Next Article in Journal
Molecular Characterization and Expression Profiles of the Ovine LHβ Gene and Its Association with Litter Size in Chinese Indigenous Small-Tailed Han Sheep
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Effects of Stovers of Four Varieties of Common Vetch on Growth Performance, Ruminal Fermentation, and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Lambs
Previous Article in Journal
Sensorial Hierarchy in Octopus vulgaris’s Food Choice: Chemical vs. Visual
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Agro-Industrial By-Products Rich in Polyphenols be Advantageously Used in the Feeding and Nutrition of Dairy Small Ruminants?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Dietary Hemp Seed and Flaxseed on Growth Performance, Meat Fatty Acid Compositions, Liver Tocopherol Concentration and Bone Strength of Cockerels

by
Miloš Skřivan
1,*,
Michaela Englmaierová
1,
Tomáš Taubner
1 and
Eva Skřivanová
1,2
1
Department of Nutrition Physiology and Animal Product Quality, Institute of Animal Science, 104 00 Prague-Uhrineves, Czech Republic
2
Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague Suchdol, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2020, 10(3), 458; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030458
Submission received: 3 February 2020 / Revised: 24 February 2020 / Accepted: 2 March 2020 / Published: 10 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Use of Agricultural By-Products in Animal Feeding)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Different combinations of extruded flaxseed (EF; 0 and 60 g/kg) and hemp seed (HS; 0, 30, 40 and 50 g/kg) in the cockerel diet are compared. Rapeseed oil is used to balance the energy in the control diet without HS and EF supplementation. The diets are provided ad libitum throughout the fattening period (35 days). Cockerel body weight, feed intake, feed conversion, vitamin E deposition and meat and bone quality are evaluated. The highest body weight at both 14 (511 g) and 35 days of age (2493 g) and the lowest n-6/n-3 fatty acid ratio in breast meat (1.75) is observed in the cockerels fed 60 g/kg EF and 40 g/kg HS. The combination of the highest levels of HS (50 g/kg) with 60 g/kg EF increases the vitamin E content in the liver compared to diets supplemented with HS or EF only. The hemp seed alone (346.3 N) and the combination of HS and EF (40 g/kg HS with 60 g/kg EF (359.2 N) or 50 g/kg HS with 60 g/kg EF (358.3 N)) positively influences the bone strength in the cockerels compared to the control group (297.3 N), a fact that could result in a reduction in fracture incidence and an improvement in breeding efficiency.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the effect of hemp seed (HS) of the nonpsychotropic variety Futura and extruded flaxseed (EF) in the diet of cockerels on cockerel growth performance, breast muscle and liver α- and γ-tocopherol concentrations, breast muscle fatty acid concentrations and tibia strength. Five hundred and forty one-day-old male Ross 308 cockerels are equally allocated into six groups. Each group has three replicates of 30 cockerels in pens with litter. The formulated diets are isoenergetic (the metabolisable energy ranged from 12.4 to 12.8 MJ/kg) and isonitrogenic (the protein concentration ranged from 209.7 to 210.9 g/kg) and provided ad libitum. During the experiment, which lasts 35 days, the control group is fed a diet without EF or HS. Rapeseed oil was the lipid source in the control diet. The diet for the second group contains EF at 60 g/kg, the diet for the third group contains HS at 40 g/kg, and the diets for the fourth to sixth groups contain HS and EF at 30 and 60 g/kg, 40 and 60 g/kg and 50 and 60 g/kg, respectively. At the end of the experiment, 15 cockerels of average weight are slaughtered per group, and the breast muscle, liver and tibia bone are dissected for chemical analyses. The all dietary combination of HS and EF increases (p < 0.001) cockerel body weight (2375–2493 g) more than HS alone (2174 g) or EF alone (2254 g). A similar finding is observed for the diet composition and tocopherol content in the liver, but the doses of HS required to achieve this effect are higher (40 and 50 g/kg). The tocopherol content in the breast muscle is not influenced by the diet. The dietary combination of 60 g/kg EF and 40 g/kg HS results in the most promising findings of the experiment, since it leads to the lowest n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ratio (p < 0.001; 1.75). Incorporation of HS into the diet increases cockerel tibia strength (p < 0.001), which is of great practical importance due to the frequent occurrence of limb fractures. To conclude, the dietary supplementation with 40 g/kg HS and 60 g/kg EF improves cockerel performance, meat and bone quality and deposition of α-tocopherol in the liver.

1. Introduction

Flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) is appreciated for the favourable representation of n-3 fatty acids, especially α-linolenic acid (ALA). Flaxseed contains 35–45% oil of which 45–52% is ALA [1], which is a precursor of the other two n-3 fatty acids, eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) [2]. Regarding humans, the n-3 fatty acids reduce the risk of coronary heart disease, osteoporosis, rheumatoid arthritis, autoimmune disorders or cancer [3]. Therefore, according to recommendations of the World Health Organization, the n-6/n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) ratio should be 4–5 or less. The inclusion of flaxseed in the chicken diets significantly increases the ALA in the breast tissue with no difference in the organoleptic quality of the meat [4]. Higher content of unsaturated fatty acids in chicken meat leads to higher susceptibility to oxidation, therefore it is necessary to ensure a sufficient dose of antioxidants, e.g., vitamin E, in the feed mixture.
Hemp seed (HS, Cannabis sativa) cultivars with low tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations are a desirable source of bioactive substances. Hemp oil is also an important source of tocopherols, which can reduce cardiovascular disease, cancer and age-related macular degeneration [5]. The variability in oil, tocopherol and fatty acid levels in hemp varieties was described by Kriese et al. [6], who examined seeds of 51 hemp genotypes from two consecutive harvests. The main tocopherol in hemp seeds is γ-tocopherol, followed by α-, δ- and β-tocopherols. The contents of these tocopherols (γ-, α-, δ-, and β-) in seeds of 51 genotypes averaged 21.68, 1.82, 1.20 and 0.16 mg/100 g, respectively. These findings are consistent with the study of Oomah et al. [7]. Due to the high levels of unsaturated fatty acids (FAs) in HS, tocopherols act as antioxidants to prevent the oxidation of these FAs [8]. α-Tocopherol is generally considered to be more effective than γ-tocopherol as a chain-breaking antioxidant that inhibits lipid peroxidation. Cooney et al. [9] suggested that the unsubstituted position of C-5 gamma-tocopherol enables the most efficient capture of lipophilic electrophiles, such as reactive nitrogen species. This hypothesis has been repeatedly confirmed [10]. Both dietary α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol are largely transferred into egg yolks when HS is present in hen diets [11]. However, it is unclear whether γ-tocopherol from the HS and extruded flaxseed (EF) can also be transferred to the muscles of chickens.
A nonpsychotropic component in HS, cannabidiol (CBD), is important for human and animal nutrition. A positive effect of CBD on the treatment of fractures has been observed due to the resulting increase in collagen metabolism [12]. Sazmand et al. [13] showed a positive effect of Cannabis sativa extract on the morphology and growth of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rats. Fractures in chickens cause problems in all indoor poultry systems. Regarding the case of hens, the sternum is fractured most often; in chickens, limb fractures reduce the economy of breeding. Dietary supplementation with HS increases tibia strength in hens [11].
To date, studies on the effects of the addition of HS or hemp oil to chicken and hen feed have been focused on performance and the fatty acid (FA) concentrations in eggs and meat [14,15,16,17,18]. According to published data, the amount of HS used in the chicken diet was 2.5–30%. Khan et al. [14] tested the effects of HS incorporation at the level of 5–20% in chickens and found that at 20% HS, the chickens had the best weight gain and most efficient feed conversion. Eriksson and Wall [15] obtained positive results with higher doses of HS cake in organic chicken breeding. Mahmoudi et al. [18] studied the effects of 2.5–7.5% HS in diets and obtained inconsistent results. The addition of the lowest concentration of HS, 2.5%, led to reduced weight gain and feed intake. To contrast, the addition of three-fold that amount of HS, 7.5%, did not reduce weight gain or intake levels and, in addition, it decreased the levels of triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total serum cholesterol and increased the amount of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Additionally, HS has a high fibre content (28%).
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are predominant in hemp oil, in which the main FA is linoleic acid (LA), which constitutes 60% of all FAs. α-Linolenic acid (ALA) comprises 17–19% of the total FAs [19], and the ratio of LA (n-6) to ALA (n-3) is approximately 3.3. To reduce this ratio in the diet, incorporation of plant materials, such as flaxseed, which has a high ALA content and is suitable for enriching chicken meat with n-3 PUFAs, is primarily considered [20]. However, antinutritional factors in flax may reduce chicken performance [21]. The concentration of antinutritional substances in flaxseed can be greatly reduced by extrusion [22]. Chicken meat could be a potential sustainable source of EPA and DHA in human nutrition, provided these FAs could be synthesized from plant-derived ALA. Crespo and Esteve–Garcia [23] showed higher rates of de novo FA synthesis in chickens fed a diet supplemented with linseed oil compared with those fed tallow or sunflower oil. Moreover, chickens may be able to metabolise more docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) through tetracosapentaenoic acid, the precursor of DHA, than other species such as rats [24].
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of HS of the nonpsychotropic variety Futura and EF in the cockerel diet on the performance, breast muscle and liver tocopherol concentrations, breast muscle FA concentrations and tibia strength of cockerels.

2. Materials and Methods

A total of 540 one-day-old Ross 308 cockerels were used in this experiment. The cockerels were randomly assigned to six treatments with 3 replicate pens (30 cockerels per pen) in each treatment according to the content of HS and EF (Table 1) in the diet (Table 2). The diets were formulated as isoenergetic (the metabolisable energy ranged from 12.4 to 12.8 MJ/kg) and isonitrogenic (the protein concentration ranged from 209.7 to 210.9 g/kg). A balanced metabolisable energy concentration in the diet was achieved by adjusting the amount of rapeseed oil added. The control diet had rapeseed oil as the oil source and did not contain HS or EF. The second and third group of cockerels were fed diets containing 60 g/kg EF and 40 g/kg HS, respectively. The cockerels from the fourth, fifth and sixth group received a combination of the above seeds at HS/EF ratios of 30/60, 40/60 or 50/60. The level of rapeseed oil in the experimental diets was reduced in comparison with the control. Concerning the case of HS, the nonpsychotropic variety Futura was used. The amount of HS used in the present study was based on the results of an experiment by Skřivan et al. [10], who had used 3, 6 and 9% HS of the Futura genotype in a hen diet and achieved the best results at 3%. Therefore, the concentrations of 3, 4 and 5% HS were selected. The EF contained 70% flaxseed and 30% wheat bran, which provided the fat material and fat absorbent material in the extrusion. The amount of flaxseed alone in the EF was 70%, i.e., 42 g of the total 60 g, a proportion that is almost identical to the dietary average of 40 g of HS. The composition and nutrient analyses of the diets are shown in Tables 1, 2, 3 and 5. Shown in Table 3, the FA concentrations in the HS diet showed higher total concentrations of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and PUFAs than those in the diet with EF alone, with the exception of n-3 PUFAs. Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Cockerels were kept in pens on wood shavings (13.5 cockerels per m2). The room was heated with a gas heating source and ventilation was provided with a temperature-controlled fan. Each pen was equipped with nipple drinkers and pan feeders. The environmental conditions were kept in accordance with the requirements for cockerels. The lighting programme from 1 to 7 days was 23 h light and 1 h dark and then 16 h light and 8 h dark. The cockerels were weighed at 0, 14 and 35 days of age. The average body weight of the cockerels at the beginning of the experiment ranged from 43.2 to 43.4 g per group, and no significant differences among the groups were noted (Table 4). Health status was checked twice a day during the experiment based on chicken activity, normal behaviour patterns (e.g., active feed and water intake, normal walking, wing stretching, calm and effortless breathing, energetic movements when distracted), voice, skin, plumage quality, stance and foot and limb formation. Feed intake was monitored daily on a per-pen basis. Feed conversion was calculated as the total feed intake divided by the total weight gain over 35 days.
At 35 days of age, 15 cockerels (5 cockerels from each pen, 5 × 3) with an average body weight were selected from each dietary treatment group and slaughtered. Their carcasses were cooled for 24 h, and then the breast muscle, liver and a tibia bone were dissected for chemical analyses. Procedures performed with the animals were in accordance with the Ethics Committee of the Central Commission for Animal Welfare at the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (Prague, Czech Republic) and carried out in accordance with Directive 2010/63/EU for animal experiments. The protocol of this experiment was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute of Animal Science (Prague–Uhříněves, Czech Republic), case number 06/2018.

2.1. Analyses

Nutrient analyses of the diets, HS and EF were performed according to Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) methods [25]. The dry matter of the diets, HS and EF was determined by drying to constant weight at 105 °C in an oven (Memmert ULM 500; Memmert, Schwabach, Germany). The crude protein content was measured using a Kjeltec Auto 1030 instrument (Tecator, Höganäs, Sweden). The fat content was determined upon extraction with petroleum ether using a 1045 Soxtec Tecator extraction system (Tecator). Dry homogenized diets, HS and EF were heated to 550 °C (muffle furnace LMH 11/12 with Ht40 AL temperature controller, LAC Asia Limited, Hong Kong, China) and the mineral ash dissolved in 3 M hydrochloric acid. The total phosphorus in the solution was determined using vanadate-molybdate reagent (AOAC International, 2005; method No. 965.17). The calcium concentration in the hydrochloric acid extract was measured by atomic absorption spectrometry using a Solaar M6 instrument (TJA Solutions, Cambridge, UK).
The concentrations of α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol in the diets, HS, EF, breast meat and liver were determined after saponification and diethyl ether extraction in accordance with the EN 12822 (European) standards [26].
The FA profiles of the diets, HS, EF and breast meat were determined after chloroform-methanol extraction of the total lipids [27]. The alkaline trans-methylation of the FAs was performed as described by Raes et al. [28]. The fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) were discerned by gas chromatography using an HP 6890 chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a programmed 60 m DB-23 capillary column (150–230 °C) and a flame-ionization detector; the split injections were performed using an Agilent autosampler. One-microliter samples of FAME in hexane were injected at a 1:40 split ratio. Separation was achieved using the following column temperature programme: initially, the column was operated at 60 °C for 7 min, and then, the temperature was programmed to increase by 20 °C/min to 110 °C, which was maintained for 4 min; then, the temperature was programmed to increase by 10 °C/min to 120 °C, which was maintained for 4 min; then, the temperature was programmed to increase by 15 °C/min to 170 °C and by 2 °C/min to 210 °C, which was maintained for 13.5 min and, finally, the temperature was programmed to increase by 40 °C/min to 230 °C, which was maintained for 7 min. The FAs were identified by their retention times compared with standards: PUFA 1, PUFA 2, PUFA 3 and a 37-component FAME mix (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA).
The tibia bones were excised from the carcasses and cleaned of all tissue. The strength required to break the tibia and deformation of the tibias were measured using an Instron 3342 apparatus (Instron) with a 50-kg load cell with a crosshead speed of 50 mm/min. Each tibia was supported on a 5.75-cm span. Then, the bones were dried at 105 °C for 72 h, placed in a desiccator, and weighed to determine the dry weight. Then, the bones were homogenized and placed in a muffle furnace at 600 °C for 24 h, cooled in a desiccator, and the ash weight was recorded. The phosphorus and calcium contents of the tibia ash were determined using the same methods as previously described. The magnesium concentration was measured in the hydrochloric acid extract by atomic absorption spectrometry using a ContrAA 700 F instrument (Analytik Jena AG, Jena, Germany).

2.2. Statistical Analyses

The data from the experiments were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a general linear model (GLM) procedure in SAS software (Statistical Analysis Software, Version 9.3) [29]. One-way ANOVA was used for comparisons. The pen was the experimental unit (n = 3). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. The results in the tables are presented as the means and the standard errors of the means (SEMs).

3. Results

The cockerels fed the dietary combination of HS and EF had a higher (p < 0.001) body weight at both 14 and 35 days of age than the cockerels fed with HS and EF alone or the control diet (Table 4). The same pattern was found for feed intake, but differences in the results from feed comparisons showed a lower level of significance (p < 0.05). Feed conversion and mortality were not influenced by dietary treatment.
The concentration of tocopherols in the breast meat was not influenced by HS or/and EF dietary supplementation. The concentrations of α-tocopherol (p = 0.017) and γ-tocopherol (p = 0.028) in the liver were influenced by the dietary treatment (Table 5).
Evident from Table 6, significant differences in monounsaturated fatty acid (MUFA) levels in breast meat (p = 0.011) were found, with greater levels found in the control. Regarding n-3 PUFAs (p = 0.011), a higher level was determined with the diet combination of 40 g/kg HS and 60 g/kg EF (Table 6). The breast meat from cockerels fed the HS/EF supplemented diet at the level of 40 and 60 g/kg, respectively, had the lowest ratio of n-6/n-3 FAs (1.75) (p < 0.001) and an increased n-3 long-chain PUFA concentration. The concentration of eicosatrienoic acid 20:3 n-3 (ETE) was also higher in this group (p < 0.001) than in cockerels fed EF or HS alone. Additionally, the eicosatetraenoic acid 20:4 n-3 (ETA) concentration was also increased (p = 0.050) in this group. The EPA 20:5 n-3 content in the breast meat of the cockerels from the fifth group exceeded the concentration of this FA in the meat of the cockerels fed HS alone or a lower concentration of HS in combination with EF (p < 0.001). Additionally, in this group, the DPA 22:5 n-3 FA content was the highest (p = 0.002) compared to the content obtained with all other dietary treatments, and the DHA 22:6 n-3 FA in the breast muscle was at a higher (p = 0.013) concentration than that achieved with the HS treatment alone and was consistent with that of the EF treatment alone. There was no significant difference in the content of n-3 FAs in the combined HS and EF supplemented diets. Linoleic acid 18:2 n-6 and other n-6 FAs in the breast muscle did not change in cockerels fed a dietary combination of HS and EF, but the concentration of n-3 PUFAs was increased. The fat concentration in the breast meat was 1%, with no significant differences among the treatment groups.
Hemp seed alone and the combination of HS (40 and 50 g/kg) and EF (60 g/kg) in the diet increased tibia strength (p < 0.001) compared to the control diet (Table 7). A lower degree of tibia deformation was found in all experimental treatments (p < 0.001) than in the control, as determined by the instrumental measurements. There were no significant differences in the ash, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus contents of tibias.

4. Discussion

According to the existing literature, the results from published experiments on dietary HS supplementation in poultry have consistently shown its positive effect on performance and product quality [14,15,16,17,18]. The experiments conducted by these authors differed in the amount of HS in the diets, but the levels used were often higher than 20%. The high fibre content of HS, up to 30%, does not appear to be an obstacle to its use, although it is known that excessive dietary fibre reduces nutrient digestibility. Contrasting to the majority of the published data, the dietary component of HS in our experiment is low but effective. Exceeding the HS limit of 30 g/kg led to a reduction in the performance of hens in a previous study [11]. Accordingly, in the present cockerel experiment, the best results are achieved with 40 g/kg of HS in a dietary combination with 60 g/kg of EF. Antinutritional agents, especially polyphenols and phytate, are a limiting factor for the use of HS in the diet [30]. A greater negative effect of antinutritional agents is found for EF than for HS. It has already been shown that 5% EF reduced the performance of chickens [4]. The decrease in broiler growth with diets containing flaxseed may be due to the presence of mucilage, cyanogenic glycosides, and allergens and vitamin B6 antagonism [31]. To contrast, the extruded EF used in this experiment increases the body weight of the cockerels at 35 days compared to the control without EF and without HS. The oil, vitamin E and FA contents also vary according to the genotype of the hemp. The data reported by Kriese et al. [6] on fat and vitamin E concentrations in Futura HS were very close to the results of our analyses. Hemp seed contains high levels of γ-tocopherol, which was until recently neglected in human nutrition [32]. While HS and EF do not increase the concentration of α-tocopherol in the diets, the concentration of γ-tocopherol is higher due to the HS. However, the concentration of both tocopherols in the liver increases when HS is used in the diet. This means that a higher intake of γ-tocopherol by the cockerels positively influences not only γ-tocopherol, but also α-tocopherol in the liver. The same relationship between the two tocopherols in human blood was presented by Jiang et al. [10]. High doses of α-tocopherol decreased plasma γ-tocopherol, whereas, supplementation with γ-tocopherol increases both tocopherols. Tomazin et al. [33] found different results in chickens. α-Tocopherol or γ-tocopherol were added in equal amounts to a wheat-soy diet with 5% linseed oil. The addition of α-tocopherol increased the α-tocopherol in breast and thigh muscles, but the addition of γ-tocopherol increased only the γ-tocopherol levels. The α-tocopherol concentration in the breast muscles was higher than that in our experiment, and higher than that found in broilers at the same rate by Pompeu et al. [34] based on a meta-analysis. Compared to egg yolk, the muscles of chickens, especially the breast, are a poor source of vitamin E. Although there is a close relationship between vitamin E and the fat content, the differences among tissues and organs are attributed to the genetically determined control of the vitamin E concentration in different categories of poultry, organs and products. There is 30% fat in egg yolk, and the fat content of the liver samples examined in this study was 6.5% and of breast muscle was 1%.
The EF in the diet increased the concentrations of most long-chain n-3 FAs. The n-3 FA most represented in the breast muscle of the cockerels was ALA 18:3. The numerical value of this FA was increased by higher doses of HS (40 or 50 g/kg) and 60 g/kg of EF in the diet, but the increase was not significant. No similar effect was observed in PUFA n-6. This finding is consistent with that of Skiba et al. [35], who stated that deposition efficiency was greater for n-3 than for n-6 FAs. Delta-6-desaturase plays a key role in PUFA biosynthesis, as reported by Brenner [36]. It can be assumed that the effect of flaxseed on the higher production of long-chain n-3 PUFAs was due to the higher activity of delta-5- and delta-6-desaturases and elongases, as described by Garg et al. [37].
This study confirms the positive effect of HS in the broiler diet on the instrument-measured tibia deformation and tibia strength originally recorded in hens [11]. Additionally, the combination of HS (40 or 50 g/kg) and EF (60 g/kg) in the diet increased the tibia strength compared to the control. Increased bone strength is of considerable practical importance since fractures are common in all indoor poultry breeding systems. The impetus for measuring the tibia strength was derived from several new studies in the field of human medicine and experiments on rats and bone metabolism [12,13].

5. Conclusions

To conclude, the combined dietary addition of HS and EF increased the body weight of the cockerels and decreased the n-6/n-3 PUFA ratio in the breast muscle. The α- and γ-tocopherol contents in the liver, the long-chain n-3 PUFA concentration in the breast muscle and tibia strength were also increased at higher dietary levels of HS and EF. Regarding terms of cockerel performance, meat and bone quality and deposition of α-tocopherol in the liver, the diet combination with 40 g/kg of HS and 60 g/kg of EF was the best among those evaluated.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., M.E. and E.S.; Methodology, M.E.; Formal Data Analysis, T.T. and M.E.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, M.S. and M.E.; Writing-Review & Editing, M.S. and M.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic (Project No. MZE-RO0718 and Project No. QK1910387).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bhatty, R.S. Nutritional composition of whole flaxseed and flaxseed meal. In Flaxseed in Human Nutrition; Cunnane, S.C., Thompson, L.H., Eds.; AOCS Press: Champaign, IL, USA, 1995; pp. 22–45. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lisiak, D.; Grześkowiak, E.; Borzuta, K.; Raj, S.; Janiszewski, P.; Skiba, G. Effects of supplementary vegetable and animal fats on the slaughter values of fatteners, meat quality, and fatty acid profile in pigs. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 58, 497–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Connor, W.E. Importance of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 171S–175S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mridula, D.; Kaur, D.; Nagra, S.S.; Barnwal, P.; Gurumayum, S.; Singh, K.K. Growth performance and quality characteristics of flaxseed-fed broiler chicks. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2015, 43, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Leger, C.L. Vitamin E: Current state of knowledge, role in the prevention of cardiovascular disease, bioavailability. OCL-Ol. Corps Gras Lipides 2000, 7, 258–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kriese, U.; Schumann, E.; Weber, W.E.; Bayer, M.; Brühl, L.; Matthāus, B. Oil content, tocopherol composition and fatty acid patterns of the seeds of 51 Cannabis sativa L. genotypes. Euphytica 2004, 137, 339–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Oomah, B.D.; Busson, M.; Godfey, G.D.; Drower, J.C.D. Characteristics of hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) seed oil. Food Chem. 2002, 76, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kamal-Eldin, A.; Appelqvist, L.-A. The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids 1996, 31, 671–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cooney, R.V.; Franke, A.A.; Harwood, P.J.; Hatch-Pigott, V.; Custer, L.J.; Mordan, L.J. γ-Tocopherol detoxification of nitrogen dioxide: Superiority to α-tocopherol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1993, 90, 1771–1775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Jiang, Q.; Christen, S.; Schigenava, M.K.; Ames, B.N. γ-Tocopherol, the major form of vitamin E in the USA diet, deserves more attention. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2001, 74, 714–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Skřivan, M.; Englmaierová, M.; Vít, T.; Skřivanová, E. Hempseed increases gamma-tocopherol in egg yolks and the breaking strength of tibias in laying hens. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gabet, Y. Cannabidiol enhances fracture healing by targeting collagen crosslinking. Osteroporosis Int. 2017, 28, S124. [Google Scholar]
  13. Sazmand, M.; Mehrabani, D.; Hosseini, S.E.; Amini, M. The effect of hydroalcoholic extract of Cannabis Sativa on morphology and growth of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in rat. Electron. J. Gen. Med. 2018, 15, em32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Khan, R.U.; Durrani, F.R.; Chand, N.; Anwar, H. Influence of feed supplementation with Cannabis Sativa on quality of broiler carcass. Pak. Vet. J. 2010, 30, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eriksson, M.; Wall, H. Hemp seed cake in organic broiler diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 171, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goldberg, E.M.; Gaghar, N.; Ryland, D.; Allani, M.; Gibson, R.A.; House, J.D. Fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of table eggs from laying hen fed hempseed and hempseed oil. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Neijat, M.; Gaghar, N.; Neufeld, J.; House, J.D. Performance, egg quality, and blood plasma chemistry of laying hens fed hempseed and hempseed oil. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2827–2840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mahmoudi, M.; Farhoomand, P.; Nourmohammadi, R. Effects of different levels of hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) and dextran oligosaccharide on growth performance and antibody titer response of broiler chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2015, 14, 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Parker, T.D.; Adams, D.A.; Zhou, K.; Harris, M.; Yu, L. Fatty acid composition and oxidative stability of cold-pressed edible seed oils. J. Food Sci. 2003, 68, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodriguez, M.L.; Alzueta, C.; Rebole, A.; Ortiz, L.T.; Centeno, C.; Trevino, J. Effect of inclusion level of linseed on the nutrient utilisation of the diets for growing broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2001, 42, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alzueta, C.; Rodriquez, M.L.; Cutuli, M.T.; Rebole, A.; Ortiz, L.T.; Centano, C.; Trevino, J. Effect of whole and demucilaged linseed in broiler chicken diet on digesta viscosity nutrient utilisation and intestinal microflora. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Anjum, F.M.; Haider, M.F.; Khan, M.I.; Sohaib, M.; Arshad, M.S. Impact of extruded flaxseed meal supplemented diet on growth performance, oxidative stability and quality of broiler meat and meat products. Lipids Health Dis. 2013, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Crespo, N.; Esteve-Garcia, E. Dietary linseed oil produces lower abdominal fat deposition but higher de novo fatty acid synthesis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 1555–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gregory, M.K.; Geier, M.S.; Gibson, R.A.; James, M.J. Functional characterization of the chicken fatty acid elongases. J. Nutr. 2013, 143, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. EN 12822. Foodstuffs-Determination of Vitamin E by High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Measurement of α-, β-, γ-, and δ- Tocopherols; European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  27. Folch, J.M.; Lees, M.; Sloane-Stanley, G.H. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957, 226, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Raes, K.; De Smet, S.; Balcaen, A.; Claeys, E.; Demeyer, D. Effects of diets rich in N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on muscle lipids and fatty acids in Belgian Blue double-muscled young bulls. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 2003, 43, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. SAS. SAS/STAT User’s Guide (Release 9.3); SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  30. Galasso, I.; Russo, R.; Mapelli, S.; Ponzoni, E.; Brambilla, I.M.; Battelli, G.; Reggiani, R. Variability in Seed Traits in a Collection of Cannabis sativa L. Genotypes. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Bond, J.M.; Julian, R.J.; Squires, E.J. Effect of dietary flaxseed on broiler growth, erythrocyte deformability, and fatty acid composition of erythrocyte membranes. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1997, 77, 279–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Crescento, G.; Piccolella, S.; Esposito, A.; Scognamiglio, M.; Fiorentino, A.; Pacifico, S. Chemical composition and nutraceutical properties of hempseed: An ancient food with actual functional value. Phytochem. Rev. 2018, 17, 733–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tomazin, U.; Frankic, T.; Voljc, M.; Rezar, V.; Levart, A.; Salobir, J. The potency of alpha- and gamma-tocopherol, and their combination, in reducing dietary induced oxidative stress in vivo and improving meat lipid stability in broilers. Arch. Geflügelk. 2013, 77, 266–274. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pompeu, M.A.; Cavalcanti, L.F.I.; Toral, F.L.B. Effect of vitamin E supplementation on growth performance, meat quality, and immune response of broiler chickens: A meta-analysis. Livest. Sci. 2018, 208, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Skiba, G.; Polawska, E.; Sobol, M.; Raj, S.; Weremko, D. Omega-6 and omega-3 fatty acids metabolism pathways in the body of pigs fed diets with different sources of fatty acids. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2015, 69, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Brenner, R.R. The oxidative desaturation of unsaturated fatty acids in animals. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1974, 3, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Garg, M.L.; Sebokova, F.; Thomson, B.R.; Clandinin, M.T. 6-Desaturase activity in liver microsomes of rats fed diets enriched with cholesterol and/or Ω-3 fatty acids. Biochem. J. 1988, 98, 19i–26i. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Nutrient composition of hemp seed and extruded flaxseed.
Table 1. Nutrient composition of hemp seed and extruded flaxseed.
ItemHemp SeedFlaxseed (Extruded) 1
Dry matter (g/kg)960.1956.4
AMEN (MJ/kg)15.212.2
Crude protein (g/kg)236.5188.5
Ether extract (g/kg)300.7212.6
Crude fibre (g/kg)270.4169.8
Calcium (mg/100 g)177.5203
Phosphorus (mg/100 g)1599838
SFA (mg/100 g)45102844
MUFA (mg/100 g)63123829
PUFA (mg/100 g)3152517802
PUFA n-6 (mg/100 g)244564506
PUFA n-3 (mg/100 g)706813296
n-6/n-33.4600.339
α-Tocopherol (mg/kg)10.201.61
γ-Tocopherol (mg/kg)173.461.4
1 70% flaxseed and 30% wheat bran. The flaxseed itself contained 1.06 mg/kg α-tocopherol and 102.7 mg/kg γ-tocopherol. AMEN = apparent metabolisable energy, SFA = saturated fatty acid, MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Table 2. Composition of broiler diets.
Table 2. Composition of broiler diets.
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
Ingredients (g/kg)
Wheat440.0430.0430.0430.0430.0430.0
Maize151.0142.0158.8110.7107.6105.5
Soybean meal300.0305.0295.0315.0310.0305.0
Flaxseed (extruded)-60.0-60.060.060.0
Wheat bran40.04.020.0---
Hemp seed--40.030.040.050.0
Rapeseed oil30.020.017.015.013.010.0
Monocalcium phosphate12.012.012.012.012.012.0
Limestone13.013.013.013.013.013.0
Sodium chloride2.02.02.02.02.02.0
Sodium bicarbonate3.03.03.03.03.03.0
DL-Methionine2.02.02.02.02.02.0
L-Lysine2.02.02.22.32.42.5
Vitamin-mineral premix 15.05.05.05.05.05.0
Nutrient content (g/kg)
Dry matter897.5889.9901.3895.8898.3889.4
AMEN by calculation, MJ/kg12.412.712.612.812.612.8
Crude protein209.7210.4210.9210.3210.6210.4
Ether extract52.652.852.455.154.955.4
Crude fibre40.843.542.542.943.844.0
Calcium9.19.09.39.39.39.5
Phosphorus5.45.65.25.55.75.5
1 Vitamin-mineral premix provided per kg of diet: retinyl acetate, 3.6 mg; cholecalciferol, 13 µg; niacin, 40 mg; α-Tocopheryl acetate, 30 mg; menadione, 3 mg; thiamine, 3 mg; riboflavin, 5 mg; pyridoxine, 4 mg; cyanocobalamin, 40 µg; calcium pantothenate, 12 mg; biotin 0.15 mg; folic acid, 1.5 mg; choline chloride, 250 mg; ethoxyquin, 100 mg; iron, 50 mg; copper, 12 mg; iodine, 1 mg; manganese, 80 mg; zinc, 60 mg; and selenium 0.2 mg. AMEN = apparent metabolisable energy.
Table 3. Concentrations of fatty acids in the broiler diets (mg/100 g).
Table 3. Concentrations of fatty acids in the broiler diets (mg/100 g).
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
C 20:5 n-39.1311.1613.2713.2511.8013.81
C 22:6 n-34.274.023.304.113.913.90
SFA908879996135013971743
MUFA259620612091263827122902
PUFA285134323689439845454975
n-34321183669139013971680
n-6241822483007299531343280
n-6/n-35.601.904.492.152.241.95
SFA = saturated fatty acid, MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid.
Table 4. Performance characteristics.
Table 4. Performance characteristics.
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050SEMProbability
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
Body weight, 1 D (g)43.243.343.343.443.243.30.10NS
Body weight, 14 D (g)418 c400 d427 c495 ab511 a491 b10.9<0.001
Body weight, 35 D (g)2145 d2254 c2174 cd2417 ab2493 a2375 b31.7<0.001
Feed intake, 1-35 D (g/D)89.5 b94.5 b91.0 b100.6 a102.5 a100.2 a2.30<0.05
Feed conversion (kg/kg)1.521.511.501.501.511.510.030NS
Mortality (%)3212220.4 NS
SEM = standard error of the mean; NS = not significant; ad means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly.
Table 5. Concentration of α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol in the diets, breast meat and liver (mg/kg).
Table 5. Concentration of α-tocopherol and γ-tocopherol in the diets, breast meat and liver (mg/kg).
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050SEMProbability
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
Diet
α-Tocopherol55.552.054.553.453.953.1
γ-Tocopherol15.815.121.518.618.719.0
Breast meat
α-Tocopherol3.853.513.684.063.663.900.146NS
γ-Tocopherol0.290.310.410.390.370.410.016NS
Liver
α-Tocopherol15.0 abc12.6 bc10.0 c16.0 ab18.6 a19.6 a0.990.017
γ-Tocopherol1.01 ab0.77 b0.75 b0.87 b1.10 ab1.31 a0.0610.028
SEM = standard error of the mean; NS = not significant; a,b means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly.
Table 6. Concentration of fatty acids in the breast meat of broilers (mg/100 g).
Table 6. Concentration of fatty acids in the breast meat of broilers (mg/100 g).
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050SEMProbability
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
C 6:00.051 bc0.062 ab0.066 a0.066 a0.057 ab0.042 c0.00260.011
C 8:00.175 ab0.246 a0.088 c0.092 c0.117 bc0.108 bc0.01630.007
C 10:00.1980.1390.1120.0950.0990.1190.0116NS
C 12:00.7680.7620.7690.7370.5910.5450.0410NS
C 13:00.0960.1070.0940.0950.0740.0690.0066NS
C 14:06.924.936.106.974.585.860.310NS
C 14:1 n-51.698 a0.806 bc1.154 b0.818 bc0.575 c1.066 b0.10030.003
C 15:01.4521.0541.2931.3580.9720.9800.0748NS
C 16:026920726524320024210.7NS
C 16:1 n-748.5 a26.4 cd40.3 ab32.3 bc17.6 d30.4 bc2.800.004
C 17:01.661.551.911.961.421.500.103NS
C 18:095.888.0105.193.487.996.83.62NS
C 18:1 n-9445 a260 cd366 ab359 abc229 d320 bc21.00.010
C 18:1 n-735.326.932.127.921.825.91.54NS
C 18:2 n-6 t0.181 a0.098 b0.167 a0.093 b0.107 b0.111 b0.00970.003
C 18:2 n-623117726124319621110.7NS
C 18:3 n-64.173.545.105.184.334.200.217NS
C 18:3 n-363.653.859.463.977.568.93.3NS
C 18:2 (9,11)1.2000.8961.4421.3961.3431.6410.0820NS
C 18:2 (10,12)0.062 b0.056 b0.097 a0.054 b0.075 b0.051 b0.00480.011
C 20:04.234.413.794.554.753.590.146NS
C 20:1 n-96.86 a3.74 cd6.05 ab5.07 bc3.26 d3.96 cd0.3550.001
C 20:2 n-65.65 b4.98 b7.48 a5.32 b6.29 ab5.57 b0.294NS
C 21:00.4800.4480.5180.4410.3880.4320.0184NS
C 20:3 n-66.48 b5.68 b8.68 a5.64 b6.88 b6.09 b0.3260.035
C 20:4 n-627.8 bc25.5 bcd35.4 a21.7 d30.3 ab22.4 cd1.430.019
C 20:3 n-32.15 c4.36 b2.90 c4.33 bc6.20 a4.92 ab0.358<0.001
C 20:4 n-30.666 bc0.900 a0.803 ab0.574 c0.904 a0.642 bc0.04140.050
C 22:00.153 d0.225 cd0.344 b0.260 c0.422 ab0.448 a0.0280<0.001
C 20:5 n-35.34 d12.11 a5.72 d9.25 c11.86 ab9.33 bc0.7330.002
C 22:1 n-90.264 b0.265 b0.511 a0.401 ab0.414 a0.394 ab0.02650.021
C 23:00.154 bc0.140 c0.213 ab0.224 a0.153 bc0.111 c0.01190.012
C 24:00.266 b0.163 c0.339 ab0.263 b0.419 a0.408 a0.02530.003
C 22:5 n-311.3 c22.1 b14.1 c18.4 b26.5 a19.3 b1.33<0.001
C 24:1 n-90.114 bc0.147 b0.100 c0.204 a0.119 bc0.090 c0.01070.003
C 22:6 n-35.67 d12.91 abc10.43 bcd12.33 abc16.36 a10.38 cd0.9600.013
SFA38130938635330235314.6NS
MUFA538 a318 cd446 ab426 abc273 d382 bcd25.50.011
PUFA36532441339238536515.3NS
n-388.7 c106.2 bc93.4 bc108.8 bc139.3 a113.4 ab5.800.011
n-627521731828124425012.3NS
n-6/n-33.11 b2.03 d3.41 a2.58 c1.75 e2.21 d0.144<0.001
SEM = standard error of the mean; NS = not significant; SFA = saturated fatty acid, MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acid, PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acid; ad means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly.
Table 7. Breaking strength and the mineral content of tibia bones of broilers.
Table 7. Breaking strength and the mineral content of tibia bones of broilers.
Hemp Seed (g/kg)0040304050SEMProbability
Flaxseed (g/kg)0600606060
Breaking strength (N)297.3 b304.6 ab346.3 a339.0 ab359.2 a358.3 a8.62<0.001
Deformation (mm)6.32 a5.40 b5.36 b5.50 b5.24 b5.50 b0.17<0.001
Ash (g/kg)486.4481.7478.6472.9485.8469.12.15NS
Calcium (g/kg ash)3753693773633643692.1NS
Phosphorus (g/kg ash)1781791791771781770.5NS
Magnesium (g/kg ash)8.628.768.918.759.009.320.093NS
SEM = standard error of the mean; NS = not significant; a,b means in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skřivan, M.; Englmaierová, M.; Taubner, T.; Skřivanová, E. Effects of Dietary Hemp Seed and Flaxseed on Growth Performance, Meat Fatty Acid Compositions, Liver Tocopherol Concentration and Bone Strength of Cockerels. Animals 2020, 10, 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030458

AMA Style

Skřivan M, Englmaierová M, Taubner T, Skřivanová E. Effects of Dietary Hemp Seed and Flaxseed on Growth Performance, Meat Fatty Acid Compositions, Liver Tocopherol Concentration and Bone Strength of Cockerels. Animals. 2020; 10(3):458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030458

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skřivan, Miloš, Michaela Englmaierová, Tomáš Taubner, and Eva Skřivanová. 2020. "Effects of Dietary Hemp Seed and Flaxseed on Growth Performance, Meat Fatty Acid Compositions, Liver Tocopherol Concentration and Bone Strength of Cockerels" Animals 10, no. 3: 458. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030458

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop