Next Article in Journal
Role of Hydrogen Sulfide in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Next Article in Special Issue
N-Acetylcysteine, N-Acetylcysteine Amide, and Thioredoxin Mimetic Peptides Regenerate Mercaptoalbumin and Exhibit Antioxidant Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Blb-NRF2-PON1 Cross-Talk in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Progression
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Uric Acid and Allantoin and Rheumatoid Arthritis

by
Angelo Zinellu
1 and
Arduino A. Mangoni
2,3,*
1
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
2
Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
3
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Flinders Medical Centre, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(8), 1569; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081569
Submission received: 2 July 2023 / Revised: 27 July 2023 / Accepted: 4 August 2023 / Published: 5 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress)

Abstract

:
Alterations in the circulating concentrations of uric acid and its degradation product, allantoin, might account for the systemic pro-oxidant state and the increased cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We sought to address this issue by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between the plasma/serum concentrations of uric acid and allantoin and RA. We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to 20 June 2023 for studies comparing plasma/serum concentrations of uric acid and allantoin between RA patients and healthy controls. We assessed the risk of bias with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for analytical studies and the certainty of evidence with the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group system. In the 19 studies selected for analysis, there were non-significant differences in uric acid concentrations between RA patients and controls (standard mean difference, SMD = 0.11, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.30, p = 0.22; I2 = 87.9%, p < 0.001; low certainty of evidence). By contrast, the concentrations of allantoin were significantly higher in RA patients (SMD = 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.55, p < 0.001; I2 = 55.6%, p = 0.08; extremely low certainty of evidence). In meta-regression, a significant association was observed between the SMD of uric acid concentrations and body mass index, a risk factor for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (t = 3.35, p = 0.007). Our study has shown a significant increase in the concentrations of the oxidative stress biomarker allantoin in patients with RA. Further research is warranted to investigate the interplay between uric acid, allantoin, redox balance, and cardiovascular disease in this group. (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023441127).

1. Introduction

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic and disabling autoimmune condition that is characterized by joint damage, pain, stiffness, and inflammation, often suffer from extra-articular clinical manifestations affecting various organs and tissues [1,2]. Among these extra-articular manifestations, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease are particularly common and, importantly, represent the main cause of death in RA patients [3,4,5,6,7]. It has been suggested that the cardiovascular risk imparted by RA is similar in magnitude to diabetes, a major cardiovascular risk factor and a leading cause of mortality and disability worldwide [8]. For example, in an observational study comparing the incidence of cardiovascular disease at three years in three groups—patients with RA, patients with diabetes, and the general population without diabetes and RA—the hazard ratio of cardiovascular disease for RA patients vs. the general population was 1.94 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.95, p = 0.004). This was similar to the hazard ratio of diabetic patients vs. the general non-diabetic population, which was 2.04 (95% CI 1.12 to 3.67, p = 0.019) [9]. Several structural and functional abnormalities in the cardiovascular system have been reported in patients with RA. These abnormalities primarily involve the reduced synthesis of nitric oxide by endothelial nitric oxide synthase with consequent development of endothelial dysfunction and impaired vasodilation [10,11,12,13,14], intima-media thickening [15], increased arterial stiffness [16,17], and accelerated onset and progression of atherosclerosis [18,19]. These phenomena, also known under the umbrella term “vascular remodeling”, are also responsible for an increase in arterial wave reflection and cardiac afterload which, in turn, favor the development of additional myocardial abnormalities with arrhythmogenic potential in RA patients [20,21]. These alterations explain the excessive risk of ischemic heart disease [14,22], atrial fibrillation [23], stroke [24], and sudden cardiac death in this patient group [25]. Notably, the pathophysiology of RA and the described cardiovascular abnormalities are both characterized by the presence of an impaired redox balance which favors the development of a local and systemic pro-oxidant state [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. These observations suggest that the identification of robust and easily measurable biomarkers of oxidative stress might be useful not only to assess RA activity but also the extra-articular cardiovascular manifestations and, potentially, the benefits of specific therapies targeting RA and cardiovascular risk.
Several biomarkers of oxidative stress have been investigated in clinical studies of RA, including markers of lipid oxidation (thiobarbituric and reactive substances, malondialdehyde, and F2-isoprostane), protein oxidation (protein carbonyls, advanced oxidation protein products, and S-nitrosothiols), DNA oxidation (DNA strand breaks, micronucleus), specific enzymes involved in the regulation of redox balance (superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, myeloperoxidase, catalase, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase, glutathione reductase, arylesterase, and paraoxonase), antioxidant molecules (glutathione, total antioxidant capacity, beta-carotene, vitamin E, thiol group), and free radicals [35,36,37]. However, the analytical challenges that are often encountered with their measurement in various biological samples have so far curtailed the utility of assessing biomarkers of oxidative stress in clinical studies investigating RA and cardiovascular endpoints [38,39,40]. An alternative approach in the search for biomarkers of oxidative stress consists in investigating the biological and pathophysiological role of routinely measured molecules and metabolites that may also affect the redox state, e.g., uric acid and allantoin. Uric acid, routinely measured in clinical practice to monitor patients at risk of gout, is the final product of the metabolism of purine nucleotides and has been shown to exert both antioxidant and pro-oxidant effects [41,42,43]. Allantoin, derived from the non-enzymatic oxidation of uric acid by reactive oxygen species, has also been proposed as a biomarker of oxidative stress in humans (Figure 1) [44,45,46,47].
Notably, there is also robust evidence showing that an increase in serum/plasma concentrations of uric acid is associated with an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in various patient groups [48,49,50]. Significant associations between uric acid and cardiovascular disease have also been reported in RA [51,52,53], suggesting that the combined assessment of uric acid and allantoin might be useful in investigating alterations in the redox balance as well as extra-articular cardiovascular manifestations in RA patients.
Therefore, we investigated the pathophysiological role of uric acid and allantoin in RA by means of systematic review and meta-analysis and also assessed possible associations between the effect size and a range of clinical and demographic characteristics, including surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease.

2. Methods

2.1. Systematic Literature Search

We searched Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science from inception to 20 June 2023, using the following terms: “rheumatoid arthritis” AND “uric acid” OR “allantoin”. Two investigators independently screened the abstracts and, if relevant, the full-text articles according to the following inclusion criteria: (a) the assessment of uric acid and/or allantoin concentrations in plasma or serum; (b) the comparison of RA patients and healthy controls in case-control studies; and (c) the availability of full-text articles in the English language. Additional studies were searched for in the references of individual articles. Any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator.
The following parameters were collected and transferred to an electronic spreadsheet for further analysis: first author details, age and sex distribution of the study participants, year of publication, study continent, sample size, uric acid and allantoin concentrations in serum or plasma, body mass index, lipid profile, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. The risk of bias and the certainty of evidence were assessed using conventional methods, i.e., the JBI checklist and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations [54,55]. The study results are presented according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement (Supplementary Tables S1 and S2) [55]. The review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023441127).

2.2. Statistical Analysis

We created forest plots using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess for differences in the continuous data of uric acid and allantoin concentrations between RA patients and healthy controls (p-value < 0.05 for significance). We extrapolated, if necessary, the means and standard deviations from the medians and the interquartile ranges reported in studies [56], and assessed the heterogeneity of the SMD using the Q statistic (significance level set at a p-value < 0.10) and the I2 statistic [57,58]. Sensitivity analysis was conducted for studies on uric acid and allantoin to confirm the stability of the results [59]. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg’s and the Egger’s tests (a p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant) [60,61], and the “trim-and-fill” method [62]. We also investigated, in univariate meta-regression and subgroup analyses, associations between the effect size and the following parameters: age, male-to-female ratio, year of publication, study continent, sample size, body mass index, lipid profile, and history of hypertension, diabetes, and dyslipidaemia. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 14 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Systematic Search

A flow chart describing the study selection is described in Figure 2. There was no disagreement between the two independent investigators, therefore input from a third investigator was not required. We initially identified 1718 articles. A total amount of 1694 was excluded after the initial screening because of duplication or irrelevance to the search question. After reviewing the full text of the remaining 24 articles, a further five were removed because they failed to meet the inclusion criteria, leaving 19 studies, published between 1987 and 2022, for analysis (Table 1 and Table S3) [63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].

3.2. Uric Acid

Seventeen studies (18 study groups) reported uric acid concentrations in 2845 RA patients (mean age 57 years, 82.4% females) and 1889 healthy controls (mean age 57 years, 77.5% females) [63,64,65,66,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81]. Eleven studies were conducted in Asia [64,66,70,71,73,74,77,78,79,80,81], four in Europe [63,65,69,76], and two in America [72,75]. Uric acid was measured in plasma in five studies [63,65,69,72,79], and in serum in the remaining 12 [64,66,70,71,73,74,75,76,77,78,80,81]. The risk of bias was low in all studies, barring two studies with moderate risk (Supplementary Table S4) [63,64]. The initial certainty of evidence was also low given the cross-sectional study design (rating 2, ⊕⊕⊖⊖).
The forest plot shows that the concentrations of uric acid were non-significantly different between RA patients and controls (SMD = 0.11, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.30, p = 0.22; I2 = 87.9%, p < 0.001; Figure 3). Sensitivity analysis showed that the corresponding pooled SMD values were stable (range between 0.02 and 0.15; Figure 4). There was no publication bias according to the Begg’s test (p = 0.41), the Egger’s test (p = 0.40), or the “trim-and-fill” method (Figure 5).
In meta-regression, non-significant associations were observed between the effect size and age (t = 0.14, p = 0.89), sex (t = −1.12, p = 0.29), publication year (t = 1.19, p = 0.25), and sample size (t = −0.49, p = 0.63). Conversely, we observed a significant association between the SMD of uric acid concentrations and the body mass index patients/body mass index controls ratio (t = 3.35, p = 0.007; Supplementary Figure S1). Meta-regression investigating associations with lipid profile and a history of hypertension, diabetes, or dyslipidaemia could not be conducted because of the small number of studies reporting these variables (Supplementary Table S3). In subgroup analysis, a non-significant difference (p = 0.42) was observed between Asian (SMD = 0.19, 95% CI −0.05 to 0.43, p = 0.11; I2 = 90.6%, p < 0.001) European (SMD = −0.07, 95% CI −0.39 to 0.24, p = 0.66; I2 = 65.7%, p = 0.033), and American studies (SMD = −0.01, 95% CI −0.58 to 0.56, p = 0.97; I2 = 87.3%, p = 0.005), with a lower heterogeneity in European studies (Supplementary Figure S2). Similarly, there were non-significant differences (p = 0.45) in pooled SMD between studies assessing serum (SMD = 0.06, 95% CI −0.07 to 0.18, p = 0.37; I2 = 67.8%, p < 0.001) and plasma uric acid concentrations (SMD = 0.24, 95% CI −0.53 to 1.01, p = 0.55; I2 = 96.0%; p < 0.001), with a lower heterogeneity in the former subgroup (Supplementary Figure S3).
The level of certainty remained low (rating 2, ⊕⊕⊖⊖) after considering the low risk of bias in most studies, the high but partly explainable heterogeneity, the lack of indirectness, and the absence of publication bias.

3.3. Allantoin

Four studies reported allantoin concentrations in a total of 145 RA patients and 177 healthy controls [63,64,67,68]. Two studies were conducted in Europe [63,67], one in Asia [64], and the remaining one in Oceania [68]. Three studies investigated allantoin in plasma [63,67,68], and the remaining one in serum [64]. Three studies had a moderate risk of bias [63,64,67], and the remaining one a high risk (Supplementary Table S4) [68]. The initial certainty of evidence was low given the cross-sectional study design (rating 2, ⊕⊕⊖⊖).
The forest plot showed that the concentrations of allantoin were significantly higher in RA patients compared to controls (SMD = 1.10, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.55, p < 0.001; I2 = 55.6%, p = 0.08; Figure 6). The corresponding pooled SMD values were stable in sensitivity analysis (range between 1.04 and 1.31; Figure 7).
The assessment of publication bias, meta-regression and subgroup analysis could not be conducted because of the limited number of studies selected.
The level of certainty was downgraded to extremely low (rating 0, ⊖⊖⊖⊖) after considering the moderate-high risk of bias (downgrade one level), the large heterogeneity (downgrade one level), the relatively low imprecision (no rating change), the relatively large effect size (SMD = 1.10, upgrade one level), and lack of assessment of publication bias (downgrade one level).

4. Discussion

In our study, there were non-significant differences using SMD in plasma/serum concentrations of uric acid between RA patients and healthy controls. By contrast, RA patients had significantly higher plasma/serum allantoin concentrations compared with controls. In meta-regression analysis, a significant association was observed between the SMD of uric acid concentrations and body mass index, a surrogate marker of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. The results of individual studies do not substantially affect the corresponding SMD values in sensitivity analysis. Overall, our results suggest the presence of a pro-oxidant state in RA, as indicated by elevations in circulating allantoin, and a more complex role played by uric acid in terms of redox balance and cardiovascular risk in this patient group.
Uric acid is synthesized in humans primarily in the liver, the intestine, and the endothelium as the end product of exogenous purines and endogenously following the degradation of the purines adenine and guanosine resulting from cell damage or cell death [82]. The precursor xanthine is converted to uric acid by the enzyme xanthine oxidase [83]. In the absence of another enzyme in humans, uricase, uric acid is oxidized to allantoin by reactive oxygen species (Figure 1) [84]. The plasma/serum concentrations of uric acid are the net result of endogenous synthesis, dietary intake, and renal elimination [43]. The biological and pathophysiological role of uric acid in the regulation of the redox state has been investigated in experimental and human studies. Traditionally, uric acid was thought to act predominantly as an antioxidant extracellularly and a pro-oxidant intracellularly [85]. Extracellularly, the antioxidant effects of uric acid primarily involve its interaction with reactive oxygen species, as previously described, to form allantoin [44], and with peroxynitrite to form the compound triuret [86]. However, human studies have provided conflicting results regarding the putative antioxidant effects of uric acid [87,88,89]. It is also important to highlight that uric acid can react with nitric oxide, a key messenger involved in the maintenance of cardiovascular homeostatic mechanisms, to form 6-aminouracil [90]. This reaction reduces the availability of nitric oxide, with a consequent dysregulation of vascular homeostasis [91]. This hypothesis is corroborated by the results of studies showing that a relative increase in uric acid concentrations is associated with an increased risk of hypertension [92], obesity [93], insulin resistance [94], renal disease [95], and cardiovascular disease [96,97]. Significant positive associations between uric acid and mortality have also been reported. For example, in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 studies investigating a total of 25,453 patients with chronic kidney disease, those in the upper tertile of uric acid concentrations had a significantly higher risk of death compared with those at the bottom tertile (hazard ratio = 1.52, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.73). In further analyses, each 1mg/dL increase in uric acid concentrations was associated with an 8% increased risk of mortality [98] Similarly, in a prospective study of subjects with diabetes participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey those in the top quintile of uric acid concentrations had a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality compared with those in the bottom quintile (hazard ratio = 1.28, 95% 1.03 to 1.58, and 1.41, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.94, respectively) [97]. Furthermore, uric acid-lowering pharmacological interventions have been shown to exert some beneficial cardiometabolic effects in different patient groups. For example, in a systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 studies the uric acid lowering drug allopurinol reduced systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure to a greater extent than a control group (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.50, p < 0.001, and SMD = 0.26, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.42, p = 0.001, respectively). Notably, in subgroup analysis the reduction in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not influenced by the concomitant use of conventional antihypertensive agents [99]. In other systematic reviews and meta-analyses, different pharmacological strategies reducing uric acid concentrations have been shown to reduce the progression of kidney function decline and glucose concentrations, other well established cardiovascular risk factors [100,101]. Intracellularly, uric acid acts as a pro-oxidant by stimulating nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases and the peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation of lipids [102,103].
Therefore, the absence of significant differences in uric acid concentrations between RA patients and healthy controls in our systematic review and meta-analysis may reflect the various and sometime opposite effects exerted by this molecule on the redox state and vascular homeostasis. In this context, an interesting observation has been made wherein there is a significant and positive association between the SMD of uric acid concentrations and the ratio between the body mass index of patients and the body mass index of controls. A higher body mass index, a recognized risk factor for cardiovascular disease [104,105], has also been shown to be positively associated with plasma/serum uric acid concentrations in population groups of different age, gender distribution, and ethnicity. For example, in a study investigating 18,473 participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey there was a significant and independent association between uric acid concentrations and body mass index both in males (β = 1.41, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.50, p < 0.0001) and in females (β = 1.85, 95% CI 1.74 to 1.97, p < 0.0001). Notably, these associations remained significant in all of the included ethnic groups, i.e., Mexican Americans, other Hispanics, non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and other groups [106]. In another study, 100 participants without a history of gout received an oral dose of 1.5 g of inosine. At baseline, those with high body mass index had significantly higher serum uric acid concentrations compared with those with low or normal body mass index (0.32 ± 0.08 vs. 0.27 ± 0.07 mmol/L, p = 0.0002). Following inosine treatment, the fractional excretion of uric acid was significantly lower in participants with high body mass index, suggesting the presence of significant alterations in the renal capacity of uric acid reabsorption in this group [107]. The results of our meta-regression analysis indicate that a significant association between uric acid and RA is more likely to be observed in RA patients with relatively higher body mass indexes. While this observation is also in line with the putative role of uric acid as a mediating factor in the link between RA and cardiovascular disease, we could not test this hypothesis further as the limited number of selected studies prevented the possibility of further meta-regression and subgroup analysis investigating the association between uric acid and other cardiovascular risk factors (Supplementary Table S3).
The significant increase observed in the circulating concentrations of allantoin further supports the idea of a systemic pro-oxidant state in RA patients and the potential utility of this degradation product of uric acid as a biomarker of oxidative stress, which is facilitated by the significant progress made with the development of robust analytical methods for its determination in biological samples [108,109,110], the limited number of studies identified in our-metanalysis suggests that further research is warranted to confirm the association between allantoin and RA, to investigate the effects of this metabolite on vascular homeostasis and atherosclerosis, and to identify possible treatments affecting its concentrations. In this context, one study investigated the circulating concentrations of allantoin in 50 patients with ischemic heart disease (age 59 ± 11 years, 20% females) and 23 healthy controls (age 50 ± 6 years, 65% females). The concentrations of allantoin were significantly higher in patients with ischemic heart disease (46.5 ± 14.5 vs. 27.2 ± 10.7 μmol/L, p < 0.0001). Notably, the between-group differences remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, and serum creatinine concentrations [111]. Another study has recently investigated the effects of treatment with dietary antioxidants on allantoin. In this study, healthy non-smoking participants underwent a randomized controlled cross-over study investigating the effects of a control meal without polyphenol rich foods, and two meals with different doses of polyphenol rich foods. Notably, there was a dose-dependent effect between the consumption of polyphenol rich foods and a significant reduction in post-prandial allantoin concentrations [112].
Our study has several strengths, which include the combined assessment of uric acid and allantoin; the assessment, where possible, of the associations between the effect size of the between-group differences and several clinical and demographic characteristics; and the assessment of the risk of bias and certainty of evidence. By contrast, a significant limitation is represented by the large–extreme heterogeneity observed. However, we identified sources of heterogeneity for uric acid in subgroup analysis (study continent and matrix used for measurement, i.e., plasma vs. serum) and demonstrated that individual studies did not substantially affect the corresponding pooled SMD in sensitivity analysis.

5. Conclusions

Our systematic review and meta-analysis have shown that RA patients have similar concentrations of uric acid but significantly higher concentrations of the oxidative stress marker allantoin compared to healthy controls. While caution is needed in the interpretations of our data given the relatively small number of studies identified in our literature search, the results suggest the potential utility of allantoin in monitoring oxidative stress and the need for further research to investigate the complex effects of uric acid on the redox balance and cardiovascular risk in RA. Additional studies should also investigate pharmacological and dietary interventions targeting uric acid and allantoin and their effects on RA disease activity and cardiovascular risk.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox12081569/s1, Table S1: PRISMA 2020 for abstracts checklist; Table S2: PRISMA 2020 checklist; Table S3: Cardiovascular risk factors in health controls and patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Table S4: The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal checklist; Figure S1: Bubble plot of the univariate meta-regression analysis between the effect size and the body mass index patients/body mass index controls ratio; Figure S2: Forest plot of studies reporting uric acid concentrations in RA patients and controls according to study continent; Figure S3: Forest plot of studies reporting uric acid concentrations in RA patients and controls according to matrix type (serum or plasma).

Author Contributions

A.Z. and A.A.M. conceived the study, conducted the literature search, and analyzed the data. A.A.M. wrote the first draft. A.Z. and A.A.M. reviewed further drafts and the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

No support was received from any organization for this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not required as this was a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

Informed Consent Statement

Not required as this was a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies.

Data Availability Statement

The relevant data are available from A.Z. upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Young, A.; Koduri, G. Extra-articular manifestations and complications of rheumatoid arthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2007, 21, 907–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Figus, F.A.; Piga, M.; Azzolin, I.; McConnell, R.; Iagnocco, A. Rheumatoid arthritis: Extra-articular manifestations and comorbidities. Autoimmun. Rev. 2021, 20, 102776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Baghdadi, L.R.; Woodman, R.J.; Shanahan, E.M.; Mangoni, A.A. The impact of traditional cardiovascular risk factors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0117952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Blum, A.; Adawi, M. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and cardiovascular disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2019, 18, 679–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Semb, A.G.; Ikdahl, E.; Wibetoe, G.; Crowson, C.; Rollefstad, S. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease prevention in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2020, 16, 361–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Weber, B.N.; Giles, J.T.; Liao, K.P. Shared inflammatory pathways of rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2023, 19, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Widdifield, J.; Paterson, J.M.; Huang, A.; Bernatsky, S. Causes of Death in Rheumatoid Arthritis: How Do They Compare to the General Population? Arthritis Care Res. 2018, 70, 1748–1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Lin, X.; Xu, Y.; Pan, X.; Xu, J.; Ding, Y.; Sun, X.; Song, X.; Ren, Y.; Shan, P.F. Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: An analysis from 1990 to 2025. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 14790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peters, M.J.; van Halm, V.P.; Voskuyl, A.E.; Smulders, Y.M.; Boers, M.; Lems, W.F.; Visser, M.; Stehouwer, C.D.; Dekker, J.M.; Nijpels, G.; et al. Does rheumatoid arthritis equal diabetes mellitus as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease? A prospective study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009, 61, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Erre, G.L.; Piga, M.; Fedele, A.L.; Mura, S.; Piras, A.; Cadoni, M.L.; Cangemi, I.; Dessi, M.; Di Sante, G.; Tolusso, B.; et al. Prevalence and Determinants of Peripheral Microvascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study. Mediat. Inflamm. 2018, 2018, 6548715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mangoni, A.A.; Tommasi, S.; Sotgia, S.; Zinellu, A.; Paliogiannis, P.; Piga, M.; Cauli, A.; Pintus, G.; Carru, C.; Erre, G.L. Asymmetric Dimethylarginine: A Key Player in the Pathophysiology of Endothelial Dysfunction, Vascular Inflammation and Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis? Curr. Pharm. Des. 2021, 27, 2131–2140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bordy, R.; Totoson, P.; Prati, C.; Marie, C.; Wendling, D.; Demougeot, C. Microvascular endothelial dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2018, 14, 404–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Erre, G.L.; Mangoni, A.A.; Castagna, F.; Paliogiannis, P.; Carru, C.; Passiu, G.; Zinellu, A. Meta-Analysis of Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Concentrations in Rheumatic Diseases. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Erre, G.L.; Buscetta, G.; Paliogiannis, P.; Mangoni, A.A.; Carru, C.; Passiu, G.; Zinellu, A. Coronary flow reserve in systemic rheumatic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rheumatol. Int. 2018, 38, 1179–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, P.; Guan, S.Y.; Xu, S.Z.; Li, H.M.; Leng, R.X.; Li, X.P.; Pan, H.F. Increased carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis: An update meta-analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2016, 35, 315–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ambrosino, P.; Tasso, M.; Lupoli, R.; Di Minno, A.; Baldassarre, D.; Tremoli, E.; Di Minno, M.N. Non-invasive assessment of arterial stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literature studies. Ann. Med. 2015, 47, 457–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Erre, G.L.; Piras, A.; Mura, S.; Mundula, N.; Piras, M.; Taras, L.; Longu, M.G.; Saba, P.S.; Ganau, A.; Carru, C.; et al. Asymmetric dimethylarginine and arterial stiffness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A case-control study. J. Int. Med. Res. 2016, 44, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Reiss, A.B.; Silverman, A.; Khalfan, M.; Vernice, N.A.; Kasselman, L.J.; Carsons, S.E.; De Leon, J. Accelerated Atherosclerosis in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mechanisms and Treatment. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019, 25, 969–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shoenfeld, Y.; Gerli, R.; Doria, A.; Matsuura, E.; Cerinic, M.M.; Ronda, N.; Jara, L.J.; Abu-Shakra, M.; Meroni, P.L.; Sherer, Y. Accelerated atherosclerosis in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Circulation 2005, 112, 3337–3347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Malczuk, E.; Tlustochowicz, W.; Kramarz, E.; Kisiel, B.; Marczak, M.; Tlustochowicz, M.; Malek, L.A. Early Myocardial Changes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis without Known Cardiovascular Diseases-A Comprehensive Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Study. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 2290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sanna, G.D.; Piga, M.; Piga, A.; Falco, O.; Ponti, E.; Cauli, A.; Floris, A.; Mangoni, A.A.; Casu, G.; De Luca, G.; et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of electrocardiographic signs of atrial myopathy in rheumatoid arthritis: Results from the EDRA study. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 2023, 41, 1427–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Houri Levi, E.; Watad, A.; Whitby, A.; Tiosano, S.; Comaneshter, D.; Cohen, A.D.; Amital, H. Coexistence of ischemic heart disease and rheumatoid arthritis patients-A case control study. Autoimmun. Rev. 2016, 15, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ungprasert, P.; Srivali, N.; Kittanamongkolchai, W. Risk of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Rheum. Dis. 2017, 20, 434–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, W.; Ma, W.; Liu, H.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Z.; Zang, C.; et al. Stroke risk in arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0248564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maradit-Kremers, H.; Crowson, C.S.; Nicola, P.J.; Ballman, K.V.; Roger, V.L.; Jacobsen, S.J.; Gabriel, S.E. Increased unrecognized coronary heart disease and sudden deaths in rheumatoid arthritis: A population-based cohort study. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Phull, A.R.; Nasir, B.; Haq, I.U.; Kim, S.J. Oxidative stress, consequences and ROS mediated cellular signaling in rheumatoid arthritis. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 281, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Smallwood, M.J.; Nissim, A.; Knight, A.R.; Whiteman, M.; Haigh, R.; Winyard, P.G. Oxidative stress in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2018, 125, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kaur, G.; Sharma, A.; Bhatnagar, A. Role of oxidative stress in pathophysiology of rheumatoid arthritis: Insights into NRF2-KEAP1 signalling. Autoimmunity 2021, 54, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lopez-Armada, M.J.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, J.A.; Blanco, F.J. Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Stress in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Shaito, A.; Aramouni, K.; Assaf, R.; Parenti, A.; Orekhov, A.; Yazbi, A.E.; Pintus, G.; Eid, A.H. Oxidative Stress-Induced Endothelial Dysfunction in Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Biosci. 2022, 27, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mozos, I.; Luca, C.T. Crosstalk between Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress and Arterial Stiffness. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2017, 15, 446–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Goette, A.; Lendeckel, U. Atrial Cardiomyopathy: Pathophysiology and Clinical Consequences. Cells 2021, 10, 2605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koutsaliaris, I.K.; Moschonas, I.C.; Pechlivani, L.M.; Tsouka, A.N.; Tselepis, A.D. Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, Vascular Aging and Atherosclerotic Ischemic Stroke. Curr. Med. Chem. 2022, 29, 5496–5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Forstermann, U.; Xia, N.; Li, H. Roles of Vascular Oxidative Stress and Nitric Oxide in the Pathogenesis of Atherosclerosis. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 713–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bassu, S.; Zinellu, A.; Sotgia, S.; Mangoni, A.A.; Floris, A.; Farina, G.; Passiu, G.; Carru, C.; Erre, G.L. Oxidative Stress Biomarkers and Peripheral Endothelial Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Monocentric Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study. Molecules 2020, 25, 3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Quinonez-Flores, C.M.; Gonzalez-Chavez, S.A.; Del Rio Najera, D.; Pacheco-Tena, C. Oxidative Stress Relevance in the Pathogenesis of the Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review. Biomed. Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 6097417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. da Fonseca, L.J.S.; Nunes-Souza, V.; Goulart, M.O.F.; Rabelo, L.A. Oxidative Stress in Rheumatoid Arthritis: What the Future Might Hold regarding Novel Biomarkers and Add-On Therapies. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 7536805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Dalle-Donne, I.; Rossi, R.; Colombo, R.; Giustarini, D.; Milzani, A. Biomarkers of oxidative damage in human disease. Clin. Chem. 2006, 52, 601–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Marrocco, I.; Altieri, F.; Peluso, I. Measurement and Clinical Significance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Humans. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 6501046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Frijhoff, J.; Winyard, P.G.; Zarkovic, N.; Davies, S.S.; Stocker, R.; Cheng, D.; Knight, A.R.; Taylor, E.L.; Oettrich, J.; Ruskovska, T.; et al. Clinical Relevance of Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress. Antioxid. Redox Signal 2015, 23, 1144–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Sautin, Y.Y.; Johnson, R.J. Uric acid: The oxidant-antioxidant paradox. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008, 27, 608–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Glantzounis, G.K.; Tsimoyiannis, E.C.; Kappas, A.M.; Galaris, D.A. Uric acid and oxidative stress. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2005, 11, 4145–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Gherghina, M.E.; Peride, I.; Tiglis, M.; Neagu, T.P.; Niculae, A.; Checherita, I.A. Uric Acid and Oxidative Stress-Relationship with Cardiovascular, Metabolic, and Renal Impairment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kaur, H.; Halliwell, B. Action of biologically-relevant oxidizing species upon uric acid. Identification of uric acid oxidation products. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1990, 73, 235–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kand’ar, R.; Zakova, P. Allantoin as a marker of oxidative stress in human erythrocytes. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2008, 46, 1270–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Martinez-Moral, M.-P.; Kannan, K. Allantoin as a Marker of Oxidative Stress: Inter- and Intraindividual Variability in Urinary Concentrations in Healthy Individuals. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mikami, T.; Kita, K.; Tomita, S.; Qu, G.J.; Tasaki, Y.; Ito, A. Is allantoin in serum and urine a useful indicator of exercise-induced oxidative stress in humans? Free Radic. Res. 2000, 32, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhao, G.; Huang, L.; Song, M.; Song, Y. Baseline serum uric acid level as a predictor of cardiovascular disease related mortality and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Atherosclerosis 2013, 231, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, R.; Song, Y.; Yan, Y.; Ding, Z. Elevated serum uric acid and risk of cardiovascular or all-cause mortality in people with suspected or definite coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Atherosclerosis 2016, 254, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mazidi, M.; Katsiki, N.; Mikhailidis, D.P.; Banach, M.; Lipid Blood Pressure Meta-Analysis Collaboration, G. Associations of serum uric acid with total and cause-specific mortality: Findings from individuals and pooling prospective studies. Atherosclerosis 2020, 296, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Panoulas, V.F.; Milionis, H.J.; Douglas, K.M.; Nightingale, P.; Kita, M.D.; Klocke, R.; Elisaf, M.S.; Kitas, G.D. Association of serum uric acid with cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2007, 46, 1466–1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Panoulas, V.F.; Douglas, K.M.; Milionis, H.J.; Nightingale, P.; Kita, M.D.; Klocke, R.; Metsios, G.S.; Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, A.; Elisaf, M.S.; Kitas, G.D. Serum uric acid is independently associated with hypertension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Hum. Hypertens. 2008, 22, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Hannawi, S.; AlSalmi, I.; Moller, I.; Naredo, E. Uric acid is independent cardiovascular risk factor, as manifested by increased carotid intima-media thickness in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017, 36, 1897–1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Moola, S.; Munn, Z.; Tufanaru, C.; Aromataris, E.; Sears, K.; Sfetcu, R.; Currie, M.; Qureshi, R.; Mattis, P.; Lisy, K.; et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; Johanna Briggs Institute: Adelaide, Australia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  55. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wan, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Tong, T. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2014, 14, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat. Med. 2002, 21, 1539–1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Higgins, J.P.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Tobias, A. Assessing the influence of a single study in the meta-analysis estimate. Stata Tech. Bull. 1999, 47, 15–17. [Google Scholar]
  60. Begg, C.B.; Mazumdar, M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994, 50, 1088–1101. [Google Scholar]
  61. Sterne, J.A.; Egger, M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: Guidelines on choice of axis. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001, 54, 1046–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Duval, S.; Tweedie, R. Trim and fill: A simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000, 56, 455–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Grootveld, M.; Halliwell, B. Measurement of allantoin and uric acid in human body fluids. A potential index of free-radical reactions in vivo? Biochem. J. 1987, 243, 803–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yardim-Akaydin, S.; Sepici, A.; Ozkan, Y.; Torun, M.; Simsek, B.; Sepici, V. Oxidation of uric acid in rheumatoid arthritis: Is allantoin a marker of oxidative stress? Free Radic. Res. 2004, 38, 623–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Santos, M.J.; Vinagre, F.; Silva, J.J.; Gil, V.; Fonseca, J.E. Cardiovascular risk profile in systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis: A comparative study of female patients. Acta Reum. Port. 2010, 35, 325–332. [Google Scholar]
  66. Mishra, R.; Singh, A.; Chandra, V.; Negi, M.P.; Tripathy, B.C.; Prakash, J.; Gupta, V. A comparative analysis of serological parameters and oxidative stress in osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol. Int. 2012, 32, 2377–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Stamp, L.K.; Khalilova, I.; Tarr, J.M.; Senthilmohan, R.; Turner, R.; Haigh, R.C.; Winyard, P.G.; Kettle, A.J. Myeloperoxidase and oxidative stress in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2012, 51, 1796–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Turner, R.; Stamp, L.K.; Kettle, A.J. Detection of allantoin in clinical samples using hydrophilic liquid chromatography with stable isotope dilution negative ion tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2012, 891, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Navarro-Compan, V.; Melguizo-Madrid, E.; Hernandez-Cruz, B.; Santos-Rey, K.; Leyva-Prado, C.; Gonzalez-Martin, C.; Navarro-Sarabia, F.; Gonzalez-Rodriguez, C. Interaction between oxidative stress and smoking is associated with an increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis: A case-control study. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Bilecik, N.A.; Tuna, S.; Samanci, N.; Balci, N.; Akbas, H. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in women with rheumatoid arthritis and effective factors. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2014, 7, 2258–2265. [Google Scholar]
  71. Chavan, V.U.; Ramavataram, D.; Patel, P.A.; Rupani, M.P. Evaluation of serum magnesium, lipid profile and various biochemical parameters as risk factors of cardiovascular diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, BC01–BC05. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Costa, N.T.; Scavuzzi, B.M.; Iriyoda, T.M.V.; Lozovoy, M.A.B.; Alfieri, D.F.; de Medeiros, F.A.; de Sa, M.C.; Micheletti, P.L.; Sekiguchi, B.A.; Reiche, E.M.V.; et al. Metabolic syndrome and the decreased levels of uric acid by leflunomide favor redox imbalance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Exp. Med. 2018, 18, 363–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Liu, X.Z.; Gao, Y.; Fan, J.; Xu, X.; Zhang, J.; Gao, J.; Wan, W.; Zhao, D.B. Metabolic abnormalities in rheumatoid arthritis patients with comorbid diabetes mellitus. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 37, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Al-Hakeim, H.K.; Moustafa, S.R.; Jasem, K.M. Serum Cesium, Rhenium, and Rubidium in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2019, 189, 379–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Contreras-Haro, B.; Hernandez-Gonzalez, S.O.; Gonzalez-Lopez, L.; Espinel-Bermudez, M.C.; Garcia-Benavides, L.; Perez-Guerrero, E.; Vazquez-Villegas, M.L.; Robles-Cervantes, J.A.; Salazar-Paramo, M.; Hernandez-Corona, D.M.; et al. Fasting triglycerides and glucose index: A useful screening test for assessing insulin resistance in patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2019, 11, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Prescha, A.; Zablocka-Slowinska, K.; Placzkowska, S.; Gorczyca, D.; Luczak, A.; Grajeta, H. Silicon intake and plasma level and their relationships with systemic redox and inflammatory markers in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 28, 1485–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Hu, Z.; Xu, S.; Lin, H.; Ni, W.; Yang, Q.; Qi, J.; Du, K.; Gu, J.; Lin, Z. Prevalence and risk factors for bone loss in Southern Chinese with rheumatic diseases. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2020, 21, 416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, H.N.; Kim, A.; Kim, Y.; Kim, G.T.; Sohn, D.H.; Lee, S.G. Higher serum uric acid levels are associated with reduced risk of hip osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis. Medicine 2020, 99, e20633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Patel, S.L.; Prakash, J.; Gupta, V. TGF-beta1 +869C/T polymorphism increases susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis in North Indian population. Clin. Rheumatol. 2020, 39, 2881–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hu, Z.; Zhang, L.; Lin, Z.; Zhao, C.; Xu, S.; Lin, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Chu, Y. Prevalence and risk factors for bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis patients from South China: Modeled by three methods. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2021, 22, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Wang, Z.; Wang, W.; Xiang, T.; Gong, B.; Xie, J. Serum Uric Acid as a Diagnostic Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease. Inflammation 2022, 45, 1800–1814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Maiuolo, J.; Oppedisano, F.; Gratteri, S.; Muscoli, C.; Mollace, V. Regulation of uric acid metabolism and excretion. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 213, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Moriwaki, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Higashino, K. Enzymes involved in purine metabolism--a review of histochemical localization and functional implications. Histol. Histopathol. 1999, 14, 1321–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jin, M.; Yang, F.; Yang, I.; Yin, Y.; Luo, J.J.; Wang, H.; Yang, X.F. Uric acid, hyperuricemia and vascular diseases. Front. Biosci. 2012, 17, 656–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Ames, B.N.; Cathcart, R.; Schwiers, E.; Hochstein, P. Uric acid provides an antioxidant defense in humans against oxidant- and radical-caused aging and cancer: A hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78, 6858–6862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Robinson, K.M.; Morre, J.T.; Beckman, J.S. Triuret: A novel product of peroxynitrite-mediated oxidation of urate. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 423, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Fabbrini, E.; Serafini, M.; Colic Baric, I.; Hazen, S.L.; Klein, S. Effect of plasma uric acid on antioxidant capacity, oxidative stress, and insulin sensitivity in obese subjects. Diabetes 2014, 63, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Kurajoh, M.; Fukumoto, S.; Yoshida, S.; Akari, S.; Murase, T.; Nakamura, T.; Ishii, H.; Yoshida, H.; Nagata, Y.; Morioka, T.; et al. Uric acid shown to contribute to increased oxidative stress level independent of xanthine oxidoreductase activity in MedCity21 health examination registry. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Waring, W.S.; Convery, A.; Mishra, V.; Shenkin, A.; Webb, D.J.; Maxwell, S.R. Uric acid reduces exercise-induced oxidative stress in healthy adults. Clin. Sci. 2003, 105, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Gersch, C.; Palii, S.P.; Kim, K.M.; Angerhofer, A.; Johnson, R.J.; Henderson, G.N. Inactivation of nitric oxide by uric acid. Nucleosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids 2008, 27, 967–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cannon, R.O., 3rd. Role of nitric oxide in cardiovascular disease: Focus on the endothelium. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 1809–1819. [Google Scholar]
  92. Grayson, P.C.; Kim, S.Y.; LaValley, M.; Choi, H.K. Hyperuricemia and incident hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arthritis Care Res. 2011, 63, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Zeng, J.; Lawrence, W.R.; Yang, J.; Tian, J.; Li, C.; Lian, W.; He, J.; Qu, H.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; et al. Association between serum uric acid and obesity in Chinese adults: A 9-year longitudinal data analysis. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e041919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Feng, X.; Guo, Y.; Tu, H.; Li, S.; Chen, C.; Sun, M.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Wu, X.; Song, Z. Temporal changes in serum uric acid and risk for metabolic syndrome: A longitudinal cohort study. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2022, 14, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zhu, P.; Liu, Y.; Han, L.; Xu, G.; Ran, J.M. Serum uric acid is associated with incident chronic kidney disease in middle-aged populations: A meta-analysis of 15 cohort studies. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jin, Z.; Zhao, Q. Association of serum uric acid with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension: A meta-analysis. J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 2021, 52, 1084–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, B.; Chen, L.; Hu, X.; Tan, T.; Yang, J.; Bao, W.; Rong, S. Association of Serum Uric Acid With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2023, 46, 425–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Xia, X.; Luo, Q.; Li, B.; Lin, Z.; Yu, X.; Huang, F. Serum uric acid and mortality in chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Metabolism 2016, 65, 1326–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Qu, L.H.; Jiang, H.; Chen, J.H. Effect of uric acid-lowering therapy on blood pressure: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Med. 2017, 49, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Tsukamoto, S.; Okami, N.; Yamada, T.; Azushima, K.; Yamaji, T.; Kinguchi, S.; Uneda, K.; Kanaoka, T.; Wakui, H.; Tamura, K. Prevention of kidney function decline using uric acid-lowering therapy in chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022, 41, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Chen, J.; Ge, J.; Zha, M.; Miao, J.J.; Sun, Z.L.; Yu, J.Y. Effects of Uric Acid-Lowering Treatment on Glycemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Santos, C.X.; Anjos, E.I.; Augusto, O. Uric acid oxidation by peroxynitrite: Multiple reactions, free radical formation, and amplification of lipid oxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1999, 372, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sautin, Y.Y.; Nakagawa, T.; Zharikov, S.; Johnson, R.J. Adverse effects of the classic antioxidant uric acid in adipocytes: NADPH oxidase-mediated oxidative/nitrosative stress. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2007, 293, C584–C596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Dwivedi, A.K.; Dubey, P.; Cistola, D.P.; Reddy, S.Y. Association Between Obesity and Cardiovascular Outcomes: Updated Evidence from Meta-analysis Studies. Curr. Cardiol. Rep. 2020, 22, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Larsson, S.C.; Burgess, S. Causal role of high body mass index in multiple chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization studies. BMC Med. 2021, 19, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, H.; Yao, J.; Ding, N.; He, Y. Correlation of uric acid with body mass index based on NHANES 2013–2018 data: A cross-sectional study. Medicine 2022, 101, e30646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Dalbeth, N.; Allan, J.; Gamble, G.D.; Horne, A.; Woodward, O.M.; Stamp, L.K.; Merriman, T.R. Effect of body mass index on serum urate and renal uric acid handling responses to an oral inosine load: Experimental intervention study in healthy volunteers. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2020, 22, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kozlik, P.; Hasikova, L.; Stiburkova, B.; Zavada, J.; Kalikova, K. Rapid and reliable HILIC-MS/MS method for monitoring allantoin as a biomarker of oxidative stress. Anal. Biochem. 2020, 589, 113509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Chung, W.Y.; Benzie, I.F. Plasma allantoin measurement by isocratic liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry: Method evaluation and application in oxidative stress biomonitoring. Clin. Chim. Acta 2013, 424, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kopcil, M.; Kandar, R. Screening method for the simultaneous determination of allantoin and uric acid from dried blood spots. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 225, 115222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Ozkan, Y.; Yardim-Akaydin, S.; Imren, E.; Torun, M.; Simsek, B. Increased plasma homocysteine and allantoin levels in coronary artery disease: Possible link between homocysteine and uric acid oxidation. Acta Cardiol. 2006, 61, 432–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Haldar, S.; Pakkiri, L.S.; Lim, J.; Chia, S.C.; Ponnalagu, S.; Drum, C.L.; Henry, C.J. Reductions in Postprandial Plasma Allantoin Concentrations With Increasing Doses of Polyphenol Rich Curry Intake—A Randomized Crossover Trial. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Uric acid metabolic pathways in humans.
Figure 1. Uric acid metabolic pathways in humans.
Antioxidants 12 01569 g001
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram describing the study identification, screening, and final selection.
Figure 2. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram describing the study identification, screening, and final selection.
Antioxidants 12 01569 g002
Figure 3. Forest plot of studies reporting uric acid concentrations in RA patients and healthy controls [63,64,65,66,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].
Figure 3. Forest plot of studies reporting uric acid concentrations in RA patients and healthy controls [63,64,65,66,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].
Antioxidants 12 01569 g003
Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis of the association between uric acid and RA [63,64,65,66,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].
Figure 4. Sensitivity analysis of the association between uric acid and RA [63,64,65,66,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81].
Antioxidants 12 01569 g004
Figure 5. Assessment of publication bias using the funnel plot.
Figure 5. Assessment of publication bias using the funnel plot.
Antioxidants 12 01569 g005
Figure 6. Forest plot of studies reporting allantoin concentrations in RA patients and healthy controls [63,64,67,68].
Figure 6. Forest plot of studies reporting allantoin concentrations in RA patients and healthy controls [63,64,67,68].
Antioxidants 12 01569 g006
Figure 7. Sensitivity analysis of the association between allantoin and RA [63,64,67,68].
Figure 7. Sensitivity analysis of the association between allantoin and RA [63,64,67,68].
Antioxidants 12 01569 g007
Table 1. Study characteristics.
Table 1. Study characteristics.
Healthy ControlsPatients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
StudynAge
(Years)
M/FUric Acid
Mean ± SD
(mg/dL, µmol/L, or mmol/L)
Allantoin
Mean ± SD
(µmol/L)
nAge
(Years)
M/FUric Acid
Mean ± SD
(mg/dL, µmol/L, or mmol/L)
Allantoin
Mean ± SD
(µmol/L)
Grootveld et al., 1987, UK [63]7NR4/3432 ± 121 *18.6 ± 3.84NR2/2375 ± 102 *36.1 ± 63
Yardim-Akaydin et al., 2004, Turkey [64]15553/12278 ± 54 *13.6 ± 6321554/17281 ± 65 *22.1 ± 11.3
Santos et al., 2010, Portugal [65]102480/1023.8 ± 1.0NR98490/984.1 ± 1.1NR
Mishra et al., 2012, India [66]365011/255.05 ± 1.74NR365014/224.00 ± 1.26NR
Stamp et al., 2012, UK [67]1206887/33NR2.22 ± 1.38775522/55NR4.01 ± 1.88
Turner et al., 2012, New Zealand [68]35NRNRNR2.47 ± 1.6343NRNRNR4.10 ± 1.93
Navarro-Compan et al., 2013, Spain [69]655014/514.83 ± 1.26NR655014/514.47 ± 1.04NR
Bilecik et al., 2014, Turkey [70]100510/1004.08 ± 0.97NR100520/1004.09 ± 1.13NR
Chavan et al., 2015, India [71]50NR20/303.73 ± 1.45NR50NR19/314.46 ± 1.74NR
Costa et al., 2018, Brazil [72]1504542/1084.42 ± 1.43NR1775533/1444.0 ± 1.5NR
Liu et al., 2018, China [73] (a)1006231/690.25 ± 0.12 °NR1046235/650.28 ± 0.10 °NR
Liu et al., 2018, China [73] (b)1006231/690.25 ± 0.12 °NR1046434/700.27 ± 0.12 °NR
Al-Hakeim et al., 2019, Iraq [74]60NR30/305.93 ± 1.78NR126NR66/606.32 ± 2.41NR
Contreras-Haro et al., 2019, Mexico [75]5051NR4.07 ± 0.9NR9554NR4.4 ± 1.2NR
Prescha et al., 2019, Poland [76]1295447/825.7 ± 4.3NR1155224/515.0 ± 5.6NR
Hu et al., 2020, China [77]3026373/229326 ± 102 *NR55658106/450328 ± 117 *NR
Lee et al., 2020, Republic of Korea [78]200610/2004.17 ± 0.89NR447610/4474.03 ± 1.11NR
Patel et al., 2020, India [79]874129/581.9 ± 0.8NR764417/594.09 ± 1.6NR
Hu et al., 2021, China [80]1986052/146327 ± 101 *NR4055985/317314 ± 104 *NR
Wang et al., 2022, China [81]1386626/112235 ± 55 *NR2665528/238262 ± 92 *NR
Legend: F, female; M, male; NR, not reported; *, µmol/L; °, mmol/L.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zinellu, A.; Mangoni, A.A. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Uric Acid and Allantoin and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081569

AMA Style

Zinellu A, Mangoni AA. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Uric Acid and Allantoin and Rheumatoid Arthritis. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(8):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081569

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zinellu, Angelo, and Arduino A. Mangoni. 2023. "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Association between Uric Acid and Allantoin and Rheumatoid Arthritis" Antioxidants 12, no. 8: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12081569

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop