Effects of Phytonutrients on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestibility, and Microorganisms in Swamp Buffaloes
1
Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
2
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Technology, Nakhon Phanom University, Nakhon Phanom 48000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2019, 9(9), 671; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090671
Submission received: 30 May 2019
/
Revised: 25 June 2019
/
Accepted: 1 July 2019
/
Published: 11 September 2019
(This article belongs to the Collection Use of Agricultural By-Products in Animal Feeding)
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Fermentation in ruminants can influence greenhouse gas production, especially methane (CH4) production. Phytonutrients (PTN) and secondary metabolites (tannins, saponins) have antimicrobial activity which can be used for the inhibition of rumen methanogens and the reduction of methane emissions in ruminants. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of PTN containing both mangosteen peel powder and banana flower powder on feed consumption, nutrient digestibility, and rumen microorganisms in swamp buffaloes. The results suggest that supplementation of PTN can improve fiber digestibility, increase the proteolytic and cellulolytic bacteria, and alter rumen volatile fatty acids (VFAs), especially increased C3 and reduced methane production. This study shows that PTN containing either mangosteen peel powder (MSP) or banana flower powder (BFP) could be used as a rumen modifier.
Abstract
This experiment aimed to use dietary sources containing phytonutrients (PTN) such as mangosteen peel powder (MSP) and banana flower powder (BFP) as sources of phytonutrients. Four swamp buffalo bulls fitted with rumen fistulae were used as experimental animals. A digestion trial covering four periods was used according to a 4 × 4 Latin square design with four treatments: Treatment 1 (T1) = control (Cont), T2 = supplementation of PTN1 fed at 100 g/d, T3 = supplementation of PTN2 fed at 100 g/d, and T4 = supplementation of PTN3 fed at 100 g/d. The experiment was conducted for four periods; each period lasted for 21 days. All animals were fed a concentrate mixture at 0.5% body weight, while rice straw, water, and mineral blocks were fed ad libitum. The findings revealed significant increases in the digestibility of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF), while no changes in dry matter feed consumption occurred due to PTN supplementation. Rumen fermentation end-products, such as total volatile fatty acids (TVFA), propionic acid (C3), and butyric acid (C4), were notably enhanced (p < 0.05) and there were the highest in PTN2 and PTN3, whilst acetic acid (C2) was significantly decreased with PTN supplementation groups. Furthermore, the rumen protozoal population was suppressed (p < 0.05), which resulted in decreased rumen methane production (p < 0.05), while the bacterial population was enhanced. Using PTN sources can improve rumen fermentation as well as mitigating rumen methane production.
1. Introduction
There are many factors that could alter rumen ecology, for example, a high grain and low fiber diet can reduce rumen pH. Feed additives like antibiotics or chemicals and buffers can improve rumen fermentation efficiency [1]. Research and development regarding methane (CH4) production in ruminants has received considerable attention in which mitigation of the rumen CH4 has been the main issue [2,3]. CH4 production from rumen fermentation can result in a loss of energy intake of about 8–12% in ruminants [4]. Phytonutrients or secondary metabolites (tannins, saponins, essential oils, etc.) impose antimicrobial activity which can be used for the inhibition of specific microorganism groups in the rumen and can modify their fermentation [5,6]. Poungchompu et al. [7] and Shokryzadan et al. [8] stated that mangosteen (Garcinia mangostana) peel is one kind of agricultural by-product containing the highest levels of condensed tannins (CT) and saponins (SP) when compared with other tropical plants and fruit peels. It is a non-chemical feed additive that is used as a rumen fermentation modifier, and it mitigates methane production. Phytonutrients have been shown to affect ruminal fermentation efficiency, especially by decreasing the acetic acid (C2) concentration, reducing ruminal protozoa and the methanogen population, and mitigating CH4 emissions [9]. Furthermore, Wanapat et al. [10] reported that consumption of dietary mangosteen peel powder (MSP) by buffaloes can increase the concentration of C3 and microbial protein synthesis. In addition, Oskoueian et al. [11] found that flavonoids, especially naringin and quercetin, suppressed the protozoal population and methanogen population in an in vitro experiment.
Banana (Musa sapientum L.) flower powder (BFP) has been reported to be used as a rumen buffering agent, as it contains a high concentration of mineral elements. The pH stability in the rumen is considered a prime factor that feeds into optimal rumen ecology, as the shift towards acidic conditions, especially pH values lower than 6.0, will dramatically affect microorganisms and the fermentation process [1,12]. Dietary sources containing phytonutrients (PTN) have been used to replace chemical buffers and have resulted in improved rumen fermentation, as shown by Poungchonpu et al. [7], Norrapoke et al. [13], Foiklang et al. [14], and Kang et al. [15,16]. However, the use of other PTN in combination, especially in swamp buffaloes, has not been fully investigated. Therefore, this experiment aimed to investigate the influence of PTN containing both mangosteen peel powder and banana flower powder on feed consumption, nutrient digestibility, and rumen microorganisms in swamp buffaloes fed rice straw as a basal roughage.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Feeds, Animals, and Experimental Design
The sources of phytonutrients were as follows: The mangosteen peel (MSP) was collected from fresh fruit, sun-dried for 3 to 4 days, and ground into powder form. The banana flower powder (BFP) was collected from fresh flowers, sun-dried for 5 to 6 days, and ground into powder form. Mangosteen peel powder, banana flower powder, urea, and sulfur were mixed to form PTN1, PTN2, and PTN3, as reported in Table 1. The concentrate contained 14.5% of crude protein. Feed ingredients and chemical compositions are presented in Table 1.
The study was conducted at the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University (KKU), Thailand. All procedures involving animals in the metabolism studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Khon Kaen University (KKU) (ref. no. AEKKU 18/2558).
Four swamp buffalo bulls fitted with rumen fistulae were used as experimental animals. A digestion trial covering four periods was used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design with four treatments: Treatmeat1 (T1) = control (Cont), T2 = supplementation of PTN1 fed at 100 g/d, T3 = supplementation of PTN2 fed at 100 g/d, and T4 = supplementation of PTN3 fed at 100 g/d. The experiment was conducted for 4 periods, and each period lasted for 21 days. All animals were fed the concentrate mixture at 0.5% body weight, while the concentrate mixture was fed in the morning and afternoon (07:00 a.m., 16:30 p.m.). Rice straw was fed ad libitum. Water and mineral blocks were available at all times for all buffaloes.
2.2. Data Collection and Sample Analysis
After the first 14 days, buffaloes had adapted to the diet, and feed consumption was measured. Samples of concentrate and rice straw including refusals were collected daily during the feeding period. During the last 7 days, all buffaloes were moved to the metabolism crates for feed, feces, and urine collection. Feed and fecal samples were measured for nutritive values of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), ash and crude protein (CP) [17] and neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) [18], and then nutrient digestibility was estimated according to the standard methods described by Wanapat et al. [19]. Condensed tannins (CT) were analyzed by the Vanillin-HCL method (Burns [20]; modified by Wanapat and Poungchompu [21]).
At the last day of each period, rumen fluid samples were collected at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h post morning feeding. Rumen fluid was immediately measured for pH and temperature using a portable pH meter (HANNA Instrument HI 8424 microcomputer, Hanna Instruments (S) Pte Ltd., 161 Kallang Way, Singapore). Rumen fluid samples were then filtered through three layers of cheesecloth. The first part was used for the analysis of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and NH3–N, where 5 mL of H2SO4 solution (1 M) was added to 45 mL of rumen fluid. The mixture was centrifuged at 1600× g for 15 min, and the supernatant was stored at −20 °C prior to VFA analysis using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and the NH3–N analysis method [17]. The next part was used for the measurement of microbial populations by total direct counts of bacteria, protozoa, and fungal zoospores [22]. The last part was cultured for groups of bacteria (i.e., cellulolytic, proteolytic, amylolytic, and total viable bacterial counts) using the roll-tube technique [23]. A blood sample (about 10 mL) was drawn from the jugular vein into EDTA-containing tubes and was separated by centrifugation at 500× g for 10 min at 4 °C to obtain plasma. Then, the plasma was stored at −20 °C until the analysis of blood urea N according to the method of Crocker [24].
Rumen CH4 production was estimated using VFA proportions according to Moss et al. [25] and as follows:
CH4 production = 0.45(acetate, C2) − 0.275(propionate, C3) + 0.4(butyrate, C4).
2.3. Statistical Analyses
All data were statistically analyzed using the general linear-model procedure (Statistical Analysis System, SAS (2013) [26]) according a 4 × 4 Latin square design in which the buffalo, period, and level of PTN supplementation were the main factors. Treatment means were analyzed using the following model: Yijk = μ + Ti + Cj + Rk + eijk, where Yijk is the criteria under study in treatment i, column j, and row k; μ is the overall sample mean; Ti is the effect of treatment i; Cj is the effect of treatment i at column j; Rk is the effect of treatment i at row k; and eijk is the error.
3. Results
3.1. Voluntary Feed Consumption and Digestibility
In Table 2, rice straw intake was not influenced by PTN supplementation, and total DM feed intake was not significantly different among PTN supplementation groups. The apparent digestibility in terms of DM, OM and CP was not increased by PTN supplementation (p > 0.05). However, the PTN groups showed significantly enhanced digestibility of fiber (NDF, ADF). Although the values were the highest for the PTN2 and PTN3 groups, there were no significant difference among treatments.
3.2. Ruminal Fermentation, Blood, Methane Production
The results for ruminal fermentation, blood, and methane production are presented in Table 3. The pH (6.6–6.8) and temperature (38.8–39.5) in the rumen were unchanged (p > 0.05). The ruminal NH3–N concentration was increased in the PTN supplementation groups, while the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentration was similar among treatments. The total volatile fatty acid (TVFA), propionic acid (C3), and butyric acid (C4) concentrations increased (p < 0.05) following PTN supplementation, especially in the PTN2 and PTN3 groups, which had the highest concentrations. In contrast, the acetic acid (C2) concentration decreased (p < 0.05), while the C2:C3 ratio and estimated CH4 production decreased remarkably in the PTN supplementation groups, and was the lowest in PTN2.
3.3. Microbial Population Enumeration
The protozoal population significantly decreased (p < 0.05) following PTN supplementation, while under PTN1 and PTN3 supplementations, the protozoal numbers remarkably decreased (p < 0.05). However, the concentrations of fungal zoospores, starch-digesting bacteria, and total bacteria were unchanged (p > 0.05) among treatments, while the rumen proteolytic and cellulolytic bacterial populations were the highest (p < 0.05) in the PTN2 and PTN3 supplementation groups (Table 4).
4. Discussion
4.1. Voluntary Feed Consumption and Digestibility
Supplementation of PTN did not affect feed consumption in this experiment. This is similar to the findings of Kang and Wanapat [27], who reported that supplementation of a banana flower powder (BFP)-pellet at 4% of dry matter intake (DMI) did not impact feed intake in dairy steers. The use of MSP at 30 g/d did not impact feed consumption and nutrient digestibility in buffaloes [28], while the use of tannin sources as less than 50 g/kg DM of feed did not suppress DMI or nutrient digestibility in beef cattle [29]. However, Cruywagen et al. [30] found that the use of bicarbonate as a buffering agent in a high concentrate diet did not alter dry matter feed intake. Moreover, the result from Rauch et al. [31] revealed that the use of sodium bicarbonate and calcium magnesium carbonate did not influence dry matter feed consumption but increased the digestibility of crude protein in lactating dairy cows. In this study, DM, OM and CP digestibility did not ultimately change, while NDF and ADF contrarily increased in the PTN2 and PTN3 groups. This phenomenon may be because BFP and CT reduce the protozoal number, and bacteria are the feed substrate of protozoa; hence, it would be expected that the fibrolytic bacteria population would subsequently increase. In addition, BFP supplementation improves the in vitro true digestibility, according to Kang and Wanapat [27]. Furthermore, rumen pH is the major factor influencing fibrolytic bacteria attachment in the particles of feed [32].
4.2. Ruminal Fermentation, Blood, and Methane Production
In this experiment, the pH and temperature in the rumen were not impacted and remained in the narrow range for ruminal fermentation of feeds [19,32]. Russell [33] stated the importance of pH on propionate production in the rumen; hence, the pH should be maintained for optimal rumen ecology. The rumen NH3–N concentration increased in the PTN supplementation groups, while BUN was unchanged. The optimal level of NH3–N is from 15 to 30 mg/dL for rumen fermentation, as revealed by Preston and Leng [34] and Wanapat and Pimpa [35] under a rice straw feeding regime. The TVFA, C3, and C4 were significantly increased, especially in the PTN2 and PTN3 groups, and were the highest, while C2 and the C2:C3 ratio decreased following PTN supplementation. The reason for this is probably that the buffering agent and CT from PTN sources resulted in enhanced fiber digestion and microbial activity. Similarly, Cruywagen et al. [30] reported that the use of buffering agent from sodium bicarbonate and limestone in the high concentrate diet could increase the total VFA and reduce lactate fermentation. Moreover, CH4 production was consequently decreased by PTN supplementation. This could be the result of the suppression of protozoa and methanogens in the rumen. Similarly, it was found that the use of mangosteen peel pellets and soapberry fruit supplementation containing phytonutrients can influence ruminal fermentation by decreasing the C2 concentration and mitigating CH4 production, thereby increasing the C3 concentration [7]. Wanapat et al. [10] reported that the use of MSP at 100 g/d in swamp buffaloes affected the total VFA concentration and increased C3, reducing C2:C3 and methane production following MSP supplementation. Recently, Shokryzaden et al. [8] and Paengkoum et al. [36] found that condensed tannins (CT) from MSP could reduce methane production by the suppression of ruminal microbes, especially protozoa and methanogens.
4.3. Rumen Microorganism Population
The protozoal population was suppressed by supplementation, especially in the PTN1 and PTN3 supplementation groups. This could be due to CT in PTN, which directly react with sterols in the membranes of protozoa. This result was confirmed by Ngamseang et al. [37], who found that the use of MSP containing CT at 150 g/d suppressed protozoal population, while supplementation with MSP and soapberry fruit pellets containing CT and SP suppressed protozoal population [7]. Similarly, Shokryazdan et al. [8] additionally stated that replacing alfalfa with 25% and 50% MSP mitigated the protozoal population. Polyorach et al. [38] reported, in addition, that MSP supplementation in cows increased the total bacteria concentration, while the protozoal and methanogen populations reduced. Suppression of the rumen protozoal population was found in dairy steers and dairy cows as a result of MSP supplementation [13,37]. Furthermore, Dong et al. [39] revealed that the dietary supplementation of Moringa oleifera containing plant phytonutrients changed the composition and diversity of methanogens and reduced methane emissions in dairy cows. In this study, the fungal zoospore, amylolytic bacteria, and total bacteria concentrations did not differ among treatment groups. However, the cellulolytic bacteria and proteolytic bacteria concentrations increased in the PTN2 and PTN3 supplementation groups. This may be due to the enhancement of the rumen pH by BFP supplementation [16]. This result was confirmed by Kang and Wanapat [27], who used BFP as a rumen pH buffer, and the results revealed an increase in the rumen pH, as BFP constitutes a high level of minerals, especially Ca, Mg, and K, and the use of BFP could increase nutrient digestibility and improve rumen fermentation in the ruminants.
5. Conclusions
Some source of phytonutrients (PTN) can significantly improve fiber digestibility, bacterial population (proteolytic and cellulolytic bacteria) concentrations, and rumen VFA, especially through an enhanced C3 concentration and, consequently, reduced CH4 production. This study suggests that PTN3 containing either mangosteen peel powder (MSP) or banana flower powder (BFP) could be recommended as a rumen modifier to enhance the rumen fermentation efficiency without negatively affecting feed consumption or the rumen fermentation process.
Author Contributions
T.A. conceived the trial, conducted the feeding experiment, drafted the initial manuscript, and conducted the lab analyses; M.W. generated the design of the study and conducted all statistical analyses, including animal training and animal data collection; K.P. carried out animal data collection and drafted the initial manuscript. All authors read the manuscript, participated in revisions, and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the International Research Network (IRN) program (TRF-IRN57W0002 and TRF-IRG598001).
Acknowledgments
Special thanks are extended to the Tropical Feed Resources Research and Development Center (TROFREC), Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand and the Thailand Research Fund (TRF) through the International Research Network (IRN) program (TRF-IRN57W0002) and TRF-IRG598001 for their kind support with research funds and the use of their facilities.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no competing conflict of interest.
References
- Russell, J.B.; Rychlik, J.L. Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology. Science 2001, 292, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wanapat, M.; Chanthakhoun, V.; Wanapat, S. Development of Food- Feed-System for smallholder livestock farmers. In Proceedings of the Animal Nutrition Association World Conferences, New Delhi, India, 14–17 February 2009; pp. 24–27. [Google Scholar]
- Bodas, R.; Prieto, N.; Garcı´a-Gonza´lez, R.; Andre´s, S.; Gira´ldez, F.J.; Lo´pez, S. Manipulation of rumen fermentation and methane production with plant secondary metabolites. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatta, R. Reducing enteric methane emission using plant secondary metabolites. In Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 273–284. [Google Scholar]
- Wallace, R.J.; McEvan, N.R.; McIntosh, F.M.; Teferedegne, B.; Newbold, C.J. Natural products as manipulators of rumen fermentation. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2002, 15, 1458–1468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamra, D.N.; Agarwal, N.; Chaudhary, L.C. Manipulation of rumen microbial ecosystem for reducing enteric methane emission in livestock. In Climate Change Impact on Livestock: Adaptation and Mitigation; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2015; pp. 255–272. [Google Scholar]
- Poungchompu, O.; Wanapat, M.; Wachirapakorn, C.; Wanapat, S.; Cherdthong, A. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation and methane production by dietary saponins and tannins from mangosteen peel and soapberry fruit. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2009, 5, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokryzadan, P.; Rajion, M.A.; Goh, Y.M.; Ishak, I.; Ramlee, M.F.; Faseleh, J.M.; Ebrahimi, M. Mangosteen peel can reduce methane production and rumen biohydrogenation in vitro. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 46, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.Q.; Liu, J.X.; Lu, Y.; Zhu, W.Y.; Denman, S.E.; McSweeney, C.S. Effect of tea saponin on methanogenesis, microbial community structure and expression of mcrA gene, in cultures of rumen microorganisms. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2008, 47, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wanapat, M.; Chanthakhoun, V.; Phesatcha, K.; Kang, S. Influence of mangosteen peel powder as a source of plant secondary compounds on rumen microorganisms, volatile fatty acids, methane and microbial protein synthesis in swamp buffaloes. Livest. Sci. 2014, 162, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oskoueian, E.; Abdullah, E.; Oskoueian, A. Effects of flavonoids on rumen fermentation activity, methane production, and microbial population. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanapat, M. Rumen manipulation to increase the efficient use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in the tropics. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2000, 13, 59–67. [Google Scholar]
- Norrapoke, T.; Wanapat, M.; Wanapat, S. Effects of protein level and mangosteen peel pellets (Mago-pel) in concentrate diets on rumen fermentation and milk production in lactating dairy crossbreds. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 25, 971–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Foiklang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Norrapoke, T. In vitro rumen fermentation and digestibility of buffaloes as influenced by grape pomace powder and urea treated rice straw supplementation. Anim. Sci. J. 2016, 87, 370–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.; Wanapat, M. Using plant source as a buffering agent to manipulating rumen fermentation in an in vitro gas production system. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 26, 1424–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Cherdthong, A. Effect of banana flower powder supplementation as a rumen buffer on rumen fermentation efficiency and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers fed on high concentrate diet. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 196, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). Official Methods of Analysis, 19th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Van Soest, P.J.; Robertson, J.B.; Lewis, B.A. Methods for dietary fiber neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 1991, 74, 3583–3597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanapat, M.; Gunun, P.; Anantasook, N.; Kang, S. Changes of rumen pH, fermentation and microbial population as influenced by different ratios of roughage (rice straw) to concentrate in dairy steers. J. Agric. Sci. 2014, 152, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burns, R.E. Method for estimation of tannin in the grain sorghum. Agron. J. 1971, 163, 511–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wanapat, M.; Poungchompu, O. Method for Estimation of Tannin by Vanillin-HCL Method (A Modified Method of Burns, 1971); Department of Animal Science, Khon Kaen University: Khon Kaen, Thailand, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Galyean, M. Laboratory Procedure in Animal Nutrition Research; Department of Animal and Range Sciences; New Mexico State University: Las Cruces, NM, USA, 1989; p. 188. [Google Scholar]
- Hungate, R.E. A roll tube method for cultivation of strict anaerobes. In Methods in Microbiology; Norris, J.R., Ribbons, D.W., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1969; pp. 117–132. [Google Scholar]
- Crocker, C.L. Rapid determination of urea nitrogen in serum or plasma without deproteinization. Am. J. Med. Technol. 1967, 33, 361–365. [Google Scholar]
- Moss, A.R.; Jouany, J.P.; Newbold, J. Methane production by ruminants: its contribution to global warming. Anim. Res. 2000, 49, 231–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- SAS (Statistical Analysis System). User’s Guide: Statistic, 9.3th ed.; SAS Inst. Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, S.; Wanapat, M. Improving ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers by banana flower powder-pellet supplementation. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 58, 1246–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pilajun, R.; Wanapat, M. Effect of coconut oil and mangosteen peel supplementation on ruminal fermentation, microbial protein synthesis in swamp buffaloes. Livest. Sci. 2011, 141, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manasri, N.; Wanapat, M.; Navanukraw, C. Improving rumen fermentation and feed digestibility in cattle by mangosteen peel and garlic pellet supplementation. Livest. Sci. 2012, 148, 291–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cruywagen, C.W.; Taylor, S.; Beya, M.M.; Calitz, T. The effect of buffering dairy cow diets with limestone, calcareous marine algae, or sodium bicarbonate on ruminal pH profiles, production responses, and rumen fermentation. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 5506–5514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Raucha, R.E.; Robinson, P.H.; Erasmus, L.J. Effects of sodium bicarbonate and calcium magnesium carbonate supplementation on performance of high producing dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 177, 180–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, S.; Wanapat, M.; Viennasay, B. Supplementation of banana flower powder pellet and plant oil sources on in vitro ruminal fermentation, digestibility and methane production. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017, 48, 1673–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Russell, J.B. The importance of pH in the regulation of ruminal acetate to propionate ratio and methane production in vitro. J. Dairy Sci. 1998, 81, 3222–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preston, T.R.; Leng, R.A. Matching Ruminant Production Systems with Available Resources in the Tropics and Sub-Tropics; Penambul Books: Armidale, Australia, 1987; p. 265. [Google Scholar]
- Wanapat, M.; Pimpa, O. Effect of ruminal NH3-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 12, 904–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paengkoum, P.; Phonmun, T.; Liang, J.B.; Huang, X.D.; Tan, H.Y.; Jahromi, M.F. Molecular weight, protein binding affinity and methane mitigation of condensed tannins from mangosteen-peel (Garcinia mangostana L.). Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 28, 1442–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ngamsaeng, A.; Wanapat, M.; Khampa, S. Effects of mangosteen peel (Garcinia mangostana L.) supplementation on rumen ecology, microbial protein synthesis, digestibility and voluntary feed intake in cattle. Pak. J. Nutr. 2006, 5, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polyorach, S.; Wanapat, M.; Cherdthong, A.; Kang, S. Rumen microorganisms, methane production, and microbial protein synthesis affected by mangosteen peel powder supplement in lactating dairy cows. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2016, 48, 593–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, L.; Zhang, T.; Diao, Q. Effect of Dietary Supplementation of Moringa Oleifera on the Production Performance and Fecal Methanogenic Community of Lactating Dairy Cows. Animals (Basel) 2019, 9, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1.
Feed ingredients and chemical compositions of the experimental diets.
| Item | Concentrate | PTN1 | PTN2 | PTN3 | Rice Straw |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredients, g/kg dry matter | |||||
| Cassava chip | 618 | - | - | - | - |
| Rice bran | 78 | - | - | - | - |
| Coconut meal | 120 | - | - | - | - |
| Palm kernel meal | 120 | - | - | - | - |
| Mangosteen peel powder (MSP) | - | 910 | - | 455 | - |
| Banana flower powder (BFP) | - | - | 910 | 455 | - |
| Cassava chip meal | - | 50 | 50 | 50 | - |
| Molasses | 19 | - | - | - | - |
| Urea | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | - |
| Mineral mixture | 5 | - | - | - | - |
| Salt | 5 | - | - | - | - |
| Sulfur | 5 | 10 | 10 | 10 | - |
| Chemical composition, g/kg dry matter | |||||
| Dry matter, g/kg | 898 | 925 | 905 | 913 | 905 |
| Organic matter | 920 | 942 | 913 | 921 | 880 |
| Ash | 80 | 58 | 87 | 79 | 220 |
| Crude protein | 145 | 189 | 151 | 168 | 29 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 265 | 557 | 677 | 611 | 795 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 124 | 495 | 451 | 475 | 436 |
| Condensed tannins | - | 167 | 113 | 145 | - |
PTN1 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 91%) at 100 g/head/day; PTN2 (containing banana flower powder at 91%); PTN3 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 45.5% and banana flower powder at 45.5%).
Table 2.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on voluntary feed intake and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffaloes.
Table 2.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on voluntary feed intake and nutrient digestibility in swamp buffaloes.
| Items | Cont | PTN1 | PTN2 | PTN3 | SEM | p-Value |
| Rice straw DM intake | ||||||
| kg/day | 6.8 | 6.7 | 6.9 | 6.9 | 0.20 | 0.87 |
| %BW | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 0.04 | 0.40 |
| Concentrate DM intake | ||||||
| kg/day | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.32 | 0.19 |
| %BW | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.07 | 0.61 |
| Total DM intake | ||||||
| kg/day | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 8.9 | 0.13 | 0.56 |
| %BW | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 0.25 | 0.47 |
| Apparent digestibility, %DM | ||||||
| Dry matter, % | 59.0 | 58.5 | 57.9 | 58.7 | 1.56 | 0.45 |
| Organic matter | 61.2 | 60.3 | 60.1 | 61.0 | 1.77 | 0.33 |
| Crude protein | 62.5 | 67.2 | 64.8 | 65.7 | 2.45 | 0.72 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 40.5 a | 45.7 b | 48.1 b | 48.0 b | 1.15 | 0.01 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 40.2 a | 45.4 b | 49.7 c | 48.5 c | 0.45 | 0.01 |
a,b,c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); Cont (control group); PTN1 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 91%) at 100 g/head/day; PTN2 (containing banana flower powder at 91%); PTN3 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 45.5% and banana flower powder at 45.5%); SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 3.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on the ruminal pH, temperature, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and volatile fatty acid concentrations in swamp buffaloes.
Table 3.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on the ruminal pH, temperature, ammonia nitrogen (NH3–N), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and volatile fatty acid concentrations in swamp buffaloes.
| Item | Supplementation (100 g/h/day) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cont | PTN1 | PTN2 | PTN3 | |||
| Rumen parameters | ||||||
| pH | 6.7 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 6.8 | 1.89 | 0.13 |
| Temperature | 38.8 | 38.9 | 39.5 | 39.1 | 1.53 | 0.35 |
| Ammonia nitrogen, mg/dL | 12.1 a | 15.7 b | 14.0 a | 14.9 b | 0.60 | 0.01 |
| Blood urea nitrogen, mg/dL | 6.8 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.7 | 2.77 | 0.24 |
| Total volatile fatty acid, mmol/L | 97.2 a | 101.0 ab | 103.0 b | 106.6 b | 1.71 | 0.04 |
| Acetic acid (C2), % | 73.4 a | 65.1 b | 59.3 c | 64.0 b | 1.12 | 0.01 |
| Propionic acid (C3), % | 15.5 a | 21.5 b | 26.9 c | 22.5 b | 1.15 | 0.01 |
| Butyric acid (C4), % | 11.1 a | 13.0 b | 14.9 c | 13.6 b | 0.41 | 0.02 |
| C2:C3 | 4.8 a | 3.2 b | 2.1 c | 2.9 b | 0.57 | 0.01 |
| Methane estimation, mM/L * | 33.2 a | 28.7 b | 25.8 c | 28.1 b | 0.83 | 0.03 |
a,b,c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); Cont (control group); PTN1 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 91%) at 100 g/head/day; PTN2 (containing banana flower powder at 91%); PTN3 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 45.5% and banana flower powder at 45.5%); * Calculated according to Moss et al. [25] CH4 production = 0.45(acetate) − 0.275(propionate) + 0.4(butyrate); SEM = standard error of the mean.
Table 4.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on the rumen protozoa, fungal zoospore, and bacteria populations in swamp buffaloes.
Table 4.
Effects of some sources of phytonutrients (PTN) on the rumen protozoa, fungal zoospore, and bacteria populations in swamp buffaloes.
| Items | Supplementation (100 g/h/day) | SEM | p-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cont | PTN1 | PTN2 | PTN3 | |||
| Total direct counts | ||||||
| Protozoa, ×105 cell/mL | 8.2 a | 6.5 b | 7.7 c | 6.7 b | 0.09 | 0.02 |
| Fungal zoospore, ×105 cell/mL | 5.4 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 0.41 | 0.12 |
| Roll-tube technique, CFU/mL Amylolytic bacteria, ×107 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 0.43 | 0.07 |
| Proteolytic bacteria, ×107 | 3.5 a | 4.2 b | 4.4 b | 4.4 b | 0.15 | 0.02 |
| Cellulolytic bacteria, ×108 | 3.4 a | 3.5 a | 4.6 b | 4.1 b | 0.16 | 0.01 |
| Total viable bacteria, ×108 | 5.4 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 5.7 | 0.77 | 0.15 |
a,b,c Means in the same row with different superscripts differ (p < 0.05); Cont (control group); PTN1 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 91%) at 100 g/head/day; PTN2 (containing banana flower powder at 91%); PTN3 (containing mangosteen peel powder at 45.5% and banana flower powder at 45.5%); SEM = standard error of the mean.
© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ampapon, T.; Phesatcha, K.; Wanapat, M. Effects of Phytonutrients on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestibility, and Microorganisms in Swamp Buffaloes. Animals 2019, 9, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090671
AMA Style
Ampapon T, Phesatcha K, Wanapat M. Effects of Phytonutrients on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestibility, and Microorganisms in Swamp Buffaloes. Animals. 2019; 9(9):671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090671
Chicago/Turabian StyleAmpapon, Thiwakorn, Kampanat Phesatcha, and Metha Wanapat. 2019. "Effects of Phytonutrients on Ruminal Fermentation, Digestibility, and Microorganisms in Swamp Buffaloes" Animals 9, no. 9: 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9090671
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
