Next Article in Journal
DigiPig: First Developments of an Automated Monitoring System for Body, Head and Tail Detection in Intensive Pig Farming
Previous Article in Journal
Understanding Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Colonization in Walnut Plantations: The Contribution of Cover Crops and Soil Microbial Communities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Compost Bacteria That Improved Physiological Characteristics in Tomato and Lettuce Seedlings

by
Betsie Martínez-Cano
1,
Juan Fernando García-Trejo
1,
Arantza Elena Sánchez-Gutiérrez
1,
Manuel Toledano-Ayala
2 and
Genaro M. Soto-Zarazúa
1,*
1
Facultad de Ingeniería Campus Amazcala, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, Carr. Chichimequillas S/N Km 1, Amazcala, El Marques 76265, Mexico
2
Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro, El Marques 76010, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2022, 12(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010003
Submission received: 29 November 2021 / Revised: 16 December 2021 / Accepted: 17 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021

Abstract

:
Currently, agricultural systems are inadequate to meet the demand of the population, coupled with the constant degradation of natural resources. Therefore, it is necessary to explore alternatives to increase the productivity and quality of crops with minimal environmental impact. The use of plant growth-promoting bacteria can provide solutions to some agri-environmental problems and replace or minimize conventional agricultural practices. In this study, a Bacillus pumilus strain with plant growth-promoting properties was isolated from mature compost. In vitro, the ability of Bacillus pumilus to solubilize phosphate, inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic fungi, and its effect on the germination of tomato and lettuce seeds was evaluated. In vivo, its effect on stem thickness, height, and the number of leaves of tomato and lettuce seedlings was studied. The results show that, in vitro, Bacillus pumilus solubilizes phosphate, inhibits the growth of the fungus Fusarium oxysporum, and increases the germination percentage of tomato seeds. The results, in vivo, demonstrate that the bacteria increases the stem thickness of tomato seedlings, while, in lettuce, it increases the stem thickness and the number of leaves. The outcome implies that Bacillus pumilus has properties as a plant growth promoter and can be used as a promising inoculant to enhance the growth of tomato and lettuce seedlings.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Today, agriculture faces the challenge of producing more food in a smaller area in order to meet the growing demand of the population and the impact of constant soil degradation, climate change, and water scarcity, which decrease crop yield [1]. Therefore, it is important to implement different strategies for the rational use of natural resources. One of these strategies is the application of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) in crops. These bacteria have phytostimulant connections; they also intervene in biochemical cycles, actively participate in the availability of nutrients, and have properties as biocontrol agents [2,3]. In addition, some bacteria solubilize phosphate rock and other sources of inorganic phosphorus in the soil; for this reason, they are called phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. This activity is relevant because a large amount of the P contributed by phosphate fertilizers loses efficiency due to different biochemical processes such as sorption, fixation, and immobilization, which in turn causes high rates of P application in crops. The inefficient use of phosphate fertilizers can modify the state of the nutrients in the soil, the availability for the absorption of the crops, and the microbial communities [4]. Finally, phosphate solubilizing bacteria can be an alternative for increasing the phosphorus available to plants [5,6].
Compost use is constantly increasing since it is considered a potential alternative for controlling soil pathogens and increasing plant growth, which is safer for overall health and the environment. Several studies have shown that the properties of compost are governed by mechanisms of microbial origin. That is, plant growth and phytopathogens control occur due to the presence of some PGPB in the bio-oxidative composting process of organic waste to produce stable material rich in humic substances [7,8,9].
The inoculation of PGPB in agricultural lands contributes to improvement in the microbiota and the physical properties of the soil, which in turn decreases production cost and increases the yield of crops [10]. This technology promises to provide solutions to some agri-environmental problems since it promotes plant growth and increases the availability and absorption of nutrients through the production of phytoregulators, antagonism against phytopathogens, or the activation of systemic resistance [11].
Diverse studies show that PGPB associated with the rhizosphere of plants have beneficial effects on plant growth, such as Bacillus [12,13]. Several species have been detected inside this genus that show potential as promoters of plant growth [14,15]. Bacillus pumilus promotes growth in beans [16] and in different varieties of rice [17], mustard, and radish [18]. Additionally, it improves the quality of tomato fruit [19], mainly due to its potential to increase the absorption of nutrients by promoting root growth. The inoculation of B. pumilus in lettuce plants considerably increases vigor, average head weight, and height compared with other PGPB [20]. However, the positive interaction of B. pumilus with crops depends on the plant genotype, soil nutrition, inoculant density, and environmental conditions, which significantly affects the capacity of PGPB to improve plant growth under field conditions. [21]. Moreover, B. pumilus transforms the organic P available to plants [22].
Several studies have focused on evaluating the activities of PGPB with commercial interest. However, the evaluation of a PGPB isolated from compost with phosphorus solubilizing activity, an antagonist of pathogens and promotion of plant growth, has had very little evidence regarding its properties.
The main objective of this study was to isolate and characterize plant growth-promoting bacteria from mature compost to evaluate, in vitro, the bacteria’s ability to solubilize phosphate and inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic fungi and subsequently to also determine the effect of the isolated bacteria on germination, height, stem thickness, and the number of leaves of lettuce and tomato seedlings.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Identification of PGPB from Mature Compost

2.1.1. Isolation of Bacteria

The samples were obtained from a 75-day-old compost. The compost was prepared from bovine manure from a barn located at the Amazcala campus of the Engineering Faculty of the Autonomous University of Querétaro, municipality of El Marqués, Querétaro, México.
The compost sampling was carried out by separating the compost at depths of 0–25 cm, 50–75 cm, and 100–125 cm to the left, center, and right. Samples were placed in sterile sealed plastic bags and homogenized, to later perform the bacterial isolation.
For isolation purposes, 10 g of each sample was dissolved in 90 mL of sterile distilled water and 0.1% Tween 20 and incubated with constant shaking. Each solution was serially diluted to 106; a 1 mL aliquot was taken and inoculated onto Pikovskaya agar plates to select a phosphate-solubilizing bacteria. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for a period of 72 h. When a translucent halo was visualized on Pikovskaya agar, the bacterial strain with the higher halo was selected, inoculated into Luria Bertani (LB) broth, and Gram-stained [23].
Then, the selected colonies were streaked three times on fresh nutrient agar plates to obtain a pure isolate, and the purified bacterial isolates were stored at 4 °C in 20% glycerol. Subsequently, some pure isolates were lyophilized for long-term storage.

2.1.2. Molecular Characterization

Bacterial genomic DNA was extracted using Kirby’s technique, which consists of lysing cells and solubilizing DNA [24]. After DNA extraction, it was amplified with the 16S rRNA gene. Sequencing was carried out at the National Laboratory of Agricultural, Medical, and Environmental Biotechnology of the IPICyT using the dideoxynucleotide method marked with a Genetic Analyzer 3130 sequencer. The DNA sequencing of the 16S ribosomal gene obtained from the amplicon was compared with others in the GenBank database using the NCBI BLAST nucleotide sequence program on the website https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi (accessed on 25 November 2021).
The complete sequence was deposited in NCBI GenBank with access number SUB5832921 Seq2 MN067217.

2.1.3. Phosphate Solubilization

An inoculum of Bacillus pumilus grown in LB broth was taken, placed in Pikovskaya medium, and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 5 days [25]. On the plates, the formation of clear areas around the colonies was observed. In order to determine the phosphate solubilizing activity of the bacteria, the phosphate solubilization index (PSI) was calculated with Equation (1) [26], and the relative solubilization efficiency (RSE) was calculated with Equation (2) [27]. The study was triplicated for comparison purposes.
PSI = Halo   zone   diameter Colony   diameter
RSE = Solubilization   mean   diameter Colony   mean   diameter × 100

2.1.4. Antifungal Activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Sclerotium cepivorum

An inoculum of B. pumilus was prepared and standardized in LB broth at a concentration of 1 × 109 CFU/mL. On the other hand, a disk of F. oxysporum or S. cepivorum was placed in the center of potato dextrose agar (PDA) plates, and a line was made with 25 μL of the inoculum 15 mm from each side of the disk. As a control, a fungus strain grown on PDA was used without any treatment. Treatments were incubated for 12 days at room temperature [28]. The study was carried out in triplicate.
After 12 days, the mycelial growth of the pathogenic fungi was measured, and the inhibition index was calculated with Equation (3).
I = Control   mycelium   diameter Treatment   mycelium   diameter × 100
I is the inhibition percentage.

2.2. Evaluating the Effect of Bacillus Pumilus on Plant Growth

2.2.1. Preparation of Inoculum and Seed Selection

Bacillus pumilus was inoculated in 100 mL of LB broth and incubated at 28 ± 2 °C with constant rotational shaking of 150 rpm for 48 h until the exponential growth phase [29]. Inoculum standardization was carried out through dilutions with 0.9% sterile saline solution until obtaining a bacterial cell density of 1 × 109 CFU/mL.
To check the bacterial density, ten serial dilutions of the inoculum were made and 1 mL of each dilution was taken and inoculated in nutrient agar plates. The plates were incubated at 28 ± 2 °C for 24 h. Finally, cell growth was counted and recorded [30].
For the germination test, commercial seeds of saladette-type tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa L. var. Longifolia) were used. The seeds were disinfected with 70% ethanol (volume/volume) for one minute, then 2.5% sodium hypochlorite for 20 min, and washed three times with sterile distilled water. Floating seeds were discarded.
germination   % =   Germinated   seeds Total   seeds ×   100

2.2.2. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on the Germination of Lettuce and Tomato Seeds

Squared and sterilized filter paper was placed inside Petri dishes. A tomato or lettuce seed was placed in each space until there were 45 seeds per Petri dish. The seeds were moistened with 5 mL of sterile distilled water and 0.1 mL of B. pumilus per seed. The plates were sealed and kept at room temperature, approximately 20 ± 5 °C, to maintain for 20 days the temperature conditions of the region where the experiments were performed. Control was 45 uninoculated seeds in the Petri dish. The amount of germinated seeds was recorded daily, and after 20 days, the germination percentage was calculated with Equation (4) [23]. Finally, the test had a completely randomized one-factor design with three replications.

2.2.3. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on Tomato and Lettuce Seedlings

Tomato and lettuce seeds previously disinfected were sown in seedbeds with sterile peat. Under aseptic conditions, one seed was placed per cavity. Daily irrigation with sterile distilled water was maintained until the seedlings emerged.
Inoculation with Bacillus pumilus started seven days after sowing, and 1 mL of standardized bacterial inoculum was added to each cavity, close to the seedling roots every seven days for five weeks [31]. Non-inoculated seedlings were used as a control.
The experiment was established in a greenhouse at an average temperature of 21.5 °C, a humidity of 81.9%, and a photoperiod of 10 h, approximately. The seedlings were watered every three days with sterile distilled water at field capacity. At the end of the experiment (5 weeks after sowing), the height and thickness of the stem were measured, as well as the chlorophyll content and the number of leaves. For the measurements, a digital caliper was used—range 0–6″/0–150 mm, resolution 0.0005″/0.01 mm, Surtek brand. Additionally, chlorophyll was measured with a SPAD-502 Plus Chlorophyll Meter. Finally, the experiment had a completely randomized univariate design with three replications, with experimental units of 10 seedlings.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The experiments were performed in a completely randomized factorial design. The experimental data were statistically analyzed by using an ANOVA (analysis of variance) and a Tukey test with a 95% confidence level. Finally, Statgraphic software (Statgraphics Technologies, Inc., The Plains, VA, USA) was used for figures.

3. Results

3.1. Isolation and Identification of PGPB from Mature Compost

3.1.1. Isolation of Bacteria Strain

The bacterium isolated from the mature compost was a medium, circular, convex, whitish, and fusiform with rounded edges. When Gram staining was applied and observed under a microscope, it was determined that the bacterium was a Gram-positive bacillus.

3.1.2. Molecular Characterization of Isolated Bacteria and Sequence Analysis

The phylogenetic tree constructed from 16S rRNA sequences showed that the selected isolate is a member of the genus Bacillus, and the sequence of the isolate showed 99% similarity to Bacillus pumilus strain MB411 in BLASTn analysis.
The phylogenetic position of B. pumilus was constructed by retrieving 16S rRNA gene sequences from closely related bacterial species using BLAST pairwise alignments at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/treeview/treeView.cgi (accessed on 26 November 2021) (Figure 1).
The partial sequence was deposited in NCBI GenBank with access number SUB5832921 Seq2 MN067217.

3.1.3. Phosphate Solubilizing Activity

B. pumilus showed a translucent halo in the Pikovskaya medium from the second day after inoculation. The bacterium had a phosphate solubilization index of 12.19 mm and a relative solubilization efficiency of 1119.23%.

3.1.4. Antifungal In Vitro Activity

The antifungal activity of B. pumilus against Sclerotium cepivorum and Fusarium oxysporum was evaluated using the direct antagonism test (Figure 2). In Table 1, it is observed that there is a representative statistical inhibition in F. oxysporum in presence of B. pumilus.
Bacillus pumilus showed a 31.19% inhibition for Fusarium oxysporum and presented a statistically significant difference with the control. On the other hand, the bacteria promoted the growth of Sclerotium cepivorum by 25% without finding a significant statistical difference with the control.

3.2. Bacillus pumilus Improves Plant Growth

3.2.1. Effect of Bacillus pumilus Inoculation on Seed Germination

The effect of treatment with B. pumilus on germination varied according to the type of plant.
In tomato, B. pumilus increased germination by 11.12%, a statistically significant increase, obtaining a germination percentage of 87.65%, while the control without inoculation was 76.54%.
In lettuce, the seeds treated with B. pumilus had a germination percentage of 62.02%, while the control was 70.54%, without a statistically significant difference between both data (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

3.2.2. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on Morphological Variables in Tomato and Lettuce Seed-Lings

The effect of B. pumilus on the growth of tomato and lettuce seedlings was evaluated. Height, stem thickness, leaf area, and chlorophyll content were measured and compared with an uninoculated control.
Inoculation with B. pumilus did not have a significant effect on the height of tomato and lettuce seedlings (Figure 5a).
On the other hand, the inoculation significantly increased the thickness of the tomato and lettuce stem. Figure 5b shows that tomato and lettuce seedlings had an increase of 7.64% and 18.87% in stem thickness, respectively. The stem thickness of tomato and lettuce seedlings increased with B. pumilus inoculation.
For the number of leaves, the inoculated lettuce seedlings had a significant increase, while in tomato seedlings they decreased—both data according to the uninoculated control (Figure 5c). Additionally, for the chlorophyll content, there was no significant difference between the seedlings inoculated with B. pumilus and the control plants (Figure 5d).

4. Discussion

Many microorganisms are involved in the composting process, and some of them have the properties to promote plant growth [32]. The analysis presented shows how compost can be used as a source of biofertilizers, and the analysis allows a better understanding of biofertilizer use by characterizing a single microorganism of its microbiota.
The results of this study indicate that Bacillus pumilus isolated from mature compost has properties as a plant growth-promoter. The main characteristic of this bacterium is the solubilization of phosphate and the antimicrobial activity against Fusarium oxysporum. Therefore, B. pumilus can bring positive effects when used in agriculture. Yuan and Gao [33] reported that B. pumilus produces several bioactive substances: It has properties to promote plant growth and produces antimicrobial agents against bacteria and phytopathogenic fungi.
The isolated strain showed phosphate solubilizing activity, which may be due to the production of organic acids. These compounds are capable of mineralizing most of the organic sources of P present in the medium. The importance of PSB for agriculture lies in the fact that their application allows us to counteract the shortage of assimilable phosphorus and the increase in the cost of phosphorus fertilizers. Therefore, the inoculation of PSB in crops can reduce investment and loss of fertilizer through the efficient use of P [34].
In nature, some microorganisms can solubilize phosphates. In the Bacillus genus, we can find Bacillus subtilis with a PSI of 4.03 and RSE of 303.3% [35], Bacillus cereus with a PSI of 3.3 mm [36], and a Bacillus pumilus reported by Pandey [37] with a RSE of 175%. When we compare the previous data with the results obtained, we can observe a significant difference in phosphate solubilizing capacity. The data above indicate that isolated B. pumilus has potential qualities to be used as a plant growth promoter, providing phosphorus to plants [38] and possibly minimizing the use of chemical phosphate-based fertilizers.
Another aspect of the bacteria was its capacity to inhibit the growth of F. oxysporum. Heidarzadhe and Baghaee-Ravari [39] showed that B. pumilus minimizes the incidence of disease caused by F. oxysporum in vivo by 73%. Likewise, in the in vitro tests carried out by Rodríguez [40], a B. pumilus strain inhibited 63.87% F. oxysporum f. sp. cubense. The studies mentioned show similar results to those obtained in this study, but the effectiveness will depend on the bacterial strain used and the environmental conditions of the experiment.
Tomato and lettuce were used to evaluate the effect of B. pumilus inoculation on seeds and plants to determine how the bacteria act on each type of plant under the desired conditions [41].
The effect that B. pumilus had on the different types of seeds was contradictory. In tomatoes, it significantly increased germination, while in lettuce, it decreased overall germination. Previous studies show that the genus Bacillus can increase the germination percentage in different types of seeds. B. megaterium increases the germination of tomato seeds by 6.1% [42], while B. circulans does so by 14.56% [43]. Different Bacillus strains have been used to improve the germination of lettuce seeds. Malkoclu [44] found that a B. subtilis strain had a germination rate of 92%, and with a consortium between B. subtilis and P. fluorescens, the germination was 89.3%. However, there are bacterial strains such as Azospirillum sp., Enterobacter cloacae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Pseudomonas cepacia that, when are inoculated into lettuce seeds, decrease germination [45]. The information above indicates that many factors influence seed germination, including plant hormones produced by soil bacteria [46].
Finally, the effect of B. pumilus in tomato and lettuce seedlings on height, stem thickness, leaf number, and chlorophyll content was measured.
The inoculation with Bacillus pumilus did not affect the height of the tomato and lettuce seedlings. It suggests that the isolate does not produce gibberellins. Previous studies show that the inoculation of B. pumilus and B. amyloliquefaciens does not have a significant effect on the height of tomato plants compared with a non-inoculated control. However, when adding a controlled-release fertilizer and the mixture of bacteria in soils with low nitrogen content, a positive effect on the height of the plants is observed [47]. The data suggest that the repercussion of PGPB on altitude is highly dependent on the type of crop and the strain.
The thickness of the stem of tomato and lettuce seedlings increased with B. pumilus inoculation. PGPB such as Bacillus cereus increase the thickness of tomato stem plants by 40.74% because bacteria release hormones that directly affect the tissue growth of vegetables [48]. In this study, the inoculation was functional for both vegetables—tomato and lettuce. However, we observed a higher effect in lettuce, suggesting that B. pumilus, similar to B. cereus, produces hormones that benefit plant tissue growth.
Finally, the leaf number in lettuce increased by more than 100% since Bacillus pumilus tends to accumulate some hormones, solubilizes phosphate, and produces large amounts of indole acetic acid that benefit plant growth [49].
The results of this study indicate that the isolated strain of mature compost, Bacillus pumilus, has properties as a plant growth-promoter. The main characteristic was the solubilization of phosphates. Therefore, the use of B. pumilus could be an efficient approach for improving crops and producing agriculture, combined with the reduction in P fertilizer, which has currently created a considerable dependence on current agricultural techniques of fertilization.
The strain of B. pumilus used in this study has not yet been evaluated for its capacity to improve plant growth in unsterilized soils and the field. However, the efficacy of the bacteria cannot be tested in other vegetables in addition to tomato and lettuce; for this, it is necessary to study and investigate how B. pumilus exerts its beneficial effects on the desired plants. Under the conditions evaluated, and due to its ability to solubilize phosphates, B. pumilus can be an efficient alternative for improving crops and minimizing the application of phosphate fertilizers. The latter is a current agricultural fertilization technique with considerable dependency.

5. Conclusions

It was possible to isolate and characterize bacteria with plant growth-promoting properties from a mature compost. The results of this study show that the inoculation of isolated Bacillus pumilus significantly improves the germination of tomato seeds and the growth of some physiological variables of lettuce and tomato seedlings, for which it is concluded that the isolated strain of Bacillus pumilus can be used as a plant growth-promoter in lettuce and tomato seedlings.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, research, methodology, and writing—original draft preparation, B.M.-C.; resources and writing—original draft preparation, A.E.S.-G.; conceptualization, validation, and writing—review and editing, J.F.G.-T.; formal analysis and review and editing, M.T.-A.; conceptualization, validation, data curation, supervision, and writing—review and editing, G.M.S.-Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The partial sequence of Bacillus pumilus strain Amazcala of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene was deposited in GenBank NCBI with accession number MN067217. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN067217.1/ (accessed on 26 November 2021).

Acknowledgments

The first author thanks the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) for the scholarship awarded for postgraduate studies and the Autonomous University of Queretaro, where the research was carried out.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ferreira, C.M.H.; Soares, H.M.M.; Soares, E.V. Science of the Total Environment Promising bacterial genera for agricultural practices: An insight on plant growth-promoting properties and microbial safety aspects. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 779–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Creus, C.M. Inoculantes microbianos: Piezas de un rompecabezas que aún requiere ser ensamblado. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 2017, 49, 207–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ramakrishna, W.; Yadav, R.; Li, K. Plant growth promoting bacteria in agriculture: Two sides of a coin. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2019, 138, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bargaz, A.; Elhaissoufi, W.; Khourchi, S.; Benmrid, B.; Borden, K.A.; Rchiad, Z. Benefits of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on belowground crop performance for improved crop acquisition of phosphorus. Microbiol. Res. 2021, 252, 126842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Stutter, M.I.; Shand, C.A.; George, T.S.; Blackwell, M.S.A.; Bol, R.; MacKay, R.L. Recovering phosphorus from soil: A root solution? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 1977–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nash, D.M.; Haygarth, P.M.; Turner, B.L.; Condron, L.M.; McDowell, R.W.; Richardson, A.E. Using organic phosphorus to sustain pasture productivity: A perspective. Geoderma 2014, 221, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Alavi, N.; Daneshpajou, M.; Shirmardi, M.; Goudarzi, G.; Neisi, A.; Babaei, A.A. Investigating the efficiency of co-composting and vermicomposting of vinasse with the mixture of cow manure wastes, bagasse, and natural zeolite. Waste Manag. 2017, 69, 117–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Milinković, M.; Lalević, B.; Jovičić-Petrović, J.; Golubović-Ćurguz, V.; Kljujev, I.; Raičević, V. Biopotential of compost and compost products derived from horticultural waste—Effect on plant growth and plant pathogens’ suppression. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 121, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Suárez-Estrella, F.; Jurado, M.M.; López, M.J.; López-González, J.A.; Moreno, J. Role of bacteria isolated from a plant waste-based compost producing bioactive substances in the control of bacterial spot syndrome caused by Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 20, 101198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Timmusk, S.; Behers, L.; Muthoni, J.; Muraya, A.; Aronsson, A.C. Perspectives and Challenges of Microbial Application for Crop Improvement. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hernández-Soberano, C.; Ruíz-Herrera, L.F.; Valencia-Cantero, E. Endophytic bacteria Arthrobacteragilis UMCV2 and Bacillus methylotrophicus M4-96 stimulate achene germination, in vitro growth, and greenhouse yield of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa). Sci. Hortic. 2020, 261, 109005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, P.; de-Bashan, L.; Crocker, T.; Kloepper, J.W.; Bashan, Y. Evidence that fresh weight measurement is imprecise for reporting the effect of plant growth-promoting (rhizo) bacteria on growth promotion of crop plants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2017, 53, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kuri, S.; Prakasha, G.V.; Harsha Kumar, S.S.S. Rhizobia and Their Bio-Partners as Novel Drivers for Functional Remediation in Contaminated Soils. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2018, 7, 1673–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Prakash, J.; Arora, N.K. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp. enhances growth, phosphorus uptake and oil yield of Menthaarvensis L. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sandilya, S.P.; Bhuyan, P.M.; Gogoi, D.K.; Kardong, D. Phosphorus Solubilization and Plant Growth Promotion Ability of Rhizobacteria of R. communis L Growing in Assam, India. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. India Sect. B—Biol. Sci. 2018, 88, 959–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kang, Y.; Shen, M.; Wang, H.; Zhao, Q. A possible mechanism of action of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strain Bacillus pumilus WP8 via regulation of soil bacterial community structure. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 59, 267–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Win, K.; Oo, A.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N.; Yokoyama, T. Bacillus pumilus Strain TUAT-1 and Nitrogen Application in Nursery Phase Promote Growth of Rice Plants under Field Conditions. Agronomy 2018, 8, 216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Aung, H.P.; Djedidi, S.; Oo, A.Z.; Aye, Y.S.; Yokoyama, T.; Suzuki, S.; Bellingrath-Kimura, S.D. Growth and 137 Cs uptake of four Brassica species influenced by inoculation with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Bacillus pumilus in three contaminated farmlands in Fukushima prefecture. Jpn. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 521, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Shen, M.; Kang, Y.J.; Wang, H.L.; Zhang, X.S.; Zhao, Q.X. Effect of Plant Growth-promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPRs) on plant growth, yield, and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) under simulated seawater irrigation. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2012, 58, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Venancio, W.S.; Gomes, J.M.; Nakatani, A.S.; Hungria, M.; Araujo, R.S. Lettuce Production under Reduced Levels of N-Fertilizer in the Presence of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacillus spp. Bacteria. J. Pure Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 13, 1941–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Win, T.; Okazaki, K.; Ookawa, T.; Yokoyama, T.; Ohwaki, Y. Influence of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 on yield, biomass production, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0220236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wei, Y.; Wei, Z.; Cao, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, X.; Lu, Q.; Zhang, X. A regulating method for the distribution of phosphorus fractions based on environmental parameters related to the key phosphate-solubilizing bacteria during composting. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 211, 610–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Islam, S.; Akanda, A.M.; Prova, A.; Islam, M.T.; Hossain, M.M. Isolation and Identification of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria from Cucumber Rhizosphere and Their Effect on Plant Growth Promotion and Disease Suppression. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Kirby, K.S.; Fox-Carter, E.; Guest, M. Isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid and ribosomal ribonucleic acid from bacteria. Biochem. J. 1967, 104, 258–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Pikovskaya, R.I. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 1948, 17, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar, V.; Narula, N. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates and growth emergence of wheat as affected by Azotobacter chroococcum mutants. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1999, 28, 301–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vera, D.; Pérez, H.; Valencia, H. Aislamiento de hongos solubilizadores de fosfatos de la rizósfera del arazá (Eugenia stipitata, Myrtaceae). Acta Biol. Colomb. 2002, 7, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  28. Zamora-Natera, J.F.; Bernal-Alcocer, A.; Ruiz-López, M.; Soto-Hernández, M.; Escalante-Estrada, A.; Vibrans-Lindeman, H. Perfil de alcaloides de semillas de Lupinus exaltatus Zucc. (Fabaceae) y la evaluación antifúngica del extracto alcaloideo y lupanina contra fitopatógenos. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 2005, 23, 124–129. [Google Scholar]
  29. Yu, X.; Liu, X.; Zhu, T.H.; Liu, G.H.; Mao, C. Co-inoculation with phosphate-solubilizing and nitrogen-fixing bacteria on solubilization of rock phosphate and their effect on growth promotion and nutrient uptake by walnut. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2012, 50, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kalam, S.; Das, S.N.; Basu, A.; Podile, A.R. Population densities of indigenous Acidobacteria change in the presence of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in rhizosphere. J. Basic Microbiol. 2017, 57, 376–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, H.; Murzello, C.; Sun, Y.; Kim, M.S.; Xie, X.; Jeter, R.M.; Paré, P.W. Choline and osmotic-stress tolerance induced in Arabidopsis by the soil microbe Bacillus subtilis (GB03). Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2010, 23, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Lin, Y.; Du, D.; Si, C.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Z.; Li, P. Potential biocontrol Bacillus sp. strains isolated by an improved method from vinegar waste compost exhibit antibiosis against fungal pathogens and promote growth of cucumbers. Biol. Control 2014, 71, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yuan, Y.; Gao, M. Genomic analysis of a ginger pathogen Bacillus pumilus providing the understanding to the pathogenesis and the novel control strategy. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 10259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Li, Z.; Cui, J.; Mi, Z.; Tian, D.; Wang, J.; Ma, Z.; Niu, S. Science of the Total Environment Responses of soil enzymatic activities to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops—A global meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 651, 1830–1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mumtaz, M.Z.; Ahmad, M.; Jamil, M.; Hussain, T. Zinc solubilizing Bacillus spp. potential candidates for biofortification in maize. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 202, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hussain, N.; Singh, A.; Saha, S.; Kumar, M.V.S.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Bhattacharya, S.S. Excellent N-fixing and P-solubilizing traits in earthworm gut-isolated bacteria: A vermicompost based assessment with vegetable market waste and rice straw feed mixtures. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 222, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Pandey, C.; Negi, Y.K.; Maheshwari, D.K.; Rawat, D.; Prabha, D. Potential of native cold tolerant plant growth promoting bacilli to enhance nutrient use efficiency and yield of Amaranthus hypochondriacus. Plant Soil 2018, 428, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, J.; Li, M.; Whelan, M. Phosphorus activators contribute to legacy phosphorus availability in agricultural soils: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 612, 522–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Heidarzadeh, N.; Baghaee-Ravari, S. Application of Bacillus pumilus as a potential biocontrol agent of Fusarium wilt of tomato. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot. 2015, 48, 841–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Rodríguez, L.L.; Cruz-Martín, M.; Acosta-Suárez, M.; Pichard, T.; Bermúdez-Caraballoso, I.; Alvarado-Capó, Y. Antagonismo in vitro de cepas de Bacillus spp. frente a Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Cubense. Biotecnol. Veg. 2017, 17, 229–236. [Google Scholar]
  41. Olanrewaju, O.S.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Mechanisms of action of plant growth promoting bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Martínez, L.L.; Peniche, R.A.M.; Iturriaga, M.H.; Medrano, S.M.A.; Pacheco Aguilar, J.R. Caracterización de rizobacterias aisladas de tomate y su efecto en el crecimiento de tomate y pimiento. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 2013, 36, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  43. Mehta, P.; Walia, A.; Kulshrestha, S.; Chauhan, A.; Shirkot, C.K. Efficiency of plant growth-promoting P-solubilizing Bacillus circulans CB7 for enhancement of tomato growth under net house conditions. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 55, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Malkoclu, M.C.; Tüzel, Y.; Oztekin, G.B.; Ozaktan, H.; Yolageldi, L. Effects of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on organic lettuce production. Acta Hortic. 2017, 1164, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Díaz-Vargas, P.; Ferrera-Cerrato, R.; Almaraz-Suárez, J.J.; González, G.A. Inoculation of Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Lettuce. Terra 2001, 19, 327–335. [Google Scholar]
  46. Miransari, M.; Smith, D.L. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 99, 110–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fan, X.; Zhang, S.; Mo, X.; Li, Y.; Fu, Y.; Liu, Z. Effects of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria and N Source on Plant Growth and N and P Uptake by Tomato Grown on Calcareous Soils. Pedosphere 2017, 27, 1027–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moustaine, M.; Elkahkahi, R.; Benbouazza, A.; Benkirane, R.; Achbani, H.E. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth in tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) and characterization for direct PGP abilities in Morocco. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2017, 2, 590–596. [Google Scholar]
  49. Breedt, G.; Labuschagne, N.; Coutinho, T.A. Seed treatment with selected plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria increases maize yield in the field. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2017, 171, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic neighbor-binding tree reconstructed based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence showing the phylogenetic relationship between the isolated B. pumilus strain (MN067217) and similar strains.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic neighbor-binding tree reconstructed based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence showing the phylogenetic relationship between the isolated B. pumilus strain (MN067217) and similar strains.
Agriculture 12 00003 g001
Figure 2. Antifungal in vitro activity of Bacillus pumilus. (a) Fusarium oxysporum control, (b) antifungal activity of B. pumilus against Fusarium oxysporum, (c) Sclerotium cepivorum control, (d) antifungal activity of B. pumilus against Sclerotium cepivorum.
Figure 2. Antifungal in vitro activity of Bacillus pumilus. (a) Fusarium oxysporum control, (b) antifungal activity of B. pumilus against Fusarium oxysporum, (c) Sclerotium cepivorum control, (d) antifungal activity of B. pumilus against Sclerotium cepivorum.
Agriculture 12 00003 g002
Figure 3. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on the germination of tomato and lettuce seeds. Error bars represent the standard deviation. The different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the Tukey treatments for p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on the germination of tomato and lettuce seeds. Error bars represent the standard deviation. The different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the Tukey treatments for p ≤ 0.05.
Agriculture 12 00003 g003
Figure 4. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on the germination of tomato and lettuce seeds. (a) Tomato seeds germinated in the presence of B. pumilus and the uninoculated control. (b) Lettuce seeds germinated in the presence of B. pumilus and the uninoculated control.
Figure 4. Effect of Bacillus pumilus on the germination of tomato and lettuce seeds. (a) Tomato seeds germinated in the presence of B. pumilus and the uninoculated control. (b) Lettuce seeds germinated in the presence of B. pumilus and the uninoculated control.
Agriculture 12 00003 g004
Figure 5. Effect of Bacillus pumilus inoculation for 5 weeks on height (a), stem thickness (b), number of leaves (c), and chlorophyll content (d) in tomato and lettuce seedlings compared with a non-inoculated control. The error bars represent the standard deviation. The different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the Tukey treatments for p = 0.05.
Figure 5. Effect of Bacillus pumilus inoculation for 5 weeks on height (a), stem thickness (b), number of leaves (c), and chlorophyll content (d) in tomato and lettuce seedlings compared with a non-inoculated control. The error bars represent the standard deviation. The different letters indicate statistically significant differences between the Tukey treatments for p = 0.05.
Agriculture 12 00003 g005
Table 1. Diameter of the control fungus and the fungus in presence of Bacillus pumilus, and percentage of inhibition.
Table 1. Diameter of the control fungus and the fungus in presence of Bacillus pumilus, and percentage of inhibition.
FungusControl Mycelium Diameter (cm)Mycelium Diameter (cm) in the Presence of B. pumilus% Inhibition
Fusarium oxysporum7.267 ± 0.45 a5 ± 0.87 b31.19
Sclerotium cepivorum3 ± 0.6 a3.75 ± 0.35 a−25.0
a,b Statistically significant differences between the Tukey treatments for p ≤ 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Cano, B.; García-Trejo, J.F.; Sánchez-Gutiérrez, A.E.; Toledano-Ayala, M.; Soto-Zarazúa, G.M. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Compost Bacteria That Improved Physiological Characteristics in Tomato and Lettuce Seedlings. Agriculture 2022, 12, 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010003

AMA Style

Martínez-Cano B, García-Trejo JF, Sánchez-Gutiérrez AE, Toledano-Ayala M, Soto-Zarazúa GM. Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Compost Bacteria That Improved Physiological Characteristics in Tomato and Lettuce Seedlings. Agriculture. 2022; 12(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010003

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Cano, Betsie, Juan Fernando García-Trejo, Arantza Elena Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Manuel Toledano-Ayala, and Genaro M. Soto-Zarazúa. 2022. "Isolation and Characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Compost Bacteria That Improved Physiological Characteristics in Tomato and Lettuce Seedlings" Agriculture 12, no. 1: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010003

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop