Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Potential Role of Phenolic Extracts of Mentha in Managing Oxidative Stress and Alzheimer’s Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Antioxidant Packaging Films Based on Poly(ε-Caprolactone) and Almond Skin Extract: Development and Effect on the Oxidative Stability of Fried Almonds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Glutathione S-Transferase Rescues Motor Neuronal Toxicity in Fly Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 9
Issue 7
10.3390/antiox9070630
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effect of Nrf2 Inducer Dimethyl Fumarate in Neurodegenerative Diseases

by
Sarah A. Scuderi
†,
Alessio Ardizzone
†,
Irene Paterniti
,
Emanuela Esposito
* and
Michela Campolo
Department of Chemical, Biological, Pharmaceutical and Environmental Sciences, University of Messina, Viale Ferdinando Stagno D’Alcontres, 31-98166 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
The authors equally contributed to this work.
Antioxidants 2020, 9(7), 630; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9070630
Submission received: 22 June 2020 / Revised: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 14 July 2020 / Published: 17 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oxidative Stress and Neurodegenerative Disorders)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) represents debilitating conditions characterized by degeneration of neuronal cells in specific brain areas, causing disability and death in patients. In the pathophysiology of NDs, oxidative stress, apoptosis and neuroinflammation have a key role, as demonstrated by in vivo and in vitro models. Therefore, the use of molecules with antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities represents a possible strategy for the treatment of NDs. Many studies demonstrated the beneficial effects of fumaric acid esters (FAEs) to counteract neuroinflammation and oxidative stress. Among these molecules, dimethyl fumarate (DMF) showed a valid therapeutic approach to slow down neurodegeneration and relieve symptoms in patients with NDs. DMF is a methyl ester of fumaric acid and acts as modulator of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway as well as nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) translocation. Therefore, this review aims to examine the potential beneficial effects of DMF to counteract oxidative stress and inflammation in patients with NDs.

1. Introduction

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are debilitating conditions caused by the progressive degeneration and death of neurons; the prevalence of these diseases is rising in today’s society [1]. NDs include a large spectrum of heterogeneous and multifactorial pathologies as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease (PD), Huntington’s disease (HD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
Although some genetic factors have been identified, the pathophysiology of NDs remains poorly understood [2]. NDs are specifically characterized by apoptosis and/or necrosis accompanied by dysfunction of neuronal cells. The brain, for the high oxygen consumption and lipid-rich content, is highly susceptible to oxidative stress (OS) [3]; in fact, many studies underlined a significant connection between OS and NDs. OS is generally caused by an imbalance between oxidant species and antioxidant defense systems as summarized in Figure 1.
The imbalance occurs as a result of an overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), reactive nitrogen species (RNS), or improper functioning of the antioxidant system [4]. OS has an important role in the pathogenesis of NDs, often associated with specific protein clusters such as α-synuclein, DJ-1, β-amyloid, tau protein and/or signaling pathways [5], which cause the deterioration of neuronal cells, the formation of neurofibrillary tangles and senile plaques.
The molecular mechanisms of OS include inflammation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis that culminates in neuronal death [6]. In NDs, inflammation is characterized by activation of microglia and astrocytes in the brain parenchyma, which lead to the production of inflammatory mediators, ROS and RNS [7], that including superoxide radical anion (O2•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical (•OH), nitric oxide (NO), and peroxynitrite (ONOO−).
Moreover, it is interesting to highlight how astrocytes would seem to play an important role on a cellular level, particularly in the case of ALS and PD. It should be considered that ARE-regulated Nrf2-dependent genes are also preferentially activated in astrocytes, thus providing an interesting cellular and molecular link between astrocyte dysfunction and the role of oxidative stress in neurodegeneration [8]. In particular, Nrf2 has been proposed as a new pharmacological target in neuroinflammatory pathologies, including NDs [9]. Many papers highlighted the importance of molecules with antioxidant activities for the treatment of NDs, such as the fumaric acid esters (FAEs), where DMF represents the most pharmacologically effective molecule [10]. It has been shown that DMF acts as an Nrf2 activator, able to stimulate a cellular defense to protect neurons from ROS-induced damage [11]. Therefore, this review aims to highlight the involvement of OS in neurodegenerative diseases and the effect of DMF in the treatment of these diseases.

2. Neurodegenerative Diseases Background

2.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

AD is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disorder [12]; it is the most common type of dementia that affects more than 46.8 million people worldwide, especially in older people [13]. AD is a heterogeneous and multifactorial neurodegenerative disease [14]; initially, AD is characterized by a sporadic decline in episodic memory, followed by a more global decline in cognitive abilities, such as long-term loss of memory, language, attention, and personality changes [15].
The majority of AD cases are sporadic, caused by genetic and environmental factors that contribute to the genesis of the disease [16,17]. Whereas, other cases of AD are due to mutations in specific genes such as amyloid-β protein precursor (APP), presenilin 1 and presenilin 2 [18].
The pathophysiology of AD is characterized by an extraneuronal deposition of the β- amyloid protein (Aβ) in the form of plaques and by an intraneuronal aggregation of the microtubule-associated protein tau in specific brain regions such as the hippocampus and cerebral cortex [19].
In AD, the deposition of Aβ causes a chronic inflammatory response which contributes to neurodegeneration [14]. The mechanisms and pathways of neuroinflammation triggered by Aβ protein have been shown in vivo and in vitro [20,21]. In AD, the mechanism of inflammation is mediated by activation of microglia and astrocytes, followed by the production of cytokines and chemokines [22].
In response to Aβ-induced damage, astrocytes showed a significant increase in the expression of the glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin (VIM), markers of astrogliosis [23].
Moreover, activated astrocytes induce the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) [21], promoting the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1 (IL-1), IL-6, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and chemokines [21]. In response to Aβ, chronically activated microglia release pro-inflammatory and toxic products that include ROS, nitric oxide (NO), IL-1β and IL-6, which in turn stimulates the activation of CDK5, a kinase known to hyperphosphorylate tau protein [24].
Currently, no effective disease-modifying therapies are available in clinical practice. However, some treatments have been approved for the symptomatic management of AD and consist mostly of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChE) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists to alleviate the cognitive and functional deficits, even if only for a limited time [25].

2.2. Parkinson’s Disease

PD is the most common pathology characterized by motor disorders and the second-most common neurodegenerative disease after AD [26]. It is estimated that it affects about 5 million people every year, with a higher incidence in males than in females; the average age of onset is around 60 years where the prevalence and incidence increase exponentially with age [27]. In the early stages of the disease, symptoms are presented that relate to movement, including tremors, stiffness, bradykinesia, and difficulty in walking; subsequently, cognitive and behavioral problems can arise, with dementia in the advanced stages [28]. The symptomatology has its basis in the etiopathogenesis of PD; it is known that PD has multifactorial origins, which include genetic and environmental factors [29,30,31,32,33]. Both genetic and environmental factors cause degeneration of the neurons of the substantia nigra pars compacta [34]; this degeneration is due to an alteration of the closed-circuit acetylcholine-GABA-dopamine that reduce dopamine content and increase the level of acetylcholine at the neuronal level [35,36,37,38,39]. In fact, the treatment for Parkinsonian patients acts to attenuate the symptoms and can be used both in the early and in the advanced stages of the disease.
The common therapy involved are the administration of Levodopa, a dopamine precursor, cholinergic antagonists, and monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) inhibitors. [40,41,42]. However, drug therapy still cannot completely cure the disease; therefore, it is of fundamental importance to deepening the neurological molecular mechanisms that underlie the development of the disease; in fact, the neurodegenerative aspects are closely related to the immune system, neuroinflammation and oxidative stress [43,44]. Therefore, in-depth knowledge of these multifactorial aspects could be helpful in the discovery of new therapeutic targets for the management of PD.

2.3. Huntington’s Disease (HD)

HD is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive motor, cognitive, and psychiatric symptoms [45]. HD is caused by an abnormal extension in the cytosine–adenine–guanine (CAG) repeat in the huntingtin (HTT) gene, causing the mutation of the huntingtin protein [46], which is generally involved in the development of the nervous system.
HD is characterized by progressive degeneration and death of striatal neurons in CNS. In HD patients, symptoms progress over 15–20 years; motor functions are affected initially, while cognitive impairment and dementia can be observed at later stages of the disease [45].
Moreover, elevated concentrations of heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) 3 -nitrotyrosine and MDA have been detected in HD patients post mortem, particularly in the cerebrospinal fluid, in the striatum, and the cortex [47]. Many studies suggest that mHTT promotes the abnormal release of cytokines by activated microglia [48,49]. HD patients have been shown high levels of proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα, in their plasma and striatal tissues, and promotes the activation of the nuclear factor (NF)-κB-p65 [50].

2.4. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

Among the various NDs, ALS is the most common type of motor neuron disease. ALS is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by the progressive degeneration of upper and lower motor neurons in the spinal cord, cortex, and brainstem [51].
ALS is characterized by OS and neuroinflammation. In ALS, neuroinflammation is mediated by astrocytes and microglia activation [52,53]. The reactive microglia release inflammatory cytokines as which high levels have been found in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood from ALS patients.
Recently, 24 additional genes have been connected with sALS and fALS [54] including p62 [55], which has a direct link to Keap1/Nrf2 and autophagy. Nrf2 and Keap1 have been analyzed in the primary motor cortex and spinal cord of ALS patients [56]. These studies have shown a reduction in Nrf2 mRNA in ALS patients tissues relative to Nrf2 levels in control tissues, suggesting that alterations in this signaling cascade may contribute to motor neuron degeneration in ALS.

3. Involvement of OS in NDs

3.1. Alzheimer’s Disease

In the development of AD, OS plays a central role. In AD, OS promotes Aβ deposition and the loss of synapses and neuronal cells [57]. In specific brain regions of AD patients, like the hippocampus, temporal cortex, and amygdala, a significant increase has been shown in malondialdehyde (MDA) and acrolein levels, markers for lipid peroxidation [58,59,60], and an increase of 3-nitrotyrosine level, a marker for peroxynitrite-mediated protein nitration [61].
Moreover, different studies suggested that increased levels of Aβ in the brain of AD patients could accelerate ROS production by binding to mitochondrial membranes, altering mitochondrial function [62]. Dysfunction in mitochondrial function contributes to dysregulation of neuronal calcium homeostasis, causing synaptic dysfunction and neurodegeneration [63,64]. Furthermore, many papers showed a decrease of Nrf2 activity in AD on hippocampal and cortex neurons [65,66].

3.2. Parkinson’s Disease

Oxidative stress is one of main factors leading to cell dysfunction and cell death in PD [67,68,69], thus causing mitochondrial damage and neuroinflammation [70]. The oxidative condition in PD is due to both exogenous [71] (environmental toxins, ionizing radiation, UV rays, smoke) and endogenous factors [72] like free radicals. Free radicals produced following the catabolism of catecholamines, including dopamine [73], represents the link between OS and PD. Specifically, the damage of the neurons of the substantia nigra originate in the hyperproduction of free radicals during the oxidative metabolism (autoxidation) of dopamine [73]; in particular, this increase in dopaminergic metabolism, [74] together with the depletion of reduced glutathione (GSH) [75] and a large presence of Fe2+ ions [76], favor an overproduction of free radicals, which contributes to an increase in the aggregation of synuclein and other misfolded proteins [73]. Recent articles highlighted the roles of two proteins, c-Rel and Leucine-rich repeat kinase (LLRK) 2, which would seem to have a crucial role in OS related to PD. The c-Rel protein is a transcriptional regulator for mitochondrial antioxidant and antiapoptotic factors, therefore, the reduction of its physiological production could contribute to OS in PD [77]; while mutations of the LLRK2 enzyme in PD would seem related to mitochondrial ROS production, thus suggesting the involvement of this enzyme in the regulation of OS and mitochondrial dysfunction [78].

3.3. Huntington’s Disease (HD)

OS and neuroinflammation are among the common pathogenic mechanisms implicated in HD [47,79,80]. Different studies demonstrated that the accumulation of mutant huntingtin (mHtt) causes an alteration of mitochondrial calcium buffering and reduces the expression of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) and coactivator-1 α (PGC-1α), a transcriptional coactivator involved in the mitochondrial respiration and ROS metabolism [81].
Various therapies have been adapted to counteract OS and inflammation in HD; in particular, the stimulation of the Nrf-2/ARE pathway has be proven to be efficacious, associated with increased expression of antioxidant enzymes and reduction of ROS levels in CNS [82].

3.4. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)

The etiology of the disease is still unknown, but it was found that approximately 10% of familial ALS (FALS) cases are the result of a mutation in the gene responsible for the SOD-1 encoding, whereas 90% of ALS cases are sporadic (sALS) and it is not clear the genetic connection [51]. SOD-1 is an antioxidant enzyme covering a key role in the regulation of OS [83]. Therefore, mutations of SOD-1 predispose cellular organelles to oxidative damage causing elevate ROS production.
The reactive microglia release inflammatory cytokines as which high levels have been found in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood from ALS patients. On the other hand, mitochondrial dysfunction causes excessive ROS production, which has been linked to neurodegeneration in ALS.
Furthermore, a substantial number of clinical studies have demonstrated that levels of MDA and 8-hydroxyguanosine (8-OHdG), a marker of oxidative DNA damage, were significantly increased in the peripheral blood of ALS patients [84,85].
Therefore, Nrf2-ARE pathway activation could be a valid therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegeneration and OS in ALS patients [86].

4. Dimethyl Fumarate

4.1. DMF Structure and Origin

FAEs, also known as fumarate, are derivatives of fumaric acid which occurs naturally in many fruits and vegetables. It has been isolated for the first time from the roots of the wild herbaceous plant Fumaria officinalis (Fumariaceae). Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities have been attributed to this class of molecules, among which DMF represents the pharmacologically most effective molecule among FAEs [87]. Chemically, DMF is the methyl ester of fumaric acid. In human, DMF is extensively metabolized by esterase before reaching systemic circulation and further metabolism occurs through the tricarboxylic acid cycle (Krebs cycle and citric acid cycle), without any involvement of the cytochrome P450 system [11].

4.2. DMF Metabolism and Function

DMF is considered a prodrug because after administration, usually oral, DMF is cleaved into monomethyl fumarate (MMF) and fumarate via esterase inside cells into the small intestine DMF [88] and MMF have half-lives of 12 min and 36 h, respectively. The maximum concentration of the MMF is reached within 5–6 h [89]. FAEs have been used for years as a therapy for psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease mediated by skin-directed T cells, resulting in scaly plaques [90,91,92]. Clinical studies reported high efficacy, thanks to its immunomodulatory activity also in the treatment of MS [93,94,95]. Thanks to the results obtained from clinical studies, in 2013 DMF was licensed as an oral therapeutic agent for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis [96,97]. Furthermore, it has been disclosed that DMF and MMF act on Kelch-like ECH associating protein 1 (Keap1), an Nrf2 activator (Figure 2A), which works on both antioxidant and inflammatory pathways [98], promoting the attenuation of pro-inflammatory cytokine production [99] and the modulation of microglia and astrocytes [100].

4.3. Nrf2 Structure and Function

Nrf2 is ubiquitously expressed in the body, including in the central nervous system (CNS) [101]. Nrf2 regulates and induces the expression of cytoprotective antixenobiotic and antioxidant enzymes [102]. However, Nrf2 activity declines with age, which is the main risk factor for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s [103]. Under physiological conditions, Nrf2 is bound in the cytoplasm to Keap1; upon exposure to ROS or xenobiotics, Nrf2 translocates into the nucleus, then heterodimerizes and binds to the antioxidant response element (ARE) promoter region. The binding of Nrf2 to ARE induces the transduction of antioxidant enzymes, such as glutathione-S-transferase and HO-1 [104]. It is identified that Nrf2 activity is linked to the NF-kB pathway, which is more readily activated in oxidative environments [105]. Therefore, considering the cross-talk that exists between NF-kB and Nrf2 pathways provides DMF the ability to counteract the inflammation. Given these considerations, the use of DMF could improve the management of many pathologies including the NDs (Figure 2B); this thesis is supported by different research articles that demonstrate the efficacy of DMF in many in vitro and in vivo models of NDs.

5. DMF and NDs

5.1. DMF and Alzheimer

The studies that correlate DMF to AD are few; in fact, this research field is still in continuous evolution. The first studies conducted between the late 90s and early 2000s demonstrated the ability of DMF to activate endogenous antioxidant defenses in neuronal cells that could counteract the damage produced by free radicals [106], in particular, increasing the production of the enzyme NAD(P)H quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO1), which exerts a neuroprotective function in hippocampal pyramidal neurons in AD patients [107,108]. NQO-1 belongs to NAD(P)H dehydrogenase (quinone) family—these species encode for a cytoplasmic 2-electron reductase that reduces quinones to hydroquinones. The enzymatic activity of this target gene Nrf2 prevents the reduction of the enzymatic levels of quinones (which would cause the production of radical species) and thus exerts antioxidant effects [8]. Some studies identified p62 as activator Nrf2 [109,110,111]; it has been hypothesized that p62 is phosphorylated in the AD brain and that the phosphorylated p62 binds to Keap1, with consequent accumulation of Nrf2 [101]. In addition, with the phosphorylation of p62, a decrease in the cytosolic expression of Keap1 and an increase in the expression of the target gene Nrf2 in the brain were observed [66].
Other studies conducted by Majkutewicz et al. [112,113] analyzed the effect of DMF on spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neurodegeneration on the therapeutic effect of DMF in the streptozotocin (STZ)-induced model of sporadic AD. The data showed that DMF improved spatial memory deficits, hippocampal neurodegeneration, nitrative/oxidative stress, and microglial activation caused by an intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of STZ [112].
Moreover, an in vitro study investigated the multiple mechanisms of DMF [10]; for the experiment, were used SH-SY5Y human neuroblastoma cell lines stimulated with amyloid-beta (Ab). The form of 42-amino acid of this peptide, Ab (1–42), has been shown to contribute to the pathogenesis of AD, and is also linked to oxidative stress and inflammation in the CNS [114].
The study, performed by Campolo et al., indicated that DMF operated its protective role by: 1. reduction in Tau hyper-phosphorylation; 2. Reduction of the Nf-kB pro-inflammatory pathway; and 3. Modulation of the Nrf2 pathway increasing antioxidants enzymes production; these results confirmed the involvement of Nrf2 and NFkB systems to protect against cytotoxicity induced by β-amyloid and promoting DMF as a potential treatment for limiting the inflammatory and oxidative stress in neurons following amyloid peptides formation [10].
Furthermore, following a systemic immune challenge, DMF treatment was able to reduce acute microglial activation, neuroinflammation, long-term memory deficits, and responses of reactive astrocytes [115], thus adding also an immune hypothesis in the multifactorial causes of AD.
It is interesting to highlight a study by Rojo et al. [116] that used a new mouse model of AD that combines amyloidopathy and tauopathy. The study proved that low-grade chronic neuroinflammation is a “primer” of neurodegeneration, and not just a result, therefore an antioxidant modulator of inflammation as DMF, which targets NRF2, protected from AD disease progression [116].

5.2. DMF and Parkinson

The first studies evaluating the efficacy of DMF in PD are relatively recent. Some promising results have been obtained by studies on Nrf2 knock-out mice, in which the lack of this transcription factor caused a greater loss of dopaminergic afferents in the striatum. However, it has been shown how the overexpression of Nrf2 in astrocytes protects against the damage caused by 6-hydroxydopamine in mice [117,118]. Similar results were also obtained by a study of Lastres-Becker et al. [119] in which Nrf2 activation attenuating the death of dopaminergic neurons in DMF-treated mice. Moreover Nrf2 deficiency is associated with an increase of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydroxydopamine (MPTP) sensibility; on the other hand, astrocytic Nrf2 overexpression, in mice, protect from the toxic effect of MPTP [120]. So certainly Nrf2 activation improved the antioxidant response and protects against the neurotoxic effects caused by both 6-hydroxydopamine and MPTP, as confirmed in various in vivo models [120,121,122].
DMF was able to attenuate neurotoxicity in in vitro model of 6-OHDA-stimulated SH-SY5Y cells and also in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease by enhancing Nrf2 activity and reducing the production of proinflammatory cytokines in splenocytes of mice as reported by Jing et al. [123].
A study, including both an in vitro and in vivo models, was conducted by Campolo et al. [124]; the research article highlighted how DMF exerts neuroprotective action in an MPTP-mouse model of PD, this action is given not only by the DMF’s ability to regulate antioxidant enzymes such as Nrf2, Mn-SOD and HO-1, but also by the anti-inflammatory action deriving from the cross-talking between Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways, thus decreasing levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines like IL-1 and pro-inflammatory enzymes like cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 and Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). Besides, the results of this study underlined how DMF is capable of significantly reducing neuronal cell degeneration in the dopaminergic tract and behavioral impairments, preventing dopamine depletion, increasing tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter activities and also reducing the number of α-synuclein- positive neurons.
Therefore, the CNS-protective effects of DMF could involve regulation of Nrf2-mediated oxidative stress and inflammatory response mechanisms implicated in a variety of pathological conditions [124].
In addition, human data showed that Nrf2 dependent factors NQO1 and HO-1, are strongly up-regulated in glial cells in postmortem tissue from PD patients, possibly indicating a naturally occurring event that is insufficient to counteract the damage suggesting an endogenous approach strategy for PD [125,126]. Therefore, the neuroprotective property of DMF, in addition to its safety profile, may represent a helpful and complementary therapeutic approach that can be applied to future clinical practice in PD.

5.3. DMF and Huntington

Many papers demonstrated the neuroprotective effect of DMF in HD, thanks to its ability to activate the Nrf2 transcriptional pathway [127].
The therapeutic efficacy of DMF was investigated in a study performed by Ellrichmann et al. [127], on R6/2 and YAC128 transgenic mice models of HD. DMF treatment was able to preserve the morphology of neurons in the striatum and the motor cortex, exerting beneficial effects on survival and motor behavior in R6/2 mice [127]. Moreover, DMF treatment led to a significant reduction in dyskinesia as well as diminished neurodegeneration [128].
The efficacy of DMF as an inducer of the oxidative stress response in models of HD underlines the importance of free radicals in the pathophysiology of HD [127]. Furthermore, DMF thanks to its antioxidants effects could represent a valid approach therapeutic for HD treatment [128].

5.4. DMF and ALS

In the CNS regions of patients with ALS, high levels of ROS, and changes in antioxidant defense system have been revealed. Therefore, new therapies that improve cellular resistance to free radicals could prove useful for ALS treatment [129].
Many studies highlighted the key role of astrocyte on Nrf2 activation in ALS since activation of Nrf2 coordinates the up-regulation of antioxidant defenses systems such as SOD-1 [130,131]. Various molecules activating Nrf2 have been assessed in murine models of ALS; among these molecules, DMF [132]. A clinical trial conducted by Vucic et al. assessed the efficacy of DMF treatment in sporadic ALS, using a commercially available medication approved for the treatment of the relapsing-remitting form of multiple sclerosis [133]. In this study, DMF treatment showed to reduce pro-inflammatory T-cells levels including CD4+, interferon (IFN)γ, CD8+, induce Nrf2 activity in astrocytes and preserve the motor neurons function, also stabilizing respiratory function in patients [134].
Therefore, this study demonstrated how DMF treatment slows disease progression and improves the quality of life of ALS patients [134].

6. Conclusions

DMF represents a promising molecule in the management of many neurodegenerative diseases, thanks to its antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulating, and neuroprotective properties. In particular, the study of DMF in the context of CNS disorders could help to better understand not only the effectiveness of the drug but also the underlying mechanisms of action that characterize NDs. Therefore, DMF could represent a new starting point for the management of NDs.

7. Future Directions

DMF have found great interest from scientific world in the management of brain pathologies thanks to its neuroprotective effects leading to a reduction of inflammatory and oxidative pathways.
Moreover, DMF is considered a molecule with a secure profile as demonstrated by many studies performed by Gold et al. [135] and Ochi et al. [136]. Considering all of its properties, we are convinced that DMF offer enormous growth potential as a future therapeutic agent for the treatment of NDs (or in association with the general treatment of NDs), which could assist in alleviating symptoms and improving the quality of life of patients.

Author Contributions

S.A.S. and A.A. were involved in the design and intellectual concept of the study; I.P. performed the literature search. E.E. and M.C. designed the study and critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Roth, G.; Johnson, C.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abera, S.F.; Abyu, G.; Ahmed, M.; Aksut, B.; Alam, T.; Alam, K.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases for 10 Causes, 1990 to 2015. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2017, 70, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Johri, A.; Beal, M.F. Mitochondrial dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 342, 619–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Salim, S. Oxidative Stress and the Central Nervous System. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2016, 360, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chiurchiù, V.; Orlacchio, A.; Maccarrone, M. Is Modulation of Oxidative Stress an Answer? The State of the Art of Redox Therapeutic Actions in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Guo, C.; Sun, L.; Chen, X.; Zhang, D. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2013, 8, 2003–2014. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Lim, J.-H.; Gerhart-Hines, Z.; Dominy, J.E.; Lee, Y.; Kim, S.; Tabata, M.; Xiang, Y.K.; Puigserver, P. Oleic Acid Stimulates Complete Oxidation of Fatty Acids through Protein Kinase A-dependent Activation of SIRT1-PGC1α Complex. J. Boil. Chem. 2013, 288, 7117–7126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ransohoff, R.M.; Perry, V.H. Microglial Physiology: Unique Stimuli, Specialized Responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27, 119–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Lee, D.-H.; Gold, R.; Linker, R.A. Mechanisms of Oxidative Damage in Multiple Sclerosis and Neurodegenerative Diseases: Therapeutic Modulation via Fumaric Acid Esters. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 11783–11803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Johnson, D.A.; Johnson, J.A. Nrf2—A therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Free Radic. Boil. Med. 2015, 88, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Casili, G.; Lanza, M.; Filippone, A.; Campolo, M.; Paterniti, I.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. Dimethyl fumarate alleviates the nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced migraine in mice. J. Neuroinflamm. 2020, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Campolo, M.; Casili, G.; Lanza, M.; Filippone, A.; Paterniti, I.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. Multiple mechanisms of dimethyl fumarate in amyloid β-induced neurotoxicity in human neuronal cells. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2017, 22, 1081–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pedrinolla, A.; Schena, F.; Venturelli, M. Resilience to Alzheimer’s Disease: The Role of Physical Activity. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2017, 14, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Wortmann, M. Dementia: A global health priority - highlights from an ADI and World Health Organization report. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 2012, 4, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Bona, D.; Scapagnini, G.; Candore, G.; Castiglia, L.; Colonna-Romano, G.; Duro, G.; Nuzzo, D.; Iemolo, F.; Lio, D.; Pellicano, M.; et al. Immune-Inflammatory Responses and Oxidative Stress in Alzheimers Disease: Therapeutic Implications. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Querfurth, H.W.; LaFerla, F.M. Alzheimer’s Disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Duthey, B. Background Paper 6.11: Alzheimer Disease and Other Dementias. A Public Health Approach to Innovation. 2013, pp. 1–74. Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/priority_medicines/BP6_11Alzheimer.pdf (accessed on 8 June 2014).
  17. Reitz, C.; Brayne, C.; Mayeux, R. Epidemiology of Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 137–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Li, L.; Perry, G.; Lee, H.-G.; Zhu, X. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Bioenerg. 2013, 1842, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Simic, G.; Leko, M.B.; Wray, S.; Harrington, C.R.; Delalle, I.; Jovanov-Milošević, N.; Bažadona, D.; Buée, L.; De Silva, R.; Di Giovanni, G.; et al. Tau Protein Hyperphosphorylation and Aggregation in Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Tauopathies, and Possible Neuroprotective Strategies. Biomolecules 2016, 6, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Colangelo, A.M.; Alberghina, L.; Papa, M. Astrogliosis as a therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases. Neurosci. Lett. 2014, 565, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Glass, C.K.; Saijo, K.; Winner, B.; Marchetto, M.C.; Gage, F.H. Mechanisms Underlying Inflammation in Neurodegeneration. Cell 2010, 140, 918–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Agostinho, P.; Cunha, R.A.; Oliveira, C. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2010, 16, 2766–2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kamphuis, W.; Kooijman, L.; Orre, M.; Stassen, O.M.J.A.; Pekny, M.; Hol, E.M. GFAP and vimentin deficiency alters gene expression in astrocytes and microglia in wild-type mice and changes the transcriptional response of reactive glia in mouse model for Alzheimer’s disease. Glia 2015, 63, 1036–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Quintanilla, R.A.; Orellana, D.I.; Gonzalez-Billault, C.; Maccioni, R.B. Interleukin-6 induces Alzheimer-type phosphorylation of tau protein by deregulating the cdk5/p35 pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 295, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Rygiel, K. Novel strategies for Alzheimer’s disease treatment: An overview of anti-amyloid beta monoclonal antibodies. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2016, 48, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Ascherio, A.; Schwarzschild, M.A. The epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease: Risk factors and prevention. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15, 1257–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kalia, L.V.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2015, 386, 896–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hallett, M. Parkinson’s disease tremor: Pathophysiology. Park. Relat. Disord. 2012, 18 (Suppl. 1), S85–S86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Aaseth, J.; Dusek, P.; Roos, P.M. Prevention of progression in Parkinson’s disease. BioMetals 2018, 31, 737–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. García, A.M.; Sedeño, L.; Trujillo, N.; Bocanegra, Y.; Gomez, D.; Pineda, D.A.; Villegas, A.; Muñoz, E.; Arias, W.; Ibanez, A. Language Deficits as a Preclinical Window into Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence from Asymptomatic Parkin and Dardarin Mutation Carriers. J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc. 2017, 23, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Langston, J.W. The MPTP Story. J. Park. Dis. 2017, 7, S11–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Morris, H. Genetics of Parkinson’s disease. Ann. Med. 2005, 37, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xilouri, M.; Brekk, O.R.; Stefanis, L. Autophagy and Alpha-Synuclein: Relevance to Parkinson’s Disease and Related Synucleopathies. Mov. Disord. 2016, 31, 178–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cacabelos, R. Parkinson’s Disease: From Pathogenesis to Pharmacogenomics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aosaki, T.; Miura, M.; Suzuki, T.; Nishimura, K.; Masuda, M. Acetylcholine-dopamine balance hypothesis in the striatum: An update. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2010, 10 (Suppl. 1), S148–S157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dray, A. The striatum and substantia nigra: A commentary on their relationships. Neuroscience 1979, 4, 1407–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jellinger, K.A. Post mortem studies in Parkinson’s disease—Is it possible to detect brain areas for specific symptoms? Adv. Res. Neurodegener. 1999, 56, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nakano, K. Neural circuits and topographic organization of the basal ganglia and related regions. Brain Dev. 2000, 22 (Suppl. 1), S5–S16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rizzi, G.; Tan, K.R. Dopamine and Acetylcholine, a Circuit Point of View in Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neural Circuits 2017, 11, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Fox, S.H. Non-dopaminergic Treatments for Motor Control in Parkinson’s Disease. Drugs 2013, 73, 1405–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rezak, M. Current Pharmacotherapeutic Treatment Options in Parkinson’s Disease. Dis. Mon. 2007, 53, 214–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhuo, C.; Xue, R.; Luo, L.; Ji, F.; Tian, H.; Qu, H.; Lin, X.; Jiang, R.; Tao, R. Efficacy of antidepressive medication for depression in Parkinson disease: A network meta-analysis. Medicine 2017, 96, e6698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. De Virgilio, A.; Greco, A.; Fabbrini, G.; Inghilleri, M.; Rizzo, M.I.; Gallo, A.; Conte, M.; Rosato, C.; Appiani, M.C.; De Vincentiis, M.; et al. Parkinson’s disease: Autoimmunity and neuroinflammation. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 1005–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Puspita, L.; Chung, S.Y.; Shim, J.-W. Oxidative stress and cellular pathologies in Parkinson’s disease. Mol. Brain 2017, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Ghosh, R.; Tabrizi, S.J. Clinical aspects of huntington’s disease. Curr. Top Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 22, 3–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Singh, A.; Kukreti, R.; Saso, L.; Kukreti, S. Oxidative Stress: A Key Modulator in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Molecules 2019, 24, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Browne, S.E.; Ferrante, R.J.; Beal, M.F. Oxidative stress in Huntington’s disease. Brain Pathol. 1999, 9, 147–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sapp, E.; Kegel, K.B.; Aronin, N.; Hashikawa, T.; Uchiyama, Y.; Tohyama, K.; Bhide, P.G.; Vonsattel, J.P.; DiFiglia, M. Early and Progressive Accumulation of Reactive Microglia in the Huntington Disease Brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2001, 60, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Pavese, N.; Gerhard, A.; Tai, Y.F.; Ho, A.K.; Turkheimer, F.; Barker, R.A.; Brooks, D.J.; Piccini, P. Microglial activation correlates with severity in Huntington disease: A clinical and PET study. Neurology 2006, 66, 1638–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Khoshnan, A.; Ko, J.; Watkin, E.E.; Paige, L.A.; Reinhart, P.H.; Patterson, P.H. Activation of the IκB Kinase Complex and Nuclear Factor-κB Contributes to Mutant Huntingtin Neurotoxicity. J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 7999–8008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kikuchi, S.; Shinpo, K.; Ogata, A.; Tsuji, S.; Takeuchi, M.; Makita, Z.; Tashiro, K. Detection of Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) and non-CML advanced glycation end-products in the anterior horn of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2002, 3, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lampson, L.; Kushner, P.; Sobel, R. Strong expression of class-II major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigens in the absence of detectable t-cell infiltration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) spinal-cord. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 1988, 47, 353. [Google Scholar]
  53. Moisse, K.; Strong, M.J. Innate immunity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1762, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Marangi, G.; Traynor, B.J. Genetic causes of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: New genetic analysis methodologies entailing new opportunities and challenges. Brain Res. 2014, 1607, 75–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Fecto, F.; Yan, J.; Vemula, S.P.; Liu, E.; Yang, Y.; Chen, W.; Zheng, J.G.; Shi, Y.; Siddique, N.; Arrat, H.; et al. SQSTM1 Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Arch. Neurol. 2011, 68, 1440–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sarlette, A.; Krampfl, K.; Grothe, C.; Von Neuhoff, N.; Dengler, R.; Petri, S. Nuclear Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2-Antioxidative Response Element Signaling Pathway in Motor Cortex and Spinal Cord in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2008, 67, 1055–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chen, Z.; Zhong, C. Oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Bull. 2014, 30, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lovell, M.A.; Xie, C.; Markesbery, W.R. Acrolein is increased in Alzheimer’s disease brain and is toxic to primary hippocampal cultures. Neurobiol. Aging 2001, 22, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Palmer, A.M.; Burns, M.A. Selective increase in lipid peroxidation in the inferior temporal cortex in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 1994, 645, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Calingasan, N.Y.; Uchida, K.; Gibson, G.E. Protein-Bound Acrolein: A novel marker of oxidative stress in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurochem. 1999, 72, 751–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Aksenov, M.; Aksenova, M.; Butterfield, D.; Geddes, J.; Markesbery, W. Protein oxidation in the brain in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscience 2001, 103, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Swerdlow, R.H. Brain aging, Alzheimer’s disease, and mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1812, 1630–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Omar, R.A.; Chyan, Y.-J.; Andorn, A.C.; Poeggeler, B.; Robakis, N.K.; Pappolla, M.A. Increased Expression but Reduced Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes in Alzheimer’s Disease. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 1999, 1, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kim, T.-S.; Pae, C.-U.; Yoon, S.-J.; Jang, W.-Y.; Lee, N.J.; Kim, J.-J.; Lee, S.-J.; Lee, C.; Paik, I.-H.; Lee, C.-U. Decreased plasma antioxidants in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2006, 21, 344–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ramsey, C.P.; Glass, C.A.; Montgomery, M.B.; Lindl, K.A.; Ritson, G.P.; Chia, L.A.; Hamilton, R.L.; Chu, C.T.; Jordan-Sciutto, K.L. Expression of Nrf2 in neurodegenerative diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2007, 66, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tanji, K.; Maruyama, A.; Odagiri, S.; Mori, F.; Itoh, K.; Kakita, A.; Takahashi, H.; Wakabayashi, K. Keap1 Is Localized in Neuronal and Glial Cytoplasmic Inclusions in Various Neurodegenerative Diseases. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 2013, 72, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Bosco, D.A.; Fowler, D.M.; Zhang, Q.; Nieva, J.; Powers, E.T.; Wentworth, P., Jr.; Lerner, R.A.; Kelly, J.W. Elevated levels of oxidized cholesterol metabolites in Lewy body disease brains accelerate α-synuclein fibrilization. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2006, 2, 249–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nakabeppu, Y.; Tsuchimoto, D.; Yamaguchi, H.; Sakumi, K. Oxidative damage in nucleic acids and Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurosci. Res. 2007, 85, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zeevalk, G.D.; Razmpour, R.; Bernard, L.P. Glutathione and Parkinson’s disease: Is this the elephant in the room? Biomed. Pharmacother. 2008, 62, 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rocha, E.M.; De Miranda, B.; Sanders, L.H. Alpha-synuclein: Pathology, mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis. 2018, 109, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wadhwa, R.; Gupta, R.; Maurya, P.K. Oxidative Stress and Accelerated Aging in Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric Disorder. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 24, 4711–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Umeno, A.; Biju, V.; Yoshida, Y. In vivo ROS production and use of oxidative stress-derived biomarkers to detect the onset of diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and diabetes. Free Radic. Res. 2017, 51, 413–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Segura-Aguilar, J.; Paris, I.; Muñoz, P.; Ferrari, E.; Zecca, L.; Zucca, F.A. Protective and toxic roles of dopamine in Parkinson’s disease. J. Neurochem. 2014, 129, 898–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Poewe, W.; Seppi, K.; Tanner, C.M.; Halliday, G.M.; Brundin, P.; Volkmann, J.; Schrag, A.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Vali, S.; Chinta, S.J.; Peng, J.; Sultana, Z.; Singh, N.; Sharma, P.; Sharada, S.; Andersen, J.K.; Bharath, M.S. Insights into the effects of α-synuclein expression and proteasome inhibition on glutathione metabolism through a dynamic in silico model of Parkinson’s disease: Validation by cell culture data. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2008, 45, 1290–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Xiao, Y.; Chen, X.; Huang, S.; Li, G.; Mo, M.; Zhang, L.; Chen, C.; Guo, W.; Zhou, M.; Wu, Z.; et al. Iron promotes α-synuclein aggregation and transmission by inhibiting TFEB-mediated autophagosome-lysosome fusion. J. Neurochem. 2018, 145, 34–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Parrella, E.; Bellucci, A.; Porrini, V.; Benarese, M.; Lanzillotta, A.; Faustini, G.; Longhena, F.; Abate, G.; Uberti, D.L.; Pizzi, M. NF-κB/c-Rel deficiency causes Parkinson’s disease-like prodromal symptoms and progressive pathology in mice. Transl. Neurodegener. 2019, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kaur, R.; Mehan, S.; Singh, S. Understanding multifactorial architecture of Parkinson’s disease: Pathophysiology to management. Neurol. Sci. 2018, 40, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kausar, S.; Wang, F.; Cui, H. The Role of Mitochondria in Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Its Implications for Neurodegenerative Diseases. Cells 2018, 7, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Browne, S.E.; Beal, M.F. Oxidative Damage in Huntington’s Disease Pathogenesis. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2006, 8, 2061–2073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Cui, L.; Jeong, H.; Borovečki, F.; Parkhurst, C.N.; Tanese, N.; Krainc, D. Transcriptional Repression of PGC-1α by Mutant Huntingtin Leads to Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Neurodegeneration. Cell 2006, 127, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Stack, C.; Ho, D.; Wille, E.; Calingasan, N.Y.; Williams, C.; Liby, K.T.; Sporn, M.; Dumont, M.; Beal, M.F. Triterpenoids CDDO-ethyl amide and CDDO-trifluoroethyl amide improve the behavioral phenotype and brain pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease. Free Radic. Boil. Med. 2010, 49, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Saccon, R.A.; Bunton-Stasyshyn, R.K.A.; Fisher, E.M.; Fratta, P. Is SOD1 loss of function involved in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Brain 2013, 136, 2342–2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Blasco, H.; Garcon, G.; Patin, F.; Veyrat-Durebex, C.; Boyer, J.; Devos, D.; Vourc’H, P.; Andres, C.R.; Corcia, P. Panel of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Biomarkers in ALS: A Pilot Study. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 44, 90–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Moumen, R.; Nouvelot, A.; Duval, D.; Lechevaliera, B.; Viadera, F. Plasma superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase activity in sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J. Neurol. Sci. 1997, 151, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Carrera-Juliá, S.; Moreno, M.L.; Barrios, C.; Ortí, J.E.D.L.R.; Drehmer, E. Antioxidant Alternatives in the Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Comprehensive Review. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Albrecht, P.; Bouchachia, I.; Goebels, N.; Henke, N.; Hofstetter, H.H.; Issberner, A.; Kovacs, Z.; Lewerenz, J.; Lisak, D.; Maher, P.; et al. Effects of dimethyl fumarate on neuroprotection and immunomodulation. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Werdenberg, D.; Joshi, R.; Wolffram, S.; Merkle, H.; Langguth, P. Presystemic metabolism and intestinal absorption of antipsoriatic fumaric acid esters. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2003, 24, 259–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Litjens, N.; Burggraaf, J.; Van Strijen, E.; Van Gulpen, C.; Mattie, H.; Schoemaker, R.; Van Dissel, J.T.; Thio, H.B.; Nibbering, P.H. Pharmacokinetics of oral fumarates in healthy subjects. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2004, 58, 429–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Mrowietz, U.; Altmeyer, P.; Bieber, T.; Röcken, M.; Schopf, R.E.; Sterry, W. Treatment of psoriasis with fumaric acid esters (Fumaderm®). J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2007, 5, 716–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mrowietz, U.; Christophers, E.; Altmeyer, P. Treatment of psoriasis with fumaric acid esters: Results of a prospective multicentre study. German multicentre study. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 138, 456–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Prinz, J.C. The role of T cells in psoriasis. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 2003, 17, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bovenschen, H.J.; Langewouters, A.M.; Van De Kerkhof, P.C. Dimethylfumarate for psoriasis: Pronounced effects on lesional T-cell subsets, epidermal proliferation and differentiation, but not on natural killer T cells in immunohistochemical study. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 2010, 11, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ockenfels, H.M.; Schultewolter, T.; Ockenfels, G.; Funk, R.; Goos, M. The antipsoriatic agent dimethylfumarate immunomodulates T-cell cytokine secretion and inhibits cytokines of the psoriatic cytokine network. Br. J. Dermatol. 1998, 139, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Reich, K.; Thaçi, D.; Mrowietz, U.; Kamps, A.; Neureither, M.; Luger, T. Efficacy and safety of fumaric acid esters in the long-term treatment of psoriasis †A retrospective study (FUTURE). J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2009, 7, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Bomprezzi, R. Dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: An overview. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2015, 8, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Diaz, G.M.; Hupperts, R.; Fraussen, J.; Somers, V. Dimethyl fumarate treatment in multiple sclerosis: Recent advances in clinical and immunological studies. Autoimmun. Rev. 2018, 17, 1240–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Fox, R.J.; Kita, M.; Cohan, S.L.; Henson, L.J.; Zambrano, J.; Scannevin, R.; O’Gorman, J.; Novas, M.; Dawson, K.T.; Phillips, J.T. BG-12 (dimethyl fumarate): A review of mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety. Curr. Med Res. Opin. 2013, 30, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chen, X.-L.; Dodd, G.; Thomas, S.; Zhang, X.; Wasserman, M.A.; Rovin, B.H.; Kunsch, C. Activation of Nrf2/ARE pathway protects endothelial cells from oxidant injury and inhibits inflammatory gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2006, 290, H1862–H1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Schilling, S.; Goelz, S.; Linker, R.; Luehder, F.; Gold, R. Fumaric acid esters are effective in chronic experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and suppress macrophage infiltration. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2006, 145, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Yamazaki, H.; Tanji, K.; Wakabayashi, K.; Matsuura, S.; Itoh, K. Role of the Keap1/Nrf2 pathway in neurodegenerative diseases. Pathol. Int. 2015, 65, 210–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Cuadrado, A.; Moreno-Murciano, P.; Pedraza-Chaverri, J. The transcription factor Nrf2 as a new therapeutic target in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2009, 13, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Jazwa, A.; Rojo, A.I.; Innamorato, N.G.; Hesse, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, J.; Cuadrado, A. Pharmacological Targeting of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 at the Basal Ganglia Provides Disease Modifying Therapy for Experimental Parkinsonism. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2011, 14, 2347–2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Joshi, G.; Johnson, J.A. The Nrf2-ARE pathway: A valuable therapeutic target for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. Recent Patents CNS Drug Discov. 2012, 7, 218–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Yerra, V.G.; Negi, G.; Sharma, S.S.; Kumar, A. Potential therapeutic effects of the simultaneous targeting of the Nrf2 and NF-κB pathways in diabetic neuropathy. Redox Boil. 2013, 1, 394–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Duffy, S.; So, A.; Murphy, T.H. Activation of endogenous antioxidant defenses in neuronal cells prevents free radical-mediated damage. J. Neurochem. 1998, 71, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Raina, A.; Templeton, D.; Deak, J.; Perry, G.; Smith, M. Quinone reductase (NQO1), a sensitive redox indicator, is increased in Alzheimer’s disease. Redox Rep. 1999, 4, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Wang, Y.; Santa-Cruz, K.; DeCarli, C.; Johnson, J.A. NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase activity is increased in hippocampal pyramidal neurons of patients with alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2000, 21, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Komatsu, M.; Kurokawa, H.; Waguri, S.; Taguchi, K.; Kobayashi, A.; Ichimura, Y.; Sou, Y.-S.; Ueno, I.; Sakamoto, A.; Tong, K.I.; et al. The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kosaka, K.; Mimura, J.; Itoh, K.; Satoh, T.; Shimojo, Y.; Kitajima, C.; Maruyama, A.; Yamamoto, M.; Shirasawa, T. Role of Nrf2 and p62/ZIP in the neurite outgrowth by carnosic acid in PC12h cells. J. Biochem. 2009, 147, 73–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Liu, Y.; Kern, J.T.; Walker, J.R.; Johnson, J.A.; Schultz, P.G.; Luesch, H. A genomic screen for activators of the antioxidant response element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 5205–5210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Majkutewicz, I.; Kurowska, E.; Podlacha, M.; Myślińska, D.; Grembecka, B.; Ruciński, J.; Pierzynowska, K.; Wrona, D. Age-dependent effects of dimethyl fumarate on cognitive and neuropathological features in the streptozotocin-induced rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2018, 1686, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Majkutewicz, I.; Kurowska, E.; Podlacha, M.; Myślińska, D.; Grembecka, B.; Ruciński, J.; Plucińska, K.; Jerzemowska, G.; Wrona, D. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced spatial memory impairment and hippocampal neurodegeneration in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2016, 308, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Butterfield, D.; Drake, J.; Pocernich, C.; Castegna, A. Evidence of oxidative damage in Alzheimer’s disease brain: Central role for amyloid β-peptide. Trends Mol. Med. 2001, 7, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Paraiso, H.C.; Kuo, P.-C.; Curfman, E.T.; Moon, H.J.; Sweazey, R.D.; Yen, J.-H.; Chang, F.-L.; Yu, I.-C. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates reactive microglia and long-term memory deficits following systemic immune challenge. J. Neuroinflamm. 2018, 15, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rojo, A.I.; Pajares, M.; García-Yagüe, A.J.; Buendia, I.; Van Leuven, F.; Yamamoto, M.; López, M.G.; Cuadrado, A. Deficiency in the transcription factor NRF2 worsens inflammatory parameters in a mouse model with combined tauopathy and amyloidopathy. Redox Boil. 2018, 18, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Burton, N.C.; Kensler, T.W.; Guilarte, T.R. In vivo modulation of the Parkinsonian phenotype by Nrf2. Neurotoxicology 2006, 27, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Jakel, R.J.; Townsend, J.A.; Kraft, A.D.; Johnson, J.A. Nrf2-mediated protection against 6-hydroxydopamine. Brain Res. 2007, 1144, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Lastres-Becker, I.; García-Yagüe, A.J.; Scannevin, R.; Casarejos, M.J.; Kügler, S.; Rábano, A.; Cuadrado, A. Repurposing the NRF2 Activator Dimethyl Fumarate as Therapy Against Synucleinopathy in Parkinson’s Disease. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 25, 61–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Chen, P.-C.; Vargas, M.R.; Pani, A.K.; Smeyne, R.J.; Johnson, D.A.; Kan, Y.W.; Johnson, J.A. Nrf2-mediated neuroprotection in the MPTP mouse model of Parkinson’s disease: Critical role for the astrocyte. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 2933–2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Wruck, C.J.; Claussen, M.; Fuhrmann, G.; Römer, L.; Schulz, A.; Pufe, T.; Waetzig, V.; Peipp, M.; Herdegen, T.; Götz, M.E. Luteolin protects rat PC12 and C6 cells against MPP+ induced toxicity via an ERK dependent Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway. J. Neural Transm. Suppl. 2007, 10, 978–1007. [Google Scholar]
  122. Yamamoto, N.; Sawada, H.; Izumi, Y.; Kume, T.; Katsuki, H.; Shimohama, S.; Akaike, A. Proteasome Inhibition Induces Glutathione Synthesis and Protects Cells from Oxidative Stress: Relevance to parkinson disease. J. Boil. Chem. 2006, 282, 4364–4372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  123. Jing, X.; Shi, H.; Zhang, C.; Ren, M.; Han, M.; Wei, X.; Zhang, X.; Lou, H. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates 6-OHDA-induced neurotoxicity in SH-SY5Y cells and in animal model of Parkinson’s disease by enhancing Nrf2 activity. Neuroscience 2015, 286, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Campolo, M.; Casili, G.; Biundo, F.; Crupi, R.; Cordaro, M.; Cuzzocrea, S.; Esposito, E. The Neuroprotective Effect of Dimethyl Fumarate in an MPTP-Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease: Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species/Nuclear Factor-κB/Nuclear Transcription Factor Related to NF-E2. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2017, 27, 453–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Schipper, H.M. Heme oxygenase expression in human central nervous system disorders. Free Radic. Boil. Med. 2004, 37, 1995–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Van Muiswinkel, F.L.; De Vos, R.; Bol, J.; Andringa, G.; Steur, E.J.; Ross, D.; Siegel, D.; Drukarch, B. Expression of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase in the normal and Parkinsonian substantia nigra. Neurobiol. Aging 2004, 25, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ellrichmann, G.; Petrasch-Parwez, E.; Lee, D.-H.; Reick, C.; Arning, L.; Saft, C.; Gold, R.; Linker, R.A. Efficacy of Fumaric Acid Esters in the R6/2 and YAC128 Models of Huntington’s Disease. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Meissner, M.; Valesky, E.M.; Kippenberger, S.; Kaufmann, R. Dimethyl fumarate—only an anti-psoriatic medication? J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2012, 10, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Linker, R.; Lee, D.-H.; Ryan, S.; Van Dam, A.M.; Conrad, R.; Bista, P.; Zeng, W.; Hronowsky, X.; Buko, A.; Chollate, S.; et al. Fumaric acid esters exert neuroprotective effects in neuroinflammation via activation of the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway. Brain 2011, 134, 678–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Liddell, J.R. Are Astrocytes the Predominant Cell Type for Activation of Nrf2 in Aging and Neurodegeneration? Antioxidants 2017, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Neymotin, A.; Calingasan, N.Y.; Wille, E.; Naseri, N.; Petri, S.; Damiano, M.; Liby, K.T.; Risingsong, R.; Sporn, M.; Beal, M.F.; et al. Neuroprotective effect of Nrf2/ARE activators, CDDO ethylamide and CDDO trifluoroethylamide, in a mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Free Radic. Boil. Med. 2011, 51, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Lin, S.X.; Lisi, L.; Russo, C.D.; Polak, P.E.; Sharp, A.; Weinberg, G.; Kalinin, S.; Feinstein, D.L. The Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Dimethyl Fumarate in Astrocytes Involve Glutathione and Haem Oxygenase-1. ASN Neuro 2011, 3, AN20100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Gold, R.; Kappos, L.; Arnold, D.L.; Bar-Or, A.; Giovannoni, G.; Selmaj, K.; Tornatore, C.; Sweetser, M.T.; Yang, M.; Sheikh, S.I.; et al. Placebo-Controlled Phase 3 Study of Oral BG-12 for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 367, 1098–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Vucic, S.; Ryder, J.; Mekhael, L.; Rd, H.; Mathers, S.; Needham, M.; Dw, S.; Mc, K.; TEALS Study Group. Phase 2 randomized placebo controlled double blind study to assess the efficacy and safety of tecfidera in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (TEALS Study): Study protocol clinical trial (SPIRIT Compliant). Medience 2020, 99, e18904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gold, R.; Arnold, D.L.; Bar-Or, A.; Fox, R.J.; Kappos, L.; Chen, C.; Parks, B.; Miller, C. Safety and efficacy of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: 9 years’ follow-up of define, confirm, and endorse. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 2020, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Ochi, H.; Niino, M.; Onizuka, Y.; Hiramatsu, K.; Hase, M.; Yun, J.; Matta, A.; Torii, S. 72-Week Safety and Tolerability of Dimethyl Fumarate in Japanese Patients with Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of the Randomised, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III APEX Study and its Open-Label Extension. Adv. Ther. 2018, 35, 1598–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Antioxidants 09 00630 g001 550
Figure 1. Interconnection between OS and NDs. The figure shows the main NDs (on the left; colored arrows represent the specific region for every NDs), while on the right, the damage emerging by OS—the common point for all NDs.
Figure 1. Interconnection between OS and NDs. The figure shows the main NDs (on the left; colored arrows represent the specific region for every NDs), while on the right, the damage emerging by OS—the common point for all NDs.
Antioxidants 09 00630 g001
Antioxidants 09 00630 g002 550
Figure 2. Properties of DMF in NDs. (A) shows the mechanism of action of DMF through Keap1/Nrf2/ARE pathway; (B) provides a table which summarizes the main effects of DMF in NDs (specifically for AD, PD, HD, ALS).
Figure 2. Properties of DMF in NDs. (A) shows the mechanism of action of DMF through Keap1/Nrf2/ARE pathway; (B) provides a table which summarizes the main effects of DMF in NDs (specifically for AD, PD, HD, ALS).
Antioxidants 09 00630 g002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Scuderi, S.A.; Ardizzone, A.; Paterniti, I.; Esposito, E.; Campolo, M. Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effect of Nrf2 Inducer Dimethyl Fumarate in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9070630

AMA Style

Scuderi SA, Ardizzone A, Paterniti I, Esposito E, Campolo M. Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effect of Nrf2 Inducer Dimethyl Fumarate in Neurodegenerative Diseases. Antioxidants. 2020; 9(7):630. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9070630

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scuderi, Sarah A., Alessio Ardizzone, Irene Paterniti, Emanuela Esposito, and Michela Campolo. 2020. "Antioxidant and Anti-inflammatory Effect of Nrf2 Inducer Dimethyl Fumarate in Neurodegenerative Diseases" Antioxidants 9, no. 7: 630. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9070630

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop