Next Article in Journal
A Meta-Analysis to Estimate Prevalence of Resistance to Tetracyclines and Third Generation Cephalosporins in Enterobacteriaceae Isolated from Food Crops
Next Article in Special Issue
Hydrophilic Composites of Chitosan with Almond Gum: Characterization and Mechanical, and Antimicrobial Activity for Compostable Food Packaging
Previous Article in Journal
Determinants of the Empiric Use of Antibiotics by General Practitioners in South Africa: Observational, Analytic, Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Grafted Chitosan-Hyaluronic Acid (CS-g-poly (MA-co-AN) HA) Complex Inhibits Fluconazole-Resistant Candida albicans Biofilm Formation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Thermoplastic Starch Composites Reinforced with Functionalized POSS: Fabrication, Characterization, and Evolution of Mechanical, Thermal and Biological Activities

Antibiotics 2022, 11(10), 1425; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101425
by Raja Venkatesan †, Ramkumar Vanaraj, Krishnapandi Alagumalai †, Shakila Parveen Asrafali, Chaitany Jayprakash Raorane †, Vinit Raj * and Seong-Cheol Kim *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Antibiotics 2022, 11(10), 1425; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11101425
Submission received: 6 September 2022 / Revised: 9 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 17 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Over all plagiarism checking is needed.

Introduction to be modified 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

There are some issues that should be checked before the manuscript has been accepted.

For (2.2.5). There is no discussion about the antimicrobial activitity of the similar nanobiocomposites. However, there are so many publications about nanocomposite bioactive/biodegradable food packaging materails in the literature. 

For (2.2.6) Same as above, there is no discussion part about the biodegradability of the sample.

For (3.4.9) Did the authors use any reference for antimicrobial activity? where did authors obtain the strains?  How did they prepared the inoculums? 

For (3.4.10) Same as above, there is no reference about the biodegradability of the sample.

For (3.4.11) Did the authors repeat the antimicrobial activity test for five times? If so, they should give the standard deviation values for inhibition zone measurements (Table S3).

Overall, the discussion is not adequate throughout the manuscript.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Dear Authors,

The manuscript is well written, and has scientific significance. The experimental design is well planned and presented. Numerous techniques have been used so as to study the mechanical, thermal and antimicrobial properties of thermoplastic starch composites reinforced with functionalization of POSS. From the derived results the improvement of the characteristics due to the addition of fn-POSS to TS composites is clearly defined. The explanation and discussion made by the Authors is well presented. The conclusions are supported from the data presented and are meaningful. Format, grammar and units are correct.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Check the uploaded file. There are too many English mistakes. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop