Next Article in Journal
EZ-DripLoss Assessment in Chicken Breast Meat Using Different Sample Areas, Fiber Orientation, and Measurement Intervals
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Assessment of Anticoccidials: Methods and Molecules
Previous Article in Journal
mRNA Expressions of Candidate Genes in Gestational Day 16 Conceptus and Corresponding Endometrium in Repeat Breeder Dairy Cows with Suboptimal Uterine Environment Following Transfer of Different Quality Day 7 Embryos
Previous Article in Special Issue
Torquenema n. g., Wallabicola n. g., and Macropostrongyloides phascolomys n. sp.: New Genera and a New Species of Nematode (Strongylida: Phascolostrongylinae) Parasitic in Australian Macropodid and Vombatid Marsupials
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/ani11041093
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Molecular Characterization of Lipoptena fortisetosa from Environmental Samples Collected in North-Eastern Poland

by
Remigiusz Gałęcki
1,*,
Xuenan Xuan
2,
Tadeusz Bakuła
1 and
Jerzy Jaroszewski
3
1
Department of Veterinary Prevention and Feed Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
2
National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan
3
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(4), 1093; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041093
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 April 2021 / Published: 12 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasites and Parasitic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Lipoptenafortisetosa is an invasive, hematophagous insect, which lives on cervids and continues to spread across Europe. The species originated from the Far East and eastern Siberia. Besides wild animals, these ectoparasites can attack humans, companion animals, and livestock. These insects may also play a role in transmitting infectious diseases. The objective of this study was to confirm the presence of L. fortisetosa in north-eastern Poland and to characterize the examined population with the use of molecular methods. Deer keds were collected from six natural forests in the region of Warmia and Mazury. DNA of L. fortisetosa was extracted and subjected to molecular studies. Two species of deer keds (Lipoptena cervi and L. fortisetosa) were obtained in each location during field research. There were no differences in the sex distribution of these two ectoparasite species. During the research, more L. cervi than L. fortisetosa specimens were obtained. The studied insects were very closely related to specimens from Lithuania, the Czech Republic, and Japan. Our study indicates various ectoparasite lineages, and such research contributes to the improvement of basic knowledge on the distribution, genetic structure, and variability of the invasive ked fly L. fortisetosa.

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed an increase in the population of Lipoptena fortisetosa in Central Europe. The genetic profile of this ectoparasite has not been studied in Poland to date. The aim of the present study was to confirm the presence of L. fortisetosa in north-eastern Poland and to characterize the examined population with the use of molecular methods. Deer keds were collected between June and July 2019 in six natural, mixed forests. A fragment of the rRNA 16S gene was used as a marker to identify L. fortisetosa by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). DNA samples were sequenced in the last step. Six new locations of L. fortisetosa were confirmed. No significant differences were observed in the sex ratios of L. cervi and L. fortisetosa (L. cervi p-value = 0.74; L. fortisetosa p-value = 0.65). Significant differences were noted between the total size of L. cervi and L. fortisetosa populations (p-value < 0.001). The similarity to GenBank sequences ranged from 95.56% to 100%. The obtained nucleotide sequences were very closely related to L. fortisetosa sequences from Lithuania, the Czech Republic, and Japan. Molecular analyses revealed considerable genetic diversity, which could indicate that various ectoparasite lineages have spread throughout Europe.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Deer keds are hematophagous ectoparasites of birds and mammals. The genus Lipoptena consists of 32 species, including L. capreoli, L. cervi, L. depressa, L. mazamae, and L. fortisetosa, which are of great importance in veterinary medicine. Lipoptena fortisetosa has been insufficiently investigated in cervids, despite the Japanese sika deer (Cervus nippon) that is its original host. The parasite also colonizes non-specific hosts, including cattle and humans [1,2]. Deer keds shed wings when they find a definitive host. Hippoboscidae reproduce by adenotrophic viviparity, and their life cycle is influenced mainly by climatic conditions [3,4]. Lipoptena spp. bites are painful and may lead to skin inflammation and alopecia [5,6].
There is evidence to suggest that L. fortisetosa continues to spread across Europe. The species originated in the Eastern Palearctic, in particular, the Far East and eastern Siberia. Lipoptena fortisetosa was first identified in 1965 in Japan by Maa [7]. In Central Europe, this deer ked is considered a cryptogenic species, but it is increasingly classified as an invasive species [8]. Lipoptena fortisetosa was first recorded in Europe in the 1960s [9]. Currently, this insect was spotted in several European countries including the Czech Republic [10], Estonia [11], Italy [12,13], Moldova [2], and Slovakia [14]. This ectoparasite was not detected in Poland during a program monitoring the ectoparasite burden of wild animals in 1973–1980 [15]. In Poland, L. fortisetosa was first observed in the region of Lower Silesia in the late 1980s [16]. Later, in 2007–2012, L. fortisetosa was identified in cervids in northern Poland and in the Tatra Mountains [8,17,18,19,20]. In 2017, this ectoparasite was found even in companion animals in central Poland [21].
Lipoptena fortisetosa is a potential vector of infectious diseases. Deer keds can act as carriers of Bartonella spp., and the vertical transmission of this pathogen poses a particularly serious problem [22,23,24]. In recent research, Bartonella spp. of Japanese origin were isolated from L. cervi in the region of Warmia and Mazury in Poland [22]. According to Szewczyk et al. [22], the isolated Bartonella spp. strain had originated from Japanese sika deer that were introduced to Europe, and it was transmitted to the local environment by various vectors. Molecular studies confirmed that the insects harbored genetic material of Anaplasma phagocytophilum, A. ovis, Borrelia spp., Coxiella-like bacteria, Theileria luwenshuni, T. ovis, and Trypanosoma spp. [25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. Despite the above, little is known about the ectoparasite’s ability to transmit pathogens other than Bartonella spp. to new hosts.
The observed migration patterns of the analyzed ectoparasites suggest that their geographic range should be monitored because of the potential vectorial capacity of this ectoparasite [32]. Salvetti et al. [12] noted that the geographic distribution of deer keds in Europe should be analyzed for social and environmental implications because Lipoptena spp. may cause problems for wildlife management. However, a detailed evaluation of ancestral lineages and migration routes requires larger and more frequent sampling. There is a considerable gap in the genetic distribution of L. fortisetosa between Western and Eastern Europe. Andreani et al. [33] did not detect any obvious and stable morphological and molecular differences in specimens from the geographical areas of Asia and Europe. In Italy, they identified the monophyletic clade of L. fortisetosa, along with two Central European and two Korean haplotypes [33]. These ectoparasites have been largely neglected in Polish research, and potentially important genetic data, including genetic diversity, are scarce. Most Polish studies of L. fortisetosa were based on macroscopic analyses, which is why the genetic and phylogenetic characteristics of the species, including DNA rRNA 16S gene remain unknown. The locations colonized by L. fortisetosa in north-eastern Poland have not been evaluated to date [4]. This Polish region abounds in forests, and it is characterized by increasingly frequent deer ked flights and mass attacks on animals and humans. Differences in sex ratios of host-seeking insects were not investigated in this location. This may be important because of the fact that females are more likely to harbor the genetic material of pathogens [32]. The spread of L. fortisetosa outside of Asia could have been accelerated by the introduction of sika deer to the European continent, whose small but stable populations can be found in the central part of the region of Silesia and in the eastern part of the region of Warmia and Mazury. The aim of this study was to confirm the occurrence of L. fortisetosa in north-eastern Poland and to characterize the specimens collected during host-seeking flights based on the results of molecular analyses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection

The occurrence of Lipoptena spp. was monitored in natural mixed forests in the region of Warmia and Mazury in north-eastern Poland. Ectoparasites were monitored in the following municipalities: Ełk (54°19′10.1″ N 22°22′38.7″ E), Gołdap (54°19′10.1″ N 22°22′38.7″ E), Kolno (53°57′34.3″ N 21°04′46.0″ E), Jedwabno (53°28′24.8″ N 20°34′04.9″ E), Pieniężno (54°15′52.1″ N 20°11′14.2″ E), and Ruciane-Nida (53°35′47.4″ N 21°33′13.3″ E). A detailed map of the surveyed region is presented in Figure 1.
The selected sampling sites are characterized by extensive forests and large cervid populations, including red deer (Cervus elaphus), European roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), and moose (Alces alces). The study was conducted between June and July 2019 between 7 and 10 a.m. This study period was chosen because of a noticeable increase in hippoboscidae activity. The number of Lipoptena spp. individuals was expressed by the sum number of winged deer keds that were captured on the investigator’s clothing per day. Five daily measurements were conducted in each sampling site. A total of 30 measurements were conducted. The investigator walked through the forest wearing brown cotton clothing covering the entire body. Lipoptena spp. were captured immediately after landing on the clothing. During the walk, the investigator checked protective clothing every 20 m and collected insects from creases and folds on the fabric. Keds that escaped were not counted. Similar methods have been used by other researchers to acquire environmental samples of ticks and Lipoptena spp. [34,35]. The collected ectoparasites were placed in individual test tubes containing 70% ethanol.

2.2. Species Identification

The collected samples were transported to the Biological Hazard Laboratory at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn. Species and sex were identified based on morphological features, including body dimensions, wing venation, the length and structure of the palpi, and the number of erect hairs on the mesonotum, under the Leica M165C stereoscopic microscope (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Measurements were performed in Leica Application Suite 4.4 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) based on the taxonomic keys for Lipoptena spp. developed by Borowiec and Maa, and the morphological descriptions provided by Andreani et al. [13,36,37].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The sex ratio of Lipoptena spp. and the number of L. cervi and L. fortisetosa specimens from each measurement were analyzed with Student’s t-test for independent samples. The following statistical parameters were calculated for the analyzed populations of L. cervi and L. fortisetosa using overall data from daily observations (n = 30): mean (M), median (ME), standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE), variance (V), minimum (Min), and maximum (Max). Differences were regarded as statistically significant at p-value < 0.05. Data were processed statistically in Statistica 13.3 (TIBCO Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA, USA).

2.4. DNA Extraction

Five samples of L. fortisetosa (n = 30) from each sampling site were randomly selected for molecular analyses. The representative number of samples was estimated with the use of formulas for computing the minimum sample size to guarantee the reliability of the results (sample size: NP = number of collected specimens, α = 95%, f = 0.5, e = 15%). Keds were air-dried at room temperature for 15 min, and they were crushed with a sterile rod in sterile Eppendorf tubes. Genomic DNA was extracted from each sample with the Sherlock AX kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was eluted in 40 μL of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, and the concentration of the extract was checked in the Nano Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extracted DNA was stored at −20 °C until analysis.

2.5. Polymerase Chain Reaction

The DNA sequence of the mitochondrial DNA rRNA 16S gene of L. fortisetosa with an estimated length of 412-bp was amplified by PCR. The amplification primers were L700F (5′-AAAGTTTAACCTGCCCACTGAT-3′) and L1213R (5′-CTGAACTCAGATCACGTAAGAAT-3′) [22]. The following cycling conditions were applied: initial denaturation at 92 °C for 3 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s; annealing at 60 °C for 10 s; extension at 68 °C for 30 s; final extension at 68 °C for 5 min [22]. Each reaction was performed in a final volume of 25 μL containing 2.5 μL of 10× Standard Taq Reaction Buffer (Biolabs, NC, USA), 0.5 μL of 10 mM deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dNTPs) (Biolabs, USA), 0.5 μL of 10 μM of each primer, 1 μL of Lipoptena spp. DNA template, 0.125 μL of Taq DNA Polymerase (Biolabs, NC, USA), and 19.875 μL of double-distilled water. Double-distilled water was the negative control. Lipoptena cervi DNA extracted during a previous study was the positive control. PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on 2% agarose gel. They were stained with ethidium bromide and visualized in a UV transilluminator.

2.6. Sequencing

After PCR, DNA samples were purified by the ethanol precipitation method described by Weinberger [38]. DNA was sequenced with the use of the described primers (L700F/L1213R) and the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and the results were analyzed in the ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The acquired nucleotide sequences were edited in the BioEdit program [39] and compared with GenBank sequences in the BLAST-NCBI program (attached in result section). Sequences were aligned with the ClustalW algorithm. A phylogenetic analysis of rRNA 16S sequences and the corresponding GenBank sequences was performed by the maximum likelihood method and the Tamura–Nei model in MEGA 10.1.17 [40]. Sequences of L. cervi served as the outgroup. Model selection was based on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC). Bootstrap confidence values for assessing the reliability of branches were calculated in 10,000 replicates.

3. Results

The representative L. fortisetosa sequences were deposited in the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology with the BankIt tool under accession numbers MT182645-MT182661, MT182663.
A total of 482 Lipoptena spp. specimens (M = 80.33; ME = 79.5; SD = 12.39; SE = 5.06; V = 15.43; Min = 61; Max = 96) were collected in sampling sites. Of those, 385 were identified as L. cervi (M = 64.17; ME = 67; SD = 9.26; SE = 3.78; V = 14.43; Min = 47; Max = 72), including 196 females (50.9%) and 189 males (49.1%). No significant differences in the sex ratio were noted in L. cervi (p-value = 0.74). Lipoptena fortisetosa was recorded in all six locations. Ninety-seven individuals were identified as L. fortisetosa (M = 16.17; ME = 15.5; SD = 5.53; SE = 2.56; V = 34.20; Min = 8; Max = 24), including 51 females (52.58%) and 46 males (47.42%). No significant differences in the sex ratio were found (p-value = 0.65). The overall populations of L. cervi and L. fortisetosa from studied locations differed significantly in size (p-value < 0.001). The results are presented in detail in Table 1.
The phylogenetic tree is presented in Figure 2. The length of the alignment used to build the phylogeny was 445-bp. Twenty-eight sequences (MT182645-MT182658, MT182660-MT182661, MT182663) were characterized by 98.32% to 100% similarity with L. fortisetosa sequences from the Czech Republic and Lithuania (MF495939, MN889549). The similarity between sequences MT182659 and the L. fortisetosa sequence from Japan (AB632589) reached 95.56%. Detailed data, including the ID of the closest match, country of origin, and percent sequence identity, are presented in Table 2. The distribution of sequences in each sampling site is presented in Table 3.

4. Discussion

Autochthonous L. cervi accounted for 79.88% of the collected ked samples, which suggests that it is the dominant species in the region of Warmia and Mazury. However, the proportions of Lipoptena species should be regularly monitored in the studied region because of the possible increase in the population of L. fortisetosa. In Europe, L. fortisetosa is considered a multivoltine species, whereas L. cervi is regarded as a univoltine species [8]. The phenomena described above could influence the rate at which these ectoparasite populations develop in the future, and it could increase the number of host-seeking L. fortisetosa. Because of phenological differences between the species, the number of collected individuals can also be influenced by the month of sampling. Both ectoparasites species should be sampled in a period when they are most active. This study demonstrated that adult L. fortisetosa and L. cervi are active in the same period of time, and similar observations were made by Oboňa et al. [14]. Neither species was characterized by significant differences in the sex ratio. In around 30% of ectoparasitic species, the sex ratio does not significantly depart from unity [44]. Adult keds find hosts immediately after emergence. However, the sex ratio of Lipoptena-spp.-inhabiting hosts could differ from that noted in this study because of a potentially shorter life span of adult males [44].
The migration patterns of Lipoptena spp. in Europe have not been fully elucidated, but the geographic range of these ectoparasites was probably expanded by natural migration from the east. It cannot be ruled out that this insect may have been brought to Europe along with imported animals [33]. Lipoptena fortisetosa had been previously identified in only several European countries, including the Czech Republic [10], Moldova [2], and Poland [4,8]. Recent reports from Estonia [11] and Italy [12,13,33] indicate that the geographic range of Lipoptena spp. has expanded both northward and southward since 2017. Andreani et al. [33] suggested that the relatively recent migration of sika or hybrid individuals to Italy from neighboring countries may have contributed to the ectoparasite transmission. There is no conclusive evidence to indicate whether this geographic shift has resulted from an increase in the cervid population or climate change. The impact of global climate change on the geographic expansion of Lipoptena spp. was postulated by Kurina et al. [11]. Keds are poor fliers that cover a distance of only up to 50 m when searching for hosts [45], which is why hosts play an important role in the transmission of these ectoparasites. The presence of L. fortisetosa in highly diverse regions also suggests that these insects are eurytopic species that tolerate a wide range of environmental conditions [4,46].
The importance of Lipoptena spp. in veterinary medicine has not been fully established, which is why these ectoparasites should be studied in greater detail. The existing knowledge about the impact of L. fortisetosa on wild animals is superficial, and these ectoparasites could affect game management in the future. Polish cervids and other wild animals were found to be heavily infested with hippoboscids. Deer keds were detected in 64% of European roe deer [47], 76% of fallow deer, and 78% of European red deer [48]. One animal was infested with 9.9 insects on average [48]. Vikøren et al. [49] found that one moose can carry more than 16,000 keds. Andreani et al. [33] detected infestation of European deer species by L. fortisetosa. The stability of the L. fortisetosa population can be attributed to adaptive genetic variation and the benefits associated with colonizing different cervid species as hosts. These observations point to high plasticity in host selection, which is influenced by the availability and population density of a given host species. For this reason, there are no obvious barriers to the future expansion of the discussed ectoparasites [11,33].
The available GenBank data show that the sequences originating from the Czech Republic or Lithuania (cited in the manuscript) were closely similar to ours. However, the GenBank database contains only several 16S rRNA sequences of European L. fortisetosa. Sequence MT182659, obtained in the present study, was most similar to the sequence originating from Japan (AB632589) [43]. The insect harboring the above sequence was captured in the municipality of Pieniężno where a stable population of sika deer has existed since the beginning of the 20th century. Lipoptena fortisetosa could have been accidentally introduced to that region by sika deer, and a distinct population of these ectoparasites could have evolved over time. Similar conclusions were formulated by Andreani et al. [33] and Mihalca et al. [50]. Interestingly, two Korean haplotypes of this insect were detected in Italy [33]. This confirmed our assumptions. Polish deer keds could belong to an isolated and genetically diverse population. The genetic polymorphism of L. fortisetosa is probably associated with the segregation of haplotypes that are relatively popular in this species, and the stability of the L. fortisetosa population points to the presence of dynamic evolutionary mechanisms.
Similar levels of genetic diversity were reported in a study carried out on L. mazamae [51]. Trout et al. [51] identified six unique haplotypes using 30 DNA sequences of a 259-bp region of the mitochondrial DNA rRNA 16S gene amplified by PCR. Such molecular differences were also reported in other ectoparasites, including Cimex lectularius, tsetse flies (Glossina spp.), and ticks [52,53,54,55]. Szalanski et al. [52] observed high mitochondrial DNA diversity with moderate to high levels of gene flow in C. lectularius. Krafsur et al. [53] identified 26 haplotypes in tsetse flies with the use of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA markers, where most haplotypes occurred only once or twice. Only six haplotypes were identified in the same locations [53]. 16S rRNA and Cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) gene sequences are also useful markers for analyzing genetic polymorphism in ticks and for identifying and differentiating the populations of Dermacentor nuttalli, Ixodes persulcatus, and I. pavlovskyi [54,55]. These findings indicate that the mitochondrial DNA rRNA 16S gene can be reliably used to study the population genetics of ectoparasites. Previous research has demonstrated that Lipoptena spp. could be paraphyletic; therefore, further research is needed to explore the genetic variation and taxonomy among this genus [56]. Kurina et al. [11] and Andreani [33] found that the COI sequences of L. fortisetosa deposited in GenBank are genetically diverse and have different geographic lineages in Europe. Similar conclusions can be formulated based on the results of this study.
The current study revealed considerable genetic diversity of L. fortisetosa in six sampling sites in the region of Warmia and Mazury, which indicates that the genetic structure of its population is far more complex than previously thought. Several genetically distinct original populations probably migrated or were introduced to Europe. The present findings suggest that a decrease in deer ked populations in forests could contribute to their diversity. The presence of progressive evolutionary mechanisms indicates that L. fortisetosa could further adapt to the environmental conditions of Central Europe [4]. Lipoptena fortisetosa is an invasive species that strongly competes for hosts with the native population of L. cervi, which could influence the size of both insect populations in the future. Further genetic analyses of louse flies, combined with pathogen detection, are needed to identify areas with a potentially high risk of infectious disease transmission by L. fortisetosa [51]. The structure of deer ked populations should be analyzed in greater detail to adequately manage and protect wild animals and to monitor the transmission of pathogens between distant regions. The identification of Bartonella spp. of Japanese origin by Szewczyk et al. [22] and L. fortisetosa of Japanese origin in this study demonstrates how the dispersion of deer keds in the environment can contribute to the spread of infectious diseases transmitted by these vectors. The results of this study provide additional evidence that L. fortisetosa populations in Central Europe have different genetic lineages. Detailed genetic characterization of deer keds in Central Europe will enable researchers to track and predict the spread of L. fortisetosa. Migrations to new areas should encourage new research into the dynamics and genetics of L. fortisetosa populations because, according to Kurina et al. [11], a thorough understanding of the distribution and bionomics of this invasive migratory species is crucial for its effective control in Europe.

5. Conclusions

The results of the present study and previous research suggest that L. fortisetosa has formed stable and genetically diverse populations throughout Poland. The population genetics of L. fortisetosa should be further explored to track the migration of these ectoparasites to Northern and Western Europe. The occurrence of L. fortisetosa should be regularly monitored to detect an increase in the number of individuals in the total deer ked population. Further research is needed to detect new locations and analyze the genetic lineages of L. fortisetosa. The sequences identified in this study indicate that the population of L. fortisetosa continues to spread despite geographic limitations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.G.; methodology, R.G.; software, R.G.; validation, R.G.; formal analysis, R.G.; investigation, R.G.; resources, R.G.; data curation, R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, R.G.; writing—review and editing, R.G., J.J., X.X., and T.B.; visualization, R.G.; supervision, J.J., X.X., and T.B.; project administration, R.G.; funding acquisition, R.G., J.J., and T.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was financially co-supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education under the program entitled Regional Initiative of Excellence for the years 2019–2022 (project no. 010/RID/2018/19; amount of funding PLN 12,000,000). The funders had no role in the study design, the data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, or the preparation of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are presented in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Healthy Animal-Safe Food Scientific Consortium of the Leading National Research Center (KNOW) (grant No. 05-1/KNOW2/2015) for supporting cooperation between the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn and the National Research Center for Protozoan Diseases of the Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Schumann, H.; Messner, B. Erstnachweis von Lipoptena fortisetosa Maa, 1965 in Deutschland (Dipt., Hippoboscidae). Entomol. Nachr. Ber. 1993, 37, 247–249. [Google Scholar]
  2. Metelitsa, A.K.; Veselkin, G.A. Parasitism of the louse fly Lipoptena fortisetosa on cattle. Parazitologiia 1989, 23, 276–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. McAlpine, J.F. Manual of Nearctic Diptera; Research Branch, Agriculture Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1987; Volume 2, pp. 1271–1332. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gałęcki, R.; Jaroszewski, J.; Xuan, X.; Bakuła, T. Temporal-Microclimatic Factors Affect the Phenology of Lipoptena fortisetosa in Central European Forests. Animals 2020, 10, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Buczek, W.; Buczek, A.M.; Bartosik, K.; Buczek, A. Comparison of skin lesions caused by Ixodes ricinus ticks and Lipoptena cervi deer keds infesting humans in the natural environment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Madslien, K.; Ytrehus, B.; Vikøren, T.; Malmsten, J.; Isaksen, K.; Hygen, H.O.; Solberg, E.J. Hair-loss epizootic in moose (Alces alces) associated with massive deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) infestation. J. Wildl. Dis. 2011, 47, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Maa, T.C. A synopsis of the Lipopteninae. J. Med. Entomol. 1965, 2, 233–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kowal, J.; Nosal, P.; Kornaś, S.; Wajdzik, M.; Matysek, M.; Basiaga, M. Biodiversity and importance of hippoboscids infection in cervids. Med. Weter. 2016, 72, 745–749. [Google Scholar]
  9. Theodor, O. Lipoptena parvula, n. sp. eine neue Art aus der Tschechoslowakei (Diptera, Hippoboscidae). Acta Entomol. Mus. Nat. Pra. 1967, 37, 275–278. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zeman, P. Borrelia-infection rates in tick and insect vectors accompanying human risk of acquiring Lyme borreliosis in a highly endemic region in Central Europe. Folia Parasitol. 1998, 45, 319–325. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kurina, O.; Kirik, H.; Õunap, H.; Õunap, E. The northernmost record of a blood-sucking ectoparasite, Lipoptena fortisetosa Maa (Diptera: Hippoboscidae), in Estonia. Biodivers. Data J. 2019, 7, e47857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Salvetti, M.; Bianchi, A.; Marangi, M.; Barlaam, A.; Giacomelli, S.; Bertoletti, I.; Roy, L.; Giangaspero, A. Deer keds on wild ungulates in northern Italy, with a taxonomic key for the identification of spp. of Europe. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2020, 34, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Andreani, A.; Sacchetti, P.; Belcari, A. Comparative morphology of the deer ked Lipoptena fortisetosa first recorded from Italy. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 140–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Oboňa, J.; Sychra, O.; Greš, S.; Heřman, P.; Manko, P.; Roháček, J.; Šestáková, A.; Šlapák, J.; Hromada, M. A revised annotated checklist of louse flies (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) from Slovakia. ZooKeys 2019, 862, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kadulski, S. Występowanie Stawonogów Pasożytniczych na Łownych Lagomorpha i Artiodactyla—Próba Syntezy; Rozprawy i Monografie 132; Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego: Gdańsk, Poland, 1989; pp. 1–140. [Google Scholar]
  16. Borowiec, L.; Zatwarnicki, T. Lipoptena fortisetosa Maa, 1965 (Diptera, Hippoboscidae), nowy gatunek dla fauny Polski. Prz. Zool. 1989, 33, 579–582. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kowal, J.; Nosal, P.; Rościszewska, M.; Matysek, M. New records of Lipoptena fortisetosa Maa, 1965 (Diptera:Hippoboscidae) in Poland. Dipteron 2009, 25, 27–29. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cydzik, K.; Kadulski, S. Parasitic Insects of the Red Deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Northeastern Poland; Stawonogi. Inwazje i ich ograniczanie; Akapit: Lublin, Poland, 2009; pp. 113–115. [Google Scholar]
  19. Jędrysik, D.; Kadulski, S. Parasitic Arthropods of Roe Deer Capreolus capreolus (L.) of the Region of Pojezierze Południowobałtyckie (The Southern Baltic Lake District); Arthropods. The Medical and Economic Importance; Akapit: Lublin, Poland, 2012; pp. 95–103. [Google Scholar]
  20. Matysek, M.; Kowal, J. Dwa nowe gatunki muchówek. Tatry 2014, 48, 64–65. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sokół, R.; Gałęcki, R. Prevalence of keds on city dogs in central Poland. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2017, 31, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Szewczyk, T.; Werszko, J.; Steiner-Bogdaszewska, Ż.; Jeżewski, W.; Laskowski, Z.; Karbowiak, G. Molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) in Poland. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. De Bruin, A.; Van Leeuwen, A.D.; Jahfari, S.; Takken, W.; Földvári, M.; Dremmel, L.; Sprong, H.; Földvári, G. Vertical transmission of Bartonella schoenbuchensis in Lipoptena cervi. Parasit. Vectors 2015, 8, 176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Korhonen, E.M.; Vera, C.P.; Pulliainen, A.T.; Sironen, T.; Aaltonen, K.; Kortet, R.; Härkönen, L.; Härkönen, S.; Paakkonen, T.; Nieminen, P.; et al. Molecular detection of Bartonella spp. in deer ked pupae, adult keds and moose blood in Finland. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 578–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Lee, S.H.; Kim, K.T.; Kwon, O.D.; Ock, Y.; Kim, T.; Choi, D.; Kwak, D. Novel detection of Coxiella spp., Theileria luwenshuni, and T. ovis endosymbionts in deer keds (Lipoptena fortisetosa). PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0156727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Doby, J.M.; Bigaignon, G.; Degeilh, B.; Guiguen, C. Ectoparasites of large wild mammals (deer and wild boars) and Lyme borreliosis. Search for Borrelia burgdorferi in more than 1400 ticks, lice, Pupipara Diptera and fleas. Rev. Med. Vet. 1994, 145, 743–748. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hulinsky, V.; Smetana, K. Molecular and microscopical evidence of Ehrlichia spp. and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in patients, animals and ticks in the Czech Republic. Microbiologica 2002, 25, 437–448. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lane, R.S.; Mun, J.; Parker, J.M.; White, M. Columbian black-tailed deer (Odocoileus hemionus columbianus) as hosts for Borrelia spp. in northern California. J. Wildl. Dis. 2005, 41, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Böse, R.; Petersen, K. Lipoptena cervi (Diptera), a potential vector of Megatrypanum trypanosomes of deer (Cervidae). Parasitol. Res. 1991, 77, 723–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hornok, S.; De La Fuente, J.; Biró, N.; Fernández de Mera, I.G.; Meli, M.L.; Elek, V.; Gönczi, E.; Meili, T.; Tánczos, B.; Farkas, R.; et al. First molecular evidence of Anaplasma ovis and Rickettsia spp. in keds (Diptera: Hippoboscidae) of sheep and wild ruminants. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 1319–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Víchová, B.; Majláthová, V.; Nováková, M.; Majláth, I.; Čurlík, J.; Bona, M.; Komjáti-Nagyová, M.; Peťko, B. PCR detection of re-emerging tick-borne pathogen, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, in deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) a blood-sucking ectoparasite of cervids. Biologia 2011, 66, 1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gałęcki, R.; Jaroszewski, J.; Bakuła, T.; Galon, E.M.; Xuan, X. Molecular Detection of Selected Pathogens with Zoonotic Potential in Deer Keds (Lipoptena fortisetosa). Pathogens 2021, 10, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Andreani, A.; Giangaspero, A.; Marangi, M.; Barlaam, A.; Ponzetta, M.P.; Roy, L.; Belcari, A.; Sacchetti, P. Asia and Europe: So Distant So Close? The Case of Lipoptena fortisetosa in Italy. Korean J. Parasitol. 2020, 58, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mysterud, A.; Madslien, K.; Herland, A.; Viljugrein, H.; Ytrehus, B. Phenology of deer ked (Lipoptena cervi) host-seeking flight activity and its relationship with prevailing autumn weather. Parasit. Vectors 2016, 9, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Ginsberg, H.S.; Ewing, C.P. Comparison of flagging, walking, trapping, and collecting from hosts as sampling methods for northern deer ticks, Ixodes dammini, and lone-star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1989, 7, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Borowiec, L. Klucze do Oznaczania Owadów Polski; Część XXVIII. Muchówki-Diptera. Zeszyt 77, Wpleszczowate-Hippoboscidae; Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe: Warsaw, Poland, 1984; pp. 3–35. [Google Scholar]
  37. Maa, T.C. A revised checklist and concise host index of Hippoboscidae (Diptera). Pac. Insects Monogr. 1969, 20, 261–299. [Google Scholar]
  38. Weinberger, R. Practical Capillary Electrophoresis; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 423–457. [Google Scholar]
  39. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp. Ser. 1999, 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  40. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis. Available online: https://www.megasoftware.net (accessed on 3 September 2019).
  41. Radzijevskaja, J.; Paulauskas, A.; Klepeckiene, K.; Razanske, I.; Rosef, O. Species Diversity and Molecular Characterization of Deer Keds (Genus Lipoptena) from Cervids. Unpublished. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/MN889549 (accessed on 2 February 2020).
  42. Šochová, E.; Husník, F.; Nováková, E.; Halajian, A.; Hypša, V. Arsenophonus and Sodalis replacements shape evolution of symbiosis in louse flies. PeerJ 2017, 5, e4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Hosokawa, T.; Nikoh, N.; Koga, R.; Satô, M.; Tanahashi, M.; Meng, X.Y.; Fukatsu, T. Reductive genome evolution, host–symbiont co-speciation and uterine transmission of endosymbiotic bacteria in bat flies. ISME J. 2012, 6, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Marshall, A.G. The sex ratio in ectoparasitic insects. Ecol. Entomol. 1981, 6, 155–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Paakkonen, T. Ecophysiology of the Deer Ked (Lipoptena cervi) and Its Hosts. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu, Finland, 2012. Available online: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/15169155.pdf (accessed on 23 April 2020).
  46. Barrows, E.M. Animal Behavior Desk Reference: A Dictionary of Animal Behavior, Ecology, and Evolution; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2011; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kadulski, S. Ectoparasites of Cervidae in north-east Poland. Acta Parasitol. 1996, 41, 204–210. [Google Scholar]
  48. Szczurek, B.; Kadulski, S. Ectoparasites on fallow deer, Dama dama (L.) in Pomerania, Poland. Acta Parasitol. 2004, 49, 80–86. [Google Scholar]
  49. Vikøren, T.; Lillehaug, A.; Handeland, K. Helseovervakingsprogrammet for Hjortevilt (HOP); Årsrapport for 2006 og 2007, Report Series; National Veterinary Inst.: Oslo, Norway, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mihalca, A.D.; Păstrav, I.R.; Sándor, A.D.; Deak, G.; Gherman, C.M.; Sarmaşi, A.; Votýpka, J. First report of the dog louse fly Hippobosca longipennis in Romania. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2019, 33, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Trout, R.T.; Steelman, C.D.; Szalanski, A.L. Phylogenetics and population genetics of the louse fly, Lipoptena mazamae, from Arkansas, USA. Med. Vet. Entomol. 2010, 24, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Szalanski, A.L.; Austin, J.W.; McKern, J.A.; Steelman, C.D.; Gold, R.E. Mitochondrial and ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) diversity of the bed bug Cimex lectularius L. (Heteroptera: Cimicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 2008, 45, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Krafsur, E.S.; Madsen, M.; Wohlford, D.L.; Mihok, S.; Griffiths, N.T. Population genetics of Glossina morsitans submorsitans (Diptera: Glossinidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 2000, 90, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kulakova, N.V.; Khasnatinov, M.A.; Sidorova, E.A.; Adel’shin, R.V.; Belikov, S.I. Molecular identification and phylogeny of Dermacentor nuttalli (Acari: Ixodidae). Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 1787–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Livanova, N.N.; Tikunov, A.Y.; Kurilshikov, A.M.; Livanov, S.G.; Fomenko, N.V.; Taranenko, D.E.; Kvashnina, A.E.; Tikunova, N.V. Genetic diversity of Ixodes pavlovskyi and I. persulcatus (Acari: Ixodidae) from the sympatric zone in the south of Western Siberia and Kazakhstan. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2015, 67, 441–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Peterson, F.T.; Meier, R.; Kutty, S.N.; Wiegmann, B.M. The phylogeny and evolution of host choice in the Hippoboscoidea (Diptera) as reconstructed using four molecular markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2007, 45, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 11 01093 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) Map of Poland and the region of Warmia and Mazury (b) with an indication of the municipalities were field studies were performed. Legend: WM = the region of Warmia and Mazury; E = Ełk; G = Gołdap; J = Jedwabno; K = Kolno; P = Pieniężno; R = Ruciane-Nida.
Figure 1. (a) Map of Poland and the region of Warmia and Mazury (b) with an indication of the municipalities were field studies were performed. Legend: WM = the region of Warmia and Mazury; E = Ełk; G = Gołdap; J = Jedwabno; K = Kolno; P = Pieniężno; R = Ruciane-Nida.
Animals 11 01093 g001
Animals 11 01093 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the rRNA 16S gene in Lipoptena fortisetosa. Legend: phylogenetic tree based on the results of the maximum likelihood analysis of a fragment of the rRNA 16S gene in Lipoptena fortisetosa. The identified unique haplotypes are labeled with sequence identification numbers. The reference sequences from GenBank are indicated in the tree. Bootstrap confidence values for assessing the reliability of branches were calculated in 10,000 replicates.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the rRNA 16S gene in Lipoptena fortisetosa. Legend: phylogenetic tree based on the results of the maximum likelihood analysis of a fragment of the rRNA 16S gene in Lipoptena fortisetosa. The identified unique haplotypes are labeled with sequence identification numbers. The reference sequences from GenBank are indicated in the tree. Bootstrap confidence values for assessing the reliability of branches were calculated in 10,000 replicates.
Animals 11 01093 g002
Table
Table 1. Number of deer keds collected in sampling sites, with a division into species and sexes.
Table 1. Number of deer keds collected in sampling sites, with a division into species and sexes.
Sampling SiteLipoptena cerviLipoptena fortisetosaTotal
♂♀♂♀
Ełk28393575
Gołdap293271078
Jedwabno34336881
Kolno4032141096
Pieniężno20277761
Ruciane-Nida383391191
Legend: ♂ = male; ♀ = female.
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the acquired sequences with GenBank sequences.
Table 2. Comparison of the acquired sequences with GenBank sequences.
Sequence ID Closest Match ID Country of Origin Percentage Match Reference
MT182645 MF495939
MN889549 		Czech Republic
Lithuania 		99.56% Radzijevskaja et al. [41]
Sochova et al. [42]
MT182646 99.78%
MT182647 98.68%
MT182648 99.58%
MT182649 99.36%
MT182650 99.58%
MT182651 100%
MT182652 98.32%
MT182653 99.04%
MT182654 98.93%
MT182655 98.93%
MT182656 98.91%
MT182657 98.43%
MT182658 99.36%
MT182659 AB632589 Japan 95.56 % Hosokawa et al. [43]
MT182660 MF495939
MN889549 		Czech Republic
Lithuania 		99.36% Radzijevskaja et al. [41]
Sochova et al. [42]
MT182661 99.15%
MT182663 98.91%
Table
Table 3. Molecular characteristics of Lipoptena fortisetosa in sampling sites.
Table 3. Molecular characteristics of Lipoptena fortisetosa in sampling sites.
Number of Lipoptena fortisetosa Specimens
Sampling SiteEłk
(n = 5)		Gołdap
(n = 5)		Jedwabno
(n = 5)		Kolno
(n = 5)		Pieniężno
(n = 5)		Ruciane-Nida
(n = 5)
MT1826452-----
MT1826461-----
MT18264711-1--
MT1826481-----
MT182649-1----
MT182650-1----
MT182651-1-1--
MT182652--1---
MT182653--1--2
MT182654--1--1
MT182655--1--1
MT182656---11-
MT182657-1-1--
MT182658--111-
MT182659----1-
MT182660----1-
MT182661----1-
MT182663-----1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gałęcki, R.; Xuan, X.; Bakuła, T.; Jaroszewski, J. Molecular Characterization of Lipoptena fortisetosa from Environmental Samples Collected in North-Eastern Poland. Animals 2021, 11, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041093

AMA Style

Gałęcki R, Xuan X, Bakuła T, Jaroszewski J. Molecular Characterization of Lipoptena fortisetosa from Environmental Samples Collected in North-Eastern Poland. Animals. 2021; 11(4):1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041093

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gałęcki, Remigiusz, Xuenan Xuan, Tadeusz Bakuła, and Jerzy Jaroszewski. 2021. "Molecular Characterization of Lipoptena fortisetosa from Environmental Samples Collected in North-Eastern Poland" Animals 11, no. 4: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11041093

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop