Syntaxonomy of Charophyte Algal Communities in the Northeastern Part of the Black Sea (Russia)
1
Azov-Black Sea Branch of Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography, Beregovaja Str., 21v, Rostov-on-Don 344002, Russia
2
Department of Botany and Bioresources, Don State Technical University, Gagarin Sq. 1, Rostov-on-Don 344000, Russia
3
Department of Technosphere Safety on Transport, Admiral F.F. Ushakov State Maritime University, Lenin Ave., 93, Novorossiysk 353924, Russia
4
Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushi Ave., 199, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel
5
Federal Scientific Center of the East Asia Terrestrial Biodiversity, Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 100-Let Vladivostoka Prospect, 159, Vladivostok 690022, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Environments 2023, 10(9), 154; https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090154
Submission received: 30 June 2023
/
Revised: 10 August 2023
/
Accepted: 1 September 2023
/
Published: 3 September 2023
Abstract
:Within the northeastern part of the Black Sea, the vegetation of charophytes was studied using the Braun-Blanquet approach. For the first time, five communities are described, including three associations and two subassociations from the alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964, the order Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937, and the class Charetea intermediae F. Fukarek 1961. Diagnoses of the described syntaxa are given. A comparison with the Baltic and Mediterranean communities of charophytes is made. It is shown that all northeastern Black Sea communities with the dominance of charophytes, in contrast to Western European ones, include Lamprothamnium papulosum with high constancy. At the same time, the investigated communities are characterized by a lower occurrence and abundance of higher aquatic plants (except for Nanozostera noltei) and a slightly higher occurrence of red and green algae. An indirect ordination analysis showed the ecological isolation of the described phytocenoses and revealed two main factors influencing the floristic composition of communities—the granulometric composition of bottom sediments and water eutrophication.
1. Introduction
The vegetation of silty–sandy substrates of fresh and brackish waters with the dominance of charophytes is currently combined into one class, Charetea intermediae F. Fukarek 1961. The class includes submerged macroalgal stonewort swards growing in stagnant or slow-flowing, fresh or brackish, slightly acidic to alkaline, oligotrophic to mesotrophic, unpolluted, or very slightly polluted water [1,2]. Communities colonize loose substrates, forming ephemeral or perennial often pioneer phytocenoses. The class includes two orders: Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937 (submerged macroalgal stonewort swards in neutral to alkaline and lime-rich waters) and Nitelletalia W. Krause 1969 (submerged stonewort swards in acidic and lime-poor waters). Both orders combine 40 associations recognized by the majority of syntaxonomists [1,2]. Order Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937 includes three alliances: Charion intermediae Sauer 1937 (perennial submerged macroalgal stonewort swards in neutral to alkaline waters), Charion vulgaris (W. Krause et Lang 1977) W. Krause 1981 (ephemeral macroalgal stonewort swards in neutral to alkaline waters), and Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 (submerged macroalgal stonewort swards in brackish waters) [2]. Thus, the alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 combines all the diversity of charophytes communities in mineralized, brackish, and sea waters with salinities from 0.5 to 18‰ [1].
Communities of the alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 inhabit very characteristic biotopes: shallow areas of freshwater, brackish water bodies, or aquatories of variable salinity (ponds, lakes, lagoons, estuaries) subject to periodic or cyclic fluctuations in water level, flood waters, and sometimes temporarily drying up [1,2,3]. These communities, as a rule, are monodominant or usually contain a few species [1].
In Russia, three associations of the alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 were previously noted, and only in continental water bodies: Charetum canescentis Corill. 1957 [4,5], Charetum altaicae Kipriyanova 2005 [6], and Charetum conniventis Ionescu-Teculescl 1972 [7]. In marine habitats, the description of the syntaxa of this alliance using the Braun-Blanquet approach has not been previously carried out in the territory of Russia.
Charophyte communities are extremely sensitive to water pollution and eutrophication and show intense degradation around the world, including the Azov-Black Sea basin. For example, in the Tendrovskiy Bay of the Black Sea, the areas occupied by communities of charophytes decreased from 100 km2 (in the 1960–1990th) to 10–20 km2 (by 2016) [8]. In Taman Bay and in the area of the Kerch Strait, the areas of charophyte communities do not exceed 50 km2, and these water areas are now under intensive anthropogenic influence. It is believed that the reduction in the area of the natural range of many species of aquatic plants, especially charophytes, is associated with its fragmentation as a result of human activities, recreation, eutrophication, and technogenic pollution, as well as in connection with a decrease in river flow [9,10,11,12]. Some taxa of charophytes are used as bioindicators for assessing water quality [13,14].
The aim of this study is to create a syntaxonomic scheme of the alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 (order Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937, class Charetea intermediae F. Fukarek 1961) of the North Caucasian coast of the Black Sea using Braun-Blanquet approach for environment indication purposes.
2. Materials and Methods
The study is based on 87 geobotanical descriptions («relevés») of charophytes-dominated communities performed in the sublittoral zone of the North Caucasus shelf of the Black Sea. The study was performed at two points where charophytes are known to grow—the Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay and Taman Bay (Figure 1) in 2009–2020. A map of the sampling sites was made with Google Maps [15]. Salinity was measured at each site using a calibrated hand-held refractometer with automatic temperature compensation (Euromex, Arnhem/NL). Communities were described on sites from 0.25 to 1.0 m2 and a depth from 0 m to 2 m. The algae were determined mainly during the description of communities, and the refinement of the taxonomic identity of some species was carried out in the laboratory. Identification was based on typical morphological characters using identification keys [16,17]. Some species of Ulva could not be identified confidently and were marked as Ulva sp. Nomenclature is given according to AlgaeBase [18]. Saprobity of the species is given according to [14,19]. Lists of macroalgal species with an indication of their phytogeographic characteristics were used for phytogeographical analysis of the communities [19,20,21].
Classification of macroalgal communities followed the Braun-Blanquet approach [22,23]. Syntaxon names follow the International Code of Phytosociological Nomenclature [24]. Characteristic tables include 41 descriptions («relevés»). To assess the abundance of species, a modified Braun-Blanquet scale was used: r—rarely occurs; +—insignificant participation of the coenopopulation of the species in the phytocenosis; 1—projective cover up to 5%; 2—6–15%; 3—16–25%; 4—26–50%; 5—more than 51% [25]. The follow constancy scale was used: r—0.1–5%; +—6–10%; I—11–20%; II—21–40%; III—41–60%; IV—61–80%; V—81–100% [23].
Ordination analysis was performed using Canoco 4.5/CanoDraw 4.0 software [26]. The structure of the dataset was tested with detrended correspondence analysis (DCA), and the gradient length of the first DCA axis (1.000 SD units) indicated an application of linear ordination techniques. Principal components analysis (PCA), considering axes 1 and 2, was performed to detect the main environmental factors affecting the species composition of the sites in question and to visualize any differences between them. Default options included focus scaling on inter-sample distances, species scores divided by standard deviation, centering by samples and without transformation of the species data applied in PCA.
3. Results
3.1. General Taxonomic Analysis
In the studied charophyte communities of the sublittoral zone North Caucasian coast of the Black Sea, 24 species of algae were identified, belonging to four phyla: Chlorophyta—13 species; Rhodophyta—8 species; Charophyta—2 species; Ochrophyta, Phaeophyceae—1 species. In addition, three species of higher aquatic plants (Magnoliophyta, Liliopsida) were identified (Table A1, Table A2 and Table A3).
3.2. Description of New Syntaxa
As a result of the analysis of the collected material, we described five new communities that combine oligosaprobic sublittoral charophyte vegetation of the North Caucasian coast of the Black Sea (Table A1, Table A2 and Table A3).
The syntaxonomic synopsis of charophyte vegetation of the sandy–silty sublittoral of the North Caucasian coast of the Black Sea.
Cl.: Charetea intermediae F. Fukarek 1961.
Ord.: Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937.
All.: Charion canescentis Krausch 1964.
Ass.: Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Ass.: Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Subass.: Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei subass. typicum Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Subass.: Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Ass.: Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Subass.: Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. typicum Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Subass.: Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. cladophoretosum albidae Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco
Association Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 1 of Table A1 in this paper.
Diagnostic species: Chara baltica (Hartm.) Bruz., Lamprothamnium papulosum (K.Wallroth) J.Groves.
Description: The diagnostic and dominant species of the association are two species of charophytes, Chara baltica and Lamprothamnium papulosum, which usually form dense or rather dense thickets in which other red and green algae with low abundance may also be present. Communities are photophilic and single-tiered, developing mainly in clear transparent waters on sandy–shell substrates at a depth of 0.2–0.4 m in Taman Bay. The salinity of seawater in the areas of growth of communities is 14–17‰. The number of species at the sample plot varies from 3 to 6; in total, 12 species of macrophytes were recorded in the communities. The total projective cover (TPC) of the community varies from 30 to 100%.
Association Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nov. hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 3 of Table A2 in this paper.
Diagnostic species:Chara baltica, Lamprothamnium papulosum, Nanozostera noltei (Hornemann) Tomlinson & Posluszny, Pneophyllum fragile Kütz.
Description: The community habitat on sandy–shell substrates at a depth of 0.5–1.0 m at the distant part of Taman Bay in areas with fairly clean water with a salinity of 14–17‰. The communities are two-tiered, represented by thickets of Nanozostera noltei at the first tier and Chara baltica and Lamprothamnium papulosum at the second tier. The PC of the first tier is 40–50% and the second is 70–90%. In total, 15 species of macrophytes were identified in the communities of the association; most of them are highly constant species. The association has two subassociations.
Subassociation Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei subass. typicum Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 3 of Table A2 in this paper.
Diagnostic species: same as the association.
Description: Communities usually grow on sandy substrates and are represented by dense thickets of Nanozostera noltei, Chara baltica, and Lamprothamnium papulosum. The number of species at the sampling plots is within the range of 6–7; in total, 10 species were identified in the communities.
Subassociation Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 6 of Table A2 in this paper.
Diagnostic species: Cladophora liniformis Kütz.
Description: In contrast to typical communities, the cenoses of this subassociation habitat on the substrates with a large number of bivalve shells. The subassociation is characterized by greater floristic richness compared to typical communities of the association due to a larger amount of shells overgrown with algae. The number of species on the sampling plots varies from 8 to 11; in total, 12 species were identified in the communities of the subassociation.
Association Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 3 of Table A3 in this paper.
Diagnostic species:Lamprothamnium papulosum, Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner
Description: The diagnostic and dominant species of the association are the flowering plant Stuckenia pectinata and charophyte Lamprothamnium papulosum. The community is photophilic and develops mainly on silt, sometimes with some shells at a depth of 0.3 to 1.5 m in the Sudzhuk lagoon of Novorossiysk Bay. The salinity of the lagoon is extremely unstable and varies in different parts of the lagoon and in different seasons from 5–7‰ to 15–17‰. Communities, as a rule, are quite dense and two-tiered, represented by thickets of Stuckenia pectinata in the first tier and Lamprothamnium papulosum in the second tier. PC of the first tier is 10–70% and the second is 25–90%. The total PC of the community varies from 65 to 100%—on average about 90%. In total, 13 species of macrophytes were revealed in the communities.
There are two subassociations in the association.
Subassociation Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. typicum Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 3 of Table A3 in this paper.
Diagnostic species: same as the association.
Description: Communities grow in areas with extremely unstable salinity and include pure cenoses of two diagnostic species. Only on some sampling plots are other random species with low abundance and constancy found.
Subassociation Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. cladophoretosum albidae Afanasyev & Abdullin subass. nov. hoc loco.
Holotypus: Rel. 14 of Table A3 in this paper.
Diagnostic species: Cladophora albida (Nees) Kutz.
Description: Unlike typical communities, the cenoses of this subassociation live in conditions of higher and more stable salinity and, possibly, increased water trophicity. The diagnostic species are covered with a large number of epiphytes and associated algae species, mainly Cladophora albida. Subassociation is characterized by greater floristic richness compared to typical communities. The number of species on the sampling plots varies from 3 to 6; in total, 10 species of macrophytes were identified in the communities of the subassociation.
3.3. Ordination Analysis
PCA (Figure 2) shows two principal groups of communities that are distinct and separated according to abiotic factors: (1) dominated with Chara baltica (A, B and C; semi-open habitats) and (2) prevailed with Lamprothamnium papulosum (D and E; enclosed lagoons). PCA analysis revealed two main complex factors influencing the floristic composition of these communities (Figure 2; eigenvalues: axis 1–0.462, axis 2–0.230). The first axis is interpreted as a decrease in the proportion of small-sized fractions of bottom sediments. The extreme position on the left on the first axis is occupied by groups D (Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae) and E (Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. cladophoretosum albidae), which live exclusively on small-sized fractions of silty bottom sediments, whereas the extreme position on the right is occupied by groups A (Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi), B (Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile), and C (Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi), growing on silty–sandy, sandy and sandy–shell bottom sediments. The last community, which occupies the extreme right position on the axis, is characterized by rich floristic composition, due to the greater amount of shells overgrown with algae. The second axis is interpreted as water eutrophication. The lower position on the second axis is occupied by groups B and C, which were not found under conditions of high water trophicity, while the uppermost position is occupied by group E, characterized by the presence of mesosaprobiont species. Other communities occupy an intermediate position.
4. Discussion
Chara baltica (Hartman) Bruzelius was identified in the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov only recently and was not previously mentioned for these areas [9]. Previously, all collections of charophytes from the north-western part of the Black Sea, as well as the bays of the Azov Sea, were usually attributed to the species C. papillosa Kütz., known here under the epithets C. aculeolata Kütz. sensu Hollerb. et Krass. or C. intermedia A.Braun ex Lange, nom. illeg. [9].
An analysis of the syntaxonomic literature on the communities of charophytes shows that the following validly published syntaxa are closest to those described by us: the ass. Charetum balticae Kornas 1959 and the ass. Lamprothamnietum papulosi Corillion 1953 [1,27,28,29,30,31]. The first has been described in brackish lagoons and bays of the Baltic Sea [29,32], as well as on the western Mediterranean coast of Spain [33] and France [1], and the second in estuaries and lagoons of European shores of the Mediterranean and the Atlantic Ocean [1,27,28]. These communities are distributed in fairly similar habitats: on silty and sandy–silty substrates, at depths of up to 1–2 m, in clean and transparent waters with a salinity of up to 18‰, and in biotopes protected from the direct impact of waves.
The difference between the Black Sea communities described by us and close Mediterranean and Baltic associations is shown in Table 1. First, all the Black Sea communities dominated by Chara baltica, in contrast to Western European ones, include Lamprothamnium papulosum and have a high constancy. Second, the investigated communities of Russia are characterized by a lower occurrence and abundance of higher aquatic plants (with the exception of Nanozostera noltei) and a slightly higher occurrence of red and green algae. Moreover, in some cases, the occurrence of green algae of the genus Cladophora is so high that we distinguish such communities as a particular subassociation Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi. The main differences between the European association Lamprothamnietum papulosi and the association Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae are the high constancy and abundance of the flowering plant Stuckenia pectinata in the communities of the Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, as well as, in some areas, the relatively high participation of green and red algae, primarily Cladophora albida. At the same time, some species found in previously described European communities, including those indicated as diagnostic species, do not occur in the Black Sea or are rare. Among such taxa are Althenia filiformis Petit, Ceramium tenuicorne (Kütz.) Waern, species of the genus Tolypella, and some species of the genus Chara, in particular C. galioides De Candolle and C. canescens Loiseleur.
In the Black Sea, communities of charophytes have been repeatedly described [19,34,35] using a dominant approach. N.V. Morozova-Vodyanitskaya [34] identified the community Lamprothamnium papulosum for shallow silty areas of bays and inlets of the Black Sea, including the Sudzhuk lagoon of the Novorossiysk. At the same time, unfortunately, she gave a brief and non-specific description, indicating only a few of the most characteristic species: Stuckenia sp., Ruppia sp., Chondria capillaris (Hudson) M.J.Wynne. From the standpoint of the dominant (physiognomic-ecological) approach, and in a more precise manner, the communities of charophytes were characterized by A.A. Kalugina-Gutnik [19]. She identified three communities of charophytes of silty and silty–sandy substrates: Lamprothamnium papulosum + Chara vulgaris, Lamprothamnium papulosum and Chara papillosa (original name—Chara aculeolata). The first was described in the Sudzhuk lagoon at a depth of 0.5–1.3 m; the second and the third were revealed in the northwestern part of the Black Sea. For the community Lamprothamnium papulosum + Chara vulgaris, A.A. Kalugina-Gutnik [19] listed 29 species of macroalgae and 2 species of flowering plants. It was reported that the core of the community was formed by the dominant Lamprothamnium papulosum, the subdominant Chara vulgaris L., and Chondria capillaris (Hudson) M.J.Wynne, Lophosiphonia obscura (C.Ag.) Falkenberg, Vertebrata reptabunda (Suhr) Díaz-Tapia & Maggs, Cladophora albida (Nees) Kutz., Cladophora sericea (Hudson) Kütz., and Rhizoclonium riparium (Roth) Harvey. In the community Lamprothamnium papulosum, she identified 33 species of macroalgae and 2 species of flowering plants. The core of the association was formed by the same dominant L. papulosum and subdominant C. vulgaris (but with a smaller PC), as well as Chondria capillaris, Laurencia obtusa (Hudson) J.V.Lamouroux, Vertebrata subulifera (C.Ag.) Kuntze, Carradoriella denudata (Dillwyn) Savoie & G.W.Saunders, Dasya pedicellata (C.Ag.) C.Ag., Vertebrata reptabunda, Ceramium strictum Roth, Rhizoclonium riparium, and Ulothrix implexa (Kütz.) Kütz. According to [19], the community Chara papillosa is very similar to the previous one, with the only difference in the composition of dominants and the addition of Gongolaria barbata f. repens (A.D.Zinova & Kalugina) Sadogurska. Thus, the above descriptions do not coincide with any syntaxa we have identified. It is noteworthy that even the descriptions made by us in the Sudzhuk lagoon differ significantly from the descriptions made in the same aquatory and on the same grid of stations by A.A. Kalugina-Gutnik [19]. It should be noted that the hydrological regime and phytocenoses of the Sudzhuk lagoon have undergone significant transformations over the past 50 years, caused, among other things, by human activities that are described in a fairly large number of works [36,37,38,39].
Charophyte communities are characterized by the formation of ecotone phytocenoses with other hydrophytes, and charophytes are included in such cenoses as components of the lower tier. The upper tier is most often represented by species of Potamogetonaceae. It is considered that such stratification is an overlay of separate groups of associations or fragments of associations belonging to separate phytosociological units [1]. It should be noted that some authors describe such communities as distinct associations or subassociations. For example, the ass. Cladophoro fractae–Stuckenietum chakassiensis Kipriyanova 2017 has been described [40]. Other researchers believe it would be preferable to designate such communities only in the rank of variants [1]. All three revealed associations are such ecotone syntaxa. Thus, the ass. Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi is the ecotone community between the ass. Charetum balticae Kornas 1959 and the ass. Lamprothamnietum papulosi Corillion 1953, the ass. Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei—between the ass. Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi and Nanozosterion noltii Den Hartog ex Mucina 2016, Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae—between the ass. Lamprothamnietum papulosi Corillion 1953 and Potamogetonetum pectinati Carstensen ex Hilbig 1971.
Charophytes communities described by us are dominated by annual cosmopolitan and sub-cosmopolitan species, especially in communities dominated by Lamprothamnium papulosum. Communities dominated by Chara baltica are somewhat more diverse in terms of phytogeographic composition. In addition to cosmopolitans and sub-cosmopolitans, there are several species of Indo-Atlantic and boreal-Atlantic origin, as well as two endemics.
Thus, in the studied areas of the northeastern parts of the Black Sea, the oligosaprobiotic vegetation of sandy and silty–sandy substrates with the dominance of charophytes belongs to one class Charetea intermediae F. Fukarek 1961, one order Charetalia intermediae Sauer 1937, one alliance Charion canescentis Krausch 1964 and is represented by five communities united in three associations and two subassociations. In the lagoons, bays, and estuaries of the Mediterranean, such vegetation is represented by seven described communities of the same alliance, united in six associations, and in the Baltic Sea in three associations [1]. In the investigated regions of the Black Sea, there are probably no communities with the dominance of Tolypella hispanica Nordstedt ex T.F.Allen (ass. Tolypelletum hispanicae Corillion 1957), Chara galioides De Candolle (ass. Charetum galioidis Corillion 1957), Chara connivens Salzmann ex A.Braun (ass. Charetum conniventis Ionescu-Teculescu 1972), Chara canescens Loiseleur (ass. Charetum canescentis Corillion 1957) (all of them occur in the brackish waters of the Mediterranean), as well as Chara horrida Wahlstedt (ass. Charetum horrido-balticae F. Fukarek 1961) and Tolypella nidifica (O.F.Müller) A.Braun (ass. Tolypelletum nidificae Kornâs 1959) (which are typical for the brackish waters of the Baltic). Thus, the vegetation of charophytes of geologically young seas—the Black Sea and Baltic Sea—is poor compared to the Mediterranean Sea.
5. Conclusions
In general, significant differences in the floristic composition between the communities of charophytes described by us and their Mediterranean and Baltic counterparts make it possible to distinguish the Black Sea communities as independent new syntaxa. The diversity of the vegetation of charophytes in the studied areas of the Black Sea is poor and presented only by three associations and two subassociations. Because the charophyte communities are extremely sensitive to water pollution and eutrophication, the revealed syntaxa can be indicators of water quality dynamics and therefore can be used in monitoring the coast water quality in the Black Sea.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, data analysis, visualization, writing—original draft preparation, supervision, project administration, D.F.A. and S.R.A.; sampling, D.F.A. and N.S.B.; writing—review and editing, D.F.A., S.R.A. and S.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The research was carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme No. 121031000117-9).
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A
Table A1.
Association Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Table A1.
Association Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
| No. of Relevé | 1 * | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | Constancy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth (m) | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | |
| Macroalgae cover (%) | 100 | 100 | 90 | 70 | 55 | 40 | 20 | 20 | |
| No. of species | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | |
| Diagnostic species of the ass. Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi | |||||||||
| Chara baltica (Hartman) Bruzelius | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | V2–5 |
| Lamprothamnium papulosum (K.Wallroth) J.Groves | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | + | V+–2 |
| Other species | |||||||||
| Chondria capillaris (Hudson) M.J.Wynne | 1 | . | . | + | . | + | + | . | III+–1 |
| Vertebrata reptabunda (Suhr) Díaz-Tapia & Maggs | . | + | . | + | + | . | . | + | III+ |
| Ulva sp. | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | III+ |
| Cladophora siwaschensis K.I.Meyer | + | . | . | . | + | . | . | . | II |
| Stilophora tenella (Esper) P.C.Silva | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | II |
| Cladophora liniformis Kütz. | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | II |
Notes. *—holotypus. Sporadic species: Rel. 1: Ceramium diaphanum (Lightfoot) Roth +. Sampling data: Rel. 1—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 15.07.2020, 45°28.075′ N, 36°97.742′ E. Rel. 2—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 15.07.2020, 45°28.103′ N, 36°97.890′ E. Rel. 3—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 15.07.2020, 45°28.134′ N, 36°97.898′ E. Rel. 4—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 15.07.2020, 45°28.187′ N, 36°97.999′ E. Rel. 5—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 16.07.2020, 45°28.186′ N, 36°97.855′ E. Rel. 6—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 16.07.2020, 45°28.271′ N, 36°98.151′ E. Rel. 7—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 16.07.2020, 45°28.294′ N, 36°98.275′ E. Rel. 8—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 15.07.2020, 45°28.250′ N, 36°97.929′ E. Author of relevés: Rel. 1–8—Afanasyev D.F. Plot size (m2): Rel. 1–8—0.1225. Substrate: Rel. 1–8—sand and shell.
Table A2.
Association Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Table A2.
Association Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
| No. of Relevé | 1 | 2 | 3 * | 4 | 5 | 6 * | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | C1 | C2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth (m) | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||
| Macrophytes cover (%) | 100 | 100 | 75 | 70 | 55 | 100 | 90 | 95 | 80 | 50 | ||
| No. of species | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 8 | ||
| Number of relevés | 5 | 5 | ||||||||||
| Diagnostic species of the ass. Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei | ||||||||||||
| Chara baltica (Hartman) Bruzelius | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | V3–5 | V3–5 |
| Lamprothamnium papulosum (K.Wallroth) J.Groves | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | V1–2 | V1–2 |
| Pneophyllum fragile Kütz. | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | V+ | V+ |
| Diagnostic species of the ass. Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei, the ass. Nanozosteretum noltii Harmsen 1936, the all. Nanozosterion noltii Den Hartog ex Mucina 2016, the ord. Zosteretalia Beguinot ex Pignatti 1953 and the cl. Zosteretea Pignatti 1953 | ||||||||||||
| Nanozostera noltei (Hornemann) Tomlinson & Posluszny | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | V1–3 | V2–3 |
| Diagnostic species of the subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi | ||||||||||||
| Cladophora liniformis Kütz. | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | + | . | V+ |
| Other species | ||||||||||||
| Ulva sp. | + | 1 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | V+−1 | V+ |
| Chondria capillaris (Hudson) M.J.Wynne | . | + | . | + | . | 1 | . | + | + | + | II | IV+−1 |
| Vertebrata reptabunda (Suhr) Díaz-Tapia & Maggs | . | . | + | . | . | + | + | + | . | . | I | III+ |
| Cladophora siwaschensis K.I.Meyer | + | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II | . |
| Chondracanthus acicularis (Roth) Fredericq | . | + | . | . | + | . | . | . | . | . | II | . |
| Stilophora tenella (Esper) P.C.Silva | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | + | + | . | . | IV+ |
| Chaetomorpha ligustica (Kütz.) Kütz. | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | + | + | . | III+ |
| Ceramium diaphanum (Lightfoot) Roth | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | + | . | . | . | II |
Notes. C1—constancy of species in the subass. typicum. C2—constancy of species in the subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi. *—holotypus. Relevés 1–5—subass. typicum. Relevés 6–10—subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi. Sporadic species: Rel. 5: Ulva maeotica (Proshkina-Lavrenko) P.M.Tsarenko +. Rel. 8: Ruppia maritima L. 1. Sampling data: Rel. 1—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.257′ N, 36°97.832′ E. Rel. 2—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.245′ N, 36°97.762′ E. Rel. 3—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.221′ N, 36°97.720′ E. Rel. 4—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.213′ N, 36°97.663′ E. Rel. 5—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.197′ N, 36°97.625′ E. Rel. 6—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.229′ N, 36°97.592′ E. Rel. 7—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 21.07.2020, 45°28.375′ N, 36°97.983′ E. Rel. 8—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.238′ N, 36°97.713′ E. Rel. 9—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 18.07.2020, 45°28.267′ N, 36°97.815′ E. Rel. 10—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, settlement Sennoy, Azov Sea, 21.07.2020, 45°28.439′ N, 36°98.217′ E. Author of relevés: Rel. 1–10—Afanasyev D.F. Plot size (m2): Rel. 1–8—0.1225. Substrate: Rel. 1–8—sand and shell.
Table A3.
Association Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
Table A3.
Association Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae Afanasyev & Abdullin ass. nova hoc loco.
| No. of Relevé | 1 | 2 | 3 * | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 * | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | C1 | C2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depth (m) | 1.4 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 0.3 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 1.1 | 0.8 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 1.1 | 0.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.3 | ||
| Macrophytes cover (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 65 | 100 | 100 | 85 | 70 | 70 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 75 | 80 | 75 | ||
| No. of species | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | ||
| Number of relevés | 10 | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Diagnostic species of the ass. Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lamprothamnium papulosum (K.Wallroth) J.Groves | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | V3–5 | V3–5 |
| Diagnostic species of the ass. Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae and the ass. Potamogetonetum pectinati Carstensen ex Hilbig 1971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | V1–5 | V1–5 |
| Diagnostic species of the subass. cladophoretosum albidae | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cladophora albida (Nees) Kutz. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | . | V1–2 |
| Other species | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cladophora vadorum (J.E.Areschoug) Kütz. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 2 | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | II |
| Ulva prolifera O.F.Müller | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II |
| Acrochaetium secundatum (Lyngb.) Näg. | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | 1 | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | 1 | . | . | II |
| Chaetomorpha tortuosa (Dillwyn) Kleen | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | II |
| Cladophora vagabundacomplex | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | 1 | . | . | 1 | 2 | . | . | . | . | II |
| Stylonema alsidii (Zanardini) K.M.Drew | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | + | + | . | . | . | . | I |
Notes. C1—constancy of species in subass. typicum. C2—constancy of species in subass. cladophoretosum albidae. *—holotypus. Relevés 1–10—subass. typicum. Relevés 11–21—subass. cladophoretosum albidae. Sporadic species: Rel. 4: Chaetomorpha aerea (Dillwyn) Kütz. +. Rel. 5: Ulva kylinii (Bliding) H.S.Hayden, Blomster, Maggs, P.C.Silva, Stanhope & Waaland 1. Rel. 9: Ulva rigida C.Ag. 1. Rel. 17: Lophosiphonia obscura (C.Ag.) Falkenberg 1. Sampling data: Rel. 1—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 10.07.2010, 44°68.098′ N, 37°80.117′ E. Rel. 2—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 10.07.2010, 44°68.134′ N, 37°80.122′ E. Rel. 3—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 10.07.2010, 44°68.170′ N, 37°80.040′ E. Rel. 4—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 16.07.2009, 44°68.216′ N, 37°80.002′ E. Rel. 5—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 16.07.2009, 44°68.210′ N, 37°80.143′ E. Rel. 6—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 16.07.2009, 44°68.299′ N, 37°79.951′ E. Rel. 7—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 16.07.2009, 44°68.190′ N, 37°80.180′ E. Rel. 8—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°68.265′ N, 37°80.129′ E. Rel. 9—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 17.07.2009, 44°68.285′ N, 37°79.890′ E. Rel. 10—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 17.07.2009, 44°68.289′ N, 37°79.874′ E. Rel. 11—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 10.07.2010, 44°68.009′ N, 37°80.617′ E. Rel. 12—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°68.030′ N, 37°80.359′ E. Rel. 13—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°68.007′ N, 37°80.461′ E. Rel. 14—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 10.07.2010, 44°67.972′ N, 37°80.400′ E. Rel. 15—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°67.895′ N, 37°80.395′ E. Rel. 16—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 17.07.2009, 44°67.892′ N, 37°80.515′ E. Rel. 17—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 17.07.2009, 44°67.967′ N, 37°80.318′ E. Rel. 18—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°67.913′ N, 37°80.763′ E. Rel. 19—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 17.07.2009, 44°68.031′ N, 37°80.347′ E. Rel. 20—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°68.037′ N, 37°80.350′ E. Rel. 21—Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Sudzhuk Lagoon of the Novorossiysk Bay, Black Sea, 11.07.2010, 44°67.992′ N, 37°80.686′ E. Author of relevés: Rel. 1–21—Berezenko N.S. Plot size (m2): Rel. 1–21—0.25. Substrate: Rel. 1–9, 11–18—silt. Rel. 11, 19–21—shell rock and silt.
References
- Felzines, J.-C.; Lambert, E. Contribution au prodrome des végétations de France: Les Charetea fragilis F. Fukarek 1961 [Contribution to the prodrome of the vegetations of France: The Charetea fragilis F. Fukarek 1961]. J. Bot. Soc. Bot. France 2012, 59, 133–188. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Mucina, L.; Bültmann, H.; Dierßen, K.; Theurillat, J.-P.; Raus, T.; Čarni, A.; Šumberová, K.; Willner, W.; Dengler, J.; García, R.G.; et al. Vegetation of Europe: Hierarchical floristic classification system of vascular plant, bryophyte, lichen, and algal communities. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2016, 19, 3–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontanilles, A.; Wezel, A.; Rouifed, S.; Guerin, M.; Vanacker, M.; Arthaud, F.; Robin, J. Disturbance and resilience of aquatic plant communities in fish ponds after temporary dry periods. Aquat. Ecol. 2023, 57, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
- Kipriyanova, L.M.; Romanov, R.E. Communities of charophytes in water bodies and water courses in the north of the endorheic basin of the Ob-Irtysh interfluve (Western Siberia). Inland Water Biol. 2013, 6, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sviridenko, T.V.; Sviridenko, B.F. Harovye Vodorosli (Charophyta) Zapadno-Sibirskoj Ravniny [Charophytes Algae (Charophyta) of the West Siberian Plain]; Pechatnyj Mir G. Surgut: Surgut, Russia, 2017. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Kipriyanova, L.M. The current state of aquatic and shoreline vegetation of the Chany Lake System. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2005, 2, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
- Golub, V.B.; Losev, G.A.; Mirkin, B.M. Aquatic and hygrophytic vegetation of the Lower Volga valley. Phytocoenologia 1991, 20, 1–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korolesova, D.D. Suchasnij stan makrofіtobentosu Tendrіvs’koї ta Yagorlic’koї zatok Chornomors’kogo bіosfernogozapovіdnika [Current state of the macrophytobenthos in Tendrivska and Yagorlycka Bays of the Black Sea Biosphere Reserve]. Chornomors’k. Bot. Z. 2017, 13, 457–467. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Romanov, R.; Korolesova, D.; Afanasyev, D.; Zhakova, L. Chara baltica (Charophyceae, Charales) from the Black Sea Region and taxonomic implications of extrastipulodes. Botanica 2020, 26, 126–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambert, S.J.; Davy, A.J. Water quality as a threat to aquatic plants: Discriminating betweenthe effects of nitrate, phosphate, boron and heavy metals on charophytes. New Phycol. 2011, 189, 1051–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Xia, F.; Yang, D.; Huo, J.; Wang, G.; Chen, H. Spatiotemporal characteristics in ecosystem service value and its interaction with human activities in Xinjiang, China. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 110, 10–58. [Google Scholar]
- Pokazeev, K.; Sovga, E.; Chaplina, T. Main Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Pollution of the Black Sea, Its Shelf Zones and Small Water Reservoirs. In Pollution in the Black Sea; Publisher Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 97–141. [Google Scholar]
- Lambert-Servien, E.; Cazaubon, A.; Peltre, M.-C.; Laplace-Treyture, C. De la connaissance des macro-algues: Une première approche [Knowledge of macro-algae: A first approach]. In Plantes Aquatiques D’eau Douce: Biologie, Écologie et Gestion [Freshwater Aquatic Plants: Biology, Ecology, and Management]; Ingénieries-EAT special, CEMAGREF: Paris, France, 2008; pp. 9–21. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Barinova, S. Plants, mosses, charophytes, protozoan, and bacteria water quality indicators for assessment of organic pollution and trophic status of continental water bodies. Transylv. Rev. Syst. Ecol. Res. 2021, 23, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Available online: https://www.google.com/maps (accessed on 23 June 2023).
- Zinova, A.D. Opredelitel' Zelenyh, Buryh i Krasnyh Vodoroslej Yuzhnyh Morej SSSR [Key to Green, Brown and Red Algae of the Southern Seas of the USSR]; Nauka: Moscow-Leningrad, Russia, 1967; 399p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Brodie, J.; Maggs, C.A.; John, D.M. (Eds.) Green Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland; British Phycological Society: London, UK, 2007; 250p. [Google Scholar]
- Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. 2023. Available online: https://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- Kalugina-Gutnik, A.A. Fitobentos Chernogo Morya [Phytobenthos of the Black Sea]; Naukova Dumka: Kiev, Ukraine, 1975; 246p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Zinova, A.D. K voprosu o fitogeograficheskom (zonal'nom) rajonirovanii pribrezhnoj polosy Mirovogo okeana [On the issue of phytogeographic zoning of the coastal zone of the World Ocean]. In Joint Research of Flora and Fauna; Zoological Institute AN SSSR: Leningrad, Russia, 1962; pp. 1–9. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Cormaci, M.; Duro, A.; Furnari, G. Considerazioni sugli elementi fitogeografici della flora algale della Sicilia [Considerations on the phytogeographic elements of the algal flora of Sicily]. Nat. Sicil. 1982, 6, 7–14. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
- Braun-Blanquet, J. Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde [Plant Sociology. Basics of Vegetation Science]; Springer: Wien, Österreich, 1964; 865S. (In German) [Google Scholar]
- Mirkin, B.M.; Naumova, L.G.; Solomeshch, A.I. Sovremennaya Nauka o Rastitelnosti [Modern Vegetation Science]; Logos: Moscow, Russia, 2000; 264p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Theurillat, J.-P.; Willner, W.; Fernández-González, F.; Bültmann, H.; Čarni, A.; Gigante, D.; Mucina, L.; Weber, H. International Code of phytosociological nomenclature. 4th edition. Appl. Veg. Sci. 2020, 24, e12491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neshataev, Y.N. O nekotoryh zadachah i metodah klassifikacii rastitel'nosti [On some problems and methods of vegetation classification]. Rast. Rossii 2001, 1, 57–61. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ter Braak, C.J.F.; Šmilauer, P. CANOCO Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User’s Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4.5); Micro-Computer Power: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002; 500p. [Google Scholar]
- Corillion, R. Lamprothamnium papulosum J. Groves. Bull. Soc. Sci. Bretagne 1953, 28, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
- Corillion, R. Les Charophycées de France et d'Europe occidentale [The Charophyceae of France and Western Europe]. Trav. Labo. Bot. Fac. libre Sci. Angers 1957, 11–12, l–499. (In French) [Google Scholar]
- Kornâs, J. Sea bottom vegetation of the Bay of Gdansk of Rewa. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci. Sér. Sci. Biol. 1959, 7, 5–10. [Google Scholar]
- Dambska, I. Zbiorowiska ramienic Polski [Communities of charophytes in Poland]. Pozn. Tow. Przyj. Nauk. Wydz. Mat. -Przyr. 1966, 31, 3–76. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Tomaszewicz, H. Roslinnosc Wodna i Szuwarowa Polski (Klasa: Lemnetea, Charetea, Potamogetonaceae, Phragmitetea) wg Stanu Zbadania na rok 1975 [Water and Rush Vegetation of Poland (Classes: Lemnetea, Charetea, Potamogetonaceae, Phragmitetea) According to the State of Research in 1975]; Rozprawy Uniwersytetu Warszawsiego: Warszawa, Polska, 1979; 325p. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
- Torn, K. Distribution and ecology of charophytes in the Baltic Sea. Dissert. Biol. Univ. Tartu. 2008, 143, l–31. [Google Scholar]
- Cirujano, S.; Cambra, J.; Sânchez Castillo, P.M.; Meco, A.; Flor Arnau, N. Flora ibérica. Algas continentales. Carôfitos (Characeae) [Iberian Flora. Continental Algae. Charophytes (Characeae)]; Real Jardin Botânico de Madrid: Madrid, Spain, 2007; 132p. (In Spanish) [Google Scholar]
- Morozova-Vodyanitskaya, N.V. Rastitel'nye associacii v Chernom more [Plant associations in the Black Sea]. Tr. Sevastopol'skoj Biol. Stn. 1959, 11, 3–28. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Gromov, V.V. Donnaya Rastitel'nost' Verhnih Uchastkov Shel'fa Yuzhnyh Morej Rossii [Bottom Vegetation of the Upper Sections of the Shelf of the Southern Seas of Russia]. Ph.D. Thesis, Botanical Institute of RAS, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1998. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
- Gromov, V.V. Ekologo-fitocenoticheskie izmeneniya v Sudzhukskoj lagune [Ecological and phytocenotic changes in the Sudzhuk lagoon]. Izv. Sev.-Kav. Nauch. Cent. Vyssh. Shk. Estestv. Nauk. 1982, 4, 45–47. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Kalugina-Gutnik, A.A.; Halilova, M.R.; Mironova, N.V.; Berezenko, N.S. Sovremennoe sostoyanie fitobentosa Sudzhukskoj laguny [Current State of the Phytobenthos of the Sudzhuk Lagoon]. Ekol. Morya 1988, 30, 29–36. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Afanasyev, D.F.; Sereda, M.M.; Berezenko, N.S.; Martynov, Y.I. Makrofitobentos pamyatnika prirody «Sudzhukskaya laguna» Novorossijskoj buhty [Macrophytobenthos of the Natural Monument “Sudzhukskaya lagoon” of the Novorossiysk Bay]. Nauchnye Zap. Prir. Zapov. «Mys Mart'yan» 2012, 3, 166–176. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Berezenko, N.S.; Milchakova, N.A. Mnogoletnie izmeneniya makrofitobentosa pamyatnika prirody «Sudzhukskaya laguna» (Chernoe more) [Long-term changes of macrophytobenthos of «Sudzhuk lagoon» Natural Monument (Black Sea)]. Zapovednaya Nauka 2018, 3, 59–67. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
- Kipriyanova, L.M. Novaya associaciya Cladophoro fractae–Stuckenietum chakassiensis klassa Ruppietea maritimae iz Sibiri [New association of Cladophoro fractae–Stuckenietum chakassiensis of the class Ruppietea maritimae from Siberia]. Rast. Rossii 2017, 30, 55–60. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Map of sampling sites in the North Caucasian coast of the Black Sea.
Figure 2.
Principal components analysis (PCA) of charophyte algal communities in the northeastern part of the Black Sea, with axes 1 and 2 represented. A (diamonds): Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi, B (circles): Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile, C (stars): Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi, D (crosses): Lamprothamnium papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae, E (triangles): Lamprothamnium papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. cladophoretosum albidae.
Figure 2.
Principal components analysis (PCA) of charophyte algal communities in the northeastern part of the Black Sea, with axes 1 and 2 represented. A (diamonds): Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi, B (circles): Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile, C (stars): Charae balticae–Pneophylletum fragile subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi, D (crosses): Lamprothamnium papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae, E (triangles): Lamprothamnium papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae subass. cladophoretosum albidae.
Table 1.
Comparative characteristics of the charophyte communities in the northeastern part of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea, and Baltic Sea.
Table 1.
Comparative characteristics of the charophyte communities in the northeastern part of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea, and Baltic Sea.
| Syntaxa | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Number of Species | 12 | 9 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 10 | 6 | 7 |
| Diagnostic species of the associations | ||||||||
| Chara baltica (Hartm.) Bruz. | V | V | V | V | . | . | . | I |
| Lamprothamnium papulosum (K.Wallroth) J.Groves | V | V | V | . | V | V | V | V |
| Nanozostera noltei (Hornemann) Tomlinson & Posluszny | . | V | V | V | . | . | I | . |
| Pneophyllum fragile Kütz. | . | V | V | . | . | . | . | . |
| Cladophora liniformis Kütz. | II | . | V | . | . | . | . | . |
| Stuckenia pectinata (L.) Börner | . | . | . | III | V | V | . | . |
| Cladophora albida (Nees) Kutz. | . | . | . | . | . | V | . | . |
| Tolypella salina Corillion | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | V |
| Other species | ||||||||
| Ruppia maritima L. | . | . | I | III | . | . | I | IV |
| Ulva sp. | III | V | V | . | . | . | . | . |
| Chondria capillaris (Hudson) M.J.Wynne | III | II | IV | . | . | . | . | . |
| Vertebrata reptabunda (Suhr) Díaz-Tapia & Maggs in Díaz-Tapia et al. | II | I | III | . | . | . | . | . |
| Chara galioides De Candolle | . | . | . | I | . | . | I | III |
| Stilophora tenella (Esper) P.C.Silva in P.C.Silva, Basson & Moe | I | . | IV | . | . | . | . | . |
| Chaetomorpha ligustica (Kütz.) Kütz. | + | . | III | . | . | . | . | . |
| Ceramium diaphanum (Lightfoot) Roth | I | . | II | . | . | . | . | . |
| Cladophora siwaschensis C.J.Meyer | I | . | II | . | . | . | . | . |
| Chondracanthus acicularis (Roth) Fredericq | + | I | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Ulva maeotica (Proshkina-Lavrenko) P.Tsarenko in Burova et al. | + | I | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| Althenia filiformis Petit | . | . | . | . | . | . | I | III |
| Ceramium tenuicorne (Kützing) Waern | . | . | . | IV | . | . | . | . |
| Zannichellia palustris L. | . | . | . | IV | . | . | . | . |
| Chara aspera Willdenow | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
| Cladophora glomerata var. crassior (C.Ag.) C.Hoek | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
| Ectocarpus siliculosus (Dillwyn) Lyngb. | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
| Tolypella nidifica (O.F.Müller) A.Braun | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
| Vertebrata fucoides (Hudson) Kuntze | . | . | . | II | . | . | . | . |
| Acrochaetium secundatum (Lyngb.) Näg. in Näg. & Cramer | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . |
| Chaetomorpha tortuosa (Dillwyn) Kleen | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . |
| Cladophora vadorum (Areschoug) Kütz. | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . |
| Cladophora vagabunda complex | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . |
| Ulva prolifera O.F.Müller | . | . | . | . | . | II | . | . |
| Tolypella hispanica Nordstedt ex T.F.Allen | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | II |
| Bolboschoenus maritimus (L.) Palla | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . |
| Chara canescens Loiseleur | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . |
| Myriophyllum spicatum L. | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . |
| Schoenoplectus lacustris (L.) Palla | . | . | . | I | . | . | . | . |
| Stylonema alsidii (Zanardini) K.M.Drew | . | . | . | . | . | I | . | . |
| Chaetomorpha aerea (Dillwyn) Kütz. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . |
| Ulva kylinii (Bliding) H.S.Hayden, Blomster, Maggs, P.C.Silva, M.J.Stanhope & J.R.Waaland | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . |
| Ulva rigida C.Ag. | . | . | . | . | + | . | . | . |
| Lophosiphonia obscura (C.Ag.) Falkenberg in F.Schmitz & Falkenberg | . | . | . | . | . | + | . | . |
Notes. 1—ass. Charae balticae–Lamprothamnietum papulosi; 2–3—ass. Charae balticae–Nanozosteretum noltei (2—subass. typicum; 3—subass. cladophoretosum liniformisi); 4—ass. Charetum balticae [1]; 5–6—ass. Lamprothamnio papulosi–Stuckenietum pectinatae (5—subass. typicum; 6—subass. cladophoretosum albidae); 7–8—ass. Lamprothamnietum papulosi (7—subass. typicum; 8—subass. tolypelletosum salinae; [1]). Diagnostic species of syntaxa are highlighted in gray.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Afanasyev, D.F.; Berezenko, N.S.; Barinova, S.; Abdullin, S.R. Syntaxonomy of Charophyte Algal Communities in the Northeastern Part of the Black Sea (Russia). Environments 2023, 10, 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090154
AMA Style
Afanasyev DF, Berezenko NS, Barinova S, Abdullin SR. Syntaxonomy of Charophyte Algal Communities in the Northeastern Part of the Black Sea (Russia). Environments. 2023; 10(9):154. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090154
Chicago/Turabian StyleAfanasyev, Dmitry F., Natalia S. Berezenko, Sophia Barinova, and Shamil R. Abdullin. 2023. "Syntaxonomy of Charophyte Algal Communities in the Northeastern Part of the Black Sea (Russia)" Environments 10, no. 9: 154. https://doi.org/10.3390/environments10090154
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
