Next Article in Journal
Can Modification of Sowing Date and Genotype Selection Reduce the Impact of Climate Change on Sunflower Seed Production?
Previous Article in Journal
A New Protocol to Mitigate Damage to Germination Caused by Black Layers in Maize (Zea mays L.) Seeds
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Soil Properties of Fallow Land Invaded by Black Cherry (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.)

by
Paulina Bączek
1,
Aleksandra Halarewicz
2,*,
Daniel Pruchniewicz
2,
Magda Podlaska
2 and
Dorota Kawałko
3
1
Department of Plant Protection, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24a, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland
2
Department of Botany and Plant Ecology, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 24a, 50-363 Wrocław, Poland
3
Institute of Soil Science, Plant Nutrition and Environmental Protection, Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzka St. 53, 50-357 Wrocław, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2023, 13(11), 2148; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112148
Submission received: 19 October 2023 / Revised: 9 November 2023 / Accepted: 10 November 2023 / Published: 14 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Soils)

Abstract

:
The extensive spread of the invasive black cherry, Padus serotina, has been observed on abandoned agricultural land in Central and Eastern Europe. However, the impact of this species on invaded agroecosystems is still unknown, including the possibility of returning these ecosystems to agricultural production. In order to evaluate the selected soil properties of fallows invaded by P. serotina, their texture, field water capacity, reaction, and content of organic carbon, total nitrogen, and available forms of potassium and phosphorus were determined for 100 study plots. Taking into account the influence of soil conditions on floristic composition, the area covered by individual plant species in the study plots was also included in the analysis. A relationship was found between the presence of all the developmental stages of P. serotina and an increase in the phosphorus content in the soil. With the growth of a black cherry shrub layer, the content of soil nitrogen and potassium increased. An increasing proportion of P. serotina in the herb layer contributed to soil acidification and reduced the water content available for plants in the arable layer at 20–40 cm. The possible impact of P. serotina on soil properties may be an additional premise when considering the possibilities and benefits of the recultivation of fallow land invaded by this species.

1. Introduction

The abandonment of agricultural land is a widespread land use change in various regions of the world and is common in Europe’s temperate regions [1]. In historical times, the main reason to set aside land was the need to restore soil fertility. Over time, the decline in the profitability of extensive (low-input) and small-area farming systems has resulted in more and more abandoned/fallow farmland [2,3,4]. The analysis of the range of fallow lands and the possibility of their reuse are issues currently being addressed on a global scale [5,6,7]. It is assumed that the recultivation of part of previously unused agricultural land will increase the production of food or fodder, and will also allow biomass to be obtained for energy or raw materials for the chemical and pharmaceutical industries [6,8].
The first visible effect of the long-term cessation of cultivation is the recovery of vegetation, leading to the restoration of a community characteristic of local environmental conditions (meadow, shrub, and forest) [9,10]. Changes in the vegetation cover occurring in the process of secondary succession lead to changes in the properties of the soil environment [11], which depend primarily on the length of the fallowing period, climatic conditions, soil type, and topography [12]. These circumstances are likely to contribute to various discrepancies in the assessment of the impact of fallowing on the physicochemical properties of soils. The nitrogen content during set-aside usually shows an upward trend [13]. A decrease in humus resources is observed in silty and loamy soils not used for agricultural production, whereas a slight increase is observed in sandy soils [14]. Long-term fallow, which develops mature forms of succession (trees and shrubs), is conducive to increasing the content of organic matter in the soil while increasing its acidity [8]. The research by Włodek et al. [15], conducted on 7-year-old fallow, revealed an increase in the content of organic carbon and the available forms of magnesium, phosphorus, and potassium in relation to the neighboring arable soils. A negative impact of fallowing (8–10 years or more) on the average content of the available forms of potassium and phosphorus was observed by other authors [8,16].
Fallow fields belong to highly distorted phytocenoses, which favor the encroachment and establishment of alien species, including invasive ones [1,17,18,19]. Their participation in the process of secondary succession, in addition to a visible impact at the level of the phytocenosis [20,21], causes changes in the abiotic and biotic properties of the soil [22,23,24,25].
The most common plant invaders currently observed in Europe and Asia are species of goldenrod (Solidago canadensis L. and Solidago gigantea Aiton) [26,27]. In Europe, they enter abandoned land and form dense single-species fields [26]. The negative impact of these species on the natural habitat of fallow land has been confirmed in studies by many authors [8,28,29]. However, even long-term fallows with poor soil, dominated by goldenrod, retain the potential to be used for the production of biomass for non-agricultural purposes [8].
In the agricultural landscape of Europe, apart from the alien Solidago sp., the uncontrolled spread of the invasive black cherry (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.) has been increasingly observed [30,31,32]. Native to North America, P. serotina was introduced and spread in Europe’s temperate forests first as a timber species. Subsequently, it was repeatedly planted in the understory of plantations to improve their litter quality [33,34]. Its shade-tolerant seedlings and saplings start to grow rapidly when light is available (gaps forming in the overstory) and young trees acquire early the ability to reproduce generatively (seed dispersal by birds) and vegetatively (root shoots), which contributes to the formation of a dense, homogeneous understory layer [35,36]. The issue of the impact of P. serotina invasion on vegetation transformations as well as on the soil properties in forest habitats has been discussed many times [34,37,38,39,40]. However, the threat represented by the presence of black cherry in agroecosystems has not yet been precisely defined.
An analysis of the impact of this species on the environment of abandoned agricultural land is important for farmlands and fallows considered attractive for crop production, as well as for protected areas.
This study was carried out to reveal the relationships between the presence of black cherry and selected physicochemical properties of fallow soil. Taking into account the influence of soil conditions on the floristic composition, the area covered by individual plant species in the study plots was included in the analysis. We tested the following hypotheses: (1) P. serotina significantly modifies the soil properties of fallows; (2) depending on the proportion of P. serotina in an individual vegetation layer (herb, shrub, or tree layer), its impact on the soil parameters may vary.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This research was conducted in Lower Silesia, located in the southwestern part of Poland (Figure 1). This region has a moderate climate dominated by an oceanic influence. The mean annual air temperature is simply 8 °C, with warm summers (mean of 18 °C in July), mild winters (mean of −1.4 °C in January), and an annual precipitation of about 550 mm [41]. Due to the economic conditions and high fragmentation of farms, fallow land makes up a high proportion of the agricultural landscape of the study region. Ten fallows (study sites), each with an area of about 2000 m2, were chosen for this study. The main criteria for the selection of fallow land were at least a 10-year period of abandonment from agricultural use and the presence of self-seeded black cherry plants in the mature (blooming) stage. The primary propagule sources of the invader were forests, mid-field shelterbelts, and home gardens adjacent to the selected agricultural lands. The selected sites represented different types of soil (Table 1). These data were obtained from publicly available cadastral maps for the region [42]. Soils were classified according to the Polish Soil Classification [43] and the World Reference Base (WRB) classification [44]. For each soil, based on both classifications, the soil type was the same.

2.2. Field Studies, Soil Sampling, and Laboratory Tests

On each of the fallow lands, five study plots (5 m × 5 m) inhabited by Padus serotina and five plots free of this species were selected at random within a homogeneous patch of vegetation. They were located at a distance of at least 10 m from the edge of the fallow land and did not include places disturbed by animal activities. The center of each square was marked using a GPS (Table 1). The study plots were used to take relevés. The observations were made in 2017, during the period of the richest vegetation (June–July). The total vegetation cover was determined for three layers: the tree layer (>1.5 m); the shrub layer (0.5–1.5 m); and the herb layer (<0.5 m), covering herbaceous plants, the seedlings of woody plants, and leafy bryophytes (<0.5 m). We visually estimated the percentage cover (5% estimation intervals) of each plant species in the study plots. A total of 100 relevés were obtained from the examined sites. Bryophytes were collected for exact identification in the laboratory. The nomenclature of the vascular plants was based on Mirek at al. [45], whereas the moss nomenclature followed that of Ochyra et al. [46]. Plant communities were identified according to Matuszkiewicz [47].
During the floristic analyses, soil samples were collected from each study plot at the intersection of the diagonals in metal cylinders (V = 100 cm3), separately for the layer up to 20 cm and 20–40 cm deep. The field water capacity (FWC) measurements were conducted under laboratory conditions with the application of sand and sand–kaolinite blocks [48]. This parameter is a good indicator of the amount of water available to plants in the soil that remains after gravity drainage, and is regulated by transpiration and evaporation.
In addition, in November 2017, a week after moderate rainfall, soil samples with a disturbed structure were taken from each study plot to determine the remaining physicochemical properties. The material was collected with a shovel to a depth of 20 cm, at a point located close to the center of the square. The soil samples, after being transported to the laboratory, were thoroughly cleaned of stones and fragments of roots or rhizomes, and compacted soil lumps were crushed. Samples prepared in this way were dried at room temperature (air-dried samples), without access to direct sunlight, and passed through a sieve with a mesh diameter of 2 mm. In the obtained fine earth (<2 mm), the particle-size distribution was determined using the sieve (for the sand fraction) and hydrometer (for the silt and clay fractions) method [49]. The soil pH was determined in distilled water, potentiometrically, at a soil–liquid ratio of 1:2.5 [50]. Organic carbon (C) was measured using the modified Tiurin method [51]. The total nitrogen content (N) was determined using the modified Kjeldahl method with a Büchi semi-automated analyzer (units K439 + K350) [52,53]. The Egner–Riehm method was used to determine the content of the available forms of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) [54]. The determination of each parameter was carried out in two replicates, except for the soil reaction, which was determined once.

2.3. Data Analysis

To reveal the main environmental gradients of vegetation for the selected fallows, a detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) was conducted [55]. The analysis was performed for a database of 100 research plots, representing the area covered by individual plant species of herbaceous plants and mosses. The length of the gradient, represented by the first DCA canonical axis, had a standard deviation of 4, which indicated the linear structure of the data. Therefore, a canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) was chosen to assess the impact of the selected properties of soils on the vegetation [55]. The significance of the variables was tested using the Monte Carlo permutation test with stepwise variable selection (499 permutations) [56]. All the ordination analyses were prepared without data transformations. For each evaluated soil variable, we quantified its marginal (simple) effect and its conditional (partial) effect on the species composition. The ordination analyses were performed using the CANOCO software v. 5.03 [55].
In the next step of the analysis, it was decided to determine the relationship between the area covered by black cherry in each of the tree, shrub, and herb layers and the analyzed soil properties. The normal distribution of variables was evaluated with the Shapiro–Wilk test. Levene’s test was used to check for the homogeneity of variances. The correlations between the analyzed parameters were determined using Pearson’s rank correlation. The interpretation of the strength of correlation relationships was made according to Stanisz [57]. The calculations were performed at p ≤ 0.05 for the entire dataset. The above analyses were conducted using the Statistica software v. 13 [58].

3. Results

The selected fallows were characterized by a species composition representing mainly semi-natural and anthropogenic meadow communities of the class Molinio-Arrhenatheretea and communities of perennial plants in ruderal areas of the class Artemisietea vulgaris.
The soil texture was differentiated, from sands (podzols) to silts and silty loams (phaeozems, cambisols, and fluvisols). The obtained value of field water capacity for the arable layer up to 20 cm ranged from 13.2% to 29.9%, and for the depth of 20–40 cm, it ranged from 10.9% to 26.8%. The tested soils were strongly acidic, acidic, or weakly acidic. They were characterized by a varied content of organic carbon, total nitrogen, and the available forms of phosphorus and potassium (0.7–1.8%, 0.07–0.21%, 33.4–115.3 mg kg−1, and 70.0–280.5 mg kg−1, respectively).
The CCA analysis allowed for the identification of general relationships between the occurrence of herbaceous plants and mosses and environmental variables, represented by the selected soil properties. The obtained eigenvalue of the first canonical axis (0.446) indicated its decisive influence on the differentiation of the dataset. This axis explained 4.7% of the total variation in plant species composition and 30.2% of the variation in the relationship between the plant species and the soil properties.
The results of the stepwise selection of variables with the Monte Carlo permutation test showed a significant, independent effect of all seven soil variables (Table 2). Considering the interactions between soil variables acting jointly, the strongest relationship was found between the species composition and the field water capacity determined for the soil layer up to 20 cm deep. Other significant relationships, arranged in descending order according to the value of the explained variability, concerned the vegetation and the content of soil organic carbon, the soil reaction, the potassium and phosphorus concentration, and the field water capacity determined for the soil layer 20–40 cm deep.
In the diagram, obtained as a result of the CCA analysis, the study plots were weakly separated in the ordination space of the first two canonical axes (Figure 2). The vector positions indicate that four variables—the field water capacity (FWC) determined for the depths of 0–20 cm and 20–40 cm, the soil reaction, and the potassium concentration—were negatively correlated with the first axis, with the strongest relationship for the last-mentioned variable. The vector of phosphorus content was directed oppositely relative to the vector of soil pH. Species preferring fresh or moist soils, e.g., Rubus caesius, were located near the top of the FWC vector for a depth of up to 20 cm (Figure 3). The peak of the FWC vector for the soil depth range of 20 to 40 cm was accompanied by Fraxinus excelsior, requiring fertile and moist soils. The organic carbon content, like the total nitrogen content, was strongly correlated with the second canonical axis. The impact of the total nitrogen content on the diversity of the study plots and plant species and its relationship with the other soil variables were weaker compared to the organic carbon content. The indicator species for habitats rich in nitrogen, Anthriscus sylvestris, was located along the nitrogen vector, in the zone of its higher values.
In the next step of the analysis, the relationships between the cover of black cherry occurring in the tree, shrub, and herb layers and the marked soil properties were determined. The results of the conducted correlations are presented in Table 3.
It was found that the presence of P. serotina in each vegetation layer was significantly correlated with an increased concentration of the available forms of phosphorus in the soil. The strongest impact on this variable was observed for black cherry in the herb and moss layers. In addition, a weak positive correlation was found between the area covered by P. serotina in the shrub layer and the content of total nitrogen and the available potassium forms. The spread of the studied species in the layer of herbs and mosses contributed to a reduction in the water content available to plants in the arable layer at a depth of 20–40 cm and acidification to a depth of 20 cm. In both cases, these relationships were weak, but statistically significant.

4. Discussion

The modification of the soil environment by vegetation occurs mainly as a result of the supply of organic matter (litter) and the secretion of biologically active compounds (allelopathic effects) [25]. Research by Bączek and Halarewicz [59] confirms the phytotoxic effect of black cherry on white mustard (Sinapis alba) and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum), the cultivated species commonly used to restore plant production on fallow land. Nutrients released during the decomposition of organic matter can be taken up again and used by plants. The biomass of invasive plant species often contains more elements (mainly C and N) compared to the biomass of the organic matter of native species, and it decomposes faster, which has a significant impact on the inhabited soil [60,61,62,63,64,65]. The direction and extent of this impact are modified by the properties of a given plant community [66], the initial soil status (including the type of soil and soil formation processes), and the weather conditions [67], which means that there are no general patterns of changes in soil parameters caused by plant invasion [25,68]. The consequence of increased decomposition is often an increase in the level of soil nutrients, which further facilitates the growth and development of invasive species [69].
Previous scientific publications on Padus serotina clearly indicate an increase in the nitrogen and phosphorus content in the soils of forest habitats dominated by the discussed species [40,70,71]. Based on the analysis of our own data, a positive correlation was found between the coverage of P. serotina and the content of total nitrogen in the soils of post-agricultural land. A similar relationship was noted by other authors for the invasive late goldenrod Solidago gigantea, and the opposite in the case of Japanese knotweed, Reynoutria japonica [25].
On the study plots invaded by black cherry, we found a higher content of the available forms of phosphorus in relation to the plots without this species. This was probably due to the fact that fresh P. serotina litter is richer in both phosphorus and nitrogen and decomposes faster compared to the litter of other native tree species [68,70,71]. Vanderhoeven et al. [68], comparing the content of P in abandoned farmland soils affected by P. serotina invasion and free from this species, did not record statistically significant differences. The experiment conducted by these authors concerned older (at least 10 years old) and taller (3–15 m) individuals of P. serotina than the plants we analyzed. In the case of another invasive species, S. gigantea, an increase in the content of phosphorus in the soils of synanthropic habitats [68] or its decline [8] was observed. In turn, the invasion of R. japonica was accompanied by a significant reduction in the P content in inhabited soil [25].
In our own research, we found that an increase in the area of P. serotina cover may contribute to an increase in the content of available potassium in the fallow soil. Kozak and Pudełko [8], analyzing the relationship between the presence of S. gigantea and the K concentration in post-agricultural soils, noted a decrease in the tested element, while the results of Vanderhoeven et al. [68] indicated no significant interaction between the above variables.
The high acidity of fallow soil in the shallowest layer of the soil profile (0–20 cm) found in our study was associated with an increase in the area covered by the youngest stages of P. serotina (seedlings and saplings). This dependence may have resulted both from the course of the decomposition of black cherry leaf litter and from the disturbance in the ionic balance of the soil solution (increased uptake of ammonium ions and alkaline cations) as a result of the increased biomass production in the herb layer [33].
In our research, a negative correlation was found between the field water capacity at a depth of 20–40 cm and the cover of P. serotina in the herb and moss layer. This proves the tendency of black cherry to cause soil drying. A similar relationship was noted by Verheyen et al. [37] in forest phytocoenoses ranging from coarse sandy soils to fine loamy soils. On the other hand, a positive effect of P. serotina on the podzol soil moisture in mixed forest habitats was reported by Halarewicz and Żołnierz [39]. Soil water serves as a solvent and mobile carrier of soil nutrients.
The parameters of the selected soil factors presented in this paper were obtained on the basis of analyses performed once, during one growing season. They indicate certain dependencies that require verification in the future. The annual influx of new organic matter, soil processes, and the course of weather contribute to changes in the properties of the soil environment [37,61,70]. It seems that many years of experiments conducted on permanent research plots, taking into account various types of fallow soils, will contribute to expanding the knowledge about the process of the secondary succession of fallow lands and will make it possible to estimate the effects of maintaining post-agricultural habitats with the succession of P. serotina.

5. Conclusions

The black cherry, leaving forest habitats (the primary planting sites), quickly and uncontrollably invades abandoned agricultural land. Participating in the secondary succession of fallows, it affects the vegetation and soil environment, with consequences that are still not fully known. In this study, we found a relationship between the presence of all developmental stages of Padus serotina and an increase in the phosphorus content in the soil. In addition, the increase in the cover of P. serotina bushes had a positive effect on the content of nitrogen and potassium in fallow soil. The increase in the proportion of black cherry in the herb layer contributed to soil acidification and a decrease in the water content available for plants in the arable layer 20–40 cm deep.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.H.; methodology, A.H. and D.K.; field data collection, P.B., M.P. and A.H.; laboratory analyses, P.B. and D.K.; validation, M.P., D.K. and D.P.; formal analysis, D.P. and P.B.; investigation, P.B., M.P. and A.H.; writing—original draft preparation, P.B. and A.H.; writing—review and editing, P.B., A.H., D.P., M.P. and D.K.; supervision, A.H.; funding acquisition, P.B. and A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC/BPC is co-financed by the Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data from this study are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Van der Zanden, E.H.; Verburg, P.H.; Schulp, C.J.E.; Verkerk, P.J. Trade-offs of European agricultural abandonment. Land Use Policy 2017, 62, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Keenleyside, C.; Tucker, G.; McConville, A. Farmland Abandonment in the EU: An Assessment of Trends and Prospects; WWF: London, UK; IEEP: London, UK, 2010; 97p. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rounsevell, M.D.A.; Pedroli, B.; Erb, K.-H.; Gramberger, M.; Busck, A.G.; Haberl, H.; Kristensen, S.; Kuemmerle, T.; Lavorel, S.; Marcus, L.; et al. Challenges for land system science. Land Use Policy 2012, 29, 899–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ellis, E.C.; Kaplan, J.O.; Fuller, D.Q.; Vavrus, S.; Klein Goldewijk, K.; Verburg, P.H. Used planet: A global history. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 7978–7985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Siebert, S.; Portmann, F.T.; Döll, P. Global patterns of cropland use intensity. Remote Sens. 2010, 2, 1625–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Estel, S.; Kuemmerle, T.; Alcántara, C.; Levers, C.; Prishchepov, A.; Hostert, P. Mapping farmland abandonment and recultivation across Europe using MODIS NDVI time series. Remote Sens. Environ. 2015, 163, 312–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shi, K.; Yang, Q.; Li, Y.; Sun, X. Mapping and evaluating cultivated land fallow in Southwest China using multisource data. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 654, 987–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kozak, M.; Pudełko, R. Impact assessment of the long-term fallowed land on agricultural soils and the possibility of their return to agriculture. Agriculture 2021, 11, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cramer, V.A.; Hobbs, R.J.; Standish, R.J. What’s new about old fields? Land abandonment and ecosystem assembly. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lasanta, T.; Nadal-Romero, E.; Arnáez, J. Managing abandoned farmland to control the impact of re-vegetation on the environment. The state of the art in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy 2015, 52, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sosnowska, A. Changes of vegetation effects in soil properties in the post-agriculture landscapes (south-eastern Poland). Misc. Geogr.—Reg. Stud. Dev. 2019, 23, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chudecka, J.; Tomaszewicz, T. Changes of chemical properties of brunic arenosols (rusty soils) after eleven years of their fallowing. Folia Pomeranae Univ. Technol. Stetinensis. Agric. Aliment. Piscaria Zootech. 2015, 320, 31–40. [Google Scholar]
  13. Chmolowska, D.; Kozak, M.; Laskowski, R. Soil physicochemical properties and floristic composition of two ecosystems differing in plant diversity: Fallows and meadows. Plant Soil 2016, 402, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Strączyńska, S.; Strączyński, S.; Wojciechowski, W. Effect of different land uses on selected properties of the soils. Soil Sci. Ann. 2010, 61, 227–232. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  15. Włodek, S.; Sienkiewicz-Cholewa, U.; Biskupski, A.; Sekutowski, T.R. Comparison of the chosen environmental features of the arable land and fallow. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 38, 51–59. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  16. Tomaszewicz, T.; Chudecka, J. Influence of land use on properties of rusty soils: Fallow and agricultural use in Ginawa. Agric. Eng. 2005, 4, 311–320. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  17. Meiners, S.J.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L. Effects of plant invasions on the species richness of abandoned agricultural land. Ecography 2001, 24, 633–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meiners, S.J.; Pickett, S.T.A.; Cadenasso, M.L. Exotic plant invasions over 40 years of old field successions: Community patterns and associations. Ecography 2002, 25, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Węgrzynek, B.; Urbisz, A.; Nowak, T. Participation of Solidago candensis L. and S. gigantea Aiton in abandoned field communities in the Silesian Upland (Poland). Thaiszia 2005, 15, 267–275. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hejda, M.; Pyšek, P.; Jarošík, V. Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities. J. Ecol. 2009, 97, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vilà, M.; Espinar, J.L.; Hejda, M.; Hulme, P.E.; Jarošik, V.; Maron, J.L.; Pergl, J.; Schaffner, U.; Sun, Y.; Pyšek, P. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: A meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 702–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, H.; Li, B.; Fang, C.; Chen, J.; Wu, J. Exotic plant influences soil nematode communities through litter input. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 1782–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Elgersma, K.J.; Ehrenfeld, J.G. Linear and non-linear impacts of a non-native plant invasion on soil microbial community structure and function. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majewska, M.L.; Błaszkowski, J.; Nobis, M.; Rola, K.; Nobis, A.; Łakomiec, D.; Czachura, P.; Zubek, S. Root-inhabiting fungi in alien plant species in relation to invasion status and soil chemical properties. Symbiosis 2015, 65, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Stefanowicz, A.M.; Stanek, M.; Nobis, M.; Zubek, S. Few effects of invasive plants Reynoutria japonica, Rudbeckia laciniata and Solidago gigantea on soil physical and chemical properties. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 574, 938–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chytrý, M.; Pysek, P.; Wild, J.; Pino, J.; Maskell, L.; Vilà, M. European map of alien plant invasions based on quantitative assessment across habitats. Divers. Distrib. 2009, 15, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, S.; Li, K.; Li, G.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Iqbal, B.; Du, D. Canada Goldenrod Invasion Regulates the Effects of Soil Moisture on Soil Respiration. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 15446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Fenesi, A.; Vágási, C.I.; Beldean, M.; Földesi, R.; Kolcsár, L.P.; Shapiro, J.T.; Török, E.; Kovács-Hostyánszki, A. Solidago canadensis impacts on native plant and pollinator communities in different-aged old fields. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2015, 16, 335–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sekutowski, T.; Włodek, S.; Biskupski, A.; Sienkiewicz-Cholewa, U. Comparison of the content of seeds and plants of the goldenrod (Solidago sp.) in the fallow and adjacent field. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Przyr. Wrocławiu 2012, 584, 99–111. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  30. Deckers, B.; Verheyen, K.; Hermy, M.; Muys, B. Effects of landscape structure on the invasive spread of black cherry Prunus serotina in an agricultural landscape in Flanders, Belgium. Ecography 2005, 28, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Adamczak, A. Acer negundo L. and Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh. as kenophytes initiating the development of wildwoods on fallow lands. Przegl. Przyr. 2007, 18, 243–253. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  32. Bomanowska, A.; Adamowski, W. Alien plant species in secondary succession. Thaiszia J. Bot. 2012, 22, 121–141. [Google Scholar]
  33. Starfinger, U.; Kowarik, I.; Rode, M.; Schepker, H. From desirable ornamental plant to pest to accepted addition to the flora? The perception of alien tree species through the centuries. Biol. Invasions 2003, 5, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lorenz, K.; Preston, C.M.; Krumrei, S.; Feger, K.H. Decomposition of needle/leaf litter from Scots pine, black cherry, common oak and European beech at a conurbation forest site. Eur. J. For. Res. 2004, 123, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Godefroid, S.; Phartyal, S.S.; Weyembergh, G.; Koedam, N. Ecological factors controlling the abundance of non-native invasive black cherry (Prunus serotina) in deciduous forest understory in Belgium. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2005, 210, 91–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Closset-Kopp, D.; Chabrerie, O.; Valentin, B.; Delachapelle, H.; Decocq, G. When Oskar meets Alice: Does a lack of trade-off in r/k-strategies make Prunus serotina a seccessful invader of European forest? Forest Ecol. Manag. 2007, 247, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Verheyen, K.; Vanhellemont, M.; Stock, T.; Hermy, M. Predicting patterns of invasion by black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) in Flanders (Belgium) and its impact on the forest understorey community. Divers. Distrib. 2007, 13, 487–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chabrerie, O.; Loinard, J.; Perrin, S.; Saguez, R.; Decocq, G. Impact of Prunus serotina invasion on understory functional diversity in a European temperate forest. Biol. Invasions 2010, 12, 1891–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Halarewicz, A.; Żołnierz, L. Changes in the understorey of Mied coniferous forest plant communities dominated by the American black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.). For. Ecol. Manag. 2014, 313, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Halarewicz, A.; Pruchniewicz, D. Vegetation and environmental changes in a Scots pine forest invaded by Prunus serotina: What is the threat to terricolous bryophytes? Eur. J. For. Res. 2015, 134, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sobik, M. Klimat. In Przyroda Dolnego Śląska; Fabiszewski, J., Ed.; Polska Akademia Nauk Oddział we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, Poland, 2005; pp. 39–57. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  42. Geoportal Dolny Śląsk. Available online: https://geoportal.dolnyslask.pl (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  43. Kabała, C.; Charzyński, P.; Chodorowski, J.; Drewnik, M.; Glina, B.; Greinert, A.; Hulisz, P.; Jankowski, M.; Jonczak, J.; Łabaz, B.; et al. Polish Soil Classification, 6th edition—Principles, classification scheme and correlations. Soil Sci. Annu. 2019, 70, 71–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014, Update 2015, International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. In World Soil Resources Report No. 106; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  45. Mirek, Z.; Piękoś-Mirkowa, H.; Zając, A.; Zając, M. Vascular Plants of Poland. An Annotated Checklist [Rośliny Naczyniowe Polski. Adnotowany Wykaz Gatunków]; Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences: Warsaw, Poland, 2020; 526p. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  46. Ochyra, R.; Żarnowiec, J.; Bednarek-Ochyra, H. Census Catalogue of Polish Mosses; Institute of Botany of Polish Academy of Science: Kraków, Poland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  47. Matuszkiewicz, W. Przewodnik do Oznaczania Zbiorowisk Roślinnych Polski; Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warsaw, Poland, 2007; 540p. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  48. Pora, E.; Kaszubkiewicz, J.; Kawałko, D. Selected methodological aspects of determination of the water desorption curves of superabsorbents. Environ. Prot. Eng. 2015, 41, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Papuga, K.; Kaszubkiewicz, J.; Wilczewski, W.; Staś, M.; Belowski, J.; Kawałko, D. Soil grain size analysis by the dynamometer method-a comparison to the pipette and hydrometer method. Soil Sci. Annu. 2018, 69, 17–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Van Reeuwijk, L.P. Procedures for Soil Analysis; Technical paper 19; International Soil Reference and Information Centre: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ostrowska, A.; Gawliński, S.; Szczubiałka, Z. Methods of Analysis and Evaluation of the Properties of Soils and Plants; Catalog Institute of Environmental Protection: Warsaw, Poland, 1991; pp. 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bremner, J.M.; Hauck, R.D. Advances in Methodology for Research on Nitrogen Transformations in Soils. In Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils; Stevenson, F.J., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1982; Volume 22, pp. 467–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sáez-Plaza, P.; Michałowski, T.; Navas, M.J.; Asuero, A.G.; Wybraniec, S. An Overview of the Kjeldahl Method of Nitrogen Determination. Part I. Early History, Chemistry of the Procedure, and Titrimetric Finish. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2013, 43, 178–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Egner, H.; Riehm, H.; Domingo, W.R. Untersuchungen über die chemische Bodenanalyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nahrstoffzustandes der Bodens: II. Chemische Extractionsmethoden zur Phosphor- und Kaliumbestimmung. K. Lantbrukshügskolans Ann. 1960, 26, 199–215. [Google Scholar]
  55. ter Braak, C.J.F.; Šmilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, Version 5.0; Microcomputer Power: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2012; 496p. [Google Scholar]
  56. Manly, B.F.J. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology, 2nd ed.; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1997; 399p. [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanisz, A. Przystępny Kurs Statystyki z Zastosowaniem STATISTICA PL na Przykładach z Medycyny. Tom 1. Statystyki Podstawowe; StatSoft Polska: Kraków, Poland, 2006; 532p. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
  58. TIBCO Software Inc. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 13. 2017. Available online: http://statistica.io (accessed on 10 January 2022).
  59. Bączek, P.; Halarewicz, A. Allelopathic Effect of Black Cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) on Early Growth of White Mustard (Sinapis alba L.) and Common Buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench): Is the Invader a Threat to Restoration of Fallow Lands? Agronomy 2022, 12, 2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Rothstein, D.E.; Vitousek, P.M.; Simmons, B.L. An exotic tree alters decomposition and nutrient cycling in a Hawaiian montane forest. Ecosystems 2004, 7, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dassonville, N.S.; Vanparys, V.; Hayez, M.; Gruber, W.; Meerts, P. Impacts of alien invasive plants on soil nutrients are correlated with initial site conditions in NW Europe. Oecologia 2008, 157, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Liao, C.; Peng, R.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wu, X.; Fang, C.; Chen, J.; Li, B. Altered ecosystem carbon and nitrogen cycles by plant invasion: A meta-analysis. New Phytol. 2008, 177, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Arthur, M.; Bray, S.; Kuchle, C.; McEwan, R. The influence of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii, on leaf decomposition and microbial community dynamics. Plant Ecol. 2012, 213, 1571–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Castro–Díez, P.; Godoy, O.; Alonso, A.; Gallardo, A.; Saldaña, A. What explains variation in the impacts of exotic plant invasions on the nitrogen cycle? A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 2014, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jo, I.; Fridley, J.D.; Frank, D.A. More of the same? In situ leaf and root decomposition rates do not vary between 80 native and nonnative deciduous forest species. New Phytol. 2016, 209, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ehrenfeld, J.G.; Scott, N. Invasive Species and the Soil: Effects on Organisms and Ecosystem Processes. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11, 1259–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ehrenfeld, J.G. Effect of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 2003, 6, 503–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Vanderhoeven, S.; Dassonville, N.; Meerts, P. Increased topsoil mineral nutrient concentrations under exotic invasive plants in Belgium. Plant Soil 2005, 275, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ehrenfeld, J.; Kourtev, P.; Huang, W. Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous forests. Ecol. Appl. 2001, 11, 1287–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koutika, L.S.; Vanderhoeven, S.; Chapuis-Lardy, L.; Dassonville, N.; Meerts, P. Assessment of changes in soil organic matter after invasion by exotic plant species. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2007, 44, 331–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Chabrerie, O.; Verheyen, K.; Saguez, R.; Decocq, G. Disentangling relationships between habitat conditions, disturbance history, plant diversity and American black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) invasion in a European temperate forest. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of study sites with their numbering (1–10) in accordance with Table 1.
Figure 1. Location of study sites with their numbering (1–10) in accordance with Table 1.
Agriculture 13 02148 g001
Figure 2. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) diagram for the studied plots and soil variables, represented as vectors in the ordination space. Plots with Padus serotina are marked as red points, and plots without this species are marked as black points. Numbers of plots are as described in Table 1. Designations of soil variables are given in the description of Table 2.
Figure 2. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) diagram for the studied plots and soil variables, represented as vectors in the ordination space. Plots with Padus serotina are marked as red points, and plots without this species are marked as black points. Numbers of plots are as described in Table 1. Designations of soil variables are given in the description of Table 2.
Agriculture 13 02148 g002
Figure 3. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) diagram for the species of the herb and moss layer. The letter “d” before the abbreviation denotes moss species. Species names and abbreviations: Ace_neAcer negundo, Ach_miAchillea millefolium, Agr_reAgropyron repens, Alo_prAlopecurus pratensis, Ant_odAnthoxanthum odoratum, Ant_syAnthriscus sylvestris, Arr_elArrhenatherum elatius, dAtr_unAtrichum undulatum, Bet_peBetula pendula, dBra_alBrachythecium albicans, dBra_oeBrachythecium oedipodium, dBra_ruBrachythecium rutabulum, Cal_epCalamagrostis epigejos, Cam_paCampanula patula, Car_spCardaminopsis sp., Car_acCarduus acanthoides, Car_hiCarex hirta, Car_vuCarlina vulgaris, Car_caCarum carvi, dCer_puCeratodon purpureus, Cir_ arCirsium arvense, Cir_vuCirsium vulgare, Con_caConyza canadensis, Cor_saCornus sanguinea, Cra_moCrataegus monogyna, Cre_biCrepis biennis, Cre_teCrepis tectorum, Dac_glDactylis glomerata, Dia_deDianthus deltoides, Dry_fiDryopteris filix–mas, Equ_prEquisetum pratense, Eup_cyEuphorbia cyparissias, dEur_hiEurhynchium hians, Fal_duFallopia dumetorum, Fes_prFestuca pratensis, Fes_ruFestuca rubra, Fes_spFestuca sp., Fra_veFragaria vesca, Fra_exFraxinus excelsior, Gal_veGalium verum, Ger_puGeranium pusillum, Geu_urGeum urbanum, Gna_syGnaphalium sylvaticum, Her_spHeracleum sphondylium, Hie_piHieracium pilosella, Hie_umHieracium umbellatum, Ho_laHolcus lanatus, Hol_moHolcus mollis, Hyp_peHypericum perforatum, Hyp_raHypochoeris radicata, Jas_moJasione montana, Lac_seLactuca serriola, Lat_prLathyrus pratensis, Lat_tuLathyrus tuberosus, Lon_xyLonicera xylosteum, Luz_caLuzula campestris, Oxa_stOxalis stricta, Pad_avPadus avium, Pad_sePadus serotina, Pap_duPapaver dubium, Pic_hiPicris hieracioides, Pim_maPimpinella major, Pla_laPlantago lanceolata, Poa_prPoa pratensis, Pru_doPrunus domestica, Pru_do_sPrunus domestica subsp. syriaca, Que_roQuercus robur, Ros_spRosa sp., Ru_caRubus caesius, Rub_spRubus sp., Rum_acRumex acetosa, Sen_jaSenecio jacobaea, Sol_caSolidago canadensis, Sol_giSolidago gigantea, Sta_paStachys palustris, Ste_meStellaria media, Sym_ofSymphytum officinale, Syr_vuSyringa vulgaris, Tor_jaTorilis japonica, Tri_arTrifolium arvense, Tri_duTrifolium dubium, Ulm_miUlmus minor, Val_ofValeriana officinalis, Ver_thVerbascum thapsus, Ver_chVeronica chamaedrys, Ver_ofVeronica officinalis, Vic_crVicia cracca, Vic_grVicia grandiflora.
Figure 3. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) diagram for the species of the herb and moss layer. The letter “d” before the abbreviation denotes moss species. Species names and abbreviations: Ace_neAcer negundo, Ach_miAchillea millefolium, Agr_reAgropyron repens, Alo_prAlopecurus pratensis, Ant_odAnthoxanthum odoratum, Ant_syAnthriscus sylvestris, Arr_elArrhenatherum elatius, dAtr_unAtrichum undulatum, Bet_peBetula pendula, dBra_alBrachythecium albicans, dBra_oeBrachythecium oedipodium, dBra_ruBrachythecium rutabulum, Cal_epCalamagrostis epigejos, Cam_paCampanula patula, Car_spCardaminopsis sp., Car_acCarduus acanthoides, Car_hiCarex hirta, Car_vuCarlina vulgaris, Car_caCarum carvi, dCer_puCeratodon purpureus, Cir_ arCirsium arvense, Cir_vuCirsium vulgare, Con_caConyza canadensis, Cor_saCornus sanguinea, Cra_moCrataegus monogyna, Cre_biCrepis biennis, Cre_teCrepis tectorum, Dac_glDactylis glomerata, Dia_deDianthus deltoides, Dry_fiDryopteris filix–mas, Equ_prEquisetum pratense, Eup_cyEuphorbia cyparissias, dEur_hiEurhynchium hians, Fal_duFallopia dumetorum, Fes_prFestuca pratensis, Fes_ruFestuca rubra, Fes_spFestuca sp., Fra_veFragaria vesca, Fra_exFraxinus excelsior, Gal_veGalium verum, Ger_puGeranium pusillum, Geu_urGeum urbanum, Gna_syGnaphalium sylvaticum, Her_spHeracleum sphondylium, Hie_piHieracium pilosella, Hie_umHieracium umbellatum, Ho_laHolcus lanatus, Hol_moHolcus mollis, Hyp_peHypericum perforatum, Hyp_raHypochoeris radicata, Jas_moJasione montana, Lac_seLactuca serriola, Lat_prLathyrus pratensis, Lat_tuLathyrus tuberosus, Lon_xyLonicera xylosteum, Luz_caLuzula campestris, Oxa_stOxalis stricta, Pad_avPadus avium, Pad_sePadus serotina, Pap_duPapaver dubium, Pic_hiPicris hieracioides, Pim_maPimpinella major, Pla_laPlantago lanceolata, Poa_prPoa pratensis, Pru_doPrunus domestica, Pru_do_sPrunus domestica subsp. syriaca, Que_roQuercus robur, Ros_spRosa sp., Ru_caRubus caesius, Rub_spRubus sp., Rum_acRumex acetosa, Sen_jaSenecio jacobaea, Sol_caSolidago canadensis, Sol_giSolidago gigantea, Sta_paStachys palustris, Ste_meStellaria media, Sym_ofSymphytum officinale, Syr_vuSyringa vulgaris, Tor_jaTorilis japonica, Tri_arTrifolium arvense, Tri_duTrifolium dubium, Ulm_miUlmus minor, Val_ofValeriana officinalis, Ver_thVerbascum thapsus, Ver_chVeronica chamaedrys, Ver_ofVeronica officinalis, Vic_crVicia cracca, Vic_grVicia grandiflora.
Agriculture 13 02148 g003
Table 1. General information of study sites.
Table 1. General information of study sites.
Site No.Study Plot No.CoordinatesType of Soil
NE
11–1051°10′17°00′Phaeozems
211–2051°09′16°54′Cambisols
321–3051°09′16°55′Podzols
431–4051°09′17°01′Cambisols
541–5051°02′17°15′Podzols
651–6051°01′17°19′Podzols
761–7051°02′17°19′Podzols
871–8051°10′16°54′Fluvisols
981–9051°01′17°03′Phaeozems
1091–10051°10′16°52′Podzols
Table 2. Results of stepwise selection of analyzed soil variables affecting fallow vegetation, selected in the canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Designations: FWC (0–20 cm)—field water capacity in 0–20 cm layer, FWC (20–40 cm)—field water capacity in layer 20–40 cm deep, pH—acidity determined in distilled water, C—content of organic carbon, P—content of available forms of phosphorus, N—total nitrogen content, K—content of available forms of potassium.
Table 2. Results of stepwise selection of analyzed soil variables affecting fallow vegetation, selected in the canonical correspondence analysis (CCA). Designations: FWC (0–20 cm)—field water capacity in 0–20 cm layer, FWC (20–40 cm)—field water capacity in layer 20–40 cm deep, pH—acidity determined in distilled water, C—content of organic carbon, P—content of available forms of phosphorus, N—total nitrogen content, K—content of available forms of potassium.
VariableMarginal EffectConditional Effect
Explains (%)Pseudo-FPExplains
(%)
Pseudo-FP
FWC (0–20 cm) (%)3.94.00.0023.94.00.002
FWC (20–40 cm) (%)3.83.90.0021.21.40.074
pH3.03.00.0022.52.60.002
C (%)2.92.90.0023.13.20.002
P (mg kg−1)2.62.60.0021.61.80.006
N (%)2.42.40.0201.51.60.124
K (mg kg−1)2.32.30.0021.81.90.002
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation between the proportion of Padus serotina in the layers of trees, shrubs, and herbs with mosses and physical and physicochemical properties of tested fallow soils. Designations of soil variables are given in the description of Table 2. The Pearson correlation coefficient values (R) are given (n = 50). Variables significant at p ≤ 0.05 are marked in red.
Table 3. Pearson’s correlation between the proportion of Padus serotina in the layers of trees, shrubs, and herbs with mosses and physical and physicochemical properties of tested fallow soils. Designations of soil variables are given in the description of Table 2. The Pearson correlation coefficient values (R) are given (n = 50). Variables significant at p ≤ 0.05 are marked in red.
Rt (N-2)p
Padus serotina in tree layer
FWC (0–20 cm)−0.046−0.4530.652
FWC (20–40 cm)−0.016−0.1580.875
pH−0.031−0.3110.757
C0.0790.7800.437
N−0.041−0.4090.683
P0.3123.2510.002
K0.0480.4800.632
Padus serotina in shrub layer
FWC (0–20 cm)−0.014−0.1350.893
FWC (20–40 cm)−0.037−0.3670.714
pH−0.175−1.7620.081
C0.1661.6710.098
N0.2662.7300.008
P0.3844.112≤0.001
K0.2312.3540.021
Padus serotina in herb and moss layer
FWC (0–20 cm)−0.177−1.7760.079
FWC (20–40 cm)−0.215−2.1770.032
pH−0.323−3.3750.001
C0.1741.7530.083
N0.1331.3330.186
P0.5045.776≤0.001
K0.1231.2300.222
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bączek, P.; Halarewicz, A.; Pruchniewicz, D.; Podlaska, M.; Kawałko, D. Soil Properties of Fallow Land Invaded by Black Cherry (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.). Agriculture 2023, 13, 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112148

AMA Style

Bączek P, Halarewicz A, Pruchniewicz D, Podlaska M, Kawałko D. Soil Properties of Fallow Land Invaded by Black Cherry (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.). Agriculture. 2023; 13(11):2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112148

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bączek, Paulina, Aleksandra Halarewicz, Daniel Pruchniewicz, Magda Podlaska, and Dorota Kawałko. 2023. "Soil Properties of Fallow Land Invaded by Black Cherry (Padus serotina (Ehrh.) Borkh.)" Agriculture 13, no. 11: 2148. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13112148

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop