Next Article in Journal
A Random Forest Model for Post-Treatment Survival Prediction in Patients with Non-Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonographic Features of Muscular Weakness and Muscle Wasting in Critically Ill Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Diagnosis of Froin’s Syndrome by Parallel Analysis of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt and Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid in a Patient with Cervical Spinal Stenosis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography for Volume Status Evaluation: An Intriguing Promise Never Fulfilled
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perioperative Renal Ultrasonography of Arterio-to-Venous Coupling Predicts Postoperative Complications after Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery

1
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, Mura della Cappuccine 14, 16128 Genoa, Italy
2
Unit of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
3
Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
4
Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, S. Maria della Scaletta Hospital, 40026 Imola, Italy
5
Department of Critical Care, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
6
Urology Unit, E.O. Ospedali Galliera, 16128 Genoa, Italy
7
General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, 56100 Pisa, Italy
8
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(15), 5013; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155013
Submission received: 1 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 30 July 2023

Abstract

:
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) with concomitant venous and arterial Doppler assessment enables clinicians to assess organ-specific blood supply. To date, no studies have investigated the usefulness of including a comprehensive perioperative POCUS assessment of patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery. The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the combined venous and arterial renal flow evaluation, measured at different time points of perioperative period, may represent a clinically useful non-invasive method to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) after major laparoscopic urologic surgery. The secondary outcome was represented by the development of any postoperative complication at day 7. We included 173 patients, subsequently divided for analysis depending on whether they did (n = 55) or did not (n = 118) develop postoperative AKI or any complications within the first 7 days. The main results of the present study were that: (1) the combination of arterial hypoperfusion and moderate-to-severe venous congestion inferred by POCUS were associated with worst outcomes (respectively, HR: 2.993, 95% CI: 1.522–5.884 and HR: 8.124, 95% CI: 3.542–18, p < 0.001); (2) high intra-operative abdominal pressure represents the only independent determinant of postoperative severe venous congestion (OR: 1.354, 95% CI: 1.017–1.804, p = 0.038); (3) the overall number of complications relies on the balance between arterial inflow and venous outflow in order to ensure the adequacy of peripheral perfusion; and (4) the overall reliability of splanchnic perfusion assessment by Doppler is high with a strong inter-rater reliability (ICC: 0.844, 95% CI: 0.792–0.844). The concomitant assessment of arterial and venous Doppler patterns predicts postoperative complications after major laparoscopic urologic surgery and may be considered a useful ultrasonographic biomarker to stratify vulnerable patients at risk for development of postoperative complications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Perioperative AKI is a serious complication associated with high morbidity and mortality [1], occurring in 30–40% of all major surgical interventions [2,3]. Even after complete recovery from AKI, patients may develop chronic or end-stage renal disease [4], with an up to 12.6-fold relative risk of death [5]. Moreover, not only is mortality higher, but also non-renal post-surgical complications are more frequent in these patients [6,7].
While close attention is generally paid to pre- and postoperative management, the role of surgical techniques and perioperative management in the development of AKI and other complications remains underappreciated.
Postoperative AKI may be due to either sudden arterial hypoperfusion causing acute tubular necrosis, or renal venous congestion determined by intraluminal hypertension. These two mechanisms can lead to a dramatic fall in glomerular filtration rate; in fact, the net ultrafiltration pressure is derived from the opposing forces of the blood hydrostatic pressure in the glomerulus versus the combination of capsular hydrostatic pressure and blood colloid osmotic pressure [8].
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) with arterial Doppler assessment enables clinicians to assess organ-specific blood supply in both arteries and veins [9,10]. Recently, Doppler patterns of intrarenal venous flow (IRVF) have been described to predict acute kidney injury (AKI) and post-surgical complications after open heart surgery [11]. However, to date, no studies have investigated the usefulness of including IRVF in a perioperative POCUS assessment of patients undergoing major laparoscopic surgery.
Our hypothesis is that not only arterial perfusion but even venous drainage may influence organ perfusion, determining AKI and other postoperative complications. The primary aim of the present study is to evaluate whether, in patients undergoing major laparoscopic urologic surgery, the combination of IRVF and renal Doppler resistive index (RDRI) measured at different time points of perioperative period represents a clinically useful non-invasive method to predict postoperative AKI (within the first seven days) [12]. The secondary aim is to evaluate if the IRVF and RDRI can predict the occurrence of any other postoperative complication at day seven.

2. Methods

This is an observational, monocentric, prospective study. The study was approved by the local ethics committee (CER Liguria: 7/2019-id: 4378) and all the enrolled patients gave written informed consent to the use of their data.

2.1. Patients

Between December 2019 and April 2022, all the adult patients admitted for major laparoscopic surgery to the urology section of the Galliera Hospital, Genova, Italy, were evaluated for enrollment.
Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 aa, the ability to provide informed consent, and availability of the operators to perform a POCUS assessment before surgery.
Patients were excluded if they had one or more of the following: inability to sample Doppler indices, severe chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 mL/min per 1.73 m2 or dialysis), renal transplantation (planned or received), critical preoperative state (defined as preoperative mechanical ventilation, vasopressor or inotropic support), emergency surgery, obstructive uropathy, urinary infection, or sepsis (Supplemental Figure S1).

2.2. Data Collection

Demographic and baseline clinical data were collected including the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), the Karnofsky scale, and the preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA score). Creatinine measurements were obtained before surgery and daily after surgery until discharge. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the Modified Diet in Renal Disease formula [13]. AKI was defined accordingly to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, based on creatinine values and urinary output variations [14]. Intraoperative, clinical, and laboratory data were monitored until hospital discharge.

2.3. Renal Ultrasound Assessment

All ultrasonographic examinations were performed by two expert operators using a Mindray TE7 ultrasound device (Shenzhen Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics Co., Shenzhen, China) with a 2.5–5.0 MHz convex array transducer for kidney’s examination with the patient in a supine position [15,16]. After a general preliminary examination of the abdominal cavity and organs, Doppler ultrasound measurements were obtained along the interlobar vessels of the renal cortex.
The ultrasound examination was considered technically acceptable if the following criteria were met: (a) the possibility to obtain a clear two-dimensional longitudinal scan with definition of renal parenchyma, (b) a good color Doppler image with visualization of IRVF was feasible, and (c) at least three consecutive Doppler time-velocity spectra were obtained. Pulsed-wave Doppler spectrum was increased by using the lowest frequency-shift range that did not cause aliasing, and the wall filter was set at a low frequency (100 MHz). RDRI was calculated according to Planiol and Pourcelot’s protocol as (VMax–VMin)/VMax [17]. The value of Doppler measurements for IRVF was calculated and averaged to minimize sampling error. The IRVF patterns were classified as continuous, biphasic, or monophasic, depending on their presence during the whole heart cycle, intermittency with a systolic and a diastolic peak, or the only presence of a diastolic peak [18].
All Doppler examinations were recorded on the day before surgery, at postoperative day 1, and at hospital discharge. The attending physician was unaware of the results of the ultrasound examinations. The investigators were blinded to the clinical parameters while performing the ultrasound assessments.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

All the variables are expressed as median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables, or as percentage (%) for categorical variables. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to evaluate the normal distribution of continuous variables. The Mann–Whitney U-test or Fisher’s exact test were used to evaluate differences between groups for continuous or categorical variables, respectively. Cumulative probability for lack of postoperative AKI or any complications in patients with different Doppler profiles were calculated with the Kaplan–Meier product-limit estimator. The censored/uncensored patients corresponded to hospital discharge/occurrence of complications. The log-rank (Mantel–Cox) test was applied to evaluate the difference between Kaplan–Meier curves in Doppler profiles [19].
The main Doppler and clinical variables were entered into a Cox proportional hazard analysis. The variables associated in univariate models with occurrence of postoperative AKI or any complications with a p < 0.10 without violating the assumption of proportional risk were entered into a multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. In each Cox model both the regression coefficient and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Logistic regression was used to identify independent variables potentially associated with IRVF patterns identified as predictors of complications, by providing odds ratio (OR) with the corresponding 95% CI for each model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the best cut-off values. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and the related 95% CI were calculated. Linear forward regression models with the Bayesian information criterion were also performed to evaluate the relationship between independent variables and monophasic IRVF assumed as the dependent variable. Inter-observer variability was tested by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in two-way models for agreement (strength of absolute agreement between raters was considered poor, fair, moderate, strong, or almost perfect according to ICC values < 0.30, 0.3–0.49, 0.50–0.69, 0.70–0.89, and ≥0.90, respectively).
Statistical significance was assumed at p < 0.05 with a two-tailed null hypothesis. The statistical analyses were carried out by using SPSS (version 27.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R environment (version 4.0.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).

3. Results

A total of 200 patients met the inclusion criteria. After exclusion criteria, 173 patients were included in the analysis (Table 1) and divided into two groups, depending on whether they did (n = 55) or did not (n = 118) develop postoperative complications within the first 7 days. The demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients are illustrated in Table 1.

3.1. Renal Doppler Assessment

The distribution of the morphology of the IRVF pattern is illustrated in Figure 1. Before surgery, the IRVF pattern (Figure 1) was continuous in 27 patients (15.6%), biphasic in 98 (56.6%), and monophasic in 48 (27.7%). The median RDRI was 0.65 (IQR 0.58–0.70).
On postoperative day 1, the IRVF pattern was continuous in 22 patients (12.7%), biphasic in 80 (46.2), and monophasic in 71 (41%). The median RDRI was 0.69 (IQR 0.63–0.74). As compared with preoperative measurements, the IRVF pattern worsened in 54 patients (31%), changing from continuous to biphasic in 10, from continuous to monophasic in 8, and from biphasic to monophasic in 36, suggestive of a trend toward stages of more severe congestion.
At hospital discharge, the IRVF pattern was continuous in 32 patients (18.5%), biphasic in 116 (67.1%), and monophasic in 25 (14.5%). The median RDRI was 0.66 (IQR 0.59–0.70). Overall, the IRVF pattern improved from the pre- to postoperative period in 29 patients and remained unchanged in 90, while RDRI significantly increased (0.65 (IQR 0.58–0.70) vs. 0.69 (0.63–0.74) p < 0.001).

3.2. Postoperative AKI

Patients who developed postoperative AKI had more cardiovascular comorbidities treated by oral β-blockers with slightly higher baseline RDRI, higher intra-abdominal pressure due to surgical pneumoperitoneum, lower renal filtration gradient, and lower hemoglobin levels in the postoperative period (Table 2).
In addition, they had more frequent IRVF worsening with a higher incidence of postoperative monophasic pattern (40% vs. 23% p < 0.001) (Figure 2) and higher postoperative RDRI (0.73 (0.67–0.75) vs. 0.67 (0.62–0.73) p < 0.001) with the best cut-off of 0.72 (AUROC 0.67, CI: 0.58–0.77, p < 0.001). Inferior vena cava maximum diameter and collapsibility index were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 2).
In multivariate analysis, IRVF pattern and RDRI were the only factors independently associated with postoperative AKI (Table 3). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to the first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns (Figure 3).

3.3. Postoperative Complications

Of the 55 patients with various types of complications (Table 4), no one died or required intensive care unit admittance.
Patients who developed any complications within day 7, compared with patients who did not (Table 5), had a higher intra-abdominal pressure due to surgical pneumoperitoneum, lower abdominal perfusion pressure, lower renal filtration gradient, and a tendency for greater blood loss requiring more fluid administration in the intraoperative period with lower hemoglobin levels in the postoperative period.
In addition, they had more frequent IRVF worsening (58% vs. 19% p < 0.001) (Table 5) with a higher incidence of postoperative monophasic pattern (Figure 4) and higher postoperative RDRI (0.74 (0.73–0.77) vs. 0.67 (0.61–0.71) p < 0.001) with the best cut-off of 0.72 (AUROC 0.73, CI: 0.65–0.81, p < 0.001). Inferior vena cava maximum diameter and collapsibility index were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 5). In multivariate analysis, the IRVF pattern and RDRI were the only factors independently associated with postoperative complications (Table 6). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to the first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns (Figure 5).

3.4. Postoperative Monophasic IRVF

At univariate analysis, the development of monophasic IRVF was associated with high pneumoperitoneum pressure and a large amount of fluid given during the intraoperative period (Table 7), but not mean arterial pressure. In the multivariate analysis, the intra-abdominal pressure remained the only factor independently associated with the development of monophasic IRVF (Table 8).

3.5. Arterial-to-Venous Coupling and Development of Complications

From the present cohort, combining arterial and venous Doppler spectra, we can identify six different perfusion profiles: (1) “normal”, with preserved arterial perfusion without congestion characterized by an RDRI < 0.72 and continuous IRVF; (2) ”pure hypo-perfused” with RDRI > 0.72 and continuous IRVF; (3) “compensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF but RDRI < 0.72; (4) “mixed mild hypo-perfused and decompensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF and RDRI > 0.72; (5) “pure severe congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF but normal RDRI < 0.72; and (6) “mixed severe hypo-perfused-congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF and increased RDRI > 0.72. (Figure 6).
The frequency distribution of these profiles was associated with the occurrence of postoperative AKI or any complications (Table 9).
The most frequent profile (number 3) was present in 36% of patients and associated with a low rate of complications (5%). Profiles with arterial hypoperfusion but no congestion (numbers 2 and 4) were associated with a 28–33% complication rate. Profiles with severe venous congestion were associated with complication rates from 46% in the case of isolated venous congestion to 76% in the case of concomitant arterial hypoperfusion. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to first postoperative AKI or complication for the six flow profiles are represented, respectively, in Figure 7 and Figure 8.

3.6. Reliability

The IRVF patterns were identifiable in all cases with complete inter-observer agreement.
RDRI could not be determined in one or in both kidneys of 10 subjects (5%) due to poor acoustic windows caused by intestinal gas, presence of surgical drainage or obesity. The inter-rater agreement for RDRI was strong (ICC 0.844 (95% CI from 0.792 to 0.844)).

4. Discussion

In this study, the prediction of AKI and other postoperative complications after major urologic laparoscopic surgery was researched using a renal point-of-care ultrasound. The main findings were that (1) a postoperative monophasic IRVF pattern predicts AKI or any complications by day 7, (2) high intraoperative abdominal pressure represents the only independent determinant of postoperative monophasic IRVF pattern, and (3) the overall number of postoperative AKI or any complication relies on the balance between arterial inflow and venous outflow in order to ensure the adequacy of peripheral perfusion.
Postoperative IRVF patterns have not been extensively studied in the perioperative period of laparoscopic surgery. This study shows that IRVF assessment is feasible with a widely available conventional ultrasonographic system and can provide information on the risk of postoperative AKI as well as any complications within the postoperative day 7. Patients who developed postoperative monophasic IRVF patterns were those who received larger amounts of intraoperative fluids and had higher intra-abdominal pressure, independently of mean arterial pressure. Although a low mean arterial pressure may represent a condition affecting intrarenal circulation, the lack of significant association with changes in IRVF patterns in the present study suggests that mechanisms other than the sole blood supply could be involved in the development of renal dysfunction. Some of these might be the increase in venous resistance to flow induced by high intra-abdominal pressure and reduction of parenchymal compliance due to increased renal interstitial pressure caused by fluid overload; both mechanisms ultimately lead to a “splanchnic tamponade” [20].
This is an important issue to be considered because introduces the concept that splanchnic tamponade due to venous congestion is not necessarily caused by fluid overload but may be due to other conditions affecting vascular compliance such as abdominal hypertension or abdominal compartment syndrome, leading to the development of the new concept of “dry” splanchnic tamponade.
Most of the ultrasonographic studies on congestion came from the application of VEXUS protocols in cardiologic patients with varying degrees of right and/or left cardiac dysfunction and concomitant fluid overload [9]. However, our results, collected in a population of elective surgical patients submitted to a strict ERAS protocol without known cardiac pathologies or signs of heart decompensation, showed postoperative Doppler signs of splanchnic congestion even in the absence of dilatation of the inferior vena cava, thus suggesting the absence of fluid overload. These findings support the hypothesis that in our patients the main pathophysiological mechanism causing congestion may be due to a “restrictive venous compliance” rather than right heart dysfunction or overt fluid overload. If our findings would be confirmed in further studies, the VEXUS ultrasound approach as originally described, should be rethought avoiding considering the inferior vena cava as “a gate” in order to decide whether or not to proceed with the assessment of congestion in the splanchnic compartment. This consideration would be extremely important in the context of critically ill patients, due to the multiple pitfalls of IVC ultrasonography in this setting [21].
Furthermore, in our study, a considerable number of patients in the postoperative period presented with venous patterns suggestive of mild-to-moderate congestion, without actually developing postoperative AKI or any complications. These findings support the hypothesis that venous congestion may be effectively counterbalanced by a proper cardiac output and arterial in-flow [22].
Moreover, the monophasic IRVF pattern was associated with worst outcomes compared with the continuous or biphasic patterns; these findings are supported by the influence of splanchnic congestion on postoperative complications [23,24,25,26] even if the amount of intraoperative fluid administered and pneumoperitoneum pressures were relatively low, according to the ERAS protocols of our center [27]. Even if differences in the intrabdominal pressures during pneumoperitoneum were statistically different between patients who eventually developed postoperative AKI or any complications compared with those who didn’t, they were not predictive of AKI or any complication and we must say that the absolute value of these pressures was very close, and thus unhelpful in the clinical practice. Conversely, postoperative AKI and any complications can be predicted by IRVF patterns in the early postoperative period, potentially allowing the timely treatment of individual patients.
RDRI was previously demonstrated to be as a useful tool to assess splanchnic regional perfusion in critically ill patients [10,15,16]. The present study confirms and expands these findings, as an impaired postoperative RDRI was independently associated with a strong odds ratio with postoperative AKI and any complications.
Our study is different from all those previously published on the topic as for the first time it simultaneously evaluates arterial perfusion, venous congestion, and their mutual interrelationship. The combination of overt arterial hypoperfusion (RDRI > 0.72) and moderate-to-severe venous congestion (biphasic or monophasic venous patterns) was associated with the worst outcomes, suggesting that only the concomitant assessment of the arterial and venous side of the circulation may provide the entire picture of the adequacy of end-organ perfusion requirements.
Hopefully, this concept will pave the way for designing a large randomized clinical trial to investigate if and how addressing the adequacy of splanchnic perfusion more precisely by US can improve the postoperative outcomes of these patients.
We acknowledge some study limitations. This is a single-center study from a referral center. It has inherent flaws related to selection and referral bias. Our work was not aimed to evaluate the different effects on splanchnic circulation by different types of urological surgery that may be important factors affecting perfusion. Cardiac output, the major determinant of splanchnic perfusion, was not measured because it does not comply with our ERAS protocol in this type of surgery. The results of the present study refer to elective laparoscopic urological surgery and therefore cannot be transposed to other types of surgery.

5. Conclusions

The concomitant assessment of the arterial (RDRI) and venous (IRVF) side of the circulation predicts postoperative complications after major laparoscopic urologic surgery and may be considered a useful ultrasonographic biomarker to stratify vulnerable patients at risk for the development of postoperative complications. Whether prediction of AKI and other complications can anticipate or ameliorate the treatment of perfusion disorders, improving outcomes requires further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/jcm12155013/s1, Figure S1: Flow diagram of the study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.B., G.T., G.C., P.D.N., F.D. (Federico Dazzi) and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Methodology, C.B., G.T., G.C., P.D.N., A.W. and G.S.; Formal analysis, G.S. and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Investigation, C.B., A.D.D., F.G., F.D. (Federico Dotta), M.M., C.I. and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Resources, C.B. and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Data curation, C.B., G.C., A.D.D., F.G., F.D. (Federico Dotta), M.M., G.S., F.D. (Federico Dazzi), C.I. and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Writing—original draft, F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Writing—review & editing, G.T., G.C., P.D.N., A.W., F.G., F.D. (Federico Dotta), M.M., F.C. (Federico Coccolini), G.S., F.D. (Federico Dazzi) and C.I.; Visualization, P.D.N., A.W., A.D.D., F.G., F.D. (Federico Dotta), M.M., F.C. (Federico Coccolini), F.D. (Federico Dazzi) and C.I.; Supervision, C.B., G.T., P.D.N., A.W., F.C. (Federico Coccolini), G.S., C.I. and F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Project administration, F.C. (Francesco Corradi); Funding acquisition, C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Genova (CER Liguria: 7/2019-id: 4378).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be made available by the corresponding author for global collaboration on reasonable request, within the national restrictions imposed by privacy laws and ethics.

Acknowledgments

The graphical abstract has been designed using images from “Flaticon.com”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McKinlay, J.; Tyson, E.; Forni, L.G. Renal Complications of Anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 2018, 73 (Suppl. 1), 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Uchino, S.; Kellum, J.A.; Bellomo, R.; Doig, G.S.; Morimatsu, H.; Morgera, S.; Schetz, M.; Tan, I.; Bouman, C.; Macedo, E.; et al. Acute Renal Failure in Critically Ill Patients: A Multinational, Multicenter Study. JAMA 2005, 294, 813–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Thakar, C.V.; Christianson, A.; Freyberg, R.; Almenoff, P.; Render, M.L. Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Kidney Injury in Intensive Care Units: A Veterans Administration Study. Crit. Care Med. 2009, 37, 2552–2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chawla, L.S.; Bellomo, R.; Bihorac, A.; Goldstein, S.L.; Siew, E.D.; Bagshaw, S.M.; Bittleman, D.; Cruz, D.; Endre, Z.; Fitzgerald, R.L.; et al. Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: Consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2017, 13, 241–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. O’Connor, M.E.; Kirwan, C.J.; Pearse, R.M.; Prowle, J.R. Incidence and Associations of Acute Kidney Injury after Major Abdominal Surgery. Intensive Care Med. 2016, 42, 521–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kellum, J.A.; Romagnani, P.; Ashuntantang, G.; Ronco, C.; Zarbock, A.; Anders, H.-J. Acute Kidney Injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2021, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ronco, C.; Bellomo, R.; Kellum, J.A. Acute Kidney Injury. Lancet 2019, 394, 1949–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kopitkó, C.; Medve, L.; Gondos, T.; Soliman, K.M.M.; Fülöp, T. Mediators of Regional Kidney Perfusion during Surgical Pneumo-Peritoneum Creation and the Risk of Acute Kidney Injury—A Review of Basic Physiology. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 2728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tavazzi, G.; Spiegel, R.; Rola, P.; Price, S.; Corradi, F.; Hockstein, M. Multiorgan Evaluation of Perfusion and Congestion Using Ultrasound in Patients with Shock. Eur. Heart J. Acute Cardiovasc. Care 2023, 12, 344–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Corradi, F.; Via, G.; Tavazzi, G. What’s New in Ultrasound-Based Assessment of Organ Perfusion in the Critically Ill: Expanding the Bedside Clinical Monitoring Window for Hypoperfusion in Shock. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 775–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Schäfer, M.; Sägesser, H.; Reichen, J.; Krähenbühl, L. Alterations in Hemodynamics and Hepatic and Splanchnic Circulation during Laparoscopy in Rats. Surg. Endosc. 2001, 15, 1197–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Prowle, J.R.; Forni, L.G.; Bell, M.; Chew, M.S.; Edwards, M.; Grams, M.E.; Grocott, M.P.W.; Liu, K.D.; McIlroy, D.; Murray, P.T.; et al. Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Adult Non-Cardiac Surgery: Joint Consensus Report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative and PeriOperative Quality Initiative. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2021, 17, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Levey, A.S.; Coresh, J.; Greene, T.; Stevens, L.A.; Zhang, Y.L.; Hendriksen, S.; Kusek, J.W.; Van Lente, F. Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration Using Standardized Serum Creatinine Values in the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Equation for Estimating Glomerular Filtration Rate. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 145, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ostermann, M.; Bellomo, R.; Burdmann, E.A.; Doi, K.; Endre, Z.H.; Goldstein, S.L.; Kane-Gill, S.L.; Liu, K.D.; Prowle, J.R.; Shaw, A.D.; et al. Controversies in Acute Kidney Injury: Conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Conference. Kidney Int. 2020, 98, 294–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Corradi, F.; Brusasco, C.; Paparo, F.; Manca, T.; Santori, G.; Benassi, F.; Molardi, A.; Gallingani, A.; Ramelli, A.; Gherli, T.; et al. Renal Doppler Resistive Index as a Marker of Oxygen Supply and Demand Mismatch in Postoperative Cardiac Surgery Patients. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 763940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Corradi, F.; Brusasco, C.; Vezzani, A.; Palermo, S.; Altomonte, F.; Moscatelli, P.; Pelosi, P. Hemorrhagic Shock in Polytrauma Patients: Early Detection with Renal Doppler Resistive Index Measurements. Radiology 2011, 260, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Planiol, T.; Pourcelot, L. Doppler Effect Study of the Carotid Circulation. In Ultrasonics in Medicine; de Vlieger, M., McCready, W.R., Eds.; Excerpta Medica: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1974. [Google Scholar]
  18. Iida, N.; Seo, Y.; Sai, S.; Machino-Ohtsuka, T.; Yamamoto, M.; Ishizu, T.; Kawakami, Y.; Aonuma, K. Clinical Implications of Intrarenal Hemodynamic Evaluation by Doppler Ultrasonography in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2016, 4, 674–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Benjamini, Y.; Hochberg, Y. Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1995, 57, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Burnett, J.C.; Knox, F.G. Renal Interstitial Pressure and Sodium Excretion during Renal Vein Constriction. Am. J. Physiol. 1980, 238, F279–F282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Di Nicolò, P.; Tavazzi, G.; Nannoni, L.; Corradi, F. Inferior Vena Cava Ultrasonography for Volume Status Evaluation: An Intriguing Promise Never Fulfilled. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 2217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tavazzi, G.; Corradi, F.; Vandenbriele, C.; Alviar, C.L. Multimodality Imaging in Cardiogenic Shock: State-of-the Art. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2023, 29, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brandstrup, B.; Tønnesen, H.; Beier-Holgersen, R.; Hjortsø, E.; Ørding, H.; Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Rasmussen, M.S.; Lanng, C.; Wallin, L.; Iversen, L.H.; et al. Effects of Intravenous Fluid Restriction on Postoperative Complications: Comparison of Two Perioperative Fluid Regimens: A Randomized Assessor-Blinded Multicenter Trial. Ann. Surg. 2003, 238, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Warrillow, S.J.; Weinberg, L.; Parker, F.; Calzavacca, P.; Licari, E.; Aly, A.; Bagshaw, S.; Christophi, C.; Bellomo, R. Perioperative Fluid Prescription, Complications and Outcomes in Major Elective Open Gastrointestinal Surgery. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2010, 38, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wuethrich, P.Y.; Burkhard, F.C. Improved Perioperative Outcome with Norepinephrine and a Restrictive Fluid Administration during Open Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion. Urol. Oncol. 2015, 33, e21–e24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wuethrich, P.Y.; Burkhard, F.C.; Thalmann, G.N.; Stueber, F.; Studer, U.E. Restrictive Deferred Hydration Combined with Preemptive Norepinephrine Infusion during Radical Cystectomy Reduces Postoperative Complications and Hospitalization Time: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology 2014, 120, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Brusasco, C.; Germinale, F.; Dotta, F.; Benelli, A.; Guano, G.; Campodonico, F.; Ennas, M.; Di Domenico, A.; Santori, G.; Introini, C.; et al. Low Intra-Abdominal Pressure with Complete Neuromuscular Blockage Reduces Post-Operative Complications in Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery: A before-after Study. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Intrarenal venous flow pattern distribution during hospitalization. In blue: continuous venous flow pattern; in green: biphasic venous flow pattern; in gray: monophasic venous flow pattern.
Figure 1. Intrarenal venous flow pattern distribution during hospitalization. In blue: continuous venous flow pattern; in green: biphasic venous flow pattern; in gray: monophasic venous flow pattern.
Jcm 12 05013 g001
Figure 2. Prevalence of different postoperative intrarenal venous flow patterns and incidence of postoperative AKI.
Figure 2. Prevalence of different postoperative intrarenal venous flow patterns and incidence of postoperative AKI.
Jcm 12 05013 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the Kaplan–Meier curves for lack of adverse outcomes (postoperative AKI) in patients with continuous (yellow line), biphasic (blue line) or monophasic (gray line) intra-renal venous flow pattern (IRVF). Patients were censored at postoperative day 7. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns.
Figure 3. Comparison of the Kaplan–Meier curves for lack of adverse outcomes (postoperative AKI) in patients with continuous (yellow line), biphasic (blue line) or monophasic (gray line) intra-renal venous flow pattern (IRVF). Patients were censored at postoperative day 7. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns.
Jcm 12 05013 g003
Figure 4. Prevalence of different postoperative intrarenal venous flow patterns and incidence of any complications.
Figure 4. Prevalence of different postoperative intrarenal venous flow patterns and incidence of any complications.
Jcm 12 05013 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the Kaplan–Meier curves for lack of adverse outcomes (any postoperative complications) in patients with continuous (yellow line), biphasic (blue line) or monophasic (gray line) intra-renal venous flow pattern. Patients were censored at postoperative day 7. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns.
Figure 5. Comparison of the Kaplan–Meier curves for lack of adverse outcomes (any postoperative complications) in patients with continuous (yellow line), biphasic (blue line) or monophasic (gray line) intra-renal venous flow pattern. Patients were censored at postoperative day 7. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter time to first complication with monophasic than non-monophasic IRVF patterns.
Jcm 12 05013 g005
Figure 6. The six different combinations of arterio-to-venous coupling with the corresponding percentage of postoperative AKI or any complications at day 7.
Figure 6. The six different combinations of arterio-to-venous coupling with the corresponding percentage of postoperative AKI or any complications at day 7.
Jcm 12 05013 g006
Figure 7. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to first postoperative AKI for the six flow profiles. PAT (1) “normal”, with preserved arterial perfusion without congestion characterized by RDRI < 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (2) ”pure hypo-perfused” with RDRI > 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (3) “compensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF but RDRI < 0.72; PAT (4) “mixed mild hypo-perfused and decompensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF and RDRI > 0.72; PAT (5) “pure severe congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF but normal RDRI < 0.72; PAT (6) “mixed severe hypo-perfused-congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF and increased RDRI > 0.72.
Figure 7. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to first postoperative AKI for the six flow profiles. PAT (1) “normal”, with preserved arterial perfusion without congestion characterized by RDRI < 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (2) ”pure hypo-perfused” with RDRI > 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (3) “compensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF but RDRI < 0.72; PAT (4) “mixed mild hypo-perfused and decompensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF and RDRI > 0.72; PAT (5) “pure severe congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF but normal RDRI < 0.72; PAT (6) “mixed severe hypo-perfused-congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF and increased RDRI > 0.72.
Jcm 12 05013 g007
Figure 8. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to first complication for the six flow profiles. PAT (1) “normal”, with preserved arterial perfusion without congestion characterized by RDRI < 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (2) ”pure hypo-perfused” with RDRI > 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (3) “compensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF but RDRI < 0.72; PAT (4) “mixed mild hypo-perfused and decompensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF and RDRI > 0.72; PAT (5) “pure severe congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF but normal RDRI < 0.72; PAT (6) “mixed severe hypo-perfused-congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF and increased RDRI > 0.72.
Figure 8. Kaplan–Meier estimates of the time to first complication for the six flow profiles. PAT (1) “normal”, with preserved arterial perfusion without congestion characterized by RDRI < 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (2) ”pure hypo-perfused” with RDRI > 0.72 and continuous IRVF; PAT (3) “compensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF but RDRI < 0.72; PAT (4) “mixed mild hypo-perfused and decompensated congestive profile” with biphasic IRVF and RDRI > 0.72; PAT (5) “pure severe congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF but normal RDRI < 0.72; PAT (6) “mixed severe hypo-perfused-congestive profile” with monophasic IRVF and increased RDRI > 0.72.
Jcm 12 05013 g008
Table 1. Patient characteristics and data at hospital admission.
Table 1. Patient characteristics and data at hospital admission.
All Patients
(n = 173)
Demographics
Age, y68 (60–73)
Male, n (%)157 (91)
Body mass index, kg/m225 (23–28)
Baseline clinical data
Charlson Comorbidity Index4 (2–5)
Karnofsky index100 (90–100)
ECOG performance status scale0 (0–0)
ASA classification2 (2–2)
Baseline laboratory data
Hemoglobin, g/dL14 (13–15)
Sodium, mmol/L140 (139–141)
Potassium, mmol/L4.2 (4–4.5)
Urea, mg/dL38 (31–44)
Serum Creatinine, mg/dL0.9 (0.8–1.1)
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m283 (65–101)
Comorbidities, n (%)
Hypertension78 (49)
Diabetes mellitus15 (9)
Active smoker22 (14)
Chronic cardiovascular diseases21 (13)
Chronic Respiratory diseases13 (8)
Maintenance therapies
ACEI, n (%)31 (19)
ARB, n (%)32 (20)
β-Blocker, n (%)35 (22)
Loop diuretic, n (%)20 (12)
Major laparoscopic surgery
Radical nephrectomy, n (%)27 (16)
Partial nephrectomy, n (%)21 (12)
Radical prostatectomy, n (%)112 (65)
Adrenalectomy, n (%) 2 (1)
Others, n (%)11 (6)
Table 2. Comparison between patients eventually developing postoperative AKI versus those who did not.
Table 2. Comparison between patients eventually developing postoperative AKI versus those who did not.
Postoperative AKI Group
(n = 37)
No Postoperative AKI Group
(n = 136)
p
Demographics
Age, y70 (62–74)67 (59–73)0.271
Male, n (%)49 (89)108 (92)0.540
Body mass index, kg/m225 (23–29)25 (23–28)0.862
Baseline clinical data
Charlson comorbidity index5 (4–6)4 (2–5)0.003
ECOG performance status scale0 (0–0)0(0–0)0.074
ASA classification2 (2–2)2 (2–2)0.236
Baseline laboratory data
Hemoglobin, g/dL14 (13–15)15 (13–16)0.319
Sodium, mmol/L141 (139–142)140 (139–141)0.575
Potassium, mmol/L4.4 (4.1–5.0)4.2 (4.0–4.5)0.132
Urea, mg/dL40 (32–50)37 (30–44)0.124
Serum creatinine, mg/dL1.00 (0.90–1.20)0.90 (0.80–1.00)0.273
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m269 (63–89)85 (67–104)0.074
Comorbidities, n (%)
Hypertension25 (48)53 (47)0.449
Diabetes mellitus7 (14)8 (7)0.094
Active smoker3 (6)19 (17)0.418
Chronic cardiovascular diseases9 (19)12 (11)0.026
Chronic respiratory diseases5 (11)8 (7)0.493
Maintenance therapies
ACEI/ARB, n (%)24 (44)39 (33)0.478
β-Blocker14 (28)21 (19)0.019
Loop diuretic, n (%)5 (10)15 (13)0.771
Intraoperative period
MAP, mm Hg75 (80–85)79 (74–85)0.131
Heart rate, beats/min59 (50–65)62 (54–65)0.149
Intra-abdominal pressure, mmHg10 (10–12)10 (8–12)0.013
Abdominal perfusion pressure, mmHg65 (60–73)69 (63–77)0.050
Renal filtration gradient, mmHg55 (50–61)60 (52–66)0.020
Length of surgery, minutes150 (89–171)140 (109–180)0.830
Length of pneumoperitoneum, minutes120 (45–143)116 (80–151)0.353
Trendelemburg, degrees (°)19 (15–24)20 (15–24)0.216
Blood loss, mL200 (50–400)200 (50–375)0.585
Intraoperative fluids, mL1300 (975–1700)1200 (900–1600)0.478
Postoperative period
Hemoglobin, g/dL11 (10–12)12 (11–13)0.009
Sodium, mmol/L139 (137–140)139 (137–141)0.376
Potassium, mmol/L4.1 (3.9–4.3)4.1 (3.8–4.3)0.998
Urea, mg/dL39 (30–49)31 (25–39)<0.001
Postoperative creatinine, mg/dL1.5 (1.3–2.0)1.0 (0.8–1.1)<0.001
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m247 (30–65)81 (63–95)<0.001
Preoperative renal Doppler ultrasonography
Renal Doppler resistive index0.68 (0.60–0.73)0.64 (0.57–0.68)0.027
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)6 (11)21 (18)0.205
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)30 (55)68 (58)0.462
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)19 (34)29 (24)0.836
Postoperative renal Doppler ultrasonography
Renal Doppler resistive index0.73 (0.67–0.75)0.67 (0.62–0.73)<0.001
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)4 (7)19 (16)0.170
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)29 (53)72 (61)<0.001
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)22 (40)27 (23)<0.001
Worsened intrarenal venous flow pattern, n (%)32 (58)22 (19)<0.001
Postoperative inferior vena cava ultrasonography
Maximum diameter (mm)2.4 (2.2–2.6)2.4 (2.1–2.6)0.562
Collapsibility Index (%)0.14 (0.09–0.16)0.13 (0.09–0.21)0.750
Renal Doppler ultrasonography at hospital discharge
Renal Doppler resistive index0.66 (0.60–0.71)0.66 (0.58–0.70)0.915
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)8 (14)24 (20)0.478
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)36 (66)80 (68)0.554
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)11 (20)14 (12)0.430
Outcomes
Hospital length of stay (days)5 (4–8)4 (3–5)0.003
Clavien–Dindo1 (0–1)0 (0–0)<0.001
ACEI, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; MAP, mean arterial pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; values are numbers (n), percentages (%) median and interquartile ranges (IQR) unless otherwise noted.
Table 3. Predictors of postoperative AKI by the Cox proportional hazard model.
Table 3. Predictors of postoperative AKI by the Cox proportional hazard model.
VariablesBHRCIpBHRCIp
Postoperative monophasic IRVF2.95019.1084.845–75.359<0.0012.2119.1263.474–23.973<0.001
Age (years)−0.0170.9830.943–1.0260.430
Active smoker−0.0291.0300.216–4.9000.971
Sex0.0391.0400.219–4.9240.961
Preoperative RDRI−4.0450.0180.000–9.0960.205
Intra-abdominal pressure0.0831.0870.745–1.5860.665
Postoperative RDRI8.20633.3140.025–23.3760.0467.23513.9251.583–12.4200.036
Preoperative monophasic IRVF−0.8910.4100.138–1.2200.109
Preoperative creatinine1.3383.8120.238–60.9530.344
Charlson index0.3171.3730.952–1.9800.0900.1661.1810.978–1.4250.084
Arterial hypertension−0.3530.7030.200–2.4700.582
Cadiovascular diseases0.3421.4080.369–5.3660.617
Chronic respiratory diseases−0.1720.8420.210–3.3740.808
Diabetes 0.0581.0590.272–4.1240.934
RDRI, renal Doppler resistive index; IRVF, intrarenal venous flow patterns.
Table 4. Complications in the 173 included patients.
Table 4. Complications in the 173 included patients.
Patients with complications, n (%)55 (32)
Number of complications, n70
Types of complications, n
Sepsis14
Bleeding 7
Respiratory failure3
Ileus4
Acute kidney injury37
Anastomotic leakage3
Intraoperative complication1
Surgical wound infection1
Table 5. Comparison between patients eventually developing any postoperative complications at day 7 versus those who did not.
Table 5. Comparison between patients eventually developing any postoperative complications at day 7 versus those who did not.
Postoperative Complications Group
(n = 55)
No Postoperative Complications Group
(n = 118)
p
Demographics
Age, y68 (60–73)68 (60–73)0.888
Male, n (%)49 (89)108 (92)0.585
Body mass index, kg/m225 (23–29)25 (23–28)0.862
Baseline clinical data
Charlson comorbidity index4 (3–5)4 (2–5)0.057
ECOG performance status scale0 (0–0)0(0–0)0.522
ASA classification2 (2–2)2 (2–2)0.290
Baseline Laboratory data
Hemoglobin, g/dL14 (13–15)15 (13–15)0.707
Sodium, mmol/L140 (139–142)140 (139–141)0.575
Potassium, mmol/L4.4 (4.1–4.6)4.2 (4.0–4.4)0.166
Urea, mg/dL39 (31–48)37 (30–44)0.926
Serum creatinine, mg/dL0.90 (0.90–1.10)0.90 (0.80–1.10)0.773
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m274 (63–94)85 (67–104)0.113
Comorbidities, n (%)
Hypertension25 (48)53 (47)0.608
Diabetes mellitus7 (14)8 (7)0.238
Active smoker3 (6)19 (17)0.083
Chronic cardiovascular diseases9 (19)12 (11)0.200
Chronic Respiratory diseases5 (11)8 (7)0.529
Maintenance therapies
ACEI/ARB, n (%)24 (44)39 (33)0.235
β-Blocker14 (28)21 (19)0.215
Loop diuretic, n (%)5 (10)15 (13)0.796
Intraoperative period
MAP, mm Hg77 (70–85)79 (75–85)0.143
Heart rate, beats/min60 (51–66)61 (53–65)0.651
Intra-abdominal pressure, mmHg10 (10–12)10 (8–12)<0.001
Abdominal perfusion pressure, mmHg66 (60–73)69 (63–77)0.030
Renal filtration gradient, mmHg55 (50–61)60 (54–66)0.007
Length of surgery, minutes150 (115–190)135 (100–180)0.402
Length of pneumoperitoneum, minutes123 (66–150)110 (73–150)0.805
Trendelemburg, degrees (°)20 (15–24)20 (15–24)0.430
Blood loss, mL250 (50–500)190 (48–300)0.058
Intraoperative Fluids, mL1400 (1100–1700)1200 (838–1500)0.059
Postoperative period
Hemoglobin, g/dL11 (10–13)13 (11–13)0.002
Sodium, mmol/L139 (136–140)139 (138–141)0.740
Potassium, mmol/L4.1 (3.9–4.5)4.1 (3.8–4.3)0.994
Urea, mg/dL38 (29–48)31 (25–39)0.081
Postoperative Creatinine, mg/dL1.4 (1.00–1.80)1.0 (0.8–1.1)<0.001
eGFR mL/min/1.73 m259 (38–82)80 (63–95)<0.001
Preoperative renal Doppler ultrasonography
Renal Doppler resistive index0.67 (0.59–0.70)0.64 (0.57–0.68)0.081
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)6 (11)21 (18)0.271
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)30 (55)68 (58)0.743
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)19 (34)29 (24)0.203
Postoperative renal Doppler ultrasonography
Renal Doppler resistive index0.74 (0.73–0.77)0.67 (0.61–0.71)<0.001
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)4 (7)19 (16)0.054
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)29 (53)72 (61)0.324
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)22 (40)27 (23)0.029
Worsened intrarenal venous flow pattern, n (%)32 (58)22 (19)<0.001
Postoperative inferior vena cava ultrasonography
Maximum diameter (mm)2.4 (2.2–2.6)2.4 (2.1–2.6)0.102
Collapsibility Index (%)0.14 (0.09–0.19)0.13 (0.09–0.20)0.828
Renal Doppler ultrasonography at hospital discharge
Renal Doppler resistive index0.66 (0.59–0.71)0.65 (0.60–0.71)0.886
Intrarenal venous flow pattern continuous, n (%)8 (14)24 (20)0.407
Intrarenal venous flow pattern biphasic, n (%)36 (66)80 (68)0.862
Intrarenal venous flow pattern monophasic, n (%)11 (20)14 (12)0.169
Outcomes
Hospital length of stay (days)7 (4–9)4 (3–5)<0.001
Clavien-Dindo1 (0–2)0 (0–0)<0.001
ACEI angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB, angiotensin receptor blocker; MAP, mean arterial pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; values are numbers (n), percentages (%) median and interquartile ranges (IQR) unless otherwise noted.
Table 6. Predictors of postoperative any complications by the Cox proportional hazard model.
Table 6. Predictors of postoperative any complications by the Cox proportional hazard model.
VariablesBHRCIpBHRCIp
Postoperative monophasic IRVF3.02920.6716.093–70.1270.0012.0958.1243.542–18.634<0.001
Age (years)−0.0830.9200.852–0.9930.033−0.0210.1350.953–1.0060.135
Active smoker−1.0870.3370.061–1.8800.215
Sex1.1493.1550.730–13.6300.124
Preoperative RDRI−2.5110.0810.000–28.8870.402
Intra-abdominal pressure0.1081.1140.766–1.6190.572
Postoperative RDRI1.4144.1130.813–20.8120.0871.0962.9931.522–5.8840.001
Preoperative monophasic IRVF−0.6080.5440.442–1.4470.223
Preoperative creatinine0.9042.4680.205–25.8070.451
Charlson index0.5281.6951.087–2.6440.0200.1041.1090.939–1.3110.223
Arterial hypertension0.8832.4170.758–7.7110.136
Cadiovascular diseases−0.4310.6500.166–2.5370.535
Chronic respiratory diseases−0.1120.8940.292–2.7360.845
Diabetes −0.8340.4340.128–1.4790.182
RDRI, renal Doppler resistive index; IRVF, intrarenal venous flow patterns.
Table 7. Intraoperative characteristics of patients eventually developing monophasic IRVF patterns in the postoperative period compared with those who did not.
Table 7. Intraoperative characteristics of patients eventually developing monophasic IRVF patterns in the postoperative period compared with those who did not.
VariablesPostoperative
Monophasic IRVF Pattern
(71)
Postoperative
Continuous or Biphasic IRVF Pattern
(102)
p
MAP, mm Hg76 (70–85)79 (75–85)0.358
Heart rate, beats/min59 (51–66)62 (54–65)0.241
Intra-abdominal pressure, mmHg10 (10–12)10 (8–11)0.016
Abdominal perfusion pressure, mmHg66 (60–75)69 (64–76)0.246
Renal filtration gradient, mmHg55 (50–63)60 (54–65)0.057
Length of surgery, minutes144 (99–170)140 (110–180)0.920
Length of pneumoperitoneum, minutes120 (65–145)114 (83–163)0.807
Trendelemburg, degrees (°)20 (15–24)20 (15–24)0.257
Blood loss, mL190 (48–313)200 (80–400)0.757
Intraoperative Fluids, mL1500 (1200–1700)1150 (800–1500)0.029
Table 8. Multiple logistic regression analysis for parameters, predictors of monophasic IRVF pattern in the postoperative period.
Table 8. Multiple logistic regression analysis for parameters, predictors of monophasic IRVF pattern in the postoperative period.
VariablesBORCIp
MAP, mm Hg−0.0360.9650.9181.0140.160
Heart rate, beats/min−0.0230.9770.9291.0280.375
Intra-abdominal pressure, mmHg0.3031.3541.0171.8040.038
Length of surgery, minutes−0.0020.9980.9731.0250.898
Length of pneumoperitoneum, minutes0.0021.0020.9931.0120.657
Trendelemburg, degrees (°)−0.0150.9850.9291.0440.603
Blood loss, mL0.0011.0010.9991.0030.372
Intraoperative fluids, mL0.0011.0011.0001.0020.248
Table 9. Groups of patients divided according to arterial perfusion and venous congestion profiles assessed by Doppler ultrasonography.
Table 9. Groups of patients divided according to arterial perfusion and venous congestion profiles assessed by Doppler ultrasonography.
Venous PatternRDRINumber of Patients
n, (%)
Patients with AKI
n, (%)
Patients with any Complications
n, (%)
Profiles Interpretation
Continuous<0.7213 (7.5)0 (0)0 (0)Normal
>0.729 (5)2 (22)3 (33)Pure hypo-perfused
Biphasic<0.7262 (36)2 (3)3 (5)Pure congestive compensated
>0.7218 (10.5)3 (17)5 (28)Mild mixed hypo-perfused and congestive
Monophasic<0.7233 (19)12 (36)15 (46)Severe congestive
>0.7238 (22)18 (47)29 (76)Mixed severe hypo-perfused and congestive
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Brusasco, C.; Tavazzi, G.; Cucciolini, G.; Di Nicolò, P.; Wong, A.; Di Domenico, A.; Germinale, F.; Dotta, F.; Micali, M.; Coccolini, F.; et al. Perioperative Renal Ultrasonography of Arterio-to-Venous Coupling Predicts Postoperative Complications after Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 5013. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155013

AMA Style

Brusasco C, Tavazzi G, Cucciolini G, Di Nicolò P, Wong A, Di Domenico A, Germinale F, Dotta F, Micali M, Coccolini F, et al. Perioperative Renal Ultrasonography of Arterio-to-Venous Coupling Predicts Postoperative Complications after Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023; 12(15):5013. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Brusasco, Claudia, Guido Tavazzi, Giada Cucciolini, Pierpaolo Di Nicolò, Adrian Wong, Antonia Di Domenico, Federico Germinale, Federico Dotta, Marco Micali, Federico Coccolini, and et al. 2023. "Perioperative Renal Ultrasonography of Arterio-to-Venous Coupling Predicts Postoperative Complications after Major Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery" Journal of Clinical Medicine 12, no. 15: 5013. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12155013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop