Next Article in Journal
Blood Type A1 Mismatch Does Not Affect Heart Transplant Outcomes at One Year
Next Article in Special Issue
Updated Immunotherapy for Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Minimally Invasive Derotational Osteotomy of Long Bones: Smartphone Application Used to Improve the Accuracy of Correction
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/jcm12041336
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer

by
Yasushi Sato
1,*,
Koichi Okamoto
2,
Yoshifumi Kida
2,
Yasuhiro Mitsui
2,
Yutaka Kawano
2,
Masahiro Sogabe
2,
Hiroshi Miyamoto
2 and
Tetsuji Takayama
2
1
Department of Community Medicine for Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Medical Science, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
2
Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Tokushima University Graduate School of Medical Science, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(4), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041336
Submission received: 14 January 2023 / Revised: 22 January 2023 / Accepted: 6 February 2023 / Published: 7 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates on Chemotherapy for Advanced Gastric Cancer)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most clinically challenging cancers worldwide. Over the past few years, new molecular-targeted agents and immunotherapy have markedly improved GC prognosis. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression is a key biomarker in first-line chemotherapy for unresectable advanced GC. Further, the addition of trastuzumab to cytotoxic chemotherapy has extended the overall survival of patients with HER2-positive advanced GC. In HER2-negative GC, the combination of nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, and a cytotoxic agent has been demonstrated to prolong the overall survival of GC patients. Ramucirumab and trifluridine/tipiracil, which are second- and third-line treatments for GC, and trastuzumab deruxtecan, an antibody–drug conjugate for HER2-positive GC, have been introduced in clinics. New promising molecular-targeted agents are also being developed, and combination therapy comprising immunotherapy and molecular-targeted agents is expected. As the number of available drugs increases, it is important to understand the target biomarkers and drug characteristics and select the optimal therapy for each patient. For resectable disease, differences in the extent of standard lymphadenectomy between Eastern and Western countries have led to different standard treatments: perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy. This review aimed to summarize recent advances in chemotherapy for advanced GC.

1. Introduction

In 2018, more than one million new cases of GC were diagnosed, and more than 782,000 deaths were recorded worldwide [1]. The highest mortality rates from GC have been reported in East Asia, including Japan, Korea, and China [2], and the lowest rates have been reported in North America. The mortality rate is mainly dependent on the rate of Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection, as HP infection is a known dominant cause of GC [3]. Owing to the improved treatment of HP, the rate of GC has decreased [4,5]. However, the proportion of proximal GCs, which often lead to a poor prognosis, is increasing [6]. The 5-year survival rate for GC is 60% or higher in Japan [7] and Korea [8], where more than half of GC patients are diagnosed at an early stage through well-organized population screening programs [9,10]. In contrast, GC is often diagnosed at an advanced stage in most Western patients. Notably, the biological nature of GC and differences in therapeutic quality between Eastern and Western countries may affect treatment outcomes [11,12,13].
In terms of the management of localized operable disease, marked disparities between the East and West regarding surgical procedures [14] and their outcomes result in sizeable geographical variation in the preferred adjuvant treatment for localized GC [15]. For example, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is commonly used following D0/1 surgery for patients with GC in the US [16], and an approach with intensive combination chemotherapy administered before and after surgery (perioperative) is preferable in the UK [17]. In East Asia, adjuvant oral fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy following D2 resection is considered the gold standard [18].
In terms of the treatment for metastatic and unresectable GC, the first-line systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease recommended by international consensus groups has been a combination of fluoropyridine and platinum chemotherapy, in which patients with metastatic GC have a median overall survival (OS) of approximately 1 year (Asian patients survive longer), for the past several decades [19]. Owing to achievements in chemotherapy and targeted therapy [20], the mortality rate has gradually decreased in recent decades. In 2010, the combination of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed trastuzumab and chemotherapy was reported to improve the survival prognosis of patients with gastric and gastroesophageal cancers [21]. However, even with such chemotherapy and molecular-targeted therapy, the median OS is difficult to exceed 2 years, and the 5-year OS rate for advanced GC ranges from 10 to 15% [19,22].
These poor results can be attributed to the fact that until recently, only HER2 positivity was established as a drug-treatable target [22]. More importantly, as treatment resistance is largely attributable to the heterogeneity of GC, a better understanding of its molecular biology and new personalized therapeutic approaches is expected [23].
Although targeted therapies and chemotherapy primarily attack cancer cells directly, clinical trials are currently focused on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which include anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1), anti-PD-L1, and anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). ICIs are increasingly being administered to patients with late-stage malignant tumors who have failed multiple treatments, such as melanoma [24], non-small cell lung cancer [25], and colorectal cancer [26], and have achieved deep and durable tumor responses. Regarding GC, ICI has emerged as a promising therapeutic agent, and, to date, nivolumab and pembrolizumab have been recommended as second-line or subsequent therapies in GC guidelines globally [27,28,29]. Nivolumab and chemotherapy have been recognized as first-line treatments based on the results of two global phase 3 studies [30,31,32]. Moreover, some biomarkers, including microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or PD-L1, have been demonstrated to be potential predictors of the outcomes of GC patients receiving ICI [33].
GC treatment has been heterogeneous worldwide owing to differences in morbidity, mortality, and medical resources. However, as treatment selection by biomarkers has progressed in recent years, there has been an increasing trend toward the use of common regimens in many countries. As HER2 is currently the only established therapeutic target, this review sought to provide a comprehensive overview of first-line therapy, second-line therapy, and subsequent palliative systemic therapy for metastatic GC in HER2-positive and HER2-negative GC from the pivotal clinical trials reported by January 2023 and present recent evidence for perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy.

2. First-Line HER2-Negative Gastric Cancer

2.1. Doublet Chemotherapy

The Asian, US, and European guidelines recommend a regimen of oral or intravenous injection of fluoropyrimidine combined with platinum as the palliative first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative GC [27,28,29]. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials for first-line HER2-negative GC are listed in Table 1. The efficacy of cisplatin + S-1 (SP) or capecitabine (XP) doublet combination therapy has been demonstrated by the results of several phase III trials, including the SPIRITS study and JCOG 9912 study [21,34,35]. Among the platinum agents, cisplatin has been mainly used; however, its strong gastrointestinal toxicity, nephrotoxicity, and other side effects have become problematic; thus, other platinum agents have been investigated. In particular, SOX (S-1 + oxaliplatin) and XELOX (oxaliplatin + capecitabine) regimens containing oxaliplatin are recommended as they are easier to administer than SP and XP and do not require hydration. This recommendation is based on evidence obtained from the REAL-2 trial, which revealed that capecitabine and oxaliplatin are as effective as fluorouracil and cisplatin [36]. In fact, the G-SOX study demonstrated that SOX is as effective as FP and has a favorable safety profile [37].
Interestingly, in the GO2 phase III trial, the XELOX regimen with a 60% dose reduction from the standard dose was demonstrated to be less toxic and non-inferior in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) in elderly and frail patients [38]. In addition, the combination of 5-FU/levofolinate (LV) and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) has demonstrated efficacy and is particularly useful in patients with intestinal obstruction or other difficulties with oral intake [39,40]. S-1 plus docetaxel is conditionally recommended in Japan, as the START trial highlighted its OS superiority over S-1 monotherapy in patients who cannot receive platinum-containing regimens [41].

2.2. Triple Chemotherapy

There are divided views on the three-drug combination therapy. A phase III V325 trial in the U.S. and Europe revealed the superiority of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (DCF) triple therapy, in which docetaxel was added to 5FU plus cisplatin infusion [42]. However, this three-drug combination was not recommended in Asian guidelines owing to its high toxicity, which was not balanced with efficacy and was only recommended for a small number of tolerable patients. Recently, in Japan, the triple combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) was compared to SP in a phase III trial (JCOG1013) following the results of a promising phase II trial [43,44]; however, no OS benefit was found [45]. As a result, triple-drug combination therapy, including taxanes, is not currently recommended as a first-line therapy in Japan. There are many criticisms that the study did not employ an appropriate dosage regimen and ultimately did not achieve satisfactory results. Several studies have reported the usefulness of triple-drug combination therapy in cases where conversion therapy is intended [46,47].

2.3. Immunotherapy

In recent years, ICIs have been introduced as a new standard of care for several malignancies, including advanced GC, and have demonstrated good clinical efficacy [48]. To date, the KEYNOTE-062, ATTRACTION-4, and CheckMate 649 trials serve as the major trials that used ICI as the primary treatment for GC. In the KEYNOTE-062 trial, 763 patients (69% with GC) were randomized to receive pembrolizumab alone, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (cisplatin/5-FU or capecitabine), and chemotherapy plus placebo as first-line treatment for HER2-negative and PD-Ll-positive (combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1) unresectable advanced or recurrent GC and esophagogastric junction cancer [49]. In patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1, pembrolizumab monotherapy was non-inferior to chemotherapy (median OS 10.6 vs. 11.1 months (HR, 0.91; 99.2% CI, 0.69–1.18; noninferiority margin, 1.2)) but prolonged OS vs. chemotherapy in patients with CPS ≥ 10 (median OS 17.4 vs. 10.8 months, HR 0.69 (95% CI 0.49–0.97)). In particular, in the group of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 and MSI-high tumors, the survival benefit was enhanced with pembrolizumab (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11–0.81) and pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.14–0.97) vs. chemotherapy, demonstrating the benefit of pembrolizumab in MSI-H tumors [49].
ATTRACTION-4 is a phase II/III trial conducted in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan [30]. In the open-label section, the superiority of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (SOX or oxaliplatin + capecitabine [CapeOX]) over chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for unresectable advanced or recurrent GC and esophagogastric junction cancer was verified. This study revealed the superiority of nivolumab plus chemotherapy (SOX or CapeOX) over chemotherapy as a first-line treatment and showed a significant increase in PFS (median PFS: 10.45 months vs. 8.34 months, HR: 0.68, 98.51% CI: 0.51–0.90, p = 0.0007), which was one of the primary endpoints. However, no significant difference was found for the other primary endpoint, OS (median OS: 17.45 months vs. 17.15 months, HR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.75–1.08, p = 0.257), which is presumably because many patients received subsequent treatments or additional immunotherapy. The CheckMate 649 trial, a large, randomized, phase III study of 1,581 patients (24% Asian, 76% non-Asian, 100% adenocarcinoma) was conducted worldwide to analyze the superiority of nivolumab plus chemotherapy over chemotherapy or nivolumab plus ipilimumab [31,32]. Sixty percent (n = 955) of these patients had a PD-L1 CPS score ≥ 5. The primary endpoints of OS (median OS 14.4 vs. 11.1 months (HR 0.71 (98.4% CI (0.59–0.86)), p < 0.0001) and PFS (median PFS: 7.7 months vs. 6.0 months, HR: 0.68, 98% CI: 0.56–0.85, p < 0.0001) revealed the superiority of nivolumab plus chemotherapy. In addition, for OS, a statistically significant difference was found between CPS ≥ 1 patients (median OS: 14.0 months vs. 11.3 months, HR: 0.77, 99.3% CI: 0.64–0.92, p = 0.0001) and the overall population (median OS: 13.8 months vs. 11.6 months, HR: 0.80,99.3% CI: 0·68–0·94, p = 0·0002).
The PFS results also highlighted the superiority of nivolumab plus chemotherapy for CPS ≥ 1 cases and the overall population. The overall response rate (ORR) of patients with a CPS ≥ 5 was 60% vs. 45% (p < 0.0001), with a significantly higher value obtained in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm. Furthermore, an improved ORR was achieved in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy arm across all CPS subgroups, with patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 5 and MSI-H achieving a benefit, especially when administered the combination with immunotherapy. The combination of nivolumab and ipilimumab without chemotherapy had no clear OS benefit compared to chemotherapy alone. Based on these results, nivolumab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma, regardless of PD-L1 CPS status, was approved in the US, Taiwan, and Japan. In Europe, nivolumab plus chemotherapy has been approved for patients with a PD-L1 CPS of ≥ 5.

3. First-Line HER2-Positive Gastric Cancer

3.1. HER2-Targeted Therapy

HER2, also called ERBB2, is a receptor tyrosine protein kinase that is involved in cell proliferation through signaling pathways, such as RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways, etc. [50]. HER2-positive tumors show amplification of the HER2 gene, which is commonly associated with protein overexpression, leading to tumorigenesis in GC [51]. Although only 15–20% of GC cases are HER2-positive [52], the clinical efficacy of trastuzumab, a HER2-targeted therapy, has been established for HER2-positive advanced GC. Trastuzumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to the extracellular domain of the HER2 receptor and inhibits the HER2 signaling pathway. The pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials for first-line HER2-positive GC are listed in Table 2. The multicenter phase III ToGA trial revealed that trastuzumab plus cisplatin and fluoropyrimidine significantly improved the survival of patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma compared with that of patients treated with chemotherapy alone (median OS 13.8 vs. 11.1 months, HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.0–0.91; p = 0.0046). In a post-hoc subgroup analysis, the HER-2 overexpression (IHC3+ or IHC2+ and FISH-positive) showed an improvement in OS (median OS 16.0 vs. 11.8 months, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51–0.83; p = 0.036) [21].
Following the success of the ToGA trial, several randomized phase III trials evaluated the efficacy of other HER2-targeted therapies in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers [23,53]: first-line treatment with lapatinib + capecitabine + oxaliplatin (TRIO-013/LOGiC) [54], pertuzumab and trastuzumab + fluoropyrimidine + cisplatin (JACOB) [55], second-line treatment with lapatinib + paclitaxel (Tytan) [56], and T-DM1 (GATSBY) [57]. However, none of these treatments could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive GC. Several mechanisms have been proposed to cause resistance to HER2-targeted therapies, including (1) the intratumor heterogeneity of HER2, (2) aberrant activation of the PIK3CA signaling pathway (a downstream signal of HER2), and (3) simultaneous amplification of EGFR, MET, and CCNE1 [23].
Several novel HER2-targeted drugs for GC are under development, including bispecific antibodies (zanidatamab) [58], antibody–drug conjugates (trastuzumab deruxtecan) [59], and small-molecule kinase inhibitors (afatinib, neratinib, and tucatinib) [60,61,62], which have been designed to overcome this resistance [63].

3.2. Anti-PD-1 Antibody Plus HER2-Targeted Therapy

In a HER2-positive immunocompetent mouse model, anti-PD-1 antibodies have been reported to significantly improve the antitumor activity of trastuzumab by enhancing antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) [64]. A phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of trastuzumab plus pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy revealed very promising results, with a median PFS of 13.0 months (95% CI, 8.6–NA) and median OS of 27.2 months (95% CI 18.8–NA) [65]. The phase III KEYNOTE-811 trial of pembrolizumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy revealed a statistically significant increase of 22.7% in the ORR in the pembrolizumab group compared to the placebo group (77.4% vs. 51.9%, p = 0.00006) [66]. The pembrolizumab group also displayed more profound responses than the placebo group (median change from baseline: 65% vs. 49%; 80% or ≥80% decrease from baseline: 32.3% vs. 14.8%). Further, more complete responses were observed in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (11.3% vs. 3.1%). These interim results for KEYNOTE-811 led to the expedited FDA approval of the addition of pembrolizumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy as the first-line treatment of patients with HER2-positive advanced GC. The KEYNOTE-811 trial demonstrated that the addition of ICIs to molecularly targeted therapy may be another potentially efficient strategy to overcome HER2 resistance in GC [66].

4. Second-Line and Subsequent Chemotherapy

The pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials for second-line and subsequent chemotherapy for GC are listed in Table 3. Several studies have shown that the administration of taxane or irinotecan results in higher survival rates than best supportive care as a second-line chemotherapy for GC patients with adequate performance status [67,68,69,70]. In addition, the efficacy of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2 monoclonal antibody, ramucirumab, was proven in the REGARD and RAINBOW randomized phase III trials [71,72]. In the multicenter randomized phase III REGARD trial [72], patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers who progressed after first-line chemotherapy were randomized to receive ramucirumab or a placebo. The median OS was 5.2 months for ramucirumab and 3.8 months for the placebo (p = 0.047). The randomized phase III RAINBOW trial evaluated paclitaxel with or without ramucirumab in patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers who had progressed after primary chemotherapy [71]. Patients who received ramucirumab plus paclitaxel had significantly longer median OS (9.63 months) than patients receiving paclitaxel alone (7.36 months, p < 0.0001); the median PFS was 4.4 and 2.86 months, respectively; and the ORR was 6% for paclitaxel alone versus 28% for ramucirumab plus paclitaxel (p = 0.0001).
The KEYNOTE-061 trial comparing pembrolizumab alone with paclitaxel failed to meet its primary endpoint (superior OS for patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1) for patients with advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers who progressed after first-line chemotherapy. However, pembrolizumab-treated patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 10 had superior survival rates compared to patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 [73]. Paclitaxel plus ramucirumab is generally recommended based on the results of the RAINBOW study and is currently administered in many cases. As pembrolizumab is highly effective in patients with MSI-H, pembrolizumab must be used appropriately via the performance of the MSI test [74].
Recently, several new drugs have been developed as treatment options for ineffective secondary chemotherapy. The ATTRACTION-2 trial, a phase III study that sought to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab in GC after third-line treatment [75], revealed the superiority of nivolumab over a placebo in OS (nivolumab vs. placebo, median 5.26 months vs. 4.14 months, HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.50–0.75). Notably, the response rate to nivolumab was 11.9%, but the OS in responders was very long (26.68 months). However, the effectiveness of nivolumab in combination with chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for HER2-negative GC has been demonstrated, which may reduce the possibility of using nivolumab as a third-line therapy. A phase III study (TAGS study) was conducted to determine the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) as a third-line or later drug and revealed the superiority of FTD/TPI over a placebo in terms of OS (FTD/TPI vs. placebo, median 5.7 months vs. 3.6 months, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56–0.85) [76]. Of note, grade 3 or higher neutropenia was observed in 34% of patients, whereas febrile neutropenia was only observed in 2% of patients. FTD/TPI is an oral drug. As many patients with GC have poor oral intake, it is important to administer FTD/TPI when oral intake is still possible.
As mentioned above, no drug has demonstrated efficacy in HER2-targeted therapy for GC, except trastuzumab, as a first-line therapy. A phase II study (DESTINY-Gastric01 study) was conducted to explore the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-positive GC. T-DXd displayed efficacy for the first time as a HER2-targeted therapy after second-line treatment. The DESTINY-Gastric01 trial randomized patients 2:1 to receive T-DXd or chemotherapy [77]. The efficacy of T-DXd was very high, with an ORR of 51% for T-DXd and 14% for chemotherapy (p < 0.001). Further, 9% of patients (11/119 patients) had complete response to T-DXd. The OS and PFS results were also promising with T-DXd (T-DXd vs. chemotherapy, median OS 12.5 vs. 8.4 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39–0.88; median PFS 5.6 vs. 3.5 months, HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.31–0.71). The most frequent grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (51%), anemia (38%), leukopenia (21%), and anorexia (17%). In addition, febrile neutropenia was observed in six patients and drug-induced pneumonia was observed in 10% (12/125) of patients. Although T-DXd-related interstitial lung disease is an adverse event requiring caution, it is considered a manageable adverse event with nine cases of grade 1/2, two cases of grade 3, and one case of grade 4 recorded. T-DXd is preferred over nivolumab as a third-line therapy for HER2-positive patients owing to its high therapeutic efficacy.

5. Adjuvant Therapy for Gastric Cancer

The high risk of recurrence after surgery for GC has led to a search for relapse prevention strategies to improve survival. Based on accumulating evidence, different adjuvant therapy options, including perioperative (neoadjuvant) and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, are available for localized GC. The pivotal randomized controlled clinical trials of perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy for GC are listed in Table 4. Adjuvant (postoperative) systemic chemotherapy is typically used in Asian countries because D2 lymph node dissection is routinely performed in advanced GC [78]; perioperative chemotherapy (neoadjuvant plus adjuvant therapy) is mainly used in European countries [79], and adjuvant chemoradiation is historically preferred in North America [80]. These marked disparities between the East and West are attributable to surgical procedures and their outcomes, which result in considerable geographical variation in the preferred adjuvant treatment for localized GC [81,82].

5.1. Postoperative Adjuvant Therapy

Regarding postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, the CLASSIC phase III trial showed that XELOX prolonged OS and disease-free survival (DFS) after D2 lymph node dissection in stage II–IIIB GC [83]. The ACTS-GC trial also revealed that S-1 chemotherapy for one year after D2 lymph node dissection improved OS in stage II or III GC [84]. The JACCRO GC-07 trial demonstrated that S-1 plus docetaxel therapy was more effective than S-1 monotherapy for relapse-free survival (RFS) in stage III GC [85]. Therefore, XELOX or S-1 is recommended as the postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II or III GC, while S-1 plus docetaxel is recommended for stage III GC in patients with adequate D2 dissection in Japan.
With regard to adjuvant CRT, in the INT-0116 trial, patients who received CRT after R0 resection had prolonged OS compared with those who received surgery alone [86]. However, more than 50% of the patients had lymph node dissection less than D1. The phase III randomized ARTIST 2 trial revealed no survival benefit of postoperative CRT after D2 dissection in node-positive GC [87]. In the phase III randomized CRITICS trial, patients who received appropriate preoperative chemotherapy and surgery did not display a survival benefit with the addition of postoperative radiation therapy [88,89,90].

5.2. Neoadjuvant and Perioperative Chemotherapy

With respect to perioperative treatment, several randomized trials have demonstrated the benefits of perioperative chemotherapy. In Europe, the phase III MAGIC trial revealed better PFS and OS for epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (ECF) chemotherapy before and after surgery than for surgery alone [91].
In the FNCLCC/FFCD trial, perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and cisplatin increased the curative resection rate, DFS, and OS [92]. Although this study was completed early owing to low accrual, fluorouracil and cisplatin may also be good options. Furthermore, a randomized controlled phase II/III FLOT-4 trial revealed that FLOT was better than epirubicin, cisplatin, and fluorouracil or capecitabine perioperative chemotherapy regimens [93]. The greatest benefit from perioperative chemotherapy may be derived from preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy because even in the FLOT4 trial, less than half of the study population completed the postoperative treatment as outlined in the protocol [94,95,96].

6. Prospects for Novel Therapies for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Although many molecular-targeted agents have been developed to treat GC, no agent, except trastuzumab, has shown efficacy as a first-line therapy [53]. However, advances in genomic analysis have revealed genetic subgroups that are attractive therapeutic targets [13]. Here, we provide an overview of the development of zolbetuximab for claudin 18.2 (CLDNl8.2) and bemarituzumab for fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b), which are currently garnering remarkable attention as therapeutic targets.
CLDN18.2 is a transmembrane protein that forms tight junctions between cells and is expressed in many types of cancer cells, including gastric adenocarcinoma. In a randomized phase II trial (FAST) [97], zolbetuximab, an IgG1 antibody targeting CLDN18.2, in combination with standard therapy (epirubicin + oxaliplatin + capecitabine (EOX)), significantly improved OS (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39–0.77, p < 0.0005) and PFS (HR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29–0.67, p < 0.0005). Based on these results, a phase III study (the SPOT-LIGHT study) is currently ongoing.
FGFR2, a receptor-type tyrosine kinase, is known to be one of the poor prognostic factors for GC. The findings of the FIGHT study, a randomized phase II trial evaluating the add-on effect of bemarituzumab to chemotherapy (FOLFOX) in the first-line treatment of FGFR2-positive advanced GC, were reported at ASCO 2021 [98]. The primary endpoint of PFS (9.5 vs. 7.4 months, HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.44–1.04) and the secondary endpoint of OS (19.2 vs. 13.5 months, HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.38–0.94) were significantly prolonged, and the response rates were 53% vs. 40%, respectively. Notably, in patients with FGFR2b expression in more than 10% of immunohistochemistry patients, the OS was 25.4 months vs. 11.1 months (HR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.23–0.74), indicating a trend of an association between the overexpression of FGFR2b and treatment response.

7. Conclusions

In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of the recent advances in chemotherapy for patients with advanced GC. Although systemic therapy for GC has gradually improved OS over the past several decades, substantial challenges remain for oncologists to achieve ideal outcomes. As GC is a histologically, molecularly, and immunologically heterogeneous disease [99], biomarker-targeted therapy has received remarkable attention in recent years. Such marked attention is because the development of biomarkers based on an in-depth understanding of tumor molecular biology is expected to provide better patient stratification and selection and lead to patients benefitting from specific targeted therapies in GC.
Currently, trastuzumab is the standard choice for advanced GC patients with HER2 overexpression based on the positive results of HER2-targeted therapies in patients with advanced GC. However, HER2 expression in GC is less than 20%, and the presence of tumor heterogeneity and resistance to trastuzumab are major limitations. To overcome these challenges, new therapeutic agents under investigation, such as antibody–drug conjugates and HER2-targeted bispecific antibodies, are expected.
More recently, targeted therapy against PD-L1 has led to immunotherapy as a frontline treatment for advanced GC, following the results of CheckMate 649 and KEYNOTE-811. The use of immunotherapy is expected to increase in combination with other promising targeted agents. Patient selection using PD-L1 scores in ICI therapy has been investigated; however, the threshold for PD-L1 positivity remains unclear. Establishing biomarkers for immunotherapy is expected to optimize patient responses by improving patient selection for ICI treatment. In the future, a better understanding of the molecular characterization of GCs will likely aid the use of the best targeted and ICI therapies in relation to surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for GC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.S., K.O., Y.K. (Yoshifumi Kida), Y.M., Y.K. (Yutaka Kawano), M.S. and H.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.S. and T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer Statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Rahman, R.; Asombang, A.W.; Ibdah, J.A. Characteristics of gastric cancer in Asia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 4483–4490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Uemura, N.; Okamoto, S.; Yamamoto, S.; Matsumura, N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Yamakido, M.; Taniyama, K.; Sasaki, N.; Schlemper, R.J. Helicobacter pylori infection and the development of gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Arnold, M.; Park, J.Y.; Camargo, M.C.; Lunet, N.; Forman, D.; Soerjomataram, I. Is gastric cancer becoming a rare disease? A global assessment of predicted incidence trends until 2035. Gut 2020, 69, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ito, M.; Sugiyama, A.; Mino, M.; Kodama, M.; Nagaoki, Y.; Abe, K.; Imada, H.; Ouoba, S.E.B.; Ko, K.; Akita, T. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the general population evaluated in a resident-register-based epidemiological study. J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 57, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Pacelli, F.; Papa, V.; Caprino, P.; Sgadari, A.; Bossola, M.; Doglietto, G.B. Proximal compared with distal gastric cancer: Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. Am. Surg. 2001, 67, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hamashima, C.; Systematic Review Group and Guideline Development Group for Gastric Cancer Screening Guidelines. Updated version of the Japanese Guidelines for Gastric Cancer Screening. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 48, 673–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oh, C.M.; Won, Y.J.; Jung, K.W.; Kong, H.J.; Cho, H.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, D.H.; Lee, K.H.; Community of Population-Based Regional Cancer Registries. Cancer statistics in Korea: Incidence, mortality, survival, and prevalence in 2013. Cancer Res. Treat. 2016, 48, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pasechnikov, V.; Chukov, S.; Fedorov, E.; Kikuste, I.; Leja, M. Gastric cancer: Prevention, screening, and early diagnosis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 13842–13862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ajani, J.A.; Lee, J.; Sano, T.; Janjigian, Y.Y.; Fan, D.; Song, S. Gastric adenocarcinoma. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 17036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Machlowska, J.; Baj, J.; Sitarz, M.; Maciejewski, R.; Sitarz, R. Gastric cancer epidemiology, risk factors, classification, genomic characteristics, and treatment strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Etemadi, A.; Safiri, S.; Sepanlou, S.G.; Ikuta, K.; Bisignano, C.; Shakeri, R.; Amani, M.; Fitzmaurice, C.; Nixon, M.R.; Abbasi, N. Global, regional, and national burden of stomach cancer in 195 countries, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 5, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Onoyama, T.; Ishikawa, S.; Isomoto, H. Gastric cancer genomics: Review of literature. J. Gastroenterol. 2022, 57, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ueno, T.; Iida, M.; Yoshino, S.; Takeda, S.; Kubota, H.; Higashida, M.; Oka, Y.; Tsuruta, A.; Matsumoto, H.; Nagano, H. East versus West: Differences in surgical management in Asia compared with Europe and North America. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 97, 453–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Russo, A.; Li, P.; Strong, V.E. Differences in the multimodal treatment of gastric cancer: East versus West. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 115, 603–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schernberg, A.; Rivin Del Campo, E.; Rousseau, B.; Matzinger, O.; Loi, M.; Maingon, P.; Huguet, F. Adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric carcinoma: State of the art and perspectives. Clin. Transl. Radiat. Oncol. 2018, 10, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fong, C.; Johnston, E.; Starling, N. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy approaches to gastric cancer. Curr. Treat Options Oncol. 2022, 23, 1247–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kurokawa, Y.; Sasako, M. Asian perspectives on the surgical and adjuvant management of esophagogastric cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 26, 213–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Smyth, E.C.; Nilsson, M.; Grabsch, H.I.; van Grieken, N.C.; Lordick, F. Gastric cancer. Lancet 2020, 396, 635–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nakamura, Y.; Kawazoe, A.; Lordick, F.; Janjigian, Y.Y.; Shitara, K. Biomarker-targeted therapies for advanced-stage gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers: An emerging paradigm. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 18, 473–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bang, Y.J.; Van Cutsem, E.; Feyereislova, A.; Chung, H.C.; Shen, L.; Sawaki, A.; Lordick, F.; Ohtsu, A.; Omuro, Y.; Satoh, T.; et al. Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): A phase 3, open-label, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2010, 376, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Alsina, M.; Arrazubi, V.; Diez, M.; Tabernero, J. Current development in gastric cancer: From molecular profiling to treatment strategy. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mitani, S.; Kawakami, H. Emerging targeted therapies for HER2 positive gastric cancer that can overcome trastuzumab resistance. Cancers 2020, 12, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carlino, M.S.; Larkin, J.; Long, G.V. Immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma. Lancet 2021, 398, 1002–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiong, W.; Zhao, Y.; Du, H.; Guo, X. Current status of immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy for lung cancer. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 704336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Boukouris, A.E.; Theochari, M.; Stefanou, D.; Papalambros, A.; Felekouras, E.; Gogas, H.; Ziogas, D.C. Latest evidence on immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer: A 2022 update. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2022, 173, 103663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. NCCN. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Gastric Cancer. NCCN Clin. Pract. Guidel. Oncol. 2022, 7, 933–938. [Google Scholar]
  28. Smyth, E.C.; Verheij, M.; Allum, W.; Cunningham, D.; Cervantes, A.; Arnold, D.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, v38–v49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2018 (5th edition). Gastric Cancer 2021, 24, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, Y.-K.; Chen, L.-T.; Ryu, M.-H.; Oh, D.-Y.; Oh, S.C.; Chung, H.C.; Lee, K.-W.; Omori, T.; Shitara, K.; Sakuramoto, S.; et al. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative, untreated, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastrooesophageal junction cancer (ATTRACTION-4): A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-cont. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, 234–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Janjigian, Y.Y.; Shitara, K.; Moehler, M.; Garrido, M.; Salman, P.; Shen, L.; Wyrwicz, L.; Yamaguchi, K.; Skoczylas, T.; Bragagnoli, A.C. First-line nivolumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric, gastroesophageal junction, and esophageal adenocarcinoma (CheckMate 649): A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021, 398, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Shitara, K.; Ajani, J.A.; Moehler, M.; Garrido, M.; Gallardo, C.; Shen, L.; Yamaguchi, K.; Wyrwicz, L.; Skoczylas, T.; Bragagnoli, A.C.; et al. Nivolumab plus chemotherapy or ipilimumab in gastro-esophageal cancer. Nature 2022, 603, 942–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Han, S.; Chok, A.Y.; Peh, D.Y.Y.; Ho, J.Z.-M.; Tan, E.K.W.; Koo, S.L.; Tan, I.B.-H.; Ong, J.C.-A. Distinct clinical trajectory, metastatic sites, and immunobiology of microsatellite instability-high cancers. Front. Genet. 2022, 13, 933475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Koizumi, W.; Narahara, H.; Hara, T.; Takagane, A.; Akiya, T.; Takagi, M.; Miyashita, K.; Nishizaki, T.; Kobayashi, O.; Takiyama, W.; et al. S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): A phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008, 9, 215–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Boku, N.; Yamamoto, S.; Fukuda, H.; Shirao, K.; Doi, T.; Sawaki, A.; Koizumi, W.; Saito, H.; Yamaguchi, K.; Takiuchi, H.; et al. Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: A randomized phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2009, 10, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cunningham, D.; Starling, N.; Rao, S.; Iveson, T.; Nicolson, M.; Coxon, F.; Middleton, G.; Daniel, F.; Oates, J.; Norman, A.R.; et al. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008, 358, 36–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yamada, Y.; Higuchi, K.; Nishikawa, K.; Gotoh, M.; Fuse, N.; Sugimoto, N.; Nishina, T.; Amagai, K.; Chin, K.; Niwa, Y.; et al. A phase III study comparing oxaliplatin plus S-1 with cisplatin plus S-1 in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced gastric cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hall, P.S.; Swinson, D.; Cairns, D.A.; Waters, J.S.; Petty, R.; Allmark, C.; Ruddock, S.; Falk, S.; Wadsley, J.; Roy, R.; et al. Efficacy of reduced-intensity chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine on quality of life and cancer control among older and frail patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer: The GO2 Phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shah, M.A.; Bang, Y.J.; Lordick, F.; Alsina, M.; Chen, M.; Hack, S.P.; Bruey, J.M.; Smith, D.; McCaffery, I.; Shames, D.S.; et al. Effect of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with or without Onartuzumab in HER2-negative, MET-positive gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: The METGastric randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yoon, H.H.; Bendell, J.C.; Braiteh, F.S.; Firdaus, I.; Philip, P.A.; Cohn, A.L.; Lewis, N.; Anderson, D.M.; Arrowsmith, E.; Schwartz, J.D.; et al. Ramucirumab combined with FOLFOX as front-line therapy for advanced esophageal, gastroesophageal junction, or gastric adenocarcinoma: A randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 2196–2203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Koizumi, W.; Kim, Y.H.; Fujii, M.; Kim, H.K.; Imamura, H.; Lee, K.H.; Hara, T.; Chung, H.C.; Satoh, T.; Cho, J.Y.; et al. Addition of docetaxel to S-1 without platinum prolongs the survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer: A randomized study (START). J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 140, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Van Cutsem, E.; Moiseyenko, V.M.; Tjulandin, S.; Majlis, A.; Constenla, M.; Boni, C.; Rodrigues, A.; Fodor, M.; Chao, Y.; Voznyi, E.; et al. A phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: A report of the V325 study group. J. Clin. Oncol. 2006, 24, 4991–4997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sato, Y.; Takayama, T.; Sagawa, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Ohnuma, H.; Okubo, S.; Shintani, N.; Tanaka, S.; Kida, M.; Sato, Y.; et al. A phase II study of S-1, docetaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic gastric cancer. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2010, 66, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Koizumi, W.; Nakayama, N.; Tanabe, S.; Sasaki, T.; Higuchi, K.; Nishimura, K.; Takagi, S.; Azuma, M.; Ae, T.; Ishido, K.; et al. A multicenter phase II study of combined chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer (KDOG 0601). Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2012, 69, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yamada, Y.; Boku, N.; Mizusawa, J.; Iwasa, S.; Kadowaki, S.; Nakayama, N.; Azuma, M.; Sakamoto, T.; Shitara, K.; Tamura, T.; et al. Docetaxel plus cisplatin and S-1 versus cisplatin and S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (JCOG1013): An open-label, phase 3, randomized controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 4, 501–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Sato, Y.; Ohnuma, H.; Nobuoka, T.; Hirakawa, M.; Sagawa, T.; Fujikawa, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Shinya, M.; Katsuki, S.; Takahashi, M.; et al. Conversion therapy for inoperable advanced gastric cancer patients treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 (DCS) chemotherapy: A multi-institutional retrospective study. Gastric Cancer 2017, 20, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ohnuma, H.; Sato, Y.; Onoyama, N.; Hamaguchi, K.; Hayasaka, N.; Sato, M.; Murase, K.; Takada, K.; Miyanishi, K.; Murakami, T.; et al. Survival benefit of conversion surgery after intensive chemotherapy for unresectable metastatic gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 147, 2385–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Topalian, S.L.; Hodi, F.S.; Brahmer, J.R.; Gettinger, S.N.; Smith, D.C.; McDermott, D.F.; Powderly, J.D.; Carvajal, R.D.; Sosman, J.A.; Atkins, M.B.; et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibodies in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2443–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shitara, K.; Van Cutsem, E.; Bang, Y.J.; Fuchs, C.; Wyrwicz, L.; Lee, K.W.; Kudaba, I.; Garrido, M.; Chung, H.C.; Lee, J.; et al. Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab or pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for patients with first-line, advanced gastric cancer: The KEYNOTE-062 Phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020, 6, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moasser, M.M. The oncogene HER2 has signaling and transforming functions, and plays a role in human cancer pathogenesis. Oncogene 2007, 26, 6469–6487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Meric-Bernstam, F.; Johnson, A.M.; Dumbrava, E.E.I.; Raghav, K.; Balaji, K.; Bhatt, M.; Murthy, R.K.; Rodon, J.; Piha-Paul, S.A. Advances in HER2-targeted therapy: Novel agents and opportunities beyond breast and gastric cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 25, 2033–2041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Van Cutsem, E.; Bang, Y.J.; Feng-Yi, F.; Xu, J.M.; Lee, K.W.; Jiao, S.C.; Chong, J.L.; López-Sanchez, R.I.; Price, T.; Gladkov, O.; et al. HER2 screening data from ToGA: Targeting HER2 in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancers. Gastric Cancer 2015, 18, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Siena, S.; Marsoni, S.; Sartore-Bianchi, S. Breaking barriers in HER2+ cancers. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 317–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Hecht, J.R.; Bang, Y.J.; Qin, S.K.; Chung, H.C.; Xu, J.M.; Park, J.O.; Jeziorski, K.; Shparyk, Y.; Hoff, P.M.; Sobrero, A.; et al. Lapatinib in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced or metastatic gastric, esophageal, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: TRIO-013/LOGiC—A randomized Phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2016, 34, 443–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Tabernero, J.; Hoff, P.M.; Shen, L.; Ohtsu, A.; Shah, M.A.; Cheng, K.; Song, C.; Wu, H.; Eng-Wong, J.; Kim, K.; et al. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and chemotherapy for HER2-positive metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (JACOB): Final analysis of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 1372–1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Satoh, T.; Xu, R.H.; Chung, H.C.; Sun, G.P.; Doi, T.; Xu, J.M.; Tsuji, A.; Omuro, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, J.W.; et al. Lapatinib plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel alone in second-line treatment of HER2-amplified advanced gastric cancer in Asian populations: TyTAN, a randomized phase III study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014, 32, 2039–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Thuss-Patience, P.C.; Shah, M.A.; Ohtsu, A.; Van Cutsem, E.; Ajani, J.A.; Castro, H.; Mansoor, W.; Chung, H.C.; Bodoky, G.; Shitara, K.; et al. Trastuzumab emtansine versus taxane use for previously treated HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GATSBY): An international randomized, open-label, adaptive, phase 2/3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 640–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Meric-Bernstam, F.; Beeram, M.; Hamilton, E.; Oh, D.Y.; Hanna, D.L.; Kang, Y.K.; Elimova, E.; Chaves, J.; Goodwin, R.; Lee, J.; et al. Zanidatamab, a novel bispecific antibody, is used for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic HER2-expressing or HER2-amplified cancers in a phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study. Lancet Oncol. 2022, 23, 1558–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kotani, D.; Shitara, K. Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive gastric cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2021, 13, 1758835920986518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yoshioka, T.; Shien, K.; Namba, K.; Torigoe, H.; Sato, H.; Tomida, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Asano, H.; Soh, J.; Tsukuda, K.; et al. Antitumor activity of pan-HER inhibitors in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018, 109, 1166–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chan, A.; Delaloge, S.; Holmes, F.A.; Moy, B.; Iwata, H.; Harvey, V.J.; Robert, N.J.; Silovski, T.; Gokmen, E.; von Minckwitz, G.; et al. Neratinib after trastuzumab-based adjuvant therapy in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (ExteNET): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016, 17, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kulukian, A.; Lee, P.; Taylor, J.; Rosler, R.; de Vries, P.; Watson, D.; Forero-Torres, A.; Peterson, S. Preclinical activity of HER2-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor tucatinib as a single agent or in combination with trastuzumab or docetaxel in solid tumor models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 976–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Wei, X.; Tang, C.; Zhang, W. HER2-targeted therapies in gastric cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2021, 1876, 188549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Stagg, J.; Loi, S.; Divisekera, U.; Ngiow, S.F.; Duret, H.; Yagita, H.; Teng, M.W.; Smyth, M.J. Anti-ErbB-2 mAb therapy requires type I and II interferons and synergizes with anti-PD-1 or anti-CD137 mAb therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 7142–7147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Janjigian, Y.Y.; Maron, S.B.; Chatila, W.K.; Millang, B.; Chavan, S.S.; Alterman, C.; Chou, J.F.; Segal, M.F.; Simmons, M.Z.; Momtaz, P.; et al. First-line pembrolizumab and trastuzumab in HER2-positive esophageal, gastric, or gastroesophageal junction cancer: An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020, 21, 821–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Janjigian, Y.Y.; Kawazoe, A.; Yañez, P.; Li, N.; Lonardi, S.; Kolesnik, O.; Barajas, O.; Bai, Y.; Shen, L.; Tang, Y.; et al. KEYNOTE-811 trial of dual PD-1 and HER2 blockade in HER2-positive gastric cancer. Nature 2021, 600, 727–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Thuss-Patience, P.C.; Kretzschmar, A.; Bichev, D.; Deist, T.; Hinke, A.; Breithaupt, K.; Dogan, Y.; Gebauer, B.; Schumacher, G.; Reichardt, P. Survival advantage for irinotecan versus best supportive care as second-line chemotherapy in gastric cancer--a randomised phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). Eur. J. Cancer Oxf. Engl. 2011, 47, 2306–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kang, J.H.; Lee, S.I.; Lim, D.H.; Park, K.W.; Oh, S.Y.; Kwon, H.C.; Hwang, I.G.; Lee, S.C.; Nam, E.; Shin, D.B.; et al. Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: A randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, 1513–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Roy, A.C.; Park, S.R.; Cunningham, D.; Kang, Y.K.; Chao, Y.; Chen, L.T.; Rees, C.; Lim, H.Y.; Tabernero, J.; Ramos, F.J.; et al. A randomized phase II study of PEP02 (MM-398), irinotecan, or docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2013, 24, 1567–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ford, H.E.R.; Marshall, A.; Bridgewater, J.A.; Janowitz, T.; Coxon, F.Y.; Wadsley, J.; Mansoor, W.; Fyfe, D.; Madhusudan, S.; Middleton, G.W.; et al. Docetaxel versus active symptom control for refractory esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (COUGAR-02): An open-label, phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 78–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wilke, H.; Muro, K.; Van Cutsem, E.; Oh, S.C.; Bodoky, G.; Shimada, Y.; Hironaka, S.; Sugimoto, N.; Lipatov, O.; Kim, T.Y.; et al. Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): A double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1224–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Fuchs, C.S.; Tomasek, J.; Yong, C.J.; Dumitru, F.; Passalacqua, R.; Goswami, C.; Safran, H.; Dos Santos, L.V.; Aprile, G.; Ferry, D.R.; et al. Ramucirumab monotherapy for previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (REGARD): An international, randomized, multicenter, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014, 383, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shitara, K.; Özgüroğlu, M.; Bang, Y.J.; Di Bartolomeo, M.; Mandalà, M.; Ryu, M.H.; Fornaro, L.; Olesiński, T.; Caglevic, C.; Chung, H.C.; et al. Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): A randomized, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2018, 392, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Chao, J.; Fuchs, C.S.; Shitara, K.; Tabernero, J.; Muro, K.; Van Cutsem, E.; Bang, Y.J.; De Vita, F.; Landers, G.; Yen, C.J.; et al. Assessment of pembrolizumab therapy for the treatment of microsatellite instability-high gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer among patients in the KEYNOTE-059, KEYNOTE-061, and KEYNOTE-062 clinical trials. JAMA Oncol. 2021, 7, 895–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Kang, Y.-K.; Boku, N.; Satoh, T.; Ryu, M.-H.; Chao, Y.; Kato, K.; Chung, H.C.; Chen, J.-S.; Muro, K.; Kang, W.K.; et al. Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 2461–2471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Shitara, K.; Doi, T.; Dvorkin, M.; Mansoor, W.; Arkenau, H.T.; Prokharau, A.; Alsina, M.; Ghidini, M.; Faustino, C.; Gorbunova, V.; et al. Trifluridine/tipiracil versus placebo in patients with heavily pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (TAGS): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 1437–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shitara, K.; Bang, Y.J.; Iwasa, S.; Sugimoto, N.; Ryu, M.H.; Sakai, D.; Chung, H.C.; Kawakami, H.; Yabusaki, H.; Lee, J.; et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive gastric cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 2419–2430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Nie, R.C.; Luo, T.Q.; Li, G.D.; Zhang, F.Y.; Chen, G.M.; Li, J.X.; Chen, X.J.; Zhao, Z.K.; Jiang, K.M.; Wei, Y.C.; et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A retrospective, multicenter, observational study. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cann, C.; Ciombor, K.K. Systemic therapy for gastric cancer: Perioperative strategies and beyond. J. Surg. Oncol. 2022, 125, 1151–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Altman, A.M.; Sheka, A.C.; Marmor, S.; Lou, E.; Reynolds, M.; Hui, J.Y.C.; Tuttle, T.M.; Jensen, E.H.; Denbo, J.W. The addition of chemoradiation to adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with improved survival of patients with lymph node-positive gastric cancer. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 34, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fujitani, K. Overview of adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for resectable gastric cancer in the east. Dig. Surg. 2013, 30, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Petrillo, A.; Smyth, E.C. Multimodality treatment for localized gastric cancer: State of the art and new insights. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 2020, 32, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Noh, S.H.; Park, S.R.; Yang, H.-K.; Chung, H.C.; Chung, I.-J.; Kim, S.-W.; Kim, H.-H.; Choi, J.-H.; Kim, H.-K.; Yu, W.; et al. Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1389–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Sasako, M.; Sakuramoto, S.; Katai, H.; Kinoshita, T.; Furukawa, H.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nashimoto, A.; Fujii, M.; Nakajima, T.; Ohashi, Y. Five-Year Outcomes of a Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Versus Surgery Alone in Stage II or III Gastric Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 4387–4393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Yoshida, K.; Kodera, Y.; Kochi, M.; Ichikawa, W.; Kakeji, Y.; Sano, T.; Nagao, N.; Takahashi, M.; Takagane, A.; Watanabe, T.; et al. Addition of docetaxel to oral fluoropyrimidine improves efficacy in patients with Stage III gastric cancer: Interim analysis of JACCRO GC-07, a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 37, 1296–1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Macdonald, J.S.; Smalley, S.R.; Benedetti, J.; Hundahl, S.A.; Estes, N.C.; Stemmermann, G.N.; Haller, D.G.; Ajani, J.A.; Gunderson, L.L.; Jessup, J.M.; et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001, 345, 725–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Park, S.H.; Lim, D.H.; Sohn, T.S.; Lee, J.; Zang, D.Y.; Kim, S.T.; Kang, J.H.; Oh, S.Y.; Hwang, I.G.; Ji, J.H.; et al. A randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant single-agent S1, S-1 with oxaliplatin, and postoperative chemoradiation with S-1 and oxaliplatin in patients with node-positive gastric cancer after D2 resection: The ARTIST 2 trial☆. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 368–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Cats, A.; Jansen, E.P.M.; van Grieken, N.C.T.; Sikorska, K.; Lind, P.; Nordsmark, M.; Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, E.; Boot, H.; Trip, A.K.; Swellengrebel, H.A.M.; et al. Chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy after surgery and preoperative chemotherapy for resectable gastric cancer (CRITICS): An international, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 616–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. De Steur, W.O.; van Amelsfoort, R.M.; Hartgrink, H.H.; Putter, H.; Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg, E.; van Grieken, N.C.T.; van Sandick, J.W.; Claassen, Y.H.M.; Braak, J.P.B.M.; Jansen, E.P.M.; et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy was superior to chemoradiation after D2 surgery for gastric cancer in the per-protocol analysis of the randomized CRITICS trial. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 360–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Lordick, F.; Nilsson, M.; Leong, T. Adjuvant radiotherapy for gastric cancer end of the road. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cunningham, D.; Allum, W.H.; Stenning, S.P.; Thompson, J.N.; Van de Velde, C.J.H.; Nicolson, M.; Scarffe, J.H.; Lofts, F.J.; Falk, S.J.; Iveson, T.J.; et al. Perioperative Chemotherapy versus Surgery Alone for Resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ychou, M.; Boige, V.; Pignon, J.P.; Conroy, T.; Bouché, O.; Lebreton, G.; Ducourtieux, M.; Bedenne, L.; Fabre, J.M.; Saint-Aubert, B.; et al. Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: An FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter Phase III trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1715–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Al-Batran, S.E.; Homann, N.; Pauligk, C.; Goetze, T.O.; Meiler, J.; Kasper, S.; Kopp, H.G.; Mayer, F.; Haag, G.M.; Luley, K.; et al. Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): A randomised, phase 2/3 trial. Lancet 2019, 393, 1948–1957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Glatz, T.; Bronsert, P.; Schäfer, M.; Kulemann, B.; Marjanovic, G.; Sick, O.; Hopt, U.T.; Zirlik, K.; Makowiec, F.; Hoeppner, J. Perioperative platin-based chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Postoperative chemotherapy has a substantial impact on outcome. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 41, 1300–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Fritsch, R.; Hoeppner, J. Oxaliplatin in perioperative chemotherapy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019, 13, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Adenis, A.; Samalin, E.; Mazard, T.; Portales, F.; Mourregot, A.; Ychou, M. Does the FLOT regimen a new standard of perioperative chemotherapy for localized gastric cancer? Bull. Cancer 2020, 107, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Sahin, U.; Türeci, Ö.; Manikhas, G.; Lordick, F.; Rusyn, A.; Vynnychenko, I.; Dudov, A.; Bazin, I.; Bondarenko, I.; Melichar, B.; et al. FAST: A randomized phase II study of zolbetuximab (IMAB362) plus EOX versus EOX alone for the first-line treatment of advanced CLDN18.2-positive gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 609–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Catenacci, D.V.T.; Kang, Y.-K.; Saeed, A.; Yamaguchi, K.; Qin, S.; Lee, K.-W.; Kim, I.-H.; Oh, S.C.; Li, J.; Turk, H.M.; et al. FIGHT: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study of bemarituzumab (bema) combined with modified FOLFOX6 in 1L FGFR2b+ advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC). J. Clin. Oncol. 2021, 39, 4010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bass, A.J.; Thorsson, V.; Shmulevich, I.; Reynolds, S.M.; Miller, M.; Bernard, B.; Hinoue, T.; Laird, P.W.; Curtis, C.; Shen, H. The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature 2014, 513, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer.
Table 1. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative gastric cancer.
Study NPublication YearAreaTreatmentMedian OS (Month)HR
JCOG9912 2342009 Japan 5-FU10.8
236CPT-11 + CDDP 12.30.85
234S-111.40.83
SPIRITS 1502008 Japan S-1110.77
148SP13
G-SOX 3242015 Japan SP13.10.96
318SOX14.1
REAL-2 2632008 UK and Australia ECF 9.9
250ECX9.9
245EOF 9.3
244EOX11.2
ATTRACTION-4 3622022Japan, South Korea, and TaiwanSOX/CapeOX17.150.9
362SOX/CapeOX + nivolumab17.45
CheckMate6494822022 Global (29 countries) CapeOX/FOLFOX11.1
473CapeOX/FOLFOX + nivolumab 14.40.7
234Nivolumab + ipilimumab11.20.89
SP: S-1 and cisplatin; ECF: epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; ECX: epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine; EOF: epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; EOX: epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine; XELOX/capeOX: capecitabine and oxaliplatin; XP: capecitabine and cisplatin; SOX: S-1 and oxaliplatin; FOLFOX: fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival.
Table
Table 2. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer.
Table 2. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for first-line human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer.
Study NPublication YearAreaTreatmentOutcomesHR
ToGA 2342010 Global (24 countries) FP/XPMedian OS: 11.1month0.74
236FP/XP + trastuzumab Median OS: 13.8 month
KEYNOTE-811 1312021 Global (20 countries) FP/XELOX + trastuzumabObjective response: 51.9%
133FP/XELOX + trastuzumab + pembrolizumab# Objective response: 74.4%
FP: 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin; XELOX: capecitabine and oxaliplatin; XP: capecitabine and cisplatin; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival. # Significant (22.7%) improvement in objective response rate in the pembrolizumab group (95% CI, 11.2–33.7; p = 0.00006).
Table
Table 3. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for second-line and subsequent chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
Table 3. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial for second-line and subsequent chemotherapy for gastric cancer.
Study NPublication YearAreaTreatmentMedian OS (Month)HR
REGARD1172014 Global (29 countries) Placebo3.80.776
238Ramucirumab5.2
RAINBOW3302014Global (27 countries) Paclitaxel7.40.807
335Paclitaxel + ramucirumab 9.6
ATTRACTION-2 3242017 Japan, South Korea, and TaiwanPlacebo4.140.63
318Nivolumab5.26
TAGS1702018 global (17 countries)Placebo3.60.69
337FTD/TPl5.7
DESTINY-Gastric 01 622020 Japan and South KoreaPhysician’s choice of irinotecan or paclitaxel8.40.59
125Trastuzumab deruxtecan 12.5
FTD/TPI: Trifluridine/tipiracil; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival.
Table
Table 4. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial of perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.
Table 4. Pivotal randomized controlled clinical trial of perioperative (neoadjuvant) and adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.
Study NPublication YearAreaLocalization of the TumorRecommended
Resection		TreatmentSurvivalHR
ACTS-GC5302011 Japan Gastric 100% D2 Surgery only5-year OS: 61%0.669
529 S-1(1 year)5-year OS: 72%
CLASSIC5152014 South
Korea 		Gastric 98%, GEJ 2% D2Surgery only5-year OS: 69%0.6
520XELOX (8 cycles)5-year OS: 78%
JACCRO GC-07 4592019 Japan Gastric 100% D2 S-1 (1 year)3-year RFS: 50%0.632
454 S-1 plus docetaxel (1 year)3-year RFS: 66%
Intergroup 0116 2772001, 2012 USA Gastric 80%, GEJ 20% D2 Surgery only5-year OS: 28%1.32
282Adjuvant CRT
(45Gy + 5FU)		5-year OS: 43%
ARTIST-21822021 South
Korea 		Gastric 100% D2 Adjuvant chemotherapy
(S-1 for 1 year)		3-year DFS: 64.8%
181Adjuvant chemotherapy
(SOX for 6 month)		3-year DFS: 74.3%0.692
183Adjuvant CRT
(SOX plus RT 45 Gy)		3-year DFS: 72.8%0.724
CRITICS 3932018 The Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark Stomach 25%, GEJ 64% at least a D1+ Perioperative chemotherapy (3 preoperative and 3 postoperative cycles of modified ECF)Median OS: 43 months1.01
395Preoperative chemotherapy with postoperative CRT (Capecitabine and cisplatin with concurrent RT 45 Gy)Median OS: 37 months
MAGIC 250200 UK Gastric 74%, lower esophageal/GEJ 26% Undefined Surgery only5-year OS: 23%0.75
253Perioperative chemotherapy
(3 cycles of preoperative ECF and 3 cycles of postoperative ECF)		5-year OS: 36%
FNCLCC/FFCD 1112011 France Stomach 25%, lower esophageal 11%, GEJ 64% D2 Surgery only5-year OS: 24%0.69
113Perioperative chemotherapy
(2–3 cycles of preoperative CF and 3–4 cycles of postoperative CF)		5-year OS: 38%
FLOT4 3562019 Germany Stomach 44%, GEJ 56% D2 3 preoperative and postoperative cycles of ECF/ECX Median OS: 50 months0.77
360 4 preoperative and postoperative cycles of FLOT Median OS: 30 months
ECF: epirubicin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil: GEJ: gastroesophageal junction; XELOX: capecitabine and oxaliplatin; XP: capecitabine and cisplatin; SOX: S-1 and oxaliplatin; FLOT: fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel; XRT: radiotherapy with concomitant capecitabine; AC: adenocarcinoma; CRT: chemoradiotherapy; HR: hazard ratio; OS: overall survival; RFS: relapse-free survival.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sato, Y.; Okamoto, K.; Kida, Y.; Mitsui, Y.; Kawano, Y.; Sogabe, M.; Miyamoto, H.; Takayama, T. Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041336

AMA Style

Sato Y, Okamoto K, Kida Y, Mitsui Y, Kawano Y, Sogabe M, Miyamoto H, Takayama T. Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(4):1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041336

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sato, Yasushi, Koichi Okamoto, Yoshifumi Kida, Yasuhiro Mitsui, Yutaka Kawano, Masahiro Sogabe, Hiroshi Miyamoto, and Tetsuji Takayama. 2023. "Overview of Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 4: 1336. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041336

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop