Next Article in Journal
Analysis of Ground Motion Intensity Measures and Selection Techniques for Estimating Building Response
Next Article in Special Issue
Special Issue on Role of Microbes in Agriculture and Food
Previous Article in Journal
mmSight: A Robust Millimeter-Wave Near-Field SAR Imaging Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Streptomyces spp. Biofilmed Solid Inoculant Improves Microbial Survival and Plant-Growth Efficiency of Triticum aestivum
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Usefulness of Potentially Probiotic L. lactis Isolates from Polish Fermented Cow Milk for the Production of Cottage Cheese

1
Department of Biotechnology, Microbiology and Human Nutrition, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Skromna 8, 20-704 Lublin, Poland
2
Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Science, Doświadczalna 4, 20-290 Lublin, Poland
3
Department of Biomedicine and Environmental Research, Institute of Biological Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Konstantynów 1J, 20-708 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(23), 12088; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312088
Submission received: 28 October 2022 / Revised: 17 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Role of Microbes in Agriculture and Food)

Abstract

:
Lactococcus lactis bacteria are used as starter cultures in cottage cheese and fermented milk production due to their acidification and contribution in the creation of the characteristic sensory features. The aim of the research was to carry out isolation, genetic identification, and verification of the probiotic properties of selected Lactococcus lactis isolates obtained from Polish fermented cow milk and apply the best strains to produce cottage cheese with good rheological and sensory characteristics. The isolates obtained were identified morphologically, biochemically, and with the use of 16S rRNA gene sequencing. After pre-screening two of the tested Lactococcus lactis strains, A13 and A14 were observed to be most tolerant to high NaCl concentrations and bile salts and to acidify milk the most. We confirmed the activity of A13 and A14 against such pathogenic strains as Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica, Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica sv. anatum, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis. As a potential industrial starter culture with probiotic potential, the selected Lactococcus lactis A13 and A14 strains produced cottage cheese quickly with good sensory (colour, smell, taste, texture) and rheological (viscosity, elasticity) properties.

1. Introduction

Lactococcus lactis strains are widely used as starter bacteria in the production of cottage cheese and fermented milk. They not only produce lactic acid, but also contribute to the sensory features of cheese. They belong to the order Eubacteriales and the family Streptococcaceae. L. lactis are Gram-positive cocci forming single pairs or short chains (0.5–1.5 μm) in their growth medium. These facultative anaerobic and catalase-negative bacteria do not form spores. The optimal temperature for their growth is 30 °C, but they can also grow between 10 °C and 37 °C at higher salt concentrations (>4% sodium chloride) [1]. The production of acid from different sugars by these microorganisms varies depending on the species. They are not able to grow in a medium containing 6.5% NaCl or at pH 9.6. They play important roles in the protection and safety of dairy products through the secretion of antimicrobial agents, e.g., lactic acid, diacetyl, hydrogen peroxide, and bacteriocins. In addition to the morphological and biochemical properties of Lactococcus strains, it is important to determine the technological and probiotic potential of strains isolated from fermented milk [2,3].
Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) present in raw milk mainly come from teats and udders, milking and storage equipment, and the animal’s environment [4]. Therefore, wildtype lactococci isolated from milk can be new strains with desirable properties [5]. For easier and more effective isolation of strains, raw milk should be subjected to spontaneous lactic fermentation, which contributes to the multiplication of bacteria; interruption of the process in a timely manner helps to isolate lactococci. Their ability to ferment lactose is critically important, particularly for their use as starter cultures in milk processing [6,7]. In cheese production, lactococci not only ferment lactose, lower the pH and cause milk to coagulate, but they also take part in the formation of specific sensory characteristics based on the enzymatic breakdown of milk proteins and fats [8]. Scientists and practitioners believe that the selection of autochthonous strains adapted to production conditions, is a guaranteed method of reproducibility and standardisation of the product without losing its typical features [9].
Despite the availability of various types of starter cultures containing L. lactis, there is still a need to look for new strains combining the desired technological features (resistance to various NaCl concentrations or temperatures and acidifying abilities) and primarily probiotic functional features, taking into account safety aspects. Probiotic microorganisms should survive in the human digestive tract and help in the maintenance of intestinal microbiota. They should also be resistant to antibiotics and exert health-promoting effects such as immunomodulation, anti-inflammatory activity, antagonistic activity against pathogens, inhibition of toxin activity, enhancement of nutrient bioavailability, and reduction in lactose intolerance [10,11]. The safety of probiotic strains for the consumer is also very important, and this includes e.g., non-pathogenicity and non-toxicity, appropriate origin, and lack of haemolytic potential and gelatinase activity. Among the features related to non-toxicity, the lack of amino acid decarboxylases is important, because biogenic amines cause a number of adverse effects in consumers, e.g., headaches or skin irritation [12]. These properties should be confirmed by the GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status [13]. Strains intended for starter cultures should also be viable during the technological processes and storage of products. Therefore, the use of a good starter culture containing defined strains can guarantee the safety, quality, and acceptability of fermented dairy products obtained in a traditional and innovative way [14].
The aim of the research was to carry out the isolation, genetic identification, and verification of the probiotic potential of selected Lactococcus lactis strains isolated from Polish fermented cow milk. The ability of the best strains to produce cottage cheese with good rheological and sensory characteristics was tested.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Culture Conditions

Lactococcus lactis isolates were deposited in the laboratory collection of the Department of Biotechnology, Microbiology, and Human Nutrition, University of Life Sciences in Lublin. Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus GG was obtained from the probiotic preparation Dicoflor (Bayer, Warsaw, Poland). Starter S1: Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Leuconostoc sp., Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetilactis (Chr Hansen, FD-DVS CHN-19) and S2: Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris, Leuconostoc sp., Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis, and Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis biovar diacetilactis (Chr Hansen, FD-DVS FLORA DANICA) were the commercial cultures used for the production of cottage cheese. L. lactis strains were cultivated in M17 broth (BTL, Łódź, Poland)) containing 1% glucose (GM17) and were stored at −80 °C in the same medium with 20% glycerol [15].

2.2. Screening for Lactococcus lactis

In total, 30 samples of milk from dairy cows from eastern Poland were screened for the presence of Lactococcus lactis strains. The samples were incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. After fermentation, bacteria were isolated in M17 agar. After 48 h, colonies of typical LAB were selected [16]. Then, they were introduced in GM17 liquid medium, incubated, and characterized morphologically using Gram staining. The purple cocci were photographed using an Evolution 300 light microscope (Delta Optical, Warsaw, Poland). The ability to produce catalase was then tested with H2O2. Moreover, the growth of the 26 selected L. lactis strains in GM17 medium was observed after cultivation at the temperatures of 10 °C, 30 °C, 37 °C, and 45 °C and 2%, 4%, and 6.5% NaCl concentrations [14].

2.3. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification of the 16S rRNA Region

DNA was extracted from overnight-incubated pure cultures using Genomic Mini AX Bacteria+ Kit (A&A Biotechnology, Gdańsk, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and was used directly for PCR amplification in a thermocycler T100 Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). PCR was set up in a master mix containing 7.5 µL PCR mix, 0.38 µL deionized water, 0.5 µM of each primer (212f (5′-GATGCAATTGCATCACTCAAAG-3′) and 1406r (5′-ACGGGCGGTGTGTRC-3′)), and 5 µL of each DNA sample. The PCR reaction was performed as described by Zycka-Krzesinska et al. [17]. The amplified products were analysed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized using a UV transilluminator Gel-DocTM XR+ (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The Nova 1 kb DNA ladder (Novazym) was used as a marker. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA region of 1194 bp was performed by Genomed (Warsaw, Poland). The sequence of the PCR product was compared to the known sequences of the 16S rRNA genes in the NCBI GenBank database by alignment with the BLAST program [18]. Sequence similarity values were calculated from the multiple alignment using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor. The evolutionary analysis was conducted in MEGA11. The phylogenetic tree was created based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences downloaded from GenBank using the maximum likelihood method with the best-fit Kimura 2-parameter model with a discrete gamma distribution (+G). To evaluate the statistical support of the branches, 1000 bootstrap replication was applied. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences were OP811530 and OP811531 for the A13 and A14 strains, respectively.

2.4. Biochemical Characterisation

Carbon source assimilation profiles of the isolates were determined using commercial API 50CH strips (bio-Merieux, Craponne, France). The tests were performed according to the producer’s instruction using fresh cultures of 26 isolates incubated in GM17 medium at 30 °C. After centrifugation (14.000 rpm, 10 min, 4 °C) cell biomass was resuspended in API 50 CHL medium to an optical density of 2 according to the McFarland scale. The inoculated strips were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and the change in colour in the wells was observed [19].
The enzymatic activities of the 26 strains were determined with the semiquantitative API ZYM system (bio-Merieux, Craponne, France) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Cell suspensions of fresh cultures (5 in the McFarland standard) were transferred into the wells of the API ZYM strips and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C; then one drop of developing reagents ZYM A and ZYM B was added to each of the wells [20]. Observations of colour changes, indicating positive reactions were made, and the evaluation was made on the basis of the API ZYM colour chart.

2.5. Probiotic Features of L. lactis Strains

2.5.1. Acid and Bile Tolerance

Studies on the tolerance of LAB cultures to high concentrations of bile salts (Sigma-Aldrich, Warsaw, Poland) and low pH were performed as described by Bhushan et al. [21]. The two best isolates of L. lactis, A13 and A14, were taken from the MRS overnight cultures and L. rhamnosus GG was used as a control and they were resuspended in 3 mL of pH 7.2 phosphate buffer. Cell suspensions with a cell density of 109 cells/mL were tested in MRS medium with 0.3% and 1% bile salts or in MRS medium with pH 7 (control), pH 3, and pH 2 for 0, 2, and 3 h. After incubation at 37 °C, decimal dilutions of the samples were made and plated on MRS agar. After 24 h of incubation, bacterial colonies (CFU/mL) were counted [21].

2.5.2. Antimicrobial Activity

The antibacterial activity towards various pathogens was evaluated using the well-diffusion method according to Feng et al. [22] with slight modification. Indicator bacteria, i.e., Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella enterica ssp. enterica sv. anatum, S. enterica ssp. enterica, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli, and Enterococcus faecalis (approx. 108 CFU/mL), in a volume of 100 μL of overnight cultures were inoculated over the entire surface of the Petri dishes with nutrient agar (BTL, Łódź, Poland). Holes were cut in the inoculated plates using a corkborer with a diameter of 8 mm, and 24 h liquid cultures of the Lactococcus A13 and A14 strains were spotted into them. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 48 h and clear inhibition zones around wells were measured [23]. Each strain was tested in triplicate.

2.5.3. Autoaggregation/Coaggregation

The autoaggregation and coaggregation assays were performed according to the procedure described by Polak-Berecka et al. [24]. Suspensions (OD600 = 1.0) of one-day cultures of the two L. lactis strains, A13 and A14, and pathogenes: S. aureus and S. enterica spp. enterica sv. anatum were prepared in PBS buffer (pH 7.2). The OD600 values were measured every hour for 5 h and after 24 h without disturbing the bacterial suspensions using a spectrophotometer Biophotometer D30 (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). In the coaggregation assay, the suspensions of lactococci and pathogenic bacteria were mixed in equal volumes and the OD600 values were measured as described above to determine the sedimentation kinetics. The measured OD600 values were used to calculate the aggregation and coaggregation coefficients. The analysis was performed in triplicate.
Aggregation coefficient (ACt):
A C t = 1 O D t O D 0   × 100
Coaggregation coefficient (CCt):
C C t = [ O D L + O D P / 2 ] O D t L + P O D L + O D P / 2 × 100
where: OD0 is the optical density at time 0; ODt is the optical density at time t; ODL is the optical density for L. lactis at time 0; ODP is the optical density for the pathogen at time 0; and ODt (L + P) is the optical density for the Lactococcus + pathogen mixture at time t.

2.6. Haemolytic Activity

The haemolytic activity of the A13 and A14 strains was analysed on Columbia Lab-AgarTM supplemented with 5% defibrinized sheep’s blood (BioMaxima S.A., Lublin, Poland). Day-old liquid cultures in M17 were spotted (40 µL) on plates and incubated at 30 °C for 24 h. Then, the haemolysis zones were observed. S. aureus, previously cultured in nutrient broth for 1 day, was the positive control strain for β-haemolysis.

2.7. Technological Features of L. lactis

2.7.1. Ability of the Selected Strains to Acidify Milk and Form a Clot

For this experiment, fresh cultures of A13 and A14 strains were used as suspensions in 0.85% (w/v) NaCl with a turbidity similar to the McFarland standard No. 1 (~3 × 108 CFU/mL) [25]. The acidifying ability of the L. lactis isolates was assessed by addition of 1% culture aliquots to pasteurized (70 °C, 30 min) skimmed milk (10% w/v, POLSERO), followed by an incubation at 30 °C for 24 h. During the incubation, pH measurements were carried out at time 0 and after 3, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h using a digital pH meter (Hanna Instruments, H1 221, Olsztyn, Poland).

2.7.2. Rheological Properties of Milk Clot

The rheological measurements of clot formation were conducted using a Kinexus pro+ rheometer (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). L. lactis A13 and A14 cultures and a mixture of both A13 + A14 strains, as well as S1 and S1 starter cultures and mixtures of A13 + S1, A13 + S2, A14 + S1, and A14 + S2 were used in the study. Temperature control was maintained by the Peltier system of the rheometer. All rheological data were collected and calculated by rSpace software version 1.70.2180 (Malvern Instruments Ltd., Worcestershire, UK). The rheological measurements were carried out using a concentric-cylinder-fixed cup and a rotating bob. In order to prevent evaporation, 7 mL of oil was poured onto the sample’s surface. The measurements were conducted at a frequency of 0.01 Hz. The dynamic measurements were carried out at 30 °C for 21 h (the strain corresponding to the maximum found within the linear viscoelastic region of the examined sample) [26].

2.7.3. Organoleptic and Flavour Evaluation

Skimmed milk powder obtained from POLSERO was pasteurized at 70 °C for 30 min. A 1% inoculum of cultures A13, A14, S1, or S2 grown in pasteurised skimmed milk was added to 300 mL of sterile skimmed milk in beakers and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The samples obtained were poured into nylon bags and kept for 12 h in refrigerated conditions to drain the cheese. Then, the colour, smell, texture, moisture, and taste of the obtained cottage cheese were assessed. The tests were carried out in accordance with the PN-A-86300: 1991 standard by ten trained panellists [27]. The curd cheeses collected from the tests were each subjected to a sensory evaluation using a five-point scale.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Differences among the mean values were tested at p < 0.05 using an ANOVA and Fisher’s test (STATISTICA 13, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Screening for Lactococcus lactis

After the screening procedure, 105 typical LAB colonies were isolated from the fermented milk samples. Only 26 strains that were catalase-negative and Gram-positive cocci which acidified the cow milk the fastest were selected for further research. All selected strains grew in M17 liquid medium with 1% glucose at 30 and 37 °C, and with addition of 2, 4 and 6.5% NaCl (Table 1). Only two isolates did not grow at 10 °C (7.7%). The best growth of all the strains was observed at 30 and 37 °C and in media supplemented with 2 and 4% of NaCl. Two isolates, A13 and A14, showed the best growth ability during the experiment even in the presence of 6.5% NaCl, which is a prerequisite for their potential use as starter cultures. A similar screening procedure was described by Karakas-Sen et al. [5], Kimoto-Nira [28], Rasovic [29], and Dahou [30], where the researchers obtained 29 and 14 isolates confirmed as Lactococcus lactis from milk, 40 isolates from dairy products, and 10 isolates from Algerian cheese “J’ben of Naama”, respectively. In contrast to strains A13 and A14, raw milk isolate IBB109 and bryndza cheese isolate IBB417 showed no growth and a 5-fold reduction in growth in the presence of 5% NaCl, respectively [11].

3.2. Identification of Lactococcus lactis by Species-Specific PCR

Genetic identification of LAB bacteria isolated from milk or non-dairy raw materials by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene with the use of various universal primers is a popular and reliable technique practiced in recent years [29,31,32]. Exactly 26 LAB isolated from the fermented milk were subjected to L. lactis-specific PCR. A specific 1200 bp DNA amplification fragment was confirmed in all isolates (Figure 1). These PCR-positive L. lactis isolates were further tested by sequencing the 16S rRNA region. The 1089 bp long partial sequence of the 16SrRNA gene of the strains studied showed 99.8% sequence similarity to each other. These sequences displayed the highest similarity to the 16S rRNA gene sequences reported from L. lactis reference strains (99.7%). The phylogenetic analysis placed the A13 and A14 isolates in a cluster together with L. lactis strains (Figure 2), which confirmed that they belonged to the species L. lactis.

3.3. Metabolism of Carbon Sources

All the L. lactic isolates were tested for their ability to assimilate 49 carbohydrates and their derivatives using the API 50CH test (Table 2). After incubation, only 20 chemical compounds were used as media by the selected strains. All isolates of the bacteria were able to ferment glucose, lactose, ribose, fructose, mannose, galactose, N-acetyl-glucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, esculin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, turanose, and potassium gluconate. Some differences were found, i.e., the strains from group I were the only bacteria that additionally assimilated glycogen, xylitol and gentiobiose, strains from group I and II additionally assimilated starch, and bacteria from group I and III utilized D-melibiose. No isolates were able to ferment glycerol, erythritol, D- and L-arabinose, D- and L-xylose, adonitol, methyl-ß-D-xylopiranoside, sorbose, rhamnose, inositol, dulcitol, mannitol, sorbitol, methyl-α-D-mannopyranoside, methyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, saccharose, trehalose, inulin, D-melesitose, raffinose, lyxose, tagatose, D- and L- fucose, D- and L- arabitol, potassium 2-ketogluconate, and potassium 5-ketogluconate. The API CH test, which is a popular method for the identification and biochemical characterisation of bacteria, has often been used by researchers [5,11,13,32]. For example, Karakas-Sen [5] identified L. lactis and observed that all strains assimilated ribose but not inulin, which confirms our observations. In contrast, the results reported by Alharbi et al. [32] were partially different from our findings, as the authors observed that the isolates hydrolysed D-mannitol, D-sucrose, D-trehalose, D-melezitose, and D-turanose, but various patterns of catabolic activity were noted for gentiobiose, D-galactose, glucose, ribose, amygdalin, L-arabinose, and D-melibiose. In a study conducted by Sałański et al. [11], raw milk and bryndza cheese isolates assimilated 14 carbon sources and, unlike A13 and A14, they assimilated sucrose, but did not assimilate turanose and potassium gluconate, and partially only used starch and gentiobiose. Similar to ours and other researcher studies, there was a negative bacterial response to raffinose and inulin [5,11,13,32].

3.4. Enzymatic Activity

The API ZYM tests used for the analysis of the L. lactis A1-A26 strains showed three profiles of enzymatic activity, with three enzymes exhibiting positive activities: leucine arylamidase was observed in two profiles and acid phosphatase and naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase were observed in all profiles. However, most enzymes showed no or very weak activity (Table 3). The enzymatic activity of microbes is an important factor for the safety of probiotics; therefore, it is important to determine enzymatic activities of, e.g., lipase, esterase, and β-glucuronidase. The studied strains were found to have no activity of these enzymes, or this activity was weak. Similar observations were reported by Karakas-Sen et al. [5]. Abarquero et al. [8] reported the ability of Lactococcus isolates to produce esterases with low-medium activities. Isolates obtained by Alharbi et al. [32] showed other activities, e.g., strong valine, cystine arylamidase, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, and α-mannosidase activities. In a study conducted by Nomura et al. [15], lactococci exhibited a different profile, as they produced leucine arylamidase, phosphatase, naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase, and α- and β-glucosidase, while L. lactis IDCC 2301 obtained by Taeok et al. [13] differed from above strains in that they produced α-chymotrypsin but not α-glucosidase.
It is worth mentioning that the enzyme leucine arylamidase catalyses the removal of an N-terminal leucine from arylamides or p-nitroanilides [33], which is an important technological trait of strains intended to be used as starters in cheese manufacture to ensure the development of desirable flavours [34]. On the other hand, the lack of β-glucuronidase converting precarcinogens into proximal carcinogens and stimulating colonic cancer or included in the formation of toxic steroids (oestrogen) is an advantage of these strains as potential dairy cultures [13,14]. Therefore, the two A13 and A14 strains may be candidates as probiotic starters in the dairy industry.

3.5. Probiotic Potential of Lactococcus Strains A13 and A14

3.5.1. Acid and Bile Tolerance

An analysis of the survival properties of the probiotic strains in the presence of bile salts and an acidified environment is necessary when choosing the best probiotic strains. Probiotic cultures should not only survive but also grow in gastrointestinal conditions similar to those prevailing in the human gastrointestinal tract [35,36]. Many experiments have been carried out with the use of potentially probiotic strains that showed growth at pH 2.0–3.0 and bile salt concentrations of 0.3% and 1% [6,10,37,38].
The low pH and bile viability of the L. lactis A13 and A14 strains was tested to demonstrate their probiotic properties. A reduction in the number of cells at pH 2 and a greater number of cells at pH3 was observed in both the A13 and A14 strains. However, the reference strain L. rhamnosus GG achieved higher results at pH 2 and pH 3 (Table 4). During the cultivation of A13 at pH 3 for 3 h, there was a 2.15-log reduction in the cell count, while A14 showed a 2.84-log reduction. Similar results (a 2–3-log decrease in the cell number) were obtained by Faye et al. [39] in the same conditions. In addition, the A13 and A14 strains showed 4.73–4.91-log reductions in cell count during growth at pH 2 after a 3 h exposure. Similar results were obtained by other researchers [10], who reported a decrease in the number of cells of isolated lactococci by 4–5-log cfu/mL in an acidic environment. Moreover, both A13 and A14 and the reference L. rhamnosus GG were resistant to bile salts at concentrations of 0.3% and 1%. The different results of the L. lactis and L. rhamnosus GG tolerance to bile salts and acids showed that the characteristics of the tested A13 and A14 strains were unique. The obtained research results are consistent with other reports on significant differences in tolerance to bile among the LAB strains [6,12,38]. For example, in the study conducted by Galli et al. [10], only one strain of L. lactis MK L1 out of seven isolates tested was resistant to bile salts, while Kondrotiene et al. [37] reported that 80% of the preselected L. lactis strains from 33 raw and fermented milk isolates showed resistance to 1% bile salts. In turn, Sałański et al. [11] showed an approximately 50% reduction in the growth of strains IBB109 and IBB417 after 6 h of incubation in a medium containing 0.3% bile salts.

3.5.2. Antibacterial Activity

An important feature of a probiotic strain is the ability to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract. LAB have different mechanisms of antagonism and their effect on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is species- or even strain-dependent. Many researchers have identified this feature in vitro using the well-diffusion method and various food-borne pathogenic bacteria, e.g., Salmonella spp., L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, E. coli, B. cereus, and others [5,28]. The two isolated strains, A13 and A14, inhibited the growth of two strains of Salmonella spp. most effectively but did not inhibit Gram-positive bacteria, such as B. cereus and L. monocytogenes (Table 5). The differences in the inhibition zones of S. anatum and E. faecalis suggest differences between both the studied strains. Karakas-Sen et al. [5] observed similar differences between the L. lactis strains. They reported that 36.365% of the strains inhibited the growth of L. monocytogenes, 15.15% inhibited C. perfringens, and 9.1% were active against S. aureus. In a study on L. lactis isolates, Alhabri et al. [32] observed different but high levels of inhibition of pathogens, such as E. coli, B. subtilis, L. monocytogenes, S. aureus, and S. typhi. Similarly, Rasovic et al. [29] showed differences between L. lactis strains in their activity against S. aureus; however, the strains did not inhibit Gram-negative bacteria, such as: Escherichia spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., and Pseudomonas spp. Lactococci isolated by Tsigkrimani et al. [12] from sheep milk and cheeses were not active against L. monocytogenes, S. enterica and E. coli O157:H7. These observations confirm the different mechanisms of antimicrobial action of L. lactis strains against pathogens.

3.5.3. Autoaggregation/Coaggregation

The ability of bacteria to aggregate and co-aggregate determines its ability to create aggregates with possible pathogens present in the intestine. A good probiotic is believed to have these abilities higher than pathogens [40]. Strains A13 and A14, however, showed quite poor aggregation and co-aggregation abilities and needed 24 h to reach aggregation levels of 28 and 38%, respectively, and co-aggregation in the range of 28.9–45.14% depending on the combination (Table 6). L. lactis KC24 isolated from kimchi showed 36.15% aggregation and 29.28–74.11% co-aggregation capacities with pathogens L. monocytogenes and S. aureus after 5 h of incubation [40]. Nikolic et al. [41] in their study on this phenomenon proved that the ability to autoaggregate and co-aggregate depends on cell surface proteins and some ions.

3.6. Haemolytic Activity

The ability of bacteria to produce haemolysins, which are capable of lysing red blood cells, is clear evidence of their pathogenicity in humans. Therefore, analysis of this group of enzymes is crucial for food-grade bacteria [13]. Both L. lactis strains A13 and A14 did not show haemolytic activity, which initially may prove their non-pathogenicity, and thus their safe use in the dairy industry. Similar results were obtained by Tsigkrimani et al. [12] and Teaok et al. [13].

3.7. Technological Features of L. lactis

3.7.1. Ability of Strains to Acidify Milk and Form a Clot

One of the factors determining the selection of A13 and A14 isolates for further research was their ability to quickly acidify milk and form a clot. During acidification at 30 °C, the pH of the milk steadily decreased over 9 h of measurements to the values of 4.51 and 5.03 for A13 and A14, respectively. pH stabilization was observed for 12 h, reaching values around 4.3 for both strains within 24 h. L. lactis strains isolated from sheep milk and Greek cheeses [12], similarly to isolates A13 and A14, quickly acidified milk, after 6 h they lowered the pH to 5.9 and within 6 to 12 h formed a milk clot. Similarly, L. lactis isolates from raw cow milk obtained by Karakas-Sen et al. [5] after 24 h of incubation acidified milk to a pH value within the range of 4.33–5.2 with an average of 4.6. In general, it can be stated that the A13 and A14 isolates are characterized by very good acidifying activity, which is a valuable technological feature.

3.7.2. Rheological Properties of Milk Clot

To assess the suitability of the A13 and A14 strains for cheese making, the clotting rate during lactic fermentation was investigated in comparison to two commercial starter cultures, S1 and S2, used in the dairy industry. Dynamic rheometry can monitor the gelation process without destruction of the gel network by measuring properties at low-strain rates [42]. Changes in complex modulus (G*) are shown in Figure 3. Complex modulus shows the viscoelastic behaviour of the sample. The higher the G* values, the stronger the gel [43]. The rheological analysis showed that fermentation with only one strain added to the milk yielded lower complex modulus values, compared to milk fermented with two strains. This is probably an effect of synergistic reactions between the applied strains. It is a very common phenomenon in diary practice. Commercial production of sour cream, yoghurt, kefir, and quark relies on the addition of at least two different strains [7]. At the end of the fermentation process, the wildtype L. lactis A13 and A14 strains were characterized by very similar values of G* to those exhibited by the commercial starters S1 and S2. When the strains were combined, a spectacular increase in the complex modulus value was noted. The results suggest that the wildtype strains can be successfully applied commercially for curd formation.

3.7.3. Sensory Evaluation of Cheese

To highlight the suitability of the new L. lactis strains for the production of cheese with correct and/or attractive sensory characteristics, they were compared with cheeses produced by commercial starter cultures, S1 and S2, and by combined strains. The cheeses obtained by various combinations of strains (A13, A14, S1, S2, A13 + S1, A13 + S2, A14 + S1, A14 + S2, A13 + A14) are presented in Figure 4. The maximum sensory scores were awarded to cottage cheeses produced by the mixed L. lactis A13+A14 strains (Figure 5A,B), i.e., 4.44 for the colour, 4.27 for the smell, 4.5 for the texture, 4.125 for the taste, and 4.5 for the moisture, followed by the strain mixtures A13 + S1 and A13 + S2. The weakest sensory results were achieved by cheeses manufactured with use of the S1 culture (3.87 for the smell, 4.25 for the texture, 3.75 for the taste, and 4.13 for the moisture; however, the colour was highly appreciated with a score of 4.65), with the S2 culture (4.71 for the colour, 3.86 for the smell, 3.87 for the texture, 3.37 for the taste, and 4.37 for the moisture), and with the A14 strain (4.74 for the colour, 3.62 for the smell, 4.25 for the texture, 3.87 for the taste, and 4.25 for the moisture). As emphasised by the panellists, the best cheese was made with the use of the newly isolated strains L. lactis A13 and A14; therefore, they can be used for cheese production in the future. In a study conducted by Nomura et al. [15], samples of coagulated milk inoculated with L. lactis isolates were organoleptically evaluated in terms of flavour by assessment of the degree of bitterness, maltiness, and sourness and the results showed a clean, acid flavour in samples inoculated with only 20% of the strains.

4. Conclusions

L. lactis-native bacteria of milk origin may be used for cheese production thanks to their favourable technological properties. Here, 26 isolates of lactococci were screened, genetically identified, and biochemically characterized. Two of them, A13 and A14, were the most promising and were selected for further study in terms of usefulness to the dairy industry. They showed very good growth at temperatures between 30–37 °C, in medium with 6.5% NaCl and suitable enzymatic potential. They dynamically acidified milk and created milk clots separately and in mixture showing synergism similar or even better than the activity of commercial starter cultures. Cottage cheeses produced by them also obtained positive scores in sensory evaluation. Moreover, the strains showed basic probiotic features: the ability to grow in media with low pH and in the presence of bile salts, which corresponds to their ability to survive in the digestive tract. They were antagonistic against some food-borne pathogenic bacteria, such as Salmonella spp. and S. aureus, but showed poor aggregation and co-aggregation capacity with the cells of these pathogens. They met the basic safety conditions, showing no haemolytic activity. Further research into the probiotic potential and safety of the strains and their exact contribution to the formulation of the cottage cheese should be investigated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.P. and M.K.-W.; methodology, M.P., J.W., M.K.-W., P.G. and E.S.; validation, M.P., J.W. and P.G.; formal analysis, M.P., J.W. and P.G.; investigation, M.P., J.W., M.K.-W., P.G. and E.S; resources, M.P., and P.G.; data curation, M.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P., M.K.-W., and P.G.; writing—review and editing, M.P., M.K.-W. and E.S.; visualisation, M.P., and P.G.; supervision, M.P. and M.K.-W.; project administration, M.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jay, J.M. Fermentation and fermented dairy products. Mod. Food Microbiol. 2000, 56, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fesseha, H. Probiotics and its potential role in poultry production: A review. Vet. Med.-Open J. 2019, 4, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lim, S.-M.; Im, D.-S. Screening and characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from Korean fermented foods. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 19, 178–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Quigley, L.; O’Sullivan, O.; Stanton, C.; Beresford, T.P.; Ross, R.P.; Fitzgerald, G.F.; Cotter, P.D. The complex microbiota of raw milk. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013, 37, 664–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Karakas-Sen, A.; Karakas, E. Isolation, identification and technological properties of lactic acid bacteria from raw cow milk. Biosci. J. 2018, 34, 385–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yerlikaya, O. Probiotic potential and biochemical and technological properties of Lactococcus lactis ssp. lactis strains isolated from raw milk and kefir grains. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Bylund, G. Dairy Processing Handbook; Tetra Pak Processing Systems AB: Lund, Sweden, 1995; pp. 233–240. [Google Scholar]
  8. Abarquero, D.; Renes, E.; Combarros-Fuertes, P.; Fresno, J.M.; Tornadijo, M.E. Evaluation of technological properties and selection of wild lactic acid bacteria for starter culture development. LWT 2022, 171, 114121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dolci, P.; Ferrocino, I.; Giordano, M.; Pramotton, R.; Vernetti-Prot, L.; Zenato, S.; Barmaz, A. Impact of Lactococcus lactis as starter culture on microbiota and metabolome profile of an Italian raw milk cheese. Int. Dairy J. 2020, 110, 104804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Galli, V.; Venturi, M.; Mari, E.; Guerrini, S.; Granchi, L. Selection of yeast and lactic acid bacteria strains, isolated from spontaneous raw milk fermentation, for the production of a potential probiotic fermented milk. Fermentation 2022, 8, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sałański, P.; Kowalczyk, M.; Bardowski, J.K.; Szczepankowska, A.K. Health-promoting nature of Lactococcus lactis IBB109 and Lactococcus lactis IBB417 strains exhibiting proliferation inhibition and stimulation of interleukin-18 expression in colorectal cancer cells. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 822912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tsigkrimani, M.; Panagiotarea, K.; Paramithiotis, S.; Bosnea, L.; Pappa, E.; Drosinos, E.H.; Skandamis, P.N.; Mataragas, M. Microbial ecology of sheep milk, artisanal Feta, and Kefalograviera cheeses. Part II: Technological, safety, and probiotic attributes of lactic acid bacteria isolates. Foods 2022, 11, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Taeok, K.; Shakti, C.M.; Chae-Rim, J.; So-Rim, K.; O-Hyun, B.; Young, H.J.; Jungwoo, Y.; Soo-Jung, K. Safety evaluation of Lactococcus lactis IDCC 2301 isolated from homemade cheese. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 10, 67–74. [Google Scholar]
  14. Altieri, C.; Ciuffreda, E.; Di Maggio, B.; Sinigaglia, M. Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures. In Starter Cultures in Food Production; Speranza, B., Bevilacqua, A., Corbo, M.R., Sinigaglia, M., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2017; pp. 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  15. Nomura, M.; Kobayashi, M.; Narita, T.; Kimoto-Nira, H.; Okamoto, T. Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Lactococcus lactis from milk and plants. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 101, 396–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kacem, M.; Zadi-Karami, H.; Karama, N.E. Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from milk and fermented olive oil in western Algeria. Actes Inst. Agron. Vet. (Maroc.) 2003, 23, 135–141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zycka-Krzesinska, J.; Boguslawska, J.; Aleksandrzak-Piekarczyk, T.; Jopek, J.; Bardowski, J.K. Identification and characterization of tetracycline resistance in Lactococcus lactis isolated from Polish raw milk and fermented artisanal products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2015, 211, 134–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Altschul, S.F.; Boguski, M.S.; Gish, W.; Wootton, J.C. Issues in searching molecular sequence databases. Nat. Genet. 1994, 6, 119–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gebreselassie, N.; Abay, F.; Beyene, F. Biochemical and molecular identification and characterization of lactic acid bacteria and yeasts isolated from Ethiopian naturally fermented buttermilk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Jung, M.Y.; Lee, C.; Seo, M.J.; Roh, S.W.; Lee, S.H. Characterization of a potential probiotic bacterium Lactococcus raffinolactis WiKim0068 isolated from fermented vegetable using genomic and in vitro analyses. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bhushan, B.; Tomar, S.K.; Chauhan, A. Techno-functional differentiation of two vitamin B 12 producing Lactobacillus plantarum strains: An elucidation for diverse future use. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Feng, Y.; Qiao, L.; Liu, R.; Liao, H.; Gao, C. Potential probiotic properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the intestinal mucosa of healthy piglets. Ann. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Enan, G.; Abdel-Shafi, S.; Ouda, S.; Negm, S. Novel antibacterial activity of Lactococcus lactis Subspecies lactis Z11 isolated from Zabady. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 9, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Polak-Berecka, M.; Waśko, A.; Paduch, R.; Skrzypek, T.; Sroka-Bartnicka, A. The effect of cell surface components on adhesion ability of Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014, 106, 751–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Fusieger, A.; Martins, M.C.F.; Freitas, R.; Nero, L.N.; Carvalho, A.F. Technological properties of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis bv. diacetylactis obtained from dairy and non-dairy niches. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2020, 51, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Glibowski, P.; Pikus, S. Amorphous and crystal inulin behavior in a water environment. Carbohydr. Pol. 2011, 83, 635–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. PN-A-86300: 1991; Milk and Dairy Products. Unripened Curd Cheeses. Polski Komitet Normalizacyjny: Warsaw, Poland, 1991.
  28. Kimoto-Nira, H.; Aoki, R.; Mizumachi, K.; Sasaki, K.; Naito, H.; Sawada, T.; Suzuki, C. Interaction between Lactococcus lactis and Lactococcus raffinolactis during growth in milk: Development a new starter culture. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 2176–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Rasovic, M.B.; Mayrhofer, S.; Martinovic, A.; Dȕrr, K.; Domig, K.J. Lactococci of local origin as potential starter cultures for traditional montenegreen cheese production. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 55, 55–66. [Google Scholar]
  30. Dahou, A.A.; Bekada, A.A.; Homrani, A. Identification of a Lactococcus lactis isolated from a fresh local cheese of the western Algerian steppe “J’ben of Naama”. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2021, DR-208, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Maślak, E.; Złoch, M.; Arendowski, A.; Sugajski, M.; Janczura, I.; Rudnicka, J.; Walczak-Skierska, J.; Buszewska-Forajta, J.; Rafińska, K.; Pomastowski, P.; et al. Isolation and identification of Lactococcus lactis and Weissella cibara strains from fermented beetroot and an investigation of their properties as potential starter cultures and probiotics. Foods 2022, 11, 2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Alharbi, N.; Alsaloom, A.N. Characterization of lactic bacteria isolated from raw milk and their antibacterial activity against bacteria as the cause of clinical bovine Mastitis. J. Food Qual. 2021, 2021, 6466645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Müller, T.; Müller, M.; Behrendt, U. Leucine arylamidase activity in the phyllosphere and the litter layer of a Scots pine forest. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2004, 47, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Monteagudo-Mera, A.; Caro, I.; Rodríguez-Aparicio, L.B.; Rúa, J.; Ferrero, M.A.; García-Armesto, M.R. Characterization of certain bacterial strains for potential use as starter or probiotic cultures in dairy products. J. Food Prot. 2011, 74, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xia, A.N.; Me, X.S.; Tang, H.J.; Zhang, X.Z.; Lei, S.M.; Liu, Y.G. Probiotic and related properties of a novel lactic acid bacteria strain isolated from fermented rose jam. LWT 2021, 136, 110327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kumari, M.; Singh, P.; Nataraj, B.H.; Kokkiligadda, A.; Naithani, H.; Ali, S.A.; Nagpal, R. Fostering next-generation probiotics in human gut by targeted dietary modulation: An emerging perspective. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kondrotiene, K.; Lauciene, L.; Andruleviciute, V.; Kasetiene, N.; Serniene, L.; Sekmokiene, D.; Malakauskas, M. Safety assessment and preliminary in vitro evaluation of probiotic potential of Lactococcus lactis strains naturally present in raw and fermented milk. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 3013–3023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gunyakti, A.; Asan-Ozusaglam, M. Lactobacillus gasseri from human milk with probiotic potential and some technological properties. LWT 2019, 109, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Faye, T.; Tamburello, A.; Vegarud, G.E.; Skeie, S. Survival of lactic acid bacteria from fermented milks in an in vitro digestion model exploiting sequential incubation in human gastric and duodenum juice. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Lee, N.-K.; Han, K.J.; Son, S.-H.; Eom, S.J.; Lee, S.-K.; Paik, H.-D. Multifunctional effect of probiotic Lactococcus lactis KC24 isolated from kimchi. LWT 2015, 64, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nikolic, M.; Jovcic, B.; Kojic, M.; Topisirovic, L. Surface properties of Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc isoaltes from homemade cheeses showing auto-aggregation ability. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2010, 231, 925–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Glibowski, P.; Mleko, S.; Wesołowska-Trojanowska, M. Gelation of single heated vs. double heated whey protein isolate. Int. Dairy J. 2006, 16, 1113–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Glibowski, P.; Mleko, S.; Waśko, A.; Kristinsson, H.G. Effect of two stage heating on Na+-induced gelation of whey protein isolate. Milchwissenschaft 2006, 61, 252–255. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Electrophoretic separation of the PCR products of L. lactis. M—marker–Nova 1 kbp ladder (Novazym), 1–26 numbers of isolates.
Figure 1. Electrophoretic separation of the PCR products of L. lactis. M—marker–Nova 1 kbp ladder (Novazym), 1–26 numbers of isolates.
Applsci 12 12088 g001
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree based on 16S rRNA sequences showing the phylogenetic analysis of the studied L. lactis isolates (bolded). Bootstrap values >50% are indicated. The scale bar displays the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The sequence of Bacillus subtilis was used as an outgroup.
Figure 2. Maximum likelihood tree based on 16S rRNA sequences showing the phylogenetic analysis of the studied L. lactis isolates (bolded). Bootstrap values >50% are indicated. The scale bar displays the number of nucleotide substitutions per site. The sequence of Bacillus subtilis was used as an outgroup.
Applsci 12 12088 g002
Figure 3. Changes in complex modulus during the fermentation of skimmed milk by two wildtype L. lactis strains, A13 and A14, in comparison to commercial starter cultures, S1 and S2, and in combined application.
Figure 3. Changes in complex modulus during the fermentation of skimmed milk by two wildtype L. lactis strains, A13 and A14, in comparison to commercial starter cultures, S1 and S2, and in combined application.
Applsci 12 12088 g003
Figure 4. Photograph of cottage cheeses obtained with the use of L. lactis A13 and A14, commercial starter cultures S1 and S2 and their blends. Symbols as in Figure 4.
Figure 4. Photograph of cottage cheeses obtained with the use of L. lactis A13 and A14, commercial starter cultures S1 and S2 and their blends. Symbols as in Figure 4.
Applsci 12 12088 g004
Figure 5. Sensory scores of cottage cheeses according to a 5-point scale; (A) cheeses with L. lactis A13 and A14, their blend, commercial starter culture S1, and the blend of A13 and A14 with S1, (B) cheeses with L. lactis A13 and A14, their blend, commercial starter culture S2, and the blend of A13 and A14 with S2.
Figure 5. Sensory scores of cottage cheeses according to a 5-point scale; (A) cheeses with L. lactis A13 and A14, their blend, commercial starter culture S1, and the blend of A13 and A14 with S1, (B) cheeses with L. lactis A13 and A14, their blend, commercial starter culture S2, and the blend of A13 and A14 with S2.
Applsci 12 12088 g005
Table 1. Growth of 26 selected strains at various temperatures and salt concentrations after 48 h of incubation.
Table 1. Growth of 26 selected strains at various temperatures and salt concentrations after 48 h of incubation.
TemperatureSalt
Strain10 °C30 °C37 °C45 °C2%NaCl4%NaCl6.5%NaCl
A1+++++-+++++
A2+++++-+++++
A3++++-+++++
A4+++++-+++++
A5+++++-+++++
A6+++++-+++++
A7-+++-+++++
A8++++-+++++
A9+++++-+++++
A10+++++-+++++
A11+++++-+++++
A12+++++-+++++
A13+++++++-++++++
A14+++++++-++++++
A15++++-+++++
A16+++++-+++++
A17+++++-+++++
A18+++++-+++++
A19++++-+++++
A20+++++-+++++
A21+++++-+++++
A22+++++-+++++
A23-++++-+++++
A24++++-+++++
A25+++++-+++++
A26+++++-+++++
+ weak growth, ++ good growth, +++ very good growth, - no growth.
Table 2. Results of carbohydrate fermentation by the L. lactis isolates assessed with the API 50CH test.
Table 2. Results of carbohydrate fermentation by the L. lactis isolates assessed with the API 50CH test.
Carbon SourceIsolate
A1, A2, A4, A6, A10, A11, A13, A14, A15, A16, A18, A19, A21, A22, A24, A25A3, A7, A8, A20, A23A5, A9, A12, A17, A26
Glycerol---
Erythritol---
D-arabinose---
L-arabinose---
D-ribose+++
D-xylose---
L-xylose---
D-adonitol---
Methyl β-D-xylopyranoside---
D-galactose+++
D-glucose+++
D-fructose+++
D-mannose+++
L-sorbose---
L-rhamnose---
Dulcitol---
Inositol---
D-mannitol---
D-sorbitol---
Methyl α-D-mannopyranoside---
Methyl α-D-glucopyranoside---
N-acetyl-glucosamine+++
Amygdaline+++
Arbutyne+++
Esculin+++
Salicin+++
D-cellobiose+++
D-maltose+++
D-lactose+++
D-melibiose+-+
D-saccharose---
D-trehalose---
Inulin---
D-melezitose---
D-raffinose---
Starch++-
Glycogen+--
Xylitol+--
Gentiobiose+--
D-turanose+++
D-liksose---
D-tagatose---
D-fucose---
L-fucose---
D-arabitol---
L-arabitol---
Potassium gluconate+++
Potassium 2-ketogluconate---
Potassium 5-ketogluconate---
+ positive reaction, - negative reaction.
Table 3. Enzyme activities of the L. lactis strains isolated from cow milk determined by the API-ZYM system.
Table 3. Enzyme activities of the L. lactis strains isolated from cow milk determined by the API-ZYM system.
EnzymeIsolate
A1, A3, A4, A7, A8, A10, A11, A13, A14, A16, A17, A18, A20, A22, A23, A25, A26A6, A19, A24A2, A5, A9, A12, A15, A21
Alkaline phosphatase102
Esterase (C4)201
Esterase lipase (C8) 010
Lipase (C14)101
Leucine arylamidase 342
Valine arylamidase110
Cystine arylamidase 010
Trypsin 000
α-Chymotrypsin 101
Acid phosphatase 545
Naphthol-AS-BI-phosphohydrolase 222
α-Galactosidase 000
β-Galactosidase 000
β-Glucuronidase 000
α-Glucosidase 000
β-Glucosidase000
N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase 000
α-Mannosidase 000
α-Fucosidase 000
0–1—no enzymatic activity, 2–3—weak activity, 4–5—strong activity.
Table 4. Viability of the Lactococcus lactis after exposure to low pH and bile salt.
Table 4. Viability of the Lactococcus lactis after exposure to low pH and bile salt.
Stress AgentExposition Time (h)Viability (Log CFU 1/mL)
L. lactis A13L. lactis A14L. rhamnosus GG
pH708.82 ± 0.14 2a8.60 ± 0.13 a8.54 ± 0.18 b
pH729.20 ± 0.21 b8.95 ± 0.10 a9.01 ± 0.12 a
pH739.33 ± 0.25 c9.24 ± 0.22 a9.16 ± 0.13 a
pH308.81 ± 0.15 c8.60 ± 0.12 c8.49 ± 0.15 a
pH327.76 ± 0.13 b6.75 ± 0.12 b8.67 ± 0.12 a
pH337.18 ± 0.15 a6.40 ± 0.11 a8.54 ± 0.14 a
pH208.85 ± 0.14 c8.60 ± 0.13 c8.52 ± 0.12 c
pH225.52 ± 0.15 b4.91 ± 0.04 b6.81 ± 0.15 b
pH234.42 ± 0.08 a4.52 ± 0.03 a5.31 ± 0.08 a
BS 3 0.3%08.80 ± 0.15 a8.64 ± 0.11 a8.71 ± 0.13 a
BS 0.3%28.91 ± 0.11 a8.55 ± 0.14 a8.82 ± 0.11 ab
BS 0.3%39.06 ± 0.13 a8.45 ± 0.10 a8.97 ± 0.12 b
BS 1%08.74 ± 0.12 b8.64 ± 0.12 a8.79 ± 0.12 a
BS 1%28.83 ± 0.14 a8.03 ± 0.14 a8.64 ± 0.11 a
BS 1%38.97 ± 0.16 ab7.96 ± 0.16 ab8.78 ± 0.16 a
1 CFU: colony-forming units; 2 mean ± standard deviation 3 BS: bile salts. Various lowercase letters represent significantly different mean values per one strain according to a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Fisher’s test (p > 0.05).
Table 5. Antibacterial activity of L. lactis strains against different pathogens.
Table 5. Antibacterial activity of L. lactis strains against different pathogens.
PathogensAntibacterial Activity (Inhibition Zone [mm])
L. lactis A13L. lactis A14
Salmonella anatum
Salmonella enterica
Escherichia coli
Bacillus cereus
Listeria monocytogenes
Staphylococcus aureus
Enterococcus faecalis
12 ± 1.1 1d
13 ± 1.0 e
4 ± 2.3 a
-
-
7 ± 2.0 b
11 ± 1.2 c
8 ± 1.3 d
12 ± 2.0 e
4 ± 1.5 a
-
-
5 ± 2.5 b
7 ± 1.3 c
- negative (no antimicrobial activity); 1 mean ± standard deviation. Various lowercase letters represent significantly different mean values per one strain according to a one-way ANOVA with post hoc Fisher’s test (p > 0.05).
Table 6. Autoaggregation and co-aggregation abilities of the L. lactis A13 and A14 isolates.
Table 6. Autoaggregation and co-aggregation abilities of the L. lactis A13 and A14 isolates.
BacteriaAutoaggregation (%)Co-Aggregation (%)
5 h24 h5 h24 h
L. lactis A13
L. lactis A14
S. aureus
S. anatum
A13 + S. aureus
A13 + S. anatum
A14 + S. aureus
A14 + S. anatum
8.52 ± 1.43 1
7.49 ± 2.79
12.03 ± 3.84
31.81 ± 1.89
-
-
-
-
28.15 ± 0.36
38.46 ± 3.33
45.74 ± 5.73
66.91 ± 0.77
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
13.70 ± 0.01
27.80 ± 0.01
15.76 ± 0.02
29.39 ± 0.02
-
-
-
-
28.91 ± 0.06
38.57 ± 0.02
44.57 ± 0.01
45.14 ± 0.03
1 mean ± standard deviation; - not applicable.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pytka, M.; Kordowska-Wiater, M.; Wajs, J.; Glibowski, P.; Sajnaga, E. Usefulness of Potentially Probiotic L. lactis Isolates from Polish Fermented Cow Milk for the Production of Cottage Cheese. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312088

AMA Style

Pytka M, Kordowska-Wiater M, Wajs J, Glibowski P, Sajnaga E. Usefulness of Potentially Probiotic L. lactis Isolates from Polish Fermented Cow Milk for the Production of Cottage Cheese. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(23):12088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pytka, Monika, Monika Kordowska-Wiater, Justyna Wajs, Paweł Glibowski, and Ewa Sajnaga. 2022. "Usefulness of Potentially Probiotic L. lactis Isolates from Polish Fermented Cow Milk for the Production of Cottage Cheese" Applied Sciences 12, no. 23: 12088. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122312088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop