Next Article in Journal
Fungal Arsenic Tolerance and Bioaccumulation: Local Strains from Polluted Water vs. Allochthonous Strains
Previous Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Assessment of Soil and Vegetation Pollution with Toxic Metals from Road Traffic along the First Romanian Highway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Evolution of Freshwater Runoff in the Western Adriatic Sea over the Last Century

by
Teresa Sani
1,2,3,
Mauro Marini
1,2,*,
Alessandra Campanelli
1,
Mariana Machado Toffolo
2,3,
Stefano Goffredo
2,3 and
Federica Grilli
1
1
Institute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council (IRBIM, CNR), Largo Fiera della Pesca 2, 60125 Ancona, Italy
2
Fano Marine Center, The Inter-Institute Center for Research on Marine Biodiversity, Resources and Biotechnologies (FMC), Viale Adriatico 1/N, 61032 Fano, Italy
3
Marine Science Group, Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2024, 11(1), 22; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11010022
Submission received: 23 November 2023 / Revised: 5 January 2024 / Accepted: 17 January 2024 / Published: 20 January 2024

Abstract

:
The evaluation of the hydrography and biogeochemistry of the Adriatic Sea over the last century was summarized in this review to point out any changes in river runoff and provide an overview of the cause and effect of these trends on marine ecosystems. Although several rivers flow into the Adriatic, the most affected area is the northern Adriatic, where the Po River loads into the basin half of the total freshwater input, carrying river runoff and causing algal blooms and hypoxia phenomena. These fresh waters of the northern Adriatic flow predominantly along the entire western side, reaching the southernmost part of the basin up to the Mediterranean Sea. Here, and in the whole basin, variations in river runoff and nutrient concentration have been observed through the years. Starting from 1960 until the end of the century, an increase in nutrient discharge and phytoplankton activity was reported, with negative repercussions on local fisheries, species richness, and recreational activities within the basin. However, a recent decrease in river inflow has been observed along the coastal belt, which can trigger negative consequences for the food web of the marine ecosystem. These trends, more broadly, corroborate the vulnerability of the Adriatic Sea and stress the importance of implementing strategies for the defense of the relevant ecosystems within its confines.

1. Introduction

The Adriatic Sea (Figure 1) is a continental basin of the Mediterranean Sea, located between the Italian peninsula (western coast) and the coasts of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Albania (eastern coast) [1]. Around the world, coastal marine areas represent approximately 4% of the Earth’s total land surface, yet they host about half of the world’s human population and provide a key contribution to global economic profit and ecosystem services. The Adriatic basin presents these characteristics as well [2,3,4,5]. The entire western coast of the Adriatic Sea is part of Italian territory which, with 8 out of the total 20 regions overlooking this basin, marks a total length of coastal line of 1472.66 km. The morphology of the Adriatic coast, characterized by low and sandy beaches and a flat hinterland, have contributed over time to the construction of infrastructure and residential settlements, making the Italian eastern coast the most densely urbanized one in the entire Mediterranean basin. Between the 1950s and 2001, the population in coastal municipalities increased by almost 720,000 inhabitants, reaching 3,372,138 citizens in 2001. Economic interests, especially in the northern Adriatic, are tied to fishing, trade, intensive use of farming and, since the beginning of the 20th century in the northern and since the 1960s in the southern region, to tourist seaside development [6].
The Adriatic Sea extends for 800 km, oriented in the northwestern–southeastern direction. The basin has been divided into northern, central, and southern sub-basins [7,8], based on the bathymetry. The central Adriatic is deeper, reaching a maximum depth of 270 m (Jabuka Pit) and is divided from the southern Adriatic by the Palagruža Sill (170 m). In the southern basin, the maximum depth is 1250 m [9]. The central-southern Adriatic is characterized by lower primary productivity in comparison with the northern sub-basin, receiving lower continental influx of nutrients and presenting benthonic-pelagic interactions of lesser importance when compared to the northern area [10,11,12,13]. Conversely, the northern Adriatic is characterized by shallow waters (average depth ~35 m), a weak bathymetric gradient from northwest to southeast, and a significant influx of fluvial waters, mainly from Italian rivers [9,14,15]. The Po River, in particular, has an annual average flow rate of 1500 m3s−1, representing approximately half of the total freshwater input into the Adriatic Sea. The Adriatic collects, in total, one-third of the freshwater flowing into the Mediterranean Sea [16,17,18,19]. Due to the predominant cyclonic circulation of the Adriatic Sea, the Po River and other alpine rivers located in the northernmost part of the basin discharge nutrients into its waters along the western side. These rivers are responsible for significant eutrophication processes that have been periodically observed along the Italian coasts [20,21,22,23,24], at least since the 1960s, causing hypoxia phenomena and dinoflagellate blooms [25,26]. Since the 1950s, the ever-increasing use of fertilizers, prompted by intensive farming along the Po River basin, has had a significant impact on the inflow of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) into the Northern Adriatic Sea [27,28]. The release of these nutrients in the sea creates the perfect storm for the eutrophication process, where an excessive growth of phytoplankton and macroalgae creates a biomass cover that prevents sunlight and oxygen from penetrating the water column, potentially depleting oxygen levels and ceasing primary production within the ecosystem [23,29].
In the last decades, the Adriatic Sea, especially the Northern Adriatic Sea (NAS), has been the subject of several studies regarding algal or phytoplankton bloom [30,31,32,33,34] eutrophication [35,36,37] and discharge as well as enrichment of nutrients from Italian rivers [17,38,39,40,41]. However, there is still a knowledge gap regarding the variability of river runoff throughout the Adriatic Sea and the consequent changes, both in physical parameters and nutrient concentrations, over the last 150 years.
We performed a review of the evolution of river runoff in the Adriatic Sea in the literature. Hence, we used the Scopus database to conduct the query. Here, we report the specifics of our query: ‘Search Within’ > Keywords: “Adriatic Sea” AND “nutrient”; ‘Publication Dates’ > Range: From 1990 to 2022. This query resulted in 232 items. Among these, 83 were selected based on the relevance of the title and the abstract. Other articles were then added starting from the bibliography of these 83. Hence, the bibliography resulted in 134 scientific papers, published from 1873 to 2023, characterizing changes in oceanographic parameters and in nutrient discharge in seawater, highlighting their impact on this marine ecosystem.

2. River Runoff and Oceanographic Evolution of the Adriatic Sea

The Adriatic Sea is a continental sea and is therefore strongly influenced by its own geomorphological and meteorological conditions. These conditions trigger physical and chemical changes over the years. Freshwater inflow from rivers, as well as water exchange with the Ionian Sea and the influence of Levantine Intermediate Water (LIW), significantly impact the oceanographic properties of the Adriatic Sea. The Adriatic and Ionian Seas are connected through the Strait of Otranto, allowing for water exchange and influencing the oceanographic properties of both seas. LIW, originating in the eastern Mediterranean, plays a role in the water masses present in the Adriatic, contributing to the overall complexity of its hydrological characteristics [42,43]. The relatively shallow depth of the sea and the local river inflows contribute to variations in the hydrological characteristics of the water column. The coastal waters, with reduced salinity caused by river inflow, can impact the circulation of the basin in two ways. Firstly, they can act directly as a mechanism forcing circulation through buoyancy-related processes. Secondly, they can have an indirect impact by modifying the stratification conditions crucial for controlling specific features of the Adriatic, such as the exchange of water masses through the Otranto Strait and the generation of deep water along the northern continental margin [44]. Thanks to the influence of the freshwater inflow, mainly from the Po River, the northern Adriatic acts as a heat sink and a buoyancy factor. River runoff mainly depends on precipitation melting of glaciers, impacting water circulation through buoyancy input and affecting the ecosystem by introducing significant amounts of organic matter, nutrients, salts, and sediments [11,45]. The discharges into the Adriatic Sea are primarily attributed to the Dinaric Alps and the Julian Alps, with rivers such as the River Isonzo contributing to the inflow into the eastern part of the basin [19,46,47]. Rivers flowing into the northern Adriatic can be categorized by location, distinguishing between those located above and below the Po delta. Among the main rivers in the northern group are the Isonzo, Tagliamento, Livenza, Piave, Brenta, and Adige. The southern group consists of rivers of lesser importance, with lower flow rates, including the Po di Volano, Reno, Destra Reno, Lamone, Savio, Rubicone, Marecchia, Conca, Foglia, Metauro, Esino, Musone, Chienti, Tenna Tronto, Vomano, Pescara, Sango, Trigno, Biferno, and Fortone [38] (Figure 2). These Adriatic rivers showed an annual cycle characterized by two high-discharge periods, in late autumn and spring, alternating with two low-discharge periods, in winter and summer [48]. Unlike the Northern Adriatic Sea, in the south-western part of the basin, particularly the Gulf of Manfredonia, river discharges are relatively low. Here, among minor rivers that dry up during the summer, the Ofanto is the main river flowing into the basin, with an average flow of 13.9 m3s−1 [49,50]. The Eastern Central Southern Adriatic Sea (ECSAS), in addition to the flow from the Neretva River, represents one important source of freshwater in this part of the basin, with cold waters with an average discharge of 300 m3s−1 [51,52,53,54]. ECSAS receives waters from the Buna/Bojana River, which is the Southeastern Adriatic’s most important river, with a discharge of about 700 m3s−1, second only to the Po River. The Southern Adriatic Sea is influenced by the freshwater inflow of several other Albanian rivers, among which are the Drini, Mati, Ishimi, Erzeni, Shkumbini, Semani, and Vjosa Rivers, discharging a total of about 1250 m3s−1 into the basin [43,55] (Figure 2).
The most affected areas by river runoff in the Adriatic Sea during all seasons are the northern and western regions, where a strong lateral temperature and nutrient gradient is experienced in spring and autumn [19,41]. Indeed, the annual hydrological regime observed for the Po River shows a low flow during winter (January and February) and an even lower flow in August, a period of maximum flow in May–June due to glaciers thawing, and another high flow period in October–November due to the intensive rainfall [38]. This trend is observed also for the Adige River, where two yearly periods of low water flow (winter and summer) and two of high flow (spring and autumn) occur. Although these two rivers are mainly responsible for the runoff flow in the Adriatic Sea, the Po River is the major source of freshwater in the northern Adriatic [40], with a mean flow rate of 1470 m3s−1, which is higher than that of the Adige River (220 m3s−1; [38]).
An analysis of long-term changes in river runoff pointed out three distinct periods in the historical series of the Po River, with a variable runoff from 1917 to 1941, followed by an increasing load from 1942 to 1975, and subsequently a decrease from 1976 to 2008, mainly due to the drought that characterized the most recent years. Overall, in the period from 1917 to 2008, the runoff of the Po ranged from 20.54 to 82.49 km3yr−1, with an average value of 47.17 km3yr−1 [40]. This decreasing trend continued until October 2023 (Figure 3), as also reported in Marini and Grilli, 2023 [23]. However, regarding the Adige, Brenta, Piave, Isonzo, and the rivers along the Slovenian Coast, including Rizâna and Dragonja, throughout the whole period, a substantial decline in runoff was observed [40].
The main winds affecting the Adriatic Sea are the bora winds, dry and cold winds blowing offshore from the east, and scirocco winds, humid and warm winds blowing from the southeast [56]. In particular, during autumn and winter, bora winds are responsible for the formation of very dense deep waters, known as Northern Adriatic Deep Water (NADW), characterized by low temperatures (less than 10 °C), and relatively low salinity (~38.3 psu) [57,58]. These waters flow southwards across the Palagruža Sill, near the bottom of the Italian shelf [59]. The major portion of these waters flow southwards until reaching the southern part of the shelf, which due to the presence of a canyon, becomes deeper [60,61]. Here, mixing processes occur with the inflowing warmer and saltier Modified Levantine Intermediate Water (MLIW) from the Mediterranean, resulting in the formation of the Adriatic Bottom Water (ABW). The ABW then outflows into the Ionian Sea at the bottom of the Otranto Strait.

3. Importance of River Runoff for the Food Web and Influence on Plankton

The rising frequency of short-term phenomena due to climate change, especially the increase in intense rainfall events and the resulting terrigenous loads entering coastal waters from rivers, has been the focus of several studies conducted around the world [22,59,62,63,64,65,66,67]. Eutrophication is the process resulting from the decomposition of large quantities of dead algal biomass following an algal bloom event, leading to the formation of hypoxic or anoxic sea areas [68]. Since the 1800s, the Po River in the northern Adriatic has carried a very high nutrient load (N range: 1–300 µM; P range: 0.01–4 µM [41]) leading to occurrences of algal, diatom, and dinoflagellate blooms [69,70,71,72,73]. However, it was only in the mid-1970s that eutrophication episodes developed a chronic yearly pattern, varying only in intensity [29,38,74]. Since the 1970s, eutrophication, in conjunction with adverse meteorological and hydrographic conditions, has led to the presence of oxygen-depleted bottom waters in the coastal areas, leading to lethal effects such as the impoverishment or mass mortality of benthic fauna [74], hence confirming the hypothesis that riverine influence is exacerbating hypoxia/anoxia [75]. It is well known that the frequency of eutrophic events increased exponentially in coastal areas of the Adriatic Sea until the 1990s, particularly due to the intensive release of inorganic nutrients from anthropic agricultural practices [76], continental emissions, and river runoff, resulting in a significant increase in nutrient concentration. Data available for the Po River, which can be considered a significant proxy of the total runoff in the north Adriatic, indicate that the transport of total nitrogen has increased about two times since the 1980s, reaching the highest estimate of 173 × 103 t N yr−1 in the years 1996–2000 due to a constant increase of anthropogenic activities. At the same time, the transport of total phosphorous has decreased from 15.6 to 8.1 × 103 t P yr−1 since 1978 thanks to Italian regulations that in 1986 required the reduction of phosphate in detergents [28,29,40]. Regarding the transport of nutrients of the Adige River, at the end of the 1980s, they reached values of 12.7 × 103 t N yr−1 for total nitrogen and 1.2 × 103 t P yr−1 for total phosphorous. However, due to the high correlation between runoff and nutrient transport, these changes could be related to pronounced oscillations rather than a progressive trend [40]. The mean Po River flow rate in the last two decades was significantly lower than in the years 1972–1999, producing a significant decreasing trend for P and Chlorophyll a concentration in North Adriatic Sea, but not for N [77]. The influence of river runoff on the Western Adriatic’s plankton communities is notable [77,78]. Seasonal variations in river discharge, characterized by increased flows in spring and autumn and reduced flows in winter and summer, directly influence the composition and abundance of plankton species [14]. Moreover, the increase in nutrient discharge can interfere with the natural annual nutrient cycles, leading to an increase in primary producers’ activity. This has significant ecological implications for both pelagic and benthic organisms, including an increase in phytoplankton activity [79]. Indeed, macroalgal blooms resulting from eutrophication processes can lead, in addition to hypoxia events and the production of toxic hydrogen sulfide, to negative effects on the abundance and diversity of benthic fauna living in coastal waters [80].
Although beneficial for an increase in fishery availability [81,82,83], higher primary production rates have been observed to result in phytoplankton blooms, with negative repercussions on local fisheries and recreational activities [84,85,86,87,88,89]. Phytoplankton blooms, often induced by increased nutrient input, provide a growing environment for specific zooplankton species [90]. This, in turn, influences the distribution and abundance of higher trophic levels, including fish and other marine organisms. Changes in plankton composition and abundance, in relation also to coastal oceanographic conditions, not only affect the survival and growth of fish larvae but also have repercussions on the distribution and availability of commercially valuable species, as well as on the diffusion of benthic species more tolerant to hypoxia and high nutrient concentrations [91,92]. Nowadays, the rise in sea temperatures is causing a reduction in primary production and, subsequently, a decrease in zooplankton populations [77,93,94]. Warmer waters, combined with more frequent extreme weather events, have the potential to intensify the competition among pelagic predators for food resources. As a result, we may see more significant fluctuations in the stocks of species, with dramatic impacts on the overall ecosystem [95,96,97,98].
The long-term alterations in nutrient concentrations within the northern Adriatic region are intricately linked to climatic fluctuations and, in particular, to the decrease in rainfall during the winter in northern Italy, and the Alps region [40,99]. Intensity of precipitation and increased frequency of rainfall events have the potential to influence several key factors. These can modify the hydrological cycles, such as the flow rate of the Po River (Figure 2), which is a significant source of freshwater input into the northern Adriatic Sea [41,48]. Variations in the Po River’s flowrate can impact the quantity and composition of nutrients entering the sea, consequently affecting the overall nutrient balance in the ecosystem (Figure 1) [23,45,77,100,101]. The geostrophic circulation of the northern Adriatic comprises multiple gyres that can last for extended periods within the region [102,103,104]. Gyres have the capacity to transport freshened, nutrient-rich waters, originating from the region near the Po River delta, across extensive portions of the northern Adriatic, and potentially as far as the opposing eastern coast, including the Istrian Peninsula [45,105,106].
Furthermore, climatic fluctuations can also have a profound impact on the water dynamics within the Adriatic Sea. This includes alterations in the vertical mixing of the water column, which can be heavier under conditions of low stratification and lighter when the water column is highly stratified, including temperature and salinity [107,108,109]. These alterations in vertical mixing can have cascading effects on the distribution of nutrients throughout the water column [18,101,110], thus influencing the availability of these essential elements to marine organisms. Alterations in the water exchange rate between the northern and central Adriatic [10,105] can impact the overall nutrient content and ecological conditions in these areas, as the rate can determine the extent to which they are connected and influence the exchange of organisms and materials. A recent study comparing physical and chemical data of the 2002–2007 and 2007–2016 periods showed that the latter decade was characterized by an increase in phytoplankton abundance, as well as biomass and inorganic nutrient concentrations [14,111]. This indicates a reversal trend compared to the tendency of oligotrophication observed in the previous period, due to a combination of factors that includes nutrient load mitigation strategies, different use of the land of the watersheds, and reduced runoff due to prolonged drought periods [10,93,100]. Moreover, a marked change occurred in the community structure and seasonality of phytoplankton [14,100].
Nutrient distribution and concentration in the Adriatic Sea are strongly affected by the physical characteristics of the basin. The Western Adriatic basin is characterized by a decrease in surface nutrient concentration, from north to south and from inshore to offshore, due to different freshwater inputs; this is particularly significant in the northern Adriatic [112]. Here, a dominant cyclonic circulation determines a southward nutrient flow along the western coast [13,14,41,100,101,105,113,114,115]. The Adriatic circulation is also strongly influenced by winds, due to the seasonality difference in wind regimes [116], and meteorological conditions, among which hydrological balance as well as densification related to river inflows and perturbations, with the resulting cooling and mixing, affect the thermohaline structure [8]. Among the winds affecting the Adriatic biogeochemical characteristics and its marine ecosystems are the bora winds. Previous studies showed that bora events, which occur more frequently in winter [9], could generate a relevant increase of nutrient loads exported from the northern Adriatic through the accentuation of the Western Adriatic Current (WAC), which, forced by the Po River runoff, enfolds the Western Adriatic coast, flowing south-eastward to finally leave the Adriatic basin via the Otranto Strait [117], and therefore playing a relevant role in the nutrient balance of the basin [118,119,120]. Due to the WAC, during bora events, sediments with nutrients and other waterborne materials are resuspended and driven southward along the Italian coast [16,22,45,115].

4. Future Directions

The Adriatic Sea is a segment of the Mediterranean Sea enclosed by the mountain chains of the Alps, the Apennines, and the Balkans. It is rich in resources such as subsoil, supports fishing and tourism industries, and is marked by intense maritime transport and cultural exchanges among the people along its shores. The western side, encompassing the entire Italian state, is densely populated and heavily influenced by human activities [6]. The current trend of ocean warming, coupled with an increase in the frequency of extreme events, may intensify water stratification. This, combined with reduced water exchange, could extend the turnover time of Adriatic waters. Under these conditions, the Adriatic Sea ecosystem’s susceptibility to eutrophication and acidification processes could increase, despite the ongoing trend of lower eutrophication [77]. Additionally, increased rates of primary production due to the rising temperatures in shallow water have been noted to give rise to phytoplankton blooms, causing adverse impacts on local fisheries and recreational activities [89]. Nevertheless, alterations in the structure of the fish community have taken place, potentially reducing the efficiency and resilience of the ecosystem [77]. In recent decades, climate change, with a specific emphasis on the increase in sea temperature and salinity, has manifested itself not only in the Mediterranean Sea but also in the Adriatic Sea. This environmental shift has triggered the proliferation and spread of alien species of marine organisms [121]. Mariculture and shipping represent potent mechanisms for introducing native warm-water species into the northwestern Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea [122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132]. The majority of the introduced species are adapted to warm temperatures, exhibiting thermophilic characteristics and forming self-sustaining populations, like the ornate wrasse Thalassoma pavo (Linnaeus, 1758) and the parrotfish Spariosoma cretense (Linnaeus, 1758) [133]. These species impact the survival of native species and engage in resource competition, such as the predation of small pelagics by tunas [134] and the voracious feeding behavior of the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus (Rathbun, 1896), on benthic organisms [125]. The Adriatic Sea, a hotspot of biodiversity and economic activities, faces significant challenges due to climate change and the introduction of invasive species. Proactive measures, informed by scientific research and community engagement, are essential to preserve the ecological integrity and economic sustainability of this vital marine environment. Observing the evolution of coastal oceanographic conditions on the western side of the Adriatic, we believe they can be of particular interest in shaping the prospects for research development. An interdisciplinary approach, integrating marine biology, oceanography, and socio-economic factors, will provide a comprehensive understanding of ongoing changes. Research in this direction will provide valuable insights that can prove beneficial for a diverse array of stakeholders engaged in economic activities throughout the Adriatic region.

5. Conclusions

The analysis of the freshwater runoff evolution in the Western Adriatic Sea over the past century has provided valuable insights into the dynamic interactions between climatic factors and hydrological processes. A comprehensive examination of historical data and present-day observations has facilitated a nuanced comprehension of the diverse factors influencing freshwater discharge into the Adriatic. Changes in precipitation patterns, snowmelt dynamics, and land-use practices have contributed to fluctuations in freshwater runoff. Notably, climate change emerges as a significant driver, with observable impacts on the timing and intensity of runoff events. Eutrophication, driven by increased nutrient concentrations since the 1970s, adversely affects marine life and ecosystems, favoring hypoxic areas and causing benthic fauna to suffer. Hydrodynamic variations within seasons influence river flow and impact plankton communities, with altered nutrient cycles impacting primary production. Increasing sea temperatures pose further challenges, resulting in reduced primary production and subsequently decreasing zooplankton populations. Indeed, the long-term changes in nutrient concentration could lead to wider diffusion of benthic species tolerant to hypoxia and high nutrient concentrations. The findings of this review highlight the importance of considering long-term trends in freshwater runoff to comprehend the broader environmental implications. Shifts in runoff patterns have direct consequences on coastal ecosystems, influencing nutrient dynamics and overall water quality. These changes, in turn, have significant implications for the ecological balance of the Adriatic Sea and its marine biodiversity.
Observed changes in the Western Adriatic Sea show that different patterns have occurred over time in the offshore and coastal waters. Indeed, in coastal waters, a decrease in the river runoff corresponds to a decrease in the concentration of nitrogen and phosphorous, while at basin level, they continue to represent an important food source for the trophic chain.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S. and M.M.; methodology, T.S.; validation, M.M. and T.S.; formal analysis, T.S.; investigation, T.S.; data curation, T.S., F.G. and M.M.T.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, T.S., M.M., M.M.T., A.C. and S.G.; visualization, F.G. and M.M.T.; supervision, M.M. and F.G.; project administration, F.G.; funding acquisition, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

This study represents partial fulfilment of the requirements for the doctoral thesis of Teresa Sani, within the international Program “Innovative Technologies and Sustainable Use of Mediterranean Sea Fishery and Biological Resources” (FishMed-PhD; www.FishMed-PhD.org) at the University of Bologna, Italy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pikelj, K.; Juračić, M. Eastern Adriatic Coast (EAC): Geomorphology and Coastal Vulnerability of a Karstic Coast. J. Coast. Res. 2013, 29, 944–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Costanza, R.; de Groot, R.; Farberll, S.; Grassot, M.; Hannon, B.; Limburg, K.; Naeem, S.; O’Neill, R.V.; Paruelo, J.; Raskin, R.G.; et al. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature 1997, 387, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barbier, E.B. Progress and Challenges in Valuing Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Services. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2012, 6, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. United Nations. “The Ocean Conference” to Support the Implementation of SDG 14; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ravaioli, M.; Bergami, C.; Riminucci, F.; Langone, L.; Cardin, V.; Di Sarra, A.; Aracri, S.; Bastianini, M.; Bensi, M.; Bergamasco, A.; et al. The RITMARE Italian Fixed-Point Observatory Network (IFON) for Marine Environmental Monitoring: A Case Study. J. Oper. Oceanogr. 2016, 9, s202–s214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Romano, B.; Zullo, F. The Urban Transformation of Italy’s Adriatic Coastal Strip: Fifty Years of Unsustainability. Land Use Policy 2014, 38, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Artegiani, A.; Bregant, D.; Paschini, E.; Pinardi, N.; Raicich, F.; Russo, A. The Adriatic Sea General Circulation. Part I: Air-Sea Interactions and Water Mass Structure. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1997, 27, 1492–1514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Franco, P.; Michelato, A. Northern Adriatic Sea: Oceanography of the Basin Proper and of the Western Coastal Zone. In Proceedings of the International Conference, Bologna, Italy, 21–24 March 1990; pp. 35–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cushman-Roisin, B.; Gačić, M.; Poulain, P.-M.; Artegiani, A. Physical Oceanography of the Adriatic Sea; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  10. Djakovac, T.; Degobbis, D.; Supić, N.; Precali, R. Marked Reduction of Eutrophication Pressure in the Northeastern Adriatic in the Period 2000–2009. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 115, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Grilli, F.; Marini, M.; Book, J.W.; Campanelli, A.; Paschini, E.; Russo, A. Flux of Nutrients between the Middle and Southern Adriatic Sea (Gargano-Split Section). Mar. Chem. 2013, 153, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zavatarelli, M.; Baretta, J.W.; Baretta-Bekker, J.G.; Pinardi, N. The Dynamics of the Adriatic Sea Ecosystem. An Idealized Model Study. Deep-Sea Res. I 2000, 47, 937–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Degobbis, D.; Gilmartin, M. Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Biogenic Silicon Budgets for the Northern Adriatic Sea. Oceanol. Acta 1990, 13, 31–45. [Google Scholar]
  14. Totti, C.; Romagnoli, T.; Accoroni, S.; Coluccelli, A.; Pellegrini, M.; Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Marini, M. Phytoplankton Communities in the Northwestern Adriatic Sea: Interdecadal Variability over a 30-Years Period (1988–2016) and Relationships with Meteoclimatic Drivers. J. Mar. Syst. 2019, 193, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Malanotte Rizzoli, P.; Bergamasco, A. The Dynamics of the Coastal Region of the Northern Adriatic Sea. J. Phys. Oceanogr. 1983, 13, 1105–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Marini, M.; Jones, B.H.; Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Lee, C.M. Seasonal Variability and Po River Plume Influence on Biochemical Properties along Western Adriatic Coast. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2008, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Paschini, E.; Marini, M. The Influence of an Exceptional Po River Flood on the Physical and Chemical Oceanographic Properties of the Adriatic Sea. Dyn. Atmos. Ocean. 2011, 52, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Raicich, F.; Colucci, R.R. A Near-Surface Sea Temperature Time Series from Trieste, Northern Adriatic Sea (1899–2015). Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2019, 11, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raichic, F. On the Fresh Water Balance of the Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 1996, 9, 305–319. [Google Scholar]
  20. Revelante, N.; Gilmartin, M. The Effect of Po River Discharge on Phytoplankton Dynamics in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Mar. Biol. 1976, 34, 259–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Socal, G.; Acri, F.; Bastianini, M.; Bernardi Aubry, F.; Bianchi, F.; Cassin, D.; Coppola, J.; De Lazzari, A.; Bandelj, V.; Cossarini, G.; et al. Hydrological and Biogeochemical Features of the Northern Adriatic Sea in the Period 2003–2006. Mar. Ecol. 2008, 29, 449–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marini, M.; Campanelli, A.; Sanxhaku, M.; Kljajić, Z.; Betti, M.; Grilli, F. Late Spring Characterization of Different Coastal Areas of the Adriatic Sea. Acta Adriat. 2015, 56, 27–46. [Google Scholar]
  23. Marini, M.; Grilli, F. The Role of Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Eutrophication of the Northern Adriatic Sea: History and Future Scenarios. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 9267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vilibić, I.; Pranić, P.; Denamiel, C. North Adriatic Dense Water: Lessons Learned since the Pioneering Work of Mira Zore-Armanda 60 Years Ago. Acta Adriat. 2023, 64, 53–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sellner, K.G.; Fonda-Umani, S. Dinoflagellate Blooms and Mucilage Production. Coast. Estuar. Stud. 1999, 55, 173–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Justić, D.; Legović, T.; Rottini-Sandrini, L. Trends in Oxygen Content 1911–1984 and Occurrence of Benthic Mortality in the Northern Adriatic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1987, 25, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Viaroli, P.; Soana, E.; Pecora, S.; Laini, A.; Naldi, M.; Fano, E.A.; Nizzoli, D. Space and Time Variations of Watershed N and P Budgets and Their Relationships with Reactive N and P Loadings in a Heavily Impacted River Basin (Po River, Northern Italy). Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 1574–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Palmeri, L.; Bendoricchio, G.; Artioli, Y. Modelling Nutrient Emissions from River Systems and Loads to the Coastal Zone: Po River Case Study, Italy. Ecol. Modell. 2005, 184, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marchetti, R.; Provini, A.; Crosa, G. Nutrient Load Carried by the River Po into the Adriatic Sea, 1968–1987. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1989, 20, 168–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vukadin, I. Hydrographic and Biological Aspects of Algal Bloom in the Adriatic Sea in 1988. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 1991, 31, 265–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vukadin, I. Impact of Nutrient Enrichment and Their Relation to the Algal Bloom in the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1992, 23, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tomasino, M.G. Is It Feasible to Predict “Slime Blooms” or “Mucilage” in the Northern Adriatic Sea? Ecol. Modell. 1996, 84, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Penna, N.; Capellacci, S.; Ricci, F. The Influence of the Po River Discharge on Phytoplankton Bloom Dynamics along the Coastline of Pesaro (Italy) in the Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 48, 321–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Accoroni, S.; Tartaglione, L.; Dello Iacovo, E.; Pichierri, S.; Marini, M.; Campanelli, A.; Dell’Aversano, C.; Totti, C. Influence of Environmental Factors on the Toxin Production of Ostreopsis Cf. Ovata during Bloom Events. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 123, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Barmawidjaja, D.M.; Van Der Zwaan, G.J.; Jorissen, F.J.; Puskaric, S. 50 Years of Eutrophication in the Northern Adriatic from a Benthic Foraminiferal Record Sea: Evidence. Mar. Geol. 1995, 122, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Perin, G.; Giacometti, A. Short Historical Review of Contribution of a Major River Basin to Adriatic Sea Eutrophication and Heavy Metal Micropollution: The Brenta-Bacchiglione Watershed, Italy. Ecol. Environ. Conserv. 2016, 22, 1609–1620. [Google Scholar]
  37. Warren, S.C.; Nespoli, G.; Rinaldi, A.; Montanari, G.; Vollenweider, R.A. Eutrophication along the Emilia-Romagna Coast: Application of Statistical Analyses to 1984–1989 Monitoring Data. In Proceedings of the Bologna Conference, Science of the Total Environment, Bologna, Italy, 21–24 March 1990; Vollenweider, R.A., Marchetti, R., Viviani, R., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1992; pp. 187–200. [Google Scholar]
  38. Provini, A.; Crosa, G.; Marchetti, R. Nutrient Export from the Po and Adige River Basins over the Last 20 Years. In Proceedings of the International Conference, Bologna, Italy, 21–24 March 1990; pp. 291–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Spillman, C.M.; Imberger, J.; Hamilton, D.P.; Hipsey, M.R.; Romero, J.R. Modelling the Effects of Po River Discharge, Internal Nutrient Cycling and Hydrodynamics on Biogeochemistry of the Northern Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 2007, 68, 167–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cozzi, S.; Giani, M. River Water and Nutrient Discharges in the Northern Adriatic Sea: Current Importance and Long Term Changes. Cont. Shelf Res. 2011, 31, 1881–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grilli, F.; Accoroni, S.; Acri, F.; Aubry, F.B.; Bergami, C.; Cabrini, M.; Campanelli, A.; Giani, M.; Guicciardi, S.; Marini, M.; et al. Seasonal and Interannual Trends of Oceanographic Parameters over 40 Years in the Northern Adriatic Sea in Relation to Nutrient Loadings Using the EMODnet Chemistry Data Portal. Water 2020, 12, 2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Civitarese, G.; Gačić, M.; Lipizer, M.; Eusebi Borzelli, G.L. On the Impact of the Bimodal Oscillating System (BiOS) on the Biogeochemistry and Biology of the Adriatic and Ionian Seas (Eastern Mediterranean). Biogeosciences 2010, 7, 3987–3997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Marini, M.; Grilli, F.; Guarnieri, A.; Jones, B.H.; Klajic, Z.; Pinardi, N.; Sanxhaku, M. Is the Southeastern Adriatic Sea Coastal Strip an Eutrophic Area? Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2010, 88, 395–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kourafalou, V.H. Process Studies on the Po River Plume, North Adriatic Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 1999, 104, 29963–29985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Grilli, F.; Marini, M.; Degobbis, D.; Ferrari, C.R.; Fornasiero, P.; Russo, A.; Gismondi, M.; Djakovac, T.; Precali, R.; Simonetti, R. Circulation and Horizontal Fluxes in the Northern Adriatic Sea in the Period June 1999–July 2002. Part II: Nutrients Transport. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 353, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Comici, C.; Bussani, A. Analysis of the River Isonzo Discharge (1998–2005); National Institute of Oceanography and Experimental Geophysics (OGS): Trieste, Italy, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  47. Frantar, P. Geographical Overview of Water Balance of Slovenia 1971–2000 by Main River Basins. Acta Geogr. Slov. 2007, 47, 25–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zanchettin, D.; Traverso, P.; Tomasino, M. Po River Discharges: A Preliminary Analysis of a 200-Year Time Series. Clim. Chang. 2008, 89, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Specchiulli, A.; Bignami, F.; Marini, M.; Fabbrocini, A.; Scirocco, T.; Campanelli, A.; Penna, P.; Santucci, A.; D’Adamo, R. The Role of Forcing Agents on Biogeochemical Variability along the Southwestern Adriatic Coast: The Gulf of Manfredonia Case Study. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2016, 183, 136–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Caroppo, C.; Fiocca, A.; Sammarco, P.; Magazzu’, G. Seasonal Variations of Nutrients and Phytoplankton in the Coastal SW Adriatic Sea (1995–1997). Bot. Mar. 1999, 42, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Giglio, F.; Romano, S.; Albertazzi, S.; Chiarini, F.; Ravaioli, M.; Ligi, M.; Capotondi, L. Sediment Dynamics of the Neretva Channel (Croatia Coast) Inferred by Chemical and Physical Proxies. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ferrarin, C.; Penna, P.; Penna, A.; Spada, V.; Ricci, F.; Bilić, J.; Krzelj, M.; Ordulj, M.; Šikoronja, M.; Ðuračić, I.; et al. Modelling the Quality of Bathing Waters in the Adriatic Sea. Water 2021, 13, 1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Denant, V.; Saliot, A.; Mantoura, R.F.C. Distribution of Algal Chlorophyll and Carotenoid Pigments in a Stratified Estuary: The Krka River, Adriatic Sea. Mar. Chem. 1991, 32, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Grzetić, Z.; Precali, R.; Degobbis, D.; Škrivanić, A. Nutrient Enrichment and Phytoplankton Response in an Adriatic Karstic Estuary. Mar. Chem. 1991, 32, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. UNEP. Implications of Climate Change for the Albanian Coast; MAP Technical Reports Series No. 98; UNEP: Athens, Greece, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  56. Artegiani, A.; Gacic, M.; Michelato, J.A.; Kovacevic, V.; Russo, A.; Paschini, E.; Scarazzato, P.; Smircic, A. The Adriatic Sea Hydrography and Circulation in Spring and Autumn (1985–1987). Deep-Sea Res. II 1993, 40, 1143–1180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Artegiani, A.; Salusti, E. Field Observations of the Flow of Dense Water on the Bottom of the Adriatic Sea during the Winter of 1981. Oceanol. Acta 1987, 10, 387–391. [Google Scholar]
  58. Marini, M.; Russo, A.; Paschini, E.; Grilli, F.; Campanelli, A. Short-Term Physical and Chemical Variations in the Bottom Water of Middle Adriatic Depressions. Clim. Res. 2006, 31, 227–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Marini, M.; Maselli, V.; Campanelli, A.; Foglini, F.; Grilli, F. Role of the Mid-Adriatic Deep in Dense Water Interception and Modification. Mar. Geol. 2016, 375, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Langone, L.; Conese, I.; Miserocchi, S.; Boldrin, A.; Bonaldo, D.; Carniel, S.; Chiggiato, J.; Turchetto, M.; Borghini, M.; Tesi, T. Dynamics of Particles along the Western Margin of the Southern Adriatic: Processes Involved in Transferring Particulate Matter to the Deep Basin. Mar. Geol. 2016, 375, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Paladini de Mendoza, F.; Schroeder, K.; Langone, L.; Chiggiato, J.; Borghini, M.; Giordano, P.; Miserocchi, S. Deep-Water Dynamics along the 2012–2020 Observations on the Continental Margin of the Southern Adriatic Sea (Mediterranean Sea). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2023, 11, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sasaki, H.; Miyamura, T.; Saitoh, S.I.; Ishizaka, J. Seasonal Variation of Absorption by Particles and Colored Dissolved Organic Matter (CDOM) in Funka Bay, Southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2005, 64, 447–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Erga, S.R.; Ssebiyonga, N.; Frette, Ø.; Hamre, B.; Aure, J.; Strand, Ø.; Strohmeier, T. Dynamics of Phytoplankton Distribution and Photosynthetic Capacity in a Western Norwegian Fjord during Coastal Upwelling: Effects on Optical Properties. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 97, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Li, G.; Liu, J.; Ma, Y.; Zhao, R.; Hu, S.; Li, Y.; Wei, H.; Xie, H. Distribution and Spectral Characteristics of Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter in a Coastal Bay in Northern China. J. Environ. Sci. 2014, 26, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Retelletti Brogi, S.; Gonnelli, M.; Vestri, S.; Santinelli, C. Biophysical Processes Affecting DOM Dynamics at the Arno River Mouth (Tyrrhenian Sea). Biophys. Chem. 2015, 197, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Manini, E.; Baldrighi, E.; Ricci, F.; Grilli, F.; Giovannelli, D.; Intoccia, M.; Casabianca, S.; Capellacci, S.; Marinchel, N.; Penna, P.; et al. Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Variability of Faecal Pollution along Coastal Waters during and after Rainfall Events. Water 2022, 14, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Machado Toffolo, M.; Grilli, F.; Prandi, C.; Goffredo, S.; Marini, M. Extreme Flooding Events in Coastal Lagoons: Seawater Parameters and Rainfall over A Six-Year Period in the Mar Menor (SE Spain). J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2022, 10, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Innamorati, M.; Giovanardi, F. Interrelationships between Phytoplankton Biomass and Nutrients in the Eutrophicated Areas of the North-Western Adriatic Sea. In Proceedings of the International Conference, Bologna, Italy, 21–24 March 1990; pp. 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Castracane, F. Sopra La Straordinaria Apparenza Presentata Dal Mare Adriatico Nella Seconda Metà Del Luglio 1872. Atti Della Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1873, 26, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
  70. Castracane, F. Straordinario Fenomeno Della Vita Del Mare Osservato Nell’Adriatico Nell’estate Del 1880. Atti Della Accad. Pontif. Nuovi Lincei 1881, 34, 9–19. [Google Scholar]
  71. Pettine, M.; Patrolecco, L.; Camusso, M.; Crescenzio, S. Transport of Carbon and Nitrogen to the Northern Adriatic Sea by the Po River. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1998, 46, 127–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Tedesco, L.; Socal, G.; Bianchi, F.; Acri, F.; Veneri, D.; Vichi, M. NW Adriatic Sea Biogeochemical Variability in the Last 20 Years (1986–2005). Biogeosciences 2007, 4, 673–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zoppini, A.; Pettine, M.; Totti, C.; Puddu, A.; Artegiani, A.; Pagnotta, R. Nutrients, Standing Crop and Primary Production in Western Coastal Waters of the Adriatic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1995, 41, 493–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Marchetti, R.; Provini, A.; Gaggino, G.F. Eutrophication of Inland and Coastal Waters in Italy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1988, 534, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Justić, D.; Rabalais, N.N.; Turner, R.; Wiseman, W.J., Jr. Seasonal Coupling Between Riverborne Nutrients, Net Productivity and Hypoxia. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1993, 26, 184–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Fletcher, R.L. The Occurrence of “Green Tides”—A Review. In Marine Benthic Vegetation; Schramm, W., Nienhuis, P.H., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1996; Volume 123. [Google Scholar]
  77. Giani, M.; Djakovac, T.; Degobbis, D.; Cozzi, S.; Solidoro, C.; Umani, S.F. Recent Changes in the Marine Ecosystems of the Northern Adriatic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 115, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Neri, F.; Romagnoli, T.; Accoroni, S.; Ubaldi, M.; Garzia, A.; Pizzuti, A.; Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Marini, M.; Totti, C. Phytoplankton Communities in a Coastal and Offshore Stations of the Northern Adriatic Sea Approached by Network Analysis and Different Statistical Descriptors. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2023, 282, 108224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hoogweg, P.H.A.; Wulffraat, K.J.; Van, B.G.M.; Wetering, D.E. North Sea Strategies. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1991, 23, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lyons, D.A.; Arvanitidis, C.; Blight, A.J.; Chatzinikolaou, E.; Guy-Haim, T.; Kotta, J.; Orav-Kotta, H.; Queirós, A.M.; Rilov, G.; Somerfield, P.J.; et al. Macroalgal Blooms Alter Community Structure and Primary Productivity in Marine Ecosystems. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2014, 20, 2712–2724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Raymont, E.G. A Fish Farming Experiment in Scottish Sea Lochs. J. Mar. Res. 1947, 6, 219–227. [Google Scholar]
  82. Fonselius, S.H. On Nutrients and Their Role as Production Limiting Factors in the Baltic. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 1978, 6, 329–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Elmgren, R. Man’s Impact on the Ecosystem of the Baltic Sea: Energy Flows Today and at the Turn of the Century. Ambio 1989, 18, 326–332. [Google Scholar]
  84. Braarud, T. Pollution Effect upon the Phytoplankton of the Oslofjord. Hvalraadets Skr. 1945, 28, 1–142. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ruud, J.T. Introduction to the Studies of Pollution in the Oslofjord. Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresunters 1969, 17, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. O’Sullivan, A.J. Ecological Effects of Sewage Discharge in the Marine Environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 1971, 177, 331–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zou, J.; Lipingl, D.; Baoping, Q. Preliminary Studies on Eutrophication and Red Tide Problems in Bohai Bay. Hydrobiologia 1985, 127, 27–30. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kimor, B. Changes and Stress Signs in Plankton Communities as a Result of Man-Induced Perturbations in Enclosed Coastal Seas (Mediterranean, Baltic). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1991, 23, 171–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Fouzai, N.; Coll, M.; Palomera, I.; Santojanni, A.; Arneri, E.; Christensen, V. Fishing Management Scenarios to Rebuild Exploited Resources and Ecosystems of the Northern-Central Adriatic (Mediterranean Sea). J. Mar. Syst. 2012, 102–104, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Striebel, M.; Singer, G.; Stibor, H.; Andersen, T. “‘Trophic Overyielding’”: Phytoplankton Diversity Promotes Zooplankton Productivity. Ecology 2012, 93, 2719–2727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Malavolti, S.; De Felice, A.; Costantini, I.; Biagiotti, I.; Canduci, G.; Grilli, F.; Marini, M.; Tirelli, V.; Borme, D.; Barucchi, V.C.; et al. Distribution of Engraulis Encrasicolus Eggs and Larvae in Relation to Coastal Oceanographic Conditions (a South-Western Adriatic Sea Case Study). Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2018, 19, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gallmetzer, I.; Haselmair, A.; Tomašových, A.; Stachowitsch, M.; Zuschin, M. Responses of Molluscan Communities to Centuries of Human Impact in the Northern Adriatic Sea. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, 820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Mozetič, P.; Francé, J.; Kogovšek, T.Š.; Talaber, I.; Malej, A. Plankton Trends and Community Changes in a Coastal Sea (Northern Adriatic): Bottom-up vs. Top-down Control in Relation to Environmental Drivers. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 115, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Morabito, G.; Mazzocchi, M.G.; Salmaso, N.; Zingone, A.; Bergami, C.; Flaim, G.; Accoroni, S.; Basset, A.; Bastianini, M.; Belmonte, G.; et al. Plankton Dynamics across the Freshwater, Transitional and Marine Research Sites of the LTER-Italy Network. Patterns, Fluctuations, Drivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Coll, M.; Santojanni, A.; Palomera, I.; Arneri, E. Food-Web Changes in the Adriatic Sea over the Last Three Decades. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 381, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Coll, M.; Santojanni, A.; Palomera, I.; Arneri, E. Ecosystem Assessment of the North-Central Adriatic Sea: Towards a Multivariate Reference Framework. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2010, 417, 193–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fanelli, E.; Da Ros, Z.; Menicucci, S.; Malavolti, S.; Biagiotti, I.; Canduci, G.; De Felice, A.; Leonori, I. The Pelagic Food Web of the Western Adriatic Sea: A Focus on the Role of Small Pelagics. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 14554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Coll, M.; Santojanni, A.; Palomera, I.; Tudela, S.; Arneri, E. An Ecological Model of the Northern and Central Adriatic Sea: Analysis of Ecosystem Structure and Fishing Impacts. J. Mar. Syst. 2007, 67, 119–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Brunetti, M.; Maugeri, M.; Monti, F.; Nanni, T. Temperature and Precipitation Variability in Italy in the Last Two Centuries from Homogenised Instrumental Time Series. Int. J. Climatol. 2006, 26, 345–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Marić, D.; Kraus, R.; Godrijan, J.; Supić, N.; Djakovac, T.; Precali, R. Phytoplankton Response to Climatic and Anthropogenic Influences in the North-Eastern Adriatic during the Last Four Decades. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012, 115, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ricci, F.; Capellacci, S.; Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Marini, M.; Penna, A. Long-Term Dynamics of Annual and Seasonal Physical and Biogeochemical Properties: Role of Minor River Discharges in the North-Western Adriatic Coast. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2022, 272, 107902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kuzmić, M.; Janeković, I.; Book, J.W.; Martin, P.J.; Doyle, J.D. Modeling the Northern Adriatic Double-Gyre Response to Intense Bora Wind: A Revisit. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2007, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kraus, R.; Supic, N.; Precali, R. Factors Favouring Phytoplankton Blooms in the Northern Adriatic: Towards the Northern Adriatic Empirical Ecological Model. Ocean Sci. 2016, 12, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Dunić, N.; Supić, N.; Sevault, F.; Vilibić, I. The Northern Adriatic Circulation Regimes in the Future Winter Climate. Clim. Dyn. 2023, 60, 3471–3484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Degobbis, D.; Precali, R.; Ivancic, I.; Smodlaka, N.; Fuks, D.; Kveder, S. Long-Term Changes in the Northern Atlantic Ecosystem Related to Anthropogenic Eutrophication. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 13, 495–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Orlić, S.; Najdek, M.; Supić, N.; Ivančić, I.; Fuks, D.; Blažina, M.; Šilović, T.; Paliaga, P.; Godrijan, J.; Marić, D. Structure and Variability of a Microbial Community at a Transect Crossing a Double Gyre Structure in the Northeastern Adriatic Sea. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2013, 69, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Solidoro, C.; Bastianini, M.; Bandelj, V.; Codermatz, R.; Cossarini, G.; Canu, D.M.; Ravagnan, E.; Salon, S.; Trevisani, S. Current State, Scales of Variability, and Trends of Biogeochemical Properties in the Northern Adriatic Sea. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Vilibić, I.; Šepić, J.; Proust, N. Weakening Thermohaline Circulation in the Adriatic Sea. Clim. Res. 2013, 55, 217–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Vilibić, I.; Zemunik, P.; Šepić, J.; Dunić, N.; Marzouk, O.; Mihanović, H.; Denamiel, C.; Precali, R.; Djakovac, T. Present Climate Trends and Variability in Thermohaline Properties of the Northern Adriatic Shelf. Ocean Sci. 2019, 15, 1351–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kralj, M.; Lipizer, M.; Čermelj, B.; Celio, M.; Fabbro, C.; Brunetti, F.; Francé, J.; Mozetič, P.; Giani, M. Hypoxia and Dissolved Oxygen Trends in the Northeastern Adriatic Sea (Gulf of Trieste). Deep. Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 2019, 164, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Mozetič, P.; Solidoro, C.; Cossarini, G.; Socal, G.; Precali, R.; Francé, J.; Bianchi, F.; De Vittor, C.; Smodlaka, N.; Fonda Umani, S. Recent Trends towards Oligotrophication of the Northern Adriatic: Evidence from Chlorophyll a Time Series. Estuaries Coasts 2010, 33, 362–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Bernardi Aubry, F.; Berton, A.; Bastianini, M.; Socal, G.; Acri, F. Phytoplankton Succession in a Coastal Area of the NW Adriatic, over a 10-Year Sampling Period (1990–1999). Cont. Shelf Res. 2004, 24, 97–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zavatarelli, M.; Raicich, F.; Bregant, D.; Russo, A.; Artegiani, A. Climatological Biogeochemical Characteristics of the Adriatic Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 1998, 18, 227–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Marini, M.; Fornasiero, P.; Artegiani, A. Variations of Hydrochemical Features in the Coastal Waters of Monte Conero: 1982–1990. Mar. Ecol. 2002, 23, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Campanelli, A.; Fornasiero, P.; Marini, M. Physical and Chemical Characterization of the Water Column in the Piceno Coastal Area (Adriatic Sea). Fresenius Env. Bull. 2004, 13, 430–435. [Google Scholar]
  116. Russo, A.; Artegiani, A. Adriatic Sea Hydrography. Sci. Mar. 1996, 60, 33–43. [Google Scholar]
  117. Magaldi, M.G.; Özgökmen, T.M.; Griffa, A.; Rixen, M. On the Response of a Turbulent Coastal Buoyant Current to Wind Events: The Case of the Western Adriatic Current. Ocean Dyn. 2010, 60, 93–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Lee, C.M.; Askari, F.; Book, J.; Carniel, S.; Cushman-Roisin, B.; Dorman, C.; Doyle, J.; Flament, P.; Harris, C.K.; Jones, B.H.; et al. Northern Adriatic Response to a Wintertime Bora Wind Event. EOS 2005, 86, 157–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Boldrin, A.; Carniel, S.; Giani, M.; Marini, M.; Bernardi Aubry, F.; Campanelli, A.; Grilli, F.; Russo, A. Effects of Bora Wind on Physical and Biogeochemical Properties of Stratified Waters in the Northern Adriatic. J. Geophys. Res. 2009, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Giordani, P.; Miserocchi, S.; Balboni, V.; Malaguti, A.; Lorenzelli, R.; Honsell, G.; Poniz, P. Factors Controlling Trophic Conditions in the North-West Adriatic Basin: Seasonal Variability. Mar. Chem. 1997, 58, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A.; Galil, B.S. A Uniform Terminology on Bioinvasions: A Chimera or an Operative Tool? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2004, 49, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Azzurro, E.; D’Amen, M. Climate Change Paves the Way for a New Inter-Ocean Fish Interchange. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2022, 20, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Azzurro, E.; Smeraldo, S.; D’Amen, M. Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Exotic Fish Species in the Mediterranean Sea: Over a Century of Invasion Reconstructed. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2022, 28, 6268–6279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. David, M.; Magaletti, E.; Kraus, R.; Marini, M. Vulnerability to Bioinvasions: Current Status, Risk Assessment and Management of Ballast Water through a Regional Approach—The Adriatic Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 147, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Zenetos, A.; Gofas, S.; Verlaque, M.; Çinar, M.E.; García Raso, J.G.; Bianchi, C.N.; Morri, C.; Azzurro, E.; Bilecenoglu, M.; Froglia, C.; et al. Alien Species in the Mediterranean Sea by 2010. A Contribution to the Application of European Union’s Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD). Part I. Spatial Distribution. Mediterr. Mar. Sci. 2010, 11, 381–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, A.; Marchini, A.; Cantone, G.; Castelli, A.; Chimenz, C.; Cormaci, M.; Froglia, C.; Furnari, G.; Gambi, M.C.; Giaccone, G.; et al. Alien Species along the Italian Coasts: An Overview. Biol. Invasions 2010, 13, 215–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Tsirintanis, K.; Azzurro, E.; Crocetta, F.; Dimiza, M.; Froglia, C.; Gerovasileiou, V.; Langeneck, J.; Mancinelli, G.; Rosso, A.; Stern, N.; et al. Bioinvasion Impacts on Biodiversity, Ecosystem Services, and Human Health in the Mediterranean Sea. Aquat. Invasions 2022, 17, 308–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Grati, F.; Froglia, C.; Souissi, J.B.; Bolognini, L.; Azzurro, E. The Blue Swimming Crab Portunus Segnis (Forskål, 1775) Reaches the Adriatic Sea: A Distant and Disjointed Occurrence. Bioinvasions Rec. 2023, 12, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Azzurro, E.; Sbragaglia, V.; Cerri, J.; Bariche, M.; Bolognini, L.; Ben Souissi, J.; Busoni, G.; Coco, S.; Chryssanthi, A.; Fanelli, E.; et al. Climate Change, Biological Invasions, and the Shifting Distribution of Mediterranean Fishes: A Large-Scale Survey Based on Local Ecological Knowledge. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2019, 25, 2779–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Petrocelli, A.; Antolić, B.; Bolognini, L.; Cecere, E.; Cvitković, I.; Despalatović, M.; Falace, A.; Finotto, S.; Iveša, L.; Mačić, V.; et al. Port Baseline Biological Surveys and Seaweed Bioinvasions in Port Areas: What’s the Matter in the Adriatic Sea? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2019, 147, 98–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Santojanni, A.; Arneri, E.; Bernardini, V.; Cingolani, N.; Di Marco, M.; Russo, A. Effects of Environmental Variables on Recruitment of Anchovy in the Adriatic Sea. Clim. Res. 2006, 31, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Katsanevakis, S.; Coll, M.; Piroddi, C.; Steenbeek, J.; Lasram, F.B.R.; Zenetos, A.; Cardoso, A.C. Invading the Mediterranean Sea: Biodiversity Patterns Shaped by Human Activities. Front. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Galil, B.S. Alien Species in the Mediterranean Sea—Which, When, Where, Why? In Challenges to Marine Ecosystems. Developments in Hydrobiology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 606, pp. 105–116. [Google Scholar]
  134. Giménez, J.; Puigarnau, S.; Morán, E.; Lombarte, A.; Gómez-Vives, M.J.; Coll, M.; Navarro, J. Interannual Trophic Behaviour of a Pelagic Fish Predator in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Environ. Res. 2021, 168, 105288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of the Adriatic Sea within the Mediterranean Sea. The map was downloaded from d-maps.com http://www.d-maps.com (accessed on 3 January 2024) (a). Map of the Chlorophyll a concentration (mg.m−3) in the Adriatic Sea surface during the (b) winter (20 January 2023), and (c) summer (2 July 2023). Image provided by My Ocean, Copernicus Marine Service (accessed on 2 July 2023).
Figure 1. Location of the Adriatic Sea within the Mediterranean Sea. The map was downloaded from d-maps.com http://www.d-maps.com (accessed on 3 January 2024) (a). Map of the Chlorophyll a concentration (mg.m−3) in the Adriatic Sea surface during the (b) winter (20 January 2023), and (c) summer (2 July 2023). Image provided by My Ocean, Copernicus Marine Service (accessed on 2 July 2023).
Environments 11 00022 g001
Figure 2. Map of the Adriatic coast showing the locations of the main rivers and streams that flow into the Adriatic Sea. The map was downloaded from the d-maps.com website http://www.d-maps.com (accessed on 3 January 2024) with subsequent modifications applied.
Figure 2. Map of the Adriatic coast showing the locations of the main rivers and streams that flow into the Adriatic Sea. The map was downloaded from the d-maps.com website http://www.d-maps.com (accessed on 3 January 2024) with subsequent modifications applied.
Environments 11 00022 g002
Figure 3. Long-term trends in daily discharge of the Po River (m³s−1) from January 1970 to October 2023, with a significant linear regression. Data sourced from the Pontelagoscuro station and provided by the Hydro-Meteorological Service of the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection of Emilia-Romagna Region (ARPAE-ER). Modified from Marini and Grilli., 2023, Applied Sciences [23].
Figure 3. Long-term trends in daily discharge of the Po River (m³s−1) from January 1970 to October 2023, with a significant linear regression. Data sourced from the Pontelagoscuro station and provided by the Hydro-Meteorological Service of the Regional Agency for Environmental Protection of Emilia-Romagna Region (ARPAE-ER). Modified from Marini and Grilli., 2023, Applied Sciences [23].
Environments 11 00022 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sani, T.; Marini, M.; Campanelli, A.; Machado Toffolo, M.; Goffredo, S.; Grilli, F. Evolution of Freshwater Runoff in the Western Adriatic Sea over the Last Century. Environments 2024, 11, 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11010022

AMA Style

Sani T, Marini M, Campanelli A, Machado Toffolo M, Goffredo S, Grilli F. Evolution of Freshwater Runoff in the Western Adriatic Sea over the Last Century. Environments. 2024; 11(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11010022

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sani, Teresa, Mauro Marini, Alessandra Campanelli, Mariana Machado Toffolo, Stefano Goffredo, and Federica Grilli. 2024. "Evolution of Freshwater Runoff in the Western Adriatic Sea over the Last Century" Environments 11, no. 1: 22. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments11010022

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop