# A Power Demand Analytical Model of Self-Propelled Vessels

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. State of the Art of Vessel Performance Modeling

## 3. The Open-Water Propeller

## 4. The Full-Scale Vessel

## 5. Performance Evaluation

_{synth}), synthetic draft (Draft

_{synth}), synthetic rate of propeller rotation (n

_{synth}), and synthetic shaft power demand (P

_{S,synth}) with the biofouling coefficient already applied.

## 6. Conclusions

- −
- $\mathsf{\rho}$ is the mass density of the water;
- −
- $\mathsf{\nu}$ is the kinematic viscosity of the water;
- −
- $\mathrm{D}$ is the propeller diameter;
- −
- ${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$, ${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$, ${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$, ${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$, ${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ and ${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ are the open-water characteristics of the scaled model propeller;
- −
- ${\mathrm{P}}_{0.7}/\mathrm{D}$ is the pitch ratio at the blade section $\mathrm{r}/\mathrm{R}=0.7$;
- −
- ${\mathrm{t}}_{0.7}$ is the propeller maximum blade thickness at the blade section $\mathrm{r}/\mathrm{R}=0.7$;
- −
- ${\mathrm{c}}_{0.7}$ is the propeller blade chord length at the blade section $\mathrm{r}/\mathrm{R}=0.7$;
- −
- $\mathrm{Z}$ is the number of propeller blades;
- −
- ${\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{S}}$ is the shaft efficiency;
- −
- ${\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{R}}$ is the relative rotative efficiency;
- −
- $\mathrm{t}$ is the thrust deduction fraction;
- −
- ${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{p}}$ is the blade roughness;
- −
- $\mathrm{n}$ are the propeller revolutions;
- −
- ${\mathrm{R}}_{\mathrm{T}}$ is the vessel towing resistance.

## Funding

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

**Figure A1.**Propeller DTMB 3376 open-water characteristics. Data from [54].

**Table A1.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to DTMB 3376 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.4575 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 1.181 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.5122 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0701 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 1.2327 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 0.7298 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999987 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999920 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.999949 |

**Table A2.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to DTMB 3377 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.3880 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 1.0000 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.7115 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0492 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 1.0331 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 0.2231 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999844 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999824 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.997424 |

**Figure A3.**Propeller DTMB 3378 open-water characteristics. Data from [54].

**Table A3.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to DTMB 3378 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.4872 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 1.1486 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.4307 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0721 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 1.2082 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 0.6835 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999947 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999999 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.999854 |

**Table A4.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to DTMB 3379 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.4407 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 1.1165 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.5654 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0625 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 1.1732 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 0.9210 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999746 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999544 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.999566 |

**Figure A5.**Propeller DTMB 3380 open-water characteristics. Data from [54].

**Table A5.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to DTMB 3380 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.4791 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 1.1879 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.4017 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0757 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 1.2654 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 0.4292 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999892 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999967 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.999796 |

**Figure A6.**Propeller KP458 open-water characteristics. Data from [51].

**Table A6.**Fitting parameters and R

^{2}scores regressing Equations (9)–(11) to KP458 open-water propeller data.

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{To}}$ | 0.3174 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{ot}}$ | 0.8107 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{t}}$ | 0.4702 |

${\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Qo}}$ | 0.0314 |

${\mathrm{J}}_{\mathrm{oq}}$ | 0.8765 |

${\mathrm{k}}_{\mathrm{q}}$ | 1.1326 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{T}}\right)$ | 0.999969 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathrm{K}}_{\mathrm{Q}}\right)$ | 0.999787 |

${\mathrm{R}}^{2}\left({\mathsf{\eta}}_{\mathrm{o}}\right)$ | 0.998864 |

## References

- International Maritime Organization. Prevention of Air Pollution from Ships. Update of the 2000 IMO GHG Study. Final Report Covering Phase 1 and Phase 2; International Maritime Organization (IMO): London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- International Maritime Organization. Resolution MEPC.328(76). 2021 Revised MARPOL Annex VI; International Maritime Organization (IMO): London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- International Maritime Organization. Resolution MEPC.333(76). 2021 Guidelines on the Method of Calculation of the Attained Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI); International Maritime Organization (IMO): London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- International Maritime Organization. Resolution MEPC.335(76). 2021 Guidelines on the Shaft/Engine Power Limitation System to Comply with the EEXI Requirements and Use of a Power Reserve; International Maritime Organization (IMO): London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Poseidon Principles Association. Poseidon Principles. A Global Framework for Responsible Ship Finance. Available online: https://www.poseidonprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Poseidon_Principles.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2021).
- Lindstad, H.; Asbjørnslett, B.E.; Jullumstrø, E. Assessment of profit, cost and emissions by varying speed as a function of sea conditions and freight market. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ.
**2013**, 19, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Agnolucci, P.; Smith, T.W.P.; Rehmatulla, N. Energy efficiency and time charter rates: Energy efficiency savings recovered by ship owners in the Panamax market. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract.
**2014**, 66, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Armstrong, V.N. Vessel optimisation for low carbon shipping. Ocean. Eng.
**2013**, 73, 195–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - International Organization for Standardization. 19030. Ships and Marine Technology—Measurement of Changes in Hull and Propeller Performance; International Organization for Standardization (ISO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- International Towing Tank Conference. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. 7.5-02-03-01.4-1978 ITTC Performance Prediction Method, Rev 05; ITTC Association: Zurich, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, A. Monitoring of Hull Condition of Ships. Master’s Thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Eljardt, G. Development of a Fuel Oil Consumption Monitoring System; Technische Universitat Hamburg-Harburg: Hamburg, Germany, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Holtrop, J.; Mennen, G.G.J. An Approximate Power Prediction Method. Int. Shipbuild. Prog.
**1982**, 29, 166–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Guldhammer, H.E.; Harvald, S.A. Ship Resistance—Effects of Form and Principal Dimensions; Akademisk Forlag: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1965. [Google Scholar]
- Guldhammer, H.E.; Harvald, S.A. Ship Resistance—Effects of Form and Principal Dimensions. (Revised); Akademisk Forlag: Copenhagen, Denmark, 1974. [Google Scholar]
- Hollenbach, K.U. Estimating resistance and propulsion for single screw and twin-screw ships. Ship Technol. Res.
**1998**, 45, 72. [Google Scholar] - Gertler, M. A Reanalysis of the Original Test Data for the Taylor Standard Series. David Taylor Model Basin Report 806; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1954.
- Harvald, S.A.; Hee, J.M. Propulsion of Single-Screw Ships. Ocean Eng.
**1981**, 8, 339–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Logan, K.P. Using a Ships Propeller for Hull Condition Monitoring. In Proceedings of the ASNE Intelligent Ships Symposium IX, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 22–23 May 2011; p. 20. [Google Scholar]
- International Towing Tank Conference. Recommended Procedures and Guidelines. 7.5-04-01-01.1. Prepraration, Conduct and Analysis of Speed/Power Trials; ITTC Association: Zurich, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Bocchetti, D.; Lepore, A.; Palumbo, B.; Vitiello, L. A Statistical Approach to Ship Fuel Consumption Monitoring. J. Ship Res.
**2015**, 59, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Brandsæter, A.; Vanem, E. Ship speed prediction based on full scale sensor measurements of shaft thrust and environmental conditions. Ocean Eng.
**2018**, 162, 316–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Perera, L.; Mo, B. Machine Intelligence for Energy Efficient Ships: A Big Data Solution. Maritime Engineering and Technology III; Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 143–150. ISBN 9781138030008. [Google Scholar]
- Perera, L.; Mo, B. Ship performance and navigation data compression and communication under autoencoder system architecture. J. Ocean Eng. Sci.
**2018**, 3, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bui, K.Q.; Perera, L.P. Advanced data analytics for ship performance monitoring under localized operational conditions. Ocean Eng.
**2021**, 235, 109392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ahlgren, F.; Thern, M. Auto machine learning for predicting ship fuel consumption. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Efficiency, Cost, Optimization, Simulation and Environmental Impact of Energy Systems, Guimarães, Portugal, 17–21 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Soner, O.; Akyuz, E.; Celik, M. Statistical modelling of ship operational performance monitoring problem. J. Mar. Sci. Technol.
**2018**, 24, 543–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Petersen, J.P.; Jacobsen, D.J.; Winther, O. Statistical modelling for ship propulsion efficiency. J. Mar. Sci. Technol.
**2012**, 17, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wang, S.; Ji, B.; Zhao, J.; Liu, W.; Xu, T. Predicting ship fuel consumption based on LASSO regression. Transp. Res. D
**2018**, 65, 817–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gkerekos, C.; Lazakis, I.; Theotokatos, G. Machine Learning models for predicting ship main engine Fuel Oil Consumption: A comparative study. Ocean Eng.
**2019**, 188, 106282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Farag, Y.B.; Olçer, A.I. The development of a ship performance model in varying operating conditions based on ANN and regression techniques. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 198, 106972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Gkerekos, C.; Lazakis, I. A novel, data-driven heuristic framework for vessel weather routing. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 197, 106887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Coraddu, A.; Oneto, L.; Baldi, F.; Aguita, D. Vessel fuel consumption forecast and trim optimisation: A data analytics perspective. Ocean Eng.
**2017**, 130, 351–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Coraddu, A.; Lim, S.; Oneto, L.; Pazouki, K.; Norman, R.; Murphy, J.A. A novelty detection approach to diagnosing hull and propeller fouling. Ocean Eng.
**2019**, 176, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Coraddu, A.; Oneto, L.; Baldi, F.; Cipollini, F.; Atlar, M.; Savio, S. Data-driven ship digital twin for estimating the speed loss caused by the marine fouling. Ocean Eng.
**2019**, 186, 106063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Hu, Z.; Zhou, t.; Osman, M.T.; Li, X.; Jin, Y.; Zhen, R. A Novel Hybrid Fuel Consumption Prediction Model for Ocean-Going Container Ships Based on Sensor Data. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 9, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Kim, Y.; Jung, M.; Park, J. Development of a Fuel Consumption Prediction Model Based on Machine Learning Using Ship In-Service Data. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 9, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Aldous, L. Ship Operational Efficiency: Performance Models and Uncertainty Analysis; University College London: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Themelis, N.; Spandonidis, C.C.; Christopoulos, G.; Giordamlis, C. A comparative study on ship performance assessment based on noon report and continuous monitoring datasets. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of Hellenic Institute of Marine Technology, Athens, Greece, 13 December 2011; 2018; pp. 55–64. [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Y.; Zuo, Y.; Li, T. Modeling of Ship Fuel Consumption Based on Multisource and Heterogeneous Data: Case Study of Passenger Ship. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.
**2021**, 9, 273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Telfer, E.V. The practical analysis of merchant ships trials and service performance. NECIES Trans.
**1927**, 43-2, 123–177. [Google Scholar] - Townsin, R.L.; Moss, B.; Wynne, J.B.; Whyte, I.M. Monitoring the speed performance of ships. NECIES Trans.
**1975**, 91, 159. [Google Scholar] - Garg, B.R. The Service Performance of Ships with Special Reference to Tankers. Master’s Thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, 1972. [Google Scholar]
- Bonebakker, J.W. Analysis of Model Experiments, Trial and Service Performance Data of a Single-Screw Tanker; TNO: Delft, The Netherlands, 1954. [Google Scholar]
- Bonebakker, J.W. The Application of Statistical Methods to the Analysis of Service Performance Data. Oper. Res. Q.
**1951**, 67, 32. [Google Scholar] - Silovic, S.; Fancev, M. The Ship Screw as an Instruments for Determining the Ship Propulsion Data; Publication of the Yugoslav Shipbuilding Research Institute: Zagreb, Croatia, 1955; No 1. [Google Scholar]
- Journée, J.M.J.; Rijke, R.J.; Verleg, G.J.H. Marine Performance Surveillance with a Personal Computer; Report 753-P; Delft University of Technology: Delft, The Netherlands, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Munk, T. Fuel Conservation Through Managing Hull Resistance; Motorship Propulsion Conference: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Leifsson, L.Þ.; Sævarsdóttir, H.; Sigurðsson, S.Þ.; Vésteinsson, A. Grey-box modeling of an ocean vessel for operational optimization. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory
**2008**, 16, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Todd, F.H. Series 60. Methodical Experiments with Models of Single-Screw Merchant Ships. David Taylor Model Basin, Report 1712; Department of the Navy, U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington DC, USA, 1963.
- Available online: http://www.simman2008.dk/PDF/MOERI%20propeller%20for%20KVLCC’s.zip (accessed on 17 December 2021).
- Seo, J.H.; Lee, C.M.; Yu, J.W.; Choi, J.E.; Lee, I. Power increase and propulsive characteristics in regular head waves of KVLCC2 using model tests. Ocean Eng.
**2020**, 216, 108058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Saunders, H.E. The Prediction of Speed and Power of Ships by Methods in Use at the U.S. Experimental Model Basin Washington, C&R Bulletin No. 7; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1933. [Google Scholar]
- Moss, J.L. Hull Form Development and Resistance and Propulsion Tests Results of a Series of Ship Hulls Having Extreme “V” Sections; University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
- Michelsen, F.C.; Couch, R.B.; Kim, H.C. Resistance and Propulsion Tests on Two Models; The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1962. [Google Scholar]
- Michelsen, F.C.; Couch, R.B.; Kim, H.C. Resistance and Propulsion Tests on Two Series 60 Models; The University of Michigan: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1961. [Google Scholar]

**Figure 1.**Shaft Power (${\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{S}}$) from Equation (23) and Series 60 Models 4221, 4280, 4281, 4282 data.

**Figure 2.**Flowchart diagram of the proposed process to obtain the time evolution of the performance of the vessel.

Model | Propeller | ${\mathbf{R}}^{2}\left({\mathbf{P}}_{\mathbf{S}}\right)$ |
---|---|---|

4210 | 3378 | 0.999868 |

4213 | 3379 | 0.999692 |

4214 | 3377 | 0.999994 |

4215 | 3378 | 0.999971 |

4218 | 3380 | 0.999655 |

4221 | 3376 | 0.999626 |

4256 | 3380 | 0.999651 |

4260 | 3377 | 0.999994 |

4272 | 3378 | 0.999919 |

4280 | 3376 | 0.999326 |

4281 | 3376 | 0.999254 |

4282 | 3376 | 0.999674 |

KVLCC2 | KP458 | 0.999865 |

$\mathbf{W}\mathbf{N}$ | $\mathbf{W}\mathbf{N}-2\left[\frac{\mathbf{W}\mathbf{N}}{2}\right]$ | $60+40\cdot \left(\mathbf{W}\mathbf{N}-2\left[\frac{\mathbf{W}\mathbf{N}}{2}\right]\right)$ |
---|---|---|

1 | 1 | 100 |

2 | 0 | 60 |

3 | 1 | 100 |

4 | 0 | 60 |

$\vdots $ | $\vdots $ | $\vdots $ |

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |

© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Zamora, J.
A Power Demand Analytical Model of Self-Propelled Vessels. *J. Mar. Sci. Eng.* **2021**, *9*, 1450.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121450

**AMA Style**

Zamora J.
A Power Demand Analytical Model of Self-Propelled Vessels. *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering*. 2021; 9(12):1450.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121450

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Zamora, Javier.
2021. "A Power Demand Analytical Model of Self-Propelled Vessels" *Journal of Marine Science and Engineering* 9, no. 12: 1450.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9121450