Next Article in Journal
Effects of Tourist and Researcher Presence on Fecal Glucocorticoid Metabolite Levels in Wild, Habituated Sulawesi Crested Macaques (Macaca nigra)
Next Article in Special Issue
High Prevalence of Bovine Cardiac Cysticercosis in Upper Egypt: An Epidemiological and Histopathological Study
Previous Article in Journal
Microplastics in Seabird Feces from Coastal Areas of Central Chile
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Detection and Epidemiology of Potentially Zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) from Eastern Spain
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/ani13182843
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs in Shanxi Province, North China: From a Public Health Perspective

by
Chang-Ning Wei
1,
Rui-Lin Qin
1,
Zhen-Huan Zhang
1,
Wen-Bin Zheng
1,
Qing Liu
1,
Wen-Wei Gao
1,
Xing-Quan Zhu
1,2,* and
Shi-Chen Xie
1,3,*
1
Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
2
Key Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health of Higher Education of Yunnan Province, College of Veterinary Medicine, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China
3
Research Center for Parasites & Vectors, College of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(18), 2843; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182843
Submission received: 9 July 2023 / Revised: 1 September 2023 / Accepted: 3 September 2023 / Published: 7 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasitic Zoonoses: From a Public Health Perspective)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Blastocystis is one of the most prevalent parasites, which can infect humans and many animal species worldwide, and the infection can result in public health problems and economic losses. Sheep and pigs are economically important animals in Shanxi province, north China; however, it is yet to be determined whether they are infected with Blastocystis. Thus, the present investigation was conducted to reveal the prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in three representative counties in Shanxi province by examining 492 sheep feces and 362 pig feces using a molecular approach. The overall prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs were 16.26% and 14.09%, respectively. Five subtypes were found in sheep and pigs via DNA sequence analysis, of which ST5 was the dominant subtype in the three study counties. This study is the first to report the prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province. The findings not only extend the geographical distribution of Blastocystis but also provide baseline data for the prevention and control of Blastocystis infection in humans and animals in Shanxi province.

Abstract

Blastocystis is a common zoonotic intestinal protozoan and causes a series of gastrointestinal symptoms in humans and animals via the fecal–oral route, causing economic losses and posing public health problems. At present, the prevalence and genetic structure of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province remains unknown. Thus, the present study collected 492 sheep fecal samples and 362 pig fecal samples from three representative counties in northern, central and southern Shanxi province for the detection of Blastocystis based on its SSU rRNA gene. The results showed that the overall prevalence of Blastocystis in the examined sheep and pigs were 16.26% and 14.09%, respectively. Sequences analyses showed that four known subtypes (ST5, ST10, ST14 and ST30) in sheep and two subtypes (ST1 and ST5) in pigs were detected in this study, with ST5 being the predominate subtype among the study areas. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the same subtypes were clustered into the same branch. This study reveals that sheep and pigs in Shanxi province are hosts for multiple Blastocystis subtypes, including the zoonotic subtypes (ST1 and ST5), posing a risk to public health. Baseline epidemiological data are provided that help in improving our understanding of the role of zoonotic subtypes in Blastocystis transmission.

1. Introduction

Blastocystis is a common intestinal eukaryotic parasite that is frequently detected in feces in a variety of hosts, including mammals, reptiles and birds [1,2,3,4]. Up to now, one to two billion people worldwide have been infected with Blastocystis [5]. The prevalence of Blastocystis in most developing nations is higher than that in industrialized countries, which is highly related to socio-economic levels, sanitation infrastructures and geographical areas [6]. The infected hosts show different symptoms according to the host’s susceptibility [7]. After infection, asymptomatic or very mild symptomatic infections occur in most individuals, whereas immunocompromised individuals commonly exhibit gastrointestinal symptoms, such as abdominal pain, vomiting, flatulence and urticaria [8,9]. In addition, some reports have shown that Blastocystis was a possible risk factor for anemia in pregnant women [10], and the key nutrients needed for pregnancy, such as iron, glucose, lipids, proteins and so on, produced competitive effects. This competition may have a devastating effect on the growth and development of the fetus, resulting in bleeding during pregnancy [11]. At present, the pathogenicity of Blastocystis is controversial, and increasing evidence demonstrates that this depends on the interaction with intestinal microbiota, infection subtypes and the host immune response [7]. Previous reports indicated that infectious cysts of Blastocystis could persist in the environment (water and soil) for a long period of time when they were shed with the feces, until infecting the next individual via the fecal–oral route [12,13,14]. The World Health Organization’s drinking water quality publication mentions that Blastocystis is a water-related pathogen [15], indicating that Blastocystis has a significant impact on public health.
Different diagnostic methods for Blastocystis show different levels of sensitivity. Traditionally, detection of Blastocystis depends on light microscopy examination of fecal smears; however, various morphological forms of Blastocystis make diagnosis difficult [9,16]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has been applied to detect the presence and subtype of Blastocystis based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene, because a PCR-based method is more sensitive and specific than microscopic and immunological methods [17,18,19]. Previously, numerous epidemiologic studies on Blastocystis collectively reported that 30 valid subtypes (ST1–ST17, ST21, ST23–ST34) had been detected from humans and animals, of which ST1–4 contributed to over 95% of Blastocystis infections in humans [20,21,22]. ST5 was a frequently identified subtype in hoofed animals worldwide, including pigs and sheep, and considered as a potential zoonotic subtype because it was occasionally detected from farmers that had close contact with animals [23]. ST10 was commonly detected in livestock around the world and, recently, it has been detected in Senegalese school children and Thai adults [24,25]. In addition, enzootic subtypes (ST12, ST14, ST26, etc.) were commonly reported, and their zoonotic potential serves to be evaluated in the future when more data are available.
To date, Blastocystis has been detected in many animals worldwide [19,26]. Sheep and pigs are economically important animals in Shanxi province, north China, and they provide valuable meat and furs to the market. Infection of sheep and pigs with Blastocystis may reduce livestock performance and pose a zoonotic risk [27]. Thus, understanding the transmission characteristics of Blastocystis is of significance to local animal husbandry development and public health. At present, there are no data on Blastocystis infection in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province, except a report on alpacas [28]. This study reports the prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province for the first time, which contributes to understanding the prevalence, subtype distribution and public health implications of Blastocystis in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites

According to the China Statistical Yearbook—2020 (http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/ndsj/2020/indexeh.htm, accessed on 25 September 2020) and the Shanxi Statistical Yearbook—2019 (http://tjj.shanxi.gov.cn/tjsj/tjnj/nj2019/zk/indexeh.htm, accessed on 25 September 2020), fecal samples were randomly collected from sheep and pigs in three representative counties in Shanxi province, north China. In November 2020, a total of 854 fresh fecal samples (492 sheep feces and 362 pig feces) were collected from central, southern and northern Shanxi province, north China (Figure 1). All samples were directly collected from the rectum with a sterile swab to ensure no cross-contamination and placed in a tube labeled with information (area and age), then kept in a box at a low temperature. Next, all samples were transported to the Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, Shanxi Agricultural University, and kept in a −20 °C freezer. Before DNA extraction, each sample was thawed at 4 °C.

2.2. DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

The genomic DNA of each fecal sample was extracted using an E.Z.N.A.® Stool DNA Kit (Omega, Bio-Tek Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and stored at −20 °C until the PCR amplification. The Blastocystis-positive fecal samples of sheep and pigs were determined by PCR amplification of an ~600 bp fragment of the SSU rRNA gene. The primers BhrDR (5′-GAGCTTTTTAACTGCAACAACG-3′) and RD5 (5′-ATCTGGTTGATCCTGCCAGT-3′) were used in this study, as advised in a previous report [29]. Each 25 μL PCR mixture contained 14.75 μL of ddH2O, 2.0 μL of dNTPs, 2.0 μL of MgCl2, 2.5 μL of 10 × PCR buffer (Mg2+free), 0.5 μL of each primer, 0.25 μL of Ex-Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μL) and 2.5 μL of DNA template. The PCR conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles denaturing at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 65 °C for 45 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gels with ethidium bromide (EB), and the positive products were sent to Sangon Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) for bidirectional sequencing.

2.3. Sequencing and Phylogenetic Analysis

The obtained nucleotide sequences were analyzed using the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) on the NCBI website (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi, accessed on 10 December 2022). The representative sequences of each subtype of Blastocystis detected in sheep and pigs in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers ON062964–ON062987 (sheep) and OM859017–OM859041 (pig), respectively. The phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method, and Kimura two-parameter (K2P) genetic distances were also calculated using the software MEGA v7.0.26. A bootstrap with 1000 replicates was used to determine the support for the clades generated [28,30]. The outgroup was set to Proteromonas lacertae (U37108).

2.4. Statistical Analysis

In this study, a chi-squared (χ2) test was used to calculate the statistical difference between the prevalence of Blastocystis and risk factors (region and age) using the software SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Chicago, IL, USA). In addition, the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated to evaluate the correlation strength between prevalence and test conditions.

3. Results

3.1. Prevalence of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs

In this study, 80 out of 492 sheep fecal samples were detected as positive for Blastocystis, with an overall prevalence of 16.26% (80/492) (Table 1). The highest prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep was detected in Qi County (32.99%, 32/97), followed by Shanyin County (22.96%, 31/135) and Jishan County (6.54%, 17/260). Statistically significant difference in prevalence were found among the three areas (χ2 = 42.439, p < 0.001). However, the prevalence of Blastocystis detected in lamb aged less than 6 months (16.11%, 34/211) was only slightly less than that in older sheep aged more than 6 months (16.37%, 46/281); thus, no statistically significant difference was found between the two age groups (χ2 = 0.003, p = 0.939).
Meanwhile, 51 out of 362 pig feces samples were successfully amplified and identified as Blastocystis-positive in the present study, and the overall Blastocystis prevalence in pigs was 14.09% (51/362) (Table 2). In the three study areas, the prevalence of Blastocystis in Jishan County was 19.67% (36/183), higher than that in Qi County (17.65%, 12/68) and Shanyin County (2.70%, 3/111). Among age groups, the prevalence of Blastocystis in pigs aged less than 6 months (18.57%, 44/237) was significantly higher than that in older pigs aged more than 6 months (5.60%, 7/125). Statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of Blastocystis was significantly different among regions (χ2 = 17.31, p < 0.001) and ages (χ2 = 11.37, p < 0.001).

3.2. Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs

In order to better understand the correlation between prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in study areas, 80 Blastocystis-positive sheep samples and 51 Blastocystis-positive pig samples were further sequenced and analyzed. Among the 80 sheep-derived samples, four known subtypes (ST5, ST10, ST14 and ST30) of Blastocystis were identified (Table 3), with the most prevalent subtype being ST5 (n = 40). Notably, ST5 and ST10 subtypes were found in all of the three sampled areas, whereas ST14 was detected in Shanyin County and Jishan County, and ST30 was only detected in Shanyin County. Among the 51 pig-derived samples, two known subtypes (ST1 and ST5) were identified in all of the three study regions (Table 3), and ST5 (n = 47) was the predominant subtype.

3.3. Phylogenetic Analysis

The Blastocystis sequences obtained from sheep and pigs in this study corresponded to the sequences ST1, ST5, ST10, ST14 and ST30 obtained from the GenBank database, while the outgroup was in a single branch (Figure 2). We found that the corresponding ST5 sequence from pigs in the present study was highly similar to that of sheep isolates and human isolates. For example, 100% sequence homology was observed for Blastocystis ST5 between a pig isolate (OM859032) and sheep isolate (ON062966). In addition, the obtained sequence of the ST1 subtype (OM859039) from pigs was highly similar to that isolated from humans (AY618266).

4. Discussion

Blastocystis is an important microorganism, which has been frequently detected in fecal samples from humans and animals worldwide, and the shared Blastocystis STs between humans and animals indicate a potential risk of zoonotic transmission to humans [2]. In the present study, the Blastocystis prevalence in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province were 16.26% (80/492) and 14.09% (51/362), respectively. The Blastocystis prevalence in sheep in Shanxi province was lower than that in Turkey (38.2%, 84/220) [31], the United Arab Emirates (63.6%, 7/11) [32], Italy (81.8%, 9/11) [33], Brazil (33.3%, 1/3) [34], Iran (20.9%, 14/67) [35], and some provinces of China, such as Jiangsu province (24.00%, 18/75) and Shandong province (16.67%, 10/60) [36]. However, the 16.26% Blastocystis prevalence in sheep in Shanxi province was higher than that in Anhui province (6.4%, 22/697) and the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau (8.55%, 53/620) [36,37]. For pigs, Blastocystis was highly prevalent worldwide, with a range of prevalence: 12.00% in Slovakia [38], 45.20% in Cambodia [39], 57.89% in Brazil [40], 76.40% in Thailand [41], 76.70% in Australia [39] and 22.89% to 74.80% in many provinces of China [42,43,44]. The differences in the prevalence of Blastocystis between different studies may be due to sample size, animal immune status and geographical environment [22,45].
In this study, there were significant differences in Blastocystis prevalence in both sheep and pigs among the sampled regions (p < 0.001). With regards to three regions, the highest Blastocystis prevalence in sheep was detected in Qi County (32.99%, 32/97), followed by Shanyin County (22.96%, 31/135) and Jishan County (6.54%, 17/260). The possible factor for high Blastocystis prevalence in Qi County may be its unique geographic location, because it is close to Taiyuan city, the capital of Shanxi province, which has a dense population and the largest transportation network, and high accessibility can easily lead to the spread of pathogens. In addition, different climates may also contribute to the different prevalence of Blastocystis in the three study areas. The Blastocystis prevalence in pigs in Jishan County was 19.67% (36/183), higher than that in Qi County (17.65%, 12/68) and Shanyin County (2.70%, 3/111), and the prevalence of Blastocystis in pigs gradually decreased with increasing latitude (Figure 1). We speculated that the mild and warm climate in the lower latitudes of Jishan County may contribute to the different prevalence of Blastocystis compared to the other study areas. The difference in Blastocystis prevalence between sheep and pigs in the same area may be due to differences in sampling size, managing differences and different husbandry patterns, as well as the different degrees of susceptibility of sheep and pigs to Blastocystis infection.
With regards to the age groups, there was no statistically significant difference in Blastocystis prevalence in sheep (p = 0.939); however, a statistically significant difference was found in pigs (p < 0.001). Our results were consistent with those previously reported in sheep and in pigs [36,46]. The age factor is considered an important factor influencing Blastocystis transmission among animals, but this point is still controversial [47]. A study reported that the higher Blastocystis prevalence in young pigs might be due to their imperfect immune system [46]. However, a high prevalence of Blastocystis was also found in older pigs in different studies [44,48]. Furthermore, host age had no significant effect on Blastocystis infection in a previous study [36]. Therefore, it is difficult to explain the discrepancies in Blastocystis prevalence between different studies.
The phylogenetic tree revealed that all five subtypes were clustered into their corresponding branches of subtypes. Among the four subtypes (ST5, ST10, ST14, ST30) and two subtypes (ST1, ST5) detected in sheep and pigs in this study, respectively, ST5 was the most prevalent subtype in both sheep (50.0%, 40/80) and pigs (92.2%, 47/51). ST5, a dominant subtype generally identified in hoofed animals [44], has also been detected in humans with close animal contact, highlighting its potential for zoonotic transmission to humans [23,49]. Previous reports indicated that ST10 and ST14 were only detected in ruminants [45,50,51]; however, both ST10 and ST14 were recently detected in Senegalese school children and Thai adults [24,25], suggesting that its transmission dynamics warrant further study. At present, the prevalence and subtype characterization of Blastocystis ST30 is still limited, which was only identified in sheep and camel in China since it was detected in deer in the USA for the first time [20,52,53]. The four zoonotic STs (ST1, ST5, ST10, ST14) obtained in this study highlight that both sheep and pigs may play a very prominent role in the transmission cycle of Blastocystis zoonotic subtypes.
Parasitic diseases increase the burden of infectious diseases all over the world to a great extent [54]. The transmission of parasites between humans and animals is an issue of public health and veterinary significance. Animals play a critical role in the One-Health Strategy with regards to the prevention and control of zoonotic diseases [55]. Blastocystis, as a ubiquitous zoonotic parasite with a worldwide distribution [5], will not only cause irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) but also compete with pregnant women for nutrient elements, resulting in bleeding during pregnancy [11]. Although it is still controversial as to the pathogenicity of Blastocystis, the clinical symptoms caused by Blastocystis infection still need to be treated. At present, metronidazole (MTZ) is the drug of choice for Blastocystis treatment, but it does not have a good power to improve gastrointestinal symptoms [56]. Therefore, prevention remains the top priority to control Blastocystis infection. Firstly, other studies have shown that intestinal protozoans can cause zoonotic diseases related to livestock and domestic pets (transmitted from animals to humans) [57], so people in close contact with animals need to take some necessary safety measures, such as hand hygiene and keeping distance with animals [25,39]. Secondly, it is necessary to optimize the breeding environment, especially in terms of fecal cleaning and drinking water safety. Since the fecal–oral route is the principal means of transmission for Blastocystis infection, improving the management of the feeding environment can reduce the risk of infection in the external environment. Finally, steps should be taken to increase the molecular epidemiological surveillance of Blastocystis in humans and animals with low immune function [58]. The above measures can effectively prevent and control the spread of Blastocystis, and then reduce the adverse effects of Blastocystis on public health.

5. Conclusions

This study reported the prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province for the first time. The prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs were 16.26% and 14.09%, respectively. Four zoonotic subtypes (ST1, ST5, ST10 and ST14) and one species-specificity subtype (ST30) were identified according to Blastocystis SSU rRNA sequences, indicating a potential zoonotic transmission risk to humans and other animals. The results of the present study indicate that measures should be taken to reduce the risk of Blastocystis infection in humans and animals.

Author Contributions

S.-C.X., X.-Q.Z. and W.-W.G. conceived and designed the study. C.-N.W., R.-L.Q. and Z.-H.Z. performed the experiments. C.-N.W. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. W.-B.Z., Q.L. and W.-W.G. participated in the collection of fecal samples and implementation of the study. S.-C.X. participated in data analysis. S.-C.X. and X.-Q.Z. critically revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Shanxi Province Excellent Doctoral Work Award—Scientific Research Project (Grant No. SXBYKY2021019), the Research Fund of Shanxi Province for Introduced High-level Leading Talents (Grant No. RFSXIHLT202101), the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” (Grant No. 20211331-13) and the Special Research Fund of Shanxi Agricultural University for High-level Talents (Grant No. 2021XG001). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the results of this article have been submitted to GenBank and the accession number shown in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Falkowski, P.; Gaweł, A.; Bobrek, K. Prevalence of Blastocystis in geese reproductive flocks. Animals 2022, 12, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Higuera, A.; Herrera, G.; Jimenez, P.; Garcia-Corredor, D.; Pulido-Medellin, M.; Bulla-Castaneda, D.M.; Pinilla, J.C.; Moreno-Perez, D.A.; Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M.; et al. Identification of multiple Blastocystis subtypes in domestic animals from Colombia using amplicon-based next generation sequencing. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 732129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Andersen, L.O.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis in health and disease: Are we moving from a clinical to a public health perspective? J. Clin. Microbiol. 2016, 54, 524–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Maloney, J.G.; Molokin, A.; da Cunha, M.J.R.; Cury, M.C.; Santin, M. Blastocystis subtype distribution in domestic and captive wild bird species from Brazil using next generation amplicon sequencing. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2020, 9, e00138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Scanlan, P.D.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis: Getting to grips with our guileful guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Asghari, A.; Sadeghipour, Z.; Hassanipour, S.; Abbasali, Z.; Ebrahimzadeh-Parikhani, H.; Hashemzaei, M.; Alimardani, V.; Hatam, G. Association between Blastocystis sp. infection and immunocompromised patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021, 28, 60308–60328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rojas-Velázquez, L.; Morán, P.; Serrano-Vázquez, A.; Portillo-Bobadilla, T.; González, E.; Pérez-Juárez, H.; Hernández, E.; Partida-Rodríguez, O.; Nieves-Ramírez, M.; Padilla, A.; et al. The regulatory function of Blastocystis spp. on the immune inflammatory response in the gut microbiome. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 967724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Velasquez, J.N.; Astudillo, O.G.; Vittar, N.; Pantano, M.L.; Carnevale, S. Diagnostic features of Blastocystis life cycle forms in the small intestine in an HIV-infected patient. Acta Parasitol. 2022, 67, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shams, M.; Shamsi, L.; Sadrebazzaz, A.; Asghari, A.; Badali, R.; Omidian, M.; Hassanipour, S. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. infection in cattle: A zoonotic concern. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 76, 101650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Espinosa Aranzales, A.F.; Radon, K.; Froeschl, G.; Pinzón, R.Á.M.; Delius, M. Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal parasitic infections in pregnant women residing in three districts of Bogotá, Colombia. BMC Public. Health 2018, 18, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Taghipour, A.; Ghodsian, S.; Jabbari, M.; Olfatifar, M.; Abdoli, A.; Ghaffarifar, F. Global prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections and associated risk factors in pregnant women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2021, 115, 457–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vdovenko, A.A. Blastocystis hominis: Origin and significance of vacuolar and granular forms. Parasitol. Res. 2000, 86, 8–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Moreno, Y.; Moreno-Mesonero, L.; Amoros, I.; Perez, R.; Morillo, J.A.; Alonso, J.L. Multiple identification of most important waterborne protozoa in surface water used for irrigation purposes by 18S rRNA amplicon-based metagenomics. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2018, 221, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cifre, S.; Gozalbo, M.; Ortiz, V.; Soriano, J.M.; Merino, J.F.; Trelis, M. Blastocystis subtypes and their association with Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Med. Hypotheses. 2018, 116, 4–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Attah, A.O.; Sanggari, A.; Li, L.I.; Nik Him, N.; Ismail, A.H.; Meor, T.F.H. Blastocystis occurrence in water sources worldwide from 2005 to 2022: A review. Parasitol. Res. 2023, 122, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Hublin, J.S.Y.; Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M. Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 260–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Stensvold, C.R. Comparison of sequencing (barcode region) and sequence-tagged-site PCR for Blastocystis subtyping. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wawrzyniak, I.; Poirier, P.; Viscogliosi, E.; Dionigia, M.; Texier, C.; Delbac, F.; Alaoui, H.E. Blastocystis, an unrecognized parasite: An overview of pathogenesis and diagnosis. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2013, 1, 167–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Clark, C.G.; van der Giezen, M.; Alfellani, M.A.; Stensvold, C.R. Recent developments in Blastocystis research. Adv. Parasitol. 2013, 82, 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  20. Maloney, J.G.; Jang, Y.; Molokin, A.; George, N.S.; Santin, M. Wide genetic diversity of Blastocystis in white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) from Maryland, USA. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Baek, S.; Maloney, J.G.; Molokin, A.; George, N.S.; Cortés Vecino, J.A.; Santin, M. Diversity of Blastocystis subtypes in horses in Colombia and identification of two new subtypes. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Pre-empting Pandora’s Box: Blastocystis subtypes revisited. Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Current status of Blastocystis: A personal view. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 763–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Jinatham, V.; Maxamhud, S.; Popluechai, S.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Gentekaki, E. Blastocystis one health approach in a rural community of northern Thailand: Prevalence, subtypes and novel transmission routes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 746340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Khaled, S.; Gantois, N.; Ly, A.T.; Senghor, S.; Even, G.; Dautel, E.; Dejager, R.; Sawant, M.; Baydoun, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; et al. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Senegalese school children. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Martinez-Hernandez, F.; Martinez-Ibarra, J.A.; Lopez-Escamilla, E.; Villanueva-Garcia, C.; Muñoz-Garcia, C.I.; Rendon-Franco, E.; Maravilla, P.; Villalobos, G. Molecular genotyping of Blastocystis spp. in wild mammals from Mexico. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, J.; Fu, Y.; Bian, X.; Han, H.; Dong, H.; Zhao, G.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, L. Molecular identification and genotyping of Blastocystis sp. in sheep and goats from some areas in Inner Mongolia, northern China. Parasitol. Int. 2023, 94, 102739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Y.T.; Liu, Q.; Xie, S.C.; Li, X.D.; Ma, Y.Y.; Li, T.S.; Gao, W.W.; Zhu, X.Q. Prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in alpacas, Vicugna pacos in Shanxi Province, China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scicluna, S.M.; Tawari, B.; Clark, C.G. DNA barcoding of Blastocystis. Protist 2006, 157, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 1980, 16, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Onder, Z.; Yildirim, A.; Pekmezci, D.; Duzlu, O.; Pekmezci, G.Z.; Ciloglu, A.; Simsek, E.; Kokcu, N.D.; Yetismis, G.; Ercan, N.; et al. Molecular identification and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in farm and pet animals in Turkey. Acta Trop. 2021, 220, 105939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. AbuOdeh, R.; Ezzedine, S.; Madkour, M.; Stensvold, C.R.; Samie, A.; Nasrallah, G.; AlAbsi, E.; ElBakri, A. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis from diverse animals in the United Arab Emirates. Protist 2019, 170, 125679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gabrielli, S.; Palomba, M.; Furzi, F.; Brianti, E.; Gaglio, G.; Napoli, E.; Rinaldi, L.; Alburqueque, R.A.; Mattiucci, S. Molecular subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolated from farmed animals in southern Italy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Moura, R.G.F.; Oliveira-Silva, M.B.; Pedrosa, A.L.; Nascentes, G.A.N.; Cabrine-Santos, M. Occurrence of Blastocystis spp. in domestic animals in Triangulo Mineiro area of Brazil. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2018, 51, 240–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rostami, M.; Fasihi-Harandi, M.; Shafiei, R.; Aspatwar, A.; Derakhshan, F.K.; Raeghi, S. Genetic diversity analysis of Blastocystis subtypes and their distribution among the domestic animals and pigeons in northwest of Iran. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 86, 104591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, W.C.; Wang, K.; Gu, Y. Occurrence of Blastocystis sp. and Pentatrichomonas hominis in sheep and goats in China. Parasit. Vectors 2018, 11, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Chang, Y.; Yan, Y.; Han, H.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Ning, C.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, L. Prevalence of Blastocystis infection in free-range Tibetan sheep and Tibetan goats in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China. One Health 2021, 13, 100347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Danišová, O.; Valenčáková, A. First detection of Blastocystis sp. in pigs in Slovakia and in Europe. Parasitol. Int. 2021, 81, 102235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, W.; Owen, H.; Traub, R.J.; Cuttell, L.; Inpankaew, T.; Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in pigs and their in-contact humans in southeast Queensland, Australia, and Cambodia. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 203, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zanetti, A.S.; de Barros, L.F.; de Araújo, M.S.; Garcia, H.A.; Aguiar, D.M.; Espinosa, O.A.; Malheiros, A.F. Diversity and prevalence of intestinal parasites of zoonotic potential in animal hosts from different biomes in the central region of Brazil. Ann. Parasitol. 2021, 67, 95–105. [Google Scholar]
  41. Thathaisong, U.; Worapong, J.; Mungthin, M.; Tan-Ariya, P.; Viputtigul, K.; Sudatis, A.; Noonai, A.; Leelayoova, S. Blastocystis isolates from a pig and a horse are closely related to Blastocystis hominis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 967–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, P.; Li, S.; Zou, Y.; Hong, Z.W.; Wang, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Song, D.P.; Chen, X.Q. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis sp. in diarrheic pigs in southern China. Pathogens 2021, 10, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Han, J.Q.; Li, Z.; Zou, Y.; Pu, L.H.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zou, F.C.; Huang, C.Q. Prevalence, molecular characterization and risk factors of Blastocystis sp. from farmed pigs in Yunnan Province, southwestern China. Acta Parasitol. 2020, 65, 1005–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, J.K.; Hu, R.S.; Fan, X.C.; Wang, S.S.; Zhang, H.J.; Zhao, G.H. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis from pigs in Shaanxi Province of China. Acta Trop. 2017, 173, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aynur, Z.E.; Güçlü, Ö.; Yıldız, İ.; Aynur, H.; Ertabaklar, H.; Bozdoğan, B.; Ertuğ, S. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis in cattle in Turkey. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1055–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Navarro, C.; Domínguez-Márquez, M.V.; Garijo-Toledo, M.M.; Vega-García, S.; Fernández-Barredo, S.; Pérez-Gracia, M.T.; García, A.; Borrás, R.; Gómez-Muñoz, M.T. High prevalence of Blastocystis sp. in pigs reared under intensive growing systems: Frequency of ribotypes and associated risk factors. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 153, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Abdulsalam, A.M.; Ithoi, I.; Al-Mekhlafi, H.M.; Khan, A.H.; Ahmed, A.; Surin, J.; Mak, J.W. Prevalence, predictors and clinical significance of Blastocystis sp. in Sebha, Libya. Parasit. Vectors 2013, 6, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zou, Y.; Yang, W.B.; Zou, F.C.; Lin, R.Q.; Zhu, X.Q.; Hou, J.L. Molecular detection and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in farmed pigs in southern China. Microb. Pathog. 2021, 151, 104751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yan, Y.; Su, S.; Ye, J.; Lai, X.; Lai, R.; Liao, H.; Chen, G.; Zhang, R.; Hou, Z.; Luo, X. Blastocystis sp. subtype 5: A possibly zoonotic genotype. Parasitol. Res. 2007, 101, 1527–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fayer, R.; Santin, M.; Macarisin, D. Detection of concurrent infection of dairy cattle with Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Enterocytozoon by molecular and microscopic methods. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, W.; Tao, W.; Gong, B.; Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Song, M.; Lu, Y.; Li, W. First report of Blastocystis infections in cattle in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 246, 38–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Lai, P.; Li, Y.; Song, J.; Qi, M.; Zhao, G. Molecular characterization of Blastocystis sp. in Camelus bactrianus in northwestern China. Animals 2021, 11, 3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Yang, F.; Gou, J.M.; Yang, B.K.; Du, J.Y.; Yao, H.Z.; Ren, M.; Lin, Q. Prevalence and subtype distribution of Blastocystis in Tibetan sheep in Qinghai Province, northwestern China. Protist 2023, 174, 125948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Fletcher, S.M.; Stark, D.; Harkness, J.; Ellis, J. Enteric protozoa in the developed world: A public health perspective. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2012, 25, 420–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shams, M.; Asghari, A.; Baniasad, M.; Shamsi, L.; Sadrebazzaz, A. Blastocystis sp. in small ruminants: A universal systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Parasitol. 2022, 67, 1073–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cobuccio, L.G.; Laurent, M.; Gardiol, C.; Wampfler, R.; Poppert, S.; Senn, N.; Eperon, G.; Genton, B.; Locatelli, I.; de Vallière, S. Should we treat Blastocystis sp.? A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized pilot trial. J. Travel. Med. 2023, 30, taac143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Liu, X.; Ge, Y.; Wang, R.; Dong, H.; Yang, X.; Zhang, L. First report of Blastocystis infection in Pallas’s squirrels (Callosciurus erythraeus) in China. Vet. Res. Commun. 2021, 45, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Asghari, A.; Hassanipour, S.; Hatam, G. Comparative molecular prevalence and subtypes distribution of Blastocystis sp. a potentially zoonotic infection isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta. Parasitol. 2021, 66, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 13 02843 g001
Figure 1. Sampling sites of sheep and pig feces in Shanxi province, north China. The map is based on the standard map service system of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, drawing review number GS (2019) 1822.
Figure 1. Sampling sites of sheep and pig feces in Shanxi province, north China. The map is based on the standard map service system of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, drawing review number GS (2019) 1822.
Animals 13 02843 g001
Animals 13 02843 g002
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Blastocystis subtypes based on SSU rRNA sequences. Obtained Blastocystis sequences from sheep and pigs in the present study are marked with black triangle (▲) and black circle (●), respectively. The bootstrap value < 50% is hidden.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships of Blastocystis subtypes based on SSU rRNA sequences. Obtained Blastocystis sequences from sheep and pigs in the present study are marked with black triangle (▲) and black circle (●), respectively. The bootstrap value < 50% is hidden.
Animals 13 02843 g002
Table 1. Factors associated with prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep in Shanxi province.
Table 1. Factors associated with prevalence of Blastocystis in sheep in Shanxi province.
FactorCategoryNo. TestedNo. PositivePrevalence% (95% CI)OR (95% CI)p-Value
RegionQi County973232.99 (23.63–42.35)7.04 (3.68–13.46)p < 0.001
Shanyin County1353122.96 (15.87–30.06)4.26 (2.26–8.04)
Jishan County260176.54 (3.53–9.54)1
Age≤6 M2113416.11 (11.15–21.07)1p = 0.939
>6 M2814616.37 (12.04–20.70)1.02 (0.63–1.65)
Total 4928016.26 (13.00–19.52)
M: month.
Table 2. Factors associated with prevalence of Blastocystis in pigs in Shanxi province.
Table 2. Factors associated with prevalence of Blastocystis in pigs in Shanxi province.
FactorCategoryNo. TestedNo. PositivePrevalence% (95% CI)OR (95% CI)p-Value
RegionQi County681217.65 (8.59–26.71)7.71 (2.09–28.47)p < 0.001
Shanyin County11132.70 (0–5.72)1
Jishan County1833619.67 (13.91–25.43)8.82 (2.65–29.38)
Age≤6 M2374418.57 (13.62–23.52)3.84 (1.68–8.81)p < 0.001
>6 M12575.60 (1.57–9.63)1
Total 3625114.09 (10.50–17.67)
M: month.
Table 3. Prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province.
Table 3. Prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis in sheep and pigs in Shanxi province.
HostFactorCategoryNo. Positive/TestedPrevalence (%)Subtype (n)
SheepRegionQi County32/9732.99ST5 (31), ST10 (1)
Shanyin County31/13522.96ST5 (8), ST10 (11), ST14 (11), ST30 (1)
Jishan County17/2606.54ST5 (1), ST10 (13), ST14 (3)
Subtotal80/49216.26ST5 (40), ST10 (25), ST14 (14), ST30 (1)
PigRegionQi12/6817.65ST5 (11), ST1 (1)
Shanyin3/1112.70ST5 (2), ST1 (1)
Jishan36/18319.67ST5 (34), ST1 (2)
Subtotal51/36214.09ST5(47), ST1(4)
Total131/85415.34ST5 (87), ST10 (25), ST14 (14), ST1(4), ST30 (1)
ST: subtype.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wei, C.-N.; Qin, R.-L.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Zheng, W.-B.; Liu, Q.; Gao, W.-W.; Zhu, X.-Q.; Xie, S.-C. Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs in Shanxi Province, North China: From a Public Health Perspective. Animals 2023, 13, 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182843

AMA Style

Wei C-N, Qin R-L, Zhang Z-H, Zheng W-B, Liu Q, Gao W-W, Zhu X-Q, Xie S-C. Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs in Shanxi Province, North China: From a Public Health Perspective. Animals. 2023; 13(18):2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182843

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wei, Chang-Ning, Rui-Lin Qin, Zhen-Huan Zhang, Wen-Bin Zheng, Qing Liu, Wen-Wei Gao, Xing-Quan Zhu, and Shi-Chen Xie. 2023. "Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Blastocystis in Sheep and Pigs in Shanxi Province, North China: From a Public Health Perspective" Animals 13, no. 18: 2843. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13182843

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop