Next Article in Journal
UAV-Derived Spectral Indices for the Evaluation of the Condition of Rye in Long-Term Field Experiments
Next Article in Special Issue
Isolation, Characterization, and Identification of Zinc-Solubilizing Bacteria (ZSB) from Wetland Rice Fields in Peninsular Malaysia
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Optimization of Fresh Agricultural Products Trade Distribution Path Based on Genetic Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Se-Enriched Irrigation Water and Soil Texture on Biomass Production and Elemental Composition of Green Pea and Carrot and Their Contribution to Human Se Intake
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Moderate Boron Concentration Beneficial for Flue-Cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Seedlings Growth and Development

1
College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
2
Agronomic Research Center, Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences, 33 Yuantong Street, Kunming 650021, China
3
College of Tobacco Science, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Agriculture 2022, 12(10), 1670; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101670
Submission received: 10 September 2022 / Revised: 5 October 2022 / Accepted: 7 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Micronutrient Deficiency and Biofortification in Cropping Systems)

Abstract

:
Boron (B) deficiency is a common phenomenon in most tobacco-planting areas in Yunnan, China. In 2020 and 2022, hydroponic experiments that contained B in a concentration gradient of 0.000, 0.125, 0.250, 0.750, 5.000, 10.000, 20.000, and 40.000 mmol L−1 were conducted to investigate tobacco cultivar K326′s agronomic traits, photosynthetic performance, antioxidant enzymes, and boron and nicotine concentration. As B concentration increased, indices including leaves biomass and net photosynthetic rate (Pn) generally increased first and then decreased, which was in contrast to antioxidant enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT). With increasing B concentration, boron content in tobacco seedlings increased significantly by 24.00~96.44%, while decreased nicotine content by 21.60~82.03%. The highest biomass and photosynthetic performance were obtained within 0.75 and 5.00 mmol L−1 treatments. The results of the sandy soil pot verification experiment were similar to the hydroponic experiment obtained. The beneficial mechanism of moderate B on tobacco seedlings is to maintain cell structure integrity, enhance photosynthetic capability, and promote root growth. Consequently, the optimum B concentration for tobacco seedlings is 0.75~5.00 mmol L−1, and applying 0.25~0.50 B kg hm−1 in soil under available B insufficiency could meet the needs of the growth of flue-cured tobacco.

1. Introduction

Boron (B) is an indispensable nutrient for the growth of plants, and it is relevant in physical and metabolic functions, including synthesis of plant uracil nucleochlorophyll, cytokinins, auxin, promote root development, cell-wall pectin formation [1,2], protein metabolism, alkaloid production, etc., thus affecting the growth and development of plants [3]. Boric acid (BO33−) is the main form of absorption of B by plants. Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) is an important cash crop and pillar industry in China, and the total national revenue of the tobacco industry reached USD 200 billion in 2020, playing an important role in supporting the national fiscal revenue. Tobacco is sensitive to B and the response curve is reported to have a very narrow sufficiency range, which means that even in B-deficient tobacco planting areas, excessive B supplementation is likely to cause malnutrition of tobacco plants [4,5] Appropriate concentration of B increases root system, leaf area, photosynthetic capacity, and dry matter accumulation of tobacco plants, and improves stress resistance, thus laying a good substance foundation for the growth of flue-cured tobacco in the field. Therefore, exploring an optimum B application rate for major cultivar K326 of flue-cured tobacco seedlings is crucial for achieving sustainable development and production of tobacco.
Plants under B deficiency condition generally show growth retardation, limitation of the elongation and expansion of leaves, deformation of the leaves, and cessation of the bud [6,7]. Additionally, boron deficiency leads to the production of large amounts of auxin, thus prompting branches of root then increasing nicotine content [8]. Plants’ physiological function and metabolism are also disturbed under B deficiency condition [9]. Specifically, increasing cell membrane permeability and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species would damage the normal structure and function of cells [10]. Boron toxicity, on the other hand, causes a great loss of crop yield worldwide. Previous studies have shown that when solution B concentration was at or above 200 mol/L, the tobacco plant showed B poisoning symptoms [11]. Plants with B toxicity are usually characterized by leaf vein loss of greenness, leaf tip burn, leaf tip curling, and necrotic patches at the tips or margins of older leaves [12]. As for tobacco, the B poisoning symptoms were characterized by brown spots at the tips or edges of the old leaves, which then developed towards the midrib and base. In some extreme cases, the brittleness of the lamina and rapid foliation could be recorded [13]. Barley leaf length, width, and area do not show any differences between excessive and normal B application. However, root weakness and death of lateral root were noted in the cultivation of excessive solution B concentration [14,15]. In addition, oxidative stress becomes severe under B poisoning, manifested by significantly elevated superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), ascorbic acid peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) activity under B overdose conditions [16,17,18].
There are many studies that have investigated the effects of B deficiency on yield, quality, and physiological and biochemical characteristics of flue-cured tobacco in the field stage [19,20,21]; however, there are limited reports on B on photosynthesis characteristics, antioxidant enzymes, and nicotine content in the seedling stage. By using a combination of hydroponic experiment and sandy soil pot experiment, the objectives of this study were to identify the critical values of B deficiency and toxicity in tobacco seedlings, to explore the optimal concentration of B in actual production, to provide a basis for the regulation of B nutrition in the production, and, further, to enrich the physiological mechanism of B on flue-cured tobacco, which is of great significance for the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment Design

This study was carried out at the greenhouse of Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Science, Yuxi, China (24°14′ N, 102°30′ W; altitude 1680 m) in 2020 and 2022. On 18 September 2020 (6 weeks after germination), uniform tobacco seedlings (variety K326, a most conventional commercial tobacco cultivar worldwide) with a single stem were selected to transplant into 500 mL pots containing ½ B-free Hoagland’s solution. The pH was adjusted to 6.0 with 0.1 mol/L NaOH and HCl. The growing condition was kept at 25 °C under 16 h light period, humidity about 75%, and average irradiation 650 μM·m−2 s−1. The roots were covered with tin foil to protect them from light to promote root growth and were ventilated for 2 h a day, and the nutrient solution was replaced within the interval of 3 days. After 7 days of preculture, eight different B concentrations (H3BO3) were used (0.00 (B1), 0.125 (B2), 0.25 (B3), 0.75 (B4), 5.00 (B5), 10.00 (B6), 20.00 (B7), and 40.00 (B8) mmol·L−1) to induce B deficiency and toxicity [4,8,11]. The nutrient solution without BO33− (0.00 mmol·L−1) was set as the control. Each treatment was repeated three times and the biochemical analyses were conducted 30 days after treatment application.
On 10 January 2022 (6 weeks after germination), the uniform tobacco seedlings (varieties K326) with four leaves were selected and transplanted into a pot with sandy soil. The sandy soil was sterilized and dewormed with carbendazim and trichlorfon in advance. After 7 days of preculture, eight different B concentrations were conducted at 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 2.00, 4.00, and 10.00 B·kg·hm−2, according to the planting of 15,000 tobacco plants per hectare. Numerically the weight of H3BO3 of 0.00 g (CK-S), 0.0167 g (B1-S), 0.0333 g (B2-S), 0.0500 g (B3-S), 0.0833 g (B4-S), 0.1333 g (B5-S), 0.2667 g (B6-S), and 0.5333 g (B7-S) were applied to each tobacco seedling under different treatments, respectively. Other nutrients were replenished by B-free Hoagland solution, and the B-free Hoagland solution was applied once every 3 days for 2 L each. Each pot was transplanted with one plant, and the positions of the tobacco seedlings were randomly adjusted to ensure more consistent growth and illumination conditions for each tobacco. During the experiment, the day length was 14 h, temperature kept at 25 °C, humidity maintained at 75%, and light intensity was 650 μM·m−2 s−1. Relevant physiological indexes were sampled and measured when the deficiency or toxicity symptoms were shown in this study. The basic nutrients of the trail soil are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Analyses Methods

2.2.1. Agronomic Traits

Under hydroponic experiment, 30 days after transplanting, the height of tobacco seedlings was determined from the ground along the stem to the growing tip, and the leaf length and width were determined by the sixth leaf from the leaf base to the growing tip.

2.2.2. Biomass of Tobacco Seedlings

After being killed at 105 °C for 10 min and dried at 55 °C to the constant weight, the root, stem, and leaf dry weight were measured and calculated to obtain the total weight.

2.2.3. Soil–Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) Value

Chlorophyll content in tobacco seedlings leaves were measured using an SPAD-502 (Konica Minolta Inc., Tokyo, Japan) portable chlorophyll detector [22,23,24]. The middle part of the sixth leaf from the leaf base to the growing tip was measured three times. Three measurements were averaged as SPAD value for each observation.

2.2.4. Photosynthetic Parameters

At the end of the experiment, the photosynthetic parameters, such as the photosynthetic rate (Pn; μmol·m−2·s−1), stomatal conductance (Cond; mol·m−2·s−1), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci; μmol·mol−1), and transpiration rate (Tr; mmol·−2·s−1), of all plants were measured using the Li-6400 portable photosynthetic apparatus (Li-COR Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). Before the measurement, the leaf chamber photosynthetic active radiation intensity (PAR) was set to 1800 μmol·m−2·s−1 to induce the leaves. During the measurement, the set value of the CO2 injection system was 400 μmol·mol−1, the gas flow rate was 500 mmol·s−1, the leaf temperature was 25 °C, and the leaf chamber PAR was set to 1000 μmol·m−2·s−1. Finally, the automatic measurement procedure was started when the photosynthesiometer readings were stable. The average value of the three measurements was taken to facilitate the analysis.

2.2.5. Boron Ion Content in Tobacco Seedlings

Boron concentration was determined according to the wet ashing technique (10 mL nitric and 5 mL of 70% perchloric acid digestion method), and the atomic absorption spectrophotometry measurements were used in the determination [25].

2.2.6. Nicotine Concentration

The nicotine concentration of tobacco leaves was measured by gas chromatography with minor modification [26]. Briefly, 0.1 g tobacco leaf sample was freeze-dried and ground into fine powder. After soaking in 1 mL of 10% (w/v) NaOH for 20 min, the sample was extracted in the equivalent volume of dichloromethane with vortexing. The nicotine content was determined using an Agilent Technologies 7890 A Chromatograph equipped with a DB 5 MS column, using nicotine from Sigma-Aldrich as a standard control. The data for each observation were determined from three independent replicates.

2.2.7. Defense-Related Enzymes and Compounds

A total of 0.5 g tobacco seedling leaves with uniform symptoms of B deficiency or B poisoning were taken to determine the activity of antioxidant enzymes. SOD activity was evaluated by SOD kit (NBT method) [27], POD activity was accessed by POD kit [28], CAT activity was checked by CAT kit (UV absorption method) [29], and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity was evaluated by APX kit (UV absorption method) [30]. These applying kits were provided by Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.

2.2.8. Oxidative Stress Indicators

Malondialdehyde (MDA) content was determined by MDA kit [31], and H2O2 content was accessed by H2O2 kit [32]. These applying kits were provided by Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.

2.2.9. Nitrate Reductase (NR) Activity

Nitrate reductase (NR) was determined by NR kit [33], and this determination kit (UV absorption method) was procured from Keming Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.

2.2.10. Soil Physical and Chemical Parameters

Before the experiment was conducted, 500 g air-dried soil samples were used to perform routine analysis for texture, cation exchange capacity, soil organic matter, soil total nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and soil available boron.
Soil cation exchange capacity was determined via potentiometric titration [34]. Soil texture (clay, silt, and sand) was measured by hydrometric method [35]. Soil organic matter was determined by using the potassium dichromate oxidation method [36]. Soil total nitrogen was determined by using a micro-Kjeldahl digestion followed by steam distillation, total phosphorus was quantified using the molybdenum–antimony antispectrophotometric method, and total potassium was measured by flame photometry [37]. Soil available boron concentration in sandy soil was determined according to the curcumin–oxalic acid method [38]. The concentration of available B in the sandy soil before the pot experiment was 0.167 mg/kg. The B ion concentrations in sandy soil of each treatment were 0.213, 1.704, 2.716, 3.507, 6.679, 7.634, 11.953, and 22.829 mg/kg, respectively.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were statistically analyzed by the single factor analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) and Spearman correlation in SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics Inc., Chicago, IL, USA; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Triplicate measurements on tobacco plants samples (n = 3) were averaged for statistical analysis of treatments effects. Treatment effects were considered significant at alpha equals 0.05 level of probability. Means separation was performed using Duncan’s multiple test. Figures were created with GraphPad Prism 8 Software (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Seedling Growth and Shoot Biomass Formation

The growths of flue-cured tobacco seedlings treated with different B concentrations after 30 days of hydroponics condition are shown in Figure 1. The 0.00 mmol·L−1 treatment showed B deficiency symptoms with light green color, corking of leaf veins, and leaf marginal curling. With B concentration in solution increased from 5.00 mmol·L1 to 40.00 mmol·L−1, the area of scorched leaf surface gradually expanded from leaf tip to whole leaf as per tobacco B toxicity symptoms. At 40.00 mmol L−1 treatment, the lower leaves of flue-cured tobacco were completely withered to deformation.
All plant growth parameters were significantly different between the eight treatments (p < 0.05) (Figure 1A–D). With the increase in B concentration, tobacco seedlings’ leaf, stem, root, and total dry weight showed a downward parabolic trend, and peaked at B concentrations at B5 treatment, which, respectively, increased by 9.68~36.56% (leaf), 12.26~52.36% (stem), 13.64~56.82% (root), and 10.65~38.92% (whole plant), compared with other treatments.
The B concentration in solution did not affect the plant height and stalk width (Figure 2A,B), while it significantly (p < 0.05) affected the leaf number (Figure 2C), maximum leaf length (Figure 2D), and leaf width (Figure 2E). When B concentration was at B4 treatment, leaf length increased 4.83~20.175%. At B5 treatment, the leaf width was higher than other treatments by 0.77~24.36%. The leaf number peaked at B7 treatment, and was significantly higher than those of B2 and B8, compared with other treatments, which increased by 2.38~19.05%.

3.2. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Photosynthetic Performance

Boron concentrations significantly impacted the SPAD value of flue-cured tobacco seedlings leaves (p < 0.05) (Figure 1E). SPAD value reached its maximum at B7, which increased by 9.16% (B1), 15.04% (B2), 13.71% (B3), 7.88% (B4), 4.84% (B5), 3.46% (B6), and 12.00% (B8), respectively.
Photosynthetic properties of tobacco seedlings were significantly influenced by solution B concentration (p < 0.05; Table 2). Photosynthetic properties parameters showed a parabolic trend with the increase of B concentration. The Pn parameters peaked at B4 treatment and were significantly increased by 63.96%, 46.83%, and 80.28% compared with B1, B7, and B8, respectively. The Cond parameter at B4 increased the most, by 33.40%~75.86%, compared to other treatments. The Ci parameters reached the maximum at B3 treatment, which was 0.83%~57.95% higher than other treatments. The Tr parameters reached the highest at B3 treatment, which increased by 49.02% (B1), 30.83% (B2), 62.05% (B7), and 61.55% (B8), respectively.

3.3. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Antioxidant Enzymes and MDA Content

Antioxidant enzymes in tobacco seedlings were significantly influenced by B (p < 0.05, Figure 3). As solution B concentration increased, the SOD, POD, and CAT activities showed a “down-up” trend. SOD activities reached a maximum at B7, by 10.44~91.67%, compared to other treatments. POD activity was increased more severely at B6 treatment, by 21.32~65.62%, than other treatments. When B concentration was at B7 treatment, the CAT activities were significantly higher than other treatments, increasing by 50.05~96.44%. Concentrations at B4 had minimal MDA content with significant variability between each treatment (p < 0.05), which decreased by 46.65~302.57%.

3.4. Effect of B Solution Concentration on B and Nicotine Concentration in Plant Tissue

Boron concentrations in tobacco seedlings’ root, stem, and leaf were significantly affected by solution B concentration (p < 0.05, Figure 4A). With the increase of solution B concentration, there were sharp increases in the root, stem, and leaf tissue. All parameters were significantly different and reached the maximum at B8 treatment. Compared with B8 treatment, the concentration of B ion accumulation increased by 24.43~86.76% (roots), 26.97~96.44% (stems), and 24.00~67.01% (leaves), respectively.
The concentration of nicotine in roots and leaves of tobacco seedlings was significantly affected by B in solution (p < 0.05, Figure 4B). Nicotine concentration in root and leaves declined significantly when B concentration was at or above B1 treatment; however, the nicotine content in stems did not show significant difference among treatments. Compared with other treatments, B1 was increased by 33.58~82.03% (roots), 43.83~72.93% (stems), and 21.60~70.34% (leaves), respectively.

3.5. Indices Related to Different B Solution Concentration

The correlation analysis shows that the different B solution concentration was positively correlated with the accumulation of B ion in each part of tobacco seedlings (p < 0.01), and the correlation coefficients were 0.976 (roots), 0.943 (stems), and 0.985 (leaves), respectively (Table 3), while the nicotine content in roots and leaves of flue-cured tobacco seedlings was negatively correlated with the different B solution concentration (p < 0.01), and the correlation coefficients were −0.783 (roots) and −0.622 (leaves).
Moreover, the accumulation of B ion in each part of tobacco seedlings were negatively correlated with the nicotine content in each part of tobacco seedlings, and the correlation coefficients varied from −0.756 to −0.476 (p < 0.01). The activities of SOD and CAT and the content of MDA were negatively correlated with the Pn and Cond parameters, and the correlation coefficients varied from −0.869 to −0.696 (p < 0.01). The correlation of Ci parameter between the accumulation of B concentration in tobacco seedlings was negative, and the correlation coefficients varied from −0.709 to −0.618 (p < 0.01).

3.6. Effect of B Concentration on Plant Growth and Physiological Indices under Pot Experiment

The pot experiments were designed to address the inappropriate use of B in the field and verification of the results concluded under the hydroponics condition. The concentration of B in sandy soil before the pot experiment was 0.167 mg·kg−1. A total of 15 days after application of different B concentrations, the B deficiency symptoms were observed at B1-S treatments with leaf marginal curling, while the B toxicity symptoms were observed at B3-S, B4-S, B5-S, B6-S, and B7-S treatments with scorched appearance, extreme stunting, and even plant death (Figure 5). With the increase of B concentration in sandy soil, the leaves withered, and experienced thinness, stunting, and complete death. However, these hydroponics that had B deficiency symptoms did not show any symptoms in the pot environment.
Under pot experiments (Figure 6), SOD and POD activities reached a maximum at B6-S treatment, by 18.36~168.65% (SOD) and 45.39~965.44% (POD) compared to other treatments, respectively (Figure 6A,B). Under APX index, B5-S reached the highest, which increased by 25.26 times (CK-S), 11.12 times (B1-S), 6.37 times (B2-S), 76.85% (B3-S), 35.93% (B4-S), 52.05% (B6-S), and 29.89% (B7-S), respectively (Figure 6C).
When B concentration was at B-S7 treatment, the H2O2 content and the MDA content were significantly higher than these of other treatments, by 20.01~207.94% (H2O2) and by 35.06~192.45% (MDA), respectively (Figure 6D,E).
Under the NR indicators, CK-S treatment was the lowest, which was reduced by 76.41% (B1-S), 3.38 times (B2-S), 2.13 times % (B3-S), 1.47 times % (B4-S), 5.97 times (B5-S), 7.69 times % (B6-S), and 5.70 times % (B7-S), respectively (Figure 6F).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Tobacco Seedling Agronomic Traits, and Photosynthetic Performance under Hydroponic Condition

The yield and quality of tobacco leaves are core targets for tobacco production and growers, and leaf length, leaf width, and photosynthesis are the basis of yield and quality formation. Boron is involved in ions transport and maintains the photosynthetic area, transpiration rate, and stomatal conductance in plants [39]. Therefore, moderate B concentration improves photosynthesis ability and ultimately improves the accumulation of dry matter in plants [20,40]. This finding is that with the increase of B concentration, the leaf, root, stem, and total dry matter mass of tobacco seedlings showed a unimodal curve change, and when the concentration was 5.00 mmol L−1, all parameters reached the maximum. However, in terms of photosynthesis ability, when B concentration was at 0.75 mmol L−1, net photosynthetic rate (Pn) and stomatal conductance (Cond) reached a maximum, while those of both intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) and transpiration rate (Tr) would reach maximum at 0.25 mmol L−1. These results implied that tobacco plants subjected to a severe B deficiency (>0.25 mmol L−1) or excess (<5.00 mmol L−1) had significant inhibition of photosynthesis ability, leading to insufficient energy, and suppressing the accumulation of plant matter. Moreover, previous studies indicated that if Ci is consistent with the change in Pn and Cond, then the decrease in Pn could be considered as being limited by stomata factors. Otherwise, it is restricted by nonstomatal factors [41]. The results of this study showed that under different B treatments, Ci, Pn, and Cond showed a consistent trend, indicating that stomatal factors might be the major reason for the decrease in photosynthetic rate.

4.2. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Tobacco Seedling Antioxidant Enzymes and MDA Content under Hydroponic Condition

Boron plays a predominant role in the cell-wall structure of higher plants, and the primary function of this element is in cell-wall synthesis, and in maintaining its structure and integrity [20,42]. Superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) are important protective enzymes for plants to resist biotic and abiotic stresses, and they mainly eliminate reactive oxygen species in cells through balanced regulation of these enzymes. Thus, the degree of damage to plants caused by stress could be accessed by antioxidant enzyme activities [43,44]. In this case, boron concentration significantly affected the antioxidant enzyme activities, and the leaves’ SOD, POD, and CAT activities peaked at 20.00 mmol L−1, 10.00 mmol L−1, and 20.00 mmol L−1, respectively. This phenomenon indicated that B toxicity damaged tobacco seedling leaves. Moreover, there was a significant difference in CAT between all treatments, indicating that CAT was more sensitive to B deficiency or toxicity stress than other enzymes.
Malondialdehyde (MDA) is one of the products of the peroxidation of membrane lipid, which could reflect the damage degree of plants by stress. In this study, when plants were treated with 0.750 mmol L−1, the MDA content was significantly reduced. These results suggest that a certain concentration of B could protect the leaves from active oxygen damage, maintaining the stability of the cell structure, especially chloroplast structure, thereby increasing the activity of thylakoid photosynthetic proteins, rubiscoases, and photorespiration enzymes [45,46].

4.3. Effect of B Solution Concentration on Tobacco Seedling Nicotine Level under Hydroponic Condition

Nicotine is the most vital and the most abundant alkaloid compound in tobacco. Apart from being an important indicator of tobacco quality, it is also an important defense compound [47]. In tobacco, nicotine is synthesized mainly in tobacco roots, then is transported to other organs through the xylem [48]. In this experiment, when the B concentration was at 0.00 mmol L−1, the content of nicotine in each part of flue-cured tobacco seedlings was significantly higher than that of other treatments. Some studies point out that severe B deficiency would not affect the absorption of nitrogen by flue-cured tobacco [49]. Therefore, the effect of B on nicotine would be achieved by inhibiting root elongation to induce strong branching of tobacco roots, increasing the number of fine roots and the nicotine production in roots [10]. On the contrary, boron toxicity led to a significant nicotine content decrease (Figure 4B) because an excessive supply of B (40.00 mmol L−1) significantly inhibited the accumulation of root dry matter (Figure 1A). This phenomenon indicated that excessive supply of B would cause the reduced root cell division, death of apical meristems, and inhibit root biomass as well [44,50,51]. Taken together, boron affects the synthesis and accumulation of nicotine by changing the root cells’ morphology and the growth of tobacco seedlings.

4.4. Interactions between Indices to Different B Solution Concentrations under Hydroponic Condition

To further clarify the effect of B on the growth and development of flue-cured tobacco seedlings, the correlation analysis of all involved indexes showed that there was a significant negative correlation between B accumulation and nicotine content in each part of flue-cured tobacco, confirming that B may influence nicotine synthesis and accumulation [52,53]. As a result, the rational use of B fertilizer can regulate the nicotine content. Furthermore, there was a significant negative correlation between photosynthetic performance (Pn, Cond, and Tr) and defense-related enzymes and compounds (SOD, CAT, and MDA). Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci) was significantly negatively related with B accumulation. These results indicate that the decline of photosynthetic performance was mainly due to the stomatal factors [54] and the destruction of cell structure by excessive B instead of the decrease of chlorophyll content [55]. This may be explained by the fact that excessive B would damage the plasma membrane system and increase the permeability of the leaf cell membrane, thus leading to a large number of reactive oxygen species in flue-cured tobacco seedlings [56]. Excessive reactive oxygen species could cause degreasing and peroxidation of the membrane, destroy the structure and function of biofilm, inhibit photosynthetic performance, and even cause cell death.

4.5. Preliminary Study on Production Practice

To further verify the application of the optimum B concentration in actual production, a pot experiment was designed with sandy soil as the medium. Before the experiment, the initial concentration of available B in the sandy soil was 0.167 mg/kg, and the concentration of B in the 0.00 kg/hm2 treatment in the experiment was 0.213 mg/kg, both of which were lower than 0.45 mg/kg, indicating the lack of available B in the sandy soil [57]. A total of 15 days after the treatment, it was found that the tobacco leaves showed an obvious B poisoning phenomenon at and above the B concentration of 1.00 B kg/hm2. In the pot experiment, with the increase in B content in the sandy soil, the activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and content of malondialdehyde (MDA) were raised after a decline, which was consistent with the results of the hydroponic experiment. However, the activities of SOD and POD and the content of MDA in the pot were higher than those in hydroponics, which indicated that under pot conditions, tobacco seedlings were more susceptible to B than under hydroponics system.
Moreover, the H2O2 content, which is the most common reactive oxygen molecule in organisms, could damage cell membranes and accelerate the aging and disintegration of cells, while APX is the key enzyme used for metabolism of ascorbic acid, and could eliminate H2O2 and hydroxyl radicals [58,59]. The experimental results showed that when the B concentration in the sandy soil was over 0.50 B kg/hm2, the APX activity was significantly increased, and reached the maximum at 2.00 B kg/hm2. However, the H2O2 content generally decreased and then increased with the increasing soil B concentration. The maximum value of H2O2 content was reached at 8.00 B kg/hm2, indicating that a high concentration of B damages the cell membranes and accelerates the aging and disintegration of cells.
Boron plays an important role in the process of plant nitrogen metabolism [60], and NR could directly regulate the reduction of NO3-, thereby regulating nitrogen metabolism and affecting photosynthetic carbon metabolism [61]. The results showed that with the increase of B concentration in the sandy soil, NR activity generally exhibited a gradual increase trend, indicating that B deficiency destroyed the homeostasis of endogenous enzymes in plants. This consequence would reduce the activity of nitrogen invertase, which was consistent with the studies of Camacho-Cristobal and Gonzalez-Fontes [49,62].

4.6. Boron Critical Value in Flue-Cured Tobacco Seedlings

Boron is an essential micronutrient for the growth of plants, and the dramatic differences in sensitivity of different plants to B concentrations may be explained by plant species (B mobility) [63], stage of life (older plants contain more B) [64], and genotype [65]. This study observed that the B deficiency symptoms at B concentration were 0.00 mmol L−1 and 0.00 B kg hm−2, with light green color, corking of leaf veins, and leaf marginal curling, while the B toxicity symptoms were observed from 5.00 mmol L−1 and 0.75 B kg hm−2, with inhibition of plant growth and leaf scorch developing from the edges of the leaves, leading to necrosis (Figure 1 and Figure 5). The deficiency symptoms may be due to the low internal concentrations of B reducing NR activity in the tobacco leaves, resulting in a decrease in leaf surface and photosynthesis, consequently leading to impaired growth and development. Excessive B would induce oxidative damage and H2O2 accumulation, which may contribute to the expression of the B toxicity symptoms. When B solution concentration was at 0.75 and 5.00 mmol L−1, the agronomic traits and dry biomass weight were in the proper conditions, which was conducive to the growth of flue-cured tobacco seedlings.

5. Conclusions

Tobacco is a greatly important cash crop and is sensitive to B. Inappropriate B application would seriously reduce the yield and quality of tobacco leaves. When solution B concentration is beyond 0.75 to 5.00 mmol L−1, the insufficient or excessive B could lead to cell structural destruction, photosynthesis inhibition, and nicotine synthesis disorder. Moreover, severe B deficiency reduced the NR activity in tobacco leaves and also resulted in photosynthesis inhibition. Notably, excessive B application significantly increased B ion accumulation but decreased nicotine content in tobacco seedlings by changing the root morphology, and inhibiting the growth and function of the root. Therefore, the optimum application amount of B in production is 0.25~0.50 B kg hm−2. Overall, when soil available B concentration is lower than 0.45 mg kg−1, B fertilizer of 0.25~0.50 B kg hm−2 should be applied to the soil before the transplanting. This study contributes to raising the knowledge on B fertilization and improves the understanding of the physiological mechanism of the interaction between B and the growth and quality of tobacco, which would be beneficial for the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco in boron-deficient tobacco-growing areas.

Author Contributions

Original draft, writing, M.L.; validation, H.S. and J.S.; formal analysis, J.L., X.Z. and K.Z.; investigation, T.W. and X.J.; data curation, X.D., and C.H.; conceptualization, methodology, Y.L.; resources, review and editing, C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported in part by the Yunnan Fundamental Research Project (grant NO. 202001AT070013 and grant NO. 2018FA019) and the Yunnan Academy of Tobacco Agricultural Sciences Projects (2020530000241025, 2021530000241035, 2022530000241027 and 110202101084 (SJ-08)). Authors thank the Yunnan Technology Innovation Program (2019HB068) and Yunnan Ten Thousand People Program (YNWR-QNBJ-2018-400) for supporting C.Z.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. All authors approved the final manuscript.

Abbreviations

SOD—superoxide dismutase; POD—peroxidase; CAT—catalase; MDA—malondialdehyde; APX—ascorbate peroxidase; NR—nitrate reductase; Pn—net photosynthetic rate; Cond—stomatal conductance; Ci—intercellular CO2 concentration; Tr—transpiration rate; SPAD—soil and plant analysis development.

References

  1. Niu, Y.; Zhang, S.L. The Present Conditions and Prospects of Plant Boron Nutrition. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2003, 19, 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, D.; Zhao, H.; Shi, L.; Xu, F. Physiological and genetic responses to boron deficiency in Brassica napus: A review. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2014, 60, 304–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ruiz, J.; Garcia, P.C.; River, M.; Romero, L. Response of phenolic metabolism to the application of carbendazim plus boron in tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 1999, 106, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laura, M. Boron Nutrition of Burley and Dark Tobacco. Master’s Thesis, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang, B.; Zu, C.; Li, B.; Yao, Z.; Guo, D.; Jiang, C.; Shen, J. The influence of zinc and boron on tobacco growth and other mineral elements accumulation. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bulletin. 2014, 30, 218–222. [Google Scholar]
  6. McMurtrey, J. Hunger Signs in Crops, Plant-Nutrient Deficiency in Tobacco, Boron Deficiency; American Society of Agronomy and National Fertilizer Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1941; pp. 30–31. [Google Scholar]
  7. Herrera-Rodriguez, M. Role of Boron in Vascular Plants and Response Mechanisms to Boron Stress. Plant Stress 2010, 4, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  8. Feng, X.H. Application Study on Boron in Tobacco Production. Master’s Thesis, University of Hunan, Changsha, China, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  9. Liu, G.D.; Dong, X.C.; Peng, L.C.; Jiang, C.C. Metabolic profiling reveals altered pattern of central metabolism in navel orange plants as a result of boron deficiency. Physiol. Plant. 2014, 153, 513–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; Martín-Rejano, E.M.; Herrera-Rodríguez, M.B.; Navarro-Gochicoa, M.T.; Rexach, J.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency inhibits root cell elongation via an ethylene/auxin/ros-dependent pathway in arabidopsis seedlings. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 13, 3831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luo, P.T.; Shao, Y. The effect of boron in plant and the use of boron in tobacco and production. J. Yunnan Agric. Univ. 1990, 5, 237–241. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Eaton, F. Deficiency toxicity and accumulation of boron in plants. J. Agric. Res. 1994, 69, 237–277. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lal, K.N.; Tyagi, R.S. Deficiency favorable and toxic effect of boron on tobacco. Ann. J. Bot. 1949, 36, 676–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Nable, R.O. Resistance to boron toxicity amongst several barley and wheat cultivars: A preliminary examination of the resistance mechanism. Plant Soil 1998, 112, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yau, S.K.; Ryan, J. Boron toxicity tolerance in crops: A viable alternative to soil amelioration. Crop Sci. 2008, 48, 854–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Aftab, T.; Khan, M.; Idrees, M.; Naeem, M.; Ram, M. Boron induced oxidative stress, antioxidant defence response and changes in artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2010, 196, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cervilla, L.M.; Blasco, B.; Rios, J.J.; Rosales, M.A.; Eva, S.R.; Rubio-Wilhelmi, M.M.; Romero, L.; Ruiz, J.M. Parameters symptomatic for boron toxicity in leaves of tomato plants. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 726206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Landi, M.; Guidi, L.; Pardossi, A.; Tattini, M.; Gould, K.S. Photoprotection by foliar anthocyanins mitigates effects of boron toxicity in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum). Planta 2014, 240, 941–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jing, Y.Q.; Zhang, B.L.; Yuan, X.X.; Min, X.U.; Zhang, Y.H.; Ping, L.U.; Liu, J.J. Effects of Spraying Boron and Phosphorus on Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco. Hunan Agric. Sci. 2015, 1, 70–73. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  20. Brdar-Jokanović, M. Boron toxicity and deficiency in agricultural plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Qu, Q.; Liu, Q.Y. Effects of boron fertilizer on agronomic and economic traits and chemical quality of flue-cured tobacco. J. Hunan Ecol. Sci. 2020, 7, 1–7. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Dwyer, L.M.; Tollenaar, M.; Houwing, L. A nondestructive method to monitor leaf greenness in corn. Can. J. Plant Sci. 1991, 71, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ling, Q.; Huang, W.; Jarvis, P. Use of a SPAD-502 meter to measure leaf chlorophyll concentration in Arabidopsis thaliana. Photosynth. Res. 2011, 107, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kandel, B.P. Spad value varies with age and leaf of maize plant and its relationship with grain yield. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Nova, P. Evaluation of conventional dry ashing and wet digestion methods for determination of Fe, Mn, Ni, Cu, Co, Mg, Zn, Ca, Mo, Se levels in dried samples of organic tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS). J. Biotechnol. Biodivers. 2012, 3, 259–270. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ma, H.; Wang, F.; Wang, W.; Yin, G.; Zhang, D.; Ding, Y.; Timko, M.P.; Zhang, H. Alternative splicing of basic chitinase gene PR3b in the low-nicotine mutants of Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Burley 21. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 5799–5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Stewert, R.R.C.; Bewley, J.D. Lipid peroxidation associated with accelerated aging of soybean axes. Plant Physiol. 1980, 65, 245–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Lacan, D.; Baccou, J.C. High levels of antioxidant enzymes correlate with delayed senescence in nonnetted muskmelon fruits. Planta 1998, 204, 377–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Beers, R.F.; Sizer, I.W. A spectrophotometric method for measuring the breakdown of hydrogen peroxide by catalase. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 195, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dalton, D.A.; Russell, S.A.; Hanus, F.J.; Pascoe, G.A.; Evans, H.J. Enzymatic reactions of ascorbate and glutathione that prevent peroxide damage in soybean root nodules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 3811–3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. De Vos, C.H.R.; Schat, H.M.A.M.; De Waal, R.; Vooijs, H.; Ernst, W.H.O. Increased resistance to copper-induced damage of the root cell plasmalemma in copper tolerant Silene cucubalus. Physiol. Plant 1991, 82, 523–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Patterson, B.D.; MacRae, E.A.; Ferguson, I.B. Estimation of hydrogen peroxide in plant extracts using titanium (IV). Anal. Biochem. 1984, 139, 487–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Downs, M.R.; Nadelhoffer, K.J.; Melillo, J.M.; Aber, J.D. Foliar and fine root nitrate reductase activity in seedlings of four forest tree species in relation to nitrogen availability. Trees 1993, 7, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bower, C.A.; Reitemeier, R.F.; Fireman, M. Exchangeable cation analysis of saline and alkali soils. Soil Sci. 1952, 73, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Bouyoucos, G.J. Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. J. Agron. 1962, 54, 464–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Walkley, A. A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils. Soil Sci. 1947, 63, 251–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Soil Science Society of China. Methods of Soil Agricultural Chemical Analysis; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  38. John, M.K.; Chuah, H.H.; Neufeld, J.H. Application of improved azomethine-H method to the determination of boron in soils and plants. Anal. Lett. 1975, 8, 559–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bariya, H.; Bagtharia, S.; Patel, A. Boron: A Promising Nutrient for Increasing Growth and Yield of Plants. In Nutrient Use Efficiency in Plants; Hawkesford, M., Kopriva, S., De Kok, L., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 10. [Google Scholar]
  40. Matthes, M.S.; Robil, J.M.; McSteen, P. From Element to Development: The power of the essential micronutrient boron to shape morphological processes in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 1681–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Ying, X.; Jiang, C.; Wang, X.; Chen, F. Effects of low potassium stress on the photosynthesis and photosynthate partitioning of cotton. Chin. J. Ecol. 2013, 32, 1476–1482. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kutschera, U.; Niklas, K.J. Boron and the evolutionary development of roots. Plant Signal. Behav. 2017, 12, 132–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hajiboland, R.; Farhanghi, F. Remobilization of boron, photosynthesis, phenolic metabolism and antioxidant defense capacity in boron deficient turnip (Brassica rapa L.) plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 56, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Shah, F.; Bajwa, A.A.; Nazir, U.; Anjum, S.A.; Farooq, A.; Zohaib, A.; Sadia, S.; Nasim, W.; Adkins, S.; Saud, S.; et al. Crop production under drought and heat stress: Plant responses and management options. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cave, G.; Tolley, L.C.; Strain, B.R. Effect of carbon dioxide enrichment on chlorophyll content, starch content and starch grain structure in trifolium subterraneum leaves. Physiol. Plant. 2010, 51, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, M.; Mishra, S.; Heckathorn, S.A.; Frantz, J.M.; Krause, C. Proteomic analysis of arabidopsis thaliana leaves in response to acute boron deficiency and toxicity reveals effects on photosynthesis, carbohydrate metabolism, and protein synthesis. J. Plant Physiol. 2014, 171, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Steppuhn, A.; Gase, K.; Krock, B.; Halitschke, R.; Baldwin, I.T. Nicotine’s defensive function in nature. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, E217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dewey, R.E.; Xie, J. Molecular genetics of alkaloid biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum. Phytochemistry 2013, 94, 10–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Camacho -Cristóbal, J.J.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency decreases plasmalemma H+-ATPase expression and nitrate uptake, and promotes ammonium assimilation into asparagine in tobacco roots. Planta 2007, 226, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Reid, R. Update on Boron Toxicity and Tolerance in Plants. In Advances in Plant and Animal Boron Nutrition; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  51. Sheng, O.; Zhou, G.; Wei, Q.; Peng, S.; Deng, X. Effects of excess boron on growth, gas exchange, and boron status of four orange scion-rootstock combinations. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2010, 173, 469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Steinberg, R.A. Effect of Boron Deficiency on Nicotine Formation in Tobacco. Plant Physiol. 1955, 30, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lisuma, J.B.; Mbega, E.R.; Ndakidemi, P.A. The Effects of Cultivating Tobacco and Supplying Nitrogenous Fertilizers on Micronutrients Extractability in Loamy Sand and Sandy Soils. Plants 2021, 10, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Han, S.; Chen, L.S.; Jiang, H.X.; Smith, B.R.; Yang, L.T.; Xie, C.Y. Boron deficiency decreases growth and photosynthesis, and increases starch and hexoses in leaves of citrus seedlings. J. Plant Physiol. 2008, 165, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lu, Y.B.; Yang, L.T.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Liao, T.T.; Chen, Y.B.; Chen, L.S. Effects of boron deficiency on major metabolites, key enzymes and gas exchange in leaves and roots of Citrus sinensis seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2014, 34, 608–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sang, W.; Huang, Z.R.; Yang, L.T.; Guo, P.; Ye, X.; Chen, L.S. Effects of high toxic boron concentration on protein profiles in roots of two citrus species differing in boron-tolerance revealed by a 2-DE based MS approach. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Tao, X.Q.; Huang, M. An Improved Method for Determining Available Boron in Soil. Tob. Sci. Technol. 2003, 7, 30–32. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  58. Choi, E.Y.; Moon, J.H.; Lee, W.M.; Son, S.H.; Lee, S.G.; Cho, I.H. The response of antioxidant enzyme activity, growth and yield of pepper and watermelon plants to a single application of simulated acid rain. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2010, 8, 1265–1271. [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang, X.; Chen, S.; Li, W.; Tang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, N.; Zou, Y.; Zhai, X.; Xiao, N.; Liu, W.; et al. ROS regulated reversible protein phase separation synchronizes plant flowering. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2021, 17, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Brown, P.H.; Bellaloui, N.; Wimmer, M.A.; Bassil, E.S.; Ruiz, J.; Hu, H.; Pfeffer, H.; Dannel, F.; Romheld, V. Boron in plant biology. Plant Biol. 2002, 4, 205–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yamagishi, M.; Yamamoto, Y. Effects of boron on nodule development and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in soybean plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 1994, 40, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Camacho-Cristóbal, J.J.; González-Fontes, A. Boron deficiency causes a drastic decrease in nitrate content and nitrate reductase activity, and increases the content of carbohydrates in leaves from tobacco plants. Planta 1999, 209, 528–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Simón, I.; Díaz-López, L.; Gimeno, V.; Nieves, M.; Pereira, W.E.; Martínez, V.; Lidon, V.; García-Sánchez, F. Effects of boron excess in nutrient solution on growth, mineral nutrition, and physiological parameters of jatropha curcas seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2013, 176, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Moody, D.B.; Rathjen, A.J.; Cartwright, B.; Paull, J.G.; Lewis, J. Genetic Diversity and Geographical Distribution of Tolerance to High Levels of Soil Boron. In Proceedings of the 7th International Wheat Genetics Symposium, Cambridge, UK, 13–19 July 1988; Volume 2, pp. 859–865. [Google Scholar]
  65. Turan, M.A.; Taban, S.; Kayin, G.B.; Taban, N. Effect of boron application on calcium and boron concentrations in cell wall of durum (Triticum durum) and bread (Triticum aestivum) wheat. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 1351–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Effects of B on the growth performance of tobacco seedlings. Note: growth statuses of flue-cured tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations: 0.00 mmol·L−1 (B1), 5.00 mmol·L−1 (B5), 10.00 mmol·L−1 (B6), 20.00 mmol·L−1 (B7), 40.00 mmol·L−1 (B8). B1 treatment showed B deficiency symptoms, B5 showed a normal growth condition, and B6 to B8 showed B toxicity symptoms. (A) Root dry weight. (B) Stem dry weight. (C) Leaves dry weight. (D) Total weight. (E) SPAD value. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 1. Effects of B on the growth performance of tobacco seedlings. Note: growth statuses of flue-cured tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations: 0.00 mmol·L−1 (B1), 5.00 mmol·L−1 (B5), 10.00 mmol·L−1 (B6), 20.00 mmol·L−1 (B7), 40.00 mmol·L−1 (B8). B1 treatment showed B deficiency symptoms, B5 showed a normal growth condition, and B6 to B8 showed B toxicity symptoms. (A) Root dry weight. (B) Stem dry weight. (C) Leaves dry weight. (D) Total weight. (E) SPAD value. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Agriculture 12 01670 g001
Figure 2. Characteristics of agronomic parameters of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. Note: tobacco characteristics of agronomic parameters of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. (A) Plant heights. (B) Stalk width. (C) Leaf number. (D) Leaf length. (E) Leaf width. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 2. Characteristics of agronomic parameters of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. Note: tobacco characteristics of agronomic parameters of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. (A) Plant heights. (B) Stalk width. (C) Leaf number. (D) Leaf length. (E) Leaf width. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Agriculture 12 01670 g002
Figure 3. Antioxidase activities and MDA content of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. Note: antioxidant enzymes activities and MDA content in flue-cured tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) SOD activities. (B) POD activities. (C) CAT activities. (D) MDA content. Different lower letters denote significant differences at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 3. Antioxidase activities and MDA content of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. Note: antioxidant enzymes activities and MDA content in flue-cured tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) SOD activities. (B) POD activities. (C) CAT activities. (D) MDA content. Different lower letters denote significant differences at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Agriculture 12 01670 g003
Figure 4. Changes of B and nicotine concentration in different parts of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. Note: concentration of B and nicotine content in each part of tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) B concentration. (B) Nicotine concentration. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 4. Changes of B and nicotine concentration in different parts of flue-cured tobacco under different B concentrations. Note: concentration of B and nicotine content in each part of tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) B concentration. (B) Nicotine concentration. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Agriculture 12 01670 g004
Figure 5. Growth statuses of flue-cured tobacco seedlings in pot experiment under different B concentrations. Note: 0.00 B kg·hm−2 (CK-S), 0.25 B kg·hm−2 (B1-S), 0.50 B kg·hm−2 (B2-S), 0.75 B kg·hm−2 (B3-S), 1.00 B kg·hm−2 (B4-S), 2.00 B kg·hm−2 (B5-S), 4.00 B kg·hm−2 (B6-S), 8.00 B kg·hm−2 (B7-S).
Figure 5. Growth statuses of flue-cured tobacco seedlings in pot experiment under different B concentrations. Note: 0.00 B kg·hm−2 (CK-S), 0.25 B kg·hm−2 (B1-S), 0.50 B kg·hm−2 (B2-S), 0.75 B kg·hm−2 (B3-S), 1.00 B kg·hm−2 (B4-S), 2.00 B kg·hm−2 (B5-S), 4.00 B kg·hm−2 (B6-S), 8.00 B kg·hm−2 (B7-S).
Agriculture 12 01670 g005
Figure 6. Physiological indices of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. Note: physiological indices of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) SOD activity. (B) POD activity. (C) APX activity. (D) MDA content. (E) H2O2 content. (F) NR activity. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 6. Physiological indices of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. Note: physiological indices of flue-tobacco seedlings under different B concentrations. (A) SOD activity. (B) POD activity. (C) APX activity. (D) MDA content. (E) H2O2 content. (F) NR activity. Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Within a column, values followed by different lower letters are significantly different at p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Agriculture 12 01670 g006
Table 1. Basic properties of the trail soil.
Table 1. Basic properties of the trail soil.
Soil TypeTextureCation Exchange Capacity
cmol·kg−1
Organic Matter mg·kg−1Total N mg·kg−1Total P mg·kg−1Total K mg·kg−1Available B
mg·kg−1
Sandy soilSand1.263.650.140.0723.750.167
Table 2. Photosynthetic rates of tobacco seedlings under different B application rates.
Table 2. Photosynthetic rates of tobacco seedlings under different B application rates.
TreatmentsPn/(μmol/(m2·s))Cond/(mol/(m2·s))Ci/(μmol/mol)Tr/(mmol/(m2·s))
B1(CK)4.29 ± 1.43 cd0.064 ± 0.011 cd397.77 ± 6.26 b2.56 ± 1.15 cd
B210.25 ± 1.12 a0.080 ± 0.025 cd497.29 ± 4.83 a3.48 ± 0.68 bc
B310.50 ± 1.50 a0.108 ± 0.025 bc501.48 ± 5.95 a5.02 ± 0.82 a
B411.90 ± 1.59 a0.205 ± 0.038 a410.79 ± 8.05 b4.75 ± 0.70 ab
B511.75 ± 1.62 a0.129 ± 0.027 b267.78 ± 4.46 c3.70 ± 0.88 abc
B69.61 ± 1.32 ab0.136 ± 0.021 b381.16 ± 4.5 b3.79 ± 0.82 abc
B76.33 ± 1.59 bc0.071 ± 0.020 cd254.11 ± 7.04 c1.91 ± 0.64 d
B82.35 ± 0.74 d0.049 ± 0.017 d210.85 ± 6.29 c1.93 ± 0.78 d
Note: Data are means ± standard errors (n = 3). Different lower letters denote significant differences (p < 0.05 following Duncan’s multiple-range test).
Table 3. Spearman correlation coefficients for correlations among different B concentrations and the tobacco seedlings growth indices.
Table 3. Spearman correlation coefficients for correlations among different B concentrations and the tobacco seedlings growth indices.
ParameterDBCTBRTBSTBLTNRTNSTNLSPADPnCondCiTrSODPODCATMDA
DBC1
TBR0.977 **1
TBS0.943 **0.935 **1
TBL0.985 **0.967 **0.943 **1
TNR−0.783 **−0.756 **−0.681 **−0.754 **1
TNS−0.490 *−0.519 **−0.508 *−0.476 *0.548 **1
TNL−0.622 **−0.636 **−0.526 **−0.642 **0.629 **0.573 **1
SPAD0.3210.2910.2380.32−0.1470.05−0.0251
Pn−0.284−0.29−0.298−0.2960.150.0880.141−0.0691
Cond−0.079−0.159−0.098−0.091−0.1740.2410.2710.1550.625 **1
Ci−0.733 **−0.703 **−0.618 **−0.709 **0.503 *0.290.289−0.3940.473 *0.2621
Tr−0.36−0.357−0.306−0.3720.0690.1330.366−0.3260.563 **0.624 **0.557 **1
SOD0.320.3580.3880.3710.052−0.14−0.2310.187−0.696 **−0.785 **−0.443 *−0.718 **1
POD0.0470.0050.0290.0210.0220.1410.070.088−0.410 *−0.23−0.236−0.3630.430 *1
CAT0.3780.3910.421 *0.373−0.099−0.116−0.2960.139−0.733 **−0.679 **−0.351−0.703 **0.845 **0.509 *1
MDA−0.0050.0190.0410.0130.18−0.129−0.217−0.243−0.705 **−0.869 **−0.167−0.651 **0.715 **0.3820.714 **1
Note: DBC = different B concentration; TBR = total B content in root; TBS = total B content in stem; TBL= total B content in leaves; TNR = total nicotine content in root; TNS = total nicotine content in stem; TNL = total nicotine content. * Correlation was at significant level (p < 0.05); ** correlation was at extremely significant level (p < 0.01).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, M.; Sun, H.; Sun, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, K.; Wang, T.; Ji, X.; Deng, X.; He, C.; et al. Moderate Boron Concentration Beneficial for Flue-Cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Seedlings Growth and Development. Agriculture 2022, 12, 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101670

AMA Style

Li M, Sun H, Sun J, Li J, Zhang X, Zhang K, Wang T, Ji X, Deng X, He C, et al. Moderate Boron Concentration Beneficial for Flue-Cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Seedlings Growth and Development. Agriculture. 2022; 12(10):1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Mengxia, Haowei Sun, Jianfeng Sun, Jialiang Li, Xiaowei Zhang, Ke Zhang, Tao Wang, Xinwei Ji, Xiaopeng Deng, Chenggang He, and et al. 2022. "Moderate Boron Concentration Beneficial for Flue-Cured Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Seedlings Growth and Development" Agriculture 12, no. 10: 1670. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101670

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop