Integrating AIS, GIS and E-Chart to Analyze the Shipping Traffic and Marine Accidents at the Kaohsiung Port
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Human Factors
2.2. Natural Environment Factors
2.3. Application of AIS
3. Methodology
- (1)
- The collected data
- (2)
- Collect the traffic flows of vessels by using AIS
- (3)
- Plot the locations of marine accidents on the e-chart
- (4)
- Analyze the data of sea conditions by GIS
- (5)
- Integrate all data onto the e-chart to analyze the relationship between accidents and data
3.1. Automatic Identification System
3.2. Geographic Information System
4. Results Analysis and Discussion
- (1)
- The Traffic Separation Scheme works well
- (2)
- Most marine accidents occurred inside port waters
- (3)
- Discussion on the causes of marine accidents that occurred inside port waters
- (4)
- Discussion on the causes of accidents that occurred in the channel of the port
- (5)
- Discussion on the causes of accidents that occurred in the anchorage area
- (6)
- Discussion on the causes of marine accidents that occurred outside port waters
- (7)
- Discussion on the differences between previous studies and this paper
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- At present, the Traffic Separation Scheme in the Kaohsiung port works well. Most vessels entering/exiting the port obeyed the Traffic Separation Scheme.
- (2)
- Most marine accidents occurred inside port waters, followed by in the channels, the anchorage areas, and outside port waters.
- (3)
- Marine accidents that occurred inside port waters were mainly caused by allision between the vessel and the wharf. Therefore, this paper suggests that port authorities should initiate some strategies to improve the management and communications between the seafarers on merchant vessels and the workers at the wharfs, as well as the cooperation and communications between tugs and merchant vessels when berthing. In addition, slower navigation speed usually can reduce allision and collision potentials. Therefore, the port authority should enforce low-speed or safe-speed navigation inside port waters.
- (4)
- The channels are used by all vessels to enter/exit the port; therefore, they usually have heavy traffic. The marine accidents that occurred in the channels were basically navigational accidents due to human errors or environmental factors.
- (5)
- Some marine accidents occurred in the anchorage areas attached to the shoreline and the fairway. In other words, some anchored vessels did not anchor exactly inside anchorage waters. The port managers, e.g., the Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) in the port, should command the vessels to anchor exactly inside anchorage waters to lower the probabilities of potential collisions. Anchorages bounded by confined waters will lower the probability of potential collisions. In addition, the number of danger markers is associated with reduction in the collision potential.
- (6)
- The integrated AIS, GIS, and e-chart system is an initial work. Based on the integrated AIS, GIS, and e-chart system, we will continue to further develop a monitoring system for automatically monitoring the real-time traffic flows of all ships around the port (in the future tier II project), and to develop a pre-alarm system for real-time collision avoidance (in the future tier III project). The major difference between the integrated pre-alarm system and the ECDIS is that the integrated system is suitable for multiple-ship to multiple-ship and is set up in one port, and the ECDIS is suitable for one-ship to multiple-ship and is set up on one ship. The integrated pre-alarm system for real-time collision avoidance could be the basis for developing an intelligent port in the future. Additionally, this study also recommends that future studies should focus on how ship traffic movements resulted in individual accidents when using such an integrated pre-alarm system.
- (7)
- Sometimes, government marine departments do not report detailed information on marine accidents. It is understandable that there are national security and marine insurance reasons for keeping accident information secret. This paper suggests that accident information could be made public for academic research only.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Darbra, R.-M.; Casal, J. Historical analysis of accidents in seaports. Saf. Sci. 2004, 42, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yip, T.L. Port traffic risks–A study of accidents in Hong Kong waters. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2008, 44, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dobbins, J.P.; Abkowitz, M. Use of Advanced Information Technologies for Marine Accident Data Analysis Visualization and Quality Control. J. Transp. Saf. Secur. 2010, 2, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.C.; Lee, H.S. Evaluating navigation safety for harbours in Taiwan: An empirical study. J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 2012, 11, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.C.; Lee, H.S. The impact of navigation safety in Kaohsiung harbour. J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 2012, 11, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, C.-C.; Li, R.-F.; Su, Y.-L.; Tsai, C.-L.; Chang, K.-Y. A study of the distribution of marine incidents in the harbours and waters surrounding Taiwan. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2018, 233, 809–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kao, S.-L.; Hsueh, C.-K.; Chou, C.-C.; Yuan, T.-Y. A Decision-making Support System for Automatically Determining the Route Priority of Vessels Entering/Exiting the Ports. Transp. J. 2020, 59, 335–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, C.-C. Modelling and simulation of ship collisions in port and coastal waters. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part M J. Eng. Marit. Environ. 2021, 235, 737–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, C.-C.; Wang, C.-N.; Hsu, H.-P. A novel quantitative and qualitative model for forecasting the navigational risks of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships. Ocean Eng. 2022, 248, 110852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hetherington, C.; Flin, R.; Mearns, K. Safety in shipping: The human element. J. Saf. Res. 2006, 37, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giziakis, K.; Bardi-Giziaki, E. Assessing the risk of pollution from ship accidents. Disaster Prev. Manag. Int. J. 2002, 11, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jensen, C.M.; Hines, E.; Holzman, B.A.; Moore, T.; Jahncke, J.; Redfern, J.V. Spatial and Temporal Variability in Shipping Traffic Off San Francisco, California. Coast. Manag. 2015, 43, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ceylan, B.O.; Akyuz, E.; Arslanoğlu, Y. Modified quantitative systems theoretic accident model and processes (STAMP) analysis: A catastrophic ship engine failure case. Ocean Eng. 2022, 253, 111187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaib, A.; Yin, J.; Khan, R.U. Determining Role of Human Factors in Maritime Transportation Accidents by Fuzzy Fault Tree Analysis (FFTA). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, H.C.; Debnath, A.K. Modeling perceived collision risk in port water navigation. Saf. Sci. 2009, 47, 1410–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tzeng, F.C. A Study on Casualty Analysis of Ship Groundings in Taiwan Waters. Master’s Thesis, Department of Merchant Marine, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Chou, C.C.; Su, Y.L.; Li, R.F.; Tsai, C.L.; Ding, J.F. Key navigation safety factors in Taiwanese harbours and surrounding waters. J. Mar. Sci. Technol. 2015, 23, 685–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Debnath, A.K.; Chin, H.C. Modelling Collision Potentials in Port Anchorages: Application of the Navigational Traffic Conflict Technique (NTCT). J. Navig. 2015, 69, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhang, L.; Wang, H.; Meng, Q.; Xie, H. Ship accident consequences and contributing factors analyses using ship accident investigation reports. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 2019, 233, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, X.P. An analysis on maritime distress over Yantai sea area and preventive measures. Meteorol. Mon. 2001, 27, 55–57. [Google Scholar]
- Toffoli, A.; Lefèvre, J.; Bitner-Gregersen, E.; Monbaliu, J. Towards the identification of warning criteria: Analysis of a ship accident database. Appl. Ocean Res. 2005, 27, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arslan, O.; Turan, O. Analytical investigation of marine casualties at the Strait of Istanbul with SWOT–AHP method. Marit. Policy Manag. 2009, 36, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, C.-C.; Chen, C.-Y.; Chang, P.-C.; Chang, T.-M.; Chen, K.-S.; Hsu, H.-Z.; Chang, K.-E. Use the Grid to Analyze the Influential Factors on Marine Accidents. Lect. Notes Electr. Eng. 2014, 293, 867–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Kujala, P.; Hirdaris, S. A machine learning method for the evaluation of ship grounding risk in real operational conditions. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2022, 226, 108697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Liu, C.; Li, J.; Miao, Y. Trajectory clustering for SVR-based Time of Arrival estimation. Ocean Eng. 2022, 259, 111930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silveira, P.; Teixeira, A.; Soares, C.G. A method to extract the Quaternion Ship Domain parameters from AIS data. Ocean Eng. 2022, 257, 111568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, H.; Grifoll, M.; Yang, Z.; Zheng, P. Collision risk assessment for ships’ routeing waters: An information entropy approach with Automatic Identification System (AIS) data. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2022, 224, 106184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Høye, G.K.; Eriksen, T.; Meland, B.J.; Narheim, B.T. Space-based AIS for global maritime traffic monitoring. Acta Astronaut. 2008, 62, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mou, J.M.; van der Tak, C.; Ligteringen, H. Study on collision avoidance in busy waterways by using AIS data. Ocean Eng. 2010, 37, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kao, S.-L.; Chang, K.-Y. Study on fuzzy GIS for navigation safety of fishing boats. J. Mar. Eng. Technol. 2016, 16, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huang, J.-C.; Nieh, C.-Y.; Kuo, H.-C. Risk assessment of ships maneuvering in an approaching channel based on AIS data. Ocean Eng. 2019, 173, 399–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, Y.M.; Dai, R.; Sung, L.C.; Zhu, J.S. Application of AIS in marine traffic investigation. Navig. China 2006, 1, 83–85. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.D.; Hu, S.P. Application of AIS information analysis in ship collision cases. J. Shanghai Marit. Univ. 2007, 28, 133–136. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.H.; Tao, D.X.; Liu, T.C. Research and application of AIS in the field of maritime management. Ship Ocean. Eng. 2008, 37, 117–120. [Google Scholar]
- Li, G.Z.; Li, X.H.; Li, Z.J. AIS for navigation buoy system management. Ship Ocean. Eng. 2009, 38, 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- Webb, K.R.; Gende, S.M. Activity Patterns and Speeds of Large Cruise Ships in Southeast Alaska. Coast. Manag. 2015, 43, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Observation | Wind | Wave | Tide | Current |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
2 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
3 | 2 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
4 | 2 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.6 |
5 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
6 | 1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 0.3 |
7 | 5 | 1.6 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
8 | 3 | 1.9 | 0.5 | 0.8 |
9 | 9 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.9 |
10 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
11 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 1 |
12 | 3 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.5 |
13 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
14 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 |
15 | 3 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.3 |
16 | 3 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
17 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.8 |
18 | 2 | 0.4 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
19 | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.2 |
20 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
21 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
22 | 3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.6 |
23 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
24 | 3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
25 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
26 | 3 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
27 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.2 |
28 | 2 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.5 |
29 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
30 | 7 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 1.1 |
31 | 2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
32 | 2 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
33 | 1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 |
34 | 2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
35 | 3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
36 | 3 | 1 | 0.7 | 0.5 |
37 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.9 |
38 | 2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.7 |
Average | 3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
STDEV | 1.56 | 0.43 | 0.14 | 0.23 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chou, C.-C.; Wang, C.-N.; Hsu, H.-P.; Ding, J.-F.; Tseng, W.-J.; Yeh, C.-Y. Integrating AIS, GIS and E-Chart to Analyze the Shipping Traffic and Marine Accidents at the Kaohsiung Port. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10101543
Chou C-C, Wang C-N, Hsu H-P, Ding J-F, Tseng W-J, Yeh C-Y. Integrating AIS, GIS and E-Chart to Analyze the Shipping Traffic and Marine Accidents at the Kaohsiung Port. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2022; 10(10):1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10101543
Chicago/Turabian StyleChou, Chien-Chang, Chia-Nan Wang, Hsien-Pin Hsu, Ji-Feng Ding, Wen-Jui Tseng, and Chien-Yi Yeh. 2022. "Integrating AIS, GIS and E-Chart to Analyze the Shipping Traffic and Marine Accidents at the Kaohsiung Port" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 10, no. 10: 1543. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse10101543