Next Article in Journal
All-Optical Nanosensor for Displacement Detection in Mechanical Applications
Previous Article in Journal
Modification of Frictional Properties of Hydrogel Surface via Laser Ablated Topographical Micro-Textures
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Polymer Substrate on Adhesion of Electroless Plating in Irradiation-Based Direct Immobilization of Pd Nanoparticles Catalyst

Graduate School of Engineering, Osaka University, 2-1, Yamada-oka, Suita-shi, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2022, 12(22), 4106; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224106
Submission received: 27 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 17 November 2022 / Published: 21 November 2022

Abstract

:
Pd nanoparticles were directly immobilized on acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS), acrylonitrile–styrene copolymer (AS), polystyrene (PS), polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), polypropylene (PP), and polyethylene (PE) polymer substrates via chemical reactions induced by ionizing irradiation. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis revealed that the chemical state of the immobilized Pd nanoparticles depended on the polymer substrate type. Electroless plating was performed using the immobilized Pd nanoparticles as the catalyst, and Cu-plating films were deposited on all polymer substrates. The results of the tape-peeling test suggested that the chemical state of the immobilized Pd nanoparticles on the polymer substrates affected the plating adhesion strength. Notably, ABS with immobilized Pd particles exhibited a high adhesion strength beyond the practical level, even without prior chemical etching. It was presumed that the high adhesion strength was owing to the anchoring effect of the holes generated on the ABS surface by ionizing irradiation.

1. Introduction

Metallized plastics are widely used in various fields, such as automotive, home appliance, and water-related component manufacturing. Metallization imparts the treated materials with reflectivity, abrasion resistance, electrical conductivity, and decorative properties. Electroless plating is generally used for metal coating on nonconductive materials such as plastics. Acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene copolymer (ABS) is currently the most widely used polymer substrate for plating, owing to its mass producibility, dimensional stability, impact resistance, and high processability. For electroless plating on ABS substrates, chemical etching using a chromic acid–sulfuric acid solution is typically performed for pretreatment. The applied chromic acid dissolves the polybutadiene phase in the treated ABS substrate, which increases its surface roughness and significantly improves mechanical adhesion [1,2,3,4]. Other polymer substrates are difficult to etch, making it difficult to adhere the Pd catalyst to the polymer substrate and deposit electroless plating films. Several studies have sought to overcome this problem. For example, methods that add a filler to a resin matrix or apply a strong acid together with an organic solvent have been proposed for chemical etching [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Alternatively, presurface treatment (e.g., using UV irradiation) has been proposed as a physical etching process [11,12,13].
Our research group has been working on the development of methods for direct immobilization of noble metal nanoparticles on various substrates, such as ceramics, carbon, textile fabrics, and polymer substrates, using chemical reactions induced by ionizing radiation [14,15,16]. The process of nanoparticle formation induced by ionizing radiation has been elucidated by Henglein and Belloni [17,18,19]. We have found that metal nanoparticles can be directly immobilized on the support surface by irradiating the precursor aqueous solution containing the support. Recently, we reported that Pd nanoparticles immobilized on ABS substrates worked as a catalyst for electroless plating, and the Cu plating films obtained using this method exhibited a high adhesion strength despite no etching treatment [16]. This is a novel catalyst-immobilization method that differs from the graft polymerization method, in which functional groups are introduced by irradiating the polymer surface [20].
In the present study, we investigated the applicability of the above-described method to various polymer materials. Because ABS is a copolymer consisting of three polymers (acrylonitrile, butadiene, and styrene), the components that contribute to its high adhesion were investigated using polystyrene (PS) and acrylonitrile–styrene copolymer (AS). In addition to these three substrates, the possibility of Pd immobilization on various substrates was examined using homopolymers such as polypropylene (PP), a commodity plastic, and polyphenylene sulfide (PPS), an engineering plastic. As noble metal species, we used palladium, which is the most common catalyst for electroless plating reactions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Immobilization of Pd on Substrates

The chemicals used were Pd (II) nitrate (Pd(NO3)2; Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo K.K., Tokyo, Japan) and 2-propanol (CH3CH(OH)CH3; Wako, Osaka, Japan). Commercial ABS ((CH2CH(C6H6)·CH2CHCHCH2·CH2CH(CN))n, AS-ONE, Osaka, Japan), AS ((CH2CH(C6H6)·CH2CH(CN))n, Toray, Tokyo, Japan), PS ((CH2CH(C6H6))n, Hikari Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), PPS ((S(C6H4))n, DIC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) ((CH2CHCl)n, AS-ONE, Osaka, Japan), PP ((CH2CH(CH3))n, AS-ONE, Osaka, Japan), and polyethylene (PE) ((CH2CH2)n, AS-ONE, Osaka, Japan) were used as substrates. Before use, the substrates were washed with 2-propanol and pure water, and then dried at room temperature. Plastic zipper packs (Uni-Pack E-4, Seisannipponsha Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) were used as the reaction vessels.
An aqueous solution of Pd(NO3)2 (1 mM) was used as the precursor. The substrates were immersed into 20 mL of the precursor solution. Plastic zipper packs containing the substrates and precursor solutions were lined on the irradiation tray. The samples were irradiated with a high-energy electron beam (4.8 MeV) using a dynamitron accelerator (SHI-ATEX; Tokyo, Japan). The surface dose was 20 kGy. These irradiation conditions are comparable to sterilization of medical devices. It was assumed that electron-beam irradiation induced chemical reactions that generated Pd nanoparticles and simultaneously introduced functional groups on the surface of the polymer substrate. Pd nanoparticles formed by the irradiation were expected to be immobilized on the polymer substrate surface [11]. After the irradiation, the substrates were removed from the solution and washed with pure water using an ultrasonic cleaner for 5 min. The washed samples were then dried at room temperature. The obtained samples were denoted as Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, Pd/PS, Pd/PPS, Pd/PVC, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE.

2.2. Material Characterization

All the obtained samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The surfaces of the irradiated samples were observed by SEM-EDX (JSM-7001F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Prior to the SEM observations, the surfaces of the polymer plates were coated with Os (OPC60A, Filgen, Aichi, Japan). SEM observations were performed at an acceleration voltage of 10–15 kV. The amount of Pd immobilized on the substrates was analyzed by ICP-AES (ICPE-9000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The substrate surfaces (50 mm × 50 mm) were treated with 2 mL of aqua regia (HCl:HNO3 = 3:1) to dissolve the Pd nanoparticles. The surface chemical state was analyzed by XPS (Quantum 2000, ULVAC-PHI, Kanagawa, Japan) using an Al Kα X-ray source operating at 15 kV. A C1s level of 284.6 eV was used as an internal standard to correct for the peak drift. All high-resolution XPS peaks were fitted using XPSPEAK41 software.

2.3. Electroless Plating Process

The electroless plating process described in this study consisted of two main steps:
(i)
Acceleration step
In this step, the chemical states of immobilized Pd were converted to metallic sate to increase their activity. Before acceleration, the wettability was imparted by dipping the substrates in a 5.0 vol% Thru-Cup MTE-1-A (C. Uyemura & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) aqueous solution at 50 °C for 2 min. After the pretreatment, the samples were washed with water at 50 °C for 1 min and rinsed with water at room temperature. The accelerators used were ALCUP Reducer MAB-4-A, MAB-4-C, and MRD-2-C (C. Uyemura & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). The Pd-immobilized samples were accelerated using the following composition: 1.0 vol% MAB-4-A, 5.0 vol% MAB-4-C, and 1.0 vol% MRD-2-C in an aqueous solution.
(ii)
Electroless Cu plating step
The surface-activated Pd/ABS substrates were placed in electroless Cu plating baths. The conditions of the aqueous solution in the plating bath were as follows: 10 vol% Thru-Cup PEA-40-M, 6.0 vol% Thru-Cup PEA-40-B, 3.5 vol% Thru-Cup PEA-40-D, and 2.3 vol% 37% formaldehyde. The temperature of the plating bath was maintained at 34 °C. The electroless Cu plated ABS substrates were then rinsed with distilled water and dried under warm air. Subsequently, they were subjected to a thermal treatment at 80 °C for 60 min.

2.4. Electroplating Process

Electroplating was necessary for measuring the adhesion strength of electroless Cu plating on substrates in the 90° peel test. Acid degreasing and acid activity treatment were performed as pretreatments. For acid degreasing, the substrates were immersed into 10 vol. % DP-320 (Okuno Chemical Industries Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) aqueous solution at 40 °C for 5 min. For the acid activity treatment, the substrates were immersed into 1.82 mol/L H2SO4 at room temperature for 30 s. Electroplating was carried out in a 0.5 vol% Top Lucina 2000MU (Okuno Chemical Industries Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), 0.05vol% Top Lucina 2000A (Okuno Chemical Industries Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan), 1.25 mol/L CuSO4, 0.5 mol/L H2SO4, and 0.0175 vol% conc. HCl solution at 25 °C. The cathode current density was maintained at 3 A/dm² for 1 h.

2.5. Tape-Peeling Test

The adhesion of the electroless Cu plating was evaluated using the tape-peeling test based on JIS H 8504:15, 1999. A strip of the CT405AP-18 cellophane tape (Nichiban Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was applied to less than 8 mm of the substrate and adhered to the plating film by rubbing three times with a finger. The tape was then peeled off such that it was perpendicular to the plating surface.

2.6. Peel Adhesion Strength Test

The adhesion strength was determined by measuring the 90° peel adhesion strength using AG-Xplus (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), with a 1-kN-load cell. All measurements were carried out at a width of 10 mm, peel-off speed of 50.0 mm/min, and constant temperature of 24 °C. The adhesion strength was reported as the average of three sample measurements.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Pd/Substrates

Figure 1a–g show the SEM images of the Pd/substrate samples. The SEM-EDX analysis revealed that the small nanoparticles, manifesting as white spots, consisted of Pd. Pd nanoparticles with diameters in the 20–30 nm range were observed, together with relatively large aggregates with 80–500 nm diameters, in all samples (Figure S1). The amount of Pd nanoparticles immobilized on the polymer substrates were 2.4, 1.9, 1.2, 1.8, 1.5, 5.2, and 6.2 μg/cm2, for Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, Pd/PS, Pd/PPS, Pd/PVC, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE, respectively. These results clearly indicate that Pd nanoparticles were successfully immobilized on the surfaces of the studied polymer substrates.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the XPS analysis results for the Pd/substrate samples. Of note, the shape of the Pd3d XPS spectrum depended on the polymer substrate (Figure 2). The XPS peaks of Pd3d for Pd/PS, Pd/PPS, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE were 335.2 eV and 340.5 eV, corresponding to the metallic Pd [21]. For Pd/PVC, peaks corresponding to the metallic state and PdCl2 (338 eV and 343 eV) [22] were observed. In contrast, the peaks obtained for Pd/ABS were 339.2 eV and 344.5 eV (Figure 2). These peaks were attributed to the state in which Pd was coordinated with the oxygen atoms in the carbonyl groups [23]. For Pd/AS, peaks corresponding to the metallic state and coordination of carbonyl groups with oxygen were observed.
The chemical states of the polymer substrates before and after the Pd particle immobilization were evaluated using XPS O1s and C1s. After the irradiation, the peak intensities of O1s increased for Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, Pd/PVC, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE (Figure 3a). As the polymers constituting these substrates did not contain oxygen, it was assumed that oxygen-containing functional groups were generated on the polymers’ surfaces owing to the electron beam irradiation [24]. Notably, the XPS spectra of Pd/ABS and Pd/AS exhibited a peak at approximately 535.9 eV, which was quite close to the value reported for Pd(acac)2 [25]. This result suggests that Pd coordinated with the carboxyl groups formed on the ABS and AS surfaces. In contrast, the O1s and C1s spectra of Pd/PS and Pd/PPS were almost unchanged before and after the Pd particle immobilization by irradiation.

3.2. Electroless Cu Plating of Pd/Substrates

Figure 4a–g show exterior images of the samples after the electroless plating step. These images clearly suggest that Cu plating films were successfully obtained for all the samples. Thus, Pd nanoparticles immobilized on the polymer substrates functioned as plating catalysts, regardless of their chemical states. The surface coverage of the Cu plating films depended on the polymer substrate. The surfaces of the polymer substrates were completely covered with Cu plating films for Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, Pd/PS, and Pd/PP. In contrast, region on which no copper plating occurs were observed for Pd/PPS, Pd/PVC, and Pd/PE.
The adhesion properties of the Cu plating films depended on the polymer substrate. The Cu plating films did not peel off for Pd/ABS and Pd/PPS (Figure 5a,d). For Pd/AS and Pd/PVC, the Cu plating films partially peeled off (Figure 5b,e).
For Pd/PS, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE, most of the Cu plating films peeled off at the tested locations (Figure 5c,f,g).

4. Discussion

The results for the Pd immobilization amount, chemical state of Pd, deposition of electroless Cu plating films, and tape peeling tests are summarized in Table 1.

4.1. Relationship between the Chemical State of Substrate Surface-Immobilized Pd and the Polymer Substrate Type

The chemical reactions induced by the electron-beam irradiation were of two types: (1) in-solution reduction reactions of Pd ions and (2) polymer surface modification reactions. In solution, water radiolysis proceeded to form hydrated electrons, H radicals, and OH radicals [26,27]:
H2O ⟿ eaq, H, OH, etc.
The generated hydrated electrons and H radicals reduced the Pd2+ ions in solution to form Pd nanoparticles [18]:
Pd2+ + 2eaq → Pd0
Pd2+ + 2H → Pd0 + 2H+
The irradiation-induced reduction of Pd2+ ions did not depend on the polymer substrate type. The modification of the polymer substrates by the ionizing radiation in the present study included direct modification, such as crosslinking and decomposition by radiation, and indirect modification by chemical reactions with active species generated by water radiolysis. During the direct modification by radiation, radicals were generated in polymer chains, and crosslinking and decomposition reactions proceeded. During the indirect modification, the oxidizing species generated by water radiolysis attacked the polymer chains to proceed with the oxidation reaction. The degree of the modification differed, depending on the stability with respect to the radiation and chemical stability of specific polymer substrate.
The relationship between the chemical state of the polymer substrates and the immobilized Pd nanoparticles on the substrates is discussed below. The O1s and C1s XPS spectra of Pd/PPS and Pd/PS with aromatic rings changed little before and after irradiation. Polymers with aromatic groups are known to be radiation-stable because they efficiently dissipate energy [26,27]. Because these substrates were radiation-stable, functional groups were not introduced to the substrate surface. Therefore, Pd was assumed to be immobilized in the metallic state. The O1s and C1s XPS spectra of Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, Pd/PVC, Pd/PP, and Pd/PE exhibited changes before and after irradiation. It was confirmed that functional groups were introduced onto the surfaces of these substrates by irradiation. For Pd/PP and Pd/PE, functional groups were formed on the substrate surface upon irradiation, but the chemical state of the immobilized Pd was metallic. In contrast, for Pd/AS, the chemical state of Pd was metallic and coordinated to the oxygen of the carbonyl group. For Pd/ABS, the chemical state of Pd was coordinated to the oxygen of the carbonyl group. Because XPS is a surface-sensitive analytical method, only the surfaces of Pd nanoparticles can be interpreted as coordinating to the carbonyl group. Exceptionally, for Pd/PVC, the chemical state of Pd was PdCl2-like in addition to metallic. Halogens have very high electron affinity. Halides cause dissociative electron addition reactions via reactions with secondary and other electrons in the system. The dissociated Cl ions are considered to be coordinated to Pd. The radiation sensitivity of the polymer substrate strongly affected the chemical state of the immobilized Pd nanoparticles.

4.2. Properties of Cu Plating Films and Chemical State of Pd

4.2.1. The Surface Coverage of Cu Plating Films

In the electroless Cu plating reaction, Pd immobilized on the substrate functioned as a catalyst to promote the formaldehyde oxidation reaction and generate electrons. The generated electrons caused the Cu2+ ion reduction reaction to proceed by depositing Cu plating films. As shown in Figure 3, electroless Cu plating films were deposited on all samples. Pd nanoparticles immobilized on the polymer substrates using this method worked as electroless Cu-plating catalysts. As previously mentioned, all samples were treated with an accelerant solution prior to the electroless plating process. The Pd species immobilized on the substrates were reduced by the acceleration step to form metallic Pd, which exhibited catalytic activity. On samples where Pd was immobilized in the metallic state, electroless Cu-plating films were deposited without the acceleration step (Supplementary Figure S2). The deposition rates of the Cu plating films on different polymer substrates are discussed below. Electroless plating films were deposited on the entire surfaces of the ABS, AS, PS, and PP samples. However, the Cu plating films were not deposited in some areas for the PPS, PVC, and PE samples. Because there was no correlation with the loading amount of Pd, it was assumed that the plating coverage depended on the distribution of Pd on the polymer surface. These results suggest that the immobilization process of Pd nanoparticles should be improved for some polymer substrates.

4.2.2. Adhesion Strengths of Cu Plating Films

The adhesion characteristics of electroless Cu plating films depended on the Pd-immobilized polymer substrate type. The plating films for PS, PP, and PE were easily peeled off, and Pd nanoparticles were immobilized in the metallic state. In contrast, the plating films for AS and PVC exhibited a relatively high adhesion, in which Pd existed in a metallic state and/or coordinated to functional groups on the substrates. In particular, the plating film for ABS did not delaminate at all, in which Pd was coordinated to the functional groups only. These results suggest that the coordination of Pd to the functional groups on the polymer surfaces is one of the factors responsible for their high plating-adhesion strength. As an exception, the plating film for the PPS surface did not peel off even though Pd nanoparticles were immobilized in the metallic state; this should be discussed in further studies.
Let us consider the reason why the Pd/ABS samples exhibited particularly high adhesion. Electrolytic plating was performed for Pd/ABS and Pd/AS covered with electroless Cu plating, to measure the peeling strength. The peeling strength was 0.03 N/mm for Pd/AS. On the other hand, the peeling strength for Pd/ABS was 0.82 N/mm, exceeding the minimum permissible adhesion strength of 0.7 N/mm specified in the printed circuit standard. The surfaces of the ABS and AS substrates after the peeling-strength test were observed using SEM, and the results are shown in Figure 6. The surface of the ABS substrate was significantly roughened after the Cu plating was peeled, suggesting that the cohesive failure of the ABS substrate occurred during the peeling process. On the other hand, the surface of the AS substrate did not show any unevenness after the removal of the Cu plating, indicating that the cohesive failure of the AS substrate did not occur. The significantly higher peeling strength for Pd/ABS suggests the existence of mechanical anchoring, even without etching. For further discussion, the surfaces of ABS and AS substrates before and after irradiation were observed with SEM, and the images are shown in Figure S3. For ABS samples, some holes with diameters of approximately 80 nm were observed on the irradiated ABS surface, while no holes were observed for AS (Figure S4). From these results, it can be inferred that the decomposition of butadiene during irradiation might lead to the formation of small holes, which contributed to the mechanical anchoring of the Cu plating films.

5. Conclusions

Pd was immobilized on all the polymer substrates using a radiation-based method. Electroless Cu plating was performed for all the polymer substrates using immobilized Pd. The adhesion characteristics of the deposited electroless Cu plating films depended on the substrate type. It was suggested that the immobilization of Pd on the polymer substrate via its functional groups contributed to this. For Pd/PS, Pd/PE, and Pd/PP, in which Pd was immobilized in the metallic state, the adhesion of the plated films was low. In contrast, the adhesion of the plating films was high for Pd/ABS, Pd/AS, and Pd/PVC, where the chemical state of the immobilized Pd was coordinated to the functional groups. Notably, Pd/ABS exhibited strong adhesion and high peeling strengths, beyond the practical level. It was presumed that the high adhesion was owing to the anchoring effect of the holes formed on the ABS substrate surface by the radiation-induced decomposition of the butadiene components. The direct immobilization of noble metal nanoparticles onto polymer substrates is a unique and unparalleled technique. This technique is expected to be applicable to other polymer substrate types and noble metal species.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano12224106/s1, Figure S1: Low-magnification SEM images of Pd/substrates: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, Pd/PVC, Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE; Figure S2: Exterior picture of Pd/PPS 10 vol% after electroless Cu plating without the acceleration step; Figure S3: SEM images of the ABS substrate surface: (a) before irradiation and (b) after irradiation; Figure S4: SEM images of AS substrate surface: (a) before irradiation, and (b) after irradiation.

Author Contributions

N.U. and S.S. contributed equally to visualization, investigation, and conceptualization. T.N. supervised the study. N.U. prepared the Pd particle/substrate samples. Y.O. performed XPS analysis. N.U. performed SEM observations. N.U. measured and calculated the Pd-loading weights of the samples using ICP-AES. All authors contributed to scientific discussions and manuscript preparation. N.U. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant number: 20K05382).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of SHI-ATEX Co., Ltd. for their assistance with the electron-beam irradiation experiments. The authors would like to thank Fumiyasu Ishiguro at LIXIL Corp. for the valuable discussions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gui-Xiang, W.; Ning, L.; Hui-li, H.; Yuan-chun, Y. Process of Direct Copper Plating on ABS Plastics. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 480–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McCaskie, J.E. Plating on Plastics: A Survey of Mechanisms for Adhering Metal Films to Plastic Surfaces. Met. Finish. 2006, 104, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Charbonnier, M.; Romand, M. Polymer Pretreatments for Enhanced Adhesion of Metals Deposited by the Electroless Process. Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 2003, 23, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yen, P.-C. Improved ABS Plastic Activating Treatment for Electroless Copper Plating. Polymer 1995, 36, 3399–3400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fujikawa, W.; Fujkazawa, N.; Shirakami, J.; Shimaya, T. Plating Film Formation Technique on the Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) Substrate Using Silver Nanoparticles. Proc. JIEP Annu. Meet. 2016, 30, 456–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sato, K. Etching Technology for Various Plastics. J. Surf. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 1998, 49, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cao, Z.; Hsu, Y.-I.; Koizumi, A.; Asahara, H.; Asoh, T.-A.; Uyama, H. Surface Modification of Poly(Phenylene Sulfide) Using Photoinitiated Chlorine Dioxide Radical as an Oxidant. Polym. J. 2021, 53, 1231–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dev, A.; Tandon, S.; Jha, P.; Singh, P.; Dutt, A. Investigation of Process Parameters in Electroless Copper Plating on Polystyrene. Sādhanā 2020, 45, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baek, I.; Lim, C.-M.; Park, K.Y.; Ryu, B.K. Enhanced Metal Coating Adhesion by Surface Modification of 3D Printed PEKKs. Coatings 2022, 12, 854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, C.; Chen, H.; Yang, M.; Feng, Z.; Wang, Y. Metallization of Polyphenylene Sulfide by Low-Cost Mussel-Inspired Catechol/Polyamine Surface Modification. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 4445–4453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nomura, T.; Nakabayashi, Y.; Tashiro, K.; Umeda, Y.; Honma, H.; Takai, O. Formation of Plating Films on Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) Resins Treated by Atmospheric UV Irradiation. J. Surf. Finish. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 68, 624–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Yamagishi, T.; Inoue, T.; Watanabe, M. Effect of Humidity on Metallizing on Polyphenylene Sulfide (PPS) with Atmospheric UV Treatment. Coatings 2022, 12, 791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xiang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Yang, Y.; Yu, Z.; Liu, J. Fabrication of Metallic Patterns on Ordinary Polymer Substrates by Laser Direct Activation and Electroless Plating. Surf. Interfaces 2022, 33, 102209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ohkubo, Y.; Kageyama, S.; Seino, S.; Nakagawa, T.; Kugai, J.; Ueno, K.; Yamamoto, T.A. Mass Production of Highly Loaded and Highly Dispersed PtRu/C Catalysts for Methanol Oxidation Using an Electron-Beam Irradiation Reduction Method. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2016, 11, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Seino, S.; Imoto, Y.; Kitagawa, D.; Kubo, Y.; Kosaka, T.; Kojima, T.; Nitani, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Yamamoto, T.A. Radiochemical Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles onto Textile Fabrics and Their Antibacterial Activity. J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 1021–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Uegaki, N.; Seino, S.; Takagi, Y.; Ohkubo, Y.; Nakagawa, T. Development of a Simultaneous Process of Surface Modification and Pd Nanoparticle Immobilization of a Polymer Substrate Using Radiation. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Henglein, A. Small-Particle Research: Physicochemical Properties of Extremely Small Colloidal Metal and Semiconductor Particles. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89, 1861–1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Henglein, A. Electronics of Colloidal Nanometer Particles. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Belloni, J. Nucleation, Growth and Properties of Nanoclusters Studied by Radiation Chemistry: Application to Catalysis. Catal. Today 2006, 113, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ali, A.E.-H.; Aal, A.A. Conductive Thin Film Formation onto Radiation Grafted Polymeric Surfaces Using Electroless Plating Technique. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2009, 20, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moulder, J.F.; Stickle, W.F.; Sobol, P.E.; Borben, K.D. Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy: A Reference Book of Standard Spectra for Identification and Interpretation of XPS Data; Chastain, J., Ed.; Perkin-Elmer Corporation, Physical Electronics Division: Eden Praire, MN, USA, 1992; pp. 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sleigh, C.; Pijpers, A.P.; Jaspers, A.; Coussens, B.; Meier, R.J. On the Determination of Atomic Charge via ESCA Including Application to Organometallics. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 1996, 77, 41–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Simon, B.; Bouyer, C.; Sio, S.D.; Berthon, C.; Boubals, N.; Miserque, F.; Brackx, E.; Raymond, N.; Chagnes, A.; Berthon, L. Characterization of Palladium Species after γ-Irradiation of a TBP–Alkane–Pd(NO3)2 System. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 21513–21527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ohkubo, Y.; Aoki, T.; Seino, S.; Mori, O.; Ito, I.; Endo, K.; Yamamura, K. Radiolytic Synthesis of Pt-Particle/ABS Catalysts for H2O2 Decomposition in Contact Lens Cleaning. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Mazalov, L.N.; Trubina, S.V.; Kryuchkova, N.A.; Tarasenko, O.A.; Trubin, S.V.; Zharkova, G.I. X-Ray Photoelectron Study of Electron Density Distribution in Palladium(II) β-Diketonate Complexes. J. Struct. Chem. 2007, 48, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Woods, R.J.; Pikaev, A.K. Applied Radiation Chemistry: Radiation Processing; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  27. Spinks, J.W.T.; Woods, R.J. An Introduction to Radiation Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images of Pd/substrates: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f )Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE.
Figure 1. SEM images of Pd/substrates: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f )Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g001
Figure 2. Pd3d-XPS spectra, for different Pd/substrate scenarios. In each case, the XPS spectra were normalized by the highest peak intensity.
Figure 2. Pd3d-XPS spectra, for different Pd/substrate scenarios. In each case, the XPS spectra were normalized by the highest peak intensity.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra normalized to the peak intensity at 286.4 eV. (a) O1s, (b) C1s. The purple lines are the spectra after the Pd particle immobilization on the polymer substrates. The black lines are the spectra of as-received substrates.
Figure 3. XPS spectra normalized to the peak intensity at 286.4 eV. (a) O1s, (b) C1s. The purple lines are the spectra after the Pd particle immobilization on the polymer substrates. The black lines are the spectra of as-received substrates.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g003
Figure 4. Exterior pictures of Pd/substrate samples after electroless Cu plating: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f) Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE.
Figure 4. Exterior pictures of Pd/substrate samples after electroless Cu plating: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f) Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g004
Figure 5. Exterior pictures of Pd/substrate samples after the tape-peeling test: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f) Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE. The tape-peeling test was performed at the lower 8 mm of the samples.
Figure 5. Exterior pictures of Pd/substrate samples after the tape-peeling test: (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS, (c) Pd/PS, (d) Pd/PPS, (e) Pd/PVC, (f) Pd/PP, and (g) Pd/PE. The tape-peeling test was performed at the lower 8 mm of the samples.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of substrates after peel electroless Cu plating. (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS.
Figure 6. SEM images of substrates after peel electroless Cu plating. (a) Pd/ABS, (b) Pd/AS.
Nanomaterials 12 04106 g006
Table 1. Amounts and chemical states of immobilized Pd, for different polymer substrates, and the deposition and adhesion of electroless Cu plating films.
Table 1. Amounts and chemical states of immobilized Pd, for different polymer substrates, and the deposition and adhesion of electroless Cu plating films.
SubstratePd Amount
[µg/cm2]
Pd chemical State
(XPS Pd3d)
Plating Coverage
(Visual Confirmation)
Adhesion
(Tape-Peeling Test)
ABS2.4Functional group coordinationFully depositedNo peeling
AS1.9Metal,
Functional group coordination
Fully depositedPartial peeling off
PS1.2MetalFully depositedPeeling off
PPS1.8MetalDeposition failureNo peeling
PVC1.5Metal,
PdCl2 like
Deposition failurePartial peeling off
PP5.2MetalFully depositedPeeling off
PE6.2MetalDeposition failurePeeling off
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uegaki, N.; Seino, S.; Ohkubo, Y.; Nakagawa, T. Effect of Polymer Substrate on Adhesion of Electroless Plating in Irradiation-Based Direct Immobilization of Pd Nanoparticles Catalyst. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 4106. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224106

AMA Style

Uegaki N, Seino S, Ohkubo Y, Nakagawa T. Effect of Polymer Substrate on Adhesion of Electroless Plating in Irradiation-Based Direct Immobilization of Pd Nanoparticles Catalyst. Nanomaterials. 2022; 12(22):4106. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224106

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uegaki, Naoto, Satoshi Seino, Yuji Ohkubo, and Takashi Nakagawa. 2022. "Effect of Polymer Substrate on Adhesion of Electroless Plating in Irradiation-Based Direct Immobilization of Pd Nanoparticles Catalyst" Nanomaterials 12, no. 22: 4106. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12224106

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop