Dynamic Random Graph Protection Scheme Based on Chaos and Cryptographic Random Mapping

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper is well organized. The technical contribution is good. However, I have some comments:

- Adding general information is not recommended, such as in the Preliminary Knowledge section. This make confusion when reading the paper. 

- Summarize the results section, no need to add all of these separate figures, or at least, merge them into a few more figures.

- I can't find enough details about the implementation tool, please clarify which tool you used in implementing your work 

- Enrich the future work sentence that you added at the end of the conclusion by adding more details. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Please remove lines 252 to 255.

2. Cite correctly figure 1, 2, and so on.

The text must be corrected and the guidelines for submission removed from the entire text. The text does not respect all the guidelines. There are references that are not found (with a highlighting error in the text).

The state-of-the-art part has all the authors in small caps. 

The presentation must be improved because it is sometimes difficult to follow the paper's main contributions.

The described method for hopping networks is of interest to journal readers. The figures' citations in the paper and some explanations in the figures must be checked for English problems, The entire paper must be rechecked for typos and resubmitted with a better presentation. The discussion and conclusion part must be rechecked 

 

 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors responded to all my concerns to the best of their abilities.