI onset (pre-BSI infection) from both no-MDRO (p: 0.003) and MDRO (p: 0.004), although no differences were observed in antibiotic therapy performed before the BSI onset.
MDRO colonization before the BSI onset (36 (81.8%) vs. 9 (47.4%)) and K. pneumoniae BSI (22 (50%) vs. 4 (21%)) were significantly more frequent in no-CoV patients (p: 0.005 and p: 0.032, respectively); on the other hand, the CoV group showed more A. baumannii BSIs (15 (78.6%) vs. 17 (38.6%), p:0.003). Difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) P. aeruginosa was only observed in five no-CoV patients. As for the local epidemiology in the ICU, MDR K. pneumoniae almost exclusively presented KPC genes (twenty-four) except for one NDM+ and one OXA-48+ strain.

2.2. Hospitalization and Mortality Data

No-CoV patients showed a significantly longer overall hospital stay (p:0.001) as well as in the ICU (p: 0.004) and a longer time from hospital admission to BSI onset (p: 0.02), whereas CoV patients presented a shorter hospitalization time from BSI onset to death (p: 0.003). No differences were observed in the days from ICU hospitalization to BSI onset (Table 1).
Patients that presented more critical conditions at the BSI onset with documented septic shock had a higher 30-day mortality rate from BSI onset; p < 0.0001 (Figure 1A). Meanwhile, patients that underwent an early active therapy (as at least one in vitro active drug within the first 24 h) showed a higher survival rate; p: 0.038 (Figure 1B).
Finally, CoV patients had a higher 30-day mortality rate from ICU admission (14 (77.8%) vs. 6 (21.4%), p < 0.0001) and from BSI onset (14 (77.8%) vs. 6 (21.4%), p < 0.0001), as shown in Figure 1C.

3. Discussion

In the present study, we showed that COVID-19 had a negative impact on patients with MDR-GN BSIs admitted to the ICU. We also confirmed the prognostic role of severity at ICU admission and at the BSI onset and confirmed the importance of A. baumannii as a causative agent of BSIs during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In fact, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact on AMR has been more pronounced inside ICU settings [19,23]. These observations are supported by the evidence that antibiotics prescription was higher in ICUs than in general wards, peaking at more than 86% among critical patients and therefore leading to unnecessarily high antimicrobial use [7]. Furthermore, other contributing factors to AMR could be the patients’ critical illness, inappropriate adherence to IPC protocols, personal protective equipment shortages, critically low healthcare workers/patients ratios with overcrowded wards, and the disruption of MDRO screening and surveillance programs as well as antimicrobial stewardship activities [19,23].
However, how the incidence of MDRO infections changed during the pre-COVID-19 and during-COVID-19 periods is still debated. We found that the overall MDR-GN BSI incidence density was lower in the CoV patients than the no-CoV ones, although the rate per pathogen showed an increase in the CRAB incidence in the former group of patients, albeit not significant. Several studies reported a decrease or no change in the incidence of MDRO colonization or infection in ICUs during the COVID-19 pandemic period, as with our findings [9,21,24,25], while other studies observed a significant increase in MDRO infections [15,20,22] or an increase only in a specific subgroup of patients with colonization or infection due to CRAB, as our study showed [9,21]. The change in our local epidemiology is associated with some outbreaks of CRAB infection during the observation period which reduced the K. pneumoniae incidence density. Furthermore, the higher level of CRAB pneumonia in the CoV patients as a source of BSIs, although not significant, could explain this epidemiology alternation, but the real explanation is not fully elucidated. Of interest, the burden of A. baumannii infections in CoV patients has been described worldwide with several outbreaks reported [19]. This so-called “little pandemic” within the huge COVID-19 pandemic represents a matter of concern as the greatest threat to COVID-19 patients admitted to ICUs [9,20,21,22,26]. However, new observational studies are needed to assess the real impact of CRAB invasive infections on mortality in critically ill CoV patients [20,22,26].
Among critically ill COVID-19 patients, BSIs are one of the major secondary infections often caused by Gram-negative bacteria [27,28]; moreover, several studies showed an increase in MDR-GN BSI during the COVID19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the real burden of these invasive infections and how they impact on mortality have not been fully estimated yet [14,20,22,26].
Despite the remarkable difference in patients’ severity (the no-CoV group showed more critical conditions at ICU admission), mortality was higher in the CoV patients. This result is comparable to other previous reports from Italy and France, in which a higher in-hospital mortality rate was observed in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to ICUs [14,20]. In particular, our experience showed that, although the two groups did not significantly differ in days from ICU admission to BSI onset, CoV patients presented a much shorter survival time after BSI onset than no-CoV patients, as shown in Figure 1C.
This observation joined with the more severe clinical condition of CoV patients at the BSI onset (with higher PITT scores and more frequent septic shock) seems to suggest that MDR-GN BSIs might represent only the last fatal complication in patients with an already ominous prognosis. Nevertheless, we confirmed that early active therapy represents an important factor associated with a better outcome in critically ill patients with MDR-GN BSIs [29,30,31]. Therefore, additional studies are warranted in order to fully elucidate whether the BSI onset impacts the outcome of CoV patients or if it represents just the “last” event in patients with a poor prognosis per se.
CoV patients presented a significantly lower MDRO colonization but a more frequent primary BSI than the no-CoV group, although this did not reach statistical significance. These results could indirectly confirm gut damage, microbiota variation and persistent microbial translocation during SARS-CoV-2 infection, which is more pronounced in severe infections and independent from gastrointestinal manifestations [32,33]. In this context, the observed gut mucosal perturbation may play a pathogenetic role in the development of BSIs following infections [34,35].
Our study has several limitations. First of all, it was retrospective nature and had a small population. So, due to the small population and some residual confounder factors, we decided to not perform a powerful statistical assessment via multivariable analysis. Secondly, we did not recollect data about the immunosuppressive treatment that could affect the different outcomes of our patients. Thirdly, the monocentric study reflected the ecology and epidemiology of our hospital which could differ from other ICUs; therefore, our results might not be generalized. Finally, we only focused on bacteremia, and we did not recollect data from other MDR infections; accordingly, our report may underestimate the real AMR burden pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4. Materials and Methods

Over two years (2019–2020), we conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center study including patients admitted to the same ICU of an academic tertiary hospital in Rome, with at least one confirmed MDR-GN BSI.
All clinical data were systematically analyzed from patients admitted in the pre-COVID-19 period (March–December 2019) and during (March–December 2020) the first COVID-19 pandemic period in a single ICU which, in March 2020, was reorganized for exclusive COVID-19 patients’ healthcare. Patients were enrolled in the study if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: (I) age > 18 years, (II) confirmed MDR-GN BSI, and (III) confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection via polymerase-chain-reaction assay on nasopharyngeal swab only during the COVID-19 period. Only the first BSI from the same MDR-GN species was included in the analyses. The flow chart of the study population is represented in Figure 2.
We reviewed patient data from medical records and anonymously recorded the following information in an electronic database: demographics, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory findings at the ICU admission and at the BSI onset, microbiological data during ICU hospitalization, antibiotic treatments and procedures administered during hospitalization and/or in the 90 days prior to BSI onset, source of BSI, duration of hospitalization and ICU stay, and time to BSI onset and 30-day mortality from ICU admission and from BSI onset.

4.1. Definitions

The patients admitted to the ICU in the pre-COVI-19 period and during the COVID-19 pandemic were named no-CoV and CoV, respectively.
Patients’ severity at ICU admission was defined by the APACHE II score that collected these characteristics: history of severe organ failure, age, body temperature, mean arterial pressure, pH, heart and respiratory rate, sodium, potassium, creatinine, acute renal failure, hematocrit, white blood cell count, Glasgow Coma Scale and FiO2 [36], whereas the burden of comorbidities was estimated by means of the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) [37]. The severity of BSI was defined according to the PITT score that collected these characteristics: body temperature, arterial pressure and need for vasopressor, mechanical ventilation, cardiac arrest, and mental status [38]. Septic shock was defined according to the international consensus [39]. BSI onset was considered the date of the index blood culture collection.
According to the hospital’s guidelines, rectal/stool swab culture was routinely evaluated for MDRO strains, and an MDRO colonization was defined as a rectal/stool swab positive culture in the absence of clinical signs of infection. MDR bacteria was defined according to the classification of Magiorakos et al. [40], while DTR P. aeruginosa was defined as in the IDSA guidelines 2022 [41]. Primary bloodstream infection was defined as a BSI occurring in patients without a recognized source of infection.
The source control was achieved when all those physical measures used to control the focus of BSI and to restore the optimal function of the affected area were performed.
Early active therapy was defined as the use of at least one in vitro active drug within the first 24 h from the BSI onset, and the time to definite therapy was days from BSI onset to the definite therapy. All infections caused by MDR or non-MDR bacteria that occurred before the BSI were defined pre-BSI infection from MDRO or nno-MDRO, respectively.

4.2. Microbiological Analyses

Blood culture bottles were incubated in the automatic VirtuoBacT/Alert system (bioMérieux, Inc., Marcy l’Etoile, France). Isolated colonies from blood cultures were identified using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time Of Fight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) system (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany). Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested using the MicroScan WalkAway system (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, USA). The MICs of antibiotics were assessed by following EUCAST breakpoint tables for the interpretation of MICs and zone diameters, version 9.0, valid from 2 January 2019 [42].
Strains showing a carbapenem-resistant phenotype (according to EUCAST criteria [42]) were tested using the real-time PCR assay Xpert Carba-R kit for the GeneXpert system (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) to evaluate the presence of the blaVIM, blaIMP, blaKPC, blaOXA-48, and blaNDM carbapenemase genes.

Statistical Analysis

The data were given as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR, 25th–75th percentile) for continuous variables and as simple frequencies, proportions, and percentages for categorical variables. The Mann–Whitney test was used for unpaired samples. Dichotomous variables were compared using Fisher’s exact tests or chi-square test statistics, as appropriate. Log-rank tests and univariate Cox regression were used for categorical or continuous variables, respectively. p-value analyses were two-sided, and a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The rates of MDR-GN BSI in the pre-COVID-19 period and during the COVID-19 pandemic were expressed in incidence densities which were calculated using the number of MDR-GN BSI episodes in the study period as the numerator and the number of patients admitted in the ICU in the same period as the denominator multiplied by 100. We analyzed total rates and rates per pathogen in the ICU. To assess the differences between the two periods, the incidence densities in 2019 were compared with the data from 2020. All statistical analyses were performed with SATA/IC software (StataCorp) version 15.
The study was approved by the local Ethics Committee (ID Prot. 109/2020).

5. Conclusions

COVID-19 had a negative prognostic impact on patients with MDR-GN BSI admitted to the ICU. Enhancing IPC measures is crucial to reducing the likelihood of MDRO colonization and bacteremia, which is related to a worse outcome. Further studies are needed to clearly assess the relationship between COVID-19 and AMR.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.D. and A.O.; data curation, F.C.D., G.A., F.A. (Federica Alessi), S.V., A.C., F.S., G.C., G.R. and F.A. (Francesco Alessandri); formal analysis, F.C.D. and A.O.; methodology, A.O.; supervision, M.V.; visualization, C.M.M.; writing—original draft, F.C.D.; writing—review and editing, M.V. and A.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Policlinico Umberto I (ID Prot. 109/2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int (accessed on 31 May 2022).
  2. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Aguilar, G.R.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. WHO 10 Global Health Issues to Track in 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/10-global-health-issues-to-track-in-2021 (accessed on 13 May 2022).
  4. World Bank Drug-Resistant Infections: A Threat to Our Economic Future. Available online: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/health/publication/drug-resistant-infections-a-threat-to-our-economic-future (accessed on 13 May 2022).
  5. Monnet, D.L.; Harbarth, S. Will Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Have an Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance? Eurosurveillance 2020, 25, 2001886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rawson, T.M.; Ming, D.; Ahmad, R.; Moore, L.S.P.; Holmes, A.H. Antimicrobial Use, Drug-Resistant Infections and COVID-19. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 409–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Langford, B.J.; So, M.; Raybardhan, S.; Leung, V.; Soucy, J.-P.R.; Westwood, D.; Daneman, N.; MacFadden, D.R. Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients with COVID-19: Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kampmeier, S.; Tönnies, H.; Correa-Martinez, C.L.; Mellmann, A.; Schwierzeck, V. A Nosocomial Cluster of Vancomycin Resistant Enterococci among COVID-19 Patients in an Intensive Care Unit. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2020, 9, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Polly, M.; de Almeida, B.L.; Lennon, R.P.; Cortês, M.F.; Costa, S.F.; Guimarães, T. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Incidence of Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections in an Acute Care Hospital in Brazil. Am. J. Infect. Control 2022, 50, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Porretta, A.D.; Baggiani, A.; Arzilli, G.; Casigliani, V.; Mariotti, T.; Mariottini, F.; Scardina, G.; Sironi, D.; Totaro, M.; Barnini, S.; et al. Increased Risk of Acquisition of New Delhi Metallo-Beta-Lactamase-Producing Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (NDM-CRE) among a Cohort of COVID-19 Patients in a Teaching Hospital in Tuscany, Italy. Pathogens 2020, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garcia-Vidal, C.; Sanjuan, G.; Moreno-García, E.; Puerta-Alcalde, P.; Garcia-Pouton, N.; Chumbita, M.; Fernandez-Pittol, M.; Pitart, C.; Inciarte, A.; Bodro, M.; et al. Incidence of Co-Infections and Superinfections in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2021, 27, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Contou, D.; Claudinon, A.; Pajot, O.; Micaëlo, M.; Longuet Flandre, P.; Dubert, M.; Cally, R.; Logre, E.; Fraissé, M.; Mentec, H.; et al. Bacterial and Viral Co-Infections in Patients with Severe SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia Admitted to a French ICU. Ann. Intensive Care 2020, 10, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hazel, K.; Skally, M.; Glynn, E.; Foley, M.; Burns, K.; O’Toole, A.; Boland, K.; Fitzpatrick, F. The Other “C”: Hospital-Acquired Clostridioides Difficile Infection during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2022, 43, 540–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Buetti, N.; Ruckly, S.; de Montmollin, E.; Reignier, J.; Terzi, N.; Cohen, Y.; Siami, S.; Dupuis, C.; Timsit, J.-F. COVID-19 Increased the Risk of ICU-Acquired Bloodstream Infections: A Case–Cohort Study from the Multicentric OUTCOMEREA Network. Intensive Care Med. 2021, 47, 180–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baccolini, V.; Migliara, G.; Isonne, C.; Dorelli, B.; Barone, L.C.; Giannini, D.; Marotta, D.; Marte, M.; Mazzalai, E.; Alessandri, F.; et al. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Healthcare-Associated Infections in Intensive Care Unit Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2021, 10, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Falcone, M.; Tiseo, G.; Giordano, C.; Leonildi, A.; Menichini, M.; Vecchione, A.; Pistello, M.; Guarracino, F.; Ghiadoni, L.; Forfori, F.; et al. Predictors of Hospital-Acquired Bacterial and Fungal Superinfections in COVID-19: A Prospective Observational Study. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 1078–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fattorini, L.; Creti, R.; Palma, C.; Pantosti, A. Unit of Antibiotic Resistance and Special Pathogens; Unit of Antibiotic Resistance and Special Pathogens of the Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome Bacterial Coinfections in COVID-19: An Underestimated Adversary. Ann. Ist. Super. Sanita 2020, 56, 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mędrzycka-Dąbrowska, W.; Lange, S.; Zorena, K.; Dąbrowski, S.; Ozga, D.; Tomaszek, L. Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae Infections in ICU COVID-19 Patients—A Scoping Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thoma, R.; Seneghini, M.; Seiffert, S.N.; Vuichard Gysin, D.; Scanferla, G.; Haller, S.; Flury, D.; Boggian, K.; Kleger, G.-R.; Filipovic, M.; et al. The Challenge of Preventing and Containing Outbreaks of Multidrug-Resistant Organisms and Candida Auris during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Report of a Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Outbreak and a Systematic Review of the Literature. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control 2022, 11, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Serapide, F.; Quirino, A.; Scaglione, V.; Morrone, H.L.; Longhini, F.; Bruni, A.; Garofalo, E.; Matera, G.; Marascio, N.; Scarlata, G.G.M.; et al. Is the Pendulum of Antimicrobial Drug Resistance Swinging Back after COVID-19? Microorganisms 2022, 10, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pascale, R.; Bussini, L.; Gaibani, P.; Bovo, F.; Fornaro, G.; Lombardo, D.; Ambretti, S.; Pensalfine, G.; Appolloni, L.; Bartoletti, M.; et al. Carbapenem-Resistant Bacteria in an Intensive Care Unit during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Multicenter before-and-after Cross-Sectional Study. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2022, 43, 461–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Russo, A.; Gavaruzzi, F.; Ceccarelli, G.; Borrazzo, C.; Oliva, A.; Alessandri, F.; Magnanimi, E.; Pugliese, F.; Venditti, M. Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii Infections in COVID-19 Patients Hospitalized in Intensive Care Unit. Infection 2022, 50, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Segala, F.V.; Bavaro, D.F.; Di Gennaro, F.; Salvati, F.; Marotta, C.; Saracino, A.; Murri, R.; Fantoni, M. Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic on Antimicrobial Resistance: A Literature Review. Viruses 2021, 13, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magnasco, L.; Mikulska, M.; Giacobbe, D.R.; Taramasso, L.; Vena, A.; Dentone, C.; Dettori, S.; Tutino, S.; Labate, L.; Di Pilato, V.; et al. Spread of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negatives and Candida Auris during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Critically Ill Patients: One Step Back in Antimicrobial Stewardship? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chamieh, A.; Zgheib, R.; El-Sawalhi, S.; Yammine, L.; El-Hajj, G.; Zmerli, O.; Afif, C.; Rolain, J.-M.; Azar, E. Trends of Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens, Difficult to Treat Bloodstream Infections, and Antimicrobial Consumption at a Tertiary Care Center in Lebanon from 2015-2020: COVID-19 Aftermath. Antibiot. Basel Switz. 2021, 10, 1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Nebreda-Mayoral, T.; Miguel-Gómez, M.A.; March-Rosselló, G.A.; Puente-Fuertes, L.; Cantón-Benito, E.; Martínez-García, A.M.; Muñoz-Martín, A.B.; Orduña-Domingo, A. Infección Bacteriana/Fúngica En Pacientes Con COVID-19 Ingresados En Un Hospital de Tercer Nivel de Castilla y León, España. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2022, 40, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Grasselli, G.; Scaravilli, V.; Mangioni, D.; Scudeller, L.; Alagna, L.; Bartoletti, M.; Bellani, G.; Biagioni, E.; Bonfanti, P.; Bottino, N.; et al. Hospital-Acquired Infections in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19. Chest 2021, 160, 454–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Vijay, S.; Bansal, N.; Rao, B.K.; Veeraraghavan, B.; Rodrigues, C.; Wattal, C.; Goyal, J.P.; Tadepalli, K.; Mathur, P.; Venkateswaran, R.; et al. Secondary Infections in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: Indian Experience. Infect. Drug Resist. 2021, 14, 1893–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Falcone, M.; Bassetti, M.; Tiseo, G.; Giordano, C.; Nencini, E.; Russo, A.; Graziano, E.; Tagliaferri, E.; Leonildi, A.; Barnini, S.; et al. Time to Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy Is a Predictor of Outcome in Patients with Bloodstream Infection Caused by KPC-Producing Klebsiella Pneumoniae. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Russo, A.; Giuliano, S.; Ceccarelli, G.; Alessandri, F.; Giordano, A.; Brunetti, G.; Venditti, M. Comparison of Septic Shock Due to Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter Baumannii or Klebsiella Pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing K. Pneumoniae in Intensive Care Unit Patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62, e02562-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Machuca, I.; Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, B.; Gracia-Ahufinger, I.; Rivera Espinar, F.; Cano, Á.; Guzmán-Puche, J.; Pérez-Nadales, E.; Natera, C.; Rodríguez, M.; León, R.; et al. Mortality Associated with Bacteremia Due to Colistin-Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae with High-Level Meropenem Resistance: Importance of Combination Therapy without Colistin and Carbapenems. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00406-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Oliva, A.; Miele, M.C.; Di Timoteo, F.; De Angelis, M.; Mauro, V.; Aronica, R.; Al Ismail, D.; Ceccarelli, G.; Pinacchio, C.; d’Ettorre, G.; et al. Persistent Systemic Microbial Translocation and Intestinal Damage During Coronavirus Disease-19. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 708149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Spagnolello, O.; Pinacchio, C.; Santinelli, L.; Vassalini, P.; Innocenti, G.P.; Girolamo, G.D.; Fabris, S.; Giovanetti, M.; Angeletti, S.; Russo, A.; et al. Targeting Microbiome: An Alternative Strategy for Fighting SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Chemotherapy 2021, 66, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Oliva, A.; Aversano, L.; De Angelis, M.; Mascellino, M.T.; Miele, M.C.; Morelli, S.; Battaglia, R.; Iera, J.; Bruno, G.; Corazziari, E.S.; et al. Persistent Systemic Microbial Translocation, Inflammation, and Intestinal Damage During Clostridioides Difficile Infection. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2020, 7, ofz507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Falcone, M.; Russo, A.; Iraci, F.; Carfagna, P.; Goldoni, P.; Vullo, V.; Venditti, M. Risk Factors and Outcomes for Bloodstream Infections Secondary to Clostridium Difficile Infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Knaus, W.A.; Draper, E.A.; Wagner, D.P.; Zimmerman, J.E. APACHE II: A Severity of Disease Classification System. Crit. Care Med. 1985, 13, 818–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A New Method of Classifying Prognostic Comorbidity in Longitudinal Studies: Development and Validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al-Hasan, M.N.; Lahr, B.D.; Eckel-Passow, J.E.; Baddour, L.M. Predictive Scoring Model of Mortality in Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 948–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Singer, M.; Deutschman, C.S.; Seymour, C.W.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Annane, D.; Bauer, M.; Bellomo, R.; Bernard, G.R.; Chiche, J.-D.; Coopersmith, C.M.; et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016, 315, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Magiorakos, A.-P.; Srinivasan, A.; Carey, R.B.; Carmeli, Y.; Falagas, M.E.; Giske, C.G.; Harbarth, S.; Hindler, J.F.; Kahlmeter, G.; Olsson-Liljequist, B.; et al. Multidrug-Resistant, Extensively Drug-Resistant and Pandrug-Resistant Bacteria: An International Expert Proposal for Interim Standard Definitions for Acquired Resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Off. Publ. Eur. Soc. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2012, 18, 268–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Tamma, P.D.; Aitken, S.L.; Bonomo, R.A.; Mathers, A.J.; van Duin, D.; Clancy, C.J. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. Aeruginosa). Clin. Infect. Dis. Off. Publ. Infect. Dis. Soc. Am. 2021, 72, e169–e183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. EUCAST EUCAST: Clinical Breakpoints and Dosing of Antibiotics. Available online: https://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/ (accessed on 17 May 2022).
Antibiotics 11 00926 g001 550
Figure 1. Cumulative proportions on overall 30-day mortality estimates from MDR-GN BSI onset. (A), between patients with (red line) or without (blue line) septic shock at the BSI onset; (B), between patients that received early active therapy (red line) and who did not receive it (blue line); (C), between pre-pandemic patients (blue line) and COVID-19 patients (red line). Axis X: number of days from BSI onset; axis Y: probability of survival from BSI onset. Abbreviations: MDR-GN: multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; BSI: bloodstream infection; early active therapy: at least one in vitro active drug within the first 24 h.
Figure 1. Cumulative proportions on overall 30-day mortality estimates from MDR-GN BSI onset. (A), between patients with (red line) or without (blue line) septic shock at the BSI onset; (B), between patients that received early active therapy (red line) and who did not receive it (blue line); (C), between pre-pandemic patients (blue line) and COVID-19 patients (red line). Axis X: number of days from BSI onset; axis Y: probability of survival from BSI onset. Abbreviations: MDR-GN: multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; BSI: bloodstream infection; early active therapy: at least one in vitro active drug within the first 24 h.
Antibiotics 11 00926 g001
Antibiotics 11 00926 g002 550
Figure 2. Flow chart of the study population. Abbreviations: no-CoV: pre-COVID-19 pandemic period; CoV: during COVID-19 pandemic; ICU: intensive care unit; MDR-GN: multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; BSI: bloodstream infection.
Figure 2. Flow chart of the study population. Abbreviations: no-CoV: pre-COVID-19 pandemic period; CoV: during COVID-19 pandemic; ICU: intensive care unit; MDR-GN: multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria; BSI: bloodstream infection.
Antibiotics 11 00926 g002
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population. Demographic, clinical characteristics, outcomes of the study population and microbiological data, and clinical and treatment characteristics of the BSI episodes.
Table 1. Characteristics of the study population. Demographic, clinical characteristics, outcomes of the study population and microbiological data, and clinical and treatment characteristics of the BSI episodes.
CharacteristicsTotal PopulationNo-CoVCoVp Value
(n 46)(n 28)(n 18)
General, n, %
Age, years, median (IQR)65.5 (57–73)66.5 (56.7–73)63.5 (57.5–72.5)ns
Gender, F/M14 (30.4)/32 (69.6)11 (39.3)/17 (60.7)3 (16.7)/15 (83.3)ns
Other hospitalization in previous 90 days10 (21.7)8 (22.8)2 (10.5)ns
Pre-hospitalization antibiotic therapy in previous 90 days13 (28.3)6 (20.4)7 (36.8)ns
Pre-BSI antibiotic therapy45 (97.8)27 (95.4)18 (100)ns
Patients with >1 BSI from different MDRO14 (30.4)13 (28.3)1 (2.2)0.003
Comorbidities, n. (%)
Myocardial infarction7 (15.2)5 (17.9)2 (11.1)ns
Congestive heart failure14 (30.4)10 (35.7)4 (22.2)ns
Peripheral vascular disease13 (28.3)8 (28.6)5 (27.8)ns
Cerebrovascular disease4 (8.7)3 (10.7)1 (5.5)ns
Dementia3 (6.5)2 (7.1)1 (5.5)ns
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease6 (13)6 (21.4)0NA
Liver disease {1}1 (2.2)1 (3.6)0NA
Diabetes mellitus11 (23.9)8 (28.6)3 (7.2)ns
Hemiplegia1 (2.2)1 (3.6)0NA
Chronic kidney disease {2}2 (4.4)1 (3.6)1 (5.5)ns
Solid tumor3 (6.5)3 (10.7)0NA
Leukemia1 (2.2)01 (5.5)NA
Charlson Comorbidity Index, median (IQR)3.5 (2–6)4 (2–6)2 (1.25–4)ns
APACHE II score {3}, median (IQR)18.5 (13–23)22 (16–23)11 (3.2–21.5)0.003
Polytrauma9 (19.6)9 (32.1)0 (0)0.007
Outcome, median (IQR)
Days of hospitalization overall43 (29.5–98.75)69.5 (43.5–141.5)28.5(18.7–35.7)0.001
Days of hospitalization until ICU admission2 (0–6)2 (0–9.75)2 (0.25–5)ns
Days of hospitalization until BSI25.5 (12.25–37.5)29 (15–48.25)20 (9.5–26.75)0.02
Days of ICU hospitalization31.5 (21.25–68)56 (28–91.25)25 (13.5–29.5)0.004
Days of ICU hospitalization until BSI18.5 (9–29)23 (9.75–34.75)14.5 (9–21.75)ns
Days of hospitalization from BSI to death15.5 (4.25–45.75)44 (14.5–117.5)5 (1.25–11.75)0.003
Overall in-hospital mortality, n. (%)29 (63)15 (53.6)14 (77.8)ns
Mortality 30 days from ICU admission, n. (%)20 (43.5)6 (21.4)14 (77.8)<0.0001
Mortality 30 days from BSI, n. (%)20 (43.5)6 (21.4)14 (77.8)<0.0001
BSI CharacteristicsTotal BSINo-CoVCoV
(n 63)(n 44)(n 19)
Microbiological data, n (%)
Pre-BSI infections from no MDRO {4}57 (90.6)43 (97.7%)14 (73.7)0.003
Pre-BSI infections from MDRO {4}48 (76.2)38 (86.4)10 (52.6)0.004
MDRO colonization45 (71.4)36 (81.8)9 (47.4)0.005
Overall BSI incidence density, n per 100 patients 16.511.2ns
K. pneumoniae BSI26 (41.3)22 (50)4 (21)0.032
-Incidence density, n per 100 patients 8.22.40.012
A. baumannii BSI32 (50.8)17 (38.6)15 (78.9)0.003
-Incidence density, n per 100 patients 6.49ns
P. aeruginosa BSI5 (7.9)5 (11.4)0ns
Source of BSI ns
-
Lung
31 (49.2)21 (47.7)10 (52.6)
-
Urine
5 (7.9)5 (11.4)0
-
Abdomen
2 (3.2)2 (4.5)0
Primary BSI25 (39.7)16 (36.4)9 (47.4)ns
Source control8 (12.7)4 (9.1)4 (21)ns
Clinical data
Septic shock at BSI onset, n (%)25 (39.7)12 (27.3)13 (68.4)0.003
PITT score on the BSI day, median (IQR)3 (1–8)3 (1–5)8 (2–8)0.002
Treatment data
Early active therapy (<24 h), n (%)31 (49.2)21 (47.7)10 (52.6)ns
Time to definite therapy, median (IQR)1 (1–2)1 (1–2)1 (1–2)ns
{1} from chronic hepatitis to cirrhosis; {2} from moderate CKD (creatinine > 3 mg/dL) to dialysis or status post kidney transplant; {3} APACHE II score at ICU admission; {4} pre-BSI infections: an infection before BSI onset. No-CoV: pre- COVID-19 pandemic period; CoV: during COVID-19 pandemic; MDRO: multi-drug-resistant organism; ns: not significant; NA: not applicable; ICU: intensive care unit; BSI: bloodstream infection; early active therapy: at least one in vitro active drug within the first 24 h.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cogliati Dezza, F.; Arcari, G.; Alessi, F.; Valeri, S.; Curtolo, A.; Sacco, F.; Ceccarelli, G.; Raponi, G.; Alessandri, F.; Mastroianni, C.M.; et al. Clinical Impact of COVID-19 on Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections in an Intensive Care Unit Setting: Two Pandemics Compared. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070926

AMA Style

Cogliati Dezza F, Arcari G, Alessi F, Valeri S, Curtolo A, Sacco F, Ceccarelli G, Raponi G, Alessandri F, Mastroianni CM, et al. Clinical Impact of COVID-19 on Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections in an Intensive Care Unit Setting: Two Pandemics Compared. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(7):926. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070926

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cogliati Dezza, Francesco, Gabriele Arcari, Federica Alessi, Serena Valeri, Ambrogio Curtolo, Federica Sacco, Giancarlo Ceccarelli, Giammarco Raponi, Francesco Alessandri, Claudio Maria Mastroianni, and et al. 2022. "Clinical Impact of COVID-19 on Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli Bloodstream Infections in an Intensive Care Unit Setting: Two Pandemics Compared" Antibiotics 11, no. 7: 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11070926

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop