Next Article in Journal
“Fast” Plasmons Propagating in Graphene Plasmonic Waveguides with Negative Index Metamaterial Claddings
Next Article in Special Issue
Long-wave Absorption of Few-Hole Gas in Prolate Ellipsoidal Ge/Si Quantum Dot: Implementation of Analytically Solvable Moshinsky Model
Previous Article in Journal
Graphene Oxide-Based Silico-Phosphate Composite Films for Optical Limiting of Ultrashort Near-Infrared Laser Pulses
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Metal Nanoparticles-Graphene Nanodisks-Quantum Dots Hybrid-System-Based Spaser
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis of Green-Emitting Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Phosphor Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Translucent Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Scintillation Ceramics

1
School of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2
Key Laboratory of Photoelectric Materials and Devices of Zhejiang Province, Ningbo 315211, China
3
Faculty of Maritime and Transportation, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(9), 1639; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091639
Submission received: 28 July 2020 / Revised: 17 August 2020 / Accepted: 18 August 2020 / Published: 20 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Nanomaterials for Radiation Applications)

Abstract

:
A translucent Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic scintillator with an in-line transmittance of ~31% at 512 nm was successfully fabricated by argon-controlled sintering. The starting precipitation precursor was obtained by a chemical precipitation route at 80 °C using ammonia solution as the precipitate, followed by reduction at 1000 °C under flowing hydrogen to produce a sphere-like Gd2O2S:Pr powder with an average particle size of ~95 nm. The Gd2O2S:Pr phosphor particle exhibits the characteristic green emission from 3P0,13H4 transitions of Pr3+ at 512 nm upon UV excitation into a broad excitation band at 285–335 nm arising from 4f2→4f5d transition of Pr3+. Increasing Pr3+ concentrations induce two redshifts for the two band centers of 4f2→4f5d transition and lattice absorption on photoluminescence excitation spectra. The optimum concentration of Pr3+ is 0.5 at.%, and the luminescence quenching type is dominated by exchange interaction. The X-ray excited luminescence spectrum of the Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic is similar to the photoluminescence behavior of its particle. The phosphor powder and the ceramic scintillator have similar lifetimes of 2.93–2.99 μs, while the bulk material has rather higher external quantum efficiency (~37.8%) than the powder form (~27.2%).

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Scintillation materials convert the radiation of high-energy rays (X-rays or gamma rays) into visible light and are extensively applied in various fields such as safety inspection, high energy physics, nuclear medicine, and industrial non-destructive testing [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Scintillators can be divided into solid, liquid, and gaseous states, among which solid inorganic scintillators, as the most widely used materials, include single crystals and polycrystalline ceramics. A ceramic scintillator is superior to a single crystal due to its low cost, short production cycle, large-size production, as well as high dopant concentration with a homogeneous mixture at the molecular level [6,7,8,9]. Solid-state Gd2O2S (GOS) has excellent chemical and physical characteristics, such as high melting point (2070 °C), high density (7.43 g/cm3), high X-ray attenuation coefficient (~52 cm−1 at 70 keV), wide band gap (4.6–4.8 eV), favorable chemical durability, low phonon energy, low crystal symmetry, and low toxicity, which make it a promising host material for luminescence and scintillation applications [10,11]. GOS-based phosphors have attracted considerable attention for decades. For instance, the green-emitting GOS:Tb phosphor exhibits a high brightness and a high luminous efficiency and is applied in television screens, cathode ray tubes, and X-ray intensifying screens [12,13].
GOS belongs to the hexagonal crystal structure (space group: P 3 ml; lattice parameters: a = b = 0.3851 nm and c = 0.6664 nm) with trigonal symmetry [10]. Owing to its optically anisotropic structure, the sintered GOS ceramic is difficult to densify into a fully transparent body by sintering densification. The obtained GOS bulk generally shows an opaque or a translucent appearance, which mainly depends on its relative density. The Pr3+-activated GOS ceramic is an effective ceramic scintillation material for high-quality imaging applications owing to its high X-ray conversion efficiency, strong stopping power for the incident X-ray, short lifetime, fast afterglow, high chemical stability, and good emitting, matching with the high sensitivity of silicon photodiodes. Furthermore, co-doping with Ce3+ or F was found to have significant impacts on the scintillation properties, such as light output and afterglow [8,14,15].
GOS-based ceramic scintillators have been fabricated by hot pressing (HP) [14,16,17], hot isostatic pressing (HIP) [18], spark plasma sintering [19], and pressureless sintering in hydrogen/nitrogen atmosphere [20,21]. Although HP/HIP sintering has low requirements in terms of particle sinterability, the disadvantages lie in low efficiency and expensive cost. On the other hand, pressureless sintering is cost-efficient and time-effective, but it requires sinterable starting powder.
To date, oxysulfide particles have been synthesized by three main paths, namely, solid phase reaction, gaseous sulfuration method, and liquid phase route [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. The traditional solid-state reaction frequently needs ball-milling treatment and high reaction temperature, leading to coarse particles, uneven particle size distribution, and undesired contamination [31,32]. The gaseous sulfuration method results in superfine GOS powders, but harmful vapors such as H2S, CS2, or S can be simultaneously produced [30]. The wet chemical route is an environmentally friendly way for the synthesis of morphology-controllable oxysulfide particles, including hydrothermal reaction [20,33], homogenous precipitation [6,34,35,36,37], and direct precipitation [38], among which direct precipitation is preferred for its higher batch yield, time saving, and simple operation.
In the present work, nanocrystalline Gd2O2S:Pr powder was obtained by a reduction reaction under a hydrogen atmosphere at 1000 °C from its precipitation precursor prepared by a direct precipitation method, with which translucent Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic was successfully fabricated by pressureless sintering under a protective argon atmosphere. The luminescence and scintillation properties of both the Gd2O2S:Pr phosphor and ceramic were studied in detail.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Particle Synthesis

The starting materials of Gd2(SO4)3∙6H2O (>99.99% pure; Haoke Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) and Pr2(SO4)3∙6H2O (>99.99% pure; Haoke Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were together dissolved in distilled water according to the stoichiometric ratio of (Gd1-xPrx)2O2S (x = 0.001–0.0075) and well mixed to make a homogeneous mother liquor with a concentration of 0.01 mol/L.
A white suspension was yielded by dropwise dripping 1.0 mol/L NH3∙H2O (GR pure, Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) into the mother liquor in a hot-water bath of 80 °C at a rate of 3–5 mL/min under magnetic stirring (~180 r/min) until pH = 6.5. After aging for 1 h, the white precipitation was repeatedly rinsed with distilled water via centrifugal separation. The precipitation precursor was then dried at 100 °C for 12 h and lightly ground with an agate mortar. The precursor was calcined at 1000 °C for 3 h in a tubular furnace under flowing hydrogen (~150 mL/min) to yield oxysulfide.

2.2. Ceramic Production

The as-prepared oxysulfide powder was compressed by cold isostatic pressing under ~240 MPa. The green body was sintered in a tungsten-heater furnace at 1650 °C under protective argon atmosphere. The density of the sintered body was determined by Archimedes’ method. The sintered ceramics were double-side ground and polished to be ~11.15 ± 0.01 mm in diameter and ~0.50 ± 0.01 mm in thickness.

2.3. Characterization

The precipitation precursor and its reduction product were characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; Model S-4800, Hitachi, Japan) and X-ray diffraction (XRD; Model D8 Focus, Bruker, Germany) using nickel-filtered CuKα as the incident radiation. The surface microstructure of the ceramic was observed on a desktop scanning electron microscope (SEM; Model EM-30plus, COXEM, Korea). Photoluminescence (PL)/photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectrum, fluorescence lifetime, and quantum yield of the powder and ceramic were measured by transient fluorescence spectrophotometer (Model FLS 980, Edinburgh Instruments Ltd., Livingston, UK) using a 450 W xenon lamp as the excitation source. The X-ray excited luminescence (XEL) spectrum of the ceramic was measured using the photomultiplier tube working on a Zolix Omni-λ300 monochromator at a voltage of −900 V, while the X-ray tube copper target was operated at a voltage of 69 kV and a current of 3 mA.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1A shows the XRD patterns of the precursor powder and reduction products. An amorphous precursor was obtained via the chemical precipitation route. The reaction temperature of 80 °C with an aging time of 1 h is not enough for its crystallization. Upon calcination at 1000 °C under a hydrogen atmosphere, all diffraction peaks of the products can be well indexed to hexagonal Gd2O2S (JCPDS No. 26–1422) without any impure phases, indicating that the precursor fully converts into oxysulfide via thermal decomposition and reduction reaction. Its schematic crystal structure drawn by VESTA 3D visualization software is shown in Figure 1B. Only one coordination type for Gd3+ exists in the unit cell, that is, each Gd3+ is surrounded by four oxygen atoms and three sulfur atoms to form a seven-coordination polyhedron [39]. After Pr3+ incorporation, it would substitute the Gd3+ site because of their similar ionic radii (0.0990 nm for Pr3+ with CN = 6 and 0.0938 nm for Gd3+ with CN = 6). Along with increasing Pr3+ addition, remarkable shifts of diffraction peaks were not observed due to the low Pr3+ concentration and small difference in ionic radii between Pr3+ and Gd3+. The average crystallite size (DXRD) can be calculated by the Debye–Scherrer formula: d = 0.89λ/[(B02Bc2)1/2∙cosθ], where B0 is the half-peak width, Bc is the correction factor caused by instrument broadening, θ is the angle of the diffraction peak, and λ is the wavelength of the X-ray [40]. The resulting DXRD values calculated from (101) diffractions are ~35.7, 32.3, 58.0, and 47.7 nm for the samples doped with 0.1, 0.25, 0.5, and 0.75 at.% Pr3+, respectively.
Figure 2 displays morphologies of the precipitation precursor and its reduction product at 1000 °C. The precipitation precursor shows a two-dimensional nanoplate-like shape clustered into a loose honeycomb. Although the XRD analysis cannot indentify the chemical composition of the precursor, it may be speculated to possess the layered Ln2(OH)4SO4nH2O (Ln = Gd and Pr) structure consisting of the host layer of Ln-hydroxy polyhedron and the interlayer SO42− [25,33], because this compound not only exhibits the nanoplate morphology but also has the same Ln/S molar ratio as the (Gd,Pr)2O2S reduction product (Figure 1). The precipitation formation mechanism obeys the hard-soft acid-base principle, viz., the hard acid tends to react with the hard base and the same for the soft acid and the soft base—hard-hard or soft-soft combinations [41]. The hard Lewis acid of Gd3+ is readily coupled with the hard Lewis bases of SO42− and OH to form the basic sulfate. After being reduced at 1000 °C, the nanoplate-like precursor is completely cracked into a sphere-like oxysulfide powder with a statistic average particle size of ~95 nm.
The appearance of the GOS:Pr ceramic fabricated by argon-controlled sintering is shown in Figure 3A. Although the ceramic sample exhibits translucence to the naked eye, it is a relatively good optical quality for a ceramic that has an optically anisotropic crystal structure. Under UV irradiation, the bulk emits the strong green visible light derived from 3P1,03H4 transitions of Pr3+. On the ceramic transmittance curve (Figure 3B), the absorption band at ~350 nm corresponds to the 4f2→4f5d transition of Pr3+ and the other ones beyond 350 nm are assignable to the intra−4f2 transitions of Pr3+. The GOS:Pr bulk has an in-line transmittance of ~31% at 512 nm (Pr3+ emission center). Figure 3C,D shows the surface microstructure and fracture surface of the sintered GOS:Pr ceramic. The specimen has a dense microstructure, and pores are only occasionally observed. Such a microstructure is desired for improved scintillation performance, since the pores frequently induce scattering losses. Its relative density was measured to be ~99.2% by Archimedes’ method. The statistic average grain size is ~5 μm via WinRoof image analysis software. The grain size is relatively uniform, and exaggerated grain growth is not found. By observing its fracture surface, the dense GOS:Pr ceramic is mainly intragranularly fractured.
Figure 4A presents the excitation spectra of (Gd1-xPrx)2O2S (x = 0.001–0.0075) phosphor particles obtained by monitoring 512 nm emission of Pr3+ as a function of activator concentration. The main broad bands of all samples are located at 285–335 nm, which are ascribed to 4f2→4f5d transitions of Pr3+ [34]. With more Pr3+ addition, a ~2 nm redshift of the 4f2→4f5d transition band center can be observed. Such a phenomenon can be attributed to the lower electronegativity of Pr3+ (1.13) than that of Gd3+ (1.21), which allows for the easier electron transfer to the excitation state of Pr3+. The weak bands at 245–285 nm are assignable to the absorption of the host lattice, since the corresponding bandgap of Gd2O2S was found to be ~4.6 eV [34]. Redshift lattice-absorption bands (~6 nm) are also observed, because increasing Pr3+ incorporation would lead to a smaller bandgap for the oxysulfide. Under 306 nm excitation, all the (Gd1-xPrx)2O2S phosphors exhibit characteristic green emissions of Pr3+ (Figure 4B). That is, the strongest emission peak at ~512 nm originates from the 3P03H4 transition; the second strongest peak at ~502 nm derives from the 3P13H4 transition; and the weakest peak at ~547 nm arises from the 3P13H5 transition. Both the PLE and PL intensities of (Gd1−xPrx)2O2S phosphors increase to 2.6–2.8 times with the gradually rising Pr3+ concentrations from 0.1 to 0.5 at.% as shown from the normalization curves (Figure 4C,D). A further increase in Pr3+ content (e.g., 0.75 at.%), however, causes a reduction in PL/PLE intensity due to luminescence quenching. Thus, the optimal Pr3+ concentration in the GOS matrix is determined to be 0.5 at.%. As a function of the Pr3+ content, the PLE and PL intensities have a highly consistent variation tendency.
Huang et al. propose a theory to describe the relationship between PL intensity and activator concentration [42], which agrees with Dai and Meng et al. [43,44]. That is, the mutual interaction type of luminescence quenching in a solid phosphor can be determined by the following equation:
log ( I / c ) = ( s / d ) log ( c ) + log f
where I is the emission intensity, c is the activator concentration, s is the index of electric multipole, d is the sample dimensionality (d = 3 for energy transfer among the activators inside particles), and f is the constant. The variable s values correspond to different quenching mechanisms. Namely, the s values of 6, 8, and 10 relate to the dipole–dipole, dipole–quadrupole, and quadrupole–quadrupole electric interactions, respectively, while s = 3 corresponds to exchange interaction. The plot of log(I/c) versus log(c) for the 512 nm emission of Pr3+ is shown in Figure 5, from which a linear slope (s/3) of ~0.7 is yielded and thus the s value is close to 3. It can be concluded that the exchange interaction is mainly responsible for the luminescence quenching of GOS:Pr phosphors. The exchange interaction processes are divided into radiative and non-radiative. The former includes emission and radiative transfer, whilst the latter comprises internal relaxation and multipolar interactions between ions. The PL intensity linearly rises as Pr3+ concentration increases up to 0.5 at.%, since more luminous centers are generated. However, a further increase in Pr3+ content (e.g., above 0.75 at.%) enhances the probability of energy transfer with cross-relaxation between Pr3+ activators due to the shortened distances.
Figure 6A shows the XEL spectrum of the translucent GOS:Pr ceramic scintillator made in this work. The ceramic material exhibits a strong green emission at 510–514 nm, arising from 3P03H4 transition of Pr3+, which is similar to the PL behavior of its powder form. The mechanisms between PL and XEL substantially differ from each other. The PL primarily utilizes the 4f2→4f5d transition of Pr3+. However, the XEL can be divided into the following three processes:
X rays e _ + h +
Pr 3 + + h + Pr 4 +
Pr 4 + + e _ ( Pr 3 + ) * Pr 3 + + h v
That is, under high-energy ray excitation, lots of electron-hole pairs in the host lattice are created [45]. The Pr3+ cation traps the hole to form a transient Pr4+ state [15], followed by recombination with the electron to emit visible light. The 1931 CIE chromaticity coordinate of the GOS:Pr ceramic is (0.11, 0.73), which falls into the characteristic green region (Figure 6B).
Figure 7A exhibits the decay kinetics of the GOS:Pr phosphor powder and ceramic scintillator for the 512 nm emission of Pr3+ under 306 nm excitation. The fluorescence lifetime can be obtained via fitting the decay curve with the single exponential equation: I(t) = Aexp(−t/τ) + B, where τ is the fluorescence lifetime, t is the delay time, I(t) is the instantaneous emission intensity, and A and B are constants [45,46]. The fitting results yield τ = 2.93 ± 0.02 μs, A = 425.74 ± 1.09, and B = 10.12 ± 0.51 for the phosphor powder, and τ = 2.99 ± 0.03 μs, A = 264.73 ± 1.39, and B = 7.89 ± 0.38 for the scintillation ceramic. The fluorescence lifetimes determined in this work are in general agreement with the reported values of 2.4–3.0 μs for GOS:Pr,Ce ceramics [8,11,18,47].
Figure 7B exhibits the responses of the GOS:Pr phosphor powder and ceramic scintillator to 306 nm excitation using a white BaSO4 solid as a reference material. The external quantum efficiencies (εex) of the sample can be deduced from the total number of emitted photons divided by the total number of excited photons as follows [45,48]:
ε e x = λ P ( λ ) d λ λ E ( λ ) d λ
where P(λ)/hν and E(λ)/ are the numbers of photons in the emission and excitation spectra of the samples, respectively. The reflection spectrum of the white standard is used for calibration. The external quantum efficiencies of the GOS:Pr powder and bulk are determined to be ~27.2% and 37.8%, respectively. The rather higher εex for the latter is attributed to the improved crystallinity and rapid grain growth via high-temperature sintering.

4. Conclusions

A precipitation precursor with two-dimensional nanoplate-like morphology was prepared at 80 °C using ammonia as the precipitant, followed by reduction at 1000 °C under a hydrogen atmosphere to yield a hexagonal Gd2O2S:Pr phosphor powder. After cold isostatic pressing and argon-controlled sintering, the obtained Gd2O2S:Pr scintillation ceramic has a dense microstructure with a relative density of ~99.2%. The main conclusions from this work can be summarized as follows: (1) The sphere-like Gd2O2S:Pr phosphor powder has an average particle size of ~95 nm and exhibits the characteristic green emission from 3P0,13H4 transitions of Pr3+; (2) The optimum concentration of Pr3+ is 0.5 at.%, and the luminescence quenching type is dominated by exchange interaction; (3) The Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic has an in-line transmittance of ~31% at 512 nm upon X-ray excitation into the strong green emission with a 1931 CIE chromaticity coordinate of (0.11, 0.73); (4) The phosphor powder and the ceramic bulk have similar lifetimes of 2.93–2.99 μs; (5) The Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic scintillator has a higher external quantum efficiency (~37.78%) than the powder form (~27.2%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, B.L.; Investigation, B.L., Z.S. and G.R.; Data Curation, B.L. and Z.S.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Z.S.; Writing—Review & Editing, B.L.; Supervision, B.L. and H.C.; Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51702171), the Zhejiang Provincial Qianjiang Talent Program of China (Grant No. QJD1702017), and the Ningbo Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2019A610052).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pan, H.; Liu, Q.; Chen, X.; Liu, X.; Chen, H.; Xie, T.; Wang, W.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, X.; Zhou, J.; et al. Fabrication and properties of Gd2O2S: Tb scintillation ceramics for the high-resolution neutron imaging. Opt. Mater. 2020, 105, 109909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. David, S.; Michail, C.; Seferis, I.; Valais, I.; Fountos, G.; Liaparinos, P.; Kandarakis, I.; Kalyva, N. Evaluation of Gd2O2S: Pr granular phosphor properties for X-ray mammography imaging. J. Lumin. 2016, 169, 706–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yanagida, T. Inorganic scintillating materials and scintillation detectors. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B 2018, 94, 75–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kharzheev, Y.N. Scintillation counters in modern high-energy physics experiments (review). Phys. Part. Nuclei 2015, 46, 678–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Andryushchenko, L.A.; Grinev, B.V.; Tarasov, V.A. Influence of the surface state of inorganic scintillation materials on their performance characteristics (review). Instrum. Exp. Tech. 2011, 54, 603–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wu, G.; Qin, H.; Feng, S.; Tan, X.; Luo, Z.; Liu, Y.; Shao, H.; Jiang, J.; Jiang, H. Ultrafine Gd2O2S:Pr3+ powders prepared via urea precipitation method using SO2/SO42− as sulfuration agent–A comparative study. Powder Technol. 2016, 305, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, F.; Yang, B.; Zhang, J. Highly enhanced luminescence of Tb3+-activated gadolinium oxysulfide phosphor by doping with Zn2+ ions. J. Lumin. 2010, 130, 473–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Blahuta, S.; Viana, B.; Bessière, A. Luminescence quenching processes in Gd2O2S:Pr3+, Ce3+ scintillating ceramics. Opt. Mater. 2011, 33, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fern, G.; Ireland, T.; Silver, J. Characterization of Gd2O2S: Pr phosphor screens for water window X-ray detection. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2009, 600, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, Q.; Pan, H.; Chen, X.; Li, X.; Liu, X.; Li, W.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, L.; Li, J. Gd2O2S: Tb scintillation ceramics fabricated from high sinter ability an powders via hydrogen reduction. Opt. Mater. 2019, 94, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Greskovich, C.; Duclos, S. Ceramic scintillators. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 1997, 27, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Raukas, M.; Mishra, K.; Peters, C.; Schmidt, P.; Johnson, K.; Choi, J.; Happek, U. Electronic structure and associated properties of Gd2O2S:Tb3+. J. Lumin. 2000, 87, 980–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kandarakis, I.; Cavouras, D. Experimental and theoretical assessment of the performance of Gd2O2S:Tb and La2O2S:Tb phosphors and Gd2O2S:Tb–La2O2S:Tb mixtures for X-ray imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2001, 11, 1083–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, W.; Kou, H.; Liu, S.; Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Feng, X.; Pan, Y.; Guo, J. Comparison of the optical and scintillation properties of Gd2O2S:Pr, Ce ceramics fabricated by hot pressing and pressureless sintering. Opt. Mater. 2015, 42, 199–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Nakamura, R.; Yamada, N.; Ishii, M. Effects of halogen ions on the X-ray characteristics of Gd2O2S:Pr ceramic scintillators. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1999, 38, 6923–6925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thirumalai, J.; Chandramohan, R.; Divakar, R. Eu3+ doped gadolinium oxysulfide (Gd2O2S) nanostructures-synthesis and optical and electronic properties. Nanotechnology 2008, 19, 395703–395709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ananeva, G.V.; Gorokhova, E.I.; Demidenko, V.A.; Parfinskii, V.A.; Khristich, O.A. Optical properties of Gd2O2S-based ceramic. J. Opt. Technol. 2005, 2, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gorokhova, E.I.; Demidenko, V.A.; Eronko, S.B.; Khristich, O.A.; Mikhrin, S.B.; Rodnyi, P.A. Spectrokinetic characteristics of the emission of Gd2O2S:Tb(Ce) ceramics. J. Opt. Technol. 2005, 72, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Kou, H.; Liu, S.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Feng, X.; Pan, Y.; Guo, J. Gd2O2S:Pr scintillation ceramics from powder synthesized by a novel carbothermal reduction method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 2159–2164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lian, J.; Sun, X.; Gao, T.; Li, Q.; Li, X.; Liu, Z. Preparation of Gd2O2S:Pr scintillation ceramics by pressureless reaction sintering method. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2009, 2, 254–258. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, W.; Li, Y.; Kou, H.; Liu, S.; Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Feng, X.; Pan, Y.; Guo, J. Fabrication of Gd2O2S:Pr, Ce, F scintillation ceramics by pressureless sintering in nitrogen atmosphere. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2015, 12, E249–E255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, S.; Zhao, X.; Tan, M. Synthesis of uniform rare earth doped Gd2O2S submicron sized spheres using gas-aided sulfurization and their optical characteristics. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 35738–35751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Chen, J.; Song, Y.; Li, D.; Ma, Q.; Dong, X.; Yu, W.; Wang, X.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, G. Investigating efficient energy transfer in novel strategy-obtained Gd2O2S:Dy3+, Eu3+ nanofibers endowed with white emitting and magnetic dual-functionality. J. Lumin. 2019, 206, 509–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Huang, J.; Song, Y.H.; Sheng, Y.; Zheng, K.Y.; Li, H.B.; Zhang, H.G.; Huo, Q.S.; Xu, X.C.; Zou, H.F. Gd2O2S:Eu3+ and Gd2O2S:Eu3+ / Gd2O2S hollow microspheres: Solvothermal preparation and luminescence properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 532, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, X.J.; Meng, Q.H.; Li, M.T.; Wang, X.J.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhu, Q.; Li, J.G. A low temperature approach for photo/cathodoluminescent Gd2O2S:Tb (GOS:Tb) nano phosphors. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 3296–3306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xu, X.; Lu, B.; Hu, J.; Sun, Z.; Chen, H. Controlled synthesis and photoluminescence behaviors of Lu2O3:Eu and Lu2O2S:Eu phosphor particles. J. Lumin. 2019, 215, 116702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Song, Y.H.; You, H.P.; Huang, Y.J. Highly uniform and mondisperse Gd2O2S:Ln3+ (Ln = Eu, Tb) submicrospheres: Solvothermal synthesis and luminescence properties. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 11499–11504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Thirumalai, J.; Chandramohan, R.; Valanarasu, S. Shape-selective synthesis and optoelectronic properties of Eu3+ doped gadolinium oxysulfide nanostructures. J. Mater. Sci. 2009, 44, 3889–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Han, P.D.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L.X.; Zhang, Q.T. Investigation on the amounts of Na2CO3 and sulphur to obtain pure Y2O2S and up-conversion luminescence of Y2O2S:Er. J. Rare Earth. 2011, 29, 849–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Llanos, J.; Sanchez, V.; Mujica, C.; Buljan, A. Synthesis, physical and optical properties, and electronic structure of the rare-earth oxysulfides Ln2O2S (Ln = Sm, Eu). Mater. Res. Bull. 2002, 37, 2285–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cai, S.; Lu, B.; Chen, H.; Pan, J.; Chen, P. Homogeneous (Lu1-xInx)2O3 (x = 0−1) solid solutions: Controlled synthesis, structure features and optical properties. Powder Technol. 2017, 317, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, B.; Cheng, H.; Xu, X.; Chen, H. Preparation and characterization of transparent magneto-optical Ho2O3 ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 118–122. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang, X.; Li, J.; Molokeev, M.S.; Wang, X.; Liu, W.; Zhu, Q.; Tanaka, H.; Suzuta, L.; Kim, B.-N.; Sakka, Y. Hydrothermal crystallization of a Ln2(OH)4SO4nH2O layered compound for a wide range of Ln (Ln = La–Dy), thermolysis, and facile transformation into oxysulfate and oxysulfide phosphors. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 13331–13339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Lian, J.; Sun, X.; Li, J.; Li, X. Characterization and photoluminescence properties of (Gd0.99Pr0.01)2O2S sub-microphosphor by homogeneous precipitation method. Opt. Mater. 2011, 33, 596–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kharieky, A.A.; Saraee, K.R.E. Synthesis and characterization of radio and thermoluminescence properties of Sm doped Gd2O3, Gd2O2S and Gd2O2SO4 nanocrystalline phosphors. J. Lumin. 2020, 220, 116979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Meng, F.C.; Dehouche, Z.; Ireland, T.G.; Fern, G.R. Improved photovoltaic performance of monocrystalline silicon solar cell through luminescent down-converting Gd2O2S:Tb3+ phosphor. Prog. Photovolt. 2019, 27, 640–651. [Google Scholar]
  37. Saraee, K.R.E.; Zadeh, M.D.; Mostajaboddavati, M.; Kharieky, A.A. Changes of Tb emission by non-radiative energy transfer from Dy in Gd2O2S:Tb phosphor. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 4806–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tian, Y.; Cao, W.H.; Luo, X.X.; Fu, Y. Preparation and luminescence property of Gd2O2S:Tb X-ray nano-phosphors using the complex precipitation method. J. Alloy. Compd. 2007, 433, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lei, L.; Zhang, S.; Xia, H.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, S. Controlled synthesis of lanthanide-doped Gd2O2S nanocrystals with novel excitation-dependent multicolor emissions. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 5718–5724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, X.Y.; Lu, B.; Feng, K.; Liu, Y.X. Vacuum sintering of novel transparent Tm2O3 ceramics: Effect of silica additive and thermal performance. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 40, 6249–6253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liu, J.; Luo, H.D.; Liu, P.J.; Han, L.X.; Zheng, X.; Xu, B.; Yu, X.B. One-pot solvothermal synthesis of uniform layer-by-layer self-assembled ultrathin hexagonal Gd2O2S nameplates and luminescent properties from single doped Eu3+ and coped Er3+, Y3+. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 13984–13988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Huang, S.; Lou, L. Concentration dependence of sensitizer fluorescence intensity in energy transfer. Chin. J. Lumin. 1990, 11, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  43. Dai, Q.; Song, H.; Wang, M.; Bai, X.; Dong, B.; Qin, R.; Qu, X.; Zhang, H. Size and concentration effects on the photoluminescence of La2O2S:Eu3+ nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 19399–19404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Meng, Q.Y.; Chen, B.J.; Wu, X.; Yang, Y.M.; Zhao, X.X.; Di, W.H.; Lu, S.Z.; Wang, X.J. Size-dependent excitation spectra and energy transfer in Tb3+-doped Y2O3 nanocrystalline. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 102, 093505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lu, B.; Sun, Z.; Wang, X.; Chen, H.; Sakka, Y.; Li, J. Photoluminescent and scintillant properties of highly transparent [(Y1−xGdx)0.99Dy0.01]2O3 (x = 0 and 0.4) ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 102, 4773–4780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, L.; Lu, B.; Liu, X.; Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Liu, Y. Fabrication and upconversion luminescence of novel transparent Er2O3 ceramics. J. Eur. Cream. Soc. 2020, 40, 1767–1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lecoq, P. Development of new scintillators for medical applications. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 2016, 809, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sun, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, M.; Lu, B. Production and optical properties of Ce3+-activated and Lu3+-stabilized transparent gadolinium aluminate garnet ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2020, 103, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Gd2O2S (GOS):Pr precursor powder and reduction products (A), and schematic crystal structure of GOS (B).
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Gd2O2S (GOS):Pr precursor powder and reduction products (A), and schematic crystal structure of GOS (B).
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g001
Figure 2. FE-SEM micrographs showing morphologies of the precipitation precursor (A) and its reduction product at 1000 °C (B).
Figure 2. FE-SEM micrographs showing morphologies of the precipitation precursor (A) and its reduction product at 1000 °C (B).
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g002
Figure 3. Appearance (A) and in-line transmittance (B) of the GOS:Pr ceramic scintillator, and SEM micrographs of the surface (C) and fracture surface (D) of the sintered ceramic. The lower part in panel (A) is the appearance of GOS:Pr ceramic under irradiation from a 254 nm UV lamp. The inset in panel (B) is the enlargement of its in-line transmittance curve from 200 to 700 nm.
Figure 3. Appearance (A) and in-line transmittance (B) of the GOS:Pr ceramic scintillator, and SEM micrographs of the surface (C) and fracture surface (D) of the sintered ceramic. The lower part in panel (A) is the appearance of GOS:Pr ceramic under irradiation from a 254 nm UV lamp. The inset in panel (B) is the enlargement of its in-line transmittance curve from 200 to 700 nm.
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g003
Figure 4. Photoluminescence excitation (PLE) (A) and photoluminescence (PL) (B) spectra of (Gd1−xPrx)2O2S (x = 0.001–0.0075) phosphor powders, PLE intensities of the 306 nm excitations normalized to 1 for the lowest value (C), and PL intensities of the 512 nm emissions normalized to 1 for the lowest value (D).
Figure 4. Photoluminescence excitation (PLE) (A) and photoluminescence (PL) (B) spectra of (Gd1−xPrx)2O2S (x = 0.001–0.0075) phosphor powders, PLE intensities of the 306 nm excitations normalized to 1 for the lowest value (C), and PL intensities of the 512 nm emissions normalized to 1 for the lowest value (D).
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g004
Figure 5. The relationship between log(I/c) and log(c) for the GOS:Pr phosphors.
Figure 5. The relationship between log(I/c) and log(c) for the GOS:Pr phosphors.
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g005
Figure 6. X-ray excited luminescence (XEL) spectrum of the translucent GOS:Pr ceramic scintillator (A) and its 1931 CIE chromaticity diagram (B).
Figure 6. X-ray excited luminescence (XEL) spectrum of the translucent GOS:Pr ceramic scintillator (A) and its 1931 CIE chromaticity diagram (B).
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g006
Figure 7. Fluorescence decay behaviors of the GOS:Pr phosphor powder and scintillation ceramic for the 512 nm Pr3+ emission under 306 nm excitation (A) and their quantum efficiency spectra obtained under 306 nm excitation (B).
Figure 7. Fluorescence decay behaviors of the GOS:Pr phosphor powder and scintillation ceramic for the 512 nm Pr3+ emission under 306 nm excitation (A) and their quantum efficiency spectra obtained under 306 nm excitation (B).
Nanomaterials 10 01639 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Z.; Lu, B.; Ren, G.; Chen, H. Synthesis of Green-Emitting Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Phosphor Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Translucent Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Scintillation Ceramics. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091639

AMA Style

Sun Z, Lu B, Ren G, Chen H. Synthesis of Green-Emitting Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Phosphor Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Translucent Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Scintillation Ceramics. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(9):1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091639

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Zhigang, Bin Lu, Guiping Ren, and Hongbing Chen. 2020. "Synthesis of Green-Emitting Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Phosphor Nanoparticles and Fabrication of Translucent Gd2O2S:Pr3+ Scintillation Ceramics" Nanomaterials 10, no. 9: 1639. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10091639

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop