Next Article in Journal
State of the Art on the Role of Staphylococcus aureus Extracellular Vesicles in the Pathogenesis of Atopic Dermatitis
Previous Article in Journal
Recombinant Production of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rhamnolipids in P. putida KT2440 on Acetobacterium woodii Cultures Grown Chemo-Autotrophically with Carbon Dioxide and Hydrogen
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Bioactive Potential of Pisolithus (Basidiomycota): Comprehensive Insights into Antimicrobial, Anticancer, and Antioxidant Properties for Innovative Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Characterization of Antibiotic-Resistance Antarctic Pseudomonas That Produce Bacteriocin-like Compounds

Microorganisms 2024, 12(3), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030530
by Nancy Calisto 1,2, Laura Navarro 2, Cristian Iribarren 2, Paz Orellana 2, Claudio Gómez 1, Lorena Salazar 2, Ana Gutiérrez 2,3, Carlos Aranda 4, Alex R. González 5, Mario Tello 6, Piedad Cortés-Cortés 7, Manuel Gidekel 2 and Gino Corsini 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Microorganisms 2024, 12(3), 530; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12030530
Submission received: 12 September 2023 / Revised: 27 November 2023 / Accepted: 29 November 2023 / Published: 6 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Antimicrobial Activity of Natural Products)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language


Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This manuscript provide the bacteriocin-like compounds secreted by Antarctic bacteria C1 -4-7, D2-4-6, and M1-4-11, which could be promising as new antimicrobial compounds to be used in biomedical applications or in the food field. There are some places can be improved.

1> Abstract Part: improve the two scentences in lines 26-27. "Multidrug" or multi-drug? it should be uniform.

2> Materials and Methods Part: add references for all the methods if necessary. Italy the name of bacteria in lines 134-135.

3> Results Part:  Line 356, in different culture broths at 18 ºC. Figure  6 was not clear, Please improve it.

4> Discussion Part: "The results of the first part of this study showed that" and others are the repeat of results. Please improve them.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

This manuscript provide the bacteriocin-like compounds secreted by Antarctic bacteria C1 -4-7, D2-4-6, and M1-4-11, which could be promising as new antimicrobial compounds to be used in biomedical applications or in the food field. There are some places can be improved.

1> Abstract Part: improve the two scentences in lines 26-27. "Multidrug" or multi-drug? it should be uniform.

2> Materials and Methods Part: add references for all the methods if necessary. Italy the name of bacteria in lines 134-135.

3> Results Part:  Line 356, in different culture broths at 18 ºC. Figure  6 was not clear, Please improve it.

4> Discussion Part: "The results of the first part of this study showed that" and others are the repeat of results. Please improve them.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The revised manuscript comprehensively addresses the points raised in the first review.

Still not convinced about the value of Table 1 as formatted - for example, since the three isolates have identical biochemical test results, there is no need for a separate column for each strain.  All three strain identifiers could be combined at the top of a single test results (+/-) column.

The photographs of indicator agar plates (in the Supplementary file) are helpful.  In Figure S3, presumably E. coli (EC) is the indicator pathogen in panel A, and S. aureus (SA) is the indicator pathogen in panels B and C.  If that's the case, then consider making this more obvious for the reader by spelling it out in the figure legend.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Seems OK - the meaning is clear enough.

On line 489, consider: of against a set of 8 reference human pathogenic bacteria

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking the time to review this manuscript. Please find the detailed responses below and the corresponding corrections in track changes in the re-submitted files.

Still not convinced about the value of Table 1 as formatted - for example, since the three isolates have identical biochemical test results, there is no need for a separate column for each strain.  All three strain identifiers could be combined at the top of a single test results (+/-) column.

Answer: Accepted and modified. At the top of a single test result column, all three strain identifiers were combined.

The photographs of indicator agar plates (in the Supplementary file) are helpful.  In Figure S3, presumably E. coli (EC) is the indicator pathogen in panel A, and S. aureus (SA) is the indicator pathogen in panels B and C.  If that's the case, then consider making this more obvious for the reader by spelling it out in the figure legend.

Answer: Accepted and modified. In the legend to Figure S3, the following has been added: Indicator pathogen: A: E. coli (EC); B y C: S. aureus (SA).

Response to Comments on the Quality of English Language

On line 489, consider: of against a set of 8 reference human pathogenic bacteria.

Answer: Accepted and modified.

Back to TopTop