Next Article in Journal
The Preparation of High-Performance and Stable MXene Nanofiltration Membranes with MXene Embedded in the Organic Phase
Next Article in Special Issue
Crosslinking Multilayer Graphene by Gas Cluster Ion Bombardment
Previous Article in Journal
Nanofibrous Membrane with Encapsulated Glucose Oxidase for Self-Sustained Antimicrobial Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Iongel Membranes Reinforced with Nanoclays for CO2 Separation

1
LAQV-REQUIMTE, Department of Chemistry, NOVA School of Science and Technology, FCT NOVA, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
2
LEAF—Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food—Research Center, Associated Laboratory TERRA, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Universidade de Lisboa, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisabon, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Ana R. Nabais and Rute O. Francisco contributed equally to this work.
Membranes 2021, 11(12), 998; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120998
Submission received: 17 November 2021 / Revised: 10 December 2021 / Accepted: 15 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnology and Hybrid Membranes)

Abstract

:
Despite the fact that iongels are very attractive materials for gas separation membranes, they often show mechanical stability issues mainly due to the high ionic liquid (IL) content (≥60 wt%) needed to achieve high gas separation performances. This work investigates a strategy to improve the mechanical properties of iongel membranes, which consists in the incorporation of montmorillonite (MMT) nanoclay, from 0.2 to 7.5 wt%, into a cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) network containing 60 wt% of the IL 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C2mim][TFSI]). The iongels were prepared by a simple one-pot method using ultraviolet (UV) initiated polymerization of poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) and characterized by several techniques to assess their physico-chemical properties. The thermal stability of the iongels was influenced by the addition of higher MMT contents (>5 wt%). It was possible to improve both puncture strength and elongation at break with MMT contents up to 1 wt%. Furthermore, the highest ideal gas selectivities were achieved for iongels containing 0.5 wt% MMT, while the highest CO2 permeability was observed at 7.5 wt% MMT content, due to an increase in diffusivity. Remarkably, this strategy allowed for the preparation and gas permeation of self-standing iongel containing 80 wt% IL, which had not been possible up until now.

1. Introduction

In the last 25 years, numerous studies have been focusing on ionic liquids (ILs), a material with exceptional features that keeps stimulating researchers’ curiosity today. Besides being liquid salts at room temperature due to their melting points below 100 °C, ILs are characterized by distinct tunable properties [1,2]. The most appealing property of ILs is their designable nature, which allows the preparation of task-specific materials for the envisioned application by the combination of different ions and the addition of specific functional groups [1]. Regarding energy-related applications, their ionic conductivity, low volatility, electrochemical and thermal stability serve as advantages in the development of batteries [3], fuel cells [4], and chemical sensors [5]. On the other hand, considering the unique properties of some ILs, such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, and bioactivity, biomedical applications such as biosensors [6] and drug delivery systems [7] have also been developed. This work focuses on the use of ILs for carbon dioxide (CO2) separation from light gases taking advantage of the interactions established between the electrical charges of the IL and the quadrupole of CO2 molecules, and combining them with membrane technology, an economic and environmentally friendly approach to CO2 capture [8,9,10].
In the last years, diverse ionic liquid-based membranes have been developed. In particular, iongel membranes have shown promising results for CO2 separation, with performances similar to those of supported ionic liquid membranes (SILMs), surpassing the 2008 Robeson upper bound [8]. However, SILMs often have stability issues brought up by operation conditions (e.g., high pressures and high temperatures) that can cause the IL displacement from the porous support [8,9]. Instead, iongels are soft solid materials that present a gel-like nature, as they are mainly composed of ILs, retaining a liquid-like gas transport [11]. For the fabrication of iongels, there is a wide variety of materials that can be selected, as well as diverse routes to approach their preparation [11]. In order to ensure that high IL contents (>50 wt%) are efficiently retained within the iongel structure, different types of gelators can be used [11], such as polymer networks [12], block copolymers [13], biopolymers [14], supramolecular gelators [15], organosilane networks [16], or inorganic nanoparticles [17]. The combination of ILs with polymers, which are commercially available such as poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) [18] or poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) [19], and poly(ionic liquid)s (PILs) with imidazolium [20] or pyrrolidinium [21] cations and a variety of counter anions, is perhaps the most straightforward approach to fabricate iongel membranes. PIL-based membranes can hold up to 60 wt% IL due to the advantage of establishing strong electrostatic interactions between their charged PIL and IL components [8]. In order to further improve their CO2 separation performance along with other properties, some researchers also reported the incorporation of porous fillers, such as zeolites [22] and metal organic frameworks (MOFs) [23] to produce mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). Additionally, significant efforts have been made in the fabrication of iongels using cross-linked PIL-based networks since this strategy provides extra mechanical stability and allows the incorporation of higher IL contents [24]. Nevertheless, the preparation routes of cross-linked PIL-based iongels are often complex, involving multi-pot polymerization procedures or several steps of synthesis and purification at the monomer level.
A simpler strategy is the preparation of iongels by single-pot polymerization using commercially available non-ionic polymer networks, such as poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based networks, due to their high affinity towards CO2 [25]. The polymerization can be thermal or UV initiated. Recently, Martins et al. [12] studied the influence of the anion structure on the CO2/N2 separation performance of UV-cross-linked poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA) iongels. Using imidazolium-based ILs with cyano-functionalized ([C(CN)3] and [B(CN)4]) or fluorinated anions ([TFSI] and [FSI]), self-standing iongels containing between 60 and 90 wt% of IL were obtained. Although the PEGDA iongel with 70 wt% [C2mim][C(CN)3] IL showed CO2 permeability of 583 barrer and ideal CO2/N2 selectivity of 66, further improvements are needed to circumvent the use of a porous support and preserve the iongel mechanical stability while increasing the IL content.
One popular strategy used to improve the mechanical stability of polymer membranes is the incorporation of fillers [26]. A wide variety of fillers, porous or non-porous, have been reported in the literature [27,28], including the use of nanoclays [29]. Nanoclays are natural, nonporous inorganic materials that have been considered to enhance the mechanical properties of polymeric membranes, as well as their gas separation performances [30,31]. Several studies revealed that the addition of low contents of nanoclay particles (≤10 wt%) can improve the thermal, mechanical, electrical, and barrier properties of MMMs [32], because of the attractive properties of nanoclays such as ion exchange capacity and specific surface area, besides being widely available at low cost [33]. Montmorillonite (MMT) is one of the most commonly used nanoclays, mainly due to its ability to be dispersed into polymeric matrices. This nanoclay has a 2:1 phyllosilicate structure, composed of 1 nm layers of alumina octahedra sheets placed between two sheets of silica tetrahedra [34,35].
This work focuses on the development of robust PEGDA iongel membranes reinforced with MMT nanoclay particles, considering a simple one-pot preparation method. The [C2mim][TFSI] IL was selected and firstly used at 60 wt% IL content, seeing that previously reported PEGDA iongels have shown higher storage modulus when comprising this IL rather than other ILs having different anions (i.e., [FSI], [C(CN)3] and [B(CN)4]) [12]. Moreover, low contents of MMT nanoclay particles were used, between 0.2 and 7.5 wt%, in order to fabricate self-standing iongels with good mechanical properties. All the prepared iongel materials were characterized by several techniques to study their physico-chemical properties. Pure gas permeation experiments were also carried out to evaluate the potential of PEGDA iongels reinforced with nanoclays as CO2 separation membranes.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

The ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([C2mim][TFSI], 99 wt% pure) was acquired from IoLiTec GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany). Sigma-Aldrich (Madrid, Spain) supplied the poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (PEGDA, Mn 575 g mol−1) and 2-hydroxy-2-methylpropiophenone (DAROCUR, 97 wt% pure). The nanoclay Nanomer® I.34TCN, montmorillonite (MMT) clay surface modified with 25–30 wt% methyl dihydroxyethyl hydrogenated tallow ammonium was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). The gases carbon dioxide (CO2, 99.998 wt% pure), nitrogen (N2, 99.99 wt% pure), and methane (CH4, >99.99 wt% pure) were provided by Praxair (Almada, Portugal). Hydrogen (H2, 99.99 wt% pure) gas was obtained from Air Liquide (Almada, Portugal).

2.2. Preparation of the Iongels

The neat iongel and the iongels reinforced with different MMT contents (0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 wt%) were prepared by UV-initiated free radical polymerization (Figure 1). First, the desired amounts of MMT were added to 60 wt% of [C2mim][TFSI] IL. The solutions were left stirring overnight at room temperature on a magnetic stirrer plate (Magnetic Emotion Mix 15 eco, from 2mag, Munich, Germany) and sonicated for 1 h in an ultrasonic bath (Sonorex Digitec, from Bandelin, Berlin, Germany). Afterwards, the necessary content of PEGDA was added into the solutions and magnetically mixed for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the radical photoinitiator DAROCUR (3 wt% to PEGDA) was added, and the solutions were mixed and poured between two Rain-X™ coated quartz plates. The plates were separated by a spacer to assure the desired thickness and diameter of the iongel membrane and secured in place using clips. The solutions were then exposed to UV radiation with a wavelength of 365 nm and an intensity of 1.7 mW cm−2 for 10 min. Lastly, the iongels were carefully peeled from the plates and stored in Petri dishes until characterization. The iongel samples are systematically designated as “60 TFSI-XX PEGDA-YY MMT”, according to PEGDA (XX) and MMT (YY) content.

2.3. Characterization Methods

Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was carried out in order to examine the morphology of the iongel membranes. The samples were covered with a thin layer of Au-Pd before the acquisition of the images by a JOEL scanning electron microscope, model 7001F (USA) with an electron beam intensity of 10 kV.
Attenuated Total Reflectance Fourier-Transform Infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy was performed to confirm the incorporation of the IL, PEGDA, and MMT into the iongel membranes, verify possible interactions established between them, and confirm the occurrence of the photopolymerization reaction. The spectra were obtained using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum Two spectrometer that collected 10 scans from 400 to 4000 cm−1.
The contact angles were measured to assess the hydrophilicity of the iongel membranes, using a sessile drop method. A drop of distilled water was manually deposited on the surface of each iongel. For each sample, 10 frames were acquired with an intercalation of 1 s and processed by CAM100 (KSV Instruments LTD, Helsinki, Finland) software. The mean contact angle was obtained when the drop shape was fitted to mathematical equations.
Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA) addressed the thermal stability of samples (ca. 10 mg) of the starting materials and the iongel membranes by determining their onset temperatures (Tonset). The measurements were performed using a Lass Evo TGA-DTA/DSC 1600 °C PG from Setaram KEP Technologies (Caluire, France) from 25 to 600 °C, at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1, under an argon atmosphere.
The mechanical properties of the iongel membranes were determined by puncture tests. The tests were performed using a TA XT Plus Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems, Godalming, UK) by puncturing each membrane through a hole (diameter of 10 mm) with a cylindrical probe with 2 mm of diameter at a constant velocity of 1 mm s−1, at room temperature. The data obtained allowed the determination of the puncture strength according to Equation (1)
σ = F A
where σ is the puncture strength (Pa), F is the maximum force applied by the probe (N) and A is the cross-sectional area of the probe (m2). In order to compare the results rigorously, the puncture strength was normalized with thickness following Equation (2)
σ n = σ l
where σ n is the normalized puncture strength (MPa/mm) and l is the thickness of the iongel (mm). The elongation at break given by Equation (3) was also determined
ε   % = h 2 d 2 h h × 100
where ε is the elongation at break (%), h is the radius of the iongel exposed in the cylindrical hole of the sample holder (mm) and d is the distance of the probe from the point of contact to the point of puncture (mm). The Young’s modulus of all prepared iongels was obtained from the initial slope of the graphic representation of the puncture strength (σ) as a function of the elongation at break ( ε   ) . For each sample, at least four replicates were performed and the mean values of puncture strength, elongation at break, and Young’s modulus were calculated.

2.4. Gas Permeation Experiments

Pure gas permeation experiments using CO2, N2, CH4, and H2 were performed on a gas permeation setup described elsewhere [36]. The setup is composed of a cell immersed in a water bath maintained at 30 °C by a thermostat (Corio C, from Julabo, Seelbach Germany). The pressure of each cell compartment is measured over time by a transducer (Jumo type 404327, Germany) and recorded by the software PicoLog. The compartments were pressurized with pure gas and, when the pressure was stable, the experiments began with the application of a transmembrane driving force of around 0.7 bar of relative pressure. The data collected allowed the determination of the permeability of the iongels according to Equation (4)
1 β × ln Δ p 0 Δ p = P × t l
where Δp0 and Δp (bar) are the pressure variations between the feed and the permeate compartments of the cell at the beginning of the experiment and over time, respectively, P is the permeability of the iongel (m2 s−1, where 1 barrer = 1 × 10−10 cm3 (STP).cm.cm−2.s−1.cmHg−1 = 8.3 × 10−13 m2 s−1), t is time (s), l is the thickness of the iongel (m) and β is the geometric parameter of the cell (m−1), given by Equation (5)
β = A × 1 V f e e d + 1 V p e r m
where A is the membrane area (m2), Vfeed and Vperm are the volumes of the feed and permeate compartments (m3), respectively. The permeability of the iongel was obtained from the slope when 1/β ln(Δp0/Δp) was plotted as a function of t/l. The ideal selectivity of the iongels is given by Equation (6)
α = P A P B
where α is the ideal selectivity, PA and PB are the permeabilities of the most permeable gas and the least permeable gas, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM images of the cross-section of the iongels containing 0, 0.2, and 7.5 wt% MMT are displayed in Figure 2a,b,c, respectively. The images obtained for the remaining iongels are represented in Figure S1a–d of Supplementary Materials. Dense morphologies were obtained in all iongels, regardless of the MMT content. As the MMT content increases, the small inorganic particles become more visible, and at 7.5 wt% MMT, some agglomerates are clearly distinguishable. This morphology is a consequence of, not only the high MMT concentration, but also the absence of a solvent during iongel preparation, which can difficult the dispersion of MMT particles. Despite the agglomerates, no major defects that could compromise the performance of the iongels reinforced with MMT were observed. It should also be noted that, apart from the neat iongel image, some reliefs can be seen in the iongels structure, due to the fracturing process, under liquid nitrogen.

3.2. Attenuated Total Reflectance-Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)

ATR-FTIR spectroscopy was used to confirm the structure of the iongels components, as well as to detect any possible interactions being established between them. The obtained FTIR spectra of the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel, MMT powder, and 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel are displayed in Figure 3. In the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA spectrum, the peaks detected at 1053, 1133 and 1179 cm−1 correspond to the [TFSI] anion, while the bands at 3120 and 3160 cm−1 correspond to the CH3 bending and CH2 stretching vibrations of the [C2mim]+ cation, respectively. The peak at 1732 cm−1 is attributed to the C=O symmetric stretching, while the bands between 2866 and 2936 cm−1 are attributed to the C-H stretching of PEGDA. The IR spectra of the pristine [C2mim][TFSI] IL and PEGDA can be found in Figure S2 of Supplementary Materials. The absence of visible peaks at wavenumbers of 1619 and 1635 cm−1, arising from the terminal acrylate groups of PEGDA indicates the high extension of the polymerization reaction. The same peaks and bands were also observed on the 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel spectrum. Regarding the MMT spectrum, peaks at 517 and 1012 cm−1 are representative of the Si-O bending and stretching of the silica tetrahedra sheets, respectively. At 779, 885, and 918 cm−1 the peaks observed are attributed to the bending of AlMgOH, AlFeOH, and AlAlOH functional groups, respectively. The observed peaks at 2851 and 2924 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching of the C-H bending of the CH2 groups and bending of CH3 functional groups, respectively, while at 3630 cm−1 a peak from the stretching of OH groups is associated with Al-OH and Si-OH from alumina and silica sheets. Due to overlapping, the characteristic peaks of MMT are not easily distinguishable in the spectrum of the reinforced iongel. Nonetheless, the influence of MMT in the 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel spectrum can be observed at 450, 1053, and 2924 cm−1.

3.3. Contact Angle Measurements

The water contact angles of iongels reinforced with different MMT contents were determined and the results are depicted in Figure 4. A contact angle of 41.3° was obtained for the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel membrane. As it can be seen, at lower contents (≤1 wt%), the incorporation of the MMT particles did not have a significant impact on this parameter. On the other hand, at higher contents, there is a clear increase in the contact angle, from 46.9° for the 60 TFSI-37.5 PEGDA-2.5 MMT iongel, up to 58° for the highest MMT content (7.5 wt%). These variations at higher MMT contents may be attributed to two reasons; first, a tendency for the MMT to lower the hydrophilicity of the iongels, and/or the decrease in the PEGDA content. PEGDA is composed of hydrophilic ethylene oxide units and hydrophobic acrylate units. Longer PEGDA networks, such as the one used in this work, present higher contents in ethylene oxide groups, making the material more hydrophilic. A decrease in the hydrophilic PEGDA content, while maintaining the (hydrophobic) IL composition, results in a decrease in the hydrophilic character of the iongels reinforced with MMT. Nonetheless, all the prepared iongels presented a hydrophilic nature, regardless of the MMT content. This comes as an advantage for gas transport since the solubility of CO2 in hydrophilic polymers is reported as being higher than in hydrophobic ones [37].

3.4. Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA)

The Tonset, considered as the temperature at which the baseline slope changes, of MMT, [C2mim][TFSI] IL, PEGDA and all prepared iongels with different MMT contents are listed in Table 1. The respective thermogravimetric profiles of all iongels prepared in this work, as well as of the neat components can be found in Figure S3a,b of Supplementary Materials, respectively. The Tonset obtained for [C2mim][TFSI] IL, PEGDA and MMT are in accordance with previous reports [12,38,39,40].
The degradation of MMT started around 200 °C and from this point until around 530 °C this degradation step is associated to the release and decomposition of the MMT organic modifier, methyl dihydroxyethyl hydrogenated tallow ammonium. The two decomposition steps observed in this temperature range are related to the different sites where the functionalization of the nanoclay may occur: at the external surface and at the edges (first step) and in the interlayer space (second step) [38].
As it can be seen from Table 1, until 2.5 wt% of MMT content there is no significant change in the Tonset of the prepared iongels reinforced with nanoclays, due to its low content. However, at temperatures up to 200 °C, a more pronounced decomposition of around 5% was noticed in the iongels containing different contents of MMT, compared to the neat iongel (Figure S3 of Supplementary Materials). This happens probably due to the lower thermal stability of the MMT nanoclay, which started to decompose at around 200 °C. For all the iongels, a second decomposition step can be observed at around 400–410 °C, which is associated to the degradation of both PEGDA and IL. The Tonset decreased from around 339 °C for the iongels with up to 2.5 wt% MMT to 331 and 326 °C for the iongels with 5 and 7.5 wt% MMT content, respectively, due to the higher content of MMT with a lower thermal stability. In sum, it can be concluded that the thermal stability of the iongels is influenced by the incorporation of higher contents of MMT. Furthermore, the chosen nanoclay can be considered appropriate to be incorporated into iongels since its weight remained constant up to 150 °C.

3.5. Mechanical Properties

The normalized puncture strength, elongation at break, and Young’s modulus of the iongels with different MMT contents can be found in Figure 5a–c, respectively. It is known that the incorporation of nanoparticles, such as nanoclays, into a polymeric matrix, can improve the mechanical stability of the resulting materials. As such, it could be expected an increase of puncture strength and deformation of the iongels prepared in this work, if the MMT particles are well dispersed within the polymer matrix.
From Figure 5a, it is clear that the puncture strength increases in iongels with low MMT contents (between 0.2 and 1 wt%), where a maximum increase of 49% was achieved for 1 wt% MMT (6.0 MPa/mm). This suggests that the MMT particles are evenly dispersed throughout the iongel, acting as a reinforcement, while the material becomes more resistant to the external force applied during the puncture tests.
On the other hand, MMT contents higher than 1 wt% resulted in a reduction in the puncture strength to 2.98 MPa/mm for a content of 7.5 wt% MMT, even lower than the neat iongel. It seems that higher MMT contents can result in a lower level of dispersion of the particles and a higher number of agglomerates, as it can be seen in Figure 2. The appearance of weak spots due to the aggregation of MMT sheets consequently result in lower mechanical resistance of the material. In previous works, where MMT particles were incorporated into polymeric matrices, such as polyethersulfone and cellulose, higher MMT contents (>5 wt%) also resulted in deprived mechanical performances [41,42].
A similar trend was obtained regarding the elongation at break of the prepared iongels, as presented in Figure 5b. The elongation at break increased 57%, from 10.7% deformation for the neat iongel to 16.8% for the iongel reinforced with 1 wt% MMT. At lower MMT contents, and consequently homogeneous dispersion of the particles, there is a possible rearrangement of the clay sheets in the direction of the deformation, allowing higher elongation [41]. Similar to what was observed for the puncture strength, higher MMT contents decrease the ability of the iongels to elongate before rupture, due to the aforementioned lower degree of dispersion of MMT particles.
Figure 5c represents the variation in Young’s modulus with the MMT content incorporated into the iongels. Young’s modulus, defined as the ratio between the puncture strength and deformation is, in its essence, the resistance of the material to deformation when a force is applied. A significant increase in Young’s modulus was achieved for all the iongels reinforced with MMT, compared to the neat iongel, with a maximum at 5.1 MPa for 1 wt% content. This improvement is attributed to the good dispersion and alignment of MMT sheets within the iongel and the additional rigidity provided by the inorganic particles. The slight decrease in Young’s modulus at higher contents (>1 wt%) is again attributed to a reduced level of dispersion of the MMT particles. Nonetheless, the iongels reinforced with MMT particles revealed better overall mechanical performances, compared to the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel, with stronger membranes upon puncture achieved for 1 wt% MMT content.

3.6. Gas Permeation Experiments

The CO2 permeability, as well as the ideal CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and CO2/H2 selectivities are plotted in Figure 6 and Figure 7, respectively. At 0.2 wt% MMT content, there are no significant variations in the CO2 permeability, probably due to such lower MMT content. The further increase in the MMT content resulted in a continuous increase in gas permeability. The CO2 permeability increases from 40 barrer for the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel up to 98 barrer at 7.5 wt% MMT content. Following the same trend, the N2, CH4, and H2 also increase with higher MMT concentrations (Figure S4, Supplementary Materials).
In order to study the effect of the MMT particles in the gas transport of the prepared iongel membranes, the CO2 solubility of the MMT powder was also measured, following a pressure decay method, described elsewhere [36]. It was not possible to observe any pressure decay over time (40 h), so it can be assumed that the MMT particles do not show affinity towards CO2. Therefore, the incorporation of MMT particles likely provided an increase in diffusivity, without any substantial influence in terms of solubility. Nonetheless, the CO2 permeability is considerably higher than that of the remaining gases. The CO2 is a highly condensable gas and has a high affinity for the iongels, due to the fact that the quadrupole moment of the CO2 molecules interacts favorably with the electrical charges of [C2mim][TFSI] IL, which is the major component of the iongels [8]. Apart from the solubility, the smaller kinetic diameter and linear molecular shape of CO2 are also advantageous for fast diffusion of the gas across the iongel [31]. It can be concluded that, while the CO2 permeability is governed by a combination of diffusivity and solubility, the permeation of the remaining light gases in this case is mainly controlled by diffusivity.
Looking at Figure 7, it can be seen that the ideal selectivities of all gas pairs are improved by the incorporation of up to 0.5 wt% MMT. In this work, the use of a modified MMT clay is expected to improve the compatibility between this inorganic filler and the polymeric phase, allowing a more even distribution of the particles across the iongel matrix [43]. At lower contents and good MMT particles distribution, the selectivity can be enhanced by a shape and size discrimination of gases passing between the intercalated clay layers.[40] On the other hand, at higher contents, the iongels reinforced with MMT suffer a decline in selectivity. The formation of agglomerates (Figure 2) increases the free volume of the reinforced iongels, thus increasing gas diffusion. This will allow all gases to be transported more easily across the iongel membranes, resulting in the observed decrease in CO2/N2, CO2/CH4, and CO2/H2 selectivities [31]. Similar results have also been reported in the literature. For instance, Jamil et al. [44] found an optimal modified-MMT content at 2 wt% to prepare polyetherimide-based mixed matrix hollow fiber membranes. Hashemifard and co-workers [40] found out that an increase in selectivity and CO2 permeance could be achieved by incorporating up to 1 wt% of Cloisite 15A. However, at higher contents, a dramatic decline in the separation performance was observed, due to an increase in clay agglomeration.
To study the possibility of further increasing the IL content, two additional iongel membranes were prepared with 80 wt% [C2mim][TFSI] IL, and 0.5 and 7.5 wt% MMT, and the obtained CO2 permeabilities are illustrated in Figure 8. These specific MMT content were chosen based on the results obtained for the iongels containing 60 wt% IL, where the 60 TFSI-39.5 PEGDA-0.5 MMT iongel showed the highest gas selectivity, while the 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel achieved the highest CO2 permeability. Remarkably, both free-standing iongel membranes reinforced with MMT and containing 80 wt% IL were able to withstand the gas permeation experiments, which had not been possible without the incorporation of MMT [12]. The CO2 permeabilities of the iongel membranes containing 80 wt% [C2mim][TFSI] IL were considerably higher than those of the iongels with 60 wt% IL content. At 0.5 wt% MMT content, the CO2 permeability increased from 60.3 to 115.3 barrer, while for iongel membranes reinforced with 7.5 wt% MMT it increased up to 132.3 barrer. This behavior can be attributed to the higher IL content, resulting in a higher affinity of the iongel towards CO2, as expected.
The influence of increasing the IL content in the ideal selectivities of the iongel membranes reinforced with 0.5 and 7.5 wt% MMT can be found in Figure 9a,b, respectively. For the iongel with 0.5 wt% MMT, a decrease in the CO2/N2 selectivity was obtained when the IL content was increased to 80 wt%. For CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2, the variations in selectivity were not as significant. Interestingly, the opposite behavior was observed at the highest MMT content. For all gas pairs studied, the ideal selectivity increased with increasing IL content, at 7.5 wt% MMT. This is most likely attributed to the higher IL content in the iongel, which helps prevent the formation of agglomerates. A more even dispersion of MMT particles in the iongel matrix along with the higher solubility provided by the IL will promote CO2 transport, thus improving the selectivity.

3.7. Comparison with Other Iongel Membranes

In order to provide an overview of how the performance of the iongel membranes prepared in this work are comparable with other iongel membranes reported in the literature, the experimental results were plotted in the 2008 Robeson upper bounds for CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separation, as well as on the CO2/H2 upper bound developed by Rowe and co-workers, in Figure 10a–c, respectively [45,46]. The results for both two- and three-component iongels reported in the literature are also included [12,18,22,23,25,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73].
It is clear that for the CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 separations, the iongels reinforced with MMT generally present lower CO2 permeabilities and selectivities compared to those of other iongel membranes reported in the literature. The fact that MMT does not present affinity towards CO2 highly contributes to the low permeabilities and selectivities observed. On the other hand, for the CO2/H2 separation, the obtained results are placed among the ones reported in the literature.
It should be mentioned that even though the separation performances of the iongels reinforced with MMT are not as good as those reported for other iongels, the main goal of this work was to improve the mechanical stability of iongels, so they could be tested in their self-standing form. Different materials to prepare iongels should be considered, as long as their mechanical stability is preserved or enhanced.

4. Conclusions

In an attempt to improve the mechanical properties, PEGDA/[C2mim][TFSI] iongels reinforced with different contents of MMT nanoclay (0.2–7.5 wt%) were prepared. The influence of increasing MMT content on the thermal and mechanical stabilities, as well as on the gas transport properties of the iongels was assessed. Dense, flexible, and free-standing iongel membranes were successfully obtained, through a solvent-free UV polymerization process. Agglomerates were visible in the iongels, especially at higher MMT contents, however, no major defects were detected in the iongels structures. FTIR spectroscopy confirmed the high extent of the photopolymerization process of the PEGDA network. The thermal stability of the iongels was influenced by the incorporation of MMT particles, since the Tonset decreased at MMT contents >5 wt%. Both puncture strength and elongation improved in the iongels reinforced with up to 1 wt% MMT (up to 6 MPa/mm and 16.8%, respectively), further decreasing at higher contents, due to the observed MMT agglomerations. A significant increase in gas diffusivity with increasing MMT content resulted in the highest CO2 permeability being achieved for the iongel containing 7.5 wt% MMT (98 barrer). On the other hand, the highest gas selectivities were obtained for the iongel reinforced with 0.5 wt% MMT. Due to the mechanical reinforcement provided by the MMT particles, it was possible to increase the IL content up to 80 wt%, which allowed for better dispersion of the MMT particles, increasing the ideal selectivity for all gas pairs, compared to the iongels composed of 60 wt% IL.
It is clear that the incorporation of MMT particles into the iongel is a suitable strategy to improve the mechanical stability of these materials, as long as a good dispersion is assured. Nevertheless, further research regarding different nanoparticles to improve the mechanical stability of iongels containing high IL contents should be carried out.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/membranes11120998/s1, Figures S1–S4: SEM images of iongels reinforced with MMT; FTIR spectroscopy and TGA thermograms of PEGDA and [C2mim][TFSI] IL; H2, CH4, and N2 gas permeation results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.N. and L.C.T.; Investigation, A.R.N., R.O.F. and V.D.A.; Visualization, A.R.N. and R.O.F.; Resources, L.A.N., L.C.T. and V.D.A.; Supervision, L.A.N. and L.C.T.; Writing-original draft: A.R.N. and R.O.F.; Writing-review and editing, V.D.A., L.A.N. and L.C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Ana R. Nabais and Liliana C. Tomé acknowledge FCT/MCTES for financial support through PhD grant (SFRH/BD/136963/2018), and assistant researcher contract under Scientific Employment Stimulus (2020.01555.CEECIND), respectively. This work was supported by Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry—LAQV and LEAF-Linking Landscape, Environment, Agriculture and Food, which are financed by national funds from FCT/MCTES (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020; UIDP/04129/2020 and UIDB/04129/2020), respectively.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

AMembrane area
ATR-FTIRAttenuated Total Reflectance Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
dDistance of the probe from the point of contact to the point of puncture
DSCDifferential Scanning Calorimetry
FApplied force
ILIonic Liquid
lIongel thickness
MMMMixed Matrix Membrane
MMTMontmorillonite
MOFMetal Organic Framework
PPermeability
PEGPoly(ethylene glycol)
PEGDAPoly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate
PILPoly(ionic liquid)
PVDFPoly(vinylidene) fluoride
SEMScanning Electron Microscopy
SILMSupported Ionic Liquid Membrane
tTime
TGAThermogravimetric analysis
TonsetOnset temperature
UVUltraviolet
VfeedVolume of the feed compartment
VpermVolume of the permeate compartment
ΔpPressure variation between the feed and the permeate compartments of the cell over time
Δp0Pressure variation between the feed and the permeate compartments of the cell at the beginning of the experiment
αIdeal selectivity
βGeometric parameter of the cell
Cations
[C2mim]+1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium
Anions
[B(CN)4]Tetracyanoborate
[C(CN)3]Tricyanomethanide
[FSI]Bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide
[TFSI]−-Bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide

References

  1. Smiglak, M.; Pringle, J.M.; Lu, X.; Han, L.; Zhang, S.; Gao, H.; Mac Farlane, D.R.; Rogers, R.D. Ionic Liquids for Energy, Materials, and Medicine. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9228–9250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Plechkova, N.V.; Seddon, K.R. Applications of Ionic Liquids in the Chemical Industry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 123–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Porcarelli, L.; Shaplov, A.S.; Salsamendi, M.; Nair, J.R.; Vygodskii, Y.S.; Mecerreyes, D.; Gerbaldi, C. Single-Ion Block Copoly(Ionic Liquid)s as Electrolytes for All-Solid State Lithium Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10350–10359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mohammed, H.; Al-Othman, A.; Nancarrow, P.; Elsayed, Y.; Tawalbeh, M. Enhanced Proton Conduction in Zirconium Phosphate/Ionic Liquids Materials for High-Temperature Fuel Cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 4857–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Karimi-Maleh, H.; Fakude, C.T.; Mabuba, N.; Peleyeju, G.M.; Arotiba, O.A. The Determination of 2-Phenylphenol in the Presence of 4-Chlorophenol Using Nano-Fe3O4/Ionic Liquid Paste Electrode as an Electrochemical Sensor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 554, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Velasco-Bosom, S.; Karam, N.; Carnicer-Lombarte, A.; Gurke, J.; Casado, N.; Tomé, L.C.; Mecerreyes, D.; Malliaras, G.G. Conducting Polymer-Ionic Liquid Electrode Arrays for High-Density Surface Electromyography. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2100374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, S.T.; Renny, M.N.; Tomé, L.C.; Olmedo-Martínez, J.L.; Udabe, E.; Jenkins, E.P.W.; Mecerreyes, D.; Malliaras, G.G.; McLeod, R.R.; Proctor, C.M. Reducing Passive Drug Diffusion from Electrophoretic Drug Delivery Devices through Co-Ion Engineering. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tomé, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Ionic Liquid-Based Materials: A Platform to Design Engineered CO2 Separation Membranes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2785–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dai, Z.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L. Combination of Ionic Liquids with Membrane Technology: A New Approach for CO2 Separation. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 497, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yan, X.; Anguille, S.; Bendahan, M.; Moulin, P. Ionic Liquids Combined with Membrane Separation Processes: A Review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 222, 230–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tomé, L.C.; Porcarelli, L.; Bara, J.E.; Forsyth, M.; Mecerreyes, D. Emerging Iongel Materials Towards Applications in Energy and Bioelectronics. Mater. Horiz. 2021, 8, 3239–3265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Martins, A.P.S.; De Añastro, A.F.; Olmedo-Martínez, J.L.; Nabais, A.R.; Neves, L.A.; Mecerreyes, D.; Tomé, L.C. Influence of Anion Structure on Thermal, Mechanical and CO2 Solubility Properties of Uv-Cross-Linked Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Diacrylate Iongels. Membranes 2020, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gu, Y.; Cussler, E.L.; Lodge, T.P. ABA-Triblock Copolymer Ion Gels for CO 2 Separation Applications. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 423–424, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guyomard-Lack, A.; Buchtová, N.; Humbert, B.; Le Bideau, J. Ion Segregation in an Ionic Liquid Confined within Chitosan Based Chemical Ionogels. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 23947–23951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, T.; Gao, X.; Lu, F.; Sun, N.; Zheng, L. Facile Preparation of Supramolecular Ionogels Exhibiting High Temperature Durability as Solid Electrolytes. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 1169–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Noor, S.A.M.; Bayley, P.M.; Forsyth, M.; MacFarlane, D.R. Ionogels Based on Ionic Liquids as Potential Highly Conductive Solid State Electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 91, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ueno, K.; Hata, K.; Katakabe, T.; Kondoh, M.; Watanabe, M. Nanocomposite Ion Gels Based on Silica Nanoparticles and an Ionic Liquid: Ionic Transport, Viscoelastic Properties, and Microstructure. J. Phys. Chem. B 2008, 112, 9013–9019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, H.Z.; Li, P.; Chung, T.S. PVDF/Ionic Liquid Polymer Blends with Superior Separation Performance for Removing CO2 from Hydrogen and Flue Gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2012, 37, 11796–11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ri, J.H.; Jin, J.; Xu, J.; Peng, T.; Ryu, K.I. Preparation of Iodine-Free Ionic Liquid Gel Electrolyte Using Polyethylene Oxide (PEO)-Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) and Its Application in Ti-Foil-Based Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 201, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cowan, M.G.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Poly(Ionic Liquid)/Ionic Liquid Ion-Gels with High “Free” Ionic Liquid Content: Platform Membrane Materials for CO2/Light Gas Separations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 724–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tomé, L.C.; Mecerreyes, D.; Freire, C.S.R.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Marrucho, I.M. Pyrrolidinium-Based Polymeric Ionic Liquid Materials: New Perspectives for CO2 Separation Membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 428, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Singh, Z.V.; Cowan, M.G.; McDanel, W.M.; Luo, Y.; Zhou, R.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Determination and Optimization of Factors Affecting CO2/CH4 Separation Performance in Poly(Ionic Liquid)-Ionic Liquid-Zeolite Mixed-Matrix Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2016, 509, 149–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nabais, A.R.; Martins, A.P.S.; Alves, V.D.; Crespo, J.G.; Marrucho, I.M.; Tomé, L.C.; Neves, L.A. Poly(Ionic Liquid)-Based Engineered Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2/H2 Separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 222, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carlisle, T.K.; McDanel, W.M.; Cowan, M.G.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L. Vinyl-Functionalized Poly(Imidazolium)s: A Curable Polymer Platform for Cross-Linked Ionic Liquid Gel Synthesis. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 1294–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kusuma, V.A.; Macala, M.K.; Baker, J.S.; Hopkinson, D. Cross-Linked Poly(Ethylene Oxide) Ion Gels Containing Functionalized Imidazolium Ionic Liquids as Carbon Dioxide Separation Membranes. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 11658–11667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, S.; Li, X.; Wu, H.; Tian, Z.; Xin, Q.; He, G.; Peng, D.; Chen, S.; Yin, Y.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Advances in High Permeability Polymer-Based Membrane Materials for CO2 Separations. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 1863–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Monteiro, B.; Nabais, A.R.; Casimiro, M.H.; Martins, A.P.S.; Francisco, R.O.; Neves, L.A.; Pereira, C.C.L. Impact on CO2/N2 and CO2/CH4 Separation Performance Using Cu-BTC with Supported Ionic Liquids-Based Mixed Matrix Membranes. Membranes 2018, 8, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Shen, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, G.; Guan, K.; Jin, W. Size Effects of Graphene Oxide on Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2 Separation. AIChE J. 2016, 62, 2843–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amini, Z.; Asghari, M. Preparation and Characterization of Ultra-Thin Poly Ether Block Amide/Nanoclay Nanocomposite Membrane for Gas Separation. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 166, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiao, Z.; Zhao, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, Z.; Guiver, M.D. A Highly Permeable Aligned Montmorillonite Mixed-Matrix Membrane for CO2Separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 9321–9325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jamil, A.; Zulfiqar, M.; Arshad, U.; Mahmood, S.; Iqbal, T.; Rafiq, S.; Iqbal, M.Z. Development and Performance Evaluation of Cellulose Acetate-Bentonite Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2 Separation. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2020, 2020, 8855577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jamil, A.; Ching, O.P.; Shariff, A.B.M. Current Status and Future Prospect of Polymer-Layered Silicate Mixed-Matrix Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2016, 39, 1393–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Noskov, A.V.; Alekseeva, O.V.; Shibaeva, V.D.; Agafonov, A.V. Synthesis, Structure and Thermal Properties of Montmorillonite/Ionic Liquid Ionogels. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 34885–34894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sinha Ray, S. Chapter 1: An Overview of Pure and Organically Modified Clays. In Clay-Containing Polymer Nanocomposites: From Fundamentals to Real Applications; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013; pp. 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jamil, A.; Ching, O.P.; Shariff, A.B.M. Polymer-Nanoclay Mixed Matrix Membranes for CO2/CH4 Separation: A Review. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2014, 625, 690–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Neves, L.A.; Afonso, C.; Coelhoso, I.M.; Crespo, J.G. Integrated CO 2 Capture and Enzymatic Bioconversion in Supported Ionic Liquid Membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 97, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mulder, M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Defontaine, G.; Barichard, A.; Letaief, S.; Feng, C.; Matsuura, T.; Detellier, C. Nanoporous Polymer—Clay Hybrid Membranes for Gas Separation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2010, 343, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Parajó, J.J.; Teijeira, T.; Fernández, J.; Salgado, J.; Villanueva, M. Thermal Stability of Some Imidazolium [NTf2] Ionic Liquids: Isothermal and Dynamic Kinetic Study through Thermogravimetric Procedures. J. Chem. Thermodyn. 2017, 112, 105–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hashemifard, S.A.; Ismail, A.F.; Matsuura, T. Effects of Montmorillonite Nano-Clay Fillers on PEI Mixed Matrix Membrane for CO2 Removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 170, 316–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghaemi, N.; Madaeni, S.S.; Alizadeh, A.; Rajabi, H.; Daraei, P. Preparation, Characterization and Performance of Polyethersulfone/Organically Modified Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Membranes in Removal of Pesticides. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 382, 135–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mahmoudian, S.; Wahit, M.U.; Ismail, A.F.; Yussuf, A.A. Preparation of Regenerated Cellulose/Montmorillonite Nanocomposite Films via Ionic Liquids. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88, 1251–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Behroozi, M.; Pakizeh, M. Study the Effects of Cloisite15A Nanoclay Incorporation on the Morphology and Gas Permeation Properties of Pebax2533 Polymer. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2017, 134, 45302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jamil, A.; Oh, P.C.; Shariff, A.M. Polyetherimide-Montmorillonite Mixed Matrix Hollow Fibre Membranes: Effect of Inorganic/Organic Montmorillonite on CO2/CH4 Separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2018, 206, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Robeson, L.M. The Upper Bound Revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rowe, B.W.; Robeson, L.M.; Freeman, B.D.; Paul, D.R. Influence of Temperature on the Upper Bound: Theoretical Considerations and Comparison with Experimental Results. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 360, 58–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fam, W.; Mansouri, J.; Li, H.; Chen, V. Improving CO2 Separation Performance of Thin Film Composite Hollow Fiber with Pebax®1657/Ionic Liquid Gel Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2017, 537, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tomé, L.C.; Aboudzadeh, M.A.; Rebelo, L.P.N.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Polymeric Ionic Liquids with Mixtures of Counter-Anions: A New Straightforward Strategy for Designing Pyrrolidinium-Based CO2 Separation Membranes. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 10403–10411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gouveia, A.S.L.; Ventaja, L.; Tomé, L.C.; Marrucho, I.M. Towards Biohydrogen Separation Using Poly(Ionic Liquid)/Ionic Liquid Composite Membranes. Membranes 2018, 8, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Friess, K.; Lanč, M.; Pilnáček, K.; Fíla, V.; Vopička, O.; Sedláková, Z.; Cowan, M.G.; McDanel, W.M.; Noble, R.D.; Gin, D.L.; et al. CO2/CH4 Separation Performance of Ionic-Liquid-Based Epoxy-Amine Ion Gel Membranes under Mixed Feed Conditions Relevant to Biogas Processing. J. Memb. Sci. 2017, 528, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Teodoro, R.M.; Tomé, L.C.; Mantione, D.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Mixing Poly(Ionic Liquid)s and Ionic Liquids with Different Cyano Anions: Membrane Forming Ability and CO2/N2 Separation Properties. J. Memb. Sci. 2018, 552, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ito, A.; Yasuda, T.; Yoshioka, T.; Yoshida, A.; Li, X.; Hashimoto, K.; Nagai, K.; Shibayama, M.; Watanabe, M. Sulfonated Polyimide/Ionic Liquid Composite Membranes for CO2 Separation: Transport Properties in Relation to Their Nanostructures. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 7112–7120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ito, A.; Yasuda, T.; Ma, X.; Watanabe, M. Sulfonated Polyimide/Ionic Liquid Composite Membranes for Carbon Dioxide Separation. Polym. J. 2017, 49, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. O’Harra, K.E.; Kammakakam, I.; Devriese, E.M.; Noll, D.M.; Bara, J.E.; Jackson, E.M. Synthesis and Performance of 6FDA-Based Polyimide-Ionenes and Composites with Ionic Liquids as Gas Separation Membranes. Membranes 2019, 9, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Uk Hong, S.; Park, D.; Ko, Y.; Baek, I. Polymer-Ionic Liquid Gels for Enhanced Gas Transport. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1, 7227–7229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhou, J.; Mok, M.M.; Cowan, M.G.; Mcdanel, W.M.; Carlisle, T.K.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. High-Permeance Room-Temperature Ionic-Liquid-Based Membranes for CO2/N2 Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 20064–20067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. McDanel, W.M.; Cowan, M.G.; Chisholm, N.O.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Fixed-Site-Carrier Facilitated Transport of Carbon Dioxide through Ionic-Liquid-Based Epoxy-Amine Ion Gel Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2015, 492, 303–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tomé, L.C.; Isik, M.; Freire, C.S.R.; Mecerreyes, D.; Marrucho, I.M. Novel Pyrrolidinium-Based Polymeric Ionic Liquids with Cyano Counter-Anions: High Performance Membrane Materials for Post-Combustion CO2 separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 483, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yin, J.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Y.; Hao, T.; Wang, H.; Ding, X.; Meng, J. Tuning the Microstructure of Crosslinked Poly(Ionic Liquid) Membranes and Gels via a Multicomponent Reaction for Improved CO2 Capture Performance. J. Memb. Sci. 2020, 593, 117405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kammakakam, I.; Bara, J.E.; Jackson, E.M.; Lertxundi, J.; Mecerreyes, D.; Tomé, L.C. Tailored CO2-Philic Anionic Poly(Ionic Liquid) Composite Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Gas Transport Properties. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 5954–5965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deng, J.; Yu, J.; Dai, Z.; Deng, L. Cross-Linked PEG Membranes of Interpenetrating Networks with Ionic Liquids as Additives for Enhanced CO2 Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 5261–5268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, S.; Bai, L.; Gao, H.; Deng, J.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, S. Pebax-Based Composite Membranes with High Gas Transport Properties Enhanced by Ionic Liquids for CO2 Separation. RSC Adv. 2017, 7, 6422–6431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Hudiono, Y.C.; Carlisle, T.K.; LaFrate, A.L.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Novel Mixed Matrix Membranes Based on Polymerizable Room-Temperature Ionic Liquids and SAPO-34 Particles to Improve CO 2 Separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 370, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shindo, R.; Kishida, M.; Sawa, H.; Kidesaki, T.; Sato, S.; Kanehashi, S.; Nagai, K. Characterization and Gas Permeation Properties of Polyimide/ZSM-5 Zeolite Composite Membranes Containing Ionic Liquid. J. Memb. Sci. 2014, 454, 330–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ranjbaran, F.; Kamio, E.; Matsuyama, H. Inorganic/Organic Composite Ion Gel Membrane with High Mechanical Strength and High CO2 Separation Performance. J. Memb. Sci. 2017, 544, 252–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kamio, E.; Yasui, T.; Iida, Y.; Gong, J.P.; Matsuyama, H. Inorganic/Organic Double-Network Gels Containing Ionic Liquids. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1704118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kamio, E.; Minakata, M.; Iida, Y.; Yasui, T.; Matsuoka, A.; Matsuyama, H. Inorganic/Organic Double-Network Ion Gel Membrane with a High Ionic Liquid Content for CO2 Separation. Polym. J. 2021, 53, 137–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, J.; Kamio, E.; Kinoshita, M.; Matsuoka, A.; Nakagawa, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Matsuyama, H. Inorganic/Organic Micro-Double-Network Ion Gel-Based Composite Membrane with Enhanced Mechanical Strength and CO2 Permeance. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 12698–12708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ranjbaran, F.; Kamio, E.; Matsuyama, H. Ion Gel Membrane with Tunable Inorganic/Organic Composite Network for CO2 Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 12763–12772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ghasemi Estahbanati, E.; Omidkhah, M.; Ebadi Amooghin, A. Interfacial Design of Ternary Mixed Matrix Membranes Containing Pebax 1657/Silver-Nanopowder/[BMIM][BF4] for Improved CO2 Separation Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 10094–10105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dunn, C.A.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, R.; Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. (Cross-Linked Poly(Ionic Liquid)-Ionic Liquid-Zeolite) Mixed-Matrix Membranes for CO2/CH4 Gas Separations Based on Curable Ionic Liquid Prepolymers. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 4704–4708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Mahdavi, H.R.; Azizi, N.; Arzani, M.; Mohammadi, T. Improved CO2/CH4 Separation Using a Nanocomposite Ionic Liquid Gel Membrane. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2017, 46, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sampaio, A.M.; Nabais, A.R.; Tomé, L.C.; Neves, L.A. Impact of MOF-5 on Pyrrolidinium-Based Poly(Ionic Liquid)/Ionic Liquid Membranes for Biogas Upgrading. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 308–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the preparation of the iongels reinforced with MMT.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the preparation of the iongels reinforced with MMT.
Membranes 11 00998 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel (a) and iongels reinforced with 0.2 (b) and 7.5 (c) wt% MMT.
Figure 2. SEM images of the 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel (a) and iongels reinforced with 0.2 (b) and 7.5 (c) wt% MMT.
Membranes 11 00998 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of neat 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel, MMT and 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra of neat 60 TFSI-40 PEGDA iongel, MMT and 60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT iongel.
Membranes 11 00998 g003
Figure 4. Water contact angles of all prepared iongels.
Figure 4. Water contact angles of all prepared iongels.
Membranes 11 00998 g004
Figure 5. Normalized puncture strength (a), elongation at break (b) and Young’s Modulus (c) obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Figure 5. Normalized puncture strength (a), elongation at break (b) and Young’s Modulus (c) obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Membranes 11 00998 g005
Figure 6. CO2 permeabilities obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Figure 6. CO2 permeabilities obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Membranes 11 00998 g006
Figure 7. CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2 ideal selectivities obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Figure 7. CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2 ideal selectivities obtained for all prepared iongels, as a function of the MMT content.
Membranes 11 00998 g007
Figure 8. Influence of the IL content in the CO2 permeability of the iongels reinforced with 0.5 and 7.5 wt% MMT.
Figure 8. Influence of the IL content in the CO2 permeability of the iongels reinforced with 0.5 and 7.5 wt% MMT.
Membranes 11 00998 g008
Figure 9. Influence of the IL content in the CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2 ideal selectivities of the iongels reinforced with 0.5 (a) and 7.5 (b) wt% MMT.
Figure 9. Influence of the IL content in the CO2/N2, CO2/CH4 and CO2/H2 ideal selectivities of the iongels reinforced with 0.5 (a) and 7.5 (b) wt% MMT.
Membranes 11 00998 g009aMembranes 11 00998 g009b
Figure 10. CO2/N2 (a), CO2/CH4 (b) and CO2/H2 (c) selectivities as a function of the CO2 permeability for all iongels prepared in this work, as well as other iongel membranes reported in the literature.
Figure 10. CO2/N2 (a), CO2/CH4 (b) and CO2/H2 (c) selectivities as a function of the CO2 permeability for all iongels prepared in this work, as well as other iongel membranes reported in the literature.
Membranes 11 00998 g010aMembranes 11 00998 g010b
Table 1. Onset temperatures of the neat iongel components and the iongels reinforced with MMT.
Table 1. Onset temperatures of the neat iongel components and the iongels reinforced with MMT.
SampleTonset (°C)
[C2mim][TFSI]412
PEGDA369
MMT200
60 TFSI-40 PEGDA339
60 TFSI-39.8 PEGDA-0.2 MMT339
60 TFSI-39.5 PEGDA-0.5 MMT340
60 TFSI-39 PEGDA-1 MMT339
60 TFSI-37.5 PEGDA-2.5 MMT340
60 TFSI-35 PEGDA-5 MMT331
60 TFSI-32.5 PEGDA-7.5 MMT326
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nabais, A.R.; Francisco, R.O.; Alves, V.D.; Neves, L.A.; Tomé, L.C. Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Iongel Membranes Reinforced with Nanoclays for CO2 Separation. Membranes 2021, 11, 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120998

AMA Style

Nabais AR, Francisco RO, Alves VD, Neves LA, Tomé LC. Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Iongel Membranes Reinforced with Nanoclays for CO2 Separation. Membranes. 2021; 11(12):998. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nabais, Ana R., Rute O. Francisco, Vítor D. Alves, Luísa A. Neves, and Liliana C. Tomé. 2021. "Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate Iongel Membranes Reinforced with Nanoclays for CO2 Separation" Membranes 11, no. 12: 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop