Next Article in Journal
Risk Factors for Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Middle Eastern Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Role of Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Peripheral Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Classification, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Is Lipoprotein(a) the Most Important Predictor of Residual Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk?
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Newer and Emerging LDL-C Lowering Agents and Implications for ASCVD Residual Risk

J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4611; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154611
by Rishi Rikhi and Michael D. Shapiro *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4611; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154611
Submission received: 2 July 2022 / Revised: 29 July 2022 / Accepted: 3 August 2022 / Published: 8 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Dyslipidemia)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this article, in addition to statin, ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor, the authors made a review about the other emerging therapies for lowering low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), including bempedoic acid, angiopoietin-related protein 3 (ANGPTL3) and cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitors. The results of clinical trials and the future development of these emerging therapies were described. Basically, this is a well-written review article that provides comprehensive information about current therapies for LDL-C reduction. Only several minor corrections are necessary.

1.     Lin 98 and line 139. The sequence was reversed. The section 3 is ezetimibe, section 5 is bempedoic acid. But section 4 PCSK9 inhibitor was after section 5.

2.     Line 139. It should be “Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) INHIBITOR”.

3.     Line 324. In addition to monthly injection, the more commonly used dosage of PCSK9 inhibitors also include every 2 weeks injection.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

1. I suggest the authors to briefly mention the new and emerging approaches/agents/therapies in the Abstract section. It may attract more attention or broaden the readership including patients.

 

2.     I suggest to add the information on the approved date by FDA and on the drug administration route into Table 1.

 

3.     It will be better to concisely show the advantages and disadvantages of each of the new and emerging agents/therapies in a new table (i.e., Table 2).

 

 

4.     Typos: “5. Bempedoic acid” should be “4. Bempedoic acid” whereas “4. PCSK9” should be “5. PCSK9”.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop