Next Article in Journal
Sound Wave Absorption Coefficient and Sound Velocity in Thermally Modified Wood
Previous Article in Journal
Compression Behavior of Rubber–Bentonite Mixture under Different Salinities
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Generalized Function Projective Synchronization of Two Different Chaotic Systems with Uncertain Parameters

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(14), 8135; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148135
by Bin Zhen * and Yu Zhang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(14), 8135; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13148135
Submission received: 11 June 2023 / Revised: 7 July 2023 / Accepted: 10 July 2023 / Published: 12 July 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

see attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

fine

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Review Report

Title: Generalized Function Projective Synchronization of Two Different Chaotic Systems with Uncertain Parameters Based on the Laplace Transform Method

A novel method for achieving generalized function projective synchronization (GFPS) between two dissimilar chaotic systems with unknown parameters were put forth by the authors in this work. The synchronization error systems' differential equations are transformed into a series of Volterra integral equations using the Laplace transform method and convolution theorem to derive the GFPS condition. These integral equations are then solved using the successive approximation method described in the theory of integral equations.

The results are good and interesting. However, some corrections are needed to improve the quality of the manuscript:

1.       It could be better if the authors can make additional efforts to improve the introduction.  In particular, the main contributions should be mentioned point by point.

2.       The authors should give the proper citation for Cramer’s rule.

3.       Why is the Laplace transform method used in this paper? What is the significance of using this method?

4.       Figure 2 needs more explanations.

5.       Examples should verify the theory parts in more detail.

6.       Update the bibliography with recent work relevant to the problems.

Briefly, the authors have derived some interesting results. Let the authors do a line-by-line check for correcting the article based on the above suggestions before publication. Therefore, the article can be considered for publication after the major revision.

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Editor

In my opinion, the authors carefully adopted and absorbed the comments and suggestions given by the referees. This article deserves publication and it will make a meaningful contribution to the literature after publication. The current version of this article is well-written and the results are quite valuable. Therefore, I am very willing to recommend the acceptance of it for publication in your esteemed journal

 

Thanks

Dear Editor/Authors

Minor editing of English language required

Thanks

Back to TopTop