Next Article in Journal
Construction Quality of Prefabricated Buildings Using Structural Equation Modeling
Next Article in Special Issue
A Novel Approach to the Production of Printed Patch Antennas
Previous Article in Journal
Validation of a Novel Diagnostic Test for Assessing the Risk of Peri-Implantitis through the Identification of the Microorganisms Present: A Pilot Clinical Study of Periopoc
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Low-Profile Dual-Polarized Antenna Integrated with Horn and Vivaldi Antenna in Millimeter-Wave Band

1
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
2
Unit 93128, The Chinese People’s Liberation Army, Beijing 100000, China
3
Zhengzhou Key Laboratory of Electronic Information Functional Materials and Devices, Huanghe Science and Technology College, Zhengzhou 450061, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(17), 9627; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179627
Submission received: 5 August 2023 / Revised: 23 August 2023 / Accepted: 24 August 2023 / Published: 25 August 2023

Abstract

:
In this paper, a dual-polarized antenna based on a substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) horn antenna and Vivaldi antenna is proposed. The horizontal polarization (HP) is achieved by using the H-plane SIW horn antenna, while the vertical polarization (VP) is realized by a typical Vivaldi antenna etched on the surface of the SIW horn antenna. In front of the horn aperture, a dielectric lens is designed to optimize impedance matching and enhance directivity. Different feeding structures of the two polarizations are used to enhance the isolation between the two ports. The measured results demonstrate a 20.04–25.5 GHz (23.97%) overlapped dual-polarized impedance bandwidth, and the measured maximum gains of the HP and VP are 5.2 dBi and 8.2 dBi, respectively. A good isolation of 35 dB within the operating band is realized. The proposed dual-polarized antenna meets the demand to transmit and receive signals in two polarization directions simultaneously for wireless communication well.

1. Introduction

Over the past few decades, 5G has become a topic that people are discussing and interested in. As 4G systems and technologies mature, the improvements people can make and the spectrum people can choose on 4G are becoming less. However, with the advances of video streaming media and mobile phones, wireless data will increase rapidly, and data explosion will be produced. Evidently, 4G networks cannot meet the demand which is brought by immense numbers of data. In addition to the huge number of data, the number of devices and data transfer rates will also show exponential growth. This requires engineers to come up with new directions, of which super-densification, millimeter wave, and multiple input multiple output (MIMO) are the most anticipated directions [1,2]. The purpose of chasing extreme densification is to enhance the area spectral efficiency, which can accommodate more active nodes in a smaller area. Attaining this goal will require making smaller cells [3,4]. The first generation of the cells, which have the size of hundreds of square kilometers, appeared in the early 1980s. After several iterations, the cell sizes are now down to a few hundred meters. The reduction in cell size allows the reuse of the spectrum, thereby reducing the number of users per base station (BS). Therefore, it is to be expected that the cell size will be further reduced. The progress of MIMO can increase spectral efficiency, as well. MIMO represents the spatial dimension of the communication. When multi-antennas are used in BSs and mobile devices, the spatial characteristics will come out. Since the late 1990s, MIMO technology has been widely studied, and it was introduced into the WiFi system in 2006 and used to build 3G communication systems [5,6]. MIMO has been an inherent component when long-term evolution becomes mature. There are at least two antennas in a mobile device, and up to eight antennas per BS section. In [7], the effect of increasing the number of antennas is described in detail, and it has three significant advantages. Firstly, spectral efficiency can be enhanced enormously [8]. Secondly, channel responses can become smooth on account of the large spatial diversity. At last, due to the quasiorthogonal character between each BS, simple structures can be used to transmit and receive signals.
However, regardless of the development of densification and MIMO, a wider band is required [9]. At present, the microwave frequency band has been almost completely occupied. So, in order to use more new bands, enhancing the frequency and developing millimeter wave is one direction. There are a lot of free spectrums in the millimeter wave band, and there is also some free spectrum in the 20–30 GHz range. However, millimeter wave bands are limited due to high path loss, atmospheric absorption, and high equipment costs in the past, and the focus has been on WiFi and fixed wireless bands, such as 28 GHz, 38 GHz, 71–76 GHz, and 81–86 GHz. However, as semiconductors mature, the cost and power consumption of building millimeter wave systems are falling rapidly. Other obstacles are also thought to be surmountable [10,11,12]. The millimeter wave spectrum can meet the bandwidth requirements for 5G development, as well Therefore, the millimeter wave is an important direction for the development of communication systems.
As a key component of a communication system, an antenna’s performance is closely related to the whole communication system. Therefore, it is important to propose different millimeter wave antennas to meet different demands. With the development of millimeter wave antennas, a variety of antennas with different performance have been published, such as the multiband antenna, dual-frequency antenna, dual-polarized antenna, circularly polarized antenna, and so on. The dual-polarized antenna is one of the key technologies in wireless communication. Using a dual-polarized antenna can realize polarization diversity and improve the capacity and reliability of a wireless communication link. The dual-polarized antenna is realized by feeding two ports of the same antenna to excite two orthogonal polarization modes. At present, many dual-polarized antennas have been published, such as magnetoelectric dipole (ME-dipole) antennas [13,14,15], horn antennas [16,17], substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) antennas [18,19], and patch antennas [20,21]. In [13], a wideband dual-polarized antenna in a millimeter wave band is investigated. The ME-dipole is composed of four patches and fed by two pairs of orthogonal T-shaped probes. A port is connected with a pair of probes by a T-shaped power divider; thus, dual-polarized performance is realized when the different port is excited. The antenna achieves an overlapped impedance bandwidth of over 50% and isolation higher than 17.8 dB. An 8 × 8 dual-polarized ME-dipole antenna array is published in [14]. The antenna element employs the metallic pillars and cavity as ME-dipoles. A cross slots is used to excite two polarizations. Finally, the antenna array maintains an impedance bandwidth from 34.7 to 39.7 GHz (13.4%), as well as a mutual coupling of below 27 dB in the operating band. In [15], a dual-polarized ME-dipole antenna fed by a fork-shaped microstrip line is present. The antenna element is formed with four patches and two cross slots. Then, a 1 × 4 antenna array is designed, fabricated, and tested. The antenna array has an overlapped −10 dB impedance bandwidth in 28–33.5 GHz. In [16], a L-shaped horn antenna is proposed. The antenna is filled with dielectric material and fed by two orthogonal waveguides. A wide impedance bandwidth is obtained within 34–40 GHz, and the mutual coupling of the two ports is below 15 dB. In [18], a dual-polarized SIW phased array is investigated. By curving slots on the SIW cavity surface, the antenna can radiate electromagnetic waves. Dual polarization is realized by a differentially fed SIW cavity and a microstrip line. A 1 × 4 antenna array is then constructed. The antenna array obtains an impedance bandwidth from 25.8 to 28.8 GHz (11.0%). The isolation is higher than 31.5 dB. A substrate-integrated mode-based end-fire antenna is presented in [19]. A sandwich structure, which is composed of two metal blocks with an open-ended slot, is designed to radiate electromagnetic waves. And the horizontal polarization (HP) is based on the transverse electromagnetic (TEM) mode; in addition, the vertical polarization (VP) is excited by TE10 mode. The antenna achieves a wide impedance bandwidth of 24.8–32.5 GHz (26.9%). A high isolation between the two polarizations of over 36 dB is also realized. A dual-polarized Spoof-surface-plasmon-polaritons (SSPP) fed patch antenna array is proposed in [20]. Two orthogonal SSPPs are simply connected to a square patch. Therefore, the TM01 mode and TM10 mode can be excited simultaneously, and the dual polarization is obtained. Measurement results shows that the antenna has the −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 13.7% and the isolation is more than 15 dB. In [21], a dual-band dual-polarized patch antenna is studied. The antenna uses two pairs of stacked ring patches to obtain dual-band performance. The feeding structure is formed by two striplines coupled with orthogonal H-slots, which makes the antenna gain the dual-polarization in two bands.
There are still lots of way to promote the performance of dual-polarized antennas. However, in order to chase wide impedance matching, the configuration of antennas becomes more complex. It also led to an increase in antenna size and a decrease in radiation efficiency. To maintain wideband performance and simple structure, horn antennas can be seen as a potential candidate. However, horn antennas are always designed in microwave bands with an all-metal configuration. They are not suitable in millimeter wave bands because of their bulky size and difficulty to integrate. To solve this problem, horn antennas in the millimeter wave band can be designed using substrate-integrated waveguide technology. The substrate-integrated waveguide technique can be used to confine the electromagnetic energy in the waveguide cavity by replacing the metal wall with a uniform array of metal columns. By using substrate-integrated waveguide technology, horn antennas can gain the advantages of easy integration and a low profile [22,23,24]. In [22], a dual-polarized end-fire antenna array is achieved by integrating dipoles on the SIW horns. A pair of dipoles produces HP, while SIW horn antennas radiate VP. The dual-polarized antenna can cover the 5G bands of N257 and N258 and achieve a maximum gain of 6.5 dBi for both polarizations. The isolation between two ports is higher than 15 dB. In [23], a dual-polarized antenna element is designed by combining an HP dipole and a VP H-plane horn antenna, and then a 1 × 4 antenna array is designed and fabricated. The impedance bandwidth where the |S11| < −10 dB for both polarizations is 24.4–29.5 GHz. In the operating band, the maximum gain is 16 dBi, with an isolation higher than 20 dB. An E-band SIW dual-polarized horn antenna with an orthomode transducer is proposed in [24]. An SIW section is adopted to excite the TE10 mode and produce VP. The quasi-TEM mode is excited by a quasi-coaxial stripline, and HP is generated. Its impedance bandwidth lower than −10 dB is from 83 to 87 GHz and achieves a maximum gain of 14 dBi for HP and 15.2 dBi for VP. The isolation between two polarizations is higher than 25 dB. In the abovementioned designs, in order to realize the dual polarization, the SIW horn antennas are always combined with complex feeding structures. This will increase the difficulty of fabrication and increase the antenna size. The isolation between two ports is also not good enough. Therefore, it is sufficient to provide a wide-band dual-polarized antenna with a simple radiation configuration and feeding structures as well as a good isolation performance.
In this paper, a low-profile dual-polarized antenna is proposed by integrating a traditional Vivaldi antenna on the surface of the SIW H-plane horn antenna to realize dual polarizations. The Vivaldi antenna radiates VP electromagnetic waves, and the horn antenna radiates HP electromagnetic waves. A dielectric lens is loaded at the aperture of the horn antenna for better impedance matching and enhancing directivity. To improve the isolation between two ports, two different feeding structures are utilized to excite different ports. The proposed dual-polarized antenna is fabricated and measured, which achieves a −10 dB impedance bandwidth from 20.94 GHz to 25.50 GHz for both polarizations. In the operating band, the antenna achieves a maximum gain of 8.2 dBi. The proposed dual-polarized antenna is suitable for 5G mm-wave communication. In Section 2, the design procedure of the dual-polarized antenna is illustrated, including the simulation results of the SIW horn antenna and Vivaldi antenna. In Section 3, parametric study is presented which is used to verify the influence of different parameters on antenna performance. The dual-polarized antenna is fabricated and tested. A comparison of the antenna simulation and test results as well as a comparison of this antenna with other published antennas are given in Section 4. Section 5 draws a conclusion of this work.

2. Design of Dual-Polarized Antenna

The geometry of the dual-polarization antenna is displayed in Figure 1. The antenna is composed of an SIW H−plane horn antenna, a Vivaldi antenna, and a dielectric lens. Two Arlon AD430 substrates (εr = 4.3, tanδ = 0.003) and three copper layers are used to construct the antenna. These structures are assembled by screws. The dual−polarized antenna was modeled in CST studio 2020.
The Vivaldi antenna is etched on both surfaces of the horn antenna and fed through a microstrip line with a fan−shaped terminal. The fan−shaped feeding line is located at the top of Substrate 1 as port 1. The horn antenna is located on the lower dielectric substrate and fed by a grounded coplanar waveguide (GCPW) to an SIW transition line as port 2. A lens is loaded at the aperture of the horn antenna for better impedance matching and higher directivity.
The structure of the H−plane horn antenna is shown in Figure 2. To ensure that the horn antenna only transmits the TE10 mode throughout the operating band, the width W2 and W6 and thickness t2 of the antenna are calculated and designed according to [25,26]. Since the thickness of the antenna is much smaller than the operating wavelength, the beamwidth of the E−plane radiation pattern is wide, and the impedance matching is poor. To solve these problems, a dielectric lens is loaded at the aperture of the horn antenna as a dielectric guided structure in the E−plane. The simulated impedance matching is shown in Figure 3. After adding the dielectric lens, the impedance matching is obviously improved, which covers the bandwidths of 25.31–26.71 GHz. The comparison of the radiation patterns with and without the lens is plotted in Figure 4. With the loading of an appropriate−size lens, the radiated beamwidth of the horn antenna is significantly narrowed. Consequently, the directivity of the horn antenna is improved from 5.8 dBi to 9.0 dBi at 26 GHz.
In order to realize the dual polarization and maintain wide−band performance, a typical Vivaldi antenna that provides VP is designed on the basis of the existing H−plane horn antenna. By adding a Vivaldi antenna, the size of the whole antenna is hardly changed but obtains VP. The Vivaldi antenna is fed by a fan−shaped microstrip line, as shown in Figure 5, and radiates VP electromagnetic waves. After optimizing the size of the Vivaldi antenna, the parameters of the final antenna design are shown in Table 1. The simulated impedance matching of the Vivaldi antenna is shown in Figure 6, which has a simulated −10 dB impedance bandwidth of 23.25% (21.10–26.65 GHz). The bandwidth basically covers the impedance bandwidth of the SIW horn antenna. Figure 7 shows the simulated results of the radiation patterns of the antenna at 22.25 GHz, where the peak gain of the Vivaldi antenna is 8.0 dBi.

3. Parametric Analysis of The Antenna

In this section, a parametric study is performed to clarify the effect of some key parameters on an antenna’s impedance matching. When one parameter of the antenna is changed, the other parameters remain the same. The effects of the radius of the Vivaldi antenna fan−shaped feed R, the thickness of the upper substrate t1, and the width of the horn antenna W6 are analyzed. These three parameters significantly affect the antenna’s impedance matching.
As shown in Figure 8, with the increase in fan−shaped feed radius R, the impedance matching becomes worse at high frequencies. The radius of the fan−shaped structure is about a quarter wavelength of the center frequency point of the antenna. Therefore, with the increase in fan−shaped feed radius R, the operating band of the antenna is shifted to the lower frequency, and the impedance matching at high frequency becomes worse. In order to realize the best performance, the final fan−shaped feed radius R is determined to be 2.3 mm. The thickness t1 also affects the impedance matching of the Vivaldi antenna and almost has no effect on the horn antenna. The reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna as t1 varies is shown in Figure 9. As the t1 increases from 0.2 mm to 0.4 mm, the impedance matching of the antenna is improved at 22.5 GHz but becomes worse at 21 GHz and 23.5 GHz. When t1 is 0.3 mm, the Vivaldi antenna has the best impedance matching at 26 GHz, and both polarizations obtain a wide bandwidth at both polarizations. The final thickness of the Substrate 1 is determined as 0.3 mm.
In order to obtain the widest operating band in the two polarizations, the width of the horn antenna W6 is analyzed. The reflection coefficient |S22| of the horn antenna varies with W6, while the reflection coefficient |S11| hardly changes. As shown in the Figure 10 plot, the resonant frequency of the horn antenna shifts towards lower frequencies as W6 increases from 7.7 mm to 8.1 mm. The resonant mode of the horn antenna is the TE10 mode. By exciting the TE10 mode, HP is obtained. With W6 increases, the frequency corresponding to the TE10 mode in the horn antenna decreases. Therefore, by changing W6, the impedance matching of the horn antenna can be optimized independently. Finally, the width W6 is determined to be 7.9 mm for the best impedance bandwidth. By analyzing the parameters of the proposed antenna, the best impedance matching can be obtained quickly. It is helpful to get the best performance of the antenna.

4. Results and Discussions

The antenna has the dimensions of 39.7 mm × 18 mm × 3.3 mm. To verify the performance of the proposed antenna, a prototype is fabricated and measured. The S−parameters of the dual−polarized antenna are tested by an Agilent vector network analyzer E8363B, and the radiation pattern is measured in an anechoic chamber. Due to the test equipment limitations, the pattern is only tested from −90° to 90°. Figure 11 shows the fabricated prototype of the dual−polarized antenna. The simulated and measured results of S−parameters are shown in Figure 12. The simulated reflection coefficients of both polarizations are lower than −10 dB in the range of 20.25–26.55 GHz (26.92%), while the measured ones are 20.04–25.5 GHz (23.98). The simulated and measured results have a reasonable agreement.
The measured isolation between the two ports of the antenna is above 36 dB in the operating band, indicating that the antenna has good isolation between the two polarizations. When port 1 of the Vivaldi antenna is excited, the antenna exhibits good directionality at 22.5 GHz, as shown in Figure 13. The peak simulated gain of the Vivaldi antenna is 8.2 dBi at 22.5 GHz, while the measured gain is 7.0 dBi. Both simulated and measured cross−polarizations are lower than −20 dB. The maximum radiation direction deviates slightly from the normal direction due to the asymmetry of the antenna. When port 2 of the horn antenna is excited, the radiation pattern of the antenna is shown in Figure 14. It is shown that the horn antenna has the simulated gain of 7.1 dBi and the measured gain of 5.2 dBi. The simulated and measured cross−polarization are both lower than −26 dB. As shown in Figure 15, the horn antenna also achieves the maximum gain at 22.5 GHz. The dual−polarized antenna has a stable gain in the 20–23.5 GHz range for both polarizations. The difference between simulation results and measurement results may be from the air gap between the two dielectric substrates. Since the antenna is combined with two substrate layers and connected by screws, the air gap will inevitably appear. In addition, since the air gap between the two dielectric substrates is not the same everywhere, this difference is also difficult to verify by simulation results.
To illustrate the advantages of the proposed dual−polarized antenna in detail, the performance of some existing dual−polarized antenna element and antenna array compared with the proposed design is listed in Table 2. With the exception of ref. [27], the proposed antenna has a wider overlapped impedance bandwidth than other contrasting antennas. This is thanks to the way one obtains dual polarization, i.e., by integrating two wideband antennas: the horn antenna and the Vivaldi antenna. It is also obvious that the antenna has great isolation between two polarizations. The high isolation of the antenna comes from the use of different feed structures at the two ports. However, some antenna arrays are listed in Table 2, which makes the comparison of gain unclear. The high gain of the proposed antenna can be seen from the comparison with ref. [20] and ref. [27,28]. The antenna owns high gain since it adopts a dielectric lens to enhance directivity. Additionally, the antenna is designed using SIW technology, which has the advantage of being easy to integrate and having a low profile. Therefore, the proposed antenna is a wideband antenna with high gain and good isolation.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a low−profile dual−polarized antenna integrated with an SIW horn antenna and Vivaldi antenna is proposed. The dual−polarized antenna uses an SIW horn antenna to achieve VP, and HP is gained by a Vivaldi antenna integrated on the surface of the horn antenna. By integrating two common wideband antennas, the antenna obtains wide impedance bandwidth while maintaining a simple configuration. The isolation between two ports of the antenna is also optimized by a different feeding structure. The proposed antenna achieves an overlapped impedance bandwidth of 23.97% from 20.04 to 25.5 GHz for both polarizations. The Vivaldi and SIW horn antenna achieve a gain of 8.2 dBi and 5.2 dBi at 22.5 GHz, respectively. The isolation between the two ports is better than 36 dB in the operating band. The antenna can find potential applications in mm−wave communication systems. In the future, the antenna can be utilized to form an antenna array, which can increase spectrum efficiency and further enhance the directivity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Y.; Methodology, X.Y. and Y.Y.; Project administration, J.L. (Jianxing Li) and J.H.; Software, X.Y. and J.L. (Jianwu Li); Supervision, J.L. (Jianxing Li), J.H., Y.Y. and S.Y.; Writing—original draft, X.Y.; Writing—review & editing, J.L. (Jianxing Li), J.H., and J.L. (Jianwu Li). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Key R&D Program of China under Grant 2020YFB1806102, in part by the “Siyuan Scholar” Fellowship of XJTU, and in part by the Shaanxi Province Innovation Capability Support Program under Grant 2023KJXX-130.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are available from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to report regarding the present study.

References

  1. Andews, J.G.; Buzzi, S.; Choi, W.; Hanly, S.V.; Lozano, A.; Soong, A.C.K.; Zhang, J. What will 5G be? IEEE J. Sel. Area Commun. 2014, 32, 1065–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Boccardi, F.; Heath, R., Jr.; Lozano, A.; Marzetta, T.; Popovski, P. Five disruptive technology directions for 5G. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chandrasekhar, V.; Andrews, J.G.; Gatherer, A. Femtocell networks: A survey. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2008, 46, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dohler, M.; Heath, R.W.; Lozano, A.; Papadias, C.B.; Valenzuela, R.A. Is the PHY layer dead? IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Foschini, G.; Gans, M.J. On limits of wireless communications in a fading environment when using multiple antennas. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 1998, 6, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Telatar, E. Capacity of multi-antenna Gaussian channels. Eur. Trans. Telecommun. 1999, 10, 585–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Marzetta, T. Noncooperative cellular wireless with unlimited numbers of base station antennas. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 2010, 9, 3590–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hoydis, J.; Brink, S.T.; Debbah, M. Massive MIMO in the UL/DL of cellular networks: How many antennas do we need? IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 2013, 31, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Estimated Spectrum Bandwidth Requirements for the Future Development of IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced; Report M.2078; International Telecommunication Union (ITU): Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. Marcus, M.; Pattan, B. Millimeter wave propagation: Spectrum management implications. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2005, 6, 54–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alejos, A.; Sanchez, M.G.; Cuinas, I. Measurement and analysis of propagation mechanisms at 40 GHz: Viability of site shielding forced by obstacles. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2008, 57, 3369–3380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Roh, W.; Seol, J.-Y.; Park, J.; Lee, B.; Lee, J.; Kim, Y.; Cho, J.; Cheun, K.; Aryanfar, F. Millimeter-wave beamforming as an enabling technology for 5G cellular communications: Theoretical feasibility and prototype results. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dai, X.; Luk, K.M. A wideband dual-polarized antenna for millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 69, 2380–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, W.Y.; Li, X.P.; Qi, Z.H.; Zhu, H. Broadband and high-gain dual-polarized antenna array with shared vias feeding network for 5G applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2021, 20, 2377–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dadgarpour, A.; Bayat-Makou, N.; Antoniades, M.A.; Kishk, A.A.; Sebak, A. A dual-polarized magnetoelectric dipole array based on printed ridge gap waveguide with dual-polarized split-ring resonator lens. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 3578–3585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Schulwitz, L.; Mortazawi, A. Millimeter-wave dual polarized l-shaped horn antenna for wide-angle phased arrays. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2006, 54, 2663–2668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yao, Y.; Yan, S. A low-profile dual-polarized antenna with endfire radiation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Shanghai, China, 20–23 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, W.D.; Yan, S. A design of millimeter-wave dual-polarized SIW phased array antenna using characteristic mode analysis. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2022, 21, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, K.; Wang, B.; Yang, T.M.; Liu, S.H.; Chen, Y.P.; Zhao, Y.W.; Yang, D.Q. Dual-polarized millimeter-wave endfire array based on substrate integrated mode-composite transmission line. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 341–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cao, D.; Li, Y.J.; Wang, J.H.; Ge, L. A millimeter-wave spoof-surface-plasmon-polaritons-fed dual-polarized microstrip patch antenna array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 2363–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siddiqui, Z.; Sonkki, M.; Rasilainen, K.; Chen, J.C.; Berg, M.; Leinonen, M.E.; Parssinen, A. Dual-band dual-polarized planar antenna for 5G millimeter-wave antenna-in-package applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 2908–2921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, H.; Li, Y. Broadband dual-polarized millimeter wave antenna array using overlapped apertures. In Proceedings of the 2020 13th UK-Europe-China Workshop on Millimetre-Waves and Terahertz Technologies (UCMMT), Tianjin, China, 29 August 2020–1 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, H.; Li, Y.; Chang, L.; Sun, W.Y.; Qin, X.; Wang, H.Y. A wideband dual-polarized endfire antenna array with overlapped apertures and small clearance for 5G millimeter-wave applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 69, 815–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jin, H.; Huang, Y.M.; Jin, H.; Wu, K. E-band substrate integrated waveguide orthomode transducer integrated with dual-polarized horn antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2018, 66, 2291–2298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, H.; Fang, D.G.; Zhang, B.; Che, W.Q. Dielectric loaded substrate integrated waveguide (SIW) H-plane horn antennas. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 640–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Che, W.; Deng, K.; Wang, D.; Chow, Y.L. Analytical equivalence between substrate-integrated waveguide and rectangular waveguide. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2008, 2, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Liu, A.; Wei, Z.Y. Miniaturized dual-polarized metasurface antenna with high isolation. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 337–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.J.; Gong, S. Low-profile dual-polarized planar antenna with compact structure for base stations. Chin. J. Electron. 2017, 26, 1092–1095. [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen, Z.; Liu, H.; Yu, J.S.; Chen, X.D. High gain, broadband and dual-polarized substrate integrated waveguide cavity-backed slot antenna array for 60 GHz band. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 31012–31022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, A.; Luk, K.M.; Li, Y. A dual linearly polarized end-fire antenna array for the 5G applications. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 78276–78285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) 3D view. (b) Top view. (c) Side view.
Figure 1. Geometry of the proposed antenna. (a) 3D view. (b) Top view. (c) Side view.
Applsci 13 09627 g001
Figure 2. Geometry of SIW H−−plane horn antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Side view.
Figure 2. Geometry of SIW H−−plane horn antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Side view.
Applsci 13 09627 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of S−parameters of SIW horn antenna with and without lens.
Figure 3. Comparison of S−parameters of SIW horn antenna with and without lens.
Applsci 13 09627 g003
Figure 4. Comparison of radiation pattern of SIW horn antenna with and without lens at 26 GHz. (a) E−plane. (b) H−plane.
Figure 4. Comparison of radiation pattern of SIW horn antenna with and without lens at 26 GHz. (a) E−plane. (b) H−plane.
Applsci 13 09627 g004
Figure 5. Geometry of typical Vivaldi antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.
Figure 5. Geometry of typical Vivaldi antenna. (a) Top view. (b) Bottom view.
Applsci 13 09627 g005
Figure 6. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna.
Figure 6. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna.
Applsci 13 09627 g006
Figure 7. Radiation pattern of the Vivaldi antenna at 22.25 GHz.
Figure 7. Radiation pattern of the Vivaldi antenna at 22.25 GHz.
Applsci 13 09627 g007
Figure 8. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna with respect to different R.
Figure 8. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna with respect to different R.
Applsci 13 09627 g008
Figure 9. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna with respect to different t1.
Figure 9. Reflection coefficient of the Vivaldi antenna with respect to different t1.
Applsci 13 09627 g009
Figure 10. Reflection coefficient of the horn antenna with respect to different W6.
Figure 10. Reflection coefficient of the horn antenna with respect to different W6.
Applsci 13 09627 g010
Figure 11. Fabricated prototype of the proposed dual−polarized antenna.
Figure 11. Fabricated prototype of the proposed dual−polarized antenna.
Applsci 13 09627 g011
Figure 12. Simulated and measured S−parameters of the antenna. (a) Reflection coefficient. (b) Isolation.
Figure 12. Simulated and measured S−parameters of the antenna. (a) Reflection coefficient. (b) Isolation.
Applsci 13 09627 g012
Figure 13. Simulated and measured radiation pattern at 22.5 GHz when port 1 is excited. (a) xOz plane for VP, (b) yOz plane for VP.
Figure 13. Simulated and measured radiation pattern at 22.5 GHz when port 1 is excited. (a) xOz plane for VP, (b) yOz plane for VP.
Applsci 13 09627 g013
Figure 14. Simulated and measured radiation pattern at 22.5 GHz when port 2 is excited. (a) xOz plane for HP, (b) yOz plane for HP.
Figure 14. Simulated and measured radiation pattern at 22.5 GHz when port 2 is excited. (a) xOz plane for HP, (b) yOz plane for HP.
Applsci 13 09627 g014
Figure 15. Fabricated prototype of the proposed dual−polarized antenna.
Figure 15. Fabricated prototype of the proposed dual−polarized antenna.
Applsci 13 09627 g015
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed antenna element (unit: mm).
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed antenna element (unit: mm).
W1W2W3W4W5W6L1L2L3
0.652.52.06.57.99.23.16.1
L4L5t1t2sRd1d2W
25.680.331.42.32.1118
Table 2. Comparison with some previous dual−polarized antennas.
Table 2. Comparison with some previous dual−polarized antennas.
ReferencePublished YearAntenna TypeNo. of ElementImpedance BandwidthGain/dBiIsolation/dB
[14]2021ME−dipole8 × 834.7–39.7 GHz, 14.4%24.827
[18]2022SIW1 × 425.8–28.8 GHz, 11.0%10.531.5
[20]2023Patch124.4–28 GHz, 13.7%615
[27]2021Metasurface17.66–11.33 GHz, 38.65%7.6835
[28]2017AMC planar12.34–2.70 GHz, 14.29%7.825
[29]2018Slotted SIW8 × 855.7–66.1 GHz, 17.1%22.334.7
[30]2018ME−dipole1 × 853.3–63.7 GHz, 18%16.145
This work2023Horn and Vivaldi120.04–25.5 GHz, 23.97%8.236
AMC: Artificial magnetic conductor.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yu, X.; Li, J.; Hu, J.; Yao, Y.; Li, J.; Yan, S. Low-Profile Dual-Polarized Antenna Integrated with Horn and Vivaldi Antenna in Millimeter-Wave Band. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179627

AMA Style

Yu X, Li J, Hu J, Yao Y, Li J, Yan S. Low-Profile Dual-Polarized Antenna Integrated with Horn and Vivaldi Antenna in Millimeter-Wave Band. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(17):9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179627

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yu, Xiaoyan, Jianxing Li, Jianping Hu, Yuan Yao, Jianwu Li, and Sen Yan. 2023. "Low-Profile Dual-Polarized Antenna Integrated with Horn and Vivaldi Antenna in Millimeter-Wave Band" Applied Sciences 13, no. 17: 9627. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13179627

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop