Next Article in Journal
Neutralization Effect of Sera against Delta and Omicron in Patients Recovering from COVID-19 and Inactivated Vaccine Recipients
Next Article in Special Issue
Knowledge, Attitude and Worry in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq during the Mpox (Monkeypox) Outbreak in 2022: An Online Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Journal
Bacterial Pathogenesis in Various Fish Diseases: Recent Advances and Specific Challenges in Vaccine Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Monkeypox Disease (MPOX) Perceptions among Healthcare Workers versus General Population during the First Month of the WHO Alert: Cross-Sectional Survey in Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Estimating the Global Spread of Epidemic Human Monkeypox with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphic Model

1
Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
2
Daichung Hospital, Miaoli County 35044, Taiwan
3
Master of Public Health Program, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10055, Taiwan
4
Emergency Department of Taipei City Hospital, Ren-Ai Branch, Taipei 10629, Taiwan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 468; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020468
Submission received: 23 December 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 17 February 2023

Abstract

:
A “Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)” monkeypox outbreak was declared by the World Health Organization on 23 June 2022. More than 16,000 monkeypox cases were reported in more than 75 countries across six regions as of July 25. The Bayesian SIR (Susceptible–Infected–Recovered) model with the directed acyclic graphic method was used to estimate the basic/effective reproductive number (R0/Re) and to assess the epidemic spread of monkeypox across the globe. The maximum estimated R0/Re was 1.16 (1.15–1.17), 1.20 (1.20–1.20), 1.34 (1.34–1.35), 1.33 (1.33–1.33) and 2.52 (2.41–2.66) in the United States, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, respectively. The values of R0/Re were below 1 after August 2022. The estimated infectious time before isolation ranged from 2.05 to 2.74 days. The PHEIC of the global spreading of human monkeypox has been contained so as to avoid a pandemic in the light of the reasoning-based epidemic model assessment.

1. Introduction

Monkeypox is a rare zoonotic disease, and the virus was initially discovered in 1958 [1]. The first human case of monkeypox, which is caused by the monkeypox virus, was diagnosed in 1970 [2]. Monkeypox mainly occurs in forested rural areas in Central and Western Africa. Most cases were acquired with the Central African clade and the others with the West African clade from 1970 to 2019 [3]. Since the cessation of smallpox vaccination, the incidence of reported monkeypox cases, the median age of patients, and the number of outbreaks are rising. In Africa, about 72.5% of monkeypox cases were suspected to be via animal-to-human transmission, and 27.5% cases were by a human source in the 1980s [4]. However, 78% of monkeypox cases were infected by a human source in the 1990s [5]. However, most cases outside of Africa were suspected to be via animal-to-human transmission [3]. Therefore, human-to-human transmission was inefficient because sporadic outbreaks and travel-associated cases outside Africa had limited secondary spread before April 2022. Unfortunately, more than 16,000 monkeypox cases were reported in more than 75 countries across six regions as of 25 July 2022 [6], and the majority of cases (98%) have been confirmed since early May 2022. In addition, the World Health Organization declared a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC)” monkeypox outbreak on 23 June 2022 [6]. Over 7000 monkeypox cases have been confirmed in the United States as of 5 August 2022 [7]. Over 90% of monkeypox cases have occurred mainly among men through sexual contexts [8,9]. Several reasons, including waning smallpox immunity, relaxing COVID-19 containment measures, and sexual activities after large gatherings, were linked to the global outbreak of monkeypox virus infection [8]. Avoiding human contact through good hygiene [10], early detection [9], and reducing the possibility of transmission by pre-exposure and post-exposure vaccination and treatment [11] are the major containment measures to prevent the outbreak of monkeypox. Thus, the surveillance of the spread of monkeypox is important to know the effectiveness of these containment measures.
The basic/effective reproductive number (R0/Re, the expected number of secondary infections) is a useful indicator for the spread of monkeypox. The aim of this study is to estimate the R0/Re of monkeypox by the Bayesian SIR (Susceptible–Infected–Recovered) model to elucidate the spread of monkeypox. It is indispensable to determine whether or not monkeypox will continually spread through a population.

2. Materials and Methods

Data on the monkeypox outbreaks were retrieved from the Global Health team for estimating R0/Re. The details of data retrieval have been described in a previous report [12,13]. Data on the United States, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom and the Democratic Republic of the Congo worldwide were retrieved up to 23 September 2022 (Table S1). Since there were limited established travel links to endemic areas in human-to-human transmission [8], we analyzed data with emphasis on non-endemic countries.
The initial investigation employed the deterministic SIR model as described by Kermack and McKendrick [14], and subsequent advancements were made through the incorporation of a Bayesian perspective. Both the deterministic SIR model and the Bayesian SIR model were used to estimate the R0/Re. Important assumptions in our deterministic SIR model and the Bayesian SIR model include the following: (1) all cases were infected by human-to-human transmission, and animal-to-human transmission was neglected; (2) the number of predicted cases was only detectable cases in this model; (3) we assumed similar transmission probability in the same country or globally; (4) a homogeneous random mixing population was assumed; (5) patients moved from I state to R state when they were isolated or recovered. Due to limited information on infectious periods before isolation or recovery, the infectious period of monkeypox was assumed to be the incubation period. The additional assumptions our deterministic SIR model also follows are (1) a fixed infectious period and that (2) the duration of these compartments are exponentially distributed. The minimal vaccine coverage considering the effectiveness against monkeypox is often derived by Vc = Ic/E = [1 − (1/Ro)]/E [15]), where Ic denoted the herd immunity threshold and E denoted the level of vaccine effectiveness. Following this rationale, we estimated the herd immunity threshold (Vc) using our maximum estimated R0/Re to allow for the cross-protection afforded by smallpox vaccination.

Bayesian SIR Model

The Bayesian ordinary differential equation (ODE) SIR model, including S (susceptible population), I (infectious persons with monkeypox), and R (recovered persons from infectious status or infectious persons being isolated) states, was used to estimate the basic reproductive number and to predict the global propagation of the monkeypox outbreak making use of the observed number of cases with the consideration of uncertainty [16]. Let s(t), i(t), and r(t) denote the numbers of susceptible, infectives, and recovered/isolated at time t. It can be depicted by using the ordinary differential equations [14] as follows:
d s ( t ) d t = β   ·   s ( t )   ·   i ( t )
d i ( t ) d t = β   ·   s ( t )   ·   i ( t ) α   ·   i ( t )
d r ( t ) d t = α   ·   i ( t )
Note that as the population of susceptible is fixed, the following equation always holds: s(t) + i(t) + r(t) = N. Using a Bayesian framework, the parameters of transmission coefficient (β) and recovery rate (α) from the infectious status can be estimated by combining prior knowledge with current observation on the monkeypox epidemic. Two random variables, both the number of unknown infected status [s(t)] and the confirmed cases per day [i(t) + r(t)], follow two distributions of N o r m a l ( μ s t ,   100 ) and P o i s s o n ( μ i t ) [16], respectively. We set the initial value of s ( 0 ) as the total susceptible population, i ( 0 ) as the infectious case number, and r ( 0 ) with no recovery cases from the beginning.
The Bayesian directed acyclic graphic (DAG) model for assessing the spread of human monkeypox with a three-state (Susceptible–Infected–Recovered) model is illustrated in Figure 1. The transmission coefficient (β) and the recovery rate (α) were used to specify the Bayesian SIR model in accordance with the system of differential equations depicting the spread of monkeypox based on the SIR model (Equations (1)–(3)). Using the observed data on daily monkeypox cases after the first reported case throughout the duration of the epidemic (it, t = 2,3,…,T, where T is the total number of days of observation, Figure 1) and the corresponding number of susceptible during the period (st, t = 2,3,…,T), the mean count following the Poisson distribution, μIt (it~Poisson (μIt), and the mean value following the normal distribution, μSt (st~Normal (μSt, 100), were used to capture the expected number of monkeypox cases and the average number of susceptible population, respectively. These two parameters, μIt and μSt, were in turn determined by both transmission coefficient (β) and recovery rate (α) by dint of the system of differential equations specified by (1) through (3). Based on the estimated result of transmission coefficient (β) and recovery rate (α), the reproductive number can further be derived by β/α.
On the specification of the Bayesian SIR model, a non-information prior (gamma (0.001, 0.001)) was used for the transmission coefficient parameter (β). Regarding the recovery rate parameter (α), an informative prior (gamma (26.7, 222.92)) was applied using the information on the inverse of the mean infectious period (8.5 days (95% CI: 6.6–10.9)) according to the result of the previous research [17].
Note that a deterministic Susceptible–Infected–Recovered (SIR) model was also used for the monkeypox outbreaks with similar nonlinear ordinary differential equations to the COVID-19 model, as indicated in Equations (1)–(3) above. The transmission coefficient (β) and R0 were obtained after fitting the observed cases with monkeypox by the simulation of this deterministic SIR model.
Monkeypox cases were predicted on a daily basis by using the Bayesian DAG-based posterior distribution, encrypted with parameters estimated from the previously reported data. In addition, it was also predicted by simulating the deterministic SIR model after fitting the total number of cases during the observed period. Two independent methods were used to evaluate the spread of monkeypox. The results obtained from the deterministic model were presented as auxiliary evidence for checking whether the result was consistent with the novel Bayesian DAG-based model.
The simulation of the deterministic SIR model was performed using the software MATLAB version 9.30.713579 (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA), and the Bayesian SIR DAG model was analyzed using the SAS software (release 9.4).

3. Results

The results of the estimated parameters for monkeypox by using the deterministic SIR model in the global, United States, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo are listed in Table 1. The estimated basic reproductive number (R0) or effective reproductive number (Re) of monkeypox ranged from 0.817 to 2.251 in the globe, given the fixed infectious period of 8.5 days. The estimated smallpox vaccine coverage required to contain the spread of monkeypox was highest in May 2022 at 56%. The maximum estimated R0/Re values for monkeypox were 2.09 in the United States, 2.06 in Spain, 2.35 in Brazil, 2.43 in the United Kingdom and 2.80 in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, occurring between May and early June. The corresponding vaccine threshold for stopping monkeypox transmission in these countries ranged from 7% to 56%. The R0/Re values decreased below 1 after August 2022.
The parameters estimated by the Bayesian SIR model from the monkeypox cases in the United States, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom, and the globe are listed in Table 2. The estimated basic reproductive number (R0) or effective reproductive number (Re) of monkeypox ranged from 1.00 (0.99–1.15) to 1.46 (1.37–1.51) on the global. The estimated required smallpox vaccine coverage for containing the spread of monkeypox was highest in May 2022 (37%). The maximum estimated R0/Re was 1.20 (1.197–1.201), 1.19 (1.19–1.19), 1.34 (1.34–1.35), 1.33 (1.33–1.33), and 2.52 (2.41–2.66) in the United States, Spain, Brazil, the United Kingdom and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, respectively, which occurred between May and early June. The corresponding threshold of the vaccine was estimated as 31.4% and 56% by our different models (Table 1 and Table 2). The values of R0/Re were below 1 after August 2022. Though the informative priors (8.5 days) were applied, the estimated infectious time before isolation ranged from 2.05 to 2.74 days (reciprocal α).
The cumulative monkeypox cases observed and those simulated by the deterministic SIR model for the entire world, as well as for the United States, Spain, Brazil, and the United Kingdom, are presented in Figure 2 and Table S2. The cumulated observed cases and predicted cases by the Bayesian SIR model in different countries are shown in Figure 3 and Table S1. We also predicted the cumulated cases on 30 September 2022, by parameters of the last period for the model validation, and we can realize the trend of monkeypox cases.

4. Discussion

The monkeypox outbreaks seemed to be controlled in the US, Spain, Brazil, the UK, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and around the globe because the estimated R0/Re gradually dropped to below 1. Though it has a long reciprocal period (up to 21 days) and a long contagious period, the estimated infectious time before isolation was short.
The basic reproduction number (R0) or the effective reproduction number (Re) is defined as the expected number of secondary infections per primary infection. It is often used to quantify the ability of an infectious disease to invade a population. R0 refers to the susceptible population without NPIs (nonpharmaceutical interventions) or vaccination, and Re refers to the susceptible population with vaccination or some NPIs. R0/Re above 1 indicates that the infectious disease is a potential epidemic. R0/Re below 1 indicates that the infectious disease is potentially extinguished. The estimated R0/Re was above 1 in the early stage of outbreaks, but it was below 1.5 in different countries in this study. In one previous study, the reproduction number of 1.29 was reported as of 22 July 2022 [18]. It is consistent with our results.
Monkeypox and smallpox belong to the orthopoxvirus family. Both of them can be transmitted by droplet exposure, close contact with infected skin lesions, or via contaminated materials. The R0 for smallpox was estimated between 3.5 and 6.0 in the previous study [19]. However, the spread of monkeypox is mainly through close or intimate contact with ill persons or animals. Hence, the R0 for monkeypox is lower than for smallpox.
The incidence of human monkeypox has risen since the 1970s, particularly in the Democratic Republic of the Congo [2]. The average age of those affected has risen from 4 years (the 1970s) to 21 years (2010–2019) [3]. The mortality rate stands at 8.7%, with a noticeable difference between different clades [3]. Outbreaks in countries outside Africa have been caused by importation cases. Activities or interactions with infected animals or individuals are factors that increase the risk of acquiring the disease. The discontinuation of smallpox vaccination, which provided protection against monkeypox, has led to a higher human-to-human transmission rate [20]. The occurrence of outbreaks outside Africa highlights the global significance of the disease burden for the enhanced surveillance of early detection.
The spread of monkeypox among persons in this global outbreak was well controlled by early diagnosis with isolation because the estimated infectious period before finding cases was below 3 days. Though the incubation period of monkeypox is usually from 6 to 13 days, it can range from 5 to 21 days [17]. In addition, high-risk populations get vaccinated to prevent the transmission of monkeypox.
Due to the eradication of smallpox, the global population after the year 1980 also has less immunity to monkeypox than the generation of those who have been vaccinated against smallpox. Mass vaccination against monkeypox is not recommended. To date, high-risk populations, including those who have an animal bite or scratch, travel to an endemic area, have close contact with infected people, health care workers caring for monkeypox patients, people with sexual behavior that puts them at risk of infection and immunocompromised people, are suggested to get vaccinated. In our estimation, reaching smallpox vaccine coverage (Vc) for high-risk people would be enough, and we also have people with immunity from before 1980.
There were three limitations in our study, including a homogeneous random mixing population assumption made for estimating the R0 of monkeypox, the heterogeneous surveillance systems across countries, and the only human-to-human transmission of monkeypox cases. In the original study design, only data from non-endemic countries with a lower proportion of animal-to-human transmission and a high proportion of confirmed monkeypox cases were analyzed because we were interested in modeling the epidemic process through human-to-human transmission. To test whether the estimate of basic reproductive number/effective reproductive number would be affected by including the endemic countries in Africa, we estimated the corresponding R0/Re figure with the data from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which had a higher proportion of suspected cases and a high probability of animal-to-human transmission [3] and may have led to a biased estimation of the basic reproductive number in this study. It is obvious that the pattern of the evolution of R0/Re in such an endemic area is different from that in non-endemic areas, although there is not much difference in the maximum value between both types of estimates. The non-endemic process suggests the epidemic died out after the containment of human-to-human transmission, but the endemic process seems to remain rather stable. In addition, we would like to continue the study to the present day. However, the available data confirmed by the global team stopped being updated after 23 September 2022.
The proposed Bayesian SIR model is novel in that it not only gives up-to-date information on monkeypox transmission but also accounts for parameter uncertainty. The deterministic SIR model is used to describe the spread of infectious diseases where the output is a deterministically predicted value based on the inputs. On the other hand, the Bayesian SIR model is a probabilistic approach that not only adds uncertainty to the deterministic SIR model but also allows for updating the relevant parameters if more data are available. In this sense, the Bayesian SIR model generates posterior distributions for inference and prediction. Bayesian DAG was used to estimate the posterior distribution of parameters given observed data, which can be further used to make predictions about future outbreaks of monkeypox. Tailored by the clinical characteristics of monkeypox, the Bayesian DAG, in conjunction with ordinary differential equations, provides a flexible framework for modeling the spread of infectious disease. Furthermore, while the Bayesian DAG model has been extensively utilized in the field of machine learning, its application in conjunction with ordinary differential equations to model epidemic monkeypox outbreaks is novel and tailored for this purpose.
The R0/Re estimated by the deterministic SIR model for the United Kingdom and Brazil in June was higher than the global R0 for all periods. Estimated R0/Re by the deterministic SIR model was higher than the Bayesian SIR model possibly because of the fixed infectious period setting. The estimated R0/Re derived from the deterministic SIR model was specified for observing the time change of parameters in each epoch.
We estimated the parameters based on the Bayesian SIR model for the uncertainty to minimize these biases, and the results were consistent in different countries. The estimated results were similar to the simulation data by the deterministic SIR model (Table 2, Figure 3).

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the global spread of human monkeypox is not a threat because the R0/Re is below one according to the Bayesian reasoning epidemic model assessment. Therefore, the epidemic has currently been contained and will not result in a pandemic because monkeypox is less contagious than smallpox, with available effective vaccines. As time goes on, continuous surveillance of the outbreak will still be needed.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/vaccines11020468/s1, Table S1: The observed cumulated monkeypox cases and predicted cumulated cases by the Bayesian SIR model; Table S2: The observed cumulated monkeypox cases and simulated cumulated cases by the deterministic SIR model.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.-C.L. and H.-H.C.; data curation, L.-C.L. and C.-C.L.; formal analysis, L.-C.L.; supervision, H.-H.C.; validation, C.-Y.H., C.-C.L. and H.-H.C.; writing—original draft, L.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 111-2321-B-002-017).

Institutional Review Board Statement

IRB review is not required for open-access data studies that do not include the identity of the individual.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful for the financial support received from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 111-2321-B-002-017).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. This funding source had no role in the design of this study and will not have any role during its execution, analyses, interpretation of the data, or decision to submit results.

References

  1. Magnus, P.V.; Andersen, E.K.; Petersen, K.B.; Birch-Andersen, A. A pox-like disease in cynomolgus monkeys. Acta Path Microbiol. Scand. 1959, 46, 156–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Breman, J.G.; Kalisa, R.; Steniowski, M.V.; Zanotto, E.; Gromyko, A.I.; Arita, I. Human monkeypox, 1970–1979. Bull. World Health Organ. 1980, 58, 165–182. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Bunge, E.M.; Hoet, B.; Chen, L.; Lienert, F.; Weidenthaler, H.; Baer, L.R.; Steffen, R. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox-A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2022, 16, e0010141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jezek, Z.; Grab, B.; Szczeniowski, M.; Paluku, K.M.; Mutombo, M. Clinico-epidemiological features of monkeypox patients with an animal or human source of infection. Bull. World Health Organ. 1988, 66, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Aplogan, A.; Szczeniowski, M. Human monkeypox—Kasai Oriental, Democratic Republic of Congo, February 1996–October 1997. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 1997, 46, 1168–1171. [Google Scholar]
  6. WHO. Multi-Country Monkeypox Outbreak: Situation Update. Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2022-DON396 (accessed on 7 August 2022).
  7. CDC. 2022 U.S. Map & Case Count. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/us-map.html (accessed on 7 August 2022).
  8. Thornhill, J.P.; Barkati, S.; Walmsley, S.; Rockstroh, J.; Antinori, A.; Harrison, L.B.; Palich, R.; Nori, A.; Reeves, I.; Habibi, M.S.; et al. Monkeypox Virus Infection in Humans across 16 Countries—April–June 2022. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 679–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Suarez Rodriguez, B.; Guzman Herrador, B.R.; Diaz Franco, A.; Sanchez-Seco Farinas, M.P.; Del Amo Valero, J.; Aginagalde Llorente, A.H.; de Agreda, J.; Malonda, R.C.; Castrillejo, D.; Chirlaque Lopez, M.D.; et al. Epidemiologic Features and Control Measures during Monkeypox Outbreak, Spain, June 2022. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2022, 28, 1847–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Farahat, R.A.; Abdelaal, A.; Shah, J.; Ghozy, S.; Sah, R.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Rodriguez-Morales, A.J.; McHugh, T.D.; Leblebicioglu, H. Monkeypox outbreaks during COVID-19 pandemic: Are we looking at an independent phenomenon or an overlapping pandemic? Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. 2022, 21, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Loconsole, D.; Sallustio, A.; Centrone, F.; Casulli, D.; Accogli, M.; Saracino, A.; Foti, C.; Grandolfo, M.; Buccoliero, G.B.; Vitale, V.; et al. Monkeypox Virus Infections in Southern Italy: Is There a Risk for Community Spread? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. The Global Health Team. Monkeypox 2022 Global Epidemiology; Report 2022-08-05. Available online: https://www.monkeypox.global.health/ (accessed on 7 August 2022).
  13. Kraemer, M.U.G.; Tegally, H.; Pigott, D.M.; Dasgupta, A.; Sheldon, J.; Wilkinson, E.; Schultheiss, M.; Han, A.; Oglia, M.; Marks, S.; et al. Tracking the 2022 monkeypox outbreak with epidemiological data in real-time. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 941–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kermack, W.O.; McKendrick, A.G. A Contribution to the Mathematical Theory of Epidemics. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 1927, 115, 700–721. [Google Scholar]
  15. Plans-Rubio, P. Percentages of Vaccination Coverage Required to Establish Herd Immunity against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccines 2022, 10, 736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lai, C.C.; Hsu, C.Y.; Jen, H.H.; Yen, A.M.; Chan, C.C.; Chen, H.H. The Bayesian Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model for the outbreak of COVID-19 on the Diamond Princess Cruise Ship. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 2021, 35, 1319–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Miura, F.; van Ewijk, C.E.; Backer, J.A.; Xiridou, M.; Franz, E.; Op de Coul, E.; Brandwagt, D.; van Cleef, B.; van Rijckevorsel, G.; Swaan, C.; et al. Estimated incubation period for monkeypox cases confirmed in the Netherlands, May 2022. Eurosurveillance 2022, 27, 2200448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Du, Z.; Shao, Z.; Bai, Y.; Wang, L.; Herrera-Diestra, J.L.; Fox, S.J.; Ertem, Z.; Lau, E.H.Y.; Cowling, B.J. Reproduction number of monkeypox in the early stage of the 2022 multi-country outbreak. J. Travel Med. 2022, 29, taac099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gani, R.; Leach, S. Transmission potential of smallpox in contemporary populations. Nature 2001, 414, 748–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rimoin, A.W.; Mulembakani, P.M.; Johnston, S.C.; Lloyd Smith, J.O.; Kisalu, N.K.; Kinkela, T.L.; Blumberg, S.; Thomassen, H.A.; Pike, B.L.; Fair, J.N.; et al. Major increase in human monkeypox incidence 30 years after smallpox vaccination campaigns cease in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16262–16267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The directed acyclic graph model for estimating the spread of human monkeypox.
Figure 1. The directed acyclic graph model for estimating the spread of human monkeypox.
Vaccines 11 00468 g001
Figure 2. The observed cumulative monkeypox cases and predicted cumulated monkeypox cases on the global and in the different countries by the deterministic SIR model: (a) globally, (b) in the United States, (c) in Spain, (d) in Brazil, (e) in the United Kingdom and (f) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Figure 2. The observed cumulative monkeypox cases and predicted cumulated monkeypox cases on the global and in the different countries by the deterministic SIR model: (a) globally, (b) in the United States, (c) in Spain, (d) in Brazil, (e) in the United Kingdom and (f) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Vaccines 11 00468 g002
Figure 3. The observed cumulative monkeypox cases and predicted cumulated monkeypox cases on the global and in different countries by the Bayesian SIR model: (a) globally, (b) in the United States, (c) in Spain, (d) in Brazil, (e) in the United Kingdom and (f) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Figure 3. The observed cumulative monkeypox cases and predicted cumulated monkeypox cases on the global and in different countries by the Bayesian SIR model: (a) globally, (b) in the United States, (c) in Spain, (d) in Brazil, (e) in the United Kingdom and (f) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
Vaccines 11 00468 g003
Table 1. Results of estimated parameters from monkeypox outbreaks by using the deterministic SIR model.
Table 1. Results of estimated parameters from monkeypox outbreaks by using the deterministic SIR model.
Country/AreasThe Periods The Deterministic SIR Model
βR0/ReVc(%)
The Globe 31 January~30 April 0.132 1.119 11
1 May~31 May 0.265 2.251 56
1 June~30 June 0.180 1.532 35
1 July~31 July0.149 1.271 21
1 August~31 August0.136 1.153 13
1 September~23 September0.096 0.817 -
United States18 May~30 June 0.245 2.086 52
1 July~30 July 0.184 1.568 36
1 August~31 August0.145 1.229 19
1 September~23 September0.080 0.677 -
Spain18 May~16 June0.2422.05751
17 June~16 July0.153181.30223
17 July~31 August0.117671.000-
1 September~23 September 0.05230.445-
Brazil8 June~7 July 0.2762.346 57
8 July~6 August0.18821.600 38
7 August~31 August 0.12711.080 7
1 September~23 September 0.10770.915
United Kingdom8 June~7 July0.286 2.432 59
8 July~6 August0.154 1.312 24
7 August~31 August0.113 0.964
1 September~23 September0.055 0.470
Democratic Republic of the Congo8 May~5 June 0.118 1.407 29
6 June~28 July0.067 0.568
28 July~7 August 0.329 2.797 64
R0: basic reproductive number; Re: effective reproductive number; SIR model: Susceptible–Infected–Recovered model; Vc: The minimum vaccine coverage in order to control the disease.
Table 2. Results of estimated parameters from monkeypox outbreaks by using the Bayesian SIR model.
Table 2. Results of estimated parameters from monkeypox outbreaks by using the Bayesian SIR model.
DataTotal Cases Estimated by the Bayesian SIR Model
The Periods β (95% CI) α (95% CI);
Reciprocal α (95% CI)
R0/Re
(95% CI)
Vc
(%) (95% CI)
The Globe65,21531 January~30 April 0.374 (0.368–0.384) 0.373 (0.373–0.374);1.001 (0.986–1.150) -
1 May~31 May 0.545 (0.511–0.563) 1.459 (1.370–1.507) 31.4 (27.0–33.6)
1 June~31 July 0.420 (0.419–0.421) 1.125 (1.123–1.127) 11.1 (10.9–11.3)
1 August~23 September 0.383 (0.383–0.384) 2.678 (2.677–2.680) 1.027 (1.026–1.028) 2.6 (2.5–2.7)
United States24,40317 May~30 June0.583 (0.581–0.589) 0.487 (0.485–0.490);1.198 (1.197–1.201) 16.5 (16.4–16.7)
1 July~30 July 0.567 (0.563–0.569) 1.164 (1.149–1.169) 14.1 (13.0–14.5)
31 July~31 August0.499 (0.493–0.516) 1.024 (1.016–1.052) 2.3 (1.6–4.9)
1 September~23 September 0.407 (0.192–0.452) 2.054 (2.039–2.061) 0.837 (−0.391–0.929) -
Spain708318 May~16 June0.480 (0.478–0.483) 0.403 (0.400–0.405);1.191(1.189–1.194) 16.0 (15.9–16.2)
17 June~16 July 0.454 (0.451–0.457) 1.126 (1.124–1.129) 11.2 (11.0–11.4)
17 July~31 August 0.389 (0.386–0.391) 0.963 (0.961–0.966) -
1 September~23 September 0.298 (0.278–0.316) 2.479 (2.467–2.498) 0.739 (0.690–0.784) -
Brazil73008 June~7 July 0.489 (0.487–0.492) 0.365 (0.363–0.368);1.341 (1.337–1.345) 25.4 (25.2–25.6)
8 July~6 August 0.435 (0.433–0.439) 1.193 (1.189–1.197) 16.2 (15.9–14.4)
7 August~23 September 0.362 (0.359–0.365)2.740 (2.717–2.758) 0.992 (0.990–0.994) -
United Kingdom35858 June~7 July 0.542 (0.539–0.545) 0.408 (0.405–0.411);1.330 (1.326–1.334) 24.8 (24.7–25.0)
8 July~6 August 0.437 (0.433–0.440) 1.071 (1.067–1.074) 6.6 (6.3–6.9)
7 August~31 August0.395 (0.392–0.398) 0.969 (0.966–0.972) -
1 September~23 September 0.181 (0.115–0.280) 2.453 (2.436–2.472) 0.443 (0.284–0.687) -
Democratic Republic of the Congo1958 May~5 June 0.482 (0.463–0.497)0.397 (0.376–0.415)1.216 (1.199–1.235)17.8 (16.6–19.0)
6 June~28 July0.334 (0.313–0.358) 0.841 (0.816–0.864)
29 July~7 August 0.847 (0.794–0.903) 2.136 (2.011–2.284)53.2 (56.2–78.3)
After 8 August 0.005 (0.000–0.033)2.524 (2.412–2.662)0.013 (0.000–0.083)
R0: basic reproductive number; Re: effective reproductive number; SIR model: Susceptible–Infected–Recovered model.; CI: credible interval; Vc: The herd immunity threshold.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liao, L.-C.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Chen, H.-H.; Lai, C.-C. Estimating the Global Spread of Epidemic Human Monkeypox with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphic Model. Vaccines 2023, 11, 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020468

AMA Style

Liao L-C, Hsu C-Y, Chen H-H, Lai C-C. Estimating the Global Spread of Epidemic Human Monkeypox with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphic Model. Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):468. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020468

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liao, Ling-Chun, Chen-Yang Hsu, Hsiu-Hsi Chen, and Chao-Chih Lai. 2023. "Estimating the Global Spread of Epidemic Human Monkeypox with Bayesian Directed Acyclic Graphic Model" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 468. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020468

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop