Next Article in Journal
Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers on Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Cataracts
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Transfer-Related Ischemia on Free Flap Metabolism and Electrolyte Homeostasis—A New In Vivo Experimental Approach in Pigs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Factors Influencing Recurrence after Surgical Treatment of Odontogenic Maxillary Sinusitis: An Analysis from the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Point of View
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Is There a Correlation between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Improvement in Erectile Dysfunction?

by
Antonio Romano
1,
Umberto Committeri
1,
Vincenzo Abbate
1,
Marco Sarcinella
1,
Francesco Maffia
1,*,
Simona Barone
1,
Stefania Troise
1,
Giovanni Salzano
1,
Riccardo Nocini
2,
Paola Bonavolontà
1 and
Giovanni Dell’Aversana Orabona
1
1
Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, “Federico II” University of Naples, Via Pansini 5, 80100 Naples, Italy
2
Unit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(20), 6626; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206626
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 10 October 2023 / Accepted: 18 October 2023 / Published: 19 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current and Emerging Treatment Options in Sinus and Nasal Diseases)

Abstract

:
Background: In recent years, the focus on respiratory disorders has increased, notably on chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), an inflammatory condition of the upper airway that can significantly impact one’s quality of life. Interestingly, CRS has emerged as a potential comorbidity in erectile dysfunction (ED). This study aims to assess the impact of endoscopic sinus surgery for CRS on sexual function. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a prospective study of patients who visited their clinics for chronic rhinosinusitis between June 2018 and June 2022. The study involved 53 patients aged between 40 and 70 years who were treated for CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Preoperative and postoperative assessments were performed using the Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation Score (NOSE score) and the 5th International Index of Erectile Function Score (IIEF-5 score) to evaluate potential improvements in sexual function following endoscopic sinus surgery. Results: Before surgery, the average NOSE score was 72.6, which decreased to 24.9 postoperatively. The average preoperative IIEF-5 score was 16.35, while the postoperative average increased to 19.52. Statistical analysis revealed a significant improvement in erectile function for penetration (p-value = 0.024) and overall satisfaction after intercourse (p-value < 0.001) regarding the degree of nasal obstruction. Conclusion: This study underscores the potential benefits of treating chronic obstructive upper airway diseases such as sinusitis in improving the sexual outcomes of patients clinically diagnosed with erectile dysfunction.

1. Introduction

Nasal airway disorders are a diverse group of conditions influenced by factors such as geography, demographics, and individual health. These disorders encompass structural issues like deviated septum and turbinate hypertrophy, as well as allergic rhinitis, chronic sinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP), and chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), among others [1]. CRS is a prevalent inflammatory condition affecting the nasal and sinus passages, characterized by persistent inflammation of the paranasal sinuses lasting at least 12 weeks. Its prevalence ranges from 5% to 12% in the general population, with symptoms including nasal congestion, facial pain, headaches, reduced sense of smell, and nasal discharge, causing chronic suffering. CRS negatively impacts sleep quality, work productivity, and overall health-related quality of life, resulting in a substantial economic burden [2]. Recently, more attention has been paid to the link between nasal airway obstruction and concurrent erectile dysfunction (ED), defined as the inability to achieve a satisfactory erection for sexual intercourse [3,4,5,6]. Some studies, such as the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS), have reported ED prevalence ranging from 6% to 64% among men aged 40–79 years, increasing with age, with an average prevalence of 30% [7]. Some reports suggest a potential connection between CRS, nasal polyposis (NP), and ED [8,9,10]. Patients with CRS have a higher risk of stroke and acute myocardial infarction (AMI), indicating how CRS may affect blood oxygenation [11,12]. Moreover, CRS and NP can lead to symptoms like hyposmia and compromise the physiological olfactory function, a vital aspect of the reproductive sphere. A few recent studies have indicated positive effects on erectile dysfunction from the restoration of normal airflow following surgery [13,14,15]. This study’s objective was to investigate the impact of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) on the sexual function of individuals with ED who also have CRS, with or without polyps.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preoperative Assessment

This is a prospective study of a cohort of patients admitted to the Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery at Federico II University Hospital for nasal airway obstructions between June 2018 and June 2022. The ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research at the Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery of Napoli Federico II, protocol number (88/20). The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. A total of 280 patients were selected during their first visits to our clinics and evaluated according to the following inclusion criteria:
  • Male patients aged between 40 and 70 years old;
  • Nasal obstruction caused by CRS and or NP confirmed by nasal endoscopic examination and paranasal sinus CT scan;
  • Patient with indication for FESS;
  • Personal perception of the nasal obstruction assessed through the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale questionnaire before surgery and 3 months after (development and validation of the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale);
  • Clinical diagnosis of erectile dysfunction by using the 5th International Index Erectile Function Score (the use of the simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool to study the prevalence of erectile dysfunction) [16].
To avoid biases between cardiocirculatory pathologies and erectile dysfunction, patients affected by risk factors such as obesity (BMI > 24.9 kg/m2), hypertension, diabetes mellitus, penis deformities, peripheral neuropathies, patients undergoing testosterone therapies or therapies for andrological diseases, or remote anamnesis for prostatic or nasal or sinus surgery were excluded from the study. All systemic and peripheral risk factors that could worsen or cause a mild state of erectile dysfunction were eliminated.
The International Index Erectile Function Score (IIEF-5) (Figure 1) and Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) (Figure 2) were submitted routinely before surgery and at a 3-month follow-up after surgery.
Out of a total of 280 excluded patients, 226 were excluded because they did not have an ED diagnosis, 20 did not undergo FESS, and 34 did not complete the IIEF-5 questionnaire postoperatively. A total of 53 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. The control group was composed of healthy people, not affected by nasal obstruction and erectile dysfunction, adopting the exclusion criteria used for the treated patients. The control group was used to compare the study group to a hypothetical selected healthy population. This strategy was used to assess the discrepancy between the normal scores of the enrolled patients in the preoperative phase and to evaluate the outcome obtained in the postoperative phase. A total of 49 patients were chosen as control cases and ranged in age from 40 to 79 years old. All patients were subjected to a comprehensive clinical evaluation including a nasal endoscopy examination and underwent a computerized tomography (CT) scan of the paranasal sinus. The diagnosis of chronic upper airway obstruction was confirmed by the nasal endoscopy and the paranasal CT (110kV, 210 mAs, 3 mm slice thickness). All patients underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) performed by the same surgical team, and the operations were all carried out with general anesthesia.

2.2. Surgical Procedure

The surgical treatment of chronic sinusitis involved the clearing of the osteomeatal complex (OMC) before uncinectomy and bullectomy procedures. Anterior and anteroposterior ethmoidectomies were performed, when necessary, with or without sphenoidotomy. When the pathology required the removal of inflammatory tissue from the frontal sinus, senotomy of the frontal sinus was carried out with the removal of the inflamed and/or polypoid tissue along with balloon-assisted senoplasty. The surgical instruments adopted for the operations included microdebriders (Stryker, Core ESSx, UK Ltd., Berkshire, UK) and a balloon (Stryker, Xpr ESS Ultra ENT dilatation system, UK Ltd., Berkshire, UK). When needed, a septoplasty was carried out utilizing the Cottle technique. In the case of turbinate hypertrophy, a turbinotomy was executed.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Data were described as mean and standard deviation. Differences between means for continuous variables were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test for paired samples and with the Kruskal–Wallis test for independent samples, as appropriate. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression using time as a random effect was used to investigate the effect of the factors on the outcomes of interest. For all analyses, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. Analyses were performed using the statistical software R, version 4.0.3.

3. Results

The mean age was 51.3 ± 3.5 years old and the average BMI was 22.9 ± 1.3 kg/m2. A total of thirteen patients suffered from chronic pansinusitis, twenty from unilateral maxillary and ethmoidal chronic sinusitis, nine suffered from bilateral chronic sinusitis and twelve suffered from unilateral maxillary chronic sinusitis. Among 53 patients, 18 had concha bullosa, 39 were subjected to an inferior turbinectomy, and 20 to an associated septoplasty. The preoperative average NOSE score was 72.6. The average postoperative value decreased significantly to 24.9.
The pre and postoperative results related to the IIEF-5 questionnaire are expressed in Table 1. The average preoperative IIEF-5 value was 16.35, whereas the average postoperative value increased to 19.52. The pre and postoperative results related to the NOSE score questionnaire are expressed in Table 2.
All evaluated variables are displayed in Table 3, Table 4, Table 5, Table 6 and Table 7. In addition, through multiple linear regression, it can be shown that the different degree of nasal obstruction is statistically significant toward improving “Erection hard enough for penetration” (p-value = 0.024) and the “Grade of satisfaction” (p-value < 0.001). In addition, two other variables were statistically significant for improved initial penetration: improved breathing during sleep (p-value = 0.008) and during physical activity (p-value = 0.006).

4. Discussion

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the potential correlations between chronic inflammatory upper airway diseases and erectile dysfunction (ED). Patients included in the study underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) to eliminate inflammatory tissue within the sinuses and restore functional nasal anatomy for proper breathing. Postoperatively, all patients experienced notable improvements in nasal breathing, as evidenced by a reduction in the average Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation Score (NOSE score) from 72.6 to 24.9. Importantly, the study also observed an enhancement in the patients’ sexual sphere following FESS, with the International Index of Erectile Function Score (IIEF-5 score) increasing from an average of 16.35 to 19.52. Using multiple linear regression analysis, statistically significant relationships were identified between the improvement in the variable “Erection hard enough for penetration” and factors such as “Nasal obstruction” (p-value = 0.024), “Trouble sleeping” (p-value = 0.008), and “Unable to get air” (p-value = 0.006). Additionally, a significant association between the improvement in the variable “Nasal obstruction” and the variable “Grade of satisfaction” (p-value < 0.001) was found.
It is essential to consider the systemic consequences that can result from the obstruction of the paranasal sinuses. The existing literature has already described how chronic obstructive diseases can disrupt normal blood oxygenation and consequently impact pulmonary blood pressure [14,17,18]. Specifically, Fidan et al. demonstrated that even minor nasal obstruction can affect physiological pulmonary ventilation [14]. When breathing through the nose during expiration, the airflow slows down due to nasal anatomy, leading to improved oxygen release through red blood cells. Conversely, chronic upper airway obstruction often prompts mouth breathing, especially during sleep, causing increased respiratory frequency and decreased oxygen absorption. This compensatory response includes tachypnea, elevated pulmonary blood pressure, and peripheral vascular constriction, ultimately culminating in systemic consequences that may also affect penile vascularization and the sexual sphere [7,18,19,20]. Furthermore, nasal airway obstruction, when associated with snoring and sleep apnea (interruptions in regular breathing), can constitute obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). Nocturnal hypoxemia, a significant risk factor for arterial hypertension and cardiovascular complications, underscores the importance of normal respiratory function during sleep [19]. Studies, such as those by Fidan and Aksaka, have highlighted the potential for improvements in mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) after surgery to correct septum deviation. This suggests a link between nasal obstruction and pulmonary vascular dynamics [14]. Another complication associated with chronic rhinosinusitis is olfactory dysfunction resulting from inflammation and nasal congestion that affect the olfactory epithelium responsible for detecting odors. This can have implications for human ingestion, including the modulation of appetite, and even aspects of mammalian sexual behavior. Olfactory regulation plays a critical role in social communication, reproductive behavior, and mate selection [21,22,23].
Erectile dysfunction etiology has been historically identified as organic, psychogenic, and mixed; traditionally considered predominantly psychogenic, it is increasingly recognized as having organic origins in more than 80% of cases [24]. Vasculogenic factors, which encompass issues related to the blood supply, particularly arterial inflow disorders, and venous outflow abnormalities, are the most common causes of organic ED. Reduced blood flow and arterial insufficiency play pivotal roles in this multifactorial etiology [7,20,21,22].
However, it’s important to note that ED of vascular origin does not typically arise solely from high blood pressure; it often follows alterations in the vascular wall, particularly a reduction in elasticity as a response to elevated pressure. Arterial hypoxia in the corpus cavernosum results in decreased levels of prostaglandin E1, which ordinarily inhibits the action of transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1). This hypoxia encourages collagen deposition, leading to reduced vessel elasticity. When the ratio of smooth muscle to collagen decreases and collagen content increases, the ability of the corpora cavernosa to constrict the subtunical veins diminishes, ultimately causing veno-occlusive dysfunction [7]. Beyond these vascular factors, there are other aspects to consider for a comprehensive understanding of ED. Hypoxia induces vasoconstriction and significantly reduces the activity of nitric oxide synthetase, which is a risk factor that limits nitric oxide (NO) production in the corpora cavernosa. Lindberg et al. [25] reported that patients with CRS had lower concentrations of nasal nitric oxide (NO) compared to their healthy counterparts. Ragab et al. [26] observed that levels of nasal NO increased following medical and surgical treatment for CRS. These findings suggest a link between NO levels and CRS treatment. Additionally, various studies in the literature have explored other factors that may contribute to the pathophysiology of both ED and CRS. For instance, the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) has been examined. Patients diagnosed with ED who also underwent Doppler examination showed significant increases in serum CRP levels [27]. Giugliano et al. [28] found that patients with ED and a high body mass index (BMI) had higher CRP values compared to patients with a similar BMI but without an ED diagnosis (p < 0.05). Similarly, an increase in CRP levels was observed in patients diagnosed with CRS compared to control cases [29,30].
In the case of obesity, there is an infiltration of immune cells into the adipose tissues, with resultant leptin and insulin resistance. All of that induces lipotoxicity and oxidative stress in peripheral tissues as well as generates an inflammatory response in the hypothalamus like the decreased secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), which reduces the levels of testosterone. Another mechanism reducing testosterone levels seen in obesity is elevated aromatase by hypertrophied adipose tissue; this increases the conversion of testosterone to estradiol, and elevated estradiol suppresses GnRH in the hypothalamus via a negative feedback mechanism [31]. Hypertension and erectile dysfunction are closely intertwined diseases, which have endothelial dysfunction as a common base. During hypertension and/or erectile dysfunction, the disturbance of endothelium-derived factors can lead to an increase in vascular smooth muscle (VSM) contraction. Hypertension can lead to erectile dysfunction as a consequence of high blood pressure (BP) or due to antihypertensive treatment [32]. Poor glycemic control, testosterone deficiency, and peripheral arterial disease are the risk factors for ED in diabetic subjects [33,34].
In the past, Hirshoren et al. [35] reported higher CRP levels in patients with severe sinusitis, suggesting that local mucosal inflammation in CRS may contribute to elevated inflammation factors, potentially playing a role in the pathogenesis of ED. Moreover, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) appears to have a pathophysiological role in ED. Two studies have indicated that patients diagnosed with CRS-NP exhibit higher levels of TNF-α in both nasal cavity mucus and blood samples [36,37].
In summary, while vascular factors are a common cause of ED, it is essential to consider other aspects, such as the role of NO, CRP, and TNF-α, as well as their potential links to conditions like CRS. A holistic understanding of these factors can provide valuable insights into the pathophysiology of ED and related conditions [25,27,29,30,35,36,37]. Beyond the well-established psychogenic factors, ED can also have organic etiologies, with vascular issues being the most common. The present study sheds light on the potential interplay between chronic upper airway diseases and ED, emphasizing the importance of addressing nasal obstruction as a potential contributor to ED pathogenesis. Factors such as altered blood oxygenation, systemic inflammation, and olfactory dysfunction may all play roles in this complex relationship, warranting further investigation.
The limitations of this study are represented by the small sample size, the complexity in the accurate assessment of outcomes related to improved blood oxygenation, the multifactorial nature of the pathologies examined, and the weight of the psychological component related to erectile dysfunction.

5. Conclusions

This study provides evidence of how the treatment of chronic obstructive upper airway diseases can improve the sexual outcomes of patients clinically diagnosed with erectile dysfunction. Notably, the average postoperative NOSE score significantly decreased to 24.9, indicating substantial improvements in nasal obstruction. Furthermore, the average preoperative IIEF-5 score was 16.35, while the average postoperative value increased to 19.52. Consistent with the previous literature, there was a significant increase in all domains of erectile dysfunction assessed by the questionnaire following surgical treatment.
This research highlights the importance of considering nasal obstruction and its systemic effects as potential contributors to erectile dysfunction. Erectile dysfunction etiology has been identified as organic, psychogenic, and mixed. Our findings suggest that addressing nasal obstruction through surgical intervention can yield significant improvements in both nasal function and sexual outcomes because of the many consequences on the respiratory, vascular, and therefore systemic spheres that chronic upper airway obstruction can cause. This complex relationship warrants further investigation, particularly regarding factors like altered blood oxygenation, systemic inflammation, and olfactory dysfunction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., V.A., U.C. and M.S.; methodology, F.M.; software, U.C.; validation, P.B., G.D.O. and A.R.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, M.S. and F.M.; resources, R.N.; data curation, S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S. and S.B.; writing—review and editing, F.M.; visualization, S.T. and G.S.; supervision, A.R.; project administration, P.B. and G.D.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki. The ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board for Clinical Research at the Unit of Maxillofacial Surgery of Napoli, Federico II, protocol number (88/20).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient(s) to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in MDPI.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hsu, D.W.; Suh, J.D. Anatomy and Physiology of Nasal Obstruction. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2018, 51, 853–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jiang, R.-S.; Liang, K.-L.; Hsin, C.-H.; Su, M.-C. The impact of chronic rhinosinusitis on sleep-disordered breathing. Rhinology 2016, 54, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Droller, M.J.A.J.; Beck, J.C. NIH Consensus Conference. Impotence. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Impotence. JAMA 1993, 270, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  4. Corona, G.; Lee, D.M.; Forti, G.; O’connor, D.B.; Maggi, M.; O’neill, T.W.; Pendleton, N.; Bartfai, G.; Boonen, S.; Casanueva, F.F.; et al. Age-Related Changes in General and Sexual Health in Middle-Aged and Older Men: Results from the European Male Ageing Study (EMAS). J. Sex. Med. 2010, 7, 1362–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nicolosi, A.; Laumann, E.O.; Glasser, D.B.; Moreira, E.D., Jr.; Paik, A.; Gingell, C. Sexual behavior and sexual dysfunctions after age 40: The global study of sexual attitudes and behaviors. Urology 2004, 64, 991–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Laumann, E.O.; Nicolosi, A.; Glasser, D.B.; Paik, A.; Gingell, C.; Moreira, E.; Wang, T. Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80y: Prevalence and correlates identified in the global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviors. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2005, 17, 39–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yafi, F.A.; Jenkins, L.; Albersen, M.; Corona, G.; Isidori, A.M.; Goldfarb, S.; Maggi, M.; Nelson, C.J.; Parish, S.; Salonia, A.; et al. Erectile dysfunction. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Benninger, M.S.; Khalid, A.N.; Ba, R.M.B.; Smith, T.L. Surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis may improve sleep and sexual function. Laryngoscope 2010, 120, 1696–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gunhan, K.; Zeren, F.; Uz, U.; Gumus, B.; Unlu, H. Impact of nasal polyposis on erectile dysfunction. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2011, 25, 112–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tai, S.Y.; Wang, L.F.; Tai, C.F.; Huang, Y.T.; Chien, C.Y. Chronic Rhinosinusitis Associated with Erectile Dysfunction: A Population-Based Study. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 32195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wu, C.W.; Chao, P.Z.; Hao, W.R.; Liou, T.H.; Lin, H.W. Risk of stroke among patients with rhinosinusitis: A population-based study in Taiwan. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2012, 26, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kang, J.-H.; Wu, C.-S.; Keller, J.J.; Lin, H.-C. Chronic rhinosinusitis increased the risk of stroke: A 5-year follow-up study. Laryngoscope 2013, 123, 835–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, P.-C.; Lin, H.-C.; Kang, J.-H. Chronic Rhinosinusitis Confers an Increased Risk of Acute Myocardial Infarction. Am. J. Rhinol. Allergy 2013, 27, e178–e182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fidan, V.; Aksakal, E. Impact of septoplasty on pulmonary artery pressure in patients with markedly deviated septum. J. Craniofacial Surg. 2011, 22, 1591–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gelardi, M.; Piccininni, K.; Quaranta, N.; Quaranta, V.; Silvestri, M.; Ciprandi, G. Olfactory dysfunction in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps is associated with clinical-cytological grading severity. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2019, 39, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. van Kollenburg, R.A.A.; de Bruin, D.M.; Wijkstra, H. Validation of the Electronic Version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5 and IIEF-15): A Crossover Study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e13490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sobh, E.; Elhussieny, F.; Ismail, T. Elimination of nasal obstruction improves pulmonary functions and oxygenation. Egypt. J. Bronc- 2021, 15, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Menashe, V.D.; Farrehi, C.; Miller, M. Hypoventilation and cor pulmonale due to chronic upper airway obstruction. J. Pediatr. 1965, 67, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gandaglia, G.; Briganti, A.; Jackson, G.; Kloner, R.A.; Montorsi, F.; Montorsi, P.; Vlachopoulos, C. A Systematic Review of the Association Between Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease. Eur. Urol. 2014, 65, 968–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bacon, C.G.; Mittleman, M.A.; Kawachi, I.; Giovannucci, E.; Glasser, D.B.; Rimm, E.B. A Prospective Study of Risk Factors for Erectile Dysfunction. J. Urol. 2006, 176, 217–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pfeiffer, C.A.; Johnston, R.E. Hormonal and behavioral responses of male hamsters to females and female odors: Roles of olfaction, the vomeronasal system, and sexual experience. Physiol. Behav. 1994, 55, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stevenson, R.J. An Initial Evaluation of the Functions of Human Olfaction. Chem. Senses 2010, 35, 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Deng, H.Y.; Feng, J.R.; Zhou, W.H.; Kong, W.F.; Ma, G.C.; Hu, T.F.; Luo, S.G.; Xi, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Q.T. Olfactory Sensitivity Is Related to Erectile Function in Adult Males. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pozzi, E.; Fallara, G.; Capogrosso, P.; Boeri, L.; Belladelli, F.; Corsini, C.; Costa, A.; Candela, L.; Cignoli, D.; Cazzaniga, W.; et al. Primary organic versus primary psychogenic erectile dysfunction: Findings from a real-life cross-sectional study. Andrology 2022, 10, 1302–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lindberg, S.; Cervin, A.; Runer, T. Nitric Oxide (NO) Production in the Upper Airways is Decreased in Chronic Sinusitis. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 1997, 117, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ragab, S.M.; Lund, V.J.; Saleh, H.A.; Scadding, G. Nasal nitric oxide in objective evaluation of chronic rhinosinusitis therapy. Allergy 2006, 61, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bank, A.; Billups, K.; Kaiser, D.R.; Kelly, A.; Wetterling, R.; Tsai, M.; Hanson, N. Relation of C-reactive protein and other cardiovascular risk factors to penile vascular disease in men with erectile dysfunction. Int. J. Impot. Res. 2003, 15, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Giugliano, F.; Esposito, K.; Di Palo, C.; Ciotola, M.; Giugliano, G.; Marfella, R.; D’armiento, M.; Giugliano, D. Erectile dysfunction associates with endothelial dysfunction and raised proinflammatory cytokine levels in obese men. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2004, 27, 665–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hansen, J.G.; Højbjerg, T.; Rosborg, J. Symptoms and signs in culture-proven acute maxillary sinusitis in a general practice population. APMIS 2009, 117, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cals, J.W.L.; Schot, M.J.C.; de Jong, S.A.M.; Dinant, G.-J.; Hopstaken, R.M. Point-of-Care C-Reactive Protein Testing and Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Tract Infections: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann. Fam. Med. 2010, 8, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Moon, K.H.; Park, S.Y.; Kim, Y.W. Obesity and Erectile Dysfunction: From Bench to Clinical Implication. World J. Men’s Health 2019, 37, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Nunes, K.P.; Labazi, H.; Webb, R.C. New insights into hypertension-associated erectile dysfunction. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2012, 21, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nutalapati, S.; Ghagane, S.C.; Nerli, R.; Jali, M.; Dixit, N.S. Association of erectile dysfunction and type II diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care centre of south India. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2020, 14, 649–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamrakar, D.; Bhatt, D.S.; Sharma, V.K.; Poudyal, A.K.; Yadav, B.K. Association between Erectile Dysfunction and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Nepal Health Res. Counc. 2021, 19, 378–383. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hirshoren, N.; Hirschenbein, A.; Eliashar, R. Risk stratification of severe acute rhinosinusitis unresponsive to oral antibiotics. Acta Oto-Laryngologica 2010, 130, 1065–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Oyer, S.L.; Mulligan, J.K.; Psaltis, A.J.; Henriquez, O.A.; Schlosser, R.J. Cytokine correlation between sinus tissue and nasal secretions among chronic rhinosinusitis and controls. Laryngoscope 2013, 123, E72–E78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Carneiro, F.S.; Webb, R.C.; Tostes, R.C. Emerging Role for TNF-α in Erectile Dysfunction. J. Sex. Med. 2010, 7, 3823–3834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) IIEF-5 SCORE. Domains analyzed are: achieving and keeping an erection, an erection hard enough to penetrate, keeping an erection after penetration, maintaining an erection, and satisfactory sex. Answers are classified from 1 “rarely or never” to 5 “almost always, always”.
Figure 1. Simplified International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) IIEF-5 SCORE. Domains analyzed are: achieving and keeping an erection, an erection hard enough to penetrate, keeping an erection after penetration, maintaining an erection, and satisfactory sex. Answers are classified from 1 “rarely or never” to 5 “almost always, always”.
Jcm 12 06626 g001
Figure 2. Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) instrument. Domains analyzed are nasal congestion or stuffiness, nasal blockage, trouble nose breathing, trouble sleeping, and difficulty in nose breathing during exercise. Answers are classified from 0 “not a problem” to 4 “severe problem”.
Figure 2. Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) instrument. Domains analyzed are nasal congestion or stuffiness, nasal blockage, trouble nose breathing, trouble sleeping, and difficulty in nose breathing during exercise. Answers are classified from 0 “not a problem” to 4 “severe problem”.
Jcm 12 06626 g002
Table 1. Highlights of the average of the results for each question proposed by the IIEF-5 and NOSE score questionnaires. The degree of significance of the preoperative vs. postoperative sample and preoperative sample vs. control cases is then demonstrated. All results are statistically significant (p value < 0.001 except for “Grade of satisfaction” investigated by IIEF-5). In this case, it is shown that patients after undergoing endoscopic surgery demonstrated marked improvements in both ventilation and quality of erectile function.
Table 1. Highlights of the average of the results for each question proposed by the IIEF-5 and NOSE score questionnaires. The degree of significance of the preoperative vs. postoperative sample and preoperative sample vs. control cases is then demonstrated. All results are statistically significant (p value < 0.001 except for “Grade of satisfaction” investigated by IIEF-5). In this case, it is shown that patients after undergoing endoscopic surgery demonstrated marked improvements in both ventilation and quality of erectile function.
AgeQuestion n° 1Question n° 2Question n° 3Question n° 2Question n° 3IIEF-5
PRE
IIEF-5
POST
PREPOSTPREPOSTPREPOSTPREPOSTPREPOST
4045232334441519
4044355545442023
4033223333451516
4045353545441824
4034223434551619
4034354445551923
4145353345451823
4155224455442020
4255233555441922
4255352445551924
4235552335551823
4234123322551416
4345553355442122
4435553533441822
4445353335441722
4425552255551922
4635122322551317
4635553455552124
4625553533441722
4735352235441521
4845553355442122
4955122222351316
4935552355441922
4924553433551821
5014553555451824
5024553333351620
5034354455441922
5035555535552125
5034124422441416
5145125533331618
5135543544441922
5244454433552021
5355123333441617
5335553334341721
5334452333451620
5412132333541215
5523233344441517
5733452333551719
5913232344441317
6022453335331518
6123334444441718
6123123333441315
6114233555331420
6223332434551519
6234122433331216
6325122333441217
6333234423551618
6333332434441518
6444123333331415
6534132233441316
6622233234551516
6611332334451316
7033121233341114
51.3202.98114.09432.92453.69812.86793.52833.45283.88674.13204.320716.358419.5283
Table 2. Average results obtained from questionnaires in patients undergoing surgery and control cases. Data is described as means ± SD. Significant values are marked in bold. * Computed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ** Computed with Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 2. Average results obtained from questionnaires in patients undergoing surgery and control cases. Data is described as means ± SD. Significant values are marked in bold. * Computed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test. ** Computed with Mann–Whitney U test.
VariablePre,
N = 53
Post,
N = 53
Controls,
N = 49
p-Value * (Cases Pre vs. Post)p-Value ** (Cases Pre vs. Controls)
Nasal stuffiness3.02 (0.93)1.34 (1.06)0.39 (0.49)<0.001<0.001
Nasal obstruction3.19 (0.74)0.51 (0.64)0.35 (0.48)<0.001<0.001
Trouble breathing through the nose2.94 (0.82)0.77 (0.67)0.12 (0.33)<0.001<0.001
Trouble sleeping2.25 (1.22)1.00 (0.88)0.29 (0.46)<0.001<0.001
Unable to get air through the nose during exercise3.13 (0.83)1.36 (0.94)0.14 (0.35)<0.001<0.001
Confidence to get and keep an erection2.98 (1.08)4.09 (1.02)4.86 (0.35)<0.001<0.001
Erection hard enough for penetration2.92 (1.53)3.70 (1.31)4.96 (0.20)<0.001<0.001
Able to maintain the erection after penetration2.87 (0.88)3.53 (0.93)4.98 (0.14)<0.001<0.001
Difficult to maintain the erection to completion of intercourse3.45 (0.91)3.89 (1.01)4.94 (0.24)<0.001<0.001
Grade of satisfaction4.13 (0.68)4.32 (0.64)4.94 (0.24)0.015<0.001
Table 3. Mixed-effect model outcome. “Confidence to get and keep erection”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Table 3. Mixed-effect model outcome. “Confidence to get and keep erection”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Fixed EffectsEstimatep-Value
Nasal Stuffiness−0.060090.569
Nasal Obstruction0.305650.088
Trouble Breathing−0.082940.619
Trouble Sleeping0.161580.102
Unable to get air0.043420.704
Table 4. Mixed-effect model outcome. “Erection hard enough for penetration”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Table 4. Mixed-effect model outcome. “Erection hard enough for penetration”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Fixed EffectsEstimatep-Value
Nasal stuffiness−0.23350.080
Nasal obstruction0.50820.024
Trouble breathing−0.21870.299
Trouble sleeping−0.33600.008
Unable to get air0.40560.006
Table 5. The mixed-effect model outcome “Able to maintain the erection after penetration”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Table 5. The mixed-effect model outcome “Able to maintain the erection after penetration”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Fixed EffectsEstimatep-Value
Nasal stuffiness0.137640.135
Nasal obstruction0.226290.144
Trouble breathing−0.026780.853
Trouble sleeping0.018770.826
Unable to get air0.042390.670
Table 6. Mixed-effect model outcome “Difficult to maintain erection to completion of intercourse”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Table 6. Mixed-effect model outcome “Difficult to maintain erection to completion of intercourse”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Fixed EffectsEstimatep-Value
Nasal stuffiness−0.093360.308
Nasal obstruction0.020700.876
Trouble breathing−0.157720.302
Trouble sleeping−0.136550.131
Unable to get air0.096360.327
Table 7. The mixed-effect model outcome “Grade of satisfaction”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Table 7. The mixed-effect model outcome “Grade of satisfaction”. Mixed-effect multiple linear regression model, with time (pre/post) as a random effect. Significant values are marked in bold.
Fixed EffectsEstimatep-Value
Nasal stuffiness−0.070230.266
Nasal obstruction0.38287<0.001
Trouble breathing−0.091710.358
Trouble sleeping−0.040290.492
Unable to get air0.091660.181
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Romano, A.; Committeri, U.; Abbate, V.; Sarcinella, M.; Maffia, F.; Barone, S.; Troise, S.; Salzano, G.; Nocini, R.; Bonavolontà, P.; et al. Is There a Correlation between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Improvement in Erectile Dysfunction? J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6626. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206626

AMA Style

Romano A, Committeri U, Abbate V, Sarcinella M, Maffia F, Barone S, Troise S, Salzano G, Nocini R, Bonavolontà P, et al. Is There a Correlation between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Improvement in Erectile Dysfunction? Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(20):6626. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206626

Chicago/Turabian Style

Romano, Antonio, Umberto Committeri, Vincenzo Abbate, Marco Sarcinella, Francesco Maffia, Simona Barone, Stefania Troise, Giovanni Salzano, Riccardo Nocini, Paola Bonavolontà, and et al. 2023. "Is There a Correlation between Endoscopic Sinus Surgery and Improvement in Erectile Dysfunction?" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 20: 6626. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12206626

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop