Next Article in Journal
How Efficient Is Model-to-Model Data Assimilation at Mitigating Atmospheric Forcing Errors in a Regional Ocean Model?
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Species of Free-Living Nematode (Enoplida: Enchelidiidae) from the Mangrove Wetlands of China
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling Impact Load on a Vertical Cylinder in Dam-Break Flows
Previous Article in Special Issue
Culturable Endophyte Fungi of the Well-Conserved Coastal Dune Vegetation Located on the East Coast of the Korean Peninsula
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Influence of Oyster Shell Pyrolysis Temperature on Sediment Permeability and Remediation

1
Industry-University Cooperation Foundation, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Ocean Engineering, Pukyong National University, 45 Yongso-ro, Nam-Gu, Busan 48513, Republic of Korea
3
Dokdo Fisheries Research Center, National Fisheries Research & Development Institute, Pohang 37709, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11(5), 934; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050934
Submission received: 10 April 2023 / Revised: 18 April 2023 / Accepted: 25 April 2023 / Published: 27 April 2023

Abstract

:
Permeability is an important aspect of sediment remediation. It is well-known that oyster shells can be used for sediment remediation, however the influence of pyrolysis temperature on sediment permeability remains unknown. In this study, we examined sediment permeability and remediation using crushed oyster shells of less than 5 mm in size that were pyrolyzed at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) for six hours. Based on the results of the variable head permeability test, POS600 has greater sediment permeability than POS350. In addition, POS600 has greater than POS350 to reduce dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN; NH3-N, NO2-N, and NO3-N) and phosphate (PO4-P) from organically enriched sediment because of its higher Ca2+ elution. In conclusion, pyrolysis of oyster shells at 600 °C is more effective than pyrolysis at 350 °C. This finding is true because the transformation of CaCO3 to CaO, which is the source of Ca2+, stimulates pore water flow. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that pyrolyzed oyster shells are beneficial for increasing sediment permeability, thereby helping in the remediation of sediments.

1. Introduction

Oyster shells are a common type of seafood waste in Republic of Korea, where approximately 300,000 tons of waste are generated annually, only half of which is recycled and the rest is deposited on the seashore or field-heaped on farmland [1]. This careless disposal of oyster shells causes socio-economic problems, such as the growth of insects and bad smells, as well as the production of toxic gases such as ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) as a result of long-term microbial decomposition [2]. According to recent studies, oyster shells are a useful material for remediating organically enriched marine sediments by removing hydrogen sulfide (H2S) from pore water or sediments via adsorption [3,4]; reducing the concentration of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN), phosphate (PO4-P), and acid volatile sulfides [5,6,7,8,9]; and increasing the oxidation-reduction potential (ORP), dissolved oxygen, pore water pH, and the shear strength of the sediment [8,9,10,11,12].
The water column and the sediment matrix are the two main components of the marine environment. The sediment layer hosts most of the biological activity, which is crucial for maintaining a balance between the burial and mineralization of organic materials. The accumulation of nutrients and organic material in sediment is well known, and these substances may continue to act as pollution sources. The flow of organic matter and gas exchange or transfer between the sediment and water column depends on the permeability of the sediment [13]. Low permeability not only causes the accumulation of contaminants but also reductive conditions; the ecosystem will be destroyed rapidly, resulting in the formation of odors caused by anaerobic decomposition processes.
The cation absorption of clay mineral surfaces affects the hydraulic behavior of clayey particles. It is widely known that cations have a critical impact on soil permeability in the following order: Na+ > K+ > Mg2+ > Ca2+ [14]. Monovalent cations reduce soil permeability, whereas divalent cations enhance soil permeability [15,16,17]. Oyster shells are composed of over 95% CaCO3, an eco-friendly material that can supply Ca2+ to the ocean [18]. The chemical compositions of oyster shells change; the primary component of oyster shells, CaCO3, transforms into calcium oxide (CaO) at temperatures above 500 °C [19]. Numerous studies have proven that the removal of nutrients and heavy metals from oyster shells calcined at 600 °C or above has a positive impact on the environment [20,21].
Oyster shells that have pyrolyzed at different temperatures have been shown to have an effect on both their chemical properties and sediment remediation [9,10,11,19,20,21]. However, its effect on permeability performance still has relevance, and further research is required for a better understanding of this phenomenon. Therefore, in this work, we constructed an experiment using oyster shells that were pyrolyzed at various temperatures and assessed their permeability performance, changes in cation concentrations, and impact on sediment remediation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Oyster Shells and Sediments

The oyster shells used in this study were obtained from Geoje, Republic of Korea, and had been naturally dried for over six months. Oyster shells were washed to remove the leftover substances, after which they were air-dried, crushed to obtain particles with a size ~5 mm, and pyrolyzed at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) for 6 h in an electric furnace (SF-14, SciLab, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Oyster shells crushed to 5–35 mm have interior friction angles or permeability coefficients similar to sand soil [22]. Therefore, a oyster shell particle size of less than 5 mm was applied in this experiment.
Goseong Bay, Republic of Korea, is affected by high levels of terrigenous nutrients in sediments. Sediment samples were collected by dredging using a Van Veen Grab (CL-VG 351, HY Science, Pohang, Republic of Korea), and foreign substances such as shells and vinyl were removed as much as possible. Sediment samples were collected in plastic boxes and transported to the laboratory for testing.

2.2. Cations Analysis

For the analysis of the Ca2+ composition of oyster shells, 100 g of POS350 and POS600 particles were added to the Erlenmeyer flask (2 L) containing 1000 mL of distilled water, mixed well, and incubated at room temperature. After incubation for 6 h and 24 h, 15 mL samples were withdrawn and filtered through a 0.45 µm membrane syringe filter (MILLEX-HV, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and used for Ca2+ concentration determination via Inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP/MS, Perkin Elmer, Optima 730 V, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Variable-Head Permeability Test

A variable-head permeability test instrument (Figure 1) was used in accordance with the ASTM standard method [23] to carry out the procedure for determining the sediment permeability coefficient. The sediment was placed a permeability mold (Ø 100 × 12.7 cm) up to a depth of 8 cm and the remaining 4.7 cm was then covered with either sand or oyster shells for the control and experimental cases, respectively. Crushed oyster shells (5–35 mm) have interior friction angles or permeability coefficients similar to sand soil [22]. Therefore, sand with a particle size of ~2 mm was used as a control. Deionized water was used as the permeating aqueous solution. Three sets of permeability molds, a control using sand, and an experiment using POS350 and POS600 were set and permeability tests were conducted for 200 h. The permeability coefficient (k) in cm/sec was determined using Equation (1) [23]:
k = 2.3 a L A ( t 2 t 1 ) l o g 10 h 1 h 2
where k is the permeability coefficient in mm/s, a is the area of the standpipe in mm2, and L and A are, respectively, the height in mm and area in mm2 of the sand specimen. The time (t2 − t1) required for a water column to decrease from h1 to h2 was measured.

2.4. Pore Water Analysis

Pore water samples were prepared via centrifugation; sediment samples were centrifuged at 3800 rpm for 15 min (LaboGene 416, Bio-Medical Science, Seoul, Republic of Korea) to collect the pore water and then filtered through a glass microfiber membrane filter (GF/B, Whatman, Maidstone, UK). Before the permeability test (initial) sediment samples and after the permeability test all sediment samples (control and experiment) were analyzed for pH, DIN (NH3-N, NO2-N, NO3-N), and PO4-P. The pH of pore water was measured using an Ag/AgCl glass electrode (Laqua F-73, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan), and the concentrations of NH3-N, NO2-N, NO3-N, and PO4-P were determined using standard procedures for the examination of water and wastewater [24]. All tests were repeated thrice and the results were reported as average with standard deviation.

2.5. Leachate Analysis

The permeating solution (leachate) was collected between for 10–20 h and 50–60 h of the experiment, the samples were then mixed well to create a homogenized solution and determined PO4-P conc. was determined following the procedure used for pore water analysis.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cation Concentration

Depending on the pyrolysis temperature, different concentrations of Ca2+ ions were found on oyster shells. After 6 h, the amount of Ca2+ in POS350 was 35.3 µg/g, while 24 h, it was only 32.7 µg/g. Comparatively more Ca2+ was found in the POS600: 53.9 µg/g after 6 h and 54.1 µg/g after 24 h. Results indicate that the concentration of Ca2+ increased along with an increased temperature of pyrolysis. This result is due to the fact that pyrolysis of oyster shells below 350 °C does not generate CaO [9], whereas, above 500 °C, CaCO3 is converted to CaO [19], which is the source of Ca2+ [18].

3.2. Changes in Sediment Permeability

Results of the sediment permeability test using variable-head permeability testing instrument are presented in Figure 2. The permeability coefficient of sediment covered with POS600 fluctuates more than that of sediment covered with POS350 and sand (as a control) for the first 20 h of the experiment, which may be attributable to a sudden increase in permeability resulting from the various concentrations of ions and particulate sizes of POS350, POS600, and sand. The constant permeability coefficient was observed in all three sets of experiments after 110 h. No major differences in permeability coefficient results were observed between the POS350 and sand tests throughout the period of the experiment. Experiments ended after 200 h with permeability coefficients of 0.5 × 10−5 cm/sec for sediments covered with POS600 and nearly zero for sediments covered with POS350 and sand. Sediment permeability is affected by a number of factors including particle size, ionic composition, and shear strength. Even minute changes in the cation occupancy of clay surface can alter the permeability coefficient and alter clay particle behavior [14]. Monovalent cation (Na+) increases the thickness of clay particles due to dispersion or expansion in response to changing ionic strength and ultimately decreases soil permeability through increasing soil compactness and decreasing soil porosity. In contrast, divalent cation (Ca2+) reduces the thickness of clay particles and enhances the aggregation of dispersed colloidal clay particles [15]. Recent studies have reported that calcium-based materials increase soil permeability because of the flocculation of clayey particles and prevent blockage of soil porosity [16,17]. Similar results were obtained in the present study; the permeability of POS600-covered sediments is greater than that of POS350-covered and sand-covered sediments, because of a higher percentage of CaO in oyster shells pyrolyzed at temperatures above 500 °C, which is the source of Ca2+ [19].

3.3. Changes in Pore Water

The properties of sediments before (initial) and after (200 h) sediment permeability tests are shown in Table 1. The pH of pore water does not vary greatly between before and after the permeability test samples, with the exception of the POS600 sample pH, which was raised to 7.95 from the original sediment sample pH of 7.64. Pyrolysis changes the main chemical component of OS, CaCO3, into the alkaline CaO [19]. This also helps increase the pH of the sediment. The increasing pH of pore water is due to decreasing concentrations of DIN and PO4-P in the sediment treated with pyrolyzed oyster shells [5,6].
The PO4-P concentration varies remarkably; the highest concentration was observed in initial (2.20 mg-P/L) sediment samples compared to sand (1.55 mg-P/L), as well as POS350 (1.65 mg-P/L) and POS600-covered (1.35 mg-P/L) sediment pore water samples (Table 1). Significantly decreased concentration of PO4-P in POS600 sediment due to alkaline condition of sediment (pH 7.95) and higher concentration of Ca2+ which possibly promoted the formation of a precipitate form of phosphate (CaPO4) and decreased phosphate release rate. According to published findings, the formation of CaPO4 precipitates, the development of alkaline conditions in the sediment, and the adsorption of PO4-P onto oyster shells are all factors that contribute to the reduced concentration of phosphates in sediment treated with oyster shells [25]. While precipitates CaPO4 tend to be transformed into stable mineral-bound phosphate with very low phosphate release rates in alkaline conditions of sediments, calcium-bounded phosphate is released from them in acidic conditions [26,27].
NO2-N and NO3-N exhibit no significant differences, whereas NH3-N levels in POS-treated sediments are significantly lower than in sand-treated and untreated sediments (Table 1). The concentration of NH3-N in POS600-treated sediment decreased to 5.50 mg-N/L from 23.75 mg-N/L (initial untreated sediment), most likely as a result of the active covering material-treated sediment permeability enhancement-led nitrification process [28]. Similar observations were made in this study; POS600-treated sediment shows higher permeability than the POS350 and sand-treated sediment (Figure 2). Increasing sediment permeability and supplementing of oxygen result in a decrease in the concentration of NH3-N in sediment due to nitrification [29,30].

3.4. Changes in Leachate

Figure 3 shows the concentration of PO4-P in leachate obtained from sand, POS350, and POS600-covered sediments during the permeability tests. The PO4-P concentration in the leachate between 10 to 20 h and 50 to 60 h of experiment shows that POS600-covered sediment released less PO4-P than POS350 and sand, and the amount of PO4-P in the leachate also decreased with time. As POS600 has more Ca2+ ions, which react with PO4-P to form a precipitate form of CaPO4. Because the POS600-covered sediment turns alkaline (Table 1), possibly the elution rate of PO4-P is decreased. Ca2+ ions from CaO react with PO4-P and form a precipitate form of CaPO4 that tends to transform into stable mineral-bound phosphate and, because of the alkaline condition in sediment, very low phosphate release [25,26,27]. The leachate of POS350 has a higher concentration of PO4-P than POS600 because of the lower amount of Ca2+ ions. It is reported that when the pyrolysis temperature of oyster shells is below 350 °C, CaCO3 does not transform to CaO [9].

4. Conclusions

The temperature of pyrolysis has a significant effect on the cation compositions of oyster shells; a higher concentration of Ca2+ was observed in oyster shells pyrolyzed at 600 °C than at 350 °C. The variable head sediment permeability test confirms that the high concentration of Ca2+ in POS600 enhanced the sediment permeability. On the other hand, a higher concentration of Ca2+ causes sediment pH to become alkaline, which promotes the formation of a precipitate form of phosphate and reduces the rate of phosphate in pore water and in leachate. Likewise, more remarkable decreases DIN concentration in sediment cover were recorded with oyster shells pyrolyzed at 600 °C than at 350 °C which is possibly due to enhanced sediment permeability and nitrification processes. Overall, pyrolysis of oyster shells at 600 °C is better than pyrolysis at 350 °C. This is due to the fact that the transformation of CaCO3 to CaO, which is the source of Ca2+, stimulates pore water flow. Based on these findings, it can be concluded that pyrolyzed oyster shells are beneficial for increasing sediment permeability, thereby helping in the remediation of sediments.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P.P. and H.-E.W.; methodology, M.P.P. and H.-E.W.; formal analysis, M.P.P., H.-E.W. and S.Y.; investigation, M.P.P. and S.Y.; data curation, M.P.P., S.Y. and H.-E.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P.P.; writing—review and editing, S.Y. and K.K.; visualization, M.P.P.; supervision, K.K.; funding acquisition, K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by a grant from the National Institute of Fisheries Science, Republic of Korea (R2023005) and the Korea Institute of Marine Science and Technology Promotion (KIMST) funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea (G22202202522201).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Baek, E.Y. Oyster shell recycling and marine ecosystems: A comparative analysis in the Republic of Korea and Japan. J. Coast. Res. 2021, 114, 350–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ramakrishna, C.; Thenepalli, T.; Nam, S.Y.; Kim, C.; Ahn, J.W. Extraction of precipitated calcium carbonate from oyster shell waste and its applications. J. Energy Eng. 2018, 27, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Asaoka, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Kondo, S.; Hayakawa, S. Removal of hydrogen sulfide using crushed oyster shell from pore water to remediate organically enriched coastal marine sediments. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4127–4132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Yamamoto, T.; Kondo, S.; Kim, K.H.; Asaoka, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Tokuoka, M.; Hibino, T. Remediation of muddy tidal flat sediments using hot air-dried crushed oyster shells. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2012, 64, 2428–2434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Patil, M.P.; Woo, H.E.; Lee, I.C.; Nakashita, S.; Kim, K.; Kim, J.O.; Kim, K. A microcosm study of microbial community profiles during sediment remediation using pyrolyzed oyster shells. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 316, 115229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Patil, M.P.; Woo, H.E.; Kim, J.O.; Kim, K. Field study on short-term changes in benthic environment and benthic microbial communities using pyrolyzed oyster shells. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 824, 153891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jeong, I.; Woo, H.E.; Lee, I.C.; Kim, J.; Kim, K. Evaluation of nutrients removal using pyrolyzed oyster shells. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 2019, 25, 906–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khirul, M.A.; Kim, B.G.; Cho, D.; Yoo, G.; Kwon, S.H. Effect of oyster shell powder on nitrogen releases from contaminated marine sediment. Environ. Eng. Res. 2020, 25, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kim, H.C.; Woo, H.E.; Jeong, I.; Oh, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, K. Changes in sediment properties caused by a covering of oyster shells pyrolyzed at a low temperature. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 2019, 25, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jeong, I.; Woo, H.E.; Lee, I.C.; Yoon, S.; Kim, K. Effects of particle size and pyrolysis temperature of oyster shell on change of coastal benthic environment. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Saf. 2020, 26, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Woo, H.E.; Jeong, I.; Lee, I.C.; Kim, K. A study on the change of shear strength of coastal muddy sediment due to the mixing of oyster shells with different pyrolysis temperature and particle size. J. Soil Ground. Environ. 2021, 26, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, M.; Yi, M.; Lu, M.; Zhu, X.; Chen, G.; Gao, F.; Liu, Z.; Cao, J.; Zhang, D. Effect of in situ sediment remediation combining oyster shells and bottom microporous aeration on nitrogen removal and microbiota. Aqua. Res. 2019, 50, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Huettel, M.; Berg, P.; Kostka, J.E. Benthic exchange and biogeochemical cycling in permeable sediments. Annual Rev. Mar. Sci. 2014, 6, 23–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Smith, C.J.; Oster, J.D.; Sposito, G. Potassium and magnesium in irrigation water quality assessment. Agric. Water Manag. 2015, 157, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xu, S.; Bian, M.; Li, C.; Wu, X.; Wang, Z. Effects of calcium concentration and differential settlement on permeability characteristics of bentonite-sand mixtures. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 153, 16–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Etim, R.K.; Eberemu, A.O.; Osinubi, K.J. Stabilization of black cotton soil with lime and iron ore tailings admixture. Transp. Geotech. 2017, 10, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Al-Swaidani, A.; Hammoud, I.; Meziab, A. Effect of adding natural pozzolana on geotechnical properties of lime-stabilized clayey soil. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 8, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hamester, M.R.R.; Balzer, P.S.; Becker, D. Characterization of calcium carbonate obtained from oyster and mussel shells and incorporation in polypropylene. Mater. Res. 2012, 15, 204–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Yamamoto, T.; Nakajima, T.; Asaoka, S. Changes in physical and chemical characteristics and reactivity to hydrogen sulfide of calcined oyster shells. Fish Sci. 2022, 88, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moon, D.H.; Wazne, M.; Cheong, K.H.; Chang, Y.Y.; Baek, K.; Ok, Y.S.; Park, J.H. Stabilization of As-, Pb-, and Cu-contaminated soil using calcined oyster shells and steel slag. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 11162–11169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, Y.; Wu, R.; Clark, M. Phosphate removal by hydrothermally modified fumed silica and pulverized oyster shell. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 350, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yoon, G.L.; Kwon, O.S.; Im, Y.J.; Yang, E.I. Engineering Characteristics of waste oyster shell for recycling. J. Korean Soc. Civ. Eng. 2001, 21, 421–431. [Google Scholar]
  23. ASTM D5856–95(2007); Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Porous Material Using a Rigid-Wall, Compaction-Mold Permeameter. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2007.
  24. APHA (American Public Health Association). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  25. Namasivayam, C.; Sakoda, A.; Suzuki, M. Removal of phosphate by adsorption onto oyster shell powder—Kinetic studies. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2005, 80, 356–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Roques, H.; Nugroho-Jeudy, L.; Lebugle, A. Phosphorus removal from wastewater by half-burned dolomite. Water Res. 1991, 25, 959–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhao, S.; Shi, X.; Li, C.; Zhang, S.; Sun, B.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, S. Diffusion flux of phosphorus nutrients at the sediment–water interface of the Ulansuhai Lake in northern China. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 75, 1455–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, K.; Kim, K. Remediation of contaminated intertidal sediment by increasing permeability using active capping material. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 253, 109769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Eklind, Y.; Kirchmann, H. Composting and storage of organic household waste with different litter amendments. II: Nitrogen turnover and losses. Bioresour. Technol. 2000, 74, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gómez, M.A.; Hontoria, E.; González-López, J. Effect of dissolved oxygen concentration on nitrate removal from groundwater using a denitrifying submerged filter. J. Hazard. Mater. 2002, 90, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of variable-head permeability test instrument.
Figure 1. Schematic presentation of variable-head permeability test instrument.
Jmse 11 00934 g001
Figure 2. Variation in sediment permeability during variable head permeability testing with oyster shells pyrolyzed at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) and sand as the covering material. The coefficient of permeability is presented as the mean of three replicate measurements.
Figure 2. Variation in sediment permeability during variable head permeability testing with oyster shells pyrolyzed at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) and sand as the covering material. The coefficient of permeability is presented as the mean of three replicate measurements.
Jmse 11 00934 g002
Figure 3. PO4-P concentration in leachate from the sediment permeability test using sand, and pyrolyzed oyster shells at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) respectively, as sediment covering agents. All tests were performed three times, and the results are presented as the mean with error bars indicating standard deviations.
Figure 3. PO4-P concentration in leachate from the sediment permeability test using sand, and pyrolyzed oyster shells at 350 °C (POS350) and 600 °C (POS600) respectively, as sediment covering agents. All tests were performed three times, and the results are presented as the mean with error bars indicating standard deviations.
Jmse 11 00934 g003
Table 1. Characteristics of properties of sediments before and after sediment permeability test. All results are given as the mean of measurements performed in triplicate with standard deviation. POS350 and POS600 are the acronyms of oyster shells pyrolyzed at 350 °C and 600 °C, respectively.
Table 1. Characteristics of properties of sediments before and after sediment permeability test. All results are given as the mean of measurements performed in triplicate with standard deviation. POS350 and POS600 are the acronyms of oyster shells pyrolyzed at 350 °C and 600 °C, respectively.
TestProperties of Sediment (Pore Water)
Initial (Before-Permeability Test)After–Permeability Test (Sediment Covered with)
SandPOS350POS600
pH7.64 ± 0.027.63 ± 0.017.76 ± 0.027.95 ± 0.01
PO4-P (mg-P/L)2.20 ± 0.071.55 ± 0.041.65 ± 0.041.35 ± 0.04
NH3-N (mg-N/L)23.75 ± 0.1811.00 ± 0.0010.75 ± 0.185.50 ± 0.35
NO2-N (mg-N/L)0.07 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.000.02 ± 0.00
NO3-N (mg-N/L)0.14 ± 0.000.18 ± 0.000.16 ± 0.000.18 ± 0.00
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Patil, M.P.; Woo, H.-E.; Yoon, S.; Kim, K. Influence of Oyster Shell Pyrolysis Temperature on Sediment Permeability and Remediation. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050934

AMA Style

Patil MP, Woo H-E, Yoon S, Kim K. Influence of Oyster Shell Pyrolysis Temperature on Sediment Permeability and Remediation. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2023; 11(5):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050934

Chicago/Turabian Style

Patil, Maheshkumar Prakash, Hee-Eun Woo, Seokjin Yoon, and Kyunghoi Kim. 2023. "Influence of Oyster Shell Pyrolysis Temperature on Sediment Permeability and Remediation" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11, no. 5: 934. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse11050934

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop