Next Article in Journal
Computed Tomographic and Histopathologic Studies of Lung Function Immediately Post Natum in Canine Neonates
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of a Forefront Weight Scale from an Automated Calf Milk Feeder for Holstein and Crossbred Dairy and Dairy–Beef Calves
Previous Article in Journal
Thinking with Civets: The Role of Zoos in the Decolonisation of Animal Tourism
Previous Article in Special Issue
Inter-Rater Reliability of Scoring Systems for Abomasal Lesions in Quebec Veal Calves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality, the Failure of Transfer of Passive Immunity, and the Impact on Calf Health in the First Three Weeks of Life

by
Katharina Lichtmannsperger
1,*,†,
Christina Hartsleben
1,†,
Magdalena Spöcker
1,
Nicole Hechenberger
2,
Alexander Tichy
3 and
Thomas Wittek
1
1
Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University Clinic for Ruminants, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
2
Animal Health Service Salzburg, Bundesstraße 6, 5071 Wals-Siezenheim, Austria
3
Department for Biomedical Sciences, Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Platform, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinaerplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors should be considered as joint first authors.
Animals 2023, 13(11), 1740; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111740
Submission received: 8 May 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 24 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Calf Health and Performance)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Calves rely on passive immunization with significant quantities of high-quality colostrum within the first few hours of life. If immunoglobulin transfer after birth fails, calves face the failure of transfer of passive immunity. FTPI has been known to lead to high morbidity and mortality rates. Therefore, FTPI constitutes a major animal welfare issue. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the factors associated with colostrum quality and FTPI in calves from dairy farms in Austria and to assess the associations between disease occurrence and FTPI. The number of lactations of the dam and the time lag between parturition and colostrum harvest were significantly associated with low colostrum quality. Colostrum quantity and colostrum quality were factors significantly associated with FTPI. Calf morbidity rates, especially for diarrhea, were significantly associated with FTPI. The present investigation underlines the importance of improving farmers’ awareness of colostrum management, especially of the most substantial factors, including colostrum quality and colostrum quantity; it further elucidates the consequences of FTPI for disease occurrence.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate factors associated with colostrum quality and FTPI in calves from dairy farms in Austria and to assess the associations between disease occurrence and FTPI in calves. In total, 250 calves and their colostrum samples originating from 11 dairy farms were included in the study. All calves born between September 2021 and September 2022 were included. Blood samples were collected between the third and the sixth day of age. The farmers were trained in disease detection and recorded any health events within the first three weeks of age daily. Multiparous cows (>3 lactation) and colostrum harvesting within the first 2 hours after parturition were significantly associated with good colostrum quality (>22% Brix). Colostrum quantity (≥2 L) and quality (≥22% Brix) acted as protective factors against FTPI (serum Brix ≥ 8.4%) with odds ratios of OR = 0.41 and OR = 0.26, respectively. Calves facing any health event (diarrhea, navel illness, bovine respiratory disease, abnormal behavior) in the first three weeks of life had a higher probability of FTPI. Calves exhibiting diarrhea in the first 3 weeks of life were associated with having FTPI (OR = 2.69). The results confirm the current recommendations for good colostrum management practices and the impact of FTPI on calf morbidity.

1. Introduction

Calves rely on passive immunity based on immunoglobulins (IgGs) originating from the colostrum, since the cotyledonary synepitheliochorial placenta type of cows acts as a barrier for immunoglobulin transfer during pregnancy [1]. Feeding with sufficient quantities of high-quality colostrum immediately after birth is the most important protective factor in preventing calves from suffering from the failure of transfer of passive immunity (FTPI) [1]. Additionally, the colostrum contains many other essential constituents, for instance, growth factors, hormones, antimicrobial factors, leucocytes, oligosaccharides, mRNA, and nutrients; the actual role of all these constituents is not yet clearly understood [1]. High-quality colostrum is defined as having high immunoglobulin concentrations (≥50 g/L) and low bacterial contamination (total plate counts < 100,000 cfu/mL; coliform counts < 10,000 cfu/mL) [1,2,3]. Feeding with low-quality colostrum (<50 g/L) is known to be one of the factors significantly associated with FTPI, with an odds ratio of 10.7 (OR = 10.7, 95% confidence interval CI = 4.7–24.2) [4]. The apparent efficiency of immunoglobulin absorption tends to be higher in colostrum with lower levels of bacterial contamination [5]. Additionally, calves fed a second colostrum meal were less likely to suffer from FTPI. Of the 4336 investigated calves, 9.4% of those that received two meals of colostrum experienced FTPI and 22.2% of the calves that received one meal of colostrum experienced FTPI [6]. The definition of FTPI is a serum IgG level below 10 mg/mL, which is equal to serum Brix levels of 8.4% [7,8,9]. In a meta-analysis of the consequences of FTPI, the adjusted risks (95% CI) for mortality, bovine respiratory disease (BRD), diarrhea, and overall morbidity in the case of FTPI were 2.12 (1.43–3.13), 1.75 (1.50–2.03), 1.51 (1.05–2.17) and 1.91 (1.63–2.24), respectively [10]. A study from Germany noted that calf mortality rates (definition of calf mortality: 2 days to 6 months of age) of above 5% were reported on farms with more than 25% of the calves suffering from FTPI [11]. A study from New Zealand including pasture-based dairy systems also detected greater odds of farmer-recorded animal health events (OR = 1.68) in calves with FTPI [12]. Besides the fact that FTPI leads to significant economic losses due to high morbidity and high mortality, it constitutes a severe animal welfare issue [13]. Studies from different countries show that FTPI occurs frequently, and the number of calves affected with FTPI differs substantially between studies. For instance, 14.1% of the included calves were affected in a study from Scotland (N included farms = 38, N included calves = 370), 27.0% in Germany (2 farms; 216 calves), 33.0% in New Zealand (107 farms; 3819 calves), 43.5% in Switzerland (141 farms; 373 calves), 41.9% in Australia (23 farms; 253 calves), and 19.2% in the USA (413 farms; 2030 calves) [4,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Low colostrum quality is one of the major risk factors associated with FTPI; it is influenced by multiple factors, which can be partially influenced by the farmer through management. Such management-related factors include the time lag between parturition and colostrum harvest, the presence of the dam during colostrum harvest, colostrum storage procedure, and heat treatment of the colostrum [20,21,22,23]. Cow-related factors, such as the number of lactations, genetic parameters, dry period length, ante-partum milk leakage, colostrum quantity, the metabolic status of the cow, and udder health have been noted to influence colostrum quality [4,24,25,26,27,28]. Environmental factors, such as the season of calving and the temperature–humidity index, have been proven to have an impact. There are contradictory results regarding immunoglobulin concentrations, whereas other factors (e.g., management-related and cow-related factors) seem to have stronger effects [26,29].
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the factors associated with colostrum quality and serum Brix values in calves from dairy farms in Austria and to assess whether calf diarrhea, navel illness, and BRD are associated with FTPI within the first three weeks of life.
We hypothesized that (1) multiple factors are associated with a low colostrum quality and (2) a low serum Brix level and (3) that calves experiencing diarrhea, navel illness, and/or BRD have a higher probability of exhibiting FTPI.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Committee (ETK) of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, and the Austrian national authorities, according to § 26 of the Tierversuchsgesetz 2012—TVG 2012 (GZ.: 2021-0.644.875).

2.2. Farm and Animal Selection

In total, 11 farms in the Austrian federal district of Salzburg volunteered to take part in the study; 250 calves born between 17 September 2021 and 30 September 2022 and their corresponding colostrum samples were included in the study. None of the included farms performed any kind of heat treatment procedure, such as colostrum pasteurization. Additionally, the farms did not use any kind of colostrum replacer.

2.3. Cows

In total, 250 cows were included; of these cows, 213 (85.2%) were healthy throughout the whole dry period and at calving and 11 cows (4.4%) showed a disease before/at parturition. Additionally, 2 (0.8%) of the 250 cows suffered from acute mastitis during the dry period, 1 cow (0.4%) showed retained fetal membranes, 7 (2.8%) suffered from clinical hypocalcemia, and 1 cow suffered from moderate lameness (0.4%). Moreover, 21 cows received a prophylactic treatment with an oral calcium bolus or a Vitamin D3 injection in combination with oral calcium (N = 8). The cows were grouped as suffering from disease during the dry period or at calving (“disease yes”) or not (“disease no”). In total, 15 cows received a vaccination against bovine rota-/corona virus and E. coli and 15 cows were vaccinated against a herd-specific salmonella strain. Of the 53 animals (10.0%) showing ante-partum milk leakage, 22 (41.5%) were primiparous cows, 17 (32.1%) received intramammary antibiotics, 4 received an internal teat sealant (ITS) (7.6%), 1 (1.9%) received no medication, and 9 (17.0%) received intramammary antibiotics and an additional ITS, respectively. Ante-partum milk leakage was defined as colostrum leakage during parturition and/or immediately before the first colostrum harvest after calving. Calving assistance was categorized according to three categories: (1) normal calving, i.e., spontaneous delivery with no assistance, (2) assisted calving, with one person assisting at the calving, (3) severe, with >1 person assisting at the calving and/or a vet being consulted.

2.4. Calves

All 250 calves were separated from their mothers within 1 hour of birth. The breeds were Simmental (N = 118; 59.3% female and 40.7% male), Pinzgauer (N = 65; 33.9% female and 66.1% male), and cross-breed calves (N = 44; 45.4% female and 54.6% male). All calves underwent a physical examination on the day of the blood sample collection (3rd to 6th days of age); details of the blood sample collection are summarized in Section 2.6. The time point of the blood sample collection was restricted to 3 to 6 days of age, as described elsewhere (7). The results from the physical examination included a general assessment (general behavior, posture, body condition scoring, hair, skin turgor, and mucus membranes), navel, lung, heart, and abdominal assessments (including auscultation), and a fecal assessment. The detailed assessment methods are summarized in Section 2.7.

2.5. Colostrum Quality Assessment

2.5.1. Colostrum Brix Measurements

Following calving, the colostrum was routinely harvested (via a milking machine or hand milking) by the farmers. Subsequently, the colostrum was collected at the point of calf feeding. For example, for farmers feeding the colostrum using a feeding bucket, the sample was collected directly from the feeding bucket. One sterile 15 mL tube was filled with colostrum with the collector wearing disposable gloves. The colostrum sample was immediately frozen at −20 °C at the farm. All colostrum samples were transported frozen on ice in a polystyrene box to the diagnostic laboratory of the University Clinic for Ruminants, Vienna. In the lab, all samples were thawed in the refrigerator at 5–7 °C and vortexed for 5–10 s (VF2®, IKA®-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen,, Germany). Subsequently, the Brix refractometer (0 to 85% Brix; HM-DREF-1®, Hebesberger Messtechnik, Neuhofen, Austria) was calibrated using deionized water. Calibration was carried out routinely at the beginning of the analysis and following the measurement of 10 colostrum samples. After calibration, the colostrum was pipetted onto the prism using a 1-way 2 mL plastic pipette. The Brix percentage was recorded. In total, 245 of the 250 colostrum samples could be measured, and 5 samples were excluded due to technical reasons (i.e., error message on the refractometer).

2.5.2. Bacterial Contamination

Bacterial contamination was assessed in the diagnostic laboratory of the University Clinic for Ruminants, Vienna. Bacterial contamination was assessed using cut-off values of 100,000 colony-forming units (cfu) per ml and 10,000 cfu/mL for total plate counts (TPC) and coliform counts, respectively (2). In brief, the colostrum samples were thawed in the refrigerator at 5–7 °C and vortexed for 5–10 s (VF2®, IKA®-Werke GmbH & Co. KG, Staufen, Germany). A 1:10 dilution series using 900 µL of sterile 0.9% physiological sodium chloride solution (B. Braun Melsungen AG, Melsungen, Germany) and 100 µL of native colostrum or the corresponding dilution was prepared in 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes. Subsequently, 100 µL of native colostrum (1:10) and dilution 1 (1:100) and dilution 2 (1:1000) was pipetted on the Columbia agar plates (containing 5% sheep blood) to assess the TPC. Additionally, 100 µL of the native colostrum (1:10) and dilution 1 (1:100) was plated on MacConkey agar for coliform counts. All agar plates were incubated under aerobic conditions at 37 °C for 18–24 h. Photographs were taken of all agar plates and the colonies were counted using the free available Fiji Software (Fiji®, ImageJ). All visible colonies on the Columbia agar were counted. If the cfu levels were above 300 cfu/plate, the colostrum sample was investigated a second time after an additional dilution step (1:10,000). If the total number of colonies per plate still exceeded 300 cfu/plate; the sample was not further investigated and was considered to be non-assessable (“n.a.”). The cfu levels were multiplied with the respective dilution factor and cfu values were given as the cfu per milliliter of colostrum (cfu/mL). This study was conducted alongside another investigation by our group on colostrum management practices in Austria (Hechenberger et al., unpublished).

2.6. Serum and Plasma Brix Measurements

Serum and plasma samples were collected between the 3rd and the 6th day of age by jugular venipuncture using an 18-gauge needle and a Vacutainer system with serum (clot-activator) and EDTA tubes (Vacuette®, Greiner Bio-One International GmbH, Kremsmünster, Austria), respectively. This investigation was performed together with an evaluation of the point-of-care testing used to test for FTPI under field conditions (Hartsleben et al., under review). EDTA and serum tubes were centrifuged at 1500× g for 10 min at 20–25 °C at the farm of origin (CGOLDENWALL 800D Electric Centrifuge Medical Lab Centrifuge 4000 rpm with CE 6 × 20 mL, Zhengzhou Jin Chen Electronic Technology Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China). Subsequently, the Brix values were determined using a digital Brix refractometer (MA871 Refractometer, Hebesberger, Neuhofen, Austria) under field conditions. FTPI was defined as serum Brix values below 8.4% [7].

2.7. Definition of Calf Diseases

The calves underwent a complete physical examination by a veterinarian before blood sample collection (3rd to 6th days of age, see Section 2.4). A shortened physical examination was carried out by the farmers daily. Before the study, all farmers received individual training from one of the authors (C.H.) on how to perform the shortened physical examination using standard operating procedures (SOPs) and checklists. At least once per day, all calves were examined by the trained farmer. For each calf, an individual “calf card” with checklists was designed and fixed on the box of the respective calf (for details, see Supplementary Materials Figure S1). These calf cards were created by the authors based on the clinical propaedeutics and the calf cards of the Swiss calf health service (Kälbergesundheitsdienst) [30]. Any pathological findings were noted on the calf card as described on the checklists used by the trained farmer. All diseases were graded as mild, moderate, or severe diseases based on the scoring system described elsewhere [30]. For statistical analysis, the disease scoring was dichotomized from three categories (mild, moderate, severe) to two categories (moderate, severe), whereby “mild disease” was changed to “moderate”. Moderate and severe deviations were summarized as “severe”.

2.7.1. Calf Diarrhea

Following the SOPs, defecation was assessed by the farmers for type, frequency, and painfulness. Fecal consistency, color, and odor, the degree of digestion, and foreign matter were evaluated. The farmers noted the fecal consistency. The consistency may be categorized as described elsewhere: firm, soft, mushy, liquid, and watery [30] (pp. 147–148). To simplify and unify the findings, the farmers documented the feces as “firm” (=moderate disease), “mushy” (=moderate disease), or “watery” (=severe disease).

2.7.2. Navel Illness

The umbilicus was assessed extra- and intra-abdominally by palpation. During the physical examination on the 3rd to the 6th days of age by one of the authors (C.H.), any sign of inflammation (swelling/changed consistency, heat, pain) and any signs of an umbilical or inguinal hernia or enlarged umbilical arteries/veins were noted [31]. To create a suitable SOP for farmers, only navel thickness (assessed by palpation) was assessed during the shortened daily physical examinations. As described in the clinical propaedeutic, navel thickness was assessed using eight categories [30,31]. For the statistical analysis, the pathological findings were classified as moderate or severe navel illness, defined as two-finger-thick and three-or-more-finger-thick swellings, respectively.

2.7.3. Bovine Respiratory Disease

As described in the SOPs, farmers assessed respiration by counting respiratory rates, coughing, and/or nasal discharge. Physiological respiration was defined as 20 to 40 calm and regular breaths per minute. Pathological changes were classified as follows: fast and shallow breathing (40 to 50 times per minute) was defined as moderate disease, very fast breathing, almost panting, and/or respiratory distress was defined as severe disease [30] (pp. 118–121). Coughing was divided into sporadic coughs (moderate disease) and intermittent coughing, which means more than 3 consecutive coughs (severe disease) [30] (p. 113). The quality of nasal discharge was assessed and categorized as serous discharge (moderate disease) if it had a watery, clear, slightly yellowish and/or greyish appearance. Severe disease was defined as viscous mucous that looked opaque and/or purulent discharge showing a yellow color [30] (p. 90).

2.7.4. Abnormal Behavior

Normal physiological behavior was defined as a bright and alert appearance [30] (p. 54). Pathological findings were classified according to three categories defined as follows: mildly depressed/somnolent (moderate disease), moderately depressed/stupor (severe disease), and severely depressed/coma (severe disease). As per these definitions, mildly depressed calves appear dull, apathetic, and sleepy. When walking, slight swaying is observed, and the eyelids are partially closed. Feed and water intake is reduced. Moderately depressed calves lie down determinedly and show markedly sleepy behavior. They can only be roused by very strong stimuli. Calves with severe depression have delayed reflexes and are recumbent, and their respiration is superficial [30] (p. 55).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Data were collected and summarized using Microsoft Excel 2016. Subsequently, the data were transferred to IBM® SPSS® Statistics Version 28 (IBM®, New York, NY, USA) for further statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were carried out and values are shown as the median 25th and 75th percentiles, minimum and maximum, since the Brix values were not normally distributed (p < 0.05, Kolmogorov–Smirnov test including Lilliefors correction). The coded values were labeled and factors that might explain an insufficient immunoglobulin concentration in the colostrum and in the calf serum were investigated using a two-step process. The first step was a binary logistic regression and the second step was a multiple logistic regression searching for statistically significant associations (p < 0.05). The binary logistic regression was carried out using the dichotomous colostral Brix values (>22%; ≤22%) and serum Brix values (<8.4%; ≥8.4%) as dependent variables. The statistical procedure has been described elsewhere [4]. All factors that might influence the outcome were included as covariates. The binary and multiple logistic regression analyses showed odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the different categories of the covariates compared to the defined reference category. If the OR showed results equal to 1 (OR = 1), there was no association between the factor and the outcome. Factors with odds ratios > 1 (OR > 1) were interpreted as factors that were associated with the outcomes (colostrum quality: >22% or ≤22% Brix; serum brix values: <8.4%; ≥8.4%). Factors with odds ratios < 1 (OR < 1) were interpreted as protective factors. The associations between a low serum Brix value, which was defined as FTPI (Brix < 8.4%), and the occurrence of calf diarrhea, BRD, navel illness, and/or an abnormal general behavior were investigated using disease occurrence (healthy, moderate disease, severe disease) as covariates. Case definitions were used as described in Section 2.7. If the OR showed results equal 1 (OR = 1), there was no association between disease occurrence and the outcome (serum Brix values: <8.4%; ≥8.4%). Factors with odds ratios > 1 (OR > 1) were interpreted as factors that were associated with variable outcomes. Factors with odds ratios < 1 (OR < 1) were interpreted as protective factors. The Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness-of-fit function was applied for all analyses. All implemented tests were interpreted as statistically significant if the p value was <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Colostrum Quality

Of the investigated colostrum samples, 140 (57.1%) showed poor colostrum quality of ≤22% and 105 (42.9%) a good colostrum quality of >22% (Figure 1). The median colostrum Brix values were 21.2% (min = 7.3%, max = 35.1%, 25th = 18.5%, 75th = 25.0%). Primiparous cows (N = 71) showed median Brix values of 20.9% (min = 7.3%, max = 32.2%, 25th = 16.4%, 75th = 24.2%). Cows in their second (N = 58) and third (N = 49) lactations showed median Brix values of 20.9% (min = 10.9%, max = 28.3%, 25th = 18.0%, 75th = 24.0%) and 21.1% (min = 13.0%, max = 35.1%, 25th = 18.8%, 75th = 23.5%), respectively. All cows with >3 lactations (N = 66) were summarized and processed as one group and yielded median Brix values of 23.8% (min = 11.9%, max = 31.0%, 25th = 20.5%, 75th = 26.2%).

3.1.1. Explanatory Variables for Colostrum Quality

Binary Logistic Regression

Overall, the median number of lactations was 2.0 (min = 1.0, max = 11.0, 25th percentile = 1.0, 75th percentile = 4.0). The median gestation length (N = 234) was 284 days (min = 262, max = 301, 25th = 280, 75th = 288). The median time lag between parturition and the first milking (N = 248) was 75 min (min = 0, max = 960, 25th = 30.0, 75th = 180.0). The median dry period length, excluding primiparous cows (N = 174, missing information = 1), was 8.0 weeks (min = 5, max = 23, 25th = 7.0, 75th = 12.0). The univariable approach showed that the number of lactations, the dry-off procedure, the dry period length, the time to first milking, and ante-partum milk leakage were significantly associated with colostrum quality. The association between coliform counts and colostrum quality was not evaluated, since all of the 135 investigated colostrum samples were below the threshold of ≤10,000 cfu/mL. Of these, 83 (61.5%) and 52 (38.5%) showed Brix values ≤ 22% and >22%, respectively. The results of the binary logistic regression for colostrum quality are summarized in Table 1.

Multiple Logistic Regression Colostrum Quality

After the exclusion of the primiparous cows (no information on the dry period length and no dry-off procedure available) and missing values, information on 173 multiparous cows was available. The number of lactations (>3 lactations) turned out to be significantly associated with good colostrum quality (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.04–0.73, p = 0.02). The time lag between parturition and the first milking was statistically associated with poor colostrum quality; for details, see Table 2.

3.2. Physical Examination of the Calves

Milk intake was very good, good, moderate, poor, or absent in 215 (86.0%), 21 (8.4%), 8 (3.2%), 4 (1.6%), and 2 (0.8%) calves, respectively. The median body temperature was 38.9 (min = 38.0 °C, max = 40.5 °C, 25th percentile = 38.7 °C, 75th percentile = 39.1 °C) and the median pulse rate was 117 beats (min = 80, max = 200, 25th = 111, 75th = 124). The detailed results of the physical examinations conducted from the third to the sixth day of age are provided in the Supplementary Materials, Tables S1 and S2.

3.3. Serum and Plasma Brix Values

Of the 250 included calves, 93 (37.2%) and 157 (62.8%) showed an insufficient colostrum supply (FTPI) and a sufficient colostrum supply, respectively (Figure 2). The median serum and plasma Brix values were 8.6% and 9.3%, respectively. The serum and plasma Brix values ranged from 6.3% to 11.8% (25th percentile = 8.1%, 75th percentile = 9.3%) and 7.0% to 12.4% (25th = 8.8%, 75th = 10.1%), respectively.

3.3.1. Explanatory Variables for Serum Brix Levels

Binary Logistic Regression

The median time lag between parturition and the first feeding (N = 244) was 100 min, (min = 10, max = 1260, 25th percentile = 45, 75th percentile = 195). The median time lag between the first milking and calf feeding was 15 min (min = 0, max = 660.0, 25th = 10.0, 75th = 30.0). The median quantity of colostrum intake was 2.5 L (min = 0, max = 5.0, 25th = 2.0, 75th = 3.0). The colostrum intake of the bottle-fed calves was categorized by the farmers as good in 221 calves and poor in 15 calves. Additionally, 3 calves were fed using an esophageal feeder and 11 calves stayed with their dam. In total, 234 calves received colostrum from their mother and 15 calves from other sources (a cow other than the mother, frozen colostrum stock), (missing value N = 1). The median TPC was 25,850 cfu/mL (min = 0, max = 3,030,000, 25th = 7000, 75th = 121,500). The association between coliform counts and serum Brix levels was not evaluable, since all of the 136 investigated colostrum samples were within the threshold with ≤10,000 cfu/mL. Of these, 57 (41.9%) and 79 (58.1%) showed Brix values < 8.4% and ≥ 8.4%, respectively. The results are summarized in Table 3. The median coliform counts were 0 (min = 0, max = 2150, 25th = 0, 75th = 10).

Multiple Logistic Regression

After applying multiple logistic regression, the colostrum quality, time to first feeding, and amount of colostrum fed to the calf showed a significant association with low serum Brix levels, indicating FTPI. For details, see Table 4.

3.4. Effect of FTPI on Neonatal Diseases

Of the 250 included calves, 45 calves (18.0%), 44 calves (17.6%), and 25 calves (10.0%) experienced a health event of any kind in the first, second, or third week of life, respectively. Initially, health events (any signs of neonatal disease, as defined in Section 2.7) were summarized on a weekly basis and the associations between disease and FTPI were analyzed (for details, see Table 5). The association between disease occurrence and FTPI was the strongest in the third week; for details, see Table 5. Regarding the investigated neonatal diseases, only diarrhea showed a statistically significant association with an odds ratio of 2.69 (95%CI = 1.52–4.76); for details, see Table 6. For BRD, navel illness, the combination of diarrhea and BRD, and altered general behavior, the occurrence was too low for any statistically significant differences to be determined. When calculating the odds ratios for each week (1st, 2nd, and 3rd) for each disease, only diarrhea showed an association with FPTI. In the first week of life, the OR was 2.26 (95%CI = 1.10–4.65), in the second week it was 2.84 (95%CI = 1.38–5.85), and in the third week it was 4.61 (95%CI = 1.81–11.76), including the healthy calves as the basic category (OR = 1). The onset of severe diarrhea in the second and third weeks of life was particularly strongly associated with FTPI with odds ratios of 6.1 (1.6–23.26) and 16.13 (1.98–125.0), respectively. Detailed information on the associations between the occurrence of neonatal diseases and low serum Brix levels are provided in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S3–S8). In the multiple logistic regression, only the occurrence of diarrhea in the first 3 weeks was statistically significantly associated with a low serum Brix level of <8.4% (OR = 3.3, 95%CI = 1.77–6.13, p < 0.001).

4. Discussion

In total, 250 calves from 11 dairy farms from the federal state of Salzburg (Austria) were included in the study. Of the 245 investigated colostrum samples, 140 (57.1%) showed were of poor quality, with ≤22% Brix. This is similar to the findings from other countries, where poor-quality colostrum has been found in 15.5% to 57.8% [4,14,29] of samples. The aforementioned studies investigated the colostrum samples using radial immunodiffusion (RID). Radial immunodiffusion is currently recognized as the gold standard; elsewhere, it has been noted that cheap and user-friendly indirect measurement methods, such as the digital Brix refractometer, are reliable alternatives for evaluating colostrum and serum immunoglobulin concentrations [15,32,33]. Of the 250 included calves, 93 (37.2%) showed a low serum Brix level of less than 8.4%, indicating FTPI. In plasma, the threshold for FTPI remains higher. An investigation carried out in Germany of the different analytical approaches for assessing FTPI described thresholds of 7.8% for serum and of 8.6% for plasma [15]. The occurrence of FTPI found in this study is comparable to that identified in other investigations, where FTPI was found in between 14.1% and 41.9% of the included colostrum samples [4,14,15,17,18,19]. There are differences between countries and herds regarding the occurrence of low-quality colostrum and FTPI [19]. In the present study, the best farm had 88.5% high-quality colostrum samples (Farm E) and the worst farm had 13.3% (Farm G) high-quality colostrum samples. Similarly, the number of calves showing a sufficient colostrum supply was 84.6% for the best farm (Farm E) and 26.7% for the worst farm (Farm G). It has been shown that individual farm management factors have a significant impact on FTPI frequency. A study conducted in Quebec (Canada) investigated the herd-level prevalence of FTPI in 59 dairy herds (with a minimum of 14 calves included per herd) and described high herd-level variations in the rates of calves experiencing FTPI, ranging between 30% and 100% [34]. A study conducted in Italy included 21 farms (244 calves) and described a within-herd prevalence of FTPI of 20.0% to 71.4% [35]. This underlines the importance of herd-specific evaluations of colostrum management practices.
In the present study, the variation in colostrum quality was high, with minimum levels of 7.3% and maximum levels of 35.1%. Since good colostrum quality acts as a protective factor for FTPI (OR = 0.26), it is essential to test the colostrum’s quality before delivering it to the calf [4]. In an online questionnaire on calf management practices in Austria, only 20.8% of the 1287 included farmers implemented colostrum testing protocols on their farms; of these farmers, 86.1% stated that they perform visual inspection of the colostrum [36]. There is a further need to increase farmers awareness of good colostrum management practices, in which colostrum testing plays an essential role. Another management-related factor proven to be significantly associated with colostrum quality is the time lag between parturition and the colostrum harvest. Harvesting colostrum 2 to 6 h after parturition showed significantly negative effects on colostrum quality in comparison with colostrum harvested within the first 2 h after parturition (OR = 5.29). Colostrum IgG levels have been described to decrease by 3.7% every hour after parturition [20]. Therefore, it is essential to milk the colostrum as soon as possible after birth. The positive effect of cows having more lactations on colostrum quality has been proven in multiple investigations on colostrum management [29]. In the present study, cows in their second lactation showed the worst colostrum quality, which is in accordance with other studies [4,29,37]. The binary logistic regression showed that ITS acts as a protective factor for poor colostrum quality (OR = 0.21). However, in the present study, this factor was not significant in the multiple logistic regression. It can be hypothesized that this might be due to the reduced probability of milk leakage ante partum and/or during parturition. In the present study, the questionnaire solely considered whether the cow experienced milk leakage during parturition and/or immediately before the colostrum harvest. Further studies are needed to investigate whether ITS might improve colostrum quality. It has been proven elsewhere that bacterial contamination of the colostrum has an effect on the apparent efficiency of immunoglobulin absorption and on the probability of calves experiencing pneumonia [5,38]. Only a few of the investigated colostrum samples showed contamination with coliform bacteria; therefore, it was not possible to calculate the effects on colostrum quality. Additionally, the majority of the TPC values were below the published threshold of <100,000 cfu/mL and the comparative groups were too small [2]. Due to resource issues, it was not feasible to investigate 100% of the colostrum samples for bacterial contamination; further work is needed in this field.
Factors such as feeding the calf with high-quality colostrum (>22% Brix) and higher quantities of colostrum (≥2 L) were revealed to be protective factors for calves facing FTPI, yielding odds ratios of OR = 0.16 and OR = 0.25, respectively. These effects have been proven several times by different research groups and are among the most important factors for ensuring a successful colostrum supply [1,39]. Contradictory results were found regarding the time to first feeding where the time lag (>360 min) seem to be protective (OR = 0.21). In total, 51.2% of the calves were fed within the first 2 hours of life, only 37.7% between 2 and 6 h after parturition, and only 11.1% more than 6 h after parturition. The number of calves in the last group was small and the distribution between calves with and without FTPI was unequal. Therefore, this result must not be over-interpreted. The common recommendations for good colostrum management state that the calf should be fed immediately after parturition [1].
In total, the number of calves showing any signs of BRD, navel illness, diarrhea and BRD, and/or an abnormal behavior was low. Therefore, it was not feasible to assess the association between each disease in the first, second, or third week of life. When summarizing any neonatal disease as a “health event”, there was a clear association (OR > 1) between disease occurrence and FTPI. The consequences of FTPI in terms of adjusted risks for diarrhea and BRD were found to be 1.75 and 1.51 in a recent meta-analysis [10]. With the present investigation, we can support the finding that there is a clear association between diarrhea and FTPI, with an odds ratio of 2.69 (1.52–4.76). The findings underline the importance of protecting calves from FTPI to prevent them from contracting neonatal diseases, especially diarrhea. In addition to successful colostrum management, there are multiple management-related, calf-related and environment-related factors that need to be addressed to achieve low on-farm calf morbidity and mortality rates.
In the present study, the farmers showed high levels of commitment and carefully followed the SOPs for physical examinations after receiving detailed training from one of the first authors (C.H.). One of the major limitations of the study was that no sample size calculation could be carried out in advance, since the farms joined the study voluntarily. Therefore, we cannot exclude an over- or under-representation of FTPI. Additionally, the number of calves suffering from pneumonia and navel illness was too low for us to assess the impact of FTPI. Further studies are needed to obtain information on the true prevalence of FTPI in Austria and to further assess the impact of FTPI on neonatal diseases. Brix refractometry was used as a reference method to indirectly test for immunoglobulin concentrations in colostrum and serum. In future investigations, we recommend implementing the RID, which is currently recognized as the gold standard. In consensus with the literature from Austria, there is potential to improve colostrum management on farms in Austria, which could be addressed by the Animal Health Service. Good colostrum management is an indispensable component of raising healthy youngstock. In Austria, vets and advisers should not just focus on the effective transfer of passive immunity in calves but rather focus on achieving excellent passive transfer in calves and further reducing morbidity and mortality [9].

5. Conclusions

Colostrum harvested from cows within 2 hours of parturition and the colostrum from cows with >3 lactations was of a significantly better quality (>22% Brix). In the present study, the colostrum quality (>22% Brix) and the colostrum quantity (≥2 L) were the most important factors in preventing calves from experiencing FTPI. There is a strong association between the occurrence of calf diarrhea and FTPI within the first three weeks of life. Therefore, a sufficient colostrum supply achieving serum Brix levels greater than 8.4% is essential to protect calves from disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani13111740/s1, Tables S1 and S2 show the results of the clinical assessments of the calves between the third and the sixth days of age by a veterinarian (author C.H.) according to the clinical assessment published by Baumgartner and Wittek, 2018. Tables S3–S8 show the results of the binary logistic regression analysis for the first, second, and third weeks of life using FTPI levels as the dependent variable and disease occurrence as covariates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H., K.L., N.H. and T.W.; methodology, C.H., K.L. and T.W.; software, C.H., K.L. and A.T.; validation, C.H., K.L., A.T. and T.W.; formal analysis, C.H., K.L. and T.W.; investigation, C.H. and M.S.; resources, C.H. and T.W.; data curation, C.H., K.L. and A.T.; writing, K.L. and C.H.; writing, reviewing and editing, K.L., C.H., M.S., N.H., A.T. and T.W.; visualization, C.H. and K.L.; supervision, K.L. and T.W.; project administration, K.L., C.H., N.H. and T.W.; funding acquisition, K.L., N.H. and T.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work of the veterinary doctorate student (Mag.med.vet. Christina Hartsleben) was financially supported by the ustrian Association for Buiatrics (ÖBG) and the Austrian Animal Health Service, Salzburg (Tiergesundheitsdienst Salzburg).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics and Animal Welfare Commitee (ETK) of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, and the Austrian national authorities, according to § 26 of the Tierversuchsgesetz 2012—TVG 2012 (GZ.: 2021-0.644.875).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available within the article or in its Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

Open Access Funding by the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Godden, S.M.; Lombard, J.E.; Woolums, A.R. Colostrum Management for Dairy Calves. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2019, 35, 535–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. McGuirk, S.M.; Collins, M. Managing the production, storage, and delivery of colostrum. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2004, 20, 593–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Buczinski, S.; Vandeweerd, J.M. Diagnostic accuracy of refractometry for assessing bovine colostrum quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dairy Sci. 2016, 99, 7381–7394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Reschke, C.; Schelling, E.; Michel, A.; Remy-Wohlfender, F.; Meylan, M. Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality and Effects on Serum Gamma Globulin Concentrations of Calves in Swiss Dairy Herds. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2017, 31, 1563–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gelsinger, S.L.; Jones, C.M.; Heinrichs, A.J. Effect of colostrum heat treatment and bacterial population on immunoglobulin G absorption and health of neonatal calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2015, 98, 4640–4645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Abuelo, A.; Cullens, F.; Hanes, A.; Brester, J.L. Impact of 2 Versus 1 Colostrum Meals on Failure of Transfer of Passive Immunity, Pre-Weaning Morbidity and Mortality, and Performance of Dairy Calves in a Large Dairy Herd. Animals 2021, 11, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Deelen, S.M.; Ollivett, T.L.; Haines, D.M.; Leslie, K.E. Evaluation of a Brix refractometer to estimate serum immunoglobulin G concentration in neonatal dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 3838–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Weaver, D.M.; Tyler, J.W.; VanMetre, D.C.; Hostetler, D.E.; Barrington, G.M. Passive Transfer of Colostral Immunoglobulins in Calves. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000, 14, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lombard, J.; Urie, N.; Garry, F.; Godden, S.; Quigley, J.; Earleywine, T.; McGuirk, S.; Moore, D.; Branan, M.; Chamorro, M.; et al. Consensus recommendations on calf- and herd-level passive immunity in dairy calves in the United States. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 7611–7624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Raboisson, D.; Trillat, P.; Cahuzac, C. Failure of Passive Immune Transfer in Calves: A Meta-Analysis on the Consequences and Assessment of the Economic Impact. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tautenhahn, A.; Merle, R.; Müller, K.E. Factors associated with calf mortality and poor growth of dairy heifer calves in northeast Germany. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 184, 105154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cuttance, E.L.; Mason, W.A.; Laven, R.A.; Phyn, C.V.C. The relationship between failure of passive transfer and mortality, farmer-recorded animal health events and body weights of calves from birth until 12 months of age on pasture-based, seasonal calving dairy farms in New Zealand. Vet. J. 2018, 236, 4–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mee, J.F. Why Do So Many Calves Die on Modern Dairy Farms and What Can We Do about Calf Welfare in the Future? Animals 2013, 3, 1036–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Haggerty, A.; Mason, C.; Ellis, K.; Denholm, K. Risk factors for poor colostrum quality and failure of passive transfer in Scottish dairy calves. J. Dairy Res. 2021, 88, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sutter, F.; Rauch, E.; Erhard, M.; Sargent, R.; Weber, C.; Heuwieser, W.; Borchardt, S. Evaluation of different analytical methods to assess failure of passive transfer in neonatal calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5387–5397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Cuttance, E.L.; Regnerus, C.; Laven, R.A. A review of diagnostic tests for diagnosing failure of transfer of passive immunity in dairy calves in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2019, 67, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cuttance, E.L.; Mason, W.A.; Laven, R.A.; McDermott, J.; Phyn, C. Prevalence and calf-level risk factors for failure of passive transfer in dairy calves in New Zealand. N. Z. Vet. J. 2017, 65, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Abuelo, A.; Havrlant, P.; Wood, N.; Hernandez-Jover, M. An investigation of dairy calf management practices, colostrum quality, failure of transfer of passive immunity, and occurrence of enteropathogens among Australian dairy farms. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 8352–8366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Beam, A.L.; Lombard, J.E.; Kopral, C.A.; Garber, L.P.; Winter, A.L.; Hicks, J.A.; Schlater, J.L. Prevalence of failure of passive transfer of immunity in newborn heifer calves and associated management practices on US dairy operations. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92, 3973–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morin, D.E.; Nelson, S.V.; Reid, E.D.; Nagy, D.W.; Dahl, G.E.; Constable, P.D. Effect of colostral volume, interval between calving and first milking, and photoperiod on colostral IgG concentrations in dairy cows. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2010, 237, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sutter, F.; Borchardt, S.; Schuenemann, G.M.; Rauch, E.; Erhard, M.; Heuwieser, W. Evaluation of 2 different treatment procedures after calving to improve harvesting of high-quantity and high-quality colostrum. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9370–9381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Denholm, K.S.; Hunnam, J.C.; Cuttance, E.L.; McDougall, S. Influence of preservation methods on the quality of colostrum sourced from New Zealand dairy farms. N. Z. Vet. J. 2017, 65, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Mann, S.; Curone, G.; Chandler, T.L.; Moroni, P.; Cha, J.; Bhawal, R.; Zhang, S. Heat treatment of bovine colostrum: I. Effects on bacterial and somatic cell counts, immunoglobulin, insulin, and IGF-I concentrations, as well as the colostrum proteome. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 9368–9383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Cordero-Solorzano, J.; de Koning, D.-J.; Tråvén, M.; de Haan, T.; Jouffroy, M.; Larsson, A.; Myrthe, A.; Arts, J.A.J.; Parmentier, H.K.; Bovenhuis, H.; et al. Genetic parameters of colostrum and calf serum antibodies in Swedish dairy cattle. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2022, 54, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Andrée O’Hara, E.; Båge, R.; Emanuelson, U.; Holtenius, K. Effects of dry period length on metabolic status, fertility, udder health, and colostrum production in 2 cow breeds. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zentrich, E.; Iwersen, M.; Wiedrich, M.-C.; Drillich, M.; Klein-Jöbstl, D. Short communication: Effect of barn climate and management-related factors on bovine colostrum quality. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 7453–7458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Immler, M.; Büttner, K.; Gärtner, T.; Wehrend, A.; Donat, K. Maternal Impact on Serum Immunoglobulin and Total Protein Concentration in Dairy Calves. Animals 2022, 12, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puppel, K.; Gołębiewski, M.; Grodkowski, G.; Solarczyk, P.; Kostusiak, P.; Klopčič, M.; Sakowski, T. Use of somatic cell count as an indicator of colostrum quality. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0237615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gulliksen, S.M.; Lie, K.I.; Sølverød, L.; Østerås, O. Risk factors associated with colostrum quality in Norwegian dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 704–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baumgartner, W.; Wittek, T.; Aurich, C. Allgemeiner Untersuchungsgang. In Klinische Propädeutik der Haus-und Heimtiere, 9th ed.; Enke Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 2018; pp. 50–166. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wieland, M.J. Nabelerkrankungen des Kalbes: Formen, Symptomatik, Therapie und Prognose. Ph.D. Thesis, Tierärztlichen Fakultät der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany, 2010. Available online: https://edoc.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11473/1/Wieland_Matthias-Josef.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2023).
  32. Bartens, M.-C.; Drillich, M.; Rychli, K.; Iwersen, M.; Arnholdt, T.; Meyer, L.; Klein-Jöbstl, D. Assessment of different methods to estimate bovine colostrum quality on farm. N. Z. Vet. J. 2016, 64, 263–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sustronck, B.; Hoflack, G.; Lebrun, M.; Vertenten, G. Bayesian latent class analysis of the characteristics of diagnostic tests to assess the passive immunity transfer status in neonatal Belgian Blue beef calves. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022, 207, 105729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Morin, M.P.; Dubuc, J.; Freycon, P.; Buczinski, S. A herd-level study on colostrum management factors associated with the prevalence of adequate transfer of passive immunity in Québec dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2021, 104, 4914–4922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lora, I.; Barberio, A.; Contiero, B.; Paparella, P.; Bonfanti, L.; Brscic, M.; Stefani, A.L.; Gottardo, F. Factors associated with passive immunity transfer in dairy calves: Combined effect of delivery time, amount and quality of the first colostrum meal. Animal 2018, 12, 1041–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Klein-Jöbstl, D.; Arnholdt, T.; Sturmlechner, F.; Iwersen, M.; Drillich, M. Results of an online questionnaire to survey calf management practices on dairy cattle breeding farms in Austria and to estimate differences in disease incidences depending on farm structure and management practices. Acta Vet. Scand. 2015, 57, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Klein-Jöbstl, D.; Iwersen, M.; Drillich, M. Farm characteristics and calf management practices on dairy farms with and without diarrhea: A case-control study to investigate risk factors for calf diarrhea. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 5110–5119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mellado, M.; Torres, E.; Veliz, F.G.; de Santiago, A.; Macias-Cruz, U.; Garcia, J.E. Effect of quality of colostrum on health, growth and immunoglobulin G concentration in Holstein calves in a hot environment. Anim. Sci. J. 2017, 88, 1327–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Trotz-Williams, L.A.; Leslie, K.E.; Peregrine, A.S. Passive immunity in Ontario dairy calves and investigation of its association with calf management practices. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 3840–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overview of the 245 colostrum samples originating from 11 dairy farms of the Austrian federal state of Salzburg. The colostrum Brix values were categorized as high-quality colostrum (>22%, green color) and low-quality colostrum (≤22%, red color).
Figure 1. Overview of the 245 colostrum samples originating from 11 dairy farms of the Austrian federal state of Salzburg. The colostrum Brix values were categorized as high-quality colostrum (>22%, green color) and low-quality colostrum (≤22%, red color).
Animals 13 01740 g001
Figure 2. Overview of 250 serum samples from calves originating from 11 dairy farms of the Austrian federal state of Salzburg. The serum Brix values were categorized as a sufficient colostrum supply (≥8.4%, no FTPI, green color) and an insufficient colostrum supply (<8.4%, FTPI, red color), respectively.
Figure 2. Overview of 250 serum samples from calves originating from 11 dairy farms of the Austrian federal state of Salzburg. The serum Brix values were categorized as a sufficient colostrum supply (≥8.4%, no FTPI, green color) and an insufficient colostrum supply (<8.4%, FTPI, red color), respectively.
Animals 13 01740 g002
Table 1. Binary logistic regression for factors associated with poor colostrum quality. Poor colostrum quality was defined as a Brix value of ≤22%. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. Odds ratios < 1 were interpreted as protective factors for poor colostrum quality and odds rations > 1 were interpreted as factors associated with poor colostrum quality. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix * (AB, antibiotic intramammary treatment; ITS, internal teat sealant).
Table 1. Binary logistic regression for factors associated with poor colostrum quality. Poor colostrum quality was defined as a Brix value of ≤22%. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. Odds ratios < 1 were interpreted as protective factors for poor colostrum quality and odds rations > 1 were interpreted as factors associated with poor colostrum quality. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix * (AB, antibiotic intramammary treatment; ITS, internal teat sealant).
FactorN Samples TotalBrix ≤ 22%Brix > 22%OR (95% CI)
N Samples% SamplesN Samples% Samples
Number of lactations
1714867.62332.41
2583865.52034.50.91 (0.44–1.90)
3493265.31734.70.91 (0.42–1.94)
>3662233.34466.70.24 (0.12–0.49) *
Missing6
Gestation length
0–279 days371951.41848.61
>280 days19211157.88142.21.30 (0.64–2.63)
Missing21
Ante-partum milk leakage
Yes533769.81630.21
No19110253.48946.60.50 (0.26–0.95) *
Missing6
Diseases during dry period
Yes11654.5545.51
No23413457.310042.71.12 (0.33–3.76)
Missing5
Time to first milking
0–119 min1416546.17653.91
120–359 min725272.22027.83.04 (1.65–5.61) *
≥360 min322371.9928.12.99 (1.29–6.91) *
Missing5
Colostrum harvested
0–3 L1095954.15045.91
4–6 L1046461.54038.51.36 (0.79–2.34)
>6 L291551.71448.30.91 (0.40–2.06)
Missing8
Total plate count
TPC < 100,000/mL1006363.03737.01
TPC ≥ 100,000/mL382360.51539.50.90 (0.42–1.94)
Missing112
Dam vaccination
Yes302273.3826.71
No21511854.99745.10.44 (0.19–1.04)
Missing5
Dry-off procedure
Primiparous cow694666.72333.31
AB926065.23234.80.94 (0.48–1.81)
ITS371129.72670.30.21 (0.09–0.50) *
No medication11545.5654.50.42 (0.11–1.51)
AB+ITS341750.01750.00.5 (0.22–1.16)
Missing7
Dry period length
Primiparous cow704868.62231.41
<8 weeks592847.53152.50.41 (0.20–0.85) *
≥8 weeks1156455.75144.30.58 (0.31–1.07)
Missing6
Table 2. Multiple logistic regression for factors associated with poor colostrum quality. Poor colostrum quality was defined as a Brix value of ≤22%. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. Odds ratios < 1 were interpreted as protective factors for poor colostrum quality and OR values > 1 were interpreted as factors associated with poor colostrum quality. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix * (AB, antibiotic intramammary treatment; ITS, internal teat sealant).
Table 2. Multiple logistic regression for factors associated with poor colostrum quality. Poor colostrum quality was defined as a Brix value of ≤22%. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. Odds ratios < 1 were interpreted as protective factors for poor colostrum quality and OR values > 1 were interpreted as factors associated with poor colostrum quality. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix * (AB, antibiotic intramammary treatment; ITS, internal teat sealant).
OR (95% CI)p Value
Number of lactations
11
20.68 (0.17–2.73)0.59
30.71 (0.18–2.85)0.62
>30.17 (0.04–0.70)0.01 *
Gestation length
0–279 days1
>280 days1.36 (0.28–6.45)0.70
Ante-partum milk leakage
Yes1
No0.70 (0.24–1.99)0.50
Diseases during the dry period
Yes1
No0.35 (0.05–2.26)0.27
Time to first milking
0–119 min1
120–359 min5.35 (1.83–15.63)0.00 *
≥360 min5.43 (1.48–20.00)0.01 *
Colostrum harvested
0–3 L1
4–6 L1.18 (0.46–3.04)0.74
>6 L0.37 (0.09–1.52)0.17
Total plate count
TPC < 100,000/mL1
TPC ≥ 100,000/mL0.57 (0.21–1.50)0.25
Dam vaccination
Yes1
No0.58 (0.17–1.98)0.39
Table 3. Binary logistic regression for factors associated with low serum Brix levels (< 8.4%) indicating FTPI. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *. Assisted calving was defined as one person assisting at calving and severe dystocia was defined as more than one person assisting at calving and/or the vet being consulted.
Table 3. Binary logistic regression for factors associated with low serum Brix levels (< 8.4%) indicating FTPI. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *. Assisted calving was defined as one person assisting at calving and severe dystocia was defined as more than one person assisting at calving and/or the vet being consulted.
FactorN Calves TotalBrix < 8.4%Brix ≥ 8.4%OR (95% CI)
N Calves% CalvesN Calves% Calves
Colostrum quality
≤22% Brix1406949.37150.71
>22% Brix1052120.08480.00.26 (0.14–0.46) *
Missing5
Total plate count
<100,000 cfu/mL1014443.65756.41
≥100,000 cfu/mL381539.52360.50.84 (0.40–1.81)
Missing111
Time to first feeding
0–119 min1254536.08064.01
120–359 min923942.45357.61.3 (0.75–2.27)
≥360 min27622.22177.80.51 (0.19–1.35)
Missing6
Colostrum intake
<2 L432353.52046.51
≥2 L1906132.112967.90.41 (0.21–0.81) *
Missing17
Calving
Unassisted1926433.312866.71
Assistance401845.02255.01.64 (0.82–3.27)
Severe dystocia8562.5337.53.33 (0.77–14.39)
Missing10
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression for factors associated with low serum Brix values (<8.4%) indicating FTPI. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *. Assisted calving was defined as one person assisting at calving and severe dystocia was defined as more than one person assisting at calving and/or the vet being consulted.
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression for factors associated with low serum Brix values (<8.4%) indicating FTPI. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basis category (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *. Assisted calving was defined as one person assisting at calving and severe dystocia was defined as more than one person assisting at calving and/or the vet being consulted.
FactorOR (95% CI)p Value
Colostrum quality
≤22% Brix1
>22% Brix0.16 (0.06–0.43)<0.001 *
Total plate count
<100,000 cfu/mL1
≥100,000 cfu/mL0.81 (0.33–1.96)0.64
Time to first feeding
0–119 min1
120–359 min0.83 (0.33–2.09)0.69
≥360 min0.21 (0.06–0.8)0.02 *
Colostrum intake
<2 L1
≥2 L0.25 (0.08–0.76)0.01 *
Calving
Unassisted1
Assistance2.09 (0.79–5.56)0.14
Severe dystocia3.77 (0.62–23.26)0.15
Table 5. In total, 250 calves were included in the study and any sign of disease, as defined in Section 2.7, was documented for the first three weeks once per day. Signs of diarrhea, navel illness, BRD, and abnormal general behavior, as well as disease combinations, were summarized as “health events” in the binary logistic regression. The odds ratios (OR) were calculated for associations with FTPI (Brix values < 8.4%). Odds ratios were calculated using the basic category = healthy calves (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *.
Table 5. In total, 250 calves were included in the study and any sign of disease, as defined in Section 2.7, was documented for the first three weeks once per day. Signs of diarrhea, navel illness, BRD, and abnormal general behavior, as well as disease combinations, were summarized as “health events” in the binary logistic regression. The odds ratios (OR) were calculated for associations with FTPI (Brix values < 8.4%). Odds ratios were calculated using the basic category = healthy calves (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *.
FactorN Calves
Total
Brix < 8.4%Brix ≥ 8.4%OR (95% CI)
N Calves% CalvesN Calves% Calves
First week
Healthy2057034.113565.91
Health event452351.12248.92.02 (1.05–3.87) *
Second week
Healthy2067034.013666.01
Health event442352.32147.72.13 (1.10–4.11) *
Third week
Healthy2257633.814966.21
Health event251768.0832.04.17 (1.72–10.10) *
First to third weeks
Healthy1685029.811870.21
Health event824352.43947.62.60 (1.51–4.49) *
Table 6. Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out using the serum Brix levels as a dependant variable. The table gives an overview of the associations of diarrhea, bovine respiratory disease (BRD), navel illness, diarrhea and BRD, and abnormal general behavior with a low serum Brix level of <8.4% in the first 3 weeks of life. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basic category = healthy calves (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *.
Table 6. Binary logistic regression analysis was carried out using the serum Brix levels as a dependant variable. The table gives an overview of the associations of diarrhea, bovine respiratory disease (BRD), navel illness, diarrhea and BRD, and abnormal general behavior with a low serum Brix level of <8.4% in the first 3 weeks of life. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated using the basic category = healthy calves (OR = 1) as a reference. All statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are highlighted with an asterix *.
FactorN Calves TotalBrix < 8.4%Brix ≥ 8.4%OR (95% CI)
N Calves% CalvesN Calves% Calves
Diarrhea
Healthy1825630.812669.21
Diarrhea683754.43145.62.69 (1.52–4.76) *
BRD
Healthy2278637.914162.11
BRD23730.41669.60.72 (0.28–1.81)
Navel illness
Healthy2489237.115662.91
Navel illness2150.0150.01.69 (0.10–27.78)
Diarrhea and BRD
Healthy2409137.914962.11
Diarrhea + BRD10220.0820.00.41 (0.09–1.97)
Abnormal general behavior
Healthy2268135.814564.21
Abnorm. behavior241250.01250.01.79 (0.77–4.17)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lichtmannsperger, K.; Hartsleben, C.; Spöcker, M.; Hechenberger, N.; Tichy, A.; Wittek, T. Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality, the Failure of Transfer of Passive Immunity, and the Impact on Calf Health in the First Three Weeks of Life. Animals 2023, 13, 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111740

AMA Style

Lichtmannsperger K, Hartsleben C, Spöcker M, Hechenberger N, Tichy A, Wittek T. Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality, the Failure of Transfer of Passive Immunity, and the Impact on Calf Health in the First Three Weeks of Life. Animals. 2023; 13(11):1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lichtmannsperger, Katharina, Christina Hartsleben, Magdalena Spöcker, Nicole Hechenberger, Alexander Tichy, and Thomas Wittek. 2023. "Factors Associated with Colostrum Quality, the Failure of Transfer of Passive Immunity, and the Impact on Calf Health in the First Three Weeks of Life" Animals 13, no. 11: 1740. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13111740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop