Next Article in Journal
A Lesson Learnt from Food Chemistry—Elevated Temperature Triggers the Antioxidant Action of Two Edible Isothiocyanates: Erucin and Sulforaphane
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Cytocompatible Salvia officinalis Extracts: A Comparison between Traditional and Soxhlet Extraction
Previous Article in Journal
Is Melatonin the Cornucopia of the 21st Century?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus L.) Extracts Comparative Analysis Regarding Their Phytonutrient Profiles, Antioxidant Capacity along with the In Vivo Rescue Effects Tested on a Drosophila melanogaster High-Sugar Diet Model
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

HR-LCMS-Based Metabolite Profiling, Antioxidant, and Anticancer Properties of Teucrium polium L. Methanolic Extract: Computational and In Vitro Study

Antioxidants 2020, 9(11), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111089
by Emira Noumi 1,2, Mejdi Snoussi 1,3,*, El Hassane Anouar 4, Mousa Alreshidi 1, Vajid N. Veettil 1, Salem Elkahoui 1,5, Mohd Adnan 1, Mitesh Patel 6, Adel Kadri 7,8, Kaïss Aouadi 9,10, Vincenzo De Feo 11,* and Riadh Badraoui 1,12,13
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Antioxidants 2020, 9(11), 1089; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9111089
Submission received: 25 September 2020 / Revised: 30 October 2020 / Accepted: 3 November 2020 / Published: 5 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidant and Biological Properties of Plant Extracts)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

"HR-LCMS based metabolite profiling, Antioxidant, and Anticancer Properties of Teucrium polium L. methanolic extract: Computational and in vitro Study" is a well-articulated research manuscript with international collaborations which has investigated the phytochemical profile, anticancer and antioxidant activities of Teucrium polium methanolic extract using both in vitro and in silico approaches.

The results obtained clearly indicate that T. polium is a rich source of bioactive molecules with antioxidant activity and could be used as a safe antitumor drug.

Comments:

  1. Research with natural compounds is generally complex and the authors need to show is there are potential toxicity issues with this compound.
  2. The authors have used only one type of in vitro assay that is MTT I would recommend the use of a second assay such as MTS assay to further validate and strengthen their results. 
  3. There are some typographical errors that need to be corrected and the manuscript needs to be proofread by a native English speaker. 

 

 

 

Author Response

Point-by-point response to Reviewer 1:

 

Dear Dr.  (Reviewer 1): Thank you for your consideration of our manuscript. We found the comments helpful, and believe our revised manuscript represents a significant improvement over our initial submission.

"HR-LCMS based metabolite profiling, Antioxidant, and Anticancer Properties of Teucrium polium L. methanolic extract: Computational and in vitro Study" is a well-articulated research manuscript with international collaborations which has investigated the phytochemical profile, anticancer and antioxidant activities of Teucrium polium methanolic extract using both in vitro and in silico approaches.

The results obtained clearly indicate that T. polium is a rich source of bioactive molecules with antioxidant activity and could be used as a safe antitumor drug.

Comments:

  1. Research with natural compounds is generally complex and the authors need to show is there are potential toxicity issues with this compound.

In fact, some previous studies reported the cytotoxic power of T. polium plant extract.

Nematollahi-Mahani et al. [51] studied the toxicity of T. polium 96%-ethanolic extract on different known malignant cell lines like A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma), BT20 (human breast ductal carcinoma), MCF-7 (human breast adenocarcinoma), and PC12 (mouse pheochromocytoma). The results reported showed that IC50 values were 90 µg/ml (A549), 106 µg/ml (BT20), 140 µg/ml (MCF-7) and 120 µg/ml (PC12). The cytotoxic properties of T. polium aerial parts can be attributed the presence in the organic extracts of some diterpenoids and their acyl derivatives (teucvin and teucvidin), flavonoids (cirsiliol, cirsimaritin, cirsilineol, salvigenin and 5-hydroxy-6,7,3’,4’-tetramethoxyllavone), saponin poliusaposide [52], and selenium [53-55].

  1. Nematollahi-Mahani, N.; Rezazadeh-Kermani, M.; Mehrabani, M.; Nakhaee, N. Cytotoxic Effects of Teucrium polium on Some Established Cell Lines. Pharm. Biol. 2007, 45, 295–298.
  2. Elmasri, A.; Hegazy, M.E.F.; Mechrefa, Y.; Paré, W.P. Cytotoxic saponin poliusaposide from Teucrium polium. R.S.C. 2015, 5, 27126–27133.
  3. Nagao, ; Ito, N.; Kohno, T.; Kuroda, H.; Fujita, E. Antitumor activity of Rabdosia and Teucrium diterpenoids against P388 lymphocytic leukemia in mice. Chem. Pharm. Bull. (Tokyo) 1982, 30, 727–729.
  4. Mseddi, ; Alimi, F.; Noumi, N.; Deshpande, S.; Adnan, M.; Hamdi, A.; Elkahoui, S.; Alghamdi, A.; Kadri, A.; Patel, P.; et al. Thymus musilii Velen. as a promising source of potent bioactive compounds with its pharmacological properties: In Vitro and in silico analysis. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 6782–6801.
  5. Jurisic, V.K.S.; Kalodera, Z.; Grgic, J. Determination of selenium in Teucrium generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Z. Nat. 2003, 58, 143–145.
  1. The authors have used only one type of in vitro assay that is MTT I would recommend the use of a second assay such as MTS assay to further validate and strengthen their results. 

The anti-tumoral effect of T. polium extract has been checked in vitro using PBS containing Trypan Blue exclusion assay but the results are included in another study performed in the same laboratory. The effect was assessed and compared with a bisphosphonate and the results are mirroring the T. polium extract which is reported in the current study.

 

  1. There are some typographical errors that need to be corrected and the manuscript needs to be proofread by a native English speaker. 

 

Paper was deeply rechecked for English style and grammatical errors by all authors and an English  native speaker.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I have submitted a revised manuscript with some grammar changes.  Congratulations for doing some much work to support your conclusions.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Point-by-point response to Reviewer 2:

 

Dear Dr.  (Reviewer 2): Thank you for your consideration of our manuscript. We found the comments helpful, and believe our revised manuscript represents a significant improvement over our initial submission.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Open Review

(x) I would not like to sign my review report
( ) I would like to sign my review report

English language and style

( ) Extensive editing of English language and style required
(x) Moderate English changes required
( ) English language and style are fine/minor spell check required
( ) I don't feel qualified to judge about the English language and style

 

 

 

Yes

Can be improved

Must be improved

Not applicable

Does the introduction provide sufficient background and include all relevant references?

(x)

( )

( )

( )

Is the research design appropriate?

(x)

( )

( )

( )

Are the methods adequately described?

(x)

( )

( )

( )

Are the results clearly presented?

(x)

( )

( )

( )

Are the conclusions supported by the results?

(x)

( )

( )

( )

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I have submitted a revised manuscript with some grammar changes.  Congratulations for doing some much work to support your conclusions.
peer-review-8929225.v1.pdf

Dear colleague. Special thanks for your comments. We updated our manuscript according to your comments.

For the controls used in anticancer activity: Cell lines in culture medium containing all additives except plant extract (0 mg/ml).

 

Submission Date

25 September 2020

Date of this review

16 Oct 2020 00:59:19

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I am satisfied with the revisions, and now the paper is accepted for publication 

Author Response

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I am satisfied with the revisions, and now the paper is accepted for publication 

 

Dear colleague

 

Special thanks for your comments who made our paper better

All the best

Back to TopTop