Next Article in Journal
Biofilm Formation in Campylobacter concisus: The Role of the luxS Gene
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Progress in the Detection of Surra, a Neglected Disease Caused by Trypanosoma evansi with a One Health Impact in Large Parts of the Tropic and Sub-Tropic World
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cross-Linked Enzyme Aggregate (CLEA) Preparation from Waste Activated Sludge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

The Structure and Properties of Microbial Enzymes

Laboratoire de Biologie et Modelisation de la Cellule, Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5239, Inserm, U1293, Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 46 Allee d’Italie, F-69364 Lyon, France
Microorganisms 2024, 12(1), 45; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010045
Submission received: 19 December 2023 / Accepted: 24 December 2023 / Published: 27 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Structure and Properties of Microbial Enzymes)
Many microbes are pathogens not only to humans but also to cattle and crops. Some microbial enzymes, which are often different from the host, are of particular interest as targets against pathogens. However, microbes are also a valuable enzyme source, catalyzing specific reactions that can be of economic interest. For instance, microbes have particular enzymes such as the restriction enzyme, polymerase and CRISPR-Cas immune system. The identification of these proteins and rational engineering have allowed the development of molecular biology tools, the applications of which are increasing every day. Because microbes can be more easily selected, engineered and modified by directed evolution, the enzymes they produce are largely used as model enzymes for fundamental research and also in the development of industrial processes. They are also used for environmental remediation, metal bioleaching and water purification [1]. Chemical and thermal robustness are crucial for such applications, and the basis of these properties has been widely deciphered by studying structure–function relationships. New methods for the reliable prediction of structures [2], and also for predicting enzyme kinetic parameters [3], have recently revolutionized the field. In this Special Issue, the practical implementation of these methods for structure and function prediction has led to improvements in the enzymes used for sludge treatment and bioremediation, as well as enzymes used in the industrial process. Structure and function prediction can also help us to understand some fundamental biological pathways, and these findings can be extrapolated to more complex organisms. AI-based algorithms are now widely used in all aspects of prediction and engineering, but there are still some improvements to be achieved, in particular in the prediction of protein–protein and protein–ligand complexes [4]. Establishing a reliable enzymatic mechanism is a difficult task because catalytic reactions have to be precisely described with sub-angstrom precision. Therefore, correct ligand positioning in the active site and protein loops dynamics, usually critical for ligand binding and catalysis, are not trivial steps. Multiscale molecular dynamics, from coarse-grained to QM-MM, ref. [5] can help to improve mechanistic models and compute binding energies and kinetic parameters. Prediction, simulation and computation are crucial in engineering, and their development will accelerate research in microbial enzyme engineering.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xu, A.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S.; Xu, N.; Huang, Y.; Yan, X.; Zhou, J.; Cui, Z.; Dong, W. Pollutant Degrading Enzyme: Catalytic Mechanisms and Their Expanded Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Jumper, J.; Evans, R.; Pritzel, A.; Green, T.; Figurnov, M.; Ronneberger, O.; Tunyasuvunakool, K.; Bates, R.; Zidek, A.; Potapenko, A.; et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 2021, 596, 583–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yu, H.; Deng, H.; He, J.; Keasling, J.D.; Luo, X. UniKP: A unified framework for the prediction of enzyme kinetic parameters. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 8211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hekkelman, M.L.; de Vries, I.; Joosten, R.P.; Perrakis, A. AlphaFill: Enriching AlphaFold models with ligands and cofactors. Nat. Methods 2023, 20, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Saito, T.; Takano, Y. QM/MM Molecular Dynamics Simulations Revealed Catalytic Mechanism of Urease. J. Phys. Chem. B 2022, 126, 2087–2097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Réty, S. The Structure and Properties of Microbial Enzymes. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010045

AMA Style

Réty S. The Structure and Properties of Microbial Enzymes. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(1):45. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Réty, Stéphane. 2024. "The Structure and Properties of Microbial Enzymes" Microorganisms 12, no. 1: 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010045

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop