Next Article in Journal
Power and Signal-to-Noise Ratio Optimization in Mesh-Based Hybrid Optical Network-on-Chip Using Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers
Next Article in Special Issue
Helicopter Rotor Thickness Noise Control Using Unsteady Force Excitation
Previous Article in Journal
Gender Classification Using Sentiment Analysis and Deep Learning in a Health Web Forum
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Novel Adaptive State Detector-Based Post-Filtering Active Control Algorithm for Gaussian Noise Environment with Impulsive Interference
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Active Noise Control over Space: A Subspace Method for Performance Analysis

Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(6), 1250; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061250
by Jihui Zhang 1,*, Thushara D. Abhayapala 1, Wen Zhang 1,2 and Prasanga N. Samarasinghe 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(6), 1250; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061250
Submission received: 28 February 2019 / Revised: 20 March 2019 / Accepted: 20 March 2019 / Published: 25 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Active and Passive Noise Control)

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

The presented paper is a very good study about active noise control. The paper is correctly written and all the analysis and math are correctly performed. I just have few minor remarks in order to definitely fit the paper for its publication in the chosen journal:

Avoid the use of “we” in scientific paper.

Why chapter discussion is totally missing? Normally a chapter discussion is included to compare proper results with others in literature.

While dealing with Loudspeaker, please mention “Bianco, F., Teti, L., Licitra, G., & Cerchiai, M. (2017). Loudspeaker FEM modelling: Characterisation of critical aspects in acoustic impedance measure through electrical impedance. Applied Acoustics, 124, 20-29.”

Conclusions are a bit short. Please increase them by shortly report what and how the paper analyses, before really reports what were the results of the paper.

Author Response

The detailed response has been attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The subject is interesting and original and the paper well describes the proposed subspace method and its effectiveness. The natural completion of the research would be a verification with measurements on a real application of a spatial ANC; do authors think they can do it and describe in a future work?

Only one clarification about the presentation of the results in figures 7 and 9: is the Energy of the driving signals adimensional?

Author Response

The detailed response has been attached.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop