Next Article in Journal
Determining a Welfare Prioritization for Horses Using a Delphi Method
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Anandamide on the Anterior Pituitary Hormone Secretion in Ewes—Ex Vivo Study
Previous Article in Journal
Histological and Electrophoretic Analysis of Carpathian barbel (Barbus carpathicus, Cyprinidae) Skin and Mucus in Environmental Context
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Inhibin A on Apoptosis and Proliferation of Bovine Granulosa Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 10
Issue 4
10.3390/ani10040646
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Can the Presence of Ovarian Corpus Luteum Modify the Hormonal Composition of Follicular Fluid in Mares?

by
Katiuska Satué
1,*,
Esterina Fazio
2 and
Pietro Medica
2
1
Department of Animal Medicine and Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, CEU-Cardenal Herrera University, 46115 Valencia, Spain
2
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Veterinary Physiology Unit, Polo Universitario Annunziata, Messina University, 98168 Messina, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(4), 646; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040646
Submission received: 8 March 2020 / Revised: 6 April 2020 / Accepted: 7 April 2020 / Published: 9 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Animal–Human Interfaces in Physiology of Reproduction: The Research to Improve Performance, as well as Animal and Human Health)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The presence of corpus luteum (CL) in the ovary could exert a local differential effect on the hormonal composition of follicular fluid (FF), and it could also indirectly influence follicular development and oocyte quality. Using FF samples of follicles of different sizes in mares, we evaluated the differences between the composition of steroids (oestrogen, androgen and progesterone) in relation to the presence or absence of CL in the ovary. We suggest that FF concentrations of steroid hormones are not only related to follicular size but also to the presence or absence of CL in the ovary.

Abstract

The hypothesis of this study was to investigate if the presence of corpus luteum (CL) in one ovary could modify the hormonal content of follicular fluid (FF) in the follicles. Sixty ovaries were taken after the slaughter of 30 clinically healthy mares. In relation to the sizes, the follicles were classified into three different categories, as small (20–30 mm), medium (31–40 mm) and large (≥41 mm). Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein of mares before their slaughter, and then the FF samplings were extracted from each single follicle. The ovaries that were collected were classified into two groups, according to the presence (CL-bearing) or absence (non-CL-bearing) of CL. The serum and FF samples were analysed for progesterone (P4), oestradiol-17β (E2), testosterone (T), androstenedione (A4) and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA). Intrafollicular P4 concentrations in large follicles of CL-bearing groups were lower than for non-CL-bearing ones. Intrafollicular E2 concentrations increased with the increase of the follicle diameter in both groups, CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing. However, in the FF with a large and medium follicle size, E2 concentrations were significantly higher in non-CL-bearing groups than in CL-bearing groups. T and A4 significantly increased in the large and medium follicle sizes when compared to the small follicle sizes in both groups, but higher concentrations in the non-CL-bearing group were obtained. Intrafollicular DHEA significantly decreased with the increase of the follicular diameter in both groups. Steroid hormones in FF dynamically changed, according to the presence or not of CL in the ovary. This study brings new knowledge on the role of the CL in the follicular hormonal composition in mares.

1. Introduction

During folliculogenesis, granulosa cells (GCs) are in constant communication with the oocyte, and the two cell types undergo a bidirectional nutrient transfer and paracrine signalling [1,2]. The intercellular communication is essential for follicular development, oocyte maturation and acquisition of follicular competence [3], related to the healthy intrafollicular environment [4]. Follicular fluid (FF) is produced during the last period of the secondary growing follicle and it remains closely connected to the cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC). FF is composed of both plasmatic exudates and GCs’ secretory pattern, also including the metabolic activity of thecal cells [5]. The FF contains metabolites [6,7], polysaccharides, proteins’ growth factors and hormones, which are locally synthetised and easily pass through the basal lamina to enter the antrum or escape toward circulating blood [8].
Numerous studies in different species clearly demonstrated that steroid hormones are essential for oocyte maturation and fertilisation, GC proliferation and differentiation, and eventual ovulation and luteinisation [2,3,4]. In mares, intrafollicular hormones, such as oestradiol-17β (E2), progesterone (P4) [6,9,10,11,12,13,14,15], androstenedione (A4) [12], testosterone (T) [13,14,15,16] and prostaglandin (PGF2α) [9,12], were documented. These hormones are related to the metabolic activity of ovarian cells, reflecting the physiological status of the follicle [8].
The estrous cycle in the mare integrates the follicular and luteal phases. The follicular phase is characterised by the presence of follicles at different stages of development and the simultaneous increase in the secretion of E2. Its duration is from 5 to 7 days, with variations from 3 to 9 days depending on the mare and the season; ovulation occurs approximately 24–48 hours before the end of the estrous cycle. The luteal phase is characterised by the presence of the CL, a fundamental structure in the regulation of the estrous cycle, supporting uterine development, embryonic implantation and the maintenance of pregnancy. The functional maturation of CL is characterised by a progressive increase in circulating P4 concentrations, structurally related to an increase in the CL diameter. P4 concentrations during the mild luteal phase (5 to 7 days) can reach between 4 and 10 ng/mL, and are correlated with a larger luteal diameter that remains elevated for a period of 6 to 10 days, and subsequently their concentrations decline. In the late right-handed (>13–16 days), PGF2α is synthesised in the endometrium, reaches the ovary systemically and generates CL regression, characterised by a progressive decrease in P4 concentrations and luteal diameter [17].
The determination of the morphological characteristics of the ovary and CL in mares was used in recent years for clinical diagnostic practices and the application of assisted reproduction techniques [18]. Although the information on steroids in mares is extensive, it is unknown if the presence of CL in the ovary could modify the composition of steroid hormones in the FF. In cows [19], ewes [20] and camels [21], the composition of FF is modified according to the absence or presence of CL in the ovary. These differences could indicate the existence of a possible local effect of CL on the dynamic development of follicles.
The aim of this study was to investigate if the existence of CL in one ovary could induce variations of intrafollicular P4, E2, T, A4 and DHEA concentrations in follicles of different sizes in mares. The results could bring new knowledge on the mechanisms involved in follicular development. Since these hormones are commonly used in culture medium as supplements for oocyte maturation procedures, they could be employed in assisted reproductive technology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

All methods and procedures used in this study were in compliance with the guidelines of the Spanish law (RD 37/2014) that regulates the protection of animals at the time of slaughter and the EU directive (2010/63/EU) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. The Animal Ethics Committee for the Care and Use of Animals of the CEU-Cardenal Herrera University (Spain) concluded that the proposed study did not need ethical approval, as it did not qualify as an animal experiment under Spanish law.
To ensure the cyclic activity of the ovaries, the study was performed in the months of April and May 2018 of the breeding season in the northern hemisphere. The environmental temperature ranged between 27 °C and 31 °C, with 40%–60% relative humidity. A total of 30 clinically healthy mares, aged 6.6 ± 1.3 years, with a body weight paired to 533 ± 7.3 kg, were evaluated. In the livestock of origin, all animals were submitted to the same management conditions and feeding regime, including additional orchard grass-alfalfa mixed hay and free access to mineral salt and fresh water. Moreover, the official veterinarians for each livestock and slaughterhouse accepted the responsible participation in the present study, and only mares with a reproductive history of normality in the estrous cycles were studied. The veterinary examination of the animals before their slaughter consisted in verifying the official documentation, including livestock of origin, sanitary registration number, suitable health status, deworming and vaccination plan, and clinical and animal reproductive history.

2.2. Collection of Blood and Ovaries

Before the animals’ slaughter, blood samples (20 mL) were collected from the jugular vein into heparinised tubes. Samplings were centrifuged at 1200 g for 10 minutes, and plasma aliquots were collected and stored at 4 °C using a portable cooler for the successive transportation to the laboratory for analysis.
Post-mortem, the ovaries of all mares were collected; the time between the slaughter and the collection of the ovaries was under 2 hours, as reported by Hinrichs [22]. All ovaries were placed in containers added with 0.9% physiologic saline plus, penicillin (100 IU/mL) and streptomycin (50 mg/mL), and they were transported to the laboratory in individually labelled plastic bags in thermal containers (at 25 °C) [23].

2.3. Collection of Follicular Fluid

The ovaries were washed three times with sterile saline; after this, all follicles were measured using the conventional callipers and were subsequently classified according to diameter: small (20–30 mm), medium (31–40 mm) and large (≥41 mm). On the basis of the presence or not of CL in the ovary, it was possible to distinguish two groups of ovaries: N.15 CL-bearing ovaries and N.15 non-CL-bearing ovaries. In each group, 10 small, 10 medium and 10 large follicles were analysed.
In order to minimise the variations between the hormonal composition of FF, in CL-bearing ovaries the FF samplings were taken in the late-luteal phase because this is a period in which the functionality of the CL decreases. In this group, the FF of those follicles extracted from the ovaries whose CL sizes ranged from 30 to 40 mm were considered. The FF was aspirated using different sterile syringes and needles of 22G for each follicle. Following the collection, the FF samplings were centrifuged for 10 min at 1200 g to eliminate the cumulus oocyte complexes. Only the supernatant, represented by pure FF, was collected and stored in aliquots of 0.5 ml at −20 °C until analysis.

2.4. Determination of Progesterone (p4), Oestradiol-17 Beta (e2), Testosterone (t), Androstenedione (a4) and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)

The intrafollicular and plasma concentrations of P4 (ng/mL) were determined using a solid-phase I-125 radioimmunoassay (RIA) (Coat-a-Count Progesterone, Diagnostic Products Co., Los Angeles, LA, USA). The minimal assay sensitivity of P4 was 0.1 ng/mL. The CV inter- and intra-assays for P4 were 16.1% and 4.3% at 3.5 ng/mL; 7.3% and 8.5% at 22.5 ng/mL; and 23.3% and 6.4% at 54.8 nmol/L. The concentrations of E2 (ng/mL) in FF and plasma were determined by a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (E2 Sensitive, Demeditec ELISA DE4399) validated specifically for both types of fluids in the equine species, as previously reported [6]. The limit of detection of E2 was 1.4 ng/mL. The percentages of recovery in plasma and FF were 98.72% and 99.5%, respectively. The CVs’ intra- and inter-analyses at low and high concentrations were 7.87% and 5.52%, and 8.78% and 6.78%, respectively.
The concentrations of T (ng/mL), A4 (ng/mL) and DHEA (ng/mL) in plasma and FF were determined by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) techniques, using polyclonal antibodies (anti-T: R156, anti-A4: C9111 and anti-DHEA: C1011, Clinical Endocrinology Laboratory, UC Davis, California, USA), and hormone-peroxidase conjugates (conjugate of T: T3CMO-HRP, conjugate of A4: A3CMO-HRP and conjugate of DHEA: DHEA17CMO-HRP, Clinical Endocrinology Laboratory, UC Davis, California, USA), validated specifically in the equine species based on the technique proposed by Munro and Lasley [24] and previously used by these same researchers [25]. The detection limits for T, A4 and DHEA concentrations were 30 ng/mL, 25 ng/mL and 40 ng/mL, respectively. The CVs’ intra- and inter-assay for T, A4 and DHEA at high and low concentrations ranged between 5.9%–6.5% and 4.5%–6.9%, and 7.5%–9.9% and 7.5%–8.9%, respectively.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Statistica 8.0 for Windows (Statsoft Inc., Bloomberg, NY, USA) was applied for the statistical analyses. The normality was calculated using the Kolmogorov Smirnov test to verify all data of different groups. A t-test was used to compare systemic and intrafollicular P4, E2, T, A4 and DHEA concentrations. The concentrations of each steroid hormone in the same follicle size categories were compared between CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries by ANOVA (One-way analysis of variance). A post-hoc comparison was carried out using Tukey’s test. A linear regression analysis was applied to evaluate the relationships among the hormonal concentrations; the correlations were expressed by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Differences were considered statistically significant when p was paired to <0.05.

3. Results

The hormonal concentrations of systemic and FF hormones from the same follicle size categories, with CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries, are presented in Table 1. Systemic P4, E2, T, A4 and DHEA concentrations were lower than intrafollicular fluid (p < 0.05), except for FF values with a small size for non-CL-bearing ovaries. Systemic P4 concentrations for CL-bearing ovaries were higher than for non-CL-bearing ones (p < 0.05). Intrafollicular P4 concentrations in the large follicles of CL-bearing ovaries were higher than for non-CL-bearing ones (p < 0.05). Intrafollicular E2 concentrations in medium and large follicles of non-CL-bearing ovaries were higher than for CL-bearing ones (p < 0.05), and their concentrations increased with the increase of the follicle diameter in both groups (p < 0.05). T and A4 significantly increased for large and medium follicle sizes when compared to small follicle sizes in both the CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing groups (p < 0.05), with the highest concentrations in the non-CL-bearing group (p < 0.05). Intrafollicular DHEA concentrations decreased with an increase in the follicular diameter, with higher concentrations in large and medium follicle sizes than in small follicle sizes for both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing groups (p < 0.05). The correlations of systemic and intrafollicular steroid hormones in both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries are presented in Table 2. Positive and significative correlations were observed among E2 with T, A4 and DHEA (p < 0.01); A4 and T (p < 0.01); and DHEA with T and A4 (p < 0.01) concentrations.
The follicle diameter was significantly and positively correlated with FF E2 (r = 0.84; p < 0.05), T (r = 0.72; p < 0.05) and A4 (r = 0.88; p < 0.05), respectively, and negatively correlated with DHEA (r = −0.80; p < 0.05).

4. Discussion

In the present study, intrafollicular and systemic P4, E2, T, A4 and DHEA concentrations obtained from the three categories of follicular sizes, in both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries, were compared. The intrafollicular concentrations of these steroids were significantly higher than systemic ones. These differences remained for all follicle sizes and in both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries. Significant positive correlations between systemic and intrafollicular concentrations of these steroids were found, as previously reported in cows for P4, E2 and T [18]. Moreover, FF provides a complex and peculiar environment for follicular growth, representing the metabolic and secretory activity of granulosa and thecal cells. Circumstantial evidence suggests that the evaluation of FF components, like steroid hormones, may provide additional information on their metabolic and dynamic changes, including into systemic concentrations [26,27].
Although these results could suggest that steroid hormones are synthesised in the follicular cells and are subsequently released into the systemic circulation, this evidence is subject to controversy. Indeed, although no correlations between the serum and FF of P4 and T in the preovulatory period were observed, FF P4 was positively correlated with serum in the postovulatory period [13]. On the contrary, Bøgh et al. [28] reported no relationship between systemic and FF P4 and E2 in transitional mares. However, these steroids are also produced by the adrenal cortex, and thus their presence in the blood does not directly reflect the gonadal steroidogenic capacity [29].
In the present study, no differences between the follicular diameters of CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries were obtained. During diestrus, in the presence of CL, multiple structures, such as small, medium antral and preovulatory follicles, can be present in the ovary of the mare [30]. Due to the great heterogenicity of follicle sizes that can occur even in mares for which the phase of the estrous cycle is unknown [31], one can presume not to expect significant differences between follicle sizes in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing groups. However, positive correlations between the preovulatory follicles and CL diameters were documented [32]. A potential physiological mechanism that could explain this fact could be represented by the presence of an active and highly vascularised CL that may contribute to the better diffusion of growth factors and hormones throughout the ovarian stroma, favouring the quality of preantral follicles [31].
What is more, Ishak et al. [32] showed that the maximum preovulatory follicle diameter/maximum P4 concentration ratio was strongly correlated with the maximum CL diameter/maximum P4 concentration ratio. Moreover, positive correlations between the preovulatory follicles and CL diameters, and the capacity of the CL to produce P4, were found. In fact, the large follicles can continue to biosynthesise these steroids to the preovulatory state, as the results of this study suggest.
As previously documented in mares [14,33,34,35], significant positive correlations between the diameter of follicles and E2 were shown in this study. Furthermore, E2 concentrations were significantly higher in large and medium ones than in small ones for both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing groups. These results are in agreement with those reported in dromedary camels [21]. Moreover, a previous study revealed that cholesterol concentrations significantly increase in the follicles of greater vs. medium and smaller sizes, reflecting how the highest demand for this analyte is to increase the synthesis of steroids in this category of follicles [6].
Intrafollicular P4 concentrations in large follicles decrease in non-CL-bearing groups when compared with those obtained from small follicle sizes. However, P4 concentrations in the FF obtained from large follicles significantly decreased in CL-bearing groups when compared to those obtained from small and medium follicles in dromedary camels [21]. In non-CL-bearing ovaries, the higher concentration of P4 in large follicles when compared to small follicles suggests the luteinisation of GCs in dromedary camels [36]. In mares, Ishak et al. [32] reported that the diameter of the follicle influences the size of the subsequent CL and the P4 production. The larger and well-vascularised preovulatory follicles produce larger CLs, with a greater blood flow and, subsequently, a greater systemic P4 concentration in mares. However, although the results of the present study are in agreement with the increase in E2 and P4 along the follicular growth reported by Gérard et al. [37], they did not take into account the presence or absence of CL. On the contrary, Tsukada et al. [12] observed no differences in P4 concentrations in FF among follicles of different sizes.
In the present study, high concentrations of E2 and T in non-CL-bearing mares were found. Beck et al. [16] classified the follicles in oestrogenic or non-oestrogenic follicles, when the FF content of E2 was > 40 or < 40 ng/mL, respectively. Compared to the non-oestrogenic follicles, the follicle diameter and E2 to T ratios were significantly greater in the oestrogenic ones, but no differences in the E2 to P4 ratios between both types of follicles were reported. These results partially confirm those shown in this study, since in both groups high concentrations of E2 and T were obtained, although P4 was lower in the non-CL-bearing group than in the CL-bearing group.
The E2 concentrations and the ratios of E2/T and/or P4 were significantly higher in large follicle sizes than in medium and small follicle sizes for the non-CL-bearing group, as previously reported in cows [19]. Kor et al. [19] suggested the existence of a possible local effect of the CL on such steroids. Thus, the results of the present study could suggest that intrafollicular E2 concentrations and E2 to T ratios could be used to evaluate the health status of the follicles, as previously reported in mares [16].
In other species such as cows, elevated E2 and E2/P4 ratios in FF indicated a more advanced stage of oocyte maturation and were associated with a higher chance of achieving pregnancy [38].
DHEA concentrations decreased in medium and large follicles with respect to small sizes for both CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries. Since DHEA is converted to T in ovarian connective tissue (theca/stroma) and is subsequently processed by the GCs to synthesise E2, it assumes the prohormone status of a predominant endogenous precursor and a metabolic intermediate in ovarian follicular steroidogenesis [39]. Thus, DHEA could be considered a key molecule at the crossroads, maintaining a critical balance between the androgen and oestrogen production. On the contrary, lower concentrations of DHEA in FF were detected, suggesting that the increase in circulating values during oestrus was caused by an extrafollicular source(s) [40]. Since previously reported concentrations were below the limit of the analytical assay, non-detectable concentrations or baseline samples from this study were not unexpected.
The biochemical FF composition of large follicles represents a significant marker of the metabolic and secretory pattern of follicular cells, with an applicative guide in formulating cell culture topics [35]. Since the maturation of the oocytes in the mare involves specific mechanisms of the species, some of which may be related to the steroids contained in the equine FF, it is of crucial importance to oocyte preparation for fertilisation and development [26,41]. The development of in vitro culture conditions able to mimic the maturation of the oocyte may help to improve embryo production. In fact, the use of FF as a means of maturation of equine oocytes increases the rate of fertilisation and the cleavage rate [42]. The pre-incubation of equine oocytes with FF or oviductal cells increases fertilisation rate [27,43]. In addition, preovulatory FF in which the maturation naturally occurs may sustain a better cytoplasmic maturation and thus a better competence for in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and development [44]. In bovines, the developmental potential of oocytes originating from CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries has been evaluated [45]. The percentage of blastocyst formation of oocytes originating from the medium and large follicles of non-CL-bearing ovaries was greater than that of oocytes originating from the small and medium follicles of CL-bearing ovaries. This pattern was the same in blastocysts per oocytes and blastocysts per cleaved embryos. Since blastocyst maturation is the crucial step for in vitro embryo production, it would be interesting to compare the possible role of steroids of FF in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries as a medium of support in IVF programs, in order to improve the quality of maturation and developmental ovocitary competence.
Intrafollicular P4 concentrations increase in mares with CL-bearing ovaries, while E2, A4 and T increase in non-CL-bearing ovaries without any modifications in DHEA during the follicular development. These different responses suggest that the presence of CL modifies the intrafollicular concentrations of these steroids. This information is not only important for enhancing the understanding of the follicular dynamics in mares but can also be helpful in assessing the developmental competence of follicles and CL, providing basic information for future clinical applications.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, intrafollicular P4 concentrations increase in mares with CL-bearing ovaries, while E2, A4 and T increase in non-CL-bearing ovaries without any modifications in DHEA during the follicular development. These different responses suggest that the presence of CL modifies the intrafollicular concentrations of these steroids. This information is not only important for enhancing the understanding of the follicular dynamics in mares but can also be helpful in assessing the developmental competence of follicles and CL, providing basic information for future clinical applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, K.S., E.F. and P.M.; formal analysis, K.S.; investigation, K.S., E.F. and P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, K.S., E.F. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, K.S., E.F. and P.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the technical staff of the slaughterhouse and veterinarians for their assistance in sample collection and their expert technical assistance. Also, the authors express their gratitude to the Laboratory of Physiology of University Complutense of Madrid for their technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Coticchio, G.; Dal Canto, M.; Mignini Renzini, M.; Guglielmo, M.C.; Brambillasca, F.; Turchi, D.; Novara, P.V.; Fadini, R. Oocyte maturation: Gamete somatic cells interactions, meiotic resumption, cytoskeletal dynamics and cytoplasmic reorganization. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 427–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Russell, D.L.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Brown, H.M.; Thompson, J.G. Bidirectional communication between cumulus cells and the oocyte: Old hands and new players? Theriogenology 2016, 86, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Dumesic, D.A.; Meldrum, D.R.; Katz-Jaffe, M.G.; Krisher, R.L.; Schoolcraft, W.B. Oocyte environment: Follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 103, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Da Broi, M.G.; Giorgi, V.S.I.; Wang, F.; Keefe, D.L.; Albertini, D.; Navarro, P.A. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: Clinical implications. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Edwards, R.G. Follicular fluid. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1974, 37, 189–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Satué, K.; Fazio, E.; Ferlazzo, A.; Medica, P. Intrafollicular and systemic serotonin, oestradiol and progesterone concentrations in cycling mares. Reprod. Dom. Anim. 2019, 54, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Satué, K.; Fazio, E.; Ferlazzo, A.; Medica, P. Hematochemical patterns in follicular fluid and blood stream in cycling mares: A comparative note. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2019, 80, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fahiminiya, S.; Labas, V.; Roche, S.; Dacheux, J.L.; Gérard, N. Proteomic analysis of mare follicular fluid during late follicle development. Proteome Sci. 2011, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Watson, E.D.; Sertich, P.L. Effect of repeated collection of multiple endometrial biopsy specimens on subsequent pregnancy in mares. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1992, 20, 438–440. [Google Scholar]
  10. Belin, F.; Goudet, G.; Duchamp, G.; Gerard, N. Intrafollicular concentrations of steroids and steroidogenic enzymes in relation to follicular development in the mare. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 62, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Donadeu, F.X.; Ginther, O.J. Changes in concentrations of follicular fluid factors during follicle selection in mares. Biol. Reprod. 2002, 66, 1111–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Tsukada, T.; Kojima, A.Y.; Sato, K.; Moriyoshi, M.; Koyago, M.; Sawamukai, Y. Intrafollicular concentrations of steroid hormones and PGF2α inrelation to follicular development in the mares during the breeding season. J. Equine Sci. 2008, 19, 31–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Nelis, H.; Bussche, J.V.; Wojciechowicz, B.; Franczak, A.; Vanhaecke, L.; Leemans, B.; Cornillie, P.; Peelman, L.; Van Soom, A.; Smits, K. Steroids in the equine oviduct: Synthesis, local concentrations and receptor expression. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2015, 28, 1390–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Bashir, S.T.; Ishak, G.M.; Gastal, M.O.; Roser, J.F.; Gastal, E.L. Changes in intrafollicular concentrations of free IGF-1, activin A, inhibin A, VEGF, estradiol, and prolactin before ovulation in mares. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 1491–1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Młodawska, W.; Grzesiak, W.; Kochan, J.; Nowak, A. Intrafollicular level of steroid hormones and the expression of androgen receptor in the equine ovary at puberty. Theriogenology 2018, 121, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Beck, N.F.G.; Khalid, M.; Charles, J.M.; Abbas, S.K.; Care, A.D. Relationship between intrafollicular concentrations of parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) and steroid hormones in oestrogenic and non-oestrogenic ovarian follicles in the mare. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2003, 76, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aurich, C. Reproductive cycles of horses. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 124, 220–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Coutinho Da Silva, M.A. When should a mare go for assisted reproduction? Theriogenology 2008, 70, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kor, N.M.; Khanghah, K.M.; Veisi, A. Follicular fluid concentrations of biochemical metabolites and trace minerals in relation to ovarian follicle size in dairy cows. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2013, 3, 397–404. [Google Scholar]
  20. Shabankareh, K.H.; Shahsavari, M.H.; Hajarian, H.; Moghaddam, G. In vitro developmental competence of bovine oocytes: Effect of corpus luteum and follicle size. Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 2015, 13, 615–622. [Google Scholar]
  21. El-Shahat, K.; Salma, A.; Fathi, M.; Abo-El maaty, A. Dynamics of follicular fluid composition in relation to follicular size and corpus luteum in dromedary camels. Asian J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 12, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hinrichs, K. Assisted reproduction techniques in the horse. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2012, 25, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Foss, R.; Ortis, H.; Hinrichs, K. Effect of potential oocyte transport protocols on blastocyst rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the horse. Equine Vet. J. 2013, 45, 39–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Munro, C.J.; Lasley, B.L. Non-radiometric methods for immunoassay of steroid hormones. In Non-Radiometric Assays: Technology and Application in Polypeptide and Steroid Hormone Detection; Albertson, B.D., Haseltine, F.P., Eds.; Alan R. Liss: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 289–329. [Google Scholar]
  25. Satué, K.; Marcilla, M.; Medica, P.; Ferlazzo, A.; Fazio, E. Testosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone concentrations in pregnant Spanish Purebred mare. Theriogenology 2019, 123, 62–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Caillaud, M.; Dell’aquila, M.E.; De Santis, T.; Nicassio, M.; Lacalandra, G.M.; Goudet, G.; Gerard, N. In vitro equine oocyte maturation in pure follicular fluid plus interleukin-1 and fertilization following ICSI. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 106, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ambruosi, B.; Accogli, G.; Douet, C.; Canepa, S.; Pascal, G.; Monget, P.; Moros, C.; Holmskov, U.; Mollenhauer, J.; Robbe-Masselot, C.; et al. Deleted in malignant brain tumor 1 is secreted in the oviduct and involved in the mechanism of fertilization in equine and porcine species. Reproduction 2013, 146, 119–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bøgh, I.B.; Høier, R.; Synnestvedt, B.; Greve, T. Steroid concentrations in follicular fluid aspirated repeatedly from transitional and cyclic mares. Theriogenology 2000, 54, 877–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Watson, E.D.; Hinrichs, K. Adrenal production of sex steroids in the mare. Theriogenology 1989, 32, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alves, K.A.; Alves, B.G.; Gastal, G.D.A.; de Tarso, S.G.S.; Gastal, M.O.; Figueiredo, J.R.; Gambarini, M.L.; Gastal, E.L. The mare model to study the effects of ovarian dynamics on preantral follicle features. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0149693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Alves, K.A.; Alves, B.G.; Rocha, C.D.; Visonna, M.; Mohallem, R.F.; Gastal, M.O.; Jacomini, J.O.; Beletti, M.E.; Figueiredo, J.R.; Gambarini, M.L.; et al. Number and density of equine preantral follicles in different ovarian histological section thicknesses. Theriogenology 2015, 83, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ishak, G.M.; Bashira, S.T.; Gastal, M.O.; Gastal, E.L. Pre-ovulatory follicle affects corpus luteum diameter, blood flow, and progesterone productionin mares. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 187, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Ginther, O.J.; Gastal, E.L.; Gastal, M.O.; Beg, M.A. Dynamics of the equine preovulatory follicle and periovulatory hormones: What’s new? J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2008, 28, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ginther, O.J.; Jacob, J.C.; Gastal, M.O.; Gastal, E.L.; Beg, M.A. Follicle and systemic hormone interrelationships during spontaneous and ablation-induced ovulatory waves in mares. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 106, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Abo-El maaty, A.M.; El-Shahat, K.H. Hormonal and biochemical serum assay in relation to the estrous cycle and follicular growth in Arabian mare. Asian Pac. J. Reprod. 2012, 1, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ali, S.; Ahmad, N.; Akhtar, N.; Rahman, Z.U.; Ahmad, M. Hormonal profiles in the serum and follicular fluid of female camel (Camelus dromedarius) during the peak and the low breeding season. Pak. Vet. J. 2011, 314, 331–335. [Google Scholar]
  37. Gérard, N.; Loiseau, S.; Duchamp, G.; Seguin, F. Analysis of the variations of follicular fluid composition during follicular growth and maturation in the mare using proton nuclear magnetic resonance (1H NMR). Reproduction 2002, 124, 241–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Leroy, J.L.; Vanholder, T.; Dalanghe, J.R.; Opsomer, G.; Van Soom, A.; Bols, P.E.; de Kruif, A. Metabolite and ionic composition of follicular fluid from different sized follicles and their relationship to serum concentrations in dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 80, 201–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mo, Q.; Lu, S.F.; Simon, N.G. Dehydroepiandrosterone and its metabolites: Differential effects on androgen receptor trafficking and transcriptional activity. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 99, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Meinecke, B.; Gips, H.; Meinecke-Tillmann, S. Progestagen, androgen and oestrogen levels in plasma and ovarian follicular fluid during the oestrous cycle of the mare. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 1987, 12, 255–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Conforti, V.A.; Vanderwall, D.K.; Woods, G.L. Effect of homologous follicular fluid from medium-sized and large follicles on in vitro maturation of equine cumulus–oocyte complexes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2005, 17, 651–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Dell’Aquila, M.E.; Cho, Y.S.; Minoia, P.; Traina, V.; Lacalandra, G.M.; Maritato, F. Effects of follicular fluid supplementation of in-vitro maturation medium on the fertilization and development of equine oocytes after in-vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 12, 2766–2772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Mugnier, S.; Kervella, M.; Douet, C.; Canepa, S.; Pascal, G.; Deleuze, S.; Duchamp, G.; Monget, P.; Goudet, G. The secretions of oviduct epithelial cells increase the equine in vitro fertilization rate: Are osteopontin, atrial natriuretic peptide A and oviductin involved? Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2009, 7, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Douet, C.; Parodi, O.; Martino, N.A.; Lacalandra, G.M.; Nicassio, M.; Reigner, F.; Deleuze, S.; Dell’Aquila, M.E.; Goudet, G. Exposure to follicular fluid during oocyte maturation and oviductal fluid during post-maturation does not improve in vitro embryo production in the horse. Zygote 2017, 25, 612–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Shabankareh, H.K.; Kor, N.M.; Hajarian, H. The influence of the corpus luteum on metabolites composition of follicular fluid from different sized follicles and their relationship to serum concentrations in dairy cows. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 140, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Means ± SD of systemic and intrafollicular steroid hormones in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries.
Table 1. Means ± SD of systemic and intrafollicular steroid hormones in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries.
ParametersIntrafollicular Fluid Intrafollicular Fluid
CL-Bearing Ovaries Non-CL-Bearing Ovaries
SystemicSmallMediumLargeSystemicSmallMediumLarge
N15 15
Follicles’ number 101010 101010
Follicles’ diameter (mm) 26.2 ± 2.3136.0 ± 2.2949.1 ± 5.03 26.7 ± 2.5636.0 ± 1.7750.7 ± 5.76
P4 (ng/mL)3.12 ± 0.21 AB10.45 ± 1.857.47 ± 0.7518.8 ± 0.93 B2.65 ± 0.453.34 ± 1.906.80 ± 0.23 D9.10 ± 2.12 D
E2 (pg/mL)73.60 ±13.31 A652.9 ± 241.31484.6 ± 181.8 C1542.1 ± 113.6 C87.12 ± 19.73 A833.6 ± 231.31532.1 ± 270.6 B,C1773.8 ± 85.79 B,C
T (ng/mL)0.55 ± 0.19 A1.97 ± 0.173.63 ± 0.87 C5.76 ± 1.35C0.39 ± 0.13 A1.14 ± 0.204.55 ± 0,75 B,C10.9 ± 2.56 B,C
A4 (ng/mL)1.50 ± 0.79 A60.1 ± 12.5140.1 ± 24.2 C241.5 ± 28.5 C1.95 ± 0.96 A72.52 ± 13.18201.4 ± 35.4 B,C274.3 ± 23.2 B,C
DHEA (ng/mL)4.06 ± 1.71 A14.5 ± 2.31 C7.18 ± 1.71 C4.36 ± 0.71 C4.38 ± 1.64 A14.4 ± 2.997.55 ± 1.72 C4.38 ± 1.01 C
P4: progesterone; E2: oestradiol-17β; T: testosterone; A4: androstenedione; DHEA: dehydroepiandrosterone. Different superscripts indicate significant differences: A = versus intrafollicular fluid (p < 0.05); B = versus non-CL-bearing ovaries (p < 0.05); C= versus small follicles (p < 0.05); D = versus systemic (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Correlations of systemic and intrafollicular steroid hormones in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries.
Table 2. Correlations of systemic and intrafollicular steroid hormones in CL-bearing and non-CL-bearing ovaries.
ParametersP4 (ng/mL)E2 (ng/mL)A4 (ng/mL)DHEA (ng/mL)
T (ng/mL)non-CL-bearing (r = 0.33) CL-bearing (r = 0.34)non-CL-bearing (r = 0.70; p < 0.01) CL-bearing (r = 0.72; p < 0.01)non-CL-bearing (r = 0.81 p < 0.01)
CL-bearing (r = 0.79 p < 0.01)		non-CL-bearing (r = −0.79; p < 0.01) CL-bearing (r = −0.76; p < 0.01)
A4 (ng/mL) CL-bearing (r = 0.80; p < 0.01)
non-CL-bearing (r = 0.85; p < 0.01)		 CL-bearing (r = −0.82; p < 0.01)
non-CL-bearing (r = −0.89; p < 0.01)
DHEA (ng/mL) CL-bearing (r = −0.83; p < 0.01)
non-CL-bearing (r = −0.71; p < 0.01)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Satué, K.; Fazio, E.; Medica, P. Can the Presence of Ovarian Corpus Luteum Modify the Hormonal Composition of Follicular Fluid in Mares? Animals 2020, 10, 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040646

AMA Style

Satué K, Fazio E, Medica P. Can the Presence of Ovarian Corpus Luteum Modify the Hormonal Composition of Follicular Fluid in Mares? Animals. 2020; 10(4):646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040646

Chicago/Turabian Style

Satué, Katiuska, Esterina Fazio, and Pietro Medica. 2020. "Can the Presence of Ovarian Corpus Luteum Modify the Hormonal Composition of Follicular Fluid in Mares?" Animals 10, no. 4: 646. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10040646

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop