Next Article in Journal
Xerogel-Derived Manganese Oxide/N-Doped Carbon as a Non-Precious Metal-Based Oxygen Reduction Reaction Catalyst in Microbial Fuel Cells for Energy Conversion Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Microstructure and Tribological Mechanism of Mo Incorporated (AlCrTiZr)N High-Entropy Ceramics Coatings Prepared by Magnetron Sputtering
Previous Article in Journal
Estimation of Sound Transmission Loss in Nanofiber Nonwoven Fabrics: Comparison of Conventional Models and the Simplified Limp Frame Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Liquid Shear Exfoliation of MoS2: Preparation, Characterization, and NO2-Sensing Properties
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

A Co-Sputtering Process Optimization for the Preparation of FeGaB Alloy Magnetostrictive Thin Films

1
State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Manufacturing Systems Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
School of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Xiamen Institute of Technology, Xiamen 361021, China
3
Shandong Laboratory of Yantai Advanced Materials and Green Manufacturing, Yantai 265503, China
4
Xi’an Jiaotong University (Yantai) Research Institute for Intelligent Sensing Technology and System, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2023, 13(22), 2948; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222948
Submission received: 21 October 2023 / Revised: 10 November 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published: 15 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thin-Film Processing and Deposition Techniques)

Abstract

:
A co-sputtering process for the deposition of Fe0.8Ga0.2B alloy magnetostrictive thin films is studied in this paper. The soft magnetic performance of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin films is modulated by the direct-current (DC) sputtering power of an FeGa target and the radio-frequency (RF) sputtering power of a B target. Characterization results show that the prepared Fe0.8Ga0.2B films are amorphous with uniform thickness and low coercivity. With increasing FeGa DC sputtering power, coercivity raises, resulting from the enhancement of magnetism and grain growth. On the other hand, when the RF sputtering power of the B target increases, the coercivity decreases first and then increases because of the conversion of the films from a crystalline to an amorphous state. The lowest coercivity of 7.51 Oe is finally obtained with the sputtering power of 20 W for the FeGa target and 60 W for the B target. Potentially, this optimization provides a simple way for improving the magnetoelectric coefficient of magnetoelectric composite materials and the sensitivity of magnetoelectric sensors.

1. Introduction

During the past decades, it has been discovered that the magnetoelectric coefficient of composite materials is much higher than that of single-phase materials. Moreover, these materials can directly convert magnetic signals into electrical signals even under passive conditions. Therefore, magnetoelectric composite materials can be used as sensitive elements in magnetoelectric sensors and are widely applied in the fields of microwave communication [1,2,3], band-pass filters [4,5,6], phase shifters [7,8,9], etc.
Magnetoelectric composite materials are multi-phase composite materials that combine magnetostrictive layers and piezoelectric layers. In order to obtain a high magneto-electric coefficient, it is necessary to choose materials with greater magnetostrictive coefficients. FeGaB alloy is a type of material with a high magnetostrictive coefficient, low saturation magnetic field, and excellent soft magnetic performance. By optimizing the deposition process, the soft magnetic and magnetostrictive performance of FeGaB films can be improved, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of magnetoelectric sensors.
Currently, methods for preparing FeGaB films include pulsed laser deposition (PLD) [10,11,12], the sol-gel method [13,14,15], and magnetron sputtering deposition [16,17,18]. Films prepared by PLD technology exhibit controllable thickness and smooth surface morphology, but the coating area is small and the deposition rate is low. The sol-gel method allows for easy and uniform doping of trace elements at the molecular level, but the entire sol-gel process takes a long time and the gel contains a large number of micropores, which will release a lot of gas and organic compounds during the drying process, leading to a shrinkage of the composite films. Magnetron sputtering deposition has the advantages of a large coating area, slow heating of the substrate, good adhesion, and low cost, so is an excellent choice for the preparation of magnetostrictive materials. There are two approaches employing magnetron sputtering using (i) a single cathode composed of FeGaB alloy or (ii) co-sputtering [19,20] with two FeGa and B cathodes. The first method requires high accuracy for the element composition and uniformity of the target, and it is difficult to control the element composition by sputtering parameters, resulting in low target utilization. By controlling the sputtering parameters of different targets, the co-sputtering process can regulate the film composition, making the films more uniform and optimizing the soft magnetic performance. Meanwhile, co-sputtering has higher target utilization, better flexibility, and operability.
In this study, a co-sputtering process with FeGa alloy and B targets was carried out for the deposition of FeGaB magnetostrictive films, and the sputtering power was optimized for the improvement of soft magnetic performance. The composition, surface morphology, and coercivity of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B films under different sputtering process parameters were characterized and analyzed by using X-ray diffraction (XRD, D8 ADVANCE A25, Saarbrucken, Germany), atom force microscopy (AFM, INNOVA, Billerica, MA, USA), and vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lakeshore 7404, Great Barrington, MA, USA) methods. The influence of sputtering process parameters on the soft magnetic performance of the FeGaB films was systematically analyzed, which proposed a potential way for the enhancement of magnetoelectric (ME) sensor sensitivity.

2. Growth Process of Fe0.8Ga0.2B Magnetostrictive Films

The composition ratio and structure parameters play a crucial role in determining the magnetostrictive properties of FeGaB [21] thin films, which can be regulated by process parameters. A cross-sectional diagram of the composite film is shown in Figure 1. The substrate is single-crystal silicon with a thickness of 500 μm, on which is 500 nm Mo, 1 μm Al0.8Sc0.2N, and Fe0.8Ga0.2B magnetostrictive film in sequence. As the composite film is used for the preparation of an ME sensor, Mo acts as the bottom electrode of the sensor, Al0.8Sc0.2N is the piezoelectric film, and Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film is the magnetostrictive layer.
The Mo metal film is deposited by the magnetron sputtering process, and the Al0.8Sc0.2N [22] piezoelectric film is prepared by the co-sputtering method using Al and Sc targets in a nitrogen environment at the temperature of 350 °C. For the Fe0.8Ga0.2B magnetostrictive film, a magnetron sputtering system with Fe0.8Ga0.2 alloy as the DC target and pure B material as the RF target is carried out. The coercivity and deposition rate of Fe0.8Ga0.2B can be adjusted by changing the sputtering power parameters of the targets, in order to obtain an Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film with lower coercivity and better uniformity.

3. Characterization Method of Fe0.8Ga0.2B Magnetostrictive Films

After the growth of Fe0.8Ga0.2B magnetostrictive films, the composition, surface morphology, and coercivity of the films are characterized by the XRD, AFM, and VSM methods.
Through the XRD scanning spectrum, the types and composition of the films can be identified, and the quality (e.g., crystallinity and grain size) of the films can also be analyzed by the intensity of the diffraction peaks. As the major peaks of the films like Al0.8Sc0.2N, Fe0.8Ga0.2B, etc. are in the range of 36° to 65°, the scanning range is set as 30° to 70°.
By AFM measurement, the surface morphology and root mean square (RMS) roughness value of the films can be obtained for the evaluation of the deposition uniformity. Herein, a scanning area of 5 μm × 5 μm is used because it can not only reflect the relatively complete uniformity of the film, but also ensures high efficiency.
The magnetic hysteresis loops of the samples can be measured by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). By applying an external magnetic field from −1000 Oe to 1000 Oe and repeating this process, the magnetic hysteresis loop of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film is obtained through measuring its magnetization intensity. The coercivity is defined as the external magnetic field applied on the films when the internal magnetization intensity of the films is zero. Thus, through the analysis of VSM curves, the coercivity of the films can be obtained. A lower coercivity of a film means better soft magnetic properties and a greater sensitivity of an ME sensor, so by comparing the coercivity of different samples, the optimal process parameters can be achieved.

4. Results and Discussion

A Fe0.8Ga0.2B alloy magnetostrictive thin film is initially deposited at sputtering conditions of DC power of 30 W and RF power of 46 W. As illustrated in Figure 2, the surface topography of the composite film has been studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM), which shows that the root mean square (RMS) roughness value is below 9.8 nm. Hence, good uniformity of thin films with columnar growth has been obtained from sputtering.
Figure 3 shows the XRD pattern of the substrate surface after sputtering Fe0.8Ga0.2B with a DC power of 30 W and an RF power of 46 W. A diffraction peak at the degree of 36° shows that the Al0.8Sc0.2N piezoelectric film exhibits a typical (002) direction crystal and superior piezoelectric performance. On the other hand, the sputtered Fe0.8Ga0.2B film shows a more pronounced diffraction peak at 44° [21], which means that the magnetostrictive film has large grains in the crystal and great coercivity. Fe0.8Ga0.2BO3 is possibly the natural oxide of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film in air, and Fe (200) is the iron elemental in Fe0.8Ga0.2B film. Due to the natural quality of the crystalline in the film, under the external magnetic field it is difficult to achieve the rotation of magnetic domains in a high crystallinity film. So it exhibits a higher coercivity and poorer soft magnetic properties. By optimizing the sputtering power and exploring the process conditions, the best soft magnetic performance of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film can be achieved.
Figure 4 shows the variation curve of the thickness of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film with Fe0.8Ga0.2 target power. Maintaining the power of target B at 46 W, the thickness of the deposited Fe0.8Ga0.2B film changes from 247.2 nm to 318.2 nm with an increase in the FeGa alloy target power from 20 W to 40 W. There is a linear relationship between the power of the FeGa target and the thickness of the thin film. While keeping the power of the FeGa target at 30 W, the thickness of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film only ranges from 247.2 nm to 250.1 nm with an increase in the power of the B target from 46 W to 67 W.
It can be seen that the sputtering power of FeGa alloy targets can significantly change the deposition rate. Increasing the DC sputtering power results in more Ar+ ions being produced, which leads to higher energy for the atoms on the target surface. As a result, more target atoms are ejected from the target surface and deposited onto the substrate. However, excessively high sputtering power will lead to high coercivity in the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film, while low sputtering power can result in weak glow discharge during the sputtering process, which is not conducive to maintaining the sputtering process. The power of the B target has a minor influence on the deposition rate of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film. In the sputtering process of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film, the sputtering efficiency of the RF target is much lower than that of the DC target, so the sputtering yield of B atoms is relatively small and has a minor effect on the deposition rate.
Figure 5 is the XRD image of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin films corresponding to different sputtering powers of FeGa targets. The B target power remains at 46 W, and when the FeGa sputtering power changes, strong diffraction peaks appear at both 25 W, 30 W, and 40 W. The grain size of the thin film can be calculated using Scherrer’s formula:
D = κ λ β c o s ( θ )
where κ is the Scherrer constant, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray, β is the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak, and θ is the Bragg diffraction angle. The grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film with different powers of FeGa target is displayed in Table 1. When the power of the FeGa target is 40 W, the FWHM of the diffraction peak of the film is 0.496° and the grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film obtained by sputtering at this power is 11.8 nm. When the power of the FeGa target is 30 W, the FWHM of the diffraction peak of the film is 0.715°, and the grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film obtained by sputtering at this power is 8.2 nm. When the power of the FeGa target is 25 W, the FWHM of the diffraction peak for the deposited film is 0.840° and the grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film is 7.0 nm. As the power of the FeGa target decreases to 20 W, the diffraction peak tends to flatten, indicating that as the B content in the film components relatively increases, the grain size of the film is refined, and the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film becomes amorphous; Boron atoms are expected to distribute around the boundaries of grains and suppress their growth.
Figure 6 shows the magnetic hysteresis loops of thin films formed at different sputtering powers of FeGa alloy targets, which are measured by a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM). It is shown that the coercivity of the thin film raises with an increase in FeGa alloy target sputtering power, and the minimum coercivity is 17.72 Oe. Therefore, when there is a specific ratio between FeGa alloy and B target materials, a better soft magnetic property can be achieved. By comparing with the XRD graph, it can be observed that the smaller the FWHM of the diffraction peaks in the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film, the larger the coercivity will be. When the B element is introduced into the FeGa thin film, the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film transforms into an amorphous phase, leading to an increase in FWHM, which means a small coercivity. This is beneficial for eliminating magnetic crystalline anisotropy, thereby improving the soft magnetic performance of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film.
Figure 7 shows the XRD spectra of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film at different powers for B target sputtering. The FeGa target power is set at 20 W. At a B target sputtering power of 46 W, a pronounced FeGa(110) diffraction peak appears at around 44°. From the XRD spectra, it can be observed that as the B target power increases, the intensity of this diffraction peak decreases gradually and tends to flatten. This suggests that the increased B target power leads to a relatively higher B content in the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film, causing it to transform into an amorphous state. The FeGa lattice becomes more disordered, and B atoms fill the gaps within the FeGa lattice, resulting in further refinement of the FeGa grains and the gradual disappearance of sub-grain boundaries. This decrease in grain size reduces the resistance to magnetization domain rotation under external magnetic fields. When the B target power reaches 67 W, the diffraction peak becomes slightly obvious. Moreover, it is inferred that as the B target sputtering power continues to increase, the intensity of the diffraction peak will also increase. This could be attributed to the excessively high B target power leading to a high quantity of B atoms in the film, and as a result, the film deposition becomes non-uniform and discontinuous, hindering the homogeneous distribution of boron atoms within the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film. Consequently, the film surface becomes uneven, and the overall film quality deteriorates, resulting in larger crystallinity.
In order to enhance the sensitivity of an ME sensor for the detection of weak magnetic fields, it is necessary to select Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with lower coercivity. The coercivity of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B films deposited at different B powers is measured by a VSM, as shown in Figure 8. As the B target power increases, the coercivity of the film first decreases and then increases. The minimum coercivity of 7.51 Oe is achieved. The coercivity values match well with the diffraction peaks in the XRD graph in Figure 6, indicating that the amorphous nature of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film is an important factor for its excellent soft magnetic properties.

5. Conclusions

The effects of sputtering power from FeGa and B targets on the deposition rate, soft magnetic performance, and coercivity of Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin films were investigated using the magnetron co-sputtering method. The prepared Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin films’ thickness raises sharply with increasing FeGa target sputtering power, while it remains almost constant with variations in the B target power. The XRD and VSM results show that as the power of FeGa targets decreases from 40 to 20 W, the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film becomes amorphous and the coercivity decreases. However, with increasing B sputtering power, the B content in the Fe0.8Ga0.2B films increases, and the coercivity initially decreases and then increases. When the B sputtering power increases to 60 W, the coercivity of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B film decreases to 7.51 Oe, and further increasing the sputtering power leads to an increase in coercivity. In general, an FeGa power of 20 W and a B sputtering power of 60 W resulted in Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with low coercivity and a high magnetostriction coefficient, providing potential for the fabrication of high-frequency magnetoelectric sensors with high magnetic coupling coefficients and sensitivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and Z.W.; methodology, Q.M. (Qingzhi Meng); validation, Q.L., Q.M. (Qingzhi Meng), D.X., Q.M. (Qi Mao) and B.T.; investigation, Z.W. and D.X.; resources, Q.L. and B.T.; data curation, Q.L., Q.M. (Qingzhi Meng), D.X., Q.M. (Qi Mao) and B.T.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.W.; writing—review and editing, Z.W., Q.M. (Qingzhi Meng) and Q.L.; supervision, Q.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program (Grant No. 2021YFB3201800).

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the manufacturing and measurement technologies support from State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Manufacturing Systems Engineering.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Sang, L.; Wu, H.; Huang, J.; Wang, L.; Takahashi, Y.; Li, R.; Koizumi, S.; Toda, M.; et al. Coupling of magneto-strictive FeGa film with single-crystal diamond MEMS resonator for high-reliability magnetic sensing at high temperatures. Mater. Res. Lett. 2020, 8, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wu, T.; Bur, A.; Hockel, J.L.; Wong, K.; Chung, T.-K.; Carman, G.P. Electrical and Mechanical Manipulation of Ferromagnetic Properties in Polycrystalline Nickel Thin Film. IEEE Magn. Lett. 2011, 2, 6000104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lin, H.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Nan, T.; Liu, M.; Lou, J.; Yang, G.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, X.; Wu, J.; et al. Integrated Magnetics and Multiferroics for Compact and Power-Efficient Sensing, Memory, Power, RF, and Microwave Electronics. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2016, 52, 4002208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yao, Z.; Tiwari, S.; Schneider, J.; Candler, R.N.; Carman, G.P.; Wang, Y.E. Enhanced Planar Antenna Efficiency through Magnetic Thin-Films. IEEE J. Multiscale Multiphys. Comput. Tech. 2021, 6, 249–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gao, Y.; Zare, S.; Yang, X.; Nan, T.X.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Onabajo, M.; O’Brien, K.P.; Jalan, U.; EI-tatani, M.; Sun, N.X.; et al. High quality factor integrated gigahertz magnetic transformers with FeGaB/Al2O3 multilayer films for radio frequency integrated circuits applications. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 17E714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Indianto, M.A.; Toda, M.; Ono, T. Comprehensive study of magnetostriction-based MEMS magnetic sensor of a FeGa/PZT cantilever. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2021, 331, 112985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, H.; Wang, X.; Gao, Y.; Shi, X.; Wang, Z.; Sun, N.; Zaeimbashi, M.; Liang, X.; He, Y.; Sun, N.X.; et al. Integrated Tunable Magnetoelectric RF Inductors. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 68, 951–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. He, Y.; Gao, Y.; Chen, H.; Lin, H.; Wei, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, N.X. Integrated Tunable Bandstop Filter Using Self-Biased FeGaB/Al2O3Multilayer Thin Film. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2018, 54, 4000804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, X.; Wu, J.; Beguhn, S.; Nan, T.; Gao, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Sun, N.X. Tunable Bandpass Filter Using Partially Magnetized Ferrites with High Power Handling Capability. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2013, 23, 184–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, G.; Wang, W.; Yang, W.; Wang, H. Epitaxial growth of group III-nitride films by pulsed laser deposition and their use in the development of LED devices. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2015, 70, 380–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ogugua, S.N.; Ntwaeaborwa, O.M.; Swart, H.C. Latest Development on Pulsed Laser Deposited Thin Films for Advanced Luminescence Applications. Coatings 2020, 10, 1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Julien, C.M.; Mauger, A. Pulsed Laser Deposited Films for Microbatteries. Coatings 2019, 9, 386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Myasoedova, T.N.; Kalusulingam, R.; Mikhailova, T.S. Sol-Gel Materials for Electrochemical Applications: Recent Advances. Coatings 2022, 12, 1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Figueira, R.B.; Silva, C.J.R.; Pereira, E.V. Organic–inorganic hybrid sol–gel coatings for metal corrosion protection: A review of recent progress. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2014, 12, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, H.; Zhu, M.; Li, Y. Sol–gel research in China: A brief history and recent research trends in synthesis of sol–gel derived materials and their applications. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2022, 106, 406–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Yang, X.; Liu, M.; Peng, B.; Zhou, Z.Y.; Nan, T.X.; Sun, H.J.; Sun, N.X. A wide-band magnetic tunable bandstop filter prototype with FeGaB/Al2O3 multilayer films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 107, 122408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, J.; Ren, G.-K.; Chen, J.; Chen, X.; Wu, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Song, J.; Lin, Y.-H.; Shi, Y. Facilitating Complex Thin Film Deposition by Using Magnetron Sputtering: A Review. JOM 2022, 74, 3069–3081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sharma, V.; Bajracharya, P.; Johnson, A.; Budhani, R.C. Interface-driven spin pumping and inverse Rashba-Edelstein effect in FeGaB/Ag/BiSb multilayers. AIP Adv. 2022, 12, 035028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Huang, W.-L.; Chang, S.-P.; Li, C.-H.; Chang, S.-J. The Characteristics of Aluminum-Gallium-Zinc-Oxide Ultraviolet Phototransistors by Co-Sputtering Method. Electronics 2021, 10, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Torrisi, V.; Ruffino, F. Metal-Polymer Nanocomposites: (Co-)Evaporation/(Co)Sputtering Approaches and Electrical Properties. Coatings 2015, 5, 378–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, X.; Zhan, Q.; Dai, G.; Liu, Y.; Zuo, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, B.; Li, R.-W. Effect of buffer layer and external stress on magnetic properties of flexible FeGa films. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 113, 17A901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shao, S.; Luo, Z.; Lu, Y.; Mazzalai, A.; Tosi, C.; Wu, T. High Quality Co-Sputtering AlScN Thin Films for Piezoelectric Lamb-Wave Resonators. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 2022, 31, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. A diagram of the cross-section of the composite film.
Figure 1. A diagram of the cross-section of the composite film.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g001
Figure 2. (a) Surface of the composite film by AFM; (b) 3D image of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film.
Figure 2. (a) Surface of the composite film by AFM; (b) 3D image of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g002
Figure 3. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film.
Figure 3. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g003
Figure 4. (a) Thickness variation for FeGa sputtering power; (b) thickness variation for B sputtering power.
Figure 4. (a) Thickness variation for FeGa sputtering power; (b) thickness variation for B sputtering power.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g004
Figure 5. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film with different FeGa powers.
Figure 5. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film with different FeGa powers.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g005
Figure 6. (a) Normalized (M/Ms) M-H loop of Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with different FeGa powers; (b) coercivity variation with FeGa sputtering power.
Figure 6. (a) Normalized (M/Ms) M-H loop of Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with different FeGa powers; (b) coercivity variation with FeGa sputtering power.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g006
Figure 7. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film with different B powers.
Figure 7. The XRD pattern of Fe0.8Ga0.2B film with different B powers.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g007
Figure 8. (a) Normalized (M/Ms) M-H loop of Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with different B powers; (b) coercivity variation with B sputtering power.
Figure 8. (a) Normalized (M/Ms) M-H loop of Fe0.8Ga0.2B films with different B powers; (b) coercivity variation with B sputtering power.
Nanomaterials 13 02948 g008
Table 1. The grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film with different powers of FeGa target.
Table 1. The grain size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B thin film with different powers of FeGa target.
The Power of FeGa Target (W)The Grain Size of the Fe0.8Ga0.2B Thin Film (nm)
4011.8
308.2
257.0
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Q.; Wang, Z.; Meng, Q.; Mao, Q.; Xian, D.; Tian, B. A Co-Sputtering Process Optimization for the Preparation of FeGaB Alloy Magnetostrictive Thin Films. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222948

AMA Style

Lin Q, Wang Z, Meng Q, Mao Q, Xian D, Tian B. A Co-Sputtering Process Optimization for the Preparation of FeGaB Alloy Magnetostrictive Thin Films. Nanomaterials. 2023; 13(22):2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Qijing, Zelin Wang, Qingzhi Meng, Qi Mao, Dan Xian, and Bian Tian. 2023. "A Co-Sputtering Process Optimization for the Preparation of FeGaB Alloy Magnetostrictive Thin Films" Nanomaterials 13, no. 22: 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano13222948

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop